December 26, 2012
— andy It's amazing how much information is out there on the Internet for someone who wants to dig it up.
On the one hand, if you're a criminal in New York, a local paper has done a great job of casing houses for you and directing you to those where the owner doesn't have a gun permit. Granted, they may still have a gun in the house, but your odds went up when you eliminated these high probability households.
On the other hand, not everyone appreciates details that may technically be "public" but are nonetheless pretty difficult to get at, like ... say ... the government's records of gun permit holders, being shouted from the rooftops. And in the 21st century, where it seems nothing is truly private, a few mouse clicks coupled with righteous anger can be quite productive.
Reader “Jeff” sends along a link to the latest article in the White Plains tabloid, Journal-News, reporting on the hornets nest occasioned by their publication of an interactive map showing the identity and address of all registered gun owners in Westchester County and surrounding areas.Editor Cyndee Royle defends her decision and in fact sounds quite smug about it. Let’s keep those cards and letters (and telephone calls, of course) coming.
EDITOR:
Miss RoyleÂ’s married name is Lambert. She lives in White Plains and here is her Facebook page complete with pictures of her and her kids. Hello Sanctimony.
...
There's more at the link. Lots and lots more, and I don't want to steal their thunder by posting it here. Go over and pay those guys a visit and check out the database they've compiled of the paper's staff. Maybe some of you Morons could even drop them a line and let them know how much you appreciate their work.
Posted by: andy at
10:43 AM
| Comments (225)
Post contains 314 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Mobius Strip [/i] at December 26, 2012 10:47 AM (O7Q1u)
I've been a regular at FWIW for a couple of years, and Mr Fountain has a great blog. I work a coupl'a towns up from Greenwich.
Posted by: West at December 26, 2012 10:49 AM (1Rgee)
Posted by: Brenden at December 26, 2012 10:52 AM (wa+SP)
But, that's just me.
Posted by: CUS at December 26, 2012 10:52 AM (84pE9)
I really would love to know if the newspaper did any type of cross referencing to see if that information is out of date. I am absolutely positive it's not.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. We're not worthy. at December 26, 2012 10:53 AM (Gk3SS)
Posted by: Mr Pink at December 26, 2012 10:55 AM (+u2k2)
The Social Security Administration also released new data revealing that the number of workers collecting disability benefits hit a record 8,827,795 in December--up from 8,805,353 in November.
Posted by: Al Gore's "lockbox" at December 26, 2012 10:55 AM (e8kgV)
Alinskys rules. “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.
These bastards need to get the shoe on THEIR foot. Once enough of them have had a few hot feet, they will appreciate people being responsible with their media weapons.
Posted by: DiogenesLamp at December 26, 2012 10:55 AM (bb5+k)
Fewer gun permits, more sex offenders.
More gun permits, fewer sex offenders.
Lions and tigers and bears, oh my!
http://tinyurl.com/dy2ghlt
Posted by: @PurpAv at December 26, 2012 10:56 AM (TkFJS)
Posted by: CUS at December 26, 2012 10:56 AM (84pE9)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's mobile at December 26, 2012 10:57 AM (YZizW)
Posted by: CarolLK at December 26, 2012 10:58 AM (zgOS/)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at December 26, 2012 10:58 AM (/eBe8)
Posted by: phoenixgirl, Merry 2nd day of Christmas at December 26, 2012 10:59 AM (GVxQo)
If she has a college age daughter...20 bucks says there is a slutty picture of her on Facebook. Unless she's a pig.
Btw brb I'll see if the one has any speeding tickets.
Posted by: Mr Pink at December 26, 2012 02:55 PM (+u2k2)
It is long past time for us to hurt these so called "journalists" personally. They hurt *US* personally, (Sarah Palin anyone?) and they need a good punch in the nose to make them understand why they don't want to play this game with us.
The French have a saying, (yeah, I know, but this one is good.) "À BON CHAT, BON RAT." You act like a Cat to me, and i'll act like a Rat to you. Retaliation in kind. This is war people, we didn't start it, but we need to make them get a good taste of it.
Posted by: DiogenesLamp at December 26, 2012 11:00 AM (bb5+k)
Needless to say, when they defended it, they claimed their first amendment rights were more important than these women's safety.
Posted by: MrCaniac at December 26, 2012 11:00 AM (Zd/NW)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's mobile at December 26, 2012 11:00 AM (YZizW)
Posted by: Brother Cavil, Lord Commander of the Ampersand Army at December 26, 2012 11:01 AM (GBXon)
Posted by: Vizzini [/i] at December 26, 2012 11:02 AM (O7Q1u)
Posted by: Mr Pink at December 26, 2012 11:03 AM (+u2k2)
...some people just don't get that.
