August 11, 2012
— Ace York: Romney goes bold.
Romney’s gamble is that in the midst of an economic downturn, voters are ready to accept Ryan’s prescription for fixing the federal budget, in particular his proposals for reforming Medicare. Romney and Ryan are right that major changes need to be made, and at some point the voting public will accept that view, too. That day is coming. The question is whether it will arrive by November 6.Of course Team Obama says it is delighted with Romney’s choice, because they believe they can destroy Ryan’s plan, and in the process the Romney-Ryan candidacy. And it seems likely that at the very least choosing Ryan has made winning Florida a little harder for Romney — and if Romney doesn’t win Florida, he doesn’t become president. What Democrats are overlooking is that Ryan is a truly formidable figure. He not only knows his stuff, he is able to communicate his ideas in a persuasive and appealing way. There’s a very good chance voters will like him. Democrats love to portray Republicans as angry. They won’t be able to do that with Ryan, who doesn’t give off even a hint of anger.
But the fact remains that there has never before been a national debate about entitlements like the one that is coming in this presidential campaign. Mitt Romney has decided itÂ’s time for that debate, and that he can win it. ThatÂ’s the biggest bet of his candidacy, by a long shot.
Below, Paul Ryan explains to a plainly-baffled Obama what's what and what will be.
Posted by: Ace at
03:23 AM
| Comments (289)
Post contains 267 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: soothsayer, writing today the stuff everyone else will write tomorrow, since 2005 at August 11, 2012 03:26 AM (uff2W)
We already know Obama loathes Romney and Ryan is like sand in his vagina.
Forget the Romney-gaffes. I am waiting for the first Obama hate-gaffe.
Hate is a terrible motivator. It magically produces the unexpected.
Posted by: Exile at August 11, 2012 03:28 AM (2uSt9)
Posted by: TheLittlShiningMan at August 11, 2012 03:31 AM (PH+2B)
Biden can't even remember where he lives. Ryan knows what on page 876, para 2 of a 1,000 page bill.
Posted by: Exile at August 11, 2012 03:31 AM (2uSt9)
I'm in!
As someone said last night, Paul Ryan is often on morning drive-time radio here in Chicago Metro.. the leader in that market, WLS-AM, is all conservative talk format. So, he's pretty popular here on this side of the Cheddar Curtain. I would love to see a push for Illinois to go red.. and I would be the first one to volunteer for a GOTV effort.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at August 11, 2012 03:31 AM (UTq/I)
Posted by: soothsayer, writing today the stuff everyone else will write tomorrow, since 2005 at August 11, 2012 03:32 AM (Vhc4u)
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at August 11, 2012 03:33 AM (UTq/I)
Fox now saying Paul Ryan is the pick. So that makes it just about everyone.
http://is.gd/mXDqYs
Posted by: Vic - will support Romney/Ryan at August 11, 2012 03:33 AM (YdQQY)
http://is.gd/hNSUZC
Posted by: Vic - will support Romney/Ryan at August 11, 2012 03:34 AM (YdQQY)
I've had dinner with Ryan. You won't meet a nicer, more intelligent, persevering guy and family man. He is a great pick in my opinion.
Posted by: Exile at August 11, 2012 03:34 AM (2uSt9)
http://is.gd/IF3bze
Posted by: Vic - will support Romney/Ryan at August 11, 2012 03:35 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: soothsayer, writing today the stuff everyone else will write tomorrow, since 2005 at August 11, 2012 03:36 AM (vuIm8)
Vic hates everything.....like Mikey.
Jeebus.....
Posted by: Tami at August 11, 2012 03:36 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: IdowhatIwant at August 11, 2012 03:37 AM (a4CUi)
Posted by: Vic - will support Romney/Ryan at August 11, 2012 03:38 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Vic - will support Romney/Ryan at August 11, 2012 03:38 AM (YdQQY)
Make no mistake through, both Romney and Ryan will respond faithfully. This isn't the first campaign for either one.
I think Obama's negative campaign is going to backfire. It showing signs of that already and people have not even been exposed to Romney yet.
Posted by: Exile at August 11, 2012 03:39 AM (2uSt9)
This ticket is done. Lets concentrate on winning more seats in the senate and keeping the house strong.
Before worshipping t the altar of Ryan, just look at his voting record.
I know, he's made speeches, suggested things, its the votes I look at.
Nothing to see here, Romney killed what little chances he hd when his spokesperson said that the dead woman would be covered under HIS medical care program
Posted by: EPWJ at August 11, 2012 03:40 AM (NJbN7)
Posted by: elizabethe at August 11, 2012 03:41 AM (QzmhX)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at August 11, 2012 03:42 AM (Hbnr+)
Who will walk out?
Posted by: Hrothgar (Now upgraded to RINO version) at August 11, 2012 03:42 AM (Cnqmv)
Winning the Senate will not be enough unless we can get 3/4 majority in both houses to impeach the Barky SOB. And that is impossible.
We must win this election because the Jug-Eared fk has already shown he doesn't give a shit for ANY law or congress.
Posted by: Vic - will support Romney/Ryan at August 11, 2012 03:42 AM (YdQQY)
Ryan's plan was about what is possible in DC.In fact, he stretched it a bit and look at all the negative attention it garnered. You have to walk before you can crawl.
Posted by: Exile at August 11, 2012 03:43 AM (2uSt9)
Posted by: In Exile at August 11, 2012 03:44 AM (bXTv1)
Paul Ryan is solid VP for the Romney ticket. Ryan doesn't get off topic spilling beans just because "reporters" squeeze for juice. Tight lips v. the loose, announcement from the out of service Wisconsin battleship. Is that ship going to be Romney's Military spending story, that it ought to be serviceable, or somehow linked to the lines that military spending makes for jobs, jobs, jobs?
Ryan and Romney should balance the media personality demands from the public. Laura Ingraham said the other week that Romney isn't the politician's politician (Obama was that). This morning's DNC headline is squealing that Ryan has no private sector experience -- like Joe Biden has, pfft. Will Joe shit in his pants during televised live debate with Paul? Got to wonder, how does private sector experience help a VP who is not the Chief Executive, but presides over the Senate as the tie breaker? (No wonder Condi said no way. Besides, Romney will line her in his Cabinet.)
Too bad, Congress loses Ryan's leadership. Michele Bachmann's twitching to fill that vacuum, economic legislative leadership, from the bookkeeper to the tax lawyer writing bills to meet fiscal conservatism? Personalities aside, it's the agenda that matters. And it isn't just Tea Party voters demanding that the Federal Government quit screwing tax payers. "After the election" better produce lower taxes, no tax funded bail-outs.
As for Romney v. Obama-Totus in debate, Mitt had better produce the juice since '08 "fire in the belly" was his own litmus test for the "best" presidential candidate.
Posted by: Milton at August 11, 2012 03:44 AM (BAnPT)
Posted by: osu at August 11, 2012 03:44 AM (vgMWF)
Anyone think Biden will bow out? You know "personal reasons."
Posted by: Infidel at August 11, 2012 03:44 AM (qnvHI)
Posted by: elizabethe at August 11, 2012 03:45 AM (QzmhX)
Posted by: Bill_in_Kennesaw at August 11, 2012 03:45 AM (r/Bl1)
Posted by: nickless at August 11, 2012 03:46 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: elizabethe
Hey girl, just for you. Actuary, actuary, actuary.
Posted by: Paul Ryan at August 11, 2012 03:46 AM (zxitI)
Posted by: matt in maine at August 11, 2012 03:46 AM (2Ok++)
Posted by: ace at August 11, 2012 03:48 AM (fxHyG)
Posted by: macintx at August 11, 2012 03:49 AM (teREJ)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at August 11, 2012 03:49 AM (Hbnr+)
Posted by: elizabethe at August 11, 2012 03:49 AM (QzmhX)
Yeah, Ryan's voting record is so terrible he got a 96% from the ACU.
Facts are friends.
Posted by: Exile at August 11, 2012 03:49 AM (2uSt9)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at August 11, 2012 03:49 AM (E5F4w)
Pay Ryan didn't kill your dog. That was Obama, when he got to feeling a bit peckish before dinner.
Posted by: Retread at August 11, 2012 03:50 AM (zxitI)
Then we start the "Biden wasn't the problem" campaign.
I'm not sure Hilly would take it, frankly.
Posted by: nickless at August 11, 2012 03:50 AM (MMC8r)
Please with this LET'S GET IN THEIR FACES nonsense all the time.
Can I get an Amen.
Finally a voice of reason.
Posted by: Exile at August 11, 2012 03:51 AM (2uSt9)
AOS Morons are not the only ones who want to see Romney quit wimping around and open a can of hard-core kick-ass. Read Mark SteynÂ’s column Milquetoast Mitt
http://is.gd/u3Au0d
Posted by: Moar useless movie quotes at August 11, 2012 03:51 AM (YdQQY)
It's a pretty clear choice, I think. Two "nice guys" who have a realistic view of what needs to be done versus a traitor and a wet-brain.
Posted by: MrScribbler at August 11, 2012 03:52 AM (wZI4b)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at August 11, 2012 03:52 AM (Hbnr+)
For Biden to bow out would indicate that the JEF mad a bad decision at some point in the past. Maybe they will decide that no VP debate is really necessary.
One problem I have with this pick is that Ryan seems to me like a man that is too good to be savaged by the liberal wolves as we know he will be.
Posted by: Hrothgar (Now upgraded to RINO version) at August 11, 2012 03:52 AM (Cnqmv)
Wasn't Mikey the kid in the cereal commercial years ago?
Posted by: macintx at August 11, 2012 07:49 AM (teREJ)
I have no idea, that's why I asked. (I don't watch TV)
Posted by: Moar useless movie quotes at August 11, 2012 03:53 AM (YdQQY)
JJ - LOL. Gets me to 72. I still think we could find someone better than Rubio!
Posted by: Infidel at August 11, 2012 03:53 AM (qnvHI)
“And at this point, you know, with all due respect to the office of the presidency, when I hear Barack Obama speak at this point, especially when he lectures about ethics and civility, it’s nauseating to me.”
Yes, the press prostitutes. And Obama is nauseating.
Funny, the top dogs wait for Palin to bark before going at it.
Remember Michael Steele's polls asking if it's alright to call a Democratic Marxist a "Socialist"? How long before McShame calls down the media for prostituting? He'd have to start with himself and his own, first.
Posted by: Milton at August 11, 2012 03:53 AM (BAnPT)
Winning the Senate will not be enough unless we can get 3/4 majority in both houses to impeach the Barky SOB. And that is impossible.
Posted by: Vic - will support Romney/Ryan at August 11, 2012 07:42 AM
Dude, you represent everything that is wrong with the right wing today. That statement is not only factually and procedurally wrong, it is profoundly counter-productive. A super majority in both houses isn't a requirement for an impeachment conviction, chief.
How about we win both houses and the White House? If all you have to say is "we're all fucked, no matter what happens and there's no way out", why don't you keep it to yourself?
Posted by: IdowhatIwant at August 11, 2012 03:54 AM (a4CUi)
Posted by: Serious Cat at August 11, 2012 03:54 AM (zrpqj)
#RR2012 Yeah, that works.
Posted by: Retread at August 11, 2012 03:55 AM (zxitI)
Unrelenting bomb-throwing is one thing and can be overdone.
Lying on the ground in the fetal position and saying effectively "Please Sir, may I have another!" can also be viewed as a poor campaign technique.
Posted by: Hrothgar (Now upgraded to RINO version) at August 11, 2012 03:56 AM (Cnqmv)
Posted by: Infidel at August 11, 2012 03:57 AM (qnvHI)
No you are FOS. It takes a simple majority in the house true, but it takes 2/3 in the Senate and when you have a bunch of "Scottish law" RINOs you may as well say 3/4 which is why I said 3/4 in both houses.
The truth is we MUST have all three branches of gov after this election. Barky will ignore congress as he has done for the last 2 years.
We can NOT give up on this presidential election.
Posted by: Vic - will support Romney/Ryan at August 11, 2012 03:58 AM (YdQQY)
http://is.gd/u3Au0d
Posted by: Moar useless movie quotes
---
I think you misread the article. Steyn doesn't want Romney to "kick ass" but rather to communicate the grave consequences for the country if we reelect Obama.
Posted by: Serious Cat at August 11, 2012 03:58 AM (zrpqj)
Posted by: soothsayer, writing today the stuff everyone else will write tomorrow, since 2005 at August 11, 2012 03:59 AM (SaGLz)
Posted by: nickless at August 11, 2012 03:59 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: VW Zao at August 11, 2012 04:00 AM (vWZa0)
I still can't calibrate Romney's ability to actually call out the marxist in chief on facts.
My only problem with Ryan as VP is that his expertise in now lost to the House.
Posted by: Hrothgar (Now upgraded to RINO version) at August 11, 2012 04:00 AM (Cnqmv)
"Yes, you want to see Obama brought low and repudiated. We all do. But invective is only one of several methods of achieving that, and it's not near the top of the list."
I understand what you're saying, honestly, but the last thing anyone is going to accept is a "Let's stick to the issues" and "I won't attack my opponent" campaign from Mitt.
This is going to be the ugliest election ever. We better be ready to fight on their level.
Posted by: jwest at August 11, 2012 04:01 AM (ZDsRL)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at August 11, 2012 04:01 AM (Hbnr+)
Posted by: elizabethe at August 11, 2012 04:01 AM (QzmhX)
Please with this LET'S GET IN THEIR FACES nonsense all the time.
Punching down, RINO, commie, eleventy, etc.
Posted by: nickless at August 11, 2012 04:01 AM (MMC8r)
With all deference to Steyn, Obama's bet is he will define Romney to voters now. But that is falling apart already with the lies being uncovered. Roment is still very close in the polls and the strategy is costing Obama in popularity polls.
People have not really been exposed to Romney yet. When they are, they will see quite a contrast and remember Obama and his people were lying.
Then we are going to get around to talking about Obama's dismal record.
Then we are going to talk about Romney's (and now Ryan's) ideas, contrast them and talk about how we know they will be successful.
For Romney to go negative would be a big mistake. Responding factually and forcefully (and appropriately...see his bonehead adviser) is another thing. THey will get better at that as time goes on.
Posted by: Exile at August 11, 2012 04:02 AM (2uSt9)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at August 11, 2012 04:02 AM (9TTOe)
In this election the Barky campaign has gone full bore nuclear with lies, smears, and general assholiness. So far we have responded with neaner, neaner, neaner.
Meanwhile the MFM ignores the lies and prints love letters for Obama, DNC talking points, and repeats the lies about our candidate.
The RNC has not learned how to play the media yet.
Posted by: Vic - will support Romney/Ryan at August 11, 2012 04:03 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Serious Cat at August 11, 2012 04:04 AM (zrpqj)
The fact that as far as I know no one on the Romney staff has been fired doesn't bode well for us. Loyalty is one thing, suffering incompetence is another!
Posted by: Hrothgar (Now upgraded to RINO version) at August 11, 2012 04:04 AM (Cnqmv)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at August 11, 2012 04:04 AM (9TTOe)
Posted by: Tonawanda at August 11, 2012 04:05 AM (l62NP)
Posted by: soothsayer, writing today the stuff everyone else will write tomorrow, since 2005 at August 11, 2012 04:06 AM (uaJ2E)
I've been checking the left-wing websites and watching MSNBC this morning. Amazingly enough, this pick is going extremely well.
It's an hour until the announcement and no one has called his wife a whore or attacked his children. I believe this is a new era in civility.
Posted by: jwest at August 11, 2012 04:06 AM (ZDsRL)
Romney's responses have been clever, measured and appropriate for someone seeking the presidency.
You and a lot of the other jackwagons around here seem to think he's running for class bully.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at August 11, 2012 04:07 AM (UTq/I)
Posted by: Vic - will support Romney/Ryan at August 11, 2012 08:03 AM (YdQQY)
And the media is going to do it's level best to keep them from making any such inroads.
The ability to go around the conventional media (insert internet theme here) may be the only way to counter the one-sided coverage of the non-reporters on TV and radio.
Posted by: Hrothgar (Now upgraded to RINO version) at August 11, 2012 04:07 AM (Cnqmv)
Posted by: Infidel at August 11, 2012 04:08 AM (qnvHI)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at August 11, 2012 04:08 AM (Hbnr+)
Posted by: someguy at August 11, 2012 04:08 AM (sEXZ/)
CROSSBOWS!!!!
Posted by: Hrothgar (Now upgraded to RINO version)
Hey girl, It's Paul Ryan has something you'll like:
http://tinyurl.com/97jfbtf
Posted by: Retread at August 11, 2012 04:08 AM (zxitI)
Posted by: Serious Cat at August 11, 2012 07:58 AM
Just read the linked article and what it implies is that, for once, Steyn doesn't know what the fuck he thinks but feels the need to write it down anyway.
It's pretty clear that there is a huge bloc of voters out there -- from both parties -- who will always fall for the inspiring slogan/rainbows-and-unicorns/Morning in America stuff. To win, candidates have to reach them.
Bark Obama has the Race Bloc voters sewed up, as well as the Red Diaper Brigade. Romney can never win them.
We don't need to "kick ass" as much as we need to hammer home two points: 1) What has happened the last four years? and 2) Bark Obama needs to tell the truth.
Those are both legitimate, fact-based questions that should destroy the Choomer-in-Chief if reiterated often enough to get through the addled mass of uninformed voters.
Posted by: MrScribbler at August 11, 2012 04:08 AM (wZI4b)
Posted by: Serious Cat at August 11, 2012 08:04 AM (zrpqj)
I thought everyone knew that. I wanted a bigger RINO than Ryan. One from a conservative State that would result in replacing the RINO with someone good and would not result in removing someone we need from Congress.
My opinion has always been that the VP pick seldom helps and often hurts. In any case, as you should be able to see from earlier posts, I WILL support this ticket.
Posted by: Vic - will support Romney/Ryan at August 11, 2012 04:08 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Long Island at August 11, 2012 04:09 AM (kzp9t)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at August 11, 2012 04:09 AM (9TTOe)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at August 11, 2012 04:10 AM (Hbnr+)
Posted by: ace at August 11, 2012 07:48 AM (fxHyG)
You saw the results of this type of campaign commercial that ran at least four times an hour for weeks and millions in mailings in the Texas senate primary between Cruz and Dewhurst.
.
Posted by: Beto at August 11, 2012 04:10 AM (BAnPT)
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at August 11, 2012 08:07 AM (UTq/I)
Coming from you that is a compliment.
Posted by: Vic - will support Romney/Ryan at August 11, 2012 04:10 AM (YdQQY)
Does getting defeated in a reelection attempt have a bad effect on one? Or will he just shrug it off? I sure hope he gets defeated so we can see.
Just how thin will those biographies look in ten years or so, when they inevitably get written? Will all of his sealed-up backstory stuff be forever sealed? Those bios will be about as short as Jonathan Livingston Seagull.
Posted by: TheLittlShiningMan at August 11, 2012 04:12 AM (PH+2B)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at August 11, 2012 04:13 AM (Hbnr+)
I wanted a bigger RINO than Ryan. One from a conservative state
Dan Quayle called - said thanks, but he's all booked up this fall.
Posted by: crisis du jour at August 11, 2012 04:13 AM (J1eJz)
Happy with the pick. Doubles down on competence and provides a clear cut contrast.
America you have your choice.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at August 11, 2012 04:14 AM (ayzM7)
Posted by: GERG! at August 11, 2012 04:14 AM (6DDE+)
Posted by: Hrothgar (Now upgraded to RINO version) at August 11, 2012 08:07 AM (Cnqmv)
The way to do that is to get on the "live" Sunday shows and live news. And come back HARD on their lies. That doesn't mean you have to go nuclear in the campaign on your stuff, you go nuclear on responding to their lies. By nuclear I mean you don't say the add was "misleading". You say the ad was an outright lie and the people who made it are liars. Hell even the WSJ is saying that this morning. After you say the people who made it are liars you detail why it was a lie, then you tie it directly back to Obama.
WSJ editorial (via NRO) finally says it correctly:
The challenge is finding anything his campaign says that is true.
When your candidate is a serial liar it is hard to come up with anything that is true.
http://is.gd/NvimVb
Posted by: Vic - will support Romney/Ryan at August 11, 2012 04:15 AM (YdQQY)
That level of emotional control will cause you to make mistakes
Posted by: Beto at August 11, 2012 04:15 AM (BAnPT)
Posted by: R. Lee Ermey at August 11, 2012 04:15 AM (dKV5k)
Yes, the biographies will be thin, especially when they "cover" Bark Obama's presidential years.
But the trial transcripts would be bigger than those for the Scopes, O.J. and Leopold-Loeb trials combined!
Posted by: MrScribbler at August 11, 2012 04:15 AM (wZI4b)
If you think John Boehner or Mitch McConnell would ever vote to convict the first black president, you're a lunatic. Soetero could kill one of his gay lovers in the White House before a horrified tour group and crying John Boehner would be on the TV whining that Barry isn't 'working with him' on a budget.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at August 11, 2012 04:16 AM (uhAkr)
ObamaCare already cuts $500B from Medicare....and those are facts right in Ryan's wheelhouse.
Posted by: nickless at August 11, 2012 04:16 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Old Coach at August 11, 2012 04:18 AM (LYbxI)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at August 11, 2012 04:19 AM (9TTOe)
Posted by: Infidel at August 11, 2012 04:19 AM (qnvHI)
Posted by: Taro Tsujimoto at August 11, 2012 04:20 AM (celt+)
Posted by: packsoldier at August 11, 2012 04:20 AM (JZJ1+)
Posted by: ace at August 11, 2012 04:21 AM (fxHyG)
Which is why I keep saying nobody should be paying any attention to these useless polls right now.
Posted by: Vic - will support Romney/Ryan at August 11, 2012 04:21 AM (YdQQY)
Whoa! Watching Fox, and it looks like the announcement will be made from some warship.
That's right - They're on a motherfuckin' BOAT!
Posted by: Taro Tsujimoto at August 11, 2012 04:21 AM (celt+)
That's right - They're on a motherfuckin' BOAT!
Posted by: Taro Tsujimoto at August 11, 2012 08:21 AM (celt+)
USS Wisconsin. Coincidence? I think not. ;o)
Posted by: Tami at August 11, 2012 04:22 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: Infidel at August 11, 2012 04:22 AM (qnvHI)
Posted by: ace at August 11, 2012 08:21 AM (fxHyG)
WestOr maybe, someguy.
Posted by: Methos at August 11, 2012 04:22 AM (6LvlL)
However I will say this, the traditional roll of the VP pick is to be the "attack dog", so if Ryan doesn't "punch back hard" they are either going to go with an unconventional campaign, or Ryan will not be doing his job.
Posted by: Vic - will support Romney/Ryan at August 11, 2012 04:23 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: USA at August 11, 2012 04:23 AM (6Cjut)
Anyone is punching above their weight in that race.
Posted by: sTevo at August 11, 2012 04:24 AM (VMcEw)
Not only the capitol. The Capitol of the Capitol, the 1st Congressional District of Wisconsin. We are good here.
It's a beautiful day to be a conservative!
Posted by: mama winger at August 11, 2012 04:24 AM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: soothsayer, writing today the stuff everyone else will write tomorrow, since 2005 at August 11, 2012 04:25 AM (9Q2PJ)
Posted by: Infidel at August 11, 2012 04:26 AM (qnvHI)
...srsly
Posted by: Albie Damned at August 11, 2012 04:26 AM (Yhu4q)
Posted by: Harry Reid at August 11, 2012 04:27 AM (Pm8uY)
Posted by: Mr. Dave at August 11, 2012 04:28 AM (LAvLY)
Posted by: Vic - will support Romney/Ryan at August 11, 2012 04:28 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Harry Reid at August 11, 2012 04:28 AM (Pm8uY)
Seems like the majority of the Ryan naysayers come from the butthurt Palin worshipers and the Rubio (he'll push back the Obama/Biden racial advantage!!11!!!) and Jindal (ditto) adherents.
A lot of political savants don't really appear to know a damn thing about the candidates, but are happy to support them based on looks/race/gender/image/religion lines. Or maybe they just like the way the names sound.
All anyone has to do is look at the Choomer-in-Chief's history, and supporting his opponent -- even if said opponents can barely pass the Mirror Test -- is essential.
Posted by: MrScribbler at August 11, 2012 04:28 AM (wZI4b)
Posted by: soothsayer, writing today the stuff everyone else will write tomorrow, since 2005 at August 11, 2012 04:28 AM (SaGLz)
Posted by: NewBrunswicker at August 11, 2012 04:29 AM (XBxRP)
A self-confessed Bambi killer on the ticket?
Time to start thinking about regulating crossbows, and reflecting on all those poor deer who aren't around frolicking in green pastures BECAUSE PAUL RYAN SHOT THEM WITH RAZOR TIPPED ARROWS UNTIL THEY BLED TO DEATH!
Posted by: Smatter at August 11, 2012 04:29 AM (k4hO9)
Posted by: USA supports Romney/Ryan at August 11, 2012 04:29 AM (6Cjut)
Posted by: lowandslow at August 11, 2012 04:29 AM (GZitp)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC at August 11, 2012 04:29 AM (Pm8uY)
Posted by: Mr. Dave at August 11, 2012 08:28 AM (LAvLY)
The "boomers" are not the problem in FL. It is the geriatric Northern transplants who live in the Southern half. Remember Al Gore country?
Posted by: Vic - will support Romney/Ryan at August 11, 2012 04:30 AM (YdQQY)
I don't think people want "punch back hard" from a Presidential/VP candidate. I believe they want intelligent, thoughtful, factual and verifiable proposals. They want someone who is not divisive (like Congress or the President) the latter who is dropping in the polls due to his attack mentality (IMHO).
Punch back hard is the way Ryan responds to Obama above. With facts that stump the President and for which he has no answers. That makes him look foolish, partisan and inept.
I frankly think Obama would love a punch back hard guy like Christie. That's the fight they really want. It distracts from the real issues and his horrible record of misery inflicted upon us.
Posted by: Exile at August 11, 2012 04:30 AM (2uSt9)
--------
If anyone thinks Paul Ryan won't punch back, they don't know Paul Ryan. If by "punch back" you mean speak the facts clearly without fear and without backing down, while not losing your cool and not appearing like a jerk.
Of course if you mean by screaming like a jackass, no, he won't do that.
Either did Scott Walker. Ryan comports himself very much like Scott Walker. Pleasant, knowledgable, firm, specific and smart. Like a WINNER.
Watch his speeches. Watch his interactions with OBama and Wasserman-Schultz et al. Does this look like someone who backs down?
Posted by: mama winger at August 11, 2012 04:30 AM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: Kaitian at August 11, 2012 04:31 AM (itBUs)
I have one this morning (actually evening for me, I work the Vampire Shift)
.....and it feels goddam good.
I've had my misgivings about Mitt, but it looks like he gets it and he's taking a bold shot.
Who knew?
Here we go.
Posted by: ontherocks at August 11, 2012 04:32 AM (aZ6ew)
"Seems like the majority of the Ryan naysayers come from the butthurt Palin worshipers and the Rubio (he'll push back the Obama/Biden racial advantage!!11!!!) and Jindal (ditto) adherents."
Where do you come up with this shit? I've been moderately supportive of Palin in the past and was hoping for Rubio to be the pick, but Ryan is fine with me.
I think you'll find the Ryan detractors were backing Portman, the "safe" choice in their minds.
Posted by: jwest at August 11, 2012 04:32 AM (ZDsRL)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC at August 11, 2012 04:32 AM (Pm8uY)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at August 11, 2012 04:32 AM (9TTOe)
Please.
Posted by: Harry Reid at August 11, 2012 08:27 AM (Pm8uY)
Mr. Reid, my sources tell me I'm too old for your tastes...but I like the way you think!!!
Posted by: GERG! at August 11, 2012 04:32 AM (6DDE+)
Posted by: Infidel at August 11, 2012 08:28 AM (qnvHI)
Some things are just worth repeating
Posted by: Albie Damned at August 11, 2012 04:33 AM (Yhu4q)
When this gets to panty-throwing and slippery liquids I want to be there.
Posted by: Exile at August 11, 2012 04:34 AM (2uSt9)
Posted by: Albie Damned at August 11, 2012 04:34 AM (Yhu4q)
Speaking of arrows and Paul Ryan, ..... yum. Bow hunting pics. Yum.
Posted by: mama winger at August 11, 2012 04:34 AM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: soothsayer, writing today the stuff everyone else will write tomorrow, since 2005 at August 11, 2012 04:35 AM (mr2ZC)
...srsly
That's known as whistling past the graveyard.
Posted by: Retread at August 11, 2012 04:35 AM (zxitI)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at August 11, 2012 04:35 AM (9TTOe)
Posted by: mama winger at August 11, 2012 04:35 AM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: billygoat at August 11, 2012 04:35 AM (6DDE+)
Good Morning Morons. Today is Saturday, August 11, 2012. On this day in 1942 Hedy Lamarr and composer George Antheil receive a patent for a frequency hopping, spread spectrum communication system that later became the basis for modern technologies in wireless telephones and Wi-Fi.
Posted by: Vic - will support Romney/Ryan at August 11, 2012 04:36 AM (YdQQY)
mama winger - that is a hawt pic. May make that my wallpaper. yum.
Posted by: Infidel at August 11, 2012 04:36 AM (qnvHI)
http://is.gd/UaCTin
Posted by: Vic - will support Romney/Ryan at August 11, 2012 04:36 AM (YdQQY)
Why is this the first time we are hearing about this bill?
http://is.gd/sp7Eu4
Posted by: Vic - will support Romney/Ryan at August 11, 2012 04:36 AM (YdQQY)
http://is.gd/1pSeU4
Posted by: Vic - will support Romney/Ryan at August 11, 2012 04:37 AM (YdQQY)
http://is.gd/o1Ibcx
Posted by: Vic - will support Romney/Ryan at August 11, 2012 04:37 AM (YdQQY)
http://is.gd/Rf11uB
Posted by: Vic - will support Romney/Ryan at August 11, 2012 04:37 AM (YdQQY)
http://is.gd/88SWrm
Posted by: Vic - will support Romney/Ryan at August 11, 2012 04:38 AM (YdQQY)
And that is a good start, there are a lot more.
http://is.gd/P7Y2bc
Posted by: Vic - will support Romney/Ryan at August 11, 2012 04:38 AM (YdQQY)
How could any red blooded American woman not vote for this ticket? Romney/Ryan vs Jug ears/Plugs. The choice is obvious.
Posted by: Scarlet at August 11, 2012 04:38 AM (wczJt)
Pharmacology
In 1993, the digital and pharmaceutical industries are booming in San Francisco, and they're looking for the young and hip to be representatives and consumers. After Sarah Striker joins an ad agency to sell a new drug, she questions its effects and begins a perilous quest to secretly spread the truth.
And thatÂ’s it for this Saturday morning.
Posted by: Vic - will support Romney/Ryan at August 11, 2012 04:38 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: crystal clear at August 11, 2012 04:39 AM (HOOye)
Posted by: joncelli at August 11, 2012 04:40 AM (CWlPF)
Posted by: crystal clear at August 11, 2012 04:40 AM (HOOye)
Posted by: USA supports Romney/Ryan at August 11, 2012 04:41 AM (6Cjut)
the democrats who are going to repeat ad infinitum Paul Ryan is 'the guy who wants to gut Medicare'
They were going to do that no matter who Romney picked as VP, according to Joe Trippi (a Dem operative who often appears on Fox for analysis from that side).
In Stephen Hayes' bio of Ryan in The Weekly Standard last month (linked on Drudge this morning), Trippi compares the attacks on Romney's time at Bain to body blows in a boxing match, and the roundhouse to follow is linking Romney to Ryan's budget proposal, the heartless-Republican meme.
I'd just as soon see that issue come to the forefront now and have its most knowledgeable and articulate proponent take it on. Plus - I love how Ryan gets under Obama's skin.
I like the Ryan choice. A lot. I didn't expect Romney to make a high-risk, high-reward pick for VP, but he did.
Posted by: crisis du jour at August 11, 2012 04:41 AM (J1eJz)
Posted by: mama winger in Paul Ryan's district at August 11, 2012 04:44 AM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: elizabethe at August 11, 2012 04:44 AM (QzmhX)
Vic for once you weren't listening--this was public knowledge, but Boner and Bitch went along to get along. The theory (hah!) was that it would work for a Repub Pres with a Dem Congress.
Can we now pick a Speaker and Senate Majority Leader with the same kind of brains and principles that Romney and Ryan have? A shakeup in the R senior leadership in Congress is waaay overdue!
Posted by: Hrothgar (Now upgraded to RINO version) at August 11, 2012 04:44 AM (Cnqmv)
Posted by: crystal clear at August 11, 2012 04:44 AM (HOOye)
Posted by: NewBrunswicker at August 11, 2012 04:45 AM (XBxRP)
So, a venture capitalist/business consulting heavyweight taps a young, smart numbers guy as his number 2 to try to fix the world's largest, broken economy?
WTF? No unicorn skittles? No hopey/changey bs?
This seams so rational. Voters can't possibly embrace this.
Posted by: USA at August 11, 2012 08:23 AM (6Cjut)
-------------------
Thread winner.
Posted by: Taro Tsujimoto at August 11, 2012 04:46 AM (celt+)
I go through nearly 50 newspapers and internet mags nearly every morning and NEVER saw anything about that bill. I never saw anything posted here about it either.
I had a good idea why they thought it was good. I just think it is bad bad bad.
Posted by: Vic - will support Romney/Ryan at August 11, 2012 04:46 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Hrothgar (Now upgraded to RINO version) at August 11, 2012 04:47 AM (Cnqmv)
Posted by: thunderb at August 11, 2012 04:47 AM (Dnbau)
Posted by: kraki at August 11, 2012 04:48 AM (ylLDT)
The added bonus is that he's youthful, articulate, intelligent, and attractive.. a combination that isn't normally associated with GOP candidates. It gives him some excitement.
Posted by: not the mama at August 11, 2012 04:48 AM (96Kco)
Posted by: kawfytawk at August 11, 2012 04:49 AM (VIm97)
Posted by: elizabethe at August 11, 2012 08:01 AM (QzmhX)
And a crossbow man! [ducks and runs]
Posted by: joncelli at August 11, 2012 04:49 AM (CWlPF)
And the tingling in many women's nether regions doesn't hurt either.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at August 11, 2012 04:49 AM (2b4yb)
He took all of her retirement savings just before he rolled her over.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at August 11, 2012 04:50 AM (2b4yb)
I just can't get out of my head how intelligent and classy our First Lady of the Sharpied Eyebrows is.
*swoon*
Posted by: Confused Knucklehead at August 11, 2012 04:50 AM (RuVpG)
Posted by: Pecos at August 11, 2012 04:51 AM (2Gb0y)
Maybe it was "public" only in the inside the beltway area. I know I heard about it a while back and thought boy it sure would be nice to have adult representation in Congress.
link http://tinyurl.com/c2wxf3h
Darn that Constitution needs to be "perfected"!
Posted by: Hrothgar (Now upgraded to RINO version) at August 11, 2012 04:52 AM (Cnqmv)
Posted by: Gordon undead Ramsay at August 11, 2012 04:52 AM (9HhTH)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at August 11, 2012 08:49 AM (2b4yb)
Oh yeah!!!!!!!!!
http://tinyurl.com/9k5owfx
Posted by: Tami at August 11, 2012 04:52 AM (X6akg)
A seriously real conservative. Not just on the fiscal issues but the social issues as well.
--------------------
Leave the social issues out. Please. Let's plug the gaping hole in the hull before we start arguing about whether Adam or Steve can get get on the lifeboat first.
Posted by: Taro Tsujimoto at August 11, 2012 04:52 AM (celt+)
They wonÂ’t be able to do that with Ryan, who doesnÂ’t give off even a hint of anger.
_____
But he does give great forearm.
ace, you remember a couple days ago you were trying to ask in a polite way if Ryan makes a woman's juices flow and thereby influence her vote?
the short answer is YES.
Posted by: kallisto at August 11, 2012 04:52 AM (jm/9g)
And the river Ryan tossed his grandmother into was polluted by BAIN Capital closing the water treatment plant upstream!
Posted by: Hrothgar (Now upgraded to RINO version) at August 11, 2012 04:54 AM (Cnqmv)
@205:
Is that the Real Paul Ryan or did someone 'shop his head onto the body? Cause Madonna mia, who knew those Brooks Bros. shirts was hiding them nasty guns???!?
Posted by: kallisto at August 11, 2012 04:55 AM (jm/9g)
Posted by: Jean at August 11, 2012 04:55 AM (Mpktm)
Posted by: Marie at August 11, 2012 04:55 AM (P9OJs)
Posted by: thunderb at August 11, 2012 04:56 AM (Dnbau)
Posted by: Infidel at August 11, 2012 04:56 AM (qnvHI)
Note to Team Romney:
Please make sure that going forward, Paul Ryan appears at public events wearing wifebeaters and cargo pants.
Posted by: kallisto at August 11, 2012 04:57 AM (jm/9g)
LOL, I guess if the only people who carried the report was a newsletter from the John Birch Society I would have missed it.
Yes, I had to go look up that magazine because I had never heard of it before.
I guess NRO and the Weekly Standard did not carry it because the Republican bosses wanted it and that is all they care about.
It is obvious why the MFM did not cover it.
Posted by: Vic - will support Romney/Ryan at August 11, 2012 04:57 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: thunderb at August 11, 2012 04:57 AM (Dnbau)
Posted by: teej says free Miss Marple at August 11, 2012 04:57 AM (bxpf3)
Posted by: Hrothgar (Now upgraded to RINO version) at August 11, 2012 08:52 AM (Cnqmv)
Absolutely! And men like Biden and Obama and Pelosi have the intellectual power and understanding of political philosophy to do a great job.
All those dead White men at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia were just stupid farmers who didn't appreciate the nuances of government.
For God's sake...not all of them went to Harvard!
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at August 11, 2012 04:57 AM (2b4yb)
Hopefully, Mitt will go for the throat right off the bat.
The way to handle this announcement is to use MediCare as a hammer. He should say this:
"Barack Obama's plan to allow Medicare to go bankrupt and force seniors to rely on federal welfare is unacceptable. Paul Ryan has devised a way for our seniors to keep the control and dignity of their healthcare, and we will fight for this right.
Posted by: jwest at August 11, 2012 04:57 AM (ZDsRL)
Posted by: kallisto at August 11, 2012 08:55 AM (jm/9g)
The site that is from says this above the pic:
Something like 200 of you landed here looking for Paul Ryan shirtless pictures. Well, while we would be the top Internet source for such materials, we can honestly say, despite our large cache of Paul Ryan photos, we have yet to find one where he is totally shirtless. But we do have this one, taken when he tried to teach the rest of Congress P90x.
Posted by: Tami at August 11, 2012 04:58 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: madamex at August 11, 2012 04:58 AM (e9LVX)
Posted by: endeavor to persevere at August 11, 2012 04:58 AM (zZJJp)
-----
ITA. Give it a rest, eh? I realize that whomever was picked, there would be a pack of Eeyores wailing how it's all lost. Thanks for playing. Consolation prize at the door. Paul Ryan is a good pick. He is likable. He is super intelligent. He is young. He is handsome and appealing. Romney's pick was bold in the sense that it shows me he's very serious about turning around this sinking ship we call the USA. I contrast Romney/Ryan to the utter failure of the Obama presidency. Of his lies, his full throttle crash and burn economics that has left our country in very dire shape. 100 million on welfare assistance, gutted half a billion from Medicare, his obvious ideology on where he wants to take this country.....if handled correctly, and is explained well, we're going to win this. Stop with the negativity, damn it.
Posted by: Lady in Black at August 11, 2012 04:58 AM (lTVJy)
Posted by: elizabethe at August 11, 2012 04:58 AM (QzmhX)
Posted by: Marie at August 11, 2012 04:59 AM (P9OJs)
Posted by: thunderb at August 11, 2012 04:59 AM (Dnbau)
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at August 11, 2012 04:59 AM (mFxQX)
That's good American natural gas burning blue-hot!
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at August 11, 2012 04:59 AM (2b4yb)
Mikey was a meme when they were still just slogans.
http ://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=vYEXzx-TINc
http ://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Little_Mikey
Since it aired a bazillion times from 72 to 84 if you've never seen it you really must not watch TV.
Posted by: DaveA at August 11, 2012 05:00 AM (DVJEd)
have this one, taken when he tried to teach the rest of Congress P90x.
Posted by: Tami at August 11, 2012 08:58 AM (X6akg)
______
hahaha
you know Sheila Jackson Lee killed that
Posted by: kallisto at August 11, 2012 05:00 AM (jm/9g)
Romney/Ryan: They will take away your Viagra. Then who'll be fooked?
Well we know who won't be.
Posted by: Retread at August 11, 2012 05:00 AM (zxitI)
Posted by: The MSM at August 11, 2012 05:01 AM (RkH4v)
Hell, Ogabe doesn't roll out of bed until noon during the work week. It'll be 2 or 3PM until he hears about it today
Posted by: Albie Damned at August 11, 2012 05:01 AM (Yhu4q)
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at August 11, 2012 08:59 AM (mFxQX)
___
Hey baby don't worry, old ladies has vajayjay too. Just because they snow on the roof do not mean they no fire in the furnace.
holla
Posted by: kallisto at August 11, 2012 05:01 AM (jm/9g)
Posted by: Tsar Nicholas II at August 11, 2012 05:01 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: sTevo at August 11, 2012 05:01 AM (VMcEw)
That's too bad Teej. You can guess why I put it on the list. I have never worked in a group that did not have at least one of those SOBs who had to have their load carried and who got by because they were either "protected specie" or were supreme ass kissers.
Posted by: Vic - will support Romney/Ryan at August 11, 2012 05:01 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: USS Diversity at August 11, 2012 05:02 AM (2d71t)
Posted by: lowandslow at August 11, 2012 05:02 AM (GZitp)
http://tinyurl.com/9d4og7x
Obama would soil himself
Posted by: Jose at August 11, 2012 05:02 AM (srIqv)
Yup this is the clip I remembered from those phony "health care summits" or whatever they were called. The look on Obama's face is priceless, the contempt he feels for Ryan just jumps off the screen....this is a very good pick, Ryan on the ticket will cause some unforced errors by O'Dogeater.
When the campaign was going swimmingly back in 2008 Obama made the off-prompter remark to Joe the Plumber about spreading the wealth around. The remark about "you didn't build that" came a couple of weeks ago but Obama was still in his bubble, being fed only good news by his drones.
Thank you Mitt for NOT choosing a flashy, politically-correct attention getting pick.
Posted by: Boots at August 11, 2012 05:03 AM (neKzn)
Posted by: Lincolntf at August 11, 2012 05:03 AM (6gk77)
Posted by: elizabethe at August 11, 2012 05:04 AM (QzmhX)
If they're
liberal Eeyores trying to depress turnout it's bad enough.
____
Gotta scroll upthread to see if the usual suspects appeared - (mobys).
There was someone from Team Moby just the other day arguing against the Ryan pick. So all I can say is:
ROMNEY YOU MAGNIFICENT BASTID
Posted by: kallisto at August 11, 2012 05:04 AM (jm/9g)
Posted by: thunderb at August 11, 2012 05:04 AM (Dnbau)
Posted by: TJexcite at August 11, 2012 05:05 AM (3qeX5)
There is no way barry would ever admit (a) that he made a mistake in picking joooeuy, and (b) that anyone else in the world is smart enough to make a difference compared to barry. He thinks his charm and intelligence is enough so who cares who the vp is.
Posted by: endeavor to persevere at August 11, 2012 05:05 AM (zZJJp)
Posted by: USS Diversity at August 11, 2012 09:02 AM (2d71t)
Amen. The enemedia will make Paul out to be worse than Sandusky anyway.
"Penn St is in the Big 10. WI is in the Big 10...Why did Ryan let Sandusky rape young boys??"
Posted by: Albie Damned at August 11, 2012 05:05 AM (Yhu4q)
More then likely, those two will be tied at the hip for at least the weekend.
Posted by: lowandslow at August 11, 2012 05:05 AM (GZitp)
Posted by: DaveA at August 11, 2012 09:00 AM (DVJEd)
Thanks, didn't watch ANY network TV from 72 to 77 since that is hard to do on an aircraft carrier. And not much through 84 since I was working rotating shift work.
Posted by: Vic - will support Romney/Ryan at August 11, 2012 05:06 AM (YdQQY)
Bill: http://tinyurl.com/czbd7pr
Heritage: http://tinyurl.com/9e3trvo
Posted by: Hrothgar (Now upgraded to RINO version) at August 11, 2012 05:06 AM (Cnqmv)
Posted by: jewells45 is scarred for life because of ace at August 11, 2012 05:08 AM (UljOc)
Posted by: joncelli at August 11, 2012 05:08 AM (CWlPF)
Posted by: thunderb at August 11, 2012 05:08 AM (Dnbau)
Posted by: Debbie Whattheheck-Schmultz at August 11, 2012 05:08 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: thunderb at August 11, 2012 05:09 AM (Dnbau)
Posted by: CDR M at August 11, 2012 05:10 AM (dKV5k)
Damn, I see Heritage did cover it at their man site, but I don't monitor that one. I use their "Foundry Site" which is where they normally carry their breaking stuff.
Posted by: Vic - will support Romney/Ryan at August 11, 2012 05:10 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: USS Diversity at August 11, 2012 05:10 AM (2d71t)
Posted by: Albie Damned at August 11, 2012 05:12 AM (Yhu4q)
Posted by: Vic - will support Romney/Ryan at August 11, 2012 05:12 AM (YdQQY)
McCain tried to run a "nice guy" campaign but everyone knew McCain is, and has always been, a self-serving backstabbing sucker of Donkcock. We knew it, Manhattan media knew it and swing voters knew it.
Slick, grainy, blue color-timed PAC ads featuring Obama as a smiling, smug and aloof villain. German film noir existentialism.
Posted by: 13times at August 11, 2012 05:12 AM (h6XiD)
Posted by: Serious Cat at August 11, 2012 05:13 AM (zrpqj)
Posted by: Vic - will support Romney/Ryan at August 11, 2012 05:13 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Retread at August 11, 2012 05:15 AM (zxitI)
Posted by: Killerdog at August 11, 2012 05:15 AM (CZrbJ)
For those who think Ryan is a rinosquish, well, he represents a district in southern Wisconsin that shares its border with northern Illinois. Many people in Chicago and its suburbs own summer homes and/or retire in that district, and although it has a fair number of family dairy farms and other conservatives, it's not as conservative as up in Green Bay.
From his vantage point on the border, Ryan has had ample opportunity to observe the corrupt hotmess that is Chicago politics. So he comes into the race already up to speed, not as a newbie who needs to learn the ropes.
Posted by: Boots at August 11, 2012 05:15 AM (neKzn)
http://is.gd/sp7Eu4
Posted by: Vic - will support Romney/Ryan at August 11, 2012 08:36 AM (YdQQY)
Vic, if Mark Levin isn't on in your area, stream him. www.marklevinshow.com. He's on from 6:07 - 9 p.m. He's all over stuff like this (and was) and rarely (if ever) misses it.
Posted by: RushBabe at August 11, 2012 05:17 AM (tQHzJ)
Posted by: Vic - will support Romney/Ryan at August 11, 2012 05:20 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: USS Diversity at August 11, 2012 05:21 AM (2d71t)
Posted by: USS Diversity at August 11, 2012 05:25 AM (2d71t)
All those dead White men at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia were just stupid farmers who didn't appreciate the nuances of government.
They didn't build that.
Posted by: Barky Ogabe at August 11, 2012 05:25 AM (tQHzJ)
Posted by: Vic - supports the R&R ticket at August 11, 2012 05:26 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: el gordo at August 11, 2012 05:32 AM (375Mj)
Posted by: 2nd Amendment Mother at August 11, 2012 05:42 AM (L4CWX)
I think it's a good pick because I think Ryan is a sincere man and this grooms him for the presidency in 2020 provided Mittens wins 2 terms. If there are any negatives it is that we lose Ryan in the House and my guess is crying Boehner will appoint a moron to replace him.
I also think it will depend on how Ryan is utilized. If Mitt uses Ryan as a Darth Vader-style hatchet man and chief advisor, I think the Ryan choice is good. If he's a historical VP I think his talents are wasted.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at August 11, 2012 05:46 AM (uhAkr)
Posted by: Yip in Texas at August 11, 2012 05:53 AM (Mrdk1)
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at August 11, 2012 06:18 AM (r4wIV)
Posted by: eureka! at August 11, 2012 06:55 AM (1qHOu)
Better than Portman or Tpaw.
I can do this.
Posted by: willy at August 11, 2012 07:05 AM (kUCQ4)
Posted by: PJ at August 11, 2012 07:12 AM (DQHjw)
Great Ryan clip, but where is his teleprompter? He also needs to work on his delivery, and interject some "uh uh uhs" and random stutters. Most disturbingly, what he says makes sense, not just in policy terms but linguistically.
Conclusion: he's no Messiah. Doesn't even have jug ears. No way he's gonna make the ocean recede.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at August 11, 2012 07:59 AM (oX7vY)
6I already warming popcorn for the Ryan-Biden debate.
Haven't read the comments upthread, but I'd say Joe is done. The Dems will drop him like a bad habit, or face debates that will look like a Mike Tyson-Pee Wee Herman boxing match.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at August 11, 2012 08:01 AM (oX7vY)
Posted by: Bill H at August 11, 2012 08:36 AM (3sZO1)
Posted by: Somebody sneaking past the IT weenies that banned AoSHQ at August 11, 2012 08:42 AM (7BHn2)
Posted by: Bill H at August 11, 2012 08:47 AM (3sZO1)
Which, of course, Biden is. But if it looks like Ryan is totally pummelling the guy, the retirees watching the thing might decide, "aww, look at this person who hates seniors".
The Lazio / Rodham Clinton debate was like that. Lazio showed up "Hillary!" to her face and all the soccer moms in New York State felt like it was "bashing women". So NY got stuck with Senator Clinton (who, yeah, wasn't as bad as Schumer, but still).
Posted by: Boulder Toilet Hobo at August 11, 2012 09:11 AM (OAig5)
Posted by: steevy at August 11, 2012 03:13 PM (6o4Fb)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2318 seconds, 417 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Vic - will support Romney/Ryan at August 11, 2012 03:25 AM (YdQQY)