June 25, 2012
— Ace I just got done reading Game of Thrones (the full series, or at least the five books printed so far).
I was complaining to a friend about them -- "one thousand pages of pure repetitive tedium, just to set up a rip-roaring final eight hundred pages!" -- and he asked me who I thought Jon Snow's mother was.
Well, the thing is, I didn't bother to care, because all I was reading for was Vengeance Against the Lannisters.
But it struck me that that was a good question (duh), and I have read previously that the author stated the end of the series all swung on the events of 16 years past, the rebellion, Lyanna, and so forth.
So, I looked up "jon snow mother speculation" and found the answer. It's a great answer, actually, so good that there's no way it could possibly be wrong. I'm adding a little bit of my own speculation, which I think is also likely true.
I'm putting this in White Font (scroll over to read) because, well, spoilers.
GEEK ALERT for everyone. There's no sense reading this unless you've read this books, and if you've read the books, don't read it unless you don't care about spoilers.
First of all, I didn't think of the main solution: that's right here.
First theory. Explains everything. Why does the author keep noting that Jon Snow has a "Stark look"? To make sure we don't question whether Ned is his father.
But ah... he could have a Stark look from his mother, Lyanna. Making him the bastard son of Rhaegon and Lyanna, and hence an heir to the Targaryen throne.
Now, the books were always very vague about how exactly Rheagon "stole" Lyanna away. What if he didn't steal her? What if she just loved him? And then, at the end of Robert's Rebellion, she gives birth. The heir is spirited away to the Tower of Joy, where three kingsguard, including Arthur Dayne, protect him (and Lyanna).
The books keep referring to that fight -- and never say what the fight was about.
The books keep referring to a promise Lyanna made Eddard vow to keep -- but never say what that promise was.
The promise was simply to make sure her son, by Rhaegon, was hidden away, and unharmed.
This explains why Ned had a very out-of-character affair. He didn't. It explains why he won't talk about Jon Snow's mother.
Lyanna died in a "bed of blood." Was she stabbed? They never say. Maybe she had just given difficult birth. Because who there would kill her? Her kingsguard was there to protect her; Ned and his allies wanted her alive.
The books also established that Ned would do anything to protect the children of his enemies from harm (he warns Cersie to get out of King's Landing, with her children, even though that warning exposes himself and his family to great risk).
Oh, and why are the Reed children suddenly so important in the story? Why is Howland Reed such a good friend to Ned Stark, so devoted to him? Because only Howland Reed knows Ned's secret. Only Ned and Howland survived the fight with the Kingsguard, and only Howland knows the promise Lyanna made Ned swear.
Now, at first, I didn't love this, because the books already had a swapped-baby-type story: Aegon Targaryen. Aegon Targaryen is supposedly Raeghon's and Ellia's son, rescued by Varys, by swapping him for a commoner's child.
It doesn't seem to me that a book can have two Targaryen changelings in it. One Targaryen changeling too many. It's silly.
So Ageon must be a fake, a pretender.
I think this makes sense. Varys' story about him is a lie. Varys previously worked to keep the Lannisters on the throne-- he told Ned to give up his story about incest and false kings, not because he loves the Lannisters, but simply to keep the peace.
If Varys had always known of this child and always wanted to put him on the throne (which he at least implies he did), then he would told Ned to keep on pushing the "incest, false king" line. Which isn't what he did.
The whole story sounds like a recent idea, not one that's been in Varys' mind for 16 years.
Now, if Varys is lying, why lie? Kevan Lannister was about to die, and Maester Pycelle was already dead; why tell a lie to two dead men?
Well, those weren't the only people in the room. His spies/accomplices-- a gaggle of children -- were all present. He was telling them the lie, too. Likely, he wants it to spread. Aegon is coming; why not put out the word?
So where did they get this pretender from?
From books one and two. A boy was featured there, apparently for no reason, and then entirely disappeared from the series. That boy is Edric Dayne, nephew of the legendary Arthur Dayne. He has the Targaryen coloring (silver hair, purple eyes) just like this "Aegon." He was last seen riding with the Lightning Lord, but then split off from him for reasons that haven't been made clear yet. I think Arya ran into him.
I propose someone found him, discovered his Targaryen looks, and hatched a plan to put a pretender on the throne.
Some of what Varys says about "Aegon" applies to Edric-- as Edric was riding as an outlaw, looking out for the common man (and children!) who suffer in war, he would, as Varys says of "Aegon," know what it means to struggle. While it's not true that he was always raised to be a prince, he is the son of a legendary (and honorable) knight, and squire to a Lord who seems concerned with the travails of the common man. The sort of person Varys might decide would make for a good king.
