June 16, 2012
— Open Blogger Sorry about not being here last week, but last Saturday was right in the middle of the BK brouhaha and comments for all posts had been disabled. At that point, I really didn't know if there was ever going to be another chess thread, so I thought it prudent to just lay low for awhile and see how it all played out.
Seems to be back to normal now, though. More or less.
Anyway, here's a chess set worthy of a real moron:

Capture a piece, do a shot! What could possibly go wrong? Plus, I'm sure all you morons really like Pabst Blue Ribbon ("the Valu-Rite of beers").
The only thing lacking is that the shot glasses aren't in pornographic shapes. If we could only get that, then we could declare it to be the only official AoSHQ-approved chess set.
Another fun endgame
Unfortunately, I've been way too busy to go through all the analysis and comments about the endgame I put up last time, and you all have probably forgotten about it, anyway. So here's another problem:

Believe it or not, White to move can actually win in this position. The question is, how?
Game of the Week
This week's famous chess game is Botvinnik - Fischer, Varna Olympiad 1962. This was a game for the ages. It has been extensively analyzed all over the place, most notably by Fischer in his book My 60 Memorable Games. Highlight #1: Botvinnik had come up with an innovation in the Gruenfeld he thought was a killer, which he was able to use against Fischer. This would have been great except that Bobby, under the pressure of tournament conditions, found the one continuation that Botvinnik had missed (17... Qxf4). Botvinnik was devastated. He wrote afterwards, "[t]he reader can guess that my equanimity was wrecked." Highlight #2: Botvinnik eventually got back into the game, which was adjourned at move 45 with Fischer having a small but definite advantage. The story I've heard about this is that the Soviets analyzed all night and found the one line that allowed Botvinnik to stay in the game. The Americans (poss. one of the Byrne brothers?) had found it, too, but Fischer, being Fischer, had gotten into one of his usual pointless squabbles with whoever it was that found it and wasn't speaking to him, so he didn't see the continuation himself until Botvinnik played it. The game was drawn, mainly because Fischer, as usual, was his own worst enemy.
You can play through it yourself here.
Chess Books That Should Be Updated to Algebraic(4th in a series)
Dover Publications should just upgrade its entire catalog of chess books, but it's probably not cost effective for them to do so. But if they would do just one, this one would be the one I would prefer. I've mentioned this book in an earlier thread, it's got tons of games and not just the 'famous' ones that get reprinted all the time. This book should be in every serious player's collection.
Thanks to those of you who have sent me tips for this thread. They may be sent to me at
OregonMuse
and then the at sign
followed by yahoo
and then dot
com
Posted by: Open Blogger at
02:22 PM
| Comments (82)
Post contains 547 words, total size 4 kb.
Posted by: Ulsterman and the White House Insider at June 16, 2012 02:30 PM (+DaAO)
Posted by: buzzion at June 16, 2012 02:33 PM (GULKT)
Posted by: hanoverfist at June 16, 2012 02:34 PM (HiKk0)
Posted by: dfbaskwill at June 16, 2012 02:42 PM (ndlFj)
Posted by: CoolCzech at June 16, 2012 02:45 PM (niZvt)
Who is to move in the endgame setup?
Assuming white to move...
1) h3 .. Ke5
2) Kf3 .. Kf6
3) Kg3 .. Kg6
4) h4 .. g5xh4
5) Kxh4 .. [zugzwang?]
and then the white king and pawn slowly/carefully march to promotion and the win.
Posted by: knob at June 16, 2012 02:45 PM (54hYa)
Posted by: steevy at June 16, 2012 02:46 PM (Xb3hu)
By stabbing your opponent in the eye and declaring victory?
Posted by: booger at June 16, 2012 02:54 PM (HI6wa)
Posted by: King Barry O. at June 16, 2012 03:06 PM (U3z55)
Posted by: OregonMuse at June 16, 2012 03:07 PM (xm1A1)
Sorry, I don't think so. Just because White is a pawn up doesn't mean he can necessarily force a win. I fact, I believe the position your analysis leads to is one of those classic drawn positions - with exact play by Black, of course.
Posted by: OregonMuse at June 16, 2012 03:11 PM (xm1A1)
If white can keep his king adjacent to his pawn in his march up the board, he should be able to prevent a draw.
