January 16, 2012
— Ace Yay, it's Martin Luther King Jr. day.
If anyone feels like writin', get to writin'.
I'll be posting stuff and I think we're doing the last (?) liveblog of a debate tonight, but I'm treating this as a half-day.
I'm writing my review of the Kindle now.
Posted by: Ace at
09:32 AM
| Comments (75)
Post contains 57 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: M. Murcek at January 16, 2012 09:34 AM (ToZXn)
Huntsman drops out... now the GOP is screwed with independant, high-minded squishes
Posted by: Yip in Texas at January 16, 2012 09:38 AM (Mrdk1)
It was utterly absurd, and necessarily filled with lies. It was posted on a bulletin board meant for recycling notices.
So, what is the best response? Write up a point-by-point refutation and post it alongside, or just rip down the article and drop it in the trash without comment?
I already did one of these - just want to see what the Moron Nation thinks.
Posted by: grognard at January 16, 2012 09:38 AM (NS2Mo)
Posted by: Alex at January 16, 2012 09:38 AM (+1TUS)
Wipe ass, pin back up on board.
Posted by: Alex at January 16, 2012 09:39 AM (+1TUS)
Posted by: M. Murcek at January 16, 2012 09:39 AM (ToZXn)
@font-face { font-family: "Times"; }@font-face { font-family: "Cambria"; }p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal { margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: "Times New Roman"; }div.Section1 { page: Section1; }
Terrorism—The conferees are concerned that the lack of a current policy on terrorist detention may be a disincentive to the capture and interrogation of terrorist suspects, thereby depriving the Department of Justice (DOJ) and other agencies of critical intelligence that could inform and improve counterterrorism efforts. The conferees note that the Attorney General co-chaired the Special Interagency Task Force on Detainee Disposition that was tasked with reviewing policies for the detention of individuals captured or apprehended in connection with armed conflicts and counterterrorism operations. The conferees direct the Department, in consultation with other appropriate Federal agencies, to provide to the Committees on Appropriations, not later than 120 days after the enactment of this Act, an unclassified report on U.S. detention policy, including the legal basis for such policy, as it applies to current and future terrorism detainees. If appropriate, such report may be accompanied by a classified annex.
Posted by: the dandy at January 16, 2012 09:40 AM (lVK3L)
The irony is that his review takes up so much memory that it cannot fit on a Kindle.
Posted by: Alex at January 16, 2012 09:40 AM (+1TUS)
Posted by: Newsweak Magazine at January 16, 2012 09:40 AM (Mrdk1)
Posted by: Yip in Texas at January 16, 2012 09:41 AM (Mrdk1)
Can't reason someone out of a position they weren't reasoned into to begin with.
Toss it.
Maybe a offer a slogan-like response, like "Have you ever been hired by a poor man?"
Posted by: fluffy at January 16, 2012 09:42 AM (Lpgtj)
Posted by: snort! at January 16, 2012 09:42 AM (K/USr)
We're gonna need a bigger internet.
Honestly? It's a TOASTER. It makes TOAST. The TOAST comes out TOASTY. So does Nook Toast and other e-reader toast. Oh, the other ones don't also sell boots, jewelry and dishwashing liquid. Their bad...
Posted by: M. Murcek at January 16, 2012 09:42 AM (ToZXn)
On the other hand, those fuckers would not hesitate to rip down or deface anything I posted, and this is pretty much political war, at this point.
My concern wasn't the idiot who posted it - it was influencing people who might happen to read it and think that the bullshit it contained was factual just because it was written by a professor. So, I thought perhaps a rebuttal would at least provide both sides of the argument to anyone reading it.
Then, I considered the fact that I could prevent a lot of harm by just removing the ability for others to read it, while really confusing the shit out of the commie. Posting a rebuttal tells the commie he has an enemy. Just ripping it down makes the commie wonder if it's opposition, or if management tore it down because it was posted in the wrong spot.
Posted by: grognard at January 16, 2012 09:44 AM (NS2Mo)
So, what is the best response? Write up a point-by-point refutation and post it alongside, or just rip down the article and drop it in the trash without comment?
Just tape a little hammer and sycle to it; or that image of Maobama as the Joker. Graphic response is best.
Posted by: snort! at January 16, 2012 09:45 AM (K/USr)
Posted by: Beff J. at January 16, 2012 09:46 AM (sb3kT)
Posted by: M. Murcek at January 16, 2012 09:46 AM (ToZXn)
Posted by: snort! at January 16, 2012 01:45 PM (K/USr)
Nice idea. Next time perhaps I will. I'm going to watch for the idiot's future postings. There are a LOT of eastern European immigrants in this complex who won't appreciate rampant communism.