If Edric isn't Aegon, then why was he even in the books? I guess you could say that of 4000 other minor characters, but I think this is the solution here: Aegon is a pretender, to throw us off the scent of the real Lost Targaryen, Jon "Snow." (I don't know what his correct bastard name should be.)
I might be straining here, but the books keep mentioning the three-headed dragon. Maybe that's Aegon, Dany, and Jon. Three heads of the dragon Rheagon (though one is a false head).
Obviously this requires Jon Snow to survive his current difficulties, but I think that'll prove to be the case.
This then means the actual final conflict is not between Stark and Lannister (both houses already decimated), but between two Targaryen's, Jon Snow, bastard son of Rheagan, and Danyres, sister of Rheagan.
Which makes for a less than ideal war -- hero vs. heroine-- but then, the books seem to want to avoid the Good Guy vs. Bad Guy notion of war.
One More Thing: It was promised that if you stiff the Iron Bank of Braavos, suddenly you'll have pretenders vying for your crown.
Pretty sure Varys is from Braavos, or spent time there.
Well, the Lannisters stiffed the bank, and suddenly there's someone claiming to be Aegon Targaryen, fronted for by Varys. Who needs a patron, given that he had to flee his last one.
I think that's pretty strong evidence. Why would Martin drop this Promise To The Reader -- stiffing the bank = pretender -- and not follow through?
Posted by: Ace at
05:37 PM
| Comments (176)
Post contains 1249 words, total size 7 kb.
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at June 25, 2012 06:18 PM (piMMO)
Posted by: andycanuck at June 25, 2012 06:18 PM (nrW1y)
Now I was thinking that Jon Snow was Robert's bastard instead of Eddard's - none of the theories at the link matched mine.
Oh, well - I TRIED to slog through the 5th book, but could only get about halfway through it before I said "enough". I've read all of Vince Flynn's and Brad Thor's books since then, and I just can't get worked up enough to try to finish GOT#5.....
Posted by: Teresa in Fort Worth, TX at June 25, 2012 06:18 PM (0xqzf)
Posted by: Dave C at June 25, 2012 06:18 PM (pLnp0)
I will read this in spite of not giving a rat's ass about "Game of Thrones."
Don't tell me what to do!
Okay, actually, I didn't read it, because I really don't care.
What's "Game of Thrones?"
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at June 25, 2012 06:19 PM (nEUpB)
Posted by: beancounter at June 25, 2012 06:20 PM (p18em)
Posted by: andycanuck at June 25, 2012 06:20 PM (nrW1y)
Posted by: Ma Bell at June 25, 2012 06:23 PM (uVuwp)
Posted by: IdowhatIwant at June 25, 2012 06:23 PM (a4CUi)
Posted by: ace at June 25, 2012 06:24 PM (aw5Tx)
Posted by: ace at June 25, 2012 06:25 PM (aw5Tx)
Posted by: Dave C at June 25, 2012 06:27 PM (pLnp0)
Posted by: IdowhatIwant at June 25, 2012 06:27 PM (a4CUi)
Posted by: HoboJerky, profit of DOOM! at June 25, 2012 06:29 PM (ePYQF)
Posted by: ace at June 25, 2012 06:29 PM (aw5Tx)
I've slogged through the first 3 books...been a hard go, so I dropped it for a while...might finish it eventually.
It's kinda well done but depressing, he kills off everyone you care about.
I've seen all the shows...they're well done. I liked the attack ads at motherjones.com..."Daenerys Targaryen, Wrong for Dragons, Wrong for the Realm!"
Interesting theory about John Snow, ace...hadn't considered that....the 3rd book went off on a tangent, hopefully the 4th is more on target.
Posted by: CanaDave at June 25, 2012 06:31 PM (lJSgG)
Don't think Jon and Dany will ever fight for the throne tho.
They will however ride the dragons and incinerate the Others, thereby saving the realm.
Just a guess
Posted by: dearmistertumnus at June 25, 2012 06:31 PM (sB13t)
Posted by: HoboJerky, profit of DOOM! at June 25, 2012 06:32 PM (ePYQF)
Posted by: Throat Wobbler Mangrove at June 25, 2012 06:35 PM (l57Cl)
Posted by: a dragon at June 25, 2012 06:35 PM (nrW1y)
Posted by: ace at June 25, 2012 06:36 PM (aw5Tx)
Posted by: HoboJerky, profit of DOOM! at June 25, 2012 06:36 PM (ePYQF)
Yeah, I'm easily amused.
Posted by: andycanuck at June 25, 2012 06:38 PM (nrW1y)
nope. worst.
