October 16, 2012
— DrewM Last night from the relative safety of Lima, Peru Hillary Clinton announced that when it comes to the Benghazi disaster the buck stops with her (sort of).
Many have taken this as a sign Hilary is taking the fall for Obama and letting him off the hook. I have a a different theory....David Axlerod tried to throw her under the bus and she tossed it right back on him and Obama.
What Hillary has done is basically say, "the damn phone is ringing and President Creased Trousers isn't answering it so give it to me. She comes off as the grown up who said, look I'm in charge here and for good or ill that makes me responsible".
People tend to admire others who stand up and take the hits. Hillary looks like A-the loyal soldier and B-the only one who is going to stand up and say, "something awful happened on my watch and I'm going to look in the mirror to see who is in charge and not like some other people I could name, look around for scapegoats".
Hillary isn't taking the blame, she's taking the credit.
Now a lot of this is hypocritical because Hillary already tried casting the blame elsewhere but when all else fails, it's sometimes better to own it in the end.
How does this hurt Obama? Well tonight he will be standing next to Mitt Romney. Romney you might recall has made a rather big stink about Obama's failure to lead and his own stellar leadership record.
Here's how he might play this when Benghazi comes up (or he brings it up himself)..."It's all well and good that Secretary Clinton is taking responsibility but my leadership experience has taught me that only the person at the top of the organization is truly responsible. President Obama is at the top of the Executive Branch and he's ducking responsibility. I'd like to know if the President agrees with the Secretary and if he does, why hasn't he asked for her resignation? If he doesn't agree, why doesn't he say who is responsible? Most importantly, why hasn't he taken responsibility from Day 1. Harry Truman didn't say the buck stopped at the Department of State, it stopped at his desk in the Oval Office."
And then it will get ugly for Obama when Romney ads, "And who does the President blame for the failure of his policies to get this economy going? The Secretary of the Treasury? Maybe he blames you the voters for not paying enough in taxes. This country needs a President who accepts the responsibility that comes with the job and doesn't blame his subordinates."
Obama will have no answer to any of that. He also can't fire Hillary because that would cause problems with Team PUMA and his administration would be in disarray 3 weeks before the election
He can't suddenly say, "Oh no, it's me not Hillary who is responsible" because A-he doesn't believe that and B-It's too late. She beat him to the punch, he'll look like he's scrambling to catch up (which he would be).
Mitt's been running a campaign based on his leadership and Obama's unwillingness and inability to lead. The second most popular (maybe the most popular) Democrat in the country, who happens to be Obama's own Secretary of State, just co-signed that charge by stepping into the vacuum Obama's cowardice created.
What Hillary has done is hand Mitt a baseball bat, turned him in the direction of the giant Obama pinata on stage tonight and said, "Have at buddy. Maybe I'll see you in four years".
And what's the downside to Hillary? None. No one is really going to hold her responsible. The DMM (Democratic Machine Media) won't. The GOP certainly won't (update: as predicted) and Obama can't. She'll be hailed as "presidential", "the one official willing to stand up and take responsibility" and ironically enough, a "good soldier".
Don't forget, Hillary has seen a variation on this play work before. Remember Janet Reno taking the blame for Waco? Clinton looked weak and Reno owned him for the rest of his presidency.
Sure it's kabuki theater and there are still plenty of outstanding questions (who said "hey, let's blame a protest about some tape" among them) but the story will be the debate and if Romney can use it to put Obama back on his heels. By the time Hillary gets back in the country the story and the campaign will have moved on and the damage to Obama will be done.
Maybe Hillary didn't do all of this on purpose (but why wait until now to do this?) but intentionally or not, she's teed this up for Mitt. Will he hit it?
Posted by: DrewM at
05:02 AM
| Comments (284)
Post contains 800 words, total size 5 kb.
Posted by: Dastardly Dan at October 16, 2012 05:05 AM (rvLeh)
Posted by: Navin R Johnson at October 16, 2012 05:07 AM (RRbuy)
Posted by: Paladin at October 16, 2012 05:07 AM (bxc5w)
Posted by: pawn at October 16, 2012 05:08 AM (iMsF6)
Oh, and first! I have never been first and will probably never be first again.
She may be settting up Mr. Obama but I can't help but think all of this ugly Libya mess won't really come out til after Nov. 6. Hope Mitt has the courage to call him on this mess during the debates.
Posted by: Mo the Girl at October 16, 2012 05:08 AM (SQQjV)
"He can't suddenly say, "Oh no, it's me not Hillary who is responsible" because A-he doesn't believe that"
as
"He can't suddenly say, "Oh no, it's me not Hillary who is responsible" because A-hole doesn't believe that"
Posted by: seaniep at October 16, 2012 05:09 AM (ajJXu)
Posted by: TD at October 16, 2012 05:09 AM (+uFux)
Posted by: Captain Hate (more dagny and less curious) at October 16, 2012 05:11 AM (lJ5Yy)
I see that infamous perjurer and Hillary's husband, cut a new ad for SCOAMT about which candidate you should believe. This time he's telling the truth. Really. You can tell how he wags his finger.
Posted by: HtP at October 16, 2012 05:11 AM (jx2j9)
Posted by: circular logic at October 16, 2012 05:12 AM (LpQbZ)
Posted by: Fritz at October 16, 2012 05:12 AM (/ZZCn)
The moment Hillary took the blame, I figured a memo/email/something would be leaked be an "anonymous source" to prove the admin was specifically told early on. It's just too perfect. Hillary takes him down and looks like the one who "took the blame" when it wasn't her fault.
Posted by: Davey Boy at October 16, 2012 05:13 AM (GpWMQ)
[snip]
Note she "takes responsibility" but the "specific decisions" on security were made by "security professionals." Translation: If anybody screwed up, hey, it was those professionals, not me. Otherwise, why would we need an investigation to "get to the bottom of it"? The career bureaucrats can hear the war drums, smell the war paint, and will be sharpening their knives. They know that the Secretary has just put a target on them.
http://tinyurl.com/cv4fb66
Posted by: jmb at October 16, 2012 05:13 AM (I90lE)
As true as this post is, it won't make any difference during the election. Everyone who pays attention to stuff like this has already decided who they are voting for--we just have to hope that there are enough people paying attention.
One more bad debate by Obama and Romney clinches. If Obama has a good debate this evening Romney is in trouble. If this becomes a repeat of the Ryan/Biden debate (Ryan vs. the Moderator), random_journalist_01 throws the election for Obama.
Posted by: Grim at October 16, 2012 05:13 AM (0TjWd)
Drew is being too "inside baseball" and anal-ytical, IMO. This was a simple fuck-up, orchestrated by the pro-Muzzie America-hater in the White House and his lazy, unqualified SecState. Nothing more.
Posted by: MrScribbler, banned at TepidAir at October 16, 2012 05:14 AM (ZgX/g)
Posted by: circular logic at October 16, 2012 05:15 AM (LpQbZ)
So Hillary's the one who sent Susan Rice out to the talk shows to lie? Yeah, we're buying that.
Don't get distracted--the coverup's the issue.
