January 25, 2012
— rdbrewer "Privacy changes." With no opt out.
Google will soon know far more about who you are and what you do on the Web.The Web giant announced Tuesday that it plans to follow the activities of users across nearly all of its ubiquitous sites, including YouTube, Gmail and its leading search engine.
Google has already been collecting some of this information. But for the first time, it is combining data across its Web sites to stitch together a fuller portrait of users.
Consumers wonÂ’t be able to opt out of the changes, which take effect March 1.
So they'll be sifting through your emails, for example, to "better tailor ads."
Dear Congress: I know none of us have any money for lobbying, but we do have votes. How about a comprehensive privacy statute? And keep Lamar Smith away from it.
Did you know that Don't be Evil is Google's corporate motto?
Added: "NotCoach" provides this comment:
A thousand times, no. Stop using all Google services if you don't like the privacy concerns. You still have to voluntarily provide information to them. They are not a governmental organization and the feds getting involved will only make things 10,000 times worse.
That's probably right. How often do lawmakers actually get it right?
Posted by: rdbrewer at
07:18 AM
| Comments (285)
Post contains 224 words, total size 2 kb.
Just in time for election season. Outstanding!
Good thing they are totally non-partisan, with no political leanings whatsoever.
Wonder who else gets to see some of this data, collected by the thought police...
Posted by: Gunslinger at January 25, 2012 07:21 AM (OyQf0)
Posted by: © Sponge at January 25, 2012 07:21 AM (UK9cE)
Posted by: SFGoth at January 25, 2012 07:21 AM (dZ756)
This is fucked. I hope somebody sues the fuckers.. there should always be an opt out!
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at January 25, 2012 07:23 AM (f9c2L)
Posted by: Bob Saget at January 25, 2012 07:23 AM (SDkq3)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at January 25, 2012 07:24 AM (nEUpB)
And I just cannot give up google search. All of the others suck compared to it, especially for techie stuff that I need it for for my job.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at January 25, 2012 07:25 AM (f9c2L)
I do use Android, but that is only until a less-than-despicable alternative exists for touchpads.
Posted by: really ... at January 25, 2012 07:25 AM (X3lox)
Posted by: NotCoach at January 25, 2012 07:25 AM (XykUh)
Posted by: huerfano at January 25, 2012 07:26 AM (lXi+d)
Posted by: booger at January 25, 2012 07:27 AM (29wvc)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 25, 2012 07:27 AM (8y9MW)
What does this do for those bound by HIPA laws and such?
Seems like a violation to me, but......
Posted by: © Sponge at January 25, 2012 07:29 AM (UK9cE)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at January 25, 2012 11:24 AM (nEUpB)
Microsoft was always the more decent when compared to apple, which is google's business progenitor - a company that holds its own customers in contempt (and they love the company for it!). Apple has been this way since the first massively overpriced Apple II hit the streets. They just lost out to Microsoft, which only controlled software. Apple put the clamp down on the software AND the hardware and relegated themselves to a fringe existence, until they started making pop gadgets.
Google is just like Apple, an evil clone almost.
Posted by: really ... at January 25, 2012 07:29 AM (X3lox)
btw, cute shot at Rubio in the sidebar
Rubio sucks because he doesn't like Newt? Or does he suck because he doesn't hate Mitt?
"We have met the enemy, and it is us."
Posted by: soothsayer at January 25, 2012 07:30 AM (sqkOB)
I do use Android, but that is only until a less-than-despicable alternative exists for touchpads.
Posted by: really ... at January 25, 2012 11:25 AM (X3lox)
what....and you think that's Immune to this?
Posted by: © Sponge at January 25, 2012 07:30 AM (UK9cE)
Google seems like something out of the Robocop universe.
Posted by: Tad Blatherton at January 25, 2012 07:30 AM (QqRr4)
Don't like the terms for a free service? Don't use it. That simple.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at January 25, 2012 07:30 AM (SY2Kh)
This. x1,000,000.
12th Commandment: Thou Shalt Not involve the Federal Government any more than absolutely necessary in private enterprise.
If you don't want Google to use your data, don't use Google's services.
Easy-peasy.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 25, 2012 07:31 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO supporter at January 25, 2012 07:32 AM (4df7R)
First time in today and unsure of previous content?
Has the S E Cupp article about Newt been posted and discussed?
Posted by: Doctor Fish at January 25, 2012 07:32 AM (TkGkA)
Don't like the terms for a free service? Don't use it. That simple.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at January 25, 2012 11:30 AM (SY2Kh)
Yeah, that's all well and good until they ALL start doing it. Once the president is set and all that......
Posted by: © Sponge at January 25, 2012 07:32 AM (UK9cE)
I agree with the poster above that Google search is still the best. Aside from using that I have a couple of YouTube accounts that I don't do much with. They can mine my sh*t for whatever they want
Having said that, I know a lot of people who use GMail and that is plain stupid, giving them direct access to your communications.
Posted by: CanaDave at January 25, 2012 07:33 AM (uYCSy)
Yahoo and Hotmail should both be relatively comparable to Gmail.
Your internet provide almost certainly also provides you with one or more email addresses.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 25, 2012 07:34 AM (8y9MW)
Easy-peasy.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 25, 2012 11:31 AM
That, um, sounds suspiciously like free market principles. Let me be clear, we can't have that.
Posted by: Barry Obama at January 25, 2012 07:34 AM (lXi+d)
Posted by: © Sponge at January 25, 2012 11:30 AM (UK9cE)
Not at all. As soon as there's a decent alternative, I'll switch. I accept whatever privacy issues there are on the touchpad. I don't have any personal information on it and go on the assumtpion that whatever I do on it might end up somewhere else.
Posted by: really ... at January 25, 2012 07:34 AM (X3lox)
Posted by: NotCoach at January 25, 2012 07:35 AM (XykUh)
Posted by: Jazz at January 25, 2012 07:35 AM (NzrVU)
Posted by: Barry Obama at January 25, 2012 11:34 AM (lXi+d)
Yeah, well, you're a stuttering clusterf*ck of a miserable tyrant. We don't care what you think.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 25, 2012 07:35 AM (8y9MW)
And OMG, this video is really screwing up the main page!
Posted by: Tami at January 25, 2012 07:35 AM (X6akg)
Google is about a bullshit company if I ever saw one. The only reason they ever made any money was because they had a cute name that was easy to remember.
You know when you type a wrong address and it takes you to a phony "search" page? Same product Google offers. You know when you get a virus that installs a "toolbar" to search for "deals"? Same product Goocle offers. But Google has a cute name so they get the investments.
Google Earth is a great application (despite the fact its screwed me over more than once) but that's about the only useful thing this bloated facade ever produced.
Posted by: sternschaden at January 25, 2012 07:35 AM (xXhWA)
What does this do for those bound by HIPA laws and such?
Seems like a violation to me, but......
Posted by: © Sponge at January 25, 2012 11:29 AM (UK9cE)
-----------
That's a good point. When I used to work at NH DHHS, several of the sections I worked with would use Google Docs to collaborate on documents like RFPs, grant proposals, etc. Likewise the NH Dept of Ed (which brings FERPA into play).
