May 24, 2012
— Ace Simple, yes. But like many simple things, it's also hard.
Read the piece, but I'll summarize some and quote. The "3" is Romney winning back three states which are usually part of the Republican electoral count but which flipped to Obama in 2008 -- Indiana, North Carolina, and Virginia.
Virginia is the toughest, and Obama might actually win it again. He sees this one in contestation until election day. Although, it should be noted, Obama will have no choice but to fight for this one until election day -- without it, his Winning Map is very hard indeed.
Then Romney must pick up two traditional swing states, Ohio and Florida, that Obama won in 2008 (but not by a lot).
I think Ohio is the harder one here. It's trending Democratic. "Florida, Florida, Florida" might sort of be a lean Republican state at this point, which we have to count on winning if we're in the game at all.
With those states, and with the 10 votes that McCain/lean Republican states picked up in reapportionment, Romney is at 266 to Obama's 270. Edit: Oh, to get to this count, Romney would also have to pick up the Congressional District in Nebraska that went to Obama (while the other EV's went to McCain). But that's just one vote, and would only matter if Romney's winning state had exactly four EVs. Like New Hampshire, I think.
This is also the time, probably, to mention the 269-269 tie where it then goes to the House of Representatives is in play. Sort of.
Romney would need just one more state to take the election.
Here are Rove's thoughts on The One State That Wins the Election.
There are many paths open to him. One is the Neighborhood route. If the Boston resident and former Massachusetts governor captures next-door New Hampshire, its four electoral votes would take him to the magical 270 and the Oval Office.
But it's my gut that New Hampshire is a lost cause, unless this turns into a Reagan-like route. Which is possible, but in that case, we don't have to concern ourselves with New Hampshire. At that point, we'd be wondering about New Jersey.
There's also the Great Lakes route through Michigan (16 electoral votes), Pennsylvania (20) and Wisconsin (10). Of these, Michigan may be the toughest. But Mr. Obama's antipathy toward coal, added to problems with working-class whites and suburban independents, puts Pennsylvania in play...And if Gov. Scott Walker survives his June 5 recall by a healthy margin, Wisconsin could also be up for grabs...
CAC is convincing me that Wisconsin is the election. Which puts even more pressure on the June 5 recall -- if we win that, we just might have set the stage to take a state Obama absolutely cannot afford to lose.
The Western route is Colorado (nine electoral votes), Nevada (six) or New Mexico (five)....
Here's what I'm thinking: Nevada, Nevada, Nevada.
With the nation's highest unemployment rate (11.7%), Nevadans remember Mr. Obama's notorious bashing of Las Vegas in 2010: "When times are tough, you tighten your belts. . . . You don't blow a bunch of cash in Vegas . . ."
And Rove doesn't say this, but wouldn't a lot of Mormons in Nevada turn out as ground troops for Romney? Damn, a lot of California and Utahn Mormons might bus themselves in for the last weekend before the election. Eager, clean-cut troops on the ground? That's a nice thing.
He goes on to mention one other possibility -- Iowa. I just get the sense that Iowa is a farmer/labor state and also is probably a lost cause except in an election when Iowa doesn't even matter, because now we're wondering about, I don't know, Oregon.
So, I don't know anything, but to me it's Ohio, Wisconsin, and Nevada.
Posted by: Ace at
10:56 AM
| Comments (514)
Post contains 658 words, total size 4 kb.
Romney could always pick up one of those other 7 states I've heard about.
Posted by: Jollyroger at May 24, 2012 11:00 AM (t06LC)
Who is this 'Ace' RINO? Bring back Open Blogger guy. He would know that NH is going red this November.
Posted by: fluffy, Masshole at May 24, 2012 11:00 AM (z9HTb)
Posted by: wheatie at May 24, 2012 11:01 AM (YzQ1g)
Posted by: toby928© at May 24, 2012 03:00 PM (NG097)
Reagan/Carter v2.0
Posted by: Captain Hate at May 24, 2012 11:01 AM (tY1YV)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at May 24, 2012 11:02 AM (nEUpB)
Posted by: Underground Vulgarian at May 24, 2012 11:02 AM (oipCQ)
Posted by: ace at May 24, 2012 11:03 AM (aw5Tx)
Posted by: Underground Vulgarian at May 24, 2012 11:04 AM (oipCQ)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 24, 2012 11:04 AM (05RcU)
Posted by: fluffy, Masshole at May 24, 2012 11:04 AM (z9HTb)
Posted by: Soothsayer at May 24, 2012 11:04 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: Underground Vulgarian at May 24, 2012 11:04 AM (oipCQ)
Posted by: ace at May 24, 2012 11:05 AM (aw5Tx)
Posted by: ATLDiver at May 24, 2012 11:05 AM (rCsM0)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at May 24, 2012 11:05 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: steevy at May 24, 2012 11:05 AM (7W3wI)
Posted by: ace at May 24, 2012 11:05 AM (aw5Tx)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at May 24, 2012 11:05 AM (xDqit)
Posted by: Laughing in Texas at May 24, 2012 11:05 AM (dL9LY)
That would be Dole the oldest, but we get your point.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at May 24, 2012 11:06 AM (nEUpB)
http://tinyurl.com/8abwcgt
Posted by: Shiggz RocketSurgeon at May 24, 2012 11:06 AM (RfvTE)
Illinois used to be a fairly reliable Republican state. Just ask Lincoln. In retrospect, though, the Republic pretty much couldn't be preserved. Dissolve the nation along the 2012 electoral lines.
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at May 24, 2012 11:06 AM (Ec6wH)
PA Sen. Pileggi proposed a change in the way our state's electoral votes are allocated: the winner of each congressional district would get the electoral votes. Gov. Corbett also backed the proposal but the idea has stalled. If this method were implemented PA would go red this year.
Posted by: kallisto at May 24, 2012 11:06 AM (jm/9g)
Posted by: Soothsayer at May 24, 2012 11:06 AM (jUytm)
The Wisconsin recall will be the preview. If it is an absolute blow-out, November will not be Reagan/Carter 2.0, it will be Reagan/Mondale 2.0.
(Und den ve here der lamintations of der vimmin...)
Posted by: Warthog at May 24, 2012 11:06 AM (WDySP)
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at May 24, 2012 11:06 AM (r4wIV)
Posted by: steevy at May 24, 2012 11:06 AM (7W3wI)
Posted by: ace
And in the farmer state of Iowa, the government just tried to tell those farmers that their kids aren't allowed to work the farms anymore. That's gonna leave a bruise. I bet farmers have a long memory if you try to mess with their livelihood.
Posted by: Hobbitopoly at May 24, 2012 11:07 AM (Lvg/f)
Posted by: Underground Vulgarian at May 24, 2012 11:07 AM (oipCQ)
Posted by: ace at May 24, 2012 11:07 AM (aw5Tx)
As a Virginia resident (go figure), I think swinging VA back to red is very manageable. 2008 featured a very poor candidate in McCain, and Obama inspired a ton of blacks from the Hampton Roads area to come out and vote for him, in addition to Fairfax County. Republicans were not fired up to turn out for McCain here (outskirts of Northern Virginia). However, Obama's just not going to get that turnout again this year, not from the black youth. Republicans are much, much more motivated in this area, just as they are in Wisconsin.
Now, I wouldn't take Virginia for granted. Like Wisconsin, winning Virginia will take discipline and hard work. But, Virginia will definitely be possible.
As for others? I see Wisconsin as possible, and I think the Mormon factor in Nevada might also be underrated. But I do see Pennsylvania in play, and possibly even more favorable for Romney than Ohio. Again, I don't know that Obama will get the same turnout from the PA cities that he did in 2008, and he has lost substantial support in the rural PA counties. I see Obama struggling in PA this year, but of course that state may prove to be its usual Republican tease.
Posted by: Virginia SoCon at May 24, 2012 11:07 AM (+/C3g)
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at May 24, 2012 11:08 AM (kb9F1)
Just a sense of mine, that when we talk about New Hampshire, we're talking about a FORMERLY Republican state.
Mostly got instinct, buoyed by yard signs.
Isn't the NH legislature 3/4 Republican?
Posted by: fluffy at May 24, 2012 11:08 AM (z9HTb)
Posted by: USA at May 24, 2012 11:08 AM (6Cjut)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 24, 2012 11:08 AM (05RcU)
http://www.270towin.com/
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at May 24, 2012 11:08 AM (nEUpB)
Posted by: ace at May 24, 2012 11:08 AM (aw5Tx)
Posted by: MJ at May 24, 2012 11:08 AM (/x4oj)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at May 24, 2012 03:02 PM (nEUpB)
**
District 5 needs to secede from the State, We'll call it...Jersey Island, our state motto, "The shit just got real." or my fave..."Molon Labe"
Posted by: dananjcon at May 24, 2012 11:08 AM (eavT+)
I don't think it will be, but I really wish it would be a blowout. The Democrats are going to cheat, and if it's close, the aftermath is going to be horrible. Much, much worse than 2000.
Posted by: Nicholas Kronos at May 24, 2012 11:08 AM (UCR1O)
You know what state never gets talked about as a decider for Republicans? Washington. Sigh.
We have another Governor's race here that by all rights will look as though the Republican is going to win it, until the damn mail truck full of "misdelivered" ballots shows up.
Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at May 24, 2012 11:09 AM (RZ8pf)
After the auto bailout, the hand-picked candidate of the UAW went up against a nerd businessman that no one ever heard of with absolutely no political experience for the governorship of Michigan. The democrat tied himself to Obama, expecting the saving of GM and Chrysler to carry him through.
He lost by 19 points.
Obama has loaded Michigan with paid staffers, a sure sign that his internal polls are showing trouble.
If there is one state that is ripe for change, itÂ’s Michigan. Obama will lose it in November.
Posted by: jwest at May 24, 2012 11:09 AM (ZDsRL)
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at May 24, 2012 11:09 AM (bjRNS)
Posted by: ace at May 24, 2012 11:09 AM (aw5Tx)
Posted by: Soothsayer at May 24, 2012 11:10 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: Underground Vulgarian at May 24, 2012 11:10 AM (oipCQ)
The state GOP has been taken completely over by RuPaul drones rebelling against the RNC. And the last time the state's GOP had a plum opportunity, it pissed it away with the worst possible candidate.
Nevada was winnable before the 2010 fuckup. As it is, that state's gone. Look elsewhere.
Posted by: Lou at May 24, 2012 11:10 AM (xp1pq)
Posted by: toby928© at May 24, 2012 11:10 AM (NG097)
Posted by: joncelli, heartless Con and all around unpleasant guy at May 24, 2012 11:11 AM (RD7QR)
Traditionally, good econ news takes six months to percolate down to public street-level attitudes, meaning the economy right about now is what the election would be on. Increased speed of news cycles could reduce that somewhat, but the public perception is always a lagging indicator.
The consensus now appears to be that we're on the wrong track and Obama does not deserve reelection. Romney's main challenge is similar to Reagan's in 1980: convince the public he isn't the scary guy the other side wants to portray him as.
It's useful to know where we need to be concentrating resources, but this should not be a nail-biter election. We should be building on 2010.
Posted by: Adjoran at May 24, 2012 11:11 AM (VfmLu)
Posted by: ace at May 24, 2012 11:11 AM (aw5Tx)
Posted by: Soothsayer at May 24, 2012 11:11 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: blindside at May 24, 2012 11:11 AM (x7g7t)
Posted by: John the Libertarian at May 24, 2012 11:11 AM (bJQRu)
Maine is not winner take all, right? Romney should grab the (2nd?) district up north. Southern district might be worth contesting. Like CAC has said, make Obama fight for his 'safe' territory.
Posted by: fluffy at May 24, 2012 11:11 AM (z9HTb)
Posted by: tasker at May 24, 2012 11:12 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: blindside at May 24, 2012 11:13 AM (x7g7t)
Iowa's hard to pigeonhole. But I look for Obama to visit Iowa a lot and the media to remind us that Romney didn't spend the Ames straw poll here or campaign much this time (as opposed to 200
It really isn't a big deal and only a few movers and shakers in the party got their noses out of joint, but look for local media to try to gin up some phony resentment.
