November 10, 2012
— andy There's a lot of activity going on behind the scenes with John E.'s digging into the failed Project Orca election-day system used by Team Romney. I had a link in the sidebar encouraging blog readers to sign up to help with this project, and if I'd known what a cluster it was I surely wouldn't have. My apologies if you wasted your time on it.
But we're going to get to the bottom of this. And by the time we're done the responsible parties, specifically Rich Beeson, Dan Centinello and Zac Moffatt, will join the Steve Schmidts and John Weavers of the world on the DO NOT SUPPORT ANYONE WHO WOULD HIRE THIS PERSON! roster of GOP campaign consultants.
Jon Huntsman can tell you about that one. You remember him, don't you?
Ben Howe has a brutal takedown over at RedState. He seems right on the mark.
More to come ...
[Update] GnuBreed would appreciate your voting in his poll: What should us Moron/Ettes do as a result of this election?
Posted by: andy at
03:04 AM
| Comments (582)
Post contains 270 words, total size 4 kb.
Either we are all as nutty as those people, or stuff is so bad in DC even the UFO people have noticed.
Posted by: Miss Marple at November 10, 2012 03:15 AM (GoIUi)
@1:
If it had worked it would have made a difference. But the real determinant of victory would have been if just twenty per cent of the TEN MILLION who were so disillusioned, put off, or disappointed with preazy could have taken the trouble to show up and voted on Tuesday.
Posted by: kallisto at November 10, 2012 03:16 AM (jm/9g)
What I REALLY want to know though is how much voter fraud there really was. I thought it was a very small issue til I saw all the links to Pundit Press in the sidebar. Surely someone can get to the bottom of 141% turnouts in counties in Florida
Posted by: ziggyelman at November 10, 2012 03:17 AM (AsMdZ)
Posted by: Sexypig at November 10, 2012 03:18 AM (Mq0oA)
Posted by: naturalfake at November 10, 2012 03:18 AM (G9qZk)
Posted by: VW Zao at November 10, 2012 03:19 AM (vWZa0)
important question.
I wonder what medieval systems the Dems used in Philadelphia to
achieve 99% turnout in some of their wards. Of course I suspect
there might have been a little ballot stuffing, but there also is the
distinct possibility that a couple pages of printouts with names and
phone numbers and a sharpie is a more effective tool then multiple
million dollar software that doesn't work.
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat [/i] at November 10, 2012 03:20 AM (feFL6)
Posted by: Andy at November 10, 2012 03:20 AM (OZPoa)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at November 10, 2012 03:21 AM (uhAkr)
Posted by: Pyro Pete at November 10, 2012 03:21 AM (6RDA5)
Posted by: Andy at November 10, 2012 07:20 AM (OZPoa)
___
As I understand it, the Zac Moffatt brain trust rejected the Preibus method that was employed in Wisconsin.
Posted by: kallisto at November 10, 2012 03:23 AM (jm/9g)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at November 10, 2012 03:23 AM (uhAkr)
Posted by: Walkers! at November 10, 2012 03:23 AM (YEG/L)
Posted by: naturalfake at November 10, 2012 03:24 AM (G9qZk)
Posted by: ziggyelman at November 10, 2012 07:17 AM (AsMdZ)
It wouldn't take much fraud to work in the 4 big swing states that were close. Just add together the obvious fraud (130% turnouts; 100% votes for Obama, etc) that Dems always do, and the people in those states who didn't get reached because of this piece of crap not working (and especially because of all the volunteer time wasted on this that could have been spent of old style stuff that works), and you pretty much have a Romney win or damn close to it. But you know Republicans aren't going to challenge on fraud...that requires a spine. Allen West being a notable exception, but he's damn near the only one with spine intact.
Posted by: davidinvirginia at November 10, 2012 03:24 AM (qEkGZ)
Posted by: ziggyelman at November 10, 2012 07:17 AM (AsMdZ)
The 141% sounds like the tax rate for the rich that they really want to put in place, unless you be Jay-Z.
Posted by: Hrothgar at November 10, 2012 03:24 AM (Cnqmv)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at November 10, 2012 03:25 AM (uhAkr)
Posted by: W.H. Doubter at November 10, 2012 03:25 AM (Td9D+)
Posted by: Vic at November 10, 2012 03:25 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: JDTAY at November 10, 2012 03:25 AM (a0nis)
http://is.gd/DvutiN
Posted by: Vic at November 10, 2012 03:25 AM (YdQQY)
http://is.gd/zJNUx9
Another one in Utah lays off 102.
http://is.gd/ExdzVs
Posted by: Vic at November 10, 2012 03:26 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: davidinvirginia at November 10, 2012 07:24 AM (qEkGZ)
If only West had submitted to the RINO spine removal surgery, he would have had solid support from the RNC.
Posted by: Hrothgar at November 10, 2012 03:26 AM (Cnqmv)
http://is.gd/nReJ18
Posted by: Vic at November 10, 2012 03:26 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: naturalfake at November 10, 2012 03:26 AM (G9qZk)
http://is.gd/1eyTEi
Posted by: Vic at November 10, 2012 03:26 AM (YdQQY)
This morning I have the feeling that I just watched the Democrats take their ideology across the Kuwaiti border into Iraq - metaphorically speaking.
