September 17, 2012
— Ace At HillBuzz (no link for concern-trolls):
I am now going to officially keep track of every “Doom Report” filed at RedState by Erik Erikson that repeats the corrupt media’s standard propaganda that “Obama’s going to win!”. I’m going to similarly monitor Allahpundit at HotAir and Ace at AceofSpades as well. These three guys repeatedly post articles that depress and demoralize conservatives by largely repeating things the corrupt media purposefully says to help Democrats. I am tired of it and want to build a dossier on these three sites to document the Fifth Column activities over there that breed Eeyores amongst Republicans.
Um, where are these demoralizing posts of mine, exactly? Or of the cobloggers?
I'm actually doing something I'm not sure I should be doing -- cocooning. Not mentioning bad polls. I'm not sure if I should be doing that, but I have been ignoring bad polls for two weeks now.
Should be... not linking them even more aggressively? Not mentioning them even more vigorously? Ignoring them with even more fierceness encoded into my non-existing posts about them?
And I don't even agree that cocooning is a good strategy. This Rocket Scientist is obviously a big fan of it. For me, I'm a less sold on the political value of what is, when it comes down to it, lying to readers.
But I've also noted that in any contest, the other team gets the ball too, and sometimes they score. And this is not a reason for the fans to start screaming "Fire the coach!" or "Put in the second-string quarterback!"
There are going to be dips and peaks.
That said, since I've embargoed most bad polls since they started turning bad, I'm not really sure what this Rocket Scientist wants me to do. Do dozens of posts on "Democratic skews"? Just keep posting the Joe Pesci soundbite, "Everything this guy just said is bullshit"?
One of the things that's truly annoying about political movements is the large number of people who don't really have particularly interesting minds, and don't write particularly interesting things. So they appoint themselves to a position long held by uninteresting people: Morale Officer. And, like Morale Officers throughout time (the US had them in military; the Soviet Union had them for civilians) they don't actually do much to improve Morale; they just insist it should be better, and if you are not Regulation Cheerful, you are a Malcontent and must be Disciplined.
I'm a big fan of happy endings. I don't like drama. I don't like wallowing or depression. I don't like internet shit-fights. I don't like whining.
I don't like Bummers and in fact go out of my way to avoid them -- and actually I think I'm going too far on the side of No Bummers, because I do sometimes worry that I am presenting a cockeyed-optimistic view of the world to readers.
But then, I remind myself they are surrounded by the Make Believe Media, just as I am, and they almost certainly read and hear of these things elsewhere.
So I do, in fact, try to make the site a relatively happy place, and I think I do an okay job of it. A lot of people write to me to say things like, "Your site is one of the few keeping me sane right now."
I'm not sure what the self-appointed Sandals, Jamaica Fun Coordinator at HillBuzz would like me to do. Organize a limbo? Hard to do as we're not in the same room.
But I suppose I shouldn't complain too much. Newsflash: Uninteresting people say uninteresting things; film at 11.
By the Way: In 2010, I spent four of five weekends before the election traveling across the country -- Boston, Las Vegas, NJ, NYC -- to organize/popularize citizen volunteering for Republican campaigns.
I was pretty damn worn out after that-- working during the week, then canvassing and phone banking for candidates on weekends.
What did you do, Sparky?
Some people talk. Other people do.
The Morale Officer may have some use (opinions vary), but he's not out there actually on the field, is he?
No, he's a REMF.
Link For Volunteering: Anyone who actually wants to do something positive should probably stop Mau-Mauing people who are obviously voting for Romney (and whose readers are all voting for Romney) and try talking to some people who aren't necessarily voting for Romney, at least not without some encouragement.
FreedomWorks has a big suite of organizing/voter contact software, too.
Posted by: Ace at
09:59 AM
| Comments (489)
Post contains 752 words, total size 5 kb.
Posted by: phoenixgirl, what did huma abedin know? at September 17, 2012 10:02 AM (Ho2rs)
Posted by: andrew at September 17, 2012 10:02 AM (cq0FO)
Posted by: Ma Bell, now R squared at September 17, 2012 10:02 AM (uVuwp)
Posted by: Soothsayer at September 17, 2012 10:04 AM (jUytm)
Your attention please. Doc will be serially sodomizing hairless boys under 16 on the Lido deck between 10 and 2.
Posted by: Your Cruise Director Julie McCoy at September 17, 2012 10:05 AM (QKKT0)
Posted by: DOJ at September 17, 2012 10:05 AM (TR60b)
Posted by: Mac Gootbone at September 17, 2012 10:06 AM (zU4CK)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at September 17, 2012 10:06 AM (ZPrif)
New Fox article claims they have a source on the ground in Libya directly contradicting admin spin.
We need to push this hard.
Posted by: Sven10077 at September 17, 2012 10:06 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: CSI Chris at September 17, 2012 10:06 AM (qP4e9)
I've given up reading HA because I'm convinced they just want the traffic. It seems every day there's one ridiculous poll posted after another.
I don't think you do this. At least not on a regular basis. I think it was just that one day of doom and gloom. Maybe I'm not remembering right but that's why I'm skimming here and reading no other websites at this point.
I don't need fake rosy sunshine sugarcoated bullshit. But I also don't prefer hyperventilation. That's all I'm seeing from the pundits. And I think this is why most people are frustrated. A lot of people are out busting their ass this election and it doesn't help to read 'well you know we're down by 10 points in X state right?' Rather than link the bad poll, why not put the flipping context in there that they oversampled Dems by X points?
Did I mention I've had my fill of pundits?
Posted by: laceyunderalls at September 17, 2012 10:07 AM (pLTLS)
one thing I think they do have right is the number of otherwise nice people who believe everything they hear over and over on tv, and contribute to potential voter suppression by repeating it as if it's real.
It is crucial for the O-bots to get vast turnout of low-info sheep (including dead ones) out to vote early and often, and equally crucial to give as many reasons as possible for potential non-O votes to stay home.
Posted by: barbarausa at September 17, 2012 10:07 AM (WWeoI)
>.> I don't post terribly often but I lurk daily. I seem to recall most of the posts, coblogger or otherwise, being more along the lines of quit with the bitchin', return to the kitchen, the kitchen being donating and volunteering to the Kick-Obama's-Ass campaign.
It's gonna be a long couple of months.
Posted by: Kinley Ardal at September 17, 2012 10:07 AM (6lZD6)
new RedState headline: "THE PAUL RYAN FACTOR: OBAMA CAMPAIGN IN TEARS"
Posted by: the Butcher at September 17, 2012 10:07 AM (8g9qq)
"Um, where are these demoralizing posts of mine, exactly?"
Does this blog have something called an archive?
Posted by: Gerry at September 17, 2012 10:07 AM (EQOUR)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at September 17, 2012 10:07 AM (9TTOe)
Posted by: MJ at September 17, 2012 10:08 AM (TR60b)
Ras showing high enthusiasm for the Dems. I find this puzzling? The economy is in the toilet and Obama put it there.
If it's true certainly it is something to be concerned about. I also feel strongly that Obama has lost most or all of the indpendent vote. So bascially - it's the R's who need to show up and vote in this election.
Romney needs better ads. I also think Romney should fire the idiot who is in control of his ads.
try this-
If this nation wants economic stagnation, economic insecurity, high unemployment, and continued economic lethargy, vote for Obama.
If this nation wants high energy prices, with the promise of green technology unfulfilled, vote for Obama.
If this nation wants continued government cronyism and a total lack of transparency, vote for Obama.
If this nation wants more tax dollars thrown away, vote for Obama.
If this nation wants to kick the can down the road when it comes to entitlements, vote for Obama.
If this nation wants a more complicated and punitive tax code that increasingly helps grow an unaccountable government and shrink small and medium sized businesses, vote for Obama.
Posted by: Fresh at September 17, 2012 10:08 AM (O7ksG)
Ace,
There is a Propaganda War going on right now.
The polls have been compromised.
What else can you take away from it....when the Candidate in Power, has directed his government to persecute the oldest, most respected Polling company in the country...Gallup.
"Crucify" one of them...to make an example out of them.
That has been Barky's modis operandi, all along.
So I think that we need to take the polling results with a grain of salt.
Even when they show things that we like.
Stay frosty, like we did in 2010...keep hammering them, right up till the election.
It's all we can do.
Posted by: wheatie at September 17, 2012 10:08 AM (Z7b/q)
Posted by: MostlyRight (Morale Officer) at September 17, 2012 10:09 AM (ZG8Ti)
Posted by: The Political Hat at September 17, 2012 10:09 AM (XvHmy)
Posted by: Arbalest at September 17, 2012 10:09 AM (p5GoK)
Posted by: Angry Meatball at September 17, 2012 10:10 AM (mxnUd)
Posted by: Bill Mitchell at September 17, 2012 10:10 AM (hlUJY)
http://www.mittromney.com/forms/suggestions
Posted by: laceyunderalls at September 17, 2012 10:10 AM (pLTLS)
I wish I knew what to do. Ignoring bad polls and screaming "Obama is a marxist traitor" probably won't help. It will feel good to do that, though. At least until the day after the election.
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at September 17, 2012 02:06 PM (ZPrif)
Bullshit. We're ahead by 2-4 points. We may gain something if we run sensibly like the Democrat fantasy life of 2012 exceeding 2008's turnout but given how prone many are on our side to panic I'm not sure what would be gained.
http://battlegroundwatch.com/
You run the math on these goddamned polls with internals and you see. They are gaming the hell out of the samples oversampling Republican women, and overepping singles. I am afraid of reality when it's real, not too afraid of reality when it's as fake as a kardasian's tits.
Posted by: Sven10077 at September 17, 2012 10:10 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: bannor, voting Mittens and the Math Witch at September 17, 2012 10:10 AM (HEa5q)
Posted by: Ken at September 17, 2012 10:10 AM (ayCbQ)
Optimism and confidence are important. Don't underestimate.
Romney needs our confidence. 4 more years of obama and the idea of leftwinger Hillary next is too depressing.
Posted by: Fresh at September 17, 2012 10:11 AM (O7ksG)
Posted by: steevy at September 17, 2012 10:11 AM (6o4Fb)
While I think the co-bloggers report more of the outrageously bad poll numbers than you do, Ace.
So, I think you guys do a pretty good balance. Cocoon a bit if you like.. most of it is all bullshit anyway.. especially D+10 swing state polls!
It is still nowhere near as bad as the "Obama is Winning!!!1" meme Daily Kos and others are grinding out 24/7. (They had one this morning listing how much better off we are now economically! Un-Fucking-Believable)
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at September 17, 2012 10:11 AM (f9c2L)
I don't believe that Romney should be expected to to have won the election two months out, or fired all of his message ammo by now, leaving only reinforcing the message for the rest of the compaign. He doesn't need to be hammer and tongs at Obama the whole time, there is a time and surrigates for that. Btw, where's Sununu? He was great.
That being said, relentless attacks by the leftwing media and pollsters on how bad Romney is supposed to be doing is creating the atmosphere that this blog is discussing.
I still think it is all an effort to defy gravity and Obama will start plummeting to earth at some point.
Remember they kept trying to convince everyone that Carter was way ahead and Reagan was a nuke happy monster. Reagan never had to get negative and nasty the way some are arguing Romney to get, in order for him to win bigly.
Posted by: Dirks Strewn at September 17, 2012 10:11 AM (VLifP)
Posted by: Dave S. at September 17, 2012 10:12 AM (cWpCn)
One thing we need -- and we need it more by the day -- is honest appraisals of what's happening. Not all that rah-rah "Rmoney's Gonna Win!!11!!" shit (much too much of that going around for my taste), or the Eeyore-ish drivel Allahpander puts up to drive linkage.
What we abso-friggin'-lutely DO. NOT. WANT. is the inside-baseball crap being dished out at sites where the bloggers think they have the Straight Dope. Same goes for the wishy-washy "fairness" pap being drooled out by Poppin' Fresh and some of the yuppie scum at NRO.
Yeah, there are things you write that I wish you wouldn't bother posting, and vice versa. But I'll go with the percentages, and you're gold.
Fuck Holebuzz. And fuck anyone whose agenda is not to get Choom Boy out of office and make his life before and after a living hell. The treasonous fuckwit deserves no less.
Posted by: MrScribbler at September 17, 2012 10:12 AM (ZgX/g)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at September 17, 2012 10:12 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: The Robot Devil at September 17, 2012 10:12 AM (136wp)
Have a look.
Posted by: Sven10077 at September 17, 2012 10:12 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: andycanuck at September 17, 2012 10:12 AM (vDl/w)
About Hillbuzz Kevin DuJan
HillBuzz.org began as a small Hillary Clinton presidential campaign volunteer site...
Once a lifelong Democrat loyalist, he broke with the party permanently on May 31st, 2008, the day the Democrat Rules & Bylaws Committee stole delegates from Hillary Clinton and awarded them to Obama...
Hillbuzz: Republican as F**K -- until Hillary gets the Nomination
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at September 17, 2012 10:13 AM (kdS6q)
Posted by: Penfold at September 17, 2012 10:13 AM (1PeEC)
Posted by: pray for peace at September 17, 2012 10:13 AM (oZfic)
Hell, I might even be tickled pink.
Posted by: Kinley Ardal at September 17, 2012 10:14 AM (6lZD6)
Um, where are these demoralizing posts of mine, exactly? Or of the cobloggers?
Perhaps he is referring to the blog stylings of humorless prig DrewM. He's done some important work in making the perfect the enemy of M. Romney.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at September 17, 2012 10:14 AM (mJMH5)
In this Country, at least now, there are more dips than ever.
Posted by: O'Bumbles at September 17, 2012 10:14 AM (71LDo)
Posted by: HillBuzz at September 17, 2012 10:14 AM (136wp)
Posted by: hygateBut I've also noted that in any contest, the other team gets the ball too, and sometimes they at September 17, 2012 10:15 AM (iyzFk)
Posted by: buzz at September 17, 2012 10:15 AM (i27M5)
Posted by: steevy at September 17, 2012 10:15 AM (6o4Fb)
Posted by: Sam at September 17, 2012 10:15 AM (FWINB)
Posted by: MJ at September 17, 2012 10:15 AM (TR60b)
Posted by: The Robot Devil at September 17, 2012 10:15 AM (136wp)
Ace you must have missed DrewM's posts but of course he's just calling it like he sees it according to him.
Posted by: polynikes at September 17, 2012 10:15 AM (m2CN7)
One of the things that's truly annoying about political movements is the large number of people who don't really have particularly interesting minds, and don't write particularly interesting things. So they appoint themselves to a position long held by uninteresting people: Morale Officer. And, like Morale Officers throughout time (the US had them in military; the Soviet Union had them for civilians) they don't actually do much to improve Morale; they just insist it should be better, and if you are not Regulation Cheerful, you are a Malcontent and must be Disciplined.