Still, I think it's easily doable and wouldn't take a lot of resources to flip. You'll see if it's in play if Obama goes to Iowa a lot. He'll tip his hand first.
Posted by: AmishDude at May 24, 2012 11:13 AM (l17eD)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 24, 2012 11:13 AM (05RcU)
Posted by: Laughing in Texas at May 24, 2012 03:05 PM (dL9LY)
*****
****
There's a joke about low expectations or the low spark of high heeled boys or some shit in there..
Posted by: dananjcon at May 24, 2012 11:13 AM (eavT+)
Here's my prediction.....
Every State that doesn not have Voter ID will be ripe for Voting Fraud.
This is the big Flaw in all of the polling. .....The polls have no way of polling dead people and multiple registrations and illegal votes from out of state voters.
Posted by: wheatie at May 24, 2012 11:13 AM (YzQ1g)
I think Obama's gonna keep Virginia and a few others, but I like Nevada for the Mormon appeal, Wisconsin for the Walker stuff, and even maybe Michigan.
But not PA. Philly will not let PA go for Romney, even if the usual suspects have to vote 8 times each.
Posted by: The Q at May 24, 2012 11:14 AM (LnQhT)
Posted by: Adam Smith's Invisible Pimp Hand at May 24, 2012 11:14 AM (tKFT6)
There are no jobs in Michigan. It's terrible there. I hate going to visit my in-laws because it depresses me. The Republicans took the legislature and Governors office in 2010, and they've been slowly staunching the bleeding. They haven't had the numbers (I think) to really tackle things the way Walker has in WI, but they're doing some positive things there.
Here's the deal: people are noticing, and they're buying into the argument (from what I can tell) that, "It took half a century to get here, give us a chance to actually implement some things."
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at May 24, 2012 11:14 AM (8y9MW)
If we can turn Maine we should really consider annexing Nova Scotia and abit of New Brunswick.
We need to get back to our colonial roots.
Posted by: garrett at May 24, 2012 11:14 AM (XNk0Y)
Posted by: Soothsayer at May 24, 2012 11:15 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: blindside at May 24, 2012 11:15 AM (x7g7t)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 24, 2012 11:15 AM (05RcU)
Something like 7% of Iowans are employed in agriculture (although I don't know if that includes illegal aliens), and the majority of them are employed by gigantic corporate entities.
The big industries are finance, insurance, and government. There are more Iowans over 65 than under 15.
They love their subsidies--wind power, ethanol, Medicare.
Ashton Kutcher is trying to make east Des Moines an "incubator" for the "creative class."
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at May 24, 2012 11:15 AM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: tasker at May 24, 2012 11:15 AM (r2PLg)
Well, PA still has the new voter-ID law to fall back on, even if Corbett and the GOP weakened it yesterday. They dropped the rule requiring a birth certificate when applying for the voter ID card. Something about old people and/or minorities being unable to find their BC or some such nonsense.
Sigh.
Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at May 24, 2012 11:16 AM (YmPwQ)
Posted by: tasker at May 24, 2012 11:16 AM (r2PLg)
Shows you how close we are to the point of no return. The HC Mandate alone should have put O in the 30's. Nope, we are a breath away from welcoming our new socialist masters if they just give us a few more things.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Troll Hunter! at May 24, 2012 11:16 AM (0q2P7)
Perhaps. But don't count on it being anything like the Prop 8 campaign. The church actually took a formal position on that, and asked members to push for it. They definitely will not take a formal position for Romney.
Posted by: red sweater at May 24, 2012 11:16 AM (Xwgt3)
Posted by: Lincolntf at May 24, 2012 11:16 AM (HethX)
Maine and Oregon and Iowa I put into the category of "Bonus Finishing-Move Damage."<<>
FATALITY.
I'm plumping just thinking about a rout
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at May 24, 2012 11:16 AM (mJMH5)
My 3-2-1 strategy:
3 parts red wine vinegar
2 parts lime juice
1 part crushed garlic
Mix and spread over a nice flank of yellow lab. Grill at 325 until medium/rare - medium
Enjoy.
You're welcome.
Posted by: Barack Obama at May 24, 2012 11:16 AM (XxAYS)
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at May 24, 2012 11:17 AM (kb9F1)
Posted by: toby928© at May 24, 2012 03:00 PM (NG097)
^^^THIS^^^
I still remember my first presidential election - people waited in line for an hour, just to vote for Reagan. I don't know if they liked the guy, but I do know that they Wanted.Carter.Out.
Carter "bowed" to a lot of bullies, too.....
Posted by: Teresa in Fort Worth, TX at May 24, 2012 11:17 AM (0xqzf)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 24, 2012 11:17 AM (piMMO)
And this raw calculus is what Team Romney has to concentrate on. I love my Donkey flayed good and raw, but I also want to win. If I want to influence policy, let alone put mine into place I have to win. And to do that I have to convince not only the Republicans (about 32% of the electorate - so I have heard), but also as many disaffected Democrats and so-called independents as possible.
And that means not only attacking, but deflecting attacks. And yes, there will be compromises. Why? Because I want to win, and here winning is everything and losing isn't anything.
Posted by: Mikey NTH - now with more riboflavin! at May 24, 2012 11:18 AM (hLRSq)
Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at May 24, 2012 03:16 PM (YmPwQ)
***
What a crock! You go online and get your damn BC. Yes it costs 20 bucks but I thought the state was going to pay any fees associated with getting the info. I don't know where my BC is, probably in storage in one of a hundred boxes. So when I needed proof of citizenship for my job I went online and got the certificate. Death certificates are also available through the PA state portal.
Posted by: kallisto at May 24, 2012 11:18 AM (jm/9g)
Or, "Say hello to my little friend!"
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at May 24, 2012 03:11 PM (nEUpB)
**
Or, "Do you feel lucky punk"
Posted by: dananjcon at May 24, 2012 11:18 AM (eavT+)
Posted by: jimmuy at May 24, 2012 11:19 AM (kSaUf)
PA? Romney will need to win Bucks County in the east to help offset the dead voters in Filthadelphia. He should carry most of the central & western counties except Erie and Allegheny. Luzerne, Lackawanna, and Lehigh may be the key to victory in PA.
Posted by: Jim Scrummy at May 24, 2012 11:19 AM (0paMD)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at May 24, 2012 11:20 AM (nuPwU)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 24, 2012 11:20 AM (05RcU)
Chet Culver (the idiot) is collecting six figs plus benefits as an Obama appointee.
The carpetbagger running against King is married to Obama's Ag Sec. God forbid the Vilsacks stop sucking on a government teat when Romney replaces him in January.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at May 24, 2012 11:20 AM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: steevy at May 24, 2012 11:20 AM (7W3wI)
Posted by: mallfly at May 24, 2012 11:21 AM (bJm7W)
I'm going to hold out hope for my little NH. The thing that I think is really going to swing the election in THIS state is that we have a gubernatorial election this year with no incumbent; John Lynch (D) has chosen not to run for another term. If we have a lot of Dems turn out to vote for whoever ends up being the Dem candidate for governor, then I think we'll go Obama (much as it pains me). But if we have MORE Republicans turn out to vote not only for Romney, but also for the Republican gubernatorial candidate, then we'll swing Romney big time. It's all going to depend on our governor's race.
The gubernatorial candidates on either side aren't very firmed up yet, though Ovide Lamontagne is the conservative Republican most people know. He very nearly won the Senatorial candidacy from Kelly Ayotte in 2010. If he ends up nabbing the nomination, then I think you'll get a lot of social conservatives heading for the polls. But you'll also get a LOT of anti-social progressives who'll turn out to vote against him.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO supporter [/i][/b] at May 24, 2012 11:21 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: MJ at May 24, 2012 11:21 AM (/x4oj)
Posted by: stuiec at May 24, 2012 11:21 AM (fb1xf)
I'm still calling Pennsylvania for Romney. Turnout in Philly will be off from 2008, there is a new voter ID law which will cut down on the busloads of New Yorkers coming in to Philly and voting for all the dead people, and Romney will carry Bucks and Delaware Counties, which Obama carried. The blue-collar counties in the western part of the state are up in arms about Obama's War on Coal and fear EPA shutting down the fracking in the Marcellus Shale. Jack Murtha is dead and his machine is disbanded. Ed Rendell seems to be pedalling furiously away from the Obama campaign. Hopefully Rick Santorum will campaign with Romney in the conservative middle of the state and those voters will turn out in droves to get rid of Obama.
Just judging from the voter ID and fundraising calls I have received this year vs. 2008, the GOP is miles ahead of where it was.
Posted by: rockmom at May 24, 2012 11:22 AM (qE3AR)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Troll Hunter! at May 24, 2012 11:22 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at May 24, 2012 11:22 AM (8y9MW)
Not the math. But it just went on a bit too long. Like a calculation that breaks your calculator or keeps it running for a day because of too many iterations.
Posted by: Exile at May 24, 2012 11:22 AM (O0lVq)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 24, 2012 11:22 AM (05RcU)
I agree about NH but in the end I think you will see Reynold's Prefernce Cascade in play come November and if Romney is up on Obama by more than 5 in National polls he will win everywhere. Obama's only shot is a very close election.
Posted by: Rocks at May 24, 2012 11:22 AM (Q1lie)
Posted by: steevy at May 24, 2012 03:20 PM (7W3wI)
**
Bob Dole takes a back seat no one...NO ONE!!
Posted by: Bob Dole at May 24, 2012 11:23 AM (eavT+)
Way O/T:
Just read the drudge link to the Manhattan school making Arabic mandatory. I looked at the shining faces of those little girls, read the article, and realized Mahmoud the Teacher has it all wrong. He said he's teaching them how to say mama and dada, and "my school". That's all well and good, but what will really come in handy for the females is "Do this burqa make my ass look fat?"
Poor kids. It's interesting the reasoning behind the requirement. The language program director truly believes that Arabic will be the lingua franca in the not too distant future.
Posted by: kallisto at May 24, 2012 11:24 AM (jm/9g)
Posted by: tasker at May 24, 2012 11:24 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: ace at May 24, 2012 11:24 AM (aw5Tx)
Posted by: Civil War Vets for Obama at May 24, 2012 03:23 PM (XNk0Y)
The DNC, Where GOTV involves a shovel and grimoire.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Troll Hunter! at May 24, 2012 11:24 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: steevy at May 24, 2012 11:25 AM (7W3wI)
I'm thinking that a lot of this is just a way of keeping the voter intensity high. Probably by the end of the summer Rove and the other intelligencia will be saying that Romney will lose unless he can bring in NY and CA.
Posted by: Soona at May 24, 2012 11:26 AM (ufsUu)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 24, 2012 11:26 AM (piMMO)
WI is a wild card, but that will be close.
I am not so certain that VA is a lost cause. I get the insider argument, polling, etc. but turnout is key. If VA Republicans are motivated, that becomes a very close race.
Posted by: Exile at May 24, 2012 11:26 AM (O0lVq)
#110 Obama isn't pulling more than 48% even in the Democrat-skewed MSM polls. His job approval rating is down to 47-48%, and that is usally the ceiling an incumbent gets as a % of the popular vote. A 53-47 Romney win will be a rout.
The only thing that could have saved Obama was a couple of quarters of 5%+ GDP growth, and that ain't happening. Romney is right-it's still about the economy, and we aren't stupid.
Posted by: rockmom at May 24, 2012 11:26 AM (qE3AR)
Obama wins NV, NM, CO, Iowa, Wisconsin, PA, and Virginia.
Romney wins AZ, MO, MI, FL, OH, and Indiana.
The electoral score: 269-269
Posted by: The Q at May 24, 2012 11:27 AM (LnQhT)
Just read the drudge link to the Manhattan school making Arabic mandatory. I looked at the shining faces of those little girls,
And my immediate thought was, take a good hard look because if a not insignificant part of Islam gets its way, that's the last time you'll see their faces.
