September 20, 2012

Kato Kaelin: Yeah, OJ Killed Niccole Brown Simpson
— Ace

I don't know what to say about this.

He's a monster, for one thing. He's also an idiot ("the statute of limitations" has passed? No, double jeopardy has attached. Murder has no statute of limitations).

He presumably needs attention and money but mostly money.

Ask Kaelin today, this very minute, if O.J. — currently jailed in Vegas on a separate charge — killed his wife, and I repeat his exact words:

“The statute of limitations has now passed . . . so I can now say . . . yes, he did it.”

Why didnÂ’t he come forward and tell the truth? Ask why he let O.J. Simpson get away with murder, and I repeat his exact words:

“I was too scared. I was terrified.”

Time and his moment have passed. Dearly Beloved, we are gathered here together in memoriam of Kato Kaelin’s dead career. He says: “People hated me. I’ve been spat upon. They threw gum in my coffee.”

If he answered dishonestly under oath, hit him with perjury.

Posted by: Ace at 11:38 AM | Comments (219)
Post contains 186 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Is this something?

Posted by: toby928© for TB at September 20, 2012 11:39 AM (evdj2)

2 Did he mean the statute of limitations for perjury has passed?

Posted by: Sugar Kane at September 20, 2012 11:39 AM (EX+sq)

3 I suppose with the SCOAMFization of the country and the world, this is, how do you call it, a "palate cleanser?"

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 20, 2012 11:40 AM (+tqYo)

4 He means the statute of limitations for his own azz.

Posted by: Bat Chain Puller at September 20, 2012 11:40 AM (SCcgT)

5 Every one knew he did it.  The case was airtight.  It was pure jury nullification based on racism.


That case was lost as soon as the stupid LA DA filed it in LA instead of Brentwood.

Posted by: Vic at September 20, 2012 11:40 AM (YdQQY)

6 >>>If he answered dishonestly under oath, hit him with perjury.

Which statute of limitations did YOU think he was talking about?

Posted by: MikeTheMoose Regular! With Full Stomping Power! at September 20, 2012 11:41 AM (0q2P7)

7 He wasn't terrified.  He ate it up.  He loved it.

Posted by: rdbrewer at September 20, 2012 11:41 AM (Iyg03)

8 Is there a statute of limitations for perjury?

Posted by: Mike Jonze at September 20, 2012 11:41 AM (epWQP)

9 Kato Kaelin should do gay porn with Levi Johnston

Posted by: Captain Hate (more dagny and less curious) at September 20, 2012 11:42 AM (UnWrW)

10

I'm pretty sure it was the Statute of Limitations for perjury he was referring to.

Posted by: Some1 at September 20, 2012 11:42 AM (cSlKk)

11 ...Meaning you can't charge him with perjury now.

Posted by: Bat Chain Puller at September 20, 2012 11:42 AM (SCcgT)

12 He's probably angling for a spot on Dancing With The Stars.. he's currently not even the C-List celebrity quality that they usually use.

Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at September 20, 2012 11:42 AM (f9c2L)

13 Sorry, didn't see that 10 other morons had posted the same question. 

Posted by: Mike Jonze at September 20, 2012 11:42 AM (epWQP)

14 As punishment, he has to have sex with Kathy Griffin. That's more than fitting for his crime.

Posted by: Joe Wilson at September 20, 2012 11:42 AM (mcWHD)

15 wait, did Kato say 'statute' or 'statue'? because I doubt Kato knows the word 'statute.'

Posted by: soothsayer at September 20, 2012 11:43 AM (jUytm)

16 >>>Is there a statute of limitations for perjury?

Typically 3 years.

Posted by: MikeTheMoose Regular! With Full Stomping Power! at September 20, 2012 11:43 AM (0q2P7)

17 Turn him over to Kathy Griffin. She will teach him the meaning of 'terrified'

Posted by: fluffy at September 20, 2012 11:43 AM (z9HTb)

18 ..any chance this asshole gets slammed for a felony in NV? Would it not be delicious to see him and O. J. as cell/bunk mates?

Posted by: The War Planner at September 20, 2012 11:43 AM (Ue7gi)

19 Can he even be called a celebrity anymore?  OJ whacked his wife a long time ago and nobody has heard about kato since then.

Posted by: Deathknyte at September 20, 2012 11:43 AM (7JVwg)

20 Oh.. and hey, Ace.  You watching Survivor this year?  It started last night.

Not a lot of good boobage like last year, so you are probably safe to watch and remain the master of your domain.

Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at September 20, 2012 11:43 AM (f9c2L)

21 Then why is OJ still looking for the real killers?

Posted by: Robert Blake at September 20, 2012 11:44 AM (4cRnj)

22 The statute of limitations for perjury in CA is three years.

Posted by: Vic at September 20, 2012 11:44 AM (YdQQY)

23 What exactly was Kato Kaelin's function in the whole Simpson case?  Was he just a rentseeker sponging off the Browns?

Posted by: EC at September 20, 2012 11:45 AM (GQ8sn)

24 Now is not the time for fear, Kato. That comes later.

Posted by: Kathy Griffin at September 20, 2012 11:45 AM (evdj2)

25 No, he lived with Simpson.  In the guest house, if I recall..

Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at September 20, 2012 11:45 AM (f9c2L)

26 He never got the payoff he expected. So now he tells the truth?

Even Judas got his 13 pieces of silver. So Kaeto figured he would clean up.
 
Yeah my hearts breaking. Piece of shit.

Posted by: Exile at September 20, 2012 11:46 AM (GGCsk)

27 There is no statute of limitations on murder. But OJ has already been tried for that.  And the jury let hm off because he was black. 

Posted by: Vic at September 20, 2012 11:46 AM (YdQQY)

28

“People hated me. I’ve been spat upon. They threw gum in my coffee.”

 

Oh, boohoo.   Someone spat gum in your coffee.   Nicole Brown Simpson had   her HEAD ALMOST SAWN OFF BY KNIFE.

 

Fuck you, KATO.

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/b][/i][/u] at September 20, 2012 11:46 AM (4df7R)

29

1.  His career would have to have been alive before it could have died.

2.  They never liked you in the first place, loser.

Posted by: Mikey NTH thinking James Buchanan is much happier now at September 20, 2012 11:46 AM (hLRSq)

30 He's already condemned to a life of stupid. Stoner stupid.

Posted by: Adirondack Patriot at September 20, 2012 11:46 AM (iAUf+)

31

Everyone focused on the supposed 'glove did not fit' when the evidence showed that this distinctive style glove in the same SIZE as the bloody glove was purchased  by Nicole for OJ.  They had the freaking receipt. 

That the prosecution wanted OJ to try on the glove was possibly the stupidest move by any prosecutor in the history of stupid prosecutor moves.

Posted by: polynikes at September 20, 2012 11:47 AM (m2CN7)

32 No, he lived with Simpson. In the guest house, if I recall..

But was he a friend of OJ or some gay-Svengali type lover to him?