Posted by: ace at June 25, 2012 10:36 PM (aw5Tx)
Yep. Been dog-eared about halfway through for months
Posted by: dearmistertumnus at June 25, 2012 06:38 PM (sB13t)
Posted by: IdowhatIwant at June 25, 2012 06:41 PM (a4CUi)
And dragons or nekkid or not, I could care less about the Dany character at this point. And I just know that she's going to be one of the main characters that not only survives, but probably will rule.
-----
...at least she's okay to look at on the tv show...the dragons are pretty cool too, the way she fried that sorcerer at the end of season 2.
Posted by: CanaDave at June 25, 2012 06:41 PM (lJSgG)
"Joffrey Baratheon, what a bastard!"
"Where's the birth certificate!"
“Daenerys Targaryen, Wrong for Dragons, Wrong for the Realm!”
Posted by: CanaDave at June 25, 2012 06:48 PM (lJSgG)
Posted by: dr. shatterhand at June 25, 2012 06:49 PM (kcKbE)
Posted by: IdowhatIwant at June 25, 2012 06:52 PM (a4CUi)
First, the title of the series. "The Song of Ice and Fire." (later cemented during Daenary's visit to the visit to the worlocks castle, leading to her seeing her brother playing an instrument over a child. "He is the one will come," or something like that, then he sang a song of ice and fire to the child. If it was the Dorne girl, Daeny would have more easily identified the look of dorn in "frog" when he visited from that vision. Instead she had to wait for Barristan to point it out.
Second, the last first person thought from Ned was about how he failed lyanna. If that was about Robert, than he was days late, but as the only holder of the secret, it was clearly something else. Only open secret that couldn't be clarified about lyanna that was still around went back to Snow.
Posted by: Douglas at June 25, 2012 06:52 PM (YKOnu)
Posted by: Douglas at June 25, 2012 06:53 PM (YKOnu)
Posted by: Alisa at June 25, 2012 06:56 PM (5VRhq)
You didn't stop after Book III?
have lost respect for you Ace...we tried to warn you. You just didn't listen.
Posted by: garrett at June 25, 2012 07:00 PM (gplzV)
Posted by: Jose at June 25, 2012 07:01 PM (srIqv)
He has always compared it to a road trip where he knows all the major destinations ahead of time, but has to fill in the journey. So he's only partially making it up as he goes.
He got stuck severely trying to get the story from point A to B and it took 5 years for him to figure it out and finish the latest book.
Posted by: Jose at June 25, 2012 07:05 PM (srIqv)
Posted by: John Wemmick at June 25, 2012 07:06 PM (4r/8O)
Posted by: ace at June 25, 2012 07:07 PM (aw5Tx)
http://youtu.be/QTTW8M_etko#t=5m10s
Posted by: Jose at June 25, 2012 07:08 PM (srIqv)
Posted by: Mr Pink at June 25, 2012 07:10 PM (jmwiV)
Posted by: IdowhatIwant at June 25, 2012 07:10 PM (a4CUi)
Posted by: Jose at June 25, 2012 07:10 PM (srIqv)
Posted by: Max Power at June 25, 2012 07:11 PM (+wxCD)
Posted by: Mr Pink at June 25, 2012 07:11 PM (jmwiV)
Posted by: IdowhatIwant at June 25, 2012 07:13 PM (a4CUi)
Posted by: aace at June 25, 2012 07:14 PM (aw5Tx)
Posted by: Douglas at June 25, 2012 07:15 PM (YKOnu)
Posted by: ace at June 25, 2012 07:17 PM (aw5Tx)
Posted by: Douglas at June 25, 2012 11:15 PM (YKOnu)
They took over a year off for the Sopranos. They could do the same here.
Posted by: buzzion at June 25, 2012 07:18 PM (GULKT)
Posted by: ace at June 25, 2012 07:19 PM (aw5Tx)
(Still not as good as Dunsany, but nobody is.)
Posted by: Boulder Toilet Hobo at June 25, 2012 07:19 PM (QTHTd)
Posted by: Douglas at June 25, 2012 07:19 PM (YKOnu)
Posted by: The Atom Bomb of Loving Kindness at June 25, 2012 07:20 PM (jqHOY)
Posted by: IdowhatIwant at June 25, 2012 07:20 PM (a4CUi)
Posted by: ace at June 25, 2012 07:20 PM (aw5Tx)
Posted by: Boulder Toilet Hobo at June 25, 2012 11:19 PM (QTHTd)
Just finished up book III of the Book of the New Sun tonight...already thinking about revisiting the Book of the Long Sun.
Posted by: garrett at June 25, 2012 07:21 PM (gplzV)
The institutions of civil society don't exist to allow men to be good.
