October 17, 2012

New Romney Ad Based On Last Night's Debate
— DrewM

My quick take on the debate:

Romney was uneven. Good on taxes and economy (see the ad), not so good (to put it mildly) on Libya and pay equity (he should have been ready with facts about women making less in Obama's White House. Could be bad staff work).

Obama was obnoxious and lied repeatedly, nothing new there.

Crowley was an embarrassment who should be fired immediately.

Overall...Romney fought to a draw which was good enough considering the momentum is with him, so nothing changes. All Obama did was fire up his base but since that includes the DMM (Democratic Machine Media) it will seem like more than it is.

Crowley proved that if the GOP lets "undecided" voters for the Daily Kos and partisan hacks like her continue to frame these debates they are idiots. Radditz and Crowley should be the death knell for the Commission on Presidential Debates (yeah, yeah, War on Women).

Meanwhile, here's the ad culled from Romney's answer to a disgruntled Obama voter. It's very good. Clearly Team Mitt is moving into the closing arguments phase which makes sense with so much early voting going on. Can't wait until last week anymore.

Posted by: DrewM at 06:59 AM | Comments (351)
Post contains 213 words, total size 1 kb.

1

Firrrrrst !!

 

Posted by: Catcher (not the pitcher) Mitt at October 17, 2012 07:00 AM (icwKQ)

2 One telling thing for me is that over thelast couple of weeks, the focus has been totally on "debate performance" and especially on whether or not Obama or Biden could perform well enough to beat Romney or Ryan. None of it has been about whether Romney or Ryan would beat Obama or Biden. That's weird enough. But the weirdest thing for me is that a conclusion of the question of who would be the better president as a result of an analysis of what the candidates have said in the debates has not really been made. I think it is obvious to any honest critical thinker that both Romney and Ryan demolished the SCOAMT team on substance and that the Obama Biden team have yet to even show up on substance. They've shown that they can aggress, but that's it.

Posted by: HtP at October 17, 2012 07:01 AM (jx2j9)

3 12th?

Posted by: John Thompson at October 17, 2012 07:02 AM (Ni+Ei)

4

I am the eggman.

I am the eggman.

I am the  walrus.

Koo, ku, ka-chu.

Posted by: Candy Crowley at October 17, 2012 07:02 AM (L2DAB)

5

Thank you for your support and, yes, I was a little off my game last night.  I think I know where Obama lied, but can anyone here on this illustrious list please enumerate some of them for me, just so I can be prepared next week.

.

Your help and support is invaluable to me.  You are the real America I am fighting for.

Posted by: Catcher (not the pitcher) Mitt at October 17, 2012 07:02 AM (icwKQ)

6

Who needs a teleprompter when you have a moderator?

 

Posted by: HtP at October 17, 2012 07:02 AM (jx2j9)

7 He should run ads with Candy admitting she was wrong.

Posted by: Mo the Girl at October 17, 2012 07:02 AM (hhgaR)

8

"Crowley proved that if the GOP lets "undecided" voters for the Daily Kos and partisan hacks like her continue to frame these debates they are idiots. Radditz and Crowley should be the death knell for the Commission on Presidential Debates "

 

Should be, but won't be.  Republicans are a guy with blue balls and the media is the stuck-up rich girl they've wanted to bang since eighth grade.

Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at October 17, 2012 07:02 AM (TpXEI)

9 I've heard is said that the side that comes out with an ad first after a debate won the debate.

Looks like Team Romney won again.

Posted by: Nighthawk at October 17, 2012 07:03 AM (RSqz2)

10 He might have scored big on Libya had Crowley not jumped from the ropes with an illegal groin kick

TFG went on The View two weeks after to insist that it wasn't a terrorist attack

Posted by: kbdabear at October 17, 2012 07:03 AM (wwsoB)

11 Anyone know how many watched the debate?

Posted by: Velvet Ambition at October 17, 2012 07:03 AM (R8hU8)

12

Libtard tears. On Ice. With Bourbon.

November 7th. Let it be the "Day After".

Posted by: USMC8541 at October 17, 2012 07:05 AM (sGtp+)

13 2.Posted by: HtP at October 17, 2012 11:01 AM (jx2j9)..Hi, just letting you know that one of the listmembers, a nice guy, told me that people tend to scroll over "walls of text" and to keep it short and sweet.  .I like your analysis, but just letting you know what I was told earlier..And thanks for making me the man I am today.God bless America, etc and so forth. 

Posted by: Catcher (not the pitcher) Mitt at October 17, 2012 07:05 AM (icwKQ)

14

It was obvious to me that Obama had been practiced on interrupting in order to avoid certain questions.  Crowley certainly stepped up when SCOAMT stumbled.

Posted by: HtP at October 17, 2012 07:05 AM (jx2j9)

15 JEF knew damn well that Benghazi was an AQ attack, on US soil, on the 9/11 anniversary.  He decided to try to lie his way out of those "inconvenient truths" with some bullshit excuse about a video, but as a precaution he added that little throw-away line at the very end of his remarks as a CYA just in case somebody (like Mitt) called him on his lies.

He's a disgrace for that alone, hiding behind Crowley's apron folds makes him even more disgraceful.

Posted by: Nighthawk at October 17, 2012 07:06 AM (RSqz2)

16 I think he was actually good on "pay equity". Obama gave platitudes and bromides but Romney gave concrete answeres based on his past experience. I do agree that he should have mentioned Obama's women staff being paid less. That was low hanging fruit. But from the perspective of someone who isn't as up to snuff as we are about these things, Romney probably did at least OK.

Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at October 17, 2012 07:06 AM (6zgse)

17

Still waiting on that list of Obama lies.  Thanks everyone.  God Bless the United States of America, etc ad nauseum.

 

Posted by: Catcher (not the pitcher) Mitt at October 17, 2012 07:06 AM (icwKQ)

18 The ad should be Obama saying he knew it was a terror attack on the first day....then a montage of Rice, Hillary, and O talking about the video

Posted by: kawfytawk at October 17, 2012 07:07 AM (JWLqy)

19 The only mistake Mitt made was to expect the JEF to answer truthfully when directly questioned about oil leases. Mitt gets another bite of the Libya apple next debate. JEF came off shady and unlikable.

Posted by: Thunderb at October 17, 2012 07:07 AM (Dnbau)

20 I heard that Michelle Obama is replacing Bob Schieffer as the moderator in the last debate.

Posted by: digitalbrownshirt at October 17, 2012 07:07 AM (eHwT1)

21 Mitt just started the foreign policy debate, he will finish it on 10/22.

Posted by: runner at October 17, 2012 07:08 AM (WR5xI)

22 Candy Machine Crowley took the heat off Lehrer with her mis-correction correction. Who the hell is the next moderator, dare I ask?

Posted by: Lincolntf at October 17, 2012 07:08 AM (HethX)

23

Very good ad.

 

I listened to a Philly local talk radio show this morning.  The host is a former local news anchor who moderated many debates at the state level.  He shredded Candy Crowley and also hammered Obama for being evasive and not offering any sense of where he will lead the country if he is reelected.  He said, you do not win a debate simply by scoring the most attack points on your opponent - that is a "high school debate contest" mentality but does not work in political debates where the two canddiates are competing on (a) who seems the best fit for the office, and (b) who offers the most compelling vision and agenda for a better future.  And Romney simply kicked Obama's ass on both for those scores.

 

Callers to this show included a black woman who said she was inclined toward Romney after the first debate and this one cemented her vote.  Another caller is a Teamster who said Obama is killing jobs with his out of control environmental agenda and all the union guys he knows are votibng Romney.  Several callers said they did not think Romney got the worst of the exchange on Libya, because Obama appeared to be hiding behind Candy Crowley's skirt and that is not manly.

Posted by: rockmom at October 17, 2012 07:08 AM (aBlZ1)

24 So, where's the Obama ad from debate footage?
Where's Biden's?

Something tells me that if you were making points that appealed to the middle during the debate, you'd run that footage in a commercial.

Why?

Did you notice the graphics embedded in the footage? Mitt's stealing credibility/trust here--and you do that anytime you can.

The big "The Presidential Debates: 2012" is a huge trust stamp and also reminder of the stakes.

If the JEF was making a play for the middle, he'd do the same thing.

Posted by: RoyalOil at October 17, 2012 07:08 AM (imtbm)

25 We see it from the perspective of things we know that we think he should have said instead of from an ignorant undecided voter who doesn't know those things and those doesn't see their absence as a problem.

Posted by: Rdm at October 17, 2012 07:08 AM (uFyxE)

26 Candy Crowley;

The Replacement Ref of Campaign Moderators

Posted by: kbdabear at October 17, 2012 07:09 AM (wwsoB)

27 Catcher (not the pitcher) Mitt at October 17, 2012 11:06 AM (icwKQ) again with the homosexual reference. Why so intolerant? worried about that concrete bounce?

Posted by: Thunderb at October 17, 2012 07:09 AM (Dnbau)

28

Posted by: Rupert Pupkin, Esq. at September 28, 2012 02:18 PM (icwKQ)

 

Posted by: Catcher (not the pitcher) Mitt at October 17, 2012 11:06 AM (icwKQ)

Posted by: buzzion at October 17, 2012 07:09 AM (GULKT)

29 17...your concern touches me...deeply...really.

Posted by: Max Wedge at October 17, 2012 07:09 AM (zfs2X)

30

Well, to be fair, he did pass the Ledbetter Act, which I and my Republican colleagues oppose vociferously, and I didn't really have anything to counter his accomplishing what he promised except my "binders of women" - so I gotta let that one go. 

Posted by: Catcher (not the pitcher) Mitt at October 17, 2012 07:09 AM (icwKQ)

31 Are there any Libya ads out there? (I don't watch TV.) After last night, there need to be. Show Obama's non-answer and lie juxtaposed with his actual actions and statements.

Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at October 17, 2012 07:09 AM (6zgse)

32 Breitbart article: Crowley interrupted Romney 28 times, and she only interrupted Obama 9! It's hard to get any momentum/traction when you aren't allowed to complete a second. Every time she told Romney he'd get a chance to respond, I knew he wouldn't. I was right. These debates are exposing just how vile our MFM is. They will do whatever it takes to get TFG re-elected. Disgusting,

Posted by: runningrn at October 17, 2012 07:09 AM (WGmy2)

33 How did Romney screw up on Libya?  The only screw-up I heard was when he got overly defensive of his "blind trust" or whatever.  Other than that I think he made the important points.  If anyone didn't know the Obama cartel was being misleading about the whole thing they know now.

Posted by: Mr. Mojo Risin at October 17, 2012 07:09 AM (xXhWA)

34 Methinks we overestimate the impact of gender inequality and Lilly Ledletter.  Those issues appeal to some women, but usually those who will vote for Dems anyway.  I think Romney did as well as he could there, specifically focusing on employer flexibility.  That appeals to women too.  And of course most rational women understand that flexibility is one of the tradeoffs that lead to some pay inequality.  It would have been nice to point out that Obama pays his women less, but that could have come off as snide.  Regardless, Mitt  did as well as  he could on it. 

Posted by: SH at October 17, 2012 07:09 AM (gmeXX)

35 What looked like a missed opportunity for Romney last night on the 9/12 Rose Garden Speech might wind up working in his favor any way.
Romney probably should have worried less about parsing whether Obama called it an act of terror the next day, and buried him on the broader issue of his deception. Crowley jumping in, throwing Obama a lifeline, then walking back her statement after the debate will keep people talking about this issue. Though he did use the words "acts of terror", there is no denying that he spent the next 2 weeks pushing a narrative that he knew to be false.

The controversy will make it harder for Obama and his media buddies to avoid this topic, and will make it the big issue that people will remember from the debate. That is bad news for the president.

Posted by: SeeBS at October 17, 2012 07:09 AM (1XKpL)

36

Fact checkers:  Two parties blew it on certain topics.  Obama and the questioners.

 

Posted by: HtP at October 17, 2012 07:10 AM (jx2j9)

37 btw, do those people who argued that Mitt will not take 0 head on,  wanna apologize ?

Posted by: runner at October 17, 2012 07:10 AM (WR5xI)

38 My wife has a detached retina, I (probably) have carpal tunnel in my left hand, we're struggling to keep afloat, everybody I know is hurting except the ones in the Washington bubble, and I'm REALLY, REALLY TENSE. I don't think I can last 20 days but I'll try, with the help of the horde and occasional primal screams in the garage. Thank you for listening. Back to your originally scheduled blog, already in progress.

Posted by: joncelli at October 17, 2012 07:10 AM (RD7QR)

39 10 He might have scored big on Libya had Crowley not jumped from the ropes with an illegal groin kick
=========
It was more of a tackle from the sidelines as Mitt was running free for a touchdown in, what had been, a field goal contest up to then.

Posted by: RoyalOil at October 17, 2012 07:10 AM (imtbm)

40

Why so hard on Meatloaf Drew? He did the best he could as moderator last night.

Posted by: Ms Choksondik, with a shiny new ladyboner for Mitt at October 17, 2012 07:10 AM (YOZSv)

41 The phony "town hall" format exists only to give cover to MSM bias.  They pick the biased questions from Dem plants, but the format gives viewers the (false) impression that it was just a random audience member who asked it.

CNN and Crowley can simply say "See, that wasn't our question.  The audience asked that, so don't blame us".  Which is of course bullshit, because they intentionally chose the question and participant.

Posted by: Hollowpoint at October 17, 2012 07:11 AM (SY2Kh)

42 The Chicago Tribune somehow managed to write their story despite having Obama's rod in their mouth. Here's the sub-headline: Analysis: The President Obama who strode the debate stage Tuesday night banished the image of the dull and listless performer who almost ushered Mitt Romney back into the competition. Yeah, Romney's not in the competition or anything like that, but man, that was close.

Posted by: Whoever this is, it's definitely not Michael at October 17, 2012 07:11 AM (JVCVF)

43

Should be, but won't be. Republicans are a guy with blue balls and the media is the stuck-up rich girl they've wanted to bang since eighth grade.

 

Who isn't quite pretty or popular enough to date the quarterback, so she blows and fucks half the second string, creating a STD superstrain impervious to modern antibiotics.

Posted by: Lurking Canuck at October 17, 2012 07:11 AM (BrQrN)

44 HtP Don't listen to Mr. Catcher--he is a known troll. Che Gorilla. WaPo; Obama's Grooming Susan "Spontaneous Protest" Rice To Be ... minx.cc/?post=261164%22%3Eminx.cc%3C/a%3EPosted by: Che Gorilla at October 16, 2012 11:50 AM (icwKQ) __________________ Check the hash. I do think we will have certain people trying to discourage certain posters. Happened on the debate thread last night.

