June 11, 2012
— DrewM I am so sick and tired of this garbage.
Former Florida Governor Jeb Bush said today that both Ronald Reagan and his father George H. W. Bush would have had a difficult time getting nominated by today's ultra-conservative Republican Party."Ronald Reagan would have, based on his record of finding accommodation, finding some degree of common ground, as would my dad — they would have a hard time if you define the Republican party — and I don’t — as having an orthodoxy that doesn’t allow for disagreement, doesn’t allow for finding some common ground," Bush said, adding that he views the hyper-partisan moment as "temporary."
"Back to my dad’s time and Ronald Reagan’s time – they got a lot of stuff done with a lot of bipartisan support," he said. Reagan "would be criticized for doing the things that he did."
Bush called the present partisan climate "disturbing."
Before I rip into this steaming pile of nonsense I will note Bush also went after Obama and the Democrats for their partisanship as well. Some may say that shows he's an honest critic, I maintain it's a cop out and ass covering.
There are two big problems with this standard critique of "today's GOP".
First, it ignores a simple reality...the Democrats had control of the White House, The House of Representatives and a filibuster proof majority in the Senate. Voters could have very well kept that intact during the 2010 mid-terms. Instead, they gave control of the House to the GOP and Republicans made substantial gains in the Senate.
How exactly is the message of that kind of massive power switch...compromise with Obama? If voters wanted what Obama was selling, they would have kept his power base intact. That they didn't may annoy Obama and Jeb Bush but elections can be darn inconvenient.
Second, the GOP in Congress isn't nearly as confrontational and unyielding as liberals like to pretend. You might recall we had to brow beat the GOP into keeping their pledge to cut $100 billion in spending after taking control of the House.
And almost two years later, they still don't really get it.
The Republican-led House voted Wednesday to maintain billions of dollars in planned 2013 spending by the departments of Energy and Interior and related agencies.Members considered several amendments to the Energy and Water spending bill, H.R. 5325, in Wednesday afternoon votes, but continued to turn away GOP proposals to pare the bill down further. Several Republicans have complained for the past few days that the bill spends $87.5 million more than the current funding level — the entire bill tips the fiscal scale at $32.1 billion for the year.
The most dramatic proposal to cut spending came from Rep. Mick Mulvaney (R-S.C.), who proposed a $3.1 billion cut to all accounts other than those related to national security and defense. But his proposal was turned away in a 125-293 vote.
I suppose we could try a grand deal where we raise taxes now for spending cuts that Democrats promise to deliver later. We should ask Jeb's dad how that would work out politically and policy wise.
And as John E. pointed out...the GOP is so extreme our last two nominees have been John McCain and Mitt Romney. Fell the severe conservatism!
The theme of this election should be "Finish the job"....get rid of Obama and get the most conservative Congress possible because there's still plenty of deadweight to be trimmed there too.
One added thought: No, Ronald Reagan could not win the GOP nomination today but not for the reason the "GOP is so extreme" crowd thinks. The fact is, he'd never win two terms as Governor in California because the Democrats in that state have become so liberal they'd never elect him. Without that on his resume, I doubt he'd have won the presidency.
Posted by: DrewM at
04:53 AM
| Comments (565)
Post contains 665 words, total size 4 kb.
I'm so tired of the Bushes, especially Jeb Bush, this passive aggresive insulting nonsense. Just shut up, take a cue from GWB, who gives speeches once in a while but won't insult and whine.
Maybe he wants be the next Meghan Mccain, I notice he goes on lefty shows all the time to insult conservatives.
Posted by: johnc_ex-democrat at June 11, 2012 04:56 AM (ACkhT)
...ummm...it turns out the JEF-y SCOAMF was the one that who actually was the dick and tried to change the accepted agreement after the fact
Posted by: Albie Damned at June 11, 2012 04:56 AM (Yhu4q)
Scipio's response? Nice try, sunshine.
Posted by: BumperStickerist at June 11, 2012 04:57 AM (rEWPE)
we're behaving as if the whole Anger/'Comment Registration Because Some People Are Untrammeled Assholes' thing never happened.
hit the tip jar for ace.
Posted by: BumperStickerist at June 11, 2012 05:02 AM (rEWPE)
Posted by: WTF at June 11, 2012 05:03 AM (Bm8H4)
Him and his whole family have more, politically, in common with Democrats than they do with the majority of Conservatives.
It's why they made such bad and harmful decisions and THEY'RE the reason why conservatives have to be so partisan NOW. They promised they would govern with at least some conservative principles. They failed to keep those promises for the most part or failed at crucial times. Thus they were rejected by the electorate. GW only got 2 terms because of IRAQ. Otherwise he too would have been rejected.
The Reps lost the House because they began to rule like Democrats.
I don't doubt that they have not learned the lesson. Only time will tell.
OH and happy, happy , joy, joy. blehh.
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and all that at June 11, 2012 05:04 AM (CP+yl)
Posted by: Dick Nixon at June 11, 2012 08:59 AM (VrVBw)
To be fair, we'd have to get a look at his nipples to make a final determination.
Posted by: CoolCzech at June 11, 2012 05:04 AM (Iaxlk)
Posted by: Meg McCain at June 11, 2012 05:04 AM (wWa8r)
And Moe Lane has advice on how to treat people like them!
Well, I think that's what he's saying, isn't it?
Posted by: Mama AJ at June 11, 2012 05:05 AM (SUKHu)
Posted by: Vic at June 11, 2012 05:05 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: RM at June 11, 2012 05:05 AM (RM5CW)
Amen, I'm so sick of this sh*t. Most of the Republican party is run by ex-Reagan staffers, volunteers, etc.
If the Republican party ever nominates this jerk face then I'm leaving. I can't stand dynasties and I'm tired of the underwhelming Bush family.
Posted by: Ben at June 11, 2012 05:05 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Gmac at June 11, 2012 05:06 AM (xYfXU)
We're on double secret probation and I think the Ban Hammer/Threat of Registration is poised like the Sword of Damocles.
Or maybe pixy is having trouble cutting and pasting the new code.
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and all that at June 11, 2012 05:07 AM (CP+yl)
Posted by: lowfibass at June 11, 2012 05:07 AM (BrqlK)
Former Florida Governor Jeb Bush said today that both Ronald Reagan and his father George H. W. Bush would have had a difficult time getting nominated by today's ultra-conservative Republican Party.
I halfway agree with him. His father would have had a difficult time getting nominated today but not for the reasons that he offers. I suppose he hopes we have forgotten that his father (a) lost the nomination to Reagan in 1980, during which run he accused Reagan of believing in voodoo economics; (b) had a tough struggle to get the nomination in 1988 and got it primarily by running on Reagan's coattails; (c) as President he sold out his base so badly that he was challenged from the right way way way back in those hyperpartisan days of yesteryear known as 1992.
Reagan would cruise to the nomination today because what he preached was what we still want. GHW Bush would struggle today just as he did back then because he was a moderate.
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at June 11, 2012 05:08 AM (JxMoP)
That is my Representative. We had a damned Democrat for a long time and finally got him. Does it sound like he is "going along to get along" just because his district is not an automatic win?
Hell no.
Posted by: Vic at June 11, 2012 05:08 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at June 11, 2012 05:10 AM (gPDxp)
Partisanship - when republicans seek compromise
Nonpartisanship - when republicans capitulate.
(My bet is this is about one issue: amnesty for illegals...)
Posted by: Fussy at June 11, 2012 05:10 AM (Y/2U4)
>>>>I halfway agree with him. His father would have had a difficult time getting nominated today but not for the reasons that he offers. I suppose he hopes we have forgotten that his father (a) lost the nomination to Reagan in 1980, during which run he accused Reagan of believing in voodoo economics; (b) had a tough struggle to get the nomination in 1988 and got it primarily by running on Reagan's coattails; (c)asPresident hesold out his base so badly that he was challenged from the right way way way back in those hyperpartisan days of yesteryear known as 1992.
Good point. His father was essentially the Jon Huntsman of the 1980 primaires, except H.W. came a lot closer than Huntsman.
God I wish Reagan had picked Kemp instead.
Posted by: Ben at June 11, 2012 05:11 AM (wuv1c)
-----------
Why are reporters and editors asking him anything at all? Why is he giving press conferences at all? Is he running for something? Is he in charge of something that I am not aware of? As far as I know he is just a private citizen. So why is he getting press coverage? Why are they looking for a story from him in the first place?
Posted by: mama winger at June 11, 2012 05:12 AM (P6QsQ)
Not that I actually know anyone, personally, who wanted that, but I hear, and read, his name as a recommendation from time to time, and never can quite figure out why...
Posted by: Kinley Ardal at June 11, 2012 05:12 AM (unO0f)
And they can take Karl Rove with them.
Posted by: Vic at June 11, 2012 05:13 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Paul Zummo at June 11, 2012 05:14 AM (Ud5vq)
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at June 11, 2012 05:15 AM (gPDxp)
>> So why is he getting press coverage? Why are they looking for a story from him in the first place?
To scare liberals into supporting Obama? Mention the B-word and see them scream??
Or he wants a position in the Romney administration and thinks this will help.
Posted by: Mama AJ at June 11, 2012 05:15 AM (SUKHu)
Posted by: phoenixgirl clinging to my bible, gun and coca cola at June 11, 2012 05:16 AM (Ho2rs)
Posted by: Don't Drone Me, Bro! at June 11, 2012 05:16 AM (AzwZn)
Boehner has to go. If Issa's committee votes to file contempt against Holder and Boehner won't let the vote happen, it's proof we need to do more than elect a Republican to the Presidency. We need a national effort to vote out these liberal wishy washy RINO's.
The ONLY reasons to vote Republican this year is to deny Obama and his cohorts the ability to complete their ruination of the country and to prevent them from solidifying their gains by nominating 2 judges to the SCOTUS. Expecting any fiscal sanity is wishful thinking.
They will make cosmetic efforts but what they save by cutting some entitlements, they will spend on useless or wasteful Defense spending. (I don't mean Defense spending in general but we are wasting money in the Defense department.) I.E. spending in their districts regardless of the strategic/tactical benefit of the particular program. Plus the procurement procedure needs drastic changes both to get better inventory but to eliminate too much red tape that encourages corruption.
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and all that at June 11, 2012 05:16 AM (CP+yl)
Posted by: Jeb Bush at June 11, 2012 05:17 AM (IoNBC)
Posted by: DangerGirl at June 11, 2012 05:17 AM (zEeUf)
Posted by: CoolCzech at June 11, 2012 05:17 AM (Iaxlk)
Why are reporters and editors asking him anything at all? Why is he giving press conferences at all? Is he running for something? Is he in charge of something that I am not aware of? As far as I know he is just a private citizen. So why is he getting press coverage? Why are they looking for a story from him in the first place?
Because of his family name. If he were Jeb Stevens, former governor of Florida, few people would care to ask him.
The more interesting question to me is not why they ask him but why he gives them the answers that are then turned around and used against us. He isn't some innocent babe in the woods, he knows exactly what he's saying and how it will be used against us.
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at June 11, 2012 05:19 AM (JxMoP)
As to why Jeb is being put on TV. Obama is going to run against a do nothing/obstructionist congress. Therefore the media will need to trot out every "republican/conservative" they can find who is willing to agree to this premise.
Get ready to see David Frum, David Brooks, Kathleen Parker, etc on news networks non-stop until election day.
Self-hating Republicanism pays, and it's going to pay well in the next 5 months.
Posted by: Ben at June 11, 2012 05:19 AM (wuv1c)
This is not Wendell Wilkie's Republican Party, either, (h8ers)!
Poor, poor Jeb Bush... outperformed and locked out by his older and "less smart" brother. The butt hurt burn must be intense.
Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars at June 11, 2012 05:21 AM (TJWQY)
Posted by: Meggie McCain at June 11, 2012 09:18 AM (FOlqu)
I think he's partial to pussy. Or is it he's partly a pussy?
Whatevs.
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and all that at June 11, 2012 05:21 AM (CP+yl)
Posted by: Ben at June 11, 2012 09:19 AM (wuv1c)
Hey! It's one of the only industries we have left!
Posted by: Ben Dover at June 11, 2012 05:21 AM (cYQg0)
Posted by: Meggy Mac at June 11, 2012 05:25 AM (6oeYK)
He was, however, a patriotic American, something Bark Obama is not, and is therefore superior in every way that matters.
That said, I will agree with the lib wackos on one point: no more Bushes, TYVM. Their biggest failing is an excessive need to be liked by every political creature in Washington. Therefore, they will "reach across the aisle" and compromise every chance they get, just like the reviled McCain.
Add to that their pathetic belief in the USA's mandatory role in "nation-building" and sympathy for illegals, and even the most partisan Repubs should realize that putting the Bush family out to pasture is a Good Thing.
Posted by: MrScribbler at June 11, 2012 05:25 AM (MQc8e)
----------------------
THIS. Bring the message and they will come. And Reagan was a master at bringing the message. He believed it, he articulated it. What has been proven over and over again, and what keeps getting rejected, is that we don't want marshmallow Republicans anymore. I would be happy to see R's like Jeb to disappear. They have contributed to the disastrous leftward drift in this country.
Posted by: Lady in Black at June 11, 2012 05:25 AM (vOMX+)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at June 11, 2012 05:26 AM (8y9MW)
I think it's fair to say that the Bush Era is behind us. The closest the RINOs could come to bringing them back is Romney, and frankly Romney is showing himself to be a far, far tougher implacable opponent to the Left than Sen. McPain or apparently Gov. Bush would ever dream of being.
The Bush Dynasty legacy is hardly stellar: Bush I managed to give the 90's to Bill Clinton, a mere 4 years after Reagan's stunning performance seemed to guarantee conservative rule for a generation. Bush II did the right thing on foreign policy and responding to 9/11, but let's face it: he opened up the spigots on government spending. Yes, Obama is the Hoover Dam Collapse of runaway spending, but it was W. that went out of his way to chip a few holes into Reagan's Dam on spending to begin with. What followed with Obama was predictable.
I'm not interested in a Bush III. Come to think of it, Presidential dynasties in American history have never worked wall: John Quincy Adams was a one termer just like his Dad, FDR capitalized on Teddy's name to set America on the path to a Welfare State, and the Bush's managed to almost single-handedly undo everything Reagan accomplished domestically.
Posted by: CoolCzech at June 11, 2012 05:26 AM (Iaxlk)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at June 11, 2012 05:26 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: DangerGirl at June 11, 2012 05:28 AM (zEeUf)
Posted by: Temper Tantrum at June 11, 2012 05:28 AM (AWmfW)
Trying to think of a non-angry, "new AOS tone" response to this
Oh, I know.
"We respect your opinion. Thank you for sharing it with us".
Posted by: HH at June 11, 2012 05:28 AM (v+ExF)
Posted by: Cricket at June 11, 2012 05:30 AM (DrC22)
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at June 11, 2012 05:31 AM (gPDxp)
"We respect your opinion. Thank you for sharing it with us".
How about, "I'll take that under advisement."
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at June 11, 2012 05:31 AM (JxMoP)
God I wish Reagan had picked Kemp instead.