Posted by: EC at September 20, 2012 11:47 AM (GQ8sn)

33 Obama is a stuttering clusterf*ck of a miserable failure.

Posted by: steevy at September 20, 2012 11:47 AM (6o4Fb)

34 Now, y'all, that glove did not fit.

Posted by: ChristyBlinky, unbanned, ready to get this done at September 20, 2012 11:47 AM (baL2B)

35 So, how is this going to work out for OJ in prison?  I don't think very good.

Posted by: Billy Bob, psuedo intellectual at September 20, 2012 11:48 AM (wR+pz)

36 Couldn't they bring Kalien up on a new charge, like accessory after the fact or something?

Posted by: johnd01 at September 20, 2012 11:48 AM (ukNFU)

37 Not in defense of OJ Simpson, but his lawyer did not win the case. Judge Ito ran a zoo, not a courtroom, and the prosecution were incompetents. The police didn't even keep track of chain of custody for things! While yes, from a bird's eye view, it is clear that Simpson did it, in the courtroom, on the jury? Without having all the information we do? I could see them saying the prosecution didn't prove their case.

This is why prosecutors shouldn't screw up, because they did.

Posted by: Matt S. at September 20, 2012 11:48 AM (moRRg)

38 Everything the DA and prosecution did for that case was stupid. But it did not matter. That jury was not going to convict no matter what.

Posted by: Vic at September 20, 2012 11:48 AM (YdQQY)

39 “The most important lesson I’ve learned is that you can’t change Washington from the inside,” he told a Univision forum Thursday. “You can only change it from the outside.”

Posted by: cajun carrot at September 20, 2012 11:48 AM (UZQM8)

40 Maybe he'll die in a fire and the karmic balance will be restored.

Posted by: @PurpAv at September 20, 2012 11:49 AM (0dqmE)

41 How does he know?(I mean we all know but what ifornation does he have)Did he give false testimony?If so maybe that was the statute of limitations he was referring to.

Posted by: steevy at September 20, 2012 11:49 AM (6o4Fb)

42 <“People hated me. I’ve been spat upon. They threw gum in my coffee.” >

Hopefully they shit on his bologna sandwich too. Or wiped their diseased snatch on his tofu burger bun...and left a pub.

Because gum in the coffee amateur hour.

Posted by: Exile at September 20, 2012 11:49 AM (GGCsk)

43 @40 I was going to say "hit by a bus" but same difference.

Posted by: Y-not at September 20, 2012 11:49 AM (5H6zj)

44 Are we supposed to feel bad about him being spat upon?
He helped a murderer go free - and he's now admitting it. Scumbag.

Posted by: Lizzy at September 20, 2012 11:50 AM (XDfSm)

45 Posted by: cajun carrot at September 20, 2012 03:48 PM (UZQM Sorry, meant to ask, Guess Who said this? Hint: TFG, SCOAMF, Preezy

Posted by: cajun carrot at September 20, 2012 11:50 AM (UZQM8)

46 He aways struck me as a leach and bum, now you can add dumbass to the descriptors

Posted by: I'm Tired at September 20, 2012 11:50 AM (7QZ6R)

47 I think he was just a loser friend.. parasite.. freeloader.

Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at September 20, 2012 11:50 AM (f9c2L)

48 So, you had that disgusting "lawyer" Robert Kardashian hiding evidence and this guy telling lies through his teeth to gain fame.  And the glove didn't matter-the racial makeup of the jury did.  Like R. Kelly in Chicago, where you have a tape of him pissing on someone but fat skanks still clustering on the courthouse steps for a golden shower.

Posted by: ejo at September 20, 2012 11:50 AM (kfYyO)

49 "Kato" is Californian for "47%"

Posted by: not the mama at September 20, 2012 11:50 AM (kzCIn)

50 Well the good news is OJ is a dumbass and is in jail for the rest of his life without killing anyone else.

God works in not so mysterious ways sometimes.

Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 45% more DOOM! at September 20, 2012 11:50 AM (xAtAj)

51 I do have some bad news though for Kato, it's called Accessory After the Fact, as defined,

"assist a perpetrator after he/she has committed a felony by aiding in his/her escape from arrest, trial, conviction and/or punishment."


Posted by: MikeTheMoose Regular! With Full Stomping Power! at September 20, 2012 11:50 AM (0q2P7)

52 That the prosecution wanted OJ to try on the glove was possibly the stupidest move by any prosecutor in the history of stupid prosecutor moves. Posted by: polynikes at September 20, 2012 03:47 PM (m2CN7) And don't forget they made him put on a pair of cheap poorly fitting latex gloves under the custom fit leather gloves that had already shrunk? Fuckin idiots.

Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 20, 2012 11:51 AM (oSFWF)

53 And people, do not go to any of the numerous sites that have posted that death scene. There are things you can not unsee.

Posted by: Vic at September 20, 2012 11:51 AM (YdQQY)

54 Did sven finally pass out?

Posted by: soothsayer at September 20, 2012 11:51 AM (jUytm)

55

I disagree Matt S.   Not that the prosecutors were incompetent but that in spite of their incompetence,  they still proved their case beyond a reasonable doubt.  The evidence was clear and convincing except to the jurors who wanted jury nullification because Furman said the n word some time in his life.

 

Posted by: polynikes at September 20, 2012 11:51 AM (m2CN7)

56 An otherwise mediocre book 'Cracking Cases' by Henry Lee, a forensic physician, makes the point that OJ walked partly because the LAPD had completely screwed up the evidence chain on some of the most damning stuff, so it wasn't admissible as evidence anymore. Stuff like investigators going back to the crime scene with blood samples already logged as evidence, goofy stuff like that.

Posted by: Sort-of-Mad Max at September 20, 2012 11:51 AM (DLu2s)

57 Barack you dun stepped on your carrot.

If you can't change Washington, get out.

Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 45% more DOOM! at September 20, 2012 11:51 AM (xAtAj)

58 He'd have more street Fred if he came forward sooner.

Posted by: Dr Spank at September 20, 2012 11:51 AM (4cRnj)

59 As punishment, he has to have sex with Kathy Griffin.

*shudder* 
Remind me not to piss you guys off.

Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at September 20, 2012 11:51 AM (hO8IJ)

60 And that idiot judge. What a fuck wad

Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 20, 2012 11:51 AM (oSFWF)

61 His career? I didn't know he had one other than being a posse member in OJ's gang of hangers on. Even OJ was washed up at that point in time.

Posted by: Gmac at September 20, 2012 11:51 AM (IanLz)

62

Who the hell wrote that article you linked and how did you decode it?

 

All I see is massive jumbles of unrelated anecdotes... I tried unfocusing my eyes, it helped but not with the reading comprehension.

Posted by: entropy at September 20, 2012 11:51 AM (TULs6)

63 Barack Obama is a stuttering clusterf*ck of a miserable tyrant.

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at September 20, 2012 11:52 AM (8y9MW)

64 I blame the Green Hornet.

Posted by: George Orwell what knows Harry Reid is a pederast and a strangler at September 20, 2012 11:52 AM (AZGON)

65 How does he know?(I mean we all know but what ifornation does he have)>>

Didn't OJ jump the fence and hit the wall of the guest house or something like that. So he may know that OJ was not where OJ said he was. Which he may see as proof or he saw OJ all bloodied up when he came back to the house.

Posted by: Buzzsaw at September 20, 2012 11:53 AM (tf9Ne)

66 He'll have absolutely zero street fred in the big house.

Posted by: andycanuck at September 20, 2012 11:53 AM (vDl/w)

67

I'm still very surprised that  Nicole's father didn't put out a contract on OJ.

 

btw.  When is OJ the murderer getting  out of jail.  He's been there for some time, hasn't he?

Posted by: Baraka the Hussein at September 20, 2012 11:53 AM (+nn53)

68 Kato?  Like the Bruce Lee?  I'm pretty sure he's dead.

Oh, not that Kato?  Who the F is this douche?  (Yes, I know who he is in relation to OJ, I meant beyond that).

