January 28, 2012
— andy "If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever." ~ George Orwell
Today's must-read, via Jonah Goldberg.
The armed services’ ethos, although noble, is not a template for civilian society, unless the aspiration is to extinguish politics. People marching in serried ranks, fused into a solid mass by the heat of martial ardor, proceeding in lock step, shoulder to shoulder, obedient to orders from a commanding officer — this is a recurring dream of progressives eager to dispense with tiresome persuasion and untidy dissension in a free, tumultuous society.Progressive presidents use martial language as a way of encouraging Americans to confuse civilian politics with military exertions, thereby circumventing an impediment to progressive aspirations — the Constitution and the patience it demands.
Whether they're fetishizing China, attempting to reorder society to combat fictitious global warming or taking over the healthcare system, rest assured that when you cut through their high-minded bullshit, the heart of a petty tyrant beats in every "progressive".
Posted by: andy at
06:20 AM
| Comments (257)
Post contains 180 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Ed Anger - Certified Kos Kid at January 28, 2012 06:29 AM (7+pP9)
Ace was on fire yesterday.
His last post, "Obama Is a Rolodex Socialist," is vintage Ace.
It's that kinda crisp analysis that brought me here almost 7 years ago.
Posted by: soothsayer at January 28, 2012 06:30 AM (sqkOB)
The Western Left is even worse; they're nihilists. They don't want to control the West. They want to kill the West and everything in it ... except the non-Westerners.
Posted by: really ... at January 28, 2012 06:30 AM (X3lox)
Posted by: Vic at January 28, 2012 06:30 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Palerider at January 28, 2012 06:33 AM (5CusZ)
The theme of the address is something I've been saying for a long time: Obama made everything worse.
Posted by: soothsayer at January 28, 2012 06:33 AM (sqkOB)
Like Glenn Reynolds at Instapundit would put it - "They told me if I voted for that war-monger John McCain we would see a fascist military remolding of American society...and they were right!"
Posted by: Pave Low John at January 28, 2012 06:36 AM (ue6kh)
Posted by: soothsayer at January 28, 2012 10:33 AM (sqkOB)
--------------------------
Barky was the ignition. THe Western Left needed someone who had no attachment to the West and was not bound (subconsciously, even) to any of the traditions, mores, or taboos of the West ... in order to utterly destroy the system from the inside. A Westerner couldn't do this since Westerners are inherently trapped into thinking like a Westerner. The Western Left needed someone who really held the West in utter outside contempt (not mere self-hate like the Western Leftists, themselves) in order to give the necessary final shot to our system to bring it down. The Western Left could not have done this without someone who hated the West as much as Barky and who was not bound culturally in any way to the West.
Sadly, after Barky showed the Western Left the way to real dstruction of our nation, now any old self-hating American can do it. Now, they see the template for taking the US down, quickly, and they are all ready to play. The damage has been done. The gates were opened to the barbarians and there will be no closing them, now. Th city will burn.
Posted by: really ... at January 28, 2012 06:40 AM (X3lox)
Pretty good editorial from George Will.
What is worse than the petty tyrants from the left every few decades is that we never get to roll back their tyrannies. We are still suffering from FDR's policies.
Posted by: also from Oklahoma at January 28, 2012 06:45 AM (wWZWw)
I found it:
“It is hard to fix a specific starting date for the progressive race to the Great Society,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “but a good guess might be 1888, the year [when socialist] Edward Bellamy's novel Looking Backward burst on the American scene.” Set in the year 2000, this futuristic book depicts a utopian society run with the hierarchical efficiency of a military battalion. All workers in this idealized world belong to a unified “industrial army” that labors within the confines of an economy controlled by a coterie of central planners who are deemed to be more capable of fostering prosperity and productivity than is a free marketplace. A preacher in the story lauds the earthly paradise, while the population at large looks back upon the “age of individualism” with a blend of amusement and derision.
http://tinyurl.com/83ajpbw
Posted by: Ed Anger - Certified Kos Kid at January 28, 2012 06:46 AM (7+pP9)
When he is not using class warfare and stirring racial distrust to weaken the country he spouts off that we should all march shoulder to shoulder and not be worried about divisions in rank. The hypocrisy is over the top.
The hypocrisy should give us all pause. Such a dichotomy of principle is evidence of a mind split in two, with no firm foundation of principle save the glory of power over another.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, Rioting Christian at January 28, 2012 06:47 AM (d0Tfm)
War is a Force that gives us Meaning, by Chris Hedges (2002)
"The rush of battle is a potent and often lethal addiction, for war is a drug."
Posted by: Panzernashorn at January 28, 2012 06:47 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: Jose at January 28, 2012 10:45 AM (srIqv)
--------------------------
Don't forget when he insane supporters wanted to bypass EVERYTHING and have Bush resign in December 2008 to let Barky just take the office (even though there was no process ANYWHERE that allowed for anything of the sort - and that's aside from the fact that Barky was an incompetent retard who can't do anything correctly, anyhow).
Posted by: really ... at January 28, 2012 06:47 AM (X3lox)
Just curious, how much control do you have over the ads that appear in your blog, and how much do you care about which ads show up?
Posted by: Sweet Lou at January 28, 2012 06:49 AM (WrHFg)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 28, 2012 06:49 AM (niZvt)
rest assured that when you cut through their high-minded bullshit, the heart of a petty tyrant beats in every "progressive". Posted by: Andy at 10:20 AM
I disagree about any degree of high mindedness, It's about raw power and subjugation.
Posted by: willow at January 28, 2012 06:50 AM (TomZ9)
Posted by: willow at January 28, 2012 10:50 AM (TomZ9)
--------------------
Exactly. There's nothing high-minded about Western Leftism. It is nothing but simple-minded answers to complx problems that the Left arrives at by assuming that the world is static and stagnant (like the Leftist's infantile view of the world).
And that's for the true believer, honest leftists. The rest are even worse scum and more simple-minded.
Posted by: really ... at January 28, 2012 06:52 AM (X3lox)
Any of us that have been paying attention to the rise of this AA Bozo from the get go saw the potential for this scenario if he could somehow consolidate power.
These two columns are about our nightmares.
Posted by: ontherocks at January 28, 2012 06:53 AM (ZJCDy)
In fact, if we had a decent school system, children would spend a semester in HS on analyzing the differences and similarities of the policies of FDR, Mussolini, Hitler, and Stalin in the 30s.
Posted by: 18-1 at January 28, 2012 06:53 AM (3aXbg)
Posted by: Jose at January 28, 2012 10:45 AM (srIqv)
There, fixed it for ya ...
