January 24, 2012
— Ace This isn't an attack on Newt; don't take it that way. I am making no point about Newt here; of course the media will do this to any Republican.
The publication date of this issue was December 19, 1994, one month after the Republican Revolution gave the GOP the majority in Congress, but weeks before they'd actually take the gavel.

But they want you to know they're nonbiased, nonpartisan. They just call pitches and strikes like an umpire without fear or favoritism.
Peter Jennings talked about the American public having thrown a "temper tantrum."
And the liberal media? Any temper-tantrum of their own, perhaps?

Yeah you're doin' just fine, MFM.
I got this from Geraghty, whose article is, in fact, anti-Newt, in as much as it discusses something his supporters don't want to discuss, his high negatives.
Posted by: Ace at
12:27 PM
| Comments (174)
Post contains 139 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 24, 2012 12:33 PM (8y9MW)
I recall another headline for a newsmag feature along those same lines: "The Gingrinch Who Stole Christmas". Maybe they added a question mark, to be safe.
Posted by: Jim Oberg at January 24, 2012 12:33 PM (x1cuw)
Posted by: Chilling the most for perry at January 24, 2012 12:34 PM (6IV8T)
Well, of course his supporters don't want to discuss his negatives- they're his negatives.
On the flip side, Mitt supporters seem oddly recalcitrant when the subject of Mitt's conservative accomplishments comes up.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 24, 2012 12:34 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: mike at January 24, 2012 12:35 PM (RRSlp)
Bah! They're mostly peaceful demonstrations, after all.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 24, 2012 12:35 PM (8y9MW)
I'm protesting the SCOAMF, where's my magazine cover?
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at January 24, 2012 12:36 PM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: Comrade Arthur at January 24, 2012 12:36 PM (goitd)
The problem with Time is you can't wrap a fish in it and you can't wipe your ass with it.
Too glossy.
Posted by: garrett at January 24, 2012 12:36 PM (fYKvZ)
Posted by: ABO at January 24, 2012 12:37 PM (MbeEN)
Posted by: Jim Oberg at January 24, 2012 04:33 PM (x1cuw)
Pretty sure that was Time too. Or maybe Newsweek. But that was definitely a cover, and, like this one, was published before the GOP Congress even took over.
Posted by: fiatboomer at January 24, 2012 12:37 PM (Zmgiu)
If I thought Newt really were Uncle Scrooge, I might be inclined to overlook his complete lack of reliability, utter lack of executive experience, entire unsuitability to be an actual leader of anything, and checkered history of erratic big government conservatism.
Unfortunately, the only big ideas I've heard from Newt lately have been big government ideas. "Private" investment accounts with government-guaranteed returns, Medicare Part D, government-sponsored guest worker immigration, amnesties.
I would *vote* for Uncle Scrooge.
Posted by: Emperor of Obama at January 24, 2012 12:37 PM (epBek)
Protester? It looks like a fucking terrorist!
I hope he / she isn't on my flight, that's for sure.
Posted by: Juan Williams at January 24, 2012 12:38 PM (fYKvZ)
I remember it was the age of the Angry White Man, whose desire to lash out at others for his own failures led him to reject the Utopia promised by Clinton & Co.
It even had a theme movie: Falling Down.
Posted by: Michael Rittenhouse at January 24, 2012 12:38 PM (UBWiI)
Posted by: Dick Nixon at January 24, 2012 12:39 PM (kaOJx)
Hey, that 'they' is me and mine- and I certainly won't be voting for the SCOAMT.
And if you think areas like California and Illinois will be hit hard, wait until you see what a 2nd Term Obama will do to States which oppose him- like my own Texas.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 24, 2012 12:39 PM (8y9MW)
Democracy is only good when you vote for the correct people.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at January 24, 2012 12:39 PM (ZKzrr)
One for the legal seagulls.
Can the government compel you to give them your password to your encrypted computer? Why of course they can if they already know what's on it.
http://tinyurl.com/7y8sgtr
Posted by: Nash Rambler at January 24, 2012 12:39 PM (oxgwp)
Its a lot easier to decrease favorables than it is to increase them.
Especially if you've been in the public eye for a long time.
Basically increasing your favorables is impossible unless you get some kind of telegenic illness or else get the country into a war or natural disaster.
Posted by: Emperor of Obama at January 24, 2012 12:40 PM (epBek)
Posted by: Mitt Still Sux at January 24, 2012 12:41 PM (a59l9)
Romney's negatives are just as high. He went up something like 15 points in the last month.
I should find you the link, ace.
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at January 24, 2012 12:41 PM (bjRNS)
Posted by: Wm. Howard Taft at January 24, 2012 12:41 PM (sJKFk)
About the time of this cover, the AP Wirephoto of the Year was a shot of Newt having lunch with some staffers
The photo was shot in full fat-belly profile, Newt standing and shoveling a slice of pizza into his fat face. This, thinks the AP, is worthy of Photo of the Year.
That's when it occured to me that the game was rigged. Hey, I was a kid.
Posted by: spongeworthy at January 24, 2012 12:42 PM (puy4B)
Posted by: mike at January 24, 2012 04:35 PM (RRSlp)
If it walks like a duck...
Posted by: ErikW at January 24, 2012 12:42 PM (98qlF)
Right, Meicz.
