March 12, 2012
— andy You know how they keep going back in the archives and finding things Mitt Romney said in the past that aren't consistent with his current positions? Well check out this gem:
I got the chance after I lost to John McCain last time, to go over to -- that was the good part of losing -- I got to go to the Olympic Games in China. It's pretty impressive over there how quickly they can build things, how productive they are as a society. You should see their airport compared to our airports, their highways, their train systems. They're moving quickly in part because the regulators see their job as encouraging private people. It's amazing. The head of Coca-Cola said the business environment is friendlier in China than in America. And that's because of the regulators. That's because of government.
If you had elided out the part about losing to McCain, I'd have sworn that was one of Tom Friedman's recurring pieces of bilge extolling the wonders of China. Example (safe link to Reason):
There is only one thing worse than one-party autocracy, and that is one-party democracy, which is what we have in America today.One-party autocracy certainly has its drawbacks. But when it is led by a reasonably enlightened group of people, as China is today, it can also have great advantages. That one party can just impose the politically difficult but critically important policies needed to move a society forward in the 21st century.
Another great lover of the Chinese "enlightened autocracy" is, of course, the SCOAMF:
“Mr. Obama has told people that it would be so much easier to be the president of China. As one official put it, ‘No one is scrutinizing Hu Jintao’s words in Tahrir Square.’”
Awww, poor Barry.
Oh, well. At least Mitt has done a 180 since making that statement and changed his stance on China to branding them a currency manipulator on day one of his administration. I mean, it's not like he said this yesterday or something. Oh, wait, that quote is from last Friday Apologies for the HuffPo link, but note that even they found his statement odd:
They're also moving quickly, of course, because China's communist government can seize property by fiat and marshal state-owned industries to build large projects. While much of China's economy is capitalist, Romney's praise of infrastructure projects like roads and airports seemed to be an odd defense of centrally directed economics.
Perhaps someone should show the presumptive nominee this article entitled "Beijing Games make millions homeless". It begins with the story of Wang Baoguan, a man who thought the Chinese respect for property rights was so awesome he immolated himself. I guess Suzette Kelo got off easy.
But, hey, what's a little thing like property rights when there's an Olympics to win? Here's Bela Karolyi on the Chinese gymnastics program:
These people think we are stupid...We are in the business of gymnastics. We know what a kid of 14 or 15 or 16 looks like. What kind of slap in the face is this? They are 12, 14 years old and they get lined up and the government backs them and the federation runs away. There is an age limit and it can't be controlled.
Yes, Mitt, this was a fine event to hitch your wagon to.
Chinese highways were certainly in the news recently: Epic Traffic Jam Snarls Chinese Highway
As to the favorite Friedman/Obama fetish, the trains, well other than the corruption involved in their construction and the fact that they're bankrupting the country, they're just peachy.
The numbers for ******* relentless push for a high-speed rail network are impressive -- in terms of debt, not passengers.The argument in support of the vast project -- with many lines connecting to more sparsely populated inland regions -- is that they are a strategic investment that will link markets across the country.
Detractors counter that while high-speed rail may suit the densely populated eastern corridor, investment is wasted on inland projects which are better served, and more cheaply, by short flights and slow trains.
The deleted text is "China's" but you could substitute "America's" just as well.
And as far as the head of Coca-Cola's comments on the business environment in China go, I'd imagine the crony socialist heads of GE and Berkshire Hathaway would make similar statements about the U.S. under Obama.
What happened here is that Mitt went to China's Potemkin Olympic Village and was impressed. It was designed to be an impressive display, so we know they got a bit of their money's worth in this case.
Also impressive: Ghost cities.
Somehow, in this bizarro world we find ourselves in, we're on the cusp of nominating a guy who just extolled the virtues of China's command economy. Faster please, SMOD.
Posted by: andy at
04:42 AM
| Comments (307)
Post contains 814 words, total size 6 kb.
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 12, 2012 04:44 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 12, 2012 04:44 AM (8y9MW)
Then he's wrong.
Way to pander to the base, Mitt.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 12, 2012 04:45 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: McLovin at March 12, 2012 04:47 AM (j0IcY)
I agree. It is undeniable that the government of China is a benign influence on the business climate -- as long as that business fits their plan. Of course that's the devil in the details.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at March 12, 2012 04:47 AM (nEUpB)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 12, 2012 04:47 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: mama winger at March 12, 2012 04:47 AM (P6QsQ)
As for commie incentives to build stuff. Yeah their hotels go up fast, looks like they come down fast too when they collapse.
Posted by: Vic at March 12, 2012 04:49 AM (YdQQY)
---------------------
So can US government entities now.
Posted by: Vic at March 12, 2012 04:50 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: dr kill at March 12, 2012 04:51 AM (0TdUk)
That's true. You're absolutely right.
Now go to China and try to build something the government doesn't specifically want you to build.
They're still called "Communist China" for a reason, after all. Just because they'll facilitate you building things they would have spent money on anyway doesn't mean they're interested in free enterprise. They're just not stupid (which, again, is an improvement over our own regulators- but that's a problem with the regulatory state, not a mark in favor of China).
There's also the fact that, here in the US, if a Regulator gets too obstructive, there are usually systems (of varying levels of effectiveness and inefficiency) to get past that- the Courts if all else fails. In China, if the regulator says, "No," then you're stuck- he speaks for the state which rules supreme.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 12, 2012 04:51 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 12, 2012 04:52 AM (i6RpT)
And to you!
What do you think of Dagan? Is he the latest in a long list of disgruntled former officials who still want to be influential, or was the interview butchered by the editors?
Either way, Israel doesn't need public disunity.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at March 12, 2012 04:52 AM (nEUpB)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 12, 2012 04:52 AM (8y9MW)
-------------------------
Didn't a famous Russian woman write a book about that back in the 50s?
Posted by: Vic at March 12, 2012 04:53 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: katya, the designated driver at March 12, 2012 04:53 AM (bMLFV)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 12, 2012 04:54 AM (i6RpT)
It would be nice to be able to shoot eco-fascists in the head and sell their organs instead of letting them tie new projects up in court for decades. Never mind the federal dollars that fund their lawyers could be spent on something useful (or better, never spent at all).
Anyway, the towns in Indiana who got blown off the map earlier this month? No one is allowed to rebuild so much as a utility shed until until the state and federal governments sign off. And there are 150-year-old homesites that will never be rebuilt, because FEMA won't sign off.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 12, 2012 04:54 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: dagny at March 12, 2012 04:55 AM (u50z0)
Posted by: dagny at March 12, 2012 04:55 AM (u50z0)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 12, 2012 04:56 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: lowandslow at March 12, 2012 04:57 AM (GZitp)
Posted by: GergS(Dirty Scandi Dog Whistle) at March 12, 2012 04:57 AM (dptRY)
Posted by: dagny at March 12, 2012 04:57 AM (u50z0)
Come, now, dagny: we all know that double-posting is one of the finest traditions of the HQ.
Oh- quasi-on-topic: What do the morons know about the government/society of Jamaica?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 12, 2012 04:58 AM (8y9MW)
.
Now go to China and try to build something the government doesn't specifically want you to build<<<<
Like a refinery? Or a nuclear power plant? A pipeline?
Because our government is all about the free market.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 12, 2012 04:58 AM (l+kmq)
That's pretty much what Steve Jobs told Obama last spring when asked if he could move iPhone production to the US.
Posted by: Steve Jobs at March 12, 2012 04:58 AM (e8kgV)
Posted by: Ms Choksondik at March 12, 2012 04:59 AM (fYOZx)
SCOAMF is already implementing Five Year Plans. Better the devil you know, I guess.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 12, 2012 04:59 AM (ZKzrr)
Anyway, spend the weekend enjoying the new car. Here is a picture of it waiting for me at the dealership: http://tinyurl.com/7t8lluu
Turns out, it was the first one shipped to Florida, so I got a lot of head turning over the weekend. One guy even tried to buy it, while I was signing the paperwork.
Posted by: Dave in Fla at March 12, 2012 04:59 AM (nMiwq)
I was irritated that he overemphasized the damage from a conventional attack by Hamas and Hezbollah, but ignored the slightly more significant problems that would be caused by A FUCKING NUCLEAR WEAPON DETONATING IN TEL AVIV!
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at March 12, 2012 04:59 AM (nEUpB)
Yeah... it would certainly help if he hadn't specifically praised the Olympics, though- that was Communist Statism in all its sordid glory.
And that's the problem- there are plenty of places with lower regulation than we have- that get things done pretty quickly- that aren't autocratic societies that will kill or imprison someone for daring to disagree with their government.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 12, 2012 05:00 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Phinn at March 12, 2012 05:00 AM (KNtHw)
This is weak shit, Andy. The Huffington Post notes that these comments came after "his usual full-throated defense of free enterprise and small government." You just happen to omit that part.
So the Huffington Post has made a more balanced critique of OUR probable candidate than you did. Not great.
Posted by: spongeworthy at March 12, 2012 05:00 AM (puy4B)
Posted by: Fritz at March 12, 2012 05:00 AM (/ZZCn)
Posted by: lowandslow at March 12, 2012 05:01 AM (GZitp)
Posted by: dagny at March 12, 2012 08:55 AM (u50z0)
Did you see that Newt is talking to Perry about being on the bottom of his ticket? My heart breaks all over again.
Posted by: Ms Choksondik at March 12, 2012 05:02 AM (fYOZx)
And making things "pretty" comes at a huge cost. Utilitarian infrastructure is appropriate for all but the richest, mature economies. All of those beautiful buildings and rail stations for the Olympics came at the cost of basic infrastructure for the rest of China.
How many miles of sewer and water pipe will not be laid? How many homes will be without electricity? How many peasants will die?
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at March 12, 2012 05:04 AM (nEUpB)
Posted by: Jimmah at March 12, 2012 05:05 AM (amaZR)
Posted by: texette at March 12, 2012 05:05 AM (zt3lR)
Not so "free" is it?
http://is.gd/zl0klw
Posted by: Vic at March 12, 2012 05:06 AM (YdQQY)
You noticed? Apparently it was too subtle for any of the MBM to point out that China took its cues from Nazi Germany.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at March 12, 2012 05:07 AM (nEUpB)
Posted by: mama winger at March 12, 2012 05:08 AM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at March 12, 2012 05:08 AM (DacKi)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at March 12, 2012 09:08 AM (DacKi)
-------------------------------
He did that at the beginning of the campaign. Did he know something we didn't?
Posted by: Vic at March 12, 2012 05:09 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: phoenixgirl, rip andrew at March 12, 2012 05:10 AM (Ho2rs)
That's true. You're absolutely right.
Now go to China and try to build something the government doesn't specifically want you to build.
-------------------
Same damn thing, isn't it. Want to build an oil refinery? Nuke plant? Good luck with that. Want to build a windmill driven hemp processing facility? you will probably get stimulus money.
Posted by: real joe at March 12, 2012 05:13 AM (w7Lv+)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at March 12, 2012 05:13 AM (DacKi)
And there you have it in a nutshell why I will not be voting for Mitt in my state's primary. If he does not get any pressure from the conservatives on the right, he is going to continue to move left.
Posted by: mama winger at March 12, 2012 05:13 AM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 12, 2012 05:14 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at March 12, 2012 05:14 AM (Af3Wg)
Vic, he'd better hold off on that. I know a lot of "Christians" and "Conservatives" who would still vote for Obama AGAIN just to teach Romney a lesson.
Idiots.
Posted by: katya, the designated driver at March 12, 2012 05:15 AM (bMLFV)
So?
Posted by: Andy at March 12, 2012 05:16 AM (XG+Mn)
Posted by: Just Me at March 12, 2012 05:17 AM (nohNv)
Posted by: Lincolntf at March 12, 2012 05:18 AM (hiMsy)
--------------------------
You do not know any conservatives who voted for Obama. You may know some people who claim to be conservatives who voted for him. Nobody who is a real conservative would have ever voted for Obama who even the stupidest person could see was a communist.
Posted by: Vic at March 12, 2012 05:19 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: phoenixgirl, rip andrew at March 12, 2012 05:20 AM (Ho2rs)
Take a look at his house.
http://is.gd/vhxNiP
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at March 12, 2012 05:20 AM (nEUpB)
Posted by: katya, the designated driver at March 12, 2012 05:20 AM (bMLFV)
They're lying. They are neither.
Posted by: dagny at March 12, 2012 05:22 AM (u50z0)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 12, 2012 05:22 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: dagny at March 12, 2012 05:23 AM (u50z0)
Posted by: Vic at March 12, 2012 09:19 AM (YdQQY)
Exactly; they're "conservative" like Andi Sullivan is. Or Nelson Rockefeller
Posted by: Captain Hate at March 12, 2012 05:25 AM (cCsxG)
Posted by: Dave in Fla at March 12, 2012 05:25 AM (nMiwq)
I understood that. Sneer quotes.
I like to throw a [sic] in there, just so people I know I'm quoting lies instead of attributing the lies to me. Like Daylight Savings[sic] Time or Working[sic] Families[sic] Party. But I'm a nerd.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 12, 2012 05:25 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: Waterhouse at March 12, 2012 05:26 AM (Mtvi5)
.....Hmmm.....
After that I have a headache and a hankering for some high speed Chinese.
What's on special today?
Posted by: ontherocks at March 12, 2012 05:27 AM (ZJCDy)
full-throated defense of free enterprise and small government".
So?"
What do you mean so? So now we can't use China regulators to point out how fucked up our system is? What's the acceptable comparison for you Andy, we'll let everyone know so you don't smear anyone else as China sympathizers or something.
Posted by: lowandslow at March 12, 2012 05:30 AM (GZitp)
I'm not a Mitt fan, but broadly speaking, it probably is easier for a US company to open a facility in China than in the USA. In China, regulators are generally pro-business. If you want to build a new facility, you pay some bureaucrat a pittance to leave you alone so you can build your facility. In USA, too many government regulators are either agnostic or anti-business and don't want you to succeed.
Posted by: Grim at March 12, 2012 05:33 AM (gyNYk)
Posted by: dagny at March 12, 2012 09:23 AM (u50z0)
I figure they're as "informed" about politics as they are the Bible.
Posted by: katya, the designated driver at March 12, 2012 05:36 AM (bMLFV)
At some point we're going to have to get behind Romney.
There are seven and-a-half months to go till the actual vote. Speaking as a Romney loather, I think some of us are hoping for divine intervention as that is an eon in political time. The Establishment is already whining about Willard's inability to get R voters enthused. Imagine that. A candidate who ignores/dislikes the base AND doesn't excite the Beltway kids. Can't. Lose. If he's the last man standing, I'll vote ABO, but I will NEVER be behind him. He defies all laws of nature by simultaneously sucking and blowing at the same time.
Same damn thing, isn't it. Want to build an oil refinery? Nuke plant? Good luck with that.
Gotta correct you on the nuke plant building. If you get a judge to back down on Baracka's eligibility issue, you can get $8.3B and the official okay for two nuke plants.
Posted by: RushBabe, Severely Conservative at March 12, 2012 05:36 AM (tQHzJ)
Posted by: Peregrine Took, Hobbit S.O.B. at March 12, 2012 05:36 AM (owwdk)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 12, 2012 05:37 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: Randall Hoven at March 12, 2012 05:37 AM (0YUWE)
Posted by: dick cheese at March 12, 2012 05:38 AM (GTbGH)
2016, if the US still exists by then, is going to have to be 3rd party. The Republicans are breaking the lightspeed barrier in beclowning themselves.
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at March 12, 2012 05:40 AM (i0App)
Posted by: Mordart at March 12, 2012 05:40 AM (hXX/4)
Except he actively praised China. Now, I'm not going to say he's going full-on Tom Friedman here, but praising China is not the tone I would expect from a Republican candidate for dog-catcher, let alone President.
And, as I noted above, the same point could have been made by praising some country that wasn't China (India comes to mind, since they've made great strides towards Free Enterprise in the last 10 - 15 years or so) or by making more clear the distinction that even in Communist China regulation is less burdensome than it is in the US.
That's not the way the comment comes across, though. It comes across as "Wow! China sure is neat in how fast it can get things done, huh?"
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 12, 2012 05:42 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at March 12, 2012 05:43 AM (DacKi)
Posted by: drballard at March 12, 2012 05:43 AM (7Mkm/)
Posted by: PLUM at March 12, 2012 05:44 AM (h4Yoq)
Posted by: Peregrine Took, Hobbit S.O.B. at March 12, 2012 09:36 AM (owwdk)
My airedale is on perpetual war dog mode; those fucks might never find their happy place again after visiting chez Hate.
Posted by: Captain Hate at March 12, 2012 05:45 AM (cCsxG)
You have to wonder about a Republican that can gush about Red China's qualities without holding his nose and telling you to pull his finger.
Posted by: ontherocks at March 12, 2012 05:45 AM (ZJCDy)
http://tinyurl.com/yly2v5r
Posted by: Buzzsaw at March 12, 2012 05:45 AM (tf9Ne)
Waiting in the Ft. Lauderdale - Hollywood International Airport all day on Saturday, Mrs. G and I were playing MadLibs. Which gave rise to this particularly Moron-Worthy statement, I thought:
"Gently rub your eardrum with a donut soaked in a bag of warm booze."
Just thought I'd share that. Though it's much funnier on less-than-adequate sleep.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 12, 2012 05:45 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: nickless at March 12, 2012 05:45 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: drballard at March 12, 2012 05:46 AM (7Mkm/)
Posted by: PLUM at March 12, 2012 09:44 AM (h4Yoq)
As much as a non-flub I think this whole China stuff is, this is still Truth. When he sticks to his script, he talks pro-freedom and liberty. When he starts talking off the top of his head, he says some Dumb Stuff.
Posted by: GergS(Dirty Scandi Dog Whistle) at March 12, 2012 05:47 AM (xAtAj)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at March 12, 2012 05:47 AM (DacKi)
Posted by: polynikes - Texan for Romney at March 12, 2012 05:47 AM (jTVGC)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 12, 2012 05:47 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: dagny at March 12, 2012 05:48 AM (u50z0)
Posted by: phoenixgirl, rip andrew at March 12, 2012 05:48 AM (Ho2rs)
Posted by: THX 1138 at March 12, 2012 05:49 AM (tFZYM)
They vow to kill 20 civilians.
Posted by: dick cheese at March 12, 2012 05:49 AM (GTbGH)
And that was a problem for Obama, how?
Posted by: Death Chipmunk at March 12, 2012 05:51 AM (0tRzD)
We all have to be Mitt supporters now. It's him or Obama.
Posted by: dagny at March 12, 2012 05:51 AM (u50z0)
I'm convinced that the "core" of the "Conservative position" is exactly what the "middle" wants: Less government, more liberty. Government choosing to "fix" problems of its own creation by shrinking, rather than growing. Lower taxes- not for lower taxes' own sake, but as a pathway to greater economic liberty. Less regulation- not for its own sake, but as a pathway to greater general liberty.
I'm not sure why our candidates can't communicate that, though.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 12, 2012 05:51 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: GergS(Dirty Scandi Dog Whistle) at March 12, 2012 09:47 AM (xAtAj)
Godallfuckingmighty isn't that the truth. He sounds as awkward when pretending to be a "regular guy" as Kerry did. Just fucking stop it.
Speaking of sounding awkward, would somebody tell Laura Ingraham to stop inviting that fuckhead Pat Buchanan on her show.
Posted by: Captain Hate at March 12, 2012 05:51 AM (cCsxG)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 12, 2012 05:52 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Andy at March 12, 2012 05:53 AM (ulJaU)
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 12, 2012 05:54 AM (sefcY)
I like to point out that France has more restrictive abortion laws than we do.
Posted by: dick cheese at March 12, 2012 05:54 AM (GTbGH)
Carry on.
Posted by: logprof at March 12, 2012 05:55 AM (ykSKg)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 12, 2012 05:56 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: phoenixgirl, rip andrew at March 12, 2012 05:56 AM (Ho2rs)
Posted by: blaster at March 12, 2012 05:56 AM (7vSU0)
And, presuming you do, why make it to a country that doesn't respect property rights?<<<
***cough***KELO***coughcough***
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 12, 2012 05:57 AM (l+kmq)
Posted by: Heorot at March 12, 2012 05:58 AM (Nq/UF)
Posted by: chemjeff at March 12, 2012 09:50 AM
The logical conclusion I draw is that Mitt does not see the world through a conservative lens and therefore does not frame his arguments from the perspective of a champion of liberty, but rather from a perspective of how can the enterprise of business get a fast track. Which I guess is in keeping with a pro-business establishment Republican. Which is pretty much what Romney is. That may end up being good enough for this election cycle.
Posted by: mama winger at March 12, 2012 05:58 AM (P6QsQ)
Compare/Contrast:
We are a fairminded people. We're taught not to take what belongs to others. Many of us, as I said, are the children and grandchildren and great-grandchildren of immigrants, and from them we learned something of hard labor. As a nation we toiled up from poverty, and no people on Earth are more worthy to be trusted than those who have worked hard for what they have. None is less inclined to take what is not theirs.
Ronald Reagan
Remarks at Fudan University in Shanghai China,April 30, 1984
One-party autocracy certainly has its drawbacks. But...
Mitt Romney
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at March 12, 2012 05:58 AM (kdS6q)
Er, because the US even though it has 25% of the world's GDP, also has the world's highest corporate tax rate?
As of April coming, when Japan lowers their rate below ours.....leaving us with that shiny prize of #1 taxer.
Posted by: GnuBreed at March 12, 2012 05:59 AM (ccXZP)
It's obvious what he was trying to say. He just did it badly, and in fact it's not going to hurt him at all since Americans really don't give an eff.
In other news, I made an Ewok meme for the occasion, in my name link.
Posted by: GergS(Dirty Scandi Dog Whistle) at March 12, 2012 06:00 AM (xAtAj)
Posted by: polynikes - Texan for Romney at March 12, 2012 06:00 AM (jTVGC)
First off, it's not until very recently that Conservatives decided that public schools were, in themselves, a form of socialism. Indeed, the Texas Declaration of Independence cites Mexico's refusal to provide for some form of public education as a reason to sever ties- based on the idea that an educated populace is necessary to police the Government- which is true.
Modern Public Schools are a disaster, but they're a disaster because of Teachers' Unions, bot because they are evil in themselves.
That said: I think you're wrong about the other as well. I think they "want" SS, Medicare, and Farm Subsidies" because they have been trained, over the last several generations, that these things are Necessary and that only Government can provide them properly.
That's an education issue, not a core values issue.
As for being Conservative more than Libertarian, I agree. I'm more Conservative than Libertarian. I believe that the Government does need to exert influence- not quite "control" but certainly "influence"- on Society to ensure that the Society remains one that can be Governed, rather than turning into one that must be Ruled. Social issues are part of that, but so are fiscal issues (I believe the two are so closely intertwined that to speak of the one absent the other is nonsense).
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 12, 2012 06:00 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: chemjeff at March 12, 2012 09:55 AM (7FadD)
Well, in fairness, hardly any people on earth are really that way. Most are willing to surrender some liberty for safeguards against life's inevitable minfortunate. Unfortunately the institution of government always lies to the people, and convinces them that impossible things are possible. Government provides false choices. Thus, we end up in situations like this.
Of course, in this nation the worst thing that government has done is to undermine traditional values of hard work, self control, independence, etc. This has been done via the public schools and the welfare state. By doing so it has killed off the real Americans and put in their place a slave nation.
Posted by: Reactionary at March 12, 2012 06:00 AM (xUM1Q)
Romney is what you're going to get. There is no True Conservative waiting to swoop in at a brokered convention and save Teh Republic.
Grow the fuck up.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 12, 2012 06:02 AM (l+kmq)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 12, 2012 09:25 AM (ZKzrr)
Heather, in the editing world, the [sic] means that the author is unsure of the spelling.
Posted by: abandon at March 12, 2012 06:02 AM (We7+K)
Mitt Romney
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at March 12, 2012 09:58 AM
gahhhh
Posted by: mama winger at March 12, 2012 06:03 AM (P6QsQ)
The Chinese know more about economics than the Democraps in the U.S. Congress.
Posted by: Jimbo at March 12, 2012 06:04 AM (O3R/2)
Yep. I'm sure he will manage the decline better than the SCoaMF, and maybe buy us a few years.
On the plus side, I still get to vote for Perry tomorrow.
Posted by: toby928© at March 12, 2012 06:05 AM (GTbGH)
No, you will not be able to get a conservative candidate with conservative values until you somehow convince everyone that the "middle" doesn't matter.
Rush really went off on a guy last week when this claim was made. He said we do not need them. I agree.
Posted by: katya, the designated driver at March 12, 2012 06:07 AM (bMLFV)
Heather, in the editing world, the [sic] means that the author is unsure of the spelling.<<<
I'm pretty sure it means that the mispelling has been intentionally left uncorrected.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 12, 2012 06:07 AM (l+kmq)
And the Romneybots complained that Santorum was a "big government" conservative.
HAHaahaaahaaaa!!!!
Posted by: Ed Anger - Certified Kos Kid at March 12, 2012 06:08 AM (7+pP9)
Posted by: Insomniac at March 12, 2012 10:05 AM (v+QvA)
You are correct. I have seen it with a ? behind it as well.
Posted by: abandon at March 12, 2012 06:08 AM (We7+K)
If Obamacare is struck down by the SCOTUS (should be WHEN, but who knows these days) then Romneycare is no longer an issue and Romney will be able to focus on the economy. While the President sets the tone, the real heavy lifting is done by advisors, cabinet members, and agency heads. Reagan assembled a very strong team. Would expect nothing less from Mitt.
Posted by: Ammo Dump at March 12, 2012 06:08 AM (WUWb9)
Take your own advice. Drop the True Conservative crap. Do you want to win or do you want to slam conservatives?
Posted by: Heorot at March 12, 2012 06:09 AM (Nq/UF)
Posted by: toby928© at March 12, 2012 06:09 AM (GTbGH)
Unless they rule the mandate severable, in which case, the boning will be NHS complete.
Posted by: toby928© at March 12, 2012 06:11 AM (GTbGH)
Heather, in the editing world, the [sic] means that the author is unsure of the spelling.<<<
I'm pretty sure it means that the mispelling has been intentionally left uncorrected.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 12, 2012 10:07 AM (l+kmq)
I was taught it meant "such (or so) it stands", indicating an error in spelling, grammar or syntax.
Posted by: Ed Anger - Certified Kos Kid at March 12, 2012 06:12 AM (7+pP9)
All this is BS myth.
Posted by: Vic at March 12, 2012 06:13 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Andy at March 12, 2012 06:13 AM (VV9wO)
The real annoying part was getting cited for not having proof of insurance. I had a valid insurance card for my old car, that I traded in the previous day. I tried to ask the cop exactly how I was supposed to drive a new car home with valid proof of insurance. Crickets.
In the end it is going to cost me $10 for court costs and waste a few hours of my time bringing a new insurance card to the clerk's office.
Bureaucracy, gotta love it.
Posted by: Dave in Fla at March 12, 2012 06:13 AM (nMiwq)
Posted by: HeftyJo at March 12, 2012 06:14 AM (Wv4lq)
Posted by: Vic at March 12, 2012 06:15 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Jimbo at March 12, 2012 06:15 AM (O3R/2)
Posted by: USS Diversity at March 12, 2012 06:15 AM (vpe0k)
I want to win - meaning, get SCOAMF out of there.
Posted by: chemjeff at March 12, 2012 10:12 AM (7FadD)
You could start by explaining why he'd make a good president, or even defending the guy.
Posted by: Ed Anger - Certified Kos Kid at March 12, 2012 06:15 AM (7+pP9)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 12, 2012 08:58 AM (8y9MW)
If you're still around Allen. I have 20 year old second-hand knowledge of Jamaica if that'll help any.
Posted by: Polliwog, Hobbit Teahada at March 12, 2012 06:16 AM (N5/RR)
Dave, isn't it typically a 30-day grace period of sorts where your old policy for your old car covers a new vehicle? Unless the policy for the old car was out of force, it should have sufficed.
Posted by: Lady in Black.....{sigh} at March 12, 2012 06:16 AM (F+Xfj)
Posted by: Andy at March 12, 2012 06:17 AM (VV9wO)
Ummm, isn't but the trains run on time a standard slap about how someone is a dictator?
It's interesting, in church on Sunday our pastor went on a bit of a rant about China and all the people of faith being killed there (he didn't mention Falun Gong but that's what I thought of instantly) and how all American politicians care about is that we have free trade with China. I'm not bringing this up for any reason other than it's interesting that this came up on Sunday and now here's a thingy about politicians and China at the HQ today.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD 2012 at March 12, 2012 06:17 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: USS Diversity at March 12, 2012 06:17 AM (vpe0k)
Are you an idiot? Flunked reading comprehension?
Let's take the last line of what you quoted:
"The head of Coca-Cola said the business environment is friendlier in China than in America. And that's because of the regulators. That's because of government."
No, if you desperately want to, I suppose you can take from that "Mitt Romney like dictatorial rule."
But what I took from that is "Mitt Romney says that Barack Obama's government regulators are even more anti-business than Chinese Communists."
You find that comparison unfair why?
Posted by: Greg Q at March 12, 2012 06:17 AM (/0a60)
Posted by: John Galt at March 12, 2012 06:18 AM (9NQ6I)
Posted by: abandon at March 12, 2012 06:18 AM (We7+K)
Posted by: Andy at March 12, 2012 06:18 AM (VV9wO)
Posted by: polynikes - Texan for Romney at March 12, 2012 06:19 AM (jTVGC)
Posted by: mama winger at March 12, 2012 06:19 AM (P6QsQ)
Yep. I'm sure he will manage the decline better than the SCoaMF, and maybe buy us a few years. <<<
Romney is a symptom of that decline, not the cause. The American people are the cause. It's the curse of all affluent societies - abundance leads to apathy, because most people just want to do their thing and be left alone. What is there to be politically passionate about when the average schmoe is enjoying the highest standard of living on the planet? Most people aren't interested in devoting their lives to telling other people how to live theirs.
But liberal fuckery never sleeps. They are always marching forward, constantly probing for opportunities to gain positions of authority. If you want to compete with that, you need to raise a generation of Americans that both are driven to seek positions of authority, yet have no desire to wield it, much.
Get back to me when you've figured out the solution to that one. Until then, suck it up.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 12, 2012 06:19 AM (l+kmq)
Better than what I've got, certainly.
Ocho Rios was one of the stops on the Cruise, and my wife absolutely fell in love with the place. I, on the other hand, saw a ton of half-finished buildings (no on-going construction, apparently just abandoned), a large number of kids who can't be any older than 14 or 15 working instead of being in school, and so forth.
I couldn't tell if it was the early, ugly, stages of freedom, or the ugly late stages of socialism at work. Or some combination thereof.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 12, 2012 06:20 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Jimbo at March 12, 2012 06:20 AM (O3R/2)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at March 12, 2012 06:20 AM (DacKi)
Andy, Maureen Down is on line 1 for you. She says thanks for all the help making conservatives look like monkeys fucking a football. Great job, dude.
Posted by: Death Chipmunk at March 12, 2012 06:21 AM (niW49)
It's the curse of all affluent societies - abundance leads to apathy, because most people just want to do their thing and be left alone.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 12, 2012 10:19 AM (l+kmq)
This!
Posted by: abandon at March 12, 2012 06:22 AM (We7+K)
Posted by: Andy at March 12, 2012 06:22 AM (VV9wO)
Posted by: polynikes - Texan for Romney at March 12, 2012 06:22 AM (jTVGC)
Posted by: Knemon at March 12, 2012 06:24 AM (mAsZo)
Posted by: Joanne at March 12, 2012 06:24 AM (8DdAv)
That is some pure awesomeness right there.
Posted by: Lady in Black.....{sigh} at March 12, 2012 06:24 AM (F+Xfj)
Posted by: Palerider at March 12, 2012 06:25 AM (vL0Nv)
Posted by: Andy at March 12, 2012 06:26 AM (VV9wO)
Posted by: Y-not still for Newt at March 12, 2012 06:27 AM (4Q04p)
Posted by: polynikes - Texan for Romney at March 12, 2012 06:28 AM (jTVGC)
Posted by: Vic at March 12, 2012 06:28 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 12, 2012 06:29 AM (i6RpT)
Anyone?
Posted by: dagny at March 12, 2012 10:28 AM (u50z0)
----------------------------
How many read it in the news thread?
Posted by: Vic at March 12, 2012 06:29 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Dave in Fla at March 12, 2012 06:29 AM (nMiwq)
http://is.gd/dYt45S
Posted by: Vic at March 12, 2012 06:55 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Vic at March 12, 2012 06:29 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 12, 2012 06:29 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: Lincolntf at March 12, 2012 06:30 AM (hiMsy)
Posted by: dagny at March 12, 2012 06:32 AM (u50z0)
Posted by: SoCons suck at March 12, 2012 06:32 AM (l52K6)
No, the primaries aren't over yet. First we conservatives must lose to Romney, before we lose to Obama.
Posted by: Sad Dad at March 12, 2012 06:33 AM (71iUa)
Bah. Why do you think the trebuchet was invented? Of course, that was before such long commutes, so then they invented the howitzer.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 12, 2012 06:34 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: dagny at March 12, 2012 06:34 AM (u50z0)
Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at March 12, 2012 06:35 AM (RZ8pf)
Posted by: Vic at March 12, 2012 06:35 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 12, 2012 06:36 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: katya, the designated driver at March 12, 2012 06:37 AM (bMLFV)
I do have to ask, though, how much editorial influence the editors have at HLR- since I don't know. Are they limited simply to "help the author say what they want to say more effectively," or do they have the power to say, "No, that's stupid. Stick it in your ear?"
I don't doubt that she believed every word Mr. Bell wrote, so I don't think she would have said "stick it in your ear," if she'd had the chance, but if she didn't even have that option, it at least gives her some "cover."
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 12, 2012 06:37 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 12, 2012 06:37 AM (sefcY)
chemjeff, that's a good list (even including The Hair, which, sadly, does count). No, I'm not being snarky, that's a good list. You left off putting the dog on the roof and driving off. That's the one thing about Romney that I truly like.
To those who are all bitching about oh noes you're taking Romney out of context and leaving stuff out, well, my tolerance level for those who find anything positive to say about the Chicoms is nil. The Chinese government is evil. What is so damn hard about not going "well some of it is okay". You see, once you start on the some of it is okay thing, I am left to wonder just where you draw the line. Selling organs? Politicial opponents as slave labor? Censorship of the internet? Religious persecution? How hard is it to comprehend that the things you like are implemented by a gun pressed to a forehead and the finger on the trigger? Sure, I point out to people in the US that the logical conclusion of not following a law is that the government will come and shoot you. The Chicom position is this is the law BLAM. The lack of intermediate steps is significant.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD 2012 at March 12, 2012 06:38 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: polynikes - Texan for Romney at March 12, 2012 06:39 AM (jTVGC)
Posted by: RioBravo at March 12, 2012 06:39 AM (eEfYn)
Not sure I'm following you there.
Posted by: mama winger at March 12, 2012 06:39 AM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: toby928© at March 12, 2012 06:39 AM (GTbGH)
While what Romney said is being taking out of context regarding the larger point of his speech it doesn't make it false. We can pretend it isn't true or we can realize it and and step up our ability to compete with them.
Steve Jobs also realized the same thing Romney said when he said he couldn't manufacture the I Phone here even if he wanted to because of regualation and union work rules.
Posted by: robtr at March 12, 2012 06:39 AM (MtwBb)
<i>1. Executive experience, both in government and in the private sector
2. Sterling family life
3. Man of generally good integrity - ranks low on the "slimy corrupt pol" scale (not PERFECT, but much higher than your typical Chicago-style thug-pol)
4. Has a decision-making temperament that is calm and level-headed, which is what a chief executive needs when faced with unforeseen future threats
5. *Consistently* polls better vs. Obama than all of the other R candidates
6. Turnaround artist for struggling businesses, and for the Olympics
7. The Hair (laugh if you want, but it's important in some superficial way)</i>
OK, I'll bite, point by point.
1. Yes, but. The business experience is the least impeachable, but it can be oversold. He's a turnaround specialist, which is a specialized field, and--it must be emphasized--not instantly transferrable to our executive branch issues.
The governmental executive experience is a serious net minus. Too many warts, too many conflicts with basic conservative principles, and well into 2009 on the all-important individual mandate issue.
2. 100% agreement.
3. In the sense of not being a machine sleazeball, sure. But he's politically tone deaf, and has no history of being able to build up an effective party organization, which is one of the virtues of being a Chicago-type pol.
4. "Let's index the minimum wage!" He gives off a calm demeanor, but when faced with a crisis, lurches left and shows a near-craving for bipartisan approval. Not good given the crises we face. See also the "Perry Scheme" demagoguery.
5. On average, yes--to date. But he hasn't been hit with the blitz yet. His twisting on the issues is going to be a much bigger liability in the general than his boosters think. Just ask President Kerry. He is going to be painted as a pandering, hyper-ambitious politico desperate for the office, and willing to trim his sails accordingly. He's going to be a tougher sell to independents when all is said and done than is generally admitted.
6. True enough, but the Olympics aren't as persuasive as people seem to think they are. A plus, but minor. The turnaround specialist theme is probably the best, but it's a tightrope. Axes falling freak out the voters, too.
7. In this day and age, looking Presidential is important. I'm not going to knock that. He does fit the bill in that respect.
Posted by: Steve the Pirate at March 12, 2012 06:39 AM (W54Uh)
Posted by: Lincolntf at March 12, 2012 06:40 AM (hiMsy)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at March 12, 2012 06:40 AM (DacKi)
Posted by: katya, the designated driver at March 12, 2012 06:41 AM (bMLFV)
Posted by: Jimbo at March 12, 2012 06:41 AM (O3R/2)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 12, 2012 10:20 AM (8y9MW)
I'm afraid you're the one who's right (unless things have changed a lot.)
When My Grandmother went with Christ for the Nations to the poorest parish in Jamaica to start a school after my grandfather's death she said the kids were great. The adults on the other hand were horrible. Their goal was to move to the US and be rich but couldn't be bothered to work anymore than absolutely necessary to stay alive.
Honestly, Neidermeyer's Dead Horse's discription yeaterday of growing up in the projects sounds almost exactly like the attitude of the majority of Jamaicans grandma lived with for several years before brain cancer caused her to have to return to the States where she died. The people are also slightly paranoid. When my sister went back to help finish the school building a few years after grandma's death the people were shocked that she confirmed grandma's death. They had just assumed we'd lied about it even though there had been communication about the situation both before and after her death.
Crime was also very bad. From the mild stuff like everyone just picking up anything that caught their eye to knife-point robberies even in the "nice" areas. Men would also proposition my 60+ quite round grandmother and most of the girls she worked with and taught had been molested.
For a long time Jamaica was able to keep a lot of the problems "under wraps" and usually away from tourists. For you to have seen all this at a tourist port seems to indicate that either things are getting even worse or that you are unusually perceptive.
Posted by: Polliwog, Hobbit Teahada at March 12, 2012 06:42 AM (N5/RR)
Posted by: Captain Hate at March 12, 2012 06:43 AM (cCsxG)
Posted by: disgusting oratory at March 12, 2012 06:43 AM (xXhWA)
If the cameras can be elevated, then I'm with you. Presidential press conferences and speeches would suddenly be interesting again.
Posted by: Heorot at March 12, 2012 06:44 AM (Nq/UF)
Posted by: Lincolntf at March 12, 2012 10:40 AM (hiMsy)
So did you finish that book or were the nightmares too bad? I definitely appreciate your giving it a try so I don't have to.
Posted by: Polliwog, Hobbit Teahada at March 12, 2012 06:45 AM (N5/RR)
There is a world of difference between what is permissable and what is desirable, beneficial and worth pursuing.
Posted by: mama winger at March 12, 2012 06:45 AM (P6QsQ)
Mama Winger, but if the public school system
collapses, Christian Conservative parents will lose the luxury of school
sports to teach their children the rules of life.
Ummm, what? No, seriously, what? I went to Christian Conservative schools from first grade through college and we had our own sports teams and leagues with other Christian schools all the way through. Do you mean home schoolers? Because if so that's still an incredibly inarticulate comment.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD 2012 at March 12, 2012 06:45 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Max Power at March 12, 2012 06:46 AM (+wxCD)
Jamaica talk is a weird coincidence. A woman in the Seattle area was raped and robbed at knifepoint two nights ago in her own garage (she'd just gotten home from work) and the description of the suspects was that they had a Jamaican accent.
Kind of surprised the media actually put that much out, which sort of indicates a racial make-up, because usually if the assailant is anything but white there is no identifying quality given. It is hilarious how the sketch artists here manage to draw everyone as white, regardless of the reality.
Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at March 12, 2012 06:47 AM (RZ8pf)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at March 12, 2012 06:47 AM (DacKi)
Posted by: polynikes - Texan for Romney at March 12, 2012 06:48 AM (jTVGC)
There are two separate issues here. On one, I agree with Romney- certainly Massachusetts had the right to issue a health insurance Mandate. The power of the States is assumed to be much greater than the power of the Federal Government, and so that is a power they can take, if the People of the State (as the people of MA did) choose to allow it.
The other, though, is a huge problem. An Insurance Mandate assumes two things with which I disagree on a basic, fundamental level- I cannot compromise with these assumptions.
1) It assumes that Health Care is a Right. That is, it assumes that everyone has the right to be treated for their illnesses, and that the counterbalance to that is to force on them the responsibility of paying what they can. Health care is not a Right. Once more: You have NO RIGHT to something someone else must provide or produce.
2) It assumes the Government (at any level) understands more about your choices and their effects than you do, and that it should have the power to control your choices. That it should be able to force two disparate private parties into private contracts. This is not the behavior of a Representative Republican form of government, but of an autocracy. The People are not viewed as citizens, but as subjects. They do not need to be Governed, they need to be Ruled.
These are two assumptions that are antithetical to Liberty, and should be absolutely abhorrent to anyone who is conservative.
So, Mitt Romney believes (correctly) that the Federal Government should not have this authority, but he also believes (incorrectly) that it being permissible at the State level is the same thing as it being acceptable at the State level.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 12, 2012 06:48 AM (8y9MW)
That's odd. I could have sworn there were still several upcoming primaries. Have they been cancelled?
Posted by: mama winger at March 12, 2012 06:49 AM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at March 12, 2012 10:47 AM (RZ8pf)
My information is twenty years old but nothing seems to have happened to change things for the better. Grandma found Jamaican men to be the most have the greatest sense of entitlement and contempt for women of any group she'd met.
Posted by: Polliwog, Hobbit Teahada at March 12, 2012 06:49 AM (N5/RR)
Posted by: dagny at March 12, 2012 06:50 AM (u50z0)
Posted by: katya, the designated driver at March 12, 2012 06:51 AM (bMLFV)
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo-intellectual at March 12, 2012 10:48 AM (hXJOG)
I'm really glad to hear that. If the people have reached a point where they realize what they've been doing is unsustainable there may be hope.
Posted by: Polliwog, Hobbit Teahada at March 12, 2012 06:51 AM (N5/RR)
Posted by: phoenixgirl, rip andrew at March 12, 2012 06:51 AM (Ho2rs)
Posted by: Lincolntf at March 12, 2012 06:52 AM (hiMsy)
Yeah. I'm a cynic. I tend to assume the worst so I'll be pleasantly surprised if I'm wrong. I'm not wrong nearly often enough.
One of the guides on our horseback riding tour couldn't have been older than 13. He was the second of 6 kids (his older brother is 21, I think he said), and had to work, instead of going to school, to help support his family. That seemed not-uncommon.
So I wasn't sure if that was a problem with a society on the final stages of sinking, or a (bleak) tribute to a society beginning to pull itself up by its bootstraps.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 12, 2012 06:53 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 12, 2012 06:53 AM (sefcY)
Posted by: dagny at March 12, 2012 10:50 AM
Absolutely. Government indoctrination via union reps from 8 to 3, five days a week, 180 days a year, for 13 years.
Posted by: mama winger at March 12, 2012 06:53 AM (P6QsQ)
1) Mitt will be our nominee, he is the only one who can mathematically reach 1144 delegates. Neither Newt nor Rick can reach 1144, given the remaining schedule and their levels of support
2) If Mitt doesn't reach 1144, he will still be the nominee, just not on the first ballot.
3) Mitt will beat Obama. Obama is unelectable.
4) The primaries continuing are a good thing. They show Mitt and his staff that the SoCons and Tea Party can not be safely ignored. He has to manage his position and be firm on actions he will take. My feeling on Mitt is that his honor and faith make it hard for him to outright lie (hence the "soft" positions he takes). The more concrete promises he has to make, the better for us.
5) Having to fight to hold the Conservatives will force him to make a good VP pick.
Posted by: Dave in Fla at March 12, 2012 06:54 AM (nMiwq)
We have kids out of our Christian school who've been drafted by MLB.
Posted by: mama winger at March 12, 2012 06:56 AM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: phoenixgirl, rip andrew at March 12, 2012 06:57 AM (Ho2rs)
AllenG, Jamaica is very, very bad. My best friend is Jamaican and returns twice a year. She just got back from her brother-in-law's funeral. He was murdered by a cop. Crime is rampant, public corruption is norm, drug wars are constant. She waited 5 hours in the post office to mail something special delivery; this is the norm for any public service. Poverty is everywhere and the work ethic of previous generations is gone. Jamaica is one big clusterf*ck. Sad.
Posted by: jeanne misses Andrew at March 12, 2012 06:57 AM (byR8d)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 12, 2012 10:53 AM (8y9MW)
My understandin gi shtat the nation has always suffered from the people's ability to literally reach up and grab the fruit off the trees(I know, that doesn't sound like a bad thing). With subsistance nearly guaranteed and little shelter needed only those with in intense natural drive bothered to do more and usually "more" meant "go somewhere else" further draining the country.
Posted by: Polliwog, Hobbit Teahada at March 12, 2012 06:59 AM (N5/RR)
O/T need to catch up on some old bisness...
Condolences DiT, wish you and yours well.
***
Mr C. Dildo, How was the get together? Did the Ewok make a guest appearance?
Posted by: dananjcon Howel III at March 12, 2012 06:59 AM (8ieXv)
Posted by: Polliwog, Hobbit Teahada at March 12, 2012 07:00 AM (N5/RR)
"Romney issued EO for state troopers to inquire about immigrant status. Again doesn't count because he was pandering."
So, do you Romney supporters ever google his claim of this? I know he said this in the last debate, and TECHNICALLY it's true. But it was during his last month in office, AFTER the election. Governor-elect Patrick said it was not gonna happen the day Romney announced it and was true to his word; it never went into effect. Pardon my cynicism, but Mittens was in his presidential aspirational period the last year he was in office, so yeah, he was building up his pandering creds.
The sad part is Romney NEVER gets called out on this absolute fabrication of events. I'll vote for the dirt bag if he's the nominee, but please don't promote Romney's stance on illegal aliens as a reason to support him. He didn't do jack in dealing with illegal aliens while in office; hey, he needed his yard work done.
Romney's biggest disqualifier? Romneycare. Just my own opinion, but that trumps everything even remotely considered a success by this douche.
Posted by: Joanne at March 12, 2012 07:00 AM (8DdAv)
Yeah, like I said, my wife absolutely fell in love with it (based on what she saw). I was deliberately keeping my Political Brain turned off (well, the output thereof, I can't turn off it's input and analysis systems), so I didn't point out all the problems obvious if you thought about it for half a second.
Also- does anyone know this- one of the beaches we wanted to go to required a ticket- like $2 or $3. I wasn't sure if it was just a private beech (in which case- go ahead, charge for admission) or if that was the status quo on the island.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 12, 2012 07:02 AM (8y9MW)
At the risk of sounding like I'm stereotyping.... I work in an HR/Legal function at a mulit-national corporation and my daughter attends a school made up of multi nationals.
Mitt is right, in a sense. The Chinese and Indian kids, and their parents, are the nicest, most helpful people I meet. They get upset when they have a line of people waiting for them. They smile and offer real customer service. Our big problem is getting them to think outside the box.
The Americans are whiney assholes who bitch about how they are being screwed out of every little thing. Their daughters are total bitches playing the drama queen / popular game and picking on the weak girls, and their sons are just plain stupid, because it's cool to be so. The good part of American culture - the individual- is also, in the wrong hands, the bad part of Ameican culture ("it's all about me, screw everybody else... you'll get your place in the driver's license line when I feel like it).
Obviously I live in a small piece of the world, but I think Romney was right - your average bureaucrat in China is probably quite pleasant and sees it as his or her job to get things done. Versus your average bureaucrat in the US who views his glass as half empty and that he's always being "put upon" to have to actually do his job.
Add to the Chinese model that to my knowledge there is no Sierra Club, United Mine Workers, or Soros-funded advocacy group -- and no legal system to bog down with ridiculous (and meritless) citizen suits.
Posted by: the other coyote at March 12, 2012 07:02 AM (yK44T)
Posted by: Polliwog, Hobbit Teahada at March 12, 2012 07:02 AM (N5/RR)
An EXACTLY appropriate example of the wrong thing. The Pentagon went fast because the Generals said do it and didn't have to pay for it. The WTC is slow because of lots of things, one of which is artsy design contests, property squabbles, etc. and then regulation. Apparently you and Mitt both don't get where fast = Pro Business <> good for anybody but the owner and the bribee.
Posted by: DaveA at March 12, 2012 07:04 AM (h7d02)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 12, 2012 10:20 AM (8y9MW)
I'm acquainted with an empty nester couple who used to vacation in Jamaica when their kids were younger. When the kids left home, the dad decided he wanted to leave the USA and live in Jamaica forever (yeah he's a major pothead).
The mom was terrified at the thought of spending more than a week at a time down in Jamaica, it's a dangerous place for a woman and she did not want to be a captive in her living quarters forever. She spent more than a decade going there on vacation, she knew her future there was nothing but "future victim".
They divorced and he's still down there as far as we know.
Posted by: Boots at March 12, 2012 07:09 AM (neKzn)
FUCK YOU!
And for the we gotta get behind x
No it's xs job to lead.
And for the vote for x or you're voting for SCOAMF
No staying home is a VALID third choice.
And for the "oh we'll damage x for the general"
Ha, if x is that weak he won't win the general anyways and couldn't do the job.
All these clowns suck.
Posted by: DaveA at March 12, 2012 07:10 AM (h7d02)
Well, we didn't have any of that, and at no point in my (admittedly brief) time in the city did I feel particularly in danger. I'm sure if I'd gotten outside of the tourist zones that would have changed substantially, but I never did. My observations were purely on demographics (13 & 14 year olds working during the week tells me schools are a) not available b) not important c) some combination) and landscape (half-finished buildings completely abandoned, people obviously living in shacks that might not survive the next Caribbean Gale, etc.).
I know enough about life that those are signs of abject poverty. The only question was- is it poverty that comes at the end (well, really the middle) of Socialism, or is it poverty that comes at the beginning of Liberty.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 12, 2012 07:11 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Don't hate the player at March 12, 2012 07:14 AM (NOnHM)
Posted by: katya, the designated driver at March 12, 2012 07:15 AM (bMLFV)
Keep in mind that building a big building like this is damned expensive, and there is a glut of commercial property on the market right now.
Posted by: Vic at March 12, 2012 07:18 AM (YdQQY)
Define "Eclipse". China's GDP is roughly a third of that of the US. It's much worse viewed per capita.
China will grow old before it grows rich.
Posted by: toby928© at March 12, 2012 07:19 AM (GTbGH)
Posted by: Boots at March 12, 2012 11:09 AM (neKzn)
I hate divorce but good for her that she could see where that plan was headed and didn't go along.
Posted by: Polliwog, Hobbit Teahada at March 12, 2012 07:28 AM (N5/RR)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 12, 2012 10:53 AM (8y9MW)
Tropical islands will never be prosperous, unless they can pull in big cash in tourism, expat relocations, and banking. They're almost always resource poor. It's too hot to work hard much of the year. They have limited access to markets and volume efficiencies are nearly nonexistent. Most in this hemisphere were once French or Spanish colonies, which pretty much makes failure and incompetent government impossible to avoid. Not every sow's ear can be fashioned into a silk purse.
BUT - they tend to have a climate that doesn't try to kill you several months out of the year. Food is generally not hard to come by. Most people are poor, and used to helping each other out. There are usually larger patron nations to discourage others from invading you. There are cute island girls running around. There are usually very few muslims (something I find delightful). Also, the government is often too poor to spend its scant resources oppressing you directly.
Very few places are all bad. Especially in this hemisphere. Of course, there are a few. Haiti IS all bad.
Posted by: Reactionary at March 12, 2012 07:29 AM (xUM1Q)
Posted by: sexypig at March 12, 2012 07:32 AM (wWV5q)
They shoot you for union organizing and even Algae die in some of their rivers. What part of Commie hellhole do you not get!
Posted by: DaveA at March 12, 2012 07:36 AM (h7d02)
Posted by: Concerned Republican Voter at March 12, 2012 07:38 AM (wWV5q)
Posted by: sexypig at March 12, 2012 07:40 AM (wWV5q)
Posted by: dagny at March 12, 2012 07:43 AM (u50z0)
Posted by: toby928© at March 12, 2012 07:46 AM (GTbGH)
1: No, you did not anywhere in your post compliment Mitt for the fact that he was slamming Obama for being worse than Communists when it comes to regulation.
2: You might want to ask GM and Chrysler's former bondholders who Obama screwed in the bankruptcy what they think of the comparison.
Mitt compared the US to China for the purpose of bashing Obama for over-regulating the economy. The MFM don't want to see that, because they want to protect their boyfriend. What's your excuse?
Posted by: Greg Q at March 12, 2012 07:47 AM (/0a60)
Posted by: sexypig at March 12, 2012 07:48 AM (wWV5q)
For the same reason football coaches praise the opposing team. Nobody ever pumped up their team to greater exertion by telling them the opponents were not worth bothering about.
Posted by: pep at March 12, 2012 07:57 AM (YXmuI)
Posted by: sexypig at March 12, 2012 08:02 AM (wWV5q)
Posted by: sexypig at March 12, 2012 08:04 AM (wWV5q)
Posted by: sexypig at March 12, 2012 08:06 AM (wWV5q)
I'd rather comment on the latest dumb-shit move by Obama.
Surely Obama has done or said something stupid or bad in the last 24 hours, yes?
Posted by: soothsayer at March 12, 2012 08:08 AM (G/zuv)
Posted by: sexypig at March 12, 2012 08:10 AM (wWV5q)
Posted by: sexypig at March 12, 2012 08:12 AM (wWV5q)
Running a business has to be totalitarian in nature.....because if it were run like a democracy and employees got to vote for what they wanted, the business would go under.
So, while I like the idea of having someone in the white house with executive business experience......the decision-making done in business creates some fertile ground for political foes to mine for things that can be held up as 'dictatorial'.
I am bracing myself for what may be coming, if Romney is our nominee. .....With the money and resources that team Barky has to work with, they are very likely sitting on some stuff that we don't know about yet.
Posted by: wheatie at March 12, 2012 08:49 AM (aykLa)
Of its not, then why not vote for Obama? Posted by: sexypig
It's not a binary choice fuckwit.
How about the ProGOP moderates get the FACT that the edging the Democrats out didn't work when SCOAMF went full retard with our money and future. It seemed like a semi-workable idea when the debt was serviceable but now were screwed.
If you want to spend the next 4 or 8 years making excuses and rationalizing squish statism as much or more than W go for it. Me, I'm tired of stupid shit.
Posted by: DaveA at March 12, 2012 08:50 AM (h7d02)
Posted by: wheatie at March 12, 2012 08:52 AM (aykLa)
Posted by: Jordan at March 12, 2012 08:54 AM (RSG1I)
Posted by: Warden at March 12, 2012 08:58 AM (KulgD)
If your IP address changes your hash will change.
Posted by: DaveA at March 12, 2012 09:07 AM (h7d02)
Posted by: polynikes - Texan for Romney at March 12, 2012 09:08 AM (jTVGC)
312.....If your IP address changes your hash will change.
Thanks, but nothing has changed on my end.....unless my service provider changed our IP configuration for some reason. .....There have been some service outages in the last few days, but I figured that had something to do with the solar blurp thats been going on.
Posted by: wheatie at March 12, 2012 09:20 AM (aykLa)
Posted by: Willard Huntsman at March 12, 2012 09:22 AM (i330i)
Posted by: Vercingetorix at March 12, 2012 09:25 AM (pOUA4)
Or is it just that you don't like Romney, so everything he does must be bad?
Do I like China? No. Do I want the US to be more like China? No. Do I want to see Obama bashed for the things he does wrong? Yes. Is Obama doing wrong on regulation? Oh hell yes.
Do I want to see Obama lose in November? Yes. That's my top priority. What's yours?
By all means, slam Romney when he screws up. That's all we can do to try to keep him on the straight and narrow.
But don't be a tool for the MFM, and don't bash him when he doesn't deserve it.
Posted by: Greg Q at March 12, 2012 09:49 AM (/0a60)
Posted by: Greg Q at March 12, 2012 09:50 AM (/0a60)
Posted by: John at March 12, 2012 10:21 AM (KSeSW)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at March 12, 2012 10:32 AM (bxiXv)
If you're impressed by China you're doing it wrong. I may be angry but even I'm not retarded enough to think China is an anwser.
Posted by: DaveA at March 12, 2012 11:03 AM (h7d02)
Posted by: sexypig at March 12, 2012 11:36 AM (wWV5q)
Posted by: steevy at March 12, 2012 12:12 PM (7W3wI)
That's the way I read it... I actually got the idea Romney was trying to make the opposite point. Maybe he could have been more articulate about it or maybe I was misreading though... but...
context!
Posted by: Filly at March 12, 2012 12:19 PM (awKyM)
Posted by: MlR at March 12, 2012 02:06 PM (vj9lA)
Posted by: Rich K at March 12, 2012 02:41 PM (X4l3T)
Will Romney sign a repeal of ObamaCare, or veto it?
Will he appoint SC Justices more likely to vote with Scalia, or with Sotomeyer?
If the Ryan Medicare plan passes the House and Senate, would Romney sign it, or veto it?
Will the Romney "Justice" Department sue to block Voter ID laws?
If you can't tell a significant difference between Romney and Obama, the problem is you, not Romney.
Posted by: Greg Q at March 12, 2012 03:52 PM (BaFzI)
Have fun with that, Mitt.
Posted by: Genetic Tunder at March 12, 2012 08:45 PM (vQfJ3)
Posted by: Genetic Tunder at March 12, 2012 09:32 PM (vQfJ3)
Posted by: California High Speed Train at March 12, 2012 11:25 PM (VyPkJ)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3154 seconds, 435 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: real joe at March 12, 2012 04:44 AM (w7Lv+)