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at September 20, 2012 11:54 AM (8y9MW)

69 He's in for a long time. I think it's expected to be natural life.

Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 45% more DOOM! at September 20, 2012 11:54 AM (xAtAj)

70 He'll have street fred in the slammer all right.      Just not the kind he'd want.

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/b][/i][/u] at September 20, 2012 11:54 AM (4df7R)

71 Did sven finally pass out?

Posted by: soothsayer at September 20, 2012 03:51 PM (jUytm)


too much Romney spunk

Posted by: The Dude at September 20, 2012 11:54 AM (tw6Ar)

72 I am a bit shocked that the statute of limitations  re: perjury is only 3 years. Considering the weight of the matter (the damage perjury can do), it seems like it should be much longer. Is this common?

Posted by: Time Travelling Flaneur at September 20, 2012 11:55 AM (ay6+/)

73 He's a super-dumbass who decided that after getting off murder to falsely imprison some people and rob them at gunpoint.

Idiot.

Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 45% more DOOM! at September 20, 2012 11:55 AM (xAtAj)

74 When is OJ the murderer getting out of jail. He's been there for some time, hasn't he?

According to wikipedia, he's in until at least 2017 (the earliest he can be paroled). The sentence was 33 years.

Posted by: Meiczyslaw at September 20, 2012 11:55 AM (4+LTj)

75

The last time I paid any attention to OJ was when some of his    fellow inmates beat the shit out of him.   That gave me a happy buzz for a day or so.

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/b][/i][/u] at September 20, 2012 11:55 AM (4df7R)

76 No, he'll get f*co in the slammer. Alot.

Posted by: andycanuck at September 20, 2012 11:55 AM (vDl/w)

77

If he answered dishonestly under oath, hit him with perjury.

 

 

And if convicted, let him do his time in the same slam as OJ.

 

"Uh, OJ, you know I was totally kidding about that, right? I mean, I would never rat you out. You know that, right? Right?"

Posted by: Jay Guevara at September 20, 2012 11:55 AM (U+DUu)

78 Kato is going to be sweatin' 2017...

Posted by: Yip at September 20, 2012 11:56 AM (Mrdk1)

79 Like he'd know. I agree that OJ obviously did it, but Kato is a retard who wouldn't know if it happened right in front of him.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at September 20, 2012 11:56 AM (r4wIV)

80 Filed under "Stuff Everyone Already Knew For Nearly Two Decades."

Posted by: George Orwell what knows Harry Reid is a pederast and a strangler at September 20, 2012 11:56 AM (AZGON)

81 OJ comes up for parole in 2017.  He probably will not get it. There is a big difference between NV and CA.

Posted by: Vic at September 20, 2012 11:56 AM (YdQQY)

82 Ok he's still got 5 years until parole.


Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 45% more DOOM! at September 20, 2012 11:56 AM (xAtAj)

83 When is OJ the murderer getting out of jail.

I'm pretty sure "only in a body-bag."  Didn't they give him something like 99 years?

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at September 20, 2012 11:56 AM (8y9MW)

84 I think John Walker Lindh (the gay kid from San Fransisco who joined up with the Taliban) will be released from prison before O.J.

Posted by: soothsayer at September 20, 2012 11:56 AM (jUytm)

85 SCOAMT sock off.

Posted by: Soona at September 20, 2012 11:57 AM (+nn53)

86 Is anything ever really over?

Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at September 20, 2012 11:57 AM (9TTOe)

87 Is this common?

Posted by: Time Travelling Flaneur at September 20, 2012 03:55 PM (ay6+/)


it's the same in pretty much every state

Posted by: The Dude at September 20, 2012 11:57 AM (tw6Ar)

88 Brentwood is a neighborhood, not an incorporated city, Vic.  It and Bel Air and West L.A. are all part of the city of Los Angeles


Only Beverly Hills and Santa Monica are cities--and Malibu, recently.


So, if you stab your wife to death in a murderous rage, you live and she dies in L,A

Posted by: C. Hendricks at September 20, 2012 11:57 AM (Dll6b)

89 2 Did he mean the statute of limitations for perjury has passed? In a murder case? I doubt it.

Posted by: rickb223 at September 20, 2012 11:57 AM (GFM2b)

90 I could never watch Bewitched reruns again after learning that OJ had bedded Elizabeth Montgomery.   

Posted by: polynikes at September 20, 2012 11:57 AM (m2CN7)

91 Perjury, hell, hit him for accessory after the fact.

Posted by: alexthechick for Banhammer 2012. Justice. Cruelty. Mostly Cruelty. at September 20, 2012 11:57 AM (VtjlW)

92 NV keeps voting for Obama and Reid... no I have no faith in them out there... I'm boycotting Vegas until they push Reid out and don't vote for Obama. 

Posted by: Yip at September 20, 2012 11:58 AM (Mrdk1)

93 I can't fathom why they named the Kato Institute after this clown.

Posted by: USS Diversity at September 20, 2012 11:58 AM (0CiTm)

94


Even Judas got his 13 pieces of silver.

 

 

Was that after taxes? 30 pieces of silver gross, but after FICA, Social Security, and withholding, knocked down to 13?

 

Sounds about right.

Posted by: Jay Guevara at September 20, 2012 11:58 AM (U+DUu)

95 Mort Freakin' Zuckerman. Coulda used your views four years ago, friend. How do you recover from a recovery? --- Nobody is entitled to blow a trumpet because the unemployment rate for August can be headlined at 8.1 percent, down two digits from July's 8.3 percent. That's a drop brought about not by more jobs but because 360,000 people left the workforce. It muffles the fact that 5 million people have now been out of work for 27 weeks or more. That's roughly 40 percent of the unemployed. Another 2.6 million people were marginally attached to the labor force, and over eight million people have given up looking for a job, so they are not counted because they had not searched for work in the prior month. http://bit.ly/PLUvOc

Posted by: George Orwell what knows Harry Reid is a pederast and a strangler at September 20, 2012 11:58 AM (AZGON)

96 91 He did?Thanks for ruining that for me!!

Posted by: steevy at September 20, 2012 11:58 AM (6o4Fb)

97 I did like how he'd beat the heck out of Inspector Clousseau, though.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at September 20, 2012 11:59 AM (r4wIV)

98 65 I blame the purple helmet.

Posted by: rickb223 at September 20, 2012 11:59 AM (GFM2b)

99 This is not really big news. Kaelin's been publicly saying he thinks OJ did it since 1996, when he said so on Geraldo Rivera's NBC show. In Vincent Bugliosi's book Outrage, he describes Kaelin's testimony as very damaging to Simpson, and says that he "stood up to Simpson big-time" when Simpson tried to get him to provide alibi testimony. Check out the preview of Outrage on Google Books, in the Notes at page 448-449.

Posted by: Alex at September 20, 2012 11:59 AM (/yzYn)

100 94!  Heh.. my vote for thread winner!

Posted by: Yip at September 20, 2012 11:59 AM (Mrdk1)

101 Mort will sing a different tune next month when Obama lowers the UE Rate to 7.8%.

Posted by: soothsayer at September 20, 2012 11:59 AM (jUytm)

102

I could never watch Bewitched reruns again after learning that OJ had beddedElizabeth Montgomery.

 

say WHAT!??!?

Posted by: USS Diversity at September 20, 2012 12:00 PM (0CiTm)

103 Brentwood is a neighborhood, not an incorporated city, Vic. It and Bel Air and West L.A. are all part of the city of Los Angeles


But there were courts there that could have handled the case.  That was a point made by Vincent Bugliosi who tried Manson.