Posted by: grognard at January 16, 2012 09:46 AM (NS2Mo)
Perhaps you missed what Jeff B, posted earlier today but you really need to knock it off.
Posted by: Tami at January 16, 2012 09:49 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at January 16, 2012 01:47 PM (ZKzrr)
I think Alinsky was evil, but correct. Ridicule is man's most potent weapon. A post-it saying "In other words, 1+1=3." might be effective for articles like the one that was posted.
Posted by: grognard at January 16, 2012 09:51 AM (NS2Mo)
Or, better yet, a post it asking "Did Professor Frizzybean here sign all his income over to the gummint? You who are reading this and nodding along, did you sign over all your income? No? Nuff said..."
Posted by: M. Murcek at January 16, 2012 09:54 AM (ToZXn)
From what I've experienced, leftards cannot handle ridicule or mocking. They see themselves are informed, clever and only able to make snide remarks about conservatives, et al, but are unable to laugh at themselves or their sacred idiologies....
taping a soviet symbol or Obama-joker pic would do wonders... because it will also boost others to do the same... ridicule leftards daily.
Posted by: Yip in Texas at January 16, 2012 09:54 AM (Mrdk1)
Posted by: Yip in Texas at January 16, 2012 09:55 AM (Mrdk1)
Posted by: M. Murcek at January 16, 2012 09:57 AM (ToZXn)
http://preview.tinyurl.com/3kp326z
It is the Toronto Star which is not surprising. It's incredibly awful, though.
Posted by: grognard at January 16, 2012 09:59 AM (NS2Mo)
Posted by: M. Murcek at January 16, 2012 09:59 AM (ToZXn)
Kindle questions. Got one for Christmas from my dear sister, but haven't registered it yet so I can begin using it. She'd like me to get started using it.
My mental roadblock is this: I really don't like having to provide Amazon my real name, email, and credit card info. Don't want all my book purchases/browsing tracked, don't want to be marketed to, don't want my wish lists public. I've steered away from all social media sites.
I have used Amazon's website to order books and DVDs, but dislike the email solicitations that follow based on my purchases and books/DVDs viewed. Don't want any more of that. Don't like the feeling that someone is looking over my shoulder.
Am I being unreasonable? Can you use a sockname to register the Kindle and use a one-off email account w/out having to register a credit card? Is there any way to stay anonymous with a Kindle account?
Posted by: Count de Monet at January 16, 2012 10:02 AM (4q5tP)
Posted by: Ronster at January 16, 2012 10:04 AM (JGYCE)
No, but it is a cash register that they sell you and expect you to use to send money to them. How else can it work?
Posted by: M. Murcek at January 16, 2012 10:04 AM (ToZXn)
-- Martin Luther King Jr.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at January 16, 2012 10:07 AM (nEUpB)
I have used Amazon's website to order books and DVDs, but dislike the email solicitations that follow based on my purchases and books/DVDs viewed. Don't want any more of that. Don't like the feeling that someone is looking over my shoulder.
Am I being unreasonable? Can you use a sockname to register the Kindle and use a one-off email account w/out having to register a credit card? Is there any way to stay anonymous with a Kindle account?
Posted by: Count de Monet at January 16, 2012 02:02 PM (4q5tP)
If you've already used Amazon to order books, etc., how are you anonymous to them?
I've never received e-mail solicitations from ordering on Amazon.
I suppose you could have others order you a Amazon gift card, you give them the cash and use the gift card to order what you want.
I've never had a problem with Amazon...I think it's one of the best sites on the internet.
Posted by: Tami at January 16, 2012 10:08 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: The Chap in the Deerstalker Cap at January 16, 2012 10:09 AM (qndXR)
I get no solicitations or e-mails of any kind from Amazon, and I use them a lot!
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at January 16, 2012 10:09 AM (nEUpB)
Check one of the earlier posts for some news. Lay off just a bit for a few days.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at January 16, 2012 10:11 AM (nEUpB)
And use an anonymous P.O. Box or a fake name?
Privacy is important, but so what if they know what you read?
Be proud of the lesbian pron and romance novels!
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at January 16, 2012 10:13 AM (nEUpB)
Use the same font and layout and if you can dumb yourself down enough to sound like the original author, rewrite it as a Conservative Manifesto and put it up in place of the original. See how long it takes for it to get replaced.
Posted by: Will Not Assimilate For Food at January 16, 2012 10:13 AM (kXoT0)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at January 16, 2012 01:41 PM (ZKzrr)
Excellent! I shall reflect on his accomplishments and how his innovative ideas and inventions have improved and transformed the game of hockey while I'm watching the Blue Jackets lose to Edmonton tomorrow night.