Both Romney and Gingrich currently have higher unfavorables than Obama.
Heckuva a job, GOP.
Posted by: Emperor of Obama at January 24, 2012 12:42 PM (epBek)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 24, 2012 12:43 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Ranty McNewGuy at January 24, 2012 12:43 PM (ZPrif)
As long as they've got a warrant, this seems reasonable. The idea is that the password is the key, and you're required to unlock a locked container if they've got a warrant.
The unreasonable part, for me, is that some jurisdictions will scan your phone at traffic stops with no warrant. I wait for SCOTUS to hear a related case and slap that one down, too.
But until then ... don't leave it on your phone.
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at January 24, 2012 12:43 PM (bjRNS)
Posted by: tasker at January 24, 2012 12:43 PM (r2PLg)
So one of Barack's BIG guests tonight is the secretary who works for Warren Buffet. She will be there to express how she pays higher taxes than her boss. Funny though, Buffet will still pay smaller taxes than those making more than 250K.
Posted by: whatever at January 24, 2012 12:44 PM (O7ksG)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at January 24, 2012 12:44 PM (UwYXB)
Really- who the F is this guy?
And can Mu.Nu be configured automatically to reject whatever proxy he's on?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 24, 2012 12:44 PM (8y9MW)
I'll be reading the liveblogging, not watching the speech. Far more entertaining and enlightening
Posted by: kbdabear at January 24, 2012 12:44 PM (Y+DPZ)
Not surprising, really. It's still primary season, and Obama's unopposed in his.
If our candidates are any good, they'll drive his higher during the general.
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at January 24, 2012 12:44 PM (bjRNS)
Posted by: ABO at January 24, 2012 12:44 PM (MbeEN)
Posted by: The Robot Devil at January 24, 2012 12:45 PM (84oau)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 24, 2012 04:43 PM (8y9MW)
No lie, Peking Duck is one of the most succulent dishes I've ever enjoyed.
Protesters are probably gamey and smell like piss.
Posted by: ErikW at January 24, 2012 12:45 PM (98qlF)
Posted by: © Sponge at January 24, 2012 12:45 PM (UK9cE)
That's when it occured to me that the game was rigged. Hey, I was a kid.
Posted by: spongeworthy at January 24, 2012 04:42 PM (puy4B)
There was also one (by some newsmag) of Newt chugging a 22oz can of Foster's. In black & white so it could be considered more artistic, of course.
Posted by: fiatboomer at January 24, 2012 12:45 PM (Zmgiu)
Posted by: joncelli, too stressed by half at January 24, 2012 12:46 PM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Time Magazine at January 24, 2012 12:46 PM (ggRof)
Posted by: Chilling the most for perry at January 24, 2012 04:34 PM (6IV8T)
I don't know anyone that isn't voting for Mitt --
unless they're voting for Obama!
Posted by: Hrothgar RNC Establishment Shill at January 24, 2012 12:46 PM (i3+c5)
Posted by: kbdabear at January 24, 2012 04:44 PM (Y+DPZ)
I'm going with a longshot and think that "corporate jet owners" is going to make a reappearance tonight. I don't think Barky can resist it when he's talking class warfare. He doesn't know all that many phrases, to begin with.
Posted by: really ... at January 24, 2012 12:46 PM (X3lox)
Like an individual mandate and an unwillingness to repeal ObamaCare.
Check.
You know the difference between Newt's support of an individual mandate, and Romney's? Newt has at least proven willing to abandon his support of it. Also, Newt never implemented one in the first place.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 24, 2012 12:46 PM (8y9MW)
AH yes - The Old Republicans are heartless mantra. The left never tire of that one. Meanwhile, the nation is swirling down the toilet, unemployment is at record highs, people are homeless in record numbers and the media still sucks the cock of Obama, the corruptocrats and their various cronies. Hell, the media is part of that corrupt crony system.
Posted by: whatever at January 24, 2012 12:47 PM (O7ksG)
Posted by: jeannebodine at January 24, 2012 12:47 PM (byR8d)
Obama Puppetmaster Warren Buffett Biggest Winner From Keystone Pipeline Rejection
http://tinyurl.com/76vmbu9
Burlington Northern carries about 25 percent of the oil from the Bakken, said Krista York-Wooley, the railroad spokeswoman. The company can carry higher volumes from North Dakota or Alberta, she said.
Posted by: kbdabear at January 24, 2012 12:48 PM (Y+DPZ)
My wife, brilliant as she is, doesn't follow politics and is disgusted that I do. Voted for Toonces last time, knows she goofed.
Will not vote for Gingrich. Thinks Romney is a tool, a tough sell there. I hope she stays home.
Posted by: spongeworthy at January 24, 2012 12:48 PM (puy4B)
Look for "Moment of Crisis," "Critical Moment," and "Fair Shake."
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 24, 2012 12:48 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Yes, I'm voting for my left nut at January 24, 2012 12:48 PM (F6KtL)
Like an individual mandate and an unwillingness to repeal ObamaCare.
Check.
You know the difference between Newt's support of an individual mandate, and Romney's? Newt has at least proven willing to abandon his support of it. Also, Newt never implemented one in the first place.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 24, 2012 04:46 PM (8y9MW)
You're right about that... damn and blast I don't have a rebut...