Posted by: Jose at June 25, 2012 07:23 PM (srIqv)
Yeahp, he only EDITED Wild Cards but managed to drive that series of short stories, which I really enjoyed, down into the ground to the point that I had to use any announcement of a new book as kindling for my grill.
Posted by: Douglas at June 25, 2012 07:24 PM (YKOnu)
Posted by: ace at June 25, 2012 07:24 PM (aw5Tx)
Posted by: ace at June 25, 2012 07:25 PM (aw5Tx)
Posted by: Bcochran1981 at June 25, 2012 07:26 PM (GEICT)
I would say rotting in a cell and getting his hand chopped off was part of his transformation.
Posted by: Jose at June 25, 2012 07:27 PM (srIqv)
Jaime?!
Just doesn't seem all that plausible. Martin never really explained what brought on this complete moral transformation.
Posted by: ace at June 25, 2012 11:24 PM (aw5Tx)
Perhaps the same thing that caused him to slay the Mad King?
Posted by: buzzion at June 25, 2012 07:27 PM (GULKT)
Now, with the changes in the recent books, he is looking for a new focus, and seems finaly able to find his honor.
Posted by: Douglas at June 25, 2012 07:27 PM (YKOnu)
Holy shit, Ace. Good job, whether you're right or wrong. You deserve an attaboy just for so closely reading this ponderously-long series that you can credibly theorize stuff like this.
I love long convoluted series as much as the next closeted geek (I just got done re-reading the previous books of Erickson's Malazan series before I started the final) but even Martin admits this series got away from him. It may be GoT blasphemy, but this story would have been better with 1/2 the plotlines.
Good, crunchy dark realism, but waaaaay to long and gratuitously twisty. Kudos to Martin for being willing to kill his main characters with surprising regularity, but I'm deducting points for those who keep coming back.
SPOILER ALERT FOR ERICKSON READERS - Erickson's even worse on that score - does anyone actually die in these books or does every mangled, flash-fried, dragon-eaten or soul-stolen protagonist end up wandering his universe as an Ascendant, undead, ghost or something similar ?
Garret @ 54: I loved Wolfe's Severian books. Some of his writing lives up to the hype as verging on literary rather than genre fiction. Some of it's a little artsy for my tastes but I'd call him one of my top 10 scififantasy writers. So's Martin, though.
The bar's just not that high sadly, given that so many RPG-inspired hacks and romance-novel-refugee feminists seem to churn out most of the product nowadays (yes, Erickson's RPG-inspired too, but he overcomes that - mostly. The main deficiency in his books is RPG born - the overblown "Monster Manual" cast of races, creatures and other oddities).
Posted by: SocietyIs2Blame at June 25, 2012 07:27 PM (yK8YH)
Posted by: BurtTC at June 25, 2012 07:29 PM (2pG7H)
Posted by: Douglas at June 25, 2012 07:29 PM (YKOnu)
Posted by: ace at June 25, 2012 07:30 PM (aw5Tx)
Posted by: Pug Mahon at June 25, 2012 07:33 PM (cujSl)
Posted by: Douglas at June 25, 2012 07:34 PM (YKOnu)
Posted by: ace at June 25, 2012 07:34 PM (aw5Tx)
Posted by: Douglas at June 25, 2012 07:35 PM (YKOnu)
---Brienne and the loss of his hand.---
They are one and the same.
Brienne is the embodiement of Jaime Lannister sans hand and status - yet she achieves true honor. [In action if not result.]
...and Hodor!
Posted by: Hodor at June 25, 2012 07:36 PM (gplzV)
Posted by: ace at June 25, 2012 07:36 PM (aw5Tx)
Posted by: Pug Mahon at June 25, 2012 07:36 PM (cujSl)
Posted by: Arms Merchant at June 25, 2012 07:36 PM (+XVQe)
Posted by: Pug Mahon at June 25, 2012 07:38 PM (cujSl)
Posted by: Douglas at June 25, 2012 07:38 PM (YKOnu)
Posted by: IdowhatIwant at June 25, 2012 07:39 PM (a4CUi)
Posted by: Pug Mahon at June 25, 2012 07:40 PM (cujSl)
It was the loss of his hand, and brienne that cemented the path he would follow, all initiated by an unexpected kindness for cat.
Posted by: Douglas at June 25, 2012 07:40 PM (YKOnu)
79 Burt: I'd say the Night's Watch won't exist by the end of this series (or will be so different it won't be recognizable). No one seems to keep their oaths anyway (Jon, Sam, Dareon, etc).
RE: Aemon, the answer's in Crows in the 700's, since I'm not sure where you're at in reading.