Posted by: Vic at September 20, 2012 12:00 PM (YdQQY)

104 We actually had an entire local tv station, one of the small ones on UHF or VHF (whichever didn't carry the big networks back then) dedicated to the Simpson trial, all Simpson all the time. Hard to explain how bizarre that whole thing was to anyone who didn't live through it, but as for Kato i suspect he's just saying this looking to get paid somehow.

Posted by: booger at September 20, 2012 12:00 PM (HI6wa)

105 This is, in effect, the modern-day Depression. Take two issues, Social Security disability and food stamps. Roughly 15 percent of the population, a record, representing over 46 million Americans, are in the food stamp program, compared to the 7.9 percent participation from 1970 to 2000. And about 400,000 people have been signing up each month over the past four years. In addition, a record 11 million-plus Americans are now collecting federal disability checks. Half of them have come on board since President Barack Obama took office.

Posted by: George Orwell what knows Harry Reid is a pederast and a strangler at September 20, 2012 12:00 PM (AZGON)

106

The more significant thing...about the whole OJ Trial debacle...was that it added even more power to the Race Card.

 

The term 'Jury Nullification' was added to our vernacular.

 

Jury Nullification...by Race Card.

 

What else was going on in 1995...that we should take note of?

Barky was suing Citibank, in Chicago. 

On behalf of ACORN...he was suing Citibank, to force them to make Subprime Loans, to people who couldn't pay them back.

 

Barky was a Civil Rights attorney.

He was not an expert on Banking Law.

The Citibank shakedown...was done in much the same fashion as those done by Jesse Jackson.

 

But the insidious thing, about the Citibank shakedown...was that it sent out the message to other Banks:

"Make loans to poor people with bad credit...or We will sue you into oblivion!"

It worked.

The message went out...and created shockwaves in the Lending Industry.

 

That message was in keeping with the message from the OJ Trial...

"The Rules Don't Apply To Black People. You're Racist If You Try To Apply Them."

 

And so...here we are today, with a President who embodies this message.

 

Posted by: wheatie at September 20, 2012 12:00 PM (Z7b/q)

107 Every one knew he did it. The case was airtight. It was pure jury nullification based on racism. Posted by: Vic at September 20, 2012 03:40 PM (YdQQY) Yep. Everyone knew OJ was guilty the minute they saw that pathetic attempt to flee with AC, who also should have been jailed. That whole case was a mockery with the jury being the ultimate slap at civilized society.

Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at September 20, 2012 12:00 PM (X3lox)

108

He's also an idiot ("the statute of limitations" has passed? No, double jeopardy has attached. Murder has no statute of limitations).

 

I think he's talking about the statute of limitations in regards to himself, as in, being charged with perjury.

 

He's still an idiot, though.

Posted by: Hayabusa at September 20, 2012 12:00 PM (659DL)

109 Who?

Posted by: © Sponge at September 20, 2012 12:00 PM (UK9cE)

110 I am a bit shocked that the statute of limitations re: perjury is only 3 years. Considering the weight of the matter (the damage perjury can do), it seems like it should be much longer. Is this common?

Posted by: Time Travelling Flaneur at September 20, 2012 03:55 PM (ay6+/)

 

I think in the more damning cases, perjury would be just one potential charge.  As has been noted above, in a situation like this -- where Kato's perjury could    very well have allowed a guilty man to walk    free -- other charges may be in    the offing, too.   For example, Accessory     After    the Fact,    or    even    Accomplice or Co-Conspirator charges if the perjurer turns out to have been actively involved in thh crime    as well as the cover-up.        I guess     it could be a      sliding scale of severity    based on how much importance the perjurer's testimony had in the final decision by the jury, the perjurer's reasons for perjuring themselves, and the ensuing fallout from the verdict.

 

But I'm just yanking this   out of thin air since I'm not a legal beagle.

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/b][/i][/u] at September 20, 2012 12:01 PM (4df7R)

111 remember MORT from BAZOOKA JOE? he wore a TURTLE NECK up to his EYES

Posted by: soothsayerwing plover at September 20, 2012 12:01 PM (jUytm)

112 111
In a murder case? I doubt it.

OJ's protected from another murder trial. Double jeopardy bars him from being retried, and yes, even if a witness committed perjury.     Kato = Perjury & statute of limitations.

Posted by: rickb223 at September 20, 2012 12:02 PM (zji3t)

113

For capital crimes such as homicide, the statute of limitations in California on perjury can be extended beyond the court (meaning both the court's activities and the court's authority/role).  This means that, depending on the egregiousness of the crime and the materiality of the information, a person's statements before the court (at a trial), in depositions or sworn testimony, or to police can be held against them for an indeterminate length of time.  In lay terms, prosecutors just have to convince a judge that justice was denied because of the perjury. 

If the perjury created a mockery of the court, then there's a good chance the court will not suffer the perjury, regardless of how long ago it happened.  It all depends on if there's a prosecutor who's willing to take it up and if there's a hard-nosed judge willing to reassert the court's authority and prestige.  There's always the possibility that the court would use this to eliminate perjorous testimony to take another run at the accused.  Politics, money, and media play all factor in. 

Posted by: Manolo at September 20, 2012 12:02 PM (aO1W9)

114 Yeah I think the OJ case was a harbinger of Obama's election. He got off for being black. He got away with murder because he was a black man. Obama got elected because he was a black man. That's just it, full stop, end of story. But one term is all people are going to hand someone on that basis.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at September 20, 2012 12:02 PM (r4wIV)

115 Why does everyone insist OJ did it? Where was Romney when that happened? You don't know, do ya? I rest my case! /liberal

Posted by: Jay Guevara at September 20, 2012 12:02 PM (U+DUu)

116 If I am not mistaken OJ himself has admitted he did it.

Posted by: Vic at September 20, 2012 12:04 PM (YdQQY)

117 No, it's STATUE of limitations!

Posted by: Kramer at September 20, 2012 12:04 PM (kzFo5)

118

OT - Chrystal Ball (no shit, that's her name) on MSNBC was just praising the courage of the waiter who secretly video taped Mitt at the Florida fundraiser. 

 

She said he accomplished all of this while "fetching and shuffling". 

 

No coded racism there.

Posted by: jwest at September 20, 2012 12:04 PM (ZDsRL)

119 Special places in hell and all that...blah, blah. Just another scumbag in which just the sight of their ugly, smug faces makes me want to rip their arms off and beat them into a puddle of unrecognizable blood and guts.

Posted by: dananjcon at September 20, 2012 12:05 PM (eavT+)

120 And Zulu As KONO

Posted by: Soothsayer Five-0 at September 20, 2012 12:05 PM (jUytm)

121 Was there a dog on top of the Bronco?

I'm thinking that could be grounds for a re-trial.

Posted by: Time Travelling Flaneur at September 20, 2012 12:05 PM (ay6+/)

122 Why does everyone insist OJ did it? Where was Romney when that happened? You don't know, do ya? I rest my case! /liberal

Posted by: Jay Guevara at September 20, 2012 04:02 PM (U+DUu)

 

You're looking in the wrong direction, Jay!   Romney's just a red herring!

 

Where was HARRY REID?

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/b][/i][/u] at September 20, 2012 12:05 PM (4df7R)

123 ' He says: “People hated me. I’ve been spat upon. They threw gum in my coffee." ' Good.