Posted by: @PurpAv at December 26, 2012 11:03 AM (TkFJS)
Yeah, but it looks like that didn't actually pass. That text is for a bill and from the comments there it looks like it got referred to committee and either didn't come out or didn't get taken up for a vote. I do know that many states have laws on the books explicitly protecting this information.
Now, I very very vaguely recall that there are privacy protection laws for names and address of current and retired law enforcement personnel for the obvious reasons and it sounds very likely that those were broken. I'm far too lazy to go spelunking to look that up.
All that being said, I would be shocked to my core if that rag did any type of investigation to cross reference between LEOs, those with restraining orders or any other type of check to make sure they aren't placing certain individuals in even greater danger than they are placing everyone on that list.
Also, gah, I meant I'm sure the information is out of date. I blame the weather, my lack of caffeine and David Gregory.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. We're not worthy. at December 26, 2012 11:04 AM (Gk3SS)
Posted by: L, elle at December 26, 2012 11:05 AM (0PiQ4)
I think a daily or weekly listing of all the MFM celebratie's addresses and phone numbers and other vital information should be a priority on a much viewed blog like Drudge. Take them by states.
Breitbart should send out reporters to stand out in front of MFM talking head's homes and badger them every time they step out of their houses.
Posted by: Soona at December 26, 2012 11:05 AM (yCeIL)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's mobile at December 26, 2012 11:06 AM (YZizW)
"It is one thing to HAVE the right to do something, but quite another thing to BE right in doing it."
Posted by: Adjoran at December 26, 2012 11:06 AM (ZHQvg)
Posted by: gigg423 at December 26, 2012 11:06 AM (41VCE)
Now, I very very vaguely recall that there are privacy protection laws for names and address of current and retired law enforcement personnel for the obvious reasons and it sounds very likely that those were broken. I'm far too lazy to go spelunking to look that up.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. We're not worthy. at December 26, 2012 03:04 PM (Gk3SS)
They intended to hurt us with their media weapon. If they can be brought up on charges for what they did, it would poetic justice. The right needs to bite.
Posted by: DiogenesLamp at December 26, 2012 11:07 AM (bb5+k)
Naw, I sure there is slutty picture even if she is a pig.
Posted by: Paladin at December 26, 2012 11:07 AM (3sGSF)
Maybe some of these journalists like to surf porn too and the public should know. Gather up those IP addresses
Posted by: kbdabear at December 26, 2012 11:07 AM (wwsoB)
Posted by: Cowboy at December 26, 2012 11:08 AM (WcgMM)
I let you serfs peek at my colon and now you think I'm an open book.
Posted by: Katie Couric at December 26, 2012 11:09 AM (QKKT0)
Now, I'm not saying that all unemployment, welfare, SSDI, WIC, etc recipients are bad people or undeserving - but there are far more fraudulent claims out there than any of us can even imagine. I know at least 7 people on SSDI, for instance, who have no perceivable disability and who could easily work. I hear about people defrauding unemployment constantly - people don't seem to think it is wrong they are so open about doing it. I have seen people I know receive Section 8 housing assistance who drive a nicer car then me and have better clothes and televisions.
If we had an interactive map of these people, it would be easier to report fraud and it would also turn most people against these programs as the fraud would become much more visible. Which is why such a map would never be made.
Posted by: Monkeytoe at December 26, 2012 11:10 AM (sOx93)
Posted by: kbdabear at December 26, 2012 03:07 PM
Hey, who gets in the way of my car is MY business !!!
Posted by: Rick Sanchez at December 26, 2012 11:10 AM (wwsoB)
I'm going to call her to find out.
Posted by: eleven at December 26, 2012 11:10 AM (KXm42)
Posted by: Mr Pink at December 26, 2012 11:11 AM (+u2k2)
Maybe some of these journalists like to surf porn too and the public should know. Gather up those IP addresses
Posted by: kbdabear t December 26, 2012 03:07 PM (wwsoB)
I would like to see interactive maps exclusively of crimes committed by journalists, or unpaid fines, of court orders regarding them, of anything and everything to which they would object becoming public knowledge. They have been trying to hurt us for years, they should get a dose of their own medicine.
The right needs to bite.
Posted by: DiogenesLamp at December 26, 2012 11:11 AM (bb5+k)
As others have pointed out, this makes everyone less safe.
On the one hand, thieves looking for money/electronics/jewelry/etc. are now going to be able to cut down on the chances of being confronted by an angry and armed homeowner.
On the other hand, thieves looking for guns to sell to other bad guys now have a handy listing of homes they can visit.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at December 26, 2012 11:11 AM (/eBe8)
But then again, I live in a rural part of a red state, where concealed carry permit or not, there is probably at least one firearm in 80% of the homes around here.
