December 03, 2012
— Ace Legal Insurrection starts looking the field over. Obviously, it would a good thing to have a majority in the Senate, to block Obama's nominees at least in his last two years.
Grover Norquist meanwhile threatens that the Tea Party will really come out in force if Obama forces us over the fiscal cliff, which he most likely will.
Posted by: Ace at
08:48 AM
| Comments (187)
Post contains 74 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: wheatie at December 03, 2012 08:50 AM (CM59X)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Also on Teams Daryl and Glenn. at December 03, 2012 08:50 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: WalrusRex at December 03, 2012 08:51 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: Vic at December 03, 2012 08:52 AM (YdQQY)
The Mass Dem state committee is asking that same question. Brown would be the front runner out of the gate, at least.
Posted by: fluffy at December 03, 2012 08:53 AM (z9HTb)
Thank you. United States Senator Sarah Palin.
Posted by: mrp at December 03, 2012 08:53 AM (HjPtV)
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at December 03, 2012 08:53 AM (QXlbZ)
Posted by: 2011 at December 03, 2012 08:53 AM (79ueO)
I cannot say they lost because of fraud but I will say they lost because of electoral seepage.
That means that they do not protect and harvest all the votes that they should be receiving but instead allow Democrats to make them disappear or not be counted.
Democrats vote with a shotgun blast while Republicans vote with a BB gun.
Posted by: NeoKong at December 03, 2012 08:54 AM (w5v/W)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at December 03, 2012 08:54 AM (J7sV0)
Posted by: M. Murcek at December 03, 2012 08:54 AM (GJUgF)
Posted by: Queen Michelle at December 03, 2012 08:54 AM (wIgpo)
We'll make him Alan Keyes version 1.zero
Posted by: sven10077 at December 03, 2012 08:54 AM (LRFds)
But...but...perpetual campaigning is like, good for the economy.
Think of all those poor consultants who would be out of work, if we had a lull between elections.
Posted by: wheatie at December 03, 2012 08:54 AM (CM59X)
How many people get to be a sacrifice pawn twice in their career?
Posted by: fluffy at December 03, 2012 08:56 AM (z9HTb)
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at December 03, 2012 08:56 AM (QXlbZ)
11... Do we really need Scott Brown that badly?
Not so much Scott Brown, it's just that we need all the R's we can get, in order to retake the Senate.
Posted by: wheatie at December 03, 2012 08:57 AM (CM59X)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at December 03, 2012 08:58 AM (+yYvY)
Posted by: Butters at December 03, 2012 09:00 AM (NIZHJ)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at December 03, 2012 09:01 AM (J7sV0)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at December 03, 2012 09:02 AM (5DR1j)
Anyone who wants to stand on a GOP ticket next cycle has to be absolutely remorselessly grilled behind closed doors beforehand, about what their positions are on hot button issues and what they plan to say about those positions when asked.
If someone doesn't have acceptable, polished answers ready to go and drilled to perfection, they should have their candidacy canned.
No more unrehearsed, extemporaneous blurting out of insane crap about rape pregnancies being something that "God intended" to happen.
We can't afford Amateur Hour any longer. The stakes are too high now.
Posted by: torquewrench at December 03, 2012 09:02 AM (ymG7s)
Don't even think of running somebody who actually believes that Constitutional and conservatism stuff
I'll shit all over them
After all, I'm just an analyst doing my job
Posted by: Karl Rove at December 03, 2012 09:02 AM (wwsoB)
Posted by: HANNITY!!! at December 03, 2012 09:03 AM (wwsoB)
Of course, I still like the idea of starting a new Party to challenge the Republicans from the Right. Yes, it'll suck for a while, but it has a better chance of ever achieving actual results than reforming the GOP does.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at December 03, 2012 09:04 AM (5DR1j)
Posted by: Butters at December 03, 2012 09:04 AM (NIZHJ)
Posted by: so joeindc44 is full of all sorts of hindsight now, like JFK? at December 03, 2012 09:04 AM (QxSug)
Sorry, but once Bonehead caves on the Fiscal Cliff.... the GOP is pretty much done as far as Fiscal Cons are concerned...
They could not even get their own to vote last election (which is why Obama won)....
GOP, needs a serious facelift, if not replacment, before we even start talking people for the Next Election...
Posted by: Rambo at December 03, 2012 09:05 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Also on Teams Daryl and Glenn. at December 03, 2012 09:05 AM (VtjlW)
Yeah no offense to the good professor, but did anyone notice his record during the last election? I think every one of his "operation Counterweight" people failed. Even those who were arguably in safe seats from his perspective.
He let's his love (or hate) of a candidate overshadow the facts on the ground.
(Note: This isn't an argument to move more center, just an observation.)
Posted by: tsrblke (work) at December 03, 2012 09:05 AM (i177X)
Posted by: unclear on the concept at December 03, 2012 09:05 AM (TAd8I)
Repubs are in too much disaray right now to be winning anything. The MFM will make sure that it will be perpetuated too.
I'm not seeing any big changes in 2014. If we go over the fiscal cliff, all bets are off for anything resembling an American election will happen.
Posted by: Soona at December 03, 2012 09:06 AM (9Zv89)
You do it. You'll have the curmudgeon vote all sewn up!
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at December 03, 2012 09:06 AM (5DR1j)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at December 03, 2012 09:07 AM (79ueO)
Posted by: torquewrench at December 03, 2012 01:02 PM (ymG7s)
And yet, the GOP Professionals.... have gotten us into this mess.