Posted by: nerdygirl at September 20, 2012 12:05 PM (FP67C)

124 73: "I am a bit shocked that the statute of limitations re: perjury is only 3 years." Any statute of limitations only begins to run from the point when the government discovers the crime, or could reasonably have discovered the crime. If the crime is successfully concealed from the cops / prosecution for 20 years until they discover it, then they have the statutory period in which to bring charges. The SOL is not an incentive for criminals to cover up crimes until the limitations period passes; it's an incentive for the prosecution to shit or get off the pot once they know a crime's been committed, so as to not let evidence go stale (or let them hang a charge over someone's head forever without bringing it).

Posted by: Alex at September 20, 2012 12:06 PM (/yzYn)

125 I don't think Brentwood has a courthouse, but I could be wrong.  The FBI offices are on the border of Brentwood and West L.A. , unless they done moved


Big Cases in L.A. usually go DownTown.  That's where careers are made...

Posted by: C. Hendricks at September 20, 2012 12:06 PM (Dll6b)

126 Drudge, one of his best headlines yet.

Posted by: cajun carrot at September 20, 2012 12:06 PM (UZQM8)

127 "OJ Simpson Murder Trial" is too long to type. Lets just agree to call it the "Romney Trial" for expediency.  

Posted by: Up with people! at September 20, 2012 12:06 PM (kzFo5)

128

Kato was always non-believeable and an outsider granted access into the fool's court of that trial (Dancing Itos, anyone?). Let us remember his legacy by only naming pets after him - and only those pets who are loveably "blonde". Any German Shephard named 'Kato' would be improving on the Houseguest's IQ points by double digits.

 

Great way to help out the families of those murdered, Mr. Kaelin.

 

As an aside, my aunt who lives in SanFrancisco once dated the junior college coach of both OJ and Al Cowlings. He told me that he regularly had the two of them over to do yardwork. "Wait," I said, "you had OJ in your presence with sharp yard tools?" He told me that they were great young men, but it was the drugs that turned both of them into what they became. I can't remember if I actually asked him if he thought OJ was guilty - I believe it was implied that he had no problem believing OJ did it.

Posted by: dwagyak at September 20, 2012 12:06 PM (ePOm7)

129 Bitch set me up.

Posted by: OJ's glove at September 20, 2012 12:06 PM (VndSC)

130 It's hard to look for the REAL KILLERS when you're in prison.

Posted by: OJ at September 20, 2012 12:06 PM (FP67C)

131 121 OT - Chrystal Ball (no shit, that's her name) Wasn't that the hookers in the Duke Across case?

Posted by: rickb223 at September 20, 2012 12:06 PM (GFM2b)

132 Yeah I think the OJ case was a harbinger of Obama's election. He got off for being black. He got away with murder because he was a black man. Obama got elected because he was a black man. That's just it, full stop, end of story. But one term is all people are going to hand someone on that basis. Posted by: Christopher Taylor at September 20, 2012 04:02 PM (r4wIV) NOt sure about that, but I am sure I'd rather have OJ as President than obama and I think OJ is a murderer

Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 20, 2012 12:06 PM (oSFWF)

133 I have a red hot poker ready just for you, Kato. It's not as big as the one reserved for OJ, but it'll do. And don't bother with asbestos-spiked KY. You're only thinking in terms of Earthly heat. I use an entirely different metric.

Posted by: THE Barbed Cock of Satan at September 20, 2012 12:06 PM (eHIJJ)

134 >>If I am not mistaken OJ himself has admitted he did it.

I think he came out with a book entitled "If I Did It."  The "If" was in extremely small font, and from a distance, all you saw was "I Did It."

Posted by: angler at September 20, 2012 12:07 PM (SwjAj)

135 Can they hit him with Accessory after the Fact even though OJ was acquitted?

Posted by: Kensington at September 20, 2012 12:07 PM (znT2j)

136 remember MORT from BAZOOKA JOE?

he wore a TURTLE NECK up to his EYES

Posted by: soothsayerwing plover at September 20, 2012 04:01 PM (jUytm)



Bazooka Joe!!!!

http://scoamf.us/zB

Posted by: © Sponge at September 20, 2012 12:07 PM (UK9cE)

137 The statute of limitations for any crime he may have commited has long passed, unless he killed Nichole himself. I doubt they'd even have a good perjury case against if they could bring charges, because he didn't lie about anything. His testimony was that he he heard a thump and O.J. looked frazzled. He wasn't asked if he witnessed the crime or if OJ confessed it to him.

Posted by: Average Joe at September 20, 2012 12:07 PM (bN5ZU)

138 I love the pic Drudge has up for the 'Obama can't change shit' story.

He's has this look of someone who tried to sneak a fart out but ended up blasting a ship's horn.

Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at September 20, 2012 12:08 PM (3CiXB)

139 My apologies. Duke across case = Crystal Magnum of Ace 'O Spades champagne.

Posted by: rickb223 at September 20, 2012 12:08 PM (GFM2b)

140 I just checked, no courthouse listed in Brentwood but there are about 50 all over the area of LA.  One could be close.

Posted by: Vic at September 20, 2012 12:08 PM (YdQQY)

141 Statutes of Limitations also deal with the difficulty of witnesses remembering testimony, loss of evidence, and so on. For example, there was no retrial of Reuben "Hurricane" Carter because it had been so long that many of the people involved were dead and there was no way to build a case. They let him go not because he wasn't guilty, but because they couldn't realistically get a retrial.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at September 20, 2012 12:08 PM (r4wIV)

142 That whole case was a mockery with the jury being the ultimate slap at civilized society.

Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at September 20, 2012 04:00 PM (X3lox)

 

 

---------------------------------------------------

 

 

The whole circus was nothing but a staged "in yo face, whitey" exercise.  This trial was the final clue for me on just how fucked up this country was becoming.

Posted by: Soona at September 20, 2012 12:09 PM (+nn53)

143 Wasn't that the hookers in the Duke Across case?

Posted by: rickb223 at September 20, 2012 04:06 PM (GFM2b)

 

No, that was Crystal Mangum (a similarly silly name).

 

Didn't Crystal Ball run for office in 2010?   She's the one who had the skanky Christmas photos, right?

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/b][/i][/u] at September 20, 2012 12:09 PM (4df7R)

144 It doesn't matter. You poor bastards. Poor poor bastards.

Posted by: John Titor at September 20, 2012 12:09 PM (1FkrP)

145 In other news, my wife tells me that it was our only child who polished off the cookies.  Shocka!!

Posted by: Optimizer at September 20, 2012 12:09 PM (As94z)

146 wow 281 episodes of Hawaiian crime solving

Posted by: soothsayer is on imdb at September 20, 2012 12:10 PM (jUytm)

147

Please do not give the prosecution team that big of a pass. They were incompetent.

 

 

They failed to rebut the defense's contention that the DNA evidence identifying Simpson was unreliable because the DNA had been exposed to the weather.

 

I was screaming at the TV screen, "Tell the jury that weather would degrade the goddamned DNA, so it wouldn't correspond to anyone's; it would convert's A's DNA into B's. Tell them it's like pulling the antenna/cable connection out of the back of a TV: you don't get a different station, you get NO station! Even the dumbasses on that jury should have gotten that.

