May 25, 2012
— Ace I have warned people: This is a serious business and it's not going to be won with silly games in a blog's comment area.
Bannings will follow.
I do not need such "help."
If you're too stupid to realize what's going on here, I no longer need your input in this site.
As Andy posted earlier, from me:
Now, when he eventually does sue me, I am of course counterclaiming for everything he might still have, as well as having a special master appointed to keep track of any payouts to him from his, um, charities, so that any judgment is satisfied (and not evaded, as a previous victim judgment was).
But understand this: I am going to be sued, and my life is going to be one of constant harassment and intimidation and fear.Please do not put me in a worse position than I've chosen to be for the sake of some silly blogwar joke.
This is not a blogwar. This is not Amanda Marcotte. Amanda Marcotte does not write lists of people to be murdered.
If your want to help me, please do what I asked: Write to congressman.
Have we all forgotten this is supposed to be a participatory democracy? Do people really think this guy will be thwarted, finally, by a post in a blog's comment area?
We need legislative and judicial action on this. We will not get it if it appears this is just some big silly game where one side slaps the other and the other side slaps back.
If you're not sure if something will "help," then EMAIL ME and ask.
I am in this guy's crosshairs.
What can you post about Kimberlin? Things that are a matter of public record (his bombing and perjury convictions) or actual sourced and cited information.
I do not need speculations, jokes, or other such trivia.
For God's sakes. For God's sakes.
Please think before you emote.
Posted by: Ace at
09:16 AM
| Comments (186)
Post contains 330 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Kaitian at May 25, 2012 09:20 AM (1oSTF)
With that in mind, please don't be shy about reaching out for help. Not just for funds.
This may simply be thought of as a blog and you a simple "blogger". But it's much more than that.
Posted by: Exile at May 25, 2012 09:20 AM (/Argg)
Yeah, I don't get it all either.
Is this just some jerk who has tons of free money to spare and who is independently just taking all conservative bloggers to court? Or is this part of some coordinated effort?
I don't get it. Someone needs to summarize this (in less that 100000000000 words if possible).
Posted by: dan-O at May 25, 2012 09:21 AM (/ROCY)
We just have to stick to the facts about Brett to win our argument. The man is a convicted liar, bomber, and drug dealer.
Posted by: Anna Puma at May 25, 2012 09:22 AM (2cYUg)
Posted by: Kaitian at May 25, 2012 09:22 AM (1oSTF)
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at May 25, 2012 09:22 AM (gPDxp)
Posted by: blaster at May 25, 2012 09:22 AM (7vSU0)
Posted by: Jean at May 25, 2012 09:23 AM (WkuV6)
Posted by: Pete at May 25, 2012 09:24 AM (j/wD+)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at May 25, 2012 09:24 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Popcorn at May 25, 2012 09:25 AM (OOehk)
Posted by: Chris Balsz at May 25, 2012 09:26 AM (3GtyG)
Markos Moulitsas @markos
So wingnut bloggers are apparently trying their hardest to make some nobody into the greatest hitler on the left. #shrug #SlowNewsDay
Posted by: kbdabear at May 25, 2012 09:26 AM (Y+DPZ)
For those of you in need of a cell phone to coordinate your flash-mob activity there is help available. You may be eligible for free or subsidized cell phone service.
How Do You Qualify for Lifeline Discounts?
The Lifeline program is available to eligible low-income consumers in every
state, territory, commonwealth, and on Tribal lands. You must be eligible to enroll.
To participate in the program, consumers must either have an income
that is at or below 135% of the federal Poverty Guidelines or participate in one of t
he following assistance programs:
Medicaid;
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (Food Stamps or SNAP);
Supplemental Security Income (SSI);
Federal Public Housing Assistance (Section
Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP);
Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF);
National School Lunch Program's Free Lunch Program;
Bureau of Indian Affairs General Assistance;
Tribally-Administered Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TTANF);
Food Distribution Program on Indian Reservations (FDPIR);
Head Start (if income eligibility criteria are met); or
State assistance programs (if applicable).