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO supporter at January 25, 2012 07:36 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: booger at January 25, 2012 07:36 AM (29wvc)
Not seeing the issue here. Don't like the product? Don't buy it. It's free? Ok, don't use it.
We've known that Google reads email for how many years now? And we're surprised by this?
Oh, and Barack Obama is a Stuttering Clusterfuck of a miserable failure.
Posted by: Morseus at January 25, 2012 07:36 AM (YWZwH)
Posted by: Bodacious at January 25, 2012 07:37 AM (9ZiIe)
Posted by: rdbrewer at January 25, 2012 07:38 AM (Iyg03)
The Google Device is not the same thing, and I'm relatively certain they don't (can't) compile that data.
As for people using GoogleDocs- or any online office software- unless they were very, very careful, that was already in violation of HIPAA anyway.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 25, 2012 07:38 AM (8y9MW)
And remind them that Google is a bunch of wild-eyed hardcore Democrats.
Although Republicans were not uniformly against it (incl. Lamar Smith), SOPA/PIPA was really a Democrat baby.
Posted by: AmishDude at January 25, 2012 07:39 AM (T0NGe)
______________
How large is large? After getting fed up with Yahoo mail I've found a home at Zoho.com 45MB free.
Posted by: Bob Saget at January 25, 2012 07:40 AM (SDkq3)
Posted by: rdbrewer at January 25, 2012 11:38 AM (Iyg03)
Yep, it's good. Thanks.
And can you pass the Jane D'oh info on, please?
Posted by: Tami at January 25, 2012 07:41 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO supporter at January 25, 2012 11:36 AM (4df7R)
I make one every occasionally.... 8^) (yes, that's on purpose)
That being said, I do think this is a slippery slope for them, but it won't be addressed until someone is in the government that actually gives a shit about the law.
Posted by: © Sponge at January 25, 2012 07:41 AM (UK9cE)
Posted by: rdbrewer at January 25, 2012 07:42 AM (Iyg03)
Meanwhile, Julian Assmunch of Wikileaks is getting his own TV show, and Firefly is still cancelled.
The world, it is flipped ass over tea kettle.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO supporter at January 25, 2012 07:42 AM (4df7R)
No new laws, please. How about a libertarian search engine? There must be a way to monetize a search engine besides invading everyone's privacy. Come one, morons, quit horsing around here and just do it!
Posted by: PJ at January 25, 2012 07:43 AM (DQHjw)
So where are Obama's transcripts, you toughguy rapist?
Posted by: AmishDude at January 25, 2012 07:44 AM (T0NGe)
You can register your own domain and have it hosted with unlimited email accounts for like $50-$100 a year. Check hostgator.com for an examle.
I use a couple of Windows Live accounts for when I have to give an email so they can collect the spam.
Posted by: CanaDave at January 25, 2012 07:44 AM (uYCSy)
Posted by: Bob Saget at January 25, 2012 11:40 AM (SDkq3)
-----------------
I've got a lot of emails with attachments that I save (cross stitch patterns, some scanned photos, etc), so I tend to look for GB rather than MB. But I'll keep Zoho in mind!
I've used Yahoo! in the past but something about the interface just annoyed me. Not that Gmail is much better, but at least it had more storage space! And it allows for larger attachments.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO supporter at January 25, 2012 07:44 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: rdbrewer at January 25, 2012 07:45 AM (Iyg03)
Windows phones are hitting the market, but I haven't heard much about them. Anyone here have one?
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at January 25, 2012 07:45 AM (f9c2L)
Poor Jane D'oh. She finally returns from her self-imposed mental health break, and immediately gets banned.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO supporter at January 25, 2012 07:45 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: billygoat at January 25, 2012 07:47 AM (GsBJY)
Posted by: booger at January 25, 2012 07:48 AM (29wvc)
I don't have one, but I've seen them.
I think they're actually pretty slick, though I haven't found any handsets that are aesthetically as pleasing as the iPhone or some of the higher-end Android offerings.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 25, 2012 07:49 AM (8y9MW)
If you use a Windows-based phone, what are the odds that you'll get BSODed at least once during an important phonecall? Like when you're calling 911 because you're being stalked by an axe-wielding lunatic.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO supporter at January 25, 2012 07:50 AM (4df7R)
This happens to you often?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 25, 2012 07:51 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: President Chet Roosevelt at January 25, 2012 07:51 AM (yhJsm)
Posted by: Jean at January 25, 2012 07:51 AM (eLCau)
Posted by: phoenixgirl....a voter without a candidate at January 25, 2012 07:52 AM (mfbqu)
Posted by: billygoat at January 25, 2012 07:52 AM (GsBJY)
But, being evil I have an android.
Think I'll go check alternatives, I guess I could go back to Apple.
When Metro (windows
Oh yes, and Google? FOAD.
Posted by: Clutch Cargo at January 25, 2012 07:52 AM (Qxdfp)
Posted by: Ian S. at January 25, 2012 07:52 AM (tqwMN)
Posted by: HeatherRadish needs italics. And a beer. at January 25, 2012 07:53 AM (ZKzrr)
Poor Jane D'oh. She finally returns from her self-imposed mental health break, and immediately gets banned.
She did? What did I miss?
Posted by: Igor at January 25, 2012 07:53 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: sternschaden at January 25, 2012 07:54 AM (xXhWA)
Posted by: Clutch Cargo at January 25, 2012 07:54 AM (Qxdfp)
perhaps a little twilight zone inspiration coupled with the AOSHQ lifestyle
google "To Serve Hobos"
Posted by: StrategicCorporalUSMC at January 25, 2012 07:54 AM (6c2Vl)
*waving at google*
Posted by: phoenixgirl....a voter without a candidate at January 25, 2012 07:56 AM (mfbqu)
"Hey, Rd! Still have jock-itch? Try Tineacure!"
Posted by: rdbrewer at January 25, 2012 07:56 AM (Iyg03)
OT (because the thread is moving slow!), but SAY IT AIN'T SO, Liam.
-----------
"Liam Neeson Considers Converting to Islam" (www.imdb.com/news/ni21671426/)
Irish actor Liam Neeson is considering converting to Islam after becoming fascinated by the religion while filming in Turkey.
The Taken star grew up as a devout Catholic who acted as an altar boy at his local church and was even named after a priest.
However, during a trip to Istanbul to shoot a film, he was moved by Muslims' Call To Prayer, which takes place five times a day to summon followers to worship.
He says, "The Call to Prayer happens five times a day and for the first week it drives you crazy, and then it just gets into your spirit and it's the most beautiful, beautiful thing.
"There are 4,000 mosques in the city. Some are just stunning and it really makes me think about becoming a Muslim."
Neeson admits he has always been both fascinated and baffled by religion, adding, "I was reared a Catholic but I think every day we ask ourselves, not consciously, what are we doing on this planet? What's it all about?
"I'm constantly reading books on God or the absence of God and atheism."
-------------
Liam, sweetheart -- pretty architecture is not a reason to become a Muslim. That would be like becoming a Catholic because you like looking at the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel.
And remember, that "beautiful" call to prayer isn't so beautiful when you're a Coptic Christian in Egypt and every time you hear it you wonder if you're going to survive the day.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO supporter at January 25, 2012 07:56 AM (4df7R)
Yahoo and Hotmail should both be relatively comparable to Gmail."