Its that Sign of Insanity thing.... why continue to elect people who have FAILED us?
Posted by: Romeo13 at December 03, 2012 09:07 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at December 03, 2012 09:08 AM (+yYvY)
30...I blame James Carville for the current state of political discourse. He was the primary proponent of the perpetual campaign.
Thank you, AtC.
I've always thought so myself.
Before Carville...politics were still rather civil. He changed it forever.
Posted by: wheatie at December 03, 2012 09:08 AM (CM59X)
P.S. I think I kinda, half way understand what is going on. The social contract has been breached and we can no longer ignore it. I don't really mean the Hobbes, Locke, or Rousseau version whereby the people have a social contract with their government (although that has been breached as well). What I mean is that the basic social contract whereby I will act reasonably and in good faith and you will act reasonably and in good faith. We're pretty stupid but even we have finally begun to realize that Obama and the Democrats will not act reasonably nor in good faith. Therefore, there is no possibility of any fruitful compromise. And it doesn't matter what the media says. We're in Hitler-after-Munich territory now.
On the other hand, there is some thought that congress will vote to allow the president to unilaterally raise the debt ceiling whenever he wants. Apparently McConnell was making comments of this nature eighteen months ago. their motive would be that voting for or against debt ceiling raises is heavy lifting and they don't like heavy lifting.
Posted by: WalrusRex at December 03, 2012 09:08 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at December 03, 2012 09:08 AM (+lsX1)
Within hours of Obama's reelection, the Left was already at work on the midterms. They'll copy the Claire McCaskill model: actively supporting their preferred Republican opponents (aka the Todd Akins of the world). They'll dump huge sums into competitive races.
The GOP will run just enough novices and douchebags to ensure that the Democrats hold the Senate.
Meanwhile, we've seen the limits of what responsible, concerned citizens are capable of politically. They had a good run in 2010, but now there's just too many parasites who are voting reliably democratic. Seniors will die off, making future Democratic majorities that much bigger. This will get worse with amnesty.
The FSA is now Occupying Amerikkka.
Posted by: Sam In VA at December 03, 2012 09:09 AM (rFiOs)
He let's his love (or hate) of a candidate overshadow the facts on the ground.Posted by: tsrblke
Um, no. He was only trying to rally people to those candidates. If we can't support candidates who eventually lose, aren't you asking for Ace to shut down his blog as well?
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at December 03, 2012 09:10 AM (JEpGb)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at December 03, 2012 09:10 AM (e0xKF)
Lizzie "Run with Dogs" Warren has already proven to be the stupid and we will begin phazing out our coverage of her vapid statements and pressers to avoid embarrassment to the DNC and the appearance that the voters chose unwisely.
But, if the republicans dare to run against her in six years we will point out what a financial genius, intelligent compromiser and champion of the poor she is and always has been...she is solid middle class all the way baby! We must defeat the republicans with our narrative.
Wait. What?
Oh, Scott Brown? He's a heartless super wealthy conservative extremist. He just isn't good for Mass. or the country.
Posted by: The Media at December 03, 2012 09:11 AM (Ss2Nc)
Posted by: Karl Rove at December 03, 2012 09:11 AM (QXlbZ)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Also on Teams Daryl and Glenn. at December 03, 2012 09:11 AM (VtjlW)
37...And yet, the GOP Professionals.... have gotten us into this mess.
Handicapping ourselves -- it's what we do best!
Posted by: wheatie at December 03, 2012 09:12 AM (CM59X)
Posted by: wheatie at December 03, 2012 01:12 PM (CM59X)
Yeah.... and I say this as a Raider's Fan....
The GOP seems to pick leaders, like the Raiders pick coaches... some good ones in the old days, but modern track record sucks.
Posted by: Romeo13 at December 03, 2012 09:14 AM (lZBBB)
No chance Scotty Brown re-emerges as a Senator from the People's Republic of MA. None. Zero. Zip. Nada.
Posted by: DocJ at December 03, 2012 09:14 AM (A5uiv)
Nahhhh... voters would put someone who's never held office into the Senate just because they're a celebrity, right?
I mean .. Al Franken must have been student council president or a member of the student senate at Harvard, right?
Posted by: kbdabear at December 03, 2012 09:15 AM (wwsoB)
Pamela Gellar's alias spotted!
Posted by: Shoot Me at December 03, 2012 09:15 AM (qiXMt)
Posted by: ejo at December 03, 2012 09:15 AM (GXvSO)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at December 03, 2012 09:16 AM (+yYvY)
But throughout the races, his handy capping of them was horrible. Granted well all fell victim to that this cycle but he seemed somewhat worse about it.
Heck look at is work on Scott Brown, Yeoman's work on critiquing fauxahauntus, but he just seemed to think that would win over the MA people. (It didn't.)
Frankly, I got a little worried by his blog when it took him so long to let Newt's loss go. I still read it daily, it's great, I just tend to ignore his handicaps for races.
Posted by: tsrblke (work) at December 03, 2012 09:16 AM (i177X)
Posted by: Cricket at December 03, 2012 09:16 AM (DrC22)
Posted by: tsrblke (work) at December 03, 2012 09:18 AM (i177X)
Posted by: cranky-d at December 03, 2012 09:18 AM (HDtn6)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at December 03, 2012 01:16 PM (+yYvY)
Well.... for just $49.95 plus shipping and handling, we can send you the New SarcoMeter! Guarneteed to detect Sarcasm at 50 ft!