Posted by: mark x at January 28, 2012 06:54 AM (plLN9)
Posted by: Benito Amilcare Andrea Mussolini at January 28, 2012 06:58 AM (e8kgV)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 28, 2012 06:59 AM (i6RpT)
King 'Nathan R. Jessop' Barky I
The always readable VDH has a fresh article out today titled "Can't We All Get Along? -- Never". Reading the morning thread vitriol between Newt and Mitt fans there, his article is very apropos.
http://tinyurl.com/7wu2ruc
Posted by: GnuBreed at January 28, 2012 06:59 AM (BhuDE)
--also from Oklahoma
Rather, have yet to CHOOSE rolling back modern American tyranny.
Given the GOP Debates, think again of Civil Liberty and the Constitution. The status quo dissolves Rule of Law with the neoconservatives in audience cheering the loss of Liberty, insisting that subjugation is the only way to preserve American "exceptionalism".
Vanitas vanitatum omnia vanitas
Posted by: Panzernashorn at January 28, 2012 07:00 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: Truman North at January 28, 2012 07:00 AM (I2LwF)
It is nothing but simple-minded answers to complx problems that the Left arrives at by assuming that the world is static and stagnant (like the Leftist's infantile view of the world).
I have decided they (the top men) are not simple minded, They are malicious cynical bastids, They use their constituents who are as they say useful tools.
why i say this is the shrieking non stop through Bush's term, blood , oil, murderers, hitler, and with an election their guy goes way past the supposed issues of Bush doubles down on stealing personal rights of americans with nary a peep. (many of these stories) i'm sure everyone can think of another. the whole friggen thing was about power,
I was actually stunned by their about face.
Posted by: willow at January 28, 2012 07:00 AM (TomZ9)
Who can forget (well, you might want to) Jimmy Carter's exhortation to treat the Energy Crisis of the 70's as "The Moral Equivalent of War"?
This is indeed nothing "new", but it is again something to worry about. You could go back to the Roman Emperor who said he wished the world had just one throat so he could cut it.
It is based on the pure lust for power and control, which has really little to do with Democracy, and even less to to with a Constitutional Republic.
Posted by: Reader C.J. Burch writes.... at January 28, 2012 07:01 AM (sJTmU)
Posted by: Jose at January 28, 2012 10:45 AM (srIqv)
He gave up wishing to do it and just does it now. And of course there are no cries of imperial presidency from the MFM
Posted by: TheQuietMan at January 28, 2012 07:01 AM (1Jaio)
"......the heart of a petty tyrant beats in every "progressive"."
.
Yeah. .....So let's put up another progressive, Romney, to run against the Progressive-in-Chief.
.
We are so epically fucked.
Posted by: wheatie at January 28, 2012 07:02 AM (ALwK/)
Barky was the ignition. THe Western Left needed someone who had no attachment to the West and was not bound (subconsciously, even) to any of the traditions, mores, or taboos of the West ... in order to utterly destroy the system from the inside.
THREAD WINNER at #12
Posted by: Truman North at January 28, 2012 07:02 AM (I2LwF)
Haven't you heard? Only conservative Christians and family values Republicans can be hypocrites!
Posted by: Shit the MBM says at January 28, 2012 07:02 AM (Y+DPZ)
The GOP debates have clearly demonstrated to me how far we have come in ignoring the Constitutional basis for government by the people.
Posted by: Hrothgar at January 28, 2012 07:02 AM (i3+c5)
Posted by: willow at January 28, 2012 07:02 AM (TomZ9)
Posted by: Ed Anger - Certified Kos Kid at January 28, 2012 07:03 AM (7+pP9)
Posted by: willow at January 28, 2012 10:55 AM (TomZ9)
I have nightmares each and every night
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 28, 2012 10:59 AM (i6RpT)
There are tingles running up and down Chrissy Matthews' leg just at the thought of it
Posted by: TheQuietMan at January 28, 2012 07:03 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: SCOAMF at January 28, 2012 07:03 AM (RxLT6)
You've got the gimmes. They aren't concerned about the long term future. They aren't concerned about ideology, or even rights. They just want more stuff and are fine with however you get it.
You've for the managers. They generally believe themselves to be both intellectually and morally superior to their country men, and believe this gives them not only a right, but an obligation to lead them.
Then finally you've got the fools. Falling in between the managers and the gimmies, they are somewhat educated, but very carefully cocoon themselves. They don't want to think much about politics, other then "I'm voting for the good guys who will do nice things for people."
The first group is only concerned about the payoff. Nothing else matters. Obama could declare himself King, and as long as he raised their EBT card they'd be ok with that.
The second group tends to be quite pragmatic. They will defend liberal politicians as long as they are advancing the greater goal. This is the group you'll generally see if you visit leftwing boards. Always arguing about policy tactics and never questioning whether the government can or should do whatever they are discussing, because in the end, government should control everything - not necessarily own mind you, they are aware that international socialism yields a much lower living standard then the more economically pragmatic national socialism...
The last group are the ones we can conceivably reach. They are emotionally invested in liberal politics, but not intellectually. In large measure they exist because of the efforts of the state media and government-education complex. In large measure these people are the ones that have turned away from Obama and the Democrats since 2009. They've got their jobs, their savings, and seen their communities ravaged. But it is not a slam dunk that we can reach them in 2012. They will swallow the idea that Bush, "the bankers", and "special interests" have impeded Obama's policies and therefore he is not to blame if we don't tailor our message correctly.
Posted by: 18-1 at January 28, 2012 07:04 AM (3aXbg)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, Rioting Christian at January 28, 2012 07:05 AM (d0Tfm)
He gave up wishing to do it and just does it now. And of course there are no cries of imperial presidency from the MFM
Posted by: TheQuietMan at January 28, 2012 11:01 AM (1Jaio)
------------------------------
Or from the GOP, who have let Barky "rule" with impunity. The GOP was even nice enough to confirm Barky's anti-Western idea that empathy is a legitimate main characteristic for judges and justices.
Thanks a lot, GOP. You been very hepful.
Posted by: really ... at January 28, 2012 07:05 AM (X3lox)
Running punchline, the heretic you'd burn at the stake is just like you except in one thing. Or, mote meet beam. (mt 7:3)
Posted by: Panzernashorn at January 28, 2012 07:06 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: Truman North at January 28, 2012 07:08 AM (I2LwF)
Posted by: Totally Irrational Political Malcontent at January 28, 2012 07:08 AM (r2PLg)
That way the well heeled of the MBM, Hollywood, academia, and politics can claim they're "middle class"
Posted by: Shit Lefties Say at January 28, 2012 07:08 AM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: willow at January 28, 2012 07:09 AM (TomZ9)
Posted by: A Conservative Teacher at January 28, 2012 07:09 AM (WwXHu)
Posted by: logprof misses italics at January 28, 2012 07:09 AM (ykSKg)
AGW True Believers have that same attitude - it's crisis time, and everything must be subordinated to the One Great Fight ... and, oh, they'll be making the decisions about what gets done.