Posted by: GMan at June 16, 2012 03:18 PM (UkbKS)
14/15: Yeah, careful is the operative word. White would need to keep the black king from alternating between the G/H files. If the pawn gets to the 7th rank and the black king is directly in front with the white king directly behind, of course it draws.
I think the 'careful' operation, just imagining it in my brain, is to keep the White king on the H file, either even or one rank ahead of the white pawn. I believe that would secure the pawn promote.
Posted by: knob at June 16, 2012 03:30 PM (54hYa)
Posted by: Sticky Wicket at June 16, 2012 03:31 PM (L7hol)
Play it out. You can certainly force the Black King back, but once you've pushed it back to the 8th rank, I think you'll find that you will not be able to dislodge Black from the crucial square(s) without risking either stalemate or losing the pawn.. Try it.
Posted by: OregonMuse at June 16, 2012 03:34 PM (xm1A1)
win in this position. The question is, how?
Prehensile nose.
Posted by: Stimpy at June 16, 2012 03:42 PM (Y6J63)
I believe that would draw.
h4 ... gxh4
g5 ... Ke5
Kf3 ... h3
How does white force the win?
Kf3 puts the white King closer to the action, and I would consider following with h3
Posted by: fluffy at June 16, 2012 03:49 PM (z9HTb)
Posted by: andycanuck at June 16, 2012 04:01 PM (nrW1y)
Posted by: west town at June 16, 2012 04:01 PM (V8Hba)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at June 16, 2012 04:03 PM (piMMO)
Posted by: MrX at June 16, 2012 04:24 PM (ZsAO3)
Posted by: rickl at June 16, 2012 04:26 PM (sdi6R)
See comments 9, and 14
Posted by: OregonMuse at June 16, 2012 04:29 PM (xm1A1)
Posted by: rickl at June 16, 2012 04:32 PM (sdi6R)
How do you figure? After 1... gxh4, Black now has a passed pawn of his own and it looks like White will barely hold on to the draw, let alone force a win.
Posted by: OregonMuse at June 16, 2012 04:32 PM (xm1A1)
Posted by: Murray Head at June 16, 2012 04:34 PM (Y6J63)
Posted by: t-bird at June 16, 2012 04:35 PM (FcR7P)
Posted by: t-bird at June 16, 2012 08:35 PM (FcR7P)
Really they're going to be that bad after doing a can and a half of beer?
Posted by: buzzion at June 16, 2012 04:40 PM (GULKT)
I know you don't know me or owe me squat, but was wondering if you might say a prayer for me, or at least for my daughters, as I was laid off three days ago.
And maybe drop a good word for my dad, who was career army, and has seen two of his three sons lose their jobs in the past three years.
If not, no worries. But any extra words to the Big Guy, whose existence I'm beginning to doubt, would be appreciated.
Posted by: Hey.Wheres.Barry at June 16, 2012 04:41 PM (hyP1j)
The chess set in the photo is set up wrong: you've got a black square in the lower right corner.
Tartakower & Du Mont's "500 Master Games of Chess" is a great collection, but they really goofed in the notes to game 217. After move 19 they write ". . . Black can breathe more freely and think of castling on the Q side, which would favour his chances," and after White's 20th, "Preventing . . . Castles QR." But the opening was an Allgaier Gambit, and Black moved his K on the 6th move.
To appreciate the advantages of algebraic over descriptive notation, ask the question, "what is a fianchetto?"
In descriptive: "It's when you play P-N3 and B-N2."
In algebraic: "It's when you play b3 and Bb2 or g3 and Bg2 as White, or else you play b6 and Bb7 or g6 and Bg7 as Black."
Posted by: bof at June 16, 2012 04:44 PM (Bu4wL)
Posted by: rickl at June 16, 2012 04:48 PM (sdi6R)
It's possible to end up with 2 white pawns, if black is goofy. Still, keep white king on F as much as possible.
Posted by: The Atom Bomb of Loving Kindness at June 16, 2012 04:57 PM (jqHOY)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at June 16, 2012 04:59 PM (piMMO)
Posted by: The Atom Bomb of Loving Kindness at June 16, 2012 05:00 PM (jqHOY)
****
You'll find that not many hold grudges around these parts.