It is breathtaking to me how willing people are to throw women to the wolves. Seriously, when did it become politically correct to support the raping of women, the stoning of women, throwing acid in the faces of women, the genital mutilation of women, the utter subrogation of women? When? Because I missed that vote.
Posted by: alexthechick at May 24, 2012 11:28 AM (VtjlW)
Obama wins NV, NM, CO, Iowa, Wisconsin, PA, and Virginia.
Romney wins AZ, MO, MI, FL, OH, and Indiana.
The electoral score: 269-269
Posted by: The Q at May 24, 2012 03:27 PM (LnQhT)
Solution: Thunderdome. Two candidates enter, one president leaves.
Posted by: EC at May 24, 2012 11:28 AM (GQ8sn)
In case of an electoral tie.....I know the election gets thrown to the House...but is is the current House or the new (2013) House?
Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at May 24, 2012 11:28 AM (YmPwQ)
Palm Beach county is major Dem territory. The enthusiasm level here for Obama is subterranean.
Posted by: Purp (@PurpAv) at May 24, 2012 11:29 AM (Arf1c)
If MO stayed red in that storm
When she's in estrus I'll bet that thing swells three times its size and glows like forges of Gauntelgrym!
Posted by: Bruenor Battlehammer at May 24, 2012 11:29 AM (XNk0Y)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 24, 2012 11:29 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at work at May 24, 2012 11:29 AM (4/NTV)
Pennsylvania comes down to Bucks County and it elected a Republican to the House in 2010. If (a big IF, I know) we can keep voter fraud in Philly to a minimum, PA is going red this time.
Posted by: the other coyote at May 24, 2012 11:30 AM (yK44T)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 24, 2012 11:30 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: MJ at May 24, 2012 03:21 PM (/x4oj)
--------------------------------------------
That's because people can't afford or have enough gas to even make it to the filling station.
Posted by: Soona at May 24, 2012 11:30 AM (ufsUu)
They have been severely hurt by this President's economic policies or the lack thereof.
His war on coal won't help either.
Posted by: Exile at May 24, 2012 11:30 AM (O0lVq)
Posted by: steevy at May 24, 2012 11:30 AM (7W3wI)
Posted by: joeindc44 says come on, guys, no tough questions at May 24, 2012 11:30 AM (QxSug)
You have to wait for the electoral votes to actually be counted (Someone might be faithless) which means January, which means next House, not this one.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Troll Hunter! at May 24, 2012 11:31 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: joeindc44 says come on, guys, no tough questions at May 24, 2012 11:31 AM (QxSug)
Obama wins NV, NM, CO, Iowa, Wisconsin, PA, and Virginia.
Romney wins AZ, MO, MI, FL, OH, and Indiana.
The electoral score: 269-269
Posted by: The Q at May 24, 2012 03:27 PM (LnQhT)
Yes, I got that same scenario. That's why I think it will be either 2000 part II or else the election goes to the House. Ugly days either way.
Posted by: joncelli, heartless Con and all around unpleasant guy at May 24, 2012 11:31 AM (RD7QR)
Romney with 300+ EVs.
I love the way you keep talking about fundamentals, and economics, and people know things are hard and could be better. Then in the next breath talk yourself into people voting like idiots.
Jay Cost did an analysis a few years back. You can only get a close EV election if the margin of victory is less than .5%. Obama is on track to get no more than 47% of the vote. A 51-47 election nets over 300 EVs.
Chill.
Posted by: Dave in Fla at May 24, 2012 11:32 AM (LoNRD)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 24, 2012 11:32 AM (MCDCp)
Posted by: MJ at May 24, 2012 11:32 AM (/x4oj)
Posted by: Soothsayer at May 24, 2012 11:32 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: Leo Ladenson at May 24, 2012 11:32 AM (mAm+G)
It's The People's Republic of NYC and Bloomberg.
They will also force you to eat broccoli, not use salt, melt down your guns and not deep fry foods.
Now, do you want to ask that question again?
Posted by: Exile at May 24, 2012 11:32 AM (O0lVq)
Economic collapse, war, radical policy shifts, nothing is off the table.
Posted by: runninrebel at May 24, 2012 03:29 PM (N/1Dm)
-------------------------------------
That's for sure. And one can trust that the dems have been planning it since 2009, just for this eventuality.
Posted by: Soona at May 24, 2012 11:33 AM (ufsUu)
There is an epic landslide coming.
Posted by: runninrebel
Landslide presidential victories, typically agreed to start at about 60% of the popular vote and 80% of the electoral votes, just aren't possible at the moment*. There are too many solid partisan states that each campaign has in their pocket like so many nickels and dimes.
A Romney wave 'taint happening.
* Absent a significant third party challenger like Perot to eff up the math.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at May 24, 2012 11:33 AM (kdS6q)
128....I had forgotten what a stud Kurt Russel once was.
Blasphemy! .....Well, at least you have now been reaquainted with his hotness.
Posted by: wheatie at May 24, 2012 11:33 AM (YzQ1g)
Posted by: Soothsayer at May 24, 2012 11:33 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: Concealed Kerry or SubMitt at May 24, 2012 11:33 AM (vXqv3)
I need to get an update from my buddy in Fairfax County, VA. He's been a top GOP organizer there for 25 years. He told me early in 2008 that Obama would win Virginia and I thought he was nuts. He is very conservative and plugged in to the conservative network there. He will know what the enthusiasm and organization and fundraising is like on the GOP side so far.
Also, if there were any shanigans in the voting in Fairfax in 2008, that won't happen this year. One of my BFFs is the Registrar there now, and she is a former Virginia Secretary of Elections and an election law expert.
I'm not saying Romney will win Fairfax, but I expect him to do a lot better than McCain did. Romney is a good fit for suburban professional voters who are not social-cons but are fiscal cons. There are still a lot of private sector professionals living there, it isn't wall-to-wall federal employees like Arlington.
Posted by: rockmom at May 24, 2012 11:34 AM (NYnoe)
must be "poll" day around here... only one poll matters, and it always comes out on the day after the first Tuesday in Nov.
every other poll is designed to make you believe one thing or another, it is NEVER to accurately inform you.
...your soaking in it right now...
Posted by: the commentor formerly known as Shoey at May 24, 2012 11:34 AM (jdOk/)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 24, 2012 11:34 AM (piMMO)
The only thing that helps Obama is GDP growth at annual rate of 6% or better.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Troll Hunter! at May 24, 2012 11:35 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 24, 2012 11:36 AM (MCDCp)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 24, 2012 11:36 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: joeindc44 says come on, guys, no tough questions at May 24, 2012 11:36 AM (QxSug)
I love the way you keep talking about fundamentals, and economics, and people know things are hard and could be better. Then in the next breath talk yourself into people voting like idiots.
It comes down to who those voters blame for their dire straits. Do they blame Obama and his ruinous policies, or do they believe Obama when he says the shitty economy is the fault of obstructionist Republicans? If they're still hanging on to some tattered vestiges of Hope and Change, they could easily stick with Obama. "He hasn't had enough time in office to undo all the things Bush did wrong. Bush got eight years to screw up the economy; Obama should have eight years to put it right." That's the kind of irrational logic such voters would use. That's why we can't become complacent and assume this election is in the bag until it IS in the bag, with the drawstring tied tight, on the first Wednesday in November.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO supporter [/i][/b] at May 24, 2012 11:37 AM (4df7R)
Boca is a planet unto itself. Preening, classless, gauche, self absorbed. It has none of the old money charm and grace that the island of Palm Beach has (minus Trump of course)
Posted by: Purp (@PurpAv) at May 24, 2012 11:37 AM (Arf1c)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 24, 2012 11:37 AM (piMMO)
Oh, I got beat to it in the very first comment.
Posted by: Z Ryan at May 24, 2012 11:38 AM (tsC/8)
No one was expecting a 'major landslide' when Reagan got one.
He was down in the polls....right up till the election. ....It made people more motivated to get out and vote for him.
So personally....I think that all this talk of an "epic landslide" could be what prevents it from happening.
It should be like Fight Club. .....You don't talk about it.
Posted by: wheatie at May 24, 2012 11:38 AM (YzQ1g)
I love the way you keep talking about fundamentals, and economics, and people know things are hard and could be better. Then in the next breath talk yourself into people voting like idiots.
Because its using real world observed data.
Posted by: 52% at May 24, 2012 11:38 AM (GULKT)
People lie on polls. Racism, don't ya know.
Posted by: Pecos, at May 24, 2012 11:38 AM (2Gb0y)
That's because when race is involved, people vote like idiots. Right now I'm hoping for the best but I think it will be unclear who the president is as late as early January 2013.
Posted by: joncelli, heartless Con and all around unpleasant guy at May 24, 2012 11:38 AM (RD7QR)
Also, everyone in Boca seems to have really big fake tits, regardless of age. <<<
Lead us! Lead your people to the promised land!
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at May 24, 2012 11:39 AM (mJMH5)
NC is a likely GOP pick-up... but it would in fact be a pick-up.
Posted by: ace at May 24, 2012 03:05 PM (aw5Tx)
14,000 votes Ace. That's what The Gayest First President won NC by in 2008.
He'll lose the state by 100K this time.
=============
Yup. 21.5% of NC is black.
The JEF got 65% black turn-out in nationally 2008. In 2004, Kerry only got a 55% turn-out.
The JEF got 2,123,390 votes in NC. While we don't know how many of those votes were from blacks, if we assume 21.5% of all voters were black and plug in the 95% that voted for him, that's 433,702 black votes for the JEF in 2008.
If he even drops to the still historically high of 60% black participation in NC, there is no chance he keeps NC.
No "historic" election to jazz turnout, and the "gay for pay" and NC is 100% for Romney.
Posted by: jimmuy at May 24, 2012 11:39 AM (kSaUf)
Posted by: Soothsayer at May 24, 2012 11:39 AM (jUytm)
Ahhh Kurt Russell - he has now been a tv/movie star for six decades. And isn't he pretty much a hard core libertarian?
brb going to sit by my picture in the attic for a bit
Posted by: alexthechick at May 24, 2012 11:39 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 24, 2012 11:40 AM (piMMO)
Sounds a lot like LA too. My wife is a UCLA grad, she says all the time, "Everyone in LA no matter who they are wants to be the same thing.......twenty-one."
Posted by: Sean Bannion at May 24, 2012 11:40 AM (sbV1u)
every other poll is designed to make you believe one thing or another, it is NEVER to accurately inform you.
...your soaking in it right now...
Posted by: the commentor formerly known as Shoey at May 24, 2012 03:34 PM (jdOk/)
-------------------------------
THIS! Polls are used for nothing more than making news for lazy journolists and to make bloggers scratch their heads.
Posted by: Soona at May 24, 2012 11:41 AM (ufsUu)
Posted by: Soothsayer at May 24, 2012 11:41 AM (jUytm)
must be "poll" day around here... only one poll matters, and it always comes out on the day after the first Tuesday in Nov.
every other poll is designed to make you believe one thing or another, it is NEVER to accurately inform you.
...your soaking in it right now...
***
***
Thats right! Only one poll matter and thats Bob Dole's poll!!
Posted by: Bob Dole at May 24, 2012 11:41 AM (eavT+)
No sign of a preference cascade yet.
But then yu may never see it until it's right on you.
Posted by: John P. Squibob at May 24, 2012 11:41 AM (kqqGm)
Sounds a lot like LA too. My wife is a UCLA grad, she says all the time, "Everyone in LA no matter who they are wants to be the same thing.......twenty-one."
I think it was John Waters who said that in LA everyone looks like a porn star.
Posted by: alexthechick at May 24, 2012 11:41 AM (VtjlW)
Why do you hate your country so?
Posted by: © Sponge at May 24, 2012 11:42 AM (UK9cE)
Romney will lose Fairfax by something approaching 60-40. If he does better than that, then he's winning the state comfortably. If he hits that number, it's going to be a squeaker. But even in Bob McDonnell's mega-blowout in 2009 (with a ~20% margin of victory statewide), he only TIED Creigh Deeds in Fairfax at 50/50.
Trust me -- I live next door to Fairfax, and that place has changed radically over the last eight years.