That said, I'm not sure why this information really needs to be publically accessible.
And THAT said, why do I even need a special permit to carry concealed? I don't need a special permit to exercise my right to free speech or free assembly. Why do I need one for my right to keep and bear arms?
Posted by: looking closely at December 26, 2012 11:11 AM (6Q9g2)
Posted by: Fritz at December 26, 2012 11:12 AM (/ZZCn)
Posted by: kbdabear at December 26, 2012 03:07 PM (wwsoB)
---------------------------------------------------
Not just pr0n, but child pr0n. Bet there's a bunch of 'em do that.
Posted by: Soona at December 26, 2012 11:12 AM (yCeIL)
Posted by: ette at December 26, 2012 11:12 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, aka Jack July author of Amy Lynn available on Amazon. at December 26, 2012 11:13 AM (3Y7RV)
Posted by: SpongeBob Saget's square dildo at December 26, 2012 11:13 AM (epxV4)
Posted by: Cowboy at December 26, 2012 03:08 PM (WcgMM)
Some may look at it that way, but I regard it with a far more Sinister intent ; to motivate the Stasi to round up these people. They are wanting to portray gun-owners as "the other" and provoke a Kristallnacht on them.
Posted by: DiogenesLamp at December 26, 2012 11:14 AM (bb5+k)
Posted by: ette at December 26, 2012 11:14 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: Troll Patrol at December 26, 2012 11:14 AM (QKKT0)
That information is also public and subject to FOIL. In fact, you can look it up online pretty easily as some organizations have already compiled it from FOIL requests. But the media has no interest in publishing information that might educate its readers about the falsity of the left's claims.
Posted by: Monkeytoe at December 26, 2012 11:14 AM (sOx93)
there should be three armed guards, per school, and it should be paid for by the cocksmoking poor people who just get free shit all the time and don't pay for any of it.
Posted by: Ace of Spades HQ at December 26, 2012 11:14 AM (XC3Mz)
Maybe a map of those folks with DUI arrests and convictions. After all, a drunk driver is a menace to public safety too, although some
journalists might not like a push pin on their home addresses
Posted by: kbdabear at December 26, 2012 03:07 PM
All you have to do is see if you live near a Kennedy, that should take care of about half of the drunk drivers on the road.
Posted by: MrCaniac at December 26, 2012 11:15 AM (Zd/NW)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, aka Jack July author of Amy Lynn available on Amazon. at December 26, 2012 11:15 AM (3Y7RV)
all the cocksmoking poor peopel are ruining the country for the gun sucking cock drenching white folk who just want guns and cock and jesus.l
Posted by: Ace of Spades HQ at December 26, 2012 11:16 AM (XC3Mz)
Posted by: L, elle at December 26, 2012 11:17 AM (0PiQ4)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, aka Jack July author of Amy Lynn available on Amazon. at December 26, 2012 11:17 AM (3Y7RV)
I'm not typically a covetous person, but I may have to throw a temper tantrum until I get one of these.
Posted by: fluffy at December 26, 2012 11:18 AM (z9HTb)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at December 26, 2012 11:19 AM (e0xKF)
Posted by: Al Gore's "lockbox" at December 26, 2012 02:55 PM (e8kgV)
This is what I want a map of. My guess is that at least 1/3 of these "disability" claims are fraudulent. Of course, nowadays just about any ailment counts as a disability, so there is that.
Posted by: Monkeytoe at December 26, 2012 11:20 AM (sOx93)
Posted by: gigg423 at December 26, 2012 11:20 AM (41VCE)
Posted by: Ace of Spades HQ at December 26, 2012 11:20 AM (XC3Mz)
Posted by: DiogenesLamp at December 26, 2012 03:14 PM (bb5+k)
I am certain this is to name and shame. One of the Leftist tactics is to refuse to allow children to go visit a home where guns are because obviously that is child endangerment. So publishing this info is intended for use as a good old fashioned cut from society.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. We're not worthy. at December 26, 2012 11:20 AM (Gk3SS)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at December 26, 2012 11:21 AM (e0xKF)
Fewer gun permits, more sex offenders.
More gun permits, fewer sex offenders.
xxxxx
Racist!
/also, it's not child rape, it's "quasi consentual inter-generational sex." Also, between adults, it's simply "quasi consentual sex."
Posted by: Libtards Everywhere at December 26, 2012 11:21 AM (z63Tr)
I have concealed weapons permit.
So I have the gun concealed. . . Lets play "hide and seek".
Where is my gun?
Is it in my gun safe? Under my pillow? In my car? On my person?
