April 15, 2014
— DrewM You'd think that with all the victory laps Obama has been doing over hitting his numbers on "sign ups", whatever that means, he'd be eager to have hard data to back up his claims.
Surprisingly, that's actually not the case.
The Census Bureau, the authoritative source of health insurance data for more than three decades, is changing its annual survey so thoroughly that it will be difficult to measure the effects of President ObamaÂ’s health care law in the next report, due this fall, census officials said.The changes are intended to improve the accuracy of the survey, being conducted this month in interviews with tens of thousands of households around the country. But the new questions are so different that the findings will not be comparable, the officials said.
An internal Census Bureau document said that the new questionnaire included a “total revision to health insurance questions” and, in a test last year, produced lower estimates of the uninsured. Thus, officials said, it will be difficult to say how much of any change is attributable to the Affordable Care Act and how much to the use of a new survey instrument.
So look, you'll just have to trust Obama and people like Ezra Klein when they tell you all is well and ObamaCare is the best thing ever. You have a problem with that?
Related enough...the head of NBC News political coverage knows why ObamaCare is so gosh darn unpopular.
Why Obamacare's (un)popularity is probably going to continue: ACA opponents have sole control over the airwaves (1/2)
— Mark Murray (@mmurraypolitics) April 15, 2014
Per CMAG's Elizabeth Wilner, number of anti-Obamacare commericials since March 31: 32
Number of pro-Obamacare commercials: 0 (2/2)
— Mark Murray (@mmurraypolitics) April 15, 2014Let's unpack this nonsense for a second.
I like how they pick March as the cutoff deadline for counting pro-ObamaCare ads. It lets him ignore all the money HHS spent promoting it prior to that. In ads. On TV.
It also ignores all the friendly media coverage people like him give it.
But mostly it ignores something very important. The reason candidates, Democratic campaign committees and PACs aren't running pro-ObamaCare ads is that it's unpopular and running on it would be suicide.
If simply buying ads would make the thing a winner for Democrats you can bet they'd be spending tons of money doing just that. They tried using taxpayer money (Happy Tax Day!) and failed.
But chin up Mark. Socialism will be popular someday, it just needs a bigger advertising budget.
Posted by: DrewM at
07:35 AM
| Comments (366)
Post contains 461 words, total size 4 kb.
Posted by: nnptcgrad at April 15, 2014 07:38 AM (AQtZI)
Posted by: BCochran1981 - Credible Hulk at April 15, 2014 07:38 AM (da5Wo)
I've actually been paying attention and I haven't seen a single anti-ACA ad on the television.
But I do see shitbiscuits on ABC, NBC, and CBS "news" programs uncritically regurgitating Administration claims about Obamacare.
Not sure how that got turned into "ACA opponents have sole control over the airwaves."
The only thing I see is this assnugget forces himself to believe it so he can prosletyze in favor of the ACA and thereby convince himself he's providing "balance" and "equal time."
Posted by: @JohnTant at April 15, 2014 07:41 AM (eytER)
Posted by: SH at April 15, 2014 07:41 AM (gmeXX)
Posted by: SH at April 15, 2014 11:41 AM (gmeXX)
No, it's a hellova lot worse than a tax increase. A hellova lot worse.
Posted by: maddogg at April 15, 2014 07:42 AM (xWW96)
Posted by: Burn the Witch at April 15, 2014 07:43 AM (HLprW)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at April 15, 2014 07:43 AM (IXrOn)
Posted by: joncelli at April 15, 2014 07:43 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at April 15, 2014 07:43 AM (IXrOn)
Posted by: SH at April 15, 2014 07:43 AM (gmeXX)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at April 15, 2014 07:44 AM (LLb/F)
Posted by: Captain Hate at April 15, 2014 07:44 AM (dr4EY)
Posted by: SH at April 15, 2014 07:44 AM (gmeXX)
Posted by: Colorado Alex at April 15, 2014 07:44 AM (tIvOy)
Posted by: Mark Murray at April 15, 2014 07:44 AM (Aif/5)
Posted by: Soothsayer the Unstompable at April 15, 2014 07:45 AM (HC3oE)
Posted by: Lizzy at April 15, 2014 07:45 AM (IdOTf)
Posted by: Mark Murray at April 15, 2014 07:45 AM (yFb77)
Posted by: tsrblke, PhD(c) (No Really!) [/b] [/i] [/s] at April 15, 2014 07:45 AM (HDwDg)
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at April 15, 2014 07:45 AM (aq5Dc)
Posted by: SH at April 15, 2014 07:46 AM (gmeXX)
Posted by: no good deed at April 15, 2014 07:46 AM (ILBCY)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at April 15, 2014 07:46 AM (IXrOn)
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at April 15, 2014 07:46 AM (aq5Dc)
Posted by: Shoot Me at April 15, 2014 07:46 AM (EQcfE)
Per CMAG's Elizabeth Wilner, number of anti-Obamacare commericials since March 31: 32 Number of pro-Obamacare commercials: 0 (2/2)
Per @JohnTant, number of anti-Obamacare news stories on the big three: 0. Number of pro-Obamacare puff pieces and other assorted agitprop: eleventy kajillion.
Limiting it to "commercials" is dishonest in the extreme. Is it any wonder these sorry no account fucking fuckers have zero credibility?
Posted by: @JohnTant at April 15, 2014 07:46 AM (eytER)
Yeah, because that TWO FUCKING WEEKS made all the difference in the world after 4 years of cheerleading this bullshit and the past 6 months of it on the taxpayers' dime.
Posted by: Burn the Witch at April 15, 2014 07:46 AM (HLprW)
Posted by: Beyond Disgusted at April 15, 2014 07:47 AM (thLL8)
Posted by: Roy at April 15, 2014 07:47 AM (VndSC)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at April 15, 2014 07:47 AM (0LHZx)
Did this greasy assweasel fail to count Mooch's appearance on talk shows telling young people to "get covered?"
Posted by: @JohnTant at April 15, 2014 07:47 AM (eytER)
Posted by: HR at April 15, 2014 07:47 AM (hO8IJ)
Posted by: SH at April 15, 2014 07:47 AM (gmeXX)
***
Well, half of socialism is popular. People loving getting stuff for "free". The problem is that they don't like having their stuff taken to give to someone else.