The Dims are all inon on corporate taxes on sales, not profit. They are all in on "revenue projections" that will never happen.
They are all in on a 2 trillion dollar deficit before 2016.
We have a front row seat.
Note: I would have said balls deep, but the good general has that trademarked for his second book.
Posted by: Tocquevillian at November 10, 2012 03:26 AM (iuY0Y)
http://is.gd/iaS5P1
Posted by: Vic at November 10, 2012 03:27 AM (YdQQY)
http://is.gd/33r4vY
Posted by: Vic at November 10, 2012 03:27 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: ziggyelman at November 10, 2012 07:17 AM
I doubt we'll ever know. It's so much easier to blame this ORCA thing and blast the now-former candidate than venture into territory that requires investigation instead of Instant Anal-ysis. Blaming some screwed-up computer program is like blaming Microsoft when your laptop goes Tang Uniform: it's easy, requires no thought, and everyone can identify with the idea.
Besides, it's racist to accuse our enshrined Dear Leader of breaking the law. He would never, ever, ever do anything unethical, would he? And he gets the Automatic Affirmative Action Free Pass.
There will be occasional reports of massive fraud surfacing, but the squishy eunuchs among the "conservative" establishment and media will shut them down double-quick as they did the birth certificate issue. It just won't be "hip" to actually question Choom Boy's wonderfulness.
Posted by: MrScribbler, banned at TepidAir at November 10, 2012 03:27 AM (yKUrR)
http://is.gd/yv3qvg
Posted by: Vic at November 10, 2012 03:27 AM (YdQQY)
http://is.gd/w0RVad
Posted by: Vic at November 10, 2012 03:27 AM (YdQQY)
http://is.gd/m2qrgb
Posted by: Vic at November 10, 2012 03:28 AM (YdQQY)
2nd place is first loser...
Posted by: phreshone at November 10, 2012 03:28 AM (MAhUT)
Fast Food Nation
An international best-seller, Fast Food Nation reveals how the fast food industry has altered America's landscape, widened the gap between rich and poor, fueled an obesity epidemic, and transformed world-wide food production. The book inspires readers to critically look at our global food system and its impact on society.
(That description makes me want to puke – Vic)
Posted by: Vic at November 10, 2012 03:28 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Vic at November 10, 2012 03:29 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Ms Choksondik, SMOD devotee at November 10, 2012 03:30 AM (YOZSv)
Posted by: ziggyelman at November 10, 2012 03:30 AM (AsMdZ)
Beginning Wednesday morning, all the second guessing and finger pointing began: the so-cons didn't show up...Palinites were butt hurt...Gary Johnson made the difference in Florida. Maybe some or all of that is true. But I can't get my mind off the ten million voters who abandoned Obama, but couldn't get it together to vote for his opponent. From stories I'm hearing, it's this crowd that is most shocked over the election results. It's like they thought every state in the union boasted a strong GOP voter advantage.
I know one guy who hates obama, I was certain he had voted against him on Tuesday. He called me - stunned after the election. When I said, "well at least you know you voted the right way", he replied, "No, I let my registration expire because I didn't want to get called for jury duty."
Posted by: kallisto at November 10, 2012 03:31 AM (jm/9g)
This is like saying that you didn't get laid because your deodorant failed miserably.
Might have been a factor, and sure, feel good about changing your pit stop and getting back out there.
.......but there may be a bit more to it, you know, like other factors WORKING AGAINST YOU.
Posted by: ontherocks at November 10, 2012 03:31 AM (aZ6ew)
They say that the truth is the consultants essentially used the Romney campaign as a money making scheme, forcing employees to spin false data as truth in order to paint a rosy picture of a successful campaign as a form of job security.
Zac Moffatt, Digital Director for the Romney campaign, was specifically named as having “built a nest egg for himself and co-founder of Targeted Victory, Mike Beach,” and that they “didn’t get social” media and ignored objections from other consultants and staffers in the campaign.
That not only is major cause of action if true, it could also be criminal fraud.
Posted by: Vic at November 10, 2012 03:32 AM (YdQQY)
Do we really want to fight this and be part of the blame for the shitty economy in two years, or would it be better to say...elections have meaning and we will give the president what he wants with the requirement that the JEF put it in writing in the form of a budget? We can reasonably assume a second recession is coming and why not put it 100% in his lap?
Posted by: Tocquevillian at November 10, 2012 03:32 AM (iuY0Y)
Worse. Moffatt's old firm (that he co-founded), Targeted Victory, already does work for Rubio.
Like I said, lots of things going on here. Including trying to get Marco to dump them.
Posted by: Andy at November 10, 2012 03:33 AM (OZPoa)
Posted by: Vic at November 10, 2012 07:27 AM (YdQQY)
___
The silver lining in that cloud is how Il Duce met his demise.
Posted by: kallisto at November 10, 2012 03:33 AM (jm/9g)
Posted by: Jmel at November 10, 2012 03:33 AM (c+D8V)
the update. In fact, as many as 10 million votes may not have been
counted yet.