Posted by: Ben at June 11, 2012 09:11 AM (wuv1c)
A fucking men to that. Poppy Bush was the poison pill of that ticket that had to be put in to keep the country clubbers from jumping ship because of nominating that parvenu Reagan who had the temerity to challenge Gerald Ford and sent them to the fainting couches screaming for warm compresses. You know, what they always accuse us conservatives of doing yet never have been able to prove?
Posted by: Captain Hate at June 11, 2012 05:31 AM (D1HMA)
Posted by: Tsar Nicholas II at June 11, 2012 05:31 AM (r2PLg)
Oh, I know.
"We respect your opinion. Thank you for sharing it with us".
---------------
"We respect your opinion.
Thank you for sharing it with us, cockholster."
FIFY.
_
Posted by: BumperStickerist at June 11, 2012 05:31 AM (rEWPE)
I think the free cell phones to the Govt Entitled, professional baby makers, don't wanna workers, and too fat, drunk, or drugged to get off the couch, disabled crowd started under Jorge' Bushy and will be used by the Lyin kING to txt and Rock the vote and Rock the Repunk voters this fall!
How many days since the democrat Senate and Obama passed a budget? Repunks fault FOOL?
Posted by: ConcealedKerry or SubMitt at June 11, 2012 05:31 AM (vXqv3)
Posted by: nickless at June 11, 2012 05:32 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 11, 2012 05:32 AM (MCDCp)
52 I don't think the Republicans are partisan, I just think they stick too much to one side of every issue!!!
Posted by: Meggy Mac at June 11, 2012 09:25 AM (6oeYK)
Kind of like how your underwear sticks to you, Ms. Spokeninny for All Things Zaftig?
Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars at June 11, 2012 05:33 AM (TJWQY)
Posted by: MACHINESFORSALE at June 11, 2012 05:33 AM (xXhWA)
Posted by: Ohio Dan at June 11, 2012 05:33 AM (JKNDp)
Posted by: The MSM at June 11, 2012 05:33 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: nickless at June 11, 2012 05:34 AM (MMC8r)
Ha. I agree Mallamut. Enhance You Calm should be a motto here.
Posted by: Ben at June 11, 2012 05:35 AM (wuv1c)
Their writings are entertaining, in the "spot the incoherence" sort of way. But, c'mon ... deep down, Meghan McCain doesn't care what she says.
Why should I?
Posted by: BumperStickerist at June 11, 2012 05:35 AM (rEWPE)
Old: Suck my little extremely white.....
See, the New tone is so much nicer. Lacks punch but is calming...........
Posted by: dagny at June 11, 2012 05:35 AM (WCAIB)
As for being non-angry...
It pleases me, nay, it pleases me immensely, that Jeb Bush will never get "his turn" to be Preznint. It makes me smile, too.
Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars at June 11, 2012 05:35 AM (TJWQY)
Posted by: MTF at June 11, 2012 05:35 AM (3Lr19)
Had no idea the poor girl had told no one about her pregnancy and then, when it was announced on the national stage, was faced with telling everyone, including her grandparents.
Posted by: faith at June 11, 2012 05:36 AM (oZfic)
Name ONE time the Democrats AS PUBLIC PARTY POLICY compromised with Republicans.
They DO NOT compromise. Since there's always someone in the Republican party that gets itchy, they ALWAYS find a few to go along with them and booom BIPARTISANSHIP.
They ARE the slippery slope, incrementalism and have patience down to a tee. That the Republicans have been wishy washy and in general actually agree with the Democrats on most every subject is their ultimate weapon. Top that with media whining and flinging mud and the Reps cave.
One step forward and two steps back means your going in REVERSE.
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and all that at June 11, 2012 05:36 AM (CP+yl)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at June 11, 2012 05:36 AM (05RcU)
Posted by: phoenixgirl clinging to my bible, gun and coca cola at June 11, 2012 05:36 AM (Ho2rs)
Posted by: Laura Castellano at June 11, 2012 05:37 AM (fuw6p)
This. If your position is that the Constitution limits the government to certain, enumerated powers, and the opposition is that it isn't, where's the compromise?
People love to say, "Oh, Republicans are going to have to compromise on Taxes, and Democrats are going to have to compromise on spending," but that's crap. Those may be the battles, but they're not the war. The war is what kind of government and country we're going to have. Democrats want a collectivist state, Republicans want a, well, Republic. You can't really find a "middle ground" between those two.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at June 11, 2012 05:37 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Edward Cropper at June 11, 2012 05:38 AM (yBOkB)
Until then? Blow me.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at June 11, 2012 05:38 AM (nEUpB)
That's just brutal.
Posted by: Fritz at June 11, 2012 05:38 AM (/ZZCn)
The Justice Department has maintained it has cooperated fully with the congressional investigation, turning over tens of thousands of documents and having Holder testify to Congress on the topic at least eight times.
However, Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., says the Justice Department has refused to turn over tens of thousands of pages of documents. Those include materials created after Feb. 4, 2011, when the Justice Department wrote a letter to Congress saying no gunwalking had occurred. The Justice Department later retracted the denial.
"The Obama Administration has not asserted Executive Privilege or any other valid privilege over these materials and it is unacceptable that the Department of Justice refuses to produce them. These documents pertain to Operation Fast and Furious, the claims of whistleblowers, and why it took the Department nearly a year to retract false denials of reckless tactics," Issa wrote in an announcement of the vote to be released shortly. It will reveal the vote is scheduled for Wednesday, June 20.
Posted by: Islamic Rage Boy at June 11, 2012 05:38 AM (e8kgV)
Posted by: MTF at June 11, 2012 05:39 AM (3Lr19)
Furthermore, as for being non-angry...
I chortle with glee thinking about Meggers McCanns getting jiggy with Poppin' Fresh, the actual Pillsbury Doughboy, who comes equipped with the goods to find her "wet spot". 'Nuff said!
Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars at June 11, 2012 05:39 AM (TJWQY)
Didn't one of them (Soros himself, IIRC) say almost exactly this not too long ago?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at June 11, 2012 05:40 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: phoenixgirl clinging to my bible, gun and coca cola at June 11, 2012 09:36 AM (Ho2rs)
I guess some people learned nothing from what happened on this blog this weekend, but then again, as self absorbed as you are, I"m not the least bit surprised.
Posted by: faith at June 11, 2012 05:40 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: CoolCzech at June 11, 2012 09:04 AM (Iaxlk)
Wait a minute ... you have seen Meg's nipples?
Posted by: Long Island at June 11, 2012 05:40 AM (kzp9t)
I guess He wants us to also be a huge tent, where anything is allowed as long as a republican is given power> ?
and we are not to say otherwise?
so we too can be a party of communists, socialists, anarchists, and in general ,do not speak of idealogies that are antehtitical to americans freedoms, or constitutional rights, being outside principles?
Posted by: willow at June 11, 2012 05:40 AM (TomZ9)
Posted by: phoenixgirl clinging to my bible, gun and coca cola at June 11, 2012 05:41 AM (Ho2rs)
You should Enhance your Calm..........in a Fire.
Posted by: Mallamutt, RINO President for Life at June 11, 2012 09:39 AM (OWjjx)
You learned nothing too. Should there be a fire in my abode, you'll be the very first person the police and fdny question.
Posted by: faith at June 11, 2012 05:42 AM (oZfic)
'Battle of the Network Stars' from the 70s is being run from time to time.For the old timers, it'll bring back memories.
For the young ones, you'll have a window into a time when general, actual television stars actually competed against each other in sporting events. (Tom Selleck running a leg of the 440, Scott Baio doing the obstacle course, Charlene Tilton doing ... something ... while wearing a tank top.) Howard Cosell does the announcing.
Good times. Good times.
Posted by: BumperStickerist at June 11, 2012 05:42 AM (rEWPE)
Posted by: phoenixgirl clinging to my bible, gun and coca cola at June 11, 2012 05:42 AM (Ho2rs)
Posted by: phoenixgirl clinging to my bible, gun and coca cola at June 11, 2012 05:43 AM (Ho2rs)
could someone explain why the h8 towards oZfic?
She's no 100 watt bulb but seems innocuous enough so I don't understand the intensity and the desire to point.
I'm not judging or being critical, just wondering what went on that I must have missed.
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and all that at June 11, 2012 05:43 AM (CP+yl)
Posted by: phoenixgirl clinging to my bible, gun and coca cola at June 11, 2012 09:42 AM (Ho2rs)
It's obvious you have no respect for ace whatsoever.
Posted by: faith at June 11, 2012 05:44 AM (oZfic)
"would have had a difficult time getting nominated by today's ultra-conservative Republican Party."
Weird statement, I voted for Howard Dean, John Kerry, Al Gore... then starting 2008 I voted for McPalin, in 2010, I donated and supported people like Ron Johnson, Marco Rubio, Colonel Allen West, Tim Scott, Nikki Haley, etc.
Maybe Jeb hasn't figured out, its not the right who's the problem, its the left, the "Democratic" party that has moved to the very far left. There was a time when both the dem and repub parties were all right of center, the overlap between the 2 parties was big, now its the left that has gone very very far left, so when viewing from that perspective, the right looks "ultraconservative", which in reality its not, people like Sharron Angle I cannot support, but people like Paul Ryan, etc can sell conservativsm in a calm articulate way.
I'm so sick of the Bushes, I hate dynasties. No more Bushes, no more Clintons, no more Kennedies. Get real people who love this country elected.
Posted by: johnc_ex-democrat at June 11, 2012 05:44 AM (ACkhT)
Why should I?
Posted by: BumperStickerist at June 11, 2012 09:35 AM
Miss McCain does not have a deep down. She has a thick layer of insulation, though.
Posted by: huerfano at June 11, 2012 05:44 AM (bAGA/)
St. Anger was a really crappy...wait, that wasn't what he was talking about.
No more Bushes, Kennedys, or other political families...straight on.
And finally...never mistake the expression of sad resolve for anger.
Posted by: Brother Cavil, New Caprica City DA's Office at June 11, 2012 05:45 AM (GBXon)
what exact partisan is he speaking of? that we're we are demanding public servants be held accountable to their decisions ? That they be held to the same standards as the rest of us? that when they don't follow through on the platform they sold us with that we would liike them to find a new job eleswherre?
That they represent American citizens and America and not their own interests?
Posted by: willow at June 11, 2012 05:45 AM (TomZ9)
Bush said that Mitt Romney's move to channel Republicans' anger over immigration in the primary has put him "in somewhat of a box" in the general election. He advised Romney to offer a "broader and more intense" approach to the issue. He suggested Romney continue to campaign in Hispanic communities, that he recast immigration as an economic issue, and that he focus on the question of education.
Not to worry, Homes. El Dream Acto del Republicano is on its way.
Posted by: Your Republican Party
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at June 11, 2012 05:46 AM (kdS6q)
I hope not, EYCNIP (enhance your calm, next inquiry, please) just doesn't have the same zip.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at June 11, 2012 05:46 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Museisluse at June 11, 2012 05:46 AM (sjB5Y)
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at June 11, 2012 05:46 AM (gPDxp)
That they represent American citizens and America and not their own interests? Posted by: willow at June 11, 2012 09:45 AM
I'm pretty sure that's hate speech. We should consult the style guide.
Posted by: huerfano at June 11, 2012 05:47 AM (bAGA/)
Posted by: phoenixgirl clinging to my bible, gun and coca cola at June 11, 2012 05:47 AM (Ho2rs)
This time, the dispute stems from Holder failing to turn over documents subpoenaed on October 12, 2011 in the Fast and Furious "gunwalking" investigation.
The Justice Department has maintained it has cooperated fully with the congressional investigation, turning over tens of thousands of documents and having Holder testify to Congress on the topic at least eight times.
At this point I think the best course of action is to protect the documents from the shredders which will likely be working overtime if this clown car adminstration loses in November.
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at June 11, 2012 05:48 AM (JxMoP)
Posted by: Ann NY at June 11, 2012 05:48 AM (S+Du9)
Posted by: Museisluse at June 11, 2012 09:46 AM (sjB5Y)
In this particular instance, time was of the essence, that's usually when I post off topic. Bristol Palin was being interviewed right then, I stumbled upon the interview and was very impressed by her poise and honesty.
Posted by: faith at June 11, 2012 05:48 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at June 11, 2012 09:46 AM (gPDxp)
As Ace now encourages: OMMMMMMMMMMMMMM...
Posted by: Enhancing my freaking calm at June 11, 2012 05:49 AM (Qxe/p)
Posted by: Max Power at June 11, 2012 05:49 AM (+wxCD)
Combination of dubious linking habits, questionable tone, and borderline concern troll commentary. Personally I don't have a huge problem, as I'm more than able to simply ignore it (as I'm certain many do with me).
Posted by: Brother Cavil, New Caprica City DA's Office at June 11, 2012 05:49 AM (GBXon)
Posted by: Bob Saget at June 11, 2012 05:49 AM (SDkq3)
"I hate dynasties. No more Bushes, no more Clintons, no more Kennedies."
No More Adams Family!
ok, that was a long time ago...
Posted by: HH at June 11, 2012 05:49 AM (v+ExF)
Posted by: DangerGirl at June 11, 2012 05:50 AM (A9hpr)
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and all that at June 11, 2012 09:43 AM (CP+yl)
It's insulted a number of regular posters and then lied about it. I agree that some of its posts are innocuous enough now but you can't undo what's done. ace won't ban it so we're stuck with it; but that doesn't mean we have to like it.
Posted by: Captain Hate at June 11, 2012 05:50 AM (D1HMA)
Posted by: phoenixgirl clinging to my bible, gun and coca cola at June 11, 2012 05:50 AM (Ho2rs)
No thanks, Jeb.
OT -- Breitbart has an article up describing the inaugural winners of the BB Awards. No mention of reading ace's letter:
http://preview.tinyurl.com/d6luu55
Posted by: GnuBreed at June 11, 2012 05:50 AM (ccXZP)
There's only one party telling me I shouldn't be allowed to eat them.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at June 11, 2012 05:51 AM (ZKzrr)
I guess some people learned nothing from what happened on this blog this weekend
Shut the **** up.
Posted by: The Mega Independent at June 11, 2012 05:51 AM (6oeYK)
OH. Gotcha.
The last two clinched it for me. Thanks for the recap.
The h8tr part was tongue in cheek. I assumed their was justification.
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and all that at June 11, 2012 05:51 AM (CP+yl)
Posted by: phoenixgirl clinging to my bible, gun and coca cola at June 11, 2012 05:51 AM (Ho2rs)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at June 11, 2012 05:52 AM (C8mVl)
"There's only one party telling me I shouldn't be allowed to eat them."
That's because their LGBT wing wants to see you eating tacos instead.
Posted by: Zombie Shane at June 11, 2012 05:52 AM (JW/aG)
Posted by: definitions & anger at June 11, 2012 05:52 AM (HOOye)
Posted by: CoolCzech at June 11, 2012 09:04 AM (Iaxlk)
Wait a minute ... you have seen Meg's nipples?
Posted by: Long Island at June 11, 2012 09:40 AM (kzp9t)
Damned near poked my eyes out.