Remember the survey that said that only 5% of Democrats thought their own taxes were too low? Even though one of the core issues of Democrat politics is raising taxes?
Posted by: 18-1 at April 15, 2014 07:47 AM (78TbK)
Posted by: SH at April 15, 2014 11:43 AM (gmeXX)
I wonder if anybody has had the nads to tell Lebron what a brainless pinhead he looked like shilling for 404Care? Maybe if his mother Gloria was temporarily sober and not banging his teammates.
Posted by: Captain Hate at April 15, 2014 07:48 AM (dr4EY)
Posted by: joncelli at April 15, 2014 07:48 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: fixerupper at April 15, 2014 07:48 AM (nELVU)
Posted by: Beagle at April 15, 2014 07:49 AM (sOtz/)
Because even God was shocked at the gall?
Posted by: Burn the Witch at April 15, 2014 07:49 AM (HLprW)
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at April 15, 2014 07:49 AM (lDhlB)
Posted by: Barack Obama at April 15, 2014 07:49 AM (yFb77)
Posted by: tsrblke, PhD(c) (No Really!) [/b] [/i] [/s] at April 15, 2014 07:49 AM (HDwDg)
Let's put some numbers to it. The fed govt spent over $700 Million to promote obamacare. Almost 3/4 of a BILLION dollars. And yet this dumbass charlatan DNC propagandist from NBC chooses to ignore that.
I hope somebody tweeted back to him some facts so it doesn't sit there unchallenged.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at April 15, 2014 07:49 AM (hUf/y)
Posted by: Citizen X at April 15, 2014 07:50 AM (7ObY1)
Posted by: Romeo13 at April 15, 2014 07:50 AM (84gbM)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at April 15, 2014 07:50 AM (0LHZx)
Posted by: joncelli at April 15, 2014 07:50 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: redenzo at April 15, 2014 07:50 AM (WCnJW)
Posted by: Lizzy at April 15, 2014 07:50 AM (IdOTf)
Posted by: RWC at April 15, 2014 07:50 AM (fWAjv)
Posted by: willow at April 15, 2014 07:51 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at April 15, 2014 07:51 AM (t3UFN)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at April 15, 2014 07:51 AM (IXrOn)
Posted by: blaster at April 15, 2014 07:51 AM (4+AaH)
Posted by: redenzo at April 15, 2014 11:50 AM (WCnJW)
And giving waivers to cronies all over the place.
Posted by: Insomniac at April 15, 2014 07:51 AM (DrWcr)
Posted by: Soothsayer the Unstompable at April 15, 2014 07:51 AM (HC3oE)
Posted by: no good deed at April 15, 2014 07:51 AM (ILBCY)
Posted by: Citizen X at April 15, 2014 07:51 AM (7ObY1)
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at April 15, 2014 07:51 AM (lDhlB)
Posted by: willow at April 15, 2014 07:52 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: richard mcenroe at April 15, 2014 07:53 AM (XO6WW)
Posted by: Harry Reid at April 15, 2014 07:53 AM (HDwDg)
Posted by: Beagle at April 15, 2014 07:53 AM (sOtz/)
Posted by: Soothsayer the Unstompable at April 15, 2014 07:53 AM (HC3oE)
Posted by: Jay Carney at April 15, 2014 07:53 AM (yFb77)
Posted by: tsrblke, PhD(c) (No Really!) [/b] [/i] [/s] at April 15, 2014 07:53 AM (HDwDg)
Posted by: Romeo13 at April 15, 2014 07:53 AM (84gbM)
Posted by: Lincolntf at April 15, 2014 07:53 AM (ZshNr)
Posted by: SH at April 15, 2014 07:54 AM (gmeXX)
***
I've often thought that a Republican party interested in actually implementing conservative politics could make a lot of progress by offering taxes aimed squarely at Democrat constituencies.
The Dems would fight them tooth and nail...but that is the point.
Posted by: 18-1 at April 15, 2014 07:54 AM (78TbK)
Posted by: fixerupper at April 15, 2014 07:54 AM (nELVU)
Number of pro-Obamacare commercials: 0 (2/2)
They don't need to pay for advertising when they have the MFM lying and cheerleading for it non-stop
Posted by: TheQuietMan at April 15, 2014 07:55 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: Burn the Witch at April 15, 2014 11:46 AM (HLprW)
#twoweeks
Posted by: EC at April 15, 2014 07:56 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Null at April 15, 2014 07:57 AM (DuH+r)
Posted by: willow at April 15, 2014 07:57 AM (nqBYe)
***
Number of people in the workforce cratering..."unemployment" going down...
Inflation non-existent...but the price of food has doubled in five years...
etc...etc....etc
Posted by: 18-1 at April 15, 2014 07:57 AM (78TbK)
Posted by: pookysgirl at April 15, 2014 07:58 AM (9+kKl)
The Dems would fight them tooth and nail...but that is the point.
Posted by: 18-1 at April 15, 2014 11:54 AM (78TbK)
That Republican party was killed by the Bushes and Rove. Now it's shamnesty and crony capitalism.
Posted by: Captain Hate at April 15, 2014 07:58 AM (dr4EY)
Posted by: willow at April 15, 2014 07:58 AM (nqBYe)
I had some liberal brainchild respond to my comment about being forced to buy insurance with "You don't have to; you can elect to pay the fine instead."
These assholes couldn't achieve room temperature IQs in a walk-in fridge.
Posted by: Burn the Witch at April 15, 2014 07:58 AM (HLprW)
Posted by: joncelli at April 15, 2014 07:58 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Chaos the Other Dark Meat at April 15, 2014 07:58 AM (oDCMR)
Posted by: Kreplach at April 15, 2014 07:59 AM (IyKYr)
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at April 15, 2014 07:59 AM (lDhlB)
Posted by: Lizzy at April 15, 2014 07:59 AM (IdOTf)
Sure, slide on down into a flooded basement and toy with an electric device.
Better call your friend and hurry him along.
Posted by: irongrampa at April 15, 2014 07:59 AM (SAMxH)
Posted by: joncelli at April 15, 2014 08:01 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: buzzion at April 15, 2014 08:01 AM (LI48c)
Posted by: buzzion at April 15, 2014 12:01 PM (LI48c)
Keg stand, bra!