(No bloggers, flash-mob-organizers, or convicted felons have been threatened in order to bring you this public service announcement.)
Posted by: RioBravo at May 25, 2012 09:27 AM (eEfYn)
If you hit the tip jar maybe Ace could afford to rent my battalion of recently un-employed On-Her Guard.
I don't know if there are any lawyers in there, but I think a couple of them have clerked.
Posted by: Zombie Quadafy at May 25, 2012 09:27 AM (73HFo)
Posted by: nickless at May 25, 2012 09:28 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: steevy at May 25, 2012 09:28 AM (6HIQG)
The last I saw, he was giving tips on how to find Brett Kimberlin's personal information. He may have also posted some identifying information RE: Kimberlin's residence.
Guys- that can be (reasonably) considered harassing/threatening behavior. Cut that crap out.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at May 25, 2012 09:28 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: taylork at May 25, 2012 09:28 AM (ppNDn)
Posted by: The Robot Devil at May 25, 2012 09:29 AM (DNTer)
Posted by: Amos at May 25, 2012 09:29 AM (m+ljp)
Posted by: mesablue at May 25, 2012 09:30 AM (+31WT)
Posted by: Rocks at May 25, 2012 09:30 AM (Q1lie)
Posted by: Naqamel at May 25, 2012 09:30 AM (UMwMT)
Posted by: hobbes at May 25, 2012 09:30 AM (+CcmI)
Ron Jeremy has done nothing to nobody, cept a few young teens fresh off the bus and a few huge women where he played piano on their back while giving them the hedgehog.
Posted by: Rev. Dr. E. Buzz. Bunnies. at May 25, 2012 09:31 AM (tcSZb)
Posted by: The Pitt at May 25, 2012 09:31 AM (7lbXY)
Posted by: maddogg at May 25, 2012 09:32 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: nickless at May 25, 2012 09:32 AM (MMC8r)
I like Hedgehog and hope he'll be reinstated after this dies down.
Posted by: Captain Hate at May 25, 2012 09:32 AM (ugr8V)
It's supposed to be a representational republic.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at May 25, 2012 09:32 AM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: Conservative Crank at May 25, 2012 09:32 AM (1zwZo)
Posted by: joncelli, heartless Con and all around unpleasant guy at May 25, 2012 09:33 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 25, 2012 09:33 AM (MCDCp)
Funny, now that you mention it, certain...odoriferous regulars seem oddly absent today...
Posted by: Brother Cavil, New Caprica City DMV at May 25, 2012 09:33 AM (GBXon)
Posted by: plum at May 25, 2012 09:33 AM (h4Yoq)
No kidding. Keep the ammo dry, folks. Instead of the usual jokes about hobo hunting, it might be rioter season. Stay safe out there, everyone.
Posted by: Naqamel at May 25, 2012 09:34 AM (UMwMT)
Not to be an even bigger cynical jerk than usual, but what would you like us to write?
It's documented that:
1. Kimberlin is a Very Bad Man and felon.
2. He files a lot of frivolous lawsuits.
3. He has some bullshit 501c "charities".
What reasonable, plausible action should I be asking my congressman take?
You mentioned asking for a federal law to require a licensed attorney to handle legal matters for a 501(c), but I'm not sure what good that would do- Kimberlin could still sue on his own behalf, unconnected to his "charity".
Tort reform isn't going anywhere, not with Dems holding the presidency and the Senate. And they're not going to pass a federal law that targets one scumbag.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at May 25, 2012 09:34 AM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 25, 2012 09:34 AM (MCDCp)
Posted by: Chris Balsz at May 25, 2012 09:34 AM (3GtyG)
So wingnut bloggers are apparently trying their hardest to make some nobody into the greatest hitler on the left.
No way in hell would the rightosphere react like this if the roles were reversed.