Posted by: Jeff B. at May 24, 2012 11:42 AM (xAJql)
Posted by: Rocks at May 24, 2012 11:43 AM (Q1lie)
Well, that's not a bad thing...is it?
Posted by: Sean Bannion at May 24, 2012 11:43 AM (sbV1u)
And Dubuque and Davenport, and everywhere refugees from Chicago go and bring the dysfunction with them.
I'm not sure Indiana's in the bag for Romney, either; Lake County is Chicago, and Marion County's not much better.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at May 24, 2012 11:43 AM (/kI1Q)
It would be a large miracle for Pennsylvania to go red in the Fall.
Take my word for it -- I've lived here 45 years.
It will only happens if there' a huge, nationwide preference cascade in November.
Posted by: Ed Anger - Certified Kos Kid at May 24, 2012 11:43 AM (7+pP9)
Posted by: Purp (@PurpAv) at May 24, 2012 11:43 AM (Arf1c)
How is is possible for Fairfax to be more blue? Shit, they're so blue now they're almost black.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at May 24, 2012 11:44 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Soothsayer at May 24, 2012 11:44 AM (jUytm)
My prediction is that by the end of Tuesday election night, we will wonder why we were so worried. The opposite of the 2008 feeling, when we wondered why we thought we had a chance. Romney will take WI, PA, MI, NH, Iowa, NM, and NV. No one else will predict this, but it is what will happen.
Posted by: SH at May 24, 2012 11:44 AM (gmeXX)
... and by the end of the long, hotly fought contest, the crowd began chanting softly, then building to a deafening crescendo:
Rocky! Rocky! Rocky! ROCKY! ROCKY! ROCKY!
Romney! Romney! Romney! ROMNEY! ROMNEY! ROMNEY!
Mitt: "Adrian!" "Ann Louise!"
Posted by: Count de Monet at May 24, 2012 11:45 AM (4q5tP)
Oh it's in the bag. I mean, if there were a metaphorical bag marked "ELECTORAL VOTES," it would practically have the words "Indiana" and "North Carolina" written on them.
Posted by: Jeff B. at May 24, 2012 11:45 AM (xAJql)
Who was the last president to win election but lose his home state?
...While many successful candidates have won the presidency without winning their birth state, only three (James Knox Polk, Woodrow Wilson and Richard Nixon) have won election despite losing their state of residence.
Polk is the only man to win the presidency but lose both states of birth and residence.
BTW - Romney is Michigan born and I believe a California resident now.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at May 24, 2012 11:45 AM (kdS6q)
Yeah...we're fucked.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at May 24, 2012 11:45 AM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: Soothsayer at May 24, 2012 11:46 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: SH at May 24, 2012 11:47 AM (gmeXX)
Well, that's not a bad thing...is it?
Of course it is! Porn is bad and degrading and stuff!
What? What's on all those external drives I have? Versions of the Bible, I'm a good girl I am.
Posted by: alexthechick at May 24, 2012 11:47 AM (VtjlW)
Bullshit. He got 52% because there was no record and no vetting. Unless a few million people have been in a coma for 3.5 years, that magic isn't happening again.
He pulled the lions share of the Ind vote in 2008. Not a single poll has shown him winning the Ind vote this year. Every poll that shows him ahead has over sampled Dem voters.
OT - There was a guy who reported in Dec that the cooked polls were going to be a campaign tactic. They are all over sampling outside any reasonable turnout model.
Again, if a candidate wins by over .5% he wins the EV contest. Every time. Romney is going to win by at least 3% and I think 4%.
Posted by: Dave in Fla at May 24, 2012 11:47 AM (LoNRD)
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at May 24, 2012 11:47 AM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 24, 2012 11:48 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: ace at May 24, 2012 11:48 AM (aw5Tx)
OMG...just read some of the chow pow wow book reviews in the side thread to Amazon.
***
Too Funneh LMFAO
Posted by: Bob Dole at May 24, 2012 11:48 AM (eavT+)
and by the end of the long, hotly fought contest, the crowd began chanting softly, then building to a deafening crescendo:
Ummmmmmm. You do remember that in Rocky, Rocky loses, right?
Posted by: alexthechick at May 24, 2012 11:48 AM (VtjlW)
Bible, huh?
If I bring some tequila and I come over and watch some....uhhhhhh....Bible study?
Posted by: Sean Bannion at May 24, 2012 11:48 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: alexthechick at May 24, 2012 03:39 PM (VtjlW)
------------
Yeah. ....He's pretty conservative....but he doesn't talk politics much at all.
And yeah...Kurt Russell started working as an actor when he was 10 yrs old.
...I didn't know until recently that he played a 'jungle boy' on Gilligan's Island.
Posted by: wheatie at May 24, 2012 11:49 AM (YzQ1g)
Posted by: Soothsayer at May 24, 2012 11:49 AM (jUytm)
Not really. Parts of it sent GOP congressmen to DC for quite awhile (and we nearly took Gerry Connolly's seat away from the Dems in 2010.) It's been a fairly quick shift, as people exit Maryland (primarily Montgomery County, where I live) and DC, and new government employees come to the region and flock to NoVA where taxes are lower...but keep their filthy liberal voting habits.
Fairfax County, VA is very much like Bucks Co. in PA, or the collar counties in IL like Lake and DuPage: formerly 'moderate Republican' strongholds that have turned blue as changing demographics brought in more Dem voters, and previously GOP voters became estranged as the national GOP disappeared more and more up its own asshole with respect to social conservatism and big spending.
Posted by: Jeff B. at May 24, 2012 11:50 AM (xAJql)
2010. Harry Reid.
F*** Nevada, F*** nevada, F*** Nevada.
Posted by: Brother Cavil, New Caprica City DMV at May 24, 2012 11:50 AM (GBXon)
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at May 24, 2012 03:47 PM (/kI1Q)
People want to be where the power and/or prosperity is. Thus an area that deals in power or money will get lots of people near it. It will get crowded, and people will want government intervention either to deal with the problems of crowding or because they went where the money and power is in order to live off the crumbs of others.
Posted by: joncelli, heartless Con and all around unpleasant guy at May 24, 2012 11:51 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 24, 2012 11:51 AM (piMMO)
Well there your problem right there. That's exactly what's going on. They're in willing, self-induced comas caused by a poor understanding of economics and a tenuous grasp on reality.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at May 24, 2012 11:51 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: ace at May 24, 2012 03:48 PM (aw5Tx)
***
Romney is tailormade for the Bucks and Montco GOP and indie types.
Posted by: kallisto at May 24, 2012 11:51 AM (jm/9g)
Posted by: Purp (@PurpAv) at May 24, 2012 11:51 AM (Arf1c)
Of course it is! Porn is bad and degrading and stuff!
What? What's on all those external drives I have? Versions of the Bible, I'm a good girl I am.
Posted by: alexthechick at May 24, 2012 03:47 PM (VtjlW)
And you've got the catholic school girl outfit to prove it right.
Posted by: buzzion at May 24, 2012 11:51 AM (GULKT)
Nixon's residence state was NY, right?
Romney might lose all 4 states where he could claim residence: California, Massachusetts, Michigan, and New Hampshire.
Posted by: The Q at May 24, 2012 11:51 AM (LnQhT)
The preference cascade will start after the debates, just like it did with Reagan. Obama won't lay a glove on Romney and voters will see him as a perfectly reasonable and well-qualified alternative.
Obama is Jimmy Carter Part Deux.
Posted by: rockmom at May 24, 2012 11:52 AM (qE3AR)
Posted by: alexthechick at May 24, 2012 03:48 PM (VtjlW)
You have your version of the movie, I have mine.
Posted by: Count de Monet at May 24, 2012 11:53 AM (4q5tP)
Totally OT from Drudge:
LOS ANGELES (CBS) — The Recording Industry Association of America is reportedly suing now-defunct music downloading service LimeWire for $72 trillion. Yes, we said trillion.
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 24, 2012 03:48 PM (piMMO)
**
Hehe...did Dr. Evil deliver the subpeona??
Posted by: dananjcon at May 24, 2012 11:53 AM (eavT+)
Posted by: ace at May 24, 2012 03:49 PM (aw5Tx)
Can I have a puff of what you're smoking, ace? No offense but that ship sailed a long time ago.
Posted by: joncelli, heartless Con and all around unpleasant guy at May 24, 2012 11:54 AM (RD7QR)
Yeah, I live in Alexandria and I'm active in Republican politics on a local level. I just don't see it. Fairfax is deep, deep blue.
But you're right on Connolly. I SO thought he was going to go down in 2010.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at May 24, 2012 11:54 AM (sbV1u)
Do not discount this. Should Obama win via this method, who will prosecute him? Eric Holder? Ha ha ha.
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at May 24, 2012 11:54 AM (i0App)
Why?
Weren't Tommy Thompson and Tom Ridge both pro-choice? And wasn't Tommy Thompson even in favor of Obamacare? Point is, they seem to be more socially liberal than the R prez noms.
Posted by: booger at May 24, 2012 11:54 AM (HI6wa)
Some people clearly think this thing is up for grabs. I just don't see it. I know some of you spend a lot of time analyzing trends and polls and what ifs and whatnot, but I cannot imagine a scenario where the country asks the question: four more years of this? And anything close to 50% saying "Yes! We want more of the same!!"
I just can't see it.
Posted by: BurtTC at May 24, 2012 11:54 AM (TOk1P)
Posted by: Soothsayer at May 24, 2012 11:54 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: davidt at May 24, 2012 11:54 AM (hKbMq)
Any Dem candidate had a strong advantage after 8 years of a Republican President.
Posted by: Rocks
Looking at recent history:
Reagan followed by significant Bush I victory
Nixon followed by narrow Ford loss
Eisenhower followed by narrow Nixon loss
Not saying Mccain was a lock to win, but am saying it took a special type of suck to lose as badly as he did.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at May 24, 2012 11:55 AM (kdS6q)
Barack Obama had novelty, no record to hurt him, an atmosphere of hatred toward Republicans, a horrible opponent nobody but him and his daughter wanted in office, and the "change" slogan to surf into office with. None of that applies now, and its what got him a win.
The only advantage Obama carries with him now that he had then was the supportive media and they're not nearly as in the tank now as they were then. Sure, they'll sell their souls to defeat a Republican, but they aren't throwing their panties on the stage and fainting over him any longer. A lot of them don't really like Obama any more.
And Romney is a hell of a lot better campaigner than McCain ever was. And the economy has been awful for years, and people unfairly lay that at the president's feet. He loses, folks. He loses big unless something major changes.
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at May 24, 2012 11:55 AM (r4wIV)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 24, 2012 11:55 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 24, 2012 11:56 AM (05RcU)
Posted by: Dr. Varno at May 24, 2012 11:56 AM (I13eJ)
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at May 24, 2012 11:57 AM (r4wIV)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 24, 2012 11:57 AM (05RcU)
Let's not start soaping each others backs yet, gentlemen.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at May 24, 2012 11:57 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: davidt at May 24, 2012 03:54 PM (hKbMq)
***
Yes that is such a commonsensical idea that surely Her Highness the Queen of Fucking Shit Up (Ms. Jarrett) will nix it.
Posted by: kallisto at May 24, 2012 11:58 AM (jm/9g)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 24, 2012 11:58 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: Soothsayer at May 24, 2012 11:58 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 24, 2012 03:57 PM (05RcU)
Oh, not sure about that. I seem to recall him being described as a Californian in '72 but I was only 8 at the time.
Posted by: joncelli, heartless Con and all around unpleasant guy at May 24, 2012 11:59 AM (RD7QR)
You know... I'm tired of living in States where my vote apparently does not count, and therefore they won't be here running for office.
We really need to go to a proportional vote eletoral system... with the winner of the State getting the 2 extra electoral votes...
But with the Repubs invested in the current system, I won't hold my breath...
Posted by: Romeo13 at May 24, 2012 11:59 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: readyornot at May 24, 2012 11:59 AM (ErUlJ)
Posted by: Bobbi at May 24, 2012 12:00 PM (/s7hl)
I thought he had moved out of Cali after losing to Pat Brown in 62?