Posted by: Insomniac at April 15, 2014 08:02 AM (DrWcr)
Posted by: Beyond Disgusted at April 15, 2014 08:02 AM (thLL8)
Posted by: SH at April 15, 2014 08:02 AM (gmeXX)
Posted by: Elder Race of ACA Opponents at April 15, 2014 08:02 AM (fOLwM)
Posted by: phoenixgirl @phxazgrl Happy Personal Wealth Confiscation Day at April 15, 2014 08:02 AM (u8GsB)
Has anybody else been contacted by the Census Bureau wanting dettails info on everybody living in you house? I have been called twice now
Posted by: Big Swingin Al at April 15, 2014 08:03 AM (iWo0u)
Posted by: SH at April 15, 2014 08:04 AM (gmeXX)
Posted by: joncelli at April 15, 2014 08:04 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: rickb223 at April 15, 2014 08:05 AM (CRyse)
Posted by: Clutch Cargo at April 15, 2014 08:05 AM (pgQxn)
Posted by: RWC at April 15, 2014 08:05 AM (fWAjv)
Posted by: Lizzy at April 15, 2014 08:06 AM (IdOTf)
Posted by: joncelli at April 15, 2014 12:04 PM (RD7QR)
Uh...khakis.
Posted by: Jake from State Farm at April 15, 2014 08:06 AM (DrWcr)
That budget ain't gonna justify itself you know.
Use It or Lose It!™ Federal budgeting. What could possibly go wrong?
Posted by: Burn the Witch at April 15, 2014 08:06 AM (HLprW)
Posted by: SH at April 15, 2014 08:06 AM (gmeXX)
Posted by: Mark Murray at April 15, 2014 08:07 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Mustbequantum at April 15, 2014 08:07 AM (MIKMs)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at April 15, 2014 08:07 AM (aDwsi)
Posted by: Beagle at April 15, 2014 08:08 AM (sOtz/)
Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars™ [/i] [/s] [/u] at April 15, 2014 08:09 AM (yc4Nt)
I wonder what the CBO is going to say next FQ.
GIGO baby.
Posted by: Burn the Witch at April 15, 2014 08:09 AM (HLprW)
Posted by: Romeo13 at April 15, 2014 08:09 AM (84gbM)
Posted by: blaster at April 15, 2014 08:09 AM (4+AaH)
Posted by: boulder t'hobo at April 15, 2014 08:09 AM (6mYGI)
MFM: ACA, great success! Big numbers!
Citizen: B-B-But, they didn't release any actual data. Who paid? They're calculating it diff//
MFM: //Silence! ACA is great success! Look at the big number, you denier. Why are you angry about people getting healthcare?!
Posted by: forest at April 15, 2014 08:09 AM (stMuz)
Posted by: Pelosi Schmelosi at April 15, 2014 08:10 AM (jHf6U)
Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars™ [/i] [/s] [/u] at April 15, 2014 08:12 AM (v/itI)
Once you look at the ad you will know why. I wish I could find it on line, but it has various parents of various ethnicities talking happily to their children. All parents except one were good, involved parents except one: the white woman. She was ignoring her crying baby for her smart phone. All the minority parents and the white male were good. White woman, bad.
Racism, straight up, and I'm not kidding. We are getting "reeducated" by our betters.
Posted by: PJ at April 15, 2014 08:12 AM (ZWaLo)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at April 15, 2014 08:12 AM (aDwsi)
Posted by: fixerupper at April 15, 2014 08:12 AM (nELVU)
Posted by: airandee at April 15, 2014 08:13 AM (KzwzI)
They aren't buying their own baloney, yet they insist that everyone else do so.
"This is the safest ship ever built."
"Really? So, when's your first voyage?"
"Me? Do you think I'm nuts?"
Posted by: Mikey NTH - Snow! AHHHHHHHH! at April 15, 2014 08:14 AM (hLRSq)
Posted by: Clutch Cargo at April 15, 2014 08:14 AM (pgQxn)
As for the change of questionairre: Remember when they changed how to calculate GDP last year which raised the new number by 2% or more comparatively. The new number just gets stated and no one questions it.
So yeah, its good political strategy to do these things, because.....pravda.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at April 15, 2014 08:14 AM (hUf/y)
Posted by: Romeo13 at April 15, 2014 08:14 AM (84gbM)
Posted by: Damiano at April 15, 2014 08:15 AM (j0wOO)
Posted by: Beyond Disgusted at April 15, 2014 08:15 AM (thLL8)
Posted by: Boss Moss at April 15, 2014 08:15 AM (bitz6)
============
Uh, major provisions of the law are delayed.
So, yeah.
Posted by: Jay in PA at April 15, 2014 08:15 AM (3LaGb)
Everyone answer 'no' when the survey comes out. To every question.
***
Why yes, I am a Tibetan albino French speaker who does not have health insurance because I am Amish.
I have 17 children - 8 boys, 8 girls, and 1 other. I am married to both a man and a woman.
I work at a crossbow factory, and my job is chief spiritual officers.
I swear all of this is true so help me Obama
Posted by: 18-1 at April 15, 2014 08:16 AM (78TbK)
I was surprised how little coverage that even got in the blogosphere.
On a side note: I hate the word "blogosphere".
Posted by: Burn the Witch at April 15, 2014 08:16 AM (HLprW)
Posted by: red speck at April 15, 2014 08:16 AM (9/Ug/)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at April 15, 2014 08:16 AM (aDwsi)
Posted by: Newly Out of Work BLM Shooters at April 15, 2014 08:17 AM (nELVU)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at April 15, 2014 08:17 AM (aDwsi)
Posted by: Democrats at April 15, 2014 08:18 AM (j0wOO)
Posted by: Common Core at April 15, 2014 08:18 AM (84gbM)
It also ignores all the friendly media coverage people like him give it.
They never count this. They can’t. If they included the overwhelming amount of “free media” in any evaluation, the left’s relentless efforts to restrict “paid media” messaging would look downright diabolical. Instead of the good government crusade that it surely must be.