Posted by: 13times at May 25, 2012 09:34 AM (h6XiD)
Posted by: Naqamel at May 25, 2012 09:34 AM (UMwMT)
Posted by: nickless at May 25, 2012 09:34 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: clp at May 25, 2012 09:34 AM (AJx9P)
Ron Jeremy has done nothing to nobody, cept a few young teens fresh off the bus and a few huge women where he played piano on their back while giving them the hedgehog.
Posted by: Rev. Dr. E. Buzz. Bunnies. at May 25, 2012 01:31 PM (tcSZb)
You just had to put that image in my head didn't you?
Posted by: joncelli, heartless Con and all around unpleasant guy at May 25, 2012 09:35 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at May 25, 2012 09:35 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: TimothyJ at May 25, 2012 09:36 AM (Ggn0m)
Do what you have to to cover your backside. Most of us here get that, and (despite all evidence given by our action in the ONT) are pretty level-headed and intelligent.
Hang in there, little ewok.
Posted by: RightWingProf at May 25, 2012 09:36 AM (IC6Er)
Posted by: ace at May 25, 2012 09:36 AM (aw5Tx)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Troll Hunter! at May 25, 2012 09:36 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 25, 2012 09:36 AM (MCDCp)
Ben Franklin always was my fave. True words, folks.
Posted by: Brother Cavil, New Caprica City DMV at May 25, 2012 09:37 AM (GBXon)
Posted by: garrett at May 25, 2012 09:37 AM (73HFo)
Posted by: navycopjoe at May 25, 2012 09:38 AM (QULDk)
I have had my life threatened three times in my life.
As a young woman, a casual acquaintance who's affections I had spurned put a gun to my head on a crowded beach and threatened to drag me off and kill me.
The crowded beach saved my life.
Last summer, a young man tried to run us over with his boat, shouting" I'll kill you!" We had pointed out his reckless boating behavior and he proceeded to grace us with a little more of where that came from. We escaped into the mouth of the lake's river, he could not navigate the rocky entrance.
This spring we worked a neighborhood drug house situation into a SWAT raid, and the heroin junky, whose two small little girls were taken in by CPS in that raid, threatened our lives from jail. I fled the state for two weeks until things calmed down. Spent the time at the shooting range.
There is nothing more disconcerting that having your life upended by people who express a desire to kill you.
My thoughts and prayers are with you Ace. Sweating bullets is not a good place to be and I wish you peace, very, very soon.
Posted by: Derak at May 25, 2012 09:38 AM (lLFUO)
Posted by: runningrn at May 25, 2012 09:38 AM (WGmy2)
Posted by: just sayin' at May 25, 2012 09:38 AM (W5c4e)
Posted by: awhindy at May 25, 2012 09:38 AM (zeWWc)
Posted by: Brother Cavil, New Caprica City DMV at May 25, 2012 09:39 AM (GBXon)
That Kimberlin's record be read into the Congressional Record. The thin veneer of "logic" which Kimberlin appears to be using is that his crime was 34 years ago (really 33, BK, just to be clear) and that mentioning it now is defamation. If his record is read into the Congressional Record, then he loses even that chimerical bit of logic.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at May 25, 2012 09:39 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Beefy Meatball at May 25, 2012 09:39 AM (mxnUd)
This is not the day for annoying, masturbatory contrarianism
Posted by: Albie Damned at May 25, 2012 09:39 AM (Yhu4q)
Posted by: garrett at May 25, 2012 09:39 AM (73HFo)
Posted by: Cathy at May 25, 2012 09:39 AM (jJ56a)
Posted by: runningrn at May 25, 2012 09:39 AM (WGmy2)
Posted by: The Pitt at May 25, 2012 09:40 AM (7lbXY)
Maybe someone could convince the IRS to stop pestering Tea Parties and look into Kimberlin's 501(c)(3) orgs. Given how fast he is to whip out lawsuits, there's gotta be something interesting there that he'd rather nobody look at.
Posted by: brian at May 25, 2012 09:41 AM (y05cf)
I've been completely under water at school for the last month or so. Can someone point me to a summary of what's going on?
Thanks.