Hotmail tends to delete mail that's older than six months. At least it did that with mine. I've still got the account but rarely use it.
Yahoo is okay as an email client, and they do have a lot of storage. But they keep changing the interface (making it worse, of course).
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at January 25, 2012 07:57 AM (i0App)
Posted by: Jean at January 25, 2012 07:57 AM (eLCau)
Posted by: montgomery burns at January 25, 2012 07:57 AM (K/USr)
This happens to you often?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 25, 2012 11:51 AM (8y9MW)
------
....
<_<
>_>
...I plead the Fifth.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO supporter at January 25, 2012 07:57 AM (4df7R)
As for a replacement for google, I've tried startpage, but am not loving it.
Any other ideas morons?
Posted by: shibumi at January 25, 2012 07:57 AM (z63Tr)
Posted by: rdbrewer at January 25, 2012 07:58 AM (Iyg03)
Posted by: MikeInBA at January 25, 2012 07:58 AM (Q9Fr6)
Frankly, the best mail services are paid ones (not terribly surprising).
And a personal domain isn't all that expensive, if you just want the domain and the basic hosting.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 25, 2012 07:58 AM (8y9MW)
What does this do for those bound by HIPA laws and such?
Seems like a violation to me, but......
Posted by: © Sponge at January 25, 2012 11:29 AM (UK9cE)
Problem in the IT world is getting CLIENTS to care... they are computer illiterate, and all they see if 'Free'...
Then we, in IT, have to try to clean up the mess...
This also leads to HUGE insider trading issues....
Posted by: Romeo13 at January 25, 2012 07:59 AM (lZBBB)
Guess I'll have to find a new search engine, too.
Posted by: soulpile is... expendable at January 25, 2012 08:00 AM (NJpM7)
Posted by: rdbrewer at January 25, 2012 11:56 AM (Iyg03)
-------
Oh God. It'd be like every annoyingly loud cellphone conversation you've ever been forced to listen to against your will on the train/subway/bus, but ten thousand times worse because it'll be other people broadcasting YOUR issues.
"Angie! Still got anorexia? Let us help you!"
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO supporter at January 25, 2012 08:00 AM (4df7R)
Do any of the pre-paid/no contract providers offer WindowsPhone phones?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 25, 2012 08:00 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: rdbrewer at January 25, 2012 08:00 AM (Iyg03)
I use startingpage.com as my home page. It sends search requests to google thru a proxy server, so there are no cookies installed on your browser and google can't log your search requests.
And fuck Gmail. I can't believe anyone would use free hosted email for business. Having your own Exchange server is a cost of business. Don't be a cheap ass and trust these shitballs with your sensitive data.
For personal email, I've been using Hotmail for nearly 15 years and it's very non-intrusive. That comes with 25G of free storage. Just replaced BlackBerry with Windows Phone 7.5 and it syncs seamlessly with all my Outlook shit, OneNote and other Office docs. Very slick product. Beats the shit out of my wife's new iPhone 4s.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at January 25, 2012 08:01 AM (PFvlM)
Posted by: Jean at January 25, 2012 08:01 AM (eLCau)
Posted by: rdbrewer at January 25, 2012 08:02 AM (Iyg03)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 25, 2012 11:58 AM (8y9MW)
----------------------------------------
That's what I would recommend. Having a domain is so much more useful, too, and well worth the minimal cost. It is the individual's truly "private cloud" that they can access from anywhere to do pretty much anything they want.
Posted by: really ... at January 25, 2012 08:05 AM (X3lox)
Posted by: Jimmah at January 25, 2012 08:06 AM (TMeYE)
Posted by: Jean at January 25, 2012 08:06 AM (eLCau)
>>Yahoo is okay as an email client, and they do have a lot of storage. But they keep changing the interface (making it worse, of course).
Yeh...change it...and then have to offer a "classsic interface" that everyone uses...but I don't use my internet provider's email because we move every few years...
Posted by: Mama AJ, whose weather radio is going nuts at January 25, 2012 08:07 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at January 25, 2012 08:07 AM (i0App)
>>Oh God. It'd be like every annoyingly loud cellphone conversation you've ever been forced to listen to against your will on the train/subway/bus, but ten thousand times worse because it'll be other people broadcasting YOUR issues.
>>"Angie! Still got anorexia? Let us help you!"
Or..."Judging by the force pushing down on the subway seat, Angie, I guess you got over that whole anorexia thing!"
Posted by: Mama AJ at January 25, 2012 08:10 AM (XdlcF)
Scroogle search uses Google but provides users with (some) anonymity
Google has been an information vampire since day one
Posted by: Google Sucks at January 25, 2012 08:10 AM (sJKFk)
Posted by: kathysaysso at January 25, 2012 08:11 AM (ZtwUX)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at January 25, 2012 08:11 AM (nEUpB)
Posted by: Justamom at January 25, 2012 08:12 AM (Sptt8)
This one works well also.
https://us2.startingpage.com/eng/
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at January 25, 2012 08:12 AM (nEUpB)
Posted by: Mama AJ at January 25, 2012 08:13 AM (XdlcF)
Your name has been added to the reeducation camp roster, see you soon.
Posted by: Google at January 25, 2012 08:13 AM (tf9Ne)
Posted by: brak at January 25, 2012 08:13 AM (CC5Yr)
Posted by: rdbrewer at January 25, 2012 08:14 AM (Iyg03)
Which phone?
I'm in the market for a new one and I like the Windows Phones, mostly because it isn't Apple of Google and it actually makes sense to me.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at January 25, 2012 08:14 AM (nEUpB)
We'll see in 5 years if I'm singing the same tune however.
Posted by: GergS at January 25, 2012 08:15 AM (2okAn)
Not me.
I dumped my Facebook account after I realized that there was a reason why I didn't stay in contact with all of the people who wanted to "friend" me.
And because it's just fucking creepy.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at January 25, 2012 08:17 AM (nEUpB)
Posted by: rdbrewer at January 25, 2012 12:14 PM (Iyg03)"
As far as I understand, this is not how Google operates. They sell ad-words, not people. A company bids a certain amount of money for ads that correspond to the occurance of word "X". The company hiring Google does not get an IP breakdown of who accessed it. There are ways of trying to track people down using this, yes, but they are extreme examples that aren't that practical at the individual level.
Posted by: GergS at January 25, 2012 08:17 AM (2okAn)
Posted by: Mama AJ at January 25, 2012 12:13 PM (XdlcF)
I live North of Dallas and as my old man used to say; "It's raining like a cow peeing on a flat rock". A real turd floater, which is good because we need it.
Posted by: Sgt. Fury at January 25, 2012 08:18 AM (r2dnH)
https://us2.startingpage.com/eng/
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at January 25, 2012 12:12 PM (nEUpB)
Thanks. I'll give it a try, too. On my firefox, there is a down facing arrow next to the G for Google. Clicking it allows you to manage search engines.
Posted by: kathysaysso at January 25, 2012 08:18 AM (ZtwUX)
The reason I ask is Bing just a facepage for Google is i find this in the search bar when i use it-
=Google&CREA
WTH?