Posted by: CJ at April 15, 2014 08:19 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: i and pi at April 15, 2014 08:19 AM (84gbM)
Posted by: Boss Moss at April 15, 2014 08:20 AM (bitz6)
Posted by: Groucho Obama at April 15, 2014 08:20 AM (78TbK)
Posted by: Stateless Infidel at April 15, 2014 08:21 AM (AC0lD)
Posted by: Boone at April 15, 2014 08:21 AM (aDkn+)
Posted by: Regular no spin zone Guy at April 15, 2014 08:21 AM (N3Al8)
Posted by: BCochran1981 - Credible Hulk at April 15, 2014 08:21 AM (da5Wo)
The Social Security Administration announced Monday that it will immediately cease efforts to collect on taxpayersÂ’ debts to the government that are more than 10 years old.
The action comes after The Washington Post reported that the government was seizing state and federal tax refunds that were on their way to about 400,000 Americans who had relatives who owed money to Social Security. In many cases, the people whose refunds were intercepted had never heard of any debt, and the debts dated as far back as the middle of the past century. . . .
Some good news at least, I stole the above from Insty.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at April 15, 2014 08:21 AM (hUf/y)
***
Evan Thomas estimated it at a swing of 15%. Consider where we would be politically if you moved the average American election 30% to the right...
Posted by: 18-1 at April 15, 2014 08:21 AM (78TbK)
What about the Alonzo Morning healthcare ads, didn't they air in the Final Four?
Those don't count in the new math.
Posted by: NBC Hack at April 15, 2014 08:23 AM (hUf/y)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at April 15, 2014 08:23 AM (t3UFN)
***
In the new Feudalism, the role of the serf is to do the work for the good of everyone else.
Or as Obama might say, you'd think these people would be thanking me...
Posted by: 18-1 at April 15, 2014 08:23 AM (78TbK)
Posted by: Boss Moss at April 15, 2014 08:24 AM (bitz6)
Posted by: fixeruppers at April 15, 2014 08:24 AM (nELVU)
Posted by: goal posts at April 15, 2014 08:24 AM (Ua6T/)
Posted by: Dick Darman at April 15, 2014 08:25 AM (yFb77)
Posted by: Sharkman at April 15, 2014 08:26 AM (TM1p8)
Posted by: Count de Monet at April 15, 2014 08:26 AM (BAS5M)
Posted by: i and pi at April 15, 2014 08:26 AM (84gbM)
Posted by: SH at April 15, 2014 08:26 AM (gmeXX)
Posted by: Boss Moss at April 15, 2014 08:27 AM (bitz6)
___
You are most welcome my friend.
Oh, and you should send a thank you note to Mr Roberts. I tell you he is such a nice guy. His browser history is another story, but outside of that real stand up guy.
Posted by: The NSA at April 15, 2014 08:27 AM (78TbK)
Posted by: Bagdad Bob at April 15, 2014 08:27 AM (j0wOO)
Posted by: i and pi at April 15, 2014 08:28 AM (84gbM)
***
How will they know if they got most of the illegals signed up otherwise?
Posted by: 18-1 at April 15, 2014 08:28 AM (78TbK)
Posted by: Furious George at April 15, 2014 08:29 AM (yFb77)
Posted by: Boss Moss at April 15, 2014 08:29 AM (bitz6)
Posted by: Lincolntf at April 15, 2014 08:29 AM (ZshNr)
But the administration has been unable to say how many of the people gaining coverage were previously uninsured or had policies canceled, so the net increase in coverage is unclear.
I admire the mediaÂ’s newfound patience in finding out whether or not what a president is claiming is actually true. They know the answers will reveal themselves eventually. ItÂ’s an organic process. Partisans rush such things. Journalists let it play out.
Posted by: CJ at April 15, 2014 08:30 AM (9KqcB)
Large swaths of the FSA. Ask any public school kindergarten teacher in *cough* districts where the HS dropout rate is over 10% *cough.
Posted by: HR at April 15, 2014 08:31 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: phoenixgirl @phxazgrl Happy Personal Wealth Confiscation Day at April 15, 2014 08:31 AM (u8GsB)
Posted by: Romeo13 at April 15, 2014 08:31 AM (84gbM)
Posted by: rickb223 at April 15, 2014 08:32 AM (CRyse)
Posted by: Hrothgar at April 15, 2014 08:32 AM (o3MSL)
Got billed $2700 for anesthesiology for my teen son's eye surgery. Challenged it and kept asking (nicely) for a corrected amount.
As in, "I'm not paying for both a DR and a Nurse/Student at the same rate." Then reqested a discount for being self-pay and not a big pockets insurance company.
Adjusted/corrected bill was $850.
Self-pay FTW.
Posted by: Count de Monet at April 15, 2014 08:32 AM (BAS5M)
Posted by: Jay in PA at April 15, 2014 08:33 AM (3LaGb)
***
She should have said something to the effect of "Horka Borka Forka Boo!"
Also, she could have done a presentation on Bork in celebration of Icelandic culture.
Posted by: 18-1 at April 15, 2014 08:33 AM (78TbK)
Posted by: Hrothgar at April 15, 2014 08:34 AM (o3MSL)
Posted by: Boss Moss at April 15, 2014 08:34 AM (bitz6)
I'm the working poor.... I paid a tax rate of 22%...
***
The "beauty" of the current system is that those who are connected can abuse the system to pay little to no tax.
A simple system like a flat tax or a national sales tax would make that impossible.
Posted by: 18-1 at April 15, 2014 08:35 AM (78TbK)
Posted by: BCochran1981 - Credible Hulk at April 15, 2014 08:35 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: Boss Moss at April 15, 2014 08:36 AM (bitz6)
Posted by: rickb223 at April 15, 2014 08:36 AM (CRyse)
Posted by: Pitchers of Bloody Moon Mary's at April 15, 2014 08:37 AM (vHRtU)
Posted by: Hrothgar at April 15, 2014 08:38 AM (o3MSL)
***
The fairest system would be to compute the budget and the # of citizens divide the former by the latter and send everyone a bill.
It is beyond odd that fair is now defined as not only charging people different amounts, but flat out different rates.
It would be as if Comcast didn't charge everyone $120/mo (or whatever), but instead gave one guy who was friends with someone at Comcast $60/mo, charged some random guy $120, and then for some pure schmuck that the Comcast CEO didn't like charged him $1M/mo.