You don't have to be so damn mean to Neelix.
Posted by: Tom Paris, LT jg, better pilot than you at September 17, 2012 10:15 AM (6lZD6)
Obama will continue to destroy this Country until Morale improves.
Posted by: dfbaskwill at September 17, 2012 10:16 AM (71LDo)
Posted by: Hope You're Right at September 17, 2012 10:16 AM (lHTEq)
Posted by: The Robot Devil at September 17, 2012 10:16 AM (136wp)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at September 17, 2012 10:16 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Inspector Asshole at September 17, 2012 10:16 AM (T+lH2)
Posted by: Ken at September 17, 2012 10:16 AM (ayCbQ)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at September 17, 2012 10:16 AM (8Hnjw)
Posted by: Fresh at September 17, 2012 10:16 AM (O7ksG)
I think Ed over at Hot Air deals with it well. He posts the polls that are out there and when possible gets into the down and dirty of the poll data. He exposes suspicious twisting of data and over-sampling where it exists, and compares that data to actual historical sampling data. So when you see a poll showing Romney down two in whatever state (where Obama won by 8 in 200
, but they polled registered voters (who historically sample slanted Dem) with a +9 Democratic sample (when whatever state actually had a +4 Dem result even in Obama Zombie 200
the reader can use their brain to adjust what that poll actually says.
Now you may make the point that the average idiot just reads headlines and gets swayed by the propaganda that the cheating MSM provides. Then you are either arguing we ignore what the media does by not addressing it, or engage in progaganda of our own. I can't agree with either of these.
Also, there is place for optimism where it is justified, but also a place for pessimism where it is justified. And different types of people are motivated by both. When I see a big problem growing bigger, it makes me double down on how hard I'm willing to work to fix it.
Posted by: MostlyRight at September 17, 2012 10:17 AM (ZG8Ti)
Posted by: dfbaskwill at September 17, 2012 10:17 AM (71LDo)
Posted by: polynikes at September 17, 2012 10:17 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: kawfytawk at September 17, 2012 10:17 AM (JWLqy)
...........
No, he doesn't have it in the bag.. that is the point (if misdirected) of these criticisms.
If the GOP gets depressed they won't turn out in the numbers necessary to get Romny the win.
This election is 100% about turnout.. the Dems and Obama are trying very hard to
1. Increase their base - war on women - racist!, etc..
2. Demoralize the GOP base and moderates.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at September 17, 2012 10:17 AM (f9c2L)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 17, 2012 10:17 AM (+tqYo)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at September 17, 2012 10:17 AM (9TTOe)
Posted by: Soothsayer at September 17, 2012 10:18 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: Panhandler at September 17, 2012 10:18 AM (rZ5RE)
Posted by: Methos prefers the cocoon while it's sustainable at September 17, 2012 10:18 AM (6LvlL)
So stop saying any bad meanie things and sing a happy song with your mermaid friend instead.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at September 17, 2012 10:18 AM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: Nukie at September 17, 2012 10:19 AM (OKqHo)
Posted by: The Political Hat at September 17, 2012 10:19 AM (XvHmy)
Ace has been pretty consisitent in mocking the shitty Dem leaning polls. I don't think he has beeen Eeyorish.
Hot Gas... EEYORE x eleventy
Posted by: The Jackhole at September 17, 2012 10:19 AM (nTgAI)
Posted by: The Robot Devil at September 17, 2012 10:19 AM (136wp)
Posted by: Wyatt's Torch at September 17, 2012 10:19 AM (XN0LR)
Posted by: ace at September 17, 2012 10:19 AM (fxHyG)
..........
I'm sorry.. but there is way the fuck too much imagery right there.
Posted by: Al Gore at September 17, 2012 10:19 AM (f9c2L)
This wouldn't be happening if Ace was routinely flogging his little Ewok to the nastiest, most corrosive German pr0n he could find.
Just sayin'.
Posted by: Jaws at September 17, 2012 10:20 AM (4I3Uo)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 17, 2012 10:20 AM (+tqYo)
I remember everybody saying that the polls overstated Obama's popularity because Americans were afraid to tell the young liberals on the phone that -- no, they won't vote for the first black president in American history -- out of fear of being judged as racist.
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at September 17, 2012 02:12 PM (ZPrif)
McCain didn't lose because the polls were honest McCain lost because he wanted to lose he refused to call Obama out on his vacuous nature, and he fucking suspended the campaign twice. You make it clear you do not want the job you don't get it. Next time the donkey ass motherfuckers decide to use your Veep as a stress toy defend her.
46
Turns out the polls were accurate and McCain got crushed. He didn't lose a close. McCain got fucking destroyed, just like the polls said he was going to. Posted by: Flatbush Joe at September 17, 2012 02:12 PM (ZPrif)
Turns out that having reagan's junior speech botch hit your Veep along witgh frum, Brooks, Sully et al didn't work out. Ogabe didn't surge in the polls 'til after the economic timebomb went off and Juan quit. Mitt won't quit.
46
If the polls say we are losing then that means we need to do more. Time spent arguing about the polls is wasted time.
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at September 17, 2012 02:12 PM (ZPrif)
You want to know what a waste of time is? Adding your voice to a media with an overtly expressed preference for the other candidate. You may not have noticed Obaama just had reality blow up in his face two weeks fucking straight. The most accurate pollster out there show Romney gaining momentum indexed to normal patterns.
Let's drop everything and run around like chickens with our heads cut off. You are adding your voice to Joe fucking Scardouche you business. I'll keep donating money and using word of mouth.
The choice is clear and gettingmore so. The left will do everything in their power to make us act as they wish. The stupid goddamned motherfucking CBS/NYT poll was D+fucking 13 you want to slash your wrists I'll buy you a razor....I'd much rather get back to fucking work evidently "reelecting Romney" to hear the media and goddamned Obama tell it.
Have a day,
sven
Posted by: Sven10077 at September 17, 2012 10:20 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: ace at September 17, 2012 10:20 AM (fxHyG)
You forgot to add muslim marxist cockholster.
Posted by: Berserker at September 17, 2012 10:21 AM (FMbng)
Posted by: Hidajunshin at September 17, 2012 10:21 AM (20NzC)
Posted by: The Robot Devil at September 17, 2012 10:21 AM (136wp)
Posted by: Tom Paris, LT jg, better pilot than you at September 17, 2012 10:22 AM (6lZD6)
Posted by: @PurpAv at September 17, 2012 10:22 AM (NWRs2)
Posted by: Soothsayer at September 17, 2012 10:22 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: Bill Mitchell
...........
No, he doesn't have it in the bag.. that is the point (if misdirected) of these criticisms.
If the GOP gets depressed they won't turn out in the numbers necessary to get Romny the win.
This election is 100% about turnout.. the Dems and Obama are trying very hard to
1. Increase their base - war on women - racist!, etc..
2. Demoralize the GOP base and moderates.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at September 17, 2012 02:17 PM (f9c2L)
It is going to be a lot harder to get the Dem base to show up than it is to Demoralize the conservative side. Trust me us Cons are motivated. Barry "I am Sorry" Obumbles has done that.
Mock him endlessly
Posted by: The Jackhole at September 17, 2012 10:22 AM (nTgAI)
Posted by: Manuel Garcia O'Kelly-Davis at September 17, 2012 10:23 AM (bwV72)
Posted by: The Robot Devil at September 17, 2012 10:23 AM (136wp)
The polls don't show shit (well, maybe they do at HillBuzz --- ba-dum-dump).
There have not been any accurate cross-tabbed likely voter polls put out in the last 2 weeks. Anything that does get close to a reasonable breakdown shows Romney leading. That's not good for mobilizing Zero supporters, so out goes any sort of honest voter breakdown
Posted by: imp at September 17, 2012 10:23 AM (UaxA0)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 17, 2012 10:23 AM (j1gX1)
Yeah, I don't buy it for a second lumping you in with Erik Erikson and Allah. Allah really is an eeyore, and sometimes his posts piss me off when he's crying about some made up bad news that spells doom for Republicans. I don't read Red State often, but Erikson seems to be one of the guys crying that Romney isn't conservative enough (he isn't) and that "true conservatives" should just give up now because we're screwed either way (we shouldn't).
In any event, ace, you're nothing like those guys. For one thing, you're actually funny. I think you nailed it from the start: concern troll being all concerned.
Posted by: OSUsux at September 17, 2012 10:24 AM (DFXmi)
Posted by: The Robot Devil at September 17, 2012 10:24 AM (136wp)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at September 17, 2012 10:24 AM (9TTOe)
Posted by: Honey Badger at September 17, 2012 10:24 AM (9ek7+)
No, he's a REMF.
Smart. Mil. Blog.
Posted by: fluffy at September 17, 2012 10:24 AM (z9HTb)
"some of the news out there might actually be bad, you know.
Posted by: ace at September 17, 2012 02:20 PM (fxHyG) "
_____
But telling us about it makes you liable for Mitt Romney's loss!
If Mitt Romney loses, it is ace's fault for telling us about bad polls.
Sheer insanity, HillBuzz. Insanity. Days like today, I see the carvings Breitbart left on society begin to weather and fade.
Posted by: reason at September 17, 2012 10:25 AM (sPO/s)
.........
No.. but the vid was already out there doing nothing.
If Axelrod's shit stirrers wanted some action all they needed to do was point Islamic news media to it.
However.. predicting a reaction to something like that seems awfully iffy to me..
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at September 17, 2012 10:25 AM (f9c2L)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at September 17, 2012 10:25 AM (8Hnjw)
Posted by: US Forest Service at September 17, 2012 10:26 AM (136wp)
I'd like to see a big attention-getting action, a game changer of sorts. Right now we have surrogates going out one or two at a time, and they are drowned out by the MSM. We need something different and unexpected to break through. Perhaps a joint appearance/ad by a horde of prominent sane people (former military, political, entertainment, media - anyone recognizable). A show of force that visually and verbally conveys that we are the majority, united in support of American principles. Normally many of us don't get involved in politics, but the crises on multiple fronts is so dangerous it requires it now. There is only one path to economic recovery, employment turnaround, protection of freedoms and national security, etc.
And, can't Rove or somebody get a discussion of O's loyalties going, somehow? Someone prominent needs to start openly questioning his commitment to Americans, our culture, the constitution. Sure the MSM will scream, but let's get people talking about it. Is Obama incompetent or is he implementing a hidden agenda.
Posted by: Mayday at September 17, 2012 10:26 AM (F3s39)
some of the news out there might actually be bad, you know.
Posted by: ace at September 17, 2012 02:20 PM (fxHyG)
Bad according to who? That's the point. We can't assist the libs in spinning every step as bad news. Legitimate bad news we have to spin as not so bad, insignificant news we have to spin as good, and good news we have to spin as excellent, gives me a boner news. That is unless you want to be the non biased reporter that DrewM thinks himself to be. Either you're a partisan blogger or not.
I have no problem and admire people who truly try to blog with no bias but you have to make a choice. Either your a partisan blogger or not.
Posted by: polynikes at September 17, 2012 10:26 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: Bill Hedrick at September 17, 2012 10:26 AM (xlyso)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/i][/u][/b] at September 17, 2012 10:26 AM (4df7R)
Nevertheless, its not the people they called out or them that is the problem, its the left wing media industrial complex (tm). It must be destroyed, people must mock them, laugh at them, point out their Pravda reporting.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at September 17, 2012 10:27 AM (PHb2k)
OT
accientally found Blaze TV today (Dish 212). Laughed my ass off at the morning show, and now Glen Beck is on for the next several hours.
Way better than FOX for background ambiance.
Posted by: Up with people! at September 17, 2012 10:27 AM (kzFo5)
Posted by: steevy at September 17, 2012 10:27 AM (6o4Fb)
Does HillBuzz still have that piece up...about how "Abassador Stevens was Gay"?
Or have they taken that one down.
I went to HillBuzz the other day....for the first time, ever....just to read that article for myself.
It was rather compelling, with old photos of Stevens, and first-hand accounts from some people who apparently knew him.
The only reason why that is important....is, if it is true....it means that Barky and Hillary put that poor guy into danger.
It was monumentally stupid.
Weapons Grade Stupid, really.
To put a Gay Ambassador, into an islamic country in turmoil...is like putting out a sacrificial lamb for slaughter.
As well as putting all those around him in danger too.
Posted by: wheatie at September 17, 2012 10:27 AM (Z7b/q)
Posted by: ace at September 17, 2012 10:27 AM (fxHyG)
I don't like Bummers
---
<singing>These are just a few of my un-favorite things</singing>
Posted by: Ace Von Trapp at September 17, 2012 10:27 AM (SO2Q8)
Here let me set you mind at ease about that.
No. You're doing just fine with that brosef.
Posted by: eleven at September 17, 2012 10:27 AM (KXm42)
Posted by: MJ at September 17, 2012 10:28 AM (TR60b)
These three guys repeatedly post articles that depress and demoralize conservatives by largely repeating things the corrupt media purposefully says to help Democrats.
Call them blasphemers. You know you want to.
And I don't even agree that cocooning is a good strategy. This Rocket Scientist is obviously a big fan of it. For me, I'm a less sold on the political value of what is, when it comes down to it, lying to readers.
Ace, I can say in no uncertain terms, that I read your stuff for the straight shit. I don't need you to pretend for me. Conversely, when you express confidence in a campaign or a poll, it carries more weight.
Posted by: CJ at September 17, 2012 10:28 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: Stephanie Cutter, Ministry of Truth at September 17, 2012 10:28 AM (T3KlW)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at September 17, 2012 10:28 AM (9TTOe)
The wonderful thing about Laura is that she's the only one!
SHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE'S....the only one!
Posted by: reason at September 17, 2012 10:28 AM (sPO/s)
I think Ace must have bled through his tampon last night.
Posted by: MM at September 17, 2012 10:28 AM (ZMhO7)
Posted by: pray for peace at September 17, 2012 10:29 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: ace at September 17, 2012 10:29 AM (fxHyG)
Posted by: Blog Testor at September 17, 2012 10:29 AM (136wp)
Posted by: RE at September 17, 2012 10:29 AM (QTVh2)
Posted by: Soothsayer at September 17, 2012 10:29 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: Justamom in Achin' Akin's district at September 17, 2012 10:29 AM (Sptt8)
He's letting Obama fuck up. He's probably learned his lesson about how the media will spin even the mildest comment and refocus on him. If he says nothing, then there's nothing for the media to turn against him. They'll have to either embargo all this horrible news, or report it and try to spin it.
The embargo isn't really working as the international press isn't sucking Obama's dick anymore, and spinning it makes the media look more in the tank and silly.
Saying nothing seems like a good strategy right now to me.