Posted by: tasker at October 17, 2012 07:11 AM (r2PLg)

45 Good advert. Mitt's likeable and, above all, looks and sounds PRESIDENTIAL. The last debate - when he MUST nail this cocksucking TFG to the wall over Benghazi - should seal the deal. Preference cascade in 5-4-3-2... / l l l l l l l l l

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at October 17, 2012 07:11 AM (+tqYo)

46 The only mistake Mitt made was to expect the JEF to answer truthfully when directly questioned about oil leases.


Posted by: Thunderb at October 17, 2012 11:07 AM (Dnbau)
=================

It is a mistake to expect the JEF to answer truthfully when directly questioned about ANYTHING!

Hopefully Mitt will remember this...

Posted by: Nighthawk at October 17, 2012 07:11 AM (RSqz2)

47

Candy Crowley lies.

 

Obama says "Could you say that louder, Candy?"

 

Kind of a microcosm

Posted by: Mr. Mojo Risin at October 17, 2012 07:11 AM (xXhWA)

48 Piss off Che Gorilla--ass sombrero.

Posted by: tasker at October 17, 2012 07:12 AM (r2PLg)

49 19The only mistake Mitt made was to expect the JEF to answer truthfully when directly questioned about oil leases.  

Posted by: Thunderb at October 17, 2012 11:07 AM (Dnbau)

....

....

...

Well, again guys, to be fair, he explained that oil companies were sitting on the leases indefinitely, so they got yanked, and then relet (that means leased again).  I mean, there's no question that big oil has me in their pocket -- advocating a pipeline from Canada that is just for refining a finite amount of crude that will be exported, not come to the U.S. market.  But whatever, the lease question was actually answered.  So I gotta let that one go, too.

Posted by: Catcher (not the pitcher) Mitt at October 17, 2012 07:12 AM (icwKQ)

50

Crowley really helped Obama out twice - Big on Lybia, and on F & F, which Obama never had to respond to.  Mitt's charge against Obama was pretty weak too, but perhaps appropriate. 

 

Sure the questions had a liberal tilt and Candy let Obama talk more and interupted Mitt more, but that is to be expected.  However, saving Obama on Lybia and not making  Obama  answer the charge on F & F.  Those are terrible.

Posted by: SH at October 17, 2012 07:12 AM (gmeXX)

51 I'd like to see one hitting Obama on his pipeline remark also (that he said something to the effect that we have enough pipelines already).

Posted by: Isophorone at October 17, 2012 07:12 AM (Qt9tO)

52 30...yes and that's why Bamms female staff are payed less than the men...thanks for playing.

Posted by: Max Wedge at October 17, 2012 07:13 AM (zfs2X)

53 45 To my point above, I think Mitt and Ryan just need to be calm and reassuring. Yeah, I want Mitt to open up with the heavy artillery, but he has to do it in a nice, measured and calm tone. I think he can do this.

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at October 17, 2012 07:13 AM (+tqYo)

54 "Crowley was an embarrassment who should be fired immediately." Yes and yes.

Posted by: mare at October 17, 2012 07:13 AM (A98Xu)

55 Oh, and I was so disappointed that Romney didn't point out the pay discrepancy and hypocrisy displayed Obama paying female staffers less than men. I don't think very many people outside of us bitter clingers are aware of that. That being said, I think Romney really left a mark with tying Obama's failed energy policies and the high price of gas.

Posted by: runningrn at October 17, 2012 07:13 AM (WGmy2)

56 Drew, I think you are dead on.  My thoughts exactly.  Great minds think alike, ha ha.


Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectual at October 17, 2012 07:13 AM (wR+pz)

57 This was Mr. Romney's strongest and most important moment.

This is what people care about; a vision and plan for getting folks back to work and more financially secure.

People I know that are struggling said the most disappointing thing about Mr. Obama last night was his lack of that vision and a plan. They lamented he was not at least contrite and open to finding new ways to improve the economy.

Being partisan and sometimes closed to ideas from someone in another political party is often easier when you are financially secure. But when times are bad, parties seem to often take a back seat to ideas you honestly believe will personally help you.

The more people see of Mr. Romney, the more they believe he can sincerely help.

Posted by: marcus at October 17, 2012 07:13 AM (GGCsk)

58 Team Romney needs stronger ads than that.  Find your balls, fellas.

Posted by: Dang© at October 17, 2012 07:14 AM (R18D0)

59

(icwKQ)

Romney destroyed Obama in the first debate and Obama succeeded in not being owned again in the second debate.  Dickweed's like you think that's a victory.  Delusional .

Posted by: polynikes at October 17, 2012 07:14 AM (m2CN7)

60 Posted by: Catcher (not the pitcher) Mitt at October 17, 2012 11:12 AM (icwKQ)

Fuck off moby. You're wasting your efforts anyway.

Posted by: joncelli at October 17, 2012 07:14 AM (RD7QR)

61 32Breitbart article: Crowley interrupted Romney 28 times, and she only interrupted Obama 9! 

Posted by: runningrn at October 17, 2012 11:09 AM (WGmy2)

...

....

Well, I did kind of run my mouth a little over more than the format permitted, and ignored her attempts to moderate, and generally dismissed her authority as a moderator as if I already had the job as commander in chief.  But, yeah, it's patently unfair for her to reel in someone of my stature.

 

Posted by: Catcher (not the pitcher) Mitt at October 17, 2012 07:14 AM (icwKQ)

62 -
I figured it out last night.  

Mitt's got the measure of Obama because Mitt's seen this before.

One of the experiences Mitt has is this:

Walking into a failing enterprise and listening to the CEO make all kinds of excuses and time-buying arguments for the business failing.

And then Mitt's either worked with the person to right the ship, or he's  let that person go.

Time for Barack to go.

All Barack is doing now is negotiating his parachute.


_

Posted by: BumperStickerist at October 17, 2012 07:15 AM (RuUvx)

63 Catcher (not the pitcher) Mitt at October 17, 2012 you are a fucking idiot. A complete fucking idiot

Posted by: Thunderb at October 17, 2012 07:15 AM (Dnbau)

64 Next Week: "Playing the part of President Obama tonight, Denzel Washington." If they're going to be biased retards, they might as well allow illegal substitutions.

Posted by: El Kabong at October 17, 2012 07:15 AM (HWj39)

65 Glenn Beck on his morning show, called it the emasculation of Obama. Romney schooled him several times on how the economy works and I have to agree with that. Women (me especially) react on many levels to an alpha male and Romney had that vibe; Obama not so much.

Posted by: IC at October 17, 2012 07:15 AM (a0IVu)

66 Barack Obama is a stuttering clusterf*ck of a miserable tyrant.

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at October 17, 2012 07:15 AM (8y9MW)

67 In 20 days, we will witness a great exodus of trolls, never to be seen again...

Posted by: Lincolntf at October 17, 2012 07:15 AM (HethX)

68 Admittedly I could not watch or even listen, although I was glued to this website.  In the photos and clips, TFG looks like a bad teenager about to go on a rampage, sans his adderall.  What the hell was wrong with him?

Posted by: small town girl at October 17, 2012 07:16 AM (UcXTQ)

69 I  was  hiding  behind  Candy  Crowley's  skirt  last  night.  Guess  who  else  was  there  -  Barry  Soetoro!

Posted by: Skittle Pooping Unicorn at October 17, 2012 07:16 AM (OiC7K)

70 Got to agree that these debates are crystallizing the idea that SCOAMF and Biden are shady a-holes. Yes, they've been aggressive, but they are turning women off. That might be RR's plan after all.

Posted by: Log Cabin at October 17, 2012 07:16 AM (JV/H0)

71 I  think  Obama  did pretty well all things considered.  Unfortunately, he has nothing to run on.  Mitt gave a very good indictment and there was no response.  For a  man with no record, Obama did pretty well.  But it will not be near enough.  In the end, he is an  incumbent  with no record who is shedding voters going up against a very succesful businesman who was a former govenor  who seems credible.  Fundamentals  matter.

Posted by: SH at October 17, 2012 07:16 AM (gmeXX)

72 Crowley interrupted Romney 28 times and Obama 5 times.  And of those 5, four of them were for going over his time limit.

Posted by: polynikes at October 17, 2012 07:16 AM (m2CN7)

73 So, can I just get a quick list of lies that Obama told.  I don't think I know what they are because I haven't been campaigning for the past four years while he's been the chief executive of the government as voted by the people of this great country.

Posted by: Catcher (not the pitcher) Mitt at October 17, 2012 07:16 AM (icwKQ)

74 Woohoo!! Me and Mrs Hobo Bologna got our ballots in the mail yesterday. We are ready to do our part to stop the insanity via the great state of Colorado.

Posted by: Hobo Bologna at October 17, 2012 07:16 AM (bxpf3)

75 Candy Crowley:

The Angela Corey of fact checkers.

Posted by: Fritz at October 17, 2012 07:17 AM (/ZZCn)

76 70 I was hiding behind Candy Crowley's skirt last night. Guess who else was there - Barry Soetoro! Posted by: Skittle Pooping Unicorn at October 17, 2012 11:16 AM (OiC7K) The giant animé evil Ultra-sound Man and his tentacles. Ready to explore the cobweb filled tributary of the mons horribilis.

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at October 17, 2012 07:17 AM (+tqYo)

77 68 In 20 days, we will witness a great exodus of trolls, never to be seen again... Posted by: Lincolntf at October 17, 2012 11:15 AM (HethX) ___________ LOL! Too true.

Posted by: tasker at October 17, 2012 07:17 AM (r2PLg)

78 I think Mitt answered well on pay equity and "how are you different than Bush?" Both questions were obviously dem biased and seem silly to us, but they gave Mitt an opportunity to alleviate some doubts among voters who are worried about these very things. I don't think Mitt mentioning the lower pay for women of the Obama administration would have made much difference. I like the fact that instead of getting into the weeds of actually addressing the pay difference issue, Mitt used this as an opportunity to show that he is pro-woman. And I think that is more important to voters than pointing out another boring hypocrisy of the Obama administration.

Posted by: Galadriel at October 17, 2012 07:17 AM (xG0vx)

79 Rachel corey knows all about concrete bounce. It won't be pretty

Posted by: Thunderb at October 17, 2012 07:17 AM (Dnbau)

80 67Barack Obama is a stuttering clusterf*ck of a miserable tyrant.

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at October 17, 2012 11:15 AM (8y9MW)

..

...

...

I couldn't agree more -- but if I'm ever asked about it, I'll call your credibility into question with my emphatic denials.

Posted by: Catcher (not the pitcher) Mitt at October 17, 2012 07:17 AM (icwKQ)

81 68 In 20 days, we will witness a great exodus of trolls, never to be seen again...

Posted by: Lincolntf at October 17, 2012 11:15 AM (HethX)


And I will fart in their general direction.

Posted by: joncelli at October 17, 2012 07:18 AM (RD7QR)

82 >>>>74 Please direct yourself to the nearest hobo cock so that you may suck it.

Posted by: El Kabong at October 17, 2012 07:18 AM (HWj39)

83 I can't watch the ad, but is this the gentleman to whom Obama's response was essentially, "Suck it up and deal with it, I'm awesome    and      you should vote for     me again?"

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/b][/i][/u] at October 17, 2012 07:18 AM (4df7R)

84 68 In 20 days, we will witness a great exodus of trolls, never to be seen again...

Posted by: Lincolntf at October 17, 2012 11:15 AM (HethX)

 

I wish. I think they'll be even worse. They are angry when they win, furious when they lose.

Posted by: Ms Choksondik, with a shiny new ladyboner for Mitt at October 17, 2012 07:18 AM (YOZSv)

85 Canada that is just for refining a finite amount of crude that will be exported,>>

It's nice of you to point out you have no clue how jobs are made. Think that sentence through and tell me who will be doing the refining.

Posted by: Buzzsaw at October 17, 2012 07:18 AM (tf9Ne)

86 Since Candy was picking the questions I was waiting for this one;

So Mr. President; Lemon Meringue or Key lime?

Posted by: marcus at October 17, 2012 07:18 AM (GGCsk)

87 Crowley will be "fired" alright... right to the chairmanship of the Columbia School of Churn-a-lism.

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at October 17, 2012 07:19 AM (+tqYo)

88 Hey Catcher/not pitcher (heh), so far the only wall of text I have been ignoring is the crap you are dribbling out. HtP seems to be pretty revelant, which makes a little wordiness bearable. Shorter text: Fuck Off...

Posted by: rightwingdeathbeast at October 17, 2012 07:19 AM (itqfB)

89

I really need to know what Obama's lies are otherwise my poor performance next week could be on you all.  That would not be pretty for either of us.

Posted by: Catcher (not the pitcher) Mitt at October 17, 2012 07:19 AM (icwKQ)

90 I got nothing.  Let's have a drink, it's 5 O' Clock somewhere.

This shit is over, Barry is toast.

Posted by: Billy Bob, the guy who drinks in SC at October 17, 2012 07:19 AM (wR+pz)

91 I want Romney to put a clip of Obama's closing in an ad - the part where he raves about Free Enterprise as the best thing evah! Just add an old 60s sitcom laugh-track to it.

Posted by: Roy at October 17, 2012 07:19 AM (VndSC)

92 Is this 'catcher' guy going to be allow to just spam every thread?


Seriously, someone needs to do something about trolls.  It's unrealistic to expect people to just ignore them when they post every other comment in a thread.



Posted by: Tami at October 17, 2012 07:19 AM (X6akg)

93 75 Woohoo!! Me and Mrs Hobo Bologna got our ballots in the mail yesterday. We are ready to do our part to stop the insanity via the great state of Colorado. Posted by: Hobo Bologna at October 17, 2012 11:16 AM (bxpf3) Xerox a few and send em to me! Just kidding. Sort of.

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at October 17, 2012 07:19 AM (+tqYo)

94 Heh.  Thanks, Thunderb, now I want pancakes.

Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at October 17, 2012 07:19 AM (/kI1Q)

95 Romney won. No draw.

Posted by: Honey Badger at October 17, 2012 07:19 AM (GvYeG)

96 Pupkin! You suck! You're fired! Take your binky and get out of my office!

Posted by: David Axelrod at October 17, 2012 07:20 AM (DLu2s)

97 51 I'd like to see one hitting Obama on his pipeline remark also (that he said something to the effect that we have enough pipelines already).
============
No, he said we've built enough pipeline to circle the world.