But Wait! order now and we'll throw in the New Gaydar attatchment as well!
Posted by: Midmight Movie Comercial at December 03, 2012 09:18 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: Sam In VA at December 03, 2012 01:09 PM (rFiOs)
-----------------------------------------------
I think those of us that stated on the evening of Nov. 6th that the United States of America as we've known it is over were correct. We are ruled by pure democracy now. The republic, as it was prior to last month, is dead.
We have too many socialist/communist illegal aliens and mal-educated slaves of government now. We've reached and passed the tipping point.
The only way I can see the US Constitution surviving is by a split from DC.
Posted by: Soona at December 03, 2012 09:19 AM (9Zv89)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at December 03, 2012 09:20 AM (+yYvY)
Posted by: Hopeless at December 03, 2012 09:21 AM (n9F1h)
Posted by: Mr. Pink at December 03, 2012 09:21 AM (++kZl)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at December 03, 2012 09:22 AM (PVNda)
Posted by: kartoffel at December 03, 2012 09:22 AM (OgNv0)
Posted by: Cricket at December 03, 2012 09:23 AM (DrC22)
Well, many of the parasites don't turn out for midterms. At least they haven't in the past. Without their Lord God Zero on the ballot, they have nothing to vote for. That was partially the reason for the 2010 wave. But after R senate candidates lost in states that Romney won handily last month (ND and MT, I'm looking at you) I honestly don't know what think.
Of course, it would help not to have any former witches running for the GOP in blue states.
Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at December 03, 2012 09:23 AM (YmPwQ)
Posted by: A "fiscal conservative" commenter at December 03, 2012 09:25 AM (PVNda)
Thank you, AtC.
I've always thought so myself.
Before Carville...politics were still rather civil. He changed it forever.
Posted by: wheatie at December 03, 2012 01:08 PM (CM59X)
Amen to this. I'm amazed that anybody gave that hick anything but a flea collar much less any fucking credibility. That his puts-makeup-on-with-a-trowel Repuke wife can stand being around him shows that we have to clean out our own stable of dimwits. Carville should be nothing more responsible than a promoter for SEC football.
Posted by: Captain Hate (more dagny and less curious) at December 03, 2012 09:25 AM (t8uv1)
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at December 03, 2012 09:25 AM (QXlbZ)
So far as the "professional" consultantocracy are concerned, two modest proposals:
There were GOP candidates who actually won last cycle. Against the odds and despite the undertow. Promote their campaign managers and consultants to newer bigger responsibilities. I'm thinking of, for example, Dean Heller's staff. Who won by steadily ATTACKING the Democratic candidate, every day of the race. Wow! Who knew that works?
Contrariwise, there were GOP candidates last cycle who had what should have been easily winnable races and foolishly flushed them away. Their managers and consultants need to be driven weeping into outer darkness and never hired again by any Republican candidate, not even in a race for county sewer commissioner.
If these simple rules had actually been followed this year, things might have been different this year as well. I can't tell you how strong the sick, sinking feeling was when I realized that Romney was hiring McCain campaign retreads from '08. True genius there.
Posted by: torquewrench at December 03, 2012 09:25 AM (ymG7s)
Posted by: soothsayer at December 03, 2012 09:26 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at December 03, 2012 09:26 AM (QXlbZ)
Posted by: soothsayer at December 03, 2012 09:26 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at December 03, 2012 01:20 PM (+yYvY)
Okay, cold and alone I was expecting. But in the dark? Fuck that!
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit, rooting for SMOD or the Mayans, whichever comes first [/i][/b] at December 03, 2012 09:27 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at December 03, 2012 09:27 AM (QXlbZ)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 03, 2012 09:28 AM (osh8D)
Because there aren't any in it.
Posted by: oblig. at December 03, 2012 09:28 AM (cePv8)
Posted by: unclear on the concept at December 03, 2012 09:28 AM (TAd8I)
Exactly, if the shrewish and selfish Mary Matalin is your idea of a Conservative woman, then there is no hope for you. As for the Republican party, it lost because it brought a bent butter knife to a nuclear war. You cannot cede every single piece of high ground to the enemy, let the kneepad media kneecap you, let the cheaters count the votes, and the phanbois and the toke phanphatgirl moderate the debates and win.
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Wily Wrepublican Wench at December 03, 2012 09:29 AM (kXoT0)
Posted by: soothsayer at December 03, 2012 09:30 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: Cricket at December 03, 2012 01:23 PM (DrC22)
I really think that the reason Obama won last election was that Conservatives no longer believe their votes matter.
Even when they vote in the Repubs, the Repubs break every campaign promise... like in 2010 where they PROMISED immediate spending cuts.... yet we got spending increases... or now on the No Tax Pledge.
Look at the TEA party movement.... Millions of energized people in a movement, which was then coopted into the GOP... and is now, as far as GOP leadership is concerned, not a Factor at all....
Those millions tried...they spoke.... and the GOP did NOT LISTEN... so many of them stayed home....
Its REALLY hard to continue to support a group whose only real arguement is that we are not as Bad as the other guy.... election after election...
Posted by: Romeo13 at December 03, 2012 09:31 AM (lZBBB)
59 Do not nominate anyone for Senate who does not believe in a rape exception for abortion, period.
Wouldn't matter.
As long as we keep knee-capping ourselves by keeping abortion as a political issue...we're fucked.