Posted by: Waterhouse at January 28, 2012 07:10 AM (bgAe9)
Notice his fury at Arizona's governor.
The JEF doesn't understand that governors don't work for him. He thinks that he is the emperor of America, and all should bow to him.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at January 28, 2012 07:11 AM (nEUpB)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 28, 2012 07:11 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: 18-1 at January 28, 2012 11:04 AM (3aXbg)
that seems to be the problem over-all is the lack of messaging to the public from our side.
They should take the debates and all the candidates should quit beating eachother over the head and address all of these issues.
Posted by: willow at January 28, 2012 07:11 AM (TomZ9)
Okay, fess up. How did you do the italics?
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at January 28, 2012 07:12 AM (nEUpB)
As a senior in high school (1971) I remember reading the book "Vandenberg" by Oliver Lange. The essense of the story was stunning. Washington is wiped out, the Russians take over with ease as they had worked communists into the three networks (only 3 networks at the time for you youngins'). Americans, for the most part did not rebel because we were allowed to keep our stuff. Disturbing and profetic.
From the main characterVandenberg's journal:
"...the deeper shock then, was not that we lost, but that we lost with such ease, with an effortlessness that approached divine imperturability. In terms of image, the world was presented with the Statue of Liberty, not as an inviolate emblem but as a vacuously grinning old whore, who after a token assault was debauched and then rolled docilely in the hay.
We proved the lie, were served up with a gagging portion of our own vintage distillation of apocalyptic horeshit-all the narcissistic swill about indomitable spirit, invincibility, courage and nobility of purpose-and demonstrated once and for all to those who looked on with interest a fact long suspected: that this nation through a self-administered indoctrination of spurious righteousness, larded with false rewards of superflous luxury, had at last achieved the most tractable, malleable-let's face it, spineless people to walk the face of the earth."
The author had worked for the New Yorker and went galt.
Posted by: Ammo Dump at January 28, 2012 07:12 AM (WUWb9)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 28, 2012 07:12 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: BlueFalcon in Boston at January 28, 2012 07:13 AM (ijjAe)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 28, 2012 07:14 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 28, 2012 07:15 AM (niZvt)
and "special interests" have impeded Obama's policies and therefore he
is not to blame if we don't tailor our message correctly."
The retort to this is that Obama didn't have to fill his cabinet with bankers and half of Goldman Sachs did he?
Posted by: BlueFalcon in Boston at January 28, 2012 07:15 AM (ijjAe)
I can't even tolerate a few seconds of his sound bites. I start yelling and cursing and scaring my wife.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at January 28, 2012 07:16 AM (nEUpB)
I know this will sound rather over-simplistic, but principles are like that. It boils down to where you get your your life-force from: outside of you, or inside of you.
.
If you get your life from someone or something outside of you, you will never be a complete human being. There will always be someone or something "out there" that will control you, either through your desire of it (the need to look like one of the "cool people") or through outright force.
.
If you get your life from somewhere inside of you, you are in control of yourself and your conscience is your guide. This is the form of individual freedom the Founders sought to enshrine in our government, and precisely what the left is busily destroying through every means available to them.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, Rioting Christian at January 28, 2012 07:16 AM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 28, 2012 07:16 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: willow at January 28, 2012 07:16 AM (TomZ9)
Posted by: logprof misses italics at January 28, 2012 11:09 AM (ykSKg)
Somebody dropped the ball on that one
--------------------------
Shot themselves in the foot, more like.
Who did they put in charge of picking the host? The same guy that picks the halftime entertainment?
Posted by: Retread at January 28, 2012 07:16 AM (joSBv)
55 Mitt and Newt are both progressives. But they both love America. Either is preferable to this freak.
.
Newt a progressive? ....How so? ....I love you Truman, but I just don't see how the term 'progressive' can be applied to Gingrich.
.
The problem with Mitt that I see in the general, is that he just doesn't inspire Trust. ....Quite the opposite, really. .
.
Mitt can douse himself with religious piety all he wants to, but he has a long history of being out for himself, and himself only. ....I keep waiting for him to make a cogent, convincing, explanation for why he wants power....and I am still waiting.
Posted by: wheatie at January 28, 2012 07:16 AM (ALwK/)
Use square brackets like so: [ i] and [ /i] (shown here with an extra space inside the brackets so it displays).
Posted by: Waterhouse at January 28, 2012 07:17 AM (bgAe9)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 28, 2012 07:18 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: USS Diversity at January 28, 2012 07:18 AM (PddVe)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 28, 2012 11:11 AM (i6RpT)
--I can only guess that he was booked before the Words With Friends incident. That proved him to be not just a dick to those who do not share his politics, but an arrogant prick all-around to people he considers beneath him (which is almost everyone else), especially those slaving away in the travel industry.
Posted by: logprof misses italics at January 28, 2012 07:18 AM (ykSKg)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 28, 2012 07:18 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: willow at January 28, 2012 07:18 AM (TomZ9)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at January 28, 2012 07:18 AM (nEUpB)
When I said "high-minded bullshit", the emphasis was on "bullshit." All the talk of equality, fairness, saving the planet, etc. is just a smokescreen to get them what they want: control.
Posted by: Andy at January 28, 2012 07:19 AM (XG+Mn)
It's so wall-punchingly infuriating that the military gets the immediate cuts. Did I miss the story where the DoE and Education were trimming a third of their workforce? Why the fuck aren't they?
Posted by: Waterhouse at January 28, 2012 07:21 AM (bgAe9)
Posted by: logprof misses italics at January 28, 2012 07:21 AM (ykSKg)
The new New Comments Thingy is in the works, so I hear.
Posted by: Andy at January 28, 2012 07:21 AM (XG+Mn)
Your closing paragraph was well said.
It vitally important that we never forget that:
progressive=authoritarian=totalitarian=genocide.
It's an inexorable progression.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at January 28, 2012 07:21 AM (nEUpB)
Posted by: willow at January 28, 2012 11:09 AM (TomZ9)
This may be the singular truth (which they constantly obscure) of our time.
Posted by: ontherocks at January 28, 2012 07:22 AM (ZJCDy)
Try a double "enter." that's been working for me.
(there's a joke here about the English chick with two vaginas.)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at January 28, 2012 07:23 AM (nEUpB)
Bill Whittle has an excellent new Firewall video up titled 'Vote Pump' which echoes your point.
http://www.declarationentertainment.com/
Just scroll down a bit to get to the video. About 6 minutes.
Posted by: GnuBreed at January 28, 2012 07:23 AM (BhuDE)
When I said "high-minded bullshit", the emphasis was on "bullshit." All the talk of equality, fairness, saving the planet, etc. is just a smokescreen to get them what they want: control.