Yes, he claimed we built nearly 25,000 miles of pipeline.

I sure hope Romney puts that in an ad.

Posted by: RoyalOil at October 17, 2012 07:20 AM (imtbm)

98

Posted by: Catcher (not the pitcher) Mitt at October 17, 2012 11:16 AM (icwKQ)

 

OMG that's some funny shit right there.

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/b][/i][/u] at October 17, 2012 07:20 AM (4df7R)

99 concrete bounce, party of 1

Posted by: Thunderb at October 17, 2012 07:20 AM (Dnbau)

100 91
I really need to know what Obama's lies are otherwise my poor performance next week could be on you all. That would not be pretty for either of us.

Posted by: Catcher (not the pitcher) Mitt at October 17, 2012 11:19 AM (icwKQ)


Well, it looks like they let Greg back in the library.

Posted by: Greg's mom at October 17, 2012 07:20 AM (wR+pz)

101 Candy Crowley reminded me of Brando in "Last Tango in Paris." Something about "pigs" and "get the butter..."

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at October 17, 2012 07:20 AM (+tqYo)

102 The desperation of the mobies is nectar to me. They're losing, they know they're losing, so they retreat into fantasies. It will be all they have, and it warms me.

Posted by: joncelli at October 17, 2012 07:20 AM (RD7QR)

103 While everyone is talking about Meatloaf jumping in and throwing the JEF a lifeline, the thing that got me the most excited, which NOBODY is talking about was Romney saying he would completely do away with the capital gains tax and tax on interest and dividends.

This is HUGE.  It cannot be understated.  You quit taxing capital gains, interest, and dividends, and this economy takes off like a rocket.

Or as Al Czervik said at the end of Caddyshack-- "WE'RE ALL GONNA GET LAID!!!"

I will admit that I was a Perry guy during the primary, but with that little nugget of economic planning out of the bag, I am FULL ON behind Romney. 

Posted by: Uncle Mikey at October 17, 2012 07:21 AM (8qoXL)

104 Isn't the debate moderator supposed to keep the candidates focused so they answer the questions? Crowley failed on that front too...Obama never answered the Benghazi question. "Who in your administration was responsible for denying these security requests?"

Posted by: El Kabong at October 17, 2012 07:21 AM (HWj39)

105 TIME’s Joe Klein: “Obama’s Greatest Weakness Is That His Proposals For The Future Are Nonexistent.”

Posted by: Evilpens at October 17, 2012 07:21 AM (ck76k)

106

Methinks we overestimate the impact of gender inequality and Lilly Ledletter. Those issues appeal to some women, but usually those who will vote for Dems anyway.

 

This.

 

I'm a woman, and the Lily Ledbetter act is one of the reasons why I'm a borderline misogynist.

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/b][/i][/u] at October 17, 2012 07:21 AM (4df7R)

107

I support the pipeline, my opponent doesn't.  The difference is also that I know that the pipeline is just to REFINE oil that's going to be exported.  They are building a pipeline (finite jobs) for a finite amount of oil (more finite refinement jobs).  But I'm still behind it 100%, as you know, cuz it sounds like I a JOB CREATOR.  God Bless this list and God bless these United States of America, etc and so forth.

Posted by: Catcher (not the pitcher) Mitt at October 17, 2012 07:21 AM (icwKQ)

108 The left has Romney's binder of women confused with Bill Clinton's.

Posted by: schmoopy at October 17, 2012 07:21 AM (vclSa)

109 You gotta love the smell of troll burning in the morning.

Posted by: tasker at October 17, 2012 07:22 AM (r2PLg)

110 104 Posted by: joncelli at October 17, 2012 11:20 AM (RD7QR) Mein Fuhrer, would you like to see the plans and models of the New Berlin?! (SFX of shell exploding and plaster dust hitting the table)

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at October 17, 2012 07:22 AM (+tqYo)

111 The Lonesome Debate of Mitt Romney ---apologies to Bob Dylan and "The Lonesome Death of Hattie Carroll" Obama threw zingers to attack Mitt Romney Trying to compensate for his lack of Teleprompter In a mainstream-media townhall-debate format With an audience stacked to be favorable to him And all audience questions previously submitted With commentators watching to inflate his successes And minimize answers that Romney might offer But you who rationalize deceit And justify all spin Are going down to a deserved defeat For November Sixth we will win Barack Obama grew up as a Leftist In law school adopted Critical Race Theory For twenty years sat and listened to a pastor Who damned the America that gave him his fortune And claims he never heard what that preacher uttered He started political life with assistance From a terrorist bomber who is unrepentant But you who rationalize deceit And justify all spin Are going down to a deserved defeat For November Sixth we will win Romney like Obama grew up in some privilege But starting adult life gave up his inheritance So that he could earn for himself satisfaction By making his own way when finding his fortune He saved companies and he saved the jobs with them And in doing so he amassed his own millions Which Barack Obama attacks with class warfare Romney understands that it's the private sector And not government jobs and not entitlements That will bring the United States out of recession If we are not fettered by too much regulation But you who rationalize deceit And justify all spin Are going down to a deserved defeat For November Sixth we will win The moribund media determine the forum In which candidates may debate, and decorum Under which anyone challenging whom they favor Will have disabilities 'neath which they labor So that they'll be lucky to finish a sentence In order to build up the incumbent's competence And paint he who challenges him as a devil They know he can't win if the playing field's level And so his record must at all costs be hidden Ignoring the filthy stench of reeking midden Demanding the while that Romney "give specifics" Ah, but you who rationalize deceit And justify all spin Are going down to a deserved defeat For November Sixth we will win

Posted by: buzzsawmonkey at October 17, 2012 07:22 AM (sCeDk)

112 All my Facebook friends in California are sick of politics. Many criticize Romney but then subsequently unleash on Obama. Since Obama is the guy in charge, he can't escape realities. I'd say these are liv's that are calling bs on the president.

Posted by: California red at October 17, 2012 07:22 AM (DXTKe)

113 Well, it looks like they let Greg back in the library. --- Nah, it's that felcher who has the unhealthy obsession with horse penises.

Posted by: mediumheadboy at October 17, 2012 07:22 AM (aHR5E)

114 Pipeline. It's not on Hawaii's north shore and you don't do "hits" off it.

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at October 17, 2012 07:23 AM (+tqYo)

115
I figured it out last night. Mitt's got the measure of Obama because Mitt's seen this before. One of the experiences Mitt has is this: Walking into a failing enterprise and listening to the CEO make all kinds of excuses and time-buying arguments for the business failing.

Posted by: BumperStickerist




That's a pretty good observation and would make an effective 30 second ad.  Just Romney speaking to the camera and explaining "been there, seen it".

Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at October 17, 2012 07:23 AM (kdS6q)

116 Romeny missed the chance to call-out Obama on the "enough pipeline to circle the earth" comment.

That pipeline Obama refers to was installed by the private sector and had zero to do with the government or Obama's policies.

Posted by: marcus at October 17, 2012 07:23 AM (GGCsk)

117 o away with the capital gains tax and tax on interest and dividends. if Romney can do that, prepare to see the markets explode!!!!! cannot be overstated, like giving adderall to the economy

Posted by: Thunderb at October 17, 2012 07:23 AM (Dnbau)

118 107TIME’s Joe Klein: “Obama’s Greatest Weakness Is That His Proposals For The Future Are Nonexistent.”

Posted by: Evilpens at October 17, 2012 11:21 AM (ck76k)

...

...

...

Since when are we going to give any credence to this known communist and suspected bathroom lurker.  I didn't say that.  No I did not.  That is NOT what I said.

Posted by: Catcher (not the pitcher) Mitt at October 17, 2012 07:23 AM (icwKQ)

119

Obama: " I believe that the free enterprise
system is the greatest engine of prosperity the world's ever known."

 

Good news,  Enterprise  system  . Come January,   you will finally be set free.

Posted by: Roy at October 17, 2012 07:23 AM (VndSC)

120 >>>107 TIME’s Joe Klein: “Obama’s Greatest Weakness Is That His Proposals For The Future Are Nonexistent.” Exactly. Precisely what the FUCK is he going to do with another four years?

Posted by: El Kabong at October 17, 2012 07:23 AM (HWj39)

121 Now Obama is holding out for infinite jobs? Kim Jung Un may have a template he can use.

Posted by: Lincolntf at October 17, 2012 07:23 AM (HethX)

122 107 TIME’s Joe Klein: “Obama’s Greatest Weakness Is That His Proposals For The Future Are Nonexistent.” Posted by: Evilpens at October 17, 2012 11:21 AM (ck76k) But the important thing is that they are sweeping and glorious. So vote TFG.

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at October 17, 2012 07:23 AM (+tqYo)

123 112 104 Posted by: joncelli at October 17, 2012 11:20 AM (RD7QR)


Mein Fuhrer, would you like to see the plans and models of the New Berlin?!

(SFX of shell exploding and plaster dust hitting the table)

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at October 17, 2012 11:22 AM (+tqYo)


Wo ist Steiner? WO IST STEINER?

Posted by: Greggie, definitely a catcher at October 17, 2012 07:23 AM (RD7QR)

124

Well, I did kind of run my mouth a little over more than the format permitted, and ignored her attempts to moderate, and generally dismissed her authority as a moderator as if I already had the job as commander in chief. But, yeah, it's patently unfair for her to reel in someone of my stature<<<<<<

 

LOL!  Our troll has the nervous diarrhea sweats from watching his boy get mauled on everything from unemployment to his lies on energy to Libya and everything in between.

 

Oh, how I will use your warm, salty Libtard tears as fap lotion on November 7, my terrified little fuckwit.

 

Obama's not only going to lose, he's going to lose big.

Posted by: Empire of Jeff at October 17, 2012 07:24 AM (oYLeq)

125 I'm a fuckwitted troll who does nothing but divide my time between here and the local glory hole. I have absolutely nothing of substance to say so I'm going tell you all how much I love fellating horses.

Posted by: Rupert Gorillapenis at October 17, 2012 07:24 AM (aHR5E)

126

>>Crowley interrupted Romney 28 times, and she only interrupted Obama 9!

 

I can't believe Romney behaved so badly that she had to do that! #waronwimmins

Posted by: Mama AJ, who heard the SMOD that wasn't at October 17, 2012 07:24 AM (SUKHu)

127 34 It would have been nice to point out that Obama pays his women less, but that could have come off as snide. When the truth looks "snide", you've already lost.

Posted by: rickb223 at October 17, 2012 07:25 AM (GFM2b)

128 Oh holy ______ Reeal Clear Politics has the video tape--not just the still freeze frame pic of Michelle Obama leading the clapping last night during Candy Crowley's charge against Romney on Benghazi-- Check it out-- http://tinyurl.com/btqtb65 It's at the end.

Posted by: tasker at October 17, 2012 07:25 AM (r2PLg)

129 an incumbent who gets pissy about opponents penis pension size  is not on a winning streak

Posted by: runner at October 17, 2012 07:25 AM (WR5xI)

130 52 30...yes and that's why Bamms female staff are payed less than the men...thanks for playing.
==========
The point is, if women are actually paid less for the exact same work and experience, then how come every company isn't staffed top to bottom with women since their labor is cheaper?

Oh, right. Reality is a bitch. 

Posted by: RoyalOil at October 17, 2012 07:25 AM (imtbm)

131 Since when are we going to give any credence to this known communist and suspected bathroom lurker. I didn't say that. No I did not. That is NOT what I said.

Posted by: Catcher (not the pitcher) Mitt at October 17, 2012 11:23 AM (icwKQ)

 

...You treat it like that's a BAD thing to say?   You really ARE an idiot.

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/b][/i][/u] at October 17, 2012 07:25 AM (4df7R)

132 icwQK is 1 of our finest trolls...so glad you like it.

Posted by: David 'the wizard' Axelrod at October 17, 2012 07:25 AM (wePjE)

133 Regular people, not pundits or the chattering class, thought Romney wiped the floor on all the issues that matter most to voters:  taxes, deficit, handling the economy, AND health care. Spinners will spin but Romney prevailed where it counts.

Posted by: TD at October 17, 2012 07:26 AM (DQMcq)

134 116

Nah, it's that felcher who has the unhealthy obsession with horse penises.

Posted by: mediumheadboy at October 17, 2012 11:22 AM (aHR5E)

....

....

....

I see your point, here, but the less said about horses the better - makes my wife look like a priveleged, useless, rich old bag, which rubs off on me.  Cool it with teh horse references.  GodBlessAmerica,yadayadayada

Posted by: Catcher (not the pitcher) Mitt at October 17, 2012 07:26 AM (icwKQ)

135 Our local sports guys "The Ticket" were talking about how Romney told "a sitting President of the United States" when he was coming out of his chair to interrupt, to wait his turn. I didn't really get their point, but this was a debate and Obama kept interrupting and Romney had the floor to make his point.

Posted by: mare at October 17, 2012 07:26 AM (A98Xu)

136 strike through no work on blog?

Posted by: runner at October 17, 2012 07:26 AM (WR5xI)

137 On November 7th: As the news gets worse for Obama, all the trolls will flip from taunting to making racist statements so Kos and LFG can hyperventilate at racists overthrowing President McAwesomecock.

Posted by: El Kabong at October 17, 2012 07:26 AM (HWj39)

138 I support the pipeline, my opponent doesn't. The difference is also that I know that the pipeline is just to REFINE oil that's going to be exported.They are building a pipeline (finite jobs) for a finite amount of oil (more finite refinement jobs). But I'm still behind it 100%, as you know, cuz it sounds like I a JOB CREATOR. God Bless this list and God bless these United States of America, etc and so forth. Posted by: Catcher (not the pitcher) Mitt at October 17, 2012 11:21 AM (icwKQ) scared bro? fraid of the concrete bounce? its comin, its comin for you

Posted by: Thunderb at October 17, 2012 07:26 AM (Dnbau)

139
My bias aside, the more I think about it, the more I think Mitt did better than I originally thought.  I wanted him to say certain things, but that is more me than him.

I do hope someone will destroy that stupid myth of women making 72% of men someday.

Posted by: Guy Mohawk at October 17, 2012 07:26 AM (PHb2k)

140 Obama threw zingers to attack Mitt Romney

And Mooch intercepted and snarfed them down.

Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at October 17, 2012 07:27 AM (/kI1Q)

141 25: you said it very well! Wanting Romney to have said more on a topic or cited a certain fact or to have answered something slightly differently is not "losing" a portion of the debate. He'll have a whole debate to hammer the truth on Libya. And really, who cares if he brought up what Obama pays women? He'd just deflect and that's up to some other group or administrator.

Posted by: LASue at October 17, 2012 07:27 AM (gjIQF)

142 I love sucking horse penis, it's just the best thing ever. I should be banned because I'm a worthless fuckwit even though I think I'm really smart.

Posted by: Rupert Gorillapenis at October 17, 2012 07:27 AM (aHR5E)

143

 (icwKQ)

 

Tell us again how it will take us 10 years to bring crude from ANWR to the market place.  I haven't heard that in at least 10 years or so.  

Posted by: polynikes at October 17, 2012 07:27 AM (m2CN7)

144 I liked the Ruth Bader Ginsberg dunce last night on Luntz's Dunces.  She said how that it wasn't a decision between Romney and Obama, it was between Romney and not voting.   There are probably a lot of former Obama voters out there that are like that, and that's not good for President Putt-Putt.

Posted by: buzzion at October 17, 2012 07:27 AM (GULKT)

145 Well I have to say I liked yahoonews headline"Obama won the debate... too bad it wasn't the one that counts."

Posted by: Hello, it's me Donna at October 17, 2012 07:27 AM (9+ccr)

146 Ryan washed CLEAN POTS!!!!11ty!!

Posted by: Rather Madcow Post, Inc at October 17, 2012 07:27 AM (0It32)

147 Romney should also run an ad showing Crowley interrupting him to defend Obama while the First Lady cheers and the President asks her to kiss his ass a little louder so the whole world can hear it. Then they should show Crowley backtracking on her remarks. The ad should open with Obama and his administration flacks blaming Libya on a video. Some Romney PAC get that to battleground TV.

Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at October 17, 2012 07:28 AM (i0vBR)

148 But Obama came off like a lethal, restrained predator! Rowwr!!

Posted by: Andrew Price Sullivan at October 17, 2012 07:28 AM (QF8uk)

149 O'Bumbles failed to pee in his pants or take a dump onstage, so the MSM will call him the "winner".  Candy Crowley sided against "Romley", so she will be lauded by the same MSM and attain higher pay and prestige for life. 

Meanwhile the American people realize that the SCOAMT has been a disaster and will remedy the situation accordingly.

And pudding and Val-U-Rite will flow from the countryside...

Posted by: dfbaskwill at October 17, 2012 07:28 AM (71LDo)

150 Re ad. Saw some info from Romney campaign yesterday that they had a 12 million dollar ad buy in for many swing states starting today. They were probably just waiting for debate content to load it up.  Romney won.

Posted by: Honey Badger at October 17, 2012 07:28 AM (GvYeG)

151 >>>147 I liked the Ruth Bader Ginsberg dunce last night on Luntz's Dunces. She said how that it wasn't a decision between Romney and Obama, it was between Romney and not voting. There are probably a lot of former Obama voters out there that are like that, and that's not good for President Putt-Putt. All 'undecideds' are former Obama voters that can't bring themselves to admit they were wrong. I base this on nothing.

Posted by: El Kabong at October 17, 2012 07:28 AM (HWj39)

152 It should be called Not a Pussy , and Hillary "taking responsibility" should also be in it.

Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at October 17, 2012 07:29 AM (i0vBR)

153 Next week: normal debate format (well, other than another liberal moderator).

Mitt Romney did not blow the Libya issue, he set the table for it prior to being cut off by Fat-Candy.

Mitt Romney also, out of no where, brought up Fast and Furious.

As Andrew Brietbart said: "drip, drip, drip."

Do y'all not think between now and next week there won't be more "leaks" or information given out by the State Dept and/or CIA regarding the terrorist attack in Benghazi?

Do you not think that many uninformed people may be educated, finally, to what happened in Fast and Furious and the White House and DOJ still refusing to cooperate fully with Congressman Issa?

Do you not think that there will be more discussion re: the lies to the American people by this WH and Susan Rice? It is not going away. We must not let it go away.

Be patient, my little grasshoppers. Let them think they won. Who cares? It will not change Independents who have seen Romney vs Barky. Who looks more presidential? Who looks like someone sent to his time-out stool (when Mitt told him to go sit down). Who looked scared? Who lies? Who got "offended" while blasting the man who asked the question re: Benghazi? Who did not even answer his question?

Posted by: ChristyBlinky, unbanned, ready to get this done at October 17, 2012 07:29 AM (baL2B)

154 Governor Romney came out of the hostile town hall the clear winner, due to his poise, maturity and clarity. He knew that the format was an enormous bamboo spike death trap, and successfully escaped unharmed. Candy "Do I Look Faaaaaaaaat?" Crowley exposed herself as the quintessential left wing media hack, by acting as Soetero's tag team partner when the ticklish topic of those "bumps in the road", preventing Ronmey from delivering the fatal blow.

While Soetero's sycophants on MSLSD were essentially FAP FAP FAP, their own set of test rabbits after the debate were swayed by...hold it...Romney!

The janitorial crew would have to use PPE to handle the disgusting bodily fluids left behind at MSLSD's desk, however, they would have to bag the entire desk in a giant red bag, based upon the lecherous discharge from Chris Matthews ALONE. As far as Sharpton...forget it.

Posted by: AgentLobos at October 17, 2012 07:29 AM (cKdqa)

155

LOL! Our troll has the nervous diarrhea sweats from watching his boy get mauled on everything from unemployment to his lies on energy to Libya and everything in between.

Oh, how I will use your warm, salty Libtard tears as fap lotion on November 7, my terrified little fuckwit.

Obama's not only going to lose, he's going to lose big.

Posted by: Empire of Jeff at October 17, 2012 11:24 AM (oYLeq)

...

...

...

Hey there now, young fella.  Take it easy.  We're going to win, so there's no need for your bluster.  Try a little chammomile tea for those nerves, relax.  That fervent rhetoric should only come from the MoveOn people, not from the thoughtful, prescient, informed, enlightened right-side-of-the-aisle folks.

 

Posted by: Catcher (not the pitcher) Mitt at October 17, 2012 07:29 AM (icwKQ)

156 Re ad. Saw some info from Romney campaign yesterday that they had a 12 million dollar ad buy in for many swing states starting today. They were probably just waiting for debate content to load it up.Romney won. Posted by: Honey Badger at October 17, 2012 11:28 AM (GvYeG) ditto thought that last night the JEF looked like a liar and was unlikable. The slide will continue

Posted by: Thunderb at October 17, 2012 07:29 AM (Dnbau)

157

Oh shit! I forgot about the salt in their tears...that would ruin the Bourbon! Disregard post number 12.

(Just use good, clean ice cubes with that Bourbon)

Posted by: USMC8541 at October 17, 2012 07:30 AM (v3pYe)

158

Precisely what the FUCK is he going to do with another four years?

 

Try to get through one round without having to whip his dick out for not getting past the ladies tee?

Posted by: Lurking Canuck at October 17, 2012 07:30 AM (BrQrN)

159

my wife is for the most part apolitical, but a confirmed leftist. she said after the debate last night that she was completely turned off by barry's demeanor, comparing it to biden's.

if Jen (wife) was put off by obama, i guarantee he's fucked.

Posted by: ugly kid joe at October 17, 2012 07:30 AM (TI0ge)

160 That fervent rhetoric should only come from the MoveOn people, not from the thoughtful, prescient, informed, enlightened right-side-of-the-aisle folks. Posted by: Catcher (not the pitcher) Mitt at October 17, 2012 11:29 AM (icwKQ) says...catcher not the pitcher? Right? you scrared bro?

Posted by: Thunderb at October 17, 2012 07:31 AM (Dnbau)

161 Obama had spunk.

Posted by: Lou Grant at October 17, 2012 07:31 AM (0It32)

162 Fellow Morons, Why oh why can't everyone realize that the Number One thing that trolls want is ATTENTION? Stop giving them what they so obviously crave.

Posted by: Log Cabin at October 17, 2012 07:31 AM (JV/H0)

163 "Libtard tears. On Ice. With Bourbon." I plan on making my ice out of their tears.

Posted by: DCPensFan at October 17, 2012 07:31 AM (ma/2m)

164 Umm, the statistics around the Lilly Ledbetter Act are specious at best.

Mr Obama and Democrats selectively picked statistics and presented them in a way which would show bigger discrepancies. The real figure show that women in the same jobs as men earn 95 cents on the dollar.

The reason for a 5 cent gap is that women often take time off or cut back to have children. That skew the statistics.

Also childless women in the 20 something age range earn more than their male peers.

It's Obama. You folks should know better than to take his numbers at face  value.

Posted by: marcus at October 17, 2012 07:31 AM (GGCsk)

165

I love the way Obama says A, then says the opposite of A and when called on either, says, "as I've always said...., read the transcript."  Which transcript?  The convenient one, obviously.

Posted by: Dirks Strewn at October 17, 2012 07:31 AM (Rrc6j)

166 The Republican 'War on Women' consists of Romney and some binders? I could tell you how to have a WoW, complete with casualties.

Posted by: Ted Kennedy, snap, crackling, and popping at October 17, 2012 07:31 AM (feFL6)

167 Posted by: Catcher (not the pitcher) Mitt at October 17, 2012 11:29 AM (icwKQ) Ummmm, you fucked with EOJ. Batten down the hatches mateys, thars fixin to come a blow.

Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at October 17, 2012 07:31 AM (kc2b9)

168

I'm still waiting on that list of Obama lies.  Make sure it's lies that have traction, not the Fast and Furious crap, no one cares about that.  I have the best handlers and consultants and they tell me it's nowheresville.

thanks in advance - you guys are an android's best friend. 

Posted by: Catcher (not the pitcher) Mitt at October 17, 2012 07:31 AM (icwKQ)

169 I didn't really get their point, but this was a debate and Obama kept interrupting and Romney had the floor to make his point. Posted by: mare at October 17, 2012 11:26 AM (A98Xu) Kudos to whomever coached Romney on owning the dais. He positioned himself in frame for the camera so that he dominated the screen and Obama seemed diminished in the background. He upstaged the president.

Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at October 17, 2012 07:31 AM (i0vBR)

170 Who has the banhammer? This icwKQ smegma is even more worthless than Gerg, and I didn't think that was even possible.

Posted by: mediumheadboy at October 17, 2012 07:32 AM (aHR5E)

171 164 Obama had spunk. Posted by: Lou Grant at October 17, 2012 11:31 AM (0It32) Dripping down his leg.

Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at October 17, 2012 07:32 AM (kc2b9)

172 Does anyone else smell that?

Posted by: Hello, it's me Donna at October 17, 2012 07:32 AM (9+ccr)

173 Stocking up on pudding now.  Shelves will be bare in three weeks.

Posted by: Uncle Mikey at October 17, 2012 07:32 AM (8qoXL)

174 94 Is this 'catcher' guy going to be allow to just spam every thread?


Seriously, someone needs to do something about trolls. It's unrealistic to expect people to just ignore them when they post every other comment in a thread.



Posted by: Tami at October 17, 2012 11:19 AM (X6akg)

 

There used to be this amazing blog where trolls were dealt with harshly.  Their comments were heavily edited into pure mockery for the regular commenters enjoyment.  Leaving the trolls in an impotent rage and never being able to have their comments stay up.

 

I think it was called Ace of Spades HQ.  I wonder whatever happened to it sometimes.

Posted by: buzzion at October 17, 2012 07:32 AM (GULKT)

175 regarding pension size....When Obama said his wasn't as big as Romneys....I wish Romney would have said...Oh come on big boy....you have a couple of autobiographies ....you will have time to write another one once I'm elected.

Posted by: kawfytawk at October 17, 2012 07:33 AM (JWLqy)

176 Obama had spunk. Posted by: Lou Grant at October 17, 2012 11:31 AM (0It32) Dripping down his leg. Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at October 17, 2012 11:32 AM (kc2b9) on the corners of his mouth

Posted by: Thunderb at October 17, 2012 07:33 AM (Dnbau)

177

Via Breitbart:

 

On CNNÂ’s “State of the Union” on September 30, Candy Crowley insisted David Axelrod, President Barack ObamaÂ’s chief strategist, was wrong when Axelrod tried to claim President Barack Obama called the Benghazi attack “an act of terror” on the day after.  

 

“First, they said it was not planned, it was part of this tape,” Crowley said when Axelrod tried to spin her.

 

This was Crowley the journalist, unlike the pro-Obama advocate who moderated Tuesday’s debate between Obama and Mitt Romney and interjected herself into an argument between Obama and Romney on the exact same issue — and took Obama’s side.

 

During the debate, Crowley affirmed ObamaÂ’s assertion that he referred to the Benghazi attacks as acts of terror on the day after...

 

See, she was      FOR Mitt Romney's truthfulness before she was against it.

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/b][/i][/u] at October 17, 2012 07:33 AM (4df7R)

178 178 regarding pension size....When Obama said his wasn't as big as Romneys....I wish Romney would have said...Oh come on big boy....you have a couple of autobiographies ....you will have time to write another one once I'm elected. Posted by: kawfytawk at October 17, 2012 11:33 AM (JWLqy) Ha, I read that as Penis Size.

Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at October 17, 2012 07:34 AM (kc2b9)

179 Catcher, Obama obviously lied about oil and gas and of course, saying Benghazi was a terrorist attack. Now, move on.

Posted by: mare at October 17, 2012 07:34 AM (A98Xu)

180

 (icwKQ)

 

That you have no self awarness of how witless your posts are is what is sad about lefty trolls.   Its a mental defect most of you have.

Posted by: polynikes at October 17, 2012 07:34 AM (m2CN7)

181

Our local sports guys "The Ticket" were talking about how Romney told "a sitting President of the United States" when he was coming out of his chair to interrupt, to wait his turn.

I didn't really get their point, but this was a debate and Obama kept interrupting and Romney had the floor to make his point.

 

I'd have to think the point being made was that this was weakness. You're the President and someone tells you to sit down and wait your turn and you do it? Weak and submissive and not something anyone wants to see from a President.

Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at October 17, 2012 07:34 AM (JxMoP)

182 What is even lamer at the end of the video-- Michelle Obama cannot get people to clap with her. Michelle is the last one clapping.

Posted by: tasker at October 17, 2012 07:35 AM (r2PLg)

183 116 it's that felcher who has the unhealthy obsession with horse penises. It's sad to see healthy obsessions with horse penises go bad.