Posted by: CoolCzech at June 11, 2012 05:53 AM (Iaxlk)
Hello, asswipes.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at June 11, 2012 05:54 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: phoenixgirl clinging to my bible, gun and coca cola at June 11, 2012 05:54 AM (Ho2rs)
Posted by: blindside at June 11, 2012 05:54 AM (x7g7t)
Posted by: The littl shyning man at June 11, 2012 05:55 AM (PH+2B)
h8? i don't h8 it...
let's begin...
it threatened myself and a number of morons with outing them
it claims to keep a dossier on a number of morons
it said that this blog should be reported to national security
it mocked jane d'oh.....said that jane rides on the coat tails of her son's service to our country
it told one moron that it was a shame his daughter was a slut and would need the gardisil shot
Posted by: phoenixgirl clinging to my bible, gun and coca cola at June 11, 2012 09:47 AM (Ho2rs)
Never threatened anyone in my life. You decided that I threatened someone.
You love to change word meanings and words around for your own purposes, you are a very manipulative poster. I've been looking at your comments, they usually mock someone else, you add little substantive discourse and behave like a 7th grade girl (apologies to 7th grade girls).
I did not mock jane d'oh, I simply said that jane boils herself down to "my son is in the military" and not much else (at the time, it was over a year ago)
The comment about guardisil was not directed at a specific moron at all. It was directed at the group who would receive the shot in general.
NOTHING I'VE EVER SAID ON THIS BLOG EVEN CAME CLOSE TO THIS, THIS IS AN OUT AN OUT LIE:
"it said that this blog should be reported to national security"
For whatever reason, you have created this attack against me. I'm sure, were you in my position, with some old lady stranger attacking you, you'd be uncomfortable too. I try to ignore you but you lie constantly about me and the lies get more and more. It will be very interesting when we have to rgister on this blog, you'll have to use your real identity and say these things to me.
Posted by: faith at June 11, 2012 05:55 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: Don't Drone Me, Bro! at June 11, 2012 05:56 AM (AzwZn)
Posted by: phoenixgirl clinging to my bible, gun and coca cola at June 11, 2012 05:56 AM (Ho2rs)
That's actually what I'm making for dinner tonight. Bring your own tequila.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at June 11, 2012 05:57 AM (ZKzrr)
This crap I expect from from Meggy McDouble-Mac. Jeb I do not.
Getting along is appropriate when the parties agree on the goals but differ on the path to get there.
The 21st Century progressives do not share my goals, my beliefs, or what I view as what my country should be. IMHO.... they are diametrically opposed and antithetical to what I believe.
Co-operation and accommodation are not appropriate in that situation. Undoing and beating back are called for.
Jeb should know better.
Meggy is incapable of knowing better.
Posted by: fixerupper at June 11, 2012 05:57 AM (C8hzL)
I would love for him to define "bi-partisan." I do believe that means compromise with the people in mind, not the politicians and their cronies.
"Bi-Partisan" is sort of like being "bi-sexual." It just ain't right.
The Left NEVER "compromises" on their goals... they just take the past of least resistance when necessary, and continue to press relentlessly onwards like ocean waves gradually wearing down a seaside cliff. That's how Reagan's legacy - seemingly a veritable mountain of success - was dispensed with in a mere 2 decades.
Posted by: CoolCzech at June 11, 2012 05:58 AM (Iaxlk)
Posted by: someguy at June 11, 2012 05:58 AM (sEXZ/)
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at June 11, 2012 05:58 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: phoenixgirl clinging to my bible, gun and coca cola at June 11, 2012 05:59 AM (Ho2rs)
Posted by: AoS Referee at June 11, 2012 05:59 AM (AzwZn)
it mocks people who work at walmart...it thinks i work there
it mocks blonds...it thinks i'm one
it's on the ace facebook page and admitted it was enjoying the fact that no one there knew who it was and it was enjoying looking at their personal information gathering info on them
Posted by: phoenixgirl clinging to my bible, gun and coca cola at June 11, 2012 09:54 AM (Ho2rs)
You know, I read all this stuff that you made up because you have no reading comprehension skills or possibly, because you are a vindictive mean person who deliberately wants to ruin the tone of the blog. You have no respect for ace whatsoever, you could have dropped this yet you picked it up right where you left off, cause, really it's all about you right? You can't sublimate your own desires for the benefit of someone else right? You can't just ignore me for ace's sake and the sake of the blog, that would be too difficult for you?
Posted by: faith at June 11, 2012 05:59 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at June 11, 2012 05:59 AM (JxMoP)
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at June 11, 2012 05:59 AM (gPDxp)
Posted by: NULL SET at June 11, 2012 05:59 AM (E5L/H)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 11, 2012 05:59 AM (MCDCp)
"it told one moron that it was a shame his daughter was a slut and would need the gardisil shot"
Anyone got pics of the daughter?
Thx.
Posted by: Zombie Shane at June 11, 2012 05:59 AM (JW/aG)
Posted by: Scobface at June 11, 2012 05:59 AM (IoNBC)
They're not welcome in the Republican Party because they frame everything as "we need to comprise with the Democrats to get things done" and not "the Democrats need to compromise with us to get things done."
-----
Thats true. Not one single molecule of shit is good on a sandwich.
Posted by: WTF at June 11, 2012 06:00 AM (Bm8H4)
Posted by: My umbrella has holes.... at June 11, 2012 06:00 AM (HOOye)
Someone did not get the memo on the new civility,
Morning, asswipe..........
Posted by: Mallamutt, RINO President for Life at June 11, 2012 09:55 AM (OWjjx)
Must be a lot of asswipes on here. This makes me angry.
Posted by: Ammo Dump at June 11, 2012 06:00 AM (YYyqq)
Posted by: phoenixgirl clinging to my bible, gun and coca cola at June 11, 2012 06:00 AM (Ho2rs)
And, for evidence of how great compromising with Dems is, Clueless Jeb cites his Dad's violation of "Read My Lips," which was a GRAND COMPROMISE! with Democrats... with which they promptly bludgeoned GHWBush out of office. Gosh, that was a GREAT idea, Jeb!
Someone keep that idiot away from the mics for a few months. Someone tell him he'll never be President.
Posted by: Bang Out Of Order at June 11, 2012 06:01 AM (1H47k)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 11, 2012 06:01 AM (MCDCp)
anyway i would love some clarity on his idea of partisanship.
if he wants to reach across the aisle becuase it's easier and he doesn't want to upset the applecart, (or to have any standards at all) why have two parties at all?
Jeb, exactly what is a republican platform to you?
what is a Dem platform to you?
Posted by: willow at June 11, 2012 06:01 AM (TomZ9)
Can someone answer this? I never understood the whole "compassionate conservative" line.... it makes it seem like conservatism is not compassionate. But from everthing I've read and now understand conservatism is implicitly compassionate, it allows people the freedom to pursue their ideas, etc.
I've been to several tea party events, most people I met there understood, there is a safety net needed, but not a welfare state, in fact from everthing I've read, its the fiscal conservatives of the tea party who seem to understand that social programs like SS, etc need to be reformed to preserve it; we don't need more govt programs, many need to be gotten rid of off, and the ones that remain, make them work better with the understanding that they depend on other people's money, so there is a balance required.
Did GWB and Rove realise that because they framed "compassionate conservatism" the way they did, they played into the liberal/progressive's framing of what conservatism is? Its not like just throwing the needy to the wolves, which is how liberals/progs tend to frame it. I never understand why Rove framed it that way. I liked Palin's phrasing much better "common sense conservatism".
Posted by: johnc_ex-democrat at June 11, 2012 06:01 AM (ACkhT)
Sorry to have stirred the pot that apparently struck a chord with you.
Now. Take deep breaths and count to 50 between each one.
You'll either pass out or feel calmer. Either way odds are the last few minutes will recede in importance.
Remember DEEP breaths.
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and all that at June 11, 2012 06:01 AM (CP+yl)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 11, 2012 06:02 AM (MCDCp)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at June 11, 2012 06:02 AM (C8mVl)
Posted by: faith at June 11, 2012 09:55 AM (oZfic)
We respect your opinion. Thank you for sharing it with us.
Posted by: HH at June 11, 2012 06:02 AM (v+ExF)
Posted by: take 'im down at June 11, 2012 06:02 AM (HOOye)
Yeah... in 9 days. How many "last chances" is he going to get? (I'll believe they'll actually vote only after the results of said voting become public).
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at June 11, 2012 06:02 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: NULL SET at June 11, 2012 06:03 AM (E5L/H)
Posted by: Andy at June 11, 2012 06:03 AM (hrAg/)
Jeb's interview was at a Bloomberg View breakfast, and Bloomberg had a few more quotes:
Bush, whose wife was born in Mexico and who made his business career in a multicultural South Florida before election as governor in 1998, said: “I do feel a little out of step with my party on this. That doesn’t mean I don’t believe what I believe.. so what, It’s OK, isn’t it?
“I hope we don’t all have this march… if someone is a conservative or a liberal, we’re sent this little book that says, ‘you must not veer.”’
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at June 11, 2012 06:03 AM (kdS6q)
but then it told us that it couldn't get admitted into the college of it's choice...because...it refused to get vaccinated.....
and all of it's friends that got the gardisil shot....had horrible side effects .........
and it never listens to beck but it constantly tells us what beck said, what was on his show....
Posted by: phoenixgirl clinging to my bible, gun and coca cola at June 11, 2012 09:59 AM (Ho2rs)
I know you try to assert that things are true becasue they are your interpretation of words but that doesn't make them true. Manipulation is your stock and trade. At times I've wondered if you are a lib cause you often say things which do not sound conservative in the least bit, but, that's rare for you, to offer something of substance, with actual information. Generally, you enjoy attacking others on the blog, not just myself. I often think your trying to discourage people from posting or being involved here. They see the attacks on me and think "I'll just lurk". That is wholly unfair to ace.
Posted by: faith at June 11, 2012 06:03 AM (oZfic)
My guess is that Boehner won't set a date. He's gutless and scared of what Holder and Obama will do.
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and all that at June 11, 2012 06:03 AM (CP+yl)
Posted by: phoenixgirl clinging to my bible, gun and coca cola at June 11, 2012 06:03 AM (Ho2rs)
"My biggest beef with zofic is the thread hijacking. Never stays on the subject of the post."
I will admit to doing the same thing but only because I am very distractable and generally enthusiastic about whatever has caught my attention at the moment. SQUIRREL!
Posted by: Ohio Dan at June 11, 2012 06:04 AM (JKNDp)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 11, 2012 06:04 AM (MCDCp)
Take that Bushie.
Posted by: Vic at June 11, 2012 06:04 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 11, 2012 06:05 AM (MCDCp)
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and all that at June 11, 2012 10:03 AM (CP+yl)
---------------------
The article says next week.
Posted by: Vic at June 11, 2012 06:05 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: phoenixgirl clinging to my bible, gun and coca cola at June 11, 2012 06:05 AM (Ho2rs)
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and all that at June 11, 2012 06:06 AM (CP+yl)
"Today's GOP", aside from the vanishing few with conservative cred, is a go-along to get-along crew looking for their piece of the pie in districts where Democrats can't get elected, so they flag themselves as "different" (but not too different, mind you).
Oh, and "bi-partisan" implies collaboration. IYKWIMAITYD.
Posted by: Brother Cavil, New Caprica City DA's Office at June 11, 2012 06:06 AM (GBXon)
His son will excite the youth and Hispanics the way Rubio excites the ewok.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_P._Bush
Posted by: Choom Choom Choom at June 11, 2012 06:07 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at June 11, 2012 09:59 AM (JxMoP)
One of the most under-reported outcomes of Scott Walker's victory (and of the California local initiatives cutting back public employee pensions and benefits) is that a conservative message well presented isn't the losing strategy that the squishes promulgate.
Posted by: Captain Hate at June 11, 2012 06:07 AM (D1HMA)
"the Establishment GOP has no intention of taking needed stances on needed issues if they are going to *fundamentally* threaten the Progressives."
Needed issues which fundamentally threaten Progressives?
How about "needed issues" which fundamentally threaten the very existence of the nation?
Like 100+ Trillion Dollars in social spending promises which there is no way/no how can ever possibly be honored?
Like 60+ Million Illegal Infiltrator Mexican Injun Peasants who speak languages like Nahuatl, Mixtec, and Zapotec, and who plop out anchor babies as though they were rabbits?
Like a runaway Federal Reserve which has made trillions upon trillions of dollars in deals which the Congress has never approved?
How about a simmering problem with Dar Al Islam in Dearbornistan and Detroitistan which is about to boil over into overt violence?
How about a Naval Bureaucracy which thinks its gonna contain the Chinese Tiger with Littoral Ships and the F-35?!?
Sheesh.
Screw the progressives.
The whole country is about to collapse.
Posted by: Zombie Shane at June 11, 2012 06:07 AM (JW/aG)
Posted by: The Robot Devil at June 11, 2012 06:07 AM (136wp)
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at June 11, 2012 06:07 AM (gPDxp)
The lefties will have to pick a side, though. Was Reagan a far-rightwing hyper-Con military-industrial-goon, or was he a moderate compromiser, so much more civil and reasonable than the present-day GOP? I wouldn't mind seeing a few lefty heads explode, trying to re-write their programming of the last 30 years!
Posted by: Bang Out Of Order at June 11, 2012 06:07 AM (1H47k)
Posted by: Vic at June 11, 2012 06:08 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: willow at June 11, 2012 06:08 AM (TomZ9)
we don't need more govt programs, many need to be gotten rid of off, and the ones that remain, make them work better with the understanding that they depend on other people's money, so there is a balance required.
I think one of the most astute comments I've read over here in a while was the person who made the point that the federal government tells visitors to national parks not to feed the wild animals because they stop looking for food and become dependent on human, but the same federal government creates massive welfare programs for human beings under the proposition that they need help because they can't take care of themselves.
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at June 11, 2012 06:08 AM (JxMoP)
Posted by: rockmom at June 11, 2012 06:08 AM (aBlZ1)
Posted by: phoenixgirl clinging to my bible, gun and coca cola at June 11, 2012 10:05 AM (Ho2rs)
When you take what I've written, out of context and decide I said something that I didn't then I have to call you out, you are the one creating trouble. You are the one disrespecting ace.
Posted by: faith at June 11, 2012 06:09 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: Michael Babbitt at June 11, 2012 06:09 AM (p/jtE)
Posted by: phoenixgirl clinging to my bible, gun and coca cola at June 11, 2012 06:09 AM (Ho2rs)
Posted by: Rick Husband at June 11, 2012 06:10 AM (SCzqL)
Posted by: take 'im down at June 11, 2012 06:10 AM (HOOye)
Thereafter, every comment by the muted ones were displayed to you as **************.
The peace and quiet of asterisks. No temptation to respond to drivel. I mentally asterisk everything she posts, thereby enhancing my f*cking calm. YMMV
Posted by: GnuBreed at June 11, 2012 06:10 AM (ccXZP)
Posted by: Bang Out Of Order at June 11, 2012 06:10 AM (1H47k)
Posted by: phoenixgirl clinging to my bible, gun and coca cola at June 11, 2012 06:10 AM (Ho2rs)
I thinkone of the most astute comments I've read over here in a while wasthe person whomade the point that the federal government tells visitors to national parks not to feed the wild animals because theystop looking for food and become dependent on human, but the same federal government creates massive welfare programs for human beings under the proposition that theyneed helpbecause they can't take care of themselves.
----
I remember pasting that. Oops. Outed myself.