Posted by: @PurpAv at September 17, 2012 10:29 AM (NWRs2)
Cool trick.
Ask a former Obama Voter whose mostly turned off by the SCOAMF but also not a fan of the right's social crusade who they're voting for. In my experience they usually say "I'm waiting until the debates."
Frankly I hate the debates, I really do, but they serve a kind of purpose, they allow the LIVs to say "see I've watched them" and then feel informed and causually express their opinion without feeling stupid.
We haven't had a single debate yet, the preference cascade has yet to begin (or rather be acknowledged). Does this mean landslide? Hell no, we'll still need to beat the damn pavement like...erg...just insert an offensive joke here...point is GOTV. And it will still be close, but it's damn winnable. And if not, hold congress, screw 'em all over.
Posted by: tsrblke (Work) at September 17, 2012 10:30 AM (wGOqj)
Her hump is made outta rubber!
Her bottom is made out of...things...?
She's bouncy-flouncy stabby-crabby FUNFUNFUNFUNFUN!
The wonderful thing about Laura is that she's the only one!
Posted by: reason at September 17, 2012 10:30 AM (sPO/s)
Posted by: HoboJerky, profit of DOOM! at September 17, 2012 10:30 AM (MrM2k)
117 OT protestors in Jakarta...
Wow, no love even in the JEF's home turf.
Some collie casserole will placate them, no doubt.
Posted by: LibertarianJim at September 17, 2012 10:30 AM (CMbMd)
Posted by: Justamom in Achin' Akin's district at September 17, 2012 10:31 AM (Sptt8)
lol.
Posted by: Fresh at September 17, 2012 02:18 PM (O7ksG)
Sadly, that bit isn't too far from the truth especially the MFM part
Posted by: TheQuietMan at September 17, 2012 10:31 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: ace at September 17, 2012 10:31 AM (fxHyG)
Posted by: Panhandler at September 17, 2012 10:31 AM (rZ5RE)
Listening to the news and they are reporting as fact that all the violence and anger in Mid east is because of the youtube video.
Posted by: Fresh at September 17, 2012 10:31 AM (O7ksG)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 17, 2012 10:31 AM (j1gX1)
( old Chinese, saying, etc )
Posted by: DOA in Scrambletown, FLA at September 17, 2012 10:31 AM (Dll6b)
In 2010, I spent four of five weekends before the election traveling across the country -- Boston, Las Vegas, NJ, NYC -- to organize/popularize citizen volunteering for Republican campaigns.
----------------------------------------------
This paragraph did make me laugh. Thanks, Ace.
Posted by: Soona at September 17, 2012 10:31 AM (cPQjO)
Posted by: Sven10077 at September 17, 2012 10:31 AM (LRFds)
I have always been straight up about admitting I do it. I knew McCain was going to lose but pretended I thought he could win; I even pretended I thought there were hopeful signs in Christine O'Donnell's awful poll numbers (and I cherry picked the ones that showed her with the smallest deficit).
A lot of conservatives were suckered into this in 2006 and 2008. Now, it's easier to spot.
Posted by: CJ at September 17, 2012 10:32 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: Minuteman at September 17, 2012 10:32 AM (1FOy5)
Posted by: Barack Insane Obama at September 17, 2012 10:32 AM (136wp)
Posted by: the pink not panicking about one poll formerly known as the hobbit Donna at September 17, 2012 10:32 AM (W2Z3C)
Romney saying nothing only encourages the MFM to point to his nothing-saying and gleefully exclaim, "SEE! WE WERE RIGHT! HE SHOULDN'T HAVE SAID ANYTHING ABOUT EGYPT AND HE KNOWS IT!
Romney should be double-barrel every day with at least one major statement.
Posted by: reason at September 17, 2012 10:33 AM (sPO/s)
Posted by: Doc at September 17, 2012 10:33 AM (VXtkW)
Posted by: MJ at September 17, 2012 10:33 AM (TR60b)
Posted by: Y-not on the phone at September 17, 2012 10:33 AM (ddb4x)
If you weren't such a dirty dirty RINO ace, you would be able see the error of your ways. The fact you can't is proof positive that you can never be a True Conservative®
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Regular! With Full Stomping Power! at September 17, 2012 10:33 AM (0q2P7)
Some people are really so dim they can only comprehend Republicans Good Democrats Bad.<<<<<<
Slow down, Professor. We don't all have your fancy book-learnin. What was the first one?
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at September 17, 2012 10:34 AM (mJMH5)
I knew this was (oZfic) from the first four words. Skipped the whole f*ckin' thing.
Posted by: The Mega Independent at September 17, 2012 10:34 AM (2dn/j)
I, for one, don't expect endless posts about the Democrat skews in MSM polls, but some people (like Erickson and Allahpundit) seem to get so brow-beated by the ceaseless deluge of bad, politically motivated propoganda polling that they forget what they know to be true, or - even worse - start falling for the MSM narrative.
To be fair, Ace, you're not as guilty of this as Erickson or Allahpundit (who annoys me to no end). And the polls ARE getting better - even the MSM ones (once you take the skews into account).
Posted by: DRayRaven at September 17, 2012 10:34 AM (NeJwm)
Posted by: joncelli, heartless Morale Officer at September 17, 2012 10:34 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Soothsayer at September 17, 2012 10:35 AM (jUytm)
For f**k sake. In 2010, not one pollster had their turnout model correct.
The nation turned out to stem what they saw with complete Dem control of government. They wanted a new direction. Obama has only offered the same direction, and has been absolutely clear in that.
Did we learn nothing from the Journolist experience? MSM played up the post-convention bounce until it began fading, then they hammered Romney on having the right foreignn policy response, and now they are all marching on the same "its over, doom" meme this week.
So are we to believe that the same electorate, which now has a chance to vote Obama out of office, is going to stay at home? Right.
2010 is the baseline turnout model. Has Obama done anything to gain votes that he didn't have in 2008? No. Has he lost votes? Absolutely.
Posted by: @huffpeter at September 17, 2012 10:35 AM (NHNJt)
Posted by: theCork at September 17, 2012 10:35 AM (hbAdE)
Posted by: The Robot Devil at September 17, 2012 10:35 AM (136wp)
If Mitt Romney loses, it is ace's fault for telling us about bad polls.
Posted by: reason
Silly rabbit. If Mitt Romney loses, it will be the fault of Sarah Palin and/or The Tea Party.
We haven't out all the details yet, but trust us, we're already got our story in draft.
Posted by: The Republican Party (tm)
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at September 17, 2012 10:35 AM (kdS6q)
On the other side of the ledger, Republican enthusiasm is at record highs. Righties are champing at the bit to run Prezdint Choombuggy out of office. Check out the trendlines in GOP identification.
http://tinyurl.com/8c4agc7
Posted by: Cicero at September 17, 2012 10:35 AM (QKKT0)
139...Don't forget the Female Am. in Egypt.
Our ambassador in Egypt....is Female?
Jeez, OSP...I didn't know that.
And I try to pay attention to things.
Fuck.
Talk about being "insulting to islam".
Barky and Hillary have been intentionally 'in your face' provoking the savages.
And now, they want to stomp on our Free Speech rights here at home?
Posted by: wheatie at September 17, 2012 10:35 AM (Z7b/q)
"might Allahp be an eeyore becauuuuuse...he likely thinks the GOP is too "extreme" currently, and his dream GOP would be run by......"
*from the oceans, a swell grows, yielding to an open clamshell spilling forth light, and containing a nude Megan McCain, holding a torch of justice in one hand, and in the other, an extra-long chilli-cheesedog from Sonic.*
Posted by: reason at September 17, 2012 10:35 AM (sPO/s)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/i][/u][/b] at September 17, 2012 10:36 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: "Verbal" Kent at September 17, 2012 10:36 AM (XvHmy)
Mitt Romney was presented such an opportunity last week and he didn't take it. Plus, he piped down damn quick after Obama's media lashed out at him.
Posted by: Soothsayer at September 17, 2012 02:35 PM (jUytm)
Really ? He was skewered in the media the entire week, yet he held a press conference and stood by what he said. That's all he could do at that point...
Posted by: the pink not panicking about one poll formerly known as the hobbit Donna at September 17, 2012 10:36 AM (W2Z3C)
Posted by: polynikes at September 17, 2012 10:36 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at September 17, 2012 10:37 AM (PHb2k)
Posted by: The Mega Independent at September 17, 2012 10:37 AM (2dn/j)
Posted by: The Robot Devil at September 17, 2012 10:37 AM (136wp)
Posted by: Eeyore Quota at September 17, 2012 10:37 AM (QTVh2)
Fuck.
Talk about being "insulting to islam".
Barky and Hillary have been intentionally 'in your face' provoking the savages.
And now, they want to stomp on our Free Speech rights here at home?
That may be what they're doing, but see, that's not their INTENT. By having a female Ambassador in a Muslim country, Bammy is trying to say, "See? See how wonderful and accepting these Muslims are? They're not the stone age savages you think they are. Their wonderful people! Really!"
And he's drowning in his own purile bullshit.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/i][/u][/b] at September 17, 2012 10:37 AM (4df7R)
F Erick Erickson. I hate that guy. I hate seeing his fat face on CNN always telling me what is wrong with Republicans, like he has an idea. I also hate how he letsa the idiot liberals on that network run over him. He reminds me of Joe Scarborough.
F Allahpundit as well. He knows nothing. He just likes to be negative. He's a homo and so is Erickson.
Posted by: Pete_Bondurant at September 17, 2012 10:37 AM (phzv/)
"I'm waiting until the debates."
Frankly I hate the debates, I really do, but they serve a kind of purpose, they allow the LIVs to say "see I've watched them" and then feel informed and causually express their opinion without feeling stupid.
-----------
The debates will be a great opportunity for the media to declare SCoaMF the winner for a few weeks. And something tells me the person who is "waiting for the debates" is of sufficient stupidity to be told who won.
Posted by: Up with people! at September 17, 2012 10:37 AM (kzFo5)
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at September 17, 2012 02:13 PM (kdS6q)
-------------------------------------------------------
Summer of 2008, maybe, but not a snowball's chance in hell that Kevin or anyone else there would ever consider Hillary for any high office again.
Posted by: 66chevelle at September 17, 2012 10:38 AM (QjSgY)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 17, 2012 10:38 AM (j1gX1)
Posted by: DOA in Scrambletown, FLA at September 17, 2012 10:38 AM (Dll6b)
Posted by: Eeyore Quota at September 17, 2012 10:38 AM (QTVh2)
Posted by: Dr Spank at September 17, 2012 10:38 AM (4cRnj)
Aren't you supposed to--not do that?
Ace--you big BULLY! (smiley-emoticon goes here, preferably the one with the tongue sticking out)
Posted by: filbert at September 17, 2012 10:38 AM (smvTK)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at September 17, 2012 10:38 AM (8Hnjw)
- 2010 / Tea Party
- Chik-fil-A
- Wisconsin
- Are you better off?
I just can't envision Obama winning re-election. When people pul the lever, even the no-information voter is going to break hard against the incumbent.
I'm thinking about putting my intrade money where my heart is.
Posted by: Tonic Dog at September 17, 2012 10:38 AM (X/+QT)
And any more press conferences, they would have done what they did to SP (PBUH) and "blood libel", and declare he was now simply attention whoring.
Posted by: The Mega Independent at September 17, 2012 10:38 AM (2dn/j)
Why are people on our side so curmudgeonly sometimes.
Perfect example - yard signs.
I go into phonebank on Saturdays. The girl that's working there is a sweet girl - mid 20s. Nice as can be and working her tail off. She's working 14 hours a day. Every day. And then 6-8 hours in Sundays and for a pittance. For the past 3 weeks she gets at least one nasty old crank coming in there bitching to her that the office has no yard signs yet. This is not in her control. Yet these people will specifically drive into the office to proceed to yell at her for 20 minutes thus sending her to the bathroom crying.
I'm really f'ng sick of people bitching. And yes, what am I doing here? Bitching. But holy god already people (and I"m really not talking to anyone here - I'm just venting in general), stop. Either get constructive or go to hell. No I mean it. I'm sick of cranks with nothing better to do than to go off on the inappropriate people that have absolutely no pull whatsoever.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at September 17, 2012 10:39 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: ace at September 17, 2012 10:39 AM (fxHyG)
Posted by: Eeyore Quota at September 17, 2012 10:39 AM (QTVh2)
I live in a blue blue area of a blue blue state, and by this time in 2008 there were TFG bumperstickers and yard signs all over the place. Along with buttons on people's lapels.
Right now, practically nada. There are a few Romney signs in yards. Some battered TFG bumper stickers left over from 2008, looking as worse for wear as TFG himself. Nobody is adorning their lapels with TFG bling.
In 2008, people were proselytizing for TFG. It became impossible to go to the farmers' market or drugstore without having an unwanted political encounter. The enthusiasm for TFG is gone.
We need to focus on the goal the way the commies have focused for the last sixty years.
Posted by: Boots at September 17, 2012 10:40 AM (neKzn)
Posted by: Dr Spank at September 17, 2012 02:38 PM (4cRnj)
I figured it out, Ogabe is gonna give Red Ayers' the birthday gift of his dreams and kill 7% of the GOP caucus in the week before the election.
"Uh Happy birthday Bill."
Posted by: Sven10077 at September 17, 2012 10:40 AM (LRFds)
Most people don't read or watch much political news, and very little foreign policy stuff.
What exactly should he have said last week?
Posted by: DOA in Scrambletown, FLA at September 17, 2012 10:40 AM (Dll6b)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 17, 2012 10:40 AM (j1gX1)
Posted by: HoboJerky, profit of DOOM! at September 17, 2012 10:40 AM (MrM2k)
Posted by: Chris at September 17, 2012 10:40 AM (gI9Bk)
But then I still cling to my basic analysis: Elections are driven by facts on the ground and we know the facts and they are not good for Obama. He can win a news cycle or two, but he can't change the facts on the ground.
-------------------------------------------------------
Things that people see everyday. $4/gal gas. $50 for two plastic bags of groceries. The little mall that had some womans favorite nail shop -- vacant for three years. The very real threat of Ocare.
And finally. No jobs. No jobs. No jobs. No jobs.
Posted by: Soona at September 17, 2012 10:40 AM (cPQjO)
Posted by: Dirks Strewn at September 17, 2012 10:41 AM (VLifP)
I think everyone--EVERYONE--will be stunned at the magnitude of the landslide.
Of course, I do not make my money as a fortune teller or a pundit, so there is that.
