March 23, 2012
— Ace Via Hot Air, Charles Krauthammer writes of the coming Reckoning.
Ultimately, the question will hinge on whether the Commerce Clause has any limits. If the federal government can compel a private citizen, under threat of a federally imposed penalty, to engage in a private contract with a private entity (to buy health insurance), is there anything the federal government cannot compel the citizen to do?If Obamacare is upheld, it fundamentally changes the nature of the American social contract. It means the effective end of a government of enumerated powers — i.e., finite, delineated powers beyond which the government may not go, beyond which lies the free realm of the people and their voluntary institutions. The new post-Obamacare dispensation is a central government of unlimited power from which citizen and civil society struggle to carve out and maintain spheres of autonomy.
...
Rarely has one law so exemplified the worst of the Leviathan state — grotesque cost, questionable constitutionality and arbitrary bureaucratic coerciveness. Little wonder the president barely mentioned it in his latest State of the Union address. He wants to be reelected. He’d rather talk about other things.
Posted by: Ace at
07:40 AM
| Comments (276)
Post contains 207 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: pep at March 23, 2012 07:42 AM (YXmuI)
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at March 23, 2012 07:43 AM (mFxQX)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at March 23, 2012 07:43 AM (Af3Wg)
Posted by: Sandra Fluke at March 23, 2012 07:43 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Justamom at March 23, 2012 07:44 AM (Sptt8)
Posted by: Cicero at March 23, 2012 07:44 AM (yQwq5)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at March 23, 2012 07:45 AM (Af3Wg)
Posted by: DrewM. at March 23, 2012 07:45 AM (YqXne)
Under FDR the country got Aids virus, During the 60-lbj, it activated and started destroying most of our natural immune systems from patriotism-media-courts-education. Obama is simply a particularly nasty pneumonia that's probably gonna push us over the hill.
Posted by: Tretrong at March 23, 2012 07:45 AM (RfvTE)
The federal government can do anything?
Can they compel my girlfriend to give me a hummer once in a while?
They're free, by the way.
Posted by: Phinn at March 23, 2012 07:46 AM (KNtHw)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at March 23, 2012 07:46 AM (Af3Wg)
Just waiting on SCOTUS to give it permission.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at March 23, 2012 07:46 AM (SuBE0)
Posted by: Barack Hussein Obama at March 23, 2012 07:47 AM (ggRof)
Posted by: mpfs at March 23, 2012 07:47 AM (iYbLN)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at March 23, 2012 07:48 AM (Af3Wg)
Ollie North was grilled in congressional hearings then tried in a federal court. His SCOTUS case was an appeal to throw out his conviction based on the immunity given for his congressional testimony.
The only SCOTUS case I know of which got televised is Bush v Gore in 2000.
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at March 23, 2012 07:48 AM (e0xKF)
And oh, BTW, Axelrod is trying to start a race war:
; text-decoration: underline;">'IF I HAD A SON, HE'D LOOK LIKE TRAYVON'
Posted by: Barney Frank at March 23, 2012 07:48 AM (F5Rm1)
Posted by: X at March 23, 2012 07:49 AM (8Yc/9)
Uh, I need some good distractions. .....Is there a news story that envolves Race that I can exploit?
Posted by: Lord Barky, The One© who shall be obeyed... at March 23, 2012 07:49 AM (4GgJq)
Posted by: DrewM. at March 23, 2012 07:49 AM (YqXne)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at March 23, 2012 07:49 AM (Af3Wg)
I doubt it is going to happen. I think Kennedy is still pissed at Obama over the Citizens United bullshit and I doubt he wants to give him any cover on this crap.
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at March 23, 2012 07:50 AM (e0xKF)
Posted by: mpfs at March 23, 2012 07:50 AM (iYbLN)
Posted by: SantaRosaStan, w/ an aspirin between his knees at March 23, 2012 07:50 AM (Dll6b)
And oh, BTW, Axelrod is trying to start a race war:
'IF I HAD A SON, HE'D LOOK LIKE TRAYVON'
I don't think this is going to help them as much as they think it will.
The idiot who killed Trayvon is Hispanic. If they start a black-Hispanic race war, it won't help Obama much in states like Florida.
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at March 23, 2012 07:51 AM (e0xKF)
This can either bode well, or ill.
Gevalt.
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at March 23, 2012 11:45 AM (Af3Wg)
That vote was cover for what's to come. The Communists on the court can then point to the 9-0 vote to show they're fair.
Posted by: Truman North at March 23, 2012 07:51 AM (I2LwF)
Posted by: Quilly Mammoth at March 23, 2012 07:51 AM (rVkN0)
Posted by: Mr Pink at March 23, 2012 07:52 AM (ZvMnN)
Posted by: Truman North at March 23, 2012 07:52 AM (I2LwF)
Posted by: Lord Barky, The One© who shall be obeyed... at March 23, 2012 07:52 AM (4GgJq)
Agree. The cynical exploitation of a tragic situation is just to obvious.
Posted by: pep at March 23, 2012 07:52 AM (YXmuI)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at March 23, 2012 07:52 AM (Af3Wg)
They're free, by the way.
Posted by: Phinn at March 23, 2012 11:46 AM (KNtHw)
Nothing is ever free. ThatÂ’s why the hummers are few and far between. All women are the same, the only thing that varies is the amount and method of payment.
Posted by: jwest at March 23, 2012 07:53 AM (FdndL)
Posted by: Red Shirt at March 23, 2012 07:53 AM (FIDMq)
Obvious Hispanic / Mestizo, Non-White. ----- Brown on Black violence...
Posted by: SantaRosaStan, w/ an aspirin between his knees at March 23, 2012 07:53 AM (Dll6b)
It boils down pretty easily. Citizen, or serf? Which is it that the government views us as? Not just one segment of government, but the whole of it. From the legislature that passed it, to the president who signed it, to the agencies that will enforce it, and to the court that upholds it.
If this Intolerable Act is upheld, know that all of government see you and I as serfs.
What will you do when that realization hits home?
Posted by: OneEyedJack at March 23, 2012 07:54 AM (ORvjs)
Posted by: dfbaskwill at March 23, 2012 07:54 AM (ndlFj)
Posted by: Justamom at March 23, 2012 07:54 AM (Sptt8)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at March 23, 2012 07:54 AM (Af3Wg)
I don't think this is going to help them as much as they think it will.
Everything they've tried has blown up in their face. They're turning this into a White House op, just like Fluke.
And if it's a Bad Thing for Rush Limbaugh to say slut, then why is it no problem for another national media personality, Al Sharpton, to go to Florida and gin up violence?