Posted by: spongeworthy at October 16, 2012 05:15 AM (r5w1L)
Posted by: The littl shyning man at October 16, 2012 05:15 AM (PH+2B)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Jim Lehrer won't get an Xmas card from Obama at October 16, 2012 05:16 AM (AZGON)
As far as how the Clintons are taking Hillary be made the fall guy, let's see how much campaigning Bubba does for Obama in the next three weeks. My bet would be we won't see hide nor hair of Billy boy.
What amazes me is that no one from this administration has come forward with any of the really good behind the scenes dirt of all the squabbles and stuff.. Valerie Jarrett must be running a pretty tight ship over there.. it sure as hell isn't the Golfer in Chief.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at October 16, 2012 05:16 AM (UTq/I)
Posted by: TD at October 16, 2012 05:16 AM (+uFux)
Posted by: Ozzie at October 16, 2012 05:17 AM (bx8t7)
Posted by: Liberty Lover at October 16, 2012 05:18 AM (nXmKc)
Maybe Hillary didn't do all of this on purpose (but why wait until now to do this?) but intentionally or not, she's teed this up for Mitt. Will he hit it?
-----
[Crowley,tonight]: Hmmm, I can't seem to find a Banghazi question. Oh well, let's talk about aboration!
Posted by: Wisrich at October 16, 2012 05:18 AM (hdpay)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/b][/i][/u] at October 16, 2012 05:19 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Ginny at October 16, 2012 05:19 AM (ZM5Gb)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Jim Lehrer won't get an Xmas card from Obama at October 16, 2012 05:19 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: pawn at October 16, 2012 05:20 AM (iMsF6)
I suspect that's SOP to one degree or another, but Obama certainly doesn't believe that the buck stops with him.
Posted by: someone at October 16, 2012 05:20 AM (bqjJT)
Posted by: Justamom in Achin' Akin's district at October 16, 2012 05:21 AM (Sptt8)
Posted by: The Robot Devil at October 16, 2012 05:21 AM (136wp)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at October 16, 2012 05:23 AM (Rhie+)
If the President was truly not aware of this rising threat level in Benghazi, then we have lost confidence in his national security team, whose responsibility it is to keep the President informed. But if the President was aware of these earlier attacks in Benghazi prior to the events of September 11, 2012, then he bears full responsibility for any security failures that occurred."
Since Bammy prefers receiving his national security briefings on his iPad rather than face-to-face, and since he's supposed to be one of the most "sophisticated consumers of intelligence" in the nation -- nay, THE WORLD -- then I'd say this statement lays the blame squarely and fully at the feet of the Preezy. I'm happy to see my Senator is one of the three who submitted it.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/b][/i][/u] at October 16, 2012 05:23 AM (4df7R)
Now, the cover up is another animal altogether. NO ONE in this administration (big shock) covered themselves in glory here. This clusterfark is far more serious and damaging than Watergate ever was.
Tell me, if Obama does manage to steal this election... impeachment?
Posted by: sgr at October 16, 2012 05:24 AM (xa5GW)
I like to think that Bubba is on the phone this morning explaining all the angles to Mitt.
The Obama administration, outsourcing responsibility since 2009.
Posted by: Buzzsaw90 at October 16, 2012 05:24 AM (SO2Q8)
Posted by: Honey Badger at October 16, 2012 05:24 AM (GvYeG)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Jim Lehrer won't get an Xmas card from Obama at October 16, 2012 05:24 AM (AZGON)
Sorry Drew, but Hillary! (and you) have obviously fallen under the con of Obama's "long game" strategy here.
It is all too complicated to explain to a dummy like you, so just sit back and enjoy the positive Obama media coverage and coming electoral landslide!
Posted by: Jay at October 16, 2012 05:24 AM (3LaGb)
The ball is in his court and the only thing dribbling is his mouth...
Posted by: AmericanDawg at October 16, 2012 05:24 AM (XIsD/)
Clinton is responsible for the security at State unless she was overridden by her boss. What she is not responsible for are the lies that immediately followed the attack. I believe that she wanted to come clean right from the beginning but the White House vetoed that strategy. They are the one's that came up with the easily disputed Mohammed tape and faux protest scenario and forced Clinton to go along. Except Clinton really didn't go along with it , so she just stayed silent until now, after the false stories hubbub settled down and she could pretend that it never happened. .
Posted by: polynikes at October 16, 2012 05:25 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: tuesday at October 16, 2012 05:25 AM (LpQbZ)
Posted by: Hillary Clinton at October 16, 2012 05:25 AM (136wp)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Jim Lehrer won't get an Xmas card from Obama at October 16, 2012 05:26 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: tuesday at October 16, 2012 05:27 AM (LpQbZ)
Posted by: Gallup at October 16, 2012 05:27 AM (136wp)
Posted by: Boone at October 16, 2012 05:27 AM (tIyK2)
Posted by: kawfytawk at October 16, 2012 05:27 AM (JWLqy)
Posted by: AmericanDawg at October 16, 2012 05:27 AM (XIsD/)
Reading all the pieces about how she saved TFG last night, it seemed to me she was saving herself by preempting the move to throw her under the bus. It reminded me of Janet Reno "taking responsibility" for Waco when cornered to take a move away from some Congressional critics, then not resigning or doing much of anything that suggested amends on her part. It is a chess move. BJ and Hillary are good at chess moves devoid of content.
Posted by: SurferDoc at October 16, 2012 05:28 AM (6H6FZ)
Posted by: TLGM at October 16, 2012 05:28 AM (appbn)
>>The funny thing here is that it actually IS mostly Hillary's fault. Yes, Obama bears final responsibility, but the piss poor security situation is Hillary's doing. Maybe Obama insisted on leaving our guys unprotected
Yeh, I keep thinking about what actually might be TRUE, not spin and purported spin.
Why would the pres. know about number of guards at a consulate?
I'm not even sure Sec. State would, unless it was a decision to underfund security in a number of places.
Posted by: Mama AJ, who heard the SMOD at October 16, 2012 05:28 AM (SUKHu)
Where's the fucking evidence of how they're "really on our side and will fuck over the JEF"?
Posted by: Captain Hate (more dagny and less curious) at October 16, 2012 05:29 AM (lJ5Yy)
Everything is going to stick to him.
http://tinyurl.com/8e3mkg2
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectual at October 16, 2012 05:29 AM (wR+pz)
Posted by: kawfytawk at October 16, 2012 05:29 AM (JWLqy)
Not really. All she did was affirm she that she's the head of the State Department, which we kinda already knew, and that some underling made decisions which, now that everything went pear-shaped, she disagrees with.
Call me when she falls on her sword for lying to us that this attack was about a fucking YouTube video.
Posted by: Waterhouse at October 16, 2012 05:30 AM (POGCP)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 45% more DOOM! at October 16, 2012 05:30 AM (xAtAj)
Feel good story of the day:
Axelrod unhappy with how the right is spinning the "Hillary is fairest of them all" story.
http://tinyurl.com/8mzr7md
Posted by: HtP at October 16, 2012 05:31 AM (jx2j9)
Posted by: Buzzsaw90 at October 16, 2012 05:32 AM (SO2Q8)
Posted by: Boone at October 16, 2012 05:32 AM (tIyK2)
Posted by: toby928© for TB at October 16, 2012 05:33 AM (evdj2)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Jim Lehrer won't get an Xmas card from Obama at October 16, 2012 05:33 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: pam at October 16, 2012 05:34 AM (AsqQA)
Anyone think someone is going to axe about gas prices?
