June 27, 2012
— CAC Quinnipiac out with three new polls this morning for PA, OH, FL which is interesting since they...just released a Florida one last week.
Anywho, on to the registered voter results.
In Ohio, Quinnipiac has Obama jumping out to a 47-38 lead. Usually PPP and Quinnipiac move in similar directions (PPP showed Obama's lead halving in Ohio yesterday), not the case this time. On the Senate side, they have Brown cruising to re-election with a 50-34 lead over Mandel. D/R split in the state for this poll was an odd D+8, which explains much of the large lead (they also have Obama doing well amongst indies and better with men and whites than PPP, Public Policy's release yesterday used a D+2 sample). Who knew using a sample with four times the Democratic registration advantage than another pollster will give Obama favor, eh?
In Florida, Obama leads Romney by 4, 45-41, nearly identical to the individual state release they pushed out last week showing him up by the same margin. However, on the Senate side, they have Bill Nelson barely hanging onto his seat, leading Mack by a scant 41-40. They used a D+3 sample in the state, same as their singular poll last week.
In Pennsylvania, Obama leads Romney by 6, 45-39. They have Casey cruising to re-election in the Senate race, leading Smith by a 49-32 margin. These numbers are with the D/R split of D+8, reasonable for the Keystone where Democrats enjoy a marked registration advantage.
Here is where I used to get excited but now take issue with Quinnipiac- Pennsylvania and Ohio share similar demographics, but PA, as many cynical morons have pointed out, is several points to the left of its neighbor to the west. This isn't the first Q release showing a markedly more favorable result for Romney in Pennsylvania. Still, a data point is a data point.
The Q poll results are enough to pull Ohio back away from Romney and into toss-up, holds Pennsylvania steady as lean Obama, and changes nothing for Florida (since last week's identical release showed the same margin). Obama currently edges Romney 263-40-235. Why are the changes not more dramatic, given the leads?
Because we are now at the stage in the cycle where your biggest swing states are being polled by multiple firms- whereas Quinnipiac, PPP, and Rasmussen were the big dogs in winter, now everybody is throwing their two cents in and so every individual poll has less of an impact. Michigan has had five firms release in addition to Rasmussen and PPP in just the last two weeks, for example. As more polling firms pile on, each individual poll affects the margin less and less unless the result skews radically away from the rest of the pack, in which case I keep a suspicious eye when throwing them in (if another firm confirms PPP's Obama Ohio decline, Q's poll gets adjusted down in the #AOSHQDD margin).
Disappointing numbers, but they are what they are and there will be some other firm making us ooh and aaah anyway, so in they go. Surely, Quinnipiac can't be that terribly off anyway. I mean, with Michigan averaging a tossup, Oregon about a six point lead for the President, and Wisconsin a scant three pointer for him, it is totally reasonable to say Ohio is better for Obama than Oregon, Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, right?
Posted by: CAC at
02:29 AM
| Comments (85)
Post contains 574 words, total size 4 kb.
Posted by: VIA on the tiny keyboard at June 27, 2012 02:53 AM (zek+S)
Posted by: teej at June 27, 2012 02:54 AM (85x54)
Posted by: teej at June 27, 2012 02:57 AM (WY3bD)
Posted by: AuthorLMendez at June 27, 2012 02:59 AM (3XDPM)
Posted by: teej at June 27, 2012 03:00 AM (WY3bD)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Team Dagny at June 27, 2012 03:01 AM (9TTOe)
Posted by: AuthorLMendez at June 27, 2012 03:08 AM (3XDPM)
W.T.F.???????????????
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at June 27, 2012 03:08 AM (UTq/I)
I happened to be on Twitter this morning when this came out.
First, Zeke Miller of Buzzfeed had a tweet which said "In my inbox" followed by the results in ALL CAPS.
Then Mark Halperin tweeted the results not one minute later.
Then, about a minute after that Rick Klein of ABC tweeted it.
So I asked Rick if he got the same email as the other reporters I follow.
And he answered me in a very Clintonesque manner, that there were no press releases from polling firms this morning.
So I told him that he must have gotten the same email that Miller did, and I assumed it was from the Obama campaign.
Podhoretz of the New York Post says the margin of error on some of the swing states is +/- 10. Do not know if he is right, only reporting what popped up on my Twitter feed.
End of report.
Posted by: Miss Marple at June 27, 2012 03:09 AM (GoIUi)
Posted by: Matt in Maine at June 27, 2012 03:10 AM (gWLRb)
Posted by: Captain Hate (dagny solidarity) at June 27, 2012 03:13 AM (EiwOi)
Posted by: Hopped up on Something at June 27, 2012 03:14 AM (X3HIv)
Posted by: AuthorLMendez at June 27, 2012 03:17 AM (3XDPM)
Posted by: Miss Marple at June 27, 2012 03:17 AM (GoIUi)
Anyone see this yesterday?
federal appeals court ruled on Tuesday that the EPA is “unambiguously correct” in its assertion that industry and vehicle emissions are a danger to public health — one of the central tenets of their argument that they have ample justification for regulating greenhouse gases through the Clean Air Act.
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at June 27, 2012 03:17 AM (mFxQX)
Posted by: AuthorLMendez at June 27, 2012 03:20 AM (3XDPM)
Posted by: Vic at June 27, 2012 03:22 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Team Dagny at June 27, 2012 03:22 AM (9TTOe)
Oh, the suspense. How will FEMA perform? Will the Florida citizens be on TV complaining, or will they have fulsome praise for their hero president?
Will Colorado citizens be given help to recover or will they be stiffed by the evil GOP?
The suspense on how NBC will cover this critical election year story is killing me.
Posted by: Miss Marple at June 27, 2012 03:22 AM (GoIUi)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Team Dagny at June 27, 2012 03:24 AM (9TTOe)
Posted by: chai at June 27, 2012 03:25 AM (d9X/q)
Posted by: toby928© at June 27, 2012 03:27 AM (QupBk)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Team Dagny at June 27, 2012 03:27 AM (9TTOe)
Posted by: Miss Marple at June 27, 2012 03:30 AM (GoIUi)
Posted by: Hopped up on Something at June 27, 2012 03:31 AM (X3HIv)
Posted by: Case at June 27, 2012 03:33 AM (GxTMf)
They have credibility because...?
Posted by: Exile at June 27, 2012 03:58 AM (O0lVq)
Posted by: TFC3Tweets at June 27, 2012 04:02 AM (bgzAd)
Posted by: Purp (@PurpAv) at June 27, 2012 04:03 AM (Nkx5C)
My take away was mittens, if he wants PA, needs to get to work.
Posted by: morning coffee crew at June 27, 2012 04:17 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: yanks at June 27, 2012 04:20 AM (eTY6Q)
Posted by: morning coffee crew at June 27, 2012 04:30 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: DrSmith at June 27, 2012 04:31 AM (Xa2if)
They are trying to create the meme out there that Obama is unbeatable in these swing states. What bs. The sad part is that the Left screams about how fake and right-wing Rasmussen is when he is the ONLY pollster that uses real party weightings.
The "true" pollsters like PPP and Q use these insane messes.
Posted by: Bill Mitchell at June 27, 2012 04:38 AM (hlUJY)
@37 -
Ed Rendell was on the radio this morning he said the Obama ads are having an effect. I don't know, I haven't seen them because I don't own a TV right now.
Here's what appeared in my inbox yesterday, from Congressman Meehan:
The Democrats are hemorrhaging independent voters in key swing states like Virginia, North Carolina, Florida and Pennsylvania. Just yesterday, the news outlet POLITICO reported that Obama will “live and die by the size of the margin he produces out of Philadelphia and how well he does in its populous suburbs.”
The President's campaign managers know that if they lose here, they'll lose the election – this is their Alamo.
___
How well he does in Philadelphia populous suburbs.
Not the same energy for the One that was evident four years ago. With the EPA ruling out of DC, Romney needs to reassure Pennsylvanians that he will roll back coal industry destroying EPA dictats.
Nobody said it was going to be easy, but Romney could turn PA, all he has to do is flip Montco or Delco. Bucks and Chester counties already flipped in 2010.
Obama is his own worst enemy, between now and Nov. he likely will do something to make indies hate him even more.
Posted by: kallisto at June 27, 2012 04:38 AM (jm/9g)
They are trying to create the meme out there that Obama is unbeatable in these swing states.
___
yep
Posted by: kallisto at June 27, 2012 04:41 AM (jm/9g)
Posted by: DrSmith at June 27, 2012 04:47 AM (Xa2if)
DrSmith
Are you completely insane? They gave Dems a +8 advantage in the OH sample. Dems were +2 in OH in 2008. Are you saying that with Obama's wild success they had quadrupled that lead now?
What an idiot.
Posted by: Bill Mitchell at June 27, 2012 04:55 AM (hlUJY)
Posted by: DrSmith at June 27, 2012 08:47 AM (Xa2if)
Bullshit. Besides the MFM no one is buying that the economy is in a recovery. And that whole likeability thing is rubbish when you're out of work too.
Posted by: TheQuietMan at June 27, 2012 04:55 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: DrSmith at June 27, 2012 04:59 AM (t8tck)
A majority of the American public believe the economy is in recovery,
___
Where's your support for this claim?
Here in the Philadelphia suburbs, which haven't been hit as hard by the recession due to the diversity of jobs available, the unemployment rate is still above what it was before Obama was elected. Statewide, it's 7.4% today as opposed to 5.6% in Sep 2008.
***
The metric that that will hurt Obama is the one recently released about the average household wealth declining 40%. This is due mainly to the housing crash. Independent voters in Bucks, Montco, Delco and Chesco are not happy with the decline in home values or their 401k losses. They don't feel wealthy anymore. Romney looks like a winner to them. He is a known quantity as an executive. PA indies are going to make Obama pay for promising them a unicorn and not delivering.
***
Commercial RE in these parts is dead in the water and has been for at least four years. Residential inventory increases as we speak, further driving down prices. I'd like to see the evidence of the recovery which you claim.
Posted by: kallisto at June 27, 2012 05:00 AM (jm/9g)
Posted by: DrSmith at June 27, 2012 05:10 AM (oGyUC)
re: Philly burb demo "recovery":
Those who survived the 2008/2009 slash and burn are not getting the same raises, if any - as they did pre-crash. Employees who were cut and lucky enough to be rehired are earning a fraction of what they made at their former jobs. Realtors themselves are getting foreclosed on their personal residences. Contents of storage units are being auctioned off because the renters have fallen behind on their storage rent. Despite the fall in gas prices, consumer confidence has fallen another 2.4%.
In 2008 voters were under the impression that Obama could fix things. The fix never occurred, in fact, things have gotten so much worse than anyone anticipated. If it's true that attack ads are bearing fruit in these swing states, he can only attack so much. At some point, economic reality rears its ugly head.
Posted by: kallisto at June 27, 2012 05:14 AM (jm/9g)
Posted by: DrSmith at June 27, 2012 09:10 AM (oGyUC)
It's a whole different world than 2008. Barry is no longer seen as the messiah except for a small group of true believers. And I'll believe an NBC poll the day I land on the moon. And who in the fark says that Barry is likeable?
Posted by: TheQuietMan at June 27, 2012 05:14 AM (1Jaio)
EVERY SINGLE POLL shows Obama's likability much higher than Romney's.
___
What about the polls which ask "who would be better at fixing the economy"?
Voters may like the Preezy because of his wife's toned arms and his damn fine pants crease... but they want someone to make their financial pain go away. They want substance this time, not style. They want action, not empty rhetoric and promises. Anyway, now he has a record to run on. You think, "Hey, you LIKE ME, you REALLY LIKE me!" is going to work in November?
I don't.
Posted by: kallisto at June 27, 2012 05:17 AM (jm/9g)
Posted by: irongrampa at June 27, 2012 05:20 AM (SAMxH)
Posted by: DrSmith at June 27, 2012 05:21 AM (eX3h/)
Posted by: DrSmith at June 27, 2012 05:22 AM (t8tck)
GW Bush won his election, in part, because he was seen as more likable than Kerry
___
He won because of Security Moms.
Posted by: kallisto at June 27, 2012 05:26 AM (jm/9g)
Barry is only liked by the MFM and hardcore liberals. If Romney follows Reagan's script, Barry will be out of a job
Posted by: TheQuietMan at June 27, 2012 05:30 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: Marie at June 27, 2012 05:31 AM (P9OJs)
Posted by: Jim Scrummy at June 27, 2012 05:31 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: DrSmith at June 27, 2012 05:45 AM (t8tck)
Too many unknowns in PA, and how it will break, especially in late June.
___
True. IMO Montco would be more likely to flip red due to Jewish representation there. teh Won's support has eroded in this population due to his Israel hostility. If they come out against him on the Main Line, put PA in the Romney bucket.
Economically speaking, except for the fracking pockets, the rest of the state is a hot mess.
Posted by: kallisto at June 27, 2012 05:48 AM (jm/9g)
It seems entire states can suffer from Stockholm syndrome.
Posted by: MTF at June 27, 2012 05:57 AM (B5y+v)
Posted by: Jim Scrummy at June 27, 2012 06:02 AM (sbV1u)
Polls call me all the time and I simply hang up. You know why, I don't want to waste the time answering their tailored questions AND I do NOT want them to know what I am thinking. Let them guess.
I will go even further and say that obama and mooch's "despise-ability" factor is through the roof given the way they have partied hearty on the public dollar through a deep recession. The man has played 100+ rounds of golf and countless hours of hoops while many people lost everything. The big Mooch has been scarfing up caviar, couture, and Cartier like it was in the clearance bin at WalMart and going to be outlawed on the first of next month.
Posted by: Will Not Assimilate For Food at June 27, 2012 06:09 AM (kXoT0)
I'm also suspicious of polls with large numbers of undecideds.
I have no doubt that people who voted for Obama in 2008 will be reluctant to admit their mistake, but these particular numbers don't make sense to me. We'll get a lot of rigged polls and it'll be tough to be suspicious of them without cocooning yourself.
Posted by: AmishDude at June 27, 2012 06:25 AM (J5tI6)
Posted by: motionview at June 27, 2012 06:43 AM (i+DU3)
These polls are of course loaded with +D bias, and then the clever pollsters reason backward from the poll results to determine what the voters really think.
Which is hogwash.
The campaigns have better and more subtle internal polling, and I definitely get the vibe that the Obama campaign is worried. There is a lot that can go wrong for them between now and mid-October.
Mid - October is the key time. About 2-3 weeks before the election, the low information voters and the independents will start to break one way or the other, and the fog of polling will start to clear.
What Romney has to do to win:
1) Energize the Republican/conservative base with strong campaigning and a sharp pick for VP.
2) Do what he is doing right now, retail campaigning at the grass roots level, getting as many people as possible to actually see him and realize he is not some freak with horns.
3) Press the Obama campaign, and stampede them into making mistakes. They are not particularly smart with respect to what people really think, and are still insulated by the compliant bullshit media that gives them a daily tongue bath.
Exit remark: People in Ohio are pissed at Obama, but they are not pleased with the Republican Party. The after effects of the repeal of SB5 from 2011 still linger. The repeal of SB5 is about the reverse of what happened to Scott Walker in Wisconsin. What will matter come November is who comes out to vote, and how hard and well Romney campaigns here.
Posted by: Reader C.J. Burch writes..... at June 27, 2012 06:46 AM (RFeQD)
Posted by: doug at June 27, 2012 06:49 AM (gUGI6)
I just saw the sidebar link about Preezy's upcoming bus tour through PA and OH. We'll be able to gauge the enthusiasm for him in the Keystone State if the adoring crowds comprise anything more than SEIU types.
Posted by: kallisto at June 27, 2012 06:58 AM (jm/9g)
Expect more bullshit like this. Obama has no record, so he has to win by pandering to each piece of his base and getting them fired up.
His black vote has been slipping (and coming out for ghey marriage didn't help). So surrogates Sharpton and Jackson are crying raaaaaaacism again.
Posted by: Arms Merchant at June 27, 2012 06:59 AM (+XVQe)
Posted by: toby928© at June 27, 2012 07:15 AM (QupBk)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at June 27, 2012 08:22 AM (i330i)
Posted by: morning coffee crew at June 27, 2012 08:32 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: Kathy from Kansas at June 27, 2012 08:45 AM (F0o5k)
Yeah, Morris pushed Rubio to Ingraham (sitting in for O'Reilly). He thinks its the surest way to win in Florida, and (to him) Florida is the key to the election. I suppose so, but I'm wondering how we get the 47% of Ohioans to get their brains in gear too.
Can a Veep candidate swing a state vote? Controversial topic, that.
Posted by: MTF at June 27, 2012 08:49 AM (B5y+v)
Posted by: The Pixies at June 27, 2012 09:05 AM (i330i)
Posted by: Kathy from Kansas at June 27, 2012 09:25 AM (F0o5k)
Yeah, right.
Posted by: Oldcat at June 27, 2012 10:29 AM (z1N6a)
Posted by: DavidW at June 27, 2012 11:10 AM (VY2Ce)
Posted by: steevy at June 27, 2012 02:26 PM (Xb3hu)
Posted by: reliapundit at June 27, 2012 04:05 PM (Bjp+g)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2232 seconds, 213 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Toaster at June 27, 2012 02:50 AM (YCJ3T)