Posted by: The Robot Devil at January 24, 2012 12:48 PM (84oau)
You have noticed that Bloomberg has scrubbed the article from its site, too, right?
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at January 24, 2012 12:49 PM (bjRNS)
Posted by: tasker at January 24, 2012 12:50 PM (r2PLg)
I'd like the Warren Buffet Specific tax hike. It's a tax hike made just for him. Get your check book out, you creepy old buzzard.
No - For Obama, Warren's faux agreement to "yeah raise my taxes" is a big joke. Reality - Obama wants to start with small businesses first. That way Warren can take over those businesses and take even more of the corruptocrat pie.
Posted by: whatever at January 24, 2012 12:50 PM (O7ksG)
I'm sorry, but I just can't throw my support to Mittens. He has never made a Conservative case for himself; he's spent all his time trying to say (in essence) "Well this other guy is flawed, too!"
To which I respond, "Yes, he is. He may even have more flaws than you, gross. But, net, he's got far fewer, because he's at least succeeded at some conservative things."
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 24, 2012 12:51 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Ranty McNewGuy at January 24, 2012 12:51 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: kbdabear at January 24, 2012 04:44 PM (Y+DPZ)
I'm going with a longshot and think that "corporate jet owners" is going to make a reappearance tonight. I don't think Barky can resist it when he's talking class warfare. He doesn't know all that many phrases, to begin with.
Posted by: really ... at January 24, 2012 04:46 PM
Let me guess at a few;
Reviving the Middle Class
Bringing Manufacturing Jobs Back to America
Millionaires can afford to pay just a little more
Bringing back the dream of home ownership
Wall Street Banks
Democracy in Arab nations
I killed Osama Bin Laden
Posted by: kbdabear at January 24, 2012 12:51 PM (Y+DPZ)
You have noticed that Bloomberg has scrubbed the article from its site, too, right?
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at January 24, 2012 04:49 PM (bjRNS)
Thats ok we have the interwebs and those crazy wingers on our side.
Posted by: dananjcon at January 24, 2012 12:52 PM (8ieXv)
Posted by: mike at January 24, 2012 12:53 PM (RRSlp)
>>>Like an individual mandate and an unwillingness to repeal ObamaCare.
You just made that up. Romney has said again and again, waivers Day One and will sign repeal when it hits his desk. Go ahead, say you don't believe him--that would be a fact. Saying he's "unwilling" to repeal ObamaCare is just you making shit up.
Why is this primary turning us all into people who argue like Lefties, all bullshit and emotions. No respect for accuracy. Is there no longer a border between facts and feelings?
Posted by: spongeworthy at January 24, 2012 12:53 PM (puy4B)
Romney's negatives are just as high. He went up something like 15 points in the last month.
I should find you the link, ace.
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at January 24, 2012 04:41 PM (bjRNS)
Or you could just scroll down to the post he wrote about Romney's unfavorables dropping down close to Newt's. He's aware.
Posted by: buzzion at January 24, 2012 12:54 PM (GULKT)
Posted by: Shiggz Newt Warp 9.9 at January 24, 2012 12:54 PM (RfvTE)
You have noticed that Bloomberg has scrubbed the article from its site, too, right?
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at January 24, 2012 04:49 PM
If CNBC, Bloomberg, and Financial Times actually did their jobs instead of shilling for Crony Socialism, I wouldn't have to get financial analysis from a Ron Paul fanboy site that also cheers on OWS
Posted by: kbdabear at January 24, 2012 12:54 PM (Y+DPZ)
Warren pays, along with 95% of all rich people, Capital Gains taxes. NOT INCOME TAX. They don't have a salary, most of the time.
You can't compare my tax rate against their return on investments.
IT IS A LIE......fucking media suckbags.
Posted by: © Sponge at January 24, 2012 12:55 PM (UK9cE)
Posted by: mike at January 24, 2012 12:57 PM (RRSlp)
Why is this primary turning us all into people who argue like Lefties, all bullshit and emotions. No respect for accuracy. Is there no longer a border between facts and feelings?
Posted by: spongeworthy at January 24, 2012 04:53 PM (puy4B)
Spongeworthy, do you realize that in addition to fluoridating water, why, there are studies underway to fluoridate salt, flour, fruit juices, soup, sugar, milk... ice cream. Ice cream, children's ice cream.
Posted by: General Jack D. Ripper at January 24, 2012 12:57 PM (84oau)
Americans For Tax Reform is offering a variety of Bingo cards for tonight's Date Night entertainment.
http://tinyurl.com/7vrv8rh
Posted by: Nash Rambler at January 24, 2012 12:57 PM (oxgwp)
Why is this primary turning us all into people who argue like Lefties, all bullshit and emotions. No respect for accuracy. Is there no longer a border between facts and feelings?
Posted by: spongeworthy at January 24, 2012 04:53 PM (puy4B)
I think that waivers are completely different than repealing the piece of shit........I'm just saying.
He created it....he likes it. I'll vote for who says they'll repeal it and use the paper it's written on to heat homes in the north east.
Posted by: © Sponge at January 24, 2012 12:57 PM (UK9cE)
Really- who the F is this guy?