Posted by: WTF at June 11, 2012 06:11 AM (Bm8H4)
Posted by: willow at June 11, 2012 10:08 AM (TomZ9)
Look at the comments, over and over, it's always phoenix who attacks me, I ignore her until you decides to reinterpret something I've said, for her own purposes, which I'm beginning to think is to create tension on this blog.
Posted by: faith at June 11, 2012 06:11 AM (oZfic)
Issa can cancel that vote right up until it's actually been taken. I don't believe that even the committee will vote, but maybe I'll be pleasantly surprised.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at June 11, 2012 06:11 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Museisluse at June 11, 2012 06:12 AM (sjB5Y)
Just read on Michelle Malkin's tweet, the DeathCare ruling by the Supreme Ct will be today.
Can anyone confirm this? I'm looking over the internets for confirmation.
Posted by: johnc_ex-democrat at June 11, 2012 06:12 AM (ACkhT)
Posted by: faith at June 11, 2012 10:09 AM (oZfic)
We respect your opinion. Thank you for sharing it with us
Posted by: HH at June 11, 2012 06:12 AM (v+ExF)
"Jeb Bush is the GOP's Ted Kennedy without the murder, betrayal of country and general ass-hattery"
In re: Jeb Bush and the question of murder, I got only two words for ya...
TERRY. SCHIAVO.
'nuff said.
Posted by: Zombie Shane at June 11, 2012 06:13 AM (JW/aG)
Posted by: Bang Out Of Order at June 11, 2012 10:10 AM (1H47k)
-----------
That and Nancy Pelosi and Hary Reid aint exactly Tip O'Neil.....
Posted by: fixerupper at June 11, 2012 06:13 AM (C8hzL)
What happens next should be interesting.
Posted by: take 'im down at June 11, 2012 10:10 AM (HOOye)
If by "interesting" you mean "on behalf of Republicans, we apologize", I'll have to agree with that.
Posted by: Citizen jwb7605 enhancing his calm at June 11, 2012 06:13 AM (Qxe/p)
phoenix. i agree I don't know that there has been any across the aisle from Dems , the last i remember was going to war back in 2001, which they than did a 100 degree turn around and accuse Bush of all manner of 'doing it wrong' and those poooor terrorist are being hurt!
i will never trust them again.
even at the cost of lives they used ANYTHING to try to win the next election.
Posted by: willow at June 11, 2012 06:13 AM (TomZ9)
Posted by: Average Joe at June 11, 2012 06:13 AM (bN5ZU)
Posted by: Michael Babbitt at June 11, 2012 10:09 AM (p/jtE)
I like bush. Also, I like turtles.
Posted by: Ammo Dump at June 11, 2012 06:13 AM (YYyqq)
Posted by: oZfic at June 11, 2012 06:13 AM (6oeYK)
http://fxn.ws/LAtqhl
Stagflation is here. (not that it's news to us, really, but it's nice that other people are catching on)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at June 11, 2012 06:13 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: packsoldier at June 11, 2012 06:14 AM (7lI2N)
Posted by: phoenixgirl clinging to my bible, gun and coca cola at June 11, 2012 10:10 AM (Ho2rs)
See, you misinterpret and take out of context...you manipulate. You manipulate constantly. That's not a person who wants to contribute to the tone of a blog, to make it a nice experience, that's a person who wants to ruin something. If you are a lurker/reader and you might want to say something, you think in the back of your mind, will phoenix attack me like she attacks that other commenter? And then you decide not to post. That is wholly unfair to ace, wholly unfair.
You have not learned a thing from this past weekend and you think, with the blog hierarchy, that you are somehow better than everyone else and enjoy a status that allows you to abuse others and get away with that verbal abuse. That's not a team player, phoenix, that's someone who wants to hurt the blog.
Posted by: faith at June 11, 2012 06:15 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: someguy at June 11, 2012 06:15 AM (sEXZ/)
phoenixgirl - not many thnings get my blood boiling more than a Bush saying anything about Reagan. I worked in the Reagan administration and briefly in the Bush Administration before they finished the purge of all the Reagan people. And I mean all, there was nobody left. They couldn't wait to show everyone how much smarter and better they were than those yahoos who worked for the stupid movie actor. It was revolting. They got rid of a lot of mid-level appointees who could have helped them, but they were determined to have all Bush people in every agency. And we all saw how well that worked!
They are a vindictive bunch of assholes.
Posted by: rockmom at June 11, 2012 06:15 AM (aBlZ1)
How the hell did "Massachusetts Moderate" Mitt win the nomination then?
----
Exactly. ONLY rhinos get nominated, but the rhinos complain they are underrepresented.
Posted by: WTF at June 11, 2012 06:15 AM (Bm8H4)
"Fishy wording. The seizure was "in connection" with the accidents. Did he have the seizure AFTER the hit and runs as a result of the impacts, or did the seizure cause them? When was he given the medication? "
I thought the same thing, was the seizure as a result of the accidents or was it a cause of the accidents? I find it strange, that if he had a seizsure, hit a car, kept driving then hit the same car again, kept driving, and then hit another car and then passed out.
Posted by: johnc_ex-democrat at June 11, 2012 06:15 AM (ACkhT)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at June 11, 2012 06:15 AM (C8mVl)
Just read on Michelle Malkin's tweet, the DeathCare ruling by the Supreme Ct will be today.
Would be surprising to me. I assumed they'd hold off one this one until the very last day because it's going to overshadow every other ruling they issue.
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at June 11, 2012 06:16 AM (JxMoP)
Posted by: Captain Hate at June 11, 2012 06:16 AM (D1HMA)
Seizure or mini-stroke was the first thing I thought of when I heard the reports, actually. He got out and talked to the people in the car he initially hit, and they obviously didn't think there was anything wrong enough with him to call 911 until after he'd hit their car a second time.
I suspect his brain was firing on enough cylinders to have a conversation, but not enough that he should have been driving. The problem with driving impaired being, of course, that you're often too impaired to realize you shouldn't be driving.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at June 11, 2012 06:16 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: faith! at June 11, 2012 06:17 AM (ggRof)
Posted by: Andy at June 11, 2012 06:17 AM (u5ozF)
Posted by: someguy at June 11, 2012 06:17 AM (sEXZ/)
Hmmm.... Jeb, a Bush, does not realize that his brother helped create a much larger, more powerful Government? through 'cooperation'?
You CANNOT compromise with Progresives. They ALWAYS move the bar their direction, and the only compromise Republicans have done in the last 100 years, is how much to move that bar in the Dem direction... not which DIRECTION to move it.
Many of us out here recognize that we've 'progressed' too far...
Posted by: Romeo13 at June 11, 2012 06:17 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: The Robot Devil at June 11, 2012 06:18 AM (136wp)
Posted by: Infidelswine at June 11, 2012 06:18 AM (Xe/ar)
Posted by: General Zod at June 11, 2012 06:18 AM (y2eEc)
Posted by: take 'im down at June 11, 2012 06:18 AM (HOOye)
----------------------------------
"It is expressly not a forum for rage or running other commenters down (except for trolls)"
----------------------------------
Now sit back and pour yourself a nice cool refreshing glass of shut the **** up.
Posted by: The Mega Independent at June 11, 2012 06:19 AM (6oeYK)
Posted by: Andy at June 11, 2012 10:17 AM (u5ozF)
I've been multitasking
Posted by: Captain Hate at June 11, 2012 06:19 AM (D1HMA)
Posted by: joncelli, heartless Con and all around unpleasant guy at June 11, 2012 06:19 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Vic at June 11, 2012 06:20 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Scobface at June 11, 2012 06:20 AM (IoNBC)
Posted by: DangerGirl at June 11, 2012 06:21 AM (L2I78)
Posted by: Ohio Dan at June 11, 2012 06:21 AM (JKNDp)
O/T
Here's today's Supreme Court decision:
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court is declining to take a new look at the rights of foreign prisoners held for the past decade at the Guantanamo Bay naval base in Cuba.
Four years after pronouncing that detainees who face no charges have a right to challenge their ongoing confinement, the justices on Monday rejected appeals arguing that the federal appeals court in Washington has largely ignored the high courtÂ’s command.
Posted by: Ed Anger at June 11, 2012 06:21 AM (7+pP9)
Posted by: faith at June 11, 2012 06:22 AM (oZfic)
So Romney is an extremist now?
BTW if Mitt chooses Jeb for VP, I don't think I could bring myself to vote. It would be difficult, but I'm sorry, you have to draw the line somewhere.
Posted by: indigo child at June 11, 2012 06:22 AM (xXhWA)
Posted by: The Robot Devil at June 11, 2012 06:22 AM (136wp)
172 Can someone answer this? I never understood the whole "compassionate conservative" line.... it makes it seem like conservatism is not compassionate. But from everthing I've read and now understand conservatism is implicitly compassionate, it allows people the freedom to pursue their ideas, etc.
Policy shouldn't be a matter of compassion. It should be a matter of what WORKS. The truly compassionate state of affairs is a healthy economy and a level of societal freedom that allows everyone a realistic chance to pursue happiness. Gobbly-gook about "The Children" and "Grandma" is just cover for the same old statism that has plagued Mankind since the days of Nimrod of Babylon to today - the age of the Dimrod from Chicago.
Posted by: CoolCzech at June 11, 2012 06:22 AM (Iaxlk)
Posted by: Average Joe at June 11, 2012 06:22 AM (bN5ZU)
Posted by: Andy at June 11, 2012 06:22 AM (u5ozF)
Posted by: Schwalbe: The Me-262© at June 11, 2012 06:22 AM (UU0OF)
Posted by: Ohio Dan at June 11, 2012 10:21 AM (JKNDp)
Where, in everything that I said, did you get that?
Posted by: faith at June 11, 2012 06:23 AM (oZfic)
One is that the Mexican Presidential Candidates (all of them) are signalling surrender in the war with the Drug Cartels. I maintain that the Nation of Mexico didn't have much choice once Obama and Holder came in on the side of the Drug Cartels (Watergate did not have a body count).
The other is the link I posted earlier about stagflation.
What do y'all think?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at June 11, 2012 06:23 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: faith at June 11, 2012 10:15 AM (oZfic)
We respect your opinion. Thank you for sharing it with us
Posted by: HH at June 11, 2012 06:23 AM (v+ExF)
I look forward to reading your opinion when you get your GED.
You are truly part of the 1 percent of this blog!
That means you don't fit in, and you displease us.
Have a good day, or whatever kind of day you want.
Posted by: Citizen jwb7605 enhancing his calm at June 11, 2012 06:23 AM (Qxe/p)
********** ******** ********** ****** **************
********* ********* *********** ******* ************
***** at June 11, 2012 10:15 AM (oZfic)
Per Gnubreed's excellent advice.
Just use this as a template for any posts by ***** oZfic and your day will be calmer
and much more pleasant. (phoenixgirl I'm talking to you.)
DEEP BREATHS. pics would be nice. closeups. can haz nekkid?
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and all that at June 11, 2012 06:24 AM (CP+yl)
Posted by: thunderb at June 11, 2012 06:24 AM (Dnbau)
Posted by: phoenixgirl clinging to my bible, gun and coca cola at June 11, 2012 06:24 AM (Ho2rs)
They did this on the bull shit diseparate impact construct that has never been written into any law passed by congress.
Posted by: Vic at June 11, 2012 06:24 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: willow at June 11, 2012 06:24 AM (TomZ9)
"Reagan could not win the nomination in today's GOP..." A tired mantra.
Reagan would be a different Republican. HE would be more conservative than he was. Because the ills he identified relating to government growth and runaway spending would be THIRTY YEARS WORSE. He wouldn't be running as the first modern conservative with a chance of being president - that ground would be broken. He wouldn't be resigned to dealing with a Congress that had been Democrat for as long as anyone could remember.
"Reagan today" would not be a guy transported 30 years into the future, but a product of his times.
Posted by: CJ at June 11, 2012 06:24 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at June 11, 2012 06:25 AM (C8mVl)
What do y'all think?
------------------------
LOL, I posted that and a link on the news thread.
Posted by: Vic at June 11, 2012 06:25 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Waterhouse at June 11, 2012 06:25 AM (+EoBq)
No mention of ObamaCare.
No mention of the Obama Administration's flagrant attack on religious freedom
No mention of skyrocketing federal deficits.
Just more Ruling Class chit-chat.
Posted by: mrp at June 11, 2012 06:25 AM (HjPtV)
Posted by: Schwalbe: The Me-262© at June 11, 2012 06:25 AM (UU0OF)
269 So Romney is an extremist now?
It's deeply disturbing that Jeb should apparently feel that way about Romney. If there was ever a died-in-the-wool Right of Center Moderate Conservative... it's Romney. That begs the questions why Jeb should feel that way.
I don't think he reasonably can. So maybe Jeb is hoping to torpedo Mitt's chances this year, to give Jeb a shot at 2016?
Posted by: CoolCzech at June 11, 2012 06:25 AM (Iaxlk)
Posted by: The Robot Devil at June 11, 2012 06:26 AM (136wp)
"The Florida Supreme Court then overturned the law as unconstitutional."
At which point a real man would have said, "Screw the 'legal' system, I choose life, and Terry Schiavo is going to live. Period. Now all you calling for her murder can just f*ck off or else you better be prepared to face me and the Florida Highway Patrol and the Florida National Guard at the OK Corral."
PS: How did your 'legal' system do in serving that warrant for Terry Schiavo to appear as a witness before the federal congress, huh?
F*ck. The. 'Legal'. System.
Posted by: Zombie Shane at June 11, 2012 06:26 AM (JW/aG)
Posted by: Vic at June 11, 2012 06:26 AM (YdQQY)
"No announcement on AZ or Obamacare today, per SCOTUSblog."
Thanks. I guess Malkin shouldn't have relied on an idiot like Toobin for any "tips". Does anyone know if it will even be in June or will it be in July?
Posted by: johnc_ex-democrat at June 11, 2012 06:26 AM (ACkhT)
When a RINO laments that even Big Tent Reagan wouldn't survive today's Tea Party Climate, I take it as a sign we are making excellent progress.
People like Jeb see themselves as left-of-Reagan. This tells me they are starting to decipher the writing on the wall.
Posted by: reason at June 11, 2012 06:26 AM (F26eZ)
Posted by: willow at June 11, 2012 06:27 AM (TomZ9)
Posted by: phoenixgirl clinging to my bible, gun and coca cola at June 11, 2012 06:28 AM (Ho2rs)
Posted by: The Robot Devil at June 11, 2012 06:28 AM (136wp)
Posted by: Darth Chipmunk at June 11, 2012 06:28 AM (pVvkk)
He's got a good working relationship with XXXtreeeeem! Scott Hitler-Walker, Tyrant of Cheeseland, so there's some hope there.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at June 11, 2012 06:29 AM (ZKzrr)
Your call is important to us. Please stay on the line and one of our customer associates will be with you as soon as possible.
Have a great day!
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and all that at June 11, 2012 06:29 AM (CP+yl)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 11, 2012 06:29 AM (MCDCp)
"so hundreds of dead citizens of a neighboring country isn't in the interest of our leaders?"
...what were their names?