And this...is fair?
Posted by: 18-1 at April 15, 2014 08:39 AM (78TbK)
Should have mentioned "lawyer" and "harassment".
Posted by: EC at April 15, 2014 08:39 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: BCochran1981 - Credible Hulk at April 15, 2014 08:40 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: Boss Moss at April 15, 2014 08:40 AM (bitz6)
Posted by: Hrothgar at April 15, 2014 08:40 AM (o3MSL)
Posted by: Retard Strength Trumps Smart Power at April 15, 2014 08:40 AM (27KAF)
Posted by: Pug Form 4868 at April 15, 2014 08:41 AM (8c12T)
Posted by: Damiano at April 15, 2014 08:41 AM (j0wOO)
Posted by: zombie at April 15, 2014 08:42 AM (mizYg)
Posted by: phoenixgirl @phxazgrl Happy Personal Wealth Confiscation Day at April 15, 2014 08:43 AM (u8GsB)
The fairest system would be to compute the budget and the # of citizens divide the former by the latter and send everyone a bill.
Send it to the states. Let them handle collecting the money however they see fit. If California wants an income tax, then so be it. If North Dakota wants to pay its share through taxing oil companies, let them.
Posted by: Colorado Alex at April 15, 2014 08:43 AM (tIvOy)
Evan Thomas estimated it at a swing of 15%. Consider where we would be politically if you moved the average American election 30% to the right...
UCLA Prof. Tim Groseclose says it gives Dems a 8-10% edge.
The Freakonomics guys say this about his book:
As the title suggests, it has a definite conservative slant. It is not, however, a right-wing rant by any means. Rather, it is a carefully researched and amusingly written book by a highly regarded academic.
Posted by: CJ at April 15, 2014 08:43 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: Hrothgar at April 15, 2014 08:44 AM (o3MSL)
Posted by: phoenixgirl @phxazgrl Happy Personal Wealth Confiscation Day at April 15, 2014 08:44 AM (u8GsB)
>>Obamacare Wins U.S. Bond Converts as Slowing Costs Tame CPI <<
Fun with math!
http://tinyurl.com/jwx2epx
Posted by: Marcus T at April 15, 2014 08:44 AM (GGCsk)
Did WalMart take out the machines where you could do that for a quarter?
Posted by: HR at April 15, 2014 08:45 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: Damiano at April 15, 2014 08:45 AM (j0wOO)
Posted by: Hrothgar at April 15, 2014 08:45 AM (o3MSL)
Posted by: Boss Moss at April 15, 2014 08:46 AM (bitz6)
Posted by: phoenixgirl @phxazgrl Happy Personal Wealth Confiscation Day at April 15, 2014 08:47 AM (u8GsB)
This is bull. I KNOW I have seen more of that stupid Magic Johnson ad in the past month, and there is one circulating of smiling happy hipsters telling me to sign up. Also, all the health care groups in my state are telling ppl to come check out their new plans, which to me is a subtle endorsement.
Are we sure this person is not in Colorado? Because they are certainly smoking something.
Posted by: LizLem at April 15, 2014 08:47 AM (yRwC8)
Posted by: zombie at April 15, 2014 08:47 AM (mizYg)
Posted by: BCochran1981 - Credible Hulk at April 15, 2014 08:47 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: zombie at April 15, 2014 12:42 PM (mizYg)
If you want to claim credit for your cleverness, you should fill our the URL field in your posts to a static one, or just make one up. That way, your nic will be highlighted in your posts. A curious person can mouse-over your nic and will see the same, constant web address no matter how often you sock puppet.
Politcal Hat does this a lot. He's the grandmaster sock here.
Posted by: EC at April 15, 2014 08:47 AM (GQ8sn)
Romeo, Since the white female was the sole bad parent in the ad, I would say the purpose is pandering and racism in order to get votes and to destroy the notion of family. And a lot of white people are unknowingly paying for this!
Posted by: PJ at April 15, 2014 08:48 AM (ZWaLo)
Posted by: jwest at April 15, 2014 08:48 AM (u2a4R)
Posted by: rickb223 at April 15, 2014 08:48 AM (CRyse)
At that point in the conversation, he was probably expecting to get told to fuck off, because Boo is coming over and he don't like no kids.
...but it's my uterus selfishly destroying America. Harrumph.
Posted by: HR at April 15, 2014 08:49 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: Head Exploding at April 15, 2014 08:49 AM (Aif/5)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at April 15, 2014 08:49 AM (r+7wo)
Posted by: phoenixgirl @phxazgrl Happy Personal Wealth Confiscation Day at April 15, 2014 08:50 AM (u8GsB)
Posted by: jwest at April 15, 2014 12:48 PM (u2a4R)
If and when we are ever successful in implementing a consumption tax, there should be ironclad...fuck that....Adamantium clad laws that prevent any other kind of tax to be levied on top of it.
Posted by: EC at April 15, 2014 08:50 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: rickb223 at April 15, 2014 08:50 AM (CRyse)
Posted by: Hrothgar at April 15, 2014 08:50 AM (o3MSL)
Posted by: Furious George at April 15, 2014 08:51 AM (yFb77)
Its main drawback seems to be that no one will ever know how clever you were!
Posted by: zombie at April 15, 2014 12:42 PM (mizYg)
That's what the hash is for. If yours is pretty static then people will be able to figure out that its you. That's why Adam (Aif/5) is able to be credited with 300 different sockpuppets every week.
Posted by: buzzion at April 15, 2014 08:51 AM (LI48c)
Posted by: newby at April 15, 2014 08:51 AM (mizYg)
Posted by: Romeo13 at April 15, 2014 08:52 AM (84gbM)
Lincolntf, that was a good move. NOW just wait on your buddy and clear the area so you can actually see what you're up to.
Little patience won't hurt none.
Posted by: irongrampa at April 15, 2014 08:52 AM (SAMxH)
Posted by: rickb223 at April 15, 2014 08:52 AM (CRyse)
Posted by: newby at April 15, 2014 08:53 AM (mizYg)
Posted by: BCochran1981 - Credible Hulk at April 15, 2014 08:53 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: BCochran1981 - Credible Hulk at April 15, 2014 12:53 PM (da5Wo)
You're making a book???