While I'm eating my 8 dollar Skyline chili-cheese fries and sipping on an 8 dollar 24 ounce can of Bud Light.
Posted by: ErikW at January 16, 2012 10:14 AM (dA8Ib)
The Kindle went back and the friend got a Nook.
Posted by: Pecos, hates Obama, don't like Mitt much either at January 16, 2012 10:17 AM (2Gb0y)
After Mitt Romney is the nominee, I plan to have my DOJ investigate him for election tampering in Virginia. The investigation will go on during crunch time in the fall. My OWS operatives will chant about how Mitt is trying to buy the election. It will be beautiful.
Tampering with elections is my territory. I can't have those dumbshit Republicans getting away with it.
Posted by: Barky McClusterfuck at January 16, 2012 10:22 AM (xgj/f)
Jesus, what year is it? Can't wait for your reviews of the Apple Newton, Sega Dreamcast and the Gutenberg Bible, you lazy bitch.
Posted by: Gerry at January 16, 2012 10:24 AM (gVqQ3)
Posted by: Will Not Assimilate For Food at January 16, 2012 02:13 PM (kXoT0)
Interesting as a thought experiment, but I definitely don't want to waste that much time on this idiot. I think quietly disposing of this article and any others that get posted will make the person wonder who is getting rid of them. If they have a little angst over it, that's good with me!
Posted by: grognard at January 16, 2012 10:24 AM (NS2Mo)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 16, 2012 10:25 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 16, 2012 10:26 AM (niZvt)
4 In the laundry room in our condo building, some pinko idiot posted a photocopy of an article...
So, what is the best response?
A) Write up a point-by-point refutation and post it alongside
B) just rip down the article and drop it in the trash without comment?
I already did one of these - just want to see what the Moron Nation thinks.
Posted by: grognard at January 16, 2012 01:38 PM (NS2Mo)
C) shit in their laundry
(I too already did one of these...)
Posted by: Warthog at January 16, 2012 10:26 AM (ZL8Ru)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 16, 2012 02:25 PM (niZvt)
I do, Kewlcheck....what of it?
Posted by: Tami at January 16, 2012 10:26 AM (X6akg)
#31: Just a Kindle, or a Kindle Fire?
The latter is an Android device, and you can install the IndieBound Reader which may be more suitable to your tastes, and is available in the Amazon App Market.
This app allows you to purchase ebooks from someone other than Amazon (or Google).
I bought my Mom an Fire for Christmas, and she seems to like it. I found the Amazon lock-in stiffling, and I was sorely tempted to root it and make it less stiffled. But I figure I can wait a year till the warranty is over, and Cyanogenmod has a supported ROM that I could flash on the device and eliminate Amazon's hold over it.
Someone even figured out how to put the Nook reader software on the Fire...
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie © at January 16, 2012 10:28 AM (1hM1d)
Go for it Count.
Posted by: ontherocks at January 16, 2012 10:29 AM (ZJCDy)
Posted by: zeera at January 16, 2012 10:29 AM (8FXJ4)
Posted by: Haley Barbour at January 16, 2012 10:34 AM (e8kgV)
Also: if you're getting otherwise unsolicited email from Amazon, you should look at your opt-out settings. You may have accidentally checked (or not unchecked) a check box saying "yes, please send me crap in my inbox".
You should be able to check and reset the offending setting in your account settings.
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie © at January 16, 2012 10:35 AM (1hM1d)
Posted by: Occupy Laundry Bulletin Boards at January 16, 2012 10:38 AM (xgj/f)
Kerry Kennedy, 52, ex-wife of Gov. Mario Cuomo, daughter of the late Robert F. Kennedy, was secretly hired as a “public-relations consultant” by the lawyer representing the Ecuadoreans in an $18 billion lawsuit against Chevron, according to court documents.
Cashing in on her respected family name and legacy, Kennedy raked in tens of thousands of dollars and was given a 0.25 percent stake — worth as much as $40 million — if the $18 billion judgment handed down by an Ecuadorean judge is ultimately upheld. (Chevron has not yet paid pending its countersuit in Manhattan federal court.)
Kennedy was paid a flat $50,000 by lead attorney Steven Donziger on Feb. 22, 2010, bank statements made public in the case show.