Posted by: Jay Guevara at September 20, 2012 12:10 PM (U+DUu)

148 "would" --> "would not"

Posted by: Jay Guevara at September 20, 2012 12:10 PM (U+DUu)

149 http://tinyurl.com/c4mnwv9 Bammy said he has "Realized" now you can't change Wash. from inside

Posted by: Evilpens at September 20, 2012 12:10 PM (ck76k)

150 They threw gum in my coffee. They misspelled 'cum'.

Posted by: Kato's Waiter at September 20, 2012 12:10 PM (FcR7P)

151 I just checked, no courthouse listed in Brentwood but there are about 50 all over the area of LA. One could be close.Posted by: Vic

The closest criminal court is in the valley, 10 min north on the 405.

Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at September 20, 2012 12:10 PM (3CiXB)

152 146 I still remember the jubilation from the black community.No white person would react that way(the closest would be the neighborhood party's thrown when mobsters got off,but that was largely coerced).

Posted by: steevy at September 20, 2012 12:10 PM (6o4Fb)

153 The whole circus was nothing but a staged "in yo face, whitey" exercise. This trial was the final clue for me on just how fucked up this country was becoming. Posted by: Soona at September 20, 2012 04:09 PM (+nn53) Yep.

Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at September 20, 2012 12:10 PM (X3lox)

154 Some guy claimed OJ got drunk at his Brentwood house and confessed to him.

Posted by: Vic at September 20, 2012 12:11 PM (YdQQY)

155 Bammy said he has "Realized" now you can't change Wash. from inside Obama/Biden '12: No More Change!

Posted by: t-bird at September 20, 2012 12:11 PM (FcR7P)

156

>>>Bammy said he has "Realized" now you can't change Wash. from inside

 

I say let him try it from Hyde Park next year then.

Posted by: Roy at September 20, 2012 12:11 PM (VndSC)

157
What said it all was the black power salute offered up to OJ by one of the black jurors after the jury acquitted him.

Clear enough message. Two entirely different countries superimposed on the same piece of physical geography.


Posted by: torquewrench at September 20, 2012 12:12 PM (ymG7s)

158   91   I could never watch Bewitched reruns again after learning that OJ had bedded Elizabeth Montgomery.
*
*
As we used to say in junior high, "For True?"

I always imagined she had better taste than that.

Posted by: Wolfus Aurelius at September 20, 2012 12:12 PM (exvgC)

159 It's always so shocking when people who beat up, or are beaten up by, other people, on a regular basis, for a living, wind up in the news for some sort of violent crime.  Just one of life's little mysteries, I guess...

Posted by: Optimizer at September 20, 2012 12:12 PM (As94z)

160 160 Hawaii.Anywhere though,as long as he GTFO.

Posted by: steevy at September 20, 2012 12:13 PM (6o4Fb)

161 Dildo had a career? When did that happen?

Posted by: Rich Fader at September 20, 2012 12:13 PM (eFAne)

162 >>>Can they hit him with Accessory after the Fact even though OJ was acquitted?

Yes, the fact that question before the court "Is it beyond a reasonable doubt that OJ did it" was answered only applies to OJ personally. For any new person tried in relation to the crime, the question "Did OJ do it" can get asked again of the court, just so long as the result of that question isn't directed at OJ.

Posted by: MikeTheMoose Regular! With Full Stomping Power! at September 20, 2012 12:13 PM (0q2P7)

163 Not sure if he realizes this, but OJ *will* get out of the can some day...

Posted by: Affenhauer at September 20, 2012 12:14 PM (7QZ6R)

164 Perjury?  Unfortunately there IS a statute of limitations on that.  Isn't there?

Posted by: Jeroboam at September 20, 2012 12:14 PM (Tcwdq)

165 Bammy said he has "Realized" now you can't change Wash. from inside Posted by: t-bird at September 20, 2012 04:11 PM (FcR7P) Another Barky lie, anyway. He even lies when he's trying to appear that he's lying about something else. The Malevolent Retard perverted and destroyed more of America from inside than any external enemy has even been close to doing. Barky has basically killed America, from inside, and turned this into the American Socialist Superstate, with some help from Benedickhead Roberts.

Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at September 20, 2012 12:14 PM (X3lox)

166

Wolfus Aurelius at September 20, 2012 04:12 PM (exvgC

They did a movie together in 1977 and rumored to have briefly dated which is not unusual for actors that played lovers.

Posted by: polynikes at September 20, 2012 12:14 PM (m2CN7)

167 By the by, until OJ killed is wife and that Goldman kid, he hung out in all white world. His friends were white, his second family was white, his lawyers were white, his business pals were white. He didn't become "Black" again till after his bronco ride.

Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 20, 2012 12:14 PM (oSFWF)

168 New post at my place.

Which was incredibly fun to write.

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at September 20, 2012 12:15 PM (8y9MW)

169 George Orwell what knows Harry Reid is a pederast and a strangler@106,

Cloward-Piven in a nutshell. Collapse the system. This is the one area where Obama simply is not incompetent. He's been terribly competent. Malevolently competent.

Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at September 20, 2012 12:15 PM (eHIJJ)

170 OJ won his case not because of jury racism, but because of prosecutor ineptitude.

The two prosecutors (Brown and Clark) were chosen for reasons of TV political correctness, when the higher ups figured it was a slam dunk case against OJ.  

Allegedly, even Robert Shapiro advised OJ to plead guilty early in the game, given what he felt was going to be a strong case against Simpson. 

IIRC, the lead prosecutor, Marcia Clark, had literally never prosecuted a homicide case before in her career.  Darden had, but he was a novice with only a few years as a prosecutor.

In the meantime, OJ hired the best defense lawyers possible, and they ran circles around Clark and Darden, introducing "reasonable" doubt about evidence tampering, and playing the race card (again, where a good prosecutor would have shut them down). 

On this clown Kaelin, there is nothing to say. . .if he saw or heard something the night of Nicole Simpson's murder and lied about it, he's a perjurer and a piece of crap.  If he didn't actually witness the murder, but simply believed that Simpson did it, well. . .he's still a piece of crap, but his testimony may not have made a difference.

Posted by: looking closely at September 20, 2012 12:16 PM (6Q9g2)

171 163 Right,all football players are violent.

Posted by: steevy at September 20, 2012 12:17 PM (6o4Fb)

172 Oh, by the way, OJ's in prison in Lovelock, which is northeast of Reno. So just a little bit outside of Vegas.

Posted by: Rich Fader at September 20, 2012 12:17 PM (eFAne)

173 OJ won his case not because of jury racism, but because of prosecutor ineptitude.
Don't sell the jury short, there was racism in there too.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at September 20, 2012 12:18 PM (r4wIV)

174 >>>Perjury? Unfortunately there IS a statute of limitations on that. Isn't there?

dude when I posted that at comment 6 I thought I was being original. Nope two morons beat me to it.

To summarize the whole thread on limitations for you, since you can't be bothered to read the comments.
1. Yes Perjury does have a statute of limitations.
2. It is 3 years.
3. It can get extended in some cases.
4. Accessory after the fact is also still an option for a motivated prosecutor to charge Kato.

Posted by: MikeTheMoose Regular! With Full Stomping Power! at September 20, 2012 12:18 PM (0q2P7)

175 OJ also poked Kris Kardashian Jenner.  She's more of a whore than her daughters.

Posted by: polynikes at September 20, 2012 12:19 PM (m2CN7)

176 did OJ Simpson kill Bill Walsh? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L04IzJFJhpM

Posted by: AJP at September 20, 2012 12:20 PM (KHo8t)

177 179 Kardashian was the one OJ lawyer who looked shocked and frightened that OJ was aquitted.