Or maybe, there is more than one gun in more than one place. . .hard to know, though I kind of think your odd burglar probably isn't going to want to spend too much time looking for it.
Posted by: looking closely at December 26, 2012 11:22 AM (6Q9g2)
Posted by: Ace of Spades HQ at December 26, 2012 11:22 AM (XC3Mz)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. We're not worthy. at December 26, 2012 11:23 AM (Gk3SS)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at December 26, 2012 11:23 AM (e0xKF)
Posted by: gigg423 at December 26, 2012 11:24 AM (41VCE)
Posted by: Soona at December 26, 2012 11:24 AM (yCeIL)
HEY!
brb assembling third world dictator play set for revenge
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. We're not worthy. at December 26, 2012 11:24 AM (Gk3SS)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at December 26, 2012 11:25 AM (e0xKF)
Posted by: MidwesternSceptic at December 26, 2012 11:25 AM (cxl8k)
Posted by: Monkeytoe
But don't you dare suggest an overlay with crime stats on such a map!!!
That would be Racist McRacerton.
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at December 26, 2012 11:25 AM (KDq5l)
Posted by: CUS at December 26, 2012 03:24 PM (84pE9)
Yup. I'm annoyed that i'm not getting to see what is getting stomped on before it disappears.
Posted by: DiogenesLamp at December 26, 2012 11:25 AM (bb5+k)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at December 26, 2012 11:26 AM (e0xKF)
Posted by: Manolo at December 26, 2012 11:26 AM (PttbO)
Posted by: gigg423 at December 26, 2012 11:26 AM (41VCE)
Dude, I was kidding. There are appropriate times to use comment numbers and that's one of them. It just amuses the hell out of me when I end up having a renumbered comment for one that got stomped.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. We're not worthy. at December 26, 2012 11:27 AM (Gk3SS)
---
It really is nothing. Some jerk-off posting as Ace of Spades HQ.
Who brought the Ban Hammer?
Posted by: CUS at December 26, 2012 11:27 AM (84pE9)
i love being clever when I suck cock. i wish trolls were more clever, they should learn how to felch the nra like i do. that's yummy.
Posted by: gigg423 at December 26, 2012 11:27 AM (XC3Mz)
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at December 26, 2012 11:27 AM (QKKT0)
i like to be a loser, with a gun, anda cock in my mouth to choke on.
Posted by: Ace of Spades HQ at December 26, 2012 03:26 PM (XC3Mz)
So all you need now is a gun?
Posted by: DiogenesLamp at December 26, 2012 11:28 AM (bb5+k)
Posted by: phoenixgirl, Merry 2nd day of Christmas at December 26, 2012 11:28 AM (GVxQo)
Posted by: rickb223 Let. It. Burn. at December 26, 2012 11:28 AM (GFM2b)
Posted by: gigg423 at December 26, 2012 11:28 AM (41VCE)
I'm shocked and appalled. And deeply hurt besides. I'll share it with you.
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at December 26, 2012 11:29 AM (QKKT0)
Posted by: Brother Cavil, Lord Commander of the Ampersand Army at December 26, 2012 11:29 AM (GBXon)
Posted by: BurtTC at December 26, 2012 11:29 AM (TOk1P)
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at December 26, 2012 03:29 PM (QKKT0)
I am gobsmacked by the vileness.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. We're not worthy. at December 26, 2012 11:30 AM (Gk3SS)
Some of these are parents who tell their kids to act up in specific ways so they collect "crazy checks", which should frankly be labeled a form of child abuse.
There was an article, in the NYTimes I think, about families in rural Appalacia who deliberately prevent their kids from learning to read in order to collect benefits. The kids are labeled with a "learning disability" and the parents collect social security for it, but if the kids learn to read the benefits will go away the parents fear.
Posted by: Colorado Alex at December 26, 2012 11:30 AM (o1kXv)
Posted by: Polliwog the 'Ette, still a Hobbit at December 26, 2012 11:30 AM (wbeNt)
Us journolists know MUCH better than you proles what is good for you, and besides the constitution is like 100 years old or something. Like Hilary-beast said, "We're going to have to take things away from you"
Posted by: jourolist at December 26, 2012 11:31 AM (FxBCF)
Who brought the Ban Hammer?
Posted by: CUS at December 26, 2012 03:27 PM (84pE9)
-------------------------------------------------
His posts on the last thread reminded me of a long banned troll that we had during the campaign. Bur....I mean, Ban them all.
Posted by: Soona at December 26, 2012 11:31 AM (yCeIL)
Posted by: eleven at December 26, 2012 11:31 AM (KXm42)
Posted by: DiogenesLamp
Banhammer of the Gods is in effect.
Don't smear troll shit in the thread, please.