81 Douglas - I'd say Bran's an exception. Martin does seem to take Jaime's redemption a bit far, almost as if he changed his own mind about protagonist/antagonist rather than setting us up deliberately from the jump. I like seeing villains evolve into shades of grey and it fits the shifting perspective style used here pretty well. The character seems to know he's considered a villain and is suffering from his own misdeeds in party, so I don't find it too grating.
Posted by: SocietyIs2Blame at June 25, 2012 07:43 PM (yK8YH)
Posted by: Max Power at June 25, 2012 07:45 PM (+wxCD)
Posted by: buzzion at June 25, 2012 07:46 PM (GULKT)
It's not like he had a lot of strong moral examples, and everytime he sought it on his own, he was halted. . . in the name of morality.
Posted by: Douglas at June 25, 2012 07:47 PM (YKOnu)
89: Agree - Cersei and Brienne are the only kinda-compelling female characters - the rest seem like props and window dressing. Sansa's a "dialogue horse" for Petyr now (after being one at Winterfell and King's Landing before).
I'm still trying to figure out what the fuck he's doing with Arya (one of the superfluous plotlines, IMO - she gives the Grrl Power set someone to root for, but she's been disconnected from the main plot for like five books).
Posted by: SocietyIs2Blame at June 25, 2012 07:47 PM (yK8YH)
Posted by: Douglas at June 25, 2012 07:48 PM (YKOnu)
Posted by: Colonel Pooteh at June 25, 2012 07:50 PM (t2cnv)
Posted by: Moshe Al-Shabazz at June 25, 2012 07:51 PM (W6k2E)
Posted by: Douglas at June 25, 2012 07:52 PM (YKOnu)
Posted by: Colonel Pooteh at June 25, 2012 07:53 PM (t2cnv)
Posted by: Douglas at June 25, 2012 07:55 PM (YKOnu)
Posted by: Max Power at June 25, 2012 07:56 PM (+wxCD)
Posted by: CanaDave at June 25, 2012 07:57 PM (lJSgG)
101 Max - I always found Tolkein fairy-tailish - one of the reasons I tend to gravitate toward "adult fantasy" for which Martin's a mature example (most books in the genre seem to just be porn and gore).
The Torturer series stands out for me by being totally different in a lot of ways - it straddles scifi and fantasy, relies on characterization and plot rather than tech/magic, and has some fairly profound writing at times. It's a lot more fun to read than most the classic literature we got force-fed in school, while still being very literary and grown-up.
I can't get into the Soldier in the Mist books nearly as much (on my second try at it after putting it down midway through the first book). Wolfe's style is so "unique," for lack of a better word, that it's hard for me to read him on a subject I've studied for history rather than letting him run wild in a world of his own imagination.
Posted by: SocietyIs2Blame at June 25, 2012 07:58 PM (yK8YH)
DEFINATELY brilliantly written, and not at all offensive, but a lot of, "And this guy is the protagonist why? cuz he has THAT sword?"
Posted by: Douglas at June 25, 2012 07:58 PM (YKOnu)
Posted by: A.G. at June 25, 2012 07:59 PM (rHTdD)
It will fit nicely at the conclusion of the series when Jon marries Daenerys to become king and queen and restore proper Targaryen rule to Westeros. Targaryens marry each other.
Posted by: AlphaBase1 at June 25, 2012 07:59 PM (O1e87)
That was Brandon and Lord Stark. Neds older brother, and father.
Ned refused armsmen to Arys, it wasn't until the taking of lyanna that the north and StormsEnd and the Aery allied against the mad king.
That was the act I mentioned about jaime saying he could have ended the rebellion right then or something while recounting the history of the rebellion to Cat.
"Kingslayer, you say that like I feel as though it is a sin." Then he recounts the story of how lord stark and his heir were called to court and sadistically murdered.
Posted by: Douglas at June 25, 2012 08:01 PM (YKOnu)
Posted by: SocietyIs2Blame at June 25, 2012 08:02 PM (yK8YH)
Posted by: Mr Pink at June 25, 2012 08:03 PM (jmwiV)
It will fit nicely at the conclusion of the series when Jon marries Daenerys to become king and queen and restore proper Targaryen rule to Westeros. Targaryens marry each other.
----------
Ya, maybe GRRM will buy the solution from ace and wrap it up in time for the tv show, cuz the rate he's going, the actress that plays Arya is going to be an old lady before they finish. She got noticeably older between season 1 and 2.
Posted by: CanaDave at June 25, 2012 08:03 PM (lJSgG)
He's not a 'hero', but he's not a bad guy either.
Posted by: AlphaBase1 at June 25, 2012 08:06 PM (O1e87)
>>"Kingslayer, you say that like I feel as though it is a sin." Then he recounts the story of how lord stark and his heir were called to court and sadistically murdered.