Posted by: EC at April 15, 2014 08:54 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at April 15, 2014 08:55 AM (t3UFN)
Posted by: BCochran1981 - Credible Hulk at April 15, 2014 08:55 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: Hrothgar at April 15, 2014 08:55 AM (o3MSL)
Posted by: BCochran1981 - Credible Hulk at April 15, 2014 08:56 AM (da5Wo)
>shifty eyes>
Posted by: BCochran1981 - Credible Hulk at April 15, 2014 12:55 PM (da5Wo)
Some guy....down the street....told me to come here.....and ask for the "Irish bookmaker".
Posted by: EC at April 15, 2014 08:56 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: zombie at April 15, 2014 08:56 AM (mizYg)
But chin up Mark. Socialism will be popular someday, it just needs a bigger advertising budget.
Posted by: DrewM. at 11:35 AM
Or metric.
Posted by: Temper Tantrum at April 15, 2014 08:57 AM (AWmfW)
Posted by: HR's rampaging uterus at April 15, 2014 08:57 AM (Ua6T/)
Posted by: BCochran1981 - Credible Hulk at April 15, 2014 08:58 AM (da5Wo)
"always thought the census was some kind of estimate -- they poll maybe 5% or 10% of the people and guesstimate the rest. Is this not the case"
The 10-year census attempts to contact everyone via mail and other means. Most people just give names and ages etc. A small portion (maybe 5%) get a longer form with more detailed questions.
in addition, the census bureau does periodic detailed samples of people in what is called the American Community Survey.
Posted by: dudenolongerinsantacruz at April 15, 2014 08:58 AM (WdajP)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at April 15, 2014 08:58 AM (r+7wo)
Posted by: Pug Form 4868 at April 15, 2014 08:58 AM (8c12T)
Posted by: Damiano at April 15, 2014 08:59 AM (j0wOO)
Posted by: zombie at April 15, 2014 09:00 AM (mizYg)
Posted by: United Identity Thieves of America at April 15, 2014 09:00 AM (wAQA5)
I understand some women are single moms through no fault of their own, really, but I suspect that is not the case in the majority of instances.
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at April 15, 2014 12:58 PM (r+7wo)
Don't forget being told by the media to look up to someone like Wendy Davis, "Single" "Mom" who dumped her kids onto her ex husband.
Posted by: buzzion at April 15, 2014 09:01 AM (LI48c)
It was like it was 1943 and they were in a Japanese prison camp.
Posted by: Pug Form 4868 at April 15, 2014 12:58 PM (8c12T)
"Everyone wearing a red name tag will get a wedgie!"
Posted by: EC at April 15, 2014 09:01 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at April 15, 2014 09:02 AM (659DL)
Posted by: Larsen E. Whipsnade at April 15, 2014 09:02 AM (rXcBX)
Posted by: Boss Moss at April 15, 2014 09:04 AM (bitz6)
Posted by: Boss Moss at April 15, 2014 09:06 AM (bitz6)
Posted by: Damiano at April 15, 2014 09:06 AM (j0wOO)
Whenever the census creeps have come to my front door I just turned up the volume on the TV until the bastards left.
I just leave some fava beans and a bottle of chianti on the front doorstep.
Posted by: Colorado Alex at April 15, 2014 09:07 AM (tIvOy)
Posted by: Colorado Alex at April 15, 2014 01:07 PM (tIvOy)
It's missing.....something.
Posted by: Dr. Lecter at April 15, 2014 09:07 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: zombie at April 15, 2014 09:08 AM (mizYg)
Posted by: Boss Moss at April 15, 2014 09:09 AM (bitz6)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at April 15, 2014 09:09 AM (IXrOn)
Posted by: Boss Moss at April 15, 2014 01:09 PM (bitz6)
Candygram.
Posted by: Shark at April 15, 2014 09:10 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at April 15, 2014 09:10 AM (PYAXX)
Why would you claim Berkeley as your backyard?
Posted by: Burn the Witch at April 15, 2014 09:10 AM (HLprW)
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at April 15, 2014 09:11 AM (PYAXX)
Maybe that's the reason. I have a rule: Do not answer the front door, unless you are expecting someone.
--------
There's a "no soliciting" sign on my front door. I don't like unexpected visitors because my dogs bark up a storm and it's a pain in the ass to corral them before I answer the door.
Anyway, knock at the door. I corral the dogs and answer the door. Some PYT with a petition for clean water or some such bullshit starts her spiel. I point at the sign and she says "oh, it's OK, I'm not selling anything."
I tell her "First off, I'll be the judge of what's "OK." Second, if you're asking me to do something, you're soliciting. Didn't they teach basic vocabulary in whatever bumblefuck junior college that has the misfortune of claiming you as an alum?"
Oddly, I haven't had any petitioners come back. I guess now I have the rep as "that guy." Fine by me.
Posted by: @JohnTant at April 15, 2014 09:11 AM (eytER)
Posted by: the littl shyning man at April 15, 2014 09:12 AM (tmFlQ)
The answer should still be 'NO!'.
Posted by: EC at April 15, 2014 09:12 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: swChach at April 15, 2014 09:12 AM (tZbqI)
Posted by: zombie at April 15, 2014 09:12 AM (mizYg)
Posted by: Clutch Cargo at April 15, 2014 09:13 AM (pgQxn)
"That said, unless we're talking about rape, NO ONE is pregnant through no fault of their own."
being a single mother is not the same as getting preggers as a single. Death, incarceration, desertion, dehabilitation etc of the father can, in my mind, make a woman a single mother through no direct fault of her own
Posted by: dudenolongerinsantacruz at April 15, 2014 09:13 AM (WdajP)
Maybe that's the reason. I have a rule: Do not answer the front door, unless you are expecting someone
I keep a .45 next to my chair in case the unknown vagrant at my front door tries kicking it in.
Posted by: Larsen E. Whipsnade at April 15, 2014 09:13 AM (rXcBX)
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at April 15, 2014 01:11 PM (PYAXX)
I once had a local HS cheerleader come to my door selling some gift-wrapping or popcorn or whatever it was to fund a trip to a national cheer tournament competition.
Come on....
I had to buy!