Posted by: Ted "I cheated for you wetbacks at Harvard" Kennedy at January 16, 2012 10:39 AM (e8kgV)
I think this past nine months have been a preparation by anti-conservatives for Romney being the Republican candidate. Too much seems to have been set in stone- OWS, pushing a class war, softball questions from media, highlighting other candidates mistakes while minimizing their strengths, luaPnites being promoted as the face of the GOP if Romney not chosen, the numbers games by the media on BLS unemployment numbers, ignoring the real costs of daily living [energy and food]. The GOP has been working behind the scenes to promote Romney as the guy to spend your money on [see Mosbacher comments]. I don't believe the other R candidates are staying in to be spoilers- I think they really see a danger in Romney or Obama as President.
Posted by: museisluse at January 16, 2012 10:39 AM (+P7KR)
Karen Kois, of the tragedy, recounting how she had bravely remembered to bring her phone charger and purse to shore. Thank god for miracles.
Posted by: Jimmah at January 16, 2012 10:51 AM (TMeYE)
Okay, thanks for all the Kindle info. It's a KindleTouch. I'll check my Amazon website settings to turn off email.
Tami, though I used Amazon for books/DVDs through their website and am not anonymous to them that way, but am oaky with that. However, I am leery of getting sucked in deeper to a proprietary borg collective by registering the KindleTouch in addition.
I talked with the Nook guy at B&N while daughter was getting required outside reading books for classes. He said even with a gift card for making purchases, that Amazon still had to have a valid credit card on file for the Kindle account. That the credit card and the email account were the two forms of ID needed to purchase eletronic media content nowdays.
Is that accurate?
With all the encouragement and no wave-offs, I'm less weirded out. If anyone needs me, I'll be in my hermit cabin, typing out my manifesto on an old Royal manual typewriter.
Posted by: Count de Monet at January 16, 2012 10:59 AM (4q5tP)
Posted by: EBL at January 16, 2012 11:12 AM (IgakF)
Posted by: EBL at January 16, 2012 11:14 AM (IgakF)
Can't give you an answer about the gift card and still needing an email and credit card on file. I've never not had an e-mail and cc on file with them.
Posted by: Tami at January 16, 2012 11:18 AM (X6akg)
Your on the wrong blog to be reasonable!!!
Can you use a sockname to register the Kindle and use a
Dunno, ask at mobileread if your still wondering later.
"Count, I don't know how you would get content to your Kindle without registering it. "
I dunno if it will work at all pre-registration but you can move stuff on/off the removable SD cards on the ones that have it. And you can move stuff to/from a computer via calibre (free e-library manager - must have).
Posted by: DaveA at January 16, 2012 11:38 AM (t/mAc)
OK, here is my rant of the day:
I am sick of this liberal meme that Obama couldn't do anything in his first term because of GOP obstruction, and they always always always recite that Mitch McConnell said one time that his goal was to make Obama a one-term President. Andrew Sullivan makes this the centerpiece of his defense in his Newsweak screed. It appears over and over again in the commenst section of every Web article I read.
Why do they think this is a good line of attack? Doesn't it make Obama look like a weak-assed non-leader? Who thinks Mitch McConnell is that great, or strong, or anything, that his words are that powerful - especially in stopping The Lightbringer, The One, etc. If Obama was all that and a bag of chips, as he was sold to us in 2008, how did one bitchy comment by Mitch McConnell completely derail him?
I guess I can sorta see that they are trying to make this an election about the Republicans in Congress rather than Obama's abysmal record, but when they offer no substance but just quote McConnell in January 2009, I think they make Obama look weak. Real leaders overcome and subdue their opposition, or they disarm it, or they charm it into submission. Obama just sulked and stamped his feet and now his minions seem to me to be just whining.
Posted by: rockmom at January 16, 2012 11:52 AM (qE3AR)
Posted by: Mudshark at January 16, 2012 12:00 PM (CRDXw)
Posted by: Avagreen at January 16, 2012 12:13 PM (RK0xq)
Posted by: Dick Nixon at January 16, 2012 12:27 PM (+QxA6)
"I have a dream" was changed to "I have an invoice" not long after his death. Headed up by his number 2, Jessie. And carefull linking to that copyrighted speech.
Posted by: Jimmah at January 16, 2012 12:52 PM (TMeYE)
Obama has to be careful not to show what this would be like, else a “do-nothing Congress” could be replaced with a “Pigheaded President” as the problem to be solved by this election. His own meme could be turned on it’s head.
Many independents, who might vote for Obama otherwise, will not stand for 4 years of name-calling and finger-pointing.
Posted by: Ghost of Red Kirkman at January 16, 2012 02:32 PM (e8kgV)
Posted by: Model1066 at January 16, 2012 03:18 PM (rmXAm)
Posted by: nick at January 17, 2012 12:32 AM (S2Q0B)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2396 seconds, 203 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Jimmuy at January 16, 2012 09:33 AM (pbKln)