I do and Barry will have to shit and lie. Mitt will clean is clock.
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectual at October 16, 2012 05:34 AM (wR+pz)
I do know that there are 4 dead in Benghazi.
I do know there are 100's if not 1,000's dead in Mexico.
I do know there are 1,000's dead in Iran when we could have helped.
All because of the flustercluck decisions of Barry and Hillary.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at October 16, 2012 05:34 AM (PHb2k)
So no surprise that a Clinton would issue a Teflon statement attributing "responsibility" on those security advisers of hers.
Posted by: panzernashorn at October 16, 2012 05:34 AM (BAnPT)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at October 16, 2012 05:34 AM (ZifVj)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at October 16, 2012 05:34 AM (oSFWF)
Posted by: Jay at October 16, 2012 05:34 AM (3LaGb)
Posted by: Zombie Vince Foster at October 16, 2012 05:36 AM (wR+pz)
Posted by: Waterhouse at October 16, 2012 05:36 AM (POGCP)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Jim Lehrer won't get an Xmas card from Obama at October 16, 2012 05:36 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Ohiovoter at October 16, 2012 05:36 AM (AkFx3)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at October 16, 2012 05:37 AM (oSFWF)
I find it... shall we say intriguing that Libya just had a massive prison break, caused in part (it is alleged) by prisoners bribing the guards. Similarly the same type of guards who were paid to guard our Ambassador and other Americans in Benghazi.
Anyone with even a minimal knowledge of the Middle East knows that bribery is second nature in the region. It's just another form of marketplace haggling, but with a higher price tag. And in a country like Libya that's just suffered a massive internal conflict and sustained serious physical and fiscal damage as a result, it's pure pigheaded stupidity to believe that the locally-hired, minimum wage guards the Embassy had engaged to protect Ambassador Stevens and the others weren't going to take a bribe from AQ in exchange for ratting out where the Americans were hiding. Especially if the guards may have been inclined to side more with AQ than America in matters of ideology. That's why hiring local security was the SECOND most boneheaded, asinine, insane, indefensible thing this clusterfuck of an administration could have done.
The MOST indefensible thing the SCOAMT and Co. did was, of course, denying the multiple requests made by the Libyan contingent for increased security. Security that would, presumably, have been comprised of Americans; or at the very least Western-friendly contractors.
A pox on Hillary and Obama and all their houses.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/b][/i][/u] at October 16, 2012 05:37 AM (4df7R)
Hey Drew didn't you read the contract of the debates, they can't direct questions at each other.
---
RULES? In a knife fight?
Posted by: Harvey Logan at October 16, 2012 05:37 AM (SO2Q8)
...
That came up and the GOP failed to attack the DEM premise.
Blame High Taxation v. Blame Big Oil Profits
Blame them both novelty.
Posted by: panzernashorn at October 16, 2012 05:37 AM (BAnPT)
I'm doomed. But I'll take the opportunity to pimp my own blog (with a post on this very subject).
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at October 16, 2012 05:38 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: toby928© for TB at October 16, 2012 05:38 AM (evdj2)
Posted by: Schwalbe: The Me-262© at October 16, 2012 05:38 AM (UU0OF)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at October 16, 2012 05:38 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: torabora at October 16, 2012 05:38 AM (2fJpq)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at October 16, 2012 09:34 AM (oSFWF)
I think that contract is worthless. This will turn in to a slug fest with Candy on top with a hammer lock.
Look for the "undecided" to boo Romney. Look for Candy to pick liberal talking points questions. Look for Mitt to kick their asses. He is just so much smarter that Affirmative Action Barry.
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectual at October 16, 2012 05:38 AM (wR+pz)
Call me when she falls on her sword for lying to us that this attack was about a fucking YouTube video."
---
Hell, even i couldn't get her to fall on my sword.
iykwimaiktyd
Posted by: Bubba at October 16, 2012 05:39 AM (SO2Q8)
Posted by: Guywithbebegun at October 16, 2012 05:39 AM (oSFWF)
1. Bring your gun. -- Obama, the guy who wants to seize your guns for your own safety, but of course.
Posted by: panzernashorn at October 16, 2012 05:39 AM (BAnPT)
Yes, Romney needs to stress "Leadership" over and over. I think it will resonate where the poofy idea of hopenchange doesn't. It works on every subject - Taxes, Jobs, Foreign Policy - we need leadership.
Posted by: Liberty Lover at October 16, 2012 05:39 AM (encrR)
Posted by: AmishDude at October 16, 2012 05:39 AM (xSegX)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at October 16, 2012 05:40 AM (oSFWF)
Posted by: Waterhouse at October 16, 2012 09:36 AM (POGCP)
This.
Anyone who's ever held a position with even a SMALL degree of power knows that the bigger the clusterfuck, the higher up the ladder those repercussions will fall. This is a metric fuckton of clusterfuckery. Hillary should have accepted her responsibility from the outset, and Obama SHOULD be looking over his shoulder for the long arm of responsibility to fall on HIM next.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/b][/i][/u] at October 16, 2012 05:40 AM (4df7R)
Pennsylvania coal companies announce layoffs: http://tinyurl.com/8kyy5nr
Some bloody guy with a machine gun who just dumped the metaphoric body of the Obama administration out of the 50th floor window yells out, "Welcome to the party pal!"
Posted by: HtP at October 16, 2012 05:40 AM (jx2j9)
Remember when taking responsibility meant finding a loaded luger on your desk?
Good times. Good times.
Posted by: Barron Bullet Von Skull at October 16, 2012 05:41 AM (SO2Q8)
I will never forget Rush playing the clip of her doing so on his TV show, then saying, "Put. This. Woman. In. Charge. Of. The. Bosnia. Operation. Now." and then the crowd going nuts.
Posted by: Filly at October 16, 2012 05:41 AM (247Qj)
Posted by: panzernashorn at October 16, 2012 05:41 AM (BAnPT)
In case we haven't noticed, all this "taking of responsibility" has merely consisted of mouthing those words. No resignations, no one fired. No cleaning of house. Nothingburger<<<<<
They're pacing themselves.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at October 16, 2012 05:41 AM (zayy9)
Posted by: SurferDoc at October 16, 2012 05:41 AM (6H6FZ)
Posted by: Wololo at October 16, 2012 05:43 AM (38ReL)
Posted by: eman at October 16, 2012 05:43 AM (+XD7n)
Posted by: Clemenza at October 16, 2012 05:43 AM (afx6B)
Posted by: rockmom at October 16, 2012 05:43 AM (S46UU)
Posted by: phoenixgirl, team dagny, ROMNEY/RYAN 2012 at October 16, 2012 05:43 AM (Ho2rs)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Jim Lehrer won't get an Xmas card from Obama at October 16, 2012 05:44 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Captain Hate (more dagny and less curious) at October 16, 2012 05:44 AM (lJ5Yy)
It doesn't explain the two other attacks on our consulate and why nothing was done by the Immigrant O'bama and his sworn duty to PROTECT ALL AMERICANS...
They weren't AMERICAN-Americans at the time. They were in Libya after all, and everyone knows the longer you spend away from American shores, the less American you become.
...
