December 24, 2012
— Ace Ay yi yi.
If he really didn't want to be president, why the bruising attack ads against his rivals? (And where did they go when it came time to run against Obama?)
In an interview with the Boston Globe examining what went wrong with the Romney campaign, his eldest son Tagg explains that his father had been a reluctant candidate from the start.After failing to win the 2008 Republican nomination, Romney told his family he would not run again and had to be persuaded to enter the 2012 White House race by his wife Ann and son Tagg.
"He wanted to be president less than anyone I've met in my life. He had no desire... to run," Tagg Romney said. "If he could have found someone else to take his place... he would have been ecstatic to step aside."
Certainly Perry appeared to be a good candidate -- on paper, I mean; and we all know how that ultimately turned out -- at his debut. Why then did Romney scorch him, if he was happy to let someone else run?
I'm not sure I believe this.
Posted by: Ace at
10:24 AM
| Comments (237)
Post contains 203 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: huerfano at December 24, 2012 10:28 AM (bAGA/)
Posted by: teej at December 24, 2012 10:29 AM (Pwz7h)
Whatever criticisms of Romney you have, you have to admit the guy ran 'till the end. He was out there working hard very minute of that campaign.
Posted by: MrShad at December 24, 2012 10:30 AM (Xqfwb)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at December 24, 2012 10:30 AM (XkWWK)
Posted by: RWC at December 24, 2012 10:31 AM (sqp6o)
I'm not happy with how the election turned out or how it appears my contributions were spent, but there is one thing I'm sure of: If Romney were President his goal would be to fix the federal government. He may have failed or he may have made choices that pissed me off, but I have no doubt about what his goal would have been.
Posted by: Fritz (not Fritz) at December 24, 2012 10:31 AM (U0t2o)
Posted by: Temper Tantrum at December 24, 2012 10:33 AM (AWmfW)
This smells of Mom and I talked him into it so leave him the fuck alone now to me. Also there's nothing inconsistent about having to be talked into running and then, once running, going all out to get the nomination.
Why did you have to bring up Perry? Why? Though I supposed that technically it's not your fault that Perry stepped on his own dick and then went out and found a few other dicks and stepped on those too. Technically.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. We're not worthy. at December 24, 2012 10:34 AM (Gk3SS)
We lost because the FSA came out in droves for their Magic Negro. I don't think they have any more Magic Negros in the wings for 2016.
Posted by: Vic at December 24, 2012 10:36 AM (53z96)
Posted by: Wooga at December 24, 2012 10:37 AM (7AVpI)
Posted by: Dan in michigan at December 24, 2012 10:38 AM (2yD4G)
Posted by: baldilocks via iPad at December 24, 2012 10:39 AM (Su0W2)
No one goes through such hell now without immeasurable desire. This is no, "Well, I guess I'll run. If I must... since no other in a nation of hundreds of millions wants to. What the hey, right?"
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at December 24, 2012 10:39 AM (eHIJJ)
Hmm. All of the other announced candidates flared out in their own ways. Maybe it was the lack of anyone really viable, who really had a chance? You look at the self-inflicted injuries, and media inflicted injuries, the others had and you think "What if Santorum got the nod? There would have been Sandra Fluke even more so than it was." for example.
And I think - who could have run successfully?
Posted by: Mikey NTH at December 24, 2012 10:40 AM (gmoEG)
Posted by: truth at December 24, 2012 10:40 AM (0YWG9)
he made his point in the primaries, then figured either he'd coast to a Reluctant Victory or lose gracefully. Great strategy!!
Don't we deserve better ( he asked, wistfully and rhetorically ) ?
Posted by: Wally in Walla Walla at December 24, 2012 10:40 AM (Dll6b)
Posted by: Wooga at December 24, 2012 10:41 AM (7AVpI)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. We're not worthy. at December 24, 2012 10:42 AM (Gk3SS)
Posted by: truth at December 24, 2012 02:40 PM (0YWG9)
yeah, 'thank goodness' we have four more years of an incompetent radical Lefty stooge narcissist frog-faced creep as President
thank goodness...
Posted by: Wally in Walla Walla at December 24, 2012 10:42 AM (Dll6b)
Posted by: Fritz at December 24, 2012 10:42 AM (w3+gB)
Posted by: baldilocks via iPad at December 24, 2012 02:39 PM (Su0W2)
If they plan on running either one of those two losers they had best get right on making their image change.
Posted by: Vic at December 24, 2012 10:42 AM (53z96)
We lost because the FSA came out in droves for their Magic Negro. I don't think they have any more Magic Negros in the wings for 2016.
==========
Yeah but the FSA will be there in force for whoever promises more of it. The FSA has a lot of REMFs that vote rat as well.
Posted by: USS Diversity at December 24, 2012 10:43 AM (MPjT8)
Hillary is married to The First Black President. I'm pretty sure the Statists will see some of that magic having rubbed onto Hillary.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at December 24, 2012 10:43 AM (eHIJJ)
Posted by: Paladin at December 24, 2012 10:44 AM (uQ4Oe)
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at December 24, 2012 02:43 PM (eHIJJ)
Hillary will not run and she is too old.
Posted by: Vic at December 24, 2012 10:44 AM (53z96)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. We're not worthy. at December 24, 2012 02:42 PM (Gk3SS)
I'm betting that's its just a case of the guys conducting the study not paying attention to what the racktastic girls were saying because they were staring at their tits, and later going "yeah I think she sounded smart"
Posted by: buzzion at December 24, 2012 10:44 AM (GULKT)
Posted by: Tobacco Road at December 24, 2012 10:44 AM (4Mv1T)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at December 24, 2012 10:44 AM (R+6Q+)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. We're not worthy. at December 24, 2012 02:42 PM (Gk3SS)
This needs a closer study.
Posted by: Temper Tantrum at December 24, 2012 10:44 AM (AWmfW)
I wasted my vote on him for NOTHING? I mean seriously.
As for 2016, the push will be to get Michelle Obama to run, you wait and see.
Posted by: Cynthia at December 24, 2012 10:44 AM (lhhNH)
Posted by: USS Diversity at December 24, 2012 02:43 PM (MPjT
Every Commiecrat since LBJ has run on a platform of free shit. Up until recently they did not win that often.
Posted by: Vic at December 24, 2012 10:45 AM (53z96)
Posted by: nerdygirl at December 24, 2012 10:46 AM (WfUOw)
Posted by: truth at December 24, 2012 10:47 AM (0YWG9)
Let's all focus on the important part, someone(s) got paid to study differential rack size. I think we all need to question our life choices that led to that not being us.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. We're not worthy. at December 24, 2012 10:47 AM (Gk3SS)
I would have preferred a biting, scratching, take-no-prisoners candidate who stomped on Obama's face and pissed in his mouth.
But that's just me.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at December 24, 2012 10:48 AM (GsoHv)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at December 24, 2012 10:48 AM (R+6Q+)
That AFP article also called Romney a multi-billionaire.
Is that true?
Isn't AFP a commie French outfit? Commie French are not to be trusted.
Posted by: Invictus at December 24, 2012 10:49 AM (OQpzc)
Posted by: truth at December 24, 2012 02:47 PM (0YWG9)
I am waiting to see if they change the primary system or not. If they don't we will run yet another lackluster "moderate" who will not excite the base. The common cry will be "he will deliver blue States".
I am already half in the bag for abandoning the Republican Party. That will be the final straw.
Posted by: Vic at December 24, 2012 10:49 AM (53z96)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. We're not worthy. at December 24, 2012 02:47 PM (Gk3SS)
Well I don't know about you but I have certainly dedicated much of my life to studying that. Without the need to figure out what's going on in their noggins.
Posted by: buzzion at December 24, 2012 10:49 AM (GULKT)
Lincoln referred to his own and others' presidential ambitions as 'the worm in the belly'. According to Lincoln, that worm of ambition gnawed away at him until he won the election.
In retrospect (and it's always in retrospect when we have these insights), I didn't see it in Romney, that fire, that demonstration of steely resolve. Romney's lack of that burning desire to do big things and change the country explains much of his campaign--or at least his inability to go after Obama tooth and claw. I mean, think about it: the big theme seized upon by his campaign was that President Obama is a nice guy in over his head. Well, for one thing, President Obama is emphatically not a nice guy: witness Benghazi, Fast and Furious, the unsealing of Jack and Jeri Ryan's sealed divorce proceedings, the disqualification of all of his state senate opponents, and so on. And 'in over his head'? Viewed from a certain perspective, Obama has been the most effective liberal president in American history, with the possible exceptions of FDR and LBJ. Thus, Romney's central campaign theme was based on provable falsehoods but offered a nice guy, above the fray, wholesome approach that appealed to Romney's sense of himself as a gentleman.
Thing is, one can't be a gentleman (or a lady) when taking on the Chicago Machine. You've got to want it to win it. You've got to get your hands dirty and your shirt bloody. You've got to be able to imply the other guy is the son of a whore and reveal that he secretly cries while watching episodes of Grey's Anatomy. Whatever it takes.
Posted by: troyriser at December 24, 2012 10:51 AM (vtiE6)
Posted by: Navycopjoe at December 02, 2012 01:26 PM (0YWG9)
Posted by: truth at December 24, 2012 02:47 PM (0YWG9)
Posted by: buzzion at December 24, 2012 10:51 AM (GULKT)
Posted by: polynikes at December 24, 2012 10:51 AM (uYSWH)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at December 24, 2012 10:51 AM (XkWWK)
Have the french ever failed to betray an ally? I still can't figure out why the semi-sane nations never slaughtered every last of the vile, french.
This has to be the only nation ever to be allowed to exist purely for the fact that they have the best looking whores in western europe.
Posted by: Invictus at December 24, 2012 10:52 AM (OQpzc)
I have been studying rack sizes my entire adult life, and at least half of my childhood.
I consider it my avocation, and would be insulted to see it as a job.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at December 24, 2012 10:52 AM (GsoHv)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. We're not worthy. at December 24, 2012 02:47 PM (Gk3SS)
But the major question then becomes... do Women then get Smarter with Bolt Ons?
Posted by: Romeo13 at December 24, 2012 10:52 AM (lZBBB)
I guess that makes him a founding member of the LiB caucus. It would have been nice to know that before the primaries.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Troll Hunter! at December 24, 2012 10:53 AM (GE1+K)
Posted by: USS Diversity at December 24, 2012 10:53 AM (MPjT8)
Posted by: Y-not at December 24, 2012 10:53 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: eleven at December 24, 2012 10:54 AM (KXm42)
Posted by: KG at December 24, 2012 10:54 AM (p7BzH)
Posted by: Y-not at December 24, 2012 02:53 PM (5H6zj)
Hence discussing boobs.
Posted by: buzzion at December 24, 2012 10:54 AM (GULKT)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at December 24, 2012 10:55 AM (jE38p)
Posted by: KG at December 24, 2012 10:55 AM (p7BzH)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at December 24, 2012 10:55 AM (R+6Q+)
Uh...the tranny hookers on the Bois de Boulogne are not particularly attractive.
I would guess that any former Soviet bloc country has better looking hookers than France.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at December 24, 2012 10:55 AM (GsoHv)
Posted by: Vic at December 24, 2012 02:49 PM (53z96)
Registered Independent since the 90's..... once I figured out that Republicans also grow Government, just slower then the Dems... and in different directions.
EPA? DHS? No child Left Behind?
Posted by: Romeo13 at December 24, 2012 10:56 AM (lZBBB)
"do you really think Romney lost because he was too moderate?"
Is that a joke? Part of the reason Romney lost is that the average voter saw him as a human weather vane.
Posted by: Invictus at December 24, 2012 10:57 AM (OQpzc)
NO ONE goes through that without wanting it.
We lost primarily because what passes for GOP leadership is too abysmal to ascribe merely to sheer incompetence.
There is a corrupt and traitorous element (especially among the hired consultants) unfortunately.
I also find Truman North's theories on targeted fraud hard to discount as a contributing (if not decisive) factor as well.
Posted by: ontherocks at December 24, 2012 10:57 AM (aZ6ew)
Posted by: nerdygirl at December 24, 2012 02:46 PM (WfUOw)
For romney it was a rich mans hobby , there's no excuse for him to be unprepared for the MSM.
Posted by: Temper Tantrum at December 24, 2012 10:57 AM (AWmfW)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at December 24, 2012 10:58 AM (R+6Q+)
Posted by: Col. Samuel Trautman at December 24, 2012 10:58 AM (6DDE+)
Doesn't Tagg qualify given his claim? I mean, this thread started boobily.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at December 24, 2012 10:59 AM (eHIJJ)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at December 24, 2012 02:55 PM (GsoHv)
That's why I limitied it to western Europe. East European hottie are unbeatable. At least until they hit forty and move on to resemble a well inflated beach ball. However, if you dig brunette whores, France is hard to beat.
Posted by: Invictus at December 24, 2012 10:59 AM (OQpzc)
Posted by: The Mega Independent at December 24, 2012 11:00 AM (46pA5)
Posted by: sauropod at December 24, 2012 11:01 AM (G/vW6)
Yeah those grapes I can't reach probably taste sour. Even if I tried and tried but never got high enough to grab them so I did not want them in the first place. Time to move on.
Posted by: Trevor (@tjexcite) at December 24, 2012 11:02 AM (Ea64Y)
I don't know what kind of standards you have; expecting me to read and comprehend your comment before I respond?
I recall some smokin' hot hookers in Italy.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at December 24, 2012 11:02 AM (GsoHv)
Posted by: Y-not at December 24, 2012 11:02 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Beto at December 24, 2012 11:04 AM (BAnPT)
Posted by: Y-not at December 24, 2012 11:06 AM (5H6zj)
Romney can make amends by funding the next election for a Republican Candidate that really wants it and wants to fight for it
Posted by: Nevergiveup
Romney may not have spent that much of his money on the election. Spent an S-load of your's though. Money that could have gone on Senate, House or State races.
He's certainly not throwing millions on another guy's run.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at December 24, 2012 11:06 AM (kdS6q)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at December 24, 2012 11:06 AM (R+6Q+)
Posted by: rdbrewer at December 24, 2012 11:07 AM (Iyg03)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at December 24, 2012 03:02 PM (GsoHv)
How dare you?!! Italian girls are the best looking in all Europe, and not a single one of them is a whore. All the whores are imported frog chicks. Or arab chicks who claim to be Spanish.
Posted by: Invictus at December 24, 2012 11:07 AM (OQpzc)
Posted by: Beto at December 24, 2012 03:04 PM (BAnPT)
I would suggest taking that money, pooling it with a couple of others maybe... and buying your OWN Ad in the Local Newspaper...
Say what YOU want....
The disconnect is that the Politicians and media have no idea how we think out here anymore....
Posted by: Romeo13 at December 24, 2012 11:07 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: Berserker at December 24, 2012 11:07 AM (FMbng)
I had a hunch he didn't have the fire in the gut. Dems like Obullshit and Clinton, they have that fire in the gut. Either one would have set fire to his mother to get the job
Posted by: kbdabear at December 24, 2012 11:08 AM (wwsoB)
The man who truly wants to be president scares me. We have a perfect example in office right now.
Posted by: Pentangle at December 24, 2012 11:08 AM (QYEQB)
Posted by: Y-not at December 24, 2012 11:11 AM (5H6zj)
Ted Turner owns about 2million acres in Nebraska and New Mexico.
What do you think he'll call his new nation? Turnerville? Turnistan?
Posted by: Invictus at December 24, 2012 11:11 AM (OQpzc)
Posted by: Precedent Nose In The Air -- Not A Cornbread Brother [/i] at December 24, 2012 11:12 AM (feFL6)
The man who truly wants to be president scares me. We have a perfect example in office right now.
Posted by: Pentangle at December 24, 2012 03:08 PM (QYEQB)
So wasn't it Romney's duty then to beat him no matter what?
Posted by: Temper Tantrum at December 24, 2012 11:12 AM (AWmfW)
I'm Jewish.
We're going out for Chinese food....of course!
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at December 24, 2012 11:13 AM (GsoHv)
When it stated to look like he might actually win, all of the 'fire' went out of his appearances and the (mild, kitten swipe style) "attacks" on obama stopped
Posted by: Mark E at December 24, 2012 11:13 AM (3+35n)
Posted by: Pentangle at December 24, 2012 03:08 PM (QYEQB)
One usually doesn't just fall into the job--exceptions would be Washington, Grant, and Eisenhower, war heroes so popular and universially acceptable that their campaigns more or less consisted of publicly saying, 'I'm running'. For the most part, however, the job goes to he (or she) willing to fight for it. Lincoln wanted it. Reagan wanted it. Are you frightened of them?
The man who doesn't want to be president yet runs anyway pisses me off.
Posted by: troyriser at December 24, 2012 11:14 AM (vtiE6)
Wasn't Soros buying up food distribution networks?
Wanna be where the power will be in twenty years?
Posted by: Invictus at December 24, 2012 11:14 AM (OQpzc)
Posted by: Randall Hoven at December 24, 2012 11:15 AM (L5atp)
Nah. Just throwing the grandmother who raised you under the bus was enough. No incendiary device needed.
Posted by: Barry Soetero at December 24, 2012 11:15 AM (eHIJJ)
Posted by: Joe in MI at December 24, 2012 11:17 AM (3R8wQ)
Posted by: johnc_ex-dem at December 24, 2012 11:19 AM (3Kxux)
Posted by: General Trulane. Tanned, Rested, Ready(Citation Needed) at December 24, 2012 11:20 AM (Z5BDI)
Cheer up guys! It's almost Christmas!
Posted by: Jon
Maybe where you live.
Here in the Blue States it's "Non-denominational Winter Festival" -- with mariachi bands and Maya Angelou poems....
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at December 24, 2012 11:21 AM (kdS6q)
I'm only voting for Perry or Rand Paul.
Plan accordingly. Nominate another Bush, or a Christie, and I'll vote for Obama for a third term. I'd rather vote for an outright enemy that a traitor. Then I'll support Perry as president of the second confederacy.
Posted by: Invictus at December 24, 2012 11:21 AM (OQpzc)
Perhaps, but Hope and Change is kinda worn out, and Forward ain't gonna cut it by then either.
Only a certifiably insane person would run for president 4 years from now. There's gonna be a lot of lower income social unrest by then and the middle class will be ready to burn D.C. down too.
We may be entering a period similar to Rome's "Year of 4 Emperors", where the president is just a walking bulls-eye for all the usual malcontents and the economically desperate
Posted by: @PurpAv at December 24, 2012 11:24 AM (8AF5n)
"Perry was never real. Never had a chance."
Yeah. And Palin was going to give up her lucrative career of bilking rubes who thought she might actually have the guts to do something other than flap her gums about running for POTUS.
Sucker.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at December 24, 2012 11:24 AM (VrVBw)
And by "stretched," I mean "stretched more than Erik Loomis 'dildo research' facility."
Funny enough, a lot of us didn't want Romney to be president, either. But he left us little choice, so he can go pound sand. Brilliant white sand; pristine, imported from the gulf coast, and filtered so that it's 98% pure.
Posted by: K-Bob at December 24, 2012 11:26 AM (PhktM)
Posted by: Dick Nixon at December 24, 2012 03:24 PM (VrVBw)
Nominate another moderate.
I dare you.
Posted by: Invictus at December 24, 2012 11:27 AM (OQpzc)
Posted by: Wooga at December 24, 2012 11:27 AM (7AVpI)
Posted by: GuyfromNH at December 24, 2012 11:27 AM (kbOju)
Then I'll support Perry as president of the second confederacy.
Posted by: Invictus at December 24, 2012 03:21 PM (OQpzc)
Good luck with that. Must say I'm envious of your rich fantasy life.
Posted by: troyriser at December 24, 2012 11:28 AM (vtiE6)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at December 24, 2012 11:28 AM (3Y7RV)
My sister's in-laws (who are on good terms with my parents) know Romney, and provided support for him during both the 2008 and 2012 campaigns. I don't know the full extent of their involvement, but I know they did at least a lot of local work for Romney. So word sometimes trickles back to my parents about odds and ends.
The OP's post meshes up with something that I learned. I don't know how badly Romney wanted the job in 2008, but after that primary he'd decided that was it. He'd lost. He was done. He wasn't going to run again.
Posted by: junior at December 24, 2012 11:29 AM (UWFpX)
Posted by: troyriser at December 24, 2012 03:28 PM (vtiE6)
Only time will tell. Nominate one more moderate and let me know how that works out for you.
Posted by: Invictus at December 24, 2012 11:29 AM (OQpzc)
Posted by: Wooga at December 24, 2012 11:32 AM (7AVpI)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at December 24, 2012 11:34 AM (T0lrq)
Posted by: Wodun at December 24, 2012 11:34 AM (PEpU8)
Posted by: Truman North (D) at December 24, 2012 11:34 AM (I2LwF)
Posted by: Some Guy in Wisconsin at December 24, 2012 11:34 AM (0g4vW)
Posted by: El Kabong at December 24, 2012 11:35 AM (akihg)
@134 -
Doh!
Dunno why, but my spaces frequently seem to disappear around here. I seem to lose at least one per post. And it only happens here.
Posted by: junior at December 24, 2012 11:35 AM (UWFpX)
@139 - the clearer it becomes that he wasn't the brilliant manager and political shark we thought he was.
--------------------------------------
You talking about Obama?
"I can do your job better than you!"
Posted by: junior at December 24, 2012 11:36 AM (UWFpX)
So wasn't it Romney's duty then to beat him no matter what?
Absolutely not. There are many things I would not stomach in a candidate. I don't give a flying fir tree (seasonal) whether Republicans win if their policies disgust me on those principles I will not yield upon. There really are times when you *have* to say, "Get thee behind me, Satan", or you cannot call yourself a man (or woman).
I didn't care for several of Romney's policies, but if he had won, I would not have felt *ashamed* of him. I do feel ashamed of Obama. The reasons are innumerable, but just one is a dead ambassador in Benghazi.
Posted by: Pentangle at December 24, 2012 11:36 AM (QYEQB)
Posted by: CarolT at December 24, 2012 11:38 AM (tmzN0)
Posted by: Brother Cavil, Keeper of the Sacred Ampersands at December 24, 2012 11:38 AM (vkUBG)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at December 24, 2012 11:38 AM (T0lrq)
Posted by: Invictus at December 24, 2012 03:29 PM (OQpzc)
Done with moderates myself, but that doesn't mean the way to go is a second confederacy, especially when you consider the outcome of the first. Besides, if you wanted to organize a resistance movement, there's no better way to kill it in the womb than to evoke the fucking slave-owning Confederacy as a model and inspiration.
Posted by: troyriser at December 24, 2012 11:38 AM (vtiE6)
Posted by: Wodun at December 24, 2012 03:34 PM (PEpU
He was a hell of a lot harsher to Perry and Gingrich than he was Obama. What should I infer from that?
Posted by: Invictus at December 24, 2012 11:39 AM (OQpzc)
Posted by: RWC at December 24, 2012 11:40 AM (sqp6o)
One usually doesn't just fall into the job--exceptions would be Washington, Grant, and Eisenhower, war heroes so popular and universially acceptable that their campaigns more or less consisted of publicly saying, 'I'm running'.
Barry was a war hero of the Free Shit Army. He led the invasion of the nicer neighborhoods of America.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at December 24, 2012 11:41 AM (4u2LN)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at December 24, 2012 11:42 AM (T0lrq)
Yeah, I ran for President for almost a decade. Doesn't mean I wanted to be President. Really.
Posted by: Romney at December 24, 2012 11:42 AM (vR2l5)
Al Gore never recovered from his loss. Now he's a dangerous, batshit-insane, America-hating, woman/genital abuser who believes in magical fairy dust.
Posted by: Fritz at December 24, 2012 11:43 AM (w3+gB)
Posted by: Some Guy in Wisconsin at December 24, 2012 11:44 AM (0g4vW)
Perry entered the race late so I don't know if that's as good an example. But what about Pawlenty? That guy started running the second McCain lost and was reasonable enough for Romney to join him on the trail.
Posted by: Uncle Milty at December 24, 2012 11:44 AM (YsFN3)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at December 24, 2012 11:44 AM (T0lrq)
Posted by: troyriser at December 24, 2012 03:38 PM (vtiE6)
I'm totally open to a more focus group approved name.
Posted by: Invictus at December 24, 2012 11:44 AM (OQpzc)
Then your vote isn't anonymous. I'm not liking the sound of that with totalitarians running the govt.
Posted by: @PurpAv at December 24, 2012 11:45 AM (8AF5n)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at December 24, 2012 11:45 AM (3Y7RV)
Just about the only thing of consequence I didn't flip on during my Presidential campaign was that I wanted to be President.
Posted by: Romney at December 24, 2012 11:47 AM (vR2l5)
Posted by: The "Grandma Got Run Over By a Reindeer Song" Guy's Got a New Song at December 24, 2012 11:48 AM (G9qZk)
"I dare you. "
I voted Perry in the primary, and Romney in the General.
Maybe you'll nominate Jefferson Davis in 2016, and run against that Devil Lincoln.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at December 24, 2012 11:48 AM (VrVBw)
Posted by: CarolT at December 24, 2012 11:48 AM (UjSt7)
Have the voters put their fingerprints on the ballot after casting the vote..... any two or more ballots with matching fingerprints are thrown out. Period. and then the state police will track down the person commiting voter fraud and shoot them.... er.... arrest them and also fine them.... what ten grand
Nah. Cut off the finger. It's poetic justice.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at December 24, 2012 11:49 AM (4u2LN)
Posted by: Brother Cavil, Keeper of the Sacred Ampersands at December 24, 2012 11:50 AM (vkUBG)
Oh, and I got a call from the RNC today begging for money and told the guy never to call again.....but I did wish him a Merry Christmas.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at December 24, 2012 11:50 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at December 24, 2012 03:44 PM (T0lrq)
Do you really think so? If true, he hid it really well. It seemed to me that losing the 2000 election unhinged him entirely.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at December 24, 2012 11:50 AM (4u2LN)
Posted by: Invictus at December 24, 2012 03:44 PM (OQpzc)
Oh, yes, please! I don't have a creative bone in my body, but lots of people here do. I would love to make a big noise about this - if it had a kewl name - if only because it would scare the hell out of the few leftists who know they couldn't actually stop us if we really got going.
Posted by: Pentangle at December 24, 2012 11:51 AM (QYEQB)
It's over. So why don't we nominate a conservative next time. Let's try something different for a change.
I think we're going to have to because I truly believe that Choomboy will try to jury-rig the Constitution (he'll have almost free reign after the next four years) and run for a third term.
LIB.
Posted by: Soona at December 24, 2012 11:51 AM (mxRtd)
...cut off two.
Posted by: Brother Cavil, Keeper of the Sacred Ampersands at December 24, 2012 03:50 PM (vkUBG)
I've got some rusty tin snips I'd be happy to donate.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at December 24, 2012 11:51 AM (4u2LN)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at December 24, 2012 11:51 AM (T0lrq)
Posted by: El Kabong at December 24, 2012 11:52 AM (akihg)
Posted by: @PurpAv at December 24, 2012 11:52 AM (8AF5n)
@purpav....
yeah, I thought of that.... but how the hell do you stop vote fraud without having a way to make sure every person votes only once..... I have no doubt that voter fraud is happening.... how do you stop it without having a way to throw out ballots that are added to the sum total of legitimate ballots that are cast? I couldn't think of any other way to make sure it was one person one vote without fingerprinting..... Help me out?
Posted by: Some Guy in Wisconsin at December 24, 2012 11:53 AM (0g4vW)
Not sure that a more resolutely conservative candidate is the way to go, because it makes him so easy for the MSM to smear him.
They'll smear him anyway (calling Romney stupid? WTF? Romney's a lot of things, but stupid definitely isn't one of them), but why make it so easy for them?
Posted by: Jay Guevara at December 24, 2012 11:54 AM (4u2LN)
Posted by: El Kabong at December 24, 2012 11:54 AM (akihg)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at December 24, 2012 11:55 AM (T0lrq)
Death penalty. $1M rewards to whistle blowers.
Posted by: @PurpAv at December 24, 2012 11:55 AM (8AF5n)
Posted by: @PurpAv at December 24, 2012 03:52 PM (8AF5n)
We're the ones who caught the break. Gore would've come unglued on 9/11, and it'd have been 25th Amendment time.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at December 24, 2012 11:57 AM (4u2LN)
Posted by: Dick Nixon at December 24, 2012 03:48 PM (VrVBw)
Isn't he dead? I think Perry fits the bill. If you disapprove a lot, vote for the other guy. It is a semi-free country. I won't vote for your moderate in the general anymore.
Suck it, sell-outs. I'm pro-American from now on. The Rs can do it my way or learn to enjoy losing. Been voting for your lame moderate candidates since 1988. No more. I mean that.
Posted by: Invictus at December 24, 2012 11:57 AM (OQpzc)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at December 24, 2012 11:58 AM (T0lrq)
In the meantime, burnin a yule log.
Posted by: sTevo at December 24, 2012 11:58 AM (VMcEw)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at December 24, 2012 11:59 AM (T0lrq)
This nation is slowly stripping itself of good leaders. Who really wants to go through the MFM gauntlet as a conservative? Who wants to expose their families to the abuse of the leftist punkery?
The left is winning and we're losing because we're nice. We have to quit being nice. I'm tired of the abuse.
Posted by: Soona at December 24, 2012 12:00 PM (mxRtd)
Posted by: CarolT at December 24, 2012 03:48 PM (UjSt7)
I love the "Never again." message. It is true, and from the heart.
Posted by: Invictus at December 24, 2012 12:02 PM (OQpzc)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at December 24, 2012 12:04 PM (T0lrq)
Posted by: Butters at December 24, 2012 12:04 PM (NIZHJ)
In the '80s he was becoming known as a sissy-voiced Southern Bible-thumper, with Big Media and a powermad shrew of a wife pulling his strings. That wasn't going to get him a Democratic VP job, so he set that aside and switched to repent-the-end-is-nigh brimstone environmentalism. Earth in the Balance was published in '92.
If you didn't notice Gore was a Manson-eyed Americans-hating psycho before 2000, you're bad at noticing things.
Posted by: oblig. at December 24, 2012 12:05 PM (cePv8)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at December 24, 2012 12:08 PM (T0lrq)
Posted by: Billy Bob, in Argentina at December 24, 2012 12:09 PM (JOMMN)
Posted by: Butters at December 24, 2012 04:04 PM (NIZHJ)
---------------------------------------------------
I agree. But we should have started forming a third party immediately after the election. I'm afraid we're going to be stuck with the repub beltway elite for the 2016 election if we don't start making the move soon.
In the meantime, the red states need to start going into full resistance mode. The balance of power lies with the red states now.
Posted by: Soona at December 24, 2012 12:09 PM (mxRtd)
Posted by: lowandslow at December 24, 2012 12:09 PM (GZitp)
Mailmen are robbed very very infrequently. Word is out that if you jack the mailman, you're gonna do a hard 20 in Federal prison.
Make the penalty for vote fraud so harsh, and so certain, people won't even think about trying.
Right now if you get caught double voting, the chances you'll actually be prosecuted are quite slim.
Posted by: @PurpAv at December 24, 2012 12:10 PM (8AF5n)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at December 24, 2012 12:11 PM (3Y7RV)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at December 24, 2012 12:12 PM (T0lrq)
I've been voting R for thirty damned years. All that has bought me is a continual loss, as there is never anything the Rs find worthy of fighting for.
I'm done.
Rs piss me off one scintilla more and I'll vote for Ron Paul, forget Rand. If it wasn't for Israel, I'd go that way today.
Posted by: Invictus at December 24, 2012 12:13 PM (OQpzc)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at December 24, 2012 12:13 PM (T0lrq)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at December 24, 2012 12:16 PM (T0lrq)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at December 24, 2012 12:16 PM (T0lrq)
Posted by: lowandslow at December 24, 2012 04:09 PM (GZitp)
Based on history, I lose nothing taking that route. At worst I lose and don't have to suffer the embarassment of having defended such ball-less losers as the current R party.
Posted by: Invictus at December 24, 2012 12:18 PM (OQpzc)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at December 24, 2012 12:18 PM (T0lrq)
Posted by: Brave Sir Robin at December 24, 2012 12:19 PM (Aitxy)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at December 24, 2012 03:59 PM (T0lrq)
The MSM? Discussing ideas? Seriously? They'd smear the guy even harder, just to avoid discussing his ideas. Recall that six months ago they were talking about Romney's dog of THIRTY FUCKING YEARS AGO.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at December 24, 2012 12:20 PM (4u2LN)
What do you mean you don't follow it. Say what you want about how Romney governed before and may have governed as President, their message was of less government to stimulate employment along with some fiscal sanity, and the electorate rejected it. If a 16 trillion dollar debt and record unemployment didn't matter now, what makes you think a 20 trillion dollar debt and record unemployment will matter in four years?
Posted by: lowandslow at December 24, 2012 12:21 PM (GZitp)
Posted by: Truman North (D) at December 24, 2012 12:22 PM (I2LwF)
Posted by: MrX at December 24, 2012 12:23 PM (PxmNZ)
I'll spend the day in a corner, curbing the urge to choke everyone in the room. Nothing says "Merry Christmas" like having to suppress rage all day. Gah.
Hope you all have a safe and happy day tomorrow.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at December 24, 2012 12:23 PM (UOM48)
I got no problem with that, I just don't want the next Presidential election cycle being dominated with our own version of magical thinking that we're going to somehow win the Presidency.
Posted by: lowandslow at December 24, 2012 12:24 PM (GZitp)
Posted by: Butters at December 24, 2012 12:25 PM (NIZHJ)
Posted by: Truman North (D) at December 24, 2012 12:26 PM (I2LwF)
The republican governors need to push through a lot of other things as well.... how about an able bodied worker law? No one can be on welfare that is able bodied.... able bodied people work and can of course receive help from private and church run charities to supplement their incomes...welfare is for the mentally retarded and the physically handicaped only... able bodied- get a fucking job... this will hopefully push the FSA into the workforce and/ or make them move to a blue/ bluer state that will no doubt welcome them with open arms. Sounds harsh right? Fuck em. The media will have a few stories on it but, truth be told, carrying Obamas water for him is a fulltime job for the LSM so they won't devote too much to attacking governors that are fixing their states problems. The republican governors need to do this shit right now.... they are called every name in the book anyway so do the right fucking thing and end the free ride for these goddamn parasites that are sucking taxpayers dry.
30! Republican governors! 24 with a state house and state senate! How is that possible? Because the MSM focuses on national isssues and national candidates. They carry Obamas water and attack anyone against Obama and the republicans can make it to power on a state level. Use this power to advance conservative/libery principles and kick the FSA to the curb! Forward! You piece of shit degenerates! Get a job or GTFO! Woot Woot!!
Posted by: Some Guy in Wisconsin at December 24, 2012 12:28 PM (0g4vW)
Never again for moderates! They all lose!"
Posted by: CarolT at December 24, 2012 03:48 PM (UjSt7)
Not this garbage again. Why not nominate a hamster, or just wear a beanie and sit in the corner gibbering?
Next time around, we'd better not see anyone named Gingrich, Perry, Santorum, Bachmann, Bush, Cain, or Pawlenty. People want to start up with that noise again and it's beyond over. Every man for himself territory.
Posted by: K-Bob at December 24, 2012 12:28 PM (PhktM)
I'll spend the day in a corner, curbing the urge to choke everyone in the room. Nothing says "Merry Christmas" like having to suppress rage all day. Gah.
Hope you all have a safe and happy day tomorrow.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at December 24, 2012 04:23 PM (UOM4
--------------------------------------------------
Got a blizzard moving into OK tomorrow. Good times.
Posted by: Soona at December 24, 2012 12:28 PM (mxRtd)
Agreed.
And the ink-stained finger is only as good as the nearest PhD chemist who can mix a good solvent.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at December 24, 2012 12:30 PM (GsoHv)
The idea that the people want conservatism/libertarianism but does't because of a massive conspiracy from our own side is a conspiracy theory. America wants Obama because its dumb and it's the path of least resistance and, oh by the way, it's wanted bigger government for over 80 years. The best we can hope for is that something happens between now and 2016 that even the media can't hide that shakes the country up. I don't think the "let's capture the media!" idea proposed by Ace has a chance because the Right is lazy when it comes to culture.
Posted by: Shoot Me at December 24, 2012 12:30 PM (qiXMt)
Posted by: Truman North (D) at December 24, 2012 12:31 PM (I2LwF)
Maybe it will get there sooner.
In time for Christmas.
I'm here 'til Thursday. Try the veal!
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at December 24, 2012 12:31 PM (GsoHv)
Posted by: MrX at December 24, 2012 04:23 PM (PxmNZ)
I agree. We need a candidate who will call out the enemies of America in no uncertain terms. Quit mincing words, and level hard-hitting accusations. Romney was too nice a guy; he should have accused Obama personally of malfeasance, and cited Fast and Furious, and later the Benghazi Bungling, on a daily basis, and hung both around Barry's skinny neck.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at December 24, 2012 12:31 PM (4u2LN)
Posted by: Truman North (D) at December 24, 2012 12:32 PM (I2LwF)
Posted by: skinnydipinacid at December 24, 2012 12:32 PM (WuCLB)
Posted by: Butters at December 24, 2012 12:33 PM (NIZHJ)
Posted by: rickl at December 24, 2012 12:33 PM (sdi6R)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at December 24, 2012 04:30 PM (GsoHv)
-----------------------------
Hell, an undergrad chemistry student could do that. Nothing to it. Might need a reducing or oxidizing agent for some inks, and that would necessitate a certain degree of expertise to a) realize and b) select.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at December 24, 2012 12:33 PM (4u2LN)
Posted by: Truman North (D) at December 24, 2012 12:35 PM (I2LwF)
It's one thing to see people fight over who's a stronger conservative, Jim Demint or Allen West, but it's beyond stupid to see people thinking we need a Perry, Bush, or some other Rovian wet dream. That's solid "moby" territory.
I've never been a single-issue voter until now. Now it's Restoration, or get the hell out of the way. If a guy can't explain the Constitution's original intent, and point out that that's exactly why we made the world more prosperous and free, then that guy is not qualified to run for anything other than the Dem nomination.
Posted by: K-Bob at December 24, 2012 12:37 PM (PhktM)
Posted by: Gault Falcon at December 24, 2012 12:38 PM (evTki)
Posted by: Shoot Me at December 24, 2012 04:30 PM (qiXMt)
-------------------------------------------------
The right is lazy? That's bullshit. The "Right" are the only ones that are working. It's probably one of the reasons we don't see counterparts for Code Pink or the SEIU. We can't spare the time even when we want to.
Posted by: Soona at December 24, 2012 12:38 PM (mxRtd)
Posted by: Shoot Me at December 24, 2012 12:46 PM (qiXMt)
Truman North I am with you..... I'm just throwing out some ideas on how the republican governors can start to deal with these problems right. fucking. now.... before the next election. Passing bills to combat voter fraud two weeks before an election is too late as the left will file a lawsuit and the left will get a lefty judge to overrule the law or place it on a shelf to be looked at later after the left has commited massive voter fraud once again.
The 30 republican governors need to take care of this now. Before 2014. before 2016. Now. When they are in power in their states.... so that they or another republican could possibly win another elections someday at the national level. It's not gonna happen with the leathal combination of a leftist media and leftist voter fraud in all the swing states. Start reform now in red states and move it to purple states when given the chance and eventually to blue states ( there are plenty of people in blue states that voted against the JEF that can petition and protest for successful anti-voter fraud laws that were passed in other states)
The republicans also need to have some libertarian party type immediately file suit against their voter fraud laws and take it before a conservative judge who will then declare it constitutional.... thereby beating the left to the punch. Avoiding the shelving of the new anti-vote fraud law... Start playing dirty like the left. That's the only way to beat them at this political game.
Posted by: Some Guy in Wisconsin at December 24, 2012 12:47 PM (0g4vW)
Posted by: rickl at December 24, 2012 12:48 PM (sdi6R)
_
"The right is lazy? That's bullshit."
_
Lazy isn't really the right word. Chickenshit is better. Look at the Derbyshire incident, the mainstream conservative blogs couldn't condemn him fast enough. For what? Speaking some absolute truths that the now "liberal GOP" doesn't want to hear.
Posted by: lowandslow at December 24, 2012 12:52 PM (GZitp)
Posted by: Mitt Romney at December 24, 2012 01:02 PM (arjnF)
My takeaway from that story is simple: He overestimated the American people.
There was a time when stupid people (a) realized they were stupid, even though they had a college degree and (b) accepted that they didn't have enough knowledge to participate effectively in the electoral process.
Now we have wussmanities majors who think they're smarter than the founders.
Posted by: AmishDude at December 24, 2012 01:14 PM (OBlZa)
Posted by: concrete girl at December 24, 2012 01:30 PM (y2Ojs)
Romney saw the visceral hatred that most of America had for his signature program; the one the JEF and his minions "modeled" their morphodite healthcare program on. He's a NE establishment RINO and I'm sure the though of getting his ass kicked relentlessly wasn't something be looked forward to. Having said all that he knew what he was getting in to when he threw his hat into ring. And sorry son, if daddy had second thoughts after committing, well suck it up princess because a lot of us were counting on him to go the distance with all he had. Because that's what a leader does....ass monkey.
Fuck the Republican Party "leadership".
Posted by: crotchetyoldjarhead at December 24, 2012 01:37 PM (vN3Mm)
Posted by: Occam's Tool at December 24, 2012 01:52 PM (OcQfO)
Posted by: CarolT at December 24, 2012 03:58 PM (z4WKX)
Posted by: CarolT at December 24, 2012 04:05 PM (z4WKX)
Posted by: CarolT at December 24, 2012 04:29 PM (z4WKX)
Posted by: occam at December 24, 2012 04:55 PM (2HloJ)
Posted by: Chris Balsz at December 24, 2012 05:37 PM (3m8RT)
Posted by: The Lightworker at December 24, 2012 07:44 PM (tRes4)
I cry bullshit but if true then why did Romney even bother.
As for 2016 The republican establishment will try a trifecta and try to run Lynsdey Graham or Huckabee or some other notable RINO.
Maybe after the US is totally destroyed by socialism the republican heirarchy will sit back and wonder why their grand candidates didnt work.
Posted by: retired military at December 25, 2012 09:44 AM (LdEvS)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2955 seconds, 365 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Paladin at December 24, 2012 10:27 AM (uQ4Oe)