Posted by: vermin at May 25, 2012 09:42 AM (dAIU+)
Markos Moulitsas @markosSo wingnut bloggers are apparently
trying their hardest to make some nobody into the greatest hitler on the
left.
Geez, Markos really is trying to get on that guy's bad side. Calling him "some nobody" is pretty funny when you consider that he likely has a wildly overblown sense of his importance.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at May 25, 2012 09:42 AM (xDqit)
Posted by: Jean at May 25, 2012 09:43 AM (WkuV6)
..Levin's office said they'd get back to me...uh huh
Posted by: Albie Damned at May 25, 2012 09:43 AM (Yhu4q)
Posted by: joeindc44 says come on, guys, no tough questions at May 25, 2012 09:44 AM (QxSug)
Posted by: Ian S. at May 25, 2012 09:44 AM (tqwMN)
Posted by: Mallamutt, RINO President for Life at May 25, 2012 01:24 PM (OWjjx)
It's not, but it sure helps!
Posted by: Insomniac at May 25, 2012 09:45 AM (DrWcr)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 25, 2012 09:46 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: Slublog at May 25, 2012 09:46 AM (SjVZP)
Posted by: Jack at May 25, 2012 09:46 AM (wUFaM)
I'm not trying to be simply contrarian. I keep seeing calls to write our elected officials, but I'm honestly not quite clear on what they reasonably could be expected to do.
He's already on record, documented in mainstream newspapers and the criminal record, as being the Speedway Bomber. Reading his criminal history into the congressional record will stop him how? Shame him?
I'm happy to write my congress-critters (useless Dems though they are), but I don't want to just helplessly shout "DO SOMETHING!!!!".
Posted by: Hollowpoint at May 25, 2012 09:46 AM (SY2Kh)
Fidelity Investments is also a big funder for MMfA. The wife has an IRA account with them. It's time to change that
Posted by: Albie Damned at May 25, 2012 09:47 AM (Yhu4q)
Posted by: The Pitt at May 25, 2012 09:47 AM (7lbXY)
Posted by: navycopjoe at May 25, 2012 09:47 AM (QULDk)
It would make it easier to have the nuisance cases he brings dismissed. It would help disarm him.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at May 25, 2012 09:48 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Albie Damned at May 25, 2012 01:47 PM (Yhu4q)
Shit. Do you have a link for that?
Posted by: Tami at May 25, 2012 09:48 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: brando at May 25, 2012 09:49 AM (IPGju)
I think he's convinced a lot of people on the left that he's innocent of those things he was convicted for. With most of them being drooling imbeciles, it probably hasn't been difficult.
Posted by: slatz at May 25, 2012 09:49 AM (Fvc5o)
Posted by: The Pitt at May 25, 2012 09:50 AM (7lbXY)
Posted by: SouthCounty at May 25, 2012 09:51 AM (49yng)
There are tort actions for Wrongful initiation of a civil proceeding.
If he files in your home state, then he's basically given up any personal jurisdiction argument and you can haul him into court on your turf, after getting his case against you dismissed. He may not have much, but a garnishment will seriously cramp his style and probably lead to a violation of 501(c)(3) financing rules.
Posted by: imp at May 25, 2012 09:51 AM (UaxA0)
Posted by: Blue Falcon in Boston at May 25, 2012 09:52 AM (KCvsd)
Posted by: Albie Damned at May 25, 2012 01:47 PM (Yhu4q)
Shit. Do you have a link for that?
Posted by: Tami at May 25, 2012 01:48 PM (X6akg)
Scroll down
http://tinyurl.com/c38465g
Posted by: Albie Damned at May 25, 2012 09:52 AM (Yhu4q)
Posted by: Y-not at May 25, 2012 09:52 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Psycotte at May 25, 2012 09:53 AM (Hk10/)
I got the sense, yesterday, that ace was thinking have their 501(3)(c) status investigated and revoked. And, yes, the IRS does that, but it would likely take a Congressman to ask them to. At least, it probably would in this case.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at May 25, 2012 09:54 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: The Pitt at May 25, 2012 09:55 AM (7lbXY)
hey ace its no prolbem if you need a body gaurd or just want a bro
to talk about things with play video games ect basic hang out plus also
proteciton with karate boxing invasive driving skills ect piece out bro
Posted by: Jose Canseco's Gristle Encased Head at May 25, 2012 09:55 AM (+lsX1)
We may be "morons" but hopefully you know many of us are also respected professionals in our fields
**
Yes...I have been that I am outstanding in my field as well.