Posted by: steevy at September 20, 2012 12:21 PM (6o4Fb)

178

I assume Kato heard more than a bump against his wall.  I assume Kato actually saw OJ sneaking back into the house looking like the murderer he is.

That's why Kato knows OJ murdered Nicole.

Posted by: polynikes at September 20, 2012 12:21 PM (m2CN7)

179 Kardashian was the one OJ lawyer who looked shocked and frightened that OJ was aquitted. Posted by: steevy at September 20, 2012 04:21 PM (6o4Fb) he looked like he took a crap in his pants

Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 20, 2012 12:22 PM (oSFWF)

180 In the meantime, OJ hired the best defense lawyers possible, and they ran circles around Clark and Darden, introducing "reasonable" doubt about evidence tampering, and playing the race card (again, where a good prosecutor would have shut them down). Posted by: looking closely at September 20, 2012 04:16 PM (6Q9g2) Incorrect. The defense sucked donkey shlong. ANd it was to the judge to shut down the ridiculous "RAAAAACIST!!!" argument. That's the judge's job. The arguments given by the defense were totally retarded (about on the jury's level). Their line of argument was so retarded that Shapiro quit the team. Yes, Darden and Clark are idiots who never should have been graduated from any law school (or any school, for that matter). They blew the jury selection (as many noted immediately) and they were incompetent during the whole of the trial, but they were also subject to a judge who didn't seem to know what his job was and let the defense argue that aliens had possibly landed and killed Nicole and Goldman.

Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at September 20, 2012 12:22 PM (X3lox)

181 OJ won his case not because of jury racism, but because of prosecutor ineptitude. A laughable 4 hours of deliberation has nothing to do with the prosecutors. That one fact says all anyone needs to know about that jury and what they considered.

Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at September 20, 2012 12:23 PM (X3lox)

182 114:  Double jeopardy doesn't exist if an acquital was obtained through lying.  Perjorous statements can result in a verdict being set aside or vacated on appeal if the perjury materially affected the outcome of the jury's or judge's decision. In this case, I doubt it would warrant it. I recall Kaelin was an all-around terrible witness and couldn't be relied upon to provide anything substantive. The jurors pretty much dismissed everything he said.   

Posted by: Manolo at September 20, 2012 12:23 PM (osx1V)

183 I don't remember the details of this case well enough to comment intelligently (but that's never stopped me before).  How do we know that he knows whether OJ did it or not?  If I remember right, he was an alibi witness for OJ but the alibi was not airtight to begin with.  He may have testified truthfully and is merely expressing his opinion that OJ did it.  Or he may have lied in providing the alibi but still doesn't know if OJ did it.  Unless he is going to say that he saw OJ do it or that OJ confessed to him, so much fart gas.

Posted by: WalrusRex at September 20, 2012 12:24 PM (XUKZU)

184 I don't remember the details of this case well enough to comment intelligently (but that's never stopped me before). How do we know that he knows whether OJ did it or not? If I remember right, he was an alibi witness for OJ but the alibi was not airtight to begin with. He may have testified truthfully and is merely expressing his opinion that OJ did it. Or he may have lied in providing the alibi but still doesn't know if OJ did it. Unless he is going to say that he saw OJ do it or that OJ confessed to him, so much fart gas. Posted by: WalrusRex at September 20, 2012 04:24 PM (XUKZU) Kato Kalin's testimony was a side show. The Blood evidence was overwhelming and OJ had NO alibi what's so ever. He was and is as guilty as sin and the Judge, The lawyers, and they Jury have to live with that miscarriage of justice till they die. Fuck them all.

Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 20, 2012 12:27 PM (oSFWF)

185

WalrusRex at September 20, 2012 04:24 PM (XUKZU)

I believe Kato knew more than he testified to.  He testified just enough to cover himself in that he said he only heard a bump on his wall which was adjacent to where the glove was found and around the murder timeline.  I think he actually saw OJ returning and perjured himself by the story he told.

Posted by: polynikes at September 20, 2012 12:28 PM (m2CN7)

186 #118

Exactly.

If the State had employed seasoned prosecutors instead of the politically correct white woman/black man team, the OJ defense "dream team" wouldn't have been able to play the race card, and the whole trial would have take at best a few weeks.

That's even assuming there WAS a trial, because apparently OJ made some highly incriminating statements to the police after his apprehension explaining how he "accidentally" cut his hands, and then bled all over his car, his apt, etc, and due to prosecutor screwup, these statements were never admitted into evidence. 

A good prosecution team probably would have seized on this and OJ may have pled guilty.

 

Posted by: looking closely at September 20, 2012 12:28 PM (6Q9g2)

187 176... I know he did the deed in Reno and that part of the state is good to go.  I've seen Reno 911!  But I'm punishing the whole state of Nevada for their fool Senator Reid.... just like downstate Illinois are good folks but that entire state is a joke because of the Chicago dem (racist!) machine

Posted by: Yip at September 20, 2012 12:30 PM (Mrdk1)

188 It's too bad Johnny Cochran croaked before Obama took office.  He would have been a better selection for AG than that chinless piece of shit, Eric Holder.

Posted by: Fritz at September 20, 2012 12:31 PM (uRFJj)

189 >>#185 A laughable 4 hours of deliberation has nothing to do with the prosecutors. That one fact says all anyone needs to know about that jury and what they considered.

The only thing a short deliberation period says is that the jury wasn't firmly convinced OJ was guilty.

If they had reasonable doubt, the prosecutors didn't do their job, did they?

If they had come back in ten minutes with a guilty verdict, would you be accusing them of racism? 

Posted by: looking closely at September 20, 2012 12:31 PM (6Q9g2)

190 At the time of these murders, I had just left for a two week sailing trip.  The first I learned of the whole OJ spectacle was about two weeks afterwards, when I got back into a US airport.  Everyone was on the TV talking matter of factly about OJ Simpson having decapitating people and leading police on televised car chase.  Like it was common knowledge and old news.

It was intensely discombobulating to have that sort of sudden shift in popular culture.  It felt like I was transported into some bizarro dimension.

Posted by: wooga at September 20, 2012 12:31 PM (vjyZP)

191

 I could never watch Bewitched reruns again after learning that OJ had beddedElizabeth Montgomery.

 

Whoa. What?

Posted by: Infidel at September 20, 2012 12:32 PM (O/fK8)

192 seriously?  Elizabeth?  Why?  Why?

Posted by: Yip at September 20, 2012 12:33 PM (Mrdk1)

193 Kato you poor thing--they threw gum in your coffee?  Let me know what sidewalk cafe you'll next be hanging out in--and my dog and I will come by, and I'll drop a fresh dog turd in your coffee.  Sorta spice your sorry ass life up a bit you know.

Posted by: Comanche Voter at September 20, 2012 12:33 PM (oe1aw)

194

 OJ had NO alibi what's so ever.

 

---

 

I agree that OJ did it.  But I thought there was something about how he and Kato were out buying and eating hamburges from some fast food joint.  (This was before Michelle put a stop to that shit).

Posted by: Kato Kalin at September 20, 2012 12:36 PM (XUKZU)

195 166:  Accessory after the fact pertains to concealment of a crime after it has been committed for the purpose of benefiting from the crime or thwarting discovery of the crime.   If he gave false statements to police or officers of the court (prosecutors) to delay or prevent actors from being identified as a perpetrator or eliminated from suspicion, then that would be obstruction of justice.  When false statements are given before the court, it's perjury.