And can Mu.Nu be configured automatically to reject whatever proxy he's on?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 24, 2012 04:44 PM (8y9MW)
Yeah. He reminds me of the two fuckwits that got on the Perry thread yesterday......right before everything went to shit.
Posted by: Soona at January 24, 2012 12:57 PM (mmKMz)
Posted by: mike at January 24, 2012 12:57 PM (RRSlp)
Anyone Ever see a snotty unprofessional cover or TIME or Newsweek depicting any democrat or democrat related cause in a nasty light?
Posted by: whatever at January 24, 2012 12:58 PM (O7ksG)
I get his unwillingness to repeal ObamaCare from the fact that one of his top advisers is already saying it "can't" be done. You don't talk like that (during the primary) if you're willing to at least give it a go.
You don't moderate those kinds of expectations during the Primaries- you do it (if at all) during the General.
I also get his unwillingness to repeal ObamaCare from the fact even the admission that he'd sign a repeal (let alone fight for one- which he's never said he'd do) had to be dragged out of him.
I further get his unwillingness to repeal ObamaCare from his quote (paraphrasing, but I'm sure you've heard it) where he says he wants to get rid "of the bad parts" but keep "the good parts."
So, no, he's never said, "I'm unwilling to repeal ObamaCare." He has said enough other things that I believe he's unwilling to do anything- beyond sign a bill with which he has otherwise no connection- to repeal ObamaCare.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 24, 2012 12:58 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: spongeworthy at January 24, 2012 04:53 PM (puy4B)
Mittens also said that he thinks every state should adopt an individual mandate on its own and that he would like the federal government to use its money to make that decision "easier" for the states.
There's a reason that Mittens has never stood up for any principles ... except that disaster of a lefty health slavery h helped institute in Massachusettes, which is now bankrupting them.
Posted by: really ... at January 24, 2012 12:59 PM (X3lox)
Look for "Moment of Crisis," "Critical Moment," and "Fair Shake."
.
BOLO also for "We can't wait," "Republicans in Congress who play politics" and, whatever you do, DO NOT have a drinking game that involves the word "fair," or "fairness," or any derivative thereof as you will find yourself in an alcoholic coma.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at January 24, 2012 12:59 PM (d0Tfm)
who argue like Lefties, all bullshit and emotions. No respect for
accuracy. Is there no longer a border between facts and feelings?
Posted by: spongeworthy at January 24, 2012 04:53 PM (puy4B)
Spongeworthy, do you realize that in addition to fluoridating water, why,
there are studies underway to fluoridate salt, flour, fruit juices,
soup, sugar, milk... ice cream. Ice cream, children's ice
cream.
Posted by: General Jack D. Ripper at January 24, 2012 04:57 PM (84oau)
Paulbots don't die, spongeworthy. They take their time fading away with excruciating slowness.
Posted by: Soona at January 24, 2012 01:01 PM (mmKMz)
Today, Romney had a large supporter presence at Florida precinct 22 located in Palm Beach Gardens, and Newt the Grinch was unrepresented.
The weather was great this afternoon with a high of 78 degrees, and I lined up the arrows for the Newt. Early voting has been very brisk in my precinct, but that stands to reason because its heavily populated with white hairs, blue hairs, geezers, and farters who have nothing to do but count their money.
Posted by: Doctor Fish at January 24, 2012 01:02 PM (TkGkA)
Posted by: Major T. J. "King" Kong at January 24, 2012 01:02 PM (84oau)
I then say to myself, "He's going to be such a failure that the GOP won't know what to do. They'll probably go with runner-up Mitt in 2012. That's a great opportunity for someone like me, I mean us, myself."
So I knew then that I could make a run for the office, an office that has the most visibility in this our age of electronics where a pleasant image counts.
So I ask to myself, "Self, should I, you know, lose a few pounds?"
"Nah, I'll probably be ok. MOAR McRIBZ!!"
Posted by: weft cut-loop at January 24, 2012 01:02 PM (/jOyr)
-GOP 2008
Everyone here that doesn't realize that after a year of full press character destruction and demonizing their every act, regardless of reality our guy is going to end up with high negatives and independents are going to be nervous about voting for him... I gotta ask... are you still breastfeeding and believe in the tooth-fairy? This is a place for grownups who deal in reality.
Reagan had very high negatives among quite a few groups, the media constantly talked about what a polarizing figure he was and about he was starting WW3 and would en up blowing up the world through a combination of vileness and idiocy, just like they did with Bush. Yet Reagan still inspired enough people to make a 48 state sweep.
Posted by: Shiggz Newt Warp 9.9 at January 24, 2012 01:02 PM (RfvTE)
Posted by: Ranty McNewGuy at January 24, 2012 01:02 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: joeindc44 - tebow's new lifting coach at January 24, 2012 01:03 PM (QxSug)
Like Linus and the Great Pumpkin, I'll get old(er) and die before ever seeing/hearing this phrase:
"Well, you too can enjoy the 0% - 5% - 10% - 15% Capital Gains tax rate on your investments. What is there to stop you from saving up a stake to invest?"
Posted by: Count de Monet at January 24, 2012 01:05 PM (4q5tP)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at January 24, 2012 01:06 PM (2mOHT)
Posted by: OCBill at January 24, 2012 01:06 PM (YJvVE)
So Romney can't make himself seem more human (or, at least, nothing he's personally done has done so), but a third party (and professional author, to boot) can.