Posted by: Former ACORN employee with access to IL voter registration records at June 11, 2012 06:30 AM (F26eZ)
Posted by: CoolCzech at June 11, 2012 10:22 AM (Iaxlk)
Compasionate Conservatism was a term coined for Big Government Nanny State Social Conservatism. It created no child left behind... increased the size of the EPA... and created the DHS.
Its right up there with Neo Conservatism for foreign Policy, where we interneve everywhere and be World Police, instead of using the Armed Forces to defend the US...
Posted by: Romeo13 at June 11, 2012 06:30 AM (lZBBB)
I'm beginning to think that someone who spends as much time here as she does is paid.
Posted by: faith at June 11, 2012 06:30 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at June 11, 2012 06:30 AM (C8mVl)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 11, 2012 06:30 AM (MCDCp)
Posted by: Average Joe at June 11, 2012 06:31 AM (bN5ZU)
Posted by: phoenixgirl clinging to my bible, gun and coca cola at June 11, 2012 06:31 AM (Ho2rs)
I wonder what he thinks of the present partisan MFM as he delivers their compromise with commies mantra.
This is how we got into this mess you idjit.
Posted by: ontherocks at June 11, 2012 06:31 AM (aZ6ew)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 11, 2012 06:31 AM (MCDCp)
"I hope Captain Hate still gets a position in the KinderGentlerAoSHQ™."
He will have to change his name to "Cap'n Dislike."
Posted by: Former ACORN employee with access to IL voter registration records at June 11, 2012 06:31 AM (F26eZ)
"Over the years have had plenty of schools and doctors try to force me into taking various vaccines. Each time it was a mean and nasty arguement right up to and including me not going to a particular university and getting my degree at another institution."
I'm inching towards that fight, with a pediatrician, over MMR.
Posted by: Zombie Shane at June 11, 2012 06:32 AM (JW/aG)
Posted by: Average Joe at June 11, 2012 10:31 AM (bN5ZU)
Sarah and Todd, last time I looked are her parents. She was talking about her grandparents, Todd's parents and Sarah's parents.
Posted by: faith at June 11, 2012 06:32 AM (oZfic)
We don't need the actual quote, he has said so many things to infuriate conservatives in the past that 'Jeb' is all it takes to trigger a berserker rage.
Posted by: Bob Saget at June 11, 2012 06:32 AM (SDkq3)
Is his own brother "too partisan and extreme"?
Jeb is finished, and so is his consigliere Rove no matter how much Hannity drools over him
Posted by: kbdabear at June 11, 2012 06:33 AM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: faith at June 11, 2012 06:34 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: joncelli, heartless Con and all around unpleasant guy at June 11, 2012 06:34 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Troll Police at June 11, 2012 06:34 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: indigo child at June 11, 2012 10:22 AM (xXhWA) 3
**
***
TRIANGULATION!!!!! its how we beat the Republicans in 96.'
***
And don't forget to buy my new book!!
**
Again.
Posted by: Dick rubber check Morris at June 11, 2012 06:34 AM (eavT+)
This is one of those times.
THIS! +1,234,564 style points.
Posted by: Jay in Ames at June 11, 2012 06:35 AM (UEEex)
Just sayin'
Posted by: laceyunderalls sayin' really obvious shit at June 11, 2012 06:35 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: phoenixgirl clinging to my bible, gun and coca cola at June 11, 2012 06:35 AM (Ho2rs)
Posted by: Average Joe at June 11, 2012 06:35 AM (bN5ZU)
Posted by: faith at June 11, 2012 10:30 AM (oZfic)
I'M beginning to think that someone who keeps spending time here when it is intuitively obvious to the most casual observer that their opinion and/or comments are unwelcome, must be getting paid to do it.
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and all that at June 11, 2012 06:36 AM (CP+yl)
"Jeez, maybe he should rename it Ace of Clubs HQ?"
Spades and Clubs are implements of violence.
The only path forward is the Ace of Hearts HQ.
Posted by: reason at June 11, 2012 06:36 AM (F26eZ)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at June 11, 2012 06:37 AM (C8mVl)
"Jeb is finished, and so is his consigliere Rove no matter how much Hannity drools over him"
Okay, some serious speculation here.
It's been pretty firmly established that Rove is, ah, more than a little light in the loafers.
And Hannity has frequently hinted [on his radio show] that he has some fairly serious ongoing problems in his marriage.
Now the serious speculation: You don't suppose that Hannity is part of the, ah, "Dare Not Speak Its Name" Mafia, do you?
It would certainly explain a lot if he were...
Posted by: Zombie Shane at June 11, 2012 06:37 AM (JW/aG)
Posted by: Scobface at June 11, 2012 06:37 AM (IoNBC)
There's also Ace of Base HQ, to appease the foul Scandis.
Posted by: Waterhouse at June 11, 2012 06:38 AM (+EoBq)
IÂ’ve been gone for a few days, so I have no idea of what happened here. I gather someone was angry, comments were suspended and Ace wants people to be happy.
OK. IÂ’ll go along with that.
If there is a short summary of what led to this, point it out. IÂ’m curious, but I donÂ’t have time to 10,000 word posts and thousands of comments.
Posted by: jwest at June 11, 2012 06:38 AM (ZDsRL)
Posted by: faith at June 11, 2012 10:30 AM (oZfic)
The joy you create here at the kinder, gentler AoSHQ is unbelievable. Please stay and grace us with every stream of consciousness thought so that we all may be enlightened.
Posted by: Count de Monet at June 11, 2012 06:38 AM (4q5tP)
Posted by: Waterhouse at June 11, 2012 10:25 AM (+EoBq)
To accommodate the new spirit of civility, I wish to point out that I haven't used the term "fuckhead" once today and am moderating the frequency of employing the word "cocksucker". I hope that counts for something.
Posted by: Captain Hate at June 11, 2012 06:39 AM (D1HMA)
Posted by: Not this crap again at June 11, 2012 06:39 AM (NVGXF)
"That's actually what I'm making for dinner tonight. Bring your own tequila."
Wow.
Okay, hold that thought while I go get some kleenex...
Posted by: Zombie Shane at June 11, 2012 06:40 AM (JW/aG)
Posted by: Count de Monet at June 11, 2012 10:38 AM (4q5tP)
I need civility lessons from you.
But first, I need a new keyboard.
Thank you for that, citizen.
Posted by: Citizen jwb7605 enhancing his calm at June 11, 2012 06:40 AM (Qxe/p)
Posted by: General Zod at June 11, 2012 06:41 AM (y2eEc)
Posted by: joncelli, heartless Con and all around unpleasant guy at June 11, 2012 06:41 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: The Robot Devil at June 11, 2012 06:41 AM (136wp)
Posted by: jwest at June 11, 2012 10:38 AM (ZDsRL)
-----
Someone called Ace a pussy. Ace banned them. They came back like a smart ass. Chairs commenced to flying.
Posted by: Up with people! at June 11, 2012 06:41 AM (iYvMQ)
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and all that at June 11, 2012 06:41 AM (CP+yl)
Posted by: phoenixgirl clinging to my bible, gun and coca cola at June 11, 2012 06:41 AM (Ho2rs)
Posted by: joncelli, heartless Con and all around unpleasant guy at June 11, 2012 06:42 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: lowfibass at June 11, 2012 06:42 AM (BrqlK)
Posted by: MACHINESFORSALE at June 11, 2012 06:43 AM (B6My4)
Posted by: sTevo at June 11, 2012 06:44 AM (3CdaP)
Don't diss Ace (arguing impolitely is a nono.)
Don't diss Ace's blog (this includes Pixy)
Pay attention when Ace makes a BLOG POLICY statement (that's the one I'm guilty of as it's not obvious what it's about so I just skim)
Be kind to one another. (no wait that's Jerry Springer)
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and all that at June 11, 2012 06:44 AM (CP+yl)
Posted by: The Robot Devil at June 11, 2012 06:45 AM (136wp)
Posted by: phoenixgirl clinging to my bible, gun and coca cola at June 11, 2012 06:45 AM (Ho2rs)
Think the Dems would nominate him today?
Posted by: kbdabear at June 11, 2012 06:46 AM (Y+DPZ)
Jeb, Meggy, Karl...
**
The doughy, pasty-faced triumverate of evil, Rino buffet raiders.
**
Golden Corral's hardest hit.
Posted by: dananjcon at June 11, 2012 06:46 AM (eavT+)
Be kind to one another. (no wait that's Jerry Springer)
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and all that at June 11, 2012 10:44 AM (CP+yl)
Yes. Save the bile for the trolls, not one another.
Posted by: joncelli, heartless Con and all around unpleasant guy at June 11, 2012 06:46 AM (RD7QR)
Please elevate yourself to a higher level of consciousness through the
application of increased temperature
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and all that at June 11, 2012 06:47 AM (CP+yl)
Authorities are investigating a series of traffic collisions in the San Gabriel Valley involving U.S. Secretary of Commerce John Bryson, authorities said Saturday.
Bryson was found unconscious in his vehicle and has been hospitalized, officials said.
Bryson was driving a Lexus in the 400 block of South San Gabriel Boulevard shortly after 5 p.m. Saturday, when he allegedly rear-ended a Buick as it was waiting for a train to pass, according to a statement released by the L.A. County Sheriff's Department and the San Gabriel Police Department.
After briefly stopping to talk to the three men inside the Buick, Bryson left the location in the Lexus and then struck the Buick a second time, authorities said. The men followed Bryson's car and called 911 to ask for police assistance.
Bryson continued to drive his Lexus into Rosemead, which is patrolled by the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department. There, he allegedly crashed into a second vehicle near the intersection of San Gabriel Boulevard and Hellman Avenue.
There authorities found him alone and unconscious behind the wheel of his car.
Posted by: Islamic Rage Boy at June 11, 2012 06:47 AM (e8kgV)
Posted by: polynikes at June 11, 2012 06:48 AM (85x54)
Posted by: maddogg at June 11, 2012 06:49 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at June 11, 2012 06:49 AM (C8mVl)
Posted by: Sean Hannity at June 11, 2012 06:49 AM (jucos)
Funny thing. You actually make Jeb's point for him. And I don't want to see his point.
Seriously, Hannity is nominally on our side. He has on someone who is a weak sister and now he's gay? Nice. Way to join the lefty smear merchants.
Posted by: Typo Dynamo at June 11, 2012 06:49 AM (MJ76f)
Jeb, here's a suggestion for you. Become a Democrat. You'll do more service to the country trying to bring them back from the cliff than you will sticking around taking potshots at the GOP.
Karl, and Meghan, whoever elected you....don't let the screen door hit you on the way out either.
Posted by: jinxthecat at June 11, 2012 06:50 AM (l3vZN)
More to it than that. Ace told someone not to toss gasoline onto the barbeque pit. Someone called Ace a pussy and he could do what he wanted. Ace threatened to throw him out. Someone proceeded to say "nyah, nyah, I'm fireproof and invincible", proceeded to throw gas on bbq pit which damn near burned the whole neighborhood down
Posted by: kbdabear at June 11, 2012 06:50 AM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: Former ACORN employee with access to IL voter registration records at June 11, 2012 10:31 AM (F26eZ)
He's obviously in like Flynn, but future promotions will have to be handled in a delicate manner, which is hardly his strong suit.
He may just have to be satisfied with the rank of Captain.
Posted by: ontherocks at June 11, 2012 06:51 AM (aZ6ew)
Posted by: Midwest Harry at June 11, 2012 06:51 AM (p/Sn/)
Posted by: polynikes at June 11, 2012 06:52 AM (WY3bD)
Posted by: The People of Brattleboro, Vermont at June 11, 2012 06:52 AM (48wze)
Posted by: PATCO at June 11, 2012 06:52 AM (IoNBC)
Posted by: Up with people! at June 11, 2012 06:53 AM (iYvMQ)
How do you think that of the guy who broke the Flight Controller's Union?
Reagan became the Union pres while a Democrat. I think then is when he found out how many problems were caused and continued by Unions. It probably made a bigger impression when he became Governor of Cali and found out how the unions were screwing everyone else in the state.
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and all that at June 11, 2012 06:54 AM (CP+yl)
I was kind of shocked SCOAMF appointed one. Isn't commerce just bourgeois false consciousness?
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at June 11, 2012 06:54 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: Midwest Harry at June 11, 2012 06:54 AM (p/Sn/)
... "... alone and unconscious behind the wheel of his car"
Posted by: Islamic Rage Boy at June 11, 2012 06:55 AM (e8kgV)
Posted by: Adolf Hitler at June 11, 2012 06:55 AM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: soothsayer, for your own good at June 11, 2012 06:55 AM (LPRBM)
Posted by: Bill Mitchell at June 11, 2012 06:55 AM (hlUJY)
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at June 11, 2012 10:54 AM (ZKzrr)
It's a useless department is what it is. Commerce should join Energy, Education, and DHS on the budgetary scrapheap.
Posted by: joncelli, heartless Con and all around unpleasant guy at June 11, 2012 06:56 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Jay in Ames at June 11, 2012 06:56 AM (UEEex)
Much better to zot the individual idiots than make everyone else pay a price for their idiocy.
However I am weak at blog fu so I'm only guessing.
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and all that at June 11, 2012 06:56 AM (CP+yl)
Posted by: Ohio Dan at June 11, 2012 06:56 AM (JKNDp)
... "... alone and unconscious behind the wheel of his car" Posted by: Islamic Rage Boy at June 11, 2012 10:55 AM
Damn, he didn't wreck the Choomwagon did he?
Posted by: Barry the Choom King at June 11, 2012 06:56 AM (Y+DPZ)
I hope that Jeb Bush develops a somewhat more intense than normal case of flatulence that occurs at a rather inconvenient time and causes him a mild case of embarrassment.
I hope I didn't violate the new civility, but I really feel that strongly about this and just couldn't hold my tongue any longer.
Posted by: somebody else, not me at June 11, 2012 06:57 AM (nZvGM)
Posted by: maddogg at June 11, 2012 10:49 AM (OlN4e)
Since he admitted he'd edited the thing a couple of times, I had a hard time following the logic. I think he some words out. Maybe even sentences.
What I was paying attention to (although I did post a couple thoughts) were mostly the other commenters. They seemed to fall into two categories: (a) the LGF "you can do no wrong" type, or (b) "man up and get a grip on yourself".
I tend to fall into category (b).
The issues are simple if Ace knows somebody fluent in web programming (comment sections in particular).
That he either doesn't know or doesn't care are evident in the loss of ampersands and his failure to reach out on the issue. As they say, it's his blog.
Posted by: Citizen jwb7605 enhancing his calm at June 11, 2012 06:57 AM (Qxe/p)
No More Adams Family!
ok, that was a long time ago...
Posted by: HH at June 11, 2012 09:49 AM (v+ExF)
Yeah, and who died and made those Harrisons king?
Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars at June 11, 2012 06:57 AM (TJWQY)
Posted by: Drider at June 11, 2012 06:57 AM (HaJD9)
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and all that at June 11, 2012 06:58 AM (CP+yl)
For the record, I am no Hannity fan and never want to see another Bush in the White House again and consider Mitt to be way too moderate.
Posted by: Typo Dynamo at June 11, 2012 06:59 AM (MJ76f)
Posted by: kbdabear at June 11, 2012 10:50 AM (Y+DPZ)
Yeah, but it sort of went beyond that. I really thought ace was going to have a nervous breakdown. He kept posting about how he hadn't had any sleep, and just sort of seemed to be going off the deep-end.