You have broken the code.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, Rioting Christian at January 28, 2012 07:23 AM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: Andy at January 28, 2012 11:19 AM (XG+Mn)
uh hmm, well I hope you don't mind my emphasizing the point., and You are right.
backs slowly away from the keyboard.
Posted by: willow at January 28, 2012 07:24 AM (TomZ9)
Posted by: Clarence at January 28, 2012 07:24 AM (z0HdK)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at January 28, 2012 07:24 AM (jucos)
Posted by: Gasman at January 28, 2012 07:26 AM (cgrfB)
Posted by: Waterhouse at January 28, 2012 07:26 AM (bgAe9)
Posted by: Waterhouse at January 28, 2012 11:21 AM (bgAe9)
That was Bitch and Boner's great deal. And they're both still in their "leadership" positions. Fukkin unreal.
Posted by: really ... at January 28, 2012 07:26 AM (X3lox)
Posted by: Waterhouse at January 28, 2012 11:21 AM (bgAe9)
Simple, cuts that work to the detriment of the country are always made immediately, while cuts that might impact a special interest group (Soros, chirren, food stamp giftees, etc.) are, at best, subjected to a theoretical decrease in their rate of increase which will occur nine years from now.
Posted by: Hrothgar at January 28, 2012 07:27 AM (i3+c5)
Posted by: kbdabear at January 28, 2012 07:28 AM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: Andy at January 28, 2012 11:21 AM (XG+Mn)
Second look at the Old Comments Thingy?
Posted by: really ... at January 28, 2012 07:28 AM (X3lox)
Posted by: logprof at January 28, 2012 07:28 AM (ykSKg)
use no spaces in the code
Posted by: Hrothgar at January 28, 2012 07:29 AM (i3+c5)
William C. Dudley : president and chief executive officer of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, partner and managing director at Goldman, Sachs and was the firmÂ’s chief U.S. economist for a decade
Douglas Elmendorf: Obama Director of the Congressional Budget Office in January 2009, replaced Furman as Director of the Hamilton Project (Note that the Hamilton Project was funded by Robert Rubin and Goldman Sachs)
Rahm Emanuel: Obama Chief of staff, on the payroll of Goldman Sachs, receiving $3,000 per month from the firm to “introduce us to people,” in the words of one Goldman partner at the time.
Dianna Farrell: Obama Administration: Deputy Director, National Economic Council, Former Goldman Sachs Title: Financial Analyst
Stephen Friedman: Obama Administration: Chairman, PresidentÂ’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board, Former Goldman Sachs Title: Board Member (Chairman, 1990-94; Director, 2005
Michael Frohman: Robert Rubin’s Chief of Staff while Rubin served as Secretary of the Treasury and an Obama “head hunter” according to “Rubin Proteges Change Their Tune as They Join Obama’s Team” in the New York Times.
Jason Furman: directed economic policy for the Obama Presidential Campaign, served as the second Director of the Hamilton Project after Peter OrszagÂ’s departure for the Obama administration
Mark Gallogly: Sits on the Hamilton ProjectÂ’s advisory council. He is also, according to Wikipedia, currently a member of ObamaÂ’s PresidentÂ’s Economic Recovery Advisory Board.
Timothy Geithner: Secretary of the Treasury, a former managing director of Goldman Sachs
Gary Gensler: Obama Administration: Commissioner, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Former Goldman Sachs Title: Partner and Co-head of Finance
Michael Greenstone: the 4th Director of the Hamilton Project. Just as attorney Craig went from advising Obama to defending Goldman Sachs against the SEC complaint, Greenstone has used the revolving door to go from went an economic adviser position to Obama to one of the Goldman Sachs outlets, in this case its think tank embedded in the Brookings Institution and funded by Goldman and Robert Rubin. All 3 previous Directors of the Hamilton Project work in the Obama administration.
Robert Hormats: Obama Administration: Undersecretary for Economic, Energy and Agricultural Affairs, State Department Former Goldman Sachs Title: Vice Chairman, Goldman Sachs Group
Neel Kashkari: served under Treasury Secretary Paulson and was kept on by Obama after his inauguration for a limited period to work on TARP oversight, former Vice President of Goldman Sachs in San Francisco where he where he led GoldmanÂ’s Information Technology Security Investment Banking practice.
Karen Kornbluh: (sometimes called "ObamaÂ’s brain") Obama Ambassador to the OECD, was Deputy Chief of Staff to Mr. Goldman Sachs, Robert Rubin
Jacob (AKA "Jack") Lew: the United States Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources. According to Wikipedia, Lew sits on the Brookings-Rubin funded Hamilton Project Advisory Board. He also served with Robert Rubin in Bill ClintonÂ’s cabinet as Director of OMB.
David Lipton: now at ObamaÂ’s National Economic Council and the National Security Council. Lipton -worked with Larry Summers and Timothy Geithner, on the US response to the Asian financial crisis of the 1990Â’s. MergeFoundations reports that Lipton worked closely with Robert Rubin:
Emil Michael: White House Fellow, former investment banker with Goldman Sachs
Philip Murphy: Obama Administration: Ambassador to Germany, Former Goldman Sachs Title: Head of Goldman Sachs, FrankfurtMark Patterson: Obama Administration: Chief of Staff to Treasury Secretary, Timothy Geitner, Former Goldman Sachs Title: Lobbyist 2005-2008; Vice President for Government Relations
Mark Peterson: Chief of staff to Timothy Geithner, Goldman Sachs vice president and lobbyist
Steve Ratner: the shady billionaire financier who Obama appointed as his “car czar” and who resigned after it was revealed that his company, the Quadrangle Group, was apparently involved in “pay to play” for a billion dollars or so of New York State pension funds, and was under possible indictment by the New York AG and the SEC, also sits on the Advisory Council of the Goldman funded Hamilton Project
Robert Reischauer: a member of the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission from 2000-2009 and was its vice chair from 2001-2008. He too sits on the Hamilton ProjectÂ’s advisory board.
Alice Rivlin: Obama named Alice Rivlin to his so called deficit reduction commission.
Gene Sperling: advisor to Timothy Geithner on bailouts, Sperling paid by Goldman Sachs for one year of consulting work.
Adam Storch: Obama Managing Executive of the Security and Exchange CommissionÂ’s Division of Enforcement Vice President in the Goldman Sachs Business Intelligence Group
Larry Summers: Obama chief economic adviser and head of the National Economic Counsel, Worked under Robert Rubin at Goldman Sachs
John Thain: Obama Administration: Advisor to Treasury Secretary, Timothy Geitner, Former Goldman Sachs Title: President and Chief Operating Officer (1999-2003)
Posted by: BlueFalcon in Boston at January 28, 2012 07:30 AM (ijjAe)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 28, 2012 07:31 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: really ... at January 28, 2012 07:31 AM (X3lox)
Clarence is using the weasel phrase that no former GS people are in his *Cabinet*. As if that diminishes what The Ben Bernank and Co. are doing.