Err, except me. I'm as American as apple pie and casbahs. I MEAN BASEBALL! Apple pie and baseball!
Posted by: Barack Obama, bizzy presidentin' and shit at October 16, 2012 05:44 AM (4df7R)
Barry? His team runs on union thugs, nerdy college kids, and welfare recipients.
Barry was a fucking "community organizer". The longest job he has ever held?
The one he has now.
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectual at October 16, 2012 05:45 AM (wR+pz)
Posted by: phoenixgirl, team dagny, ROMNEY/RYAN 2012 at October 16, 2012 05:45 AM (Ho2rs)
"Maybe he blames you the voters for not paying enough in taxes. This country needs a President who accepts the responsibility that comes with the job and doesn't blame his subordinates."
I AM NOT HIS FREAKIN' SUBORDINATE. Let's get that straight right up front.
Posted by: Lessons from the Ceramic Throne at October 16, 2012 05:45 AM (ze9yk)
Posted by: Captain Hate (more dagny and less curious) at October 16, 2012 05:45 AM (lJ5Yy)
Posted by: Ohiovoter at October 16, 2012 05:45 AM (AkFx3)
Posted by: The littl shyning man at October 16, 2012 05:45 AM (PH+2B)
Posted by: pray for peace at October 16, 2012 05:45 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at October 16, 2012 05:46 AM (kc2b9)
Posted by: TheQuietMan at October 16, 2012 05:46 AM (1Jaio)
21 days? You waiting for 14?
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectual at October 16, 2012 05:46 AM (wR+pz)
Speaking of cover-ups, the "authorities" are claiming it wasn't SMOD.
>>The Webster Parish Sheriff's Office confirms an underground bunker exploded late last night at Camp Minden. There are no reports of any injuries or deaths. The explosion site was discovered right at sun-up.
Posted by: Mama AJ, who heard the SMOD at October 16, 2012 05:46 AM (SUKHu)
Posted by: kawfytawk at October 16, 2012 05:47 AM (JWLqy)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at October 16, 2012 05:47 AM (oSFWF)
One of my lib friends just posted the following:
"Do yourself a favor and only read Nate Silver's writing and analysis. Every media organization that conducts polling hypes their results, but he cuts through the bullshit."
I do agree the with words "Nate Silver" and "bullshit."
Posted by: Filly at October 16, 2012 05:47 AM (247Qj)
Obama Roars Back in Debate Two to Take Lead!
Romney Crushed by Assertive Commander-in-Chief!
We only gave that to MSDNC, how the fuck did you get it?
Posted by: NY Times Editors at October 16, 2012 05:47 AM (wR+pz)
In case we haven't noticed, all this "taking of responsibility" has merely consisted of mouthing those words. No resignations, no one fired. No cleaning of house. Nothingburger.
Of course not. Because regressives think words make everything better. Just saying things makes problems go away. That's why the Campaigner-in-Chief thinks all he has to do is schmooze his campaign crowds the way he did in 2008 to secure his re-election. That's why Holder thinks he can just ignore Congressional subpoenas and a Contempt of Congress citation, because he said he didn't know anything about F and F. And that's why Hillary thinks she just has to say, "I take responsibility," and everthing will be hunky-dory.
Regressives don't believe in consequences. Consequences are things that happen to OTHER people.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/b][/i][/u] at October 16, 2012 05:48 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: USA at October 16, 2012 05:49 AM (RIg+t)
Posted by: phoenixgirl, team dagny, ROMNEY/RYAN 2012 at October 16, 2012 05:49 AM (Ho2rs)
Posted by: El Kabong at October 16, 2012 05:50 AM (HWj39)
Posted by: phoenixgirl, team dagny, ROMNEY/RYAN 2012 at October 16, 2012 05:50 AM (Ho2rs)
Well the Team Puma members I know weren't going to vote for Soetero anyways. Having Barry hide behind Hillary's pantsuits is going to upset a lot of women who again see a turd like Barry blame a woman, yet again, instead of manning up and taking full responsibility.
So women will see a weakling, they won't like that, the men will see a weakling, they won't like that either.
And this was a political statement by Hillary, she's not resigning, this was just a political cover statement for her.
Posted by: johnc_ex-democrat at October 16, 2012 05:50 AM (ACkhT)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Jim Lehrer won't get an Xmas card from Obama at October 16, 2012 05:50 AM (AZGON)
Why?
Me, didn't they tell you Barry is going to announce a strike on Benghazzi at the debate?
Really? You been cut from the jurno list?
Posted by: The October Surprise at October 16, 2012 05:51 AM (wR+pz)
Tomorrow's NYT headline:
Obama Roars Back in Debate Two to Take Lead!
Romney Crushed by Assertive Commander-in-Chief!
Jaba the Crowley congratulates Barry on winning the debate during the debate
Posted by: TheQuietMan at October 16, 2012 05:52 AM (1Jaio)
Hillary goes under the bus on Libya but blames “fog of war” for shifting explanations of what happened. They can’t openly admit that they are liars. We know that they knew what was going on, they just lied about it.
http://is.gd/sD7F6b
Posted by: Vic at October 16, 2012 05:52 AM (YdQQY)
Its true that President's don't really keep track of embassy business but this was no ordinary embassy / consulate. This was a consulate that had previously been attacked in a region that should be on top of the President's security briefings.
A President should verbally accept responsiblity but he should also fire the person on the inside that he had given the responsibility to. He probably needs to fire himself because he should have known about the situation in Libya and that region. That's his responsibility. Keeping up with the embassy in Austria? Not so much.
Posted by: polynikes at October 16, 2012 05:52 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: tuesday at October 16, 2012 05:52 AM (LpQbZ)
Posted by: eman at October 16, 2012 05:53 AM (+XD7n)
Posted by: phoenixgirl, team dagny, ROMNEY/RYAN 2012 at October 16, 2012 05:53 AM (Ho2rs)
Posted by: Evilpens at October 16, 2012 05:54 AM (ck76k)
and drones in a wide ring around the region "looking for the killers".
In neighboring countries like Morrocco. Fucking really?
My theory: They've lost a WMD. Motherfucker. And al-Q does have it or
will soon. They do not know where it is.
Posted by: uterus cannon at October 16, 2012 05:54 AM (3ZtZW)
Posted by: eman at October 16, 2012 05:55 AM (+XD7n)
Hillary is now officially Janet Reno.
Oh and something was broguht up at HA...I know, I know...but it is an interesting question. Exactly why was Stevens in Benghazi on 9/11? What couldn't be done in Tripoli or on another day? I know I read somewhere that he met with other diplomats including one from Turkey. Is there more there that we don't know about? And what about all the intel that was removed? That's gone down the memory black hole too.
Posted by: Deanna at October 16, 2012 05:55 AM (HsjCc)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at October 16, 2012 05:55 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at October 16, 2012 05:55 AM (vjJM3)
Posted by: kawfytawk at October 16, 2012 05:55 AM (JWLqy)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Jim Lehrer won't get an Xmas card from Obama at October 16, 2012 05:55 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: tuesday at October 16, 2012 05:56 AM (LpQbZ)
The first way, the problem is fixed and you can move on to find the real problem and work on that. The second way, the problem persists as more information becomes available and nothing ever gets resolved. The very fact that we are still talking about this one month away from a real tragedy tells me there is a problem in the leadership.