We claim to be the party of Freedom and Liberty...yet come across as preachy control-freaks by wanting to outlaw abortion.
There are millions of men out there who want to keep abortion legal...probably more than women who do.
Until that changes, it is a loser issue.
Posted by: wheatie at December 03, 2012 09:31 AM (CM59X)
But remember Obama had a Dem Senate and House for his first two years and still screwed it up.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 03, 2012 09:32 AM (osh8D)
Posted by: soothsayer at December 03, 2012 09:33 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: torquewrench at December 03, 2012 01:25 PM (ymG7s)
Once again.... the arguement is 'if' we had run the right people.... but I don't think that is the core problem...
Its TRUST... pure and simple...
Posted by: Romeo13 at December 03, 2012 09:33 AM (lZBBB)
Awww..... isnt that cute.
Ya'all think your going to get to 2014.
You guys aint making it to Christmas.
Posted by: Mayan Calendar at December 03, 2012 09:33 AM (nELVU)
Posted by: RWC at December 03, 2012 09:34 AM (fWAjv)
Yeah, and I'm feeling much better.
Posted by: dead cat at December 03, 2012 09:34 AM (z9HTb)
Posted by: RWC at December 03, 2012 09:35 AM (fWAjv)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at December 03, 2012 09:35 AM (5PkZK)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows 47% got a fever and Uncle Sugar is the only cure at December 03, 2012 09:35 AM (Lxw+T)
Until that changes, it is a loser issue. >>
Yes if any progress is to be made on this issue repubs need to use the dem tactic of lying to the voters and small incremental changes made out of public view.
Posted by: Buzzsaw at December 03, 2012 09:35 AM (tf9Ne)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Also on Teams Daryl and Glenn. at December 03, 2012 09:35 AM (VtjlW)
Do not nominate anyone for Senate who does not believe in a rape exception for abortion, period.
Oh, fuck that - do not nominate anyone for Senate who does not believe that the MSM is a treasonous fifth column which needs to be mocked, deligitimized and attacked 24 / 7, period.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at December 03, 2012 09:35 AM (zF6Iw)
Is anyone watching the online only webisodes of Battlestar Galactica: Blood and Chrome? There are 10 eps in total, two eps released every Friday, and only two eps remain until next year (January I think) when SyFy broadcasts all ten together in a row.
I think it's worlds better than the regular series. We're looking at the first human-Cylon war without the bullshit philosophical and religious asshattery contaminating the writing. It's just balls-out action. The young William Adama does a pretty good job and the SFX are decent enough. I'm not complaining. My only regret is that NBC won't carry this through with a full series unlike BSG and Caprica. Too bad, it's pretty good and a lot of other fans think so.
Posted by: EC at December 03, 2012 09:35 AM (GQ8sn)
We claim to be the party of Freedom and Liberty...yet come across as preachy control-freaks by wanting to outlaw abortion.
Where did anyone say last election cycle that they wanted to outlaw abortion? Because I never heard that. As far as I know, the only time abortion even came up was when the lefty media (BIRM) pushed the issue.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit, rooting for SMOD or the Mayans, whichever comes first [/i][/b] at December 03, 2012 09:35 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at December 03, 2012 09:36 AM (79ueO)
Posted by: Mr. Pink at December 03, 2012 09:36 AM (++kZl)
She was credited with making a particularly strong push for the president among women and Jewish voters and in her home state of Florida, where he eked out a narrow victory over Republican rival Mitt Romney.
Medusa threatened to turn them to stone if they didn't vote her way
Posted by: TheQuietMan at December 03, 2012 09:36 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at December 03, 2012 01:35 PM (zF6Iw)
Thix x10^10
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit, rooting for SMOD or the Mayans, whichever comes first [/i][/b] at December 03, 2012 09:36 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at December 03, 2012 01:08 PM (+yYvY)
We aggreeeee!!!!
Posted by: CAIR at December 03, 2012 09:36 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at December 03, 2012 09:37 AM (jucos)
Too late the President is already stoned. On Maui Wowee.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 03, 2012 09:37 AM (osh8D)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Also on Teams Daryl and Glenn. at December 03, 2012 09:38 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at December 03, 2012 09:38 AM (QXlbZ)
Posted by: unclear on the concept at December 03, 2012 09:39 AM (TAd8I)
Do not nominate anyone for Senate who does not believe in a rape exception for abortion, period.
Every primary candidate needs to answer that question *before* the primary.
An answer of, "I personally do not believe in punishing a child for the sins of a parent, but, realistically, we are not going to get any abortion reform legislation passed without a rape exception."
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at December 03, 2012 01:25 PM (QXlbZ)
Throw the answer back in the questioner's face: "Why are you asking me that? Have you asked my opponent? What does this have to do with Obama's failed economy? Do you have any questions that don't come from the DNC?"
Hit them in the face with their bias. Punch back twice as hard. At this point, I don't give a good goddamn if a GOP candidate wants to boil babies in a pot and serve them for dinner - I want them to Preston Brooks the shit out of Democrats and the MSM (BIRM).
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at December 03, 2012 09:39 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: slatz at December 03, 2012 09:39 AM (mE0Rl)
102...Where did anyone say last election cycle that they wanted to outlaw abortion? Because I never heard that. As far as I know, the only time abortion even came up was when the lefty media (BIRM) pushed the issue.
Romney said he "would like to see Roe v Wade overturned".