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at December 26, 2012 11:31 AM (KDq5l)
Posted by: gigg423 at December 26, 2012 11:31 AM (41VCE)
98 -
There is an auto-zapper, so I'm sure that's what is being used here. No need for Ace or a Cob to manually pull the trigger.
Posted by: BurtTC at December 26, 2012 11:32 AM (TOk1P)
Hey, now, let's be fair. If that was bannable none of us would be left.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. We're not worthy. at December 26, 2012 11:32 AM (Gk3SS)
Posted by: ette at December 26, 2012 11:32 AM (nqBYe)
I love rebuking the sex talk, then accusing a troll of having incest with his/her mother. Cuz I love horse cum and jesus and guns, not in that order. I love Jesus cum first, then horse cum then more horse cum, then a little horse cum chaser, then guns.
Posted by: gigg423 at December 26, 2012 11:32 AM (XC3Mz)
Yeah butters - you're smart. you're so smart. you're such an ass felching smarty pants. wow, you're smart. how did you ever lose the election, being so smart, i mean.?
Posted by: gigg423 at December 26, 2012 11:33 AM (XC3Mz)
Don't smear troll shit in the thread, please.
Posted by: weft cut-loop at December 26, 2012 03:31 PM (KDq5l)
Sorry, couldn't resist the opening.
Posted by: DiogenesLamp at December 26, 2012 11:34 AM (bb5+k)
You are so bright! I bet you got a telescope for xmas, now you can see the crabs on grannys anus.
Posted by: gigg423 at December 26, 2012 11:34 AM (XC3Mz)
Posted by: Colorado Alex at December 26, 2012 03:30 PM (o1kXv)
Positive feedback loop. Also known as disincentivation.
Posted by: DiogenesLamp at December 26, 2012 11:35 AM (bb5+k)
Posted by: speedster1 at December 26, 2012 11:36 AM (yeM7r)
I appreciate the janitor cleaning up the mess, but when can we get the idiot banned?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at December 26, 2012 11:36 AM (/eBe8)
Posted by: eleven at December 26, 2012 11:36 AM (KXm42)
Posted by: Ace Holes in Spades HQ at December 26, 2012 11:36 AM (XC3Mz)
Posted by: gigg423 at December 26, 2012 11:37 AM (41VCE)
Posted by: Soona at December 26, 2012 11:37 AM (yCeIL)
Posted by: Polliwog the 'Ette, still a Hobbit at December 26, 2012 11:38 AM (wbeNt)
Posted by: speedster1 at December 26, 2012 11:38 AM (yeM7r)
Euclid? Seriously? Do they want the storm beat up by it's storm peers on the storm playground?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at December 26, 2012 11:38 AM (/eBe8)
Posted by: Mætenloch at December 26, 2012 11:39 AM (XkotV)
Posted by: rickb223 Let. It. Burn. at December 26, 2012 11:39 AM (GFM2b)
Gross the thing is using my handle, that's just terrible.
Yeah, it's used a few. At least they're getting zapped pretty quickly
Posted by: Lurking Canuck at December 26, 2012 11:39 AM (0WLla)
By Hurricane Ike no less.
Posted by: eleven at December 26, 2012 11:40 AM (KXm42)
Posted by: NCKate at December 26, 2012 11:40 AM (XwChs)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at December 26, 2012 11:40 AM (e0xKF)
Posted by: Vizzini [/i] at December 26, 2012 11:40 AM (O7Q1u)
Posted by: Brother Cavil, Lord Commander of the Ampersand Army at December 26, 2012 11:41 AM (GBXon)
Posted by: The Media at December 26, 2012 11:41 AM (SUKHu)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at December 26, 2012 03:38 PM (/eBe
All brought to by the earth-friendly TWC. What a hoot. I don't see how they keep a straight face when they're reporting this.
Posted by: Soona at December 26, 2012 11:41 AM (yCeIL)
Posted by: Arbalest at December 26, 2012 11:41 AM (t8dlh)
Posted by: rickb223 Let. It. Burn. at December 26, 2012 11:42 AM (GFM2b)
Posted by: Butters at December 26, 2012 11:43 AM (NIZHJ)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at December 26, 2012 11:44 AM (HDgX3)
Posted by: Butters at December 26, 2012 11:45 AM (NIZHJ)
I hate Wisconsin library trolls.
Posted by: eleven at December 26, 2012 11:46 AM (KXm42)
Posted by: garrett at December 26, 2012 11:46 AM (6OjR8)
Posted by: Butters at December 26, 2012 11:46 AM (NIZHJ)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at December 26, 2012 11:46 AM (e0xKF)
There's an IP blacklist. You put the IP addresses of serial offenders (especially the boring ones) on it. That IP tries to post, and it gets rejected.