Posted by: logprof at January 28, 2012 07:32 AM (ykSKg)
The really infuriating part is how we no longer have any control over our elected officials anymore. They say one thing to get elected, and then do something else entirely once in office with no repercussions, no penalties and no recourse for the people to correct the problem we made by electing liars.
Newt made a good point during one of the 1,320 debates about the fact that conservatives make up the majority of America, yet are so underrepresented in Washington as to essentially not exist.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, Rioting Christian at January 28, 2012 07:32 AM (d0Tfm)
Putting Alec Baldwin in as the face of such an event is not a mistake - from the point of veiw of who is organizing it.
It is an attempt at "re-habilating" Baldwin's image. Many of us will not swallow this horsehit, but many of the impressionable will. Look, Alec is "just like us" and really does like the people in the military. And the military people scheduled to appear will be the props for this Potemkin village. They will do as they are told, whether they like it or not. Alec will always be the self-centered asshole that he has always been. Nothing will change that. But some of the people can fooled all of the time.
And doing as you are told, whether you like it or not, is the template for the future. Whether you like it or not. The sun has set on our Constitutional Republic. And the sun will soon set on what followed, a Constitutional Democracy.
What is to follow will be more like a corporatist oligarchy with the superficial appearances of a lawful society.
Posted by: Reader C.J. Burch writes.... at January 28, 2012 07:32 AM (sJTmU)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 28, 2012 07:32 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, Rioting Christian at January 28, 2012 11:32 AM (d0Tfm)
Newt redeems himself often enough with statements that if I could vote for him in the primary (thanks VA GOP) I still would.
Posted by: Hrothgar at January 28, 2012 07:36 AM (i3+c5)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 28, 2012 07:36 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at January 28, 2012 07:37 AM (FIE/L)
--Yeah, just like we're supposed to care that Madonna is relevant to anyone outside the gay community.
Posted by: logprof is glad at least the smileys work at January 28, 2012 07:37 AM (ykSKg)
Posted by: wheatie at January 28, 2012 07:38 AM (ALwK/)
Posted by: Louis Prima at January 28, 2012 07:38 AM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 28, 2012 07:38 AM (niZvt)
I happen to think Hank Paulson from Goldman did a good job with the shit sandwich the Bush gang passed to him. I read his book and he puked every day during 2008 while Wall St burned.
Posted by: Clarence at January 28, 2012 07:39 AM (z0HdK)
"It's that kinda crisp analysis that brought me here almost 7 years ago."
For me it was the Algore glamor shot. It was during lunch at work, everyone kept coming into my cubical to see what was so damm funny.
Posted by: Paladin at January 28, 2012 07:39 AM (sPxmU)
--Really? I did not know Roma was the name of the city in Latin as well as Italian.
Go figger. . . .
Posted by: logprof is glad at least the smileys work at January 28, 2012 07:39 AM (ykSKg)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 28, 2012 07:40 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: wheatie at January 28, 2012 11:38 AM (ALwK/)
-- Laughing is : lol : [leave out spaces] Others are at smilies.mee.nu
Posted by: logprof is glad at least the smileys work at January 28, 2012 07:40 AM (ykSKg)
I told you it's all about the sacred feminine!
Posted by: Robert Langdon, Harvard School of Asswipes at January 28, 2012 07:41 AM (bgAe9)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 28, 2012 07:42 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: logprof is glad at least the smileys work at January 28, 2012 07:43 AM (ykSKg)
That's is interesting, but where do Romulus and Remus come in?
Posted by: really ... at January 28, 2012 07:44 AM (X3lox)
Posted by: really ... at January 28, 2012 11:44 AM (X3lox)
--Read The Aeneid.
Posted by: logprof is glad at least the smileys work at January 28, 2012 07:45 AM (ykSKg)
George Will has done what he does far too often. He has taken up space that could have been put to better use.
Implying that the President is acting like a dictator is an insult to the intelligence of all but Fox Republicans. To suggest that 30 second Senate sessions honour the Constitution when they are intended to prevent appointments that will allow a legally mandated body to operate is silly. Yes, George, you are silly. Oh, sorry, I forgot. You're a Republican. Republicans honor the Constitutioin above all else.
Gotta love that last sentence.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at January 28, 2012 07:46 AM (UOM48)
Don't go Paultard and blame the entire Fed for Greenspan's fuck-ups.
Greenspan said "Markets always self regulate" - what a fucking idiot (except he admitted he had been wrong in 2009)
TARP was the Bush gang's answer for "self regulation".
Posted by: Clarence at January 28, 2012 07:46 AM (z0HdK)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at January 28, 2012 07:47 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: BlueFalcon in Boston *now accuracy approved by Blue Hen* at January 28, 2012 07:47 AM (ijjAe)
157....That's is interesting, but where do Romulus and Remus come in?
.
What's confusing is.....there was the City of Rome, which came first.....and then there was the Country of Rome. .....The Romulus and Remus story was for the city, the other mythology was for the greater Rome, the country.
Posted by: wheatie at January 28, 2012 07:47 AM (ALwK/)
Because it's so damn funny.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at January 28, 2012 07:49 AM (phgnV)
[redacted], please sign the petition calling for an investigation of James O'Keefe for committing voter fraud in New Hampshire.
James O'Keefe, the right-wing prankster who became famous for a doctored video that led to the downfall of ACORN, recently coordinated a stunt to obtain ballots in the New Hampshire primary using the names of dead people.
His goal was to prove that strict voter ID laws are necessary. However, what he and his associates did was illegal:
“In either case, if they were intentionally going in and trying to fraudulently obtain a ballot, they violated the law,” Schultz said. “So right off the bat, what they did violated the law.”
O'Keefe and his co-conspirators were also incredibly insensitive:
Activist filmmaker James O’Keefe secretly recorded video showing his operative using Roger Groux’s name and address to obtain a Republican ballot at Manchester polls Tuesday. The U.S. Navy veteran died Dec. 31 at an assisted living home. His family held funeral services Monday, his widow said. “Oh my God, I know what he would say, ‘Call the cops, call the police,’ ” Rachel Groux said.James O'Keefe has made a living using lies to ruin the lives of
others. Now he should be investigated for a repulsive, open-and-shut
case of voter fraud.
Sign the petition calling for an investigation of James O'Keefe. We are working with allies to deliver it the New Hampshire Attorney General next week.