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat [/i] at November 10, 2012 03:34 AM (feFL6)
Posted by: Mr pink at November 10, 2012 03:34 AM (Zzyhu)
http://is.gd/yv3qvg
Posted by: Vic at November 10, 2012 07:27 AM (YdQQY)
Hey Vic...just "a" major war? I can think of at least two that are coming right up - the Muslims having another go at Israel, and the Chinese and Japan going at it over offshore oil reserves at the very least. And, if you count what's going on in Syria, since Turkey will likely get involved (with Obama's encouragement), and the Koreas will likely go at it if China and Japan actually start shooting at each other...well, that's 4...and the War that No One Admits Exists Anymore (the general war of Islam against the rest of the world) continues apace, that's 5...well, you get the idea. Interesting times as the Chinese would say.
Posted by: davidinvirginia at November 10, 2012 03:35 AM (qEkGZ)
Posted by: SurferDoc at November 10, 2012 03:35 AM (6H6FZ)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at November 10, 2012 03:36 AM (uhAkr)
Did you hear me scream when I read this? He was probably in a swing state too, right?
Posted by: Andy at November 10, 2012 03:36 AM (OZPoa)
I'm very intrigued with Rush's idea of givng amnesty to the illegals, as long as they can't vote for 25 years.
I would add this idea: They must have a sponsor that guarantees they don't go on the dole for the first 10 years.
My husband came to this country legally on a K-1 visa, but I had to sign paperwork that made me responsible for his support for 10 years if he couldn't support himself.
He can't get food stamps, welfare payments, etc until 10 years are up.
I had to provide prove to the government that I could support him. Bank statements, W-2s, tax returns.
So I say call their bluff.
Posted by: Marybeth at November 10, 2012 03:36 AM (fkaOH)
Posted by: kallisto at November 10, 2012 07:31 AM (jm/9g)
J.C.; doesn't the dumb shit know that most States no longer rely on voter registration for Jury Pools?
Posted by: Vic at November 10, 2012 03:36 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at November 10, 2012 07:25 AM (uhAkr)
I wish there was some way to sue to get my contributions back. Hell, people sue for everything else, and it sure looks like this campaign was a fraud from beginning to end.
Posted by: davidinvirginia at November 10, 2012 03:37 AM (qEkGZ)
Posted by: naturalfake at November 10, 2012 03:37 AM (G9qZk)
Posted by: phreshone at November 10, 2012 03:38 AM (MAhUT)
Posted by: Andy at November 10, 2012 07:36 AM (OZPoa)
___
PA
I've seen similar stories posted on this blog.
There is just so much about this particular election that is tragic, ironic, and instructive. Locally, a neighboring community, a blue collar burg is run by Republicans. They sent out door hangers and mailers to every house with the tagline: BAD PEOPLE GET ELECTED WHEN GOOD PEOPLE DON'T VOTE.
Posted by: kallisto at November 10, 2012 03:39 AM (jm/9g)
We got facerolled by the weakest candidate possible.
Posted by: W.H. Doubter
There were significant issues with Romney as a candidate and as a campaigner, but if you baseline him against Mccain, at least he didn't actually stop campaigning near the finish, or limit himself by taking public financing.
So, why the pullback from Mccain voting levels. Was Palin really that big a factor for turnout or was it something else?
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at November 10, 2012 03:39 AM (kdS6q)
Why do I want to know this? It seems odd to me that Romney, normally very precise with his planning, would buy into an untested program. If it is so, it goes against everything I knew (or thought I did) about this.
Also, who did his internal polling? There is no doubt in my mind he thought he was winning. Was the polling off due to bad methodology, or did fraud plus some combination of stay-at-homes (wouldn't have to be all of one group) cause the loss?
We cannot correct if we don't know what happened.
I gave more to this campaign than I should have, in the hopes my money was being used wisely. I probably won't ever do this again, as it seems it was a waste of time.
Posted by: Miss Marple at November 10, 2012 03:40 AM (GoIUi)
Posted by: Vic at November 10, 2012 07:32 AM
I don't think it's "news" when someone decides to get rich off of political-operative type work, Vic. Washington is full of people who sell out -- can you say Dick Morris? Karl Rove? Teh Noot? -- for cash.
If someone actually manipulated ORCA to fatten their own wallet, that seems terminally dumb. Make it through a campaign or two, develop a high profile and, win or lose, you too can become an "expert" and never have to work again.
I'd say there are more people looking to get "political expert" gigs than one-shot, in-and-out grifters. Look at Chuck Todd: wasn't long ago that he was pulling his pud in mommy's basement and writing truly mindless shit on the Interwebz, and now he's making big bucks and a "political director." Our trolls are jealous!
Posted by: MrScribbler, banned at TepidAir at November 10, 2012 03:40 AM (yKUrR)
say it again
BAD PEOPLE GET ELECTED WHEN GOOD PEOPLE DON'T VOTE.
Posted by: phreshone at November 10, 2012 03:40 AM (MAhUT)
I need at least one person to go there and vote so I didn't totally waste 30 minutes on it.
http://poll.pollcode.com/9kph4q
They are pretty easy to set up actually.
Posted by: GnuBreed at November 10, 2012 03:42 AM (ccXZP)
Just like we need to disassociate from those on the left(that we can, business-wise) we need to do the same with folks who don't care enough to vote.