Posted by: Whoever this is, it's definitely not Michael at October 17, 2012 07:35 AM (JVCVF)

184 You'll miss them when they're gone. Like genital warts. Posted by: Dirks Strewn at October 17, 2012 11:34 AM (Rrc6j) And Monkey Butt.

Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at October 17, 2012 07:35 AM (kc2b9)

185 177
94 Is this 'catcher' guy going to be allow to just spam every thread?Seriously, someone needs to do something about trolls. It's unrealistic to expect people to just ignore them when they post every other comment in a thread.
Posted by: Tami at October 17, 2012 11:19 AM (X6akg)


There used to be this amazing blog where trolls were dealt with harshly.

Posted by: buzzion at October 17, 2012 11:32 AM (GULKT)

....

...

I don't know what a troll is - maybe it's that woman at the town hall with the long silver hair asking about details on my economic plan.  Either way, whining is something I expect from the ACORN folks and the 47%, not you wonderful, thoughtful, fair-minded folks.

Posted by: Catcher (not the pitcher) Mitt at October 17, 2012 07:35 AM (icwKQ)

186 Obama had spunk.

Posted by: Lou Grant at October 17, 2012 11:31 AM (0It32)




Reggie Love: All over his face last night

Posted by: TheQuietMan at October 17, 2012 07:35 AM (1Jaio)

187 120 "...do away with the capital gains tax and tax on interest and dividends. " Holy smokes, I did not get that. That is HUGE!!!

Posted by: mare at October 17, 2012 07:35 AM (A98Xu)

188 The Republican response to Commie comments about the Lilly Ledbetter Act is "that law, like most so-called equal justice laws from the Democrats is designed to benefit nobody but lawyers".

Posted by: Vic at October 17, 2012 07:35 AM (YdQQY)

189 Obama had spunk. Okay, I might forego the condom this time.

Posted by: Sandra Fluke at October 17, 2012 07:35 AM (AZGON)

190 164 Obama had spunk.

Posted by: Lou Grant at October 17, 2012 11:31 AM (0It32)

 

Yeah, Chris Matthews'.

Posted by: buzzion at October 17, 2012 07:36 AM (GULKT)

191 Only 480 hours until yet another Leftist attempt at utopia falls to pieces in a humiliating jumble. Tick, tock, tick, tock...

Posted by: Lincolntf at October 17, 2012 07:36 AM (HethX)

192

he should have been ready with facts about women making less in Obama's White House

------------

Romney pointed this out, did you miss it?

Posted by: Jay at October 17, 2012 07:36 AM (3LaGb)

193 troll-baiting is fun like hobo-hunting is fun...

Posted by: USMC8541 at October 17, 2012 07:36 AM (oY6Yp)

194 "16 I think he was actually good on "pay equity". Obama gave platitudes and bromides but Romney gave concrete answers based on his past experience. I do agree that he should have mentioned Obama's women staff being paid less. That was low hanging fruit....Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at October 17, 2012 11:06 AM


Agreed.  Would have stung hard after his inelegant "binder" comment.  Preface with "practice what you preach, JEF".

Posted by: eureka! at October 17, 2012 07:36 AM (cTjRR)

195

Why is the 'binder of women' even a thing? "Oh no, Mitt has a Trapper Keeper full of resumes of qualified women! THE HORROR!!! He must want them to be his wives!!! Eleventy!!!"

 

Mitt had more women in senior positions in his cabinet than any other state when he was governor. Mitt talking about improving employment opportunities for women isn't  new. He's been talking about it since at least '94 when he debated Ted Kennedy. Here's a link to the video:

 

http://tinyurl.com/cfs57f3

 

Posted by: Lurker who doesn't know how to format comments at October 17, 2012 07:36 AM (tl7W6)

196 188 You'll miss them when they're gone. Like genital warts. Posted by: Dirks Strewn at October 17, 2012 11:34 AM (Rrc6j) And Monkey Butt. Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at October 17, 2012 11:35 AM (kc2b9) ________ Dudes!! I'm trying to eat the breakfast.

Posted by: tasker at October 17, 2012 07:36 AM (r2PLg)

197 Romney brought up Fast & Furious and the audience did not know what the hell he was talking about..... The New York audience was full of liberals and the questions picked where got you questions.... But Mitt actually answered most of the questions and Obama would blather on about all the great things he thinks he has done..... College is worthless if you can't get a job. No I am not expecting Apple to move all the factories back to America - unless they can bring the Chinese workers with them and pay them 50 cents an hour with no benefits..... It's hard to complete with a command & control economy. Obama is trying to make America into a command & control economy. Can you imagine Americans working in slave like conditions - 12 hours a day for next to nothing??? They won't - and the Chinese people won't work likes slaves forever. Eventually iPhones will cost $1000 and people will still buy them.

Posted by: izoneguy at October 17, 2012 07:37 AM (oKH8p)

198 What Crowley did to Romney on the Benghazi issue.     http://youtu.be/BoCf3WqVyx4

Posted by: Country Singer (likes teh ginger ladies) at October 17, 2012 07:37 AM (L8r/r)

199 179Obama had spunk.
Posted by: Lou Grant at October 17, 2012 11:31 AM (0It32)

Dripping down his leg.
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at October 17, 2012 11:32 AM (kc2b9)

on the corners of his mouth

Posted by: Thunderb at October 17, 2012 11:33 AM (Dnbau)

....

...

...

I know you're trying to help, but I have seen how you treat others on the list who refer to semen-- it's just not right.  You're better than that.  And it doesn't do anything to legitimize or further our cause.  But your heart's in the right place.  GBA land that I love - because of YOU, xoxox.

Posted by: Catcher (not the pitcher) Mitt at October 17, 2012 07:37 AM (icwKQ)

200
Gas prices are so high because the economy is so good!

Posted by: Barry Oflustercluck at October 17, 2012 07:37 AM (PHb2k)

201 You quit taxing capital gains, interest, and dividends, and this economy takes off like a rocket.
==========
The Ruth Bater Ginsburg look-alike in the Luntz group absolutely loved it, too. She got it; that her retirement--beat to shit the last few years--would go a lot farther that way.

Romney did two huge things last night that the JEF Team slapping themselves on the back will totally miss:
1) He made a huge play for seniors--telling them he's going to eliminate the taxes on their retirement income.
2) He made a huge play for Hispanics--a) told them how Obama promised them immigration reform in the first year, b) reminded them his grandfather was born in Mexico, and c) let them know he has a realistic plan to deal with immigration. In fact, I think he spent way too much time on what seems to be a minor topic.

But:

FL, CO, NM--all large Hispanic population swing states. I think Romney just told us his internals say NM is in play.

Who's playing long-ball, swinging for the fences--who's on defense, hoping not to get hit in the face again?

Posted by: RoyalOil at October 17, 2012 07:37 AM (imtbm)

202 "I'd have to think the point being made was that this was weakness." Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at October 17, 2012 11:34 AM (JxMoP) I'd like to think so, but I didn't hear the whole conversation. Lots of gasping and "wows" from the crew of three.

Posted by: mare at October 17, 2012 07:38 AM (A98Xu)

203 The real figure show that women in the same jobs as men earn 95 cents on the dollar.

Fymynysts don't compare "the same jobs" when they whine about "wage inequality".   The engineers (mostly male) make more than the on-site daycare workers (mostly female), so voila: the company is engaging in unfair wage inequality.

It's bullshit. I hate fymynysts.

Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at October 17, 2012 07:38 AM (/kI1Q)

204 Relevant! I hate the little fricken keys on this damn 'smartphone'....

Posted by: rightwingdeathbeast at October 17, 2012 07:38 AM (itqfB)

205

@ 106

"Who in your administration was responsible for denying these security requests?"

THIS needs to be asked of TFG 1000 X over until he finally blurts out an answer, and then hammer him on the answer. 

Posted by: Bulldog in Kansas at October 17, 2012 07:38 AM (z1C58)

206 It should be noted that now it's on the record that Obama's knowledge on Benghazi has been pre-fact-checked. This is a tremendous advantage to Romney because "the facts" are no longer a moving target.

Posted by: AmishDude at October 17, 2012 07:38 AM (T0NGe)

207 You're better than that. And it doesn't do anything to legitimize or further our cause. But your heart's in the right place. GBA land that I love - because of YOU, xoxox. Posted by: Catcher (not the pitcher) Mitt at October 17, 2012 11:37 AM (icwKQ) says.....catcher not the pitcher

Posted by: Thunderb at October 17, 2012 07:39 AM (Dnbau)

208

; margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoNormal">179Obama had spunk.
Posted by: Lou Grant at October 17, 2012 11:31 AM (0It32)

Dripping down his leg.
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at October 17, 2012 11:32 AM (kc2b9)

on the corners of his mouth

Posted by: Thunderb

The survey says...

The back of his throat?

The back of his leg?   

We would have also accepted...

The back of both legs.

Posted by: Zombie Richard Dawson at October 17, 2012 07:39 AM (Rrc6j)

209 In the real world, most people probably turned the channel after the first 30-45 minutes. The questions were generally about secondary issues and the format was weird. Anyone know if there are numbers on viewer drop off?

Posted by: LASue at October 17, 2012 07:39 AM (gjIQF)

210 191 120 "...do away with the capital gains tax and tax on interest and dividends. " Holy smokes, I did not get that. That is HUGE!!! Yes, most retired folks live on those capital gains. The Obamaphone lady can suck on it......

Posted by: izoneguy at October 17, 2012 07:39 AM (oKH8p)

211 'Catcher' sucks ganja-flavored cock; 


all trolls are 'average joe', and joe sucks mucho, mucho cock.  ( all flavors )

Posted by: Isaac Davis White at October 17, 2012 07:39 AM (Dll6b)

212

Could we have a rule that when one candidate interrupts the other, that their talking timer is simply reset to 2 minutes or however much time is allotted?

 

That'd put an end to the problem.

 

 

Posted by: Buzzsaw90 at October 17, 2012 07:40 AM (SO2Q8)

213 190Obama had spunk.

Posted by: Lou Grant at October 17, 2012 11:31 AM (0It32)


Reggie Love: All over his face last night
Posted by: TheQuietMan at October 17, 2012 11:35 AM (1Jaio)...............Again, the semen references.  I really don't appreciate you muddying up your support of me with such vile comments.  It makes my supporters look like mindless, useless, ideological miscreants with no decency or style.  Besides, I thought semen references were only for "trolls" as you call them.

Posted by: Catcher (not the pitcher) Mitt at October 17, 2012 07:40 AM (icwKQ)

214 Radish, I saw on twitter (LilMissRightie, I think) that single women under 35 actually make more than single men under 35.

Posted by: AmishDude at October 17, 2012 07:40 AM (T0NGe)

215 120 "...do away with the capital gains tax and tax on interest and dividends. "

Holy smokes, I did not get that. That is HUGE!!!

Posted by: mare at October 17, 2012 11:35 AM (A98Xu)

 

In 2008 , eliminating the tax on savings interest was one of his points in his economic plan during his campaign.

Posted by: polynikes at October 17, 2012 07:40 AM (m2CN7)

216 My very eeyorish friend is convinced that Team SCOAMF will actually steal the election. What are the chances? Anyone care to weigh in and give me info to ease his, and my, minds??

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at October 17, 2012 07:40 AM (+tqYo)

217 Romney finally said last night that Obama did take Detroit bankrupt.

Posted by: Golan Globus at October 17, 2012 07:41 AM (/1U3u)

218

Posted by: Catcher (not the pitcher) Mitt at October 17, 2012 11:40 AM (icwKQ)



"vile".  heh.   Do you like gladiator movies???????????

Posted by: Isaac Davis White at October 17, 2012 07:41 AM (Dll6b)

219 Besides, I thought semen references were only for "trolls" as you call them. Posted by: Catcher (not the pitcher) Mitt at October 17, 2012 11:40 AM (icwKQ) sayysss.... catcher not the pitcher

Posted by: Thunderb at October 17, 2012 07:41 AM (Dnbau)

220 216 Could we have a rule that when one candidate interrupts the other, that their talking timer is simply reset to 2 minutes or however much time is allotted? That'd put an end to the problem. Posted by: Buzzsaw90 at October 17, 2012 11:40 AM (SO2Q We could put shock collars on them and give the moderator the button. Moderator says "next" one time and them ZAP.

Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at October 17, 2012 07:41 AM (kc2b9)

221 Did you hear the great news? I'll bet you can guess it. Ready? All together now... Housing sector is showing signs that we finally turned the corner to recovery!! As the frustrated squirrel, Rocky, would say: Again??

Posted by: soothsayer at October 17, 2012 07:41 AM (jUytm)

222 New rule released for final debate: Obama may sit in a wheelchair and smoke Kools with a cigarette holder, and Romney is required to wear a rubber George W. Bush mask.

Posted by: George Orwell what knows Ann Althouse has a more racially sensitive hoo-hoo than you at October 17, 2012 07:42 AM (AZGON)

223 Umm, the statistics around the Lilly Ledbetter Act are specious at best.

The left has been trotting out the bullshit "women are only paid 72 cents for every dollar men make" line for decades

The intent was (and still is) to push for "equal pay for equal work" laws, where Big Brother would arbitrarily decide what salary was "fair" for a given profession.

That the girl in the audience bought into the propaganda wasn't so much the issue as the fact that CNN chose her question with the bullshit premise because they felt it would favor Obama.

Posted by: Hollowpoint at October 17, 2012 07:42 AM (SY2Kh)

224 http://tinyurl.com/cenanob Crowley the Hutt tries to bullshit and spin her Benghazi backtrack from last night. What a fucking arrogant scrunt.

Posted by: El Kabong at October 17, 2012 07:42 AM (HWj39)

225 224 We could put shock collars on them and give the moderator the button. Moderator says "next" one time and them ZAP. Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at October 17, 2012 11:41 AM (kc2b9) A Gamesters of Triskelion thing.