Of course, then they can use proxies, reset modems, etc., etc. But you can keep up with it if you try.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at December 26, 2012 11:46 AM (/eBe8)
This is why every 3rd kid these days has autism or Asperger's. It's all about the money. Kids with "disabilities" can be VERY profitable for parents and their doctors.
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at December 26, 2012 11:46 AM (HDgX3)
Posted by: Butters at December 26, 2012 11:47 AM (NIZHJ)
Posted by: Sconnie Liberry Troll With Dirty Feet at December 26, 2012 11:47 AM (AVfT8)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at December 26, 2012 11:48 AM (e0xKF)
Posted by: ette at December 26, 2012 11:48 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: rickb223 Let. It. Burn. at December 26, 2012 11:48 AM (GFM2b)
Posted by: Sconnie Liberry Troll With Dirty Feet at December 26, 2012 11:48 AM (AVfT8)
Posted by: gigg423 at December 26, 2012 11:48 AM (41VCE)
This little troll is a shitstain. Can't quite completely wash him out. He's been here before though.
Posted by: Soona at December 26, 2012 11:48 AM (yCeIL)
Posted by: gigg423 at December 26, 2012 11:48 AM (41VCE)
Posted by: speedster1 at December 26, 2012 11:49 AM (yeM7r)
Also because of NCLB. One of the ways school districts have found around some of the passing percentage requirements is to have kids they know are going to fail classified as Special Education/Special Needs. The law exempts their scores from the school's numbers. So a lot of kids who are merely difficult and unruly are classified with some "disability" and sent to the Special Ed teacher so that it won't matter when they fail their end-of-year achievement test.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at December 26, 2012 11:50 AM (/eBe8)
You have to have id #'s nowaday.
Posted by: eleven at December 26, 2012 11:50 AM (KXm42)
This is why every 3rd kid these days has autism or Asperger's. It's all about the money. Kids with "disabilities" can be VERY profitable for parents and their doctors.
There's also a status piece to it. Helicopter parents of a single child are competing against one another for who is the most "dedicated" parent. Having a child with autism or Asperger's allows them to revel in how hard they have it while simultaneously excusing any bad behavior by their child.
Posted by: Colorado Alex at December 26, 2012 11:50 AM (o1kXv)
I wouild, in my quaint and dry prose, just point out that hundreds of gun-nuts mobbing a professional female and threatening her home (implicitly, yea yea) is really going to do wonders to the conservative/pro gun part of the country. And that the liberals really dont need to do any presswork themselves, since they just have to annoy you folks a little bit and the mediastory comes of itself. (Anyone remember ho Sandra Fluke and the War on Women got started by Rush Limbaugh?)
What you dont understand is that you are dealing with a lot of frightened mothers here. Screaming at the top of your lungs at them aint going to work. But hell, you folks have moved well beyond caring about anything but the fire now, havent you? I bet Jesus is proud.
Posted by: Fnord at December 26, 2012 11:50 AM (SaVDQ)
If I wasn't in some dixie shit-hole, why, I'd go pay that troll a visit in his cushy lie-bary. We ain't got them heahr in Baton Rouge. Just a bunch of trannys maquerading as men on political blogs. HEE HEE HEE....
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at December 26, 2012 11:50 AM (XC3Mz)
Posted by: Brother Cavil, Lord Commander of the Ampersand Army at December 26, 2012 11:50 AM (GBXon)
I think it's funny that some hobo stopped by the library in Kenosha to drop a deuce, rub one out and troll the HQ.
America. What a country.
Posted by: garrett at December 26, 2012 11:51 AM (6OjR8)
Posted by: Fnord at December 26, 2012 11:51 AM (SaVDQ)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at December 26, 2012 03:50 PM (/eBe
__________________
I show up sooner or later.
Posted by: Mr. Law Of Unintended Consequences at December 26, 2012 11:51 AM (HDgX3)
Posted by: Brother Cavil, Lord Commander of the Ampersand Army at December 26, 2012 11:52 AM (GBXon)
Posted by: speedster1 at December 26, 2012 11:52 AM (yeM7r)
Posted by: Arbalest at December 26, 2012 11:53 AM (t8dlh)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, aka Jack July author of Amy Lynn available on Amazon. at December 26, 2012 11:53 AM (3Y7RV)
________________
I don't give a fuck what Jesus thinks. I hate liberals and want them to be afraid.
PS: Fuck you you too
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at December 26, 2012 11:53 AM (HDgX3)
Posted by: garrett at December 26, 2012 11:53 AM (6OjR8)
Texas had a step up on that, since we had a State version of NCLB (tied to school funding, I think) when GW was Governor. Texas schools were ARDing kids before the ink on his signature was dry on the national version.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at December 26, 2012 11:53 AM (/eBe8)
I deplore violence, unless its against schoolkids and i can make some kind of political hay out of it. then, meh.