Posted by: Truman North at March 23, 2012 07:54 AM (I2LwF)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 23, 2012 07:55 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at March 23, 2012 11:51 AM (e0xKF)
************
He's half-white, therefore he's a white supremacist racist.
Oh, wait....
Posted by: Barack Hussein Obama at March 23, 2012 07:55 AM (ggRof)
Posted by: SantaRosaStan, w/ an aspirin between his knees at March 23, 2012 07:56 AM (Dll6b)
Posted by: Mr Pink at March 23, 2012 07:56 AM (ZvMnN)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at March 23, 2012 07:56 AM (Af3Wg)
I generally tend to agree, but even so Kennedy is cautious. I think Obamacare will be gutted (ultimately fatally) but not actually killed.
This might be best because with the mandate out, it becomes completely unworkable, the phony deficit projections get thrown out the window and there will be a broad consensus that it must be completely disintegrated.
Maybe that's wishcasting.
Posted by: Sandra Fluke at March 23, 2012 07:57 AM (T0NGe)
Line forms the left buddy.
Posted by: EC at March 23, 2012 07:57 AM (GQ8sn)
--
But the Hispanic media (at least some) has been mentioning it...
Posted by: RioBravo at March 23, 2012 07:57 AM (eEfYn)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 23, 2012 07:57 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: mpfs at March 23, 2012 07:58 AM (iYbLN)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 23, 2012 07:58 AM (jUytm)
The point is that Axelrod [and Soros and Blankfein and all the rest of the puppeteers who actually pull the strings] won't hesitate to unleash a race war on the USA.
You simply cannot misoverestimate the evil of these people.
There's not a dime's worth of difference between them and the folks who murdered the Romanovs & unleashed the Holodomor on the poor Ukrainians.
Posted by: Barney Frank at March 23, 2012 07:58 AM (F5Rm1)
-------------
Wrong. It just finishes the job.
That's all. No fundamental change - that came during the time of Franklin "Delete It" Roosevelt.
Posted by: Workin' for the Man Every Night & Day at March 23, 2012 07:58 AM (eMtQ2)
Posted by: Tretrong at March 23, 2012 07:58 AM (RfvTE)
Repeated from the previous thread for reference:
233 The ground is being prepared for the meme that the Court will
uphold the individual mandate. The meme now: Conservative legal scholars
privately admit that the Court will narrowly uphold it. Don't know if
this has any basis in reality or is simply a disinformation operation; I
link, you decide: http://preview.tinyurl.com/6tj7jdd
Posted by: joncelli, heartless Con and all around unpleasant guy at March 23, 2012 07:59 AM (RD7QR)
45.....And if it's a Bad Thing for Rush Limbaugh to say slut, then why is it no problem for another national media personality, Al Sharpton, to go to Floridaand gin up violence?
Because....Rush doesn't have a Race Card, silly. ....And Sharpton does.
When the Race Card is played, everyone must drop to their knees and bow their heads.
Posted by: wheatie at March 23, 2012 07:59 AM (4GgJq)
Oral Argument against ObamaCare:
It's stupid, destructive, obviously un-Constitutional and un-American. Everybody knows this.
Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at March 23, 2012 07:59 AM (iOOXO)
Look at the photo ABC showed. It was the lede story Wednesday on the national news.. Zimmerman ain't no way no White dude
Posted by: Bonaparte ( the short guy ) at March 23, 2012 07:59 AM (Dll6b)
It's not. The latest decision is in the hand of 9 black robed lawyers.
The ultimate decision is still up to us.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 23, 2012 08:00 AM (8y9MW)
Ultimately, the question will hinge on whether the Commerce Clause has any limits.
Actually, this has nothing to do with whether the Commerce Clause has liimits but how insane people are willing to be to call something "interstate commerce" in an obviously stupid and disingenuous fashion. It has nothing to do with the actual commerce clause, though.
Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at March 23, 2012 08:00 AM (iOOXO)
Posted by: dogfish at March 23, 2012 08:01 AM (N2yhW)
Posted by: toby928© feels pessimistic at March 23, 2012 08:01 AM (GTbGH)
Posted by: Mr Pink at March 23, 2012 08:01 AM (ZvMnN)
I doubt it is going to happen. I think Kennedy is still pissed at Obama over the Citizens United bullshit and I doubt he wants to give him any cover on this crap.
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at March 23, 2012 11:50 AM (e0xKF)
I was just getting ready to post this. They are in full "sway the justices" mode.http://tinyurl.com/7j6bmbu
Posted by: Hedgehog at March 23, 2012 08:01 AM (3jGS1)
November 2011
Posted by: soothsayer at March 23, 2012 11:58 AM (jUytm)
So very stolen.
Posted by: joncelli, heartless Con and all around unpleasant guy at March 23, 2012 08:01 AM (RD7QR)
The MFM is in full court press mode trying to somehow sway the justices, particularly Kennedy.
I doubt it is going to happen. I think Kennedy is still pissed at Obama over the Citizens United bullshit and I doubt he wants to give him any cover on this crap.
My guess is they try to split the baby by (a) ruling the mandate unconstitutional and (b) ruling the law is severable so that everything else can stand. Which means that as soon as Democrats get back in control they will enact an actual tax to replace the mandate and we are back to square one.
Or the court could completely chicken out and decide that they won't make a decision until an individual who refuses the mandate files suit in a couple of years.
I am sure the cowardly Republicans are hoping that the Supreme Court will do their jobs for them.
Posted by: Connor MacLeod at March 23, 2012 08:01 AM (JxMoP)
It’s amazing that the left hasn’t photoshopped Zimmerman into a Tea Party rally picture yet. They would consider it “fake but accurate”.
Posted by: jwest at March 23, 2012 08:02 AM (FdndL)
Because if they restrict it to a state, the suckers who pay for it can leave.
Posted by: AmishDude at March 23, 2012 08:02 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Quilly Mammoth at March 23, 2012 11:51 AM (rVkN0)
That's just how we drew it up, baby.
Posted by: The Founders at March 23, 2012 08:03 AM (Fz7+s)
Posted by: MostlyRight at March 23, 2012 08:03 AM (ZG8Ti)
Also left unmentioned is the [apparent] fact that little Amish Angel Brings-A-Granny-Smith-Apple-To-His-Teacher "Trayvon" was in the process of beating Zimmerman to within an inch of his life when Zimmerman decided to pull the trigger.
But Axelrod and his lackeys in the MFM have decided that they are willing to unleash a race are in order to stay in power and finish their work on the destruction of the USA.