Yeah... still not seeing that as a huge selling point.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 24, 2012 01:07 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Ranty McNewGuy at January 24, 2012 01:07 PM (ZPrif)
>>>On day one, granting a waiver for—to all 50 states doesn’t stop in its tracks entirely Obamacare. That’s why I also say we have to repeal Obamacare, and I will do that on day two with a reconciliation bill, because, as you know, it was passed by reconciliation, 51 votes. We can get rid of it with 51 votes. We have to get rid of Obamacare and return to the states the responsibility.
--Mitt Romney
Choose not to believe the guy, that's obviously your right. I don't believe half of what politicians say no matter who it is. But don't just make up shit. Thats what Lefties do and the rest just nod along as the bullshit is absorbed by the hive-mind. We're better than that.
Posted by: spongeworthy at January 24, 2012 01:07 PM (puy4B)
Posted by: Soona at January 24, 2012 01:07 PM (mmKMz)
Social Security tax, FICA, state, federal, and local taxes on wage income...
Posted by: HeatherRadish at January 24, 2012 01:08 PM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at January 24, 2012 01:09 PM (+lsX1)
The truth about Bain Capital and Staples
There's an interesting take by Jonathan Last at the Weekly Standard:
Excerpt (but read the whole thing):
Yet ultimately, it seems a little strange to credit Romney with being much more than a smart early investor. That’s not nothing. Investment and capital are a very large part of entrepreneurial success—which is why investors reap large rewards when a business pans out. But still. A group of investors ponied up the $2.7 million needed to buy a group of restaurants from Richard and Maurice McDonald. Banker Ken Langone led a group of 40 investors to raise $2 million to start the Home Depot. And Mike Markkula gave Apple Computers the $250,000 it needed when it incorporated in 1977.
We donÂ’t credit the jobs created by McDonaldÂ’s, Home Depot, and Apple to the money men. We credit them to Ray Kroc, Bernard Marcus, Arthur Blank, Steve Jobs, and Steve Wozniak. Because those men had the ideas, ran the operations, and assumed most of the risk. ItÂ’s unclear why we should regard RomneyÂ’s role with Staples any differently.
Posted by: OCBill at January 24, 2012 01:10 PM (YJvVE)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at January 24, 2012 01:11 PM (2mOHT)
Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at January 24, 2012 05:09 PM (+lsX1)
It just didn't seem correct the other way to me. I like truth in advertising, it's a new spin.
Posted by: ambrosia at January 24, 2012 01:11 PM (oZfic)
Posted by: spongeworthy at January 24, 2012 05:07 PM (puy4B)
Was not aware of that quote. Thanks for posting.
I still can't vote for the John Kerry of the GOP. I mean, he was for the public option before he was against it....and abortion, and immigration, and .........
Posted by: © Sponge at January 24, 2012 01:12 PM (UK9cE)
Okay, when did he say that? Because, I'm thinking that particular change would have made pretty big news on the blog (which doesn't mean I still couldn't have missed it).
And, for the record, no, I don't believe that he's willing to do anything to repeal ObamaCare. Even in that quote he's talking about using Reconciliation- which is a move that even the Democrats used only when they saw nothing else would work- they didn't start with that as their first option.
It shows a spinelessness and an unwillingness to pursue the goal boldly.
So if I modify to "unwilling to fight to repeal ObamaCare" would that mollify you? Because they're functionally the same thing.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 24, 2012 01:12 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: ambrosia at January 24, 2012 01:12 PM (oZfic)
"I" or "Me" – Center of the known universe.
lol.
Posted by: Retread at January 24, 2012 01:12 PM (joSBv)
Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at January 24, 2012 05:09 PM (+lsX1)
I used to enjoy what you had to say. But after this comment, I won't be able to see your nic without thinking - stupid numbnutted fuckwit.
Posted by: Soona at January 24, 2012 01:13 PM (mmKMz)
Posted by: IreneFingIrene at January 24, 2012 01:13 PM (JNqU9)
Posted by: Count de Monet at January 24, 2012 05:05 PM (4q5tP)
Capital gains (long term) tax rate this year are zero and 15%. Those are part of the evil Bush tax cuts for the rich. It will expire at the end of this year.
Posted by: Vic at January 24, 2012 01:13 PM (YdQQY)
Time Magazine, I'll buy that for a dollar, or somebody will. But it will still be worth less than that. They got to be worth a dollar writing shit, and like most leftards, lessons are never learned.
Would a leftard pull a tick off their ass sucking their blood? Are they that heartless?
Posted by: maddogg at January 24, 2012 01:14 PM (OlN4e)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at January 24, 2012 01:14 PM (2mOHT)
Okay... and that's a reason to vote for him because why?
I don't doubt he's a very sincere man (in his personal life- he's as slimy a politician as ever there was). I don't doubt that he has very good and valid reasons for being the way he is.
I still don't want him to be our nominee.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 24, 2012 01:14 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Soona at January 24, 2012 05:07 PM (mmKMz)
This, big time. It's why they promote their destructive policies. Those policies are meant to destroy us, they do not affect the elites. Some of them, like abortion rights, have the huge potential to backfire, however.
