April 06, 2012
— Ace No link. Here's the more egregious parts of his latest column.
President Obama is an intelligent, judicious man who can see all sides of an issue. But every once in a while he tries to get politically cute, and he puts on his Keith Olbermann mask.
Every once in a while?
When does Obama not "put on a Keith Olbermann mask"? Brooks claims this; he ought to be able to give us some examples when Obama spoke as a nonpartisan, intelligent, judicious statesman.
I suppose it’s to his credit that he’s most inept when he tries to take the low road. He resorts to hoary, brain-dead clichés. He wanders so far from his true nature that he makes Mitt Romney look like Mr. Authenticity.
When is he ept?
ThatÂ’s pretty much what happened this week in ObamaÂ’s speech before a group of newspaper editors. ObamaÂ’s target in this speech was Representative Paul RyanÂ’s budget.It should be said at the outset that the Ryan budget has some disturbing weaknesses, which Democrats are right to identify. The Ryan budget would cut too deeply into discretionary spending. This could lead to self-destructive cuts in scientific research, health care for poor kids and programs that boost social mobility.
Later on, he chides Obama thus: " Then he unleashed every 1980s liberal cliché in the book, calling the Republicans a bunch of trickle-down, Trojan horse-bearing social Darwinists."
But didn't Brooks himself just do that, with his litany of woes?
Moreover, the Ryan tax ideas are too regressive. They make tax cuts for the rich explicit while they hide any painful loophole closings that might hurt Republican donors.
How is that regressive? On one hand, he says, Ryan promises, explicitly, tax cuts. In the very next breath, he says Ryan "hides any painful loophole closings that might hurt Republican donors."
Loophole closings like capping the mortgage interest deduction-- that is, increasing the taxable income base of richer people while simultaneously lowering the rate.
That's not regressive. Neither is it progressive. The whole point is to be more or less revenue neutral, and yet increase efficiency and productivity by getting rid of a lot of arbitrary, economic-decision-distorting shelters and loopholes.
All of this applies to better-off Americans. With one hand, a lower rate is granted, with another, the taxable base that rate will be applied to is expanded.
Does David Brooks understand what "regressive" means? Apparently he doesn't.
But these legitimate criticisms and ObamaÂ’s modest but real deficit-reducing accomplishments got buried under an avalanche of distortion. The Republicans have been embarrassing themselves all primary season. ItÂ’s as if Obama wanted to sink to their level in a single hour.
Obama's real deficit-reducing accomplishments?
Like when he walked away from an actual deal, because Democrats told him they needed to run on Mediscare, and could not do so if Democrats joined a useful, sensible deal on Medicare?
I think that's all for David Brooks.
The Warm, Comfortable Cocoon of the New York Times
Where even our "conservative" columnists hate Conservatives and love Obama.
Posted by: Ace at
09:33 AM
| Comments (132)
Post contains 524 words, total size 3 kb.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter at April 06, 2012 09:35 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at April 06, 2012 09:37 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: the hobbit fomerly known as Donna at April 06, 2012 09:37 AM (ZHge+)
Obama is a stupid bastard who used Affirmative Action to get his C student ass into Ivy League colleges.
Liberal always use the word "intelligent" to describe blacks, who they really think are just a bunch of stupid fuckups.
Posted by: TexasJew at April 06, 2012 09:38 AM (Bughn)
Posted by: Jean at April 06, 2012 09:38 AM (WkuV6)
Posted by: elizabethe is all dead inside at April 06, 2012 09:38 AM (T03Ll)
Posted by: Jones in CO at April 06, 2012 09:38 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at April 06, 2012 09:40 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Jean at April 06, 2012 09:40 AM (WkuV6)
Posted by: ace at April 06, 2012 09:40 AM (nj1bB)
Posted by: Cicero at April 06, 2012 09:40 AM (QKKT0)
Posted by: soothsayer at April 06, 2012 09:41 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: elizabethe is all dead inside at April 06, 2012 09:41 AM (T03Ll)
Posted by: Moonbeam at April 06, 2012 09:41 AM (1k4dd)
Posted by: Dr Spank at April 06, 2012 09:41 AM (Sh42X)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at April 06, 2012 09:41 AM (eCnLg)
LOL
Note: not brown nosing like some others.