Posted by: Ndugu at January 25, 2012 08:18 AM (Q2Fgg)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 25, 2012 08:20 AM (eCnLg)
But, being evil I have an android.
Think I'll go check alternatives, I guess I could go back to Apple.
When Metro (windows hits the scene it will be a game changer, but for the moment all the windows phones I've seen (not) working in the field give me pause.
Oh yes, and Google? FOAD.
Posted by: Clutch Cargo at January 25, 2012 11:52 AM (Qxdfp)
You could strip your android phone of Google services. If you root your phone and put a custom Android ROM on it, just don't include google services. You won't have access to the Google market, but you could instead use Amazon's app store, or some other 3rd party one.
This is what I might do in the future. Going to Apple's walled garden or Microsoft is basically an even worse idea.
Posted by: GergS at January 25, 2012 08:20 AM (2okAn)
LOL, Sgt. Fury, that's lovely imagery.
I'm in Louisiana, just waiting for the storm to hit and listening to warnings of impending Doooom.
Posted by: Mama AJ at January 25, 2012 08:20 AM (XdlcF)
=GoogleCREA
WTH?
Posted by: Ndugu at January 25, 2012 12:18 PM (Q2Fgg)
I don't. I bet Google went ahead and installed a "deal toolbar" for you.
Posted by: sternschaden at January 25, 2012 08:20 AM (xXhWA)
Posted by: rdbrewer at January 25, 2012 08:21 AM (Iyg03)
An open search alternative, if you are thinking about ditching Google search.
Posted by: GergS at January 25, 2012 08:22 AM (2okAn)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO supporter at January 25, 2012 08:23 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Advo at January 25, 2012 08:23 AM (7vbG1)
Posted by: Mama AJ at January 25, 2012 12:20 PM (XdlcF)
Yep, the old man grew up on Cotton Farm during the depression and had quite a few "colorful" sayings. I've tried to remember them all and I really need to write them down before the beer and age take them from me. Stay safe in Cajun Country.
Posted by: Sgt. Fury at January 25, 2012 08:24 AM (r2dnH)
Posted by: GergS at January 25, 2012 12:17 PM (2okAn)
If the ad includes anything from the company's servers (like an image, or a javascript file, ...) then they know exactly what IP addresses their ads are showing up on and exactly when and they can independently track those people so long as their ads continue to show up on the pages.
Posted by: really ... at January 25, 2012 08:24 AM (X3lox)
Posted by: rdbrewer at January 25, 2012 08:26 AM (Iyg03)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 25, 2012 08:26 AM (eCnLg)
No, asshole. We need to bring the Fourth Amendment out of the Dark Ages.
----
Why stop with just the 4th? Might as well bring the whole constitution back.
Posted by: Entropy, Racism Delenda Est at January 25, 2012 08:27 AM (mf67L)
Posted by: Bob The Cimmerian at January 25, 2012 08:27 AM (40Ex+)
Bing for searches, not that I do a lot. Google Maps is useful, normally used for work purposes. (Never underestimate an embedded map as an assist to directions to an event.)
The Kindle Fire is basically an Android device, though, isn't it? Frak. Frakfrak. Frakfrakfrak.
Posted by: DarkLord©, Rogue Commenter at January 25, 2012 08:28 AM (GBXon)
Posted by: sternschaden at January 25, 2012 08:29 AM (xXhWA)
It should be called the "big brother" policy.
I've seen this before; corporations are more often than government the real eroders of our constitutional rights and lower expectations.
It's because they're allowed to by reason of them being a private company.
Trouble is what starts as a "policy" in a company becomes a law from government.
Computer use monitoring, camera surveillance, drug testing, health care decision intrusions, personal outside actions made reason to affect compensation, continued employment or benefits.
All these were first carried out by companies/corporations and then spread to government.
It's companies making products and writing software that are our biggest threats against our rights and freedoms.
All in the name of profit.
We've all seen the movies where the genius invents some innovative product that then becomes the basis for death, destruction and the enslavement of the people.
Well, SkyNet'stm just around the corner and it'll be brought to us by some juice box kid with bright ideas, no sense of history, no experience of the human condition and a desire to "make the world a better place".
Laugh all you want jack wagons, it's coming and the internet will be the first target. You might want to look up the effort to REQUIRE everyone to have a NOAA radio in their home. Probably set to go on automatically whether you want it to or not. (they talk about it being a NEED or for SAFETY like a smoke detector.)
Then there's the effort to require that the government be allowed to FORCE you to accept text messages from it. Whether you want it or not.
What's all that possibly mean? Well for one it means that you'll be required to let a government agency take control of your personal communication device and allow them to place an announcement device (and if you're real paranoid, it could easily be a transceiver) into your home.
Thus if all other avenues of news were cut off (easily done. The controls are there and the laws are there.) then your only source of information will be . . . (wait for it) . . . THE GOVERNMENT!
So it seems that G. Orwell was only wrong about one thing; the date of the takeover.
Enjoy all them "FREE SERVICES" from Google.
Posted by: Obi Wan Lucky Bastard at January 25, 2012 08:29 AM (xqpQL)
Anyone seen the Newt PAC attack ad on Obamneycare?
It seems to me very devestating. I wonder how it will play in FL.
Posted by: Entropy, Racism Delenda Est at January 25, 2012 08:29 AM (mf67L)
I guess it is time for me to post a picture of my balls again, along with the word "Sharkman," and endlessly hit refresh.
Take That, Google Fucks!
Posted by: Sharkman at January 25, 2012 08:31 AM (RtpCp)
And, time to get off gmail.
Moron horde, what is your suggestion for an alternative that does not have the Book of Revelations tendencies?
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at January 25, 2012 08:31 AM (B+qrE)
@CBD
I bought the Samsung Focus for $500 thru my carrier - it's the only model they carry. But the main reason is because it's also the only WP7 device with memory expansion, so with a 32G card, I have 40G available on my phone plus online access to another 25G on my Sky Drive.
It came with the old software but as soon as I connected to my PC (it uses Zune to backup, update and buy apps) it downloaded the newest Mango update.
4-inch Super-AMOLED screen. Best looking display I've ever seen. 720p video, which is more resolution than I can discern on that small a screen.
It's not stupid-simple like the iPhone, but it is very intuitive. Best virtual keyboard I've tried. Plenty of apps - I found all the ones I used previously. The Live Tiles feature is fucking awesome.
I bought my wife an iPhone because she doesn't want to spend even 10 minutes learning how to use a device or program. That's fine, and Apple makes products with her in mind.
I find this one to be way more capable than hers for business use and just as, if not more capable with the social applications. I don't use Facebook anymore, but it integrates all your contacts and conversations with them onto one page. I can start a conversation with you via email, continue it on Facebook and Twitter, finish it in SMS and it will all be threaded on the same page under your name.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at January 25, 2012 08:33 AM (PFvlM)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 25, 2012 12:26 PM (eCnLg)
As long as he doesn't turn into a version of Cat Stevens *ahem* Yusuf Islam, then I really don't have a problem with it. His wife died not too long ago, so his drive to find a purpose to fill in that void left by his beloved's passing away is understandable.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at January 25, 2012 08:33 AM (9hSKh)
"Hollywood star Liam Neeson is considering giving up his Roman Catholic beliefs and becoming a Muslim. "
Hey, Liam, just don't have second thoughts on coming back the other way eventually because the religion of peace is not as understanding as the Pope at being slighted.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at January 25, 2012 08:34 AM (B+qrE)
Google is the definition of a progressive company. "don't be evil"... well they don't think they are.. They think doing the right thing in their mind is good, even if that just mean a bigger paycheck for them. If a gov't stooge tell them this 1984'esk behavior may .. save... one... life... then its ok with them. Other fascistic behavior be damned
Posted by: Total Asshole at January 25, 2012 08:35 AM (bcmD0)
It's labeled "Everything the West has ever done is EVIL!!!"