In the minds of liberals, that means 'outlawing abortion'.
Posted by: wheatie at December 03, 2012 09:40 AM (CM59X)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 03, 2012 09:40 AM (osh8D)
Posted by: Mr. Pink at December 03, 2012 01:21 PM (++kZl)
Yo. I'm going with "buy booze and guns and let it burn". But it's Monday so I might change my mind.
Posted by: joncelli at December 03, 2012 09:40 AM (RD7QR)
This. If the unemployed and/or massively over-taxed masses are voting on abortion, the time for appeals to rationality is over. Take the money you would have donated to R campaigns and buy more ammo.
Posted by: kartoffel at December 03, 2012 09:40 AM (OgNv0)
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at December 03, 2012 09:41 AM (QXlbZ)
Posted by: Jean at December 03, 2012 09:41 AM (iy7de)
Posted by: Brother Cavil, Trebuchet enthusiast at December 03, 2012 09:42 AM (GBXon)
Lindsay Graham seems like he could be vulnerable in theory, but I wonder if in practice. Susan Collins is the best we can do in Maine (I would have supported Olympia Snowe for the same reason had she not retired.)
My early thought is to focus on Republican primaries in Toss-up states, rather than challenging Republican incumbents.
William A. Jacobson
Legal Insurection
Rubber-stamp of the party nomenklatura, Yay Conservatism!
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at December 03, 2012 09:42 AM (kdS6q)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at December 03, 2012 09:43 AM (jucos)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at December 03, 2012 09:43 AM (5PkZK)
Posted by: Count de Monet at December 03, 2012 09:43 AM (BAS5M)
Even just reading this thread, I see that the repubs will never agree enough on any common ground. Too many liberal repubs. Too many people that want to just play along enough to win a few seats.
I really don't see any "core values" being presented that everyone can unite around. Taxes? A shallow cause in the big picture.
Once again, we're not going to have any fiscal conservatism until we address social conservatism.
Posted by: Soona at December 03, 2012 09:44 AM (EMZGs)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at December 03, 2012 09:45 AM (jucos)
In all fairness, they could ask the democrat the question but the answer would be "dude, I support unlimited access to abortion anyway."
The problem is not the asking of the question as much as it's the implication that this person is evillllll.
Posted by: tsrblke (work) at December 03, 2012 09:45 AM (i177X)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at December 03, 2012 09:45 AM (+yYvY)
Posted by: Tsar Nicholas II at December 03, 2012 09:46 AM (pmsMR)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows 47% got a fever and Uncle Sugar is the only cure at December 03, 2012 09:46 AM (Lxw+T)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at December 03, 2012 01:43 PM (jucos)
I hope that was sarcasm, TM. Because if you're serious - well, I'm pissed off, jacked up on cold medication, have a pounding headache and am in no mood to suffer fools right now.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at December 03, 2012 09:46 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at December 03, 2012 01:38 PM (QXlbZ)
I loved that. I was laughing my ass off, because the premise is so completely wrong. "Terrorists," I said, "do not 'want what we have.' They want to DESTROY what we ARE. They don't hate us for what we have that they don't. They hate us because WE AREN'T THEM. But you all go ahead and play along in your silly little leftist fantasy world while I sit here laughing at you and dreaming of Daryl stabbing you in the throat with a coat hanger."
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit, rooting for SMOD or the Mayans, whichever comes first [/i][/b] at December 03, 2012 09:47 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows 47% got a fever and Uncle Sugar is the only cure at December 03, 2012 09:48 AM (Lxw+T)
Posted by: Count de Monet at December 03, 2012 01:43 PM (BAS5M)
This morning I had to go to the doctor for my annual physical (blech), and I happened to see an "Obama/Biden 2012" sticker in the parking lot. I walked right over to the car and spat on it. Felt SO good. And it did wonders for my blood pressure -- 112/64!
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit, rooting for SMOD or the Mayans, whichever comes first [/i][/b] at December 03, 2012 09:48 AM (4df7R)
---
Jesus: Father forgive them for they know not what they do.
WalrusRex: Let them burn in eternal fire while being ass-raped by Satan's barb cock!
Posted by: WalrusRex at December 03, 2012 09:49 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie ® at December 03, 2012 09:49 AM (1hM1d)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows 47% got a fever and Uncle Sugar is the only cure at December 03, 2012 09:49 AM (Lxw+T)
Although not eloquently stated, that is an incredibly logical conclusion for a person who believes that life begins at conception to hold. I know, incredible isn't it!
Posted by: tsrblke (work) at December 03, 2012 09:50 AM (i177X)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows 47% got a fever and Uncle Sugar is the only cure at December 03, 2012 09:51 AM (Lxw+T)
Posted by: kartoffel at December 03, 2012 01:40 PM (OgNv0)
I mentioned in an earlier thread that we have clients who are all up in arms now about the higher taxes they will pay on investments and want to take any and all profits this year to avoid the higher taxes next year. Yet they all voted for Barry because of "war on womyn" and other nonsense like that but now they're pissed at the higher taxes they'll have to pay
Posted by: TheQuietMan at December 03, 2012 09:52 AM (1Jaio)
You might be less so after trying bear meat. It isn't good.