Posted by: Cast Iron at April 06, 2012 09:41 AM (EL+OC)
Unless you mean downward, Mr. Brooks, please point out one program which "boost
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at April 06, 2012 09:41 AM (8y9MW)
The lady doth protest too much, methinks.
And she needs to wipe her chin, too.
Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at April 06, 2012 09:42 AM (X3lox)
Posted by: LIGuy at April 06, 2012 09:42 AM (+usC4)
Posted by: soothsayer at April 06, 2012 09:42 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: Jimmah at April 06, 2012 09:43 AM (UpwlP)
Posted by: Forrest Gump - CEO Bubba Gump Shrimp Co. at April 06, 2012 09:43 AM (d4vjp)
Posted by: Some old dead Bard at April 06, 2012 09:43 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: Jones in CO at April 06, 2012 09:43 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: Jaws at April 06, 2012 09:43 AM (4I3Uo)
>>Where even our "conservative" columnists hate Conservatives and love Obama.
I hate myself because I'm beautiful.
Posted by: David "Samantha" Brooks-Brick at April 06, 2012 09:43 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: David Brooks Pants Creases at April 06, 2012 09:43 AM (Qxe/p)
Posted by: extravalue at April 06, 2012 09:44 AM (BBlzg)
Oh, that's right. Brooks has to please his masters at the NYT.
I think it has nothing to do with pleasing "his masters." I think that's really what he thinks.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at April 06, 2012 09:44 AM (8y9MW)
The liberal crap that comes out of the mouths of some so called conservative commentors or republicans boggles my mind.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at April 06, 2012 09:44 AM (JIDLg)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at April 06, 2012 09:44 AM (eCnLg)
Posted by: Dr Spank at April 06, 2012 09:44 AM (Sh42X)
It's a necessary thing to learn when your clit is located so deep in your throat.
Posted by: Linda Lovlace Taught Brooks a thing or 2 at April 06, 2012 09:44 AM (tf9Ne)
Posted by: Cicero at April 06, 2012 09:44 AM (QKKT0)
I think that's all for David Brooks.[i/]
Pretty much.
This could lead to self-destructive cuts in scientific research, health care for poor kids and programs that boost social mobility.[i/]
I believe David is mostly concerned about his own social mobility.
Posted by: Decaf at April 06, 2012 09:44 AM (cBR/s)
Posted by: LIGuy at April 06, 2012 01:42 PM (+usC4)
He's an idiot. I wouldn't trust him to help a 10 year old with their homework.
Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at April 06, 2012 09:44 AM (X3lox)
Posted by: Tsar Nicholas II at April 06, 2012 09:45 AM (f8XyF)
Posted by: soothsayer at April 06, 2012 09:45 AM (jUytm)
You are the poster child of a useful idiot. Useful in that your constant prattle weakens conservative political position, a political expediency for the left, an idiot because you don't realize that I will kick your ass and you will take the bottom bunk at the re-education camp of loving kindness.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose now with dark clouds! at April 06, 2012 09:45 AM (0q2P7)
.....""puts on his Keith Olbermann mask.""
This apparently is Brooks-speak for "flaming demagogue"?
But Ace is right. ....Obama is like this, all...the...time. ....He takes momentary breaks from agitating and demagogueing only when he is trying to appear to be something that he is not.
Posted by: wheatie at April 06, 2012 09:45 AM (+5U+B)
Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at April 06, 2012 09:45 AM (X3lox)
The insulting thing about Brook's piece here is that he forwards the "deficit reduction" meme.
Indeed, but they want people to hear "debt" when they say "deficit." It mostly works, too.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at April 06, 2012 09:45 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: mike at April 06, 2012 09:46 AM (yyxSW)
Posted by: the hobbit fomerly known as Donna at April 06, 2012 01:37 PM (ZHge+)
You should go to the NYT and read the comments. Good grief, the libs still believe Barry is The One.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at April 06, 2012 09:46 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at April 06, 2012 09:46 AM (eCnLg)
Funny, I don't recall the "self-destructive cuts in scientific research, health care for poor kids and programs that boost social mobility."