Which is why a number of posters told him to get some sleep. And then he more or less took the whole site down.
It was an odd day that became a very weird night.
Posted by: HH at June 11, 2012 06:59 AM (v+ExF)
I somehow doubt he believed that the "workingman" (lolwut!) has to be taxed up the ass so people who work nine months out of the year (doing a shitty job of teaching their children) never have to pay a dime toward their own healthcare.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at June 11, 2012 06:59 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at June 11, 2012 07:00 AM (C8mVl)
Posted by: The Robot Devil at June 11, 2012 07:00 AM (136wp)
379 Obama Commerce Sec takes after his boss ...
... "... alone and unconscious behind the wheel of his car"
Posted by: Islamic Rage Boy at June 11, 2012 10:55 AM (e8kgV)
We can haz Slurpees, now?
Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars at June 11, 2012 07:00 AM (TJWQY)
Now that was inspiring.
Posted by: ontherocks at June 11, 2012 07:00 AM (aZ6ew)
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at June 11, 2012 10:54 AM (ZKzrr)
------
All of his cabinet is neutered.
The real power players are all his Czars.
Why Mitt hasnt seized on that yet and made an issue of promising to do away with the practice of appointing czars is beyond me.
Posted by: fixerupper at June 11, 2012 07:00 AM (C8hzL)
Gotta save some of the important stuff for a little closer to the election. Keep your powder dry, and stuff like that.
Posted by: Jay in Ames at June 11, 2012 07:02 AM (UEEex)
Didn't Bush41 start the whole czar BS?
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at June 11, 2012 07:03 AM (ZKzrr)
I lived in California too, and one big reason that Davis was recalled over driver licenses for illegals. I doubt that Reagan would be OK with Mexican nationals booing the American flag on our soil, and other La Raza shit
Just because their parents didn't do the right paperwork? How about they didn't do ANY paperwork
Thanks for your CONCERN though
Posted by: kbdabear at June 11, 2012 07:03 AM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: Citizen jwb7605 enhancing his calm at June 11, 2012 10:57 AM (Qxe/p)
Thanks. Obviously I made the right choice by skipping it.
Posted by: maddogg at June 11, 2012 07:03 AM (OlN4e)
#369 Reagan said one of his biggest regrets was signing that amnesty law in 1986 - the enforcement that was promised never happened.
The Bush family is dead certain in its belief that the GOP will die eventually unless it starts winning over the Hispanics. But George W.'s solutions were wrong for the country and not necessarily guaranteed to win over Hispanic voters anyway.
Posted by: rockmom at June 11, 2012 07:04 AM (NYnoe)
Posted by: The Robot Devil at June 11, 2012 07:04 AM (136wp)
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and all that at June 11, 2012 10:58 AM (CP+yl)
Banning somebody by IP is simple, but it only works if the individual is not accessing the site through an IP hiding technique such as http://maskmyip.com/
Almost none of us are, but the troublemakers almost always are.
If Ace (or Pixy ?? ) comes up with a technique that requires us to 'login' to get to this new comments thingy and then still be able to sock, things will be just fine. The troublemakers will still be able to get through, but it will take effort on their part, because they'll have to log in on every new attempt.
Posted by: Citizen jwb7605 enhancing his calm at June 11, 2012 07:04 AM (Qxe/p)
Posted by: soothsayer, for your own good at June 11, 2012 07:04 AM (vzLhi)
Conservatives say "We've got to patch these holes and then bail out the boat".
Dems respond "We need bi-partisanship!"
"Uh..OK. Do you think we should use wooden plugs or epoxy? Shall we bail with buckets or use a hand pump? We have to do something, the water's up to our ankles".
"No. We will surely be in port before we flounder. We don't want to waste time doing anything. The boat's fine, leave it alone"
"Really, the water's knee deep now. I'm gonna start plugging holes."
"EXTREMIST! RADICAL! RACIST! (not sure what that has to do with holes, but they always throw it in. Maybe it's a black boat?)"
Media: "Why those wascally Republicans! We're sinking and it's their fault! None of the holes are plugged!"
Republicans, kneeling over a hole with a plug in one hand and a mallet that the Dems keep knocking out of their other, look dumbfounded. "WTF?"
Meggie Mac-n-Cheese, Jebbie, RINOs by the score "If we'd only compromised, we could have gotten the Dems to let us have a little Dutch boy put his thumb in one of the holes for 2 hours every other Wednedsday! Wah! Partisans!"
Boat sinks.
Fuck that. No, I'm not saying that there is no room for compromise and all that happy bi-partisan horsecrap. That's the argument about bailing the boat and conservatives should be willing to work with the Dems on that. Fixing the holes...that should be where we draw the line. The holes must be plugged or everything else is moot. People like Jeb are blaming Republicans for the Democrats knocking the mallet out of their hand. Madness. Far, far too many of these career government types think that their job is to compromise, period.
"Hey, look, I compromised, I got something done! Yay me!"
"Uh, Senator? Yea, you got the Dems to "allow" us to stuff some tissue paper in one of the holes, but in return they drilled 2 more holes in the hull. How is that helping?"
"No, No, I DID something. Look! Look! Tissue paper! It's a start, right? look at the great start I've made everybody! Me, me, me!Truly a bi-partisan accomplishment!"
Boat sinks.
So yes, we have to compromise, but the compromise is on the how, not the what. Otherwise, by the time the Repubs get one hole solidly patched, with welded iron hull plates (welfare reform, say), 15 new holes have been drilled, the gunwales are awash, and as soon as attention wanders, BHO sneaks over and pops the wends on the hull plate they just installed.
And that's what people like Jeb call "Good governance".
Posted by: Weirddave at June 11, 2012 07:05 AM (B3hcS)
No, not really. I think there have been "special adviser to the President" positions previously (even predating Bush41, I think), but never someone with de facto Cabinet Level Authority.
GW may (may) have appointed someone similar at the very end to help oversee the TARP funds, but, even if so, that's so far different in both quality and quantity from what Obama is doing that you can't even really compare the two.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at June 11, 2012 07:06 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: jwest at June 11, 2012 10:52 AM (ZDsRL)
**
No..Drew and cat piss lady are the exception.
Posted by: dananjcon at June 11, 2012 07:06 AM (eavT+)
Posted by: rockmom at June 11, 2012 07:06 AM (qE3AR)
Posted by: Richard Quest at June 11, 2012 07:06 AM (BHM5V)
333 The only path forward is the Ace of Hearts HQ.
There's also Ace of Base HQ, to appease the foul Scandis.
Posted by: Waterhouse at June 11, 2012 10:38 AM (+EoBq)
You have been chosen by the Baby Harp Seals Team here at Ace of Clubs HQ.
You are scheduled to mix it up with the Canadian Hunters at noon, ADT.
Thank you for choosing to engage in vigorous, yet respectful, discourse and repartee.
AoCHQ
Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars at June 11, 2012 07:06 AM (TJWQY)
Posted by: soothsayer, for your own good at June 11, 2012 07:07 AM (ZgBZU)
Posted by: Islamic Rage Boy at June 11, 2012 07:07 AM (e8kgV)
Here's the link to cspan if you want to listen to the whole thing.
http://tinyurl.com/bwvcz7v
(to cspan page. link for video is in right column)
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and all that at June 11, 2012 07:08 AM (CP+yl)
"Teamwork. I do a great deal of teamwork."
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at June 11, 2012 07:08 AM (8y9MW)
I hope Jeb stays out of national politics. I have no use for him.
Posted by: cranky-d at June 11, 2012 07:08 AM (JWd0O)
"Back to my dad’s time and Ronald Reagan’s time – they got a lot of stuff done with a lot of bipartisan support," he said.
=======================
Yeah, all this "stuff" that "got done" with "bi-partisan support" has led to $16 trillion in debt.
Posted by: Jay at June 11, 2012 07:08 AM (3LaGb)
Posted by: Jean at June 11, 2012 07:08 AM (WkuV6)
And I'd add that the Dems shot a few of those holes in the boat on their own (Obamacare, anyone?) and refuse to acknowledge their existence, much less even discuss patching them.
Posted by: Andy at June 11, 2012 07:09 AM (5Rurq)
Posted by: Retread at June 11, 2012 07:09 AM (joSBv)
Sheesh, sometimes I feel like we need to ban ozfic just to keep the rest of you clowns from gratuitously hijacking threads to talk about her/him/it.
This is one of those times.<<<<
DO IT NOW.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at June 11, 2012 07:09 AM (JDIKC)
Posted by: ontherocks at June 11, 2012 07:10 AM (aZ6ew)
We have the Communist/Marxist/Progressive Democrats calling those of us who wish to merely abide by our own Constitution "extreme."
Lovely.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at June 11, 2012 07:10 AM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: Ezra's Equal at June 11, 2012 07:10 AM (wcwIM)
Posted by: Citizen jwb7605 enhancing his calm at June 11, 2012 11:04 AM (Qxe/p)
My suggestion? We already have teh Hash... use that as the registration which leads back to your email addy...
So.... names can change so we can Sock... but the Hash (code) is the actual registration.
Posted by: Romeo13 at June 11, 2012 07:10 AM (lZBBB)
Not that it matters much but Wilson had an 'industry czar,' and FDR had a bunch of appointed executives with broad powers named 'czars.'
Our modern failshit government is the fault of those two men.
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at June 11, 2012 07:10 AM (famk3)
Ford, I think. Energy czar.
Posted by: fluffonutta at June 11, 2012 07:12 AM (z9HTb)
I don't know. From where I sit you definitely have to have a damaged or chipped male gene somewhere to want to shove a hollowed out grapefruit halve down your pants, then throw on some tights, and run onto the floor and dance like tinkerbell with the ladies.
Posted by: Berserker at June 11, 2012 07:12 AM (FMbng)
Posted by: joncelli, heartless Con and all around unpleasant guy at June 11, 2012 07:13 AM (RD7QR)
And I'd add that the Dems shot a few of those holes in the boat on their own (Obamacare, anyone?) and refuse to acknowledge their existence, much less even discuss patching them.
Posted by: Andy at June 11, 2012 11:09 AM (5Rurq)
You people are missing the point. There is nothing to worry about.
We are headed (at ramming speed) toward the iceberg.
That will keep us afloat until help arrives.
There is no need to patch anything. Enjoy your free drink.
Posted by: Citizen jwb7605 enhancing his calm at June 11, 2012 07:13 AM (Qxe/p)
437
Posted by: Citizen jwb7605 enhancing his calm at June 11, 2012 11:04 AM (Qxe/p)
My suggestion? We already have teh Hash... use that as the registration which leads back to your email addy...
So.... names can change so we can Sock... but the Hash (code) is the actual registration.
Posted by: Romeo13 at June 11, 2012 11:10 AM (lZBBB)
Time to go long in filthy hash codes' futures?
Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars at June 11, 2012 07:13 AM (TJWQY)
Posted by: Berserker at June 11, 2012 11:12 AM (FMbng)
Yeah, but you get to feel up a bunch of really skinny ballerinas. So, you know, it has its compensations.
Posted by: joncelli, heartless Con and all around unpleasant guy at June 11, 2012 07:14 AM (RD7QR)
http://is.gd/WcTo1D
During the latter stages of World War I, President Woodrow Wilson appointed financier Bernard Baruch to run the War Industries Board. This position was sometimes dubbed the "industry czar".
In the United States, the term czar has been used by the media to refer to appointed executive branch officials since at least 1930s and then the 1940s under President Franklin D. Roosevelt.
And then Nixon had the first "drug czar."
I apologize to Bush41. Kinder, gentler. A thousand pixels of light.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at June 11, 2012 07:14 AM (ZKzrr)
Ford, I think. Energy czar.
Posted by: fluffonutta at June 11, 2012 11:12 AM (z9HTb)
NO! just as in everything else, ve sztarted the Czars!
Posted by: Chekov at June 11, 2012 07:14 AM (lZBBB)
He has a known medical condition that causes seizures. He is on medication. Prudence would suggest he have someone drive him around just in case the medication does not work.
Another question, sure he is Commerce Secretary but it's still a cabinet position. Shouldn't he have at least a one person protective detail. A Lexus is not a 737, and Bryson is not Ron Brown. But he is a senior member of the administration.
Be interesting if it is swept under. The message that would send would be, one legal system for the serfs and one for royalty.
Posted by: Anna Puma at June 11, 2012 07:14 AM (bvBkk)
I have some recrimination to do...
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at June 11, 2012 07:15 AM (famk3)
That could work. Plus it's an opportunity for Ace to sell vanity hashes like BgDiK.
Posted by: Andy at June 11, 2012 07:15 AM (5Rurq)
Has Ace said anything about this?
Posted by: Darth Chipmunk at June 11, 2012 07:15 AM (pVvkk)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at June 11, 2012 07:15 AM (C8mVl)
Yeah, right. Does this include Reagan's statement on the Soviet Union -- "We win, they lose"?
Posted by: scrubjay at June 11, 2012 07:16 AM (uV4Ss)
Posted by: joncelli, heartless Con and all around unpleasant guy at June 11, 2012 07:16 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Retread at June 11, 2012 11:09 AM
How does she manage the 140 character limits?
Posted by: kbdabear at June 11, 2012 07:16 AM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: Ezra's Equal at June 11, 2012 07:16 AM (wcwIM)
The Viewco-host Joy Behar will be
launching a daily show on Current TV.
So CurrentTV is trying to brand itself as the network that hires people that suck so bad that they were fired from their previous jobs for extreme suckitude. And CurrentTV fired Olbermann. Wow.
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at June 11, 2012 07:16 AM (JxMoP)
Now that was inspiring.
Posted by: ontherocks at June 11, 2012 11:00 AM (aZ6ew)
I'd almost forgotten about that disturbing image. Hard to believe that Slick and his campaign of personal destruction didn't use that in ads. That must've been a more genteel time but it sure didn't seem like it when I was living through it.
Posted by: Captain Hate at June 11, 2012 07:17 AM (D1HMA)
Posted by: The ghey ghost of the rest areas on the merritt parkway they shut down at June 11, 2012 07:17 AM (qxcKC)
You stupid fuck, things are getting more partisan because government is involved in so many more ares of everyones lives. So the old, "it doesn't affect me" no longer is available to almost every citizen. The government will regulate if you do or don't get a cancer treatment that has been requested by my doctor and approved by the FDA. See a reason to get partisan, stupid fuck? I don't need a cancer treatment but I have friends that do. I also want to be able to buy a fucking 20oz Coca-Cola. Is that really too much to fucking ask?
Dang
Posted by: Dang at June 11, 2012 07:17 AM (Ky1+e)
Posted by: phoenixgirl clinging to my bible, gun and coca cola at June 11, 2012 07:18 AM (Ho2rs)
A cob-logger really needs to put up a Holder in Contempt post, post haste.
I have some recrimination to do...
Posted by: weft cut-loop at June 11, 2012 11:15 AM (famk3)
A flaming chinless skull would be nice, too.
Posted by: ErikW at June 11, 2012 07:19 AM (Xw+Lv)
Be interesting if it is swept under. The message that would send would be, one legal system for the serfs and one for royalty.