I probably would've just stuck to eating fish and the occasional wild boar too.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at December 03, 2012 09:52 AM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at December 03, 2012 09:52 AM (+yYvY)
Newsflash: we're not going to have any social conservatism until we WIN SOME FUCKING ELECTIONS, so it's pretty easy to figure out which of our feet we ought to be putting forward first, huh? Because fiscal conservatism can win, all over the country. Social conservatism (at least of the "no rape exception to abortions" variety) is a national death sentence now and likely loser everywhere except maybe the Deep South and the Plains states.
This isn't hard. It's not what you'd prefer, but the logic is pretty clear.
Posted by: Jeff B. at December 03, 2012 09:53 AM (5Gq4U)
Cut. Jib. Newsletter.
Posted by: EC at December 03, 2012 09:53 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: tsrblke (work) at December 03, 2012 01:45 PM (i177X)
Very true. My point is that you lose ground by initially accepting the enemy's premise. There is no - and I cannot imagine one happening any time soon - congressional race that has abortion as its central plank. Abortion questions have no immediate economic ramifications (please note I'm rambling in generalities; the long-term effects of abortion rates do matter, but that's neither here nor there right now). The Obamaphone public is too stupid, too lazy and too biased to sit through a candidate's explanation of his / her abortion position. The question should be treated and answered, at the outset and at any time it is asked, as a deliberate distraction by the media acting as an unpaid collaborator to the Democrat campaign.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at December 03, 2012 09:54 AM (zF6Iw)
126...Once again, we're not going to have any fiscal conservatism until we address social conservatism.
There are a lot of social conservatives, like Huckabee for example, who are okay with big government solutions...and higher taxes.
They want to replace liberal social engineering with conservative social engineering.
But it's still using the government to force social changes.
Personally, I would like to see the Government become as inconsequencial in our lives as possible.
Posted by: wheatie at December 03, 2012 09:54 AM (CM59X)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at December 03, 2012 01:45 PM (jucos)
Just to one of several area community college campi, so that couldn't be the draw. It's just trees, churches, subdivisions, and cattle & horses. None of that hip, trendy, urban sophistication bullshit out here. At least I thought there wasn't any.
Posted by: Count de Monet at December 03, 2012 09:54 AM (BAS5M)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at December 03, 2012 09:55 AM (DRG6e)
...if nothing else, the unfortunate events of November 6 should have performed the useful task of disabusing us poor conservatives that America is any kind of “center-right nation.”
You cannot simultaneously enjoy American-sized taxes and European-sized government. One or the other has to go.
The only way this ends well is if someone - extraterrestrials, I assume - bails us out, a miraculous development in the field of energy changes the calculus of energy production to the point that we get oil's benefits at lower prices without any of the icky consequences, Americans decided to either pay for all this government they've bought over the last 40-years or go with a whoooooooooooole lot less until the bill is paid off, or Divine intervention. These are, ahem, unlikely.
So it will end poorly, that is to say, we'll run out of other peoples' money - probably pretty damn quickly. Point being, I don't think it really matters a whole tinker's damn whom we install into The World's Most Deliberately Arrogant Body in 2014.
Posted by: DocJ at December 03, 2012 09:56 AM (A5uiv)
On even days, underpass freeway slut split crotch vinyl lo-rise jeans and nipple clamps.
You mean like casual Fridays?
Posted by: Count de Monet at December 03, 2012 09:57 AM (BAS5M)
Yeah I think as long as you include that in your response you'd be on the right track. What I've learned is the media isn't as dumb as we think it is. If you just said "This is bias, rrrrarrrrggg" they're going to turn, ask the the guy the question and get the answer they know is coming.
Better instead to deflect. I like the idea of challenging the presupposition that our rape response has to be so crappy that we need to be expecting a non-0 number of rape abortions. Deflecting that it's not anywhere near a central issue of any campaign would likely work too.
Posted by: tsrblke (work) at December 03, 2012 09:57 AM (i177X)
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie ® at December 03, 2012 09:57 AM (1hM1d)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at December 03, 2012 09:57 AM (DRG6e)
Probably not. They pulled the old "conservative Democrat" bait and switch, where they run as conservatives but will vote liberal the moment Harry Reid needs them to.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at December 03, 2012 09:58 AM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: Brother Cavil, Trebuchet enthusiast at December 03, 2012 09:59 AM (GBXon)
I've repeatedly said that this is a big-tent party and as a libertarian fiscon, I'm fine having socons under the big tent and standing for office. Completely okay with it.
The only thing is, circuses are held under big tents, and the socon wing have repeatedly shown up seemingly determined to make the whole party look like clowns.
If socons get better control of their messaging, great. Bravo. Hasten the day. But it's simply not going to work if we have socons sitting in front of television cameras and talking about pregnancies from rape being "intended" by God, or said pregnancies implying that the rapes in question were not "legitimate" rapes.
That stuff is absolutely fucking bughouse nuts, and it loses elections not only for the socons but for the party as a whole, and the socons need to knock it off right now.
Socons then take that quite reasonable request that they stop blurting out damaging crazy shit, and interpret it as a demand that they be expelled from the party!
Brick wall. Head. Some assembly required.
Posted by: torquewrench at December 03, 2012 10:02 AM (ymG7s)
Posted by: kartoffel at December 03, 2012 10:03 AM (OgNv0)
This is, of course, exactly backwards. We lost (and got pasted in so many winnable Senate races) because Obama was able to drown out our economic and fiscal message by running a cultural/war-on-women "GOP doesn't care about people like you, they just want to get up your vagina and root around" campaign. And it worked. Because people like you, it seems, actually really DO just want to do that.