Maybe Mr. Brooks can put me some f'in knowledge.
Posted by: Bat Chain Puller at April 06, 2012 09:47 AM (PzAEW)
Posted by: Mr Pink at April 06, 2012 09:47 AM (5RgAv)
His marvelous home loan program has successfully mobilized many Americans. In all directions, not just south!
Posted by: David Brooks Pants Creases at April 06, 2012 09:47 AM (Qxe/p)
Posted by: Jaws at April 06, 2012 01:43 PM (4I3Uo)
David Brooks writes his crap as the NYT's in-house conservative (read 'pet'), then some senior editor comes down to his office and pats Brooks on the head and gives him a treat
Posted by: Jones in CO at April 06, 2012 09:48 AM (8sCoq)
I know this was posted before, but this is one of the stupidest things an American President has ever done. Absolute weakness. Makes me want to cry
Sounds like quite a sensible approach to me.
Posted by: Zombie Neville Chamberlain at April 06, 2012 09:48 AM (QKKT0)
How do you prove a negative?
Of course, what he really means is "Tell us you're not doing it, and we promise to be surprised when you do," but this is an asinine statement.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at April 06, 2012 09:48 AM (8y9MW)
Isn't he Barry's sharia law lovin' butt buddy? The one who give Baraka advice on raising his daughters?
Posted by: Jane D'oh at April 06, 2012 09:48 AM (UOM48)
That requirement to prove there are no pink elephants is what will save Israel.
Posted by: Retread at April 06, 2012 09:48 AM (joSBv)
Hmmm... just reread this... I think he is arguing with himself.
He's trying to convince himself that his 'perception' of Obama as the Great Thinker and Speaker, is the reality, even though his eyes and ears are telling him differently.
Which step is 'Denial'? first? and then comes Anger? which he is on the verge of?
Posted by: Romeo13 at April 06, 2012 09:49 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at April 06, 2012 09:49 AM (jucos)
so obama is telling Imadinnerjacket 'you can fuck me, if you promise not to cum in mouth'
Posted by: Jones in CO at April 06, 2012 09:49 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: Mr Pink at April 06, 2012 09:50 AM (5RgAv)
Posted by: Mama AJ at April 06, 2012 09:50 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at April 06, 2012 09:50 AM (eCnLg)
Posted by: Hammers Local #2985 at April 06, 2012 09:50 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Obama at April 06, 2012 09:50 AM (bf/PR)
Posted by: nerdygirl at April 06, 2012 09:50 AM (mAZiW)
The Bobos right? It's as if curious got a job writing for the Times.
Posted by: toby928© at April 06, 2012 09:50 AM (GTbGH)
Posted by: Jones in CO at April 06, 2012 09:51 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at April 06, 2012 09:51 AM (eCnLg)
Posted by: Jones in CO at April 06, 2012 01:49 PM (8sCoq)
No. He's telling Imadinjedhd, "You can fuck America and do whatever you want. That's what I'm doing. I'm taking these bastards down."
Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at April 06, 2012 09:51 AM (X3lox)
Posted by: MJ at April 06, 2012 09:51 AM (/x4oj)
A taste of what we are up against. Conventional weapons of reasoning will work to persuade some but against the more entombed .... wise we must be.
Posted by: Shiggz RocketSurgeon at April 06, 2012 09:51 AM (RfvTE)
actually, hammers are smart. A hammer knows it does one thing very well, and shouldn't try to be anything else.
Posted by: Jones in CO at April 06, 2012 09:52 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at April 06, 2012 09:52 AM (jucos)
Posted by: soothsayer at April 06, 2012 09:53 AM (jUytm)
Why would they know that? They've never worked hard in their lives, for the most part. And the ones who have think their social mobility was because of "being given a break," or some crap, not the hard work and effort they put in first.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at April 06, 2012 09:53 AM (8y9MW)
Hmmm...didn't know that destroying our country was politicallty cute.