----------
Forgot about that...parts are blurry in my memory...I think the new words were causing a memory dump of the old words cuz I was out of ram...
Posted by: CanaDave at June 25, 2012 08:07 PM (lJSgG)
Posted by: Douglas at June 25, 2012 08:07 PM (YKOnu)
Posted by: Mr Pink at June 25, 2012 08:08 PM (jmwiV)
Posted by: Pug Mahon at June 25, 2012 08:11 PM (cujSl)
Posted by: CanaDave at June 25, 2012 08:11 PM (lJSgG)
I was reading the first book and getting bored with it. I give every book a 1/3 read just in case I'm missing something. Well, 1/3 or 100 pages depending on size of book.
Page 82 game of thrones hardback, and I literally sat up straight and said to myself, "Shit! this guy is trying to do something."
and I will read the rest of the series, assuming the old bastard ever gets around to writing the rest of them.
Posted by: Douglas at June 25, 2012 08:13 PM (YKOnu)
Posted by: Pug Mahon at June 25, 2012 08:13 PM (cujSl)
Posted by: Max Power at June 25, 2012 08:13 PM (+wxCD)
Posted by: Douglas at June 25, 2012 08:15 PM (YKOnu)
The only thing that inspires greatness is the need for safety and stability. This why as comedians get older they become less funny.
GRRM in 1996 was doing OK, but was not rich or super successful, so he was knocking out awesome 1,000 page books every other year.
Then he got rich and successful, and the books dropped in quality and started coming out 5 years apart. I really think he was practically forced to write book 5.
Solution is for GRRM to turn the writing over to a young and eager author, give him/her the outline of how you see the story going, and maintain as executive editor with veto power.
And make the series go for 10 books or more. Because The Song of Ice and Fire makes life better.
Posted by: AlphaBase1 at June 25, 2012 08:16 PM (O1e87)
Posted by: Max Power at June 25, 2012 08:17 PM (+wxCD)
True, but while it's written in the first person, each book has maybe ONE reaction of passion. The protagonist is so passionless. I was VERY reminded of "The Stranger."
Posted by: Douglas at June 25, 2012 08:18 PM (YKOnu)
Posted by: CanaDave at June 25, 2012 08:18 PM (lJSgG)
Posted by: Douglas at June 25, 2012 08:20 PM (YKOnu)
>>>Solution is for GRRM to turn the writing over to a young and eager author, give him/her the outline of how you see the story going, and maintain as executive editor with veto power.
-----
Ya, Clive Cussler did that...the books he 'franchised' out kinda suck.
Posted by: CanaDave at June 25, 2012 08:21 PM (lJSgG)
Posted by: CanaDave at June 25, 2012 08:22 PM (lJSgG)
Posted by: Petunia at June 25, 2012 08:23 PM (zw1MU)
Posted by: Mr Pink at June 25, 2012 08:24 PM (jmwiV)
Posted by: CanaDave at June 25, 2012 08:25 PM (lJSgG)
Nover got into Feist, and Eddings Ellenium and mallorean were good, couldn't get into the other ones.
Posted by: Douglas at June 25, 2012 08:27 PM (YKOnu)
Posted by: Petunia at June 25, 2012 08:29 PM (zw1MU)
----
GRRM written books 4 and 5 of TSoIaF - while still good - haven't come close to the high mark (peak?) of book 3. There may be no win here.
Posted by: AlphaBase1 at June 25, 2012 08:29 PM (O1e87)
Pretty sure that was meant as the singluar. "Mind."
Posted by: Douglas at June 25, 2012 08:30 PM (YKOnu)
Posted by: Mr Pink at June 25, 2012 08:31 PM (jmwiV)
Posted by: Douglas at June 25, 2012 08:32 PM (YKOnu)
Posted by: Mr Pink at June 25, 2012 08:38 PM (jmwiV)
Posted by: Douglas at June 25, 2012 08:44 PM (YKOnu)
Posted by: garrett at June 25, 2012 08:52 PM (KZz5l)
That being out of the way, I've read read book 5 twice now and I don't think Aegon ("Young Griff") is Edric Dayne. Jon Connington believes he's really Aegon and, while I don't have chapter and verse ready to hand to cite, the clear impression I got from their time travelling the Rhoyne (and Connington's own internal dialogue later) is that Connington has been looking after him for a long, long time (IOW, not just since Edric dropped out of the story a short while ago as part of a newly-hatched plot with Varys to seat a pretender). Septa Lemore has been teaching him for years, as well.
No, I believe that the story Tyrion hears is true: Varys secreted Aegon out of King's Landing as a baby and gave him over to Connington's care and he's been raised to one day return and take back the Iron Throne for his House. Varys really does what he thinks is best for the realm, so the reason he gave Kevan for killing him is his real reason: Kevan was going to fix all the lovely chaos the astonishingly stupid Cersei had created and spoil his long-nurtured plan to put Aegon on the Iron Throne.