Posted by: ErikW at January 24, 2012 01:16 PM (98qlF)
He worked his way up, made his own way, built his own business; he paid Crachet well more than the going rate; he was respected by peers as a shrewd businessman and his investments were the foundation and type that allowed English commerce to rule the world.
I think the prolog to the Christmas Carol in real life would have been bankruptcy for Scrooge and destitution for Crachet the way he is supposed to have become a spendthrift as I suspect the commodities trade back then had very tight margins what with the frequent calamities--ship wrecks, crop failures, etc.--that were even more unpredictable and certainly uninsurable back then than they are today.
Posted by: Jimmuy at January 24, 2012 01:19 PM (7jkW7)
Posted by: Nash Rambler at January 24, 2012 01:19 PM (oxgwp)
Posted by: ambrosia at January 24, 2012 01:19 PM (oZfic)
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---- --- -- -
Just taking Newt's attacks on the wrong kind of capitalism to its logical conclusion. That fat turd was eager to jump on the simple-minded class warfare bandwagon when he thought it could help him.
Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at January 24, 2012 01:19 PM (+lsX1)
Capital gains (long term) tax rate this year are zero and 15%. Those are part of the evil Bush tax cuts for the rich. It will expire at the end of this year.
Posted by: Vic at January 24, 2012 05:13 PM (YdQQY)
Yeah, I lose track from year to year. It's a moving target % whose expiration date is the ball in a political game of water polo. Let's just completely forget about stability and predictability, they're not important for encouraging people to make long term investments. /
Posted by: Count de Monet at January 24, 2012 01:21 PM (4q5tP)
And if a lot of people do this, won't that bring stocks down towards the end of the year?
Posted by: Miss Marple at January 24, 2012 01:22 PM (GoIUi)
Wow.
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at January 24, 2012 01:25 PM (i0App)
He said < "They asked my advice. And my advice as an historian was......"
He says nothing about being hired as an historian. He said he was giving advice from his perspective as an historian. He was hired as a consultant,and as a consultant he drew on his historical knowledge. Period.
Posted by: Burke at January 24, 2012 01:26 PM (9N3G1)
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at January 24, 2012 01:28 PM (i0App)
We saw something similair with Palin and I think we very much seeing something like it with Romney. Romney is less Gorden Geko and more David Wallace from the Office. I think the guy is inherently between "Business Casual and business formal" thats his whole spectrum, even at home watching TV/playing with Grandkids. Unfortunately when he tries to come across as aggressive/confrontational or the humorous guy, blue collar every-mans can look upto... he just ends up seeming tongue tied and awkward. Same as all of us would, excepting the professional sociopaths we call actors, we all get awkward and unnatural when we try to imitate some foreign personality trait, in fact the harder we try often the worst it fails.
That's why Newt looks so good up there, because he is just being himself. I doubt he is very different in the workplace or home then he is in debates.
In my personal observation regular people can alter only a little about themselves at at anytime, before it just becomes unnatural and disjointed and embarrassingly fails. Then they act like a computer hanging/frozen on contradictory commands or bad code.
Next time your going home for thanksgiving and tell yourself to be on your "best behavior"... (you know its gonna fail after someone gets under your skin anyway) pick a small handful of specific things you wont do and then just relax and be yourself with the other things.
Posted by: Shiggz Newt Warp 9.9 at January 24, 2012 01:29 PM (RfvTE)
Who turns out to vote in the biggest percentages?
Older folks.
Those older folks are going to remember how much they disliked Newt back in the 1990's, and how he was engaged in some sort of scandal or other. The recent scandals ala Freddie Mac will get added to his considerable baggage.
Ronald Reagan had been a popular and effective governor of California prior to becoming president. People in California liked him. And because he had spent his entire adult life in Hollywood & California, Reagan knew how to smile and charm the media and then move on to connect directly with voters.
He was the teflon president much to the chagrin of any opponent. No matter the charge against him (he's dumb, he's an actor, did we mention he's dumb?) Reagan was always a sunny optimist and a very likeable man.
Newt has none of Reagan's charm or good looks, he's not a happy man he's a cranky old guy who is playing us all for fools.
Posted by: Boots at January 24, 2012 01:30 PM (neKzn)
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at January 24, 2012 05:25 PM (i0App)
I know. I continue to be surprised when I should know better.
Posted by: ErikW at January 24, 2012 01:30 PM (98qlF)
@ Soona,
I'd rather Gingrich but that's only considering the sole alternative is Mitt.
But let's not pretend Newt doesn't have some cock-punches coming to him for his Bill O'Reilly ignorant bullshit.
GEH is one of the smartest commentors on here. He's getting his licks in.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at January 24, 2012 01:31 PM (hVVZR)
Thanks for making that clear.
Posted by: Miss Marple at January 24, 2012 01:32 PM (GoIUi)
Which is why you drop a nobody community organizer on the world stage and in terms of speechifying he does just fine. Because to him... hes always been that person all bottled up.
Put Palin on a worldstage suddenly, someone who has more modest expectations of herself and....
Posted by: Shiggz Newt Warp 9.9 at January 24, 2012 01:32 PM (RfvTE)
Romney on ObamaCare: http://tinyurl.com/4x9hcqj
Reconciliation is the only way we can repeal it without taking 60 Senate seats. It would be a fight. Romney says he's up for it. Take it for what it's worth.
