March 23, 2012
— Ace Oh, the Media decided We Have To Have a National Discussion about this story.
1. I appreciate the media dubbing Zimmerman "a white Hispanic." Like the Israelis, he's now an honorary member of the Oppressive White Majority.
2. Certain local stories of race-on-race crime ignite the media's passions. Others do not.
3. Most of the time, stories like the one I just linked are not reported by the media, for various reasons. One is that, alas, black on white crime is so common as to be not newsworthy, whereas the reverse is rare and hence, oddly, makes national news.
Another reason is that such stories are, by their nature, inflammatory (no pun intended, of course).
But the media does not mind inflammatory stories when the right people are inflamed. Farrakhan, for example, states that "soon and very soon" the "law of retaliation" "may be applied."
Now, if that story about the black kids setting the white kid on fire -- while declaring "You're white, this is what you deserve" -- was excessively inflammatory, why the media rush to inflame further black on white violence?
4. The cops acted predictably and understandably in not arresting Zimmerman. Here are the facts, as they knew them at the time: Zimmerman was a law-abiding citizen who gave them lots of (correct) tips about local crime. He was helpful to the police (probably also annoying in being too vigilant -- but while such people may annoy the police, they nevertheless appreciate the help that comes with the annoyance).
He called in to 911 to report a "suspicious" character, then followed him, waiting for police to arrive. Eventually there was some violence (Zimmerman was reportedly bloodied) and he claimed self-defense.
Now, under those circumstances, the police are not going to be very suspicious of Zimmerman. If he was attempting a murder, he went about it in a strange way -- calling police to arrive at the scene of the crime before there was a crime. He had no known motive against this Trayvon Martin fellow -- they'd never met.
Why suspect a deliberate murder?
That doesn't make Zimmerman innocent -- but it does explain why the police thought he was likely innocent of wrongdoing.
5. If the facts are as the media reports them, then it does seem like Zimmerman was following around a kid who wasn't doing anything illegal at all. Then again, if the facts were as the media reported them, the Duke Lacrosse Team was guilty of violent gang-rape.
While the liberal media screams, once again, "Trust us, and forget all about our hitting the Panic Button time and time again before!," some of us would like to see what the facts really are before coming to a conclusion.
6. As a general matter, and inescapably, the law of self-defense is a very thorny thicket. The media would like to simplify the law and simply declare that anyone who shoots anyone else is guilty of murder (because they would like to ban all guns, period, and this is a cutesy manner of achieving that goal through the back-door).
But these laws are inescapably thorny and these cases are inescapably very dependent on actual facts.
At the heart of every self-defense case are a pair of related questions: Did the defendant reasonably believe his safety was in jeopardy when he struck the fatal blow? And, based on the circumstances, did the defendant act lawfully, within the accepted safe-harbors for the use of lethal force in defending one's life (or another's life)?
Facts, not ginned up racial outrage or general anti-gun animus, answer these questions.
Given what we think we know (and remember, the media has lied before): it appears that the kid was unarmed, the guy can't rely on self-defense to save his life.
Further, it appears (again, appears) that Zimmerman initiated the contact/confrontation, not the kid, so the "stand your ground" law is not even relevant in the case.
But that's how it appears, at the moment, and for a whole year the media was pretty sure that drug-addled, mentally-imbalanced nightcrawler Crystal Gayle Mangum was a pretty solid citizen and dependable witness.
We'll see how this plays.
Various inarticulate, charity-hire racists don't need a sober assessment of the facts, because their conclusions are animated by racism -- the party of the Disfavored Race is always guilty. (Even when the member of the Disfavored Race is only an honorary member of that Disfavored Race.)
Although America has brought shame to some racists, others flaunt their racism proudly.
We'll have to do something about that. What is this, the 50s?
7. The media is a full-court press to politicize this, noting that the entire Republican field has remained "silent" on this case.
Two problems: First, Obama himself remained "silent" until yesterday, when he declared if he had a son, he'd look like Trayvon Martin. (And not, for example, like the guys who set fire to the white boy.)
This happened a month ago. Obama waited a month to comment, and as late as Monday refused comment, calling it a "local" matter.
So why suddenly is everyone expected to hop-to now that Hamlet has decided it's a good issue to exploit?
Second problem: Obama is not the first candidate to address this matter. Newt Gingrich was.
So is Obama racist for failing to match Gingrich's alacrity?
8. Fantasy is a very popular genre of fiction. Fantasy is often used to explore real-world problems, but in fantasy trappings. Why is this attractive? Perhaps because the real-world problems, with real-world details, are so unattractive that many people can only be induced to engage with the subject matter if it has a certain amount of distancing from real-world details. If it's fuzzed up by fantasy. Spoonfull of sugar and all that.
The actual real-world facts is that blacks commit crimes at greatly higher rates than whites, and that blacks specifically victimize whites at far higher rates than whites victimize blacks.
And yet the media doesn't ever wish to discuss that -- it's too real, it hurts too much. It offends people.
So instead we only talk about racial issues through this fantasy lens-- the fantasy lens in which white on black crime is common and some sort of national epidemic which must be addressed immediately.
In this case, if Zimmerman was too vigilant and too paranoid, it could just be because he overreacted, lethally, to the very real problem of high black crime rates.
And while we blame him, what about the actual black criminals -- not Trayvon Martin, mind you, who appears blameless, but the actual black criminals who'd been operating in Zimmerman's neighborhood and so brought this tragedy to pass?
Shall we say nothing of them?
Probably not. Because we don't have enough layers of fantasy to make that particular problem palatable and safe for polite discussion.
The Calls: These are the 911 calls during/after the incident, not from Zimmerman, but from others.
Apparently Zimmerman was calling for help as Trayvon was beating him up.
Not dispositive, but suggestive that Zimmerman's claim -- I was in fear for my life -- is credible.
Not sure what the law would say in a case where a guy thinks he's tracking a criminal, gets into a fight with said suspected criminal, loses fight with said suspected criminal, and then shoots him.
"He's Coming Towards Me:" I'd been assuming that Zimmerman approached Martin, rather than vice versa.
But this suggests (but doesn't prove) that Martin approached Zimmerman before the deadly incident.
I don't know if this is just before the incident, though. Perhaps this approach ended, and then Zimmerman started tracking him again.
Dispatcher: Sanford Police Department. ...Zimmerman: Hey we've had some break-ins in my neighborhood, and there's a real suspicious guy, uh, [near] Retreat View Circle, um, the best address I can give you is 111 Retreat View Circle. This guy looks like he's up to no good, or he's on drugs or something. It's raining and he's just walking around, looking about.
Dispatcher: OK, and this guy is he white, black, or Hispanic?
Zimmerman: He looks black.
Dispatcher: Did you see what he was wearing?
Zimmerman: Yeah. A dark hoodie, like a grey hoodie, and either jeans or sweatpants and white tennis shoes. He's [unintelligible], he was just staring...
Dispatcher: OK, he's just walking around the area...
Zimmerman: ...looking at all the houses.
Dispatcher: OK... Zimmerman: Now he's just staring at me.
Dispatcher: OK--you said it's 1111 Retreat View? Or 111?
Zimmerman: That's the clubhouse...
Dispatcher: That's the clubhouse, do you know what the--he's near the clubhouse right now?
Zimmerman: Yeah, now he's coming towards me.
Dispatcher: OK. Zimmerman: He's got his hand in his waistband. And he's a black male.
Dispatcher: How old would you say he looks?
Zimmerman: He's got button on his shirt, late teens.
Dispatcher: Late teens ok.
If that's right before the incident, it does suggest that Zimmerman did not initiate contact or violence.
Some will say "But Martin has the right to walk around the neighborhood!" Yes, he does. But Zimmerman also has the right to walk around his neighborhood, and keep tabs on strangers.
That would make him a busy-body and a Nosey Parker, but he too has that right.
To me the question comes down to who started the fight. If Zimmerman started it, then he can't plug a guy just because he started a fight and then got his ass kicked.
But if Martin started it, then Zimmerman can take refuge in the Stand Your Ground law.
Not sure if that's the actual law. Just seems like that's likely the law-- stand your ground would apply when you're attacked, not when you yourself attack.
Update: "He's Running." Takser points out that this 911 call has Zimmerman reporting "He's running" and "He ran."
But Zimmerman doesn't follow him at that point -- he's not breathing hard. He doesn't seem to be running himself.
If Zimmerman chased him I could understand why Martin might be alarmed. But Zimmerman doesn't pursue him. So I don't know what this says about the actual moment of contact between them.
The Law... Thanks to tmtsss.
776.041 Use of force by aggressor.—The justification described in the preceding sections of this chapter is not available to a person who1) Is attempting to commit, committing, or escaping after the commission of, a forcible felony; or
(2) Initially provokes the use of force against himself or herself, unless
a) Such force is so great that the person reasonably believes that he or she is
in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm and that he or she has exhausted every reasonable means to escape such danger other than the
use of force which is likely to cause death or great bodily harm to the
assailant; or(b) In good faith, the person withdraws from physical contact with the
assailant and indicates clearly to the assailant that he or she desires
to withdraw and terminate the use of force, but the assailant continues
or resumes the use of force.History.—s. 13, ch. 74-383; s. 1190, ch. 97-102.
So there's the law.
The issues: Would "following" count as "provoking"? I don't think so. I think that's talking about the guy who immediately, directly begins the fight.
If that is Zimmerman, he can't find safe harbor here... except for the next "unless," which declares he still might if he reasonably believed he was in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm.
I'm not sure a beating, without more, would qualify as that. Seems to me it has to be more serious. A beating doesn't typically result in death or great bodily harm. Could. But usually doesn't.
So it seems that my first thought -- depends on who actually started the fight -- is the important one.
Posted by: Ace at
10:19 AM
| Comments (945)
Post contains 1977 words, total size 13 kb.
Posted by: soothsayer at March 23, 2012 10:22 AM (jUytm)
Which I don't. I swear.
*cough
Posted by: Prez. Killah B! at March 23, 2012 10:23 AM (gCa4h)
Posted by: Fainting Liberal Who Prefers To Avoid Hard Questions at March 23, 2012 10:23 AM (wQ1iq)
I dunno, when the 911 dispatcher tells you help is on the way and to back off...and you don't....it sounds a lot like pre-meditation to me.
Pre-meditation doesn't mean days or weeks...it can mean minutes.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 23, 2012 10:25 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 23, 2012 10:25 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: Roy at March 23, 2012 10:25 AM (VndSC)
Posted by: media shills at March 23, 2012 10:26 AM (8g9qq)
Aren't the Democrats poised for an intra-party race war here?
Posted by: Gulfkraken at March 23, 2012 10:26 AM (WBfjO)
You're welcome!
Posted by: Dwight Schrute at March 23, 2012 10:27 AM (ykSKg)
Posted by: toby928© at March 23, 2012 10:27 AM (GTbGH)
Posted by: the Butcher at March 23, 2012 10:27 AM (8g9qq)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 23, 2012 10:28 AM (ceyqu)
Posted by: ace at March 23, 2012 10:28 AM (nj1bB)
Got it.
Or is our president a black white?
Posted by: Dang at March 23, 2012 10:28 AM (BbX1b)
Posted by: dogfish at March 23, 2012 10:29 AM (N2yhW)
Posted by: joncelli, heartless Con and all around unpleasant guy at March 23, 2012 10:29 AM (RD7QR)
He was a gung-ho wannabe cop who had delusions of grandeur. He loved to strut around with his pistol and pretend that he was big and tough. When the opportunity to use it presented itself he cold-bloodedly murdered this poor honor student and budding artist/athlete/musician/church-goer.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at March 23, 2012 10:29 AM (nEUpB)
Yes, you just add a jigger of coconut milk and a spritz of lime to the standard Black Russian.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 23, 2012 10:29 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 23, 2012 10:29 AM (jUytm)
Not a peep from anyone.
Gee, Mr President. If you had a son, he could look just like Shawn.
Couldn't he.
Posted by: Fat Al at March 23, 2012 10:30 AM (y0VOX)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 23, 2012 10:30 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: seamrog at March 23, 2012 10:30 AM (JKSUw)
Pre-meditation doesn't mean days or weeks...it can mean minutes.
Premeditation also means that he went into the situation having already decided that he was going to kill him. Good luck proving that.
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at March 23, 2012 10:30 AM (JxMoP)
Posted by: boulder toilet hobo at March 23, 2012 10:30 AM (3W9Zk)
was there any evidence or police call that inimated Trayvon was committing a crime?
Posted by: willow at March 23, 2012 10:30 AM (TomZ9)
Posted by: Damiano at March 23, 2012 10:31 AM (A2+pr)
Posted by: toby928© at March 23, 2012 10:31 AM (GTbGH)
>>>Aren't the Democrats poised for an intra-party race war here?
Hence the re-inventing of Zimmerman as a German-Scandi. And why you never see his picture.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose finally remembers why he's here at March 23, 2012 10:31 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: The Mega Independent at March 23, 2012 10:31 AM (Fz7+s)
Reading the link sooth so helpfully provided: he wasn't told to back off. The 911 operator asked Zimmerman if he was following Trayvon. Z said "yes," the operator said "You don't have to do that."
That is not the same as "Stop. Let the officers handle it."
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 23, 2012 10:31 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 23, 2012 10:31 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 23, 2012 10:32 AM (ceyqu)
And what pisses me off beyond words is the complete, total blackout of the white kid who was set on fucking FIRE while black kids expressly called him out for being white and he "got what he deserved." Fucking Sharpton: silent. Fucking Obama: silent. Fucking Farrakan: silent. Fucking media: silent. The fucking entire left: silent.
Posted by: Lady in Black.....{sigh} at March 23, 2012 10:33 AM (F+Xfj)
Just last weekend, 49 people were shot - 10 of them fatally - including a 6 yo girl.
I wonder what her crime was - or if the shooter was an angry white male?
Obviously not, because no one gives a fuck.
Posted by: Fat Al at March 23, 2012 10:33 AM (y0VOX)
The congress will need to act if Obamacare isnÂ’t declared unconstitutional next week.
(hijacking in progressÂ… help!)
Posted by: jwest at March 23, 2012 10:33 AM (FdndL)
Posted by: mugiwara at March 23, 2012 10:33 AM (DzbFD)
Hey, he sure looks a lot like me
Posted by: Barack Obama III at March 23, 2012 10:34 AM (gCa4h)
Posted by: Hinks at March 23, 2012 10:34 AM (cEdZt)
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 23, 2012 10:34 AM (niZvt)
watch out for those full-page titty pics on Page Three of The Sun, and all the "She looks fabulous" celeb bikini pics in the Mail
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at March 23, 2012 10:34 AM (Dll6b)
Posted by: the hobbit fomerly known as Donna at March 23, 2012 10:34 AM (ZHge+)
Exactly.
But when you start acting like a cop and you don't have the training that goes with it - shit happens. I'm sure all of us can think of someone we know who's a little too much Paul Blart-Mall Cop.
I don't know what happened, but again, when the cops tell you to back off and you don't, you get to pay the piper. I am pretty sure Zimmerman will draw a manslaughter conviction at least.
Then again, I was pretty sure Obama would be a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure.
Wait...I was right about that. Never mind.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 23, 2012 10:35 AM (sbV1u)
Deliberate use of deadly force usually is prima facie for intent to kill putting murder 2 on the menu if malice is involved. I think a lot of those bar brawls get downgrayedd because of plea bargaining. I don't think a plea bargain is going to happen on this one.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose finally remembers why he's here at March 23, 2012 10:35 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 23, 2012 10:35 AM (ceyqu)
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 23, 2012 10:35 AM (niZvt)
I think the fault lies entirely on Zimmerman. He was told specifically to back off and wait for the police to show up. He decided to pursue when he had no probable cause to do so, or see anything life threatening.
Posted by: EC at March 23, 2012 10:35 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: ace at March 23, 2012 10:35 AM (nj1bB)
Wonder why the MBM isn't showing pics of him?
http://tinyurl.com/6lqd3ne
Ace, could you add this picture to the thread?
Posted by: kbdabear at March 23, 2012 10:36 AM (Y+DPZ)
Excellent point. I am curious as to how big these two men are. As I understand it, witnesses say they saw Trayvon on top of George beating him before he was shot. All of the press photos show Trayvon is a football player. So I am curious if Trayvon liked to play football, or if he was a 6'4 255lb division I middle linebacker recruit. Conversely, what does George look like? If this all started as a physical confrontation, it seems very relevant.
Posted by: Gulfkraken at March 23, 2012 10:36 AM (WBfjO)
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 23, 2012 10:36 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: Palooka at March 23, 2012 10:36 AM (N2Sw/)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 23, 2012 10:36 AM (eCnLg)
Live by the race hustle, die by the race hustle...
Posted by: Alex at March 23, 2012 10:36 AM (tlK1P)
No it's not.
Then again, playing cop in a potentially lethal situation when you're not a cop is pretty much common sense.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 23, 2012 10:36 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at March 23, 2012 10:36 AM (+lsX1)
Posted by: tasker at March 23, 2012 10:37 AM (r2PLg)
Ace:
ABC News Radio said all four Republican candidates have commented on it, calling it a tragedy.
Posted by: Ed Anger - Certified Kos Kid at March 23, 2012 10:37 AM (7+pP9)
Posted by: nickless at March 23, 2012 10:37 AM (MMC8r)
You do not need to look for escape or try to escape before using dealy force
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at March 23, 2012 10:38 AM (Dll6b)
a citizen arrest for what exactly, walking through the development?
Was it a gated community? That was what I had read a few days ago...
How does that effect tresspass laws in Florida?
Posted by: garrett at March 23, 2012 10:38 AM (NOwGM)
Posted by: Fat Al at March 23, 2012 10:38 AM (y0VOX)
When this case first broke I said then it had the smell of Duke all over it. I said we needed to give it at least a week for the actual facts to come out. It appears that some facts are leaking out now despite the MFM trying to hush it up.
Any time the MFM and Al Shitptom get on their high horse you can almost guarantee a POS set of lies.
What we know:
The MFM shows pictures of the "kid" when he was about 10 y.o. Why is it they always portray the "victim" as an innocent choir boy? We now know
he was a 17 y.o gang banger who had been kicked out of school because he was violent. He also had a rap sheet for violent crimes and burglary. And yes that is relevant.
The accused racist Hispanic was a neighborhood watch. It was his job to follow him. It doesn't matter if he was a wanna-be cop. It was his job to follow this kid and keep and eye on him.
For all appearances sake the "kid" was casing the homes for burglary.
The kid was beating him when the evil racist shot him. Yes, that meets the definition of self-defense without even invoking the FL stand your ground law. There are eye witness reports that confirm this.
Lets not get all Duke on this.
Some other relevant things. Since 2009 Hate Crimes amendment the DOJ can charge him with hate crimes based soley on the opinion of Eric F-F Holder.
FL allows self-defense with deadly force based on fear.
The police have not charged Zimmerman based on eye witness accounts. They do not base charges on the liberal meanderings of the MFM.
Posted by: Vic at March 23, 2012 10:39 AM (YdQQY)
Ace, this is one of your bravest and best! You're doing Breitbart proud. Bravo.
Posted by: Havedash at March 23, 2012 10:39 AM (JfvbF)
Or Z was following M, M noticed and waited for Z around a corner, intercepted him and demanded to know why he was being followed. Z demanded to know what M was up to. M said None of your business fat ass. Z says WTF punk, bowing followed by shoving, and the ass whipping by M begins. M is 17 yes? At 17 I already had a bit of a history of violence and would not have taken shit off an old man so I can see it happening.
Or something like that.
Posted by: toby928© at March 23, 2012 10:39 AM (GTbGH)
Posted by: Caunotaucarius at March 23, 2012 10:39 AM (SHvfC)
Posted by: baldilocks at March 23, 2012 10:39 AM (T2/zQ)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 23, 2012 10:39 AM (eCnLg)
Posted by: The Mega Independent at March 23, 2012 10:39 AM (Fz7+s)
decided that he was going to kill him. Good luck proving that.
Exactly.
>>>I am pretty sure Zimmerman will draw a manslaughter conviction at least.
The evidence needs to all come out. Based on some parts of the 911 call, murder 2 is not out of the question. I think murder 1 is not sustainable though.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose finally remembers why he's here at March 23, 2012 10:39 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: tasker at March 23, 2012 10:39 AM (r2PLg)
Read my comment above. He was never told to back off.
I also don't buy ace's "citizen's arrest" theory. I don't see how Zimmerman starts the physical altercation (which attempting to affect a citizen's arrest most certainly would do) and then ends up on the losing side of the resultant beat-down. As has been pointed out- Trayvon was built like a toothpick.
I find it much more likely that Zimmerman tried to draw close to Martin- perhaps to (gasp) ask him what he was doing in the neighborhood, and Martin (for whatever reason, but I could certainly believe out of fear) decided to get the jump on Zimmerman to end the threat and then escape.
This doesn't require anyone to have broken the law, seems much more plausible (based on the Neighborhood Watch captain bit, and the fact that it seems unlikely Martin could take Zimmerman without getting the first hit in), and fits such facts as we know.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 23, 2012 10:39 AM (8y9MW)
Too bad Zimmerman is part Latino, that screws up The Narrative a bit. Any way to label him as a Tea Party member, a conservative law and order fanatic, or a Texan/deep south vigilante gun nut yahoo?
Hey, if it does turn out he acted illegally; maybe he is, by definition, all of the above.
Posted by: RM at March 23, 2012 10:39 AM (TRsME)
Posted by: ace at March 23, 2012 10:39 AM (nj1bB)
The police have not charged Zimmerman based on eye witness accounts. They do not base charges on the liberal meanderings of the MFM.
They will this time.
Posted by: Fat Al at March 23, 2012 10:40 AM (y0VOX)
Posted by: Jean at March 23, 2012 10:40 AM (WkuV6)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 23, 2012 10:40 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: Mr Pink at March 23, 2012 10:40 AM (AdqLR)
Posted by: momma at March 23, 2012 10:40 AM (oKsWl)
How much is the dispatcher actually allowed to say? If she tells him to stop, and the kid actually had been intending to do something illegal, then it falls back on the police department. Plus, Zimmerman is a private citizen and certainly free to go where he pleases.
The whole damn thing sucks. However tragic, it is a local matter and not a national crisis.
Posted by: Alex at March 23, 2012 10:41 AM (tlK1P)
Posted by: Dang at March 23, 2012 10:41 AM (BbX1b)
Keep that big caveat in mind.
No, you can't arrest someone for something vague like a "sketchy feeling." You can only arrest someone for a crime in progress. I don't know the exact rule but the rules for the use of lethal force in such a case are generally even more restrictive -- like immediate threat to someone's life.
Posted by: ace at March 23, 2012 02:35 PM (nj1bB)
this is the other real issue involved, besides the tragedy of the Death of Trayvon itself, is that here we all are trying to figure out what happened (truth) and we have a media that is untrustworthy. (now we are all aware of that fact but this is how dangerous it can be to america) , a president, al sharpton, all exploiting this tragedy for ???? what exactly???
Posted by: willow at March 23, 2012 10:41 AM (TomZ9)
Posted by: ace at March 23, 2012 10:41 AM (nj1bB)
Because the elitist enlightened lefties in their cocooned tony neighborhoods honestly believe that the unwashed masses in flyover country are just itching to lynch blacks en masse
Yet they somehow don't worry about rioting by blacks
Unless it gets uncomfortably close to THEIR neighborhoods like the Rodney King riots did
Posted by: kbdabear at March 23, 2012 10:41 AM (Y+DPZ)
Dispatchers will always tell you to let officers handle it. It doesn't matter if it's someone driving away with your kid in the trunk.
And it's not a lawful order.
That's not saying it wasn't dumb for Zimmerman to chase after him. But let's not pretend the officers were going to get there and slap the cuffs on Trayvon (if he did something illegal to begin with) and go get some lunch. If Trayvon had done something, he would have gotten away.
Posted by: yinzer at March 23, 2012 10:41 AM (/Mla1)
Posted by: Damiano at March 23, 2012 10:41 AM (A2+pr)
He looks Mayan; Central American Indian; not White; not even kinda sorta
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at March 23, 2012 10:41 AM (Dll6b)
now this is hazy because some juridictions say that pre-meditation can occur in the 'twinking of an eye" so...
That's more like a bar-brawl shooting where you'd get him for manslaughter.
Posted by: ace at March 23, 2012 02:28 PM (nj1bB)
This is what I suspect really happened as well. So I think at best prosecutors might be able to charge and convict him with manslaughter. But it's murky and there may not be enough evidence to get this.
But I'm pretty sure that Zimmerman will lose a civil suit
Posted by: Mætenloch at March 23, 2012 10:42 AM (+B3Nr)
Posted by: momma at March 23, 2012 10:42 AM (oKsWl)
Posted by: willow at March 23, 2012 10:42 AM (TomZ9)
Well if this is going to get all racial then his parents need a beat-down for naming him "Trayvon"
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 23, 2012 10:42 AM (sbV1u)
"So why suddenly is everyone expected to hop-to now that Hamlet has decided it's a good issue to exploit?"
It saves so much time when Ace asks a question and answers it in one sentence, doesn't it?
Posted by: sherlock at March 23, 2012 10:42 AM (7UMow)
Posted by: tasker at March 23, 2012 10:42 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: ace at March 23, 2012 10:42 AM (nj1bB)
Getting your ass kicked doesn't automatically make you an innocent victim. There are no witnesses that saw the start of the fight.
Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at March 23, 2012 10:43 AM (+lsX1)
Posted by: ace at March 23, 2012 10:43 AM (nj1bB)
Zimmerman does (did, I suppose). They've been documented by the police.
Blood on the back of his head.
Either a bloody or broken nose (don't remember and don't have that specific link in front of me)
Wet clothes (indicating he was on the ground) with a grass stain on the back (indicating he was on the bottom).
Posted by: toby928© at March 23, 2012 02:39 PM (GTbGH)
Also a logical conclusion from the evidence at hand.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 23, 2012 10:43 AM (8y9MW)
^^^^THIS
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 23, 2012 10:43 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: ejo at March 23, 2012 10:44 AM (0aHI9)
“I have a different take, Brian, on that,” Geraldo Rivera said. “I believe that George Zimmerman, the overzealous neighborhood watch captain should be investigated to the fullest extent of the law and if he is criminally liable, he should be prosecuted. But I am urging the parents of black and Latino youngsters particularly to not let their children go out wearing hoodies. I think the hoodie is as much responsible for Trayvon Martin’s death as George Zimmerman was.”
Well, this line of analysis has the advantage of being novel.
Before long we will have complaints of “hoodie profiling” to add to the usual dreck.
Posted by: Geraldo Rivera at March 23, 2012 10:44 AM (e8kgV)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 23, 2012 10:44 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at March 23, 2012 10:44 AM (SB0V2)
77, ....The MFM shows pictures of the "kid" when he was about 10 y.o. Why is it they always portray the "victim" as an innocent choir boy? We now know
he was a 17 y.o gang banger who had been kicked out of school because he was violent. He also had a rap sheet for violent crimes and burglary. And yes that is relevant.
Thanks, Vic.....this is the first I have heard of the kid having a record, or being a little gang banger. ....The MFM is portraying him as an innocent little angel.
If Trayvon has a history of violence....then that can lend credence to Zimmerman's account of being attacked by him.
Posted by: wheatie at March 23, 2012 10:45 AM (4GgJq)
this is what i believe is the tragedy of it all.
Posted by: willow at March 23, 2012 10:45 AM (TomZ9)
he was a 17 y.o gang banger who had been kicked out of school because he was violent. He also had a rap sheet for violent crimes and burglary. And yes that is relevant.
Vic, this is first I've heard anything about a TM rap sheet - do you have a link?
Posted by: Mætenloch at March 23, 2012 10:45 AM (+B3Nr)
Posted by: yinzer at March 23, 2012 02:41 PM
When seconds count, the police are there in minutes
If they show up at all
Posted by: kbdabear at March 23, 2012 10:45 AM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: President Chet Roosevelt at March 23, 2012 10:45 AM (WU3T3)
Posted by: The Mega Independent at March 23, 2012 02:39 PM (Fz7+s)
+1000
Posted by: baldilocks at March 23, 2012 10:45 AM (T2/zQ)
I heard it reported for the first time today that Zimmerman is claiming he broke of following Obama's son and was on his way back to his SUV when he was attacked by Obama Jr. That might explain the injury to the back of Zimmerman's head.
Like Ace said, wait for ALL the facts on this one cuz they haven't been reported.
Posted by: Room Temp at March 23, 2012 10:45 AM (Y227l)
Posted by: Cast Iron at March 23, 2012 10:46 AM (EL+OC)
^^^^THIS
Exactly...
Posted by: the hobbit fomerly known as Donna at March 23, 2012 10:46 AM (ZHge+)
No, because the police were already on their way.
"When seconds count, the cops are only minutes away," after all.
And, yes, I've heard dispatchers (at least here in TX) actively tell callers not to pursue bad guys.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 23, 2012 10:46 AM (8y9MW)
hmm i had not read that before.
Posted by: willow at March 23, 2012 10:46 AM (TomZ9)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 23, 2012 10:46 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: Jimmuy at March 23, 2012 10:47 AM (BLEio)
Posted by: tasker at March 23, 2012 10:47 AM (r2PLg)
I have to say, to see that kid's beautiful face up there on drudge it just breaks your heart.
Makes you wonder how many parents, when this story came to light, sat their teenaged kid down, no matter what race, and had a long talk with them about the world today and being aware of the impact your actions might be having on another person. That what might seem regular and normal behavior to you, might not be perceived that way by someone else. And, since you can't read other people's minds, you need to think about everything you do and say nowadays. In other words, be aware of your surroundings at all times and don't go anywhere alone.
Posted by: my heart still belongs to herman cain at March 23, 2012 10:48 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: Damiano at March 23, 2012 10:48 AM (A2+pr)
Well you are right he probably didn't throw the first blow. But since he threatened the kid (Chasing someone running away from you at night could reasonably perceived as a threat) he might as well have started it.
The issue here is he isn't a cop, and regardless of his intent to enforce the law, the lack of that magic uniform which makes being chased by him go from resisting arrest, to attempting to escape a threatening individual, is what is going to sink his boat. He can't defend his use of deadly force, because he started the confrontation by acting in a threatening manner.
At this point it becomes an argument of intent, which, distinguishes what level of wrong he has committed.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose finally remembers why he's here at March 23, 2012 10:48 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Havedash at March 23, 2012 10:48 AM (JfvbF)
Posted by: ace at March 23, 2012 10:48 AM (nj1bB)
Posted by: Gomer Pyle at March 23, 2012 10:48 AM (MMC8r)
As if there aren't enough federal irons in the fire, but that every/any murder involving a hyphenated-American needs federal prosecution because the locals are always yokels.
By no means are African-Americans the only US citizens descended from an abused people dispossessed of their homeland. Native American tribes were exterminated, having "failed" to prove their worth initially as slaves, having "failed" to assimilate "properly". The US Government never issued an extermination order of African-Americans, or forced African-Americans to constantly relocate into reservations, although LBJ did a fine job of replicating such destruction of Black America by maintaining the population within his "Great Society" welfare state of broken homes and single mothers.
AG Eric Holder said in June 2009 that recent killings show the need for a tougher U.S. hate crimes law to stop "violence masquerading as political activism". ["Attorney general urges new hate crimes law -- Crime & Courts -- msnbc.com". MSNBC. 2009-06-16. Retrieved 2011-11-14.]
Holder will argue that only federal hate crimes will stop violence masquerading as self defense.
Posted by: maverick muse at March 23, 2012 10:48 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: tasker at March 23, 2012 10:49 AM (r2PLg)
not an issue......
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at March 23, 2012 10:49 AM (Dll6b)
Posted by: Temper Tantrum at March 23, 2012 10:49 AM (AWmfW)
Posted by: movigique at March 23, 2012 10:50 AM (Cepxj)
*
That's what we said!
Posted by: Bele and Lokai at March 23, 2012 10:50 AM (exvgC)
Check the pic on Drudge now, top of page.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 23, 2012 10:50 AM (sbV1u)
Zimmerman: Yeah, now he's coming towards me.
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at March 23, 2012 10:50 AM (Dll6b)
Posted by: ITBEEZRASSISMS at March 23, 2012 10:50 AM (QTVh2)
Very well articulated post, Ace.Top-notch from several angles.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at March 23, 2012 10:50 AM (eHIJJ)
Posted by: Jaws at March 23, 2012 10:50 AM (4I3Uo)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 23, 2012 10:50 AM (jUytm)
Yeah, who among us wouldn't call 911 and initiate citizens arrest procedures at the chilling sight of a black guy.
Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at March 23, 2012 10:51 AM (+lsX1)
I am pretty sure Zimmerman will draw a manslaughter conviction at least.
That may well be depending on what the actual facts are. One option is that Martin had no idea who was following him, got scared, tried to escape, was grabbed by Zimmermann, and acted in his own self-defense during which Zimmermann, also acting in self-defense, shot him. Another option is that Martin didn't try to escape and attacked Zimmermann.
Under the first scenario both people could have been acting in self-defense, but Zimmermann was the one initiated the conflict. I don't know if Florida law would assign him any blame in this instance. Not saying he didn't do anything wrong, just saying I don't know Florida's laws.
In the second scenario I can't see any way in which Zimmermann would be guilty of a crime. If he was merely following the guy and then got attacked, I can't see it. I don't care that the 911 operator told him that he didn't have to follow him as long as he didn't initiate any violence.
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at March 23, 2012 10:51 AM (JxMoP)
Posted by: Havedash at March 23, 2012 02:48 PM (JfvbF)
Fake but Accurate.
Posted by: Temper Tantrum at March 23, 2012 10:51 AM (AWmfW)
One thing that DOES piss me off is the selective victim hood regarding race and the MFM.
Case in point.
Ya'all heard about the white kid that got doused in gasoline and set on fire by two of his black classmates in Kansas City..... didnt you.???
No???? Neither did I .... and I live here.
Posted by: fixerupper at March 23, 2012 10:51 AM (C8hzL)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at March 23, 2012 10:51 AM (SB0V2)
To what exactly? Did he cede his right to travel on foot at some point?
Posted by: MikeTheMoose finally remembers why he's here at March 23, 2012 10:51 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 23, 2012 10:52 AM (eCnLg)
@151 Sean Taylor was murdered in Miami. He was an NFL player.
He is not to be confused with Shawn Tyson of Sarasota who is charged with murdering the two Brits.
Posted by: Miami Herald editor at March 23, 2012 10:52 AM (bPbwB)
The less said about it the better.
Posted by: Voluble at March 23, 2012 10:52 AM (C9bRU)
Posted by: Damiano at March 23, 2012 02:48 PM (A2+pr)
Sorry, didn't see your post when I asked the question about the "poor little black boy's" size. Wow, just wow. Pass the kid off as 12 when he's a 17 year old gang banging monster of a man. The media, the "reverends", the race mongers, and the white apologists can all go straight to hell.
Posted by: Havedash at March 23, 2012 10:52 AM (JfvbF)
I have to go lie down in the dark with a wet washcloth on my forehead for a while.
Posted by: sifty at March 23, 2012 10:52 AM (uGQ4X)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 23, 2012 10:53 AM (eCnLg)
Posted by: ITBEEZRASSISMS at March 23, 2012 10:53 AM (QTVh2)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 23, 2012 02:44 PM
Yes, because he was just reaching for his Bible
Sounds like that 911 call proves Martin was just a nice kid
/sarc
Posted by: kbdabear at March 23, 2012 10:53 AM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: JQ Public at March 23, 2012 10:53 AM (NBj0d)
Posted by: Palooka! at March 23, 2012 10:53 AM (ggRof)
Posted by: tasker at March 23, 2012 10:53 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Miami Herald editor at March 23, 2012 02:52 PM (bPbwB)
===yes, I was wrong about that: Totally, completely, unalterably, undeniably wrong, with no excuse whatsover
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at March 23, 2012 10:54 AM (Dll6b)
That is precisely one of the reasons they didn't arrest Zimmerman. Go read sooth's link. The very first thing is a Q&A w/ the police chief wherein he details why Zimmerman was not arrested.
Nothing since then has changed any of those initial facts.
He can't defend his use of deadly force, because he started the confrontation by acting in a threatening manner.
Problem is he doesn't have to defend his use of deadly force: prosecution does have to prove that he acted in a threatening manner.
And now (just in this thread is the first time for me) we're hearing that it might have been that Martin actively rushed Zimmerman- which would put this straight back into "self defense."
Even without that, all Zimmerman has to say is that he calmly exited his vehicle, attempted to approach Martin to ask what he was doing there (in light of the previous break-ins, and other suspicious circumstances), and was attacked.
Certainly at that point, Zimmerman would be reasonable to believe he was not acting in a threatening manner, and (again) we're back to fully justified self-defense.
Now, I don't know that any of these are what happened. But they're all logical conclusions based on currently known information. Which means that (as far as it goes right now) prosecuting him even for manslaughter would be difficult.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 23, 2012 10:54 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Taken from Jimmy Simpson (informedblackmn)'s Twitter Feed at March 23, 2012 10:54 AM (1nDGk)
Posted by: Islamic Rage Boy at March 23, 2012 10:54 AM (e8kgV)
If only the national media and all the usual suspects raised this furor over the routine killings of innocent young black men who are killed while going about their daily business in their own neighborhoods. It's heartbreaking to read the stories because it's always the good kids who get offed in drive-bys, usually gang-related - that occur with too much frequency in Philadelphia, Camden NJ, Wilmington DE, Chicago, Miami, (insert urban area here).
It's not just an issue of the MFM under-reporting or downright ignoring black hate crimes on white folk. They don't even care about the hundreds of Black children senselessly killed in cities across the nation. I guess as long as the perp is white, then it deserves attention.
Posted by: kallisto at March 23, 2012 10:54 AM (jm/9g)
As mentioned before, Martin may not have been the "toothpick" as described. The MSM keeps showing a photo of 12 year-old Martin, not the 17 year old who allegdley was 6 foot 3.
Question:. If, in fact, the citizen's arrest theory is correct, how much is Martin allowed to beat on Zimmerman before Zimmerman can shoot back?
Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at March 23, 2012 10:55 AM (YmPwQ)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 23, 2012 10:55 AM (jUytm)
That because only dogs can hear in that range.
Posted by: Buzzsaw at March 23, 2012 10:55 AM (tf9Ne)
Posted by: nickless at March 23, 2012 10:55 AM (MMC8r)
There is a clever element in SCOAMF saying this. It helps make it more emotional, in several ways: 1. poor SCOAMF doesn't have a son; 2. poor SCOAMF understands what it is like to lose his son to violence.
There isn't obvious gain if everybody sticks to facts and evidence and logic but inject emotion and SCOAMF has a lot to gain by appearing to be on "our" side and against "them", the ill-defined "bad guy".
Posted by: Retread at March 23, 2012 10:55 AM (joSBv)
>>>In the second scenario I can't see any way in which Zimmermann would be guilty of a crime. If he was merely following the guy and then got attacked, I can't see it.
Zimmerman noted in the 911 call that Trayvon spotted him, noted he was being followed, and ran. That is your cue that the other person perceives you as a threat. Even if Travon did throw the first blow, you can't escape that by continuing to follow him after Trayvon attempted to break contact that you were by any reasonable standard threatening him, making Trayvon's actions an act of self defense.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose finally remembers why he's here at March 23, 2012 10:55 AM (0q2P7)
Who cares? A black murders a black teen every day somewhere in the US. No one, and I mean no one, cares.
Let the race hustlers hustle. The chances of this boomeranging against the libs is high.
Posted by: Bob from Ohio at March 23, 2012 10:55 AM (ROFkf)
I don't think they learned a thing.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 23, 2012 10:56 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: steevy at March 23, 2012 10:56 AM (vd4t0)
Posted by: ITBEEZRASSISMS at March 23, 2012 10:56 AM (QTVh2)
Your life is in danger any time there's a physical confrontation. You fall hit your head just so - game over. You get put in a choke hold - game over. You become incapacitated and attacker continues the beating - game over.
My take is that is Zimmerman initiated the physical confrontation, he had no right to escalate and use his firearm when it went wrong. If Martin struck him first and Zimmerman was overcome, the using deadly force was the right, if tragic, choice.
Posted by: Xander Crews at March 23, 2012 10:56 AM (n3A9E)
Posted by: Tonic Dog at March 23, 2012 10:57 AM (X/+QT)
Posted by: lecture us, Mr. Poop at March 23, 2012 10:57 AM (qxcKC)
Posted by: tasker at March 23, 2012 10:57 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: runninrebel at March 23, 2012 10:57 AM (17m9R)
Dad comes to the door. "Yes, that's my son." "Sorry to have bothered you, Mr. Martin." "Not at all. Thank you for keeping an eye out for our neighborhood." Case closed.
But of course, this describes and presupposes a sensible, sane society -- not the Bizarro World we've tumbled into.
Posted by: Wolfus Aurelius at March 23, 2012 10:57 AM (exvgC)
Posted by: eureka! at March 23, 2012 10:58 AM (LQIyD)
Posted by: Mætenloch at March 23, 2012 02:45 PM (+B3Nr)
----------------------
It was in a local paper. I didn't copy it. Both of them have rap sheets. Travon's has been withdrawn if I am not mistaken.
Posted by: Vic at March 23, 2012 10:58 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: ITBEEZRASSISMS at March 23, 2012 10:58 AM (QTVh2)
Posted by: drawandstrike at March 23, 2012 10:59 AM (iGKkt)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 23, 2012 10:59 AM (FEqS6)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 23, 2012 10:59 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: ace at March 23, 2012 10:59 AM (nj1bB)
This is also what happens when people in that same society adopt an attitude that they deserve respect without actually having to do anything to earn respect.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 23, 2012 11:00 AM (sbV1u)
Nor will they be by the MBM. If this starts hurting Obama, it'll be "nothing to see here, let's MoveOn"
Posted by: kbdabear at March 23, 2012 11:00 AM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: wheatie at March 23, 2012 11:00 AM (4GgJq)
"Further, it appears (again, appears) that Zimmerman initiated the contact/confrontation, not the kid, so the "stand your ground" law is not even relevant in the case."
you dont really think iniating a verbal confrontation strips you of your right to self defense
Posted by: chas at March 23, 2012 11:00 AM (xAq1C)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 23, 2012 11:00 AM (eCnLg)
Posted by: ace at March 23, 2012 11:01 AM (nj1bB)
And what pisses me off beyond words is the complete, total blackout of the white kid who was set on fucking FIRE while black kids expressly called him out for being white and he "got what he deserved." Fucking Sharpton: silent. Fucking Obama: silent. Fucking Farrakan: silent. Fucking media: silent. The fucking entire left: silent.
Posted by: Lady in Black.....{sigh} at March 23, 2012 02:33 PM (F+Xfj)
When did this happen?
Anybody have any links to the story?
Posted by: Ed Anger - Certified Kos Kid at March 23, 2012 11:01 AM (7+pP9)
Posted by: Lord Monochromicorn at March 23, 2012 11:01 AM (nBxFQ)
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 23, 2012 11:01 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: Mætenloch at March 23, 2012 02:45 PM (+B3Nr)
----------------------
It was in a local paper. I didn't copy it. Both of them have rap sheets. Travon's has been withdrawn if I am not mistaken.
*
Because it doesn't fit The Narrative. And if he'd been suspended for 10 days, he'd probably done something a lot worse than be tardy. The media are picking and choosing the details to fit their story, instead of reporting the truth, as they always do.
Posted by: Wolfus Aurelius at March 23, 2012 11:01 AM (exvgC)
Posted by: Daybrother at March 23, 2012 11:01 AM (WCuHB)
Posted by: ITBEEZRASSISMS at March 23, 2012 11:01 AM (QTVh2)
Posted by: runninrebel at March 23, 2012 11:01 AM (17m9R)
Watch him get off now. Like OJ for Rodney King.
Posted by: Dang at March 23, 2012 11:01 AM (BbX1b)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 23, 2012 11:01 AM (eCnLg)
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 23, 2012 11:02 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: tasker at March 23, 2012 11:02 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: steevy at March 23, 2012 11:02 AM (vd4t0)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 23, 2012 02:59 PM (FEqS6)
You mean a hispanic kid.
Posted by: EC at March 23, 2012 11:02 AM (GQ8sn)
/GWBush called those whom Michelle Malkin originally championed "vigilantes" -- real-time volunteers communicating illegal alien crossings directly to the Border Patrol.
Posted by: maverick muse at March 23, 2012 11:02 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose finally remembers why he's here at March 23, 2012 02:55 PM (0q2P7)
is it allowable to use physical force to prevent someone from following you in a public area?
Posted by: chas at March 23, 2012 11:02 AM (xAq1C)
Posted by: nickless at March 23, 2012 11:03 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Jean at March 23, 2012 11:03 AM (WkuV6)
My theory is that all the good white liberals in the MFM just expect black folks to act like savages, and they're cool with it as long as they keep it to themselves.
It's when you have some white/black interaction that's not all peaches and cream that they get really excited. It doesn't matter who's really at fault, 'cause we all know whitey is.
That's the view that really sells papers.
I fucking hate the media. Or I hate the fucking media, I forget which.
People are people. Period. But thanks to the media and Al Sharpton, we can't let anyone think that. It's bad for business.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 23, 2012 11:03 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: steevy at March 23, 2012 03:02 PM (vd4t0)
Good luck with that notion in LA.
Posted by: baldilocks at March 23, 2012 11:04 AM (T2/zQ)
Anybody have any links to the story?
Posted by: Ed Anger - Certified Kos Kid at March 23, 2012 03:01 PM (7+pP9)
************
Link in my nick.
Posted by: Pimpbot 5000 at March 23, 2012 11:04 AM (ggRof)
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 23, 2012 11:04 AM (niZvt)
Well you have committed a wrong in this case, and there is no getting out of criminal liability while you still draw breath. If you wait till you are on deaths door (Your death is imminent) you might be able to mitigate your criminal liability to Man 2. Indicating that you acted stupidly but did your best to get out of it and the killing was involuntary.
If you use normal bounds of self defense of responding when you thought the person was threatening your life, then you made no special effort to undue your stupidity and therefore the killing was voluntary. Man 1
Posted by: MikeTheMoose finally remembers why he's here at March 23, 2012 11:04 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 23, 2012 11:04 AM (eCnLg)
Posted by: yinzer at March 23, 2012 11:04 AM (/Mla1)
You listened to the tape and didn't read the report.
"While I was in such close contact with Mr. Zimmerman I could observe that his back appeared to be wet and covered in grass, as if he had been lying on his back on the ground. Zimmerman was also bleeding from the nose and back of the head."
"Zimmerman was placed in the rear of my vehicle and given first aid by the SFD. While the SFD was attending to Zimmerman, I overheard him state "I was yelling for someone to help me but no one would help me."
From the report of Officer Timothy Smith. Also 6 witnesses were interviewed.
Posted by: Hedgehog at March 23, 2012 11:04 AM (3jGS1)
Posted by: nickless at March 23, 2012 11:04 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: ace at March 23, 2012 11:04 AM (nj1bB)
"Zimmerman's father, 64-year-old Robert Zimmerman of Lake Mary, delivered a one-page letter to the Sentinel on Thursday, saying that the depiction of his son in the media has been cruel and misleading.
George Zimmerman is Hispanic and grew up in a multiracial family, the statement says.
"He would be the last to discriminate for any reason whatsoever ...," the letter says. "The media portrayal of George as a racist could not be further from the truth.""
Posted by: Temper Tantrum at March 23, 2012 11:05 AM (AWmfW)
http://tinyurl.com/75b2vd5
More Trayvon Martin Walkouts at Miami Schools
They'll go straight to the library to study after a candlelight vigil of course ...
"Sharpton told those gathered at the rally that "Zimmerman should have been arrested that night" and that police had probable cause."
Sharpton is a legal expert I assume. Remember how his expertise worked in the Brawley scam?
Posted by: kbdabear at March 23, 2012 11:05 AM (Y+DPZ)
It's legal to act in self-defense if you act with REASONABLE BELIEF that you are in imminent danger of death or serious bodily injury.
It is not necessary that you be correct. It's still valid self-defense, even if you turn out to have been mistaken, if you acted based on what you reasonably believed at the time.
It's entirely possible that Trayvon genuinely (but mistakenly) believed Zimmerman to be stalking him with the intent of robbing him. That is patently incorrect, but let's say that Trayvon thought that, and that belief (while mistaken) was reasonable.
It's also possible that Zimmerman genuinely (but mistakenly) believed that when Trayvon attacked him, the attack was aggressive, intended to conceal Trayvon's crimes, not motivated by Trayvon's attempt at self-defense.
It is possible that if they both knew all of the facts about each other's actions and intentions (which are only coming out with the help of massive social activity, media attention, time and investigation, none of which either men had the benefit of), that Trayvon would not have attacked, and Zimmerman would not have shot.
Hence, it's possible this is a case of mutual mistake.
But in this fucked up Progressive, Obama-esque, pot-banging bullshit society I woke up in, things like law and reason don't fucking matter.
So, I mock it.
Posted by: Phinn at March 23, 2012 11:05 AM (KNtHw)
From the facts we have, it seems as if he attacked Zimmerman. If he felt he was in danger, why didn't he call the cops?
Posted by: momma at March 23, 2012 11:05 AM (oKsWl)
( o )( o )
Just had to work those into this thread, somehow...
Eyes?
Posted by: EC at March 23, 2012 11:05 AM (GQ8sn)
--
Jeb Bush endorsed Rubio VP for more than his record. Meanwhile, back at the White House, Obama/Holder fell into their own Hate Crime trap v. Hispanic Vote.
Posted by: maverick muse at March 23, 2012 11:05 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: garrett at March 23, 2012 11:06 AM (NOwGM)
Posted by: tasker at March 23, 2012 11:06 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Barack Obama at March 23, 2012 11:07 AM (bN5ZU)
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 23, 2012 11:07 AM (niZvt)
And we see the result of these moron journalists and editors having their empty heads stuffed with CRT.
Cathode Ray Tubes.
Or Critical Race Theory...
It comes right out of the Billy Ayers edumacation textbook.
Posted by: Rev Dr E Buzz Romney at March 23, 2012 11:07 AM (UDdec)
Poor SCOAMF has two daughters. Imagine if they bring a Trayvon home.
(Unlikely because Trayvons can't afford Sidwell Friends' tuition, but once they get out from under Mrs SCOAMF's control-freak thumb...)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 23, 2012 11:07 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: polynikes at March 23, 2012 11:07 AM (A2cTV)
I wonder....
Posted by: EC at March 23, 2012 11:07 AM (GQ8sn)
Surely not. You cannot pick a fight with someone then kill him dead just because you lost.
Posted by: ace at March 23, 2012 02:39 PM (nj1bB)
===That's not what I said, or implied. I accurately summarized the law. Everything else you wrote in this post is All Ace; none is Moi
not venting; not 'tribal' (whatever that is ); not wanting this to be an issue
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at March 23, 2012 11:07 AM (Dll6b)
Posted by: Queequeg the Harpooner at March 23, 2012 11:07 AM (gTk5b)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 23, 2012 11:07 AM (eCnLg)
Posted by: Jimmuy at March 23, 2012 11:08 AM (BLEio)
--
Which explains the Baltimore and Chicago murder statistics staying smothered under the organized criminal media rug.
Posted by: maverick muse at March 23, 2012 11:08 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: supercore23 at March 23, 2012 11:08 AM (bwV72)
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 23, 2012 11:08 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: EC at March 23, 2012 02:37 PM (GQ8sn)<<
Obama's exactly as white as he is black. You just don't hear as much about it...not nearly as trendy, don't ya know.
Posted by: antisocialist at March 23, 2012 11:09 AM (j/nZn)
Posted by: tasker at March 23, 2012 11:09 AM (r2PLg)
A. Fuck you.
B. A man shouldn't have to be concerned about people breaking in and stealing shit from his house, and then be tackled from behind by a teenager with football training and a history of being deemed too violent to attend school, but that's the world we live in.
Posted by: Phinn at March 23, 2012 11:09 AM (KNtHw)
Posted by: Barky at March 23, 2012 11:09 AM (l/N7H)
If we're inferring that people behave in accordance with past practice, then Zimmerman is guilty because of his rap sheet, right? Or do they cancel each other? I'm not sure how this use of rap sheets to prove completely different crimes works, I didn't go to law school and such.
Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at March 23, 2012 11:09 AM (+lsX1)
Don't say a word about the 19 Blacks that got killed LAST WEEKEND in my hometown of Chicago.
When a Black kills another Black it's not like racism, or racism racism.
Posted by: Barry at March 23, 2012 02:59 PM (hXJOG)
IMPOSSIBLE. Chicago is a 'gun-free' zone. Everyone knows this. I suspect hyper-sonic mosquito's that turn into inert, mishapen lumps of lead when they hit something and die.
Posted by: JQ Public at March 23, 2012 11:09 AM (NBj0d)
They also have some of those calls at the link I left.Posted by: tasker
Over a decade accding to the Atlantic. Not exactly average but not extreme either.
So it seems his neighborhood watch thing wasn't just a recent fascination nor had he gotten into trouble confronting people.
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] at March 23, 2012 11:09 AM (WdKsY)
Steady. Steady big fella. Keep it together. Gushie isn't here right now.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 23, 2012 11:09 AM (sbV1u)
the calls for help are pretty damn protracted and one sided.
It's heartbreaking.
Posted by: tasker at March 23, 2012 02:57 PM (r2PLg)
The cries for help were coming from Zimmerman, not Trayvon. Trayvon's dad listened to the tape and said so. Please read the actual quotes from the police report in #249
Posted by: Hedgehog at March 23, 2012 11:09 AM (3jGS1)
Posted by: ace at March 23, 2012 11:09 AM (nj1bB)
Posted by: ktgreat at March 23, 2012 11:10 AM (TCTPY)
Great big truck-sized wheels...
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 23, 2012 03:08 PM (niZvt)
I see what you did there. Nice!
Posted by: EC at March 23, 2012 11:10 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 23, 2012 11:10 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: tasker at March 23, 2012 11:10 AM (r2PLg)
Trayvon was a handsome young man.
Posted by: antisocialist at March 23, 2012 11:11 AM (j/nZn)
Yes you have to be carefull when wondering aloud whether or not any black on the street is a suspect. The fact that half of all crime is commited by this 10% demographic should never be taken into account or you'll be Ron Pauled right out of business.
Posted by: Jimmah at March 23, 2012 11:11 AM (UpwlP)
Posted by: Anson Mitchell at March 23, 2012 11:11 AM (IhUxK)
>>>is it allowable to use physical force to prevent someone from following you in a public area?
If you run, and someone (non uniformed) continues to pursue you, and reasonable other avenues of protection, (Public space with lots of people, police etc) were not available *I* would feel threatened and use physical force to defend myself. I would be comfortable defending that decision as reasonable.
When you are packing iron, you have to make those distinctions as part and parcel to the responsibility you have voluntarily placed on yourself. If you do something a reasonable person would interpret as a threat of physical harm, and they defend themselves, your use of your firearm is a crime. The only question is what kind of crime.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose finally remembers why he's here at March 23, 2012 11:11 AM (0q2P7)
His reference as if to a long lost son was weird, as if a cue for his bastard to step forward.
Posted by: maverick muse at March 23, 2012 11:11 AM (lpWVn)
Either that, or Zimmerman saw a racoon. And he hates them.
Or he saw two racoons that were actually fucking.
That portion of the story is unverified, as far as I know.
Posted by: Phinn at March 23, 2012 11:12 AM (KNtHw)
Posted by: Supercore23 at March 23, 2012 11:12 AM (/iaWb)
Posted by: nickless at March 23, 2012 11:12 AM (MMC8r)
On a tape recording....."coon" and "goon" sound an awful lot alike.
I'm still waiting for the full details to come out.
Posted by: friendly neighbor-hoodie gang banger... at March 23, 2012 11:12 AM (4GgJq)
Posted by: Bo the Portuguese Waterboarding Dog at March 23, 2012 11:12 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 23, 2012 11:13 AM (eCnLg)
Posted by: steevy at March 23, 2012 11:13 AM (vd4t0)
Posted by: my heart still belongs to herman cain at March 23, 2012 11:13 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: tasker at March 23, 2012 11:14 AM (r2PLg)
What's the matter? Your psychic abilities failing, Shawnsayer?
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] at March 23, 2012 11:14 AM (WdKsY)
Posted by: ace at March 23, 2012 03:09 PM (nj1bB)
He probably was pre-inclined to suspect him. But that's because Zimmerman supposedly caught a guy trying to break into a house a couple weeks earlier who matched the description (well, it was a young black male, not sure how much more he matched), but the guy ran away. So Zimmerman may have been looking more closely at black males because he knew at least 1 was actively lurking around his neighborhood committing burglaries.
Posted by: yinzer at March 23, 2012 11:14 AM (/Mla1)
Posted by: maverick muse at March 23, 2012 03:11 PM (lpWVn)
**********
I could get another guy pregnant? Oh, crap....
Posted by: Barack Hussein Obama at March 23, 2012 11:14 AM (ggRof)
Posted by: Anson Mitchell at March 23, 2012 11:14 AM (IhUxK)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 23, 2012 11:14 AM (eCnLg)
Sweet fancy moses! What kind of neighborhood do you live in?
In the gangbanger world, a 17 year old is a seasoned veteran. They've got 12 year olds who would blow you away just for laughs.
Posted by: kbdabear at March 23, 2012 11:14 AM (Y+DPZ)
Despite, because, it's hard to tell.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 23, 2012 11:14 AM (ZKzrr)
The real problem with all this is that the Sanford police department has a reputation for incompetence that is really saying something considering this is Florida. That's why this has blown up: Sanford police did a crappy job investigating this, and now the freakin' Feds are showing up.
Plus, Al Sharpton. I'll never forgive Zimmerman for giving that piece of crap an excuse to soil the area.
Posted by: Pious Agnostic at March 23, 2012 11:14 AM (PiESu)
Posted by: Janir at March 23, 2012 11:15 AM (HOjYi)
This does shift things in Zimmerman's favor -- but only slightly.
Posted by: soothsayer at March 23, 2012 03:10 PM (jUytm)
Trayvon's dad said that it wasn't Trayvon. Did you read from the police report in #249. Back of head and nose bleeding claiming that he was crying for help. Two eyewitnesses seeing Trayvon on top of a guy in a red jacket/sweater beating him. then the gunshot.
Posted by: Hedgehog at March 23, 2012 11:15 AM (3jGS1)
Posted by: Supercore23 at March 23, 2012 11:15 AM (/iaWb)
That is nice for imagination land. But when you carry a gun, you have responsibilities, and you must be responsible for the actual outcomes, not the imaginary what if ones.
The very argument that you would *NOT* likely have taken the same course of action had you not had a gun, is actually an argument that you acted recklessly WITH your gun and therefore are guilty of a crime.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose finally remembers why he's here at March 23, 2012 11:15 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: nickless at March 23, 2012 02:55 PM (MMC8r)
This is my fear. The outlook for heavy mobyism/StormFront assholes is about 80% with a chance of disappearing threads by Sunday.
Posted by: joncelli, heartless Con and all around unpleasant guy at March 23, 2012 11:15 AM (RD7QR)
I have to give director Spike Lee some credit here. I'm pretty sure our politics mix about as well as oil and water, but Lee has been behind some very good social commentary via film. He has tried to awaken the public to the scourge of Black-on-Black crime, but I wonder if it has had any tangible effect. It's like the gangsta rap street culture has stepped on his message and choked the life from it.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at March 23, 2012 11:15 AM (eHIJJ)
A good reference is the brutal Christian/ Newsom murders a few years back that Michelle Malkin brought to light as as the story was absent from msm reporting. The crimes commited against these two young college students were the most brutal, heinous crimes that I can recall in recent memory. The story was typically absent from newspaper front pages and the airwaves as it was a black on white crime.
Posted by: mot at March 23, 2012 11:15 AM (8Tn0o)
PS- to Lady in Black, comment #43: I'm with you on the lack of press outrage about the kid set on fire. Also I'm grinding my teeth at the TOTAL AVOIDANCE of coverage of all the various folks across the country who are pounced on by "groups" of curiously-unspecified "youths" while walking through the park, or cycling on the bike path; these poor victims wind up with shattered jaws or eye sockets, concussions, and other serious injuries which may well affect them for the rest of their lives. Not a word of sympathy, and certainly no mention of any "discussion that needs to happen about race". I spit on our MFMSM!
Posted by: A_Nonny_Mouse at March 23, 2012 11:15 AM (hq0VE)
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 23, 2012 11:15 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: MSNBC at March 23, 2012 11:16 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: TheQuietMan at March 23, 2012 11:16 AM (1Jaio)
Just being unarmed does not make you harmless. IF T clobbered Z from behind and was on top beating him then shooting him is self-defense isn't it.
This will be a busy thread to keep clean in any case. I bet some of the papers comments sections get pretty ugly.
Posted by: DaveA at March 23, 2012 11:16 AM (TcY34)
Posted by: Jimmah at March 23, 2012 11:16 AM (UpwlP)
A 17 year old is plenty capable of physical damage. In fact, probably more capable of same than a middle aged guy, in many circumstances.
I've seen some pretty big 17 year olds.
If this kid was 6'3" and a football player, I find that hard to square with him also being 140lbs. At 6'3", that'd be rail-freaking-thin. Like "count his ribs" thin. Hard to imagine a bean-pole like that playing football.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 23, 2012 11:16 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 23, 2012 11:16 AM (eCnLg)
Posted by: yinzer at March 23, 2012 11:16 AM (/Mla1)
Posted by: Random at March 23, 2012 11:16 AM (NvI3l)
Posted by: steevy at March 23, 2012 11:17 AM (vd4t0)
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 23, 2012 11:17 AM (niZvt)
Zimmerman's 911 call is enough to put him away for at least manslaughter. The only reason to follow someone is if they're moving away from you. If you follow someone, while strapped, are told by authorities not to continue and that officers are enroute, you are in the wrong.
Posted by: supercore23 at March 23, 2012 03:08 PM (bwV72)
Thank you for showcasing your stupidity and ignorance of the known facts in the case.
Posted by: Ed Anger - Certified Kos Kid at March 23, 2012 11:17 AM (7+pP9)
Posted by: Jones in CO at March 23, 2012 11:17 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: Jones in CO at March 23, 2012 11:18 AM (8sCoq)
No. Just a guy who acknowledges the basic human right to use lethal force to repel physical attack.
Quick -- how long does it take for a guy with a knife to close ten feet of ground and stab you?
More time than it takes to draw a pistol? Or less?
Posted by: Phinn at March 23, 2012 11:18 AM (KNtHw)
Posted by: steevy at March 23, 2012 03:13 PM (vd4t0)
Three of my four nephews were all well over six feet and weighed close to or over 200 pounds by the time they were seventeen. All played football; one played hockey. Trust me, they can take care of themselves.
Posted by: baldilocks at March 23, 2012 11:18 AM (T2/zQ)
Damned if I know! But I want some of that action.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at March 23, 2012 11:19 AM (nEUpB)
Must be true. A gangbanger's girlfriend would NEVER lie, would she!
Come on, what 6-3 kid in a hoodie tells his girl he's afraid and he's going to run away?
Is she going to tell the police that Trayvon told her "I'm gonna bust a cap into this beaner!"
Posted by: kbdabear at March 23, 2012 11:19 AM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: Jones in CO at March 23, 2012 11:19 AM (8sCoq)
Biological reasons?
Do tell.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 23, 2012 11:19 AM (sbV1u)
No, it isn't. It's a right.
Posted by: Phinn at March 23, 2012 11:19 AM (KNtHw)
Posted by: Anson Mitchell at March 23, 2012 11:19 AM (IhUxK)
Posted by: bannor, voting Sweet Meteor of Death 2012 at March 23, 2012 11:19 AM (HEa5q)
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 23, 2012 11:19 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: polynikes at March 23, 2012 11:20 AM (A2cTV)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 23, 2012 11:21 AM (eCnLg)
Yeah, but he had football training. This is the secretive process by which a select few youths are turned into lethal killing machines. Zimmerman probably had no idea he was being lured into a classic football-inspired ambush.
Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at March 23, 2012 11:21 AM (+lsX1)
314.....Zimmerman should have stuck to the always popular cock sucker and and left anything with "oon" in it out
Yep....or "dickhead". ....More easily identifiable consonants in that one too.
Posted by: wheatie at March 23, 2012 11:21 AM (4GgJq)
Posted by: steevy at March 23, 2012 11:21 AM (vd4t0)
That's a trick question. Only evil teabagging racist clingers carry guns.
Real men carry purses from Europe.
[and the answer is quicker than you can draw a gun, unless you are lightning fast. The boundary is, if I recall correctly, 17 feet]
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at March 23, 2012 11:21 AM (nEUpB)
Posted by: Jones in CO at March 23, 2012 11:21 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: Supercore23 at March 23, 2012 11:21 AM (/iaWb)
Posted by: Gulfkraken at March 23, 2012 11:21 AM (WBfjO)
Posted by: polynikes at March 23, 2012 11:21 AM (A2cTV)
"You're gonna look good in a box. I guarantee it."
But that guy is George Zimmer. So all those potential one-liners, followed by "too soon?" must go unused.
Posted by: grognard, SMOD-Squad at March 23, 2012 11:22 AM (NS2Mo)
Yes. Both brats have eaten there, and both said that it's okay, but nothing special.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at March 23, 2012 11:22 AM (nEUpB)
At 10 feet I've always heard (from an NRA instructor, no less) that it's iffy, but smart money would be on the guy who had to draw his pistol instead trying to hold his guts in.
9' or less is no contest- knife guy wins.
15 ' or more is no contest- gun guy wins. Well, assuming he hits the assailant pretty quickly after pulling his gun.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 23, 2012 11:22 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: maverick muse at March 23, 2012 11:22 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: Anson Mitchell at March 23, 2012 11:22 AM (IhUxK)
Posted by: Schwalbe: The Me-262© at March 23, 2012 11:23 AM (UU0OF)
Posted by: ktgreat at March 23, 2012 11:23 AM (TCTPY)
Yeah, your missing the part where free people don't take orders from cops.
Posted by: Phinn at March 23, 2012 11:23 AM (KNtHw)
Posted by: Random at March 23, 2012 11:23 AM (NvI3l)
I heard the tapes (at least as much as the radio guys have played and the bloggers have posted) and I really don't know what happened. Zimmerman didn't sound like an avenging angel, he sounded like a winded and scared man. That doesn't really mitigate either way though, does it? And without getting into the "blame the victim!!!" crap the MSM will conjure, I'd like to know why Trayvonn was suspended, was he a local troublemaker, etc. ....Related... .........Take a look at any of the freshmen playing in tonight's NCAA games, last year they were "17 year old kids". A lot of them could probably whip the shit out of any of us here, even if we're in a lot better shape than Zimmerman.
Posted by: Lincolntf at March 23, 2012 11:23 AM (HethX)
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 23, 2012 11:23 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: steevy at March 23, 2012 11:23 AM (vd4t0)
Posted by: Jones in CO at March 23, 2012 11:23 AM (8sCoq)
So, anyway, if you think about it, "Trayvon" is not really that bad a name. I mean, it's “von”, which is good, and a “Tray”' in front of it, which is also good. Trayvon , right?
When you consider the other choices, "Trayvon" is actually pretty refreshing.
Posted by: George Costanza at March 23, 2012 11:23 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: polynikes at March 23, 2012 11:23 AM (A2cTV)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 23, 2012 11:24 AM (eCnLg)
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 23, 2012 11:24 AM (niZvt)
Do tell.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 23, 2012 03:19 PM (sbV1u)
Don't encourage him. Or you'll find out more about random's worldview than you'd care to know.
Posted by: Mætenloch at March 23, 2012 11:24 AM (+B3Nr)
Posted by: Temper Tantrum at March 23, 2012 11:24 AM (AWmfW)
Lemme know how that works for you at your next traffic stop.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 23, 2012 11:24 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Supercore23 at March 23, 2012 11:25 AM (/iaWb)
>>>If you are not a cop and are carrying you shouldn't be looking for trouble.It's a big responibilty to carry a lethal weapon.
>>>No, it isn't. It's a right.
Oh that is the most STUPID thing I have seen on this thread yet. Rights come with responsibility idiot. The irresponsible CANNOT BE FREE. And while you have a right to bear arms, CHOOSING TO ACTUALLY DO SO, puts a lot of responsibility on you.
Divorce yourself of that attitude towards dangerous weapons right now, otherwise you are a walking posterboy for why they should be banned.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose finally remembers why he's here at March 23, 2012 11:25 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Dr Spank at March 23, 2012 11:25 AM (Sh42X)
Posted by: Javems at March 23, 2012 11:25 AM (nTgAI)
Posted by: Anson Mitchell at March 23, 2012 11:26 AM (IhUxK)
Posted by: steevy at March 23, 2012 11:26 AM (vd4t0)
Maet, I'm going for the full banhammer from Ace due to racism.
It's worth a shot...for the good of all of us.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 23, 2012 11:26 AM (sbV1u)
If I had a son, he'd look like Trayvon. So vote for me. Whitey is trying to kill me. Whitey is tying to kill you. Vote for me stop whitey and gets some nifty nail polish too.
Posted by: Barnak the Hurrible at March 23, 2012 11:26 AM (8ieXv)
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 23, 2012 11:26 AM (niZvt)
The other reason the kid set on fire in KC gets no airtime: nothing in the Bill of Rights about fire or accelerants. (The eco-fascists have already outlawed fire in some cities and states; the war on gasoline we talked about already today.)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 23, 2012 11:26 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: Anson Mitchell at March 23, 2012 11:26 AM (IhUxK)
I don't know. Like I said: it's hard for me to square 6'3" 140 lbs w/ Football player.
I'm not exactly a lightweight, but I'm not really overweight either (so says my doctor). I'm just under 6' and weigh in at between 185 & 190. Someone about 4 inches taller than me should probably weigh in at the 210 mark to be "average." To be actively lighter than me (by 45 to 50 lbs) means he had to be super thin.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 23, 2012 11:26 AM (8y9MW)
If a cop orders you to stop you have to do so. You can sue him later if he didn't have sufficient cause.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose finally remembers why he's here at March 23, 2012 11:26 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at March 23, 2012 03:22 PM (Dll6b)
************
Hmmmm, I've never heard bukkake referred to as flour-bombing before.
Posted by: Pimpbot 5000 at March 23, 2012 11:27 AM (ggRof)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 23, 2012 11:27 AM (eCnLg)
Listen next time for Tremicka, Trevaria Tonaricka, and LaHarriet.
Posted by: Anson Mitchell at March 23, 2012 03:22 PM (IhUxK)
This phenomenon is very recent, coinciding with the upswing in illegitimate births in the last 40 years. Most black Americans older than that have more traditionally-European given names.
Posted by: baldilocks at March 23, 2012 11:27 AM (T2/zQ)
My brother is 6'4, and positively anorexic, a complete bean pole, at 201lbs.
Posted by: Gulfkraken at March 23, 2012 11:28 AM (WBfjO)
Posted by: The Mega Independent at March 23, 2012 11:28 AM (Fz7+s)
Posted by: steevy at March 23, 2012 11:28 AM (vd4t0)
342@295
Excellent, but you miss the main point. This isn't about Trayvon, it's about ginning up the Black support for my campaign.
Actully, you miss the point. It's not about ginning up Black support (thats what African Americans for Obama is for)...it's about recapturing the "white guilt" vote that we've lost since 2008.
That's one of the reasons why "white hispanic" is so important to the narrative.
Just think of all the squishy independents that are now giving us a second, emotion-driven look. And ignore the fact that we are so desperate that we are resorting to this tactic.
Posted by: David Axelrodent at March 23, 2012 11:28 AM (3Tc9H)
As an African American I must tell you that you, sir, are a racist!
Posted by: Sheff Boyarday Spaygettayohs Martin at March 23, 2012 11:28 AM (VMcoS)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose finally remembers why he's here at March 23, 2012 03:11 PM (0q2P7)
so the person who "feels" threatened has more latitude in using physical force than a person getting his ass kicked?
Posted by: chas at March 23, 2012 11:28 AM (xAq1C)
bacon, beer, steak, guns, fast cars, maybe something along those lines
Posted by: Jones in CO at March 23, 2012 03:18 PM (8sCoq)
Agreed
Posted by: Adam Smith's Invisible Pimp Hand at March 23, 2012 11:28 AM (tKFT6)
In light of the recent revelations of what has been going on with the N'Orleans Saints....
Has there ever been any evidence that this sort of thing is going on at High Schools too. ....Players being trained to inflict maximum damage, on purpose?
Posted by: Yeah, I went there... at March 23, 2012 11:29 AM (4GgJq)
Posted by: Anson Mitchell at March 23, 2012 11:29 AM (IhUxK)
Posted by: yinzer at March 23, 2012 11:29 AM (/Mla1)
Seems fair to me.
I think what the MSM has their panties in a wad about is the story had a happy ending this time.
Posted by: Fat Al at March 23, 2012 11:29 AM (y0VOX)
Posted by: joated at March 23, 2012 11:29 AM (NMoRX)
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 23, 2012 11:29 AM (niZvt)
Remember, Zimmerman wasn't dressed up in some Barney Fife rent-a-cop uniform
Posted by: kbdabear at March 23, 2012 11:29 AM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: Gulfkraken at March 23, 2012 11:29 AM (WBfjO)
Posted by: TheQuietMan at March 23, 2012 11:29 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: polynikes at March 23, 2012 11:30 AM (A2cTV)
It sounded like he said "octoroon" which is kind of funny because of the obscurity, but still pretty racist.
Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at March 23, 2012 11:30 AM (+lsX1)
Posted by: Phinn at March 23, 2012 03:19 PM (KNtHw)
----------------------------------------------------------
'scuse me? It's a right, but there are some very big responsibilities that go along with that right.
Posted by: antisocialist at March 23, 2012 11:30 AM (j/nZn)
It looks like the Trayvon Shooting case is going to be quite the national watershed case ...
I note that Drudge, at this writing has photos of Zimmerman and of Trayvon up.
As BTH comments above, Zimmerman is hardly mistakeable for the master race. My suspicion is that, given the ethnic populations of of Florida, he would not immediately be assumed to be of European descent; there would be questions, and the MSM would know ... immediately. That the HuffPo prints (here: tinyurl.com/7omq98z) that Zimmermann is white:
"But last month's shooting death of Trayvon Martin -- an unarmed black teenager who police said was shot by a white neighborhood watch captain -- has reopened old wounds. The police have not arrested George Zimmerman, 28, who is white, ... "
... and it's a clear case of media incompetence, and maybe malpractice.
The photo of Trayvon is interesting, in that it is NOT like any that HuffPo displays of Trayvon (here: tinyurl.com/7omq98z). As expected, the HuffPo is ... guiding ... its readers to Approved Truth. The bulk of the photos are of Trayvon as a child, someone who would likely obey authority. But the photo of Trayvon on Drudge is not that of a child, not someone who would very likely immediately respect or obey authority ... and, at 17, 6'2+, an athlete (a football player), not someone who's threats should be taken lightly.
There are comments here and many other places about "hoodies". Setting aside the question, for later, of having the right (or not) to wear a hoodie, it's reasonably clear from virtually all comments that all commenters recognize that hoodies are a strong indicator, an identifier, an advertisement ... of the weared being being someone who is more likely to have violent/criminal tendancies. The wearer might not, in fact, have violent/criminal tendancies ... but the wearer chooses to wear an advertisement ... in public.
There are other clothing items that are strong indicators, identifiers, advertisements, and everyone knows that they should be taken seriously.
I'll wait to comment on Zimmerman's guilt or innocence. I think Zimmerman screwed up, many times, and badly. It will affect all of us, and, unless some of the usual race hustlers and poverty pimps implode on national TV, probably not for the better.
Posted by: Arbalest at March 23, 2012 11:30 AM (OlbL0)
He wasn't told not to follow. Read the furnished links.
The dispatcher asked "Are you following him," he said, "yes," and the dispatcher said "You don't need to do that."
If you then read the Chief's Q&A, he expounds that such advice was not a legal order, and Zimmerman was breaking no law by continuing pursuit.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 23, 2012 11:30 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Anson Mitchell at March 23, 2012 11:31 AM (IhUxK)
Rutherford B Hayes doesn't have clean hands on this either!
Posted by: King Barry the Historian at March 23, 2012 11:31 AM (Y+DPZ)
First, are 9/11 operators actual sworn officers? Honest question, I really don't know.
Second, cops have no duty to protect except in very limited circumstances, so lawsuit? Nope!
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] at March 23, 2012 11:31 AM (WdKsY)
Posted by: Phinn at March 23, 2012 03:23 PM (KNtHw)
good point, and it wasnt even a cop. it was a dispatcher. remember a couple of months ago when the mom in oklahoma shot the guy trying to break into here house, what advice did they dispatcher give in that case?? a dispatcher is a glorified phone operator.
Posted by: chas at March 23, 2012 11:31 AM (xAq1C)
Yes, Obama did learn. He gets to drop the poison pill and march on like it never happened.
He is going to smugly sit back and let farakhan and sharpton do his dirty work on this one.
Posted by: Fat Al at March 23, 2012 11:31 AM (y0VOX)
I think I've already establish that Obama doesn't learn from his mistakes.
Posted by: The American Economy at March 23, 2012 11:32 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: my heart still belongs to herman cain at March 23, 2012 11:32 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at March 23, 2012 03:30 PM (+lsX1)
**********
There's an octoroon? Crap, Lana almost killed me when I said "quadroon"!
Posted by: Sterling Archer at March 23, 2012 11:33 AM (ggRof)
Posted by: steevy at March 23, 2012 11:33 AM (vd4t0)
Posted by: Jones in CO at March 23, 2012 03:19 PM (8sCoq)
How about a post about a busty redhead drinking scotch while she trains her good field dog? I've got a feeling we're going to need some distractions soon.
Posted by: joncelli, heartless Con and all around unpleasant guy at March 23, 2012 11:33 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 23, 2012 11:33 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: Boston12GS at March 23, 2012 11:33 AM (aVw1v)
They showed up at immigration offices without proper papers.
WITH OUT PAPERS. WOPS.
And Jews came to be called "kykes" because their papers always had a circle on them; "kykel" is Hebrew for "circle."
Know how obama got to be known as a socialist asshole?
Its because he is a socialist asshole.
Posted by: Fat Al at March 23, 2012 11:34 AM (y0VOX)
"This race hustling movement will merge will OWS and be nationwide and violent in time for the conventions."
So? In 1968 that led to Nixon and the start of the conservative swing. As a matter of fact, Reagan made his national rep standing up against the pro-Viet Cong anti-war protestors.
As I said, let them hustle.
Posted by: Bob from Ohio at March 23, 2012 11:34 AM (ROFkf)
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at March 23, 2012 11:34 AM (Dll6b)
Posted by: Hedgehog at March 23, 2012 11:34 AM (3jGS1)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 23, 2012 11:34 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 23, 2012 11:35 AM (eCnLg)
Posted by: charlie manson at March 23, 2012 11:35 AM (YJdgp)
That's not the standard. The standard is if a reasonable person would feel threatened. And if you do something that would make a reasonable person feel threatened, yes you are straying into territory where depending on the situation (Whether or not they can find some other way to protect themselves) you could find yourself with very little latitude to legally use force to protect yourself.
The correct answer here is when you get good indication that someone else feels threatened by what you are doing. BACK THE FUCK OFF.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose finally remembers why he's here at March 23, 2012 11:35 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Anson Mitchell at March 23, 2012 11:35 AM (IhUxK)
@429
*
My very Caucasian boyfriend and somewhat Caucasian brother both wear hoodies - and they're 51. Granted, BF doesn't look too threatening with his, but my bro tends to look shady at times and I have been known to tell him to pull down his hood in public - for fear of him being profiled.
In these parts, convenience store robberies have escalated, and the perps often wear hoodies. But then my bank also has a pic posted of a robber who was caught on the security camera, he is as white as the driven snow, no hoodie. (I don't believe hoodies are a solid indicator, but local law enforcement seems to, that's why I counsel my brother to keep a low profile.)
Posted by: kallisto at March 23, 2012 11:35 AM (jm/9g)
Deserve's got nothing to do with it. -- Unforgiven
Posted by: maverick muse at March 23, 2012 11:35 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 23, 2012 03:29 PM (niZvt)
Well, if the names are Russian, that means that "they" didn't come up with them.
I don't think that most Americans know that Sasha is actually a man's name...a diminutive for Alexander.
Posted by: baldilocks at March 23, 2012 11:35 AM (T2/zQ)
; margin: 0in 0in 12pt; line-height: normal;" class="MsoNormal">285>>> Zimmerman called him a fucking coon???
He did. that's on the tape. Doesn't seem like it could be anything else.
But that doesn't answer the question either. It does suggest he may have been pre-inclined to suspect the guy, or what some Street Justice.
Posted by: ace at March 23, 2012 03:09 PM (nj1bB)
No, he didnÂ’t. That was the interpretation some people had listening to the tape, but there are other interpretations just as much or more likely.
LetÂ’s stick to facts.
Posted by: jwest at March 23, 2012 11:36 AM (FdndL)
Posted by: Anson Mitchell at March 23, 2012 11:36 AM (IhUxK)
BTW, does anyone know how Italians came to be called "Wops"?
Pirelli had a short-lived tire line called the 'Dago 500'. Dago in the rain, dago in the snow, and when dago flat, dago 'wopwopwopwopwop'.
Posted by: Sheff Boyarday Spaygettayohs Martin at March 23, 2012 11:36 AM (VMcoS)
Head over to Dedicated Tenther's blog for more on this question...but I think that rights are immutable. They are independent of the responsibility with which they are wielded.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at March 23, 2012 11:37 AM (nEUpB)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at March 23, 2012 11:37 AM (jucos)
It would be nice if an actual NEWS agency reported the facts.
The area that the incident occurred in is a complex of attached condos. There are a series of narrow “alleys” between the individual blocks of units. According to the police report, Treyvon’s body was in one of these alleys.
It would have been impossible for Zimmerman to follow Treyvon while in his car.
Posted by: jwest at March 23, 2012 11:38 AM (FdndL)
What right did he have to chase a "suspect" ?He called the cops,that should have ended it.
Posted by: steevy at March 23, 2012 03:21 PM (vd4t0)
First of all, chucklehead, he wasn't "chasing" Martin -- he was following him.
Second, that is perfectly legal.
Thirdly, he was not "ordered" to stop:
...the telecommunications call taker asked Zimmerman “are you following
him”. Zimmerman replied, “yes”. The call taker stated “you don’t need to do that”. The call taker’s suggestion is not a lawful order that Mr. Zimmerman would be required to follow. Zimmerman’s statement was that he had lost sight of Trayvon and was returning to his truck to meet the police officer when he says he was attacked by Trayvon.
And fourthly it appears Martin initiated the confrontation (see above).
You really need to buy a clue because you certainly don't have one.
Posted by: Ed Anger - Certified Kos Kid at March 23, 2012 11:38 AM (7+pP9)
MSNBC analyst and Democratic strategist Karen Finney disgustingly smeared Rush Limbaugh and several Republican presidential candidates on Thursday, charging that the racist hate of these conservatives had “lethal consequences” in the case of Trayvon Martin, an African American teen shot in Florida.
After decrying “bigotry and stereotypes tak[ing] over our better judgment,” Finney sneeringly insisted that when “Rush Limbaugh calls a presidential candidate, Senator Barack Obama, a magic negro…In the case of Trayvon, those festering stereotypes had lethal consequences.”
Posted by: Islamic Rage Boy at March 23, 2012 11:38 AM (e8kgV)
Posted by: ktgreat at March 23, 2012 11:39 AM (TCTPY)
People who cannot write usually make an X or variation of a cross as their 'mark' or signature
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at March 23, 2012 11:39 AM (Dll6b)
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 23, 2012 11:39 AM (niZvt)
Baby LaToya could be named after her grandmother, for all the casual observer knows.
Y'all should see some of the stupid names the (white) kids of my high school classmates are giving their illegitimate kids. It's an act of defiance, like a neck tattoo.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 23, 2012 11:39 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: mike at March 23, 2012 11:39 AM (kqXHe)
Posted by: Anson Mitchell at March 23, 2012 11:40 AM (IhUxK)
Posted by: Jean at March 23, 2012 11:40 AM (WkuV6)
Posted by: steevy at March 23, 2012 11:40 AM (vd4t0)
Oh, YEAH?
Well, I'm only 5 foot 8, but HLaH, IYKWIM, AITTYD.
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 23, 2012 03:23 PM (niZvt)
According to the police report, Treyvon was 6 foot, 160 lbs.
Posted by: jwest at March 23, 2012 11:40 AM (FdndL)
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at March 23, 2012 11:40 AM (Dll6b)
--
I think the police report says 160 pounds whatever that is worth.
Posted by: RioBravo at March 23, 2012 11:41 AM (eEfYn)
You mean a hispanic kid.<<<
No, a white kid. I'm not Hispanic, so that would make me racist. Godamn, why you darkies always tryin to bamboozle the White Man?
I ain't fallin fer it.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 23, 2012 11:41 AM (FEqS6)
Posted by: Al Sharpton at March 23, 2012 11:41 AM (Sh42X)
Older inmates at maximum security prisons have talked about how young killers under 18 lack humanity in their eyes and scare the living shit out of them.
Posted by: kbdabear at March 23, 2012 11:41 AM (Y+DPZ)
Liberals - the skin of a human stuffed with a turd.
Posted by: Fat Al at March 23, 2012 11:41 AM (y0VOX)
Posted by: nickless at March 23, 2012 11:41 AM (X7aC8)
Posted by: steevy at March 23, 2012 11:41 AM (vd4t0)
That's a little more believable. That would still make him on the light side, but I could believe that and still believe he played football. Maybe as a second string receiver or CB/Safety.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 23, 2012 11:42 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Anson Mitchell at March 23, 2012 11:42 AM (IhUxK)
It's been going on for a month. I originally thought the usual suspects were leaving it alone because Zimmy is Hispanic. But doing it now overshadows the ObamaCare hearings that are getting fired up on Monday, and are bound to smoke Nearo's approval ratings. It also may be in response to the various racist stuff coming out of libs' mouths this week, but more likely it's ObamaCare.
Posted by: The Mega Independent at March 23, 2012 11:42 AM (Fz7+s)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 23, 2012 11:42 AM (jUytm)
that is going to be a problem with the MFM meme.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at March 23, 2012 11:42 AM (SuBE0)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 23, 2012 03:34 PM (jUytm)
didnt you post tthe link to the PD's investigation? read the faq form the city manager,
If Zimmerman was told not to continue to follow Trayvon, can that be considered in this investigation?
t will; however, the telecommunications call taker asked Zimmerman “are you following him”. Zimmerman replied, “yes”. The call taker stated “you don’t need to do that”. The call taker’s suggestion is not a lawful order that Mr. Zimmerman would be required to follow. Zimmerman’s statement was that he had lost sight of Trayvon and was returning to his truck to meet the police officer when he says he was attacked by Trayvon.
Posted by: chas at March 23, 2012 11:42 AM (xAq1C)
Given the MSM's fetish for showing 'lil Travon's picture as a 12 year old, I'd take the report of him weighing 140lbs with a bigass equine saltblock.
As to grown-up men being pussies if they can't handle a 17 year old with their fists: Seriously. What planet have you been on for the last...forever? That describes a heaping shitload of violent crime in this country. 17 year olds, for the most part, have all or more of the physical strength of an adult and almost none of the maturity and judgement.
Posted by: Jaws at March 23, 2012 11:42 AM (4I3Uo)
At least someone read the police report.
Posted by: jwest at March 23, 2012 03:38 PM (FdndL)
He was not found in an alley, he was in the grass. The same grass that was on Zimmerman's back as he was being beaten (see the official police report in #25)
Posted by: Hedgehog at March 23, 2012 11:42 AM (3jGS1)
I didn't see anything saying the witnesses indicated he clearly broke pursuit and was returning to his truck. But he might have been. If he had been doing that, it would (in my opinion) mitigate though not eliminate his criminal responsibility, down to possibly man 2.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose finally remembers why he's here at March 23, 2012 11:42 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: mike at March 23, 2012 11:42 AM (kqXHe)
Posted by: Anson Mitchell at March 23, 2012 11:43 AM (IhUxK)
Posted by: Lincolntf at March 23, 2012 11:43 AM (HethX)
If Trayvon was fulfilling the "magic negro" stereotype, his appearance would have gotten Zimmerman the job and the girl.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 23, 2012 11:43 AM (ZKzrr)
Of we could all read. How else do you think we ran the world?
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at March 23, 2012 11:44 AM (nEUpB)
Posted by: dlj at March 23, 2012 11:44 AM (rIQ+1)
And, by the way, get offa my lawn!
Posted by: Sort-of-Mad Max at March 23, 2012 11:44 AM (VMcoS)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 23, 2012 11:44 AM (eCnLg)
Posted by: Havedash at March 23, 2012 11:44 AM (JfvbF)
Posted by: my heart still belongs to herman cain at March 23, 2012 11:44 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: steevy at March 23, 2012 11:44 AM (vd4t0)
Sharpton, Jackson and crew are the first to complain about MSM focus on women like Chandra Levy and Natalee Holloway and scream that if they were minority women, the stories would be ignored.
Well, I suspect this story would be a big nothingburger if the kid had been white.
These guys really are shameless when it comes to stirring up the masses, particularly on the issue of race. They have no interest in making racial division a thing of the past. They thrive on it.
Despicable.
Posted by: Dumb low-info squishy moderate independent at March 23, 2012 11:45 AM (59JAw)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at March 23, 2012 03:44 PM (nEUpB)
===so, do YOU know the Secret of the Circle? My B.S. meter self-activated
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at March 23, 2012 11:45 AM (Dll6b)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose finally remembers why he's here at March 23, 2012 03:35 PM (0q2P7)
but not in a state that has a "stand your ground" law. and you assume a lot, that zimmerman knew martin felt threatened by him and should have expected to be attacked physically. you seem to believe that zimmerman's actions forfeit his right to defend himself even if the stand your ground law doesnt apply. after all he was on the ground getting his ass kicked. he didnt have the luxury of retreating. at that point im betting he felt a lot more threatened than martin did.
Posted by: chas at March 23, 2012 11:46 AM (xAq1C)
"I am urging the parents of black and Latino youngsters, particularly, to not let their young children go out wearing hoodies. I think the hoodie is as much responsible for Trayvon MartinÂ’s death as George Zimmerman was."
-Geraldo Rivera
The Rican goes over the edge here: http://tinyurl.com/6rue3ce
Posted by: Doctor Fish at March 23, 2012 11:46 AM (TkGkA)
But clearly some of us can't write.
of= of course
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at March 23, 2012 11:46 AM (nEUpB)
And this (well, not this specifically, but the idea behind it) is what some of us are saying.
There are several explanations which require no criminal conduct on anyone's part.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 23, 2012 11:46 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose finally remembers why he's here at March 23, 2012 03:42 PM (0q2P7)
It's in the FAQ letter from the link in #25. It's what the police claimed that Zimmerman said. Shot was in the chest. Read the initial report.
Posted by: Hedgehog at March 23, 2012 11:46 AM (3jGS1)
Posted by: TheQuietMan at March 23, 2012 11:46 AM (1Jaio)
@474
*
It was recounted to me that the "x" had too much of the appearance of a Christian cross, that's why they made their mark with a circle.
Posted by: kallisto at March 23, 2012 11:47 AM (jm/9g)
You can have my hoodie when you pull it from my cold, dead, extremely rich head.
Posted by: Bill Belichick at March 23, 2012 11:47 AM (/Mla1)
Posted by: mike at March 23, 2012 11:47 AM (kqXHe)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 23, 2012 11:47 AM (eCnLg)
Posted by: Anson Mitchell at March 23, 2012 11:48 AM (IhUxK)
Independent new reporter to Al Sharpton: So, Reverend Sharpton, you are flying to Sanford Florida on the day after your mother dies, because you are devastated over a black youth being killed - is that right?
Sharpton: "Yassuh that be right. These lynchins has gots to stop. Too manys of black chilluns be killed in the streets."
Reporter: "Reverend Sharpton, you do realize that from 1990 to 2010, in Chicago, 13,133 people were murdered, and in the same period, in DC, 5998 people were murdered. Last weekend alone, 49 people were shot in Chicago - and 10 died, including a 6 year old child. You don't seem to have been as concerned about that. Can you explain why?
Sharpton: "Whitey!"
Break to commercial.
Posted by: Fat Al at March 23, 2012 11:48 AM (y0VOX)
Posted by: polynikes at March 23, 2012 11:48 AM (A2cTV)
Posted by: km at March 23, 2012 11:48 AM (iFQkz)
IANAL, but the $64,000 question may be how much the stand your ground rights flow in either direction. Theoretically, one could argue that the following itself invited a percieved threat against Martin (perceived is all Florida requires as I understand that law) which may negate who acted first.
In any case, it's understandable that the authorities are taking time. This is Florida, where cases go to get screwed up and thrown out or poorly prosecuted because they moved to fast to push charges and a trial. If (and I stress IF) Zimmerman acted outside of the bounds of the law (which as Ace pointed out it seems is at least plausible at this point) then justice does argue that he be punished. HOWEVER, a rush to trial that results in a acquittal (presuming the first if) does not serve justice.
If Zimmer was inside the bounds of the law, rushing to a trial that results in an unfair conviction is also a violation of Justice. Your chances of rushing and getting it right are small, very small.
Posted by: tsrblke at March 23, 2012 11:48 AM (SYrwI)
Posted by: S Daniel at March 23, 2012 11:48 AM (BVkEs)
There was also an eyewitness that saw the Trayvon (6'3") pummeling Zimmerman on the ground. Zimmerman was yelling for help. Zimmerman had blacks in his family, welcomed a black neighbor to the neighborhood and mentored two black children. The fucking media, 0bama, Sharpton et al. are sick fucks out to create a race war.
This shows to me absolute desperation on the part of the Obama team. Whenever there's a black person murdered, there's a pause to see if the perpetrator might be black. If not, then the race pimps sweep into action.
It hits the media if the victim is unarmed.
The problem is, of course, that this is a boomerang situation waiting to happen:
(1) Martin is undoubtedly not an innocent little kid and seems to be into crime if not gangs.
(2) Zimmerman got bloodied somehow and that works in his favor.
(3) He's Hispanic. If this goes on too long it will be a disaster for the Democrats. They can't be seen to be unfairly attacking a Hispanic in Florida.
But they must know this. And they did it anyway. They must be seeing horrible numbers, even in the black community. Probably a lot of disenchantment. Not a lot of volunteers this time around.
Posted by: AmishDude at March 23, 2012 11:48 AM (T0NGe)
This was before he knew that other 911 calls picked up the cries for help.
Zimmerman's story, from what he told police, before he could "figure out a story," sounds quite convincing.
If this holds, the grand jury only indicts based on fear, not facts.
Posted by: Anson Mitchell at March 23, 2012 03:48 PM (IhUxK)
Don't forget the 2 eyewitnesses that saw Zimmerman getting his ass kicked and screaming for help.
Posted by: Hedgehog at March 23, 2012 11:49 AM (3jGS1)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 23, 2012 03:33 PM
Oh please. I get emails from change.org every day on some lefty "cause" they want a petition on. They're another Soros astroturf group.
Posted by: kbdabear at March 23, 2012 11:49 AM (Y+DPZ)
463 I never said anything about himbeing ordered to stop.Someone else used that word..
Posted by: steevy at March 23, 2012 03:40 PM (vd4t0)
Bullshit. In two of your posts you used the word "chase" to describe Zimmerman's following of Martin.
Look at your own post, #358: zimmerman doesn't chase him he doesn't get in a fight.What right did he have to chase a "suspect".
Those were your exact words, so cut the bullshit.
Posted by: Ed Anger - Certified Kos Kid at March 23, 2012 11:50 AM (7+pP9)
Strongly recommend you read this guy's analysis of the actual Florida law. It is very enlightening.
http://tinyurl.com/6qw6d7g
I suspect that when it is all finished, the Zimmerman is going to not be charged. But this will be heavily used for ginned up rage over racism and gun ownership.
Posted by: Dave in Fla at March 23, 2012 11:50 AM (8TANr)
Posted by: Anson Mitchell at March 23, 2012 11:50 AM (IhUxK)
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 23, 2012 11:51 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: km at March 23, 2012 03:48 PM (iFQkz)
Because Sandra Fluke is no longer succeeding in distracting people from $4/gallon gas and high unemployment.
Posted by: joncelli, heartless Con and all around unpleasant guy at March 23, 2012 11:51 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Anson Mitchell at March 23, 2012 11:52 AM (IhUxK)
From the OED: Said to be an alteration of -ki (or -ky), a common ending of the personal names of Eastern European Jews who emigrated to the U.S. at the turn of the 20th cent.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at March 23, 2012 11:52 AM (nEUpB)
Your right to free speech does not include inciting violent revolt.
Your right to travel does not mean running over women and children.
Your right to contract does not include contracting to have someone killed.
You have a right to carry a gun and absolutely NO RIGHT TO DISCHARGE IT.
The choice to carry a weapon that might discharge makes you responsible for whatever happens if you advertently or inadvertently discharge it which is not a right.
Choosing to exercise your right of free speech means taking responsibility for what you have said. Which can mean criminal liability.
Choosing to exercise your right to travel means taking responsibility for your conveyance which under some circumstances can open you up for criminal liability.
Choosing to exercise your right to bear arms means taking responsibility for where your bullets might go, which can open you up for criminal liability.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose finally remembers why he's here at March 23, 2012 11:52 AM (0q2P7)
==the standard for the 'stand your ground' law is the same 'probable cause' or 'reasonable cause' that is required of cops: You must convince cops, prosecutors, judges, juries, etc that you actually did face a credible, immediate threat of serious bodily harm
The point of the law is to make it clear that unlike New Yawk and some other states, you are not required to seek escape before using deadly force
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at March 23, 2012 11:52 AM (Dll6b)
Posted by: S Daniel at March 23, 2012 03:48 PM
Jew sounding enough for me.
Brothas, let's go burn down some Jew stores!!!!
Posted by: The Right Rev Al Sharpton at March 23, 2012 11:52 AM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: bannor, voting Sweet Meteor of Death 2012 at March 23, 2012 11:52 AM (HEa5q)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 23, 2012 11:52 AM (jUytm)
513....MSNBC is a vile thing
Yeah they are. .....There was an article yesterday at the FreeBeacon.com about how "Al Qaeda members are Fans of MSNBC" and were pissed when they fired Olbermann. ....This was according to a letter found in Bin Ladin's stuff. Heh.
Posted by: wheatie at March 23, 2012 11:52 AM (4GgJq)
Posted by: km at March 23, 2012 03:48 PM (iFQkz)
Ask Reginald Denny why you should care.
Posted by: Havedash at March 23, 2012 11:53 AM (JfvbF)
Zimmerman, in the police report, said, "I was yelling for someone to help me, and no one would help me."
Well 'they' tell you to run inside, lock the door and call 911. What do you expect?
Posted by: garrett at March 23, 2012 11:53 AM (80Hej)
Posted by: Anson Mitchell at March 23, 2012 03:52 PM (IhUxK)
If you witnessed this, would you hunt down the cameras? With as inflamed as things are, all I'd have is a "no comment" to the media. Then I'd get my own gun if I didn't already have one.
Posted by: yinzer at March 23, 2012 11:53 AM (/Mla1)
===okay, thanks. Fat Al speaks wisely, after all. Go in peace, Al
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at March 23, 2012 11:54 AM (Dll6b)
Posted by: Anson Mitchell at March 23, 2012 11:54 AM (IhUxK)
Oops -- I got discombobulated over chase and being ordered to stop. Buy my point stands: steevy is clueless.
Posted by: Ed Anger - Certified Kos Kid at March 23, 2012 11:54 AM (7+pP9)
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at March 23, 2012 11:55 AM (DuH+r)
Posted by: Reverend Al at March 23, 2012 11:55 AM (jucos)
Posted by: supercore23 at March 23, 2012 11:55 AM (bwV72)
Posted by: Anson Mitchell at March 23, 2012 11:55 AM (IhUxK)
Posted by: Dr. Varno at March 23, 2012 11:55 AM (QMtmy)
Posted by: Roy at March 23, 2012 11:56 AM (VndSC)
Posted by: steevy at March 23, 2012 11:56 AM (vd4t0)
1) It's being used to attack opponents of Obama.
2) It's being used to attack the second amendment.
My interest in it is pretty limited to how the media lies about shit (including lies of omission and presenting opinions as facts) to drive public opinion.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 23, 2012 11:56 AM (ZKzrr)
Even more brutal is the fact a black walking in a white neighborhood is safer than if he were walking in a black neighborhood.
But isn't it neat how the MSM is obscuring the fact this was a "Latino" neighborhood?
Isn't it time for a National Conversation about Latino racism?
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 23, 2012 03:51 PM (niZvt)
I forgot which black person said this, but she said when she was walking at night and someone was walking behind her, she was relieved to find that when she turned around that person was white, rather than black ... so it seems to be something not lost on many black people themselves.
As a white man who lives in Brooklyn, I can attest I have seen this happen when walking behind someone at night.
Posted by: Heralder at March 23, 2012 11:56 AM (/Mxso)
Posted by: bannor, voting Sweet Meteor of Death 2012 at March 23, 2012 11:56 AM (HEa5q)
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 23, 2012 11:56 AM (niZvt)
Just so no one else makes the same mistake Ace did, hereÂ’s the Wikipedia entry:
“A part of what Zimmerman said on the tape is unclear. Some have heard the disputed words as "fucking coons", an ethnic slur used against black people, while others suggest it was "clueless", "course", or "punks". Others insist the words are too muffled to make any determination.”
Posted by: jwest at March 23, 2012 11:57 AM (FdndL)
Posted by: Anson Mitchell at March 23, 2012 03:52 PM (IhUxK)
I don't know anything about this website but there is an Orlando Fox affiliate that interviews the neighbor the very next day and he says that he saw Zimmerman getting beat up and yelling for help. He yelled for Trayvon to stop and ran inside to call police. Click the fox35 link.
http://tinyurl.com/6wcn76k
Posted by: Hedgehog at March 23, 2012 11:57 AM (3jGS1)
Posted by: bannor, voting Sweet Meteor of Death 2012 at March 23, 2012 03:52 PM (HEa5q)
==yes, the 'stand your ground' law does not apply if you are 'in the act' of committing a felony or misD. It's obviously ( hear this, ace ?? ) obviously about a citizen who is not committing a crime but facing a perceived threat
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at March 23, 2012 11:57 AM (Dll6b)
The better question may be why did it take the MSM this long to report it?
Posted by: Retread at March 23, 2012 11:57 AM (joSBv)
Former boxing champ Tommy Hearns originally fought at the 147lb. weight class. He was one hell of a fighter.
So stop with the "he only weighed 140lbs" shit.
Posted by: seamrog at March 23, 2012 11:57 AM (JKSUw)
Posted by: supercore23 at March 23, 2012 03:55 PM (bwV72)
He did call the "pros". He was trying to keep an eye on him, by all accounts. It's not like he whipped out the cuffs he got on ebay and was trying to restrain him.
Posted by: yinzer at March 23, 2012 11:57 AM (/Mla1)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 23, 2012 11:58 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: kbdabear at March 23, 2012 11:58 AM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: Anson Mitchell at March 23, 2012 11:58 AM (IhUxK)
>>>The better question may be why did it take the MSM this long to report it?
Answer: SQUIRREL!!!
Posted by: Roy at March 23, 2012 11:59 AM (VndSC)
528 "Don't forget the 2 eyewitnesses that saw Zimmerman getting his ass kicked and screaming for help."
I heard about that earlier today...but I ask: where have these people been? Like Martin's girlfriend, what has taken them 3-4+ weeks to come forward?
Some of them called 911 from their homes, while it was happening...and are on tape telling of what they were seeing. ....Then, there are witnesses that talked to the police, when they got there. So that is apparently in the police report.
But the MFM is not talking about this much at all.
Posted by: wheatie at March 23, 2012 11:59 AM (4GgJq)
I found the following pic on a CBS News gallery. It was taken from his funeral notice. Now I can't find anything later than his hoodie photograph that Drudge has up:
http://www.tumblr.com/blog/kayakrollover
How about this scenario to make sense of the sequence of events?
Z follows M, probably totally overtly as a way of saying "I'm watching you and you aren't getting away with anything".
M blows a fuse (just like FAU girl Jonatha Carr) at being followed and decides Z needs a beatdown to respect a brother (maybe testosterone fueled by being on the phone with his girl).
The rest follows.
The baiters aren't gonna be happy until they get themselves a racism tornado tearing Florida apart.
Posted by: Kyle Kiernan at March 23, 2012 11:59 AM (/AEUY)
Posted by: supercore23 at March 23, 2012 11:59 AM (bwV72)
Six witnesses were interviewed at the time of the shooting. Presumably these two are among them.
They didn't come forward in public because there was no reason for them to.
Head over to Dedicated Tenther's blog for more on this question...but I
think that rights are immutable. They are independent of the
responsibility with which they are wielded.
How did I miss this comment? Wow, I'm normally much more self aggrandizing than that.
As I said there: I disagree. The difference between a "Right" and just "what I can do" is Responsibility. Responsibility is something you can choose to accept, or not, and is as much a moral choice as the original action.
In this case, I do believe that Zimmerman had a Moral responsibility to act smarter than he did. That Moral responsibility may not translate into a legal one, however. From what I'm reading, it sounds more and more like Zimmerman was acting completely legally- in which case he does not give up his right to self defense just because he's a CCW holder.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 23, 2012 12:00 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: bannor, voting Sweet Meteor of Death 2012 at March 23, 2012 12:00 PM (HEa5q)
Posted by: steevy at March 23, 2012 12:00 PM (vd4t0)
steevy, I'm surprised as you how many grown men here are afraid of 17 yr olds.
Posted by: soothsayer at March 23, 2012 03:58 PM
A 17 year old who looks like a character on Glee? No
A 17 year old whose mug shot just appeared as a suspect in a gang rape and beating? Yes
Posted by: kbdabear at March 23, 2012 12:00 PM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: Paul Zummo at March 23, 2012 12:00 PM (Ud5vq)
So if Trayvon looked like, say, Mitt Romney's son then President Racial Healing would be okay with this incident?
Because otherwise I don't understand why how he looks matters.
Posted by: Warden at March 23, 2012 12:01 PM (6aA95)
It is a tragedy, a 17 year old is dead and a family feels like justice has not been served. Was any formal investigation of Zimmerman's actions done or did the police just take his word for what happened? What is the due process? The President doesn't help anyone other than himself by saying Trayvon looks like a son he doesn't have. It is inflammatory and devisive. Does he want race riots?
Posted by: snowcrash at March 23, 2012 12:01 PM (t2NQr)
Jesse Jackson.
Heh.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 23, 2012 12:01 PM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: mike at March 23, 2012 12:01 PM (kqXHe)
Posted by: White RB at March 23, 2012 12:01 PM (LrLv1)
Bleeding heart liberals think that an individual can do whatever the hell he/she wants so long as a "minority" which by legal and media precedent is being defined as singularly black or African-American. But it's never been so. We're responsible for ourselves, for our choices -- and Martin chose in the middle of the night to go alone wearing his hoodie, not in his own neighborhood but a stranger where he was, and by chance be eating Skittles. But of course, skittles!
Wearing a hoodie in public in order to hide one's identity, when staying warm from a bitter winter wind is not an issue, is not so different than a jihadist wearing an Islamic scarf covering the face in order to maintain hidden identity in public. In America, it is not the custom to mask your identity when walking down the street UNLESS you are hiding from the law. Watch any old Western as the bandanas cover the face when the bad guys rob the stage coach or rob the bank.
France already fought against women wearing hidden veils in public. That argument has been fought stateside in courts, whether a Muslim woman can hide her facial identity on her driver's license or ID card, or while in a court room when the Judge orders the removal for security and open identity within his courtroom.
It's stupid wearing a hoodie in public unless its freezing outside. Don't stay stuck on stupid by arguing the "liberty" to dress at will. People do, and I'm not stopping them. That said, I resent being confronted by thugs wearing hoodies with underwear hanging out, swaggering down the street, checking out the scene for easy pickings. I'm not asking for a dress code; nor am I defending a fool for making himself look like a stupid idiot of a bad guy who "deserves" social-justice legally provided opportunism to victimize me.
Self defense is no hate crime. But tell that to the Attorney General Holder when it's your ass on the line. Obama wants to make an issue of this Florida gun law, to federally prosecute the State of Florida over its gun law. And Holder's on record insisting on brainwashing America to eschew gun rights.
Posted by: maverick muse at March 23, 2012 12:01 PM (lpWVn)
Posted by: Anson Mitchell at March 23, 2012 12:01 PM (IhUxK)
So a dead black kid will have to suffice.
Posted by: Anson Mitchell at March 23, 2012 03:54 PM (IhUxK)
Would that be the Alexrod of Doofus Network?
Posted by: TheQuietMan at March 23, 2012 12:02 PM (1Jaio)
Posted by: Louis Farrakhan at March 23, 2012 12:02 PM (ggRof)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at March 23, 2012 12:02 PM (jucos)
Posted by: dagny at March 23, 2012 12:02 PM (u50z0)
Posted by: USS Diversity at March 23, 2012 12:03 PM (vpe0k)
OK I read the FAQ letter and the initial report again. No mention of any witness that saw him clearly break off pursuit and return to his truck. Only Zimmerman's word after the fact that he had done so.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose finally remembers why he's here at March 23, 2012 12:03 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Kyle Kiernan at March 23, 2012 03:59 PM
Was an autopsy performed on Martin complete with blood results?
A 17 year old hopped up on drugs can be very lethal
Posted by: kbdabear at March 23, 2012 12:03 PM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: supercore23 at March 23, 2012 03:55 PM (bwV72)
"We are from the government, and we are here to help."
"When seconds count, the police are minutes away."
Do I have to go on?
You want to rely on the government for your well-being? Have at it.
I'll do it for myself.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at March 23, 2012 12:03 PM (nEUpB)
Posted by: supercore23 at March 23, 2012 12:03 PM (bwV72)
Jesse Jackson.
Heh.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 23, 2012 04:01 PM (ZKzrr)
Whoa, really? That seems really out of character. Funny how I thought it was a woman though.
Posted by: Heralder at March 23, 2012 12:03 PM (/Mxso)
Posted by: jwest at March 23, 2012 03:57 PM (FdndL)
So... coons. Thanks!
Posted by: The MSM at March 23, 2012 12:03 PM (Fz7+s)
The person who said that was, I shit you not, the Rehvrundddd Jacksunnnnn
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 23, 2012 12:03 PM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Anson Mitchell at March 23, 2012 04:01 PM (IhUxK)
==yes, this is almost entirely about increasing Black voting and attacking the 'stand your ground' law
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at March 23, 2012 12:03 PM (Dll6b)
Posted by: steevy at March 23, 2012 12:03 PM (vd4t0)
if it was a white kid and the shooter was white or whatever.
Steevy, if the kid was white you would never have heard the first word about this tragedy
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at March 23, 2012 12:04 PM (mFxQX)
http://tinyurl.com/6wcn76k
Posted by: Hedgehog at March 23, 2012 12:04 PM (3jGS1)
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 23, 2012 12:04 PM (niZvt)
Posted by: Heralder at March 23, 2012 12:04 PM (/Mxso)
Posted by: dagny at March 23, 2012 12:05 PM (u50z0)
Posted by: radar at March 23, 2012 12:05 PM (zmlwq)
Watch any violent WTO or G8 protest. Bandannas and keffiyahs all around. Also showed up in OWS wanna-be riots.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 23, 2012 12:05 PM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: steevy at March 23, 2012 12:05 PM (vd4t0)
That's what the race traitor gets for integrating. Let it be a lesson to everyone...
Posted by: The Mega Independent at March 23, 2012 12:05 PM (Fz7+s)
You clearly have never been beat up by a 17 year old. I have. The next time, I will shoot instead.
Posted by: Dave in Fla at March 23, 2012 12:05 PM (8TANr)
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 23, 2012 12:06 PM (niZvt)
Posted by: supercore23 at March 23, 2012 12:06 PM (bwV72)
Posted by: S Daniel at March 23, 2012 12:06 PM (BVkEs)
--
Jesse Jackson
Posted by: McLovin at March 23, 2012 12:06 PM (j0IcY)
At 10 feet I've always heard (from an NRA instructor, no less) that it's iffy, but smart money would be on the guy who had to draw his pistol instead trying to hold his guts in.
9' or less is no contest- knife guy wins.
15 ' or more is no contest- gun guy wins. Well, assuming he hits the assailant pretty quickly after pulling his gun.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 23, 2012 03:22 PM (8y9MW)
ehh not sure where you pulled this from. If you have any hand to hand or LEO training, they tell you that at 15", a knifeman can cover that distance and kill you in 3/10ths of a second. Not close to enough time to unholster a gun and fire. Thats why prison guards do not carry guns.. because they are USELESS in close quarters.
Posted by: The Cock of Truth at March 23, 2012 12:06 PM (u4/vX)
Again, where was Martin when he was shot? The autopsy should have revealed what position he was in. Why are they hiding it?
Posted by: mike at March 23, 2012 12:07 PM (kqXHe)
Stranger things have happened. Like, oh, an unqualified black man being elected President of the United States.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 23, 2012 12:07 PM (sbV1u)
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 23, 2012 12:07 PM (niZvt)
572 Posted by: wheatie at March 23, 2012 03:59 PM (4GgJq)
never seen the MSM ignore facts that don't support there narrative?
Nooo....they do that? Really?
/s
Heh.
Posted by: wheatie at March 23, 2012 12:07 PM (4GgJq)
And the blood will be on the hands of the leftist media. Sharpton, Obama and Farakhan could never have pulled this off without them.
Good grief - there is NO difference between this and the clerics fanning the koran burning flames.
Posted by: Fat Al at March 23, 2012 12:07 PM (y0VOX)
Posted by: Havedash at March 23, 2012 12:07 PM (JfvbF)
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 23, 2012 04:06 PM (niZvt)
==I saw what you did there
Posted by: guy who sees Stuff at March 23, 2012 12:07 PM (Dll6b)
Posted by: Deceased Equine at March 23, 2012 12:08 PM (YdQQY)
Define "formal investigation." Real life isn't like CSI, most "formal investigation" is on-scene. If a subject makes a statement, and the facts seem to back it up, the police will only very rarely spend additional man-hours on getting any rock-solid evidence.
So, for the cops, they had the calls to 9-1-1. They had 6 eye witnesses. They had physical evidence which seemed to corroborate Zimmerman's story. They knew Zimmerman (or the department did) as a frequent caller, and someone who had reported crimes before- as a "good actor." So, when he stated that (this is what the police say he said) he was on his way back to the truck when Martin attacked him, called for help several times, and only fired once he believed help either was not coming, or wouldn't come quickly enough, they probably believed him and did no further investigation.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 23, 2012 12:08 PM (8y9MW)
change.org is very popular among euroweenie scumpals married to death row inmates who are all innocent.
Posted by: mike at March 23, 2012 12:08 PM (kqXHe)
Audie Murphy, upon joining the Army at 18: 5'-6", 110 pounds. A Medal of Honor, 2 Silver Stars, Distinquished Service Cross, Legion of Merit, 2 Bronze Stars, and 3 Purple Hearts later he might have bulked up a little, I don't know.
Posted by: Sort-of-Mad Max at March 23, 2012 12:08 PM (VMcoS)
Okay, so you think Zimmerman was following Martin, lost sight of him, and then Martin appeared and attacked Zimmerman from the back?
Posted by: soothsayer at March 23, 2012 03:52 PM (jUytm)
Well, his statement and the wound to the back of his head suggest that he did.
Posted by: Hedgehog at March 23, 2012 12:08 PM (3jGS1)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 23, 2012 12:08 PM (jUytm)
Posted by: Annoyer of Liberal Acquaintances at March 23, 2012 12:08 PM (nTjSs)
Posted by: Anson Mitchell at March 23, 2012 12:08 PM (IhUxK)
Posted by: steevy at March 23, 2012 12:08 PM (vd4t0)
Posted by: President Pond Scum at March 23, 2012 12:08 PM (niZvt)
Some tall guy in a hoody at night. Possibly armed.
What would you do, ask him for his birth certificate?
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 23, 2012 04:07 PM (niZvt)
**********
Right, like you'd have enough light to be able to examine the pixels to tell that I 'shopped it anyway.
Posted by: Some tall guy in a hoody at night at March 23, 2012 12:09 PM (ggRof)
And the blood will be on the hands of the leftist media. Sharpton, Obama and Farakhan could never have pulled this off without them.
Good grief - there is NO difference between this and the clerics fanning the koran burning flames.
Posted by: Fat Al at March 23, 2012 04:07 PM (y0VOX)
Kinda like a Mo-Bro Pali car swarm, huh?
Posted by: Havedash at March 23, 2012 12:09 PM (JfvbF)
580-596-615 - Thanks guys! Apparently I have a shoddy memory and suck at research.
Posted by: Heralder at March 23, 2012 12:09 PM (/Mxso)
Um Fuck you.
I'm just giving an opinion based on what is known since I know I will never be on a jury to try him. I've never said murder 1, I've run from Murder 2 down to Man 2 depending on the circumstances.
The only way I would consider acquittal is if he acted within reason the same way I would expect someone to act if they weren't carrying a gun.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose finally remembers why he's here at March 23, 2012 12:10 PM (0q2P7)
I've been told by more than one cop that if you call 911 and the assailant is already in your home, the only thing they can do by the time they get there is to put up the yellow tape and draw the chalk outline
Posted by: kbdabear at March 23, 2012 12:10 PM (Y+DPZ)
At 10
feet I've always heard (from an NRA instructor, no less) that it's iffy,
but smart money would be on the guy who had to draw his pistol instead
trying to hold his guts in.
9' or less is no contest- knife guy wins.
15 ' or more is no contest- gun guy wins. Well, assuming he hits the assailant pretty quickly after pulling his gun.
21 feet is considered the break point of a moderately trained individual being able to draw a weapon and respond to an attack.
7 yards
Posted by: Fat Al at March 23, 2012 12:10 PM (y0VOX)
Posted by: tasker at March 23, 2012 12:10 PM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Anson Mitchell at March 23, 2012 12:10 PM (IhUxK)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 23, 2012 12:10 PM (jUytm)
Well that's that, then. Sorry kids, but under Florida law, that is a legal shoot.
Trayvon could have stopped assaulting Zimmerman, but didn't. Not knowing Zimmerman had a gun doesn't justify assault.
Posted by: Dave in Fla at March 23, 2012 12:10 PM (8TANr)
Posted by: steevy at March 23, 2012 12:10 PM (vd4t0)
Posted by: Adam Smith's Invisible Pimp Hand at March 23, 2012 12:10 PM (tKFT6)
"steevy, I'm surprised as you how many grown men here are afraid of 17 yr olds."
Afraid, no. Aware that a feral version can physically do as much damage as his older brother can, yes. Are 17 year old military inductees somehow less physically capable as those who are 19? Or 23?
I don't care how old they are. If they're male and set off my spidey sense, I'm looking for the exits. It beats reaching for my ccw.
Posted by: Jaws at March 23, 2012 12:11 PM (4I3Uo)
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 23, 2012 12:11 PM (niZvt)
Because 40 years of unqualified people attending college isn't enough!
No worthless degrees! No peace!
Posted by: Al Sharpton at March 23, 2012 12:11 PM (sbV1u)
Posted by: dagny at March 23, 2012 12:11 PM (u50z0)
Posted by: supercore23 at March 23, 2012 12:11 PM (bwV72)
At no point did Zimmerman announce who he was to the kid, what his intentions were, or that the police had been contacted and were on the way.
This is not the old west. You are not the law just because you have a gun or any other weapon. If you want to be a cop, be a cop. Otherwise let the pros do their job.
Posted by: supercore23 at March 23, 2012 03:55 PM (bwV72)
It makes no difference, meathead. When somebody approaches you and then attacks you, you have the right to self defense.
Posted by: Ed Anger - Certified Kos Kid at March 23, 2012 12:11 PM (7+pP9)
Ace is busy tweeting his little fingers to the bone about this. .....Defending Zimmerman, it looks like.
Way to go, Ace.
Posted by: wheatie at March 23, 2012 12:12 PM (4GgJq)
Dude. Some tall guy in a hoody at night. Possibly armed. What would you do, ask him for his birth certificate?
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 23, 2012 04:07 PM (niZvt)
Actually, I'd mind my own fucking business. I'm not a cop, and the kid wasn't doing anything illegal. He was walking down the street.
Posted by: radar at March 23, 2012 12:12 PM (zmlwq)
Posted by: Sharkman at March 23, 2012 12:12 PM (RtpCp)
Or our 20-year-old wannabe rapper.
On being asked where he was by a friend during a phone conversation, he answered, "at my crib."
I almost punched him.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at March 23, 2012 12:12 PM (nEUpB)
Posted by: Paul Zummo at March 23, 2012 12:12 PM (Ud5vq)
Posted by: Anson Mitchell at March 23, 2012 12:13 PM (IhUxK)
Trayvon on top of Zimmerman beating him. He ran inside to call police
then heard the gunshot."
Well that's that, then. Sorry kids, but under Florida law, that is a legal shoot.
Trayvon could have stopped assaulting Zimmerman, but didn't. Not knowing Zimmerman had a gun doesn't justify assault.
Posted by: Dave in Fla at March 23, 2012 04:10 PM (8TANr)
No, it depends on who initiated the fight, which we don't know yet.
Posted by: radar at March 23, 2012 12:13 PM (zmlwq)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at March 23, 2012 12:13 PM (jucos)
That's the part Zimmerman is leaving out. There were words between them at some point. Posted by: soothsayer at March 23, 2012 04:08 PM
And you KNOW this how with no documention?
Posted by: kbdabear at March 23, 2012 12:13 PM (Y+DPZ)
"To me the question comes down to who started the fight. If Zimmerman started it, then he can't plug a guy just because he started a fight and then got his ass kicked.
But if Martin started it, then Zimmerman can take refuge in the Stand Your Ground law.
Not sure if that's the actual law. Just seems like that's likely the law-- stand your ground would apply when you're attacked, not when you yourself attack."So fucking wrong it's embarrassing. Confrontation was initiated when Zimmerman followed Martin.
Posted by: tx conservative at March 23, 2012 12:13 PM (DKfLx)
Let the shakedowns commence. If we milk it long enough, it might just get Obama reelected.
Posted by: befuddled at March 23, 2012 12:14 PM (xJU23)
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 23, 2012 12:14 PM (niZvt)
Posted by: polynikes at March 23, 2012 12:14 PM (A2cTV)
Posted by: supercore23 at March 23, 2012 04:11 PM (bwV72)
No, he's making a point that "call the pros and let them handle it" is a bonehead statement. That's not to say you should go vigilante either, but there's a gray area. Assuming Z was just trying to watch, and he did call 911, he was in that gray area.
Posted by: yinzer at March 23, 2012 12:14 PM (/Mla1)
Actually, I'd mind my own fucking business. I'm not a cop, and the kid wasn't doing anything illegal. He was walking down the street.
People minding their own business is what enabled the burglaries.
Posted by: Fat Al at March 23, 2012 12:14 PM (y0VOX)
Posted by: tasker at March 23, 2012 12:14 PM (r2PLg)
551 523 Yeah,I said that and I mean it.I did not say he was ordered not to do it.Following can be a chase,since when you chase someone,you necessarily follow them.
Posted by: steevy at March 23, 2012 03:56 PM (vd4t0)
"Chase" and "follow" have distinctly different connotations.
The fact that you can't see the difference is further proof you don't have a clue.
Posted by: Ed Anger - Certified Kos Kid at March 23, 2012 12:14 PM (7+pP9)
Let's be more clear, here.
He saw a black kid he didn't recognize, just standing in the rain, shaking for some reason (he suspected drugs), looking at a specific building (a house? The community center? That seems confused from what I read), when there had been break-ins in the neighborhood by other kids fitting the same description as Martin.
As a member of the neighborhood watch ('self appointed' or otherwise) he did have every right- even a responsibility- to approach someone he found suspicious and attempt to ascertain why they were there and what they were doing. Especially if he did so in a calm, non-threatening as possible manner.
There does seem to be some confusion on if he "chased" or simply "followed" Martin. Whichever he did, he claims that he lost sight of the kid, and had begun to return to his car. If that's true (and we don't know) then he wouldn't be guilty of any crime.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 23, 2012 12:15 PM (8y9MW)
--
I'm sorry but no he didn't.
--
That's not to say that having identified himself first, Zimmerman had no right to ask the kid to identify himself.
If your neighbors or you have just been robbed during the night, and along with others you volunteer to watch out for suspicious activity, and it's your turn, and now you see a hooded stranger checking out your block in the middle of the night, those of us on the other end of the nation who weren't even there have no right to dictate what Zimmerman's rights EXCLUDE, to limit what he's permitted to do when determining who the heck this stranger scoping his house is.
I'm not going to arbitrarily condemn Zimmerman. This is America where no one was guilty before being proven in a court of law; that is, prior to Obama's Administration.
Posted by: maverick muse at March 23, 2012 12:15 PM (lpWVn)
I don't understand why Zimmerman couldn't just wait for the cops. There was no crime in progress. That is my big problem. The cops wouldn't have done anything just ask Trayvon why he was there.
Posted by: snowcrash at March 23, 2012 12:15 PM (t2NQr)
Posted by: slatz at March 23, 2012 12:15 PM (qsUe1)
Posted by: Adam Smith's Invisible Pimp Hand at March 23, 2012 04:10 PM
I always wondered about that
Posted by: Kitty Genovese at March 23, 2012 12:16 PM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: supercore23 at March 23, 2012 12:16 PM (bwV72)
Actually, I'd mind my own fucking business. I'm not a cop, and the
kid wasn't doing anything illegal. He was walking down the street.
People minding their own business is what enabled the burglaries.
Posted by: Fat Al at March 23, 2012 04:14 PM (y0VOX)
And if Martin was breaking into a house, that might be relevant. Which it isn't.
Posted by: radar at March 23, 2012 12:16 PM (zmlwq)
Posted by: tx conservative at March 23, 2012 04:13 PM (DKfLx)
What if Martin was guilty of something? Zimmerman is still the aggressor for following him? Following alone isn't a confrontation.
Posted by: yinzer at March 23, 2012 12:16 PM (/Mla1)
Posted by: dagny at March 23, 2012 12:16 PM (u50z0)
Posted by: ace at March 23, 2012 12:16 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 23, 2012 12:17 PM (jUytm)
That might be the most tasteless comment I have ever read on this blog, and I have been reading it for a long time, and there have been many tasteless comments.
Well played Sir! Well played.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at March 23, 2012 12:18 PM (nEUpB)
I have to say, you jump me, have me down and are pummeling me - I WILL shoot you.
Probably more than once.
Posted by: Fat Al at March 23, 2012 12:18 PM (y0VOX)
Posted by: slatz at March 23, 2012 04:15 PM
Let me tell ya about the city folks someday, son
Posted by: Former Los Angeles resident at March 23, 2012 12:18 PM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: snowcrash at March 23, 2012 12:18 PM (t2NQr)
Posted by: chicagorefugee at March 23, 2012 12:19 PM (FeFBS)
Posted by: dagny at March 23, 2012 12:19 PM (u50z0)
Why does everybody want to apply the same laws as shooting someone in your house in self defense with shooting someone out in the open. The rules are very very different.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose finally remembers why he's here at March 23, 2012 12:19 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: polynikes at March 23, 2012 12:19 PM (A2cTV)
Posted by: President Chet Roosevelt at March 23, 2012 12:20 PM (WU3T3)
Posted by: LaZrtx at March 23, 2012 12:20 PM (bK81x)
Does Zimmerman confronting Martin justify Martin assaulting him? What if Zimmerman he left and returned to his truck and Martin jumped him from behind? Is that okay because he was following him earlier? Come on, yahoos, answer the questions!
Posted by: mike at March 23, 2012 12:20 PM (kqXHe)
Or are you claiming that was illegal, and in fact so illegal it then make it legal for Martin to beat him up?
Posted by: ace at March 23, 2012 04:16 PM (nj1bB)
Watching. As in, not pursuing. Not to mention the fact that Zimmerman's story that he never had any contact with Martin whatsoever, just tried to follow him and then suddenly got jumped while walking back to his car, makes no goddamned sense.
Posted by: radar at March 23, 2012 12:21 PM (zmlwq)
Posted by: chicagorefugee at March 23, 2012 04:19 PM (FeFBS)
You're right. That's another thing there's been a media black-out on.
Posted by: Havedash at March 23, 2012 12:21 PM (JfvbF)
That was one person making a clearly crappy point.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at March 23, 2012 12:21 PM (nEUpB)
Way to go, Ace.
Posted by: wheatie at March 23, 2012 04:12 PM (4GgJq)
ThatÂ’s great. LetÂ’s just hope he gets his facts straight.
Posted by: jwest at March 23, 2012 12:21 PM (FdndL)
First, Central Florida has a large and somewhat diverse Hispanic population. Most are well-educated, professional Caribbean Latinos (Puerto Rico, Dominican, etc). We also have a segment of Mexicans who largely work the orange groves to the west.
Sanford has a fairly high concentration of Bubbus Floridus, with a love of loud trucks and louder Harleys. The high-tech industry of Orlando, Heathrow, and Lake Mary doesn't quite reach all the way to Sanford... but its close proximity to the St. Johns River makes it a haven for fishing, jet-skiing, gator-wrasslin', etc.
Sanford also has a growing black population, and represents a significant portion of Corinne Brown's wildly gerrymandered district that pretty much reaches a tentacle eastward in order to draw a line around the black neighborhoods near downtown Sanford.
Sanford also features a kickass German restaurant - Hollerbach's Willow Tree Cafe - that is definitely worth the trip.
As much hubbub as there is about this incident, I highly doubt that Sanford would much tolerate Louie Farrakhan's desire for retribution. Bubbus Floridus simply will not let that shit go on for very long.
Posted by: weew at March 23, 2012 12:21 PM (ElfHn)
The only evidence so far is that Martin assaulted Zimmerman.
Posted by: mike at March 23, 2012 12:21 PM (kqXHe)
Posted by: snowcrash at March 23, 2012 12:22 PM (t2NQr)
--
Fucking being the operative word.
Exactly why no one reported the woman being stabbed to death while screaming bloody murder in the middle of NYC, though people peered out their windows to get a bloody eyeful. No witnesses when the police attempted to subsequently interview the neighborhood. If a tree falls and no one reports hearing it, did it make a sound? If a person dies, and no one misses them, did that human ever exist?
Posted by: maverick muse at March 23, 2012 12:22 PM (lpWVn)
This is what I don't get, people are hearing him scream for help and everyone's initial response is to run inside and hide.
Heh, yeah, you must be new.
Posted by: Entropy at March 23, 2012 12:22 PM (TULs6)
Does Zimmerman confronting Martin justify Martin assaulting him? What if Zimmerman he left and returned to his truck and Martin jumped him from behind? Is that okay because he was following him earlier? Come on, yahoos, answer the questions!
Posted by: mike at March 23, 2012 04:20 PM (kqXHe)
Depends on what the confrontation entailed, and no, if Zimmerman did nothing else but briefly follow him, then Martin would indeed be the aggressor.
Posted by: radar at March 23, 2012 12:23 PM (zmlwq)
Life experience.
Tell me, ol chum, do you believe everything someone tells you or do you use your past experience to discern the truth? Posted by: soothsayer at March 23, 2012 04:17 PM
Read your own comments, quite the load of projection there
Just say you assume it, or it's your impression. Maybe he didn't tell the cops they had words before because he didn't have words.
You're assuming he's hiding something because you're assuming that he had motive other than self defense or an overload of adrenaline
Posted by: kbdabear at March 23, 2012 12:23 PM (Y+DPZ)
The standards is would a reasonable person feel threatened. And when a non-uniformed guy starts following you down the street at night, that answer at least for me is a definite yes.
>>>approaches you and then attacks you, you have the right to self defense.
If you threaten somebody and they attack you, no you do not have an unlimited right to self defense.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose finally remembers why he's here at March 23, 2012 12:23 PM (0q2P7)
--
Fucking being the operative word.
Exactly why no one reported the woman being stabbed to death while screaming bloody murder in the middle of NYC, though people peered out their windows to get a bloody eyeful. No witnesses when the police attempted to subsequently interview the neighborhood. If a tree falls and no one reports hearing it, did it make a sound? If a person dies, and no one misses them, did that human ever exist?
Posted by: maverick muse at March 23, 2012 04:22 PM (lpWVn)
Wow! That was an impressive non-sequitor! Do you practice this bullshit, or does it just come naturally?
Posted by: radar at March 23, 2012 12:24 PM (zmlwq)
You're assuming he's hiding something because you're assuming that he had motive other than self defense or an overload of adrenaline
Posted by: kbdabear at March 23, 2012 04:23 PM (Y+DPZ)
Or I'm using common sense to think that it sounds highly unlikely that Martin would just attack Zimmerman for no reason whatsoever while Zimmerman was walking back to his car. It seems a lot more plausible that there was SOME kind of confrontation there.
Posted by: radar at March 23, 2012 12:26 PM (zmlwq)
Posted by: dagny at March 23, 2012 12:26 PM (u50z0)
Yes, there was. And when the local police declined to pursue charges, they referred it to the County Prosecutor for further investigation. They are submitting it to the grand jury. The local police are doing everything right but still they get shit on.
Posted by: mike at March 23, 2012 12:26 PM (kqXHe)
Do I make myself clear?
Yassuh.
Later, in front of the MSNBC camera crew: "I told that honkey sheriff that we WILL have justice or we WILL NOT have peace!"
Posted by: Fat Al at March 23, 2012 12:26 PM (y0VOX)
Posted by: bannor, voting Sweet Meteor of Death 2012 at March 23, 2012 12:26 PM (HEa5q)
776.041 Use of force by aggressor.—The justification described in the preceding sections of this chapter is not available to a person who:(1) Is attempting to commit, committing, or escaping after the commission of, a forcible felony; or(2) Initially provokes the use of force against himself or herself, unless:(a) Such force is so great that the person reasonably believes that he or she is in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm and that he or she has exhausted every reasonable means to escape such danger other than the use of force which is likely to cause death or great bodily harm to the assailant; or(b) In good faith, the person withdraws from physical contact with the assailant and indicates clearly to the assailant that he or she desires to withdraw and terminate the use of force, but the assailant continues or resumes the use of force.History.—s. 13, ch. 74-383; s. 1190, ch. 97-102.
Posted by: tmitsss at March 23, 2012 12:27 PM (V4Pya)
Posted by: ace at March 23, 2012 12:27 PM (nj1bB)
They don't have to be.
Regular people can do whatever cops can do.
Cops get their authority from us. They are our agents.
If anything, cops have less power.
We are free people. We don't take orders from cops. They do not own us. They do not control us. We don't have narrower rights to defend ourselves and our property than they do.
Posted by: Phinn at March 23, 2012 12:28 PM (KNtHw)
No, it doesn't.
Posted by: mike at March 23, 2012 12:28 PM (kqXHe)
There is a line someplace. It's hard to pin down. And it lies in the area of what would a reasonable unarmed person do in that situation. Going beyond that places him at fault at some level.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose finally remembers why he's here at March 23, 2012 12:28 PM (0q2P7)
The only way I would consider acquittal is if he acted within reason the same way I would expect someone to act if they weren't carrying a gun.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose finally remembers why he's here at March 23, 2012 04:10 PM (0q2P7)
You mean getting your ass get kicked or maybe even beaten to death.
It sounds like your "getting your ass get kicked" criteria was met.
Posted by: Ed Anger - Certified Kos Kid at March 23, 2012 12:28 PM (7+pP9)
776.041 Use of force by aggressor.—The justification described in the preceding sections of this chapter is not available to a person who:(1) Is attempting to commit, committing, or escaping after the commission of, a forcible felony; or(2) Initially provokes the use of force against himself or herself, unless:(a) Such force is so great that the person reasonably believes that he or she is in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm and that he or she has exhausted every reasonable means to escape such danger other than the use of force which is likely to cause death or great bodily harm to the assailant; or(b) In good faith, the person withdraws from physical contact with the assailant and indicates clearly to the assailant that he or she desires to withdraw and terminate the use of force, but the assailant continues or resumes the use of force.History.—s. 13, ch. 74-383; s. 1190, ch. 97-102.
Posted by: tmitsss at March 23, 2012 12:28 PM (V4Pya)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 23, 2012 12:29 PM (jUytm)
I get told that a lot stevey. I have to say it isn't a bad way to get though life.
Posted by: Gulfkraken at March 23, 2012 12:29 PM (WBfjO)
How, exactly, did it "get physical" in this hypothetical? That's kind of the nut there. It seems to me that, although it is confrontational, Zimmerman had every right to walk in his own neighborhood, follow and even confront Martin.
Maybe Martin did feel threatened, but if he initiated violence, I don't see where Zimmerman did anything illegal.
Posted by: AmishDude at March 23, 2012 12:29 PM (T0NGe)
776.041 Use of force by aggressor.—The justification described in the preceding sections of this chapter is not available to a person who:(1) Is attempting to commit, committing, or escaping after the commission of, a forcible felony; or(2) Initially provokes the use of force against himself or herself, unless:(a) Such force is so great that the person reasonably believes that he or she is in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm and that he or she has exhausted every reasonable means to escape such danger other than the use of force which is likely to cause death or great bodily harm to the assailant; or(b) In good faith, the person withdraws from physical contact with the assailant and indicates clearly to the assailant that he or she desires to withdraw and terminate the use of force, but the assailant continues or resumes the use of force.History.—s. 13, ch. 74-383; s. 1190, ch. 97-102.
Posted by: tmitsss at March 23, 2012 12:30 PM (V4Pya)
---------------------------
According to the testimony of the Neighborhood Watch Captain he was appointed.
Posted by: Vic at March 23, 2012 12:31 PM (YdQQY)
Posted by: ace at March 23, 2012 12:31 PM (nj1bB)
Define "stalking." If you're actually stalking (as in: stalking is a felony), then no- but the State has to prove that's what you were doing. Because, frankly, you could have just been heading that way anyway.
In either case: in light of the now pretty close to documented (I'm not completely sure its what happened, but it seems pretty likely now) case that Zimmerman stopped chasing/following Martin, and had started heading back to his truck, Martin no longer had cause to defend himself- there was no longer a reasonable threat. That makes any attack an assault, and puts Zimmerman in the role of defender.
Why does everybody want to apply the same laws as shooting someone in your house in self defense with shooting someone out in the open. The rules are very very different.
Because FL has a "Stand Your Ground" law that people confuse with "extending the Castle Doctrine" which it doesn't exactly do.
Still, based on facts in evidence (which is not to say all the facts, just the ones that we actually have documented) this looks more like "terrible tragedy" or "self defense" and in neither case is he culpable for murder.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 23, 2012 12:31 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: tmitsss at March 23, 2012 12:31 PM (V4Pya)
Posted by: supercore23 at March 23, 2012 12:32 PM (bwV72)
No, it doesn't.
Posted by: mike at March 23, 2012 04:28 PM (kqXHe)
Right. It was just a completely random attack from a teenager with no apparent history of violence. Very convincing.
Posted by: radar at March 23, 2012 12:32 PM (zmlwq)
--
Apply that to Obama/Holder, then.
Posted by: maverick muse at March 23, 2012 04:28 PM (lpWVn)
The hell are you blathering about? What does this even mean?
Posted by: radar at March 23, 2012 12:33 PM (zmlwq)
Posted by: polynikes at March 23, 2012 12:33 PM (A2cTV)
You mean science and common sense. The data is overwhelming, and theoretically it makes sense also. Indeed, it could hardly be otherwise that there would be differences in our cognitive organ, and not just physical appearance and hormonal levels (which affect behavior greatly), considering that is our ecological niche and what we use most to survive.
If our morphology, jaw and teeth strength, etc., and physical appearance evolved to deal with different environments, then it isn't surprising our brain did as well.
And so it is. Different groups even have different brain sizes according to many studies including direct measurement MRI studies. Not surprisingly, there is an inverse correlation between those and general intelligence factor / IQ testing. Further, the crime rates pan out the way you would expect them to, with lower IQ people (whether within one racial group or groups of differing average IQs) committing more violent crime.
Nature does a lot of things, but equality was never one of them. We all know this. We all know that one individual isn't biologically equal to another. We can assign them identical political and moral worth, fine. But people vary physically and in psychometric traits.
I'm not claiming to be at the pinnacle of any biological trait, much less all. But I'm honest enough to admit to biological diversity. The fact Americans in the past brutally enslaved Africans and now have to walk on eggshells isn't going to keep me from acknowledging easily discoverable anthropological truths.
Posted by: Random at March 23, 2012 12:33 PM (XlIXi)
So fucking wrong it's embarrassing. Confrontation was initiated when Zimmerman followed Martin.
Posted by: tx conservative at March 23, 2012 04:13 PM (DKfLx)
What if Martin was guilty of something? Zimmerman is still the aggressor for following him? Following alone isn't a confrontation.
Posted by: yinzer at March 23, 2012 04:16 PM (/Mla1)
I agree yinzer. I think tx conservative's comment was idotic, to say the least.
Posted by: Ed Anger - Certified Kos Kid at March 23, 2012 12:35 PM (7+pP9)
I suppose there isn't a legal requirement for this, but let's look at Martin's actions for a minute. He had a cell phone. He thinks some guy's following him. Why isn't he calling 911?
Posted by: AmishDude at March 23, 2012 12:35 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Count de Monet at March 23, 2012 12:36 PM (4q5tP)
Karen Finney, sitting in as an MSNBC anchor, declared definitely about an hour ago that George Zimmerman murdered Trayvon Martin.
She didn’t qualify it. She didn’t “allege” or use any other term that might lead one to believe it was anything but a proven fact. This is how the left wing media works, but let’s hope some Florida lawyer is ready for a big payday.
Zimmerman is in hiding and has received death threats. By having a “news” organization declare him a “murderer” – a term with some fairly specific legal meaning – Finney and MSNBC have opened themselves up to one massive lawsuit.
Posted by: jwest at March 23, 2012 12:36 PM (FdndL)
Except that it appears (from that last recording Ace posted, and Zimmerman's account at the time) that he had attempted to distance himself from Martin- breaking off any "pursuit"- and then was attacked.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 23, 2012 12:36 PM (8y9MW)
Fits what they teach in Florida CCW classes. You never let an attacker get close to you. If you do, you are dead.
Posted by: Dave in Fla at March 23, 2012 12:37 PM (8TANr)
This is obvious to an intellectually honest informed person.
Posted by: Random at March 23, 2012 12:37 PM (XlIXi)
Posted by: S Daniel at March 23, 2012 12:37 PM (BVkEs)
I present to you ms. Corinne Brown, representing the 3rd Congressional District of Florida (which includes Sanford)
http://tinyurl.com/cugko3
Posted by: weew at March 23, 2012 12:38 PM (ElfHn)
Posted by: supercore23 at March 23, 2012 12:38 PM (bwV72)
Posted by: ace at March 23, 2012 12:38 PM (nj1bB)
"Based on the information Zimmerman chased the guy down, either tackled or attempted to tackle him and then got his ass handed to him. Then after starting the fight, he pulls a gun to finish it. "
Wow. Zimmerman's apparently got some pretty impressive footspeed for a schlumpy white hispanic dude.
Either that ot Travon was way down on the depth chart of the football team.
I find this scenario unlikely.
Posted by: Jaws at March 23, 2012 12:39 PM (4I3Uo)
Posted by: soothsayer
You're both welcome to go counsel these young men at a detention center near you.
Posted by: DaveA at March 23, 2012 12:39 PM (TcY34)
Posted by: ace at March 23, 2012 12:39 PM (nj1bB)
Or, you know, the way it seems to have happened based on current knowledge.
Zimmerman reported "He's running," and then "he ran." There is no evidence in that call that he ran after Martin. That indicates that Zimmerman's story- about losing him and turning back to his truck- is quite possibly true.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 23, 2012 12:40 PM (8y9MW)
Zimmerman said he followed Martin, then lost him and was returning to his car.
If you look at a Google satellite image of the two addresses listed in the police report, you can see how tight it is between the buildings, the offset of the alleyways and how it could be easy for Martin to lose Zimmerman in the dark, then come up behind him unseen.
Posted by: jwest at March 23, 2012 12:40 PM (FdndL)
#748, what if Trayvon starts to run and Zimmerman gives chase? Is that "starting" the altercation? By Trayvon or by George?
Posted by: snowcrash at March 23, 2012 12:41 PM (t2NQr)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 23, 2012 04:29 PM (jUytm)
So the two eyewitnesses who told the same story that was corroborated by what Zimmerman said immediately after in the cop car don't count?
Posted by: Hedgehog at March 23, 2012 12:41 PM (3jGS1)
Posted by: Dave in Fla at March 23, 2012 12:41 PM (8TANr)
About 250 to 300 aides rallied this afternoon in support of "Hoodies on the Hill." Participants were encouraged to wear hooded sweatshirts in the 80 degree heat and to bring bags Skittles candy and iced tea, two items Martin was carrying when he was killed by a 28-year-old man as he walked back to his father's girlfriend's house.
"We have a mandate to ensure that young boys like Trayvon live their lives and that they're successful and that they have the opportunity we have today," said Brandon Andrews, a congressional staffer who said he was representing African American men on the Hill.
Posted by: Geraldo Rivera at March 23, 2012 12:42 PM (e8kgV)
Posted by: supercore23 at March 23, 2012 12:43 PM (bwV72)
Anything else that may or may not have happened, Zimmerman shot and killed a 17 year old who's only crime was walking home from a store. Trying to rationalize it is the height of stupidity, because Zimmerman was the one that committed the crime.
Posted by: FPW at March 23, 2012 12:43 PM (BDNF5)
Posted by: tasker at March 23, 2012 12:43 PM (r2PLg)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 23, 2012 12:44 PM (jUytm)
Plenty of gold stars for soothsayer to earn on this thread. He's working hard to flush out all the Moron closet racists. Now he bends his giant intellect to the task of explaining how all 17 year-olds are built like toddlers and couldn't physically threaten a ladybug.
I don't know if I have the vocabulary to adequately express my scorn.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 23, 2012 12:45 PM (FEqS6)
George Zimmerman is a wannabe cop who couldn't pass the exams but he's still a nascient Dirty Harry who thinks every ***** is a thievin' thug
Little Trayvon Martin is a whispy idealistic young lad who plays football, is an honor student, and wants to feed the hungry in Africa some day.
Little Trayvon is walking through the neighborhood on his way back from cooking dinner for his invalid grandmother and decides to collect donations for the Sanford battered women's shelter.
He's not quite sure where he is and he's starting to get scared because this crazy looking musclebound hater is giving him the evil eye.
He's talking on the phone with his girlfriend about meeting after she's done with choir practice when he tells her this creepy big guy is following him and he's scared. She tells him not to take chances, run away.
Zimmerman gets into his Mozambique Drill position and yells "FREEZE -------!!"
Little Trayvon reaches into his belt to show him his ID and his Bible when Zimmerman grins and pumps hot lead into the innocent lad.
Zimmerman then rolls around in the mud and pistol whips himself to make it look like a fight when the cops get there.
Why are the cops there? Because Zimmerman disobeyed a direct order from a 911 dispatcher with all the authority of a file clerk and said "I've had enough of these uppity -----, I'm gonna make an example of this one"
That about right?
Posted by: kbdabear at March 23, 2012 12:45 PM (Y+DPZ)
If at the beginning of the encounter Trayvon did start to approach Zimmerman before running away, as Zimmerman told dispatchers, then it is likely that Trayvon is the one who initiated contact when Zimmerman followed. Zimmerman did not try to approach Trayvon earlier. He was just keeping tabs on him for the police. There is no reason to think he would have changed this behavior, or that Trayvon would change his.
The teen had already shown aggressive behavior, and it is undisputed that it was Trayvon who was on top of Zimmerman beating on him. It also seems clear that it was Zimmerman who was calling for help. The police "corrected" one witness who claimed they heard the kid call out for help, which shouldn't have happened, but it still seems clear that it was Zimmerman who called out. Hopefully they can prove whose voice it was from the 911 recordings.
Posted by: Alec Rawls at March 23, 2012 12:46 PM (kTTUz)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 23, 2012 12:47 PM (jUytm)
Beyond stupid. The point everyone has been making is that Zimmerman has evidence of being physically assaulted, and witnesses that state he was being assaulted. This changes the story that is being spun for us considerably.
Even in Florida, assault is a crime, while buying Skittles is only a crime in NYC.
Posted by: Dave in Fla at March 23, 2012 12:47 PM (8TANr)
Posted by: supercore23 at March 23, 2012 12:47 PM (bwV72)
Posted by: dagny at March 23, 2012 12:47 PM (u50z0)
Based on the information Zimmerman chased the guy down, either tackled or attempted to tackle him and then got his ass handed to him. Then after starting the fight, he pulls a gun to finish it.
If there really was a neighborhood watch association you can bet they will tell the watchers not pursue. They are not deputized law enforcement officers.
Posted by: President Chet Roosevelt at March 23, 2012 04:20 PM (WU3T3)
You're full of shit. Everyhing suggests he was Zimmerman was confroted by Martin and after taking a beating acted in self defense.
Did you even know Zimmerman received police training?
Here's what the police train:
Neighborhood Watch programs are designed for members of a neighborhood to be “eyes and ears” for police and to watch out for their neighbors. They are not members of the Police Department nor are they vigilantes. Training provided by law enforcement agencies to Neighborhood Watch organizations stresses non-contact surveillance of suspicious situations and notifying police of those situations so that law enforcement can respond and take control of the situation.
Posted by: Ed Anger - Certified Kos Kid at March 23, 2012 12:49 PM (7+pP9)
a schlumpy white hispanic dude.
.....lulz.
We're sticking with the black hispanic/white hispanic stuff eh?
Posted by: Entropy at March 23, 2012 12:49 PM (TULs6)
Posted by: Hedgehog at March 23, 2012 12:49 PM (3jGS1)
Posted by: supercore23 at March 23, 2012 12:50 PM (bwV72)
That Karen Finney?
Posted by: Dave in Fla at March 23, 2012 04:41 PM (8TANr)
Yes, that Karen Finney. The one MSNBC put in front of a microphone and camera to declare someone who hasn’t even been charged with a crime a “murderer”.
They better hope heÂ’s convicted quick or Zimmerman is going to end up owning that clown network.
Posted by: jwest at March 23, 2012 12:50 PM (FdndL)
Posted by: Attack Watch at March 23, 2012 12:50 PM (e8kgV)
Posted by: ace at March 23, 2012 12:52 PM (nj1bB)
This is just a question. It means nothing. But. Why didn't Martin call the cops?
Posted by: dagny at March 23, 2012 04:47 PM (u50z0)
He did. You need to get up to speed on what is known to have happened.
Posted by: Ed Anger - Certified Kos Kid at March 23, 2012 12:53 PM (7+pP9)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 23, 2012 04:29 PM (jUytm)
Exactly! Now, get outta my brain.
This and Ace's point about the MFM and the usual band of race baiters ignoring the story about the white kid getting lit on fire by black yutes while leaping mightily (olympically?) to conclusions on the Martin/Zimmerman story are the essential points.
Posted by: Count de Monet at March 23, 2012 12:53 PM (4q5tP)
The only saving grace is that the local DA isn't trying to use it as a political stepping stone, and is waiting for the evidence to be gathered.
Posted by: Dave in Fla at March 23, 2012 12:53 PM (8TANr)
PHILADELPHIA -- A man has been shot in the head and killed during the filming of an amateur rap video in Philadelphia.The shooting happened Thursday night in front of a crowd of about 100 people. Police say the man was in his late 20s or early 30s.After he was shot, he was accidentally run over by a car trying to leave the scene. Police say the driver won't be charged.Authorities say three gun-wielding men were arrested shortly afterward and one has been identified by witnesses as the shooter.The motive for the shooting is unclear. Police say they're unsure if the man killed was the target or if he was a part of the video or a spectator.
Posted by: Fat Al at March 23, 2012 12:53 PM (y0VOX)
>>>You mean getting your ass get kicked or maybe even beaten to death.
It sounds like your "getting your ass get kicked" criteria was met.
No I mean not even getting out of your truck and placing yourself at personal risk dick. I don't see a reasonable person going after a suspicious 17yo (yes is potentially dangerous and could be gangbanger) on foot without a weapon. The instant he made that decision it bought him man 2 in my mind.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose finally remembers why he's here at March 23, 2012 12:57 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: supercore23 at March 23, 2012 12:58 PM (bwV72)
Posted by: mike at March 23, 2012 12:58 PM (kqXHe)
774 says: "I don't know how many times I can post this but Trayvon's own father said that it wasn't his son on the 911 tapes."
Got a cite for that? I'd like to see it.
Posted by: Alec Rawls at March 23, 2012 12:58 PM (kTTUz)
Posted by: dagny at March 23, 2012 12:58 PM (u50z0)
Posted by: radar at March 23, 2012 04:13 PM (zmlwq)
absolutely not. if i punch you in the face and you pull a knife do i hve to stand there and let you stab me? i have lost my right to self defense?
Posted by: chas at March 23, 2012 12:59 PM (xAq1C)
If he was running when shot, he'd be shot in the back.
How many shots were fired?
Was the wound point blank or did the gun contact the body?
How far away from each other were Zimmerman and Martin?
Did either have alcohol or drugs in their system?
Oh, and if he was just walking home from the store, what time was the transaction made?
Inquiring minds and investigators want to know. The MBM and the leftist race arsonists have already made up their minds
Posted by: kbdabear at March 23, 2012 12:59 PM (Y+DPZ)
the instant he made that decision it bought him man 2 in my mind.
Because he got out of his car?
Then you basically oppose 'stand your ground' laws. You think a "reasonable" person's first duty is to retreat.
Posted by: Entropy at March 23, 2012 12:59 PM (TULs6)
Posted by: supercore23 at March 23, 2012 01:00 PM (bwV72)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose finally remembers why he's here at March 23, 2012 04:57 PM (0q2P7)
mainly because you dont know shit about shit obviously. you want to try zimmerman in the court of public opinion and you ahve found him guilty. all becasue he got out of his truck.
Posted by: chas at March 23, 2012 01:01 PM (xAq1C)
This is obviously important. That said, following someone after the cops tell you not to is asking for trouble. I can think of a few reasons you would, either to do with protecting yourself or someone else. But ... makes it look bad when you later put bullets into him.
So totally relevant if he was being assaulted, but calls into question that somewhat. All facts for a jury to accept, weigh, or dismiss as they see fit.
Posted by: Random at March 23, 2012 01:01 PM (dDUnD)
This shan't end well for George, methinks. And what really happened will be quite irrelevant to George's fate.
I see years in court.
Trial,
conviction,
appeal,
federal trial,
conviction,
conviction overturned,
re-trial,
acquittal,
riots,
media grandstanding
federal conviction overturned,
charges dropped,
pleas for can't we all just get along,
former President Obama wearing a hoodie leading a candlelight vigil for Trayvon during the run-up to his 2016 primary bid.
Al Sharpton accusing Barack of never really having been down with the struggle...
It'll never end.
Posted by: Sherman McCoy's Bonfire of the Inanities at March 23, 2012 01:01 PM (Xv7f/)
And you didn't see nothin' , ya got that?
Posted by: Tony Soprano at March 23, 2012 01:01 PM (Y+DPZ)
"Why don't you kill yourself first?"
And give up any further chance of reading your excellent and well-reasoned gems like "If Trayvon had been a woman, would anyone here be defending Zimmerman"?
No chance. Enlighten me some more, chief.
Posted by: Jaws at March 23, 2012 01:01 PM (4I3Uo)
Posted by: supercore23 at March 23, 2012 01:01 PM (bwV72)
Yes! Because that's what the "Stand your ground" law says!
Well! I disagree! And so do many laws!
How bout that!
Pistols at dawn?!?
Posted by: Entropy at March 23, 2012 01:02 PM (TULs6)
The only people who are sanctioned to not retreat as a first reaction are cops.
You should specify "sanctioned in my personal opinion" because you are not arguing laws.
Posted by: Entropy at March 23, 2012 01:03 PM (TULs6)
The instant he made that decision it bought him man 2 in my mind.<<<
It must have also bought you CHOCKIT ICE CWEAM! because that's retarded. Stay in the vehicle or manslaughter? Those are your two choices?
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 23, 2012 01:04 PM (cymxI)
Haven't traveled to Seattle lately huh?
Posted by: Cast Iron at March 23, 2012 01:04 PM (EL+OC)
----------------
I'm loving it.
On January 15, 2008, Nifong filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code.[89] He listed assets of almost $244,000 and liabilities of over $180.3 million, the bulk of which being six $30 million "unsecured nonpriority claims," one for each of the six members of the 2005–2006 Duke Lacrosse team suing Nifong, among others.
Posted by: befuddled at March 23, 2012 01:04 PM (xJU23)
Never take seriously a grown man who wears earrings. On that alone I'd bet on guilty.
Say what you will, I stand by that rule. It hasn't let me down yet.
Posted by: weew at March 23, 2012 01:04 PM (ElfHn)
I will tell you this much, if I ever have to stand my ground I will not call police about it.
I'm going to grab a shovel and some plastic tarp and hope people think it was fireworks.
Posted by: Entropy at March 23, 2012 01:05 PM (TULs6)
Posted by: mike at March 23, 2012 01:05 PM (kqXHe)
Posted by: Entropy at March 23, 2012 05:05 PM (TULs6)
Lime. Don't forget the lime.
Posted by: Cast Iron at March 23, 2012 01:06 PM (EL+OC)
Posted by: supercore23 at March 23, 2012 01:07 PM (bwV72)
Liberals have turned American society into a totally subjective world, in which what you FEEL is more important than the truth.
Posted by: Trimegistus at March 23, 2012 01:08 PM (v9Kjt)
17 What does that even mean-"If I had a son he'd look like Trayvon?" and how the heck does that have any bearing on this situation? I wish Obama would shut his mouth.
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 23, 2012 02:28 PM (ceyqu)
No, no, no. I want obama to open his mouth as often as possible.
Posted by: jem at March 23, 2012 01:09 PM (0oYHO)
Martin attacked-corroborated by witnesses.
Martin's father says it's not Trayvon's voice on the 911 tapes
WESH-2 news in link-Via Yahoo
http://tinyurl.com/7z7bdqo
Posted by: Hedgehog at March 23, 2012 01:09 PM (3jGS1)
Posted by: radar at March 23, 2012 04:32 PM (zmlwq)
That's incredibly naive. have you not been paying attention to what has been going on in this country?
There are so many documented cases of random fucking violence in the past 2-3 years from "urban youths" that if you were paying attention, you wouldn't say something so goddamn stupid.Champaign Illinois. Peoria Illinois. Philadelphia. Washington DC. Wisconsin State Fair.
There are hundreds more. Hundreds. Some guy and his girl leaving a restaurant jumped by "urban youths." A guy minding his own business knocked off his bike and beaten, just for thrills. TONS of race-motivated violence from black teenagers on just about everyone around them, especially whites. Flash mobs robbing stores, beating guys on subway platforms while the rest film it and look on.
For every "ambalamps" guy there are hundreds of victims that never even see justice for what is done to them, because the perps disappear.
How many of those kids have obvious criminal records? "No apparent history of violence" = "hasn't been reported by the media or released because he was a minor."
So, like just about everyone else condemning this guy, you're shooting off your mouth and making pronouncements without having the slightest fucking idea what the truth really is.
There *already is* a race war.
Posted by: grognard, SMOD-Squad at March 23, 2012 01:10 PM (NS2Mo)
More importantly the layout of the community is rather compact which means that there are potentially a lot of witnesses, I only say this for the following reasons.
Sanford PD is under no obligation to release information to anyone when an active investigation is underway so we don't know if there are more witnesses and if so what they may have seen. Secondly, immediatley upon arrival responding officers secure the crime scene and in the case of homicide begin the notification process, this would include Detectives, Duty commanders, and in this case I would think the Chief of Police. Most importantly an Assistant State Attorney would have been called and I am willing to bet arrived on the scene within the hour or sooner. Not a single one of these professionals has any skin in this game as far as covering anything up it is simply a matter of procedure, identifying potential witnesses, collecting evidence identifying and getting statements from those involved etc.
My point is we simply do not know what the Police or the ASA know or don't know or what they are working on not our business right now. To jump to conclusions and convict Zimmerman based on our lack of knowledge about that night is cruel. The young man who died deserves better, his family deserves better, Zimmerman deserves better. The Grand Jury will get this case and they will get a complete case, then and only then will all of the facts as they are known be presented. To make this a racial and political event at any point is sad, to do it before the facts are known is cruel.
Posted by: Dr. Jellyknuckles at March 23, 2012 01:12 PM (Kb7dA)
Ah, the truth comes out. The cops were racist. Zimmerman is a racist.
What's next? That all of us are racists?
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at March 23, 2012 01:13 PM (nEUpB)
Posted by: befuddled at March 23, 2012 01:14 PM (xJU23)
Oh hell yes.
Posted by: Entropy at March 23, 2012 04:54 PM (TULs6)
What do you mean, "you people"?
Posted by: Sgt. Osiris at March 23, 2012 01:15 PM (v+QvA)
Posted by: Hedgehog at March 23, 2012 01:15 PM (3jGS1)
I live down the street from Sanford (and mercifully I'm not in that woman's district). I would like nothing more than for this matter to calm down, be handled by Seminole County authorities, and blow over.
Posted by: weew at March 23, 2012 01:16 PM (ElfHn)
Posted by: mike at March 23, 2012 01:16 PM (kqXHe)
Posted by: supercore23 at March 23, 2012 01:18 PM (bwV72)
Posted by: mike at March 23, 2012 05:16 PM (kqXHe)
It's been almost a month I'm sure prosecutors have seen this. They told the police that there was no basis for an arrest even for manslaughter in this case.
When I am on the same side as law enforcement and Al Sharpton and Louis Farakhan are on the other side, I'm pretty comfortable.
Posted by: Hedgehog at March 23, 2012 01:18 PM (3jGS1)
We could say that about all of Congressional District 3, which includes Sanford, Parramore, and Pine Hills.
Posted by: weew at March 23, 2012 01:20 PM (ElfHn)
Let's pause for some observations:
Looking at the picture of Zimmerman, he is not a white Hispanic. I would hazard a guess that he is Latino, of some Amerind ancestry.
So this is not a white- black situation, but a brown-black.
The MFM and the regime want to stir up racial animosity from the comments here, they are succeeding.
And now back to the blog.
Posted by: seamrog at March 23, 2012 01:20 PM (JKSUw)
Posted by: polynikes at March 23, 2012 01:20 PM (A2cTV)
Stop shooting your mouth off.
You are speaking from a position of total ignorance, yet you pontificate about what Trayvon "might have thought," and what the cops aren't doing correctly.
Come back when you have facts.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at March 23, 2012 01:21 PM (nEUpB)
Posted by: Jonatha "muthafker" Carr at March 23, 2012 01:23 PM (kqXHe)
Posted by: supercore23 at March 23, 2012 01:23 PM (bwV72)
Posted by: Jonatha at March 23, 2012 01:25 PM (kqXHe)
Posted by: supercore23 at March 23, 2012 01:26 PM (bwV72)
This shit happens like clockwork.
The usual gang of idiots have come marching out from the woodwork to scream accusations of “racism” and “social justice”.
Sharpton doesn't want violence, but he's more than glad to throw a grenade into mix and watch the explosion. ThatÂ’s the kind of shit he does best. Like he did with Tawana Brawley, the Crown Heights accident, and the Duke Lacross players.
With a name like George Zimmerman, the leftwing race-baiters thought for sure they had themselves a bona fide, knuckle-dragginÂ’, toothless, KKK member who just got his sheets out of the cleaners. Turns out, George Zimmerman's father is white, his mother is Latina, and he has black relatives.
That sound you hear is the bubble bursting on the LeftÂ’s wet dream.
Karen Finney, filling in for Martin Bashir on MSNBC, blamed Rush Limbaugh, Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum for ‘creating the environment’ that lead to Trayvon Martin’s death. Crazy Louie Farrakhan pitched his two cents on Twitter with a thinly-veiled threat that “the law of retaliation may very well be applied”. And of course, B. Hussein who never lets a good crisis go to waste, chimed in with: ”If I had a son, he’d look just like Trayvon.”
Really, Barry? I envision something like Steve Urkel.
The leftwingnuts are so predictable. When Gabrielle Giffords was shot and when Joseph Stack flew his plane into the Austin Federal bulding, the frothing moonbats blurted out obscene incriminations against the Tea Party, Republicans, and anyone who spoke out against ObamaCare, followed by hate rhetoric and death threats.
When racism results in hate crimes against white people, Sharpton and the rest of the race-baiting fuckwads are nowhere in sight.
The next time thereÂ’s a racially-motivated attack against a white person, I expect to see every one of those assholes marching in the streets, demanding justice, and intimidating the families of the perpetrators.
I wonÂ’t hold my fucking breath.
Posted by: SFC MAC at March 23, 2012 01:26 PM (jvkft)
Actually, the "fucking coons" audio is pretty clear. Right after Trayvon starts to run, Zimmerman mutters either "fucking coons" or "fucking punks." Probably "fucking coons." Recording here (CNN plays it a bunch of times starting at 1:30):
< Google CNN Trayvon racial epithet, since this primitive HQ ewok cave won't let me post links. >
I actually think the timing of the remark suggests that Zimmerman is NOT racist. He only says it after the black teen shows what in court would be called evidence of consciousness of guilt. First Trayvon comes towards Zimmerman (suggesting aggression) then he runs away (suggesting guilt).
Only then does he use the racial epithet, indicating that it is a response to Trayvon's actions, not to his race, like calling an overweight adversary a "fat fuck," or an underweight adversary a "skinny little worm," or a girl adversary a skank, or... well you get the idea.
(That's what Rush should have called Fluke: a skank. It's almost alliterative. And it doesn't mean the dreaded promiscuous. Maybe a skank WANTS to be promiscuous, but nobody will have her. Hey, no aspersions on your chastity, miss $1000 of contraceptives per year.)
So then the question arises, does the fact that somebody used a racial epithet under his breath a few mean that he loses his right to defend himself when a few minutes later the object of that epithet is on top of him beating him?
Pretty sure that's a "no," but my guess is that this is what the case is going to come down legally. The evidence will show that Treyvon DID initiate an assault on Zimmerman, and the question will be whether the racial epithet somehow makes Zimmerman's following of Treyvon an act of aggression, stripping him of his right to claim self-defense.
Posted by: Alec Rawls at March 23, 2012 01:27 PM (kTTUz)
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at March 23, 2012 01:27 PM (r4wIV)
Posted by: polynikes at March 23, 2012 01:27 PM (A2cTV)
Yep. And not just in America. Happens all around the world.
Posted by: Random at March 23, 2012 01:27 PM (dDUnD)
I'm not sure what happened that night we will have to wait for all the facts to come out. Unfortunately we will never know the real truth because the usual suspects have whipped up such racial animus that they will have their pound of flesh no matter what the outcome.
SCOAMF just had to open he mouth today further inflaming tensions all over the country but especially in Sanford. This was not a good idea but when has the SCOAMF had a good idea? It just added gasoline to an impending explosion. Its going to be a long, hot contentious summer.
Posted by: mpfs at March 23, 2012 01:28 PM (iYbLN)
What was 'Obama's son he never had' doing in a gated ca-mune-it-teh to begin with?
Posted by: Cast Iron at March 23, 2012 01:29 PM (EL+OC)
Posted by: Attack Watch at March 23, 2012 01:30 PM (e8kgV)
Posted by: supercore23 at March 23, 2012 01:31 PM (bwV72)
Posted by: supercore23 at March 23, 2012 01:32 PM (bwV72)
Good God man. My first instinct (also training) would be to advance toward the guy following me. But then he judged his physical ability sufficient to run, and did that. Then Zimmerman got in his truck and followed. Then got out, Trayvon engaged him (or vice versa), and Zimmerman lost that confrontation, and shot him.
NO I do not know for a fact that is what happened. But it's at least as plausible as your parenthetical comments.
Posted by: Random at March 23, 2012 01:32 PM (dDUnD)
Posted by: mpfs at March 23, 2012 01:34 PM (iYbLN)
Posted by: Bubba at March 23, 2012 01:34 PM (Ifa6n)
Posted by: polynikes at March 23, 2012 01:34 PM (A2cTV)
Posted by: supercore23 at March 23, 2012 01:34 PM (bwV72)
This thread's still going?
Okay. Cool. .....Does anyone know if Trayvon lives in that neighborhood where he ended up being shot? ....Is that where his dad lives?
I was just wondering 'why he was there'.
Posted by: wheatie at March 23, 2012 01:35 PM (4GgJq)
There are so many Americans who have been walking around with a heavy heart since this came to light. They are all shapes sizes and colors. They are all upset because a kid was killed. I don't think most people see that it's a black kid that was killed, they just see a kid was killed. It could be anyone's kid, black, white, hispanic, anyone's kid. And they are starting to ask why that is so. What has changed in the last couple of years that there is so much fear and suspicion among us? What has changed that has made everyone wary of everyone else? That's the discussion we ought to be having, what has changed and how can we fix it right now!
Posted by: my heart still belongs to herman cain at March 23, 2012 01:35 PM (oZfic)
Maybe. Could also have a surreptitious set of gate keys, help from a security company, or what have you. I'd be curious how much surveillance tape there is, etc.
Posted by: Random at March 23, 2012 01:36 PM (dDUnD)
someone up thread said his dad lived in the neighborhood. I am trying to check that now.
Posted by: my heart still belongs to herman cain at March 23, 2012 01:37 PM (oZfic)
Posted by: kbdabear at March 23, 2012 01:38 PM (Y+DPZ)
http://is.gd/PfF3ze
Black Democrat in SC wants to repeal parts of "stand your ground" law in SC.
Posted by: Vic at March 23, 2012 01:38 PM (YdQQY)
http://tinyurl.com/4nbl5gs
Wait, this is even more stupid than I had first thought.
brb
Posted by: soothsayer at March 23, 2012 01:38 PM (84JKc)
Posted by: supercore23 at March 23, 2012 01:38 PM (bwV72)
Posted by: wheatie at March 23, 2012 05:35 PM (4GgJq)
*
A local radio host has had Orlando media types and other principals as guests lately. IIRC Trayvon was visiting a relative, not sure if the relative lived in the gated community. However it was stated a few times that the racial makeup of the development was 50% white, 25% black, 25% latino.
He was in the ORlando area for a basketball event.
Posted by: kallisto at March 23, 2012 01:39 PM (jm/9g)
If you treat people the way you treat me on this blog in real life I guess you are know as "the fat biotch".
Posted by: my heart still belongs to herman cain at March 23, 2012 01:39 PM (oZfic)
Sounds like more assumptions to me
Posted by: kbdabear at March 23, 2012 01:39 PM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 23, 2012 01:40 PM (ceyqu)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at March 23, 2012 01:40 PM (MvjmI)
Posted by: Kyle Kiernan at March 23, 2012 01:42 PM (/AEUY)
Sounds like more assumptions to me
"Gated community" in this case means "apartment complex with security gates and fences."
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at March 23, 2012 01:42 PM (e0xKF)
In the link I posted up thread they said he was in an area of the school where he wasn't supposed to be. I thought the teacher's lounge or something like that cause when I went to high school the only area off limits to us was the teacher's lounge and the principal's office, like behind the barrier set up by the people in the principal's office to keep you on one side and them on the other.
Posted by: my heart still belongs to herman cain at March 23, 2012 01:42 PM (oZfic)
Posted by: supercore23 at March 23, 2012 01:42 PM (bwV72)
Posted by: my heart still belongs to herman cain at March 23, 2012 05:39 PM (oZfic)
Do you have an English translation for that?
Posted by: Tami at March 23, 2012 01:44 PM (X6akg)
Thanks 814. That URL nails it:
Police detectives report witness confirmation that Trayvon was the aggressor, coming at Zimmerman and attacking him. As for who cried out for help, Trayvon's father told police that it was NOT Trayvon calling out for help on the 911 tape.
So it will all come down to the fact that Zimmerman muttered "fucking coons" under his breath after Trayvon first came at him and then ran away.
Posted by: Alec Rawls at March 23, 2012 01:45 PM (kTTUz)
Posted by: supercore23 at March 23, 2012 01:45 PM (bwV72)
Thanks for all the replies, ya'll.
857 And the commies have already started on the gun control train.
http://is.gd/PfF3ze
Black Democrat in SC wants to repeal parts of "stand your ground" law in SC.
Wow, Vic. That didn't take long, did it.
Posted by: wheatie at March 23, 2012 01:46 PM (4GgJq)
Posted by: wheatie at March 23, 2012 05:46 PM (4GgJq)
-------------------
That and blatant racism is why the MFM is pushing it.
Posted by: Vic at March 23, 2012 01:48 PM (YdQQY)
Posted by: my heart still belongs to herman cain at March 23, 2012 05:39 PM (oZfic)
Shut the fuck up Tidy Cat.
Posted by: mpfs at March 23, 2012 01:50 PM (iYbLN)
Posted by: Jonatha at March 23, 2012 01:52 PM (kqXHe)
Posted by: mpfs at March 23, 2012 01:54 PM (iYbLN)
I didn't vote for him. But when he became President, I thought -- I hoped, anyway -- that he could be the one to turn things around. To genuinely put an end to the race-hustling. He could have smacked down the Sharptons and told black Americans "Okay, no more excuses. I'm in the fucking White House. The Man is a brother now."
But he didn't. He retreated into Southside Chicago racial-grievance politics, and as a result race relations in this country are worse than they've been since 1970.
Fuck him. Fuck him for being a lazy, selfish, opportunistic son of a bitch.
Posted by: Trimegistus at March 23, 2012 01:57 PM (v9Kjt)
Posted by: Louis Farrakhan at March 23, 2012 01:58 PM (ggRof)
No. But I do openly carry often IAW law here in the Golden State, which kinda makes you a walking dictionary of what is allowed what isn't. I've studied it and studied it. When in public you have some pretty stringent rules on self defense that will get you off clean from all criminal responsibility should someone be dead by your weapon. Number 1 is, if you could have reasonably avoided the situation without harm to yourself, or your property, (Not a retreat law, but a do not advance trouble law) you are going down for Man 2. If a reasonable person would have thought what you were doing as threatening harm to them, Man 1. If you pursued a confrontation out of malice, Murder 2, if you planned to do so, Murder 1.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose finally remembers why he's here at March 23, 2012 01:59 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: dagny at March 23, 2012 02:00 PM (u50z0)
Posted by: urandom at March 23, 2012 02:00 PM (0d0K7)
So you're thinking in the golden state, Z would be charged with Murder 2?
Posted by: Random at March 23, 2012 02:02 PM (dDUnD)
843: My parenthetical remarks about Zimmerman's initial encounter with Martin (that Martin's approach to Zimmerman suggested aggression and his flight suggested guilt) was not to interpret the actual meaning of Martin's actions. The subject was how Zimmerman might reasonably interpret them, to assess his state of mind at the time that he made his "fucking coons" (or "fucking punks") remark under his breath.
There is pretty good evidence that Martin did NOT run out of guilt, but because his girlfriend on the phone advised him to run. But that is irrelevant to Zimmerman's state of mind, since he could not hear Martin's phone call.
Tell me 843, would your training have you approach and assault a person who is obviously keeping tabs on you from a distance and is not trying to approach you?
Posted by: Alec Rawls at March 23, 2012 02:03 PM (kTTUz)
Posted by: supercore23 at March 23, 2012 02:04 PM (bwV72)
Posted by: dagny at March 23, 2012 02:05 PM (u50z0)
Yeah, thanks for explaining. I obviously don't think Zimmerman's interpretation is reasonable. Black people probably lived in the complex and for that matter, white people know black people and they visit. Suspicion is one thing. Stalking after being advised by the police not to and eventually following, getting into a confrontation with, and shooting is another.
Also, look at that kid. May have seemed different in the dark, but he's a smiling good-natured looking kid. I don't think that means he couldn't have been violent -- he was when cornered, provoked, or angered near the end -- but I definitely think the world suffered a loss at his shooting.
\'Tell me 843, would your training have you approach and assault a person who is obviously keeping tabs on you from a distance and is not trying to approach you?"
It would depend partly on distance. Above a certain range, unarmed, no -- escape and evasion would be the order of the day (and apparently this was tried when he ran). Wthin a certain distance, if I feared for my life, I'd close with and dominate my opponent.
Posted by: Random at March 23, 2012 02:10 PM (dDUnD)
Posted by: Alec Rawls at March 23, 2012 02:11 PM (kTTUz)
We've got a black President. If (or, more likely now, WHEN) we get another "long hot summer" of race riots and violence, how are his precious moderate voters going to react? The middle-class white women he's trying desperately to scare with all this "Republicans want to steal your VAGINA!" crap? They're not going to reward him, that's for sure.
Posted by: Trimegistus at March 23, 2012 02:13 PM (v9Kjt)
892 Why does Obama think it is relevant that if he had a son, "he'd look like Trayvon"? Does he think that people who look like him warrant special treatment? WTF?
The parents of Trayvon came out today and responded that they "are honored" by him saying this.
Barky has a 'racial martyr' here, with this boy. ....Next step, is the deification of him.
Posted by: wheatie at March 23, 2012 02:16 PM (4GgJq)
"If I feared for my life, I'd close with and dominate my opponent."
I would think it would be pretty obvious to a black kid in a white neighborhood that somebody following him at a distance was keeping an eye on him to make sure he wasn't committing crimes. He would have no reason to fear for his life.
Attacking a person who is keeping tabs on you? THAT is dangerous, as events proved, but it cannot justify the attack.
Posted by: Alec Rawls at March 23, 2012 02:19 PM (kTTUz)
He could possibly be due to the muffled racial epithet, possibly. I don't think he pursued out of a particular malice looking for confrontation. But I do think he put the possibility of nabbing someone who is possibly guilty way ahead of what was prudent to accomplish his goal of crime prevention and avoid a violent confrontation. To what extent is the question. Just reckless, or recklessly stupid.
Things that are prudent and unknown. When he decided to go back to his truck, did he retrace his steps straight back, or circle around and take a different route? When Martin ran away, did Zimmerman attempt to pursue at anything faster than a walk? And at the very last when he was attacked did he ever try to inform Martin he was neighborhood watch? All of these establish how much responsibility Martin takes away from Zimmerman in this problem.
The more reasonable Martin's actions are the more culpable Zimmerman is for having shot him.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose finally remembers why he's here at March 23, 2012 02:21 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Alex Rawls at March 23, 2012 06:11 PM (kTTUz)
That was a warning shot to investigators.
Posted by: Tami at March 23, 2012 02:22 PM (X6akg)
Wow there is a lot of BS floating around today. Zimmerman had called the police, he was on the phone with the operator who told him not to pursue Trayvon. He obviously did unless the 140lb Trayvon yanked a man 100 lbs heavier than him out of an SUV. Second Trayvon was reported as a suspicious character, NO CRIME WAS COMMITTED OR WITNESSED!
I know, some of you might say Zimmerman thought the kid had Pop Rocks and Pepsi, a lethal combo, but in fact it was Ice Tea and Skittles. Sounds silly doesn't it, that's how stupid some of you sound when you talk about the kid being suspended from school!
If you tried restrain me while I was walking home from 7 eleven, I might just beat your ass too! If you think I am suspicious character, call the police and let them do their job. Granted they dropped the ball in Trayvon's case.
I don't care about the ass munch of a President or the poverty pimps trying to rabble rouse. If they start the violence, the next round of shootings will be justified! The stand your ground law is fine, the castle law is fine. Zimmerman needs to face justice, regardless of the Dem's turning the tragedy into a political opportunity. Gabby Giffords anyone???
Posted by: Justus Brothas at March 23, 2012 02:24 PM (5xuOJ)
You obviously don't live anywhere rough. If you start getting followed while walking at night, alone, you have plenty to fear. And since you want to bring up race, "obvious to a black kid in a white neighborhood" I have to note that Zimmerman is not what I expect a neighborhood watch to look like. And following me on foot is not what I expect a neighborhood watch to do.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose finally remembers why he's here at March 23, 2012 02:27 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose finally remembers why he's here at March 23, 2012 06:21 PM "
Trayvon was minding his own business when a man who had called the police. The police were on the way, you get that part right! Your talking out of your ass as no crime was witnessed! The incident should have ended there, the police stop Trayvon and ask a few questions. Skittles and ice tea, they take him home alive, you dumbass!
Posted by: Justus Brothas at March 23, 2012 02:32 PM (5xuOJ)
"If you tried restrain me while I was walking home from 7 eleven, I might just beat your ass too!"
There is no evidence that Zimmerman tried to restrain Martin. Just the opposite: witnesses verify that Martin attacked Zimmerman.
It seems that Zimmerman was just trying to keep tabs on Martin so the police could find him. Would you beat someone's ass for that too?
That may be a serious irritant. Who wants to talk to the police? But it was not a crime on Zimmerman's part.
Posted by: Alec Rawls at March 23, 2012 02:34 PM (kTTUz)
Posted by: Random at March 23, 2012 02:37 PM (dDUnD)
the "law of retaliation" "may be applied."
Hey, Calypso Louie, don't forget which segment of the population actually goes to shooting ranges and practices hitting what they aim at.
Posted by: Glenmore at March 23, 2012 02:38 PM (EuPtY)
"NO CRIME WAS COMMITTED OR WITNESSED!"
Martin was witnessed attacking and beating Zimmerman. That's from the police detectives:
Posted by: Alec Rawls at March 23, 2012 02:38 PM (kTTUz)
I agree.
*Especially* that being followed late at night is going to make one fear for their safety.
Posted by: Random at March 23, 2012 02:38 PM (dDUnD)
Posted by: Beez at March 23, 2012 02:40 PM (QTVh2)
Posted by: Beez at March 23, 2012 02:41 PM (QTVh2)
I agree with Mike that it matters a lot whether Zimmerman tried to inform Martin that he was Neighborhood Watch and that the police were on their way. Reports say there was a loud argument in the yard, so it is likely that such things were said. Hopefully that comes out.
If Zimmerman did identify himself before Martin attacked, then Martin had no reason to fear anything but an interview with the police, which is no justification for assault.
Posted by: Alec Rawls at March 23, 2012 02:46 PM (kTTUz)
A lot of assaults take place in the daytime. Certainly, I can remember ome.
Posted by: Random at March 23, 2012 02:48 PM (dDUnD)
The man who lives in the nearest condo said that he saw Martin on top of Zimmerman, on the ground in his yard, beating him. That seems to me to indicate that Zimmerman had reason to fear Martin intended to harm him.
It is possible, as so many of you have suggested, that Zimmerman somehow brought this on himself. But remember, Zimmerman has been doing this neighborhood watch thing for a while. He has called the cops a lot. He hasn't attacked anybody, or tried to arrest anybody. He watches and he calls the cops.
Posted by: Jerome at March 23, 2012 02:55 PM (eQa5p)
A friend of mine (black) told me about a girl she knew in her youth whose mama named her "Menage a Trois " because it sounded pretty. True story.
Posted by: Grandma Mimi at March 23, 2012 03:11 PM (GHxIi)
"Martin was witnessed attacking and beating Zimmerman. That's from the police detectives: "
You mean they witness Trayvon winning, they didn't witness who started anything. Zimmerman admits to pursing Trayvon on tape, Hannity just played it. That means Trayvon ran away and at that point Zimmerman should have allowed the police to handle the situation. He also could have monitored Trayvon from his car.
Posted by: Justus Brothas at March 23, 2012 03:12 PM (5xuOJ)
"You mean they witness Trayvon winning, they didn't witness who started anything."
Wrong. The witnesses saw Trayvon initiate the attack.
http://tinyurl.com/7z7bdqo
Posted by: Alec Rawls at March 23, 2012 03:25 PM (kTTUz)
If Zimmerman called the police *so* many times in the past, he could not have just been calling them about black people he'd seen. He had to have been calling for all kinds of "suspicious" (in his mind) activity, and chances are, for ALL different ethnic backgropunds. Chances are that he'd even called the cops about white people, don't you think? The guy was paranoid it seems, but not just about blacks.
Posted by: Aslan's Girl at March 23, 2012 03:52 PM (KL49F)
Posted by: Aslan's Girl at March 23, 2012 03:53 PM (KL49F)
Posted by: Aslan's Girl at March 23, 2012 03:55 PM (KL49F)
Posted by: The dude at March 23, 2012 03:59 PM (3bQwx)
Posted by: mike at March 23, 2012 04:06 PM (kqXHe)
O/T but to add to my missing space post, the ampersand never shows up either.
Posted by: Aslan's Girl at March 23, 2012 04:10 PM (KL49F)
Posted by: mike at March 23, 2012 08:06 PM (kqXHe)
I thought this was a gated community? My goodness, so much crime. And yes, I need to read the details of this case more.
Posted by: Aslan's Girl at March 23, 2012 04:11 PM (KL49F)
Posted by: Sarahw at March 23, 2012 04:52 PM (LYwCh)
Posted by: Sarahw at March 23, 2012 04:56 PM (LYwCh)
Wrong again Alec, the witnesses themselves say on live tv they came out after the confrontation. Look it up on youtube as for some reason this site won't take my url. Listen to the actual tape as the sanford police seem to want to cover their butts.
Yeah Sarah, a 140lb kid leaned in an grabbed an armed 200lb man out of two ton vehicle. Right!!!!!!!
Posted by: Justus Brothas at March 23, 2012 05:03 PM (5xuOJ)
If I'm on my back, armed, and someone is beating on my face, whatever I'm armed with, knife, gun, or bazooka, is being used.
Punched can and have killed.
Posted by: Gospace at March 23, 2012 05:08 PM (OKVse)
Posted by: mpfs at March 23, 2012 05:50 PM (iYbLN)
back at ya, "sweetheart"
Posted by: my heart still belongs to herman cain at March 23, 2012 05:25 PM (oZfic)
Posted by: my heart still belongs to herman cain at March 23, 2012 05:28 PM (oZfic)
Punched can and have killed.
Posted by: Gospace at March 23, 2012 09:08 PM (OKVse) "
If you stalked and intiated the conflict you then go before a jury for murder and being a total pussy. Don't go looking for trouble and your less likely to find it! The 911 operator tells you not to follow the guy, don't follow him! Wait for the police in your SUV with your GUN!
Posted by: Justus Brothas at March 23, 2012 05:29 PM (5xuOJ)
Posted by: Frankns at March 23, 2012 05:47 PM (r4fN5)
K, I didn't know that.
I was kicked out of school for cutting class to go to the library that interested me. For real.
So, while maybe it was violence related, I'm aware it could have been things other than violence that got him suspended.
Anyway, following someone is probably a bad idea, in general.
Posted by: Random at March 23, 2012 05:51 PM (bFbIY)
I don't know. It does that to me sometimes. Sometimes it strips away line breaks. It is also *always* stripping away all HTML tags so I don't even bother anymore. I used to be able to format and link, but no more.
Posted by: Random at March 23, 2012 05:56 PM (bFbIY)
We may have a real problem on our hands here ...
Posted by: Frankns at March 23, 2012 09:47 PM (r4fN5) "
If ever the metorite of death fell from the heavens, I do wish it would strike Al Sharpton, the problem is it would probably bounce off his perm and smite some innocent!
Posted by: Justus Brothas at March 23, 2012 05:58 PM (5xuOJ)
Posted by: SDN at March 23, 2012 06:05 PM (nsKxe)
Posted by: East Bay Jay at March 23, 2012 06:21 PM (svwGR)
Posted by: Jordan at March 23, 2012 06:47 PM (RSG1I)
Posted by: Frankns at March 23, 2012 09:47 PM (r4fN5) "
I agree. The MSM is going to try to make this "IT", IYKWIMAITYD.
Posted by: Aslan's Girl at March 23, 2012 07:09 PM (KL49F)
If one is being beaten, as in is losing and being battered, what is your plan to stop them from seriously injuring you?
Wait it out?
Hope they don't feel like it?
Posted by: Random at March 23, 2012 07:17 PM (bFbIY)
Posted by: Jordan at March 23, 2012 10:47 PM (RSG1I) "
Wow, your easy, I am sure if it was you son or loved one you would just lie down and accept it. He goes to the store for skittles an ice tea, gets a bullet to the chest thrown in. Somehow I don't believe you!
Oh wait, throw in almost every witness is contradicting the police reports along with the 911 tapes. Now I really don't believe you. In fact we have a lot of liars and rumor mongers in the thread. I searched for witness statements on line and none of them confirm some of the crap that was claimed. They resort to the police statements and we know the police always get it right, even if the actual witnesses say something different. Look for yourself, there all over youtube!
Posted by: Justus Brothas at March 23, 2012 08:02 PM (5xuOJ)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose finally remembers why he's here at March 23, 2012 06:21 PM "
>>> Trayvon was minding his own business when a man who had called the police. The police were on the way, you get that part right!Your talking out of your ass as no crime was witnessed! The incident should have ended there, the police stop Trayvon and ask a few questions. Skittles and ice tea, they take him home alive, youdumbass!
>>> Posted by: Justus Brothas at March 23, 2012 06:32 PM (5xuOJ)
He was making your point before you typed anything.
Posted by: Random at March 23, 2012 08:34 PM (bFbIY)
Posted by: Random at March 24, 2012 12:34 AM (bFbIY) "
Your correct, I retract my dumbas remark on Mikey and apply it to Alec Rawls! Good work Random, but I don't think Trayvon was culpable of anything except no having a chance to tell his side of the story. My sincere apologies to Mikey the Moose!
Posted by: Justus Brothas at March 23, 2012 09:46 PM (5xuOJ)
Posted by: Terri at March 23, 2012 11:51 PM (Qug6W)
Alright, here are some important considerations:
First of all, the angelic pictures they have been showing of Mr. Trayvon Martin look to be from when he was a junior high school boy of about fourteen. - Not of the much stronger man he had developed into by the age of seventeen.
This is likely a form of manipulation by the family (-understandable) and/or the media (-unforgivable).
Secondly, it is apparent from the compilation of more than five independent 911 calls released by the police (which, taken together, run for more than thirty-four minutes) that Mr. George Zimmerman and Mr. Martin had become engaged in a desperate, hand-to-hand power struggle that lasted at least the better part of a minute and conceivably longer. During this struggle one of the men was repeatedly and desperately crying out for someone to come to his aid.
We can safely conclude from this that Trayvon Martin was obviously not shot while holding a bag of Skittles and an ice-tea beverage.
Further, the strong (but as yet publicly unconfirmed) indication is that the desperate cries for help were being issued by George Zimmerman.
Posted by: _Dave_ at March 24, 2012 12:37 AM (2amQY)
Regarding the law:
Clause a in part 2 which begins "Such force is so great that the person reasonably..." will almost certainly completely protect George Zimmerman from prosecution. The several 911calls (even before we here Zimmerman's first hand claims) tell a compelling story of a frantic and prolonged physical struggle between two men with one of them desperately crying out for help. Assume for the moment that it was George Zimmerman crying out for help. In that case, it is reasonable to conclude that his options in the desperate hand-to-hand contest are on the verge of exhausting - otherwise he would not be begging for someone - anyone! - to come and help him.
In the audios it sounds like a struggle to the death. That's where clause a in part 2 of the law kicks in. It effectively says: 'If you kill your opponent at this no-more-options point, then your homicide will automatically be justified.' - According to the law it doesn't matter who started the fight, or even why.
On the other hand, if it was certain that it was not George Zimmerman but rather it was Trayvon Martin who was crying out for help, then a prosecutor would have a serious angle to pursue against George Zimmerman. It would be reasonable to argue before a jury that it was not George Zimmerman's options on the verge of exhausting (as the law requires) - but rather it was Trayvon Martin's options on the verge of exhausting as he struggled to keep George Zimmerman from shooting him. If the jury found the prosecution's argument that Zimmerman indeed had other reasonable means to escape the situation, they could convict him of some degree or other of manslaughter.
However, putting aside for the moment that there are strong indications that it is George who can be heard in the background of one of the 911 recordings screaming out for help: it is at least very unlikely that it can be concluded that those screams are coming only from Trayvon. And without such certainty, then it would be entirely plausible that it was George who was the one screaming out in dire straits. That's what's known as a crystal-clear reasonable doubt.
The prosecution could put Zimmerman through the tribulations of a trial, but they'd know they'd never get a homicide conviction.
Because as long as the jury believes that it could have been George who was desperately crying out for help in the middle of what all eye-witnesses testify as being a desperate, man-on-man struggle; it is extremely unlikely that the jury will then unanimously decide that George had a reasonable option by which he could safely escape the “imminent danger of death or great bodily harm”.
Put simply:
Desperate cries for someone - anyone! - to come help you in a mortal struggle are a clear indication that you are all but out of personal resources.
Posted by: _Dave_ at March 24, 2012 12:51 AM (2amQY)
And that's what makes clause a of part 2 of that law so bad.
It says that even if you are the very one who provoked the deadly physical violence of which you now find yourself on the losing end: you are protected under the law to resolve that conflict by killing the person you provoked - if there is no other way to keep from getting killed yourself.
THAT'S AWFUL.
Throw into the mix a conceal and carry permit and you have a recipe for disaster because that turns an already scary fistfight with a stranger into a deadly surprise.
Imagine it's night and you're walking home through your neighborhood with about a half mile to go. You notice a strange man following you, and you pick up your pace as adrenaline begins to course through your system. Frighteningly, he picks up his pace too, and now you know you're being pursued by this creep. Panic sets in and you run. He runs after you. You started with a decent lead on him, but you have no idea if you can outrun him. Rounding a bend and temporarily out of sight you decide to hide in the back of a neighbor's yard in some bushes. For a few moments you think maybe you've lost him. But then you see him coming slowly and quietly into the back yard... searching. You stay perfectly still until... he's almost where you're hiding. Another couple of steps and he is practically on top of your hiding spot. You know he's about to discover you, and in a state of pure instinct you attack. He has in fact provoked you into this attack - as he was clearly hunting you down.
You start getting the better of him. But he's fighting back. But your adrenaline is racing! And righteous indignation is rising in your blood: this motherfucker was stalking you!
He's gotten some good hits in on you, but now you're starting to kick the shit out of him.
Suddenly he pulls out a gun, and you immediately grab it forcing his aim to the ground. Now you're both locked in a death struggle. Only one of you gets to live through this. That's obvious. No rational, cool-headed conversation is going to suddenly calm this scenario down.
You attacked him because he hunted you down: he cornered you and thereby outright provoked you.
He instinctively pulled his gun out because you were kicking the shit out of him and he needed to make you stop. He may have thought you were going to beat him to death, or there may have been no thought at all - just the desperate need to stop the beating. You saw him pull the gun and begin to aim it at you, and there was only one thing to do: grab it from him.
I'm not saying that the above scenario is what happened to Trayvon Martin. I'm saying that it should not be able to legally happen to anybody.
It is good to have a "Stand Your Ground" law like the one Florida has. But not one that protects a well meaning gunman in a scenario like the one above.
It incentivizes courageous and armed but untrained and unauthorized men to confront and chase down suspicious looking strangers.
The answer is simple. Keep part 2 of the law, but strike out clause a. - So that if you are responsible for provoking a deadly situation that ends in the death of an unarmed innocent: the law will not protect you.
Maybe the jury will acquit you due to special circumstances. Maybe the victim was high on crack when he felt compelled to attack you, his pursuer.
Or maybe the victim had only hours before committed a rape or murder. Or maybe the jury just thinks you're too cute to convict. Sure, whatever. But there shouldn't be a law in place that guarantees your acquittal and thus makes prosecution a fool's errand.
Want to be part of the nighttime neighborhood watch? That's a good thing. Want to make sure that suspicious looking characters in your neighborhood get questioned by police by you constantly tracking their position on foot? Either disarm yourself before you pursue your suspect - and accept all the inherent dangers of possibly facing an armed thug. Or accept the fact that should your tactics of pursuit inadvertently freak-out and provoke an innocent person to defend herself against you (her weirdo stalker) wherein you are forced to shoot her in defense of your own life: that the law will not protect you, and you will very likely go to prison.
Note that as part of a neighborhood night watch, you could still use a carry and conceal permit to arm yourself with a gun in case you have to face an armed thug in your rounds. It's just that whenever you saw someone suspicious you would merely report him - and not pursue him. Often that means the suspect will go unquestioned by the police. Oh well. You've done your job in deterring crime that night.
If instead he comes toward you, you'd announce you have a gun and if necessary you'd brandish it. If he decided to run straight at you lunging for your gun, so that you were forced to shoot him: this is where the "Stand Your Ground" law would protect you (as it should) from prosecution. - Even if you ended up killing an innocent who was sleep walking. Because you would not have provoked the death struggle by giving pursuit to a stranger in uncertain circumstances.
Rather, you would have done your best to let the person know you had a gun that you were willing to use so that they had a clear option not to get shot.
In the situation where you're pursuing someone with your concealed weapon, your "suspect" may have no idea what your intentions are and no idea that you have a gun. And you're not trained to handle the situation anyway.
Posted by: _Dave_ at March 24, 2012 02:07 AM (2amQY)
Posted by: JadedByPolitics at March 24, 2012 02:45 AM (+Jg9I)
Posted by: Rollory at March 24, 2012 05:52 AM (kFIsy)
Posted by: JeffC at March 24, 2012 06:43 AM (NEXKe)
@77: "The MFM shows pictures of the "kid" when he was about 10 y.o. Why is it they always portray the "victim" as an innocent choir boy? We now know
he was a 17 y.o gang banger who had been kicked out of school because he was violent. He also had a rap sheet for violent crimes and burglary. And yes that is relevant."
Yeah, that kid could be Barry's son. In fact, right about now, his mug shot is probably in the same place as Barry's Birth Certificate.
Posted by: 66chevelle at March 24, 2012 07:03 AM (QjSgY)
I'd also like to see how baby-faced the 17 yo was, since essentially all I have seen are years-old "baby" pictures.
I have heard that the kid leaned into the car. I'd like to know whether that is true or false.
If some thuggish kid marched over aggressively and stuck his head in my car, If I were too surprised to have driven away, I'd probably shoot him, especially if he started throwing punches.
Posted by: Sarahw at March 24, 2012 09:23 AM (LYwCh)
As for Zimmerman calling Martin a "Coon" under his breath. Yeah, CNN is making that claim when even their own sound expert said that its impossible to determine if the word was coon or goon. But, I am sure all you people trust everything CNN tells you. Its not like they have been caught faking things before.
Posted by: Deathknyte at March 24, 2012 10:12 AM (AA3pR)
Posted by: Pmzey at March 24, 2012 12:29 PM (pmzey)
Posted by: Buttclapper at March 24, 2012 06:10 PM (Q63S1)
Posted by: Grung_e_Gene at March 25, 2012 05:28 AM (9pv9v)
1. I appreciate the media dubbing Zimmerman "a white Hispanic." Like the Israelis, he's now an honorary member of the Oppressive White Majority.
----
The media does not have to dub anyone named Zimmerman white. If anything he has been dubbed a "white Hispanic". I swear Ace has become the biggest white man's burden/ I'm white victim of the media narrative motherfucker ever...
Sand,vagina, water, vinegar, cleanse...
Posted by: theworldisnotenough at March 25, 2012 03:30 PM (kgX2S)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3168 seconds, 1073 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: soothsayer at March 23, 2012 10:20 AM (jUytm)