Or something like that.
Posted by: CUS (chanelling his inner Romney) at October 16, 2012 05:57 AM (84pE9)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Jim Lehrer won't get an Xmas card from Obama at October 16, 2012 05:57 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: phoenixgirl, team dagny, ROMNEY/RYAN 2012 at October 16, 2012 05:57 AM (Ho2rs)
Posted by: torabora at October 16, 2012 09:38 AM (2fJpq)
Hell, just bring the chair. Even without talking to it it's silent presence will be a more devastating indictment than anything said in the debate. It will lead all the commentary, and no one will remember what either candidate said. I love it!
Posted by: Lessons from the Ceramic Throne at October 16, 2012 05:58 AM (ze9yk)
I'm not sure of HRC's motives, though Drew's theory makes as much sense as any other I have heard. In the end, it won't matter. What Obama should have done all along was take responsibility. The worst terrorist attack in history occurred on GWB's watch. But no one blames him. Maybe I am misremembering history, but I do not remember him blaming the previous administration (though certainly surrogates may have), our Western values, or anyone in his administration. He simply took charge and said we will get those who did this.
While the magnitude of the attacks are not comparable, the difference in the response is striking. What confounds me about Obama is that he seems to always do the wrong thing which hurts him politically. I'm guessing this is because he has always lived with a compliant media. The better response would have been to get to Washington, make an immediate statement and condemn the action. He could have contained the security issue if he had done that, and likely come off as Presidential. But as the saying goes, lack of leadership creates a vacumn, and he has allowed HRC and Mitt to fill that space. America is a very forgiving society. He misplayed this one badly.
Posted by: SH at October 16, 2012 05:58 AM (gmeXX)
I saw her on Hannity last night. The singing in the video is atrocious but she said someone else did it. Somebody was HIRED for that?
Posted by: Filly at October 16, 2012 05:58 AM (247Qj)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at October 16, 2012 05:58 AM (oSFWF)
Answer: President Divot did.
Underlings do not deny requests from Ambassadors unless they know they are following policy from above.
Posted by: eman at October 16, 2012 09:53 AM (+XD7n)
To me, the issue remains the response - the constant claim of it being a spontaneous protest over a movie and talking about how we must venerate mohammad, as well as the lack of any military response - that is the issue rather than whose fault it is that we failed to provide adequate security. Yes, the latter question is important, but I think the former issues say a lot more about this administration in terms of what they think of America, free speech and the weakness of its foreign policy. Even if there had been better security personal in Benghazi, the outcome still might have been the same.
Posted by: Monkeytoe at October 16, 2012 05:58 AM (sOx93)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at October 16, 2012 05:58 AM (vjJM3)
Posted by: TD at October 16, 2012 05:59 AM (+uFux)
Posted by: El Kabong at October 16, 2012 05:59 AM (HWj39)
Posted by: Marie at October 16, 2012 06:00 AM (P9OJs)
He just needs to ignore Barry, stand up and talk to the chair.
How much would THAT piss off the media?
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectual at October 16, 2012 06:00 AM (wR+pz)
The far left blames him and claims he ignored warnings. They also have some kind of fetish about the fact that he was reading to a group of kindergarteners when it happened. But I get your bigger point - nobody in the mainstream blames him.
Posted by: Monkeytoe at October 16, 2012 06:01 AM (sOx93)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Jim Lehrer won't get an Xmas card from Obama at October 16, 2012 06:01 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: The Drizzle at October 16, 2012 06:01 AM (ysCLj)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Now with extra impact. at October 16, 2012 06:02 AM (VtjlW)
Progresso answers its phone.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at October 16, 2012 09:58 AM (vjJM3)
You can eat Progresso stuff without worrying about AIDS?
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectual at October 16, 2012 06:02 AM (wR+pz)
I lol'ed.
Baking snark + MFM snark= WIN
Posted by: Filly at October 16, 2012 06:02 AM (247Qj)
...
This. That. When Rush is wrong, he's 100% -- and to his faithful devotees, same applies. Don't push warmongering as a virtue. With the exception of neoconservatives who alone can NOT win the election, people today aren't buying.
Political affiliation aside, "It's the economy, stupid." Our arsenal was overspent in Libya. NATO Members are depleted. US carried the lion's share of NATO's load. Syria is NOT Libya. And we don't need another illegal war. THAT from NATO Deputy Secretary-General Alexander R. Vershbow's August address in Washington, D.C. (The Airforce Magazine, October 2012)
Don't think that rebuilding our military "that will never be strong enough" in order to nation build abroad on behalf of globalist corporatist profits ALL AT THE EXPENSE WITHOUT REIMBURSEMENT TO US TAXPAYERS, is something that American voters are glad to do.
Americans want our military strength to defend the United States of America and the US Constitution. Not to be loaned out without constitutional authority, breaking international law, given away directly against the interests of US citizens and American taxpayers. Promises of "wealth" are as hollow as the premise for nation building, and the indigenous tribal populations in foreign lands aren't buying from "The Ugly American" either.
Being stuck between Mitt's rock and Barry's hard spot is staying stuck on stupid. Don't. Go. There.
Posted by: panzernashorn at October 16, 2012 06:03 AM (BAnPT)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at October 16, 2012 06:03 AM (vjJM3)
Barry really is a pathetic little man, isn't he?
Posted by: Fritz at October 16, 2012 06:03 AM (/ZZCn)
Posted by: The littl shyning man at October 16, 2012 06:04 AM (PH+2B)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at October 16, 2012 06:05 AM (vjJM3)
Posted by: D Stewart at October 16, 2012 06:06 AM (+iqDb)
Posted by: Roy at October 16, 2012 06:06 AM (VndSC)
I'd like to know if the President agrees with the Secretary and if he does, why hasn't he asked for her resignation?
How'd that play out against Holder?
Hillary's "apologized" as far as that will ever be. She is not about to hand in her letter of resignation for Obama to refuse to accept. Rather, she's already fingering "intelligence" advisers for her guillotine.
Posted by: panzernashorn at October 16, 2012 06:06 AM (BAnPT)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at October 16, 2012 06:06 AM (vjJM3)
Posted by: kawfytawk at October 16, 2012 06:07 AM (JWLqy)
Why? ---
I need more room for the roast pig and dessert
Posted by: Candy Crowley at October 16, 2012 06:07 AM (SO2Q8)
Posted by: Roy at October 16, 2012 06:08 AM (VndSC)
Posted by: Fritz at October 16, 2012 06:08 AM (/ZZCn)
Posted by: SH at October 16, 2012 06:08 AM (gmeXX)
Bill Clinton was no better. He never visited the WTC after the first bombing attempt. He basically did nothing after the attacks on the Cole and our African embassies. The only terrorist attack that Clinton really got in front of was the OKC bombing and only because he saw and used that as a political opportunity.
Bill Clinton is smarter than Obama and more evil than Obama. Obama is just an incompetent communist.
Posted by: polynikes at October 16, 2012 06:08 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: eman at October 16, 2012 06:09 AM (+XD7n)
Posted by: The littl shyning man at October 16, 2012 06:09 AM (PH+2B)
Posted by: pray for peace at October 16, 2012 06:09 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: edj at October 16, 2012 06:09 AM (+QKfp)
As I've said all along, Hillary needed to fire a couple underlings quickly to make this one go away. She waited too long, really, but since it's Hillary she'll probably get away with it.