Posted by: EC at April 15, 2014 09:14 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: I lurk, therefore I amn't at April 15, 2014 09:14 AM (rz0yi)
Posted by: zombie at April 15, 2014 09:14 AM (mizYg)
Even though he has rent, food, and expenses, provided by his job.... ANY of which others would have to pay taxes on....
He paid an effective tax rate of 20%...
I'm the working poor.... I paid a tax rate of 22%...
So much for the graduated income tax...
Posted by: Romeo13 at April 15, 2014 12:31 PM (84gbM)
If he were a Republican the MFM would be bleating that from the mountain tops about how unfair it is. But King Barry could pay nothing in taxes and there wouldn't be a peep from the MFM
Posted by: TheQuietMan at April 15, 2014 09:15 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: Ibin Pharteen at April 15, 2014 09:16 AM (zL/eJ)
Posted by: Boss Moss at April 15, 2014 09:16 AM (bitz6)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at April 15, 2014 09:16 AM (IXrOn)
Posted by: Boss Moss at April 15, 2014 01:16 PM (bitz6)
Where in the SE are you?
Posted by: EC at April 15, 2014 09:16 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: zombie at April 15, 2014 09:16 AM (mizYg)
Posted by: Kim Jung Un at April 15, 2014 01:15 PM (K2XO3)
He'd look good in that snazzy haircut
Posted by: TheQuietMan at April 15, 2014 09:17 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: rickb223 at April 15, 2014 09:17 AM (CRyse)
Posted by: zombie at April 15, 2014 01:16 PM (mizYg)
Exactly. How could you tell if the person on the phone was an actual census worker or an ID thief?
"Before we continue, I need to verify your information.....can you tell me your mother's maiden name and the last for digits of your social security number?"
Posted by: EC at April 15, 2014 09:18 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: jwest at April 15, 2014 09:18 AM (u2a4R)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at April 15, 2014 09:18 AM (IXrOn)
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at April 15, 2014 09:18 AM (PYAXX)
Posted by: Brother Cavil at April 15, 2014 09:19 AM (rt3TY)
or whatever it was
Go on......
Posted by: rickb223 at April 15, 2014 01:17 PM (CRyse)
Hey, I was supporting our local talent. How could I not say yes?
Posted by: EC at April 15, 2014 09:19 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Some Dumb Lib at April 15, 2014 09:19 AM (hHFOx)
f) Little girls selling Girl Scout Cookies made from 0% Real Girl Scouts.
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It.
Where I live, I have never encountered or seen Girl Scouts selling cookies. I think that's more of a Middle America thing.
Posted by: zombie at April 15, 2014 01:14 PM (mizYg)
I can't see San Francisco being too big on anything that isn't supported by the gay mafia or who's purpose isn't to implement communism.
Posted by: buzzion at April 15, 2014 09:19 AM (LI48c)
That's exactly what the authors of the Fair Tax Plan say too. The 16th amendment would need to be repealed.
----
Incorrect - the income tax can exist without the 16A.
Posted by: @JohnTant at April 15, 2014 09:19 AM (eytER)
Posted by: The Very Same Dumb Lib at April 15, 2014 09:20 AM (hHFOx)
Posted by: rickb223 at April 15, 2014 09:20 AM (CRyse)
Posted by: fluffy at April 15, 2014 09:20 AM (Ua6T/)
Posted by: Brother Cavil at April 15, 2014 09:20 AM (rt3TY)
Posted by: Boss Moss at April 15, 2014 01:16 PM (bitz6)
If they're set up outside of a store its because mommy and daddy already bought and paid for all those cookies they have displayed and ready to sell.
Posted by: buzzion at April 15, 2014 09:20 AM (LI48c)
Posted by: Prez'nit 404 at April 15, 2014 09:20 AM (Dwehj)
Posted by: rickb223 at April 15, 2014 09:21 AM (CRyse)
Posted by: zombie at April 15, 2014 01:16 PM (mizYg)
Then you never received the enhanced survey that has page after page of questions and a threat of felony prosecution if you don't comply.
I took a red sharpie and wrote "Fuck Off" on mine and left it on the front door.
Posted by: Larsen E. Whipsnade at April 15, 2014 09:21 AM (rXcBX)
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at April 15, 2014 09:21 AM (PYAXX)
Posted by: Some Dumb Progressive in 1920 at April 15, 2014 09:22 AM (mizYg)
Posted by: maddogg at April 15, 2014 09:22 AM (xWW96)
Q3:
How do we make sure that in future years “we are not as white as we are today?”
I suggest relocation
... or ....
Enroll James Holmes and Jared Loughner.
In no time at all, the campus will be red.
Offer a special program in "serial killer studies"
Posted by: Rev. Al Sharpton, former FBI asset known as “CI-7” at April 15, 2014 09:24 AM (e8kgV)
Posted by: Boss Moss at April 15, 2014 09:24 AM (bitz6)
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at April 15, 2014 09:24 AM (PYAXX)
Posted by: Mega at April 15, 2014 09:25 AM (hHFOx)
Posted by: Some Dumb Progressive in 1920 at April 15, 2014 09:25 AM (mizYg)
Posted by: Pug Form 4868 at April 15, 2014 09:26 AM (8c12T)
Posted by: Some Dumb Progressive in 1920 at April 15, 2014 01:22 PM (mizYg)
Segregation is the law of the land. DEAL WITH IT!
Posted by: Democrat Party, circa 1960 at April 15, 2014 09:26 AM (QFxY5)
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at April 15, 2014 09:27 AM (PYAXX)
I read on the Internet that Lawrence O'Donnell was in an auto accident with several underage male prostitutes in the car with him.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at April 15, 2014 09:28 AM (QFxY5)
Posted by: rickb223 at April 15, 2014 09:28 AM (CRyse)
Posted by: Prez'nit 404 at April 15, 2014 09:28 AM (Dwehj)
Posted by: Boss Moss at April 15, 2014 09:28 AM (bitz6)
Posted by: Mega at April 15, 2014 09:28 AM (hHFOx)
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at April 15, 2014 09:28 AM (PYAXX)
Well, AN income tax can exist without the 16A. "The" (as in: the current) income tax cannot.