I initially disagreed with the idea that Lyanna & Rhaegar were Jon Snow's parents but I've come around to it. I now think there's a very good argument that Jon Snow is actually Azor Ahai. So, either he, Dany, and Aegon are indeed the 3-headed dragon (but all real, not 2 real and one fake) who will take Westeros back or (more likely to my mind, given that he's already passed on being Lord of Winterfell), Jon assumes the mantle of Azor Ahai and leaves Westeros to Aegon, Dany, or whoever and goes North to defeat the Others (GRRM has said we're going to see a lot of the North we haven't seen yet coming up soon). Dying would technically release him from his vow to the Night's Watch (the words of the vow are clear, even if they weren't intended for that situation) but he's not the type to shirk his duty on a technicality.
As for the Iron Bank, they're setting up what could prove to be a more interesting end game: They're throwing their support behind Stannis--the only personage they know of who's actually in Westeros with a solid competing claim to Tommen's. Because he will pay them. So the Bank will be backing Stannis against Aegon/Dany/Jon(?) when it all comes to it.
Posted by: Dodd at June 25, 2012 09:24 PM (7KDDM)
I love Stannis, btw. And as far as the Iron Bank goes, he's the best money bet currently going in Westeros. He may be a dick, but he acts the king better than anyone else so far.
Posted by: AlphaBase1 at June 25, 2012 09:34 PM (O1e87)
Posted by: gonzotx at June 25, 2012 09:37 PM (3izs/)
Posted by: gonzotx at June 25, 2012 09:46 PM (3izs/)
Posted by: JRR at June 26, 2012 03:11 AM (TK/Kt)
this theory basically hinges on a differing description of her at two different points, one where she is introduced to Catelyn and describes as having good child bearing hips, and then later when Jaime meets up with her during one of his POV chapters describing her as having narrow hips.
Probably a red herring, but it seemed like a big clue that a lot of people on the various internets seized on.
I'm not done with DWD yet, so maybe it's resolved but I don't think so.
Posted by: dr. shatterhand at June 26, 2012 03:33 AM (OisKx)
on a side note, the sound track from The Princess Bride is horrendous, I have realized that the movie in all facets is way over rated.
Posted by: dr. shatterhand at June 26, 2012 03:49 AM (OisKx)
They took over a year off for the Sopranos. They could do the same here.
The producers said they will split the next book into 2 seasons because it is just too large to squeeze into a single season.
Posted by: exsanguine at June 26, 2012 04:20 AM (RccHN)
Most of the speculation about Aegon is that he is a fake, since Qaithe (the mysterious woman who appears to Dany and tells her of the people coming to her) prophecies "a mummer's dragon." Connington was told of Aegon's identity as a young boy, a few years after his supposed death, by Ilyrios of Pentos. Tyrion notes the statue in Pentos of Illyrios as a young man looks like "Young Griff." It is noted that Ilyrios' dead wife resembled the Targaryen look. The speculation is that she was a Blackfyre, a descendent of the Targaryen line that rebelled against the crown a hundred years earlier. The Golden Company, formed by Bittersteel, was created with the intention of putting a Blackfyre on the throne. Who is supporting Aegon in his attempt to take the throne? Golden Company. The theory is that Ilyrios is taking his own son, descended from the Blackfryes on his mother's side (Martin makes a point of saying how the male line was extinguished), and gave him to Connington under the pretense that he is the rightful king. Just do a search for Blackfyre Pretenders or Rebellion and there is a ton more.
I would recommend checking out the forums on Westeros.org, where you can literally waste hours reading things you never even noticed.
This is what makes the series so enjoyable. There are literally hundreds of elements woven throughout the book that aren't apparent until re-reading. For example, Tommen complains about an old, mean black cat picking on his kittens. Its description is the same as the cat Arya is chasing when she discovers the dragons skulls. If you read a bit further into it, it is the same cat mentioned by Ser Barristan in his recollections of Princess Rhaenys (Rhaegar's daughter). He remembers her little black kitten that was always be her side and whatever happened to it. It is such a minor thing, but really adds to the world building.
Posted by: Synnerman at June 26, 2012 06:03 AM (0Bdlg)
Posted by: NYCcon at June 26, 2012 06:08 AM (jLXdE)
Posted by: NYCcon at June 26, 2012 06:14 AM (jLXdE)
If you go back and read the prologue of DWD after finishing the book, you see that Jon has probably warged into Ghost. Otherwise, the prologue makes no sense.