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at October 17, 2012 07:42 AM (+tqYo)

226 171 Yet Obama had to address gun control. He has always been a gun grabber and pretended otherwise. Here he is in the Loyola tape: “The vast majority of Americans would like to see serious gun control. It does not pass. Why does it not pass? It doesnÂ’t pass because there is this huge disconnect between what people think and what legislators think and are willing to act upon.” Obama believes Mexican druglords should have assault weapons, but not American citizens. Obama also said he viewed welfare recipients and “the working poor” as “a majority coalition” that could be mobilized to help advance progressive policies and elect their champions. “I actually believe in [wealth] redistribution,” Obama said.“At least at a certain level, to make sure that everybodyÂ’s got a shot.” “What I think will re-engage people in politics is if weÂ’re doing significant, serious policy work around what I will label the ‘working poor,’” he said, “although my definition of the working poor is not simply folks making minimum wage, but itÂ’s also families of four who are making $30,000 a year.” “They are struggling. And to the extent that we are doing research figuring out what kinds of government action would successfully make their lives better, we are then putting together a potential majority coalition to move those agendas forward.” Obama Will Make Energy Prices Necessarily Skyrocket http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HlTxGHn4sH4 Stephanopoulos asked Obama if he believed high gas prices were a good thing. http://youtu.be/5M1WlV7vafk "I would have prefered a gradual adjustment"

Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at October 17, 2012 07:43 AM (i0vBR)

227 Romney was creaming him up until he got "fact checked" by the second liar on the grassy knoll. From then on he was unsteady. But Romney won the debate.

Posted by: The Mega Independent at October 17, 2012 07:43 AM (oUIDw)

228 Again, I'm asking nicely - the "cock" and "spunk" references hurt ME and they hurt our cause.  Makes Republicans and Libertarians look like ignorant, stupid, illiterate, vile, incestuous, child-molesting knuckle draggers, which I know that you're all SO not.  [Kate Smith, eating a donut, sings "Gobbbddd Bllllsss Ammmrrriccuggghh, Lnnnd thhhhaght uhhhh luhhgggvvv ..."]

Posted by: Catcher (not the pitcher) Mitt at October 17, 2012 07:43 AM (icwKQ)

229 James Pethokoukis @JimPethokoukis Obama had absolutely no answer last night for these 3 charts bit.ly/PBMj8i

Posted by: Evilpens at October 17, 2012 07:43 AM (ck76k)

230 Also: You'll notice that all positive economic news now comes with a cherry on top for Obama: "...the best levels seen since 2008."

Posted by: soothsayer at October 17, 2012 07:43 AM (jUytm)

231 Jason Chaffetz gave slapped her around good on CNN.

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at October 17, 2012 07:43 AM (+tqYo)

232 hiding behind Crowley's apron folds

Son, that's not an apron.

Posted by: The Mega Independent at October 17, 2012 07:43 AM (oUIDw)

233
Note to plumber:  Make plans to replace the extra-wide bidet in the private quarters with a heated towel rack. 

Posted by: White House Maintenance Manager at October 17, 2012 07:44 AM (lDWQr)

234 Libs are pissing in the wind right now. I think one is decided. Any state R is within 2-3 points on 11/3-11/5 he wins, since he will take the majority of the 5-6% undecided voters. Spin it any way you want, its the reality. O needed to be 5% up going into the last week to keep it close. Ain't happening.

Posted by: Interested Party at October 17, 2012 07:44 AM (0J3jC)

235 I'm  a  rational thinker, so sometimes I don't get things.  Like why are people so interested in alternative energy?  I guess I'm interested in them to from an curiousity standpoint and  think  its neat engineering to harness  forces on earth to develop energy.  I just don't want to pay for it.  If GE or  Exxon wants to research it so that if  and  when (and I doubt there will ever be  a  when), they can benefit from it, by all means do it.  But why are we throwing tax dollars at it.  Why  do people fall for it.  Maybe I'm just too rational.  I would have loved for Mitt to say that his energy policy is oil and gas, coal and nuclear.   That other stuff is pie in the sky.   Perhaps  he should have said that  wind  turbines  kill far more birds that then 20 that the administration was trying to save in ND.  

Posted by: SH at October 17, 2012 07:44 AM (gmeXX)

236 Radish, I saw on twitter (LilMissRightie, I think) that single women under 35 actually make more than single men under 35.

Yeah, I probably retweeted that.  Not sure if that's controlling for education and job description or not?  The whole thing where young women are encouraged to go to college and then get hiring preference is probably at play, though....

Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at October 17, 2012 07:45 AM (/kI1Q)

237 single women under 35 actually make more than single men under 35.

Posted by: AmishDude at October 17, 2012 11:40 AM (T0NGe)



yes, for college-educated persons ( which makes for the most accurate numbers /  studies), women 22-34 without children ( married or unmarried ) make more than men in that age group.



Women with children make less than men ; ( having children or not does not significantly affect college-educated men ).

Posted by: Isaac Davis White at October 17, 2012 07:45 AM (Dll6b)

238 236 hiding behind Crowley's apron folds Son, that's not an apron. Posted by: The Mega Independent at October 17, 2012 11:43 AM (oUIDw) Ewwwwww!!!!!!!!! my eyes!

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at October 17, 2012 07:45 AM (+tqYo)

239 Posted by: Catcher (not the pitcher) Mitt at October 17, 2012 11:43 AM

You got your pseudo-intellectual training from George Wallace, didn't you?

Posted by: LC LaWedgie at October 17, 2012 07:45 AM (0It32)

240 I hate to be a kill joy. But can someone get around to asking Obama, "so, champ, what exactly do you have planned for the next 4 years." As a political junkie, I'm actually weirded out. No presidential campaign in modern American history (post-ww2) has ever given this little information about their future plans. I'm glad Mitt has forced the Benghazi and FF issues. But in all seriousness, this is utterly surreal. The sitting incumbent has said nothing about what he plans to do. At all. Besides raise taxes. How is this possible?

Posted by: Hopeless at October 17, 2012 07:45 AM (aY3VP)

241 I agree totally with your recap, Drew. Tactical draw but strategic opportunity. If we can keep the heat on about Benghazi, we can turn Crowley's despicable interference then, against Obama now.

Posted by: boulder hobo at October 17, 2012 07:45 AM (QLB8r)

242 doesn't affect their income...

Posted by: Isaac Davis White at October 17, 2012 07:46 AM (Dll6b)

243 237 Note to plumber: Make plans to replace the extra-wide bidet in the private quarters with a heated towel rack. Posted by: White House Maintenance Manager at October 17, 2012 11:44 AM (lDWQr) Joe BIDET?

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at October 17, 2012 07:46 AM (+tqYo)

244 I for one want to hear more, a lot more, about this binder.

Posted by: Bill Clinton at October 17, 2012 07:46 AM (feFL6)

245 See, she was FOR Mitt Romney's truthfulness before she was against it. Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter at October 17, 2012 11:33 AM (4df7R) WHOA! Breitbart is smiling from heaven

Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at October 17, 2012 07:46 AM (i0vBR)

246 A Gamesters of Triskelion thing. Even if Candy Crowley were wearing a silver lamé bikini, I wouldn't hit that with a 300 meter warp core.

Posted by: James Tiberius Kirk at October 17, 2012 07:47 AM (AZGON)

247 >>>243 I'm glad Mitt has forced the Benghazi and FF issues. But in all seriousness, this is utterly surreal. The sitting incumbent has said nothing about what he plans to do. At all. Besides raise taxes. How is this possible? If only there was some group of Americans whose job it was to gather this information and then REPORT it to the public.

Posted by: El Kabong at October 17, 2012 07:47 AM (HWj39)

248

Suddenly struck me.... watching these debates is like being a Raider's Fan....

 

You just KNOW the Ref is going to inject himself into the game....

Posted by: Romeo13 at October 17, 2012 07:47 AM (lZBBB)

249 There really are very very few "undecideds" in any election.  Especially when you get to this late in the game. At this point the few undecideds there are are Democrats who have not yet decided whether they are going to vote at all or not. 

Posted by: Vic at October 17, 2012 07:47 AM (YdQQY)

250 231Romney was creaming him up until he got "fact checked" by the second liar on the grassy knoll. From then on he was unsteady. But Romney won the debate.

Posted by: The Mega Independent at October 17, 2012 11:43 AM (oUIDw)

....

....

....

Except for the "creaming" up reference, thanks for your support.  The quality of your character and others on the list define who I am.  Every day, and in every way.  [Kate Smith sings:  .... stannnnd behhgsiiidde hrrrrggh, nng guiggghhdde hrrggh...}

Posted by: Catcher (not the pitcher) Mitt at October 17, 2012 07:47 AM (icwKQ)

251 This troll isn't even worthy of the erg treatment. Just ban it, please.

Posted by: mediumheadboy at October 17, 2012 07:47 AM (aHR5E)

252 236 hiding behind Crowley's roast beef curtains FIFY

Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at October 17, 2012 07:48 AM (i0vBR)

253 >>>254 231Romney was creaming him up until he got "fact checked" by the second liar on the grassy knoll. From then on he was unsteady. But Romney won the debate. Posted by: The Mega Independent at October 17, 2012 11:43 AM (oUIDw)............Except for the "creaming" up reference, thanks for your support. The quality of your character and others on the list define who I am. Every day, and in every way. [Kate Smith sings: .... stannnnd behhgsiiidde hrrrrggh, nng guiggghhdde hrrggh...} So how's that Honey Boo-Boo endorsement working out for you guys? President Sketty-n-Butter?

Posted by: El Kabong at October 17, 2012 07:48 AM (HWj39)

254 Has anyone seen the link at Legal Insurrection about a supposed October Surprise to come out on Oct. 22nd?  Associated tweets reference a tax return of one of the candidates that will change the race to a landslide. 

Posted by: Old Texas Chic at October 17, 2012 07:48 AM (lLXZV)

255 ace you need to put up this visual

tiny.cc/16xbmw

Posted by: laceyunderalls at October 17, 2012 07:48 AM (pLTLS)

256

Meme to push.... stolen from somewhere...

 

I am voting for Mitt Romney, BECAUSE of the Content of His Character...

Posted by: Romeo13 at October 17, 2012 07:48 AM (lZBBB)

257 the Joe Bidet thing is my schtick, BTW.  ---not a typo, but a Celebration of Joe's Essence

Posted by: Isaac Davis White at October 17, 2012 07:48 AM (Dll6b)

258 Again, I'm asking nicely - the "cock" and "spunk" references hurt ME and they hurt our cause. Makes Republicans and Libertarians look like ignorant, stupid, illiterate, vile, incestuous, child-molesting knuckle draggers, which I know that you're all SO not. [Kate Smith, eating a donut, sings "Gobbbddd Bllllsss Ammmrrriccuggghh, Lnnnd thhhhaght uhhhh luhhgggvvv ..."]

Posted by: Catcher (not the pitcher) Mitt at October 17, 2012 11:43 AM (icwKQ)

 

Oh babycakes, check out your     regressive leftist compatriots on Twitter sometime    if you really want to read some ignorant, stupid, illiterate, vile, incestuous, child-molesting    knuckle-dragger commentary,   with    a side order of felonious, threatening, violent and psychotic.       

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/b][/i][/u] at October 17, 2012 07:49 AM (4df7R)

259

If you're undecided at this point, you're looking for attention. 

Posted by: Doctor Fish at October 17, 2012 07:49 AM (lDWQr)

260 Even if Candy Crowley were wearing a silver lamé bikini,



Poke my eyes with an ice-pick.  Thinks about this, that chick from Star Trek went on to make porno flicks.  So I'll give you one back.  Imagine the Twilight Zone where Candy Crowly makes porno flicks.


Hell, she's already got the name for it.

Posted by: Vic at October 17, 2012 07:49 AM (YdQQY)

261 OK, for trolls to count their shit has to make sense (even if it is a lie) or be funny ... this one does neither.

Posted by: Honey Badger at October 17, 2012 07:49 AM (GvYeG)

262 What are the chances? Anyone care to weigh in and give me info to ease his, and my, minds??



Posted by: J.J. Sefton at October 17, 2012 11:40 AM (+tqYo).............

If they were ever going to steal an election it would have been the Wisconsin recall. They spent millions and brought union thugs in from Shitcago. It didn't work.

Posted by: Velvet Ambition at October 17, 2012 07:50 AM (R8hU8)

263

Posted by: Hopeless at October 17, 2012 11:45 AM (aY3VP)

 

Yep.... Prezzy spent the debate talking about what Mitt would do.... not what he had done, or would do....

Posted by: Romeo13 at October 17, 2012 07:50 AM (lZBBB)

264 The October surprise is John Kuntsman/Gary Johnson Occupying the next debate!!!!

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at October 17, 2012 07:51 AM (+tqYo)

265 255This troll isn't even worthy of the erg treatment. Just ban it, please.

Posted by: mediumheadboy at October 17, 2012 11:47 AM (aHR5E)

....

....

....

You, sir, do not represent me.  I welcome criticism and engage in debates willingly because political discourse is important.

...

...

hhhahhhahahhaha -- oh, who am I kidding.  I almost couldn't say that with a straight face.  hahaha.

[Kate Smith:  wwwthh thhh lggghtt frroomm thhh lammmgghhp frrrmmm abovvvgggghhhhvvv !]

Posted by: Catcher (not the pitcher) Mitt at October 17, 2012 07:51 AM (icwKQ)

266 267 Posted by: Velvet Ambition at October 17, 2012 11:50 AM (R8hU And probably 2010 as well. I like the cut of your jib, old man!

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at October 17, 2012 07:52 AM (+tqYo)

267

One of the comments that the God-that-Chooms made that hasn't been getting any notice was when he said something along the lines that the policies of the last 2 decades  were  what damaged the U.S. economy (besides reiterating, "it's not my fault!!!").  I know math isn't Barky's strong suit, but that puts us in the 1990s when the economy was doing  well.  Obama realized he f*cked up, because he later talked about how great the Clinton years were.

 

By the end of the debate, the SCOAMF sure lurved himself some private enterprize.  Too bad actions speak louder than words.

Posted by: Retired Buckeye Cop at October 17, 2012 07:52 AM (nYHk7)

268

Methinks we  (I  use that term losely.  A  few on this board have expressed some concern - not me)  overly worry about stealing national elections too.  For local contests and statewide contests it is much easier.  For  50  statewide local contests it is less easy.  This is particularly true when the other side is prepared and will not conceded lightly.  Bush v. Gore.  Bush was not only prepared, but he did not concede.  Mitt wants to be president really  bad.  That is a good and bad thing.  In this case,  it is good.   He is not going to go down easily  if there is reason to believe that the other side is playing shannigans.  And if this election is the rout  I believe it will be, then shannigans  can't  overcome for that.

Posted by: SH at October 17, 2012 07:53 AM (gmeXX)

269 Who is Lily Bedwetter?

Posted by: Tim the Enchanter at October 17, 2012 07:53 AM (izA2D)

270 Oh dear.  icwKQ has officially overdosed on s/h/it's morning shot of morphine-laced lithium.    It's just embarrassing itself now.