Maybe he moved to NY (definitely moved to NJ for awhile) after impeachment
Posted by: The Q at May 24, 2012 12:00 PM (LnQhT)
I wonder what it is about living in high population-density areas that makes people vote for more state control of their lives.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at May 24, 2012 03:47 PM (/kI1Q)
Most of them are renters, who have no property stake in their community and pay no property taxes, and have little appreciation for private property rights. Living in a large, dense city makes you more inclined to think "society" needs "rules" so that chaos does not ensue. Most city dwellers are wage-earners, W-2 employees who have little concept of how much they pay in income taxes because they never have to write a check to the IRS. So they are disconnected from the true cost of government. They are suckers for politicians who promise them more services and goodies because they don't think they will have to pay for any of it.
Suburban and rural residents tend to be homeowners and landowners, they pay property taxes, more of them own businesses or are independent contractors or receive bonuses, and have to write big checks to the IRS. They commute and are more sensitive to the price of gas. They don't feel they need as many societal rules because they aren't crowded by their neighbors.
Posted by: rockmom at May 24, 2012 12:00 PM (NYnoe)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 24, 2012 12:00 PM (MCDCp)
Posted by: steevy at May 24, 2012 12:00 PM (7W3wI)
Posted by: MJ at May 24, 2012 12:01 PM (/x4oj)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 24, 2012 12:01 PM (piMMO)
Posted by: Dr. Varno at May 24, 2012 12:01 PM (I13eJ)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 24, 2012 12:01 PM (MCDCp)
Posted by: Toaster at May 24, 2012 12:01 PM (sJKFk)
Until we start being honest and admit that Barack Obama is really good at one thing, i.e., campaigning, we won't defeat him.
Posted by: Soothsayer at May 24, 2012 03:54 PM (jUytm)
But he is pretty much sucking at campaigning so far this year. All the more reason why he is going to lose. His one qualification to be President was that he ran a great campaign. He isn't even doing that this time.
Posted by: rockmom at May 24, 2012 12:02 PM (NYnoe)
Posted by: dananjcon Claven at May 24, 2012 12:02 PM (eavT+)
You people still believe Obama is going to do well enough to be the democrat nominee. I donÂ’t.
Forget what you hear the pundits say on TV and the headlines generated by the polls. If you look at the historical data of GDP, real unemployment, gas prices and the rest, Obama doesnÂ’t stand a chance. Every time you see a poll showing Obama even remotely close to Romney, just look at the details. In all instances, the poll will either be of adults instead of likely voters or be weighted with some ridiculous factor giving democrats 8 to 12 additional points.
The people running the campaigns and in the parties know the real numbers. ThatÂ’s why there were so many retirements from the house and senate and why the mega donors on the left are sitting this one out.
Right now, they are in full panic mode and they are trying to see if it can be salvaged. No incumbent with a ghost of a chance would spend this much money this early in the cycle if they werenÂ’t in big trouble. Obama and the democrat powers will need to come to a decision in late June on whether Obama is going to be the candidate.
His option is to drop out, saying that is best for a country that is just not ready for a black president, and that he will run again when the time is right. That’s how he will explain keeping a few hundred million in campaign donations. Hillary will “reluctantly” step in and the election will be close due to the increased interest and the “historic” nature.
Posted by: jwest at May 24, 2012 12:02 PM (ZDsRL)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 24, 2012 12:03 PM (piMMO)
It was the Ken Buck/Jane Norton fiasco on a smaller level: we had a GOP candidate for that seat in Pat Herrity who wouldn't have just defeated Connolly, he would have pasted him: massive crossover appeal. But instead the Tea Party types insisted on nominating Keith Fimian, who was more than a little sketchy in his private life and too conservative for the district in any event...and we blew it. Herrity would have been an easy bet for reelection in 2012 too. Now Connolly has been redistricted into a safer seat, and we're never getting it back absent some sea-change.
Posted by: Jeff B. at May 24, 2012 12:04 PM (xAJql)
You underestimate the power of mouth breathers in large groups.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at May 24, 2012 12:04 PM (sbV1u)
Obama won because he had that perfect combo of stylish racial and cultural qualities, the right connections, a fawning media, and the ability to speechify real good, at a time when the country was (with some justification) disgusted with the party that had held the White House for 8 years, while economic conditions were worsening, and the GOP was fielding one of its weakest candidates in living memory.
Some of those have turned. Some have not. Some are yet to be proven. Any skill in 'campaigning' comes because it's all he does. He's the political equivalent of Rain Man, it's all he does, so he'd good at it, even though he can probably only barely dress himself without assistance.
Is our opposition formidable? Yes--but let's be realistic, both about who the real opponent is (hint: Obama's just the front man), and about how 'invincible' it is (hint: momento mori, m****rf****rs).
Posted by: Brother Cavil, New Caprica City DMV at May 24, 2012 12:04 PM (GBXon)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 24, 2012 12:05 PM (piMMO)
Posted by: BurtTC at May 24, 2012 03:54 PM (TOk1P)
If they do it will be the endgame for the country and I am not being overly dramatic. We may have at best a 20% chance to right the ship with a Romney win and total collapse with four more years of the JEF.
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at May 24, 2012 12:05 PM (mFxQX)
I just can't see it.
Posted by: BurtTC at May 24, 2012 03:54 PM (TOk1P)
That's because you're a racist h8ter who h8tes.
So there, because I'm right.
Posted by: KayInMaine's panty liner at May 24, 2012 12:05 PM (Qxe/p)
Weren't Tommy Thompson and Tom Ridge both pro-choice? And wasn't Tommy Thompson even in favor of Obamacare? Point is, they seem to be more socially liberal than the R prez noms.
Er, I think he's talking about Scott Walker in WI and Tom Corbett in PA.
I'm still not sure about my home state of PA. We did elect Corbett and Toomey, and the state legislature is GOP controlled. Not seeing much Obama love in Philly besides the usual banshees. The fraudsters may not be as motivated.
Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at May 24, 2012 12:05 PM (YmPwQ)
Posted by: tasker at May 24, 2012 12:05 PM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 24, 2012 12:05 PM (05RcU)
Posted by: SH at May 24, 2012 12:05 PM (gmeXX)
Nothing like it. Nothing at all.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at May 24, 2012 12:06 PM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Deety at May 24, 2012 12:06 PM (dQCkw)
that is just not ready for a black president, and that he will run again when
the time is right. ThatÂ’s how he will
explain keeping a few hundred million in campaign donations. Hillary will “reluctantly” step in and the
election will be close due to the increased interest and the “historic” nature.
Posted by: jwest at May 24, 2012 04:02 PM (ZDsRL)
Forget what ace is smoking. Clearly jwest has the good stuff.
Democrats are gong to force the first black president to not run, and the man so full of himself that Narcissus says "Damn that dude really loves himself" is going to step down because you can actually convince him that he will lose. Yeah right
Posted by: buzzion at May 24, 2012 12:06 PM (GULKT)
Posted by: Soothsayer at May 24, 2012 12:06 PM (jUytm)
Just reading that nic makes me throw up a little in my mouth.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at May 24, 2012 12:07 PM (sbV1u)
Posted by: tasker at May 24, 2012 12:07 PM (r2PLg)
10% of VA's economy comes from the Pentagon. Northern VA is blue....but not the rest of the state. Outside of the Beltway it is deep red.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at May 24, 2012 12:08 PM (sbV1u)
Er, I thinkhe's talking about Scott Walker in WI and Tom Corbett in PA
My brain is still in 2004.
Posted by: booger at May 24, 2012 12:08 PM (HI6wa)
Posted by: USA at May 24, 2012 12:08 PM (6Cjut)
Forget Fairfax, it is lost, and I think Loudoun will be close. Combination of Fairfax demographics in the Eastern part of the county and a love of Barry O by upper class white voters.
God love their smug little expressions.......
Posted by: jinxthecat at May 24, 2012 12:08 PM (l3vZN)
This is a little OT but if I'm using a sonic toothbrush do I really need to floss?
Only if you wish to retain your teeth
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at May 24, 2012 12:09 PM (mFxQX)
I don't trust Karl Rove.
Sorry....I just don't. Not any more.
And I hope that the Romney team doesn't trust him either. ....Rove is still firmly in the Bush camp, who probably wouldn't mind seeing us lose this year....so that Jeb could run in 2016.
Posted by: wheatie at May 24, 2012 12:09 PM (YzQ1g)
Posted by: tasker at May 24, 2012 12:09 PM (r2PLg)
#282 That is exactly what my friend said. He is hard-right conservative, easily the most pro-life person I know, but he also wants to win elections and he knows the county has moved left over the years. Fimian was WAY too conservative. So they got Connolly who voted 100% the Pelosi line.
One reason Fairfax has turned Blue is that the far-right social-cons took over the GOP there in the late 1990s and they haven't won anything since. They put on two gigantic rallies for Sarah Palin in 2008, and lost twice as many votes from independents and moderates. I'm sure none of those assholes like Mitt Romney, but a lot of independents and even moderate Democrats will.
Posted by: rockmom at May 24, 2012 12:09 PM (qE3AR)
300...no prob. Corbett is so dull that it';s easy to forget thathe's the Gov. Walker, on the other hand.......
Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at May 24, 2012 12:10 PM (YmPwQ)
Posted by: Mitt Mo Romney at May 24, 2012 12:10 PM (LnQhT)
Posted by: MJ at May 24, 2012 12:10 PM (/x4oj)
According to my periodontist....yes.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at May 24, 2012 12:10 PM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Soothsayer at May 24, 2012 12:10 PM (jUytm)
Posted by: R. Budd Dwyer at May 24, 2012 12:11 PM (jucos)
Posted by: Sean at May 24, 2012 12:11 PM (6O/MP)
The other I read something that proves it true: There is a tragedy of the commons, it's called: Government. Our current form of government and spending encourages individuals and small groups who carve out benefits only for themselves while passing on the costs to everyone else.
Posted by: jimmuy at May 24, 2012 12:11 PM (kSaUf)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 24, 2012 12:12 PM (MCDCp)
Posted by: thunderb at May 24, 2012 12:12 PM (Dnbau)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 24, 2012 12:12 PM (05RcU)
Posted by: SH at May 24, 2012 12:13 PM (gmeXX)
That's not quite true, either. Richmond is pretty blue, and Hampton Roads is also a deep shade of (minority) blue as well.
One thing to keep in mind about VA is that it's tough in THIS cycle for reasons that wouldn't necessarily apply to any other Democratic candidate. Obama's African-American appeal is what brought out such massive numbers in Richmond and Hampton Roads on top of the standard Arlington/Fairfax yuppie appeal. That will hopefully be less of an element this time around, but still a real problem.
Posted by: Jeff B. at May 24, 2012 12:13 PM (xAJql)
Romney You ain't so bad, you ain't so bad, you ain't nothin'. C'mon, Preezy, hit me in the face! My mom hits harder than you!
Posted by: Count de Monet at May 24, 2012 12:13 PM (4q5tP)
Here's the thing, Sooth, I don't really think he's that good at campaigning. The stuff in the 2008 campaign was laughable. It should have earned him nothing but derision and scorn.
I'm not sure why it didn't. Part of it was the firewall the media built around him, and part of it was the cult of personality, but there's more there that I'm not sure I'll ever understand.
I think part of it, though, goes along with being "unknown." The only office to which he's ever won re-election was the Illinois State Senate. And that he won by "winning" the un-opposed Democrat primary in a district that went 89% Democrat in that election (that is: there was never any chance a Republican was going to win). He won a 3rd term- but ran unopposed in both the primary and the general.
Other than that? He had to resort to the dirtiest of dirty tricks to win his first US Senate Seat, then he ran for President.
I think part of what helped him in 2008 was that he was so unknown. People could use him (as other have said) as a Rorschach- he could be whatever they wanted him to be. But now he has a record, and people can see behind the rhetoric.