Wonder if we will hear a few million didn't vote for Romney because he's a Mormon?
Posted by: ziggyelman at November 10, 2012 03:42 AM (AsMdZ)
http://image.patriotpost.us/2012-11-08-alexander-3.jpg
SC doesn't look as half as "soooooo Republican" as advertised. Looks about half as blue (the correct color of liberty) as Ohio. Heh.
(Also, upstate NY? You're dead to me like Terre Haute and Iowa.)
Posted by: HeatherRadish™, Crankypants Extraordinaire at November 10, 2012 03:42 AM (hO8IJ)
Posted by: naturalfake at November 10, 2012 07:37 AM (G9qZk)
ORCA would have made no difference for this guy. He was no longer registered to vote and most States have a cutoff date for registration.
To all, ORCA may have cost a few thousand votes in some States but I don't think it would have made a difference. I know I have been beating this drum now for years and some people are tired of hearing it.
But the secret is having a candidate who inspires the base to crawl over broken glass to vote. We though we had that in the JEF. He would inspire our candidate to vote. It has become obvious that we were mistaken. It appears that your own candidate must do the inspiring.
And after back to back failures by lackluster moderate candidates it looks obvious to me why we lost.
I want that poll of stay-at-homes. Maybe Rass will do it. Or somebody else other than the RNC who I would not trust.
Posted by: Vic at November 10, 2012 03:43 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Vic at November 10, 2012 07:36 AM (YdQQY)
__
I think PA still draws from voter reg rolls, I'll have to check.
Posted by: kallisto at November 10, 2012 03:43 AM (jm/9g)
Posted by: Andy at November 10, 2012 03:44 AM (OZPoa)
1)He's black
2) He's Democrat
3) Most importantly a supine and incurious press
Throw in a cowardly and incompetent "opposition party and you have a big nothing burger.
The head of the CIA just resigned two days after an election, he was being investigated by the FBI and was scheduled to testify before a Senate committe on Benghazi, now for some reason he does not.
If this were a Republican, this affair would have been named, there would have been up to the minute updates on all the news channels with special bump in and bump out music and graphics.
Reporters would be shoving microphones in front of every administration official.
IT WOULD BE A FUCKING CIRCUS!!!
THE HEAD OF THE CIA HAS JUST RESIGNED IN DISGRACE TWO DAYS AFTER AN ELECTION FOR PRESIDENT
This is something that if it happened, say, a week before the election could have really changed the outcome.
And notice how nothing was leaked about an FBI investigation swirling around the head of the CIA. Which more than likely has been going on for months.
I'll tell you that Obama is one lucky son of gun.
Posted by: General Woundwort at November 10, 2012 03:44 AM (0fxcV)
Posted by: bigpinkfluffybunny at November 10, 2012 03:44 AM (1Ialr)
Posted by: Samwise Gamgee the 3rd at November 10, 2012 03:45 AM (SKX2R)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at November 10, 2012 03:45 AM (uhAkr)
I'll disagree with you a bit when it comes to Lieawatha Warren.
In my bright-blue MA town, the starry-eyed big-L Liberals loooooved them some Lizzie. Every time they saw her on teevee, they just knew she cares about them, hates the rich, and will work tirelessly for Teh Peeple. A lot of regular folks (at least regular MA folks, which are not the same as normal humans) felt the same.
Growing up in California made me suspect that liberals actually believe the shit they spew. Living in MA confirms it.
Posted by: MrScribbler, banned at TepidAir at November 10, 2012 03:45 AM (yKUrR)
Posted by: Ms Choksondik, SMOD devotee at November 10, 2012 03:46 AM (YOZSv)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at November 10, 2012 07:33 AM (XkWWK)
1456? or 2456 or 3456 or 4456? I mean, why would you ever want to change presidents when you've already created a Socialist Paradise on Earth?
Posted by: davidinvirginia at November 10, 2012 03:46 AM (qEkGZ)
Posted by: tofer732 at November 10, 2012 03:46 AM (m5Iwq)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at November 10, 2012 03:47 AM (dqNUA)
In this day and age, you should be able to vote from home, or from your computer.
Posted by: sTevo at November 10, 2012 03:47 AM (VMcEw)
Posted by: Pyro Pete at November 10, 2012 03:48 AM (SgVUM)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at November 10, 2012 03:48 AM (uhAkr)
I'm out of here to further poison my liver with whatever I have laying around the house....(Mouth wash, cough syrup, and hand sanitizer).
Posted by: Sticky Wicket at November 10, 2012 03:49 AM (L7hol)
If they viewed him a Mormon, they might have voted, instead they saw him as a Northeastern Rino
Posted by: phreshone at November 10, 2012 03:49 AM (MAhUT)
Posted by: phreshone at November 10, 2012 07:40 AM (MAhUT)
___
The creators of this slogan are not Ivy educated, white collar high tech geeks. They didn't even go to college. These are traditional blue collar guys who decided to make a difference in their very little corner in the world. They managed to distill the essence of what it takes to win an election, yet Zac Moffatt and Rich Beeson with all their education and sophisticated bells and whistles gave us a clusterfark. It sounds like they were more interested in fattening their wallets and creating a high profile for themselves than rolling up their sleeves to work for the common good.