2) The issue that needs to be pushed is the administration's 'Look, a pony!' number regarding the video. It's got to be hammered home that the administration fabricated that nonsense out of whole cloth in the face of piles of evidence to the contrary and so far they're hiding behind a bunch of "Intelligence community! Intelligence community!" nonsense.
Posted by: JEM at October 16, 2012 06:09 AM (o+SC1)
Black Hawk Down
Clinton demanded action. Then left our men without support.
Posted by: panzernashorn at October 16, 2012 06:10 AM (BAnPT)
Posted by: BignJames at October 16, 2012 06:10 AM (rlFQ+)
Posted by: Me-just me at October 16, 2012 06:10 AM (Y//vu)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at October 16, 2012 06:10 AM (oSFWF)
Posted by: The littl shyning man at October 16, 2012 06:12 AM (PH+2B)
Posted by: polynikes at October 16, 2012 10:08 AM (m2CN7)
Yup, that pretty much sums it up. Good job
Posted by: Nevergiveup
Agree. Communism only is competent when the death camps are running.
Posted by: Roy at October 16, 2012 06:12 AM (VndSC)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Now with extra impact. at October 16, 2012 06:12 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at October 16, 2012 06:12 AM (oSFWF)
Posted by: Wall_E at October 16, 2012 06:12 AM (48wze)
Posted by: JEM at October 16, 2012 06:13 AM (o+SC1)
Posted by: JEM at October 16, 2012 10:09 AM (o+SC1)
You seem to be as clueless as the rest of the progressives. The President has security briefings everyday. He was most definitely briefed on the two previous bombings in Benghazi. That he would not inquire as to the security status of that consulate is not believable. If by the chance that he did not, it only proves how incompentent he is.
Posted by: polynikes at October 16, 2012 06:14 AM (m2CN7)
For it to work requires a compliant press (check)
and a compliant Republican Party (check).
Ok I guess it might work
The only fly in the ointment is Romney. If he wants to win he won't let this go. Four dead Americans can't be washed away by a childish no consequences "I take responsibility" statement.
Posted by: Harold at October 16, 2012 06:14 AM (JKNLp)
Posted by: Firing Prezzy Wazzint Me In November at October 16, 2012 06:15 AM (2l/vK)
Diana West is great, amongst the very best war journalists.
Quote:
Wait, I thought she "took responsibility"...!
I understand why people want to ask questions, but I just caution that we need to look at everything, and everything needs to be explained at the same time," Clinton said. ...
Translation: After the election.
Clinton has said the responsibility for diplomatic security ends with the Stat Department.
"I'm not going to get into the blame game," she told Brennan.
Always a preface to getting into the blame game:
"I think intelligence is very hard to do and what we're going to find out as we do this accountability review and we get what will be the best possible chronology, that will be attached to what we knew when, which takes time. I understand the, you know, the anxiety and the desire to try to get answers. Nobody wants to get answers more than I do."
And we thought Hillary went noble on us.
Posted by: panzernashorn at October 16, 2012 06:15 AM (BAnPT)
Posted by: jd at October 16, 2012 06:15 AM (zqg7o)
Posted by: Lisa Groves at October 16, 2012 06:16 AM (ir4O/)
Posted by: SH at October 16, 2012 06:17 AM (gmeXX)
Posted by: GalosGann at October 16, 2012 06:18 AM (T3KlW)
Posted by: BignJames at October 16, 2012 06:18 AM (rlFQ+)
"This is one of the most important elections in our country's history.
"I believe we need a president who believed what Harry Truman believed. That buck stopped in the Oval Office.
"I will do what I can to run the government and manage the economy, because I think we need a president who is hands-on, not hands-off.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dKGNQg4T3NE&feature=player_embedded
Posted by: Chris at October 16, 2012 06:19 AM (zCV7t)
.--
spare us the alligator tears for the abused wife who had her own affairs
Posted by: panzernashorn at October 16, 2012 06:20 AM (BAnPT)
So you really think anyone outside her core supporters will throw a tickertape parade, foist her upon their shoulders and start singing "Hail to the Chief"?
I didn't think so.
If the buck stopped with Clinton, shoe should resign. But she won't because that would be the coup de grace for her political career.
We may even hear Mr. Obama say at some point that Hillary offered her resignation and he refused because the "buck stops with him".
That way we have the political circle-jerk that gets both of them through the election.
Have I said that Bill and Hillary Clinton run a close second to the suck that is President Obama?
Posted by: marcus at October 16, 2012 06:20 AM (GGCsk)
Posted by: BignJames at October 16, 2012 06:21 AM (rlFQ+)
Obama is not Unprecedented in that the buck never stops at the Oval Office.
"Because I Could" Willijeff was never prosecuted after being impeached.
Posted by: panzernashorn at October 16, 2012 06:22 AM (BAnPT)
I thought (before the Bengazi attack) a radio commentator said,"Clinton will step down next year if Obama is re-elected." I presumed that would be to prepare for a 2016 campaign.
What if the recent crisis has her looking like the flawed hero/heroine who made a mistake, took the punishment like a grown-up and has learned from her mistakes?
Comments, anyone?
Posted by: Greg at October 16, 2012 06:22 AM (U9nTN)
Posted by: OJ Simpson at October 16, 2012 06:22 AM (GBXon)
In a sane world where responsibility went with authority that'd be true. But we haven't seen much of that in a long time.
But even Bush 43 was very weak on that. He may be a better man than Obama but he was far too loyal to failed subordinates.
How long did Les Aspin hang on as SecDef after Mogadishu?
The current administration believes that accountability is a sign of weakness. There was a whiff of this with Bush, but it's a religion with this bunch. Duck and cover, never admit anything.
Posted by: JEM at October 16, 2012 06:22 AM (o+SC1)
Posted by: Roy at October 16, 2012 10:08 AM (VndSC)
RACIST!!!!
Posted by: TheQuietMan at October 16, 2012 06:23 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: Brother Cavil presents at October 16, 2012 06:23 AM (GBXon)
The idea that Obama is somehow personally responsible for knowing the security arrangements at each consulate throughout the Mideast is laughable.
To an extent, yes. But I don't think that holds water in regards to this PARTICULAR "consulate" (if it can really be called that, since it still doesn't appear to have been anything of the sort).
The Libyan embassy is not just any embassy. Obama's "kinetic military action" in Libya to oust Mummer Gadfly was one of this administration's petulant attempts to frame Obama as a hawkish Preezy. He has a clear, vested interest in making it appear that the Libyan uprising and his magnanimous outreach to the Libyan rebels were successful in instituting a more Western-friendly climate in that country. If not Western-friendly, then at least less openly hostile to the West and its interests. He has clearly failed in that mission.
I agree that Obama doesn't need to know the specific security arrangements of every embassy worldwide; he doesn't even need to know the specific security arrangements of particular embassies in very dangerous parts of the world. But he SHOULD have required any and all conversations regarding American presence in Libya after Gadfly's ouster -- be it military or diplomatic -- go through HIS office. He got America into Libya's conflict; he had a duty to make sure our people were protected.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/b][/i][/u] at October 16, 2012 06:24 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: sTevo at October 16, 2012 06:27 AM (o5ZuD)
Posted by: looking closely at October 16, 2012 06:30 AM (DpfU5)
Posted by: BignJames at October 16, 2012 06:30 AM (rlFQ+)
This is a foreign policy set by Mr. Obama and carried out by Mrs. Clinton. The basic principles and posture originate from Mr. Obama. He owns it.