But I suppose I'm not surprised to see you drawing the wrong conclusions. Because it would be too psychologically devastating to have to revise them, I suppose. The real shame is that you're clinging to the one thing that destroyed us, and threatens to destroy the nation: forefronting wildly, perversely unpopular socon stances that have no bearing whatsoever on the economic health of the country, so that the middle of the country turns away from us as being wild-eyed extremists.
Look, part of me wants to 'let it burn' as we're all saying these days. But another part of me doesn't want to let these fuckers just win, either.
Posted by: Jeff B. at December 03, 2012 10:03 AM (5Gq4U)
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie ® at December 03, 2012 10:05 AM (1hM1d)
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie ® at December 03, 2012 01:57 PM (1hM1d)
Like all liberals they are hypocrites. They voted for Barry to be socially hip but will turn inside out to avoid paying the higher taxes he's going to hit the "rich" with. The election for them wasn't about economics it was about binders and Sandy Fuck. But now that all of their taxes are going up it's piss and moan time
Posted by: TheQuietMan at December 03, 2012 10:06 AM (1Jaio)
155 There are a lot of social conservatives, like Huckabee for example,
Name another one, then.
I can name tons of social moderate GOPers who fucked us fiscally, but nobody ever mentions them.
----------
Name another one?
George W Bush liked big government solutions...and spending.
But at least he gave us some tax cuts, though.
Santorum likes big government solutions too.
Herman Cain seemed to, as well.
People like to say that Romney was a fiscal conservative more than a social conservative.
But Romney wanted to "replace" Obamacare with his own version.
And you don't get much more socially conservative, than someone who was a leader in his own church...and doesn't drink alcohol or coffee for religious reasons.
Posted by: wheatie at December 03, 2012 10:07 AM (CM59X)
I think a lot of people don't quite realize how the swing voters feel: they don't want higher taxes (who does, really, except for the true liberal believers?), but they will damn sure take THAT over electing the Todd Akins and Richard Mourdocks of the world. We can all sit here and shriek about the irrationality of that decision, how those guys don't represent us as a whole, how it's not like abortion is ever really going to be banned ANYWAY...and we're wasting our time, because we're attempting to use reason to overcome an emotional, gut-level feeling.
The only solution is to not make the mistake in the first place. No more Todd Akins, no more Richard Mourdocks.
Posted by: Jeff B. at December 03, 2012 10:07 AM (5Gq4U)
>>Personally, I would like to see the Government become as inconsequencial in our lives as possible.
This.
You know what I want? A government that stays out of my way so I can live like a social conservative and not bankroll someone else's choices.
I don't want one strong enough to impose that way of life on others, because that same government will eventually change hands.
Posted by: LibertarianJim (team #letitburn) at December 03, 2012 10:14 AM (WDCYi)
Around mid 2013 there will be polls showing Repubs picking up 8 seats.
On election night the Dems "win" seats in 4 states with 50.01% of the vote as the urban counties report 818 new votes found in a trunk at 1:45am. This is in states that haven't elected a Democrat to the senate in 90 years and where every single poll showed the Repub winning.
The GOP as usual says nothing, does nothing, Karl Rove blames the tea party. Nate Silver says, hey polls aren't perfect you know.
We end up with 49 GOP seats. Harry Reid sets a record by not proposing a budget for 9882 days.
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at December 03, 2012 10:16 AM (HDgX3)
Mitch McConnell could end up facing Ashley Judd for the Kentucky Senate seat?
Nahhhh... voters would put someone who's never held office into the Senate just because they're a celebrity, right?
I mean .. Al Franken must have been student council president or a member of the student senate at Harvard, right?
Posted by: kbdabear at December 03, 2012 01:15 PM (wwsoB)
Ashley Judd hasn't had anything to do with Kentucky since she was fucking half the UK basketball team in 1996. She showed up for the Kentucky inaugural ball in 2008, but had bodyguards all around her and wouldn't talk to anyone. Nobody in the state actually considers her a real Kentuckian, and they don't take kindly to carpetbaggers in the Commonwealth.
The only Democrat that could have beaten McConnell was Jerry Abramson, and he has already said he isn't running. Ashley may make a vanity run, but that's all it will be.
Posted by: rockmom at December 03, 2012 10:19 AM (NYnoe)
This is, of course, exactly backwards. We lost (and got pasted in so many winnable Senate races) because Obama was able to drown out our economic and fiscal message by running a cultural/war-on-women "GOP doesn't care about people like you, they just want to get up your vagina and root around" campaign. And it worked.
Romney won white women and all women over 55. So you are flatly wrong with your political instincts yet again.
Because people like you, it seems, actually really DO just want to do that.
As usual, fuck off Jeff. Your only goals are to get your damn taxes lower and to pretend you are some political whiz kid. You have no special insight into Politics, Jeff. You have an opinion which is frequently wrong, like the rest of us. Unfortunately, you have it tied to a smug sense of superiority.
But I suppose I'm not surprised to see you drawing the wrong conclusions. Because it would be too psychologically devastating to have to revise them, I suppose.
This is the very definition of projection, Jeff. We didn't lose independents. We lost because minorities turned out and independents didn't turn to Mitt like you prophesied they would.
You think minorities turned out because of abortion? Because of social issues?
The fact is, you were completely wrong when you said that Romney would mobilize independents and win on a fiscal conservative message.So I'm unsurprised you are scapegoating a Senate race (which the presidential candidate soundly condemned, mind you) as the reason a President wasn't elected - it is the only thing you've got.