I'm not trying to change anybody's mind about Romney. I am advocating we take out our opponents with facts, not feelings or fantasies. I hate the Left for their dishonesty and their refusal to assimilate anything that conflicts with whatever they're told is trendy to believe. Can we not do that?
Posted by: spongeworthy at January 24, 2012 01:33 PM (puy4B)
Social Security tax, FICA, state, federal, and local taxes on wage income...
Posted by: HeatherRadish at January 24, 2012 05:08 PM (ZKzrr)
True. There are some people who are painted into a corner, financially. For most people, it's probably more like: 4G Phone w/ unlimited everything; TV package w/ everything; always having the latest electronic devices; aversion to driving a less luxurious, older model car; aversion to packing a simple lunch; fondness for dining out, ...
Whatever the income level, there's someone, somewhere, in this country getting by on less and saving/investing for their future.
Posted by: Count de Monet at January 24, 2012 01:36 PM (4q5tP)
Posted by: Burke at January 24, 2012 01:41 PM (9N3G1)
Perhaps you're easily confused? Or you don't get the idea of someone wanting to show off ?
Posted by: Burke at January 24, 2012 01:47 PM (9N3G1)
Perhaps you're easily confused? Or you don't get the idea of someone wanting to show off?
There---that's better.
Posted by: Burke at January 24, 2012 01:48 PM (9N3G1)
So let me now understand this. You are saying that he's not dishonest, just a show-off? And this is better for a presidential candidate? We want a show-off to be leader of the Free World?
Posted by: Miss Marple at January 24, 2012 01:54 PM (GoIUi)
http://tinyurl.com/8yljgul
Posted by: Y-not at January 24, 2012 01:55 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Y-not at January 24, 2012 01:56 PM (5H6zj)
I don't think Newt's perfect, but I do know that anyone who successfully runs for President has to have a very big ego. Newt has a PhD in history, taught history, has written historical books. I don't think its a crime if he alludes to it, especially since he does have an enormous fund of knowledge. I think it's a lot more honest than Romney's "I know what it's like to start at the bottom." And miles better than Obama's "I'm a better speech writer than my speech writers. I could be a better chief-of-staff than my chief-of-staff."
Posted by: Burke at January 24, 2012 02:01 PM (9N3G1)
Posted by: ex pat at January 24, 2012 02:07 PM (rsOPT)
Do you know what he wrote his Ph.D. thesis on? Belgian educational policy in the Congo.
Posted by: Miss Marple at January 24, 2012 02:08 PM (GoIUi)
So most PhD theses are written on obscure topics,and don't necessarily reflect the strong interests of the writer.
Posted by: Burke at January 24, 2012 02:16 PM (9N3G1)
That wasn't the worst depiction of Newt that the media did back then. .....There was "The Gingrich who Stole Christmas" and "Crybaby Newt" in a diaper.
.
So what? .....Just wait till they do it to Romney. Colbert already did that "Mitt the Serial Killer" video, playing off of that remark that Romney made about "corporations are people" and showing him killing corporations. .....There is a lot of fertile ground with Romney for them to exploit.
Posted by: wheatie...liking Perry more than ever at January 24, 2012 02:21 PM (ALwK/)
My husband has worked as a consultant. The terms are usually billing by the hour plus expenses. He was hired for a specific purpose: find something out, figure the costs of a potential project, produce a report, etc.
I cannot figure out why Newt was hired and what he was supposed to do.
He had no experience in banking, real estate, mortgages, accounting, or the stock market.
So, what was he hired for, and what did he do?
Posted by: Miss Marple at January 24, 2012 02:24 PM (GoIUi)
I think Romney's business experience may be a plus--but there's no guarantee.
Posted by: Burke at January 24, 2012 02:25 PM (9N3G1)
Posted by: Miss Marple at January 24, 2012 02:35 PM (GoIUi)
It seems to me that Newt's consulting work is a pretty minor component of his resume. In contrast, we are supposed to accept Romney as ultra qualified based on four years as Governor and not allowed to ask for specifics about his work at Bain.
Posted by: Y-not at January 24, 2012 02:35 PM (5H6zj)
People look down at the liberal arts nowadays, because the left has turned it into a swamp, and because it doesn't seem to have any practical use. Yet Western education was based in the liberal arts for centuries. It forms habits of analysis that can't be acquired through any other method. I remember my father complaining about the new MBAs under his charge at work, He always said, "None of them know how to think, because they haven't had a liberal arts education. ."
Posted by: Burke at January 24, 2012 02:37 PM (9N3G1)
Talk about "high negatives"..
Honor roll of the Best of the Best of Harvard's Best and the Brightest. Look at this list and ask yourself why the USA is so screwed..