On top of that, he's lazy. Again, he didn't win either his first term to the State Senate, nor his term to the US Senate by great debating skills, or great campaigning, but by dirty tricks. Similarly, he didn't do all that much when campaigning for president. Oh, sure, he showed up lots of places (that hasn't stopped), but he had basically two campaign speeches, and a lot of proxies.
I don't think he's nearly as good a campaigner as the MFM would have us believe.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at May 24, 2012 12:13 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 24, 2012 12:13 PM (05RcU)
Have we passed 50% of the population getting all or part of their income--welfare, salary, Social Security, business subsidies--from the government?
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at May 24, 2012 12:13 PM (/kI1Q)
I'm seeing a lot of racism in these pro-Romney predictions.
Posted by: Jaws at May 24, 2012 12:14 PM (4I3Uo)
Posted by: toby928© at May 24, 2012 12:14 PM (NG097)
Walker? The Texas Ranger? Oh yeah right, that other guy
Posted by: booger at May 24, 2012 12:15 PM (HI6wa)
Posted by: Soothsayer at May 24, 2012 12:15 PM (jUytm)
Posted by: R. Budd Dwyer at May 24, 2012 12:15 PM (jucos)
Posted by: buzzion at May 24, 2012 04:06 PM (GULKT)
It wonÂ’t be the democrats who convince Obama not to run. He (and mainly Moochelle) will come to that conclusion all by themselves. Although heÂ’s a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure, heÂ’s not an unintelligent man. He will be able to read the internal polling just as well as everyone else.
He wonÂ’t give a shit about the party, but he will care about his legacy. If he runs, he becomes the black Jimmy Carter who lost in a spectacular blowout and set the left back 20 years. He will be the brunt of political jokes for decades to come. Worst of all, if he loses as bad as the indications are, his removal from the White House will be more like an eviction, and the Mooch doesnÂ’t do no more evictions.
Faced with a certain loss or the ability to take a couple hundred million to pay expenses for a perpetual “campaign” for some office to be named in the future, Mooch will tell the One to take the deal.
Posted by: jwest at May 24, 2012 12:15 PM (ZDsRL)
Que? The Tragedy of the Commons is a justification of private property rights.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at May 24, 2012 12:15 PM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: Soona at May 24, 2012 12:16 PM (ufsUu)
Barack Hussein Obama, paper-thin resume, friend of convicted terrorists, and recipient of 67 million votes.
I am sure that he had massive help from the MSM. Those of us with common sense saw right through the Roman Columns and teleprompter speeches. A lot of people were willing to be fooled in '08.
Do you see the 2012 version of Zero as a master campaigner? He's been a freakin' disaster so far. The '08 "magic" is long gone.
Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at May 24, 2012 12:16 PM (YmPwQ)
Posted by: Stephen Price Blair at May 24, 2012 12:16 PM (QF8uk)
I'm not sure Obama is a good campaigner or not.
Largest Democratic victory in a two party match up since LBJ in '64.
44 years dude.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at May 24, 2012 12:16 PM (kdS6q)
Posted by: tasker at May 24, 2012 12:17 PM (r2PLg)
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at May 24, 2012 12:17 PM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: thunderb at May 24, 2012 12:18 PM (Dnbau)
Gone are the urgent statements warning of melting glaciers and rising sea levels. Indeed, the energy and environment page at WhiteHouse.gov now shows a photo of the president walking in front of segments of oil pipeline, and the White House never neglects an opportunity to tout its support for domestic oil and natural gas drilling. In briefings on background, senior administration officials now talk about exporting fracking technology, which has caused natural gas production to boom and prices to fall.
Posted by: Polar Bears for Romney at May 24, 2012 12:18 PM (e8kgV)
Posted by: steevy at May 24, 2012 12:18 PM (7W3wI)
Posted by: fluffy at May 24, 2012 12:18 PM (z9HTb)
http://tinyurl.com/bnkrja8
Posted by: jwb7605 at May 24, 2012 12:18 PM (Qxe/p)
Posted by: Jimmah at May 24, 2012 12:19 PM (cWkOB)
Joe the Plumber....coming up on Cavuto. ...Eric Boling filling in for Cavuto.
Joe Wurzelbacher will be sharing his thoughts about Biden dissing plumbers.
Posted by: wheatie at May 24, 2012 12:19 PM (YzQ1g)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 24, 2012 04:12 PM (MCDCp)
Hillary has about 60% approval right now. SheÂ’s actually done a good job bullshitting her way through this Sec. of State thing and the unwashed masses believe sheÂ’s competent.
It would be a tough race if she stepped in.
Posted by: jwest at May 24, 2012 12:19 PM (ZDsRL)
They asked me to work for the Board of Elections here in NJ this year..
Posted by: Nevergiveup
Union rep or linen cleaning?
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at May 24, 2012 12:19 PM (kdS6q)
Posted by: Nutmeg Moron at May 24, 2012 12:19 PM (qxcKC)
This is exactly the point I made in #226. I know it's not a popular point with a lot of online conservative commenters, but here's an ugly truth: social conservatism is a MAJOR, MAJOR VOTE-LOSER everywhere in the nation at this point, except perhaps in the Deep South. That's not to say that moderates won't vote for a guy who happens to be socially conservative, but rather that leading with it, culture-warrior style, is a suicide play everywhere north of South Carolina.
This has always been the core of my argument for Romney on a purely electoral sense: he doesn't carry that kind of baggage the way so many other Republicans do. He's not a raving socon, he's the antithesis of Tea Party, he's an educated business professional...he's the first candidate the GOP has put forth in decades whose profile matches that of the swing voters and persuadable moderate Democrats in this country.
Posted by: Jeff B. at May 24, 2012 12:19 PM (xAJql)
He (and mainly Moochelle) will come
to that conclusion all by themselves.
Although heÂ’s a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure, heÂ’s not
an unintelligent man. He will be able to
read the internal polling just as well as everyone else.
The man that tells everyone he thinks he can do their job better than they could even though its obvious he has no talent. He is an unintelligent man. And he probably can't read internal polling because it involves numbers and its obvious that he sucks at everything that requires numbers. He will never reach the conclusion that he cannot win and so should drop out. It requires more of a connection to reality than he has ever shown.
Posted by: buzzion at May 24, 2012 12:19 PM (GULKT)
Posted by: booger at May 24, 2012 12:19 PM (HI6wa)
Soothesayer - I'll need one more election to determine whether he is a good campaigner. If Obama loses, but it is close, then I'll probably conclude he was a good campaigner. 2008 can still be chalked up to a confluence of events in which any Dem was going to beat any Republican. Not sure that makes one a good campaigner. Saw too many mistakes from him on the road. He was definitely a good fundraiser, which is part of campaigning. But Obama has never had to run a tough campaign. Bush at least showed that he could beat a popular incumbent govenor in Ann Richards. Yes it was Texas, but Texas was not nearly as red in 1994 as it is now. And she was popular. And that was his first big campaign.
All that being said, Obama did beat the mighty Clinton machine. That has to count for something.
But I still think the evidence is out as to whether he is a good campaigner.
Posted by: SH at May 24, 2012 12:20 PM (gmeXX)
The victory isn't in dispute. The reasons are. With the backup (and alleged opposition) he had, an idiot could win.
And in fact an idiot DID, mind you.
Posted by: Brother Cavil, New Caprica City DMV at May 24, 2012 12:21 PM (GBXon)
No, I'm saying that voting for a Historical First is always going to get more folks out to the polls, turnout-wise, than voting for the Disappointing Followup. But that AA voters will still turn out in big numbers for Obama. Count on it.
Posted by: Jeff B. at May 24, 2012 12:21 PM (xAJql)
Posted by: Soothsayer at May 24, 2012 12:21 PM (jUytm)
Posted by: sonnyspats at May 24, 2012 12:22 PM (Qr9Rc)
Because he's lazy. Even the most slothful don't mind doing things they enjoy. A guy who would never "work" a day in his life can spend hours or days perfecting the skills necessary to completely dominate at MW3:Call of Duty, for example. Someone who is "lazy" in everything else can somehow find time and energy, at any moment, to go play basketball, or golf, or football, or soccer, or whatever.
Lazy isn't about sitting on a couch with a bag full of Cheetos, it's a mental thing. It's "the easy way."
Believe me, I'm an expert on lazy.
He does all those campaign stops because he enjoys them- they take no particular effort for him, and they're very rewarding. He gets heaped with adoration and told how good he is, and he gets to hear the sound of his own voice. But he does none of the work. You can tell he doesn't even help with his own speeches, because he does have to read virtually every word from a Tele-prompter. He does no preparation (besides maybe some gargling with salt-water or something). He's there for the speechifying and the adoration.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at May 24, 2012 12:22 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 24, 2012 12:23 PM (05RcU)
Posted by: Soothsayer at May 24, 2012 12:23 PM (jUytm)
Posted by: john mclaughlin at May 24, 2012 12:24 PM (NG097)
Here ya go Ace...
In the New Hampshire
House of Representatives we went from Dems (216) Repubs (102) with (10) vacancy, to Repubs (29
Dems (174).
In the New Hampshire State Senate we went from Dems (14) Repubs (5), to Repubs (19) Dems (10).
We/Republicans also flipped both congressional seats and took a Senate seat...
And WE WILL Take the Governors office this Nov.
Soooooo.........Barky will have to fight HARD for NH.
Posted by: Knightbrigade at May 24, 2012 12:25 PM (Fj9J/)
In an alternate universe, he'd have made a decent actor: delivers the lines well, reasonably photogenic, soaks up publicity, dumb as a post.
Posted by: Brother Cavil, New Caprica City DMV at May 24, 2012 12:25 PM (GBXon)
I know right now the scenario of Obama dropping out sounds crazy, but watch the media for signs.
ItÂ’s actually already in the early stages from those who have access to the leftÂ’s internal data. Corey Booker took his shot the other day. Ed Rendell and Harold Ford jumped in. A few of the media types are becoming a little uppity towards the One. Cracks are forming.
As the rats jump ship, it will become clear who wants to be known as a visionary and who gets left behind in the Great Obama Debacle.
Posted by: jwest at May 24, 2012 12:25 PM (ZDsRL)
Posted by: SH at May 24, 2012 12:26 PM (gmeXX)
Your truth would make sense if Bush had lost in 2000 or 2004, he didn't. Hell a serious argument can be made that fighting redfining marriage singlehandedly got Bush reelected in 04. How many times did Bush have to defend not backing embryonic stem cell research in debates? He very publicly pushed the FMA.
Do I even need to mention 33-0?
Posted by: Rocks at May 24, 2012 12:26 PM (Q1lie)
Posted by: Soona at May 24, 2012 12:26 PM (ufsUu)
No. He has a lapdog media who shelter him from any bad news, and a convenient foil in the House Republicans.
For all that, I don't believe he's actually at 47+% Probably closer to 45%, and even then I'd take the under.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at May 24, 2012 12:26 PM (8y9MW)
Me either. Hate Rove. Won't listen to him or read his stuff anymore. I've met the man and he talks a good game in public but him is a little toad after a few drinks.
Posted by: Pecos, at May 24, 2012 12:26 PM (2Gb0y)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 24, 2012 12:26 PM (piMMO)
Posted by: toby928© Person of Pallor at May 24, 2012 12:28 PM (NG097)
Posted by: toby928© Person of Pallor at May 24, 2012 12:29 PM (NG097)
Posted by: Soothsayer at May 24, 2012 12:29 PM (jUytm)
Posted by: Tami at May 24, 2012 12:30 PM (X6akg)
Posted by: toby928© Person of Pallor at May 24, 2012 12:30 PM (NG097)
Posted by: Blacksheep at May 24, 2012 12:31 PM (8/DeP)
Posted by: Soothsayer at May 24, 2012 12:31 PM (jUytm)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO supporter [/i][/b] at May 24, 2012 12:31 PM (4df7R)
Posted by: Soothsayer at May 24, 2012 12:31 PM (jUytm)
Posted by: SH at May 24, 2012 12:32 PM (gmeXX)
He and Axelrod must have shit themselves when he started winning primaries.