Posted by: Anna Puma at June 11, 2012 11:14 AM (bvBkk)
Mizz Puma;
We need to legally inform you that this talk has been reported us through our various abuse websites, and you may expect a visit from armed Dept. of Justice representatives in the near future in order to ensure you are not directing a veiled threat towards the Administration.
Posted by: Eric Holder at June 11, 2012 07:19 AM (lZBBB)
Lots of pills come with warning labels about mixing with alcohol or operating heavy machinery. So, he really can't be held responsible.
Posted by: fluffonutta at June 11, 2012 07:19 AM (z9HTb)
My favorite Bush, W, is the only one I totally admire. Watching the G.H.W. Bush special vividly showed the difference between class and thuggery (today's Prez).
Barbara, as you may recall, went after Palin. Jeb is so arrogant. While I did not like the spending under W, I still believe he has a principled core of steel and will do what he believes is best for America, now and into the future. The current campaigner-in-chief would switch any position for votes.
Posted by: JudyNM at June 11, 2012 07:19 AM (ie/uy)
Posted by: booger at June 11, 2012 07:19 AM (dMT9X)
Posted by: soothsayer, for your own good at June 11, 2012 07:20 AM (Ba6aP)
Posted by: Vic at June 11, 2012 07:20 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Romeo13 at June 11, 2012 11:10 AM (lZBBB)
Hash is derived from the IP.
But yes. That would work just fine.
One line of code to match incoming IP to 'user', then a couple lines of code to blank out the "Name: *" box. A couple more lines to substitute the original user name for DB (legal) purposes while displaying the sock.
It all depends on what blogging package Ace is using, because the PHP has to "know" what the variable names are for that particular package and how to handle them from the database. Wordpress, Joomla, PHPBB, etc. are all a bit different.
Posted by: Citizen jwb7605 enhancing his calm at June 11, 2012 07:20 AM (Qxe/p)
Posted by: Up with people! at June 11, 2012 07:21 AM (iYvMQ)
The Sushi Lobby prolly got it shitcanned. I think they were in the Land of the Rising Sun/Falling Yen.
Posted by: ontherocks at June 11, 2012 07:21 AM (aZ6ew)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at June 11, 2012 07:21 AM (C8mVl)
Posted by: thunderb at June 11, 2012 07:21 AM (Dnbau)
As fr Herr Eric, when you come to visit please bring all those documents Rep. Issa wants to see. I am inviting him over for a visit you see. Save you a trip.
Posted by: Anna Puma at June 11, 2012 07:21 AM (WeA4Y)
Posted by: Darth Chipmunk at June 11, 2012 07:22 AM (pVvkk)
Posted by: Romeo13 at June 11, 2012 11:10 AM (lZBBB)
as was mentioned above, changing the hash (IP Address) is inconsequential for most. (even I know how to do it)
My only hope is that there's a way to preserve easy use of sockpuppets.
BTW: even with registration, can't someone manage a new reg after banning? email addys are a dime a dozen and this ip faking puts the icing on that cake. some kind of digital fingerprint?
Everyone will have to get an rfid placed on their forehead and a reader attached to the browser. yeah, that'll work.
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and all that at June 11, 2012 07:22 AM (CP+yl)
Posted by: Citizen jwb7605 enhancing his calm at June 11, 2012 11:20 AM (Qxe/p)
Actualy simpler.... create a 'code' (hash) for the actual registration, which ties to the IP and email for legal and ban reasons... but use a second short Narrative field for the 'name' allowing us to sock.
Posted by: Eric Holder at June 11, 2012 07:23 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: kbdabear at June 11, 2012 11:16 AM (Y+DPZ)
Multiple tweets of nonsense, of course.
Posted by: Retread at June 11, 2012 07:23 AM (joSBv)
Posted by: Eric Holder at June 11, 2012 11:23 AM (lZBBB)
And this would also allow for the conitnuation of EPIC Sock Failage! LOL
Posted by: Romeo13 at June 11, 2012 07:24 AM (lZBBB)
Sure a seziure can cause an accident but it does not cause you to intentionally leave th4 scene of the accident.
As I said early this morning on the news thread, a State Patrol officer told me that 99% of the hit and run accidents he knew of the reason for leaving the scene was trying to avoid a DUI.
Posted by: Vic at June 11, 2012 07:24 AM (YdQQY)
Fallen? I understand the anticipation but the yen's at a 15 year high (if not record high.)
You are familiar with the term 'the death trade,' are you not?
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at June 11, 2012 07:25 AM (famk3)
Posted by: joncelli, heartless Con and all around unpleasant guy at June 11, 2012 07:25 AM (RD7QR)
But yes. That would work just fine.
Not really. First: it still doesn't avoid the problem of trolls changing their IPs. Second, it does hurt people like me who (quite legitimately) post from different IPs (I really don't want to have to register twice for my main locations, and then again every time I post from a different McDonald's or Chick-Fil-A or whatever.)
Simple one-time registration where you provide a verifiable email address should be fine. Then you "log in" with the email address (heck, you could even just use open-id) to even be able to access the comments site at all. Once you're in the comments section, leave it as is, so you can post with whatever name (that is: sock) you want.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at June 11, 2012 07:25 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Cymphia McKinney at June 11, 2012 07:27 AM (IoNBC)
I seem to remember there was a promise of new blogware some time ago also.
Posted by: Buzzsaw at June 11, 2012 07:27 AM (tf9Ne)
Posted by: JudyNM at June 11, 2012 11:19 AM (ie/uy)
Although I enthusiastically voted for GWB twice (since the alternatives were unthinkable) I really hold 2 things against him that no amount of "explanation" will ever satisfy me over and beyond spending money like a drunk sailor: Not pardoning Scooter Libbey and not holding more pressers to level with people on what was going on in Iraq.
Posted by: Captain Hate at June 11, 2012 07:27 AM (D1HMA)
Posted by: phoenixgirl clinging to my bible, gun and coca cola at June 11, 2012 07:27 AM (Ho2rs)
What part of "uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States" don't you understand?
Peregrine
Posted by: Peregrine Took, Hobbit S.O.B. at June 11, 2012 07:28 AM (52BrO)
While I did not like the spending under W, I still believe he has a principled core of steel and will do what he believes is best for America, now and into the future.
I must disagree. W refused to stand up to the false and scurrilous charges leveled at him for eight long years. His silence equalled agreement and the years of Bush Derangement Syndrome on the part of the Left and the MFM (birm) set us up for teh SCOAMF.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at June 11, 2012 07:28 AM (d0Tfm)
Oh, that would work.
Wouldn't that be over-playing one's hand? "BReitbart Unamsked" is one thing. "Some commenter known to dozens" wouldn't draw flies.
Posted by: fluffonutta at June 11, 2012 07:28 AM (z9HTb)
A diabetic coma or some sort of seizure could allow one to act normal but have very poor motor skills. He may have been having the beginnings of a seizure when the accident occurred or the accident may have caused the seizure.
The brain is a complicated organ and NO two are exactly the same thus a seizure in the same spot on two different people will cause different effects and outward symptoms.
I'd give him the benefit of the doubt. Trauma amnesia does occur.
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and all that at June 11, 2012 07:28 AM (CP+yl)
Posted by: joncelli, heartless Con and all around unpleasant guy at June 11, 2012 11:16 AM
According to RSM, it means acquiring the real identities of those like Ace who post under pseudonyms, then using that information in sinister ways such as making public negative information, SWAT-ting, getting them fired or ruining their businesses, creepy intimidation and stalking of family members, and more
One big reason that Ace did not go to Providence is that many nutjobs on the Left spy on these gatherings, and the Nutroots had a convention in Providence this past weekend also. Several creeps had promised to get inside the Breitbart Awards as moles to get information on Ace in order to get his real identity
Posted by: kbdabear at June 11, 2012 07:29 AM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: soothsayer, for your own good at June 11, 2012 07:29 AM (LPRBM)
Posted by: ontherocks at June 11, 2012 11:21 AM (aZ6ew)
Indeed they were; good hypothesis because I hadn't considered that.
Posted by: Captain Hate at June 11, 2012 07:29 AM (D1HMA)
I think he said it would be ready to test today. I took that as something different than implementing it, but the day is young still, for Ace anyway.
Posted by: Retread at June 11, 2012 07:29 AM (joSBv)
Seizures cause severe confusion. I've seen a few and people don't know were they are or what they are doing afterwards.
Posted by: Typo Dynamo at June 11, 2012 07:30 AM (MJ76f)
Is there an InTrade on how dire the ratings will be yet?
Posted by: Ian S. at June 11, 2012 07:30 AM (tqwMN)
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and all that at June 11, 2012 11:28 AM (CP+yl)
Yeah, but do we want this guy helping to run the country? When he can't F'n Drive?
Posted by: Romeo13 at June 11, 2012 07:32 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: Up with people! at June 11, 2012 07:32 AM (iYvMQ)
launching a daily show on Current TV.
Is there an InTrade on how dire the ratings will be yet?
Well, the ratings can't be much worse than their other shows, can it?
Posted by: Jay in Ames at June 11, 2012 07:32 AM (UEEex)
Posted by: Eric Holder at June 11, 2012 11:23 AM (lZBBB)
In my perfect world, I'm hoping to register as "jwb7605", which will be my default user name -- I can alter that at will. It would be nice, actually, if that happened so I wouldn't have to post "OFF, filthy sock" when appropriate.
My actual user name can either be "jwb7605" or "QXE/p". Or "CitizenDickWad". That wouldn't matter at all, but it would be 'permanent' at registration-time.
In either case, an additional column will probably be required in the comment DB, and the PHP script will match "jwb7605" with the actual IP I'm registered with before the comments box appears. Assuming Ace is using MySQL, adding the column without losing prior data (comments) is trivial.
Disclaimer: I'm 64 years old and rapidly losing my mad skillz at this interwebs programming stuff.
Posted by: Citizen jwb7605 enhancing his calm at June 11, 2012 07:33 AM (Qxe/p)
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at June 11, 2012 11:14 AM (ZKzrr)
[steeples fingers] That would be prudent at this juncture. Stay the course.
Posted by: SNL Dana Carvey at June 11, 2012 07:33 AM (4q5tP)
http://tinyurl.com/6rb26m4
Posted by: kbdabear at June 11, 2012 07:33 AM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and all that at June 11, 2012 07:33 AM (CP+yl)
Posted by: Typo Dynamo at June 11, 2012 11:30 AM (MJ76f)
If his seizures are such that he doesn't know what he is doing he shouldn't be driving a car period. In fact, I don't see how could drive away if that was the case.
Posted by: Vic at June 11, 2012 07:34 AM (YdQQY)
"Seizures cause severe confusion. I've seen a few and people don't know were they are or what they are doing afterwards."
So a cabinet secretary in SF driving without security. With this bunch of commies I'm going to go with the story he got high at a "bath house" and was trolling the area to find a homeless person and eat their face off. Just as plausible.
Posted by: Ammo Dump at June 11, 2012 07:34 AM (YYyqq)
Posted by: Ammo Dump at June 11, 2012 07:36 AM (YYyqq)
This is why I think we need some sort of whitelist (I know, raaaacistt!!11!) feature that would identify known Morons. The good kind.
You can't keep people from re-registering with a different email, etc., but new commenters would be on a short leash.
The more difficult we make it for the trolls to do a driveby, the fewer of them we'll have.
Posted by: Andy at June 11, 2012 07:36 AM (5Rurq)
Bipartisanship: "A state of affairs in which Republicans betray their supporters in order to mollify their political enemies and the editorial boards of The Washington Post and New York Times. Cf., capitulation, professional suicide."
-Tony Snow
Posted by: TANSTAAFL at June 11, 2012 07:37 AM (KVi4X)
Posted by: Rick Husband at June 11, 2012 07:37 AM (SCzqL)
Posted by: joncelli, heartless Con and all around unpleasant guy at June 11, 2012 07:37 AM (RD7QR)
"I'm 64 years old and rapidly losing my mad skillz at this interwebs programming stuff."
Heck, at least you had some...
So what's all this stuff about Windows 1995?
Posted by: HH at June 11, 2012 07:37 AM (v+ExF)
That's what he said.
I immediately took the over.
Posted by: Andy at June 11, 2012 07:38 AM (5Rurq)
Aw, c'mon. What Jeb said is exactly the sort of thing you say when you want to play the other side for suckers.
"Sure, we want to negotiate. Let's look for common ground. Well, no, of course, we can't go to that extreme. No, not to that one either. But let's keep talking [while our ninjas suit up to sneak in and strangle yo sorry necks]....
"Gosh, that sounds kinda promising, except for the part about the tax hikes and socialized medicine. I'd say we're getting somewhere. How about we throw in an extra half-trillion for the Navy and Air Force, [boy]?"
Posted by: J. Moses Browning at June 11, 2012 07:39 AM (spJw/)
With new registration, it would be possible for another to take a name commonly used now by someone else.
Plus will registration or base user names be allowed to have spaces?
Most user names I have and seen have no spaces. (dumb requirement but hey)
also will one have to retype one's base name all the time for a comment or will it be "cookied" for persistency.
I'm really not asking any of you, I'm just mentioning concerns and maybe they'll float to the top of the actual discussion about how to implement this HISTORIC CHANGE!
Ace is about to FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGE THE WAY THE BLOG WORKS!!1!!!!!!
Aw, that trick never works Bullwinkle. /sarc
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and all that at June 11, 2012 07:39 AM (CP+yl)
"The View co-host Joy Behar will be launching a daily show on Current TV."
CurrentTV - where Global Warming continues, one raving gasbag at a time.
Posted by: reason at June 11, 2012 07:40 AM (RQDhf)
Having masticated Jeb Bush's squishyness sufficiently, I just caught this line at Blazing Cat Fur. The Morens and Ettes being more sophisticated and urban than I I have probably heard this before but it's new to me. in reference to jugears (we can still say stuff like that right?) " The clothes have no emperor."
Posted by: Ohio Dan at June 11, 2012 07:41 AM (JKNDp)
Thanks...
Posted by: Anna Puma at June 11, 2012 07:41 AM (WeA4Y)
Hey Ace, hit the tip jar a little with my work email address. Thanks for the reminder guys.
Laura J
Posted by: Jaimo at June 11, 2012 07:41 AM (9U1OG)
"...what do you mean, the ratings were negative...?"
--To be overheard at CurrentTV offices, in the near future
Posted by: Brother Cavil, New Caprica City DA's Office at June 11, 2012 07:41 AM (GBXon)
I immediately took the over.
Posted by: Andy at June 11, 2012 11:38 AM (5Rurq)
Smart move; anybody that's been involved with software installs knows how unsmooth things go, even with TOP MEN on site.
Posted by: Captain Hate at June 11, 2012 07:42 AM (D1HMA)
@514
Turns out Secretary of Commerce is higher in the line of Presidential succession than you'd think:
9 Secretary of Agriculture
10 Secretary of Commerce
11 Secretary of Labor
High enough to expect to have security nearby just in case war were declared.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at June 11, 2012 07:42 AM (kdS6q)
The more difficult we make it for the trolls to do a driveby, the fewer of them we'll have.