Barack Obama Jr. & Sr, Michelle Obama, G W Bush, Mike Dukakis, Pierre Trudeau, Jaques Chirac, Mitt Romney, Al Gore Jr., Duval Patrick, Scott Harshbarger, Ben Bernanke, Joseph P. Kennedy, JFK, Ted Kennedy, Chuck Schumer, Dick Blumenthal, John Vitter, Carl Levin, Jim Guy Tucker, Jim Jeffords, Barney Frank, Alan Grayson, Mel Reynolds, Christopher Cox, Hank Paulson, Larry Sommers, Elena Kagan, Lawrence Tribe, Charles Ogletree, Skip Gates, William "Freezer" Jefferson, Ted Kennedy, Robert Toricelli, Elliot Spitzer, Al Franken, Michael Huffington, Patsy Schroeder, Joe Sestak, Hank Cisneros, Alan Krueger, John Holdren, Cass Sunstein, Harold Koh, Chris Lu, Willard Tom, Jason Bordoff, David Kris, (DOJ) Samantha Power, Julius Genachowski, Franklin Raines, Daniel Mudd, Jamie Gorelick, Robert Zoellick, Jeff Skilling, Hassan Nemazee, Henry Kissinger, Robert McNamara, Sandy Berger, Brock Adams, Alberto Gonzalez, J. Paul Bremer, Douglas Feith, Lloyd Blankfein, Jamie Dimon, Kenneth Chennault, Franklin Raines, Stan O'Neal, Jamie Gorelick, Daniel Mudd, Robert Zoellick, John Thain, Jeff Immelt, John Paulson, Sumner Redstone, Robert Belfer (founder of Enron), Jeff Skilling (Enron), James B. Lockhart III, Robert "bailout Bob" Rubin, Penny Pritzker, Rick Wagoner, Philip Falcone (Lightsquared), George Kaiser (Solyndra), Peter Rouse (F & F, Solyndra, Lightsquared), Vin Weber, Jacob Lew (Lightsquared), David Barron (DOJ F & F), Ian H. Gershengorn, Tom Perez (DOJ F & F), Steven Spinner (Solyndra), Jonathan Silver (Solyndra), Chai Feldman, Klaus Schwab, Eric Mindich, Richard Whitney (of 1929 infamy), Thomas Lamont (banker to Mussolini), Patrick Fitzgerald, David Baron, Todd Stern, Zbigniew Brzmezinski, Harry Dexter White, Ted Hall, Alger Hiss, Amy Bishop, Timothy Leary, Alfred Kinsey, Al Gore III, Robert Tunnell Jr, Cardinal Bernard Francis Law, Rajat Gupta, Marc Stuart Dreir, Oded Aboodi,Sam Barai, Eugene Plotkin Andrew Schliefer, Ephren Taylo,r Marc Stuart Dreier. Hemy Zvi Neuman, Noah Freeman
Posted by: Charles River Swamp Yankee at January 24, 2012 02:38 PM (FRnn5)
in as much as it discusses something his supporters don't want to discuss, his high negatives.
What is there to discuss, ace? Yep, his negatives are pretty high and thats just acknowledging facts. Did Newtists run out of the room screaming when you wanted to talk about that?
Btw: Hillary Clinton was always seen as unlikable, divisive politician with negatives too high. Today she has high approval ratings (higher than any other politician if I remember correctly), we're discussing if making her veep would put Obama beyond reach for Republicans and more and more people - and not only Dems - regret not to have nominated her in the first place.
Posted by: Elize Nayden at January 24, 2012 02:39 PM (1ZoqB)
I see they've spent an average of $600K a year on lobbying over the past five years ($400k low; $800K high). Their main lobbying firm has former Congressman Bill Paxon as one of the principals.
Posted by: Y-not at January 24, 2012 02:43 PM (5H6zj)
During and after WWI, he became famous for administering aid to starving Belgium. Then he was Secretary of Commerce under Harding and Coolidge. It's an extremely impressive and well-rounded resume.
Posted by: Burke at January 24, 2012 02:43 PM (9N3G1)
I guess if the House investigation files are leaked, we won't have just one suspect for who leaks them.
Posted by: Y-not at January 24, 2012 02:45 PM (5H6zj)
That is why I want to know what he was hired for and what he did.
If all he did was what he said (told them their business plan was going to fail) then someone needs to be investigating Fannie 's management.
Posted by: Miss Marple at January 24, 2012 02:48 PM (GoIUi)
Posted by: Y-not at January 24, 2012 02:53 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Y-not at January 24, 2012 02:55 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Y-not at January 24, 2012 02:55 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Burke at January 24, 2012 03:03 PM (9N3G1)
>>>Herbert Hoover was a mining engineer who made his money in Australia when he was a young man. Mining gold.
Which I'm sure he promptly turned over to the Joos, Which led to his rise to power and the resulting demise of the middle class.
Hoover and teh Joos is why my people live in single-wides!
Posted by: spongeworthy at January 24, 2012 03:16 PM (puy4B)
Posted by: Burke at January 24, 2012 03:24 PM (9N3G1)
Posted by: JewishOdysseus at January 24, 2012 03:40 PM (hRH92)
Posted by: HondaV65 at January 24, 2012 03:58 PM (Wm6n5)
Since every Presidential election in history.
Literally every single one.
You're a fool for pretending it's no big deal. But you'll learn the hard way, I imagine.
Posted by: Jeff B. at January 24, 2012 04:35 PM (hIWe1)
Posted by: How to turn wooden bowls on lathe at January 31, 2012 04:39 AM (mIhy6)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.1883 seconds, 302 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Flapjackmaka at January 24, 2012 12:30 PM (lm+B8)