Posted by: dananjcon-ski at May 25, 2012 09:56 AM (eavT+)
Posted by: booger at May 25, 2012 09:56 AM (HI6wa)
I have made no comments on any of the Kimberlin posts because, frankly, I would not have said anything positive. I wanted - and still want - to poke the bear (for clarification's sake, Ace is not the 'bear'). I have found myself on more than one occasion wishing I had my own blog for the purposes of antagonizing this ... 'person'...ever since I read the first post about him...and his cohorts.
But consider this: There's a guy on your street who's an asshole. Everyone knows he's an asshole. So you walk down the street, stand in front of his house, and shout "Dude, you're an asshole!" He's going to want to confront you on your opinion of him. Now consider this scenario in a slightly different context; instead of standing in front of the guy's house you go inside his neighbor's house, open his window and shout "Dude, you're an asshole!" Now this asshole has a problem not only with you, but the neighbor who let you in the house so you could shout at him from a closer proximity.
Calling Kimberlin well-deserved names on this blog is the equivalent of shouting form the neighbor's house. This is Ace's house, and Kimberlin is the kind of...'person'...who will take any opportunity to use even the most innocuous comment against him. If you read Patterico's long post that Andy linked to, you will know that there is an effort by ...'these people'...to discover Ace's real identity. There can be no purpose for wanting Ace's actual identity other than for harassment objectives.
Maybe I'm out of line saying all this; I'm not trying to sound like a lecturing mother. Believe me, I know full well how tempting it is to toss comments at ...'these people'...but we're not standing out on the street. We're in Ace's house.
And the neighbor in this case is a very unstable person, surrounded by very unstable persons, with a violent past. And they have made it clear they want to know who Ace is.
Of course...I know who Ace is. I figured it out last week.
Ace is 'Open Blogger'. I noticed this when they weren't in the same room at the same time.
We're with you Ace. It's just that our enthusiasm is such that we don't just want to stand up and say "I'm Spartacus!", we want to grab swords and impale Romans.
Posted by: sgt. york at May 25, 2012 09:57 AM (cGPup)
Posted by: Inspector Asshole at May 25, 2012 09:57 AM (YSyyZ)
Every inch of the congressional record is by definition a subject of public debate and discussion. Having the subject matter in the record makes subsequent law suits easier for those who might get caught in them.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Troll Hunter! at May 25, 2012 09:57 AM (0q2P7)
It strikes me if all the allegations about Kimberlin are true--if half of them, even--this guy is a sociopath. A seriously dangerous person.
At any rate, I'm trying to get some media people in orgs I'm in interested in this. But I also believe law enforcement, as I said in my article, should do due diligence to investigate and prosecute.
Posted by: Kay B. Day at May 25, 2012 09:57 AM (yEzyE)
Posted by: runningrn at May 25, 2012 09:58 AM (WGmy2)
Posted by: Cicero at May 25, 2012 09:58 AM (QKKT0)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 25, 2012 09:58 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: Y-not at May 25, 2012 10:00 AM (5H6zj)
I didn't think Ace believed in God. No atheists in foxholes, and so, I guess, no doubters in the dock.
Posted by: Leo Ladenson at May 25, 2012 10:00 AM (mAm+G)
Posted by: Chris Balsz at May 25, 2012 10:00 AM (3GtyG)
Matthew Vadum joins Ezra Levant to outline the ties between the Tides Foundation and convicted terrorist Brett Kimberlin.