Keep fighting,
Chris Cocksucker Bowers
Campaign Director, Daily Kos
Posted by: soothsayer at January 28, 2012 07:49 AM (sqkOB)
Yeah, CC, the lot we get to pick our GOP candidates from is the worst in a long time and reminds me of McLame in '08 and Dole in '96. Weak sauce, all of them. Another depressing thing (which reminds me to start drinking soon today) is that this really is one of the most important elections that I can ever remember. We abolutely have to complete the task that was started in the '010 midterms and continue to purge Washington and the GOP of Progressives. If we don't, we are literally sunk, and we'll never be able to get our freedom back with out a civil war, a possibility I don't want to even think about.
We've had nearly one hundred years of Progressivism and they are nearing their final success of destroying our Constitution, our ability to govern ourselves, our economy and our way of life.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, Rioting Christian at January 28, 2012 07:49 AM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: logprof is glad at least the smileys work at January 28, 2012 11:45 AM (ykSKg)
I'll pass, but I read a summary. Thanks.
Posted by: really ... at January 28, 2012 07:50 AM (X3lox)
Posted by: Cowboy at January 28, 2012 07:51 AM (So+7G)
Posted by: BlueFalcon in Boston *now with accuracy approved by Blue Hen* at January 28, 2012 07:51 AM (ijjAe)
Posted by: BlueFalcon in Boston *now accuracy approved by Blue Hen* at January 28, 2012 11:47 AM (ijjAe)
--Exactly. I also messed up my wording above to imply that The Ben Bernank was former GS. In any event, Geithner is part of the Cabinet.
Posted by: logprof is glad at least the smileys work at January 28, 2012 07:51 AM (ykSKg)
Is there an explanation in the Star Trek universe as to why Romulans were so enamored of ancient Rome, which they did not know about? Parallel civilizations evolving along exactly the same lines, or something?
Posted by: Waterhouse at January 28, 2012 07:51 AM (bgAe9)
Chris is very proud of his c-sucking status. So proud, in fact, that he made it his middle name.
Posted by: soothsayer at January 28, 2012 07:51 AM (sqkOB)
145 "Cabinet" is not a weasel word. No one from Obama's cabinet ever worked for Goldman Sachs (not that there is anything wrong with that).
Posted by: Clarence at January 28, 2012 11:39 AM
Ahem!
Posted by: Turbo Tim Geithner at January 28, 2012 07:52 AM (Y+DPZ)
Geithner was never at GS, though.
He's been leeching off the public purse for almost his entire life.
Posted by: Waterhouse at January 28, 2012 07:53 AM (bgAe9)
Little known fact: He had a sister named Vibratus.
Posted by: Not Drinking Nearly Enough at January 28, 2012 07:53 AM (HtUdo)
Posted by: really ... at January 28, 2012 11:50 AM (X3lox)
--Oh yeah, I never read it either, but did get the summary in ninth grade from Edith Hamilton's mythology text.
Posted by: logprof is glad at least the smileys work at January 28, 2012 07:53 AM (ykSKg)
Posted by: Kesselring at January 28, 2012 07:54 AM (v5IXp)
Posted by: Clarence Clavin at January 28, 2012 07:56 AM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: eman at January 28, 2012 07:56 AM (pn8u0)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 28, 2012 07:56 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: Clarence at January 28, 2012 11:54 AM (z0HdK)
The idiot projection is serially hilarious.
Posted by: ontherocks at January 28, 2012 07:57 AM (ZJCDy)
Posted by: Ammo Dump at January 28, 2012 08:00 AM (WUWb9)
Posted by: Clarence at January 28, 2012 11:54 AM
OK raykon, you got that one right. He is a career hack who never held a job in the private sector. Kind of explains why doing his taxes is such a difficult task for him
Posted by: Clarence Clavin at January 28, 2012 08:00 AM (Y+DPZ)
Does the neighbor you steal wi-fi from block google?
Posted by: Not Drinking Nearly Enough at January 28, 2012 08:01 AM (HtUdo)
Neoconservatism smashes constitutional matter as if to corner the god particle.
From Aesop, "Greedy, greedy makes a hungry puppy."
America has the US Constitution, THE matter worth fighting to protect. Whereas, advancing interventionist military wars of aggression also removed the Rule of Law recognized "standing" within the US Judicial Branch.
On the status quo bandwagon, the legal bloggers here counter illogically that there is no dissolution of our Civil Rights in the Patriot Act (originally promised as temporary and to be rescinded power upon expiration) or more recent augmentation of that law's authoritarianism. Furthermore, these legal bloggers insist that no constitutional article is a hill worth dying on. Finally, these same legal voices advocate that the retention of constitutional integrity is itself insane, radical, dangerous, and not to be tolerated under any circumstance. Relegated to antiquity, incinerated and "sanitized" for public consumption, the neoconservative candidates (Mitt, Newt) propagandize revisionist whole cloth sophism as if logically upholding the authentic article. Rather than protecting the Constitution as Source, they betray their allegiance to authoritarianism.
Neoconservative voices remove Civil Liberty while campaigning "Can't We All Get Along? -- Never" refusing the truth of historical record, insisting on the self serving lie, sermonizing ignorance as bliss. "Promise them anything; just get their votes." Voters jump on the Vanitas vanitatum omnia vanitas bandwagon. Misery loves company, nothing new about Alinsky tactics. (Mt 23:37)
Posted by: Panzernashorn at January 28, 2012 08:01 AM (lpWVn)
In case it slipped by you, these assholes actually went to a grieving widow and told her (I'm safely surmising) that someone used her dead husband's name to get a ballot.
That's all they told her. Again, I'm surmising, here. What's interesting was the widow's reaction -- Call the police! That happens to be the exact reaction by the Left when they know of and hear of dead people voting for Democrats.
Posted by: soothsayer at January 28, 2012 08:02 AM (sqkOB)
193
In Bizzarro Universe.....
exposing voter fraud and voter disenfranchisement is voter fraud.
.
Aayup. ....And we are definitely living in bizzaro world. .....Which is why, just watch, they will point to the fiasco in Virginia and say:
.
"Look there, Romney conspired to keep the other candidates off the ballot! Romney caused voters to be disenfranchised! That's election tampering! Romney is a rich guy who is trying to buy the election!"
.
It's all about the demagoguery.....and what we give them to use in their propaganda machine. .....That's why throughout this whole thing, I have been trying to look at "what they will use against us".....and I seem to be pretty alone in this.
Posted by: wheatie at January 28, 2012 08:05 AM (ALwK/)
Posted by: Lincolntf at January 28, 2012 08:07 AM (HethX)
Posted by: real joe at January 28, 2012 08:09 AM (w7Lv+)
Posted by: Gault Falcon at January 28, 2012 08:09 AM (evTki)
Posted by: Bodacious at January 28, 2012 08:10 AM (9ZiIe)
Posted by: Clarence Clavin at January 28, 2012 12:09 PM
What's my percentage for being their pimp?