Posted by: kallisto at November 10, 2012 03:50 AM (jm/9g)
This the total for Choom Boy or the number of days we have to put up with the Incredible Super-Brilliance of this "Samwise Gamgee" troll?
Posted by: MrScribbler, banned at TepidAir at November 10, 2012 03:50 AM (yKUrR)
Posted by: Ms Choksondik, SMOD devotee at November 10, 2012 03:50 AM (YOZSv)
(Also, upstate NY? You're dead to me like Terre Haute and Iowa.)
Posted by: HeatherRadish™, Crankypants Extraordinaire at November 10, 2012 07:42 AM (hO8IJ)
SC is 40% black which is a guaranteed JEF vote by 96%. However, the upstate Western part of the State is not only heavily populated, but ultra conservative and they more than offset that belt of black voters that you are seeing running through the Piedmont region.
The net result is usually a wide margin of victory for the Republican. I have been living here over 30 years. There have only been two Democrat Governors during that time. One who was elected way back before when Democrats were still somewhat conservative scoop jackson types and we still had the left over dredges of FDR dems.
The other was one who got elected over promises to implant gamboling.
That one only lasted one term.
Posted by: Vic at November 10, 2012 03:50 AM (YdQQY)
If he's got a driver's license or a public utility bill in his name, he's gonna get called anyway. Be sure to gloat.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™, Crankypants Extraordinaire at November 10, 2012 03:50 AM (hO8IJ)
Posted by: tofer732 at November 10, 2012 03:50 AM (m5Iwq)
Yeah, no potential for fraud there. Good grief.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™, Crankypants Extraordinaire at November 10, 2012 03:51 AM (hO8IJ)
Posted by: kallisto at November 10, 2012 07:43 AM (jm/9g)
I think they all draw from them, but they also draw from other sources like driver's licenses and telephone books.
Posted by: Vic at November 10, 2012 03:51 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Bedlam at November 10, 2012 03:52 AM (8EPcY)
Posted by: Samwise Gamgee the 3rd at November 10, 2012 03:52 AM (SKX2R)
NJ apparently allowed people to do exactly that.
Those Democrat vote totals will go nowhere but up when yoots can switch away from game-playing and texting to fire off a vote for Choom Boy from their XBox.
Posted by: MrScribbler, banned at TepidAir at November 10, 2012 03:53 AM (yKUrR)
When people are pissed off and their arguments are no longer welcome, she smart ones nod, smile, shut the hell up about it. Then they look for a way to get even.
Posted by: SurferDoc at November 10, 2012 03:53 AM (6H6FZ)
Posted by: tofer732 at November 10, 2012 03:53 AM (m5Iwq)
Posted by: Ms Choksondik, SMOD devotee at November 10, 2012 03:54 AM (YOZSv)
Posted by: phreshone at November 10, 2012 03:54 AM (MAhUT)
Posted by: Bildo at November 10, 2012 03:54 AM (eToum)
Posted by: tofer732 at November 10, 2012 03:55 AM (m5Iwq)
That one only lasted one term.
Posted by: Vic at November 10, 2012 07:50 AM
I try to avoid commenting about typos, mainly because I can rival anyone in production of typing mistakes.
But Good Sweet Jeebus, would I vote for anyone, regardless of party, who endorses gamboling! Hell, I'd vote for 'em TWICE!
Posted by: MrScribbler, banned at TepidAir at November 10, 2012 03:55 AM (yKUrR)
The commercial for one of the medicare supplement insurance companies. Has a lady(actress) who says (iirc) "I'm over 60 and I found out that medicare doesn't cover all of my health care costs"
Has this, granted "actress" been living under a rock? Or is she portraying the honey boo boo watchers of the world? Are there people our there that are that stupid?
Oh, right I forgot about Tuesday. I guess I answered my own question.
Posted by: Bruce at November 10, 2012 03:56 AM (z4eur)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at November 10, 2012 03:57 AM (3Y7RV)
Posted by: naturalfake at November 10, 2012 03:57 AM (G9qZk)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC Waiting for the Sun at November 10, 2012 03:58 AM (m0+JC)
Posted by: sunshine & the beach at November 10, 2012 03:58 AM (LpQbZ)
Nice doesn't work, but unfortunately, Mitt's consultants didn't want to p.o. their buddies in DC
Posted by: phreshone at November 10, 2012 03:58 AM (MAhUT)
Posted by: Lurker who doesn't copy/paste from Word at November 10, 2012 03:59 AM (xfWVe)
Posted by: tofer732 at November 10, 2012 03:59 AM (m5Iwq)
Posted by: JDTAY at November 10, 2012 04:00 AM (a0nis)
Posted by: SurferDoc at November 10, 2012 07:53 AM (6H6FZ) "
___
So they didn't vote...for revenge?
Posted by: kallisto at November 10, 2012 04:00 AM (jm/9g)
Posted by: naturalfake at November 10, 2012 07:57 AM (G9qZk)
The available evidence points to a lot and the pundits are finally starting to see that. That is all except the ones who continually push the "electable moderate" Republican candidates.