I didn't think he won that many Primaries. It was the caucuses that he was carrying. And the Democrat rules that all their primaries were proportional that really helped keep him up. Didn't Hillary actually win most of the primaries?
Posted by: buzzion at May 24, 2012 12:32 PM (GULKT)
You mean you don't hand-type "Barack Obama is a stuttering clusterf*ck of a miserable failure" every time?
Posted by: fluffy at May 24, 2012 12:32 PM (z9HTb)
But see... I still don't think he did. I remember those debates and the coverage, and I remember the way the other news pieces were handled. What Obama did was to throw the most childish possible attacks (not to mention most naive possible promises) around, and the Media just covered for him.
When Hillary pointed out that she was being attacked for being a woman (don't remember the issue, but I remember the coverage), we were told she was whining. When they trotted out the Race-Card on Bill, he was laughed at. When Obama made a stupid promise to meet with Imadinnerjacket without any preconditions, the Media went so far as to say he didn't mean what he said. When he promised the moon (including no mandate) on Health Care, there was not one skeptical report, not one "are you sure?" question.
Obama didn't do the campaigning- the Media did.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at May 24, 2012 12:33 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Beefy Meatball, who just realized this isn't the ONT at May 24, 2012 04:24 PM (yn6XZ)
Rove will always paint the worst picture for the right. He’s in the business of raising money (don’t ever mistake what he does for a living) and right now, the best fundraising tool is projecting a sense that the right is behind but catching up – if only we had enough money.
Posted by: jwest at May 24, 2012 12:33 PM (ZDsRL)
Posted by: SH at May 24, 2012 12:33 PM (gmeXX)
And the Democrat rules that all their primaries were proportional that really helped keep him up.
I never, EVER want you to use the term "keep him up" in reference to the Preezy of the United Steezy EVER AGAIN. Understand? Because gross.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO supporter [/i][/b] at May 24, 2012 12:33 PM (4df7R)
Smilin' Bob McDonnell & George Allen's keeping his yammer shut get Virginia for Romney.
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at May 24, 2012 12:34 PM (Ec6wH)
That victory was the most costly victory to the liberal agenda. Because they turned their own conformity and intolerance machine against their base. We gained strength following the Obama win as more and more moderates woke up to the lie that liberalism was when they were ostracized for supporting a different democrat in the primary.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Troll Hunter! at May 24, 2012 12:34 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: The littl shyning man at May 24, 2012 12:34 PM (PH+2B)
OT, but you know what amazes me? That this is the HQ, and we haven't had a post about Bubba and the Porn Stars in Monte Carlo.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO supporter at May 24, 2012 04:31 PM (4df7R)
Word. Y'all cob-loggers are slipping.
Posted by: ErikW at May 24, 2012 12:34 PM (HO0Kh)
Oh, I still type out "Barack Obama is a stuttering clusterf*ck of a miserable tyrant" by hand- but I enjoy doing that.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at May 24, 2012 12:35 PM (8y9MW)
The fact that they don't have a coherent reelection strategy 6 months out pretty much proves that.
Posted by: Ian S. at May 24, 2012 12:35 PM (tqwMN)
Posted by: garrett at May 24, 2012 12:35 PM (XNk0Y)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at May 24, 2012 12:35 PM (C8mVl)
Posted by: Soothsayer at May 24, 2012 12:35 PM (jUytm)
Marion Barry, healing the racial divide one slur at a time...
"“America has had racial tensions from the time it was founded,” Barry said. “Italians coming here, the Irish came here, the Jews came here, the Polacks came here, the Chinese came here.”"
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at May 24, 2012 12:36 PM (akXk+)
Yes, but this presumes that we are the same nation, culturally, in 2012 that we were in 2000 and 2004. We're not. Generations cycle through. We're always changing (this is a reality of civilization, not just something unique to the U.S.), and we're shifting in a direction that makes it important to emphasize the GOP's libertarian small-government philosophy (the Meyer side of the old famous Bill Buckley/Frank Meyer 'fusionism' that created National Review), and not Santorum-like daddystate "we need to impose a lost moral order" crap.
I want to be clear that I don't include abortion in my list of "dumb socon crap." I don't think it's a winner to push it in certain states (I seriously don't understand what the problem is with allowing Republicans in the NE to go mushy-mouthed on it instead of forcing them to adhere to the national party line and torpedo their electability there), but it's the sort of moral absolute -- life and death -- that is worth standing on principle for.
You might also notice that, unlike things like gay marriage, the numbers on abortion are not only staying consistent, they're shifting to our side. Not a coincidence!
Also, do note that my specific point was really in relation to the Northern VA Republican Party (well, the statewide apparatus as well): they got taken over by hardcore socons in the '90s and instantly embarked upon a tragicomic losing streak that turned the place from reliably red to not just blue but actively REVOLTED by social conservatism. Bunch of fucking morons, led by Jim Gilmore.
Posted by: Jeff B. at May 24, 2012 12:36 PM (xAJql)
That this is the HQ, and we haven't had a post about Bubba and the Porn Stars in Monte Carlo.
No. For the love of all that's unholy, no. I shall have to comfort myself in the warm glow of my versions of the Bible to get those images out of my head.
Posted by: alexthechick at May 24, 2012 12:36 PM (VtjlW)
He's not racist. He hates everyone equally.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at May 24, 2012 12:37 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Count de Monet at May 24, 2012 12:38 PM (4q5tP)
The caucus fraud (and intimidation) probably helped more than the campaigning. She did better in states with ballots.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at May 24, 2012 12:38 PM (/kI1Q)
Oh, I still type out "Barack Obama is a stuttering clusterf*ck of a miserable tyrant" by hand- but I enjoy doing that.
Indeed, there is something quite soothing about typing "Barack Obama is a stuttering clusterf*ck of a miserable failure", like a tantrum from a public school teacher.
Posted by: fluffy at May 24, 2012 12:38 PM (z9HTb)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO supporter [/i][/b] at May 24, 2012 12:39 PM (4df7R)
Posted by: SH at May 24, 2012 12:39 PM (gmeXX)
Ohioans are sick of Barry. One and done.
Posted by: Tough,Tougher,Crunchy at May 24, 2012 12:39 PM (c3mby)
Oh, don't ever forget the intimidation. Some of the stories I heard were unbelievable. I'm not sure I actually believe them, in fact, but if they're even half-true, the one thing Obama was good at was gaming a caucus system.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at May 24, 2012 12:40 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Soothsayer at May 24, 2012 12:40 PM (jUytm)
Posted by: buzzion at May 24, 2012 12:40 PM (GULKT)
Posted by: alexthechick at May 24, 2012 04:36 PM (VtjlW)
Do any of your bible versions happen to have April O'Neil?
Posted by: buzzion at May 24, 2012 12:42 PM (GULKT)
Posted by: Soothsayer at May 24, 2012 12:42 PM (jUytm)
The new 2013 House, and it's not a vote by majority of representatives, it's a vote by state- California gets one vote, South Carolina gets one vote, etc. Right now, the GOP has a massive advantage in the number of states with a GOP House majority.
MN would be troublesome, as we have 2 GOP and 2 Dem reps.
The other interesting thing- the Senate picks VP. If it were a 269-269 tie, none of the electors switched sides to vote for the other candidate, and the Dems hold the Senate, it's very plausible that we'd end up with a Romney / Biden administration.
Hell, part of me hopes it does come down to a 269-269 tie where the House elects Romney. The caterwauling by the Dems would make the 2000 election seem amicable.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at May 24, 2012 12:43 PM (SY2Kh)
You might also notice that, unlike things like gay marriage, the numbers on abortion are not only staying consistent, they're shifting to our side. Not a coincidence!
I'm still not seeing this great shift towards gay "marriage". It still gets voted down decisively in red, blue and purple states. The only places where it's legal are places that had it imposed judicially or by legislature action (which is perfectly fine by me if they followed the process).
It's kind of like soccer...everyone is saying it will be the wave of the future...and it remains that way indefinitely.
Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at May 24, 2012 12:43 PM (YmPwQ)
Posted by: tasker at May 24, 2012 12:44 PM (r2PLg)
Can you imagine the two of them trying to assemble a bicycle together?
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at May 24, 2012 12:45 PM (akXk+)
Posted by: polynikes at May 24, 2012 12:45 PM (bPvWY)
Posted by: Junshin at May 24, 2012 12:45 PM (VWlmO)
Posted by: tasker at May 24, 2012 12:46 PM (r2PLg)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at May 24, 2012 04:40 PM (8y9MW)
Didn't some Clinton supporters put together a video about the fraud? I can't remember the name of it.
Posted by: Tami at May 24, 2012 12:46 PM (X6akg)
I really think Ace has overplayed this card and I hate doing it myself but the only way I can describe your comment there is wishcasting. The Republican party isn't becoming more "libertarian" (I mean socially liberal wink, wink). 8 years isn't a generation and Obama didn't back "gay marriage" in 08 for no reason. Heck he still wouldn't publicly if his gay cash hadn't dried up and everybody, even the MSM, was still buying his BS on the issue.
Constantly harping on social issues has never been a big draw. But actively bucking them never has been either.
Posted by: Rocks at May 24, 2012 12:47 PM (Q1lie)
Posted by: Tami at May 24, 2012 04:46 PM (X6akg)
The Omen?
Posted by: Count de Monet at May 24, 2012 12:47 PM (4q5tP)
Posted by: R. Budd Dwyer at May 24, 2012 04:11 PM (jucos)
That's just wrong...
Posted by: Hedgehog at May 24, 2012 12:48 PM (3jGS1)
Posted by: tasker at May 24, 2012 12:48 PM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Dr Spank at May 24, 2012 12:49 PM (I/Xad)
Yes. For some reason the Dems in our state had a split Primary/Caucus system. She won the votes (the Primary) but then lost the Caucuses.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at May 24, 2012 12:49 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: SH at May 24, 2012 12:50 PM (gmeXX)
Hillary won the first step but not the second?
Posted by: tasker at May 24, 2012 04:48 PM (r2PLg)
Not the primary, but just the rules of Texas altogether. Texas has a Primary and Caucus on the same day and delegates get awarded based on both. Clinton won the primary and Obama won the caucus. I don't know how the delegates get divided up from them though.
Posted by: buzzion at May 24, 2012 12:50 PM (GULKT)
Posted by: tasker at May 24, 2012 12:50 PM (r2PLg)
>>0One thing is for sure. The October surprises are going to be epic.
Economic collapse, war, radical policy shifts, nothing is off the table. <<
Go on. I like the way your mind works.
Posted by: George Soros at May 24, 2012 12:52 PM (uMVcg)
Posted by: Soothsayer at May 24, 2012 12:52 PM (jUytm)
Posted by: dagny at May 24, 2012 12:52 PM (Z5iSP)
OT: Lights Out Detroit (drudge)
Detroit, whose 139 square miles contain 60 percent fewer residents than in 1950, will try to nudge them into a smaller living space by eliminating almost half its streetlights.
As it is, 40 percent of the 88,000 streetlights are broken and the city, whose finances are to be overseen by an appointed board, canÂ’t afford to fix them. Mayor Dave BingÂ’s plan would create an authority to borrow $160 million to upgrade and reduce the number of streetlights to 46,000.
Who wants to lend Detroit $160 million?
Posted by: Count de Monet at May 24, 2012 12:53 PM (4q5tP)
My guess is how well Romney does in the debates. It will be his record against the scoamf and sitting there like a punching bag is not an option.
He has to finesse the message that Barack Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure at these debates.
Posted by: YIKES! at May 24, 2012 12:53 PM (fgJMi)
California?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCbfMkh940Q
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Troll Hunter! at May 24, 2012 12:53 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: tasker at May 24, 2012 12:53 PM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 24, 2012 12:54 PM (piMMO)
@227
You need a quorum of 2/3 of the House to hold the vote. Blue state delegations play hooky, Presidency is held in limbo, Obama continues to rule by decree.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at May 24, 2012 12:55 PM (kdS6q)
Who wants to lend Detroit $160 million?