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/b][/i][/u] at October 17, 2012 07:53 AM (4df7R)

271 263Oh babycakes, check out your regressive leftist compatriots on Twitter sometime if you really want to read some ignorant, stupid, illiterate, vile, incestuous, child-molesting knuckle-dragger commentary, with a side order of felonious, threatening, violent and psychotic.

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter at October 17, 2012 11:49 AM (4df7R)

...

...

..

Really - does Empire of Jeff have an alter ego out there?  Just kidding.  Jeff knows I'm kidding, because he's so understanding and eloquent. 

..

..

But seriously, are you saying your list, my supporters, the rock of my base, is only slightly better than them?   You can't say that.  Really?

Posted by: Catcher (not the pitcher) Mitt at October 17, 2012 07:53 AM (icwKQ)

272 Imagine the Twilight Zone where Candy Crowly makes porno flicks. You stepped in it, son. Even in the 23rd century we still have Rule 34.

Posted by: James Tiberius Kirk at October 17, 2012 07:53 AM (AZGON)

273 now, knowing how zero magically moved from columbia to Harvard with questionable grades and very questionable achievement, remembering how this brilliant legal mind never authored an opinion, and seeing how invested candy/msm/dem party are in obama's win, is it at all possible that 0 had advance knowledge of these debate questions ? possible

Posted by: runner at October 17, 2012 07:54 AM (WR5xI)

274 If at this point you're still undecided, you're a willfully uninformed and disinterested fuckwit who shouldn't have the right to vote.

Posted by: Hollowpoint at October 17, 2012 07:54 AM (SY2Kh)

275 maybe that is why candy tried to cut off Romney's questions to barry ? he was unprepared for those.

Posted by: runner at October 17, 2012 07:55 AM (WR5xI)

276

Posted by: James Tiberius Kirk at October 17, 2012 11:53 AM (AZGON)

 

Yes..... my eyes... they burn.... inititate the Omega 13 so I didn't see that!

Posted by: Capt. Jason Tagert at October 17, 2012 07:55 AM (lZBBB)

277 Meme to push.... stolen from somewhere...

I am voting for Mitt Romney, BECAUSE of the Content of His Character...


 Stacey Dash. Who happens to have more melanin content in her skin than Barack Obama. She got a thank-you call for her support from Paul Ryan. You should google the story, it's pretty interesting.

Posted by: Schrödinger's cat at October 17, 2012 07:55 AM (feFL6)

278 obama lied, Crowley covered, mooshell clapped in violation of the agreed rules of decorum. Decorum hell, mooshell the flapping seal wouldn't know class if she attended one  based on her own qualifications. 

Posted by: Buffalobob at October 17, 2012 07:55 AM (x+7qA)

279

@256  "hiding behind Crowley's roast beef curtains"

 

Damn you.  Damn you to Hell.

Posted by: Jaws at October 17, 2012 07:56 AM (4I3Uo)

280 New Rasmussen poll of NV... Obama 50% Romney 47% Obama now getting to the magic 50% mark in NV and NH, locking up those states.

Posted by: Romneylosttheelectionlastnight at October 17, 2012 07:56 AM (l5Jl8)

281 Obama now getting to the magic 50% mark in NV and NH, locking up those states.

Posted by: Romneylosttheelectionlastnight at October 17, 2012 11:55 AM (Lf/c1)



I'm sure that's what momma told you to get you to sleep last night.

Posted by: Unclefacts, now with even more summoning power. at October 17, 2012 07:57 AM (6IReR)

282 279 If at this point you're still undecided, you're a willfully uninformed and disinterested fuckwit who shouldn't have the right to vote. Uh oh. Now you have done it. Ann Althouse will throw the election.

Posted by: George Orwell what knows Ann Althouse has a more racially sensitive hoo-hoo than you at October 17, 2012 07:57 AM (AZGON)

283 Strangly enough there only seems to be one troll here at any given time. Almost like they work shifts in an office someplace.

Posted by: The Garbone at October 17, 2012 07:57 AM (v/itI)

284 285 New Rasmussen poll of NV... Obama 50% Romney 47% Obama now getting to the magic 50% mark in NV and NH, locking up those states. Posted by: Romneylosttheelectionlastnight at October 17, 2012 11:56 AM (l5Jl _________________ Jezzuz gawd--do you understand MOE? Well do you son? You can plus or minus the MOE form the total that you get for both candidates. Most MOE's are running at 3%--so what you have there is a statistical tie.

Posted by: tasker at October 17, 2012 07:57 AM (r2PLg)

285 Stacey Dash. Who happens to have more melanin content in her skin than Barack Obama.

Posted by: Schrödinger's cat at October 17, 2012 11:55 AM (feFL6)

And looks much, much better naked.

Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at October 17, 2012 07:58 AM (2b4yb)

286 "not so good (to put it mildly) on Libya and pay equity (he should have been ready with facts about women making less in Obama's White House. Could be bad staff work)."

And if the election was about either of these issues, it might matter.

It isn't.  Romney won hands down on the most important issue to voters, the economy.  He will continue to build his advantage.

This election is probably over, since foreign policy is pretty low on the voter's radar (right above abortion).  Obama is out of opportunities to sell his economic vision for the next 4 years.

Posted by: Dave in Fla at October 17, 2012 07:58 AM (VKd99)

287 New Rasmussen poll of NV... Obama 50% Romney 47% Obama now getting to the magic 50% mark in NV and NH, locking up those states. Yep Greggums a State the Retard Obama carried by 12.5 points! Better get some Ice on your Asshole

Posted by: Evilpens at October 17, 2012 07:58 AM (ck76k)

288 "I really need to know what Obama's lies are otherwise my poor
performance next week could be on you all. That would not be pretty for
either of us.

Posted by: Catcher (not the pitcher) Mitt at October 17, 2012 11:19 AM (icwKQ)"

As much as I hate the Left (I hate them probably more than they hate the Right), I don't think "lies" is the proper term for what Obama and every other Leftist does, at least not all the time.

It's that they live in a bubble created by the affluence of Western civilization and mistake what they do in the furtherance of their ideology within the confines of that bubble as the things that sustain that civilization, when really they are orthogonal to that civilization altogether. The Left is NOT part of Western civilization, any more than the Chinese are.

It's as if domestic animals suddenly were to think that it was them who created human civilization and they demanded on that basis that their interpretation of reality be respected. Even deigning to listen to the Left as if they are actual people is to let the inmates run the asylum. I haven't taken a single statement by a lefty seriously in decades. They can be annoying, but only in the same way that a mosquito or similar pest is annoying, for their actions, not for their ability to actually provide a rational critique of my philosophical positions, which is something I would no more expect from a lefty than I would expect it from a domestic animal.

The Left in the West lives in a womb-like existence created and sustained by people who are not of the Left. It's not that they "lie" per se, it's that the distance Western civilization has momentarily created from reality has never forced them to come to terms with itself and they, collectively, don't have the initiative to do it on their own. So, they lash out with pseudo-intellectual ideologies like Marxism or other forms of victimology to rationalize their own failures.

That's not to say that Obama didn't lie and the main place where he really did lie is when he responded to the accusation about Bengazhi. The irony is that Romney's reaction is the proof Obama lied. Romney reacted like a person who knows something is true but is told it isn't true and having Crowley initially back up Obama's assertion momentarily provided social proof to Obama's lie. Romney's reaction at that moment is how people react to real lies, not the ginned-up version of "lie" which is, at base, a differing of perceptions from those on the Left and those on the non-Left.

Posted by: BS Inc. at October 17, 2012 07:58 AM (P2Ufm)

289 Really - does Empire of Jeff have an alter ego out there? Just kidding. Jeff knows I'm kidding, because he's so understanding and eloquent. ....But seriously, are you saying your list, my supporters, the rock of my base, is only slightly better than them? You can't say that. Really?

Posted by: Catcher (not the pitcher) Mitt at October 17, 2012 11:53 AM (icwKQ)

 

My list?   What list?  


And who's talking SLIGHTLY better?   When it comes to actually being able to make a point, argue it, provide facts, and rebut falsehoods, any conservative with an ounce of sense (BIRM) can more than hold their own against an idiot    regressive      whose best response to any disagreement is, "I'm going to kill you!"

 

Or, in your case, "Ha ha ha, look how silly and condescending I can be!  Doesn't that make me     wonderful?      I'm so smaht!"

 

You're very boring.  I've already spent too much time dealing with you, so from now on you will be treated as SPAM.    How much for a knockoff Rolex,      ergie?

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/b][/i][/u] at October 17, 2012 07:58 AM (4df7R)

290 And looks much, much better naked.

Says who?

Posted by: Reggie Love at October 17, 2012 07:59 AM (feFL6)

291 Posted by: Catcher (not the pitcher) Mitt at October 17, 2012 11:53 AM (icwKQ)

Huh?

Format fail.
Logic fail.
Humor fail.

Dude, suck it up and try to do better.

Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at October 17, 2012 07:59 AM (2b4yb)

292 kinda makes sense; week or so before colorado, barry's team comes out with a narrative that mitt is a good debater - translation, we could not get JL to reveal.  a week before NY, barry's team is excited, no mention of mitt the good debater, and everyone is encouraged to watch.

Posted by: runner at October 17, 2012 07:59 AM (WR5xI)

293 When I saw Mrs. Obama hootin' and clappin' during the debate, well, I knew right then I'd be voting to re-elect President Obama.

Posted by: A very concerned independent at October 17, 2012 08:00 AM (/ZZCn)

294

I've gotten lots of responses, and I appreciate that.  Your candor and your passion is what makes me sure that I will be victorious in November.  But, and this is important, I need to know WHAT LIES OBAMA TOLD last night so I can be prepared next week.  This is important.  I don't know what I'll do if I cannot effectively counter ALL THOSE LIES OBAMA TOLD last night.

Thanks so much.

[Kate "Crowley" Smith, chowing down a bear claw:  "frrrmm thhh mogghhwnntonnssss, tohggg thhh prrairrggghheeesssh, togh thh ogghhshunnnn, whhht wth foagggghhhhhhhhhhhhmm !"]

Posted by: Catcher (not the pitcher) Mitt at October 17, 2012 08:00 AM (icwKQ)

295

We could put shock collars on them and give the moderator the button. Moderator says "next" one time and them ZAP.

---

With increasing voltage each time.

Posted by: Buzzsaw90 at October 17, 2012 08:00 AM (SO2Q8)

296 And Gerg proves once again he doesn't understand what "margin of error" means.

Posted by: mediumheadboy at October 17, 2012 08:00 AM (aHR5E)

297 292 New Rasmussen poll of NV...

Obama 50%
Romney 47%

Obama now getting to the magic 50% mark in NV and NH, locking up those states.

Yep Greggums a State the Retard Obama carried by 12.5 points!

Better get some Ice on your Asshole

---------------------

Incumbents don't win re-election by losing 12 points in a state they carried.  Unless Nevada voters are in a vaccuum, and he loses no more votes anywhere else.  Because that'll happen.

Posted by: Uncle Mikey at October 17, 2012 08:01 AM (8qoXL)

298 I stll have no idea what in the hell the troll was talking about.

Posted by: Honey Badger at October 17, 2012 08:01 AM (GvYeG)

299 Regardless of my above comment-- Benghazigate may finally be breaking into the press. Team Romney is distributing timelines of administrative statements, etc. And the general public is starting to ask, "so, uh, media, what teh eff is going on with Benghazi?"

Posted by: Hopeless at October 17, 2012 08:01 AM (aY3VP)

300 is there anyone here isn Fucking charge of the dimwit Twit trolls good Lord Get it to fucking gether

Posted by: Evilpens at October 17, 2012 08:02 AM (ck76k)

301

I've gotten lots of responses, and I appreciate that. Your candor and your passion is what makes me sure that I will be victorious in November. But, and this is important, I need to know WHAT LIES OBAMA TOLDlast night so I can be prepared next week. This is important. I don't know what I'll do if I cannot effectively counter ALL THOSE LIES OBAMA TOLD last night.
Thanks so much.

 

 

How about a     set of fake Gucci pumps?   And a faux Prada bag?    I need to really doll myself up for Obama's going away party in     January, but i'm not spending good money on that     dumbass.    

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/b][/i][/u] at October 17, 2012 08:02 AM (4df7R)

302 This place needs some puppeh videos to cheer everyone up! Up, up with puppehs! You meet them wherever you go! Up, up with puppehs! They're the best kind of folks we know!

Posted by: Redd at October 17, 2012 08:02 AM (f0ies)

303 I stll have no idea what in the hell the troll was talking about. --- Allow me to translate. "YES!!! For the first time in my worthless misbegotten life, someone's paying attention to me!!! I knew mommy was wrong when she said I'd never have any friends!"

Posted by: mediumheadboy at October 17, 2012 08:02 AM (aHR5E)

304 We could put shock collars on them and give the moderator the button. Moderator says "next" one time and them ZAP.
---
With increasing voltage each time.

Posted by: Buzzsaw90 at October 17, 2012 12:00 PM (SO2Q



I shock collar for the moderator too. There would have been a lot of fried pork on the stage last night

Posted by: TheQuietMan at October 17, 2012 08:03 AM (1Jaio)

305 "YES!!! For the first time in my worthless misbegotten life, someone's paying attention to me!!! I knew mommy was wrong when she said I'd never have any friends!"

Posted by: mediumheadboy at October 17, 2012 12:02 PM (aHR5E)

 

Alas, the troll doesn't realize its mother hates it.  

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/b][/i][/u] at October 17, 2012 08:03 AM (4df7R)

306 Posted by: Evilpens at October 17, 2012 12:02 PM (ck76k)

It's obviously a failure of supervision. Sometimes they are entertaining, but today? Awful. Boring and repetitive.

Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at October 17, 2012 08:03 AM (2b4yb)

307 305 is there anyone here isn Fucking charge of the dimwit Twit trolls good Lord Get it to fucking gether Posted by: Evilpens at October 17, 2012 12:02 PM (ck76k) ________________ It smells like Troll Tide up in here.

Posted by: tasker at October 17, 2012 08:03 AM (r2PLg)

308 292 New Rasmussen poll of NV I've been reading too many polls. I thought, I know what RV means, and I know what LV means, but what the hell is NV?