IO warned way back in the beginning here that I thought Romney was unelectable because he was a NE liberal and the South would not vote for him.
I was wrong on that score in one manner. The South turned out to vote. It was other regions who didn't.
Posted by: Vic at November 10, 2012 04:01 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC Waiting for the Sun at November 10, 2012 04:01 AM (m0+JC)
Maybe SCOAMT should have attended his intel briefings.
Posted by: Retread at November 10, 2012 04:02 AM (zxitI)
Posted by: JosephMuhfugginStalin at November 10, 2012 04:02 AM (LXKJo)
I threw the link into my sig.
Posted by: GnuBreed at November 10, 2012 04:03 AM (ccXZP)
Posted by: SurferDoc at November 10, 2012 04:03 AM (6H6FZ)
Posted by: Al From Bay Shore at November 10, 2012 04:03 AM (H7qBA)
Posted by: Samwise Gamgee the 3rd at November 10, 2012 04:03 AM (SKX2R)
Posted by: JosephMuhfugginStalin at November 10, 2012 04:03 AM (LXKJo)
And take a look at south Texas.
Posted by: Retread
---
Looks like a good place to redraw the boarder with Canada and Mexico.
Posted by: sTevo at November 10, 2012 04:04 AM (VMcEw)
Of course they do. Most people on the Left have absolutely no idea how businesses work. The worldview truly is that a business exists to provide a job as a societal benefit. The concept of profit has been so demonized that pointing out that a business cannot continue to pay people if expenses outstrip income is like trying to explain how to tell north from south to me. To many on the Left, that should have no bearing at all on whether people are fired.
Posted by: alexthechick at November 10, 2012 04:05 AM (Gk3SS)
Posted by: Scobface at November 10, 2012 04:05 AM (IoNBC)
Posted by: Moron Horder at November 10, 2012 04:05 AM (bS6uW)
Posted by: sunshine & the beach at November 10, 2012 04:06 AM (LpQbZ)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at November 10, 2012 04:06 AM (79ueO)
I don't know why this is so hard to understand? As a country we keep moving further and further to the left (with the GOP's help) then we sit and wonder why we don't have enough votes to defeat the left. Well we don't, I don't know if we ever will again, I highly doubt it.
Posted by: lowandslow at November 10, 2012 04:06 AM (GZitp)
Posted by: Lurker who doesn't copy/paste from Word at November 10, 2012 04:07 AM (xfWVe)
Posted by: Pyro Pete at November 10, 2012 04:07 AM (N2svL)
Posted by: William The Conqueror at November 10, 2012 04:07 AM (ylZ5l)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at November 10, 2012 04:08 AM (3Y7RV)
Posted by: GnuBreed at November 10, 2012 08:03 AM (ccXZP)
___
I took the 'sign up for every benefit" option.
1) Get part time job, earn less than 20k
2)all taxes are refunded
3) sign up for govt cheese
4) Join underground economy
5) Profit!!!!!
Posted by: kallisto at November 10, 2012 04:08 AM (jm/9g)
Stuff like internal investigations of the head of the CIA would typically be covered in the PDB (which Obama missed on a regular basis) adding to the plausible denial mantle.
Face it--we are well and truly boned.
Posted by: Hrothgar at November 10, 2012 04:09 AM (Cnqmv)
Posted by: Samwise Gamgee the 3rd at November 10, 2012 04:09 AM (SKX2R)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC Waiting for the Sun at November 10, 2012 04:09 AM (m0+JC)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at November 10, 2012 04:10 AM (79ueO)
Umm, Bevel, hate to break this to you, but I know for a fact it's true. (this is about some folks not voting for Romney, because hes a Mormon) I have a friend that while he was going to vote for Romney, he still feels like Mormonism is a cult.(I remember 20 years ago, the 700 club running ads for a Anti Mormon book) My best friend cuts grass for a living near Savannah. Not one, but two old ladies he cuts grass for, told him they would NOT vote for Romney, purely because he was a Mormon.Its sad, but true.
Posted by: ziggyelman at November 10, 2012 04:10 AM (AsMdZ)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at November 10, 2012 04:10 AM (79ueO)
Posted by: Lurker who has recently stopped lurking at November 10, 2012 04:10 AM (xfWVe)
Posted by: Samwise Gamgee the 3rd at November 10, 2012 04:11 AM (SKX2R)
Allow anyone to marry anything.
People should be free to print their own money at will "because" ask helicopter ben and his best bud Barry Choom.
Fuck you America you'll get everything Barry wants and I will not stop him.
Posted by: sven10077 at November 10, 2012 04:11 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: samsom at November 10, 2012 04:12 AM (AZuIO)
Posted by: naturalfake at November 10, 2012 04:13 AM (G9qZk)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC Waiting for the Sun at November 10, 2012 04:14 AM (m0+JC)
Posted by: Samwise Gamgee the 3rd at November 10, 2012 04:14 AM (SKX2R)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at November 10, 2012 04:14 AM (79ueO)
Posted by: sunshine & the beach at November 10, 2012 04:15 AM (LpQbZ)
Meanwhile, in Los Angeles:
Under a resolution unanimously approved by the City Council this week, all future Mondays in the City of Angels have been declared "Meatless Mondays." It's part of an international campaign to cut down on meat consumption for health and environmental reasons.