Posted by: Brother Cavil, Lord Commander of the Ampersand Army at December 26, 2012 11:53 AM (XC3Mz)
Posted by: Manolo at December 26, 2012 03:26 PM (PttbO)
What is the point of publicizing law abiding gun owners' names and addresses?
With people on disability, it tells the electorate where our tax dollars are being spent and allows us to watch out for fraud.
It appears to anyone with any sense of honesty that publicizing a list of welfare recipients has much more relevance than publishing gun ownership. One is a private legal activity without government involvement (aside from the requirement to obtain a permit). The other is taking money from the gov't - which we should always be entitled to know about. As a taxpayer and voter, I should know where my money is being spent, on who, and why. I don't see why I need to know who owns a gun.
but your snide and ignorant comment rightly shames me into thinking I was wrong. Or maybe it just shows how stupid you are?
Posted by: Monkeytoe at December 26, 2012 11:54 AM (sOx93)
Posted by: Mr. Law Of Unintended Consequences at December 26, 2012 03:51 PM (HDgX3)
---------------------------------------------------
I do too.
Posted by: Mr. Taking-resposibility-for-my-actions at December 26, 2012 11:55 AM (yCeIL)
Posted by: Brother Cavil, Lord Commander of the Ampersand Army at December 26, 2012 11:55 AM (XC3Mz)
>>>What is the point of publicizing law abiding gun owners' names and addresses?
Greg Gutfeld just released a book on this very subject called, 'The Joy of Hate'.
Posted by: garrett at December 26, 2012 11:56 AM (6OjR8)
As hard as you try you have still not convinced Americans guns are a bad thing. Poll after pool, even after the CT event shows 70% of people do not want to ban guns.
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at December 26, 2012 11:56 AM (HDgX3)
As hard as you try you have still not convinced Americans guns are a bad thing. Poll after pool, even after the CT event shows 70% of people do not want to ban guns.
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at December 26, 2012 03:56 PM (HDgX3)
>>>
>>
>
>
I depore the use of this language. It deserves a ban hammer.
Posted by: Brother Cavil, Lord Commander of the Ampersand Army at December 26, 2012 11:57 AM (XC3Mz)
Posted by: Butters at December 26, 2012 11:58 AM (NIZHJ)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at December 26, 2012 12:00 PM (HDgX3)
Posted by: Fnord at December 26, 2012 03:50 PM (SaVDQ)
Like they wouldn't hurt us more if they could. No, I think giving them a taste of their own medicine is exactly the right thing to do. You want to jump into a fight? You ought to be ready to get hurt.
Posted by: DiogenesLamp at December 26, 2012 12:00 PM (bb5+k)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC Waiting for the Sun at December 26, 2012 12:04 PM (TRX3G)
What you dont understand is that you are dealing
with a lot of frightened mothers here. Screaming at the top of your
lungs at them aint going to work. But hell, you folks have moved well
beyond caring about anything but the fire now, havent you? I bet Jesus
is proud.
Posted by: Fnord at December 26, 2012 03:50 PM (SaVDQ)
---------------------------------------------------
First off, I doubt very seriously that you know anything about Jesus, and secondly, you obviously know nothing about mothers.
A great percentage of gun sales, I'll bet, are by mothers.
Posted by: Soona at December 26, 2012 12:05 PM (yCeIL)
Posted by: MidwesternSceptic at December 26, 2012 12:06 PM (cxl8k)
I wouild, in my quaint and dry prose, just point out that hundreds of gun-nuts mobbing a professional female
__
Come on now, any "professional" woman named CynDee loves her some attention from the readership. Why else would she have published a pic of her sporty red convertible in front of her McMansion? Maybe she's trying to hook up with Ted Nugent, he's a famous gun-nut...it must be all part of her master plan.
Hey! Maybe we could get Spike Lee to tweet some more of her personal info...that could get her on Uncle Ted's radar!
Posted by: kallisto at December 26, 2012 12:07 PM (jm/9g)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC Waiting for the Sun at December 26, 2012 12:09 PM (TRX3G)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at December 26, 2012 12:09 PM (XkWWK)
I wouild, in my quaint and dry prose, just point out that hundreds of gun-nuts mobbing a professional female and threatening her home (implicitly, yea yea) is really going to do wonders to the conservative/pro gun part of the country. And that the liberals really dont need to do any presswork themselves, since they just have to annoy you folks a little bit and the mediastory comes of itself. (Anyone remember ho Sandra Fluke and the War on Women got started by Rush Limbaugh?)