Posted by: andycanuck at May 25, 2012 10:00 AM (FTuxU)
Posted by: dananjcon-ski at May 25, 2012 10:00 AM (eavT+)
Defendants in such nuisance cases can already point to his documented criminal record.
If a congressman did read it into the record, it would be one of those sessions where there the chamber is practically empty, watched by almost nobody on C-SPAN.
Likewise suggesting we write asking to "change the law" isn't helpful. Change what specific law? In what way?
Posted by: Hollowpoint at May 25, 2012 10:01 AM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: Mandy P., long-time lurker at May 25, 2012 10:01 AM (qFpRI)
Posted by: nickless at May 25, 2012 10:02 AM (MMC8r)
So I don't have to close all my Fidelity accounts, right?
Posted by: Tami at May 25, 2012 10:03 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at May 25, 2012 10:03 AM (f9c2L)
Hey Ace,
In case you haven't seen it, just posting a link to a good size Canadian blog (small dead animals) which discusses and links to much of this issue. It also contains a Sun News video clip (as the left would say, Sun News is FOX NEWS NORTH!!!eleventy!11!!!) to Ezra Levant's show with guest Matthew Vadum
Not sure how much it helps, but it's certainly more publicity.
Posted by: Lurking Canuck at May 25, 2012 10:04 AM (V4JUZ)
Posted by: Lauren at May 25, 2012 10:04 AM (bV8xV)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at May 25, 2012 01:35 PM (8y9MW)
Lol, welcome to my average Twitter day.
Posted by: Polliwog, Teahada hobbit at May 25, 2012 10:05 AM (CQ1cz)
Every inch of the congressional record is by definition a subject of public debate and discussion. Having the subject matter in the record makes subsequent law suits easier for those who might get caught in them.
OK, perry mason. The "congressional record" is meaningless. If he's suing for defamation, it's either true or it isn't. If it is, he has no case. And if he's suing over speech activities, many jurisdictions will allow a special anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) motion to dismiss that gives the sued party attorney fees if the case is dismissed at that point. Depends entirely on the jurisdiction. NY is not so good, Illinois is better, California is great.
The only thing "reading it into the cong record" will do is possibly help with BK's public figure status, of which there isn't really much doubt. He's a public figure and has to prove actual malice for defamation.
ace and other bloggers stand a good chance of winning any anti-SLAPP motions and getting fees where available if they are sued. But going through it is a nightmare, no matter what.
I'm one moron who gives ace crap when he gets too worked up about stuff. He's not getting too worked up about this. Be cool.
Posted by: imp at May 25, 2012 10:06 AM (UaxA0)
Vaguely reminds me of what happened to an American sports talk radio figure a couple years ago. This guy, Steven Cohen said some things about what he believed caused a stadium crush two decades ago and these Liverpool fans started hounding him. The thing is, there is over 60 Million Liverpool fans, so even 1% of that number is a huge number. They didn't like him saying that he thought fan misbehavior and ticketless fans were part of what started the crush instead of laying the entire blame on the Police/stadium security. They sent death threats to his email, death threats to his stepkids on Facebook and Myspace, death threats throught the mail, and then got organized by some supporter groups and started emailing every single sponsor/advertiser promising they would boycott. His bank was routinely calling to let him know someone had attempted to access his accounts online but had not been able to figure out the passwords. One member of a supporters group leading the boycott was also a "journalist" for some Business publication and they wrote incredibly one-sided stories about the nobel boycott and didn't mention that they were affiliated with the supporter's group. The sponsers, including Hieneken all pulled out leaving his show on Sirius XM dead in the water. He left Sirius and went to a podcast format which they said was all they wanted (he would be gone from Sirus XM). Then when ESPN let it be known a couple years later they were going to hire him to put together a podcast for them they were flooded with over a million emails threatening a boycott (which is actually more effective in England as ESPN is a subscription chanel there, not a basic cable package chanel).