Councilwoman Jan Perry, who introduced the motion with Councilman Ed Reyes, noted the environmental impacts of meat production, and she emphasized that a high-meat diet has been linked to health problems such as colon, prostate, kidney and breast cancers, as well as heart disease. "Eating less meat can prevent and even reverse some of our nation's most common illnesses," Perry said.
Her motion posted 12-0 in a council session Friday.
The council resolution referred to the link between livestock and environmental problem, and noted that reduced consumption of animal-based foods can "lower our carbon footprint."
Monday is Soylent Green Day. Soylent Green -- The miracle food of high-energy plankton gathered from the oceans of the world.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at November 10, 2012 04:15 AM (kdS6q)
And that's a perfect example of how far we've shifted in thirty years. As I've said before, we're just a minority resistance movement now and I wish the GOP leadership would come to grips with this and act like it. There should be no talk of compromise on anything, obstructionism is the only weapon we have right now. But the GOP doesn't care about stopping the liberalization of the country, they care about "winning".
Posted by: lowandslow at November 10, 2012 04:16 AM (GZitp)
Posted by: DaveA at November 10, 2012 04:17 AM (MOWP1)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at November 10, 2012 04:18 AM (79ueO)
Posted by: Moron Horder at November 10, 2012 04:18 AM (bS6uW)
Nothing like a compromised executive to do as he's told.
The FBI discovery of the affair was accidental last spring.
The public revelation was days before he's to testify on a subject with such far reaching implications as Weapons Trafficking and using Al Qaeda as a mercenary force to overthrow Libya for the EU and the current coup in Syria.
Posted by: Dept. of Accuracy Dept. at November 10, 2012 04:19 AM (BAnPT)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at November 10, 2012 04:20 AM (79ueO)
Yes 50% of the people pay no taxes and want them some "free stuff" AND 50% of the voters this time wanted them some free stuff, it doesn't need to work out that way.
There is no doubt that a huge block of Republican voters who normally vote sat at home. Why they sat at home is the current $64K question. There is a lot of speculation by the pundits, and their answer depends on what ax they are grinding.
That is why we MUST have an accurate survey of the Republican stay-at-homes. Screaming about how stupid they are doesn't help us a bit. We should be screaming about how we are going to change this.
Because it has been going on since Bush left office.
Posted by: Vic at November 10, 2012 04:20 AM (YdQQY)
Under a resolution unanimously approved by the City Council this week, all future Mondays in the City of Angels have been declared "Meatless Mondays."
___
Does this mean the porn industry shuts down on Mondays?
Posted by: kallisto at November 10, 2012 04:20 AM (jm/9g)
MS has the highest percent black population in the country at 38% per the 2010 census. Whites make up 58.7% of the total population.
Yet no one even campaigns in MS or buys ads. Why? Because whites also vote as a bloc too. From wiki:
In 2004, 14% of Caucasians voted for John Kerry and 10% of African Americans voted for Bush, according to exit polling. [19] In 2008, Barack Obama was able to improve on Kerry's performance by six percent, mainly due to the higher African American turnout. Obama's main support was in the Black Belt, the western delta counties next to the Mississippi River. In contrast, McCain's margins came from the regions bordering the Gulf Coast and the northeast Appalachian area. Voting became even more polarized: nine in ten whites voted Republican, and nearly all blacks voted Democratic in Mississippi, according to exit polls.[19] As expected, McCain carried the Magnolia State by a comfortable 13.18-point margin over Obama. McCain's margin of victory, however, was less than that of George W. Bush's 19.69-point margin of victory over John Kerry in 2004.
In 2012, Romney's margin shrank to about 11%, 55-44. I just thought this info was interesting.
Posted by: GnuBreed at November 10, 2012 04:21 AM (ccXZP)
Posted by: Samwise Gamgee the 3rd at November 10, 2012 04:22 AM (SKX2R)
Posted by: HoboJerky, profit of DOOM! at November 10, 2012 04:22 AM (fCMdQ)
Guess I will be writing another letter to my Rep.
Posted by: sTevo at November 10, 2012 04:22 AM (VMcEw)
Posted by: Lurker who has recently stopped lurking at November 10, 2012 04:22 AM (xfWVe)
Posted by: Havedash at November 10, 2012 04:22 AM (ToMJU)
Or it is just as likely he would have made this election about moon bases or some International Synchronicity of Machines movement. That's the problem with Newt, he can't stay focused. His position and priorities on issues varies depending on the latest book he read.
Posted by: lowandslow at November 10, 2012 04:22 AM (GZitp)
Posted by: JDTAY at November 10, 2012 04:22 AM (a0nis)
Nothing new.
Only your life may hinge on the next screwup at your local handy dandy hospital IT department.
http://tinyurl.com/hit-misadventure - pushed by the Dems via the HITECH Act that somehow was sneaked into the ARRA Act, to the tune of $$hundreds of billions.
Posted by: MIMD at November 10, 2012 04:23 AM (fh3lh)
there is nothing any party can do to conquer this.