Posted by: filbert at September 17, 2012 10:41 AM (smvTK)
Posted by: Nukie at September 17, 2012 10:41 AM (OKqHo)
^^^^^^
Per my last comment, they may not be there yet. I'd call ahead. You're in Jersey right? I'm thinking they're on backorder if they're not in Ohio yet.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at September 17, 2012 10:41 AM (pLTLS)
Sven and other poll-disbelievers...try out this site, www.unskewedpolls.com
They take apart ALL of the polls and weight them properly. Net result? Romney has an average 7.8 point lead.
I have no idea about the methodology. The site was recommended by David Limbaugh (no relation?) on Twitter.
I don't know how accurate that is but it should provide some relief to some of the more skittish folks around here.
Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at September 17, 2012 10:41 AM (YmPwQ)
Mitt Romney was presented such an opportunity last week and he didn't take it. Plus, he piped down damn quick after Obama's media lashed out at him.
Posted by: Soothsayer
In Mitt's defense, he has shown a willingness to lean into the first pitch to a surprising degree. Frankly, more than I expected of him.
The problem seems to be he can be brushed back from the plate, and the Dems are throwing a lot of hard pitches.*
*Baseball metaphors courtesy of George Will's Analogies R Us.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at September 17, 2012 10:41 AM (kdS6q)
Posted by: Soothsayer at September 17, 2012 10:42 AM (jUytm)
A good thing self reflection and questioning is.
Is not, re-igniting the Eyore Wars, settled they were.
Posted by: Master Yodah at September 17, 2012 10:42 AM (C8hzL)
I am still coping with how much people will back Obama, verbally or otherwise.
Posted by: HoboJerky, profit of DOOM! at September 17, 2012 02:40 PM
But are they close? We really don't know by looking at the breakdown of who they polled.
Posted by: the pink not panicking about one poll formerly known as the hobbit Donna at September 17, 2012 10:42 AM (W2Z3C)
>>>The Morale Officer may have some use (opinions vary), but he's not out there actually on the field, is he?
No, he's a REMF.
I'm always out there, though Emperor knows I don't want to be. And Jurgen needs a shower.
Posted by: Commissar Ciaphas Cain at September 17, 2012 10:42 AM (CMbMd)
http://tinyurl.com/8c4agc7
Basically his analysis is that unless Democrats have a 6+% edge on voter registration over Republicans, they tend not to win. And he shows how that is true over the years, back to 2004 at least.
Now, I don't know if Rassmussen's +4 GOP registration is accurate or not - it fits the sense I get and the trend in voter registration (down for both parties, but much more down for Democrats), but what I do know is there's simply no chance that voter registration is up by 6 or more points for Democrats.
I mean, CBS did a poll showing Obama up by 3 points, and they had to oversample Democrats to the tune of thirteen points over Republicans to get even that result.
And as people are starting to note, they're heavily oversampling women to get a more Obama trend. And its barely showing any significance.
In a year when we've seen the press so desperately pushing Obama like they did last week... I cannot conceive of why anyone trusts the polls. No matter if Obama is up in a poll or not, if its close, Romney wins.
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at September 17, 2012 10:42 AM (r4wIV)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 17, 2012 10:42 AM (j1gX1)
Posted by: ace at September 17, 2012 10:42 AM (fxHyG)
and I contend she is right but not in the way she is selling....Obama has always been looked at as a pussy by the ME.
Posted by: Sven10077 at September 17, 2012 10:42 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at September 17, 2012 10:42 AM (mbuvg)
Posted by: toby928© for TB at September 17, 2012 10:42 AM (QupBk)
Posted by: Ken at September 17, 2012 10:43 AM (ayCbQ)
Yet these people will specifically drive into the office to proceed to yell at her for 20 minutes thus sending her to the bathroom crying.
Those are the kind of people I CANNOT STAND. I've had enough of those kinds of people yell at me on the phone or in person in other areas of my life, and I'm at the point where I am NOT going to stand there and take it anymore. And I sure as hell hope I'd stand up for this poor young woman you describe and tell the aggressor to back the hell off and learn some manners. Hell, if they want a yard sign, they can buy one online. Or gosh, make one themselves!
Pricks. Seriously.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/i][/u][/b] at September 17, 2012 10:43 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Michelle at September 17, 2012 10:43 AM (j1gX1)
Mr. Romney, why are you such a racist and hate people and want corporations to take all of their money and destroy the environment?
Prezzy Wonderful, what's like to be soooooooooo dreamy?
Posted by: TheQuietMan at September 17, 2012 10:43 AM (1Jaio)
No, you're the Hero for supporting the Loser, and encouraging him to Lose.
Selfish.
I don't care about Akin.
No one here was suggesting a strategy to win, with or without Akin, just crying that the whole election had been destroyed by his win. When I stopped counting there had been 18 posts screaming about how Akin had lost the entire election and two that were hopeful about how to win the seat despite him.
Nothing on how to fight back like e.g. tying the Dems and Obama to Kermit Gosnell; nothing on what Romney should have been saying about it. Just surrender and attacking the Xianist right who'd lost the GOP the entire election.
Glenn Reynolds is a practising atheist and he wasn't going ape about it but the HQ did. In the middle of August when 99% of America wasn't paying attention to anything the MFM was saying.
I'm just glad it ended with the conventions.
Posted by: andycanuck at September 17, 2012 10:43 AM (vDl/w)
I'll just keep answering to people who ask who I plan to vote for: "Romney, of course. Why the f*ck would anyone want to vote for Obama, again?" I still haven't gotten a good reply to that.
Posted by: Roy at September 17, 2012 10:43 AM (VndSC)
Posted by: Ed Anger at September 17, 2012 10:43 AM (tOkJB)
Phone banking into *other* states. The campaign and the RNC have software for this. They give you lists of people to call and a script.
^^^
So does Freedomworks btw. If you're registered there they can help you do something if you're in a 'safe state'. You can even do it on your lunch break from work if you have time. You can do it from virtually anywhere.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at September 17, 2012 10:43 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: Dave S. at September 17, 2012 10:44 AM (M7Cfv)
Posted by: Nukie at September 17, 2012 10:44 AM (OKqHo)
Posted by: pray for peace at September 17, 2012 10:44 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: Sven10077 at September 17, 2012 02:42 PM (LRFds)
I think the correct anatomical comparison would be that the ME has always seen Obama as a goat's anus.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/i][/u][/b] at September 17, 2012 10:44 AM (4df7R)
I'm just catching up after having been away for a week. I got a message from the Romney campaign about the polls, it's a breakdown of how their internals show the race is much tighter.
I used to read Hillbuzz but it got kind of boring, there were too many posting rules to observe.
Posted by: kallisto at September 17, 2012 10:45 AM (jm/9g)
Posted by: Soothsayer at September 17, 2012 10:45 AM (jUytm)
Oh, and about that idea to use taxpayer funds to promote Obamacare in TV shows, this propaganda move needs to be fought. No public funds should be used and if money is paid to promote a partisan policy, then a disclaimer should be required. In fact, that is probably better. Let their PACs or whomever pay to promote Obamacare, but make the networks run a disclaimer at the bottom of the screen during each relevant scene. Show the couch potatoes exactly what is going on.
Posted by: Mayday at September 17, 2012 10:45 AM (F3s39)
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at September 17, 2012 02:42 PM (r4wIV)
http://tinyurl.com/8chljg8
Al-Reuters
"Democratic registration is way down," said election law specialist Rick Hasen. "You might count the court victory as a win for Democrats. In fact, it should be seen as ... perhaps a loss."
Posted by: Sven10077 at September 17, 2012 10:45 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: HoboJerky, profit of DOOM! at September 17, 2012 10:45 AM (MrM2k)
Nobody's asking you to stop doing what you're doing, Ace. But when you ask for feedback, you'll get feedback.
Some of it you'll like, some of it you won't. Some of it will be hopelessly irrelevant.
Some days you're optimistic, some days you're defeatist. I have to say that I rarely see you linger in the "it's a dead heat" phase for long. Mostly it seems to me that you're at one extreme or the other.
However, one of your cob-loggers is consistently grinding his axe against Romney, seeming to go through unnecessary contortions to present him as a terrible candidate, and then haughtily sniff that "it's not my job to raise your morale" when you point out his dickish tone.
Make of it what you will. There's my feedback.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at September 17, 2012 10:45 AM (mJMH5)
Read somewhere that the final polling prior to the 1980 election showed Carter up by 6 points.
And Reagan won by 9.
I honestly think this year's elections are going to look much more like 1980 than most people think.
How far off were the polls in 2010, when we wiped the floor with the metaphorical spilled blood of Democrat Congresscritters?
People are seething with fury right now, and most people I know would crawl over a football field of broken glass to cast their vote AGAINST Chicago Jesus.....
Posted by: Teresa in Fort Worth, TX at September 17, 2012 10:45 AM (P6H+d)
Posted by: DOA in Scrambletown, FLA at September 17, 2012 10:45 AM (Dll6b)
Posted by: Rondinellamamma at September 17, 2012 10:46 AM (53riN)
^^^^
One woman that yelled at her brought her flowers the very next day. She felt really appalled by her own behavior. But for every one of her, there are 15 others that just like to pop off.
I think everyone is beyond stressed. Cool heads need to learn to prevail. Easier said than done. I'm trying to figure out if I can find one more cliche to sum up how I feel!
Posted by: laceyunderalls at September 17, 2012 10:46 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: AuthorLMendez, Head Of The Projection Desk at September 17, 2012 10:46 AM (yAor6)
Posted by: pray for peace at September 17, 2012 10:47 AM (oZfic)
That way I can say that I didn't specifically vote for him--it just sorta happened.
It's the old "I'd vote for a ham sandwich before I'll vote for a Democrat" thing.
Posted by: filbert at September 17, 2012 10:47 AM (smvTK)
Given Obama's proclivity to retaliate against private citizens, this is the most prudent course of action. There's a lot of people who are scared to mouth off about Obama out of legitimate concern for their safety.
Posted by: @PurpAv at September 17, 2012 10:47 AM (NWRs2)
Posted by: The Dude at September 17, 2012 10:47 AM (tw6Ar)
The one thing we do know about 1980 is that 'undecideds' this close to the election will either vote for the challenger or not vote
Posted by: DOA in Scrambletown, FLA at September 17, 2012 10:47 AM (Dll6b)
Posted by: Roy at September 17, 2012 10:47 AM (VndSC)
Posted by: The Robot Devil at September 17, 2012 10:48 AM (136wp)
They're able to not actually cover news (which is expensive) and instead talk about the milieu of thought (which is cheap) produced by pseudoscience and statistics compiled in a witches brew.
Quit f*cking obsessing about polls. Cover the news. Try to work in content not first "reported" by that very news, and work the plan to get President M.T. Chair into a chaise lounge an the 19th Hole.
And avoiding adding ammo to the circular firing squad might help, too. Also, more minimally-pointed elbow cheerleader pics could boost morale. Kudos to DiT for his diligence here even though he's toying with us a bit with the recent photos to hide what are surely ghastly elbow imperfections.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at September 17, 2012 10:48 AM (eHIJJ)
Some people are really so dim they can only comprehend Republicans Good Democrats Bad.
Slow down, Professor. We don't all have your fancy book-learnin. What was the first one?
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at September 17, 2012 02:34 PM (mJMH5)
And will this be on the quiz? Should we write it down? --- I was told there would be no ethics
Posted by: Buzzsaw90 at September 17, 2012 10:48 AM (SO2Q8)
That's amazing Curious you and your dad both remember Mullah Zogby and Tucker Carlson calling 2004 a surge for Gore?
It explains a lot.
Posted by: Sven10077 at September 17, 2012 10:48 AM (LRFds)
192....That may be what they're doing, but see, that's not their INTENT. By having a female Ambassador in a Muslim country, Bammy is trying to say, "See? See how wonderful and accepting these Muslims are? They're not the stone age savages you think they are. Their wonderful people! Really!"
And he's drowning in his own purile bullshit.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter at September 17, 2012 02:37 PM (4df7R)
-------------
Intent...?
We should step back and look at the whole picture.
"Never let a crisis go to waste"
Remember that?
Rahm Imanuel was a Clintonista, first.
That shit was going on during the Clinton years, bigtime.
Everything....was a fucking 'Crisis!'
Barky uses this same tactic.
He has been quietly amassing New Executive Powers....that kick in...'in the event of a 'Crisis'.
All that is left for them to do....is to manufacture a 'Crisis'.
Insulting the islamists, in their faces, in their own countries...what would that accomplish?
Gloating about "killing Bin Laden"....just days before the 11th Anniversary of 9/11....?
"Bin Laden is Dead! ...And GM is alive!"
Shit.
That's way more 'provocative' to the savages, than some underground, obscure film.
Posted by: wheatie at September 17, 2012 10:48 AM (Z7b/q)
CBS stat guys: But we would have to have a D +13 to get that!
CBS exec: Make it so. We've already written the script for tonight's nightly news.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at September 17, 2012 10:48 AM (PHb2k)
Posted by: WalrusRex at September 17, 2012 10:48 AM (XUKZU)
Posted by: Homer J Simpson at September 17, 2012 10:49 AM (136wp)
Posted by: HoboJerky, profit of DOOM! at September 17, 2012 10:49 AM (MrM2k)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at September 17, 2012 10:49 AM (8Hnjw)
One woman that yelled at her brought her flowers the very next day. She felt really appalled by her own behavior. But for every one of her, there are 15 others that just like to pop off.
Bless that woman! And the others can take a flying leap. Pfft!
At least you're putting in the hours and fighting the fight, lacey. And you've always got the HQ for venting!
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/i][/u][/b] at September 17, 2012 10:49 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: HoboJerky, profit of DOOM! at September 17, 2012 10:49 AM (MrM2k)
Posted by: pray for peace at September 17, 2012 02:44 PM (oZfic)
He's probably shocked because Gore didn't run in 2004.
Posted by: Tami at September 17, 2012 10:49 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: pray for peace at September 17, 2012 02:47 PM (oZfic)
curious, the Joe Pesci rule applies to what you posted. Time to clean out the litter box, eh?
Posted by: DOA in Scrambletown, FLA at September 17, 2012 10:49 AM (Dll6b)
That clip should be a Romney ad at some point.
"Do you really want an administration that tells such transparent lies to you?"
Posted by: @PurpAv at September 17, 2012 10:50 AM (NWRs2)
With that he should give some more policy concretes. You'll always turn some people off with that, but if you do it right, it will be the people who were voting for Obama to begin with.
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at September 17, 2012 10:50 AM (r4wIV)
Posted by: The Robot Devil at September 17, 2012 10:50 AM (136wp)
Posted by: AuthorLMendez, Head Of The Projection Desk at September 17, 2012 10:50 AM (yAor6)
Butt all her cats said that's what happened just like they all say Ogabe's got this in the bag...
Posted by: Sven10077 at September 17, 2012 10:50 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: WalrusRex at September 17, 2012 02:48 PM (XUKZU)
I'm calling bull unless I see the partisan breakdown.