*
**fuckwit loser**
**spit**
Posted by: dananjcon at April 06, 2012 09:53 AM (8ieXv)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at April 06, 2012 01:52 PM (jucos)
reminds me to get out "The Ten Commandments" dvd for the annual viewing
Posted by: Jones in CO at April 06, 2012 09:54 AM (8sCoq)
cuts in bear spending in pual ryan budget is the
total unexeptable to any one that cares about how
the earth has a fever and hurting bears and samlons
we cuold just sell like part of the army and have alot
of extra mony for saving bear spending pretty easy
nice job pual ryan way too think it throgh idiot
#JusticeForBeldron
Posted by: Jose Canseco's Gristle Encased Head at April 06, 2012 09:55 AM (+lsX1)
"Liberals like hollywood types, and Obama, are people who never grew up. Hollywood types, politicians, and college professors don't have to grow up."
Just yesterday I read David Mamet's take on this in his "The Secret Knowledge".
Posted by: Decaf at April 06, 2012 09:56 AM (cBR/s)
Posted by: Mandy P. voted and is All Dead Inside now at April 06, 2012 09:56 AM (qFpRI)
Posted by: MJ at April 06, 2012 09:57 AM (/x4oj)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at April 06, 2012 09:57 AM (eCnLg)
Posted by: Entropy at April 06, 2012 09:57 AM (TULs6)
Posted by: TheQuietMan at April 06, 2012 09:59 AM (1Jaio)
Somebody is "embarrassing themselves" here...and in this case, it ain't the Republicans.....
Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at April 06, 2012 09:59 AM (YmPwQ)
sorry if that was over-the-top graphic
Posted by: Jones in CO at April 06, 2012 01:51 PM (8sCoq)
**
Meh...sometimes the truth is nasty.
Posted by: dananjcon at April 06, 2012 09:59 AM (8ieXv)
Posted by: mrp at April 06, 2012 10:01 AM (HjPtV)
David Brooks is not "curious". "Curious" is his daughter.
Ann Althouse is his sister.
These people are all the same, with their dime-store rationalizations.
We are all screwed.
Posted by: Reader C.J. Burch writes.... at April 06, 2012 10:01 AM (sJTmU)
Posted by: eureka! at April 06, 2012 10:01 AM (LQIyD)
Brooks has long been a supporter of John McCain; however, he did not show a liking for McCain's 2008 running mate, Sarah Palin, calling her a "cancer" on the Republican Party.[24] He has referred to her as a "joke," unlikely to ever win the Republican nomination.[25] But he later admitted during a CSPAN interview that he had gone too far in his previous "cancer" comments about Palin, which he regretted, and simply stated he was not a fan of her values.[26]
Oh, in December he gave the jug eared f*ck a B-. There's that U of Chicago history degree paying off big time. Hey, isn't that where Billy Boy Ayers teaches?
Posted by: GnuBreed at April 06, 2012 10:02 AM (ccXZP)
Posted by: dick cheese at April 06, 2012 10:03 AM (GTbGH)
Posted by: Javelina Bomb at April 06, 2012 10:07 AM (VGlJT)
Posted by: Boulder Toilet Hobo at April 06, 2012 10:08 AM (QTHTd)
"Judicious"? Brooks must believe Palin about the death panels.
Posted by: The Poster Formerly Known as Mr. Barky at April 06, 2012 10:08 AM (qwK3S)
There isn't a speck of truthfulness to the tripe Brooks, Scarborough, Frum, Andi, etc. peddle every day. They are actors and not much different than pro wrasslin' bad guys on TV. They are Democrats who don and then trash the conservative label for the purpose of garnering power for Democrats from low-information voters.
With wrasslin' bad guys, it's entertaining because it's just a show. With these political pundit clowns, it's not just a show. It's our lives and our futures. That's not very entertaining.
Posted by: Jaws at April 06, 2012 10:16 AM (4I3Uo)
How ungentlemanly. I never spit.
Posted by: David Brooks at April 06, 2012 02:09 PM (QTHTd)
**
Don't I know it!
Posted by: Barak at April 06, 2012 10:19 AM (8ieXv)
Fixed. Brooks can't even type well; and so much for the Times's vaunted proofreaders.