Cannot. Misoverestimate. Evil.
Posted by: Barney Frank at March 23, 2012 08:03 AM (F5Rm1)
Posted by: Knucklehead id at March 23, 2012 08:03 AM (hFrDa)
Because the moment you're reliant upon the State for your health care, you cease being a citizen and become a serf. And they've wanted us all to be serfs since they were still called "Royalists" in the late 18th Century.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 23, 2012 08:03 AM (8y9MW)
When the Race Card is played, everyone must drop to their knees and bow their heads.
Posted by: wheatie at March 23, 2012 11:59 AM (4GgJq)
Hell, I can even talk about the Hymies and greek homos with no problems. I got the CARD!
Posted by: Al Sharpton at March 23, 2012 08:03 AM (3jGS1)
Posted by: Norcross at March 23, 2012 08:03 AM (RM0br)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 23, 2012 08:04 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: BurtTC at March 23, 2012 08:04 AM (TOk1P)
Dude, we've been serfs since 1913. Central banking + income taxation = monetary slavery.
We're forced to use governmental monopoly debt-paper as "money." So, you are born in debt, and operate in a sea of debt. No one is allowed to use anything other than this governmentally-chartered debt as money.
That same government also claims the right to take a portion of our incomes, which it then uses to service this debt, and to maintain the market value of its debt-paper. Being compelled to use the paper, and pay taxes in paper, we are forced into the paper-money system. And everything this same government borrows to pay for ... whatever it feels like (Solyndra, I'm looking at you) ... is repaid with money derived directly from our labor.
Central banking and income taxation work together.
Making us dependent on the State for medical care is only one more layer of control. But it's by far not the first.
Posted by: Phinn at March 23, 2012 08:04 AM (KNtHw)
Posted by: Jaws at March 23, 2012 08:04 AM (4I3Uo)
Eric Holder's people will argue that the Federal Govt has "the right to Tax"....and that the individual mandate is within the definition of a 'tax'.
This will be politically bad, of course......since Barky has gone on record to say that it is "not a Tax". .....But I think they will set that aside for the time being, in order to try to win this.
Posted by: wheatie at March 23, 2012 08:04 AM (4GgJq)
"ItÂ’s an obsession with Democrats to nationalize everything: healthcare, welfare, the speed limit, abortion, the drinking age - so thereÂ’s no escape. Like all totalitarians, the DemocratsÂ’ position is: We thought up something we know will work better than anything anyone's done for the last 30,000 years. We donÂ’t know why no one else thought of it. We must be smarter. That is why the history of liberalism consists of replacing things that work with things that sounded good on paper." -The Formerly Sane and Funny Ann Coulter
Posted by: The Mega Independent at March 23, 2012 08:04 AM (Fz7+s)
This isn't how I heard it. What's your source?
Posted by: joncelli, heartless Con and all around unpleasant guy at March 23, 2012 08:04 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: toby928© feels pessimistic at March 23, 2012 08:04 AM (GTbGH)
No, the Card lets you go start riots when gang-bangers get killed.
It's blackdemocratium that allows you to use racial epithets without fear of reprisal.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 23, 2012 08:05 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: mike at March 23, 2012 08:05 AM (kqXHe)
Posted by: Elena Kagan at March 23, 2012 12:05 PM (wAQA5)
I thought that softball did that to you.
Posted by: Hedgehog at March 23, 2012 08:06 AM (3jGS1)
I am sure the cowardly Republicans are hoping that the Supreme Court will do their jobs for them.
Posted by: Connor MacLeod
House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) issued the following statement ahead of ObamaCareÂ’s two-year anniversary:
ObamaCare has already proven unpopular and unaffordable, and my hope is that the law’s cornerstone – the individual mandate – will be ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.
Speaker.gov
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at March 23, 2012 08:06 AM (kdS6q)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 23, 2012 08:07 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: Mr Pink at March 23, 2012 08:07 AM (ZvMnN)
America is doomed
I'll be dead, but over the next 20-30 years, you young bucks are fucked
United Socialist States of America
Posted by: Jones in CO at March 23, 2012 08:08 AM (8sCoq)
They followed that one up with a new layer make work decision.
From yesterday's news posts
In
other Supreme Court case decisions yesterday the court expanded rights of
criminals to get free lawyers. They can
now get free lawyers for plea bargaining.(another 5-4 wonder)
http://is.gd/PMdy3U
Posted by: Vic at March 23, 2012 08:08 AM (YdQQY)
Can they compel my girlfriend to give me a hummer once in a while?
---
If you're standing in California and she kneels in Oregon during the act then sounds like they can
If you're standing in California and she kneels in Washington during the act then wow...just wow
Posted by: Zombie Quint at March 23, 2012 08:08 AM (SO2Q8)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 23, 2012 08:08 AM (jUytm)
staying with his 'estranged father' in that area because he was 'involved in gang activity' where he was living.
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at March 23, 2012 08:09 AM (Dll6b)
As for the USSC, they will rule as narrowly as they can. That's just the way they roll.... Posted by: mike at March 23, 2012 12:05 PM
That won't work for the SCOAMF like he hopes if we get a repeat of last summer with black mobs attacking white shoppers in Chicago and other cities
If that happens, there'll be a lot of people quietly wanting to do what Zimmerman did
Posted by: kbdabear at March 23, 2012 08:09 AM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: Ranginess at March 23, 2012 08:09 AM (1d6WV)
Posted by: mpfs at March 23, 2012 08:10 AM (iYbLN)
Why do they want national health care so badly?
Because 'health care' provides the perfect vehicle by which Total Control over every aspect of our lives can be accomplished.
You dare to question the wonderfulness of the Government? ....No health care for you!
You dare to eat a cheeseburger or smoke a cigarette? ....No health care for you!
In order to know who is "putting their health at risk"....the government must be able to monitor every aspect of your life. ....And the government must have the ultimate power to determine 'what' is healthy, and what is not.
Posted by: wheatie at March 23, 2012 08:10 AM (4GgJq)
Posted by: Mr Pink at March 23, 2012 08:11 AM (ZvMnN)
Posted by: yankeefifth at March 23, 2012 08:11 AM (Z9EHQ)
If they can, and you don't even own a car, then, yes, all is lost.
Also, Average Joe sucks cock by choice.
Posted by: toby928© feels pessimistic at March 23, 2012 08:11 AM (GTbGH)
Posted by: Y-not at March 23, 2012 08:11 AM (5H6zj)
"This isn't how I heard it. What's your source?"
GOOGLE: trayvon beating zimmerman
I get "About 20,300,000 results".
Sorry, though, but the AoSHQ software package won't even let me post a cold link to it [much less a hot link].
Posted by: Barney Frank at March 23, 2012 08:11 AM (F5Rm1)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 23, 2012 08:11 AM (jUytm)
That's an apples to assholes argument.
Posted by: Buzzsaw at March 23, 2012 08:12 AM (tf9Ne)
This will be politically bad, of course......since Barky has gone on record to say that it is "not a Tax". .....But I think they will set that aside for the time being, in order to try to win this.
It was already set aside and our media is covering it up.
SCOTUS will take into consideration the administration's rhetoric when writing up the bill in order to judge its intent. This flip-flop from "It's not a tax!" to "It's a tax!" will not be looked upon favorably.
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at March 23, 2012 08:12 AM (e0xKF)
If that happens, there'll be a lot of people quietly wanting to do what Zimmerman did
Posted by: kbdabear at March 23, 2012 12:09 PM (Y+DPZ)
Remember: They moved the G-8 Summit but the NATO summit is still in Chicago. Happy spring!
Posted by: joncelli, heartless Con and all around unpleasant guy at March 23, 2012 08:13 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: steevy at March 23, 2012 08:14 AM (7W3wI)
--
Who's doing that? (That is an actual question not a retort.)
Posted by: RioBravo at March 23, 2012 08:14 AM (eEfYn)
Nope, none of them were ever involved in gang activity, never even heard of drugs and never committed a crime
I remember when NY Daily News muckracker and drunk Jimmy Breslin was horrified at all the support Bernie Goetz was getting from Noo Yawkahs. He tried to paint Goetz as a racist paranoid who shot four innocent kids because they were black.
Didn't help his case when he interviewed one of the darling angels in the hospital who admitted they were going to rob Goetz "because he looked easy"
Posted by: kbdabear at March 23, 2012 08:14 AM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: Y-not at March 23, 2012 08:15 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 23, 2012 08:15 AM (jUytm)
I don't own a car. No one forces me to buy any liability insurance.
And liability insurance exists for the benefit of others, not me, since driving a car is an ultra-hazardous activity, seeing as how it is the No. 1 cause of death for all age groups under age 45. You have to have insurance to use explosives to demolish buildings, too (which is actually a safer practice than driving).
But if I draw breath in the open-air prison formerly known as the USA, then I MUST buy whatever bullshit "insurance" they want to put together.
Which is not really insurance, since it takes no account of risk whatsoever, and therefore cannot connect the "premiums" to anyone's degree of risk.So, calling Obamacare "insurance" is another lie.
And forced car insurance is unconstitutional, too, shit-stack. The fact that some statist whore in a black robe says otherwise really means nothing to me.
Posted by: Phinn at March 23, 2012 08:16 AM (KNtHw)
Posted by: Mr. Wonderful at March 23, 2012 08:16 AM (WKTJz)
Posted by: Y-not at March 23, 2012 12:11 PM
When seconds count, the police are there in minutes
Posted by: kbdabear at March 23, 2012 08:16 AM (Y+DPZ)
Conservatives want 'the system' to 'work'--without race-baiters and the Usual Suspects 'politicizing' it. ---It wasn't conservatives who made this a national political cause
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at March 23, 2012 08:16 AM (Dll6b)
Posted by: Justamom at March 23, 2012 08:17 AM (Sptt8)
Via Weasel Zippers.
Link at my name.
Posted by: mpfs at March 23, 2012 08:17 AM (iYbLN)
Posted by: EC at March 23, 2012 08:17 AM (GQ8sn)
At least give all the facts.
http://tinyurl.com/6wcn76k
Posted by: Hedgehog at March 23, 2012 08:17 AM (3jGS1)
"It's a mistake for conservatives to champion Zimmerman's cause. They should encourage letting the system work and leave it at that."
You mean it's a mistake for "conservatives" to fail to defend their own castles [much less their wives & daughters] from worthless little thugs like Trayvon?
Maybe you'd like Trayvon's would-be baby daddy to come over and tuck you into bed each night [like he for David Cameron]: Tell you bedtime stories, and sing you lullabies, and play a little game of "Pull Daddy's, ah, 'Finger' (wink-wink)"?
And to think that this was supposed to have been a Mil-Con blog.
Posted by: Barney Frank at March 23, 2012 08:17 AM (F5Rm1)
Posted by: joncelli, heartless Con and all around unpleasant guy at March 23, 2012 08:18 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: yankeefifth at March 23, 2012 08:18 AM (Z9EHQ)
This Trayvon stuff is just camoflage for the Left.
Obama is now on it 24/7. He needs the cover.
Last week Fluke, now this.
Let's stay on fucking topic.
Obamacare is the real issue
Posted by: Mr. Wonderful at March 23, 2012 08:18 AM (WKTJz)
Posted by: Anyone-But-Romney-Bot at March 23, 2012 08:19 AM (BB0/w)
Posted by: Jones in CO at March 23, 2012 12:08 PM (8sCoq)
It will be the A]/b]merican Socialist Superstate more appropriately.
Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at March 23, 2012 08:19 AM (iOOXO)
A SCOAMF
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at March 23, 2012 12:18 PM (e0xK
True...true...
Posted by: EC at March 23, 2012 08:19 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: yankeefifth at March 23, 2012 08:19 AM (Z9EHQ)
116.....It is a bad piece of legislation, as legislation goes. It would be doing everyone involved a favor if they rule the entire thing void.
Without a 'severability clause' in the O-care law....if any part of it is deemed 'unconstitutional', then the whole thing can be tossed out.
Apparently, in their haste to get the p-o-s bill passed, in the eleventh hour....the Dems forgot to put in a severability clause.
Posted by: wheatie at March 23, 2012 08:20 AM (4GgJq)
We can just dismiss everything CK says here because he's, you know, a RINO!!!!!
More importantly, he's almost always wrong and the few times he is correct he's a year and a half behind everyone with a brain.
Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at March 23, 2012 08:20 AM (iOOXO)
And to think that this was supposed to havebeen a Mil-Con blog.
Posted by: Barney Frank at March 23, 2012 12:17 PM (F5Rm1)
This is nonsense. Zimmerman went looking for trouble.
Posted by: joncelli, heartless Con and all around unpleasant guy at March 23, 2012 08:20 AM (RD7QR)
The parents want to get paid, so they went to the media; the MFM want a Controversy Attracting Viewers, so they're playing up the 'injustice'.
This is a liberal cause, not a conservative cause. Race-baiters are making the noise here, not the Right. ---Get a clue
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at March 23, 2012 08:20 AM (Dll6b)
Posted by: Elena Kagan at March 23, 2012 08:21 AM (wAQA5)
I had announced my plan to expeditously solve the George Zimmerman Trayvon Martin situation with Beer Summit II. In retrospect this was obviously not-an-error per se but rather a misjudgment on our part. Since Trayvon is not yet 21, this meeting could not have achieved the goals of my administration.
We are actively scheduling Skittle Summit I (with some Manischewitz for Mr. Zimmerman of course) which shall judiciously resolve the current situation.
Posted by: Barry at March 23, 2012 08:21 AM (SO2Q8)
Posted by: Y-not at March 23, 2012 08:21 AM (5H6zj)
"People in this town who refused to talk to me for years were calling me up begging me to sell them one of my guns"
Posted by: kbdabear at March 23, 2012 08:21 AM (Y+DPZ)
If Obama had a son, we'd be paying for his trips to a Cayman Island whorehouse.
And 50 Secret Service agents.
Posted by: Mr. Wonderful at March 23, 2012 08:22 AM (WKTJz)
--- Thanks, i just soiled my armor
Posted by: Sir Robin at March 23, 2012 08:22 AM (SO2Q8)
Stormfront is that way, douche ----->>>
Posted by: Hollowpoint at March 23, 2012 08:22 AM (SY2Kh)
"It's a mistake for conservatives to champion Zimmerman's cause. They should encourage letting the system work and leave it at that."
BTW, the system DID work - the police investigated, noted that Trayvon had bloodied Zimmerman's nose and Zimmerman's back [consistent with Zimmerman having being thrown to the ground and pummeled], listened to the other witness who said that he was so terrified of Trayvon that he couldn't summon the courage to intervene, noted Trayvon's severe [and documented] discipline problems at government school, and...
...drum roll please...
CHOSE NOT TO FILE CHARGES AGAINST ZIMMERMAN!!!
This Axelrod/Soros race war is all about OVERTURNING THE SYSTEM!!!
Sheesh.
I can't believe that I have to spell this out at an ostensible Mil-Con blog.
Posted by: Barney Frank at March 23, 2012 08:22 AM (F5Rm1)
Posted by: yankeefifth at March 23, 2012 12:19 PM (Z9EHQ)
Poorly worded on my part. I should have written "Zimmerman is not the good guy in this case." By all indications he went after the kid when he should have just stayed in his car and observed.
Posted by: joncelli, heartless Con and all around unpleasant guy at March 23, 2012 08:22 AM (RD7QR)
But once he was attacked and being beaten ( according to a witness and his own testimony ) he had a right to defend himself.
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at March 23, 2012 08:23 AM (Dll6b)
When, in the course of investigating a person lurking around residences, looking in windows, and otherwise evading his questioner, that same person physically attacks you, you get to shoot back.
Even if he was mistaken, self-defense is legitimate unless Zimmerman was the aggressor.
If, on the evidence and facts he is proven to have been the aggressor, then self-defense is not an option, and you have a criminal homicide.
When the deceased turns out to have been recently expelled for being too violent to remain in school, I am leaning toward saying it's legitimate self-defense.
Posted by: Phinn at March 23, 2012 08:23 AM (KNtHw)
Children who speak English as their main language at home are now in the MINORITY in 1,600 schools across Britain
http://tinyurl.com/72mbh3c
Posted by: momma at March 23, 2012 08:23 AM (oKsWl)
Posted by: Barack Hussein Obama at March 23, 2012 08:24 AM (ggRof)
The question is can the Federal Government compel your girlfriend to give ME a hummer?
---
Can they compel Sandra Fluke to Not give me one?
Posted by: American Man at March 23, 2012 08:24 AM (SO2Q8)
Posted by: steevy at March 23, 2012 08:25 AM (7W3wI)
--- If only we had 9 black, robed lawyers named Clarence Thomas on the SC
Posted by: cracker at March 23, 2012 08:26 AM (SO2Q8)
What say you, Geraldo?
Posted by: kbdabear at March 23, 2012 08:26 AM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: steevy at March 23, 2012 12:25 PM (7W3wI)
===yes, but life if often not that simple. Then what do you do??
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at March 23, 2012 08:27 AM (Dll6b)
Posted by: joncelli, heartless Con and all around unpleasant guy at March 23, 2012 08:27 AM (RD7QR)
instructions from the police dispatcher and decided to pursue on foot
rather than stay in his car and monitor from a safe distance.
Posted by: Y-not at March 23, 2012 12:11 PM
Why don't you STFU and go suck some West cock.
Posted by: Obama Made Me A Racist at March 23, 2012 08:27 AM (EL+OC)
Posted by: joncelli, heartless Con and all around unpleasant guy at March 23, 2012 12:22 PM (RD7QR)
Zimmerman said that he got out of his car to check the name of the street he was on and the kid attacked him from behind (hence the bleeding from the back of the head) and then got on top of him and started beating him (thus the grass stains on his back and blood on his face). The neighbor was too scared to help so he ran inside. Zimmerman then shot the kid who was beating him. This all checked out to the police so they didn't arrest him. End of story.
Posted by: Hedgehog at March 23, 2012 08:27 AM (3jGS1)
--
Y-not,
I do not see how discussing reported issues in a case that is now heavily covered in the media is construed as championing the cause of a defendant. It seems to me to be more of a review of media coverage and their motivations. Perhaps I am mistaken.
Posted by: RioBravo at March 23, 2012 08:27 AM (eEfYn)
When the Race Card is played, everyone must drop to their knees and bow their heads.
----
Race card me baby! I've been a bad girl
Posted by: Sandra Fluke at March 23, 2012 08:28 AM (SO2Q8)
I'm sorry
I don't like being played by the MSM and Obama, so I don't give a shit about the Trayvon issue.
Let the locals work that one out.
I do care about Obamacare and the oil prices and our national decline and stuff like that.
Posted by: Mr. Wonderful at March 23, 2012 08:28 AM (WKTJz)
Posted by: And Irresolute at March 23, 2012 08:28 AM (RC3M9)
Posted by: mike at March 23, 2012 08:30 AM (kqXHe)
I do care about Obamacare and the oil prices and our national decline and stuff like that.
Posted by: Mr. Wonderful at March 23, 2012 12:28 PM (WKTJz)
===that's all I'm asking. Obama should STFU
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at March 23, 2012 08:30 AM (Dll6b)
Posted by: mike at March 23, 2012 08:32 AM (kqXHe)
This is precisely what happened. This place makes me puke lately.
Posted by: Obama Made Me A Racist at March 23, 2012 08:33 AM (EL+OC)
"This is nonsense. Zimmerman went looking for trouble."
And just WTF do you think the USMC and the USN and the USA have been doing for the last 225-odd years?
Sitting around the campfire with their thumbs up their asses being tucked into bed by Trayvon's would-be baby daddy?
Zimmerman - the local Neighborhood Watch captain - went looking for "trouble" in the form of a very clear and very present and VERY OBVIOUS threat to his neighborhood.
THIS WAS ZIMMERMAN'S JOB!!!
Or maybe you'd like the Zimmermans of the world to lay back and "take it" and do nothing as their property is stolen, their wives are raped, and their houses are burned to the ground.
Because I can guaran-dadgum-tee you that that is PRECISELY what Axelrod and Soros envision for your immediate future: thievery, rapes, conflagrations and murders.
And as you lay there suffering, Axelrod and Soros are just gonna laugh at you all the way to the bank.
Posted by: Barney Frank at March 23, 2012 08:33 AM (F5Rm1)
90 This 1000 times.
Why do they want national health care so badly?
Because the skyrocketing medicare/medicaid costs are bankrupting the government and the thieves in D.C. want to stick the middle class with the bill. It's their attempt at forstalling the DOOM. That's why the Rinos are talking about repeal and replace instead of just repeal. Neither half of the big government party want to openly throw granny to the curb and admit that their promises won't be kept.
Posted by: Larsen E. Whipsnade at March 23, 2012 08:34 AM (6BgmB)
Posted by: yankeefifth at March 23, 2012 08:35 AM (Z9EHQ)
So you were there and witnessed the entire episode? Why didn't you say so?
Posted by: Hollowpoint at March 23, 2012 08:35 AM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: A BIG DOUCHE at March 23, 2012 08:36 AM (MMC8r)
ZimmermanÂ’s mother was Peruvian and the father possibly white. He was adopted by a Jewish couple.
Posted by: jwest at March 23, 2012 08:36 AM (FdndL)
Posted by: mike at March 23, 2012 08:36 AM (kqXHe)
Posted by: Hollowpoint at March 23, 2012 12:35 PM (SY2Kh)
No the eyewitnesses interviewed by the police and the physical evidence on Zimmerman's body were all the evidence the police needed.
Posted by: Hedgehog at March 23, 2012 08:38 AM (3jGS1)
"It is do or die time with SCOTUS. If they declare it unconstitutional, it will more than likely be a 5-4 vote, and the reaction will be 10,000 times more vituperative than Bush v Gore 2000."
The stakes are high. I have no faith that they will declare it unconstitutional. Just bucking too much Obama/media/liberal/PC complex pressure to kick this peice of crap in the trash where it belongs.
I look for a loss by a close vote, along political lines, with some tortured reasoning, and a pretty strong dissent by Thomas or Scalia.
Posted by: RM at March 23, 2012 08:39 AM (TRsME)
@161 Exactly.
Why is it so hard to grasp the concept that maybe BOTH Zimmerman AND Trayvon were at fault in this incident? Zimmerman for chasing when he was told not to and Trayvon for assaulting, and beating him without a legal reason. No, to do not have the legal right to beat the shit out of someone because he profiled and pursued you.
Posted by: Jaws at March 23, 2012 08:39 AM (4I3Uo)
"it concerns me greatly that so many, even morons, are ascribing so much validity to accounts we are receiving through the mfm"
THIS.
Do you suppose they're Axelrodian astroturfers?
I can't believe that regulars at a Mil-Con blog would support this idea of "curl up in the fetal position and shove your thumb up your ass at the very first sign of trouble" as some sort of a correct and proper and genteel & well-mannered way of going about the living of your life.
I mean, WTF?
Posted by: Barney Frank at March 23, 2012 08:40 AM (F5Rm1)
Posted by: yankeefifth at March 23, 2012 08:41 AM (Z9EHQ)
Posted by: mike at March 23, 2012 08:41 AM (kqXHe)
Posted by: yankeefifth at March 23, 2012 08:46 AM (Z9EHQ)
Posted by: Jaws at March 23, 2012 08:46 AM (4I3Uo)
Posted by: Mongerel at March 23, 2012 08:46 AM (YqWfw)
Posted by: mike at March 23, 2012 08:47 AM (kqXHe)
Posted by: And Irresolute at March 23, 2012 08:47 AM (RC3M9)
All we know is that Zimmerman got out, followed the kid believing that he was "up to no good", and that a fight ensued. Zimmerman (who outweighted the kid by 100 lbs) was getting beat up, drew his weapon and fired.
We don't know who initiated the fight. We do know that Zimmerman got close enough to be in that situation, and that he wasn't seriously injured.
According to the kid's girlfriend who was talking to him on the phone just before, the last thing he said was "Why are you following me?". We know that Zimmerman believed the kid had criminal intent. We know Zimmerman was carrying, and that the kid was walking home from the store and was unarmed.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at March 23, 2012 08:48 AM (SY2Kh)
MALICIOUS.
That is the only word I could think of when ObamaCare was first being crafted. When the democrats said they would do it no matter what, or how. When they noted they had the numbers in both chambers of congress to completely ignore republicans, and lock them out of chambers while the details were inserted. When they lied to key allies to get their temporary votes, and blatantly bribed others for the same reason. All in the clear light of day, and as public opposition increased, there was no appeasement of the concerns of the people, just forging ahead with their vision of our future.
This was a big fucking deal. They want this real bad, and I don't fool myself for a moment that it's for the good of the country. This is the last wall, the gate, and the razor wire, all rolled up into one bill.
And it falls to the capricious nature of one judge.
FUBAR
Posted by: OneEyedJack at March 23, 2012 08:49 AM (ORvjs)
Posted by: MostlyRight at March 23, 2012 08:49 AM (ZG8Ti)
Posted by: mike at March 23, 2012 08:49 AM (kqXHe)
Posted by: yankeefifth at March 23, 2012 08:50 AM (Z9EHQ)
According to Wikipedia, which has some reference material.
Posted by: jwest at March 23, 2012 08:51 AM (FdndL)
Posted by: yankeefifth at March 23, 2012 08:52 AM (Z9EHQ)
So Zimmerman has the right to defend himself with deadly force in a fistfight against a smaller man, but Trayvon didn't have the right to defend himself from what he might reasonably have construed as a threat (a big dude stalking him at night)?
It's possible that Trayvon just attacked Zimmerman out of nowhere, but given the circumstances it's the less likely circumstance.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at March 23, 2012 08:53 AM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: Y-not at March 23, 2012 08:53 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: yankeefifth at March 23, 2012 08:53 AM (Z9EHQ)
Wikipedia also cites a witness that says Trayvon was on top of Zimmerman beating the shit out of him.
Posted by: jwest at March 23, 2012 08:53 AM (FdndL)
Posted by: mike at March 23, 2012 08:55 AM (kqXHe)
---
Do you happen to have a reference to the weight and height of Zimmerman and Martin? (All I can find is the Martin was 6"2'' and 140 lbs (really?). Zimmerman is 'fat'.)
Posted by: RioBravo at March 23, 2012 08:57 AM (eEfYn)
Posted by: mike at March 23, 2012 08:57 AM (kqXHe)
Posted by: yankeefifth at March 23, 2012 08:57 AM (Z9EHQ)
Any time the MFM and Al Shitptom get on their high horse you can almost guarantee a POS set of lies.
What we know:
The MFM shows pictures of the "kid" when he was about 10 y.o. Why is it they always portray the "victim" as an innocent choir boy? We now know he was a 17 y.o gang banger who had been kicked out of school because he was violent.
The accused racist Hispanic was a neighborhood watch. It was his job to follow him. It doesn't matter if he was a wanna-be cop. It was his job to follow this kid and keep and eye on him. For all appearances sake the "kid" was casing the homes for burglary.
The kid was beating him when the evil racist shot him. Yes, that meets the definition of self-defense without even invoking the FL stand your ground law.
Lets not get all Duke on this.
Posted by: Vic at March 23, 2012 08:57 AM (YdQQY)
It's possible that Trayvon just attacked Zimmerman out of nowhere, but given the circumstances it's the less likely circumstance.Posted by: Hollowpoint at March 23, 2012 12:53 PM (SY2Kh)
Everything IÂ’ve seen has Trayvon at 6 foot or taller, and Zimmerman at 5 ft. 6 or 7 inches. Zimmerman did weigh more though.
Posted by: jwest at March 23, 2012 08:57 AM (FdndL)
Re: auto liability insurance.
Solution: no requirement to purchase; if you purchase, you can get high limits underinsured and uninsured motorist coverage. Everybody gets to be as protected against third parties as they choose. If you don't buy any insurance and get injured, well, you chose to self-insure.
Posted by: The Poster Formerly Known as Mr. Barky at March 23, 2012 08:59 AM (qwK3S)
Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at March 23, 2012 08:59 AM (+lsX1)
Posted by: RioBravo at March 23, 2012 09:00 AM (eEfYn)
Posted by: yankeefifth at March 23, 2012 09:00 AM (Z9EHQ)
Just on general principles.
Posted by: filbert at March 23, 2012 09:00 AM (smvTK)
Posted by: mike at March 23, 2012 09:02 AM (kqXHe)
Posted by: yankeefifth at March 23, 2012 09:02 AM (Z9EHQ)
The lynch mob at “Morning Joe” was still pushing the meme that it was Trayvon screaming for help on the tapes, despite all the evidence that it was Zimmerman.
Posted by: jwest at March 23, 2012 09:04 AM (FdndL)
Posted by: mike at March 23, 2012 09:05 AM (kqXHe)
Posted by: Y-not at March 23, 2012 09:08 AM (5H6zj)
On Zimmerman - I'm trying to understand the whole situation, no ax to grind yet. If Trayvon was on foot, could Zimmerman have reasonably thought that if he DIDN'T get out of his car and stay near Trayvon, Trayvon would simply vanish into the night before the police arrived to check things out?
Was Zimmerman "shadowing" him at a distance to keep an eye on him to avoid losing him before the police arrived, or was he actively pursuing or chasing him, causing Trayvon (if innocent) to feel threatened?
I know in our neighborhood, it would take someone on foot about 20 seconds to totally and permanently evade someone limited to staying in a car. Cops arriving two or three minutes later would be SOOL.
Posted by: RM at March 23, 2012 09:08 AM (TRsME)
Posted by: yankeefifth at March 23, 2012 09:09 AM (Z9EHQ)
Posted by: mike at March 23, 2012 09:09 AM (kqXHe)
Noting that he had taken some time to “assess the current episode,” West wrote: “The US Navy SEALS identified Osama Bin Laden within hours, while this young man laid on a morgue slab for three days. The shooter, Mr Zimmerman, should have been held in custody and certainly should not be walking free, still having a concealed weapons carry permit. From my reading, it seems this young man was pursued and there was no probable cause to engage him, certainly not pursue and shoot him….against the direction of the 911 responder.”
The congressman added: “Let’s all be appalled at this instance not because of race, but because a young American man has lost his life, seemingly, for no reason.”
The Florida lawmaker said that he had signed a letter supporting the Justice Department’s investigation but that he did not plan to attend protests in Florida “to shout and scream, because we need the responsible entities and agencies to handle this situation from this point without media bias or undue political influences.” - Allen West
Ha.
Posted by: Obama Made Me A Racist at March 23, 2012 09:10 AM (EL+OC)
Posted by: blogspot.com at March 23, 2012 09:12 AM (GTbGH)
Posted by: Vic at March 23, 2012 09:12 AM (YdQQY)
"Why aren't people demanding that Martin call 911 instead of "putting himself at risk unnecessarily" by fighting with Zimmerman? "
Ain't that a hell of a question.
Posted by: Jaws at March 23, 2012 09:12 AM (4I3Uo)
it appears that democrats get easily distracted by american idol, and republicans by minor local stories of little national import.
What's important is that they can be distracted....oh look, a squirrel!
Posted by: OneEyedJack at March 23, 2012 09:12 AM (ORvjs)
Posted by: mike at March 23, 2012 09:12 AM (kqXHe)
Posted by: Mr. Wonderful at March 23, 2012 09:13 AM (WKTJz)
My image of the situation changes depending on whether i imagine Zim following 30 feet behind, or getting right up in Trayvon's personal space.
Holding distance or closing ground.
Posted by: Buzzsaw90 at March 23, 2012 09:13 AM (SO2Q8)
I don't know but, I wanted to stick him in the knob polishers squeak holes here and break it off.
Posted by: Obama Made Me A Racist at March 23, 2012 09:14 AM (EL+OC)
Posted by: yankeefifth at March 23, 2012 09:14 AM (Z9EHQ)
"Let's don't talk about the most egregious violation of the natural rights purportedly guaranteed by the Constitution since maybe Dred Scott was sent back to slavery, let's talk about some dumbshit vigilante in Florida instead! Attica! Attica! No Justice! No Peace!"
Sheesh.
I'm gonna go outside and watch the squirrels. At least they're doing something interesting.
Posted by: filbert at March 23, 2012 09:15 AM (smvTK)
"...and republicans by minor local stories of little national import."
When the Big MSM, Federal DOJ, and the Prez are sticking their noses into the case to whip shit up for political reasons, it has plenty of national import.
BTW, someone please tell me what the hell business the DOJ has in this case.
Posted by: Jaws at March 23, 2012 09:16 AM (4I3Uo)
Posted by: Tsar Nicholas II at March 23, 2012 09:17 AM (f8XyF)
Posted by: yankeefifth at March 23, 2012 09:19 AM (Z9EHQ)
Posted by: Jaws at March 23, 2012 09:23 AM (4I3Uo)
Posted by: yankeefifth at March 23, 2012 09:23 AM (Z9EHQ)
Posted by: mike at March 23, 2012 09:24 AM (kqXHe)
You're right... it is an important issue. Just not AS important, or better still, worthy of its own thread. This one was hijacked from the get-go.
Posted by: OneEyedJack at March 23, 2012 09:27 AM (ORvjs)
Posted by: Jaws at March 23, 2012 01:16 PM (4I3Uo)
--------------------
Recall when the commies had both houses of congress and they added homosexuals to the hate crimes act. They also enabled the DOJ to prosecute these crimes based on nothing more than the opinion of the DOJ. before it took a ruling by a court.
Posted by: Vic at March 23, 2012 09:28 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: yankeefifth at March 23, 2012 09:31 AM (Z9EHQ)
Posted by: mike at March 23, 2012 09:35 AM (kqXHe)
Posted by: yankeefifth at March 23, 2012 09:36 AM (Z9EHQ)
Posted by: mike at March 23, 2012 09:42 AM (kqXHe)
What evidence does anyone have that Sharpton, Jackson, and Farrakhan are down for the struggle for any other reason than becoming multimillionaires?
Unhappiness and strife are their product and they sell the hell out of it.
Posted by: Jaws at March 23, 2012 09:45 AM (4I3Uo)
Some of the commenters have a point.
Ace posted this thread on Obamacare and was innocently walking along with a bag of Skittles and an ice tea, when all of sudden the thug thread hijackers approached him.
No one knows exactly what happened, but in the end, the Obamacare thread lay dead while the hijackers went free. WeÂ’ve got a call in to Al Sharpton right now.
Posted by: jwest at March 23, 2012 09:50 AM (FdndL)
Posted by: mike at March 23, 2012 09:52 AM (kqXHe)
Mike, youÂ’re forgetting centuries of African Americans being oppressed by Jews of Peruvian ancestry.
Posted by: jwest at March 23, 2012 09:57 AM (FdndL)
Posted by: President Chet Roosevelt at March 23, 2012 09:58 AM (WU3T3)
Posted by: Soona at March 23, 2012 10:00 AM (u7Qrl)
Posted by: mike at March 23, 2012 10:04 AM (kqXHe)
There are some who think like that, but MSNBC has said too much time has past already. ItÂ’s important that the country band together, find Zimmerman and lynch him immediately.
Posted by: jwest at March 23, 2012 10:04 AM (FdndL)
Posted by: mike at March 23, 2012 10:05 AM (kqXHe)
Posted by: mike at March 23, 2012 10:08 AM (kqXHe)
In addition to being a math scholar, homeless shelter volunteer, Peace Corps trainee and future saint, Trayvon was also a ninja.
Posted by: Phinn at March 23, 2012 10:09 AM (KNtHw)
Posted by: mike at March 23, 2012 10:12 AM (kqXHe)
Since when are we beholden to governmental agents? Since when are we underlings in some kind of civilian army?
Police exist to enforce laws. They are trained and paid to do that properly.
They do not have extra rights and powers that we, the people, don't first have.
That's where the police got the power to use force -- from us. We delegate our powers and rights to them. They are not supermen. They are not graced with the power to do what we can't do. They are our agents, acting on our behalf, because they are specialists, and it's more efficient for them to do it.
If I want to, I can fix my own car, or I can delegate that authority to someone else. Likewise, I can act to protect my own safety, or I can hire someone to do it for me.
I know lots of people seem to think that cops have extra powers. That they are legally entitled to defy gravity.
If anything, the scope of their authority is equal to or less than what any ordinary person may do.
And we certainly don't take orders from them.
Posted by: Phinn at March 23, 2012 10:28 AM (KNtHw)
Posted by: mike at March 23, 2012 10:32 AM (kqXHe)
Posted by: mike at March 23, 2012 10:35 AM (kqXHe)
It's legal to act in self-defense if you act with REASONABLE BELIEF that you are in imminent danger of death or serious bodily injury.
It is not necessary that you be correct. It's still valid self-defense, even if you turn out to have been mistaken, if you acted based on what you reasonably believed at the time.
It's entirely possible that Trayvon genuinely (but mistakenly) believed Zimmerman to be stalking him with the intent of robbing him. That is patently incorrect, but let's say that Trayvon thought that, and that belief (while mistaken) was reasonable.
It's also possible that Zimmerman genuinely (but mistakenly) believed that when Trayvon attacked him, the attack was aggressive, intended to conceal Trayvon's crimes, not motivated by Trayvon's attempt at self-defense.
It is possible that if they both knew all of the facts about each other's actions and intentions (which are only coming out with the help of massive social activity, media attention, time and investigation, none of which either men had the benefit of), that Trayvon would not have attacked, and Zimmerman would not have shot.
Hence, it's possible this is a case of mutual mistake.
But in this fucked up Progressive, Obama-esque, pot-banging bullshit society I woke up in, things like law and reason don't fucking matter.
So, I mock it.
Posted by: Phinn at March 23, 2012 10:49 AM (KNtHw)
Posted by: Steve Johnson at March 23, 2012 11:09 AM (2IYWT)
Unfortunately every time the Supreme Court has faced this it seems to want to come down on the side of "why, no sir!"
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at March 23, 2012 02:12 PM (r4wIV)
Just got back from seeing The Hunger Games. Lots of food for thought about the power of the government. The President (played by Donald Sutherland) has some interesting dialogue about the government allowing the people to have a modicum of hope, but not too much. I thought it was going to be more of an indictment on the reality TV culture, but the movie came across as more of a warning about what the government can do -take your children and force them to kill each other- with too much power.
I highly recommend it.
Posted by: the other coyote at March 23, 2012 07:23 PM (yn5p0)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2399 seconds, 404 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: steevy at March 23, 2012 07:41 AM (7W3wI)