Posted by: Count de Monet at May 24, 2012 04:53 PM (4q5tP)
What they need is High Speed Salmon Rail.
Posted by: garrett at May 24, 2012 12:55 PM (XNk0Y)
Posted by: Hank Johnson at May 24, 2012 12:55 PM (piMMO)
Posted by: toby928© Person of Pallor at May 24, 2012 12:56 PM (NG097)
Posted by: Jean at May 24, 2012 12:56 PM (WkuV6)
Posted by: Dave at May 24, 2012 12:57 PM (Lgtuu)
Posted by: toby928© Person of Pallor at May 24, 2012 12:57 PM (NG097)
Posted by: Detroit 1950-something at May 24, 2012 12:58 PM (piMMO)
Posted by: toby928© Person of Pallor at May 24, 2012 04:57 PM (NG097)
You mean wonkier than usual?
Posted by: buzzion at May 24, 2012 12:58 PM (GULKT)
Can't be done. No such thing as Presidential limbo. If he isn't elected for a second term he can't serve past 4 years. Which means if the position of the President becomes vacant, the VP becomes President, if the VP is vacant, then the Speaker of the House becomes President.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Troll Hunter! at May 24, 2012 12:59 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: toby928© Person of Pallor at May 24, 2012 12:59 PM (NG097)
Posted by: Rocks at May 24, 2012 12:59 PM (Q1lie)
Posted by: Detroit 1950-something at May 24, 2012 12:59 PM (piMMO)
Posted by: CNBC at May 24, 2012 01:01 PM (jUytm)
He's shown such regard so far for the Constitution and the method of governance it establishes, I totally see him abiding by that. O_O
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at May 24, 2012 01:01 PM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at May 24, 2012 01:01 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at May 24, 2012 01:02 PM (akXk+)
Posted by: Virginia SoCon at May 24, 2012 01:02 PM (+/C3g)
Posted by: Jean at May 24, 2012 01:02 PM (WkuV6)
Posted by: Underground Vulgarian at May 24, 2012 01:03 PM (oipCQ)
Brace yourself for a movie review.
Posted by: fluffy at May 24, 2012 01:03 PM (z9HTb)
If he tries to do anything else, he gets removed. It's that simple: he's not the President anymore, so nothing he says or does carries any weight. (in that scenario).
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at May 24, 2012 01:03 PM (8y9MW)
Oh my dream is he tries that kind of a stunt, a power grab, it won't work and it will set liberalism back by decades as they demonstrate that they all really are mini Hugos and Castros.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Troll Hunter! at May 24, 2012 01:04 PM (0q2P7)
Only house votes in that case.
Posted by: Underground Vulgarian at May 24, 2012 05:03 PM (oipCQ)
Senate votes for VP?
Posted by: Rocks at May 24, 2012 01:04 PM (Q1lie)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at May 24, 2012 01:04 PM (Y9uVD)
Speaking of movie reviews: I just heard about a movie "For Greater Glory" today. Have any of the other Morons heard about this? Know anything about it?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at May 24, 2012 01:05 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Jean at May 24, 2012 01:05 PM (WkuV6)
Don't listen to that crap. Romney needs every vote esp here in Virginia. I'm utterly convinced that those that are running down Romney at this date actually want Obama for another 4 years. I can't see any other reason. I can just see Obama appointing some long-lived supreme court justice that will haunt us even as well huddle around our LED fires trying to stay warm on our diet of jicama and arugala we hauled home on our green bike. I'll refuse to sing the "dear leader" song and will be shot early on.
Posted by: dagny at May 24, 2012 01:05 PM (Z5iSP)
By whom? How?
I'm enjoying the mental picture of a bunch of Marines handcuffing him and the missus and dragging them kicking and screaming into the helicopter, but I don't think that's how it would really play out.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at May 24, 2012 01:05 PM (/kI1Q)
@467
The position of President isn't vacant, it's in dispute. Think Coleman/Frankin -- writ large.
Not sure if the succession process would kick in pending a decision. Something like the 2000 election kerfuffel, if that went beyond Clinton's last day of his term.
Some smartypants must of gamed that scenario back in 2000.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at May 24, 2012 01:07 PM (kdS6q)
The Decorah Eagles Nest is about to get hit by a pretty bad storm.....
Hail....high winds....it's almost on top of them. ....Poor things. The three babies are bigger now, and have their feathers but are still a ways from being able to fly.
They could be blown out of the nest, quite easily at this stage.
Linky in my sig, if you want to watch the live nest cam.
Posted by: wheatie at May 24, 2012 01:07 PM (YzQ1g)
While the Clintons were in the White House they gathered all power and the attendant profits to themselves. Then during the Bush years others in the Dem. Party rose to power within their party, and those bigshots(Pelosi, Reid, etc.) didn't like the idea of surrendering those powers and the attendant profits back to the Clintons again.
So the Super!delegates backed Obama, whom they saw as someone they could use to rubberstamp their agenda.
Posted by: davidt at May 24, 2012 01:08 PM (hKbMq)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at May 24, 2012 01:08 PM (Y9uVD)
A lot of the time people loosely affiliated with the right will absorb the left meme on the issues because they expose themselves to so much lefty bullshit, they really have no way to withstand it.
Posted by: dagny at May 24, 2012 01:08 PM (Z5iSP)
First, an inadequacy of the historical temperature measurements that are used to reconstruct the average global temperature statistic.
And, second, fuelled by lobbyists and media interests, an unfortunate tribal emotionalism that has arisen between groups of persons who are depicted as either climate “alarmists” or climate “deniers.”
In reality, the great majority of working scientists fit into neither category. All competent scientists accept, first, that global climate has always changed, and always will; second, that human activities (not just carbon dioxide emissions) definitely affect local climate, and have the potential, summed, to measurably affect global climate; and, third, that carbon dioxide is a mild greenhouse gas.
The true scientific debate, then, is about none of these issues, but rather about the sign and magnitude of any global human effect and its likely significance when considered in the context of natural climate change.
Posted by: Polar Bears for Romney at May 24, 2012 01:10 PM (e8kgV)
And then Bill ran his mouth about how SC electing Obama was not big deal since it had elected Jesse Jackson twice. Race cards started flying like face cards in an 8 deck blackjack setup.
Posted by: The Q at May 24, 2012 01:10 PM (LnQhT)
That whole social conservative thing? Big loser. Butt fucking is so much more appealing. Ouch.
Posted by: dagny at May 24, 2012 01:12 PM (Z5iSP)
Posted by: unique at May 24, 2012 01:13 PM (HOOye)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at May 24, 2012 01:14 PM (Y9uVD)
Barky has no one. Valerie Jarrett won't let the truth through the door.
Posted by: Jimbo at May 24, 2012 01:16 PM (O3R/2)
494 The left has been trying to sell the TeaParty as a socon movement all along. They knew that if the independents ever realized what the teaparty stood for, it was all over. They had to make it look like it was Jerry Falwell and Anita Bryant wagging their fingers about gay marriage, blacks, jews, and blacks to get any traction in the tea party is racist meme.
A lot of the time people loosely affiliated with the right will absorb the left meme on the issues because they expose themselves to so much lefty bullshit, they really have no way to withstand it.
Posted by: dagny at May 24, 2012 05:08 PM (Z5iSP)
Yeah its the left that wants the Tea Party to be social conservatives only. And forgetting that it came about as a fiscal conservatism movement. The best example of someone "on the right" taking the its social cons is Charles Johnson.
It was an indication of him going off the deep end before coming out that he had gone off the deep end. He as someone having a major hate for social cons should have loved the tea party movement. But well Glenn Beck supported the Tea Party, so chuckles definitely couldn't. Its that derangement about one person making them paint the entire group.
And well you do know that Sarah Palin does support and gets positive views from the Tea Party...
Posted by: buzzion at May 24, 2012 01:16 PM (GULKT)
And now Chairman Nan and Harry Reid are finding that history is repeating itself. That's what they get for changing the rules and pushing through a narcissist.
Posted by: The Q at May 24, 2012 01:16 PM (LnQhT)
That sort of depends if you are the er or the ee, doesn't it?
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at May 24, 2012 05:14 PM (Y9uVD)
I don't care how long we've been married. I'm not strapping one of those things on to do that to you!
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet's wife at May 24, 2012 01:18 PM (GULKT)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at May 24, 2012 01:20 PM (Y9uVD)
The cause of death appeared to be a bitter realization that he needed to win reelection in an increasingly partisan political environment, a cancer that he had been battling for months if not years.
Obama's illness got the best of him late Monday, as he announced that his campaign for four more years in the White House would be based not on optimism, but rather the shady corporate record of his opponent, Mitt Romney, who ran a private-equity firm that few Americans knew about before this year.
Obama's announcement was a stark contrast to the speech that catapulted him into his party's sights eight years ago, when he electrified Democrats at their quadrennial convention.
Posted by: Hope & Change at May 24, 2012 01:21 PM (e8kgV)
Posted by: Fritz at May 24, 2012 01:21 PM (ZN5qR)
Posted by: readyornot at May 24, 2012 01:23 PM (ErUlJ)
Only words I know, but words matter when signatures are in blood.
Posted by: An Observation at May 24, 2012 01:23 PM (ylhEn)
Posted by: readyornot at May 24, 2012 05:23 PM (ErUlJ)
Then you need to quit taking so much LSD.
Posted by: buzzion at May 24, 2012 01:24 PM (GULKT)
@511
Yes, I would agree...have you seen some of the caucus results? They make me think I've been using....
Posted by: readyornot at May 24, 2012 01:26 PM (ErUlJ)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at May 24, 2012 01:28 PM (Y9uVD)
Posted by: Mephistopheles at May 24, 2012 01:37 PM (NG097)
Posted by: dagny at May 24, 2012 01:37 PM (Z5iSP)
Posted by: Tami at May 24, 2012 04:46 PM (X6akg)
***
"We will not be silenced", by Gigi Gaston.
Posted by: kallisto at May 24, 2012 01:46 PM (jm/9g)
Posted by: john at May 24, 2012 01:55 PM (btEs1)
What if Ron Paul ends up with the nomination?
Posted by: readyornot
It would explain why we all have Evil Spock beards...
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at May 24, 2012 01:58 PM (kdS6q)
Posted by: seamrog at May 24, 2012 02:01 PM (8CMf9)
Posted by: john at May 24, 2012 02:02 PM (btEs1)
The SPLC declares that Malik Zulu Shabazz of the NBPP (New Black Panther Party) is now part of the "Radical Right."
You know Barack Obama did hang out with these "Right Wing" radicals.
Posted by: Hope & Change at May 24, 2012 02:10 PM (e8kgV)
Romney will take Iowa.
Posted by: Greg Q at May 24, 2012 02:12 PM (4Pleu)
Posted by:laceyunderalls at May 24, 2012 03:20 PM (nuPwU)
CLE; sorry I was out this afternoon, hopefully you see it now.
Posted by: Captain Hate at May 24, 2012 02:12 PM (piwNy)
Posted by: Chris R, red in NY-9 at May 24, 2012 02:54 PM (NFcOS)
Posted by: JB at May 24, 2012 03:38 PM (AZFLP)
Posted by: Bwaney Fwank at May 24, 2012 03:54 PM (crQ6y)
The checkbox of electing a clean articulate black man as president has now been checked off. It's rather poetic that the president who uses a checkbox governing style will be ushered out the same way.
Posted by: hannitys_hybrid at May 24, 2012 04:03 PM (zpqa2)
Posted by: Nomittens at May 24, 2012 05:52 PM (elHhH)
One thing is clear, if Romney doesn't carry Florida, he has to pretty much run the rest of the table. But if he doesn't carry Florida, that's not going to happen.
Give Romney Florida and it becomes a more even race.
Posted by: Steve O at May 24, 2012 06:12 PM (Orxpy)
Posted by: The Political Hat at May 24, 2012 06:44 PM (a9dim)
Posted by: General Zod at May 26, 2012 01:52 AM (2+bRt)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.6548 seconds, 642 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Dr. Varno at May 24, 2012 10:58 AM (I13eJ)