Posted by: Whoever this is, it's definitely not Michael at October 17, 2012 08:04 AM (JVCVF)

309 Stacey Dash @REALStaceyDash Well Done Governor. God Speed. @MittRomney

Posted by: Evilpens at October 17, 2012 08:04 AM (ck76k)

310 what the hell is NV? --- Numbnuts voters. That's why Gerg is so excited.

Posted by: mediumheadboy at October 17, 2012 08:05 AM (aHR5E)

311 Team Romney is distributing timelines of administrative statements, etc. ________________ Nice. They should also distribute timelines of the events that happened before the attack. The attack on the Brits, and the Red Cross in Benghazi. The previous attack on the consulate. The brag about shadowing the movements of the US ambassador on June 5th. Etc.

Posted by: tasker at October 17, 2012 08:06 AM (r2PLg)

312 Up, up with puppehs!
They're the best kind of folks we know! Posted by: Redd


Now we're talkin'!

More sauce, waiter. And this fork is dirty.

Posted by: Pres. I, Me, Mine [/i] [/b] at October 17, 2012 08:06 AM (qrpxS)

313 Notice how the election has moved from "Over because Romney is losing Virginia!!!" to "Over because Romney is losing Nevada!!!"

In  a week he's going have moved to "Over because Romney is totally losing Washington!!!"

Posted by: Dave in Fla at October 17, 2012 08:07 AM (VKd99)

314 I was pondering the whole debate thing this morning. The point of the debates is, supposedly, to provide the American public with information about the positions of the candidates. That is actually a helpful and worthy goal. The only way that could be accomplished is through an actual debate process, you know, where each side is asked difficult questions and where each person is given the opportunity to respond without being interrupted. That's simply not possible in the current format. I know many, including me, are upset that the RNC agrees to these debates given how ridiculous they are. But what's the alternative? Like it or not, many many people still rely on the networks, including the "news" networks, for information. Saying no our candidate won't go to a debate there comes across as petulant and as if the candidate is running from the debate. So what are some realistic alternatives? I know there was a suggestion that there be two questioners, one from the Right and one from the Left, and I do think that is at least a start.

Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. A righteous dude. at October 17, 2012 08:08 AM (VtjlW)

315 I stll have no idea what in the hell the troll was talking about.

---

Neither does the troll....

Posted by: fixerupper at October 17, 2012 08:08 AM (C8hzL)

316

but what the hell is NV?

---

Nude Voters?

Neanderthal Voters?

Nincompoop Voters?

Nigerian voters?

Nubile lonely teenage girl voters?

Posted by: Buzzsaw90 at October 17, 2012 08:08 AM (SO2Q8)

317

Wait a minute.  I hear something.  It's getting closer ... it feels like, tastes like ... fear.  Yes, fear -- I know the taste of fear.  I felt it during the Viet Nam war, when I went a-minestering, toted a Book of Mormon instead of a rifle. 

..

You guys don't know the kind of fear I tasted.

.

And there it is again.  I thought you could help me, but all you gave me was semen and cock jokes, maligned my character and acted like the despicable left-wing blog-trotters.  I still love you though.  You define me, after all.  Good or bad, I'm yours and you're mine. 

[Once again, ladies and gentlemen, Kate "Crowley" smith, chewing on a danish roll, singing:  "....Googgghhhhhd Blllesssss Ammmergghhiiiccaaaggghhh, mmmmughy hooommmmmm swwwegghhht hommmmmmmmmgggghhhhhhmmmm ... mmm ... gggagh... ggaggg ....coughgagsputter ... spew ....  .... hoooooooommmmmmme !"]

Posted by: Catcher (not the pitcher) Mitt at October 17, 2012 08:09 AM (icwKQ)

318  I stll have no idea what in the hell the troll was talking about.

 

Posted by: Honey Badger at October 17, 2012 12:01 PM (GvYeG)

 

Me neither.   It sounds like one of those  disheveled guys lurching down the city sidewalk, waving arms in the air and ranting to ... no one (visible)  in gibberish.

Posted by: Count de Monet at October 17, 2012 08:09 AM (BAS5M)

319 what the hell is NV?

Nevada. Blame the United States Postal Service for that. Speaking of... what time is it? Are they still solvent today, 'cause I'm expecting a package.

Posted by: Schrödinger's cat at October 17, 2012 08:09 AM (feFL6)

320 Why is this fucknugget being allowed to waste Ace's bandwidth?

Posted by: mediumheadboy at October 17, 2012 08:09 AM (aHR5E)

321

Nah, it's that felcher who has the unhealthy obsession with horse penises.

 

It's only unhealthy if you don't chug a bottle of hand sanitizer first.

Posted by: Sandra Fluke at October 17, 2012 08:10 AM (zF6Iw)

322 while the issue of Benghazi is very impt to me & to many high info voters (who are already voting for R/R), the low info voter has no idea what it is & does not care.

Posted by: kelley in virginia at October 17, 2012 08:11 AM (HNwOT)

323 I shock collar for the moderator too. There would have been a lot of fried pork on the stage last night Posted by: TheQuietMan at October 17, 2012 12:03 PM (1Jaio) Like some one dumped a bag of Pork Skins on the stage. Romney crushing them underfoot like Godzilla through Tokyo.

Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at October 17, 2012 08:11 AM (kc2b9)

324

God, I'm sick of the "women earn less than men" rubbish. The only valid comparison is between individuals in the same position with the same experience in positions that have a set payscale. I can't believe that that actually happens in this litigious era.

 

Otherwise, I don't want to hear about pay differences when the complainer is comparing individuals who differ in:

 

1. Experience/seniority. In most non-physical jobs, more experience makes an employee more valuable. Take time off to have kids? Great (really). But that is at a cost in experience on the job.

 

2. Negotiating skills. If your pay is not set by a payscale, and you get less than someone else you consider equivalent, then you need to work on your negotiating skills, and stop whining to the government;

 

3. Expertise/training. Sure, more women than men now graduate from college, but let's face it, there's a limit to the number of Womyn's Studies majors demanded by the economy (the upper limit being 0). To compare an English or Womyn's Studies major with an engineering major is nonsense.

 

I suspect that that "72%" crap comes from all men in the workforce compared to all women in the workforce, in which case these gals need to learn about weighted averages. That would be in the math department. They can ask an engineer where that would be.

 

And I get particularly incensed by the "equivalent work" crap, where women sitting in an air-conditioned office typing consider their job "equivalent" to something like high steel work, lumberjacks, electrical linemen, or even guys on the loading dock. How many clerks get killed on the job? And ultimately, if they think the jobs are equivalent, quit the office job and take the other one. They're equivalent, right? /rant

Posted by: Jay Guevara at October 17, 2012 08:11 AM (U+DUu)

325 We could put shock collars on them and give the moderator the button. Moderator says "next" one time and them ZAP. Ahem. Me with a tazer. C'mon, it would be awesome.

Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. A righteous dude. at October 17, 2012 08:11 AM (VtjlW)

326 I can tell from the troll invasion that 0bama has 'fired up the base'.

Unfortunately, half the base has now grabbed their crack pipes and is now firing up the base themselves. Then getting online.

Posted by: Schrödinger's cat at October 17, 2012 08:12 AM (feFL6)

327 Ahem. Me with a tazer. C'mon, it would be awesome. Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. A righteous dude. at October 17, 2012 12:11 PM (VtjlW) A Leather corsett, Garters, stockings and stompy boots required to finish the "Look".

Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at October 17, 2012 08:13 AM (kc2b9)

328

Ahem. Me with a tazer. C'mon, it would be awesome.

---

I'm imagining all the lights in the auditorium flickering, and a liberal screaming in the dark.

I approve.

 

Posted by: Buzzsaw90 at October 17, 2012 08:14 AM (SO2Q8)

329 yeah, poll results with no link, no MOE, no partisan sampling breakdown....


sure, those are valid.  

Posted by: Isaac Davis White at October 17, 2012 08:16 AM (Dll6b)

330 A Leather corsett, Garters, stockings and stompy boots required to finish the "Look". I was thinking more this, but with a tazer. http://bit.ly/O6ijRB

Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. A righteous dude. at October 17, 2012 08:16 AM (VtjlW)

331

 Ahem. Me with a tazer. C'mon, it would be awesome.

 

Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. A righteous dude. at October 17, 2012 12:11 PM (VtjlW)

 

 

A Leather corsett, Garters, stockings and stompy boots required to finish the "Look".

 

Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at October 17, 2012 12:13 PM (kc2b9)

 

 Most def.  Backlit silhouette onto a screen from an  elevated position, like the "banker" in  the TV Deal/No Deal game.  Bonus would be a surprise twist of a paintball sniper unleashing rounds at the moderator for interjecting itself into the debate.

Posted by: Count de Monet at October 17, 2012 08:18 AM (BAS5M)

332 gotta agree with rush today.. while mitt didnt hammer the libya issue like he could have,, he didnt lose a single vote last night , in fact gained ground. krauthammer and his ilk are so damned worried about perception. if i say it was close ,, they wont think im extreme.  it wernt close fuckers.

Posted by: coldwarrior at October 17, 2012 08:20 AM (fpL1+)

333

Thank.You.For.Your.Continued.Support. (buzzwhhirhummclick) ... I.Must.Go.Now. ... Battery.Cell.Getting.Low.   (buzzwhirrhummmclickclick). You.Define.Me.Every.Day.And.With.Every.Flip.Flop. (buzzwhhirclickhumclick).

and God Bless your version of the United States of America that you dream about every night from your little, underformed, innocuous brainstems. 

Posted by: Catcher (not the pitcher) Mitt at October 17, 2012 08:20 AM (icwKQ)

334 Go away, Rupert. Your mommy is waiting for your special alone time.

Posted by: mediumheadboy at October 17, 2012 08:23 AM (aHR5E)

335 See ya round the funway, You Pathetic Load Of (Delusional, Irrelevant) Communal Horse Cum.

Posted by: Poopert Rupkin at October 17, 2012 08:24 AM (icwKQ)

336

that chick from Star Trek went on to make porno flicks.

 

Really?  Fuck, why couldn't it have been Diana Muldaur or Kirstie Alley (during her Lt Saavik days)?

Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at October 17, 2012 08:25 AM (zF6Iw)

337 Why is Rupert so obsessed with horse semen? His daddy must be well hung.

Posted by: mediumheadboy at October 17, 2012 08:27 AM (aHR5E)

338 Romney is trying to eat into the [now modest] lead Obama has amongst women.  While true, the fact that Obama doesn't walk the walk with his own staff as regards pay issues is not important to what Romney did on the pay equity subject. 

Mitt offered a talking point that immediately connects with women/families with the flex schedule thing.  It sounds great, is is something big companies are already doing, and it is specific and responsive to ordinary people's concerns, which cuts into the meme that Romney "doesn't understand ordinary people."

Further, he went into a practical discussion of what he had already done with his MA staff.  Libs are having some juvenile fun with the "binders of women" malapropism, but that's because they have nothing else from this question to hang on to.  Digging any further into this issue for libs will only open them up to a compare-contrast on Obama's pay equity issues.

Obama, by contrast, went on and one about a legal case that is remote from the practical experience of most people.  He was "Dingle-Norwooding" himself on an issue where he should be stronger.  He came off as remote and "inside the Beltway" on pay equity.

This question was a win for Romney on several levels.  Being tit-for-tat on the WH pay equity issue would have only muddied the water.


Posted by: trumpetdaddy at October 17, 2012 08:29 AM (dcoFe)

339 Well, then, Kelley, it's time to educate those vapid "low info voters", innit? Making them care is a tall order, no doubt, but it's certainly something that Zero is trying desperately to hide....for good reason.

Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at October 17, 2012 08:32 AM (AxE3L)

340 Dick Cheney needs to be on the debate commission .

Posted by: Jean at October 17, 2012 08:32 AM (g2ldK)

341 it wernt horse cum

Posted by: coldwarrior at October 17, 2012 08:33 AM (fpL1+)

342 Or Rupert. He's clearly a master debater.

Posted by: mediumheadboy at October 17, 2012 08:33 AM (aHR5E)

343 I know many, including me, are upset that the RNC agrees to these debates given how ridiculous they are. But what's the alternative? The same thing that would fix everything wrong with the world: Force the courts to accept "he broke an oath" as an affirmative defense against battery or homicide charges.

Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at October 17, 2012 08:35 AM (ogdab)

344

I was thinking more this, but with a tazer.

 

No, no - riding crop, if you please.

 

Oh, wait - you were talking about using it on the moderator, weren't you?  Carry on, then.

Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at October 17, 2012 08:39 AM (zF6Iw)

345 #220  Many states have implemented voter ID,  including my state (Indiana) and Pennsylvania.

There is still the possibility of fraud,  but the states in which they can make a difference are fewer in number.  Also,  many of the states in which they practice fraud (like Illinois) are already Obama states so they will only be cheating in local races.  

In addition,  some cities which used to be factors in pumping extra votes in order to swing states to the democrat side are shrinking.  Detroit is an example of that.

Romney is aware of fraud possibilities and has attorneys lined up.  However,  if we get as many voters to the polls as possible we can overcome the fraudulent numbers.


Posted by: Miss Marple at October 17, 2012 09:02 AM (GoIUi)

346 Royal Oil (100),

Thanks for the clarification.

Posted by: Isophorone at October 17, 2012 09:04 AM (Qt9tO)

347    the G O P  is  garbage - lying scummy filthy shit   qand they  lie and cheat the population -  they are scum

Posted by: gop is scum at October 17, 2012 09:13 AM (7IVio)

348 I think Romney's equal pay for women was one of his most memorable answers. The goal in this election is to be seen as human, not the monster Obama portrays. Romney succeeded when he talked about his record hiring women and improving the economy in Massachussetts.

Posted by: JustLikeDavidHasselhoff at October 17, 2012 09:45 AM (QyMDY)

349 How many plants were at the debate last night? I counted 2. 1. The Susan Katz lady that asked the George W. Bush question who came all the way from Baltimore to be at this place. 2. AK-47 lady was a plant since she's a registered Democrat in an audience of "Undecided" dunces. http://tinyurl.com/8lrykeq Anymore?

Posted by: Kaitian at October 17, 2012 09:51 AM (fI6dx)

350 @352 Good joke! Apparently I slept through 8 years of hearing that when Bush was president.

Posted by: Kaitian at October 17, 2012 09:52 AM (fI6dx)

351 Obama is a stuttering clusterf*ck of a miserable failure.

Posted by: steevy at October 17, 2012 10:08 AM (6o4Fb)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
278kb generated in CPU 0.3748, elapsed 0.5186 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.43 seconds, 479 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.