Posted by: HoboJerky, profit of DOOM!
The had it GayGuys+13, so it's crap.
Posted by: Roy at September 17, 2012 10:50 AM (VndSC)
Posted by: HoboJerky, profit of DOOM! at September 17, 2012 10:51 AM (MrM2k)
I agree.
I also think that Romney isn't being quite, he's being ignored by the press. Look last time he was given air time he looked really presidential and forced the press to pay attention to something they didn't want to (the middle east) and in the process they ended up looking like jackasses. So best to just pretend he doesn't exist.
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at September 17, 2012 10:52 AM (r4wIV)
No Ryan/Romney yard signs yet.
No stickers, buttons, etc.
GET ON THE BALL.
I asked them if they had buttons I could pass out. Well, if I want to buy from a guy and then sell them, yes.
I explained that ObamaBots are passing out buttons at my mom's Catholic Church and there were a lot of ppl that wanted a Romney one.
I then asked if he had any I stand with Coal/Romney signs or bumperstickers. No.
I told him that energy is REALLY important to the people of Ohio and that signs like that are what is needed in my area (coal/natural gas).
I told him that we need signs that say Kasich jump started Ohio's economy, not Obama. He said they don't have anything like that in the works.
I asked who I had to talk to so I can get this done.
He told me Romney main website.
UGH.
People need to see the overwhelming support there is for Romney before they (mouthbreathers) even start to listen to him.
Posted by: momma at September 17, 2012 10:52 AM (fKyrY)
"In a year when we've seen the press so desperately pushing Obama like
they did last week... I cannot conceive of why anyone trusts the polls.
No matter if Obama is up in a poll or not, if its close, Romney wins."
Journalislam. There is no god but Obama, and Carney is his Messenger.
Posted by: reason at September 17, 2012 10:52 AM (+hPIb)
Posted by: pray for peace at September 17, 2012 10:53 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: ace at September 17, 2012 10:53 AM (fxHyG)
Posted by: sven10077 at September 17, 2012 10:55 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: pray for peace at September 17, 2012 02:53 PM (oZfic)
I'm typing this slowly because I know you don't read fast....
GORE
DIDN'T
RUN
IN
2004!
Posted by: Tami at September 17, 2012 10:55 AM (X6akg)
http://tinyurl.com/8c4agc7
Oh yeah. it's +6 turnout advantage....for the Republicans. (Well really +4)
2010 won't be half the blood bath 2012 is. Well sure unless republicans start letting the media structure the race.
Look, Greg's dad and i are apolitical. But the issue is Greg sucks his dad off better than me. And if my husband isn't satisfied, then he is in no mood to chow my beaver. And let me tell you guys, Greg sucks at chowing box.
So strictly for our own selfish sexual appetites, we hope the SCOAMF wins. But that's about as likley as Greg moving out of our basement.
Posted by: Greg's mom at September 17, 2012 10:55 AM (qxcKC)
I don't think he's worried about scaring off the squishy middle.
At this point if someone tells me they're either undecided or "uncertain" about voting for Romney, I might just have to take a deep breath and start telling them -- in precise, clinical terms -- just how mind-bogglingly idiotic they are. Just flat out call them stupid. I'm done caring about coaxing them to our side. If they haven't been "coaxed" by the shitty economy, the arrogant petulance of Teh One, or the Preezy's appalling foreign policy, then they aren't worth chasing.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/i][/u][/b] at September 17, 2012 10:55 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at September 17, 2012 10:55 AM (PHb2k)
Posted by: ace at September 17, 2012 10:56 AM (fxHyG)
The signs would be wasted on him. He's clearly an Obama 5th columnist. The tip off is demanding free shit.
I'd confront him the next time with that. I'll bet you never see him again once he realizes he's been outed.
Posted by: @PurpAv at September 17, 2012 10:56 AM (NWRs2)
Posted by: pray for peace at September 17, 2012 10:56 AM (oZfic)
>>>no I was a kid I didn't remember anything.
In 2004. So, when do you get your driver's license?
Posted by: Roy at September 17, 2012 10:56 AM (VndSC)
Posted by: Minuteman at September 17, 2012 10:56 AM (1FOy5)
Posted by: sven10077 at September 17, 2012 10:57 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: ace at September 17, 2012 10:57 AM (fxHyG)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at September 17, 2012 10:57 AM (8Hnjw)
Posted by: Y-not on the phone at September 17, 2012 10:57 AM (iBaHp)
Posted by: The Robot Devil at September 17, 2012 10:58 AM (136wp)
Posted by: pray for peace at September 17, 2012 10:58 AM (oZfic)
You know what I do when I get a little Eeyorish?
I get my cellular phone, and I open up the photo gallery.
I flip to the three pictures I took at Support Chick-Fil-A Day. One of the massive line that wrapped twice around the inside, and two to get a panoramic view of the parking lot and the grass field next to the place that was filled with cars like a highschool homecoming football game.
These people came out specifically on that day to go out to eat in support of a cause. These people were willing to forego whatever lunch or dinner plans they may have already had and instead shell out an extra $7 for fast-food, in support of a cause.
I look at those pictures, and I see a bunch of people who happened to have $7 and an hour to spare that particular week. I think about that, and then I remind myself that voting takes less time, and costs less money.
Expect to see all those people in line in front of you when you go vote in November. And then some. Many more some.
Posted by: reason at September 17, 2012 10:58 AM (+hPIb)
Posted by: yinzer at September 17, 2012 10:58 AM (/Mla1)
Posted by: Berserker at September 17, 2012 10:58 AM (FMbng)
The Debates...will suck.
They will be an infuriating slobberfest, designed to showcase the greatness of Barky.
Barky...himself...has decreed that "this will be a close race".
He has an army of lawyers, standing by...to contest it...if it is not a landslide.
Posted by: wheatie at September 17, 2012 10:58 AM (Z7b/q)
Posted by: Chicago Voter at September 17, 2012 10:58 AM (qZb8X)
^^^
They are. As much as I don't care for Rove, he's churning out some kick-ass ads here in OH.
****anecdotal evidence alert here****
We've been targeting indies over the last two weeks. I went in 10 days go and it was 50/50 (like it usually is).
I flipped two folks last Wed though. Actually I didn't flip them - Obama built that. Obama's woeful fuckery and inaction over the last 7 days has people here scared shitless. And I'm thinking it's the same all over the country.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at September 17, 2012 10:58 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: pray for peace at September 17, 2012 10:59 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: HoboJerky, profit of DOOM! at September 17, 2012 11:00 AM (MrM2k)
I hope on November 7th, we can look back and say "My, we were wrong. The Romney campaign was very clever."
But, as always, there is a fine line between clever and stupid.
Posted by: Roy at September 17, 2012 11:01 AM (VndSC)
But of course you want to miss the actual point....cause you want to be an obtuse person....kinda like the libs/dems I deal with every day...
Posted by: pray for peace at September 17, 2012 02:59 PM (oZfic)
You guessed!? How the hell old are you?! 2004 was eight years ago.....you can't remember who ran against Bush.....8 years ago?!
Posted by: Tami at September 17, 2012 11:01 AM (X6akg)
Erickson on the other hand is a turd, who uses his Republican critique to land more face time at CNN - as is typical of any (lib media) token conservative.
Posted by: nhwingnut at September 17, 2012 11:01 AM (DhgCF)
Question for Michigan morons. Y'all have a large Muslim population -- Dearbornistan in particular -- so I'm wondering how the events of the last week have been playing in political circles. Has there been any shifting of the winds in light of Obama's appeasement strategy?
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/i][/u][/b] at September 17, 2012 11:01 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Jean at September 17, 2012 11:01 AM (4jJCE)
Posted by: The Robot Devil at September 17, 2012 11:01 AM (136wp)
Posted by: tcn at September 17, 2012 11:01 AM (ZOUmX)
Posted by: ace at September 17, 2012 11:02 AM (fxHyG)
Ace, I commented in your defense at Hillbuzz, but I think you and Kevin misunderstand each other. He's a pretty interesting guy, and so are most of the other bloggers there. I think you'll find that he is more than a "Morale Officer" as far as political activism goes. Too aba alot of that activism in the past was for the wrong side, but he's making up for it now.
And I think he's right about RedState. For a site that bans profanity and nukes trolls in a heartbeat, the internecine warfare over there is pretty brutal and not uplifting in the least. Look at their front page on any given day, and the comments for most stories are in the single digits for days at a time. The New Look (3rd or 4th new look) there isn't helping either, at least not right now.
Yet here you are, plugging away looking pretty much like you did all those years ago, with threads being judged slow if the comments are below 300, trolls staggering around with "Kick Me" signs on their backs, and no locks on the door because the place never closes. I think Kevin may be just a little jealous.
Posted by: 66chevelle at September 17, 2012 11:02 AM (QjSgY)
Posted by: sven10077 at September 17, 2012 11:02 AM (LRFds)
"Actually I didn't flip them - Obama built that. Obama's woeful fuckery and inaction over the last 7 days has people here scared shitless. And I'm thinking it's the same all over the country. "
Tell us more. These are the stories that strenghten resolve.
Posted by: reason at September 17, 2012 11:02 AM (+hPIb)
Posted by: HoboJerky, profit of DOOM! at September 17, 2012 11:03 AM (MrM2k)
Posted by: Ken Royall at September 17, 2012 11:03 AM (x0g8a)
Posted by: Ed Anger at September 17, 2012 11:03 AM (tOkJB)
What's different is that some of the older people I know who were upset with President Bush voted for Obama last time and they won't get fooled again. I'd be amazed if Obama got 10% of this voting bloc.
Its true that the GOP is basically run by retards, but that just means you who have the time and ability should be in there becoming the ones in charge, so they do get done what needs to.
Honestly though I really question the value of signs and bumper stickers. When was the last time you saw one and said "That's the one for me!!" really?
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at September 17, 2012 11:04 AM (r4wIV)
That is to say that negativity about the outcome will initiate a cascade of lackluster effort and recriminations in anticipation of a loss - to better position one's self in the aftermath of the loss rather than working towards a win - and the loss itself then becomes an inevitability. It is simply unrealistic to say that you can both anticipate an inevitable loss but still give full effort towards a win - human nature doesn't work that way.
When I played hockey as a kid I always counseled teammates that when we were a goal or two or more ahead in the third period, to "put the other team to sleep." By this I mean that when you line up for a face off or between stoppages instead of talking trash you tell the opposing team's player that he played well, or that his team was the victim of a few bad bounces or bad calls. You say these things not necessarily because you believe them but because the player of a losing team is looking for a moral "out" or excuse to mentally excise his play from the outcome of the game. On a practical level, his effort doesn't count for anything significant if his team loses, but on a psychological level he is tempted to find a resolution where he can be satisfied with something other than a win and not associate himself with the loss. The effect of course is to demotivate the player - if he's dissociated himself emotionally from the outcome of the game which seems inevitable, he's a lot less likely to chase down loose pucks or endure physical punishment to make a play, which in turn makes a comeback much less likely.
The value of policing Eyores should be to punish those who are simply positioning themselves to look best after a loss because of the cascade effect that this has on the rest of the "team" as it were. I don't think this requires an unreasonable suspension of disbelief, and I understand that much of the frustration lies with what seems like the insurmountable ability of a horribly biased media to shape a narrative for Obama's benefit. It does seem like we're always put in a position to be playing defense, or to carry the hockey analogy forward, we're always killing a 5 on 3 power play due to shitty calls and can't get one to go our way.
Posted by: Alec Leamas at September 17, 2012 11:04 AM (mg08E)
Hey, I am not going to pretend I didn't see the "Stupid Akin has cost us the election" column. And a couple of others a well.
This is why we shouldn't post every single emotion and thought we have here. I know this is hard to believe, but people actually read this site.
Posted by: Miss Marple at September 17, 2012 11:04 AM (GoIUi)
Why? Someone in Poland put out a YouTube derisive of your religion?
Posted by: filbert at September 17, 2012 11:04 AM (smvTK)
Posted by: Soona at September 17, 2012 11:04 AM (cPQjO)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at September 17, 2012 11:04 AM (8Hnjw)
Posted by: pray for pieces at September 17, 2012 11:04 AM (fxHyG)
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at September 17, 2012 11:05 AM (r4wIV)
Where are these now?
Posted by: ace at September 17, 2012 03:02 PM (fxHyG)
http://tinyurl.com/7dqnar6
Al Wa-Po campaign tracker. That where the ads are Ace. Make of it what you will.
Romney seems to think he is winning I'd wager and is watching the bullshit unfold and making ads based on how flat on his face Bark falls.
Posted by: Sven10077 at September 17, 2012 11:05 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: HoboJerky, profit of DOOM! at September 17, 2012 11:05 AM (MrM2k)
AnonymousDrivel at 266
This is exactly right. The Massive Bullshit Media are creating make-believe content (phony skewed polls) to give themselves something to talk about and a point of departure for attacking Romney.
If they actually had to rely on REALITY, it would be much more evident that Obama is in big trouble. This is the psyops that we have to fight against. And it is a psyops that is taking place all across the board.
Witness only the "big lie" that continues regarding the root cause of the riots in Libya and Egypt and elsewhere. These are operations that are being manipulated by Salafist Islam (al Qaeda operatives among them) mullahs and such, and are only tied to that stupid YouTube video for propaganda purposes. And they have got the Obama Regime tied in knots rationalizing this silliness.
We live in an Orwellian age, and even a Romney victory will not end that. The MBM is intent on perverting truth and reality to achieve the ends that they desire. Why isn't Dan Rather in jail for libeling George Bush in 2004?
When people talk about destroying the Media to save the country, this is really not far off base. Something has to change or we will all go nuts.
Posted by: Reader C.J. Burch (fake Internet person) writes..... at September 17, 2012 11:05 AM (RFeQD)
Posted by: tcn at September 17, 2012 03:01 PM (ZOUmX)
---------------------------
And there is no better place for Gay Obama dish, Bobby Titcomb "Fish & Poi" stuff either.
Posted by: 66chevelle at September 17, 2012 11:05 AM (QjSgY)
Posted by: ozzie at September 17, 2012 11:05 AM (+hPIb)
This is, I believe, called "building the ground game" in the business, correct?
Posted by: filbert at September 17, 2012 11:05 AM (smvTK)
Are you claiming there was no movement towards Obama in the past two weeks?<<<<<<
No. I'm telling you that of the Romney posts I've read by that author, that has been my general experience.
If you want to talk facts on the ground, that's one thing. But the HillBuzz piece seems to be addressing tone. And saying that the tone here is demoralizing.
That it lessens morale.
That it's morale is low.
I'm not the most emotional guy. I recognize that this is a close one. Or maybe it isn't. We'll find out in November. Either way, I have plans.
I hate being given topics to write about. If it's not my idea in the first place, the result usually sucks. Not trying to suggest you change anything - just trying to fit the HillBuzz piece into context.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at September 17, 2012 11:06 AM (mJMH5)
That's what Boston told me when I asked them why they weren't more aggressive in ads when they tried to get me to go see Ryan up at the marriot today.
1,000 bucks a plate plenty did show.
Posted by: Sven10077 at September 17, 2012 11:06 AM (LRFds)
The MEDIA like to say that debates matter, because they cover / obsess on them , and think that Words and Big Ideas matter.
Most people who will actually vote have already decided; some of those who are truly undecided will not vote, and some will vote for Romney
that's just the way it is..........
Posted by: DOA in Scrambletown, FLA at September 17, 2012 11:06 AM (Dll6b)
Posted by: pray for peace at September 17, 2012 11:06 AM (oZfic)
Why are you piling on Pray for Peace for typing a number wrong? Why are you taking out your frustration and pouring mockery and derision on someone like that?
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at September 17, 2012 11:06 AM (r4wIV)
Posted by: ace at September 17, 2012 11:06 AM (fxHyG)
Posted by: reason at September 17, 2012 02:35 PM (sPO/s)
That's one hell of a clam...
Posted by: joncelli, heartless Morale Officer at September 17, 2012 11:07 AM (RD7QR)
"Hey, the candidate and his staff are visibly way in over their heads, and they're making a long string of unforced errors, and they're actually talking up our opponent's virtues, while banning discussion of the opponent's faults, and I'm genuinely scared that if things don't change then disaster awaits on Election Day."
We all know what happened next.
Sometimes eeyorism is unfortunately correct.
Posted by: torquewrench at September 17, 2012 11:08 AM (ymG7s)
Every major contest since 2009, except for upstate New York, has gone to our side: McDonnel, Christie,Scott Brown, multiple Wisconsin elections(remember the supreme court justice too) and all the prognosticators predicted democrat wins. I don;t know anyone who voted for McCain who will vote for Obama, but I know lots of Obama voters who will vote for Romney or not vote at all. I live int eh bluest of the blue in Massachusetts and polls say Warren is beating Brown but there are Brown yard signs everywhere and hardly a Warren sign to be seen. I have Romney and Brown bumper stickers but am afraid to put them on my car because I don;t want it keyed.
I think Ace is doing it exactly right. How can you start a preference cascade if no one says things out loud. I thought that is the point of people like Ben Stein and Clint Eastwood saying our dear Leader is an empty suit or chair or TFG.
Posted by: Sharon at September 17, 2012 11:09 AM (DtEq4)
Posted by: HoboJerky, profit of DOOM! at September 17, 2012 11:09 AM (MrM2k)
Today they are celebrating cause romney's "internals aren't good". I didn't mention that or say anything but it might be weighing on my mind.
Curious
Yes curious the only place you post, and golly you work at Obama HQ....
look reality is reality they are rioting in Durka Durka saying Obamaa is guilty....but Obama says "uh it's a film!" you ever consider that Obama like most things has no fucking idea what he's talking about?
Posted by: Sven10077 at September 17, 2012 11:09 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: Soona at September 17, 2012 11:09 AM (cPQjO)
No.
The media has had a surge in the past two weeks. Any blip in the polls or any perception of an Obama "surge" is a direct result of the shameless partisan knee-padding of the media. Period.
In fact, the past two weeks for Barack Obama have been, by any objective measure, two of the worst weeks that a sitting president has experienced in recent memory.
And that includes 9/11/2001.
Posted by: filbert at September 17, 2012 11:10 AM (smvTK)
Posted by: Jean at September 17, 2012 11:10 AM (4jJCE)
Posted by: Al to the Gore at September 17, 2012 11:11 AM (jm/9g)
Posted by: ace at September 17, 2012 11:11 AM (fxHyG)
It took a vast groundswell of animosity toward Republicans, a sycophantic, worshipful press, a massively disliked opponent and a godawful, pathetic campaign by McCain to get a win for Obama, and he only got 53% of the popular vote.
He has none of that this time around. Not one bit of it. The press is definitely on his side, but not in the absurd, cringing bitch way they were in 2008. Nobody is portraying Obama as the "lightworker" or putting halos around his head this time around. They are defending him out of desperation, not worship.
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at September 17, 2012 11:11 AM (r4wIV)
I have avoided joining the pack in attacking you. I've even defended you a bit.
But your concern-trolling is getting extremely annoying.
Posted by: ace at September 17, 2012 02:57 PM (fxHyG)
OMG I just threw up in my underwear a little bit!
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at September 17, 2012 11:11 AM (mJMH5)
Posted by: pray for peace at September 17, 2012 02:53 PM (oZfic)
You mean like his analysis that Huckabee decided not to run because he thought that the convention was just going to nominate him on their own. Analysis like that. Pure genius.
Posted by: buzzion at September 17, 2012 11:11 AM (GULKT)
Why are you piling on Pray for Peace for typing a number wrong? Why are you taking out your frustration and pouring mockery and derision on someone like that?
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at September 17, 2012 03:06 PM (r4wIV)
Pray for Peace is a concern troll named "Curious" who says that "only New Yorkers understand 9/11" even though my Foster dad was supposed to be at the Pentagon that morning in the win across from the debris field?
That could be part of it there CT.
Posted by: Sven10077 at September 17, 2012 11:12 AM (LRFds)
You are of course availing yourself of all this as often as possible, right?
The bumper stickers and pins are not that useful unless you're equipped to overpaint them, but coroplast signs are great for repairing animal gnawed holes in barn walls and temporarily repairing busted panes on multi-pane windows.
Coroplast is also great for making cheap R/C planes. There's a whole subculture of R/C enthusiasts that do that.
http://www.rcgroups.com/spad-simple-plastic-airplane-designs-176/
Posted by: @PurpAv at September 17, 2012 11:12 AM (NWRs2)
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at September 17, 2012 11:13 AM (i0App)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at September 17, 2012 11:13 AM (8Hnjw)
Posted by: Soothsayer at September 17, 2012 11:14 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: Baldy at September 17, 2012 11:14 AM (opS9C)
The Philadelphia Inquirer was trumpeting a poll showing Obama up by 11% in Pennsylvania.
I know it is bullshit because Obama only won Pennsylvania by 10% in 2008 - who the fuck believes that this guy is going to get more support in Pennsylvania (or anywhere else) than he did in 2008? Or even the same amount of support? The Obama campaign doesn't even believe that. If they don't believe it, why the fuck should I believe it? The whole purpose of the poll and articles "reporting" the poll is to give voters false perception of inevitability and futility.
This is what we're up against.
Posted by: Alec Leamas at September 17, 2012 11:14 AM (mg08E)
Being unconquerable lies with yourself, being conquerable lies with the enemy.
Thus one who excels in warfare is able to make himself unconquerable, but cannot necessarily cause the enemy to be conquerable.
Thus it is said a strategy for conquering the enemy can be known but yet not possible to implement.""
In a perfect world Mitt is following this and is just waiting for the right time to strike.
Posted by: Berserker at September 17, 2012 11:15 AM (FMbng)
^^^^
I just can't stress enough that if people have time, they spend an hour a week in their phone bank or canvassing. Esp if they're feeling despondent. It helps turning off the news. Plus it helps surrounding yourself with like-minded folks.
I, prob like a lot of folks here, have some fatalistic tendencies. So when I get in my own head too much. I drive over to my local Victory Center. Chances are I'll see the same people I saw the from week before. These folks are amazing. No other way to put it. You have retirees that spend 5 days a week in there because they have the time and are scared shitless for their children/grandchildren. There's another guy I work with that has cerebral palsay. Yet he's in there every.damn.day. There's the head of the college Republican group that's there every weekend. She's bringing in kids from the HS to help make phone calls. These HS kids in there that know more than the people they're talking to (sad thing on that is that they're too young to vote!). They're all minorities. Not to cherrypick here and say 'oh look - here's one on our side!' That's the bullshit the media does. I only said that to to put into context that there are people who are very motivated to see Obama gone. And they're from all walks of life. This 0% of blacks are voting for Romney was one of the most disgusting things I've ever seen the media push. And it's not coincidental the moment that "poll" came out - our local phone bank was flooded with "closeted" conservatives. So thank you, MFM!
I'm really not trying to be a Pollyana on this - I *know* we're going to pull this out. It's in my gut.
Then I get home and read twitter and see all the debby downerisms and then it deflates me. So I'm picking and choosing who I'm reading at this point.
I'm going back to my gut. #TeamMe
Posted by: laceyunderalls at September 17, 2012 11:15 AM (pLTLS)
Another validating metric that this actually works: review their headlines.
HotAir has links to the Progressives/NYT all the time. When HA editors quote the headline or juice it up a bit a la Drudge to show anti-conservative spin or eeyorism, the hit counts jump. Readers seem to gravitate to "bad news" and, well, this is the internet and HotAir is going for hit counts - not exclusively but still significantly.
Now, for me, when I see a link to, for example, the NYT, I utterly ignore it. I just junk the link and virtually walk away shaking my head pretty much mumbling, "Why the hell is anyone covering that red rag?" So what does it say about a site that continuously links to outfits we know are discredited? For one, bad news (even if manufactured) sells. Two, poking the readers with a stick can get you money. Three, HotAir is not my top news/politics blog for exactly the mentioned reasons.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at September 17, 2012 11:15 AM (eHIJJ)
Now I see it was actually noting that Gore surged in the polls but didn't win.
I'm sorry.
And look: This is why I actually defend curious sometimes: Because some of you guys are just bullying her over EVERYTHING she says, even if it's unobjectionable.
And I joined in.
Posted by: ace at September 17, 2012 03:11 PM (fxHyG)
I'll get your hairshirt Ace. Oh wait no no I won't Curious is trying to pretend she doesn't remember 2004 but "works surrounded by a bunch of poltitcally astute Obama backers". Like the person said upthread "when did you get your license again?'
I remember the spirit of '76 but barely anything about the cycle of '76, I remember '80 like the back of my hand I was 8 chief.
Posted by: Sven10077 at September 17, 2012 11:15 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at September 17, 2012 11:16 AM (da5Wo)
And I joined in.
Posted by: ace at September 17, 2012 03:11 PM (fxHyG)
You've missed 95% of the crap she says. But whatever.....
Posted by: Tami at September 17, 2012 11:16 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: Baldy at September 17, 2012 11:16 AM (opS9C)
I kinda thought that was just the beginning of hockey season around my house. Pee-yew.
Posted by: tcn at September 17, 2012 11:17 AM (ZOUmX)
Ace,
The concern trolls who are really good at what they do.....suck you in....with posts that you can agree with.
They suck you in, then start in with the psy-ops bullshit.
You should be looking at all of it's posts, before you chastise yourself.
Posted by: wheatie at September 17, 2012 11:17 AM (Z7b/q)
This is sort of the problem.
We really don't know what the fuck is going on coming off the convention; we have little good data to rely on and it's created a vacuum. Which the democrats and MSM buddies have effectively filled with stories of Romney infighting and doom.
They hit the 'elections over' button as soon as the formal election began the night the DNC ended -- and got to work flooding the networks with stories and talk about how Romney can't win, how the polls show X, etc. Absurd, but effective.
So, the hillbuzz guy has a point only as far as there's no pushback from the conservatives movement on this issue. Which ultimately is fine as it's a cycle, the Romney folks will feel it and adjust hopefully for the better.
The damage is in the money race and depressing fundraising.
Posted by: Uriah Heep at September 17, 2012 11:18 AM (Wa+Fw)
and it reeks of insecurity
Posted by: Soothsayer at September 17, 2012 03:14 PM (jUytm)
Yeah Sooth? I haven't changed kicking democrat idiots in the head one bit since 1992 on the internet. Your goal should be to kick their teeth in so hard they have a temptation to use Colgate as Preparation H.
Your mileage may vary.
Posted by: Sven10077 at September 17, 2012 11:18 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at September 17, 2012 03:16 PM (da5Wo)
How about because the little shit said unkind things about one of our military mom's? How about that?
Posted by: tcn at September 17, 2012 11:18 AM (ZOUmX)
Posted by: Soothsayer at September 17, 2012 11:18 AM (jUytm)
"On the other side of the ledger, Republican enthusiasm is at record highs. Righties are champing at the bit to run Prezdint Choombuggy out of office. Check out the trendlines in GOP identification."
I think that was probably during the summer and before the conventions. Really pretty much everyone, except for some people here, are saying this is a loss. Local talk radio(even the most ardent Obama haters are saying this), pundits, and people saying they will vote for a muslim before they will a LDS candidate. Democrats seem like they are starting to energize their base.
Meanwhile, conservatives and GOPers bicker over this and that. Romney needs to be tough, no Romney spoke too soon. Romney was never anyone's first choice. Obama is every left leaner's first choice. Not matter what Romney does, conservatives and liberals will be critical. Waiting for Reagan to show up is a waste of time. And I'm afraid many are waiting for 2016, so that a 'true' conservative will show up. I see Republicans, conservatives, and right-leaning independents staying home for this one.
Sorry, Eeyore showed up at my house today.
Posted by: Deb the downer with Eeyore at September 17, 2012 11:18 AM (V5GcO)
Posted by: pray for peace at September 17, 2012 11:18 AM (oZfic)
Does anyone else feel like we're getting the beating that Ace isn't giving his dick?
I am about 5 minutes away from posting links to busty Japanese girls squeezing through narrow doorframes.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at September 17, 2012 11:19 AM (mJMH5)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at September 17, 2012 03:13 PM (8Hnjw)
----------------------------------------------
Agree. I didn't get kicked off LGF, but I "flounced". As I was commenting one evening I noticed I was surrounded by leftist assholes with Chucky agreeing with all of them. They hated AoSHQ, so naturally I had to check this cite out. I've been here ever since.
Posted by: Soona at September 17, 2012 11:19 AM (cPQjO)
"Coroplast is also great for making cheap R/C planes. There's a whole subculture of R/C enthusiasts that do that."
I would totally make an Obama/Biden RC plane, just so I could crash it into the ground over and over and over and over.
That's probably rayciss.
Posted by: reason at September 17, 2012 11:19 AM (CGjum)
The concern trolls who are really good at what they do.....suck you in....with posts that you can agree with.
They suck you in, then start in with the psy-ops bullshit.
You should be looking at all ofit's posts, before you chastise yourself.
Posted by: wheatie at September 17, 2012 03:17 PM (Z7b/q)
Pretty much dead on. I didn't join in as judging Curious as needing to stuny double for a soccer ball until he/she/it played the "9/11 only happened to NYC" card.
Posted by: Sven10077 at September 17, 2012 11:19 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: Soothsayer at September 17, 2012 11:20 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at September 17, 2012 11:21 AM (8Hnjw)
Posted by: tcn at September 17, 2012 03:18 PM (ZOUmX)
The icing on the "9/11 is only about NYC" cake...
Posted by: Sven10077 at September 17, 2012 11:21 AM (LRFds)
Unlike AoSHQ, which is kinda amusing but nothing to take too terribly seriously. Because you know, we ARE all going to die.
(In "Lord of the Rings," was the sound the orcs made when they were going to get the Balrog to sic him/her/it on Gandalf something like "DOOM...CHOOM...DOOM...CHOOM..."?)
Posted by: filbert at September 17, 2012 11:22 AM (smvTK)
Something in a pusher prop, motor over the wing format -- kinda like a seaplane. That could be bounced over and over on the ground with little actual damage. Multiple "crashes" per flight would be possible.
Posted by: @PurpAv at September 17, 2012 11:23 AM (NWRs2)
Posted by: tcn at September 17, 2012 03:18 PM (ZOUmX)
Many of the things attributed to curious don't actually hold up upon inspection. IMO this is one of them.
Posted by: Mætenloch at September 17, 2012 11:23 AM (pAlYe)
Posted by: filbert
THIS.
Posted by: Hobbitopoly at September 17, 2012 11:23 AM (OFoUo)
I don't really want Ace to kick curious out. She's actually a very good troll. The best that I've seen on AoSHQ. That includes Average Joe who sucks cock by choice.
Posted by: Soona at September 17, 2012 11:23 AM (cPQjO)
Posted by: pray for peace at September 17, 2012 11:23 AM (oZfic)
Gosh, are you auditioning to be Obama's new White House spokesman? The level of honesty is about the same.
I expect this guy (whoever the hell he is, and no, I don't care) is talking about your 2 or 3 dozen panicky ALL IS LOST!!! posts over the past couple of weeks. I got sick of 'em too.
And now you're whining about what this guy said instead of posting something useful in the effort to WIN THE FUCKING ELECTION. You know, something that might be worth your time, but hey, I'm not a big, famous blogger, so what do I know.
Posted by: davidinvirginia at September 17, 2012 11:23 AM (qEkGZ)
"When I get a response I'll let you know what they said. They are usually very quick with a response."
What else have you emailed The Romney Campaign about? What is their general response-time back to you?
Posted by: meowmix at September 17, 2012 11:23 AM (CGjum)
Posted by: AuthorLMendez, Head Of The Projection Desk at September 17, 2012 11:24 AM (yAor6)
Some of it is still sour grapes from the primary (like with the douchebag Erick Erickson who thinks he's some sort of kingmaker), which really is petty at this stage.
The state of the race simply does not warrant these feeling of despair, and it does indeed become a self-fulfilling prophesy. Rasmussen has Romney WINNING and Gallup has it within the margin of error. Incumbent Presidents are in the game until the very end, Carter was leading Reagan a week before the election in 1980.
Posted by: McAdams at September 17, 2012 11:24 AM (0kf1G)
I am not a Palinista, having grown tired of her several months ago.
And you are trying to change the subject. I am NOT saying that Akin should get support. I AM saying that because he was an asshole you wrote a column about how it would cost us the election.
That is all I have to say.
Posted by: Miss Marple at September 17, 2012 11:24 AM (GoIUi)
Do you see that palpable excitement now? That sense of history that you could almost touch? Fainting? World tours? Speeches in stadiums? The media selling Obama (which feels a lot different than defending/covering Obama)? Are Dems excited to be voting for Obama (as opposed to voting against the Repub)? Are indeps / no-info voters excited to be voting for the "first black president!" (tm)?
Let me answer for you: No.
Who's fired up? When the rubber has hit the road (2010, Wisconsin, Chik-fil-A), Repubs/cons have acted. Fired up = turnout (the ONLY thing that matters).
So, buck up, little campers! ace will get back to fapping next month and all will be right in the universe. A little stickier, but a better place.
Posted by: Tonic Dog at September 17, 2012 11:25 AM (X/+QT)
^^^^
See this is why people don't like you. How the hell do you speak with authority on what "people in the other parts of the country" think about?
Really condescending.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at September 17, 2012 11:25 AM (pLTLS)
Which doesn't tell us much.
As in Iowa during the caucuses, where they spent the previous year on voter contact and modeling if they could win, holding back until the data showed at the last minute they could -- they could be making a play.
Or they could be minimizing expenditures as they know they're gone, but want to help down-ticket races. Romney does that as well.
As I said, we have no bloody information (as in reliable data) to really understand where we stand in the race as of Sept 11th.
Posted by: Uriah Heep at September 17, 2012 11:25 AM (Wa+Fw)
Posted by: tcn at September 17, 2012 03:18 PM (ZOUmX)
Exactly my point. Thank you.
I am about 5 minutes away from posting links to busty Japanese girls squeezing through narrow doorframes.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at September 17, 2012 03:19 PM (mJMH5)
No. Please. Not the briar patch.
Posted by: BCochran1981 at September 17, 2012 11:26 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: small town girl at September 17, 2012 11:26 AM (rDgRa)
Posted by: Soothsayer at September 17, 2012 03:20 PM (jUytm)
Nah you're right fuck it let's invite Kos over hell come one come all, we'll use the specially modified by Obama first amendment and use HotAir rules. Moonbats can say whatever they want up to the point of wishing Bush dead and giving links to that doc-u-snuff flick and we'll all sit on our hands to show how manly we are. The GOP got buzzsawed in '08 by an Asymmetric Attack of concern trolls, Mobys, fratricidal fire, and the money bomb from hell.
Let's invote Allahpundit and Frum here to whip up the troops. I worked campaigns in '10 like Ace I am so pissed off I am hesitant this cycle so I have donated like a motherfucker instead. I am political realist enough to know that my wanting to physically knock the heads off of donk bodies this cycle is not what Mitt needs to sell him. Funny that.
Oh Chuck Todd is hyping a D+8 poll on average that says the race is over...let's quit!
Oh CBS has Choom up 5 in a D+13 poll let's quit.
No let's do some goddamned math and look at reality....not buy into the DNC and their media friends slash fics about their boyfriend,.
Posted by: Sven10077 at September 17, 2012 11:27 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: Minuteman at September 17, 2012 11:27 AM (1FOy5)
Really? I'm pretty sure I saw Jane D'Oh confirm this.
Posted by: BCochran1981 at September 17, 2012 11:27 AM (da5Wo)
Really condescending.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at September 17, 2012 03:25 PM (pLTLS)
Why it's almost like it's a parody of Absolutely Fabulous meets Green Acres
Posted by: Sven10077 at September 17, 2012 11:28 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at September 17, 2012 03:22 PM (pLTLS)
Yeah lacey, he came home earlier this month. Not sure how long his leave is though.
Posted by: Tami at September 17, 2012 11:28 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: pray for peace at September 17, 2012 11:28 AM (oZfic)
"Multiple "crashes" per flight would be possible."
Hilarious. This needs to happen in my life.
*neeeeeeeeeeeeerrrrr - boing! - preeeeeewwwwwwrrr - boing! - bnnnneeeeeeeeeerrr - boing!*
Posted by: reason at September 17, 2012 11:28 AM (CGjum)
Waaaay to late for that shit now. I was no Romney fan, still not really, but he's the only one on a ballot has any chance of evicting Obama, which is all I really need to know anymore.
Even if Romney tweeted pics of his junk to interns, I'd still have to vote for him at this point.
Posted by: @PurpAv at September 17, 2012 11:28 AM (NWRs2)
Really? I'm pretty sure I saw Jane D'Oh confirm this.
Posted by: BCochran1981 at September 17, 2012 03:27 PM (da5Wo)
Jane D'oh did confirm it, and you know how I feel and watch like a hawk about military spouses/family members.
Posted by: Sven10077 at September 17, 2012 11:29 AM (LRFds)
Lets cut the shit: you're all a bunch of goddamned RINOs.
What has two thumbs and is the only true conservative on the internet?
d:: THIS guy ::b
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at September 17, 2012 11:30 AM (mJMH5)
Oh CBS has Choom up 5 in a D+13 poll let's quit.
That's not what anybody is saying. Yet, we all must realize that Obama's standing has improved post-convention and Romney's campaign wasn't as quick in responding as they should be.
I've been one of the only Romney supporters here going back to the primaries, so this is hardly bashing, but don't turn a blind eye to the data.
While there's no doubt the movement conservatives suck as providing cover for Romney, there is also no doubt they need to retool and sharpen their messaging. We're in the final stretch, it's needed.
Posted by: Uriah Heep at September 17, 2012 11:31 AM (Wa+Fw)
Posted by: AuthorLMendez, Head Of The Projection Desk at September 17, 2012 11:31 AM (yAor6)
Posted by: Honey Badger at September 17, 2012 11:32 AM (Vdd8W)
When I go visit home I never know if Penn Station will have soldiers with guns or not. It's the reality that we live, it's there, it's real, everyday.
Posted by: pray for peace at September 17, 2012 03:28 PM (oZfic)
Why it's just like you're on the frontlines at FOB Bastion Curious, except it's not. I lived in Aberdeen Maryland and spent a LOT of time in DC metro and DC metro has nothing on any DMZ hitch. You keep looking for ways to make NYC a lot more exceptional than it is. You faced less harm and "angst" than any Military Member or Family member who had to go do business on any installation that had Nuclear/Chem/Bio capability on any part of the base.
Do go on, and we haven't even started in on your grief blanketing jane D'oh when her boy was afoot.
Posted by: Sven10077 at September 17, 2012 11:32 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: AuthorLMendez, Head Of The Projection Desk at September 17, 2012 11:32 AM (yAor6)
Soothsayer,
"Silence means consent".
I try to ignore the bullshit anal leakage that trolls post.
But it makes me want to leave...and not come back.
Which is what they want. Right?
So I enjoy seeing trolls getting roasted.....I enjoy it more than seeing it left there....as though what they're saying is being accepted as 'truth'.
Posted by: wheatie at September 17, 2012 11:32 AM (Z7b/q)
They are there to protect your little libtard ass, you should walk up to them and thank them, see why folks hate you, because you are a typical libtard hating the people that are there to protect your sorry ass why don't you pick another blog we are trying to save our Country on this one!!!!!!
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at September 17, 2012 11:33 AM (8Hnjw)
^^^
I don't know what you presume to think. I suggest you try to do the same for others. That way you don't make sweeping (and incorrect) statements you know *nothing* about. You know what they say those who ASSume...
And thanks, Tami.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at September 17, 2012 11:33 AM (pLTLS)
I think much of the critique is more gay or ghey than gay gay.
Either way, he's a SCoaMF SCoaMF.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at September 17, 2012 11:33 AM (eHIJJ)
Posted by: small town girl at September 17, 2012 03:26 PM (rDgRa)
I think Erick would rather be on Radio and TV full-time than messing with his blog anymore. I bet he sells it off after the election. Maybe that's what the new coat of paint and fresh landscaping is all about.
Posted by: 66chevelle at September 17, 2012 11:33 AM (QjSgY)
Posted by: reason at September 17, 2012 11:34 AM (CGjum)
Really? I'm pretty sure I saw Jane D'Oh confirm this.
Posted by: BCochran1981 at September 17, 2012 03:27 PM (da5Wo)
Jane D'oh did confirm it, and you know how I feel and watch like a hawk about military spouses/family members.
Posted by: Sven10077 at September 17, 2012 03:29 PM (LRFds)
If you go back to the original comments, it wasn't exactly how Jane D'oh remembers it.
Posted by: Mætenloch at September 17, 2012 11:34 AM (pAlYe)
Hilarious. This needs to happen in my life.
http://www.how2rc.com/Images/Polaris-ROW.jpg
I have a friend who has a Polaris seaplane. Its been pounded in numerous times, and being all foam it just bounces most of the time. Worser crashes can be repaired with 5 minute epoxy
Posted by: @PurpAv at September 17, 2012 11:35 AM (NWRs2)
I've been one of the only Romney supporters here going back to the primaries, so this is hardly bashing, but don't turn a blind eye to the data.
While there's no doubt the movement conservatives suck as providing cover for Romney, there is also no doubt they need to retool and sharpen their messaging. We're in the final stretch, it's needed.
Posted by: Uriah Heep at September 17, 2012 03:31 PM (Wa+Fw)
UH Mitt Romney just led Barack Obama over a weekend cycle at Ras who uses a solid non gimmicked baseline. The riots and the inept handling of them and attack on the 1st amendment has hurt Barky Choom with the Indys and probably a portion of his donk coalition. I know let's angst over the fact that King Putt had a convention bounce for 9 weeks.
I'll keep my eye on the ball no matter how hard the M$M tries to wish it away barack Obama smells like Jimmy Carter to a lot of people.
Posted by: Sven10077 at September 17, 2012 11:35 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: Mætenloch at September 17, 2012 03:34 PM (pAlYe)
and if you go over the timeline Curious is hardly the innocent she is portraying Maet the truth is in the middle leans towards jane's recollection IMHO.
Posted by: Sven10077 at September 17, 2012 11:36 AM (LRFds)
Its not even that much, they had to oversample Democrats enormously to get him up by ...3.
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at September 17, 2012 11:37 AM (r4wIV)
Posted by: AuthorLMendez, Head Of The Projection Desk at September 17, 2012 11:37 AM (yAor6)
She'll post something ridiculous and when it's shown to her, she'll absolutely deny she said it. Or she'll claim we ALL read it wrong. All.the.time.
Her schtick is passive aggressive.
It's tedious....
Posted by: Tami at September 17, 2012 11:37 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: pray for peace at September 17, 2012 11:37 AM (oZfic)
Malkin monetized HA and cashed out for some pretty serious coin. Its a reasonable thing to do to ensure a nice retirement.
Posted by: @PurpAv at September 17, 2012 11:37 AM (NWRs2)
Obama got a one week bounce of 2-3 points that Romney didn't, and now it's over. Some polls have us up, some down, but it's still a race. Telling people it's over means they don't donate, don't volunteer, and don't show up on Election Day.
Gallup is supposed to change it's polling from registered voters to likely voter in a couple weeks. That alone will give several points to Romney.
Elections tend to shift hard in the closing days according to the events on the ground. People are not going to be getting in line to vote for 4 more years of this, no matter what they tell pollsters.
Posted by: McAdams at September 17, 2012 11:38 AM (0kf1G)
Posted by: Mætenloch at September 17, 2012 03:34 PM (pAlYe)
We now have somebody who says they were there and saw it go down.
Posted by: AuthorLMendez, Head Of The Projection Desk at September 17, 2012 03:31 PM (yAor6)
Look, I wasn't there, I didn't see it. But a lot of people on this site seem to have serious hatred towards ozfic and they're all tellin the same story. Soooo....
Posted by: BCochran1981 at September 17, 2012 11:39 AM (da5Wo)
It is what RCP USED to be.
Posted by: Sven10077 at September 17, 2012 11:39 AM (LRFds)
YOu know very well I am not a libtard.
and they don't talk to the public. They are very serious. Me and my friends have tried to shamelessly flirt with them and they let you know they are on duty, which makes you want to flirt with them more but you respect their wishes. And one of my guy friends tried flirting with a female soldier and he got shut down too.
Posted by: pray for peace at September 17, 2012 03:37 PM (oZfic)
It's a combination of "taste" and about 146 hours per 4 years of "sexual harassment seminars".
They are doing a job stud.
Posted by: Sven10077 at September 17, 2012 11:41 AM (LRFds)
"Me and my friends have tried to shamelessly flirt with them and they let you know they are on duty, "
They're being polite and staying clear of complaints / lawsuits, which would likely follow them speaking their true feelings about tubby disheveled cat-ladies trying to put some smooves on...
Posted by: you can ooba at September 17, 2012 11:43 AM (CGjum)
Posted by: Sven10077 at September 17, 2012 03:36 PM (LRFds)
I'm not saying curious is entirely innocent. But in that specific instance Jane was not either and curious didn't do what she's been accused by many of doing.
I hate defending a probably concern troll but I also hate bullying and believe in being honest about what *actually* happened.
Posted by: Mætenloch at September 17, 2012 11:43 AM (pAlYe)
Posted by: Sven10077 at September 17, 2012 11:44 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: PillBuzz at September 17, 2012 11:45 AM (4jACm)
"Me and my friends have tried to shamelessly flirt with them and they let you know they are on duty, "
No one else in the world understands the seriousness of this and how it impacts your daily life, every day, on a daily basis...
Posted by: nyne lives at September 17, 2012 11:46 AM (CGjum)
I'm not saying curious is entirely innocent. But in that specific instance Jane was not either and curious didn't do what she's been accused by many of doing.
I hate defending a probably concern troll but I also hate bullying and believe in being honest about what *actually* happened.
Posted by: Mætenloch at September 17, 2012 03:43 PM (pAlYe)
I'm nobody Maet and I go away for long periods of time but Curious has a history with MPFS that I have seen and a few others. I don't hate Curious in the way you see me go nuts at gerg and whoever the hell this Axeltoon who sneaks in when Gerg is afoot is. A lot of people consider people I interact with trolls like Mirror Universe Mitt Romney, but curious is the one passive-aggressive concern troll I am angered by instead of amused by and there are reasons.
Posted by: Sven10077 at September 17, 2012 11:47 AM (LRFds)
I hate defending a probably concern troll but I also hate bullying and believe in being honest about what *actually* happened.
Posted by: Mætenloch at September 17, 2012 03:43 PM (pAlYe)
So honesty, like pointing out that the troll did insult her with a line about how it must suck for her son to have her for a mother.
Posted by: buzzion at September 17, 2012 11:47 AM (GULKT)
Why did you deliberately take that the wrong way?
YOu know very well I am not a libtard.
and they don't talk to the public. They are very serious. Me and my friends have tried to shamelessly flirt with them and they let you know they are on duty, which makes you want to flirt with them more but you respect their wishes. And one of my guy friends tried flirting with a female soldier and he got shut down too.
Posted by: pray for peace at September 17, 2012 03:37 PM Posted by: pray for peace at September 17, 2012 03:37 PM (oZfic)
----------
Dear God, give me strength.
*takes deep breath*
So..."flirting"....is the same as thanking them for their service?
'Flirting'?
Are you fucking kidding me?
Flirting with them, while they are on duty....you equate that with "thanks" ?
That is exactly how libtards think.
That is what the bitches on "Sex in the City" did...as their 'tribute' to the troops after 9/11.
Fuck you, (oZfic)....whatever your name du jour might be.
Flirting with troops that are on duty is something that a libtard would do....in order to get them in trouble.
Idiot.
Posted by: wheatie at September 17, 2012 11:48 AM (Z7b/q)
Posted by: Y-not is back at September 17, 2012 11:51 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: kbdabear at September 17, 2012 11:52 AM (wwsoB)
That is what the bitches on "Sex in the City" did...as their 'tribute' to the troops after 9/11.
Fuck you, (oZfic)....whatever your name du jour might be.
Flirting with troops that are on duty is something that a libtard would do....in order to get them in trouble.
Idiot.
Posted by: wheatie at September 17, 2012 03:48 PM (Z7b/q)
or you can put it that way....
it's funny given how anxiety driven and enraged the entire force and their spouse and family members' lives are over the danger and separation, but hey let's be sure to try to get the troops article 15'd or at a minimum couseled for trying to play "MTV's Real World" while poor GI joe or Jane is trying to scan 15,000 people a shift hard....
"we're in this together"
Posted by: Sven10077 at September 17, 2012 11:52 AM (LRFds)
New hotness: Ace IS Kevin DuJuan.
(Latest post up on HillBuzz right now is . . . wait for it . . . "The Hope and the Change Movie is Coming to TV.")
Posted by: filbert at September 17, 2012 11:52 AM (smvTK)
People in other parts of the country had forgotten it because it didn't directly impact them like it did new yorkers and dc'ers....
And you'd be arrogantly wrong about that.
Posted by: Unclefacts, now with even more summoning power. at September 17, 2012 11:53 AM (6IReR)
Posted by: grease monkey at September 17, 2012 11:53 AM (VSWPU)
Posted by: toby928© at September 17, 2012 11:54 AM (QupBk)
1) I have no trouble believing he likes to play hooky see Intel briefing attendence.
2) I have little trouble believing he'd get off watching a show about a Manchurian candidate soldier undermining the US.
Posted by: Sven10077 at September 17, 2012 11:55 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: toby928© at September 17, 2012 11:56 AM (QupBk)
Not one.
Posted by: toby928© at September 17, 2012 03:54 PM (QupBk)
Alex the Chick might in the same sense that I'll miss Gerg when we win.
Posted by: Sven10077 at September 17, 2012 11:56 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: AuthorLMendez, Head Of The Projection Desk at September 17, 2012 11:56 AM (yAor6)
Posted by: Sven10077 at September 17, 2012 11:57 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: AuthorLMendez, Head Of The Projection Desk at September 17, 2012 03:56 PM (yAor6)
She was either hard at work marching, or the OW$ goons were more recpetive to "appreciation".
Posted by: Sven10077 at September 17, 2012 11:58 AM (LRFds)
There are eeyores out there, even on our side. I have known this and generally ignore it and don't read it. Ace, not saying you are one of them. But I don't think now is the time to start attacking each other like a bunch of lawyers fighting over the spoil. Let's attack everything Obama-like. Join forces and get the truth out to others. This is war, y'all. We are not North freaking Korea.
Let's attack the mainstream media and circle the wagons.
TODAY, people, minutes ago, the viral video going around showing Ambassador's body being dragged around while people yell in Arabic: 1) Some show it as the utter disregard of how his body was treated, with allah snackbar shouted and raised fists. 2) Just now, on Yahoo, on a meme from the WH no doubt... this same video is portrayed as the Libyans shouting with joy that he is alive! allah snackbar!
Now, I don't speak Arabic. I was not there, but a human body was dragged around without respect. I have read the rumors he was treated horribly, as that is what the savages do. I don't know, and out of respect for the family I won't repeat rumors. But I believe these rumors more than I do that he was treated with respect and missing for hours then someone brought his corpse to a hospital five hours later.
The media is totally on the dole of the Obama campaign. You know that and I know that. If nothing else, the past five days proved that, big time with the denial of the WH that they were warned of problems on NINE ELEVEN and ignored them, as a stupid youtube has caused the melt down in the Middle East.
TODAY, also, a Libyan guard has been interviewed that there were no protests, that there was not even "an ant" protesting it was so quiet, then 125 murdering savages attacked as one from three different directions. He pretended to be a gardener and got treatment for his wounds. He said rocket-propelled grenades and other weaponry were used.I believe this story.
So: which story to believe on both accounts? Lovely, gently life-giving Libyans, respectfully dragging an American Ambassador through the building, bumping his body through the door...dragged by one guy under the armpits, while being photographed with cell phones, and not by several men lifting him,trying to spare injury? Or, instead, what your and my eyes show: savages happy he is barely alive and victory. allah snackbar
The other story, of the "demonstrations" due to the video--the MSM message. This vs a consulate Libyan guard who said, as the heads of Libya state, this was a coordinated mission after warnings to the Americans.
Which stories do you believe? And if you believe that the MSM is lying like a rug, then don't you think we need to join forces and fight this and not fight within our ranks? Our ranks include everyone and anyone who wants to see Obama defeated in November. Hillbuzz, Hot Air, whoever. Let's roll.
Posted by: ChristyBlinky, unbanned, ready to get this done at September 17, 2012 12:08 PM (baL2B)
One of the insidious things that libtard trolls do....is to try to get conservatives to fight each other.
Posting irritating little things, over and over...week after week....interspersed with conservative-sounding things to garner support....
This is the way to do that.
This is what (oZfic)...does.
It tries to act pitiful, whenever people attack 'her'.
That's part of it.
That gains h/s/it some sympathy...from people who are not paying attention.
Conservatives generally don't like to see someone being 'bullied', right?
That is the insidiousness of this particular person.
Posted by: wheatie at September 17, 2012 12:10 PM (Z7b/q)
Posted by: @PurpAv at September 17, 2012 03:37 PM (NWRs2)
That's what I was thinking, he's following MM's business model. Most of the regulars seem to know that he's just phoning it in now. He probably told them not to scuff the new floors or smudge the paint so he can flip that blog.
Posted by: 66chevelle at September 17, 2012 12:11 PM (QjSgY)
Posted by: Baldy at September 17, 2012 12:13 PM (opS9C)
Posted by: pray for peace at September 17, 2012 12:15 PM (oZfic)
But is it wrong to point out the severly tilted sampling bias in some of these polls?
The biggest doom-bringer of them all, the NBC Poll that had Obama +7 in Ohio was a 38-28, Democrat to Republican skew. NEVER IN THE HISTORY OF THE STATE HAS THERE BEEN A TURNOUT SKEWED THAT MUCH IN FAVOR OF DEMOCRATS. Is it not a good thing to point this out, or am I being to "rah-rah?"
Posted by: Rich at September 17, 2012 12:16 PM (TOgQZ)
Romney: 47%
Obama: 45%
--and this is on a Monday, with all three, pro-Democrat weekend days in the poll.
Obama's post-convention bump is totally gone, but Romney's is not.
Remember, Romney trailed the President by two before the Republican convention in Tampa. After the convention, he was up by about 3 points. The Dem convention netted Obama a bounce of no more than 1 point, and probably less because we are looking at only weekend days here.
Takeaway: The Republicans won the convention battle.
Posted by: edj at September 17, 2012 12:20 PM (+QKfp)
I don't mind hearing bad news based on independent analysis: e.g. yours or Ben Stein's.
What grates, what hurts? Posts that take "bad news" from media-based polls and act as if it forms some kind of objective data set. The media-based polls, including those from Fox News, are shot through with subjective assumptions. Why act as if they reflect some kind of "reality" that we have to deal with?
Media-based polls (MBPs) reflect reality like a funhouse mirror, only it is a funhouse mirror that always makes Obama look tall and slim and that always makes Romney look short and fat.
The only results from MBPs worth paying attention to are when they show a positive result for Romney. Why? It is an admission against interest, as when a defendant in a murder trial says he did hate the dead man with a passion. Everything else the defendant says could be a lie, but his incriminating statements are probably true.
Likewise, anything the MBPs say in Romney's favor is probably true, because it is an admission against their self interests--seeing Obama re-elected.
Posted by: edj at September 17, 2012 12:38 PM (+QKfp)
Posted by: Firing the Foreign Policy President in November at September 17, 2012 01:17 PM (4Y9BO)
No thanks.
Posted by: Dan at September 17, 2012 01:32 PM (kfRJh)
"I think Hillbuzz' complain is valid, certainly for Eric Erickson, and some of the stuff AP posts. There is a fine line between lying to ourselves about the polls, telling ourselves that it's the Bradley Effect and then getting beat like in 2008. On the other side is going too Eeyore, taking polls that are spun and letting them get us into a funk.
Posted by: Hope You're Right at September 17, 2012 02:16 PM (lHTEq)
I agree. And, as Wyatt's Torch pointed out it doesn't hurt to tear yourself away from the computer for a few hours and do some phone-calling and canvassing down at the local Romney-Ryan HQ. Yeah, sometimes you get moonbats yelling at you (or, since I'm in a swing state, maybe they're just people sick to death of being nagged by pollsters and campaign people). It's still doing something constructive.
And I generally like HillBuzz. Kevin's DNC convention posts were very funny. Yeah, the guy was for Hill in 2008 - he now says he wouldn't vote for her if she were running. I'm a former liberal myself, so my tendency is to welcome the converted, not to spit bullets at them because they didn't emerge conservative from the womb.
Posted by: Donna V. at September 17, 2012 01:39 PM (xEumh)
But it doesn't really matter -- what matters is what we do to defeat Obama. And for me, recently it has been independents or conservatives who don't want to vote -- don't think it matters --these guys I spend a lot of time with focusing the chat on the country. Does my artist friend who currently paints seascapes like the By looking out over the ocean? Or Obama walking on the water or parting the sea? Does my sculptor friend want someone to tell her how many, what kind, where and when she can make and sell her work? And as for the others who want to endlessly analyze, add up, nit pick etc. I simply present the choice -- America or....?
If Mitt Romney is not doing enough of what "we" want him to do then I guess we are all going to have to pick up the slack, one by one, in our own way to save this country.
If not we better get used to the idea of the midnight knock on the door.
Posted by: gracepmc at September 17, 2012 01:40 PM (rznx3)
Posted by: twoslaps at September 17, 2012 01:50 PM (rAV7y)
Posted by: pray for peace at September 17, 2012 03:27 PM (oZfic)
Posted by: johnc_ex-democrat at September 17, 2012 04:18 PM (ACkhT)
Posted by: Mitt Romney at September 17, 2012 06:02 PM (wp98n)
Posted by: halodoc at September 17, 2012 06:23 PM (Fzbp3)
He's very valuable in his information about the inner workings of the Chicago machine, and as a former member of the Hellary campaign, he's got their number as well.
He also has the skinny on Rahm and Hussein's man-love activities.
Posted by: beverly at September 17, 2012 11:07 PM (qwRKa)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3792 seconds, 617 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Erik Erikson is a dumbass.
Posted by: runningrn at September 17, 2012 10:00 AM (WGmy2)