Posted by: Clarence Clavin at January 28, 2012 08:10 AM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: logprof is happy at least the smilies work at January 28, 2012 08:11 AM (ykSKg)
Posted by: Clarence Clavin at January 28, 2012 12:10 PM (Y+DPZ)
3000%. That's fair.
Posted by: King Barky at January 28, 2012 08:12 AM (X3lox)
I'll take the penis mightier for $600
Posted by: Sean Connery at January 28, 2012 08:12 AM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: ambrosia at January 28, 2012 08:13 AM (oZfic)
Based solely on her income from Harvard, $429,000 , Elizabeth Warren is a 1%-er.
Top 1% $343,927.00 or more with an average tax rate of 24.01%
Top 5% $154,643.00 or more with an average tax rate of 20.46%
Top 10% $112,124.00 or more with an average tax rate of 18.05%
Top 25% $ 66,193.00 or more with an average tax rate of 14.68%
Top 50% $ 32,396.00 or more with an average tax rate of 12.50%
Posted by: George Harrison at January 28, 2012 08:14 AM (e8kgV)
Did you know the Mayor of Indianapolis is GOP, and is a retired Marine officer who specialized in logistics?
He will probably only get a 5-secon interview in non-prime time.
Posted by: Miss Marple at January 28, 2012 08:15 AM (GoIUi)
Santorum is OK with this line of thinking.
Posted by: Panzer Trout at January 28, 2012 08:17 AM (j5CHE)
206 See to it your kids don't bully nerds. The nerd grows up damaged and believing in things like "social justice", gets a law degree and ends up in politics...
.
This applies to both Santorum and Romney as well. ....They were both nerds who 'got law degrees and ended up in politics'.
.
Trouble is....they don't have any charisma like the cute black guy from Chicago.
Posted by: wheatie at January 28, 2012 08:18 AM (ALwK/)
He will probably only get a 5-secon interview in non-prime time.
Posted by: Miss Marple at January 28, 2012 12:15 PM (GoIUi)
--He actually got interviewed on our local sports station this week. It would be ironic if he got more air time in a drive-home show in Winnipeg than in the States.
Posted by: logprof is happy at least the smilies work at January 28, 2012 08:19 AM (ykSKg)
Posted by: wheatie at January 28, 2012 08:20 AM (ALwK/)
I've noticed that when lefties complain about military spending, it's not the spending they're complaining about. They're complaining because people who will willingly spend on defense aren't so willing to spend on the left's noble causes.
They're already dreaming about spending the money that will be saved by reducing the military, so don't expect tax cuts or deficit reduction for the peace dividend.
Posted by: Frankly at January 28, 2012 08:21 AM (YaImr)
http://tinyurl.com/7slmzcw
Posted by: kbdabear at January 28, 2012 08:21 AM (Y+DPZ)
The real fraud happens after the polls close.
"How many didn't vote?"
"625"
"OK, here are 450 ballots."
"What if that's not enough?"
"There are another 150 in the trunk of my car"
Posted by: Panzer Trout at January 28, 2012 08:22 AM (j5CHE)
Posted by: Frankly at January 28, 2012 12:21 PM (YaImr)
But almost every example the Left cites of federal government spending that actually returned anything to society was a defense project! It's funny ... kinda.
Posted by: really at January 28, 2012 08:24 AM (X3lox)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 28, 2012 08:25 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 28, 2012 12:25 PM (i6RpT)
And the military are one of the few federal functions enumerated in the "dead" Constitution.
Most of the perpetually funded crap is unenumerated in the "living" Cnstitution.
Posted by: Hrothgar at January 28, 2012 08:27 AM (i3+c5)
Posted by: really ... at January 28, 2012 08:33 AM (X3lox)
Biden Employs Indian Accent During NH Speech
Oh, and for that Discover Card commercial, he says "Nancy" instead of "Peggy"
http://tinyurl.com/7t6gmee
Posted by: kbdabear at January 28, 2012 08:34 AM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: Blue Hen at January 28, 2012 12:29 PM
Warren Buffett is even happier, since he owns a shitload of Burlington Northern stock and they haul the oil that the pipeline would have
Posted by: kbdabear at January 28, 2012 08:35 AM (Y+DPZ)
The catÂ’s out of the bag ...
Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi, a Romney supporter, went on The Record last night. The Florida Republican told Greta Van Susteren that Mitt wants Romneycare in every state.
She also said she would be on RomneyÂ’s Health Care Advisory Team when heÂ’s president.
http://tinyurl.com/77xh4mj
Posted by: Ed Anger - Certified Kos Kid at January 28, 2012 08:36 AM (7+pP9)
No real football on, but TNT has the original Friday Night Lights on now followed by We Are Marshall and Miracle. I love love LOVE watching Miracle.
Posted by: NC Ref at January 28, 2012 08:37 AM (/izg2)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 28, 2012 08:38 AM (niZvt)
Election "fixing" via tampering with the machines is only stopped by having an honest AG or law officer. But until they start sending people to jail for long terms for vote fraud it will never stop.
Posted by: Vic at January 28, 2012 08:39 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Monsieur DaFarge (quietly attending his knitting while glaring from the corner) at January 28, 2012 08:40 AM (fOvMn)
239.....Warren Buffett is even happier, since he owns a shitload of Burlington Northern stock and they haul the oil that the pipeline would have [transported].
.
Yeah, and I think he owns more than that. .....I seem to remember Charlie Gasparino or Eric Bolling talking about how Buffett starting buying up railroads right after Barky got in.
Posted by: wheatie at January 28, 2012 08:42 AM (ALwK/)
Obama Weekly Address: "We Weren't Sent Here To Wage Perpetual Political Campaigns"http://tinyurl.com/7fzo3zn
This isnÂ’t about me. We werenÂ’t sent here to wage perpetual political campaigns against each other. We were sent here to serve the American people. And they deserve better than gridlock and games. One senator gumming up the works for the whole country is certainly not what our founding fathers envisioned.
During my Address on Tuesday night, I spoke about the incredible example set by the men and women of our armed forces. At a time when too many of our institutions have let us down, they exceed all expectations. TheyÂ’re not consumed with personal ambition. They donÂ’t obsess over their differences. They focus on the mission at hand. They work together.
Posted by: kbdabear at January 28, 2012 08:44 AM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: wheatie at January 28, 2012 12:42 PM
Well, you don't think all those wingnuts are just going to DRIVE themselves to the FEMA camps, do you?
Posted by: Warren Buffett, the Orifice of Obama at January 28, 2012 08:46 AM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: Jornolist at January 28, 2012 08:46 AM (0r9H9)
239 .....Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi, a Romney supporter, went on The Record last night. The Florida Republican told Greta Van Susteren that Mitt wants Romneycare in every state.