Word to the Big Guy coming up.
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at June 16, 2012 05:01 PM (piMMO)
Posted by: GolfBoy at June 16, 2012 05:01 PM (M0ftf)
Posted by: BillyBob at June 16, 2012 05:05 PM (d3FpJ)
Posted by: chemjeff on the phone at June 16, 2012 05:09 PM (U3z55)
1. Kf2 is indeed the killer move. There is no defense against it no matter how carefully Black plays.
This is an old problem (dated 1848!) that I found in one of my endgame books.
Posted by: OregonMuse at June 16, 2012 05:12 PM (xm1A1)
White takes black king. Game over. Why? Because rules are only for Republicans. ~ His Royal Highness and Messiah Obama
Posted by: Mr_Write at June 16, 2012 05:13 PM (CLkAH)
Posted by: Cicero at June 16, 2012 05:13 PM (7ppar)
Posted by: t-bird at June 16, 2012 05:13 PM (FcR7P)
Posted by: TH at June 16, 2012 05:14 PM (1EJIj)
Posted by: teej at June 16, 2012 05:22 PM (cDwCa)
Posted by: teej at June 16, 2012 05:27 PM (cDwCa)
Posted by: teej at June 16, 2012 05:29 PM (cDwCa)
Posted by: wierd flunky at June 16, 2012 05:32 PM (tlhtD)
Everyone's looking at the Chinese Astro-nette. Most from their bunks. It's hard to type with just one hand.
Posted by: Sticky Wicket at June 16, 2012 05:34 PM (L7hol)
Posted by: wierd flunky at June 16, 2012 05:53 PM (tlhtD)
"Everyone's looking at the Chinese Astro-nette."
Yeah, that's just China trying to flex fake muscle.
I've got ten on her burning up a la Columbia.
Posted by: ErikW at June 16, 2012 05:53 PM (Cs9gg)
Take a close look at the pic....Iran did a better job faking their missile launches. What the hell is with the six fingered claw in the background?
Posted by: Sticky Wicket at June 16, 2012 05:55 PM (L7hol)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=7R06ft5rqKw
Posted by: Boulder Toilet Hobo at June 16, 2012 05:55 PM (QTHTd)
what was the joke?
Posted by: OregonMuse at June 16, 2012 05:57 PM (mm7B+)
Posted by: OregonMuse at June 16, 2012 05:58 PM (mm7B+)
Posted by: Al Gore Mating with Anna Wintour at June 16, 2012 05:58 PM (c3mby)
Posted by: wierd flunky at June 16, 2012 05:59 PM (tlhtD)
1. Kf2 is indeed the killer move. There is no defense against it no matter how carefully Black plays.
This is an old problem (dated 1848!) that I found in one of my endgame books.
Posted by: OregonMuse at June 16, 2012 09:12 PM (xm1A1)
I beg to differ. The guy at # 12 gave the correct answer. You did not say that we have to follow the rules.
Posted by: The Jackhole at June 16, 2012 06:05 PM (DU15A)
Posted by: TH at June 16, 2012 07:48 PM (1EJIj)
Posted by: Francis W. Porretto at June 17, 2012 02:09 AM (FeYbR)
Posted by: GolfBoy at June 17, 2012 03:15 AM (M0ftf)
Posted by: mojo at June 17, 2012 09:39 AM (d/67n)
In the first line, what happens if at move 3 black doesn't take the pawn?
Instead of:
1.Kf2 Ke4
2.Kg3 Ke5
3.h4 gxh4
we go
3. h4 Kf6
either white exchanges pawns
4.hxg5 Kxg5 and black king is right on top of white pawn
or white king is stuck defending the rook pawn unless he pushes past. Then black merely has to stay far enough back to catch the rook pawn but block the white king from getting to f5.
Posted by: CAL at June 17, 2012 01:28 PM (JDIe+)
Posted by: GolfBoy at June 17, 2012 06:16 PM (M0ftf)
Posted by: Brian Pendell at June 18, 2012 07:35 AM (GDDIu)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2316 seconds, 210 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: nickless at June 16, 2012 02:29 PM (MMC8r)