June 01, 2012
— Open Blogger Not 1984 big, but so decisively as to preempt any Dem claims of voter irregularities and to forestall any Dem voter irregularities themselves. ("If it's not close, they can't cheat." -- Hugh Hewett)
And when analysts look back at the 'turning point' of the 2012 election, they'll point to this week as the inflection point of the campaign, and in particular to three key points:
1) It's now apparent that the Emperor's campaign has no clothes. In spite of the best "wind beneath his wings" efforts of the mainstream media (haircuts? dressage?), every Obama campaign attack on Romney so far has blown up in their faces, either undercut by other Dems (gotta love Bill's statements last night -- remember, revenge is a dish best served cold and with plausible deniability) -- or by bringing to light background information about Obama that the MSM has carefully overlooked for six years.
2) Romney and his campaign staff are clearly moving themselves "inside the loop" in their campaign against Obama. They're raising more money, they're responding to the news cycle better, and they're aggressive about getting in his face. As others have noted, Obama has never faced a tough campaign before and for the first time he has a highly public, highly visible record to defend. I've been waiting 30 years for a bare-knuckled Republican Presidential candidate; who would have thought it would be Mitt Romney? Not me, but I couldn't be happier.
3) It really is hard to overstate just how bad the economic news today was for Obama. It's not just the slight tick upward in the artificially low unemployment rate; it's not just the horrendous May jobs numbers (69,000 actual vs. 150,000+ expected). It's the April jobs numbers being revised down from 114,000 to 77,000, with a chance that the May jobs numbers will be revised downward a month from now. Basically, the 'soft recovery' is sliding down a steep slope, and I'll give even odds that we see at least one month this year with negative job growth.
Even the Puffington Host can't hide how bad it is, though of course their answer is "more stimulus!":

The timing of these bad numbers is atrocious for Obama. They come close enough to the election ("Five more months!" -- Romney protestors to David Axelrod) to really matter, but not so close as to be swamped by other campaign hoopla or to be set aside by saying "We'll get to that just as soon as this election is over." Obama and the Senate Dems will be on the spot to do something, but frankly there's not much they can do that (a) would have an impact between now and November, (b) wouldn't alienate the Leftist base that Obama is trying so hard to energize, and (c) would actually pass Congress. They're screwed, pure and simple.
Here's what makes it even worse for the Obama campaign. A lot of businesses have held off hiring due to uncertainty about quite a few factors: Obamacare, the Bush tax cuts expiring, high energy prices, increased environmental regulations, and so on. But as of a few months ago, most were probably anticipating Obama being re-elected and were simply adjusting their long-term plans accordingly. But suddenly Romney is looking not just more electable but like the stronger candidate . Most corporations and businesses would much rather wait for a Romney administration, a Republican DOJ, a Republican EPA, and a Republican Congress, but they can't be absolutely certain it's going to happen -- so a lot of them are going to continue to sit on their hands until after November, which will only stall the economy more.
Hey, I could be wrong about all this, but as Billy Joel once sang, "I've been a fool for lesser things." Or to quote a more literary source that just came to mind:
Ghân-buri-Ghân and touched the earth with his horny brow in farewell. Then he got up as to depart. But suddenly he stood looking up like some startled woodland animal snuffling a strange air. A light came in his eyes."Wind is changing!" he cried, and with that, in a twinkling as it seemed, he and his fellows had vanished into the glooms...."
-- "The Riding of the Rohirrim", The War of the Ring, vol. 6 of The Lord of the Rings, J.R.R. Tolkien
I think the winds have changed indeed. It's about damn time. ..fritz..
Posted by: Open Blogger at
08:25 AM
| Comments (112)
Post contains 750 words, total size 5 kb.
Posted by: Journolist at June 01, 2012 09:01 AM (e2O5W)
Posted by: David "Comb - Over Beethoven" Axelrod at June 01, 2012 09:01 AM (c3mby)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at June 01, 2012 09:02 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at June 01, 2012 09:02 AM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: Boyd at June 01, 2012 09:02 AM (Xv7f/)
Posted by: DangerGirl at June 01, 2012 09:03 AM (Os+6p)
I say Warren gets to stay on at Harvard
Posted by: American Indian Rage Boy at June 01, 2012 09:04 AM (e8kgV)
Obama's permacampaign gives up the biggest advantage of a sitting president: doing the job while the other guy looks like a lowly politician. Instead he's setting new records for $50,000 steak dinners.
Posted by: Beagle at June 01, 2012 09:04 AM (sOtz/)
Posted by: Jumbo Shrimp at June 01, 2012 09:04 AM (DGIjM)
Posted by: Jean at June 01, 2012 09:05 AM (WkuV6)
open blogger sez;;
3) It really is hard to overstate just how bad the economic news today was for Obama. It's not just the slight tick upward in the artificially low unemployment rate; it's not just the horrendous May jobs numbers (69,000 actual vs. 150,000+ expected). It's the April jobs numbers being revised down from 114,000 to 77,000.
bad for Obama? fk that, Bad for americans!
where the hell is the media checking out homeless, i stop at mickey d's and have to buy twenty extra burgers to feed the group outside.
remember when it would be i'll word for food?
people actually mean it!
Posted by: willow at June 01, 2012 09:05 AM (TomZ9)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at June 01, 2012 09:05 AM (piMMO)
I have this feeling that the election is going to be a total blowout. In our favor.
-----
But dont you worry that Michelle will no longer be proud of her country..... even just a little bit worried???
Posted by: fixerupper at June 01, 2012 09:05 AM (C8hzL)
I love the rosy prognostication, Fritz.....
But hey, don't jinx it.
A lot could happen.
Barky could bale out Europe to postpone it's inevitable meltdown until after the election.
This could make the Wall Street whores run up the Market to 13000.
....Which would make Barky look great...right before the election.
SCOTUS could shoot down ZeroCare....
Which could cause companies to start hiring again....something else that Barky would take credit for.
So, let's not start celebrating just yet.
Too many things could happen between now and Nov 6.
Posted by: wheatie at June 01, 2012 09:06 AM (YzQ1g)
Let's not get cocky yet.
It's still going to be a long ugly road. Obama is a world class liar, and pretty good at the "identity politics" thing. He's going scortched earth on this, willing to shatter the country to build it in his image.
It's certainly winnable, and more winnable than not, but this doesn't mean we should just kick back and let shit happen to us.
(Countdown to the Conventions, then the debates, THEN I can hopefully get my wife on board so I can start putting up signs, handing over cash and generally being useful.)
Posted by: tsrblke at June 01, 2012 09:06 AM (22rSN)
Posted by: Beefy Meatball at June 01, 2012 09:06 AM (mxnUd)
This will turn a a few counties, and perhaps the right state. Enough to maybe make things ambiguous again like in 2000.
Posted by: EC at June 01, 2012 09:06 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Pennsylvania at June 01, 2012 09:07 AM (v1uZf)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 01, 2012 09:07 AM (MCDCp)
Posted by: Anna Puma at June 01, 2012 09:07 AM (aTSQ9)
So, let's not start celebrating just yet.
Let's not be hasty - It's never too early to start sucking each other's dicks.
Posted by: Don Lemon at June 01, 2012 09:07 AM (tufZk)
They will regroup and, if possible, use our comfort or, Heaven forbid, smugness, against us.
They are evil, not stupid, and will cut our throats the first chance they get.
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at June 01, 2012 09:08 AM (piMMO)
I've been waiting 30 years for a bare-knuckled Republican Presidential candidate; who would have thought it would be Mitt Romney? Not me, but I couldn't be happier.
=================================
No, no, no!!! We need a BROKERED CONVENTION!!!
RON PAUL 2012! THIS RINO CAN NOT BE ALLOWED TO PROCEED!
Posted by: Jay at June 01, 2012 09:08 AM (3LaGb)
I am praying for my Mom's gossip to be true. Got a little more out of her that Justice Kagan is rumored to have told the WH almost immediately that the vote was to strike it down and that's why Obama publically freaked out intitially. By "it," she clarified mandate. Definitely said that it was supposed to be announced this week. Take it for what it's worth.
Posted by: swagga at June 01, 2012 09:08 AM (tYCwA)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 01, 2012 09:08 AM (MCDCp)
Posted by: Tami at June 01, 2012 09:09 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: JustMe at June 01, 2012 09:09 AM (QbjWk)
Posted by: Tami at June 01, 2012 01:09 PM (X6akg)
Really and truly did Obama save the auto industry.... /sarc
Posted by: Anna Puma at June 01, 2012 09:10 AM (aTSQ9)
2 - SCOTUS upholds AZ immigration law
3- Walker wins in Wisconsin
4 - Mitt wins
5 - I explode with delight.
*****
I REALLY would like to attend a meetup the night of the vote or the night of the inauguration.
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at June 01, 2012 09:10 AM (piMMO)
Despite some expecting Bark Obama's butt-boys to haul out the "Racism!!11!!" meme once again, I see something worse on the horizon: When the magnitude of the Traitor-in-Chief's potential defeat begins to sink in, I'm expecting action, not words.
Holder has been interfering more and more, ordering Florida to stop purging illegals from the voter rolls, attacking any state that dares to demand ID from voters, and so forth and so on. He has a track record of illegal and damn-near illegal activity cloaked by his fraudulent authority.
His boss is no slouch when it comes to gloves-off dirty fighting, either. We can look at precedent and imagine how much farther he will go using the power of his current office.
A few people may object, but the stupefied masses won't, and neither will the eunuchs on the "conservative" side. Does anyone expect meaningful protest or calls to action from Jonah Goldberg? Poppin' Fresh? Fox News?
Just sayin'. It's going to get damn rough in the next few months....
Posted by: MrScribbler at June 01, 2012 09:10 AM (MQc8e)
Posted by: Captain FAPtastical at June 01, 2012 09:10 AM (/pd0C)
That's getting harder and harder for them to do.
1) They're absolutely killing the energy industry, especially Coal (I say "especially coal" because Coal tends to come from purple states, where Oil tends to come from red states). This is going to make Coal Country tend to break Republican in November.
2) The jobs data is just horrific. And, no matter how much they'd like to, they can't spin it as GWB's fault any more. This is 40 months of 8%+ "official" unemployment. People are falling of the artificially long Unemployment check apparatus.
3) Even government unions are starting to die. Mostly this is in WI, but there's no evidence that it will end there. Even Michigan is looking at some "Union Busting" legislation.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at June 01, 2012 09:10 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: swagga at June 01, 2012 01:08 PM (tYCwA)
Sorry if I missed this but.....how is your mom in a position to know this?
Posted by: Tami at June 01, 2012 09:10 AM (X6akg)
GM offering lump sum payout to 42,000 salaried employees to reduce the pension expenses.
Thank God they didn't have to go through bankruptcy!
Posted by: 1 of 42,000 at June 01, 2012 09:11 AM (tufZk)
----
Ive seen that speculated before.
Isn't that some breach of SCOTUS ethics or protocol or something?? I dont think many of the peers would take kindly to that behavior.
Posted by: fixerupper at June 01, 2012 09:11 AM (C8hzL)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 01, 2012 09:11 AM (MCDCp)
Posted by: willow at June 01, 2012 09:11 AM (TomZ9)
Posted by: Jean at June 01, 2012 09:11 AM (WkuV6)
^ ^ ^ This...
A win is a win...I'm with you in saying that I hope Mitt wins enough votes to clear the margin of cheat. It doesn't have to be a 1984.
Posted by: Mr_Write at June 01, 2012 09:11 AM (VJUQK)
Posted by: franksalterego at June 01, 2012 09:11 AM (9XykO)
****
Ding! Ding! Ding!
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at June 01, 2012 09:12 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 01, 2012 09:12 AM (MCDCp)
She and my Dad heard it from a Senator's campaign manager this week.
Posted by: swagga at June 01, 2012 09:13 AM (tYCwA)
>>“In the 1930s, when my parents got married, these were hard issues,’’
Warren said. “My father’s family so objected to my mother’s Native
American heritage that my mother told me they had to elope.
If she weren't LYING about being at all NA, she would be claiming that her dad's parents didn't like the idea of someone being 1/16th NA.
They probably didn't like her mom because she was blonde and went around acting like she was NA and demanding special treatment.
Posted by: Mama AJ at June 01, 2012 09:13 AM (XdlcF)
Michelle and the girls running around packing. Barry trapped behind the Resolute Desk trying to write out that last pardon for Bill Ayers and Brett K while the ashtray rapidly fills.
And then the next day, having to watch as Romney is sworn in as President.
Posted by: Anna Puma at June 01, 2012 09:13 AM (aTSQ9)
This certainly makes the $150,000 to Rev Wright seem safe
Posted by: American Indian Rage Boy at June 01, 2012 09:14 AM (e8kgV)
Michelle and the girls running around packing. Barry trapped behind the Resolute Desk trying to write out that last pardon for Bill Ayers and Brett K while the ashtray rapidly fills.
*****
Trying to remember where he hid that dime bag.....
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at June 01, 2012 09:14 AM (piMMO)
What she said was "the part that makes young people buy insurance." Then she said "what it all depends upon."
Posted by: swagga at June 01, 2012 09:15 AM (tYCwA)
anna, i wouldn't throw shoes but i will be humming under my breath , "hey , hey hey, goodbye"
and good riddance!
but i have this horrible feeling half the voters will be stupid and do this again in the near future.
we do have a large part of society that really does want to take other peoples stuff.
Posted by: willow at June 01, 2012 09:15 AM (TomZ9)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at June 01, 2012 09:15 AM (C8mVl)
>>Michelle and the girls running around packing.
I think you meant to write "yelling at the packers".
Posted by: Mama AJ at June 01, 2012 09:16 AM (XdlcF)
Romney's gonna win?
Great. I didn't want to have to bother with going to vote, anyway.
So it won't matter if I just stay home and watch a movie.
Posted by: Squishy, the low info voter... at June 01, 2012 09:16 AM (YzQ1g)
Yeah, I realize all that but I'm saying they will resort to outright ballot fuckery and chad raping to turn enough votes to their favour. It doesn't matter how many people are resentful of Obama, the ballots that get counted at the end of the night are what matter. We don't need any boxes of ballots suddenly appearing that were forgotten.
Posted by: EC at June 01, 2012 09:16 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 01, 2012 09:17 AM (MCDCp)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at June 01, 2012 09:17 AM (SB0V2)
The big question now is when does the new debt bubble burst: the bubble created by the Fed forcing domestic banks to buy up all our new government debt. That's why loans aren't going to businesses. And it's a double bubble. Now the goverenment defaulting takes down every major bank. Watching Europe, who's confident democratic governments with large 'Progressive' (F'n socialists, properly labeled in Europe at least) are capable of doing anything meaningful on spending?
It's another example of Obama running the nation like a guy with a gambling addiction who just moves his debt from credit card to credit card with no intention of paying it back. Which works for individuals. A person's death ends the debt and the company eats it. A nation's death is messy and painful for millions of people as we all eat it, but mainly the poor and those on fixed incomes, interest, or transfer payments.
Posted by: Beagle at June 01, 2012 09:17 AM (sOtz/)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at June 01, 2012 01:16 PM (piMMO)
Drew bumped his over this.
Posted by: Tami at June 01, 2012 09:17 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at June 01, 2012 09:18 AM (SB0V2)
Posted by: Jimbo at June 01, 2012 09:18 AM (O3R/2)
Posted by: midaz at June 01, 2012 09:18 AM (JzHho)
Posted by: Sort-of-Mad Max at June 01, 2012 09:19 AM (VMcoS)
Posted by: Mama AJ at June 01, 2012 01:16 PM (XdlcF)
--------------------
You might be right. Should get the TSA to give the Obamas a pat down upon exiting the White House. To make sure some of the portraits are still hanging. Though in a possible fit of pique, the new Bush portrait might suffer an accident.
Posted by: Anna Puma at June 01, 2012 09:19 AM (aTSQ9)
5 MORE MONTHS!!!
It's not only a great, taunting chant to throw at Barky Ofuckstick, but it's also a warning to conservatives. There's still a lot of time left for the Stupid Party to step on their cranks.
Don't get cocky.
Push this thing through to the end.
Celebrate on Nov. 6.
Do whatever we can to prevent Lame Duck / EO damage after the Lightbringer is defeated.
Celebrate again on January 21.
Then pound Mittens and the Congress relentlessly to get it right this time.
Posted by: Jaws at June 01, 2012 09:20 AM (4I3Uo)
Nope, we're not in a position to bail out Europe -- whose systemic problems are beyond Europe's ability to solve, much less us -- and any attempt to do so, given our current deficit and debt ceiling issues will only make things worse for Obama, not better. Likewise, now that Obama has been telling donors that his second term would be used to tackle health care again should SCOTUS overturn Obamacare, most businesses will not suddenly see such a court decision a green light to start hiring -- and those that do will not start doing so in time to have an impact before the election. Keep in mind the recession that cost Bush Sr his second term was over well before the Nov 1992 election -- it was the memory of the pain, among other things, that cost him his second term.
Nobody cares much about the DOW these days, for the most part. It's been churning up and down in the same relatively narrow range for over a decade. It's become a place for computers to fight each other in nanoseconds of time for millions of pennies, rather than an actual economic bellwether.
Yes, the news today is bad for Americans, but (IMHO) it's a direct consequence of the policies of this Administration and the Democrats in Congress, put into power by the majority of those same Americans. "Experience is a dear school, but fools will learn at no other." -- Ben Franklin. When Ed Schultz hyperventilates that we might not see another Democratic president in our lifetimes, my response is, 'From your lips to God's ear." But I don't believe that for a second. ..fritz..
Posted by: fritzworth at June 01, 2012 09:21 AM (7svyX)
Posted by: dananjcon at June 01, 2012 09:21 AM (eavT+)
we can win but landslide not possible now
But I can still stay home and not bother to vote...right?
Posted by: Squishy, the low info voter... at June 01, 2012 09:22 AM (YzQ1g)
Posted by: midaz at June 01, 2012 01:18 PM (JzHho)
**
***
Boss..is that you?? SHIT!!.....I was just checking e-mails and somehow got dumped here!! REALLY!!
Posted by: dananjcon at June 01, 2012 09:22 AM (eavT+)
Our motto: 'If Fido won't heel, he ends up as somebody's meal!'
Posted by: Sort-of-Mad Max at June 01, 2012 09:22 AM (VMcoS)
Posted by: Bo the Official Dog Of The United States (OFFOGUS for short) at June 01, 2012 09:25 AM (VMcoS)
Posted by: 13times at June 01, 2012 09:25 AM (h6XiD)
This election will be the first time, other than when he ran against Bobby Rush (and lost) that Obama has ever had an opponent who was willing and able to punch back. After he lost by a 2:1 margin in his Congressional race against Rush, Obama had the skids greased for him in Chicago. The Daley machine got Obama's opponents either knocked off the ballot entirely, or forced their withdrawal by making public their sealed divorce records. And as we all remember, in 2008, McCain basically handed the election to Obama, because he could not stand the thought of "standing in the way of history" and defeating the first serious black candidate for president.
Posted by: Bystander at June 01, 2012 09:28 AM (/sohm)
Posted by: Chris R, red in NY-9 at June 01, 2012 09:33 AM (NFcOS)
I think this prediction is reasonable. Not only because the economy is bad, but also because Mitt actually fights (a vanishingly rare thing among Republican politicians) and becuse Mitt is more attractive to women than Obie is. Mostly because Mitt is more attractive to women. I think that should be the number one criteria in any primary fight - figuring out who will make the women get excited. Cuz that guy's gonna win. A good looking male candidate is even better for getting female votes than any woman candidate.
The folly of womens' suffrage has reduced the fight for the highest executive office in the US to an affair of which Cosmo magazine may be best positioned to predict the outcome.
Posted by: Reactionary at June 01, 2012 09:37 AM (xUM1Q)
Posted by: thirteen28 at June 01, 2012 09:37 AM (AbmsP)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at June 01, 2012 09:38 AM (C8mVl)
Posted by: Tami at June 01, 2012 01:09 PM (X6akg)
You don't suppose that would have been avoidable if GM hadn't produced an over-priced, unreliable electric car that nobody wants, do you?
Posted by: Warthog at June 01, 2012 09:45 AM (WDySP)
Posted by: Paul Zummo at June 01, 2012 09:46 AM (Ud5vq)
74.....Nope, we're not in a position to bail out Europe -- whose systemic problems are beyond Europe's ability to solve, much less us -- and any attempt to do so, given our current deficit and debt ceiling issues will only make things worse for Obama, not better.
Of course we're "not in a position" to bail out Europe....we're broke.
But that won't stop Barky from doing it anyway.
They're already talking about a QE3.....then, they can buy more Euro-bonds, quietly, and keep it off the radar for a while.
There is a reason why the Dems refuse to sign a Budget.
Likewise, now that Obama has been telling donors that his second term would be used to tackle health care again should SCOTUS overturn Obamacare, most businesses will not suddenly see such a court decision a green light to start hiring -- and those that do will not start doing so in time to have an impact before the election.
Well, you would think so.
But keep in mind, there will be some employers who are Dems, that have been using ZeroCare as an excuse....they might very well start hiring.
And the adoring DNCmedia is poised to trumpet any hirings to prop up their Boy King.
Keep in mind the recession that cost Bush Sr his second term was over well before the Nov 1992 election -- it was the memory of the pain, among other things, that cost him his second term.
Yeah, it was well over before the Nov '92 election....but the media didn't report about it till over a year later.
That same lying leftist media is still at work....lying and covering up stories, to try to get Barky reelected.
And....if all else fails....that same lying media will start saying that "Romney is going to win in a landslide". .....Because they know that it will cause a lot of lazy voters to stay home and not bother to go vote for Romney.
Posted by: wheatie at June 01, 2012 09:58 AM (YzQ1g)
Posted by: Flapjackmaka at June 01, 2012 10:03 AM (PXNon)
No kidding.
Celebrations are waaaaaaay premature.
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at June 01, 2012 01:15 PM (C8mVl)
So is perpetual moaning and hand-wringing.
Posted by: Oldcat at June 01, 2012 10:13 AM (z1N6a)
"I've been waiting 30 years for a bareknuckled Republican presidential candidate; who would have thought it would be Mitt Romney?"
This. The whole Solyndra photo-op and Axeldouche getting the smirk wiped off his face - in BOSTON, of all places! - makes me feel better about Mitt. I'm still not ready to suck his dick yet, but he's magnitudes better than Juan McShitstain.
"Romney is about as competent and less charming than McCain."
Fuck you. If it wasn't for that senile old collaborationist dickwipe, we wouldn't have the Dog-Eating Retard desecrating the Oval Office. McCain couldn't carry Mitt's magic undewear.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Clitoris at June 01, 2012 10:14 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: Flapjackmaka at June 01, 2012 10:19 AM (PXNon)
Posted by: W. Wolf at June 01, 2012 10:20 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Flapjackmaka at June 01, 2012 10:31 AM (PXNon)
Posted by: tsj017 at June 01, 2012 10:31 AM (4YUWF)
Posted by: Steve White at June 01, 2012 10:32 AM (D14J4)
Posted by: small town girl at June 01, 2012 10:33 AM (ieZ+e)
Posted by: Flapjackmaka at June 01, 2012 10:51 AM (PXNon)
Posted by: Steevy at June 01, 2012 10:59 AM (Ts9tU)
Posted by: polynikes channeling bizarro Edwards at June 01, 2012 11:06 AM (DdHu+)
Just a note for the GOP: How about an ad about Obama refusing to acknowledge Lech Walesa because he was too "political" -- meaning, he said the US was slipping towards socialism. Nice way of using the socialism word without actually saying it?
Posted by: PJ at June 01, 2012 11:10 AM (DQHjw)
Posted by: Flapjackmaka at June 01, 2012 11:17 AM (PXNon)
Posted by: Flapjackmaka at June 01, 2012 11:18 AM (PXNon)
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at June 01, 2012 11:29 AM (r4wIV)
You're right. Let's just say home then and lose.
Posted by: Dow Jones at June 01, 2012 11:38 AM (DQHjw)
Since you ended on with a LOTR quotation, here's another that we must all keep in mind: "There is only one Lord of the Rings. And he does not share power."
Posted by: Brown Line at June 01, 2012 12:36 PM (29pYQ)
Here, here Fritz!
I think your analysis of how bad things are for Obama as of this week is spot on. For a good while not I have been posting at Ace of Spades that I think the broad dynamics indicate a big Romney win was likely coming. But the economic facts emerging this week make those broad dynamics even starker than before.
And while I agree that it would be overly optimistic by quite a bit to even cautiously predict a 1984-like landslide, I think it is reasonable to wonder if a victory in that stratospheric range might develop.
The reason:
It is within the realm of possibility that a national zeitgeist of anti-Obama ridicule could develop. If those kinds of floodgates open, watch out! - Not saying this is likely because it isn't. But perhaps barely within range.
But I reiterate what I've been saying for a while now: a big Romney win is likely.
Posted by: _Dave_ at June 01, 2012 01:27 PM (gqoYf)
How much do I want Obama and his henchmen to lose? Nationwide I can think of nothing better than total destruction. Allow me a simple explanation. I am NOT advocating any killing, but
Fight to kill or fight to win? With apologies to Terry Pratchett writing in “Witches Abroad: “Cats will kill. But they do not fight to kill. They fight to win.
There is a difference. ThereÂ’s no point in killing an opponent, if they are dead, then they are not aware that theyÂ’ve lost. To be a real winner you must have an opponent who not only is beaten, but also knows he has been beaten, even crushed. There is small triumph standing over a corpse, but a beaten, crushed opponent who will remain beaten and crushed every day of their sad and wretched lives, is something to treasure.
This is how I feel about November. I donÂ’t want to kill these Democrats, I want to destroy them. I want the American people that I know and love to rise up en masse and vote these son of a bitches OUT! I want them standing on the outside of politics, looking in and realizing how badly they screwed things up, for the next thirty years or so. If this happens in November. I can die a happy man.
Posted by: jfalcon, the curmud..curmuge..the old guy in Vegas at June 01, 2012 03:46 PM (alNEB)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2756 seconds, 240 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: micmcn at June 01, 2012 09:00 AM (/3KtX)