Posted by: Andy at June 11, 2012 11:36 AM (5Rurq)
I kinda lean towards the method Uncles Garth and Hub used to fend off traveling salesmen. Give fair warning, then "encourage" them to depart the premises with all due haste. And a friendly goodbye wave (AoSHQ new civility standards and all)
Posted by: Count de Monet at June 11, 2012 07:43 AM (4q5tP)
Posted by: Ohio Dan at June 11, 2012 07:43 AM (JKNDp)
Posted by: blaster at June 11, 2012 07:44 AM (SCzqL)
"When Andrew Breitbart said he liked the comments at AoS do you think he liked all the catpiss stuff? "
I think he liked all of the, "OMG who is that hawttie / WTF is that absolute gollum creature in the background?" comments whenever one of the cob's would put up some sort of serious post with a visual.
AoSHQ - We put the "Hyper" in Attention Defic -- O/T but did you see what just went up on Twitter?
Posted by: reason at June 11, 2012 07:44 AM (RQDhf)
Re driving away. a classmate of mine had a seizure in our class one day. When he recovered enough I was assigned to escort him to the nurse. He could walk but wasn't sure what had happened or why he was in the hall. We couldn't get him to put on his shoes at first but after we walked a good ways he realized he was barefoot and asked why and where his shoes where. I was holding them in my hands when he asked. Seems to be like senile dementia.
I have little doubt that he could have started a car and driven it into another.
I agree about not driving but depending on the state they use the ADA to determine that people can't be stopped. I think we had that discussion one morning.
Posted by: Typo Dynamo at June 11, 2012 07:45 AM (MJ76f)
Posted by: weft cut-loop at June 11, 2012 11:25 AM (famk3)
Yeah, more than most. Have buried almost all of my family and a couple of friends. All I have left is 1 sister.
And the death traders are parasites.
Actually that was the time that I learned the most about the destructiveness of anger - in all seriousness.
Posted by: ontherocks at June 11, 2012 07:49 AM (aZ6ew)
Posted by: HH at June 11, 2012 11:37 AM (v+ExF)
I've heard about that. Supposed to be up and coming technology!
I'm almost finished reading my Windows for Workgroups manual, and that's next on my list!
Posted by: Citizen jwb7605 enhancing his calm at June 11, 2012 07:50 AM (Qxe/p)
"The more difficult we make it for the trolls to do a driveby, the fewer of them we'll have."
Registration results in a verification email sent before you can use the registered ID. Email supplies a link to a Turing-Test style page where you must fill in the correct response to the prompt-question.
"Her elbows are _____ ."
"The guys ___ shirts!"
"During SOTU, I beat my ____ like it owed me money."
"____ avis..."
"I want to ____ his garbage!"
Posted by: reason at June 11, 2012 07:53 AM (W2YA6)
Woah, sorry to hear that but 'the death trade,' as in shorting the Yen. The Yen has been on a incline since the end of the war. People who have bet on a 'falling yet' lose a lot of money.
It will reverse course at some point, but we're not there yet.
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at June 11, 2012 07:53 AM (famk3)
Read Ronald Reagan's words. Watch clips. RWR would win as a write-in.
W is the smart one in the family. GWB and Jeb not-so-much.
Posted by: Huggy at June 11, 2012 07:55 AM (VtU/3)
Posted by: joncelli, heartless Con and all around unpleasant guy at June 11, 2012 07:55 AM (RD7QR)
He was a malfunctioning robot. Then again... if I had a secretary like that, I might "malfunction" too.
Posted by: Uncle Buck at June 11, 2012 07:55 AM (aWJ3R)
Posted by: blaster at June 11, 2012 11:44 AM (SCzqL)
Unless you're posting from all three at once, NO, I don't.
You login once, and that session variable is valid until you close your browser.
Multiple (simultaneous) logins are at the whim of the programmer.
Posted by: Citizen jwb7605 enhancing his calm at June 11, 2012 07:55 AM (Qxe/p)
Posted by: John McLame at June 11, 2012 07:55 AM (+XVQe)
Posted by: Count de Monet at June 11, 2012 07:57 AM (4q5tP)
Posted by: Golfy O'Dog-Gobbler at June 11, 2012 07:57 AM (XBdI0)
Posted by: faith at June 11, 2012 08:00 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: Arms Merchant at June 11, 2012 08:04 AM (+XVQe)
1) Post some harmless, sympathetic stuff. Blend in for a while.
2) Push some buttons. Really piss a few people off.
3) When confronted, fall back on harmless facade. Play dumb victim.
4) Wait for other posters (who didn't witness the offensive stuff) to defend.
5) BONUS: Someone says something truly offensive in response that can be captured.
It's a goddamn micro-version of the Brett Kimberlin tactic.
It hasn't really worked, but that doesn't stop the attempt.
Posted by: grognard at June 11, 2012 08:06 AM (NS2Mo)
Russell Adds Facebook to Benchmark U.S. Equity Index
http://tinyurl.com/cx78flf
Posted by: kbdabear at June 11, 2012 08:07 AM (Y+DPZ)
@414 - the only thing I would add to the Sinking Boat Allegory might be a part where the Democrats finally agree "something must be done about all this water in the boat!" after one slips and falls.
After which they prompty decide that the best solution is a drain so all the water can escape, and they proceed to punch yet another hole into the hull.
Posted by: reason at June 11, 2012 08:07 AM (W2YA6)
@552 - also, on occassion, veer a new thread completely off-course by (apologetically) posting an O/T within the first 20 comments or so. Sit back and wait for people to either take the bait, or go off on her for going O/T.
Either way, mission accomplished.
Posted by: reason at June 11, 2012 08:09 AM (W2YA6)
Posted by: Dougf at June 11, 2012 08:13 AM (Gc4ym)
This is one of those times.<<<<
DO IT NOW.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at June 11, 2012 11:09 AM (JDIKC)
Why ban when a simple troll alert will do, meaning read and laugh, but do not feed. They feed off renting a space in your head.
We should all come up with an site-approved alert (meaning approved by us, natch), such as: TROLL ALERT: NO VACANCY. Or some such.
Posted by: Joanne is happy dammit at June 11, 2012 08:13 AM (GCsZz)
1) Post some harmless, sympathetic stuff. Blend in for a while.
2) Push some buttons. Really piss a few people off.
3) When confronted, fall back on harmless facade. Play dumb victim.
4) Wait for other posters (who didn't witness the offensive stuff) to defend.
5) BONUS: Someone says something truly offensive in response that can be captured.
It's a goddamn micro-version of the Brett Kimberlin tactic.
It hasn't really worked, but that doesn't stop the attempt.
Posted by: grognard at June 11, 2012 12:06 PM (NS2Mo)
No, I'm not what you call a troll. I'm a busy person and sometimes I'm very busy and can only post something going on in real time O/T in a post. I sometimes think it's because I'm an independent and a new yorker, the hate is palpable. I mean do you want to stay in your little conservative bubble, with only people who agree with you? or do you want to hear opinions of people who aren't wearing the republican or conservative label? If Ace wants a site made up only of conservatives who believe the same stuff and agree with one another all day patting each other on the back, that's fine, it's his site. But that should be said. So people who aren't a part of the ideology don't post their comments.
Either way, I feel bad for ace. The site is changing. Once the requirement of registering is put in place there will be many commenters who don't register for personal or professional reasons. What made this site different from the other run of the mill conservative sites was the anonymity. So, in that respect, those who wanted to squelch free speech, by forcing ace to put a non anon vetting in place, will have won.
Posted by: faith at June 11, 2012 08:18 AM (oZfic)
Not up/down but a troll flag/abusive commenter.
this would aid the "troll buster" brigade and easy their work load.
(btw who knew their was a troll brigade? Well done for them as it was done without notice.)
I'm guessing that the soft ware will take a bit of time to perfect and then Ace will wait for the next ###hole to get in his face and BAM down comes the curtain.
Or not. Depends on how fast Pixy can whip those hamsters.
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and all that at June 11, 2012 08:25 AM (CP+yl)
I was an adult and politically aware during Reagan's 1976 and 1980 runs for President. One of the things I heard at the time was "We don't need some movie star from California who ran the commie actors union as President".
But it was Jerry Falwell who had the most influence, possibly through the press he got at the time, in polarizing things. It was the "moral majority" movement, though actually fairly small on the scale of the entire electorate, that was used by the media to frame the Republican party as a bunch of bible-thumping rednecks in order to attempt to stem the hemorrhage of Democrats to the Republican toward the end of Reagan's first term as the economy had turned around and Reagan's popularity was soaring.
At that point practically all media interviews suddenly switched from political questions to social questions. "What is your stand on abortion" became the mandatory question to ask all Republican candidates and they were portrayed by the media as being anti-woman ever since. They notion that Republicans were the party of the barefoot and pregnant wife began in the last year of the Reagan administration and we have been unable to shake that since. Candidates like Santorum don't help to shake that image, either. Santorum politically is a socially conservative Democrat that can not align with the DNC because of their stands on abortion and contraception. Everything about Santorum's vision of the role of government and big labor reeks of statism. But he is a social conservative so he puts an R after his name.
Jerry Falwell was probably the worst thing to ever happen to the Republican Party as the media used that as a brush to paint the entire party.
Posted by: crosspatch at June 11, 2012 08:27 AM (ZbLJZ)
Posted by: toby928© at June 11, 2012 08:32 AM (QupBk)
Posted by: crosspatch at June 11, 2012 12:27 PM (ZbLJZ
great point. I was a reagan dem, and I never felt that reagan tried shove his values down on others, he was a social conservative, but never judgemental. I saw Sarah Palin in that same sense, she is much more social conservative than me, but as a governor she didn't use her power as a governor to that extent, she just tried to limit the reach of her state's govt as much as she could with limited, fiscal discipline.
Posted by: johnc_ex-democrat at June 11, 2012 08:33 AM (ACkhT)
The GOP just nominated a self described Progressive who urged Obama to adopt a federal ind mandate, increased state spending 10% in a single year, and imposed a gun tax.
I don't know that this is because the GOP is less conservative. I think our primaries need to be reformed and what happened was a winnowing out of conservatives (not to mention ballot access).
What's done is done, and I hope Romney beats Obama, but the idea the GOP wouldn't nominate Reagan today when it just nominated Romney is pretty absurd.
Posted by: Dustin at June 11, 2012 08:33 AM (z36s0)
Posted by: Y-not at June 11, 2012 08:42 AM (5H6zj)
Exactly. It is more about the role of government than about someone's personal social leanings, to me. Someone who believes in smaller government, getting more done at the state level, and getting rid of the notion that the federal government is somehow responsible for "taking care of you" is key.
I would suggest that every watch Reagan's first inaugural address which is available on YouTube (the 1981 address).
Posted by: crosspatch at June 11, 2012 08:47 AM (ZbLJZ)
I don't think we will be able to turn this around and it'll be a circlefest until one or the other blinks.
Posted by: newmike at June 11, 2012 08:53 AM (1OLmL)
I be glad when glad when the Bush family end up in the same place as Ron
Reagan Jr. Gone and soon forgotten.
Posted by: burt at June 11, 2012 08:55 AM (OzqQM)
Oh, and to paraphrase ex-heavyweight champ Larry Holmes, the Bushes couldn't carry Ronald Reagan's jock strap. Now go away. Forever.
Posted by: thirteen28 at June 11, 2012 08:56 AM (AbmsP)
I would agree that it is likely temporary UNLESS something else comes along that the media can use as a brush to paint the entire party again. That is less likely this time as we have alternative means of communications that are not under the control of a bunch of editors and journalists sitting on a conference call with the DNC.
I also agree that it is temporary because I believe President Romney is going to surprise a lot of people. After his popularity starts to soar when the economy turns around, probably the second or third year of his administration, it will be just like in Reagan's day when everyone will jump on board claiming they were for Romney all along.
Posted by: crosspatch at June 11, 2012 08:56 AM (ZbLJZ)
Posted by: Optimizer at June 11, 2012 09:23 AM (As94z)
Jeb's got one big plus in speaking Spanish pretty well.
OTOH, he appears to be a complete retard, which kinda offsets that.
Posted by: Purp (@PurpAv) at June 11, 2012 09:38 AM (nvNNU)
Posted by: Linda at June 11, 2012 09:59 AM (+4Zuh)
Your "busy" is not a good reason for consistently doing what you do.
I sometimes think it's because I'm an independent and a new yorker, the hate is palpable.
I believe you're a new yorker. I don't believe you're "independent."
I mean do you want to stay in your little conservative bubble, with only people who agree with you? or do you want to hear opinions of people who aren't wearing the republican or conservative label? If Ace wants a site made up only of conservatives who believe the same stuff and agree with one another all day patting each other on the back, that's fine, it's his site. But that should be said. So people who aren't a part of the ideology don't post their comments.
You never post ideas contrary to conservative or libertarian thought. Ever. Your posts do, however, have the ring of someone who knows what the philosophy is, but not of someone who has internalized it.
Either way, I feel bad for ace. The site is changing. Once the requirement of registering is put in place there will be many commenters who don't register for personal or professional reasons. What made this site different from the other run of the mill conservative sites was the anonymity. So, in that respect, those who wanted to squelch free speech, by forcing ace to put a non anon vetting in place, will have won.
Why feed bad for Ace? This is his decision, to protect him. If some people don't want to log in to speak their mind on his blog, maybe their opinions weren't worth the time it takes to type them.
Posted by: grognard at June 11, 2012 10:12 AM (NS2Mo)
Posted by: grognard at June 11, 2012 02:12 PM (NS2Mo)
Your other comments were purely opinion, your opinion so I'll addresses the one I disagree with. I think he might lose some of his commenters, We have no way of gauging whether or not some people not only read ace's post but actually seek out the opinions of certain commenters. Time will tell.
Posted by: faith at June 11, 2012 10:22 AM (oZfic)
disclaimer before you word smiths start a meme that I agree with everything that was said by Posted by: grognard at June 11, 2012 02:12 PM (NS2Mo) because I said the one thing i disagree with...
No I'm not agreeing with anything grognard said vis a vie me and my comments but to think they know the future and will definitively decided that the readers only read the comments that the likes of grognard deems good and acceptable is to be wholly naive.
But, then again, in reading some of the comments on the thread from people who lurk and read and having some say they were surprised to see so many lurkers/readers makes me think some have no conception of the real world in which they live.
Posted by: faith at June 11, 2012 10:26 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: Alborn at June 11, 2012 11:48 AM (+oksp)
But most notably by Newt Gingrich who basically proclaimed Reagan's cold war strategy to be incompetent when he was in the House.
Posted by: crosspatch at June 11, 2012 12:53 PM (ZbLJZ)
Posted by: steevy at June 11, 2012 03:03 PM (Xb3hu)
Posted by: steevy at June 11, 2012 03:04 PM (Xb3hu)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at June 11, 2012 05:03 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: torabora at June 11, 2012 05:45 PM (ujZ5D)
He's even more liberal than his brother. Screw him. Let's take the effort to make sure he never works in politics again.
Posted by: Kevin at June 12, 2012 04:19 AM (3o64G)
Jeb's not saying the "establishment" of the GOP is too extreme, he's saying that YOU and your ilk are too extreme, shit-for-brains.
Posted by: Johan at June 12, 2012 09:39 AM (P5aEc)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2566 seconds, 693 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: 141Driver at June 11, 2012 04:56 AM (UQSBy)