Posted by: Manolo at September 20, 2012 12:36 PM (osx1V)

196 So it was the OJ trial that crapped the Kardashian's onto the public consciousness? I can almost forgive a guy for a murder or two, but not that.

Posted by: irright at September 20, 2012 12:36 PM (pMGkg)

197 If they had come back in ten minutes with a guilty verdict, would you be accusing them of racism? Posted by: looking closely at September 20, 2012 04:31 PM (6Q9g2) After having seen the obviously guilty man try to run anyone with a brain knew that he was guilty. Don't try to equivocate between coming in with a guilty charge for someone everyone knows is guilty - by HIS OWN ACTIONS - and the opposite. That's quite the bullshit argument. But a deliberation of ten minutes would clearly indicate that they didn't review the trial evidence and the defense case.

Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at September 20, 2012 12:40 PM (X3lox)

198

FYI:   I took a number of law classes while adrift in college while  "figuring out what I wanted to do when I grew up."    They kicked me out when the found out my parents were married.

Posted by: Manolo at September 20, 2012 12:41 PM (osx1V)

199
That case was lost as soon as the stupid LA DA filed it in LA instead of Brentwood.

Posted by: Vic at September 20, 2012 03:40 PM (YdQQY)


This.


Posted by: DiogenesLamp at September 20, 2012 12:42 PM (kUU+T)

200 If they had reasonable doubt, the prosecutors didn't do their job, did they? Posted by: looking closely at September 20, 2012 04:31 PM (6Q9g2) "reasonable doubt" ... sure. These idiots were going by "beyond any shadow of a doubt". I don't think you could find two of those jurors who could even begin to understand what "reasonable doubt" means. They were taking 1/10000000 probability arguments as a "reasonable doubt" ... if they even bothered to consider them, at all. LOL.

Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at September 20, 2012 12:42 PM (X3lox)

201 >>>Double jeopardy doesn't exist if an acquital was obtained through lying. Perjorous statements can result in a verdict being set asideor vacatedon appeal if the perjurymaterially affected the outcome of thejury's or judge'sdecision.

Yeah, good luck with that. I don't think so.

Posted by: MikeTheMoose Regular! With Full Stomping Power! at September 20, 2012 12:43 PM (0q2P7)

202 Wow, now I know more about OJ's porkin than I ever wanted to know.  Between that and the carrot top look-a-like, there just isn't enough brain bleach.

Posted by: Infidel at September 20, 2012 12:44 PM (O/fK8)

203 zzz

Posted by: Gerry at September 20, 2012 12:45 PM (G5lOH)

204 >>>Accessory after the fact pertains to concealment of a crime after it has been committed for the purpose of benefiting from the crime orthwarting discovery of the crime.

Is anyone doubting that Kato had something to gain by not letting his meal ticket go to jail?

"Every person who, after a felony has been committed, harbors, conceals or aids a principal in such felony, with the intent that said principal may avoid or escape from arrest, trial, conviction or punishment, having knowledge that said principal has committed such felony or has been charged with such felony or convicted thereof, is an accessory to such felony."

emphasis added.

Posted by: MikeTheMoose Regular! With Full Stomping Power! at September 20, 2012 12:47 PM (0q2P7)

205 I don't think OJ ever had an affair with Elizabeth Montgomery.  There is a lot of evidence that he did with Jenner.


He did make a movie with Montgomery.

Posted by: Vic at September 20, 2012 12:51 PM (YdQQY)

206 116 Yeah I think the OJ case was a harbinger of Obama's election. He got off for being black. He got away with murder because he was a black man. Obama got elected because he was a black man. That's just it, full stop, end of story. But one term is all people are going to hand someone on that basis. Posted by: Christopher Taylor at September 20, 2012 04:02 PM (r4wIV) I disagree that OJ was released because he was black. Famous and generally well-liked also played a factor. Consider the case of Mike Tyson - his was a he-said-she-said and he was still tossed into the clink.

Posted by: blindside at September 20, 2012 12:54 PM (x7g7t)

207 174: "In the meantime, OJ hired the best defense lawyers possible" Not really, except for perhaps the DNA lawyers. Shapiro had never tried a murder case. Cochran wasn't primarily a criminal lawyer. Bugliosi's book shreds the media-created "Dream Team" narrative by pointing out several examples of mediocre-to-incompetent lawyering by Cochran et al.

Posted by: Alex at September 20, 2012 12:55 PM (/yzYn)

208 One statement by Christopher Hitchens that I always admired was when he said that he refused to refer to the murderer of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman as "O.J."  He said the criminal didn't deserve to be called by an affectionate or pallsy nickname; "To me, he is just Simpson the murderer."

Posted by: Dr. Mabuse at September 20, 2012 01:03 PM (FkH4y)

209 210 - Mike Tyson:  Trial took place in Indianapolis.  Jury: 9 whites, 3 blacks.  Versus Simpson's jury of 9 blacks, 1 Hispanic and 2 whites.  Both were popular sports stars, both were guilty, only one was convicted.  What factor do you think made the difference?

Posted by: Dr. Mabuse at September 20, 2012 01:28 PM (FkH4y)

210 "I always imagined she had better taste than that."
=====

Oh, she tasted fine!

Posted by: Orenthal the Murderer at September 20, 2012 01:29 PM (znT2j)

211 125 Why does everyone insist OJ did it? Where was Romney when that happened? You don't know, do ya? I rest my case! /liberal Posted by: Jay Guevara at September 20, 2012 04:02 PM (U+DUu) My God! It all fits now. Missing two minutes of Romney tape. TimeMachine® functional. Guilty as sin. /Democratic Underground

Posted by: 98ZJUSMC in Johnson County laughing at Cook County at September 20, 2012 01:37 PM (Jk8Nu)

212 I think he was high at the time and does not know either way. He just is not that good an actor to know he murdered her and lie about it

Posted by: Thunderb at September 20, 2012 01:38 PM (Dnbau)

213 This clown thought he was hated before... what does he expect to happen now that he admitted to helping a murderer walk?

Total maroon.

Posted by: Sarge at September 20, 2012 01:39 PM (We5IL)

214 Charge him with being an accessory after the fact to the murder for having assisted conceal it.

Posted by: LordAzrael at September 20, 2012 02:17 PM (2ShZa)

215 Feeds the theory that Jason Simpson did it and OJ covered it up.

Posted by: i like ancors at September 20, 2012 02:20 PM (LCZ3l)

216 If only Nifong had been in charge of prosecuting OJ... he probably would have f*cked that up too.

Posted by: Jack Squat Bupkis at September 20, 2012 02:56 PM (F3nFt)

217 If only Nifong had been in charge of prosecuting OJ... he probably would have f*cked that up too. Posted by: Jack Squat Bupkis at September 20, 2012 06:56 PM (F3nFt) I think it was Nifong watched some of the KTLA coverage an decided there was something for him to learn from it.

Posted by: Bill H at September 20, 2012 09:26 PM (3sZO1)

218 He probably means the statute of limitations on any crimes he may have committed by not saying this earlier, but is there a SOL for accessory after the fact in a murder case? A lawyer would know -- I hope he's talking to one.

Posted by: Ken at September 21, 2012 09:18 AM (3ar4L)

219 You know what they say about losing your 15 minutes of fame, don't you?

<removes sunglasses>

It Hertz.

Yeaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhh!!!!!!

Posted by: David Caruso at September 21, 2012 10:07 AM (DzvS7)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
180kb generated in CPU 0.1375, elapsed 0.3431 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.2905 seconds, 347 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.