.......She also said she would be on RomneyÂ’s Health Care Advisory Team when heÂ’s president.
.
I remember how hostile she was towards Rick Perry, during Huckabee's first 'debate'.....which was set up like a fucking inquisition, with three lawyers set up as the grand inquisitors.
.
And yeah.....progressives just luuuve them some of that social engineering. .....That's why they went nuclear on Newt for that "right wing engineering" remark that he made.
Posted by: wheatie at January 28, 2012 08:47 AM (ALwK/)
Posted by: Jornolist at January 28, 2012 08:51 AM (0r9H9)
Posted by: AndrewsDad at January 28, 2012 08:54 AM (V4KQI)
Fyodor Dostoyevsky summed it up in his novel The Brothers Karamazov, in the chapter on "The Legend of the Grand Inquisitor".
In the Legend, the Grand Inquisitor states that he and his fellow clerics have conspired to relieve people of their freedom, in order to ensure their happiness. In place of freedom, he offers three things: bread, mystery, and authority.
So, how does this relate to the JEF?
Well, bread is obvious: he is the Food Stamp president, after all.
Authority is obvious, too: the authority of the "genius" graduate of a super-elite university - the US equivalent of Eton or Harrow. We peasants must do what the elite tell us, because they are, well, ever so more elite than us.
But mystery? Well, what could be more mysterious, in the spiritual sense, than the progressive project of the perfection of Man: they know where perfection lies, and how to achieve it, and all those who stand in their way are therefore, by definition, haters of Humankind.
Barky is the just latest in a long, long line of those bloody ignorant fools who think they are idealists, but are simply striving after power. He's a junior-grade Napoleon, a petty Lenin, a C-average Woodrow Wilson, a tongue-tied FDR; but still, with the capacity to wound the Republic deeply, perhaps mortally. He must be defeated.
Posted by: Brown Line at January 28, 2012 08:54 AM (6yJi7)
I hear you guys on reaching out to others. Spoke with a friend who is a reflexive democrat and who I suspect voted for JEF. These debates are taking a toll in that they breed disgust with GOP candidates. My friend has been watching the debates.
That said, I think I reached him on two points. First, I said America needs a leader and that Obama clearly is not a leader; he is divisive and cowardly. Second, I said that even though Romney and Gingrich and Santorum are flawed, at least they appear to at least "like" America and Americans and that this country deserves a leader who doen't loathe America. He agreed.
He refered to the JEF as BamBam. We are winning this person to person to person. Screw the MFM. In the end the SCOAMF meme is strong for people like my buddy. We all got to have the balls to repeat it even when awkward.
I am preparing for a weekend in Feb for my wife's work. I will be surrounded by 8 educated libs. Not lefties, but libs. I will help them test their premises and put doubt in their minds.
Posted by: The Poster Formerly Known as Mr. Barky at January 28, 2012 09:00 AM (s0vAq)
One need only look at California for confirmation.
Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at January 28, 2012 09:16 AM (l2fOr)
I found it:
“It is hard to fix a specific starting date for the progressive race to the Great Society,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “but a good guess might be 1888, the year [when socialist] Edward Bellamy's novel Looking Backward burst on the American scene.” Set in the year 2000, this futuristic book depicts a utopian society run with the hierarchical efficiency of a military battalion. All workers in this idealized world belong to a unified “industrial army” that labors within the confines of an economy controlled by a coterie of central planners who are deemed to be more capable of fostering prosperity and productivity than is a free marketplace. A preacher in the story lauds the earthly paradise, while the population at large looks back upon the “age of individualism” with a blend of amusement and derision.
http://tinyurl.com/83ajpbw
Posted by: Ed Anger - Certified Kos Kid at January 28, 2012 10:46 AM (7+pP9)
Btw, morons, this book is available through Project Gutenberg, which charges what the thought contained therein is worth.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at January 28, 2012 09:18 AM (TybtS)
Posted by: willow at January 28, 2012 11:09 AM (TomZ9)
This.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at January 28, 2012 09:35 AM (TybtS)
Posted by: NC Ref at January 28, 2012 12:37 PM (/izg2)
--That's good, but I am eager to see NFL Network replay the last Giants-Pats Super Bowl.
Posted by: logprof is happy at least the smilies work at January 28, 2012 10:34 AM (ykSKg)
In its place, let any adult person volunteer, if they choose, for a difficult (perhaps also dangerous) term of service in the military or elsewhere. Upon successful completion of their initial term, let them become full citizens with voting rights.
Yes, this isn't my idea, and yes, you know exactly where it comes from.
But this idea of having everyone -- even young single women! -- vote and participate in politics is a bad one.
Posted by: Random at January 28, 2012 10:46 AM (YiE0S)
"... fictitious global warming ..." !?!
Why ... everyone knows that the Earth warmed about a full DEGREE over the last century or so! (Insert dramatic end-of-the-world music here).
OK, that was sarcastic, but most people - even skeptics at least agree that warming occurred during the 20th century. But the thing is, you can always find a period of warming if you adjust the endpoints. The latest stretch of 10 years or so has shown no statistically significant warming at all, much the the chagrin of AGW alarmists. Still, it might be more accurate to say "fictitious AGW", and even less controvertial to question whether AGW, the the extent it might exist, is significant (having an effect of only a fraction of a degree).
Personally, I'd question the temperature histories altogether. The land-based measurements in the US suck, and the ones in the rest of the world are worse. Similarly, the ones in the US go back a little over a hundred years (not long enough), and the rest of the world is worse. The land measurements are of poor quality, and are inadaquate to measure the temperature over land. Figure in that the land is only 30% of the Earth, and it's a joke.
The satellite measurements at least have global coverage, but only go back a few decades. Nobody seems to question them, but (being someone in a related technical field) wonder just how accurate a measurement of temperature a satellite can take. I'm not saying it's impossible; I'd just like to see somebody review that because I don't see how it could work. As a result of the Space Race, people tend to believe anything that comes from a satellite.
Posted by: Optimizer at January 28, 2012 11:18 AM (As94z)
'Whether they're fetishizing China, attempting to reorder society to combat fictitious global warming or taking over the healthcare system, rest assured that when you cut through their high-minded bullshit, the heart of a petty tyrant beats in every "progressive".'
--Andy
I FULLY AGREE. The progressives are fascists, part deux.
Posted by: KR1 at January 28, 2012 12:47 PM (oEfom)
Posted by: steevy at January 28, 2012 01:02 PM (7W3wI)
Posted by: 66chevelle at January 28, 2012 01:04 PM (QjSgY)
Posted by: 66chevelle at January 28, 2012 01:11 PM (QjSgY)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2446 seconds, 385 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Rick at January 28, 2012 06:21 AM (Gfgj6)