The Mummer's Dragon was one of the visions in the house of Undying that Dany sees in ACOK,
Posted by: Stormy70 at June 26, 2012 06:21 AM (gfTmA)
But too much fantasy/video game world schlock.
Don't want to invest time in the books.
Prefer something historical or history based fiction. Much more interesting and satisfying.
Though the naked dragon mother chick in the films is hot . . .
Posted by: Sphynx at June 26, 2012 06:45 AM (fEmj2)
Posted by: Publius24 at June 26, 2012 07:19 AM (ML55S)
Posted by: Dag at June 26, 2012 07:30 AM (g53Ph)
Posted by: Matt at June 26, 2012 07:38 AM (c4srZ)
Posted by: 2nd Amendment Mother at June 26, 2012 07:45 AM (L4CWX)
Posted by: steevy at June 26, 2012 08:17 AM (Xb3hu)
Posted by: Lee Reynolds at June 26, 2012 08:27 AM (rJMw2)
But Jon is Robert's bastard.
That way everybody can die happy when the wights come over the wall.
Posted by: mpurinTexas at June 26, 2012 09:14 AM (J4Pnx)
If you go back and read the prologue of DWD after finishing the book, you see that Jon has probably warged into Ghost. Otherwise, the prologue makes no sense.
Problem, for Jon to be king he must have the blood of the dragon, and in the prologue the other WARG describes a complete loss of abilities. Only way Jon could be of the blood of the dragon after a warg transition would be to subjugate someone else with the blood of a dragon, and also a warg.
Posted by: Douglas at June 26, 2012 09:25 AM (YKOnu)
The analysis of the name of the series, is OBVIOUSLY about both the targaryens and the starks, which means that Jon will be the king, in my opinion, also, it's a play on the conflict with the Others, who can only be killed with "fire in steel, stone or as fire."
As for the starks, lets go through the first presaging of plot.
We have Jon, "Ghost." there is a lot of ambiguity to that, could just be that he was the one without a name or history, but Martin will find a way of killing Jon and then bringing him back.
Robb the next eldest, and first legitimate "Grey Wind." I had a problem with this, but I think it was deliberate. Robb was the stark who would sweep the world in the greyness between "summer and winter," presaging that winter is comming, and with his fall, winter was there, which is depicted in the books.
Sansa had "lady" and then lost her, but she still dreams of lady, though she's dead. Without her wolf, she is still a lady, she will be the political tool that manipulates the actions of kingdomes to rebuild under the dragon, which Baelish is a part of the conspiracy of.
Arya had "Nymeria" which is an actual historical name of a woman warior, a rather brutal one, as well as being an in book historical queen who lead troops when her husband fell on the battle field, also known for violence.
Bran has "Summer" and old nurse nan, hodors great or great great grandmother, would call bran "a child of summer" since he had never faced a winter. This insinuates that not only is Bran the child of summer, but he will be the one who will usher in the new summer one the others are defeated, and winter is gone.
Ricken has "Shaggydog." Rickon lost all references to society and is a wild animal, sorta like being infected with Arys' madness due to poor guidance, ricken is a non-character other than to promote fillial conflict and motiviation.
It didn't register until Arya had her dreams on the ship, but the thing that JON! said when finding the Wolves, "The banner of house Stark is the Direwolf my lord, these were meant for them sir."
And the fact that Jon said it, means that Jon is still alive and central to the story. Jon said it, and Bran was the first to adopt. If George had a plan, that was one of the most important moments in the books, even if it's just to give some hints as to how the rest of the series plays out.
Posted by: Douglas at June 26, 2012 09:41 AM (YKOnu)
Posted by: EROWMER at June 26, 2012 01:29 PM (sIm3i)
I beleive that Jon is the son of Rhaegon and Lyanna. He will not die from the attempt on his life and there is the issue unaddressed on how can you ride a dragon if you can't control them....
The only way is to control the dragon is as a skinchanger or the horn. The only one who can survive the horn would be the priest. Thus Jon, Bran and the priest will control the dragons....how the plot gets there I don't know.
Just my take on the matter....
Posted by: Budahmon at June 26, 2012 01:55 PM (vDh+T)
Posted by: kg1982 at June 26, 2012 05:01 PM (b0RUk)
@167 -- I have always taken Cersei's story of her 'stillborn' babe to be the story she tells because, in reality, it was Robert's child and she killed it.
Posted by: Dodd at June 27, 2012 07:46 PM (7KDDM)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2418 seconds, 304 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Honestly,
all of the main protagoniste are pretty horrible people. The only truely admirable person is Tyrion Lannister. And even he is pathetically flawed.
Posted by: Jack at June 25, 2012 06:14 PM (wUFaM)