The 16A gets rid of a very important limitation on any direct taxation- that of apportionment. W/o the 16A, the taxes collected would have to be returned to the States (based on population per the census).
----
That would only happen on the tax on incomes derived from property, such as rents and dividends. Income taxes on things like wages would be unaffected, since the SCOTUS ruled that those taxes are not direct taxes and thus have no apportionment requirement. Pollock v Farmers' Loan and Trust co.
Posted by: @JohnTant at April 15, 2014 09:29 AM (eytER)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at April 15, 2014 09:29 AM (IXrOn)
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at April 15, 2014 09:31 AM (PYAXX)
Posted by: Boss Moss at April 15, 2014 09:32 AM (bitz6)
Posted by: phoenixgirl @phxazgrl Happy Personal Wealth Confiscation Day at April 15, 2014 09:32 AM (u8GsB)
Posted by: Some Dumb Progressive in 1920 at April 15, 2014 09:33 AM (mizYg)
Posted by: D-Lamp at April 15, 2014 09:34 AM (bb5+k)
Posted by: dudenolongerinsantacruz at April 15, 2014 09:35 AM (PGXA8)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at April 15, 2014 09:36 AM (IXrOn)
King Put (King Put)
Now when he was a young man,
He never thought he'd see
People stand in line to see the boy king.
(King Put) How'd you get so funky?
(Funky Put) Did you do the monkey?
Born in I dontknowa
Moved to Chigaga (king Put).
Posted by: The Jackhole at April 15, 2014 09:36 AM (nTgAI)
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at April 15, 2014 09:36 AM (PYAXX)
Posted by: Boss Moss at April 15, 2014 09:36 AM (bitz6)
Posted by: zombie at April 15, 2014 09:36 AM (mizYg)
Posted by: Fritz at April 15, 2014 09:37 AM (oJUxt)
As so blind not to see....
Posted by: Ibin Pharteen at April 15, 2014 01:16 PM (zL/eJ)
----------------------------------------------
He doesn't watch tv or have cable because he's hip and can't be bothered with such a mundane act.
Posted by: Soona at April 15, 2014 09:38 AM (/nOVW)
Be thankful I don't take it all.
Posted by: zombie at April 15, 2014 01:36 PM (mizYg
And if you die before you wake.
Pray your wallet I do not take
Posted by: The Jackhole at April 15, 2014 09:39 AM (nTgAI)
Posted by: Lizzy at April 15, 2014 09:39 AM (IdOTf)
Posted by: Boss Moss at April 15, 2014 09:41 AM (bitz6)
Posted by: Boss Moss at April 15, 2014 01:41 PM (bitz6)
But she has fabulously toned arms! ::swoon::
Posted by: The MFM at April 15, 2014 09:42 AM (DrWcr)
By what logic is a tax on my income *NOT* a "direct or capitation" tax?
------
Because "direct tax" in the Constitutional sense is not a tax directly levied on a person.
For background, check out Madison's Notes of Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787. Also useful is to understand that under the Articles of Confederation, the States were required to supply the centeral government with its money, and yet each state only had one vote in the Confederation...This meant that larger states had to contribute more but were outvoted by smaller states as to how to spend it.
Further, the Federalist Papers are replete with references to "direct tax" being a tax on wealth, eg Federalist #12 and #21. Briefly, "direct tax" is and always was meant to reference a tax on wealth (eg land) and capitation/poll taxes.
The income tax is not either of those. It is a tax on the transaction, eg you do something and you get money for it. It is not a tax on the money itself, ergo it is not a direct tax. Even the Pollock decision got it wrong by saying a tax on the income derived from property is the same as a tax on the property itself, being that the Court studiously ignored precedent to get to that conclusion.
And for backup, I would like to reference Hylton v. United States, a case heard by the SCOTUS in 1796 where someone was contesting a federal tax levied against someone. The contention was that it was a "direct" tax. Justice Chase wrote:
"I am inclined to think, but of this I do not give a judicial opinion, that the direct taxes contemplated by the Constitution, are only two, to wit, a capitation, or poll tax, simply, without regard to property, profession, or any other circumstance; and a tax on LAND. I doubt whether a tax, by a general assessment of personal property, within the United States, is included within the term direct tax.”
Further, Justice Paterson wrote:
"Whether direct taxes, in the sense of the Constitution, comprehend any other tax than a capitation tax, and tax on land, is a questionable point. ... I never entertained a doubt, that the principal, I will not say, the only, objects, that the framers of the Constitution contemplated as falling within the rule of apportionment, were a capitation tax and a tax on land."
And since Paterson was a delegate to the Constitutional Convention I'm inclined to take his word as to what "direct tax" means over someone like Neal Boortz.
Simply put, since the 16A was put in place to remedy a stupid decision by the Fuller SCOTUS, removing it would put the state of affairs back to Pollock - namely that the Feds can tax wage income without apportionment, but must come up with some goofball mechanism to apportion taxes on rents, interest, and dividends.
Posted by: @JohnTant at April 15, 2014 09:43 AM (eytER)
Posted by: petunia at April 15, 2014 09:43 AM (DAcBA)
Posted by: Brother Cavil at April 15, 2014 09:49 AM (rt3TY)
The Federal government tried to implement an income tax several times between the 1870s and 1910s. Each time it was challenged in court and thrown out as unconstitutional. The 16th Amendment was passed specifically because it was the only way to make a national income tax legal.
---------
Also incorrect.
For instance, the income tax existed pre-Pollock. The Pollock decision did not rule the income tax illegal, only the parts of it that taxed income derived from property. It did not hold that the remainder of the income tax was unconstitutional, only that it could not be severed from the overall tax law without the burden being shifted unduly and unfairly to "professions, trades, employments, or vocations" and therefore the law had to be changed.
Oh, and prior to that the Springer v United States decision upheld the income tax. That was in 1880, btw.
Posted by: @JohnTant at April 15, 2014 09:50 AM (eytER)
Posted by: alwyr at April 15, 2014 09:54 AM (V0j3u)
Posted by: Old Toby at April 15, 2014 11:29 AM (dop0N)
Posted by: Peggy at April 15, 2014 11:54 AM (+wyoo)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.5024 seconds, 494 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: maddogg at April 15, 2014 07:37 AM (xWW96)