Funny how we heard about the Bush Doctrine, etc. and not the Rice Doctrine last time around.
Now we have Clinton assuming or at least trying to give the appearance of assuming powers she does not possess.
This is about an administration that has allowed AQ to become stronger and gain a foothold in multiple sovereign governments in the Middle East. It's not about a "request" for more security. It is about the policies and posture that would permit such a request to be refused.
Posted by: marcus at October 16, 2012 06:31 AM (GGCsk)
That isn't to say he does the job, I'm sure the political hacks second-guess that one, but that's the office he's got.
Posted by: JEM at October 16, 2012 06:33 AM (o+SC1)
Posted by: Sexypig at October 16, 2012 06:38 AM (jGUj1)
...
Savvy, hm. The Union Obama Camp lacks tactful nuance they presumed to advertise, "just" another false advertisement. But no one knows "politics" better than union, mafia, organized crime thug lords. If the Obama-Ayers' camp weren't politically savvy, he'd never have been elected in the first place. And at this point, the MFM would have completely turned against the loser.
Ah, but the Obama dam withholding his gross corruptions in office is faulty, built on corrupted "science" self destructing under its own pressure.
http://tinyurl.com/8neemaq
Illustration: Wm. Mulholland's St. Francis disaster, beware the impending catastrophe and seek high ground sooner than later. When capacity of the reservoir is 32,000 acre-feet, don't sell it with a capacity of 38,000 acre-feet.
Don't over extend. Life and property lost aren't so cheap.
Posted by: panzernashorn at October 16, 2012 06:40 AM (BAnPT)
I do not like the Clintons but prefer them to The Won. Pick your poison. That said, for a nanosecond I sort of felt sorry for her doing this and acting like an adult. Unfortunately she waited over a month to do this, so it seems, uh, desperate. She probably knows she has a little time coming up with Congressman Issa, and wanted to get a jump start on the hearing. She also knows the WH has already thrown her and the CIA under the bus (note: the silence of Petraeus). So...if there are Hillary fans out there who don't like Obama to begin with, this may have them either staying home or switching to Romney. Or this may be wishful thinking on my part.
I think Mitt should bring up the old "buck stops with me" prior to Obama saying it, or agreeing with him in some floppy way. And it is true.
Questions for the White House:
1) Who told Susan Rice to say it was a video?
2) Why did it take eleven days to say it was not a video by the State Dept?
3) This "fog" of war: does mobs of armed radical islamic terrorists not ring a bell on 9/11?
4) There were 234 attacks in Libya in the past year. Twenty percent were in Benghazi. Were you, Buhrock, not told of any of these attacks?
I think McCain and Graham (not fans of either, but a good move on their part) coming out with their statement shows this is not over. Let the media and Dems scream "politicizing." They can scream this until the American people learn who lied to them after 9/11/12 and why---when the British press (Indenpendent and Telegraph) had this story straight on 9/12/12.
It is the cover-up, not the security breach, which should weigh on voter's minds. The security breaches---heck, the flat-out lack of security---still should come back to Obumbles, as he is, supposedly, the guy in charge and over his appointed staff. The buck does, indeed, stop with him.
Posted by: ChristyBlinky, unbanned, ready to get this done at October 16, 2012 06:41 AM (baL2B)
Posted by: Brother Cavil presents at October 16, 2012 10:23 AM (GBXon)
Really? I think she looks like a cross between the two; the poor girl.
Posted by: Captain Hate (more dagny and less curious) at October 16, 2012 06:41 AM (lJ5Yy)
She answers to Obama. He placed her on his cabinet.
Posted by: ChristyBlinky, unbanned, ready to get this done at October 16, 2012 06:44 AM (baL2B)
It is the cover up. It is the cover up. It is the cover up. This is what is important.
Posted by: ChristyBlinky, unbanned, ready to get this done at October 16, 2012 06:48 AM (baL2B)
A couple more topics Romney might ask about:
A. You and other Democrats spent the 8 years of President Bush's term demanding he take personal responsibility for every bad thing that happened. Did the rules change when you became President? Why did you expect GWB to man up to every crisis but not yourself?
B. You tried to convince the American people that an amateur video inflamed the Islamic street against America. What do you have to say about the TV specials made about the Osama Bin Laden strike and the upcoming feature film, all of which have had implicit administration approval if not outright cooperation? Is there a reason to believe that sloppy videos inflame people against America, but professionally done ones don't? Didn't you regularly accuse GWB of creating more terrorism and more terrorists by claiming American successes against them? Haven't you recently claimed in public that you had defeated AQ?
Posted by: sherlock at October 16, 2012 06:55 AM (BKPeM)
Hillary promises to attach responsibility on the appropriate intelligence adviser(s).
Meanwhile, CIA Director Gen. Petraeus remains mute.
Truman said the buck stops here. But Truman was not unique.
"Don't blame anyone else, you just fasten it on me. If there was an error in human judgment, I was the human, and I won't try to fasten it on anyone else." -- Wm Mulholland, St. Francis Dam Inquest
http://tinyurl.com/8v3fhlm
pass the buck revisionist rules usurped integrity long ago
Posted by: panzernashorn at October 16, 2012 06:55 AM (BAnPT)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at October 16, 2012 06:55 AM (i0vBR)
Posted by: DaMav at October 16, 2012 06:57 AM (rT08W)
Posted by: Mr. Feverhead at October 16, 2012 06:58 AM (SzAZ7)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at October 16, 2012 06:59 AM (i0vBR)
This leading from behind crap didn't work out so well for Chris Stevens, Tyrone Woods, Glen Doherty and Sean Smith.
If this idiot is re-elected, the list will grow.
Posted by: rockhead at October 16, 2012 07:00 AM (jtTKf)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at October 16, 2012 07:00 AM (i0vBR)
Posted by: Sinalco at October 16, 2012 07:02 AM (dfp3p)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at October 16, 2012 07:03 AM (i0vBR)
shxt my comment got eaten.
basically:
I love Hillary and still root Team Clinton but Bat for Team Romney for America.
Hillary did what we expected and took responsibility, it exposes SCOAMF for the derilicter of duty he is.
She needs to stay in office as Israels early warning system, I think her stare is what keeps O from going whole hog AntiAmerican foreign policy right now, with Kerry we AND Israel are well and truly screwed.
Good news is that wont happen as SCOAMF can do early retirement and navel gazing with his fans after Jan 20.
Posted by: ginaswo at October 16, 2012 07:04 AM (Z/0rR)
Well it's a nice analysis--and I'd like to believe that Hillary has in fact teed up the ball for Romney. The problem is that as far as I know, unlike The Bamster, Romney doesn't play golf.
We'll see.
Posted by: Comanche Voter at October 16, 2012 07:05 AM (oe1aw)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at October 16, 2012 07:08 AM (i0vBR)
Posted by: runninrebel
--
I don't know. I don't even know what Petraeus literally reported, only having heard about it, not having read any transcript.