Posted by: kelley in virginia at November 10, 2012 04:23 AM (HNwOT)
Posted by: Samwise Gamgee the 3rd at November 10, 2012 04:24 AM (SKX2R)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC Waiting for the Sun at November 10, 2012 04:24 AM (m0+JC)
Posted by: samsom at November 10, 2012 04:25 AM (AZuIO)
Posted by: Samwise Gamgee the 3rd at November 10, 2012 04:26 AM (SKX2R)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at November 10, 2012 04:26 AM (79ueO)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC Waiting for the Sun at November 10, 2012 04:26 AM (m0+JC)
Posted by: sunshine & the beach at November 10, 2012 04:26 AM (LpQbZ)
Posted by: Scobface at November 10, 2012 04:27 AM (IoNBC)
Which is coming. Gonna be REAL interesting on whether or not we financially back the mid terms.
Ogabe's playing chicken.
Posted by: sven10077 at November 10, 2012 04:27 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at November 10, 2012 04:27 AM (79ueO)
Posted by: Samwise Gamgee the 3rd at November 10, 2012 04:27 AM (SKX2R)
Posted by: AnnaS at November 10, 2012 04:28 AM (CQzvT)
it is abslute bullshit not a single Christian Conservative i know sat this one out.
It was RiNo I am betting.
Posted by: sven10077 at November 10, 2012 04:28 AM (LRFds)
Yup b/c Superman will fix it.
Don't worry with that attitude I can promise you John Boehner will not be speaker in 2014.
Posted by: sven10077 at November 10, 2012 04:29 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: sunshine & the beach at November 10, 2012 04:29 AM (LpQbZ)
Shut it down! Only way to go. Yeah, the media will go crazy and say all kinds of nasty stuff about the evil Republicans, ok, so what. That's a lot of opportunity for them to stand in front of the camera and explain, "hey look, we're broke, that's the bottom line." How long you think it will take until it blows back on the Dems? Seriously. GOP just has to pass a balanced budget. Obama refuses to sign, that's his problem. He will get blamed.
It's a matter of right and wrong. If GOP isn't willing to do right, we've already lost and this is a waste of time even discussing.
Posted by: Andrew at November 10, 2012 04:29 AM (ZG2yX)
Posted by: gp at November 10, 2012 04:29 AM (+Jpqc)
Posted by: Jose/ningrim at November 10, 2012 04:29 AM (srIqv)
Posted by: Samwise Gamgee the 3rd at November 10, 2012 04:29 AM (SKX2R)
At the end of the day, its about the candidate. Like it or not, people dig Obama. Lots and lots of people. They eat up his silver tongued nonsense like a pack of starving wolves.
He aint gonna be there next time, no matter how hard he may stump for whatever schmuck the D's put up. And they do NOT have a deep bench.
The problem is, neither do the Rs. Next round will come down to whether the GOP can put up someone likeable and who can articulate fiscal sanity in a way that makes sense to people. Class warfare can only get you so far.
Posted by: Mr. Happy at November 10, 2012 04:30 AM (ACO7P)
1. Revise primary rules and order of voting by State.
2. Eliminate the MFM influence by refusing debates hosted by them and getting in their face when they act like assholes during interviews. i.e. Go Newt, that was one thing he did right.
3. Look at Republicans divorcing themselves from the State in order to close the Primaries. Either that are change the State laws that force open primaries. Forget the courts, we will NEVER win there.
4. Get Red State governors and prominent legislators to start a dialog on an Art V convention.
5. Get a damn good conservative chairman and give him more influence than just fund raising.
Posted by: Vic at November 10, 2012 04:30 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Bildo at November 10, 2012 04:31 AM (eToum)
Posted by: Sexypig at November 10, 2012 04:31 AM (Mq0oA)
Yeah that's how it'll work eh?
The GOp passes ~40 "Jobs bills" and "budgets."
Go to the nearest McDonald's and ask around and see if ANYONE knows that.
The media needs kneecapped.
Posted by: sven10077 at November 10, 2012 04:31 AM (LRFds)
Orca had issues but...People still didn't come the vote...
Here it is The Republican/Message is we don't need a Nanny...
But yet we are blaming the Nanny for people not voting...
Orca is not the problem...The problem is there are to many people reliant on the Nanny and that is why they voted for Obama
Posted by: Chicken ala King at November 10, 2012 04:31 AM (VvvBE)
Posted by: HoboJerky, profit of DOOM! at November 10, 2012 04:31 AM (fCMdQ)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC Waiting for the Sun at November 10, 2012 04:32 AM (m0+JC)
Let's face it, most people are NOT going to start their own business. Romney kept talking about entrepreneurs. This went right over the heads of people who are hourly workers and wouldn't even go into business selling Avon.
Until we understand human nature better, we are going to be steamrolled. Obama played on this envy of the boss (entrepreneur) and the distrust or rich people.
If I had been in charge, the message would have been : Repeal Obaacare or your premiums are going to go up even more than they did this year. Bring manufacturing jobs back, whatever it takes. Obama is handing out money to his rich cronies via green energy.
Well, one thing for sure. We did NOT understand how a big chunk of the country thinks, probably because we don't have much contact with them.
Posted by: Miss Marple at November 10, 2012 04:33 AM (GoIUi)
Posