January 17, 2012
— Ace He hasn't accepted the invitations for two Florida dates yet, and one of his strategists is grousing.
[A] key Romney adviser is expressing fatigue and frustration over what he sees as a never-ending series of GOP debates."There are too many of these," Romney strategist Stuart Stevens said after Monday night's Fox News debate at the Myrtle Beach Convention Center. "We have to bring some order to it. We haven't accepted FloridaÂ…It's kind of like a cruise that's gone on too long."
I don't suppose that anyone can disagree too much that there have been too many debates. I wish he had skipped earlier ones, though, because most debates are about him, and you rarely get to hear other people except vis a vis Romney.
Maybe his thinking is that, given an apparently wide lead in Florida (Romney 46, Gingrich 20, Santorum 12), he's got Florida wrapped up and can afford to coast.
The problem with that rationale is that the field may not be five-strong when he gets to Florida. Perry or Gingrich or Santorum may drop out by then, and the remaining candidates will get a bump from that.
Prediction: He goes to both debates or at least one. Maybe he'll skip one to make the point that he's not required to attend every single one of them.
Posted by: Ace at
08:25 AM
| Comments (184)
Post contains 235 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: DarkLord© for Prez!
This message brought to you by Morons Against HTML Abuse at January 17, 2012 08:27 AM (GBXon)
Posted by: IreneFingIrene at January 17, 2012 08:27 AM (JNqU9)
Yeah, it's over.
Posted by: Guy Who Pisses In The Punchbowl at January 17, 2012 08:28 AM (23Ios)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 17, 2012 08:28 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: Hollowpoint at January 17, 2012 08:28 AM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: imp at January 17, 2012 08:29 AM (UaxA0)
Especially if he keeps getting his behind beat like a drum by Newt like he did yesterday.
Posted by: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus at January 17, 2012 08:29 AM (+inic)
Posted by: MJ at January 17, 2012 08:29 AM (/x4oj)
But there have been too many damn worthless debates.
Posted by: Vic at January 17, 2012 08:30 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Bannable at January 17, 2012 08:30 AM (6xrsv)
Posted by: alexthechick at January 17, 2012 08:30 AM (vKv4x)
@ 7 Stellar HTML day at the HQ.
So this is what it's like inside Ace's self-contained fact space?
Posted by: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus at January 17, 2012 08:30 AM (+inic)
Nah, I'm poised for a comeback. Say, have you heard about my 9-9-9 plan?
Posted by: Herman Cain at January 17, 2012 08:30 AM (YXmuI)
@ 13 he may find hiself going one on one with Perry on super Tuesday
Perry Mason got into the race?
Posted by: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus at January 17, 2012 08:32 AM (+inic)
Posted by: willow at January 17, 2012 08:32 AM (h+qn8)
Posted by: BurtTC at January 17, 2012 08:33 AM (TOk1P)
Now it's ok that Mittens wants to cut back?
Eat it. Each state gets two or three debates of their own. Suck it, Trebek.
Posted by: grognard at January 17, 2012 08:33 AM (NS2Mo)
I'm (ung) tan, rested (ughn) and ready (grrumngh) baby!
Posted by: John King at January 17, 2012 08:34 AM (SY2Kh)
Perry's gone on Sunday.
Noot, maybe, too. Or Santorum.
Two out of three will drop out on Sunday after SC.
Posted by: soothsayer at January 17, 2012 08:34 AM (sqkOB)
Posted by: MJ at January 17, 2012 08:35 AM (/x4oj)
So the only left for FL will be Ron Paul, Noot or Santorum, and Mitt Romney.
If that is indeed the case, then Mitt shouldn't bother with the debates.
Think about ittm.
Posted by: soothsayer at January 17, 2012 08:35 AM (sqkOB)
Posted by: Wilford Brimley at January 17, 2012 08:35 AM (Jcj0G)
Posted by: Extreme Blog Makeover at January 17, 2012 08:36 AM (/x4oj)
Posted by: nickless at January 17, 2012 08:38 AM (MMC8r)
"We haven't accepted FloridaÂ…It's kind of like a cruise that's gone on too long."
Let's see, will MMfA go after this on a "smacks of elitism" angle, or will they go for the "how callous a statement, while people have DIED ON A CRUISE recently?"
Posted by: reason at January 17, 2012 08:38 AM (+hPIb)
Posted by: Lincolntf at January 17, 2012 08:38 AM (uIz80)
Posted by: The Mega Independent at January 17, 2012 08:39 AM (Ui+qF)
...........
Naah.. they're in it for a while, I believe. Especially if Romney decides to skip debates. They will look on it as an opportunity.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at January 17, 2012 08:39 AM (f9c2L)
Posted by: The Mega Independent at January 17, 2012 08:40 AM (Ui+qF)
I'm (ung) tan, rested (ughn) and ready (grrumngh) baby!
Posted by: John King at January 17, 2012 12:34 PM (SY2Kh)
Threadwin.
Posted by: reason at January 17, 2012 08:41 AM (+hPIb)
Disagree. You may not get the candidate you prefer, but that doesn't mean the debates haven't served a purpose. They have been a mechanism for testing and sorting out the field. If it weren't for the debates, Herman Cain might still be on top.
Nevertheless, there is a point of diminishing returns and we've reached it. We've gone through the whole field, with everyone having a period at the top. Well, except for providing more opportunities for Ron Paul to beclown himself.
Posted by: pep at January 17, 2012 08:42 AM (YXmuI)
Time to make the hair look good for the Sunday morning yacker shows
Posted by: kbdabear at January 17, 2012 08:42 AM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: The terrorist Hobbit formerly known as Donna at January 17, 2012 08:43 AM (qmF3d)
Posted by: probably banned now at January 17, 2012 08:44 AM (Rwrs+)
Posted by: Henny Youngman at January 17, 2012 08:44 AM (Ui+qF)
Posted by: sandy burger at January 17, 2012 08:45 AM (DRcoj)
Posted by: Dianne Sawyer at January 17, 2012 08:45 AM (tqwMN)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 17, 2012 08:46 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: imp at January 17, 2012 12:29 PM (UaxA0)
Speaking of easy on the eyes, am I the only person who didn't know about this?
Posted by: RushBabe at January 17, 2012 08:46 AM (tQHzJ)
Maybe let ace post the primaries and then they'll be inside a grey box. Okay, I'm done now.
Posted by: The Mega Independent at January 17, 2012 08:46 AM (Ui+qF)
Posted by: Wall_E at January 17, 2012 08:46 AM (48wze)
Perry or Gingrich or Santorum may drop out by then, and the remaining candidates will get a bump from that.
Fixed that for you, Luscious.
BAH-CLUCK!!!
Posted by: That Chicken at January 17, 2012 08:46 AM (FJhdv)
In fact, I'd be floored if they weren't the ones leading the Bronx Cheer there.
Posted by: Jimmuy at January 17, 2012 08:46 AM (pbKln)
Posted by: kbdabear at January 17, 2012 08:47 AM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: ontherocks at January 17, 2012 08:47 AM (ZJCDy)
That shithead race-monger Rep. Cleaver says: "A white president, frankly, could be pushed a great deal more than we would push President Obama because nobody would accuse him or her of having partiality towards African-Americans."
Lowering the bar for Obama because he's black.
Posted by: soothsayer at January 17, 2012 08:47 AM (sqkOB)
Posted by: Wall_E at January 17, 2012 08:47 AM (48wze)
Posted by: sandy burger at January 17, 2012 08:48 AM (DRcoj)
True. That's because that was the beginning of the process. We've seen them now.
Posted by: pep at January 17, 2012 08:48 AM (YXmuI)
Of course, there are too many debates. But they have now replaced reality TV as cheap entertainment. All that was missing from last night's debate was the crowd doing the Arsenio - woh woh woh arm chant. Maybe next cycle the serious candidates can decide to hold their own serious debates that do not resemble a high school student-council debate.
That being said, the debates are a lot better now that there is a smaller number of candidates. If they would just get rid of Paul, we could have a pretty good and serious debate. Assuming they find some good moderators. Last night's were pretty good, except for Juan, but he did allow Newt to shine - so having him ask questions wasn't a total loss.
Posted by: SH at January 17, 2012 08:49 AM (gmeXX)
These debates don't matter now, now that Perry is doing better at them.
Let's get these early primaries over with already! I can't have the Republican voters finding out what Obama's opposition research teams already know about me.
Posted by: Willard, the electable one at January 17, 2012 08:49 AM (xgj/f)
The only possible plus I see right now to this endless cavalcade of debates is that it will desensitize the country at-large to the discussion of these topics. Granted, the political junkies (and those of us that genuinely care about the future of our country) will continue to pay attention, but all of the "I'm only political when it's cool" hipsters will have long since gotten bored. Then, when the general election hits, and Barry shifts into Media Saturation Mode, it backfires, because everyone's already tired of hearing about Bain Capital, or Healthcare Reform, or 99 Weeks of Unemployment Bennies...
And let's face it, Barry will shift into Media Saturation Mode. He can't not. It's all he knows. And by then, the media will likely be the only friends he's still got.
Posted by: reason at January 17, 2012 08:49 AM (5npD/)
I expect he'll go to at least one.
Stuff like this is as much about warning moderators that if they want Mitt to show, they better give him some plums. I suspect his campaign is fuming that Fox gave Newt the chance to rip Ron Paul for his Osama bin Laden stuff instead of Newt.
Posted by: Emperor of Icecream at January 17, 2012 08:50 AM (epBek)
Yes, that's it. He fears Perry's mighty poll numbers.
Posted by: pep at January 17, 2012 08:51 AM (YXmuI)
Pay per view...we'd solve that debt problem thingy.
Posted by: Tami at January 17, 2012 08:51 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 17, 2012 08:51 AM (i6RpT)
Mitt Romney: Oh, barnacles, err, I got that from a speaking engagement. Yep, that's where I got it. Just throw it in the "loose change" jar. Thanks.
Ann Romeny: Hey Mitt what are these brown stains on your shirt?
Posted by: The Robot Devil at January 17, 2012 08:51 AM (136wp)
Never ending gotcha moments aka gifts to the democrat party. We need to pile on Obama, not each other.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at January 17, 2012 08:52 AM (i/wm2)
Posted by: Jean at January 17, 2012 08:52 AM (WkuV6)
This guy is getting some piss poor advice.
Does Not Bode Well.
Posted by: ontherocks at January 17, 2012 08:52 AM (ZJCDy)
Mitt should skip the debates - they can only hurt him. Contrary to conventional wisdom (or NRO wisdom), Mitt is a lousy debater. He spews words without every taking a pause or considering that a one-word answer may be appropriate. He uses all of his time as if this was a high school debate format where you get a point for every argument you make. In the process he either makes no point at all, confuses the point, or completely overwhelms the audience to where it forgets the good point he made at the very beginning. He could learn a lot form Newt. Sounding coherent while spewing out words is not always the most effective way to build an argument. Have you ever noticed that when people say Mitt won it is only because they say he didn't hurt himself. He never wins on the actual debate - only in relative terms. That is all fine and dandy, and is akin to the mantra that you can win in football with a QB who doesn't make mistake. But it doesn't make you a good debater.
Posted by: SH at January 17, 2012 08:53 AM (gmeXX)
Posted by: Pragmatic at January 17, 2012 08:53 AM (lTnzg)
Who cares? Romney will never get my vote. . . .I wish he would skip running as a Republican altogether (because he isn't one)!
Pssst! Romney's a Democrat in RINO clothing!
Posted by: Pragmatic at January 17, 2012 08:54 AM (lTnzg)
Wow, what an original thought. Nobody around here has ever said that before.
Posted by: pep at January 17, 2012 08:54 AM (YXmuI)
Posted by: Lincolntf at January 17, 2012 08:55 AM (hiMsy)
True. That's because that was the beginning of the process. We've seen them now.
Posted by: pep at January 17, 2012 12:48 PM (YXmuI)
Right. Had we cut last night, we never would have gotten Romney's "I didn't flip-flop. I changed my mind. That's different. See?" moment.
We all know exactly what this is all about: People are landing punches on Romney and Bachmann isn't there to defend him anymore.
Posted by: Jimmuy at January 17, 2012 08:55 AM (pbKln)
Posted by: Emperor of Icecream at January 17, 2012 08:56 AM (epBek)
When the President of the United States becomes a joke and a punch line, you know we are in deep shit.
IRONY, this was exactly why the Democrat Party peddled Barry as the Only Logical Successor to Dubya.
Posted by: reason at January 17, 2012 08:56 AM (5npD/)
Posted by: Rick Santorum at January 17, 2012 08:56 AM (gmeXX)
Posted by: tasker at January 17, 2012 08:57 AM (r2PLg)
We have given the nudge, the plan must be followed, Romney will be nominee, you can't change fate, get on the super highway to serfdom.
Posted by: The Adjustment Bureau, Republican Division at January 17, 2012 08:58 AM (JYheX)
Posted by: alexthechick at January 17, 2012 08:58 AM (VtjlW)
OT
Anybody stupid enough to give money to HSUS should read this. They use pitiful animal pictures to get people to send them money, then they actually spend less than 1% on animal rescue/welfare. I'll bet the sons of bitches give a shitload more money to PETA than that.
Posted by: maddogg at January 17, 2012 08:59 AM (OlN4e)
Perry has done a good job of setting expectations. By virtue of not shitting his pants during an epileptic seizure he is deemed to have "won" the debate.
Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at January 17, 2012 08:59 AM (+lsX1)
Posted by: tasker at January 17, 2012 08:59 AM (r2PLg)
That's more Santorum, tasker.
I agree that Romney is not a great debater. He has flashes, and long streaks of competence. But his competence is unexciting and he gets rattled too easily.
Gingrich is the only great debater this go around, although last night he came off worse on substance when he sparred with Santorum on Social Security and with Romney on SuperPACs. But given the substance he had to work with, he out-executed them both.
Posted by: Emperor of Icecream at January 17, 2012 09:00 AM (epBek)
Posted by: Aaron Rodgers at January 17, 2012 09:00 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: Emperor of Icecream at January 17, 2012 09:01 AM (epBek)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at January 17, 2012 09:01 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Juan Williams at January 17, 2012 09:01 AM (FcR7P)
Electability!
Posted by: Gimley at January 17, 2012 09:02 AM (ubduJ)
@70 - a pink one? Man, they're gonna go there?
The LGBTQ community is gonna go ballistic. They're gonna insist that we re-invade, and teach him a lesson on how hazing and bullying are completely unacceptable hate-crimes.
I sure hope Iran knows what kind of can of worms he's opening up now...
/sarc
Posted by: reason at January 17, 2012 09:02 AM (5npD/)
Posted by: Willard, the electable one at January 17, 2012 09:02 AM (xgj/f)
Posted by: t-bird at January 17, 2012 09:04 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: Jean at January 17, 2012 09:04 AM (WkuV6)
Posted by: Beff J. at January 17, 2012 09:05 AM (79uY1)
Posted by: tasker at January 17, 2012 09:05 AM (r2PLg)
I really liked jarts, and even as 7-yr-olds, my friends and I never came close to killing each other. I s'pose we could learn, though.
Posted by: RushBabe at January 17, 2012 09:06 AM (tQHzJ)
More than two dozen gay sharks beached themselves on Cape Cod a few days ago.
Are they stupid? An "animal welfare organization" tried to rescue them meddle and managed to save a bunch of the stupid gay sharks.
"SCUSSET BEACH, Mass.—An animal welfare organization says up to 30 dolphins have been found stranded on five Cape Cod beaches, and only 11 were able to be released.
Kerry Branon of the International Fund for Animal Welfare says the common dolphins were found in Dennis, Brewster, Orleans, Eastham and Wellfleet on Saturday. She says of the 28 to 30 dolphins found, 10 to 12 have died and eight were inaccessible to rescuers.
Branon told The Associated Press the surviving dolphins were given blood tests and evaluated to determine their health, then some were tagged and released at Scusset Beach.
The cause of the beaching could not immediately be determined."Posted by: soothsayer at January 17, 2012 09:06 AM (sqkOB)
@96 - it's like a Cuban cigar that just won't snuff out. I mean, at some point, you simply can't possibly fit any more pate onto your water cracker.
Why, I'd bet money that we'd have nothing but debates from now 'til Election Day if somebody didn't stop this insanity! Anyone wanna make it interesting? Eh? $10,000?
Posted by: reason at January 17, 2012 09:06 AM (5npD/)
Posted by: SH at January 17, 2012 09:07 AM (gmeXX)
When do the shitbirds in WI have to deliver those petitions? COB
Gov. Scott Walker on Rush's show right now.
Posted by: RushBabe at January 17, 2012 09:07 AM (tQHzJ)
Posted by: Zit Romney at January 17, 2012 09:07 AM (E7yM+)
My Newtie will be the nominee. He is the most electable anyway, because he is the best debater.
I am sure that the media will not talk about how I was fucking a married man. We are married now, so that doesn't matter. Women voters will love me. I have perfect hair.
Posted by: Calista-bird at January 17, 2012 09:07 AM (xgj/f)
Posted by: I am the walrus, goo-goo-ga-joo at January 17, 2012 09:07 AM (ybkwK)
Posted by: Beff J. at January 17, 2012 09:09 AM (79uY1)
Also, he had a Gingrich Moment when he proposed dealing with one big government program (unemployment benefits) by adding a new big government program (job training).
Posted by: Hollowpoint at January 17, 2012 09:09 AM (SY2Kh)
The cause of the beaching could not immediately be determined.
They heard that Dolphin-Lover guy was test-driving a new Ski-Doo.
Posted by: reason at January 17, 2012 09:11 AM (5npD/)
Posted by: Zit Romney at January 17, 2012 09:11 AM (E7yM+)
Posted by: Newt Ate Romney's Lunch Last Night at January 17, 2012 09:11 AM (i330i)
Posted by: t-bird at January 17, 2012 09:12 AM (FcR7P)
........
Yeah.. because not voting for him guarantees Obama a victory.. and what could go wrong with another 4 years of the SCOAMF? There's only the Bush tax cuts sunsetting and maybe a couple Supreme Court nominations.. that's all.. nothing important.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at January 17, 2012 09:12 AM (f9c2L)
Posted by: Big Al at January 17, 2012 09:13 AM (UWp/G)
Posted by: t-bird at January 17, 2012 09:13 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: Hollowpoint at January 17, 2012 01:09 PM (SY2Kh)
I think it's a good idea for the funemployed to learn how to barter for McNuggets.
Posted by: Mayor McCheese at January 17, 2012 09:13 AM (E7yM+)
I have perfect hairhelmet.
Mrs. Reason commented on that this past weekend, actually.
She had two points:
1. Helmet hair.
2. An uncanny overall resemblance to John McCain's wife
Posted by: reason at January 17, 2012 09:14 AM (5npD/)
Posted by: RushBabe at January 17, 2012 09:14 AM (tQHzJ)
Posted by: sandy burger at January 17, 2012 09:14 AM (DRcoj)
Who cares? Romney will never get my vote. . . .I wish he would skip running as a Republican altoghether (because he isn't one)! Posted by: Pragmatic
I think you need to find a new name because you're not really "pragmatic."
Hrothgar had it right this morning. It's very mathematical.
ABO > ABR
Posted by: Sean Bannion at January 17, 2012 09:14 AM (sbV1u)
.........
Or spelling.. or, did your school teach that if the "k" was silent you didn't need it?
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at January 17, 2012 09:14 AM (f9c2L)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at January 17, 2012 09:14 AM (i330i)
@ 44 If it weren't for the debates, Herman Cain might still be on top.
Shoot, if it weren't for the debates, Rick Perry might still be on top!
Posted by: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus at January 17, 2012 09:14 AM (+inic)
Posted by: bannor, voting for NotRomney at January 17, 2012 09:15 AM (6AXh/)
2. An uncanny overall resemblance to John McCain's wife
She's the heiress to a beer distributorship fortune too!?!?!?
Well, that changes everything.
Calista, my darling, pour me a cold one.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at January 17, 2012 09:16 AM (sbV1u)
I'm thinking "Failure To Stay In Water" had something to do with it.
I don't understand why this is an age old mystery. Maybe dolphins and whales do this because they're stupid and this is how nature thins the herd. Crazy, I know.
It's probably due to global warming. Because stuff like this never happened before.
Posted by: soothsayer at January 17, 2012 09:16 AM (sqkOB)
Posted by: Lance Armstrong at January 17, 2012 09:17 AM (i330i)
Posted by: Typical Provincetown Resident at January 17, 2012 09:18 AM (sbV1u)
It's probably due to global warming. Because stuff like this never happened before.
Posted by: soothsayer at January 17, 2012 01:16 PM (sqkOB)
The only rational conclusion is that dolphins and whales are Democrats.
Posted by: grognard at January 17, 2012 09:18 AM (NS2Mo)
Gingrich, who had my attention (briefly) is done for me. He is a whining, fat, malicious little twit, riding on the coat-tails of President Reagan (forgetting that he had to, um, resign, and many thought him a self-centered little blowhard during his reign). Perry? Love the guy, but he has blown several chances to win the hearts and minds of the voters. Santorum? I am ok with him, but in the one minute I watched the hazing last night he was whining about minutes given to Romney like a toddler whose Vanilla Wafer measures a few mm smaller. I don't like whiners, in the event you can't tell. Who is left? Oh, Ron Paul. One word: insane. That leaves me with Romney, keeping in mind I would vote for a baboon with swollen red hindquarters before I'd vote for Barry. Pragmatism, people.
These debates have turned into a "mean girls" sista sorority hazing. They are stupid. After each one, there is a Drudge vote and the Ron Paul people vote en mass. Then the conservative blogs, like Michelle Malkin, wail and shriek and pull out their eyelashes in mass trichotillomania, howling lamentations to the wind. Or, if it makes the non-Romney people feel better, they vote for their pet candidate in polls here and there and threaten to not vote in November. Rinse. Vomit. Repeat.
If there was a candidate who could win the hearts and minds of all the conservatives in the country, where was he all this time since 2010? Huh?
The debates serve no purpose at this time, the sheer number of them (like riveting reruns of a Discovery Channel examination of frog feces), except to provide late-night TV material to bash the GOP. Oh! And to fracture any type of unity going forward. Well done! Oh! And to make it much easier on the Obummer people's digging for information.
A great big, fat, flatulent "whatever." Is it over yet?
Posted by: ChristyBlinky loves Rubio at January 17, 2012 09:19 AM (baL2B)
Which makes about as much sense as the rest of the theories I've heard.
Posted by: DarkLord© for Prez!
This message brought to you by Morons Against HTML Abuse at January 17, 2012 09:19 AM (GBXon)
Posted by: tasker at January 17, 2012 09:19 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at January 17, 2012 01:14 PM (f9c2L)
Man, I really need to go back to sckhool.
Posted by: Tit Romney at January 17, 2012 09:19 AM (E7yM+)
We were promised that the seas would have risen to that point by now. Al Gore specifically told us that the ocean would have covered that beach by now!
What have you done to thwart our glorious plot for world domination through Dolphopogenic Global Warming?!??!?
Curse you for causing the tides to recede, Barack Obama!
Posted by: The Illumi-dolphi at January 17, 2012 09:20 AM (5npD/)
Posted by: snort! at January 17, 2012 09:21 AM (K/USr)
Curse you for causing the tides to recede, Barack Obama!
Posted by: The Illumi-dolphi at January 17, 2012 01:20 PM (5npD/)
So guys are so boned. So long, and thanks for all the fish.
Posted by: The Xeno-dolphi at January 17, 2012 09:23 AM (E7yM+)
Posted by: SH at January 17, 2012 09:23 AM (ym/iP)
What in his past indicates that he will defend anything conservative in face of a democrat filibuster.
Electing a Tea Party-centered House and Senate along with him.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at January 17, 2012 09:24 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: tasker at January 17, 2012 09:24 AM (r2PLg)
FIFY
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at January 17, 2012 09:24 AM (8y9MW)
FTFY.
Posted by: The Illumi-dolphi at January 17, 2012 09:24 AM (5npD/)
What is that? Tremors. We don't like that. Whatever that was, it was scary.
Must get away. Must swim fast. Get away. Get far away. *shlooop* What is this? Land? Shit.
Posted by: Dolphins at January 17, 2012 09:25 AM (xgj/f)
Posted by: bannor, voting for NotRomney at January 17, 2012 09:26 AM (6AXh/)
Or... this is how that wacky evolution works.
Dolphins and whales beach themselves until someday one of them can walk on land!
Yeah, that's the ticket!
Posted by: soothsayer at January 17, 2012 09:27 AM (sqkOB)
that's pissing in the wind if GOP leadership on the hill isn't dumped over board.
Posted by: bannor, voting for NotRomney at January 17, 2012 01:26 PM (6AXh/)
Maybe. Maybe not.
Only one way to find out though.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at January 17, 2012 09:27 AM (sbV1u)
It's only Jan 17, and I'm pretty sure that Romney's tax return isn't of the short form variety.
What's the next True Conservative Republican line of attack going to be? That Romney isn't paying his "fair share" and that Romney's tax returns show that we need to increase taxes on the rich?
Posted by: Hollowpoint at January 17, 2012 09:27 AM (SY2Kh)
Stop that. It's not going to happen (especially the Senate) so don't try to claim that we're going to have a Congress that will pull him to the right. At best we'll get slightly more control in the House (and still not a majority with Tea Party ideals), and we'll have around 52 - 53 in the Senate.
If we don't have a President who is willing to fight (as in: use up political capital, and turn away so-called "moderates" fight) for Conservative Principles, then we're not slowing down (let alone stopping) the march toward socialism.
So instead of pointing to a fantasy, answer the question: In his record, what suggests that Mitt Romney will actually fight for conservative values/conservative justices?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at January 17, 2012 09:27 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: SH at January 17, 2012 09:29 AM (ym/iP)
Nothing. Does that make Obama a better choice?
Posted by: mrshad at January 17, 2012 09:29 AM (Xqfwb)
Posted by: Beached Whales at January 17, 2012 09:30 AM (FcR7P)
..........
There are no guarantees with Romney. But quite a lot is guaranteed with Obama.
So, go ahead and take your chances, ya jackwad. But don't come around and bitch about it well into Obama's second term.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at January 17, 2012 09:30 AM (f9c2L)
Posted by: Obama 2012 at January 17, 2012 09:31 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: AllenG
........
So yeah.. might as well re-elect Obama then according to your logic.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at January 17, 2012 09:31 AM (f9c2L)
You know what's funny? This is what Mitt Romney gets for forgoing his governor's salary (roughly $140K/yr).
He coulda paid income taxes on that, but instead...
So, you got a guy like Obama who's income has been mainly from the public teat. Obama takes his teat money, pays taxes on it, and looks like a swell guy.
Posted by: soothsayer at January 17, 2012 09:32 AM (sqkOB)
Stop that. It's not going to happen (especially the Senate) so don't try to claim that we're going to have a Congress that will pull him to the right.
Might not happen.
But if you think that's a fantasy, I'll tell you that Rick Perry swearing in as the 45th President of the U.S. in 2013 is a bigger fantasy.
So stop that.
If you make Congress more conservative it's a check on the POTUS. Not a perfect check, but one to force enough compromises to get more right, instead of whatever Mitch McConnell and John Boehner are defining as "the middle" these days.
What's in Romney's record that makes me think he's conservative? Nothing. He's also not my guy.
What's in Rick Perry's record that makes me think he can win a national election? Nothing.
Rick Perry has proven he can win elections in a red state where more people than not see the world that way he does.
That's not de facto a winning formula for a national campaign. It might be...but after 8 years of Bush, it's unlikely.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at January 17, 2012 09:32 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Willard the Rat at January 17, 2012 09:36 AM (i330i)
Posted by: George HW Bush at January 17, 2012 09:37 AM (i330i)
Posted by: SH at January 17, 2012 09:39 AM (ym/iP)
@123 - You owe me a new keyboard. (I should know better than to eat/drink when I read the comments here.....)
Posted by: Teresa in Fort Worth, TX at January 17, 2012 09:39 AM (0xqzf)
Posted by: SH at January 17, 2012 09:49 AM (ym/iP)
It is too easy for everyone to make him, and by extension his absence, the main issue if he isn't there. All he needs to do right now is keep showing up and he's very likely to be the nominee.
Posted by: CausticConservative at January 17, 2012 09:51 AM (gT3jF)
Posted by: SH at January 17, 2012 01:49 PM (ym/iP)
Don't disagree with 99% of what you said.
Except this...
Mitt will not simply get my vote for being not Obama.
Mitt won't get my vote in the primary for not being Obama. But he will in the general if he is the nominee.
Beause Obama really is that much of an epic fucking disaster.
This is demonstrable fact.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at January 17, 2012 09:54 AM (sbV1u)
As far as the primaries go, I agree we should vote for the most conservative candidate. Even if Romney gets the nomination, it would be more reason for him to toe the conservative line if he had solid conservative opposition in the primaries.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at January 17, 2012 09:55 AM (f9c2L)
Posted by: Greg Q at January 17, 2012 10:05 AM (/0a60)
Posted by: SH at January 17, 2012 10:09 AM (gmeXX)
Posted by: Hrothgar at January 17, 2012 10:10 AM (i3+c5)
Posted by: Burke at January 17, 2012 10:29 AM (9N3G1)
Posted by: Valiant at January 17, 2012 11:07 AM (aFxlY)
Posted by: ambrosia at January 17, 2012 11:35 AM (oZfic)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3119 seconds, 312 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Hollowpoint at January 17, 2012 08:26 AM (SY2Kh)