A source to be taken with his ingrained prejudices in mind, Webster Tarpley, reported that Petraeus promoted the video in Washington with the advise to take it under consideration. Tarpley researched the video SPONSORS to be associates of John Bolton, the sponsors providing the means for the "shady character Coptic" bias video making and distribution via word of mouth "intelligence" reports.
Were that the case, scapegoat.
Posted by: panzernashorn at October 16, 2012 07:08 AM (BAnPT)
Perjury "is" nothing new to Clintons.
Posted by: panzernashorn at October 16, 2012 07:09 AM (BAnPT)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at October 16, 2012 07:09 AM (i0vBR)
Posted by: panzernashorn at October 16, 2012 07:10 AM (BAnPT)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at October 16, 2012 07:11 AM (i0vBR)
Posted by: Bill at October 16, 2012 07:11 AM (yibTb)
The Lebanon barracks bombing in 1983 killed 220 U.S. Marines - the largest number of Marines killed since Iwo Jima. In all, 241 American servicemen were killed, the single worst day for servicemen since the Tet Offensive.
All under the careful watch and paragon of accountability known as President umm, umm, (heh) -- wait, wait, Mommy, I know this one ... (ahh, lemme see) ... the bananas were nice in my oatmael this morning, Nancy ... not too soft or mushy ... where was I, no, no don't help me - darn it all -- lemme give George Shultz a call, he's my go to guy when things go wrong over in camel land -- AHA - I got it Mommy. Reagan! President Reagan. See, I knew I could remember my own name. (zzzzz)
Posted by: Che Gorilla at October 16, 2012 07:18 AM (icwKQ)
Posted by: Mr. Feverhead at October 16, 2012 07:24 AM (SzAZ7)
Tarpley lost a lot of credibility as a scholar having gone completely overboard with anti-Masonic prejudices. "Consider the source" -- he should better select his own. And once you go too far in any single direction, there it is. Too bad, because as a scholar and investigative journalist, he's done much good relaying the world's historical context to the ignorant moronic American cursed with the shortest term memory.
None the less, Tarpley himself visits all of these countries, already knowing all the politics at play considering all historical contexts. So regarding the Middle East on its own grounds, Tarpley is as credible as any if not more.
http://tinyurl.com/9jdqdar
"World needs Turkey-Syria Peace"
Posted by: panzernashorn at October 16, 2012 07:25 AM (BAnPT)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at October 16, 2012 07:28 AM (i0vBR)
Posted by: Jimi Ray iPhone at October 16, 2012 07:32 AM (79EF9)
This is just SAD.
C'mon people! The SecState just admitted that she is responsible for security at embassies. Isn't the correct response to say, "Hey, that's great that you understand the responsibilities of your job. Did you poop today, too?"
She took a MONTH to "admit" something that is simply factually true - a recitation of part of her job description!
What we REALLY need to know is, who refused to provide adequate security at the embassy, why they refused, and what the effective date of their resignation letter is. An ambassador is dead, for cryin' out loud!!
If the policy was at the President's insistance, the voters are especially entitled to know that, too.
Billy Bob pulled this same scam, "taking responsibility", when he knew damn well there would be NO consequences, whatsoever. It's a mentality of "if I just admit I was wrong then it's OK that I did wrong."
Mitt seems to understand this stuff, having been a successful big-deal executive, and (judging from last time) knows how to call out Obama on this crap. He knows that this "admission" by Hillary means absolutely NOTHING.
Posted by: Optimizer at October 16, 2012 07:45 AM (4MJt/)
Posted by: Paul Ryan at October 16, 2012 07:52 AM (fUwsw)
"246 ... It is the cover up. It is the cover up. It is the cover up. This is what is important."
That's the other thing. There are two aspects to this Benghazi event, the bad security, and the lying to the American people about what had happened.
The media is still agonizing over this, but the facts have been established for a month now. Congressmen (from both parties) who had been briefed knew within a day or two that it was almost certainly a terrorist attack, and said so publicly, and yet the White House pushed the bizarre story that it was a demonstration that went out of control. The intelligence was fine, they obviously knew the truth, and they were obviously selling us a phony cover story.
Even in her "admission", Hillary continued with this lie, calling it "fog of war". She said nothing we didn't already know (that ANY SecState is always responsible for everything in the State Dept, including security), and doubled-down on the lie.
And, yeah, just as she is responsible for everything at State, the President is responsible for everything in the entire Executive Branch. This doesn't get him off the hook.
Posted by: Optimizer at October 16, 2012 08:00 AM (4MJt/)
Just sayin'.
The Clintons are not shy about playing that kind of hardball.
Posted by: Kristophr at October 16, 2012 08:04 AM (wYVte)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at October 16, 2012 11:11 AM (i0vBR)
Does anybody take Chelsea seriously? She's in her thirties and they still treat her like a retarded child, worse than the JEF. I don't think they'll ever take the training wheels off for the ugly duckling.
Posted by: Captain Hate (more dagny and less curious) at October 16, 2012 08:10 AM (lJ5Yy)
But I still say she convinced him this was his idea. I think Hillary Clinton understands the value of leadership and what it means to show it. She has a long game; Obama always plays for short-term gain only.
Posted by: Lummox JR at October 16, 2012 08:12 AM (9m2/U)
Posted by: trlbasser at October 16, 2012 08:19 AM (NelRv)
I don't buy the Hillary as genius explanation. I think the fact she blames her underlings tells us that the plan is to accept responsibility and then when the investigation comes she blames the underlings per her own words here. The deal she made with Axelrod is that the WH will help her cover her tracks as she blames the people who were suppose to keep her (supposedly) informed. That someone will act as a ground on a wire. It will get tied up with them sufficiently that no one will care about what happens to this person good or bad and the whole thing goes away and it all happens well after the election. problem is the people are not going to accept Obama just blowing it off for 90 minutes at the foreign policy debate and I am waiting to see the plan to get through that.
Posted by: Conan at October 16, 2012 08:27 AM (J9cKx)
(1) Hillary is taking the blame in order to get Obama re-elected.
(2) If Obama is not re-elected and Hillary runs in 2016, she will run against an incumbent: Mitt Romney. She will lose and she knows it.
(3) The only way to get Benghazi off Obama is to provide talking points for the MSM and Democrats so the crisis can be put on a slow shelf until after the election. This is what Hillary is doing.
(4) Hillary has no choice. Benghazi is after all her responsibility. The cover up is Obama's to own. But with Hillary taking responsibility and with a re-election of Obama, Hillary at least has a chance in 2016.
(5) If Obama loses in 2012, Hillary is finished anyway.
Posted by: Paul A'Barge at October 16, 2012 08:48 AM (KXcGC)
Posted by: Typewriterstreaming at October 16, 2012 09:24 AM (b87vx)
138BTW Obama isn't under the bus either. No one can throw him under the bus. He's the boss.
Ahem.
Posted by: George Soros at October 16, 2012 09:37 AM (U+DUu)
Posted by: steevy at October 16, 2012 11:21 AM (6o4Fb)
Posted by: Stabschef des SA Rohm at October 16, 2012 11:25 AM (3sZO1)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.1959 seconds, 412 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Mo the Girl at October 16, 2012 05:04 AM (SQQjV)