Posted by: andycanuck at April 06, 2012 10:19 AM (6RnvM)
Posted by: Javelina Bomb at April 06, 2012 10:25 AM (VGlJT)
I hate to keep beating this dead horse, but the man majored in history. When did he ever have to develop an original thought? Not even a novel thought, just one that he arrived at on his own.
Posted by: AmishDude at April 06, 2012 10:25 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: ThepRimordialOrderedPair at April 06, 2012 10:26 AM (X3lox)
Posted by: Michael at April 06, 2012 10:29 AM (Hl5ka)
Uh, outside of health care for poor kids (medicaid, which is bankrupting us) why the hell is my government supposed to pay for these things? And what the feck does this feckless snow ninny mean by "programs that boost social mobility"?
The boy Brooks here has a painfully obvious and frightfully unrequited crush on Halitosis Nero.
It's just embarrassing to read, much less live through.
Posted by: Chariots of Toast at April 06, 2012 10:29 AM (eNURf)
Posted by: AmishDude at April 06, 2012 10:35 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: LASue at April 06, 2012 10:36 AM (I1icO)
Posted by: Sherlock at April 06, 2012 10:39 AM (8ra42)
Posted by: old glazier at April 06, 2012 10:47 AM (KcINh)
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Clitoris at April 06, 2012 10:50 AM (zF6Iw)
It's all just a nonstop torrent of bullshit designed to protect the government racket which funnels money from the taxpayers' pockets to incompetent but loyal lackies.
Posted by: BS Inc. at April 06, 2012 10:50 AM (P2Ufm)
Posted by: Rich K at April 06, 2012 11:30 AM (X4l3T)
All I can say now is that I want to invest in the paper towel concession for all of the slobber that David Brooks has to wipe off of his chin whenever he writes about Teh One.
Posted by: dissent555 at April 06, 2012 11:46 AM (yR6A1)
Posted by: Dave at April 06, 2012 12:10 PM (jR40i)
They ignore the inflation the rest of us see every day, at the pump and in the store. They believe that only 8.2% of the population is unemployed. What is in their Kool-Aid?
Posted by: MarkD at April 06, 2012 12:18 PM (iYBP2)
"I suppose it’s to his credit that he’s most inept when he tries to take the low road. He resorts to hoary, brain-dead clichés. He wanders so far from his true nature that he makes Mitt Romney look like Mr. Authenticity."
"his true identity"..? Still Brooks cannot figure out that "his true identity" is the guy who sounds like a left wing dolt whenever he looks away from the teleprompter?
People like Mencken and Hitchens were brilliant when they took the low road because they were brilliant. Obama will look like a dolt no matter which road he takes, which is why we gotta put him on the one way road back to Chicago in November
Posted by: mallfly at April 06, 2012 12:31 PM (bJm7W)
Posted by: 29Victor at April 06, 2012 12:45 PM (ES9R7)
Posted by: Voluble at April 06, 2012 12:56 PM (C9bRU)
Posted by: steevy at April 06, 2012 01:01 PM (7W3wI)
Posted by: President Emiritus, and your humble servant, Barak Obama at April 06, 2012 05:24 PM (rz0yi)
Clarence Thomas gave a talk at UK recently. When asked whether he read The New York Times every day, Thomas replied, "Oh, God, no!"
A good lesson for all intelligent people. We know what they will print. We are surrounded by their emanations and penumbras from the moment we wake to the time we fall asleep. Why bother going to the source of the pollution when we wade in it knee deep every blessed day. Anyone here can write a David Brooks column or one by Maureen Dowd or Paul Krugman without breaking a sweat because they are utterly predictable. They give Rush Limbaugh half the material he uses to ridicule them. I began reading BrooksÂ’ column (it was printed in my local paper) but after the first sentence I stopped because I knew the rest of it was waste of my life.
The paper is printed for its audience, itÂ’s an ongoing inside joke. They thrive on attention; they sell eyeballs to advertisers. DonÂ’tÂ’ help them.
Posted by: Moneyrunner at April 07, 2012 04:00 AM (PZYuq)
Posted by: Tantor at April 07, 2012 04:26 AM (93gTR)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3362 seconds, 260 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: ersta mahnn at April 06, 2012 09:35 AM (GTbGH)