What you dont understand is that you are dealing with a lot of frightened mothers here. Screaming at the top of your lungs at them aint going to work. But hell, you folks have moved well beyond caring about anything but the fire now, havent you? I bet Jesus is proud.
Posted by: Fnord at December 26, 2012 03:50 PM (SaVDQ)
And he hates leftists and whiny women.
Posted by: MrCaniac at December 26, 2012 12:09 PM (Zd/NW)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at December 26, 2012 12:11 PM (e0xKF)
Posted by: ette at December 26, 2012 12:12 PM (nqBYe)
All the creeps have to do is check a potential target against this map, and they will know whether or not they can safely attack the inhabitants of an address.
So soccer moms, once they are aware of this, are not going to be particularly pleased.
As far as I am concerned, every crime against someone NOT on this map is directly attributable to this idiot newspaper telling criminals which homes are unprotected.
Posted by: Miss Marple at December 26, 2012 12:15 PM (GoIUi)
Posted by: ette at December 26, 2012 12:15 PM (nqBYe)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC Waiting for the Sun at December 26, 2012 12:15 PM (TRX3G)
Posted by: ette at December 26, 2012 12:17 PM (nqBYe)
Posted by: ette at December 26, 2012 12:18 PM (nqBYe)
IIRC, Proverbs has some helpful tips re fools and their folly.
Posted by: Count de Monet at December 26, 2012 12:21 PM (BAS5M)
Posted by: Fnord at December 26, 2012 03:50 PM (SaVDQ)
Because, of course, it makes perfect sense to publicize a legal gun owners name and address simply because they have the audacity to use their constitutional right to bear arms - but to turn the tables and publicize the name and address of the person who publicized that info is somehow wrong.
Also "gun nut". I guess that would be anyone who believes in the constitution? What is a "gun nut"? If you hate guns, you hate America, as one of the foundational principles of America is the right to bear arms. Is "gun nut" a term of art? Does it refer to anyone who believes in the 2nd amendment, or do you need to do more than believe in the 2nd amendment to be considered a "gun nut" but America haters like you?
And that the liberals really dont need to do any presswork themselves, since they just have to annoy you folks a little bit and the mediastory comes of itself. (Anyone remember ho Sandra Fluke and the War on Women got started by Rush Limbaugh?)
You are correct that liberals can sit back and allow the media (98% of which is liberal) simply advocate liberal viewpoints rather than report facts - Sandra Fluke is a perfect example. They pretended that her lies before congress about not being able to afford or find affordable birth control were reasonable or made any sense in the argument over whether I should be forced to pay for your birth control. Had the media truthfully reported the story, they would point out that a) birth control is inexpensive and readily available and b) that requiring a religious institution to pay for birth control against its beliefs violates the constitution. Something the media ignored.
What you dont understand is that you are dealing with a lot of frightened mothers here.
What exactly is this supposed to mean? Because there are frightened mothers, it is ok for the paper to publicize law abiding citizens names and addresses simply because they use their constitutional right to bear arms? That b/c there are frightened mothers we should no longer use reason and common sense? What is your point?
Screaming at the top of your lungs at them aint going to work.
Then why is this liberals one and only debating technique?
But hell, you folks have moved well beyond caring about anything but the fire now, havent you?
What?
I bet Jesus is proud.
Proud of what? Defending our beliefs? I think he probably would be proud of that. But, of course, you mean that to be snide. Typical.
Posted by: Monkeytoe at December 26, 2012 12:41 PM (sOx93)
Posted by: Monkeytoe at December 26, 2012 12:43 PM (sOx93)
On gun thieves. I live in a small, very safe cul de sac area with about 35 homes. Since the neighborhood was developed about 25 years ago (I'm an original homeowner there), there has been exactly one (1) break in/theft. And guess what was taken?
Yup, the homeowner's couple of guns. And it was a break in by someone who had been doing finishing work on the house just after the homeowner moved in, so the scumbag knew the guns were there.
Posted by: RM at December 26, 2012 12:44 PM (TRsME)
Posted by: The Ghost of Flannery O'Connor at December 26, 2012 12:59 PM (mMtFx)
Posted by: someguy at December 26, 2012 04:07 PM (sEXZ/)
Posted by: Rex the Wonder God at December 26, 2012 06:11 PM (21TJo)
Posted by: Fnord at December 26, 2012 03:50 PM (SaVDQ)
Oh, I remember ho Sandra Fluke.
Posted by: washington nearsider at December 27, 2012 04:58 AM (fwARV)
Posted by: Tina Rocha at December 27, 2012 01:21 PM (Z8+C7)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2421 seconds, 353 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Mama AJ at December 26, 2012 10:47 AM (SUKHu)