Not the same thing... but I wonder which is worse, having one completely psychotic person with a vendetta and a violent history going after you or a few hundred thousand people willing to email every perspective employer you will ever have and the knowlege that there has to be a few mentally unstable ones in that large number willing to physically assault you?
Posted by: Marco at May 25, 2012 10:06 AM (WdTrT)
Posted by: toby928© at May 25, 2012 10:06 AM (NG097)
Posted by: Y-not at May 25, 2012 10:07 AM (5H6zj)
There was a time when a felony conviction stripped you of more civil rights than just the franchise.
I'd like to see a return to that. How can a violent felon and perjurer hold a position of trust?
Posted by: xbradtc at May 25, 2012 10:09 AM (LouEe)
Posted by: Y-not at May 25, 2012 10:09 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: runningrn at May 25, 2012 10:10 AM (WGmy2)
Posted by: Y-not at May 25, 2012 10:10 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Y-not at May 25, 2012 10:12 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Marion Barry at May 25, 2012 10:12 AM (WGmy2)
Posted by: kbdabear at May 25, 2012 01:26 PM (Y+DPZ)
i had thought one of the group of 3 men harrassing stacy and patterico used to write at Kos?
was banned?
Patterico :
Rauhauser compiled a large packet of defamatory material accusing me, Walker, Nagy, and others of participating in criminal activity, and said he had sent it to state police in New Jersey and the FBI in Baltimore. He made the entire packet available as a torrent.
Writing as Stranded Wind at Daily Kos (where he has since been banned), Rauhauser insinuated that I had obtained forged documentation during the course of my employment to support claims by shadowy Internet entity John Reid:
Posted by: willow at May 25, 2012 10:12 AM (TomZ9)
Somebody posted a link to his "Justice Through Music" filing yesterday. It was very vague (and in my opinion a little bit fishy), but claiming that almost all the money they took in was spent on publishing / material costs.
It also claimed that Kimberlin works 40 hours a week for the charity, but was compensated less than $20,000.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at May 25, 2012 10:12 AM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: xbradtc at May 25, 2012 10:14 AM (LouEe)
That isn't really relevant, and if you were following this closer you would know that. Defending yourself in court is time consuming and/or costly.
Defense of both harassment and defamation becomes LESS time consuming, and LESS costly if the matter were read into the congressional record.
That's what we are talking about here.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Troll Hunter! at May 25, 2012 10:14 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 25, 2012 10:14 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: MostlyRight at May 25, 2012 10:15 AM (ZG8Ti)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 25, 2012 10:15 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 25, 2012 10:16 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: toby928© at May 25, 2012 10:18 AM (NG097)
#24, just as a general rule, we've talked a lot of shit here for years about how conservatives keep turning the other cheek and lose a lot of fights as a result.
So, hypothetically, if some dickhead on the Left likes to out people, how is it therefore unfair to leave the address of his mother's basement somewhere online where someone might find it?
Posted by: SGT Dan at May 25, 2012 10:18 AM (jCQ+I)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 25, 2012 10:19 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 25, 2012 10:20 AM (piMMO)
It's almost like someone was trying to hide the donations
Posted by: Albie Damned at May 25, 2012 10:25 AM (Yhu4q)
Posted by: toby928© at May 25, 2012 10:25 AM (NG097)
Posted by: runningrn at May 25, 2012 02:10 PM (WGmy2)
I can't tell you how absolutely *shocked* I am to find out that Slick has some role in this whole sordid mess.
Posted by: Captain Hate at May 25, 2012 10:29 AM (ugr8V)
Defense of both harassment and defamation becomes LESS time consuming, and LESS costly if the matter were read into the congressional record.
No, it doesn't Mike.
A motion to dismiss is based on the pleadings. I'm assuming jailhouse Esq knows how to file a dismissal proof complaint. Only in jurisdictions with anti-SLAPP provisions broad enough to cover this kind of thing will allow a dismisssal on evidence outside the complaint. Otherwise, it's a slog to summary judgment whether or not it's in some "congressional record." Reading it on the floor of congress makes it no more or less true or false. If he's a public figure, it's easier to defend. BK is already a public figure. Nothing about "reading " his history in congress makes a whit of difference.