You have to blame social conservatives, because you can't come to grips with the fact that everything you believed - that a moderate running on fiscal issues would win every state - was utterly wrong.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at December 03, 2012 10:21 AM (FkKjr)
_______________
I remember the exact same things being said about Al Franken. He hasn't lived in MN for 20 years. He's a joke in the state. Nobody in MN likes carpetbaggers, etc. And look how that turned out.
I'm not saying Judd would be a lock or anything, but this "oh we have nothing to worry about" type of thinking worries me.
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at December 03, 2012 10:22 AM (HDgX3)
But Romney wanted to "replace" Obamacare with his own version.
And you don't get much more socially conservative, than someone who was a leader in his own church...and doesn't drink alcohol or coffee for religious reasons.
Posted by: wheatie at December 03, 2012 02:07 PM (CM59X)
Romney was not a social conservative. He was a social liberal who said he was a social conservative when he ran for president.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at December 03, 2012 10:23 AM (FkKjr)
Posted by: rockmom at December 03, 2012 10:23 AM (NYnoe)
Posted by: ejo at December 03, 2012 10:26 AM (GXvSO)
Posted by: Captain Hate (more dagny and less curious) at December 03, 2012 10:29 AM (t8uv1)
#169 Judd's a different animal from Al Franken. She hasn't done anything political except campaign for abortion (many suspect she has had a few), which is not popular in Kentucky. Franken wrote two books about the Right that made him a folk hero nationally among progressives. And still he only won because there was a third party candidate and then with massive fraud.
The last Democrat Senator from Kentucky was Wendell Ford, a conservative who was a popular Governor before running for Senate. He retired in 1998 and Jim Bunning won that seat easily, even while Republicans got beat up in that midterm election. Before that you have to go back to Dee Huddleston, who McConnell beat in 1984. They're down to one Congressman now out of the 6 in the delegation. Other than the Governorship, Kentucky is as solid a Republican state as there is.
Posted by: rockmom at December 03, 2012 10:32 AM (NYnoe)
I can't name an Ashley Judd movie other than Eye of the Beholder.
And that one with Tommy Lee Jones.
Posted by: LibertarianJim (team #letitburn) at December 03, 2012 10:35 AM (WDCYi)
170...Romney was not a social conservative. He was a social liberal who said he was a social conservative when he ran for president.
Maybe so.
So did he lose the socon vote because of this? Is that who stayed home?
Personally, I don't want to think that.
I like social conservatives, and consider myself one.
I too, think that abortion is murder.
But I think that the only way to stop abortion, is to stop glorifying the attitude towards "sex with no consequences" which pervades our society.
So what do we do? ...Declare that dicks are a lethal weapon, and cause abortions?
Heh.
That would go over real well, wouldn't it.
I think that Romney lost for several reasons...one of which is that he was characterized as a 'corporate boss', and a lot of people were turned off by the idea of 'voting for your boss'.
Posted by: wheatie at December 03, 2012 10:37 AM (CM59X)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at December 03, 2012 10:50 AM (i0vBR)
Posted by: Jeff B. at December 03, 2012 02:07 PM (5Gq4U)
Yeah those pesky primaries are really a bitch, aren't they? Maybe you think the idea of six more years of Dick Lugar was a great fucking idea but I sure as hell didn't and neither did the voters of Indiana. Nor did Lugar turn out to be anything but a spiteful bitter prick after the primaries.
Maybe the concept of John Cornyn coordinating efforts to capture the Senate should be put in mothballs forever.
Posted by: Captain Hate (more dagny and less curious) at December 03, 2012 10:52 AM (t8uv1)
If '10 and '12 have taught us anything, it's that it DOES matter who the nominee is, even in red states. I'm all for knocking off Graham, but it has to be with a good candidate. Just being more conservative isn't good enough. It also might be a good idea for all of them to attend Politics 101 training on how to answer the 'so, you don't think there should be an exception for rape' abortion question.
Posted by: Chris at December 03, 2012 10:52 AM (gI9Bk)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at December 03, 2012 10:53 AM (i0vBR)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at December 03, 2012 10:57 AM (i0vBR)
The only bright spot in the '16 Senate elections is that Nevada's super-popular Governor might end up running against Harry Reid (assuming Gov. Sandoval isn't knee-capped by the Ron Paul cultists...
Posted by: The Political Hat at December 03, 2012 11:01 AM (XvHmy)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at December 03, 2012 11:02 AM (i0vBR)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at December 03, 2012 11:06 AM (i0vBR)
Ron Paul will have long retired since then, and his followers will flock to the son, who will not yet have announced his presidential ambitions at that time. Besides, Rand is more about legalizing weed and gay marriage (like his dad was with the anti war message) than tea party populism.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at December 03, 2012 03:06 PM (i0vBR)
When Rand Paul endorsed Romney, the Ron Paul cultists went even more crazy and started calling him a "Judas"
Their reaction is the one reason that I am willing to consider Rand.
Posted by: The Political Hat at December 03, 2012 11:11 AM (XvHmy)
Posted by: TheREALApocalypse at December 03, 2012 12:39 PM (rFiOs)
PS - I'm never wrong.
Posted by: Kevin at December 03, 2012 03:14 PM (ufexm)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.318 seconds, 315 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit, rooting for SMOD or the Mayans, whichever comes first [/i][/b] at December 03, 2012 08:50 AM (4df7R)