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at January 25, 2012 08:35 AM (0q2P7)
There's Yahoo Email, hotmail, and a ton of other places you can get mail. For that matter, for $5 / month you can get a GoDaddy account with your own domain name and mail, etc.
Get multiple accounts, with multiple providers, use them for different things, and never tell any of the providers about any of the other providers.
The only way they can collect info on you is if you are lazy enough to give it to them.
Posted by: Greg Q at January 25, 2012 08:36 AM (/0a60)
Posted by: Van Jokes at January 25, 2012 08:36 AM (sOPIV)
Just click on the little down arrow on the left side of the search box. You will get a list of several other search engines. I set mine to Bing as soon as I install Firefox on a computer.
I've been on the "use Google as little as possible" bandwagon for a long time, but it was over their refusal to acknowledge Memorial Day.
Posted by: Dave in Fla at January 25, 2012 08:36 AM (RI0fC)
Helloooooo Liam? Programming? Cult? Do you hear yourself?
Get out of town.
Literally.
I really think that actors have inadvertently trained themselves not to really hear their own words.
It would explain a lot.
Posted by: ontherocks at January 25, 2012 08:36 AM (ZJCDy)
Moron horde, what is your suggestion for an alternative that does not have the Book of Revelations tendencies?
-----
Hotmail. Always has been Hotmail. It's the disposable pre-paid cell phone of email accounts. You can make as many as you want, for free, and use totally bullshit personal information for all of them. John Doe, Mindur Bidnez, whatever.
Posted by: Entropy, Racism Delenda Est at January 25, 2012 08:37 AM (mf67L)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at January 25, 2012 08:37 AM (0q2P7)
I really think that actors have inadvertently trained themselves not to really hear their own words.
----
They train themselves to be extremely delusional and uncritical. So they can, on command, believe they are a make believe person, so as to convincingly act it.
Posted by: Entropy, Racism Delenda Est at January 25, 2012 08:38 AM (mf67L)
On the Windows Phone front...AT&T is rumored to be releasing the Nokia Lumia 900 on March 18th for $100. I currently have the HTC Titan, and the phone and O/S are friggin awesome! That 900 sure does look purty though.
Also, Obama is a SCOAMF.
Posted by: SirOsisofLiver at January 25, 2012 08:40 AM (q+EA/)
Pretty sure Pixy has more than us Morons to worry about.
Besides, the problem was/is/always has been hijinks in the namespace. That hasn't changed yet, and I suspect it's not a simple fix.
Posted by: DarkLord©, Rogue Commenter at January 25, 2012 08:40 AM (GBXon)
Every single time you have an image or even a useless, do-nothing javascript file or style file or anything that has to be rendered on your web page (even with a refresh), your browser looks in your cache to see if you have a file with the same name, already, that is still valid. If it does, it just throws it on the screen. If it doesn't, however, it goes to the company server and tells it that your IP needs the image file. The difference in the image name can be of no consequence (in a query portion of the filename, with information that has nothing to do with the image) and the fact that your browser requested it gives that company server two big pieces of information about your IP (that it has to send the image back to, with new information to read on your next request for this same main image name - minus the query addition) which that company looks up in all the transactions it has on your account so far. By this simple method, ads track your movements and requests without dropping cookies or leaving anything overt. They store all the old information on their servers and update it with every image/file request your browser makes to render a page one of their ads is on.
Pretty much everyone does this stuff, which is why you see image files in your cache with image names that look more like web page addresses, with full queries and the like and php extensions instead of jpg, png (not that the extension really matters, but it's a lazy tell).
Posted by: really ... at January 25, 2012 08:40 AM (X3lox)
Posted by: BlackOrchidHeartlessAgain at January 25, 2012 08:41 AM (SB0V2)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at January 25, 2012 08:41 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: ontherocks at January 25, 2012 08:42 AM (ZJCDy)
LOFL.
The Rush/Paul Schaffer satire of the SOTU is hillarious... and yet, difficult to tell apart from the real thing.
Posted by: Entropy, Racism Delenda Est at January 25, 2012 08:42 AM (mf67L)
He's in Hollywood. Probably did so years ago.
Posted by: DarkLord©, Rogue Commenter at January 25, 2012 08:43 AM (GBXon)
Posted by: Entropy, Racism Delenda Est at January 25, 2012 08:43 AM (mf67L)
Posted by: Gerry at January 25, 2012 08:44 AM (jis7d)
Posted by: Farmer Joe at January 25, 2012 08:44 AM (IZoOk)
Film Furor: Narnia Star Says Aslan Can Symbolize Mohammed
As stated in the story, Liam is a great actor, but a lousy theologian and a bit of a lazy thinker.
I would like to think my own faith is unshakable and unassailable, but I dunno what I'd do if I lost a close loved-one and was constantly on the move.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at January 25, 2012 08:44 AM (9hSKh)
Using Firefox, my right-click goes to Bing, by the options I've set.
Posted by: DarkLord©, Rogue Commenter at January 25, 2012 08:45 AM (GBXon)
$5 every time you scream my name. Lol.
Posted by: HeatherRadish needs italics. And a beer. at January 25, 2012 08:46 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: DarkLord©, Rogue Commenter at January 25, 2012 08:46 AM (GBXon)
If you're in FireFox, you can. Your default search provider should be in the top-right of your browser window (IE Defaults to Bing, now, I think), and you (or, at least, I- but I suspect you, too) can set that default search provider to Bing. *Poof* now when you highlight and right-click, it says, "Search with Bing..."
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 25, 2012 08:47 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Paul Kroenke at January 25, 2012 08:47 AM (FYRA3)
Posted by: Inspector Asshole at January 25, 2012 08:47 AM (K1qrq)
Posted by: HeatherRadish needs italics. And a beer. at January 25, 2012 12:46 PM (ZKzrr)
Good thinking!
Posted by: Khaaaaaaan! at January 25, 2012 08:47 AM (qMs8j)
When I can right-click on a highlighted phrase and search with a different engine, then I'll say that "the government should stay out of it."
----
You can, if you add the accelerator for that.
You don't know what you don't know how to do. You can pretty much do whatever you want - never is it "you can't do that with your computer", it's just that you have no idea how, or else, it might not be worth the time it will take.
But it can be done.
Posted by: Entropy, Racism Delenda Est at January 25, 2012 08:48 AM (mf67L)
Posted by: Khaaaaaaan! at January 25, 2012 08:49 AM (qMs8j)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 25, 2012 08:50 AM (0I4YH)
Posted by: Inspector Asshole at January 25, 2012 08:52 AM (K1qrq)
Narnia Star Says Aslan Can Symbolize Mohammed
So Aslan, instead of sacrificing himself to pay the debt of a traitor to evil, fucks Lucy and then kills everyone who won't worship him. Must be in Book 8.
Posted by: dagny at January 25, 2012 08:52 AM (w+PM8)
And if they pick up any of it and use it, then sue them.
And stop using them going forward.
Further, you can archive all of that data to a local and secure data store (which is where personal/confidential information should be anyway) and then delete it from GMail.
Once you've done that, you can send an email to Google asking them to permanently delete those files (they do after a while anyway). If they give you any grief- sue them.
I'll say it again: if you are using any of the "free" email providers for personal/confidential/business emailing, you're doing it wrong.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 25, 2012 08:53 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at January 25, 2012 12:44 PM (9hSKh)
All you'd have to do is keep reminding yourself that those fucksticks aren't willing to wait patiently for the game ending chaos.
They'd rather be proactive about it.
Posted by: ontherocks at January 25, 2012 08:53 AM (ZJCDy)
Steve Jobs must be so happy in his grave.
Apple, I think, right now has just barely surpassed ExxonMobil for the biggest market cap. Amazing.
Posted by: soothsayer at January 25, 2012 08:54 AM (sqkOB)
I would like to think my own faith is unshakable and unassailable, but I dunno what I'd do if I lost a close loved-one and was constantly on the move.
I don't get it personally. Their are plenty of orders and callings within Christianity to satisfy any fervor or desire for piety or rigor in practice. What makes someone who truly believed in the divine mercy so ready to cast it aside by simply viewing the faith of others? Is it some desire to find a faith that is missing, and being simply envious of those that have it, and believing that by changing religious doctrine that suddenly a wellspring of faith will emerge? I think he is putting the cart in front of the horse. He needs to find his own faith *first* then go shopping for a proper devotion. Not say "hey that devotion is cool" and use that to define his faith.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at January 25, 2012 08:54 AM (0q2P7)
Why were you accepting 500 SSNs into a "free" webmail service? You didn't see any potential problems there? How many times have Yahoo and Hotmail and Gmail been hacked, already?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 25, 2012 08:54 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Inspector Asshole at January 25, 2012 12:52 PM (K1qrq)
Hmm. You make a good point. Google and its evil collaborators are hunched over a table right now pouring over your information. Your need the government on this one.
For everyone else, don't use it.
Posted by: CJ at January 25, 2012 08:56 AM (9KqcB)
I'm not sure if it really helps circumvent the spying, but I use Start Page. It uses Google and hides your information. It's G's search results....hiding you in the process. Or as I understand it.
Posted by: Lady in Black....{sigh} at January 25, 2012 08:56 AM (F+Xfj)
>>What makes someone who truly believed in the divine mercy so ready to cast it aside by simply viewing the faith of others?
Hopefully he was just shooting off his mouth for the sake of talking and getting people to pay attention to him.
Posted by: Mama AJ at January 25, 2012 08:56 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: Inspector Asshole at January 25, 2012 08:56 AM (K1qrq)
Posted by: Lady in Black....{sigh} at January 25, 2012 08:57 AM (F+Xfj)
Posted by: soothsayer at January 25, 2012 12:54 PM (sqkOB)
Shit. Apple's cash position alone is the 44th largest company in the world, by market cap.
Posted by: really ... at January 25, 2012 08:57 AM (X3lox)
Google's market cap is $185B.
And they make, what, nothing?
Apple makes stuff.
ExxonMobil makes stuff.
Google makes nothing.
Posted by: soothsayer at January 25, 2012 08:58 AM (sqkOB)
Posted by: Lady in Black....{sigh} at January 25, 2012 08:59 AM (F+Xfj)
I was unfucking clueless about the "Don't Accept THIS Email" button you evidently have that would un-receive emails sent from someone else five years ago.
-----
Umm... yes. So? Nothing can change what happened 5 years ago...
Posted by: Entropy, Racism Delenda Est at January 25, 2012 08:59 AM (mf67L)
Posted by: Christina Hendricks' Mighty Jugs Says We Are All Truly Boned at January 25, 2012 08:59 AM (i/3GK)
I'm not talking about time travel- I'm talking about paying attention to what you're doing in the first place.
Don't blame us because you didn't stop to think, "Hmm... I don't actually own this email account or domain, let alone the servers where the data resides. Maybe I shouldn't use it for my business email, and should provide some other address- more under my control- to business contacts for business use."
And if you did provide such, and your partner sent 500 SSNs to your GMail address anyway, that's their bad- not yours.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 25, 2012 09:00 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: soothsayer at January 25, 2012 12:58 PM (sqkOB)
As much as I hate them, google makes information and that is as valuable as anything. Google got its intial market share because they introduced better ways (by orders of magnitude) of doing certain sorts of distributed programming and searching.
Posted by: really ... at January 25, 2012 09:01 AM (X3lox)
Well, if you're outraged about this just remember the old adage:
If you aren't paying them money, you aren't a customer...you're the product.
Users have about as much sway with Google over things like this as pigs do about the shape of the trough they get.
Posted by: JohnTant at January 25, 2012 09:01 AM (PFy0L)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 25, 2012 09:02 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Christina Hendricks' Mighty Jugs Says We Are All Truly Boned at January 25, 2012 12:59 PM (i/3GK)
Apple always refused to license any of its stuff (hardware or software) and loved to lock their customers in expensive strangleholds. That's apple's right and their customers loved them for it, anyway. Good for them.
It's not my type of thing.
Posted by: really ... at January 25, 2012 09:03 AM (X3lox)
Posted by: Jared Loughner at January 25, 2012 09:04 AM (e8kgV)
Posted by: Inspector Asshole at January 25, 2012 09:04 AM (K1qrq)
I suspect it's more exhausted, depressed resignation than anything else.
I expect consumption of Valu-Rite to increase by roughly 400%, as if that were possible.
Posted by: DarkLord©, Rogue Commenter at January 25, 2012 09:04 AM (GBXon)
Posted by: Socratease at January 25, 2012 09:05 AM (vaIln)
Posted by: DarkLord©, Rogue Commenter at January 25, 2012 09:05 AM (GBXon)
Posted by: Jared Loughner at January 25, 2012 09:07 AM (e8kgV)
OT, yet again. I do apologize, but only the Morons and 'ettes here at the HQ can ring the pure humor out of this headline. It's impossible not to share.
Link in my username, found via Drudge
------------
"Southern California Woman Claims Neighbor's Energy-Efficient Windows are Melting Her Prius"
...Toyota told Patron nothing was wrong with the car. After having the mirrors replaced, she noticed the mirrors on the car parked next to hers were also melting.
Patron then observed a powerful beam of light that was reflecting off the window of a next door condominium, casting a concentrated beam over her carport.
CBS2Â’s Randy Paige placed a thermometer in the pathway of the beam on a partially cloudy day. The temperature registered over 120 degrees in less than five minutes.
“I’m positive that this window is what is causing the damage to my car,” says Patron..."
-----------
My favorite quote is at the very end of the article.
"The Los Angeles City Department of Building and Safety says even if the window is the source of the damage, there are no code violations involved. The department says itÂ’s not against the law to install a window that reflects sunlight."
I LOVE THIS.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO supporter at January 25, 2012 09:07 AM (4df7R)
the...
iPresident
Posted by: soothsayer at January 25, 2012 01:02 PM (sqkOB)
--In fact, in a way that is how Barky McShitwit campaigned. The "i" in Apple products is meant to stand for different things like "individual" or "imagine." When the cliché is mentioned of 0bama being a "blank screen" to "project" various "hopes and dreams" on, the same principle was at work. That shit ain't flying with the truly skeptical this time around.
Posted by: logprof at January 25, 2012 09:07 AM (ykSKg)
Posted by: Jared Loughner at January 25, 2012 09:08 AM (e8kgV)
It's not my type of thing.
Posted by: really ... at January 25, 2012 01:03 PM (X3lox)
The whole Apple phenomena always cracked me up. They have the worst warranty in the industry, their customer service has ALWAYS been sub-par and they've never really innovated anything, I guess until the iPhone, so the cult following is amazing.
Posted by: © Sponge at January 25, 2012 09:08 AM (UK9cE)
Allen, I voted for Newt, but I'd be damned if I call myself a partisan. Just the thought of that makes me.....feel dirty and itchy.
Posted by: Lady in Black....{sigh} at January 25, 2012 09:08 AM (F+Xfj)
Posted by: Wolfus Aurelius at January 25, 2012 09:09 AM (WuRdj)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO supporter at January 25, 2012 09:10 AM (4df7R)
good catch, logprof
Obama has indeed packaged himself as a nifty device that can do all kinds of neat and cool shit.
But, as you say, he does not function as advertised.
Posted by: soothsayer at January 25, 2012 09:10 AM (sqkOB)
<gmail was and is recommended by at least ten ""state departments"" of education for their employees>
State Departments is a second IMO
Posted by: Buzzsaw at January 25, 2012 09:10 AM (tf9Ne)
Posted by: Blaster at January 25, 2012 09:11 AM (Fw2Gg)
Their are a lot of things "not against the law" that can cause you to be civilly liable. Libel for instance, not illegal, you can do it all you want and not go to jail.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at January 25, 2012 09:11 AM (0q2P7)
Ive been waiting for a pretty WP7 phone. Something that gives iPhone a run for it visual appeal hardware wise. This is it for me. Come march i will be Apple and Google free.
Posted by: MikeInBA at January 25, 2012 09:11 AM (Q9Fr6)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO supporter at January 25, 2012 09:12 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 25, 2012 09:12 AM (eCnLg)
Without an opt-out option, this goddamned company is going to cost me tens of thousands of dollars to keep my clients from being liable themselves for disclosing private info."
Then sue them.
Actually, I'm sure you're not the only one so affected (I bet a whole bunch of accountant and lawyer types are), so start a class-action suit. Seriously- demand (at least) the scrubbing of specific files and providing you with an archived copy (not in that order, obviously). Then let your clients know that, because of this "privacy" change, that you'll no longer be accepting business related material which has gone through Google- people will need to start sending business related documents to you separately and from non-Google-based accounts.
On the liability front, though, I don't see how you're liable because someone else used GMail to send you documents to your non-Gmail account.
That would be like holding an insurance company responsible for PHI that was released by someone else. I just don't see that happening.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 25, 2012 09:13 AM (8y9MW)
"Gingrich: Romney lacks concern for the “humanity” of illegal immigrants"
...yeah. That would be a 'heartless' moment, right there. Didn't take long for that to happen. Hey guys, at least the Dems only had ONE 'Dean Scream' moment that year...just saying, is all...
Posted by: DarkLord©, Rogue Commenter at January 25, 2012 09:13 AM (GBXon)
Posted by: Blaster at January 25, 2012 09:14 AM (Fw2Gg)
I was referring to the sidebar. Some of the plugs there are... interesting.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 25, 2012 09:14 AM (8y9MW)
Thanks for the review. I am comfortable with learning how to operate electronics, and the features you have described sound like it's just what I need. Integrating all of the various contacts regardless of method is great!
I think I'll go with a real keyboard because of my fat fingers and irritation with the virtual, but the operating system sounds good.
I appreciate the time you took to write this.
Thanks again.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at January 25, 2012 09:16 AM (nEUpB)
Microcomputer, keyboard, monitor, that seemed like a big innovation at the time...
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at January 25, 2012 09:16 AM (0q2P7)
I'm hoping that RIM's shakeup at the top will make them more relevant.
Posted by: logprof at January 25, 2012 09:17 AM (ykSKg)
Why won't one of these GOP asshats pander to ME? Conservative taxpaying citizens need love too.
Posted by: Bob Saget at January 25, 2012 09:17 AM (SDkq3)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 25, 2012 01:12 PM (eCnLg)
Actually, they have the same design flaws and issues that EVERYONE else does in the electronic gadget industry.
I guess you didn't see the articles about the phones lighting on fire or randomly erasing their data and all the other things that all other manufacturers appear to have issues with as well.
Posted by: © Sponge at January 25, 2012 09:17 AM (UK9cE)
Posted by: Clubber Lang at January 25, 2012 09:18 AM (ZPrif)
...yeah. That would be a 'heartless' moment, right there. Didn't take long for that to happen. Hey guys, at least the Dems only had ONE 'Dean Scream' moment that year...just saying, is all...
Posted by:at January 25, 2012 01:13 PM (GBXon)
--Good lord, that "heartless" shit is like a Tourette's tic with these fucking establishment guys.
Posted by: logprof at January 25, 2012 09:18 AM (ykSKg)
Join Team Meteor. We have cupcakes and cheesecake.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 25, 2012 09:19 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 25, 2012 09:20 AM (eCnLg)
Imagine a cpu designed and programmed by the most idiotic leftist professors in the world.
Now put that cpu into a robot.
Posted by: soothsayer at January 25, 2012 09:21 AM (sqkOB)
Posted by: Blaster at January 25, 2012 09:21 AM (Fw2Gg)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at January 25, 2012 01:16 PM (0q2P7)
Apple invented that?
Um.........
Posted by: © Sponge at January 25, 2012 09:21 AM (UK9cE)
http:// gizmodo.com/5879163/ how-will-googles-new-privacy-policy-affect-you
Posted by: Don't Panic! at January 25, 2012 09:21 AM (ggRof)
Posted by: M80B at January 25, 2012 09:22 AM (d6QMz)
Posted by: Clubber Lang at January 25, 2012 09:23 AM (ZPrif)
Now put that cpu into a robot.
Posted by: soothsayer at January 25, 2012 01:21 PM (sqkOB)
--Reminds me of the Iowahawk text game parody.
Posted by: logprof at January 25, 2012 09:24 AM (ykSKg)
----
Scroogle has been in business longer than any other Google alternate/bypass that I'm aware of (but then again, I'm an idiot). They've been getting somewhat shafted by google via denying them access to the Google search servers intermittently. I need to re-read this thread ......
Posted by: Google Sucks at January 25, 2012 09:25 AM (sJKFk)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 25, 2012 01:20 PM (eCnLg)
Well, that's great. I'm glad you're happy.
You just keep them up on that pedestal then.
Oh, and Revenue wise, Apple is the 46th largest company in the world.
And I don't suppose that you think Apple is doing similar things with all your data via iTunes, do you?
Posted by: © Sponge at January 25, 2012 09:26 AM (UK9cE)
When they should be competing to see who can Donkey Punch Obama in the (rhetorical) Jimmy the hardest.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 25, 2012 09:26 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Fnord at January 25, 2012 09:26 AM (GL9yr)
Posted by: logprof at January 25, 2012 01:18 PM (ykSKg)
Indeed. Makes me sick. It doesn't matter how often they make these fake displays of compassion (and they're all fake - just like it's fake when the libtards do it) - the MFM will make them look like evil minority-haters regardless. Any Republican who wastes his time trying to appear compassionate is a fool. It will not help him, AT ALL.
Republicans do better when they cast aside that BS. If you're going to be portrayed as a big fat meanie, then go with it. Use it. Show that it is good. There are a lot of us out here who are pining away, waiting for someone with many stones to say "NO" every now and then. Chris Christie isn't popular because he embraces the widows and orphans and holds them tight. He's popular because he's calling all these self righteous and entitled libtards on their BS. He's saying "no more for you."
Posted by: Reactionary at January 25, 2012 09:27 AM (xUM1Q)
Posted by: Blaster at January 25, 2012 01:21 PM (Fw2Gg)
FIFY
Posted by: Hrothgar at January 25, 2012 09:28 AM (i3+c5)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 25, 2012 09:28 AM (eCnLg)
(http://tinyurl.com/7j8ae6k)
Newt bashes Romney for making money off investments (http://tinyurl.com/86atr5v)
Posted by: M80B at January 25, 2012 09:30 AM (d6QMz)
****
Woo hoo! Time to bring in boring and predictable! I'm up!!
Posted by: Mitch Daniels at January 25, 2012 09:31 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 25, 2012 01:28 PM (eCnLg)
Well, good for you, then. I'm not really intending to argue with you about anything, so, it's all good.
Posted by: © Sponge at January 25, 2012 09:32 AM (UK9cE)
Apple invented that?
Um.........
They were the first that offered a microcomputer in that configuration; The Apple 1. Later that year the TRS 80 and the Commodore PET were released which had similar configurations. But Apple gets credit for making the first computer to be considered a "Personal Computer"
Prior to the Apple 1, interfaces with microcomputers sucked. They really really sucked.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at January 25, 2012 09:33 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: M80B at January 25, 2012 09:33 AM (d6QMz)
Preach it, brother!
Posted by: DarkLord©, Rogue Commenter at January 25, 2012 09:34 AM (GBXon)
Second look at Windows phone?
****
For precisely that reason I have stayed the hell away from Droids even when Verizon didn't sell the I-Phone. I've been with Verizon for years and my latest contract expires next month and I'll get a great deal on an I-Phone, which I intend to purchase. All along however, I could have received a discount on Droid, it's just that I'd rather not have a smartphone than be tied to Google in any way shape or form.
And, I've taken care here at every opportunity to point out that it's BING, never, ever Google.
Posted by: Mitch Daniels at January 25, 2012 09:35 AM (piMMO)
Apple makes elegantly simple, robust products aimed at affluent technophobes. Products with limited usefulness for people with limited needs and lots of cash.
All of that is fine with me. It's when these dipshits think that they're computer savvy now that they were able to create a photo collage in one of their Fisher-Price iTard programs that I start to get annoyed. It's like every teenage boy who gets laid for the first time thinks he invented fucking. Shut up, kid.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at January 25, 2012 09:35 AM (PFvlM)
I have no strong feelings about Apple one way or the other (though I've been sickened often enough by apple fanbois). But what I'll say is this - Apple is now, and has always been, a would-be monopolizer. Special music format that only the ipod can play? No thanks. Apple's designs, whether for good or ill, trap the consumer wherever possible. If it's a happy place to be trapped, then great. But I'm just not that trusting.
Posted by: Reactionary at January 25, 2012 09:35 AM (xUM1Q)
(http://tinyurl.com/7j8ae6k)
Aw hell, she can keep that $#!+ to herself...
Posted by: DarkLord©, Rogue Commenter at January 25, 2012 09:35 AM (GBXon)
***
I still have my old, free AOL account, as well as a Yahoo and Comcast account, and I use the AOL the most. You are right that there are plenty of other options to Gmail.
Posted by: Mitch Daniels at January 25, 2012 09:37 AM (piMMO)
No one has ever accused the Chinese of reading Lockheed's mail.
At $0.45 each now, just think of how much you've saved on stamps. Damn, we sure taught them a lesson, didn't we? We so modern.
Phil Marlowe: "A black pool opened up at my feet. I dived in. It had no bottom." Bottom's coming up fast, now. Sound of a trap snapping.
Posted by: comatus at January 25, 2012 09:45 AM (ySTXt)
Posted by: Tad Blatherton at January 25, 2012 09:52 AM (QqRr4)
I'm consistently underwhelmed by the physical robustness and mechanical engineering aspects of their products. Their stuff doesn't do well when dragged out into the field regularly into relatively hostile environments.
Their notions of backward compatibility and extendability also differ significantly than say Microsoft or IBM. Working within the closed Apple universe reduces their testing effort considerably though. Its much easier to train code to walk through an errata minefield when the safe path has no foreign code altering the map.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 25, 2012 09:58 AM (0I4YH)
Do you have a Bing search bar in the window? That's the only way I can figure out how to do it. I don't want the search bar, so it defaults to Google!
Help me Obi Wan, you're my only hope!
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at January 25, 2012 09:59 AM (nEUpB)
I still have a simple flip phone and been thinking about getting a smart phone for a while. I like the Windows Metro style interface - amazing Microsoft came up with something that different.
thanks again!
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at January 25, 2012 10:32 AM (f9c2L)
Posted by: GergS at January 25, 2012 10:50 AM (dptRY)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 25, 2012 11:26 AM (piMMO)
"If you root your phone and put a custom Android ROM on it, just don't include google services." How does one go about doing this?
As for Google Search--I use startingpage.com. It supposedly doesn't store or share your search info.
If enough people ditched their Android smartphones, pressure from the wireless carriers/handset makers might be brought to bear. However, I don't see it happening.
Posted by: mondonico at January 25, 2012 11:37 AM (6cBSH)
I'm curious as to why Google is announcing this now. Their privacy policies going back several years have given them the ability to combine data from their various services, so why announce that they're going to do something they've already reserved the right to do? It's not a change in the policy, so why announce it? Merely to not be evil? I somehow doubt it.
Posted by: Lord Funkicus at January 25, 2012 12:07 PM (gQt6b)
* Use bing.com, or scroogle.com for searches. (Scroogle rocks. Check it out.) * Get a good blocking hosts file. winhelp2002 at mvsp org.
winhelp2002 (dot) mvps (dot) org (forward slach) hosts.htm has an excellent one.
I've added googleanalytics to my blocking hosts file.
Posted by: Looking Glass at January 25, 2012 01:22 PM (UESfc)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2491 seconds, 413 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Lenny Bruce / Leonard Alfred Schneider at January 25, 2012 07:19 AM (UqKQV)