Gleen Grunwald did not become gospel truth when he was "read on the floor of the senate" or whatever such nonsense it was.
Posted by: imp at May 25, 2012 10:34 AM (UaxA0)
Posted by: rightlysouthern (aim low boys, they`re ridin shetland ponies) at May 25, 2012 10:48 AM (sqzvk)
Posted by: Dogbert at May 25, 2012 10:58 AM (CFshT)
Posted by: Otis Criblecoblis at May 25, 2012 11:13 AM (IlZPo)
Posted by: Jay Bee at May 25, 2012 11:15 AM (6W8+8)
Posted by: Ian S. at May 25, 2012 01:44 PM (tqwMN)
Good stuff. Everyone needs to read this.
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC at May 25, 2012 11:24 AM (dM8c9)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC at May 25, 2012 11:26 AM (dM8c9)
It would make it easier to have the nuisance cases he brings dismissed. It would help disarm him.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at May 25, 2012 01:48 PM (8y9MW)
Additionally, he's wired into the DNC (and probably a Dem congressperson or two) and hiding behind a tax-exempt entity.
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC at May 25, 2012 11:31 AM (dM8c9)
to see if they meet a reasonable threshold of expenditure for altruistic
purposes, or any at all.
Somebody posted a link to his "Justice Through Music" filing yesterday. It was very vague (and in my opinion a little bit fishy), but claiming that almost all the money they took in was spent on publishing / material costs.
It also claimed that Kimberlin works 40 hours a week for the charity, but was compensated less than $20,000.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at May 25, 2012 02:12 PM (SY2Kh)
--------------
He keeps his ...ahem....."funds" off the grid, so to speak. Learned that from a lawyer back in the late 70's. Only wrote two checks a year (both for taxes) and never kept more than his tax liability in a bank, plus around 10% or so.
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC at May 25, 2012 11:37 AM (dM8c9)
I am just a moron who is out of work... my funds are extremely tight, but you have my support in this fight. I wish there was something more I could do in your endeavor against people that believe defamation and harassment are the only way to prove their point of view and hide the truth.
Posted by: Satan's Barbed Schnitzengruber at May 25, 2012 11:42 AM (Jls4P)
ace and other bloggers stand a good chance of winning any anti-SLAPP motions and getting fees where available if they are sued. But going through it is a nightmare, no matter what.
-------
That's the whole point.
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC at May 25, 2012 11:43 AM (dM8c9)
Posted by: Delaware Blue at May 25, 2012 11:54 AM (RwpbN)
Posted by: Bystander at May 25, 2012 11:56 AM (/sohm)
Posted by: Jim Treacher at May 25, 2012 11:59 AM (X3KAb)
Posted by: sonnyspats at May 25, 2012 12:15 PM (Qr9Rc)
Markos doesn't even realize what a transparent POS he is. Everything in life is not a partisan game.
Posted by: Voluble at May 25, 2012 12:17 PM (c8WV/)
Mark Alexander with The Patriot Post is on this story also:
He's got a great e-mail newsletter by the way.
Posted by: Max Entropy at May 25, 2012 12:18 PM (nHd52)
Posted by: Counterproductive KosTard at May 25, 2012 12:43 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at May 25, 2012 12:44 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: Cortillaen at May 25, 2012 01:41 PM (3muKk)
http://bit.ly/MNvYdE
Posted by: Cortillaen at May 25, 2012 01:52 PM (3muKk)
Posted by: Dog eat dog world at May 25, 2012 03:10 PM (Qp2GE)
Posted by: FUBAR at May 25, 2012 03:37 PM (mdhVr)
Posted by: Hoss at May 25, 2012 03:52 PM (jl+A/)
Posted by: Kevin C. at May 25, 2012 04:57 PM (a55Ts)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.4735 seconds, 314 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Pete at May 25, 2012 09:18 AM (j/wD+)