May 30, 2012
— Ace Walker released some job figures early, leading to claims they were fake.
Nope.
Real.
Posted by: Ace at
02:30 PM
| Comments (45)
Post contains 28 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: pep at May 30, 2012 02:32 PM (6TB1Z)
The "clear" text in the link says it should go to a Dancing With the Stars article.
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at May 30, 2012 02:32 PM (bjRNS)
Posted by: tcn at May 30, 2012 02:32 PM (WhSRj)
Posted by: Dan Rather at May 30, 2012 02:32 PM (96M6e)
Posted by: Alex at May 30, 2012 02:33 PM (tGh6R)
Crap, that was supposed to be posted in the other thread.
Go back to that other thread and take your RINO droppings with you.
Posted by: fluffy at May 30, 2012 02:35 PM (4pSIn)
7 What's the opposite of "fake but accurate"? "True but misleading" BHO in 3 words: Crushed our Hope Spent our Change Has no Clue
Posted by: I'm the Honey Badger, BITCH! at May 30, 2012 02:36 PM (nyxv/)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at May 30, 2012 02:38 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD 2012 at May 30, 2012 02:39 PM (Gk3SS)
Posted by: gweggie [/i] [/b] at May 30, 2012 02:40 PM (akXk+)
Fox just showed Pelosi in an interview.....she's gone Full Hillary with the flat, greasy hair.
Sorry. Carry on.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at May 30, 2012 02:41 PM (UOM48)
Note that the reporting isn't "Federal Officials have confirmed that the Wisconsin Employment figures, published early by the Walker Administration..." but, rather, that "Gov. Scott Walker's administration says the job-growth numbers he made public earlier than normal have been verified by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics."
See, it's still just what Walker says- and he could be lying.
*sigh* And I bet they wouldn't even see the difference if I pointed it out to them.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at May 30, 2012 02:41 PM (8y9MW)
BTW, their spokesman today said that it looked like the guy that cooked the books on jobs was also the same guy who did the Marquette poll. Then I saw where he was tweeting prayers to the patron saint of workers. I almost feel a little sorry for him. I think he's coming seriously undone.
Posted by: mama winger at May 30, 2012 02:43 PM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: Darth Chipmunk at May 30, 2012 02:43 PM (0tRzD)
Why not both? I mean, you do have (as Day-by-Day once pointed out) two convex surfaces instead of just one.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at May 30, 2012 02:44 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Princes Milksacagawea at May 30, 2012 02:45 PM (c3mby)
Those figures are as real and spectacular as my breasts during the bar exam.
Judging by your pin-up shot, you need to be pregnant just to find your sweater puppies.
Posted by: fluffy at May 30, 2012 02:47 PM (4pSIn)
MoveOn,a giant in the progressive political world and an early endorserof Barack Obama in 2008, warns that it might have to “pull the plug” on key campaigns to help Obama and Senate Democrats if its five million members don’t pony up with at least $5.
Without a rush of new cash, MoveOn says it will have to give up efforts to elect Elizabeth Warren in Massachusetts, help the recall fight against Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, and energize younger voters whoÂ’ve soured on Washington.
“It's like picking which of your kids you love the most. I just can't do it,” said MoveOn in an email plea. “If we can’t increase our budget, we might have to dramatically scale back or pull the plug on some of MoveOn’s most important election efforts this year.”
Posted by: Jane D'oh at May 30, 2012 02:48 PM (UOM48)
Oh my. From the WA Examiner:
But then won't Soros just pour more money into that? Do you suppose Soros is losing his confidence in the JEF?
Posted by: Infidel at May 30, 2012 02:51 PM (O/fK8)
Posted by: Dick Nixon at May 30, 2012 02:51 PM (T6Ass)
Posted by: joeindc44 says choom on fuckers at May 30, 2012 02:51 PM (QxSug)
See, it's still just what Walker says- and he could be lying.
*sigh* And I bet they wouldn't even see the difference if I pointed it out to them.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at May 30, 2012 06:41 PM (8y9MW)
Yes but it's significant that they are pathetically trying to shape a story that will be another nail in Barrett's coffin.
Posted by: ErikW at May 30, 2012 02:51 PM (cUtzi)
OMFG WASH YOUR DAMN HAIR. WASH. IT. ARRRGGGGHHHH.
Ahem. I have A Thing about this whole not washing your hair. There's no freaking excuse for it. I don't want to hear about how it's better for your hair not to wash it so much blah blah blah. Wash your damn hair.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD 2012 at May 30, 2012 02:52 PM (Gk3SS)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at May 30, 2012 02:52 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: mama winger at May 30, 2012 02:53 PM (P6QsQ)
Is she wearing a Blofeld suit?
Posted by: Waterhouse at May 30, 2012 02:56 PM (QxL+K)
said MoveOn in an email plea. “If we can’t increase our budget, we
might have to dramatically scale back or pull the plug on some of
MoveOn’s most important election efforts this year.”
That means some of them are inconvenient and obviously must be eliminated. That's what you do with unwanted children, isn't it George?
Posted by: dagny at May 30, 2012 02:57 PM (9ybEY)
Heh, I read that MoveOn article. It didn't say one thing about the 2010 midterms.
I wonder why?
The left's tears will be ambrosia, their cries as birdsong, and they shall rend their garments in grief.
And I shall dip deeply, just as soon as the pudding reaches room temperature.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at May 30, 2012 02:59 PM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: joeindc44 says choom on fuckers at May 30, 2012 02:59 PM (QxSug)
Posted by: t-bird at May 30, 2012 02:59 PM (FcR7P)
Posted by: Andy at May 30, 2012 03:05 PM (7ijfS)
Posted by: steevy at May 30, 2012 03:12 PM (7W3wI)
Posted by: steveegg at May 30, 2012 04:01 PM (o44nj)
Posted by: steveha at May 30, 2012 04:04 PM (TMG3G)
Posted by: Purp (@PurpAv) at May 30, 2012 06:11 PM (kmwef)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.1993 seconds, 173 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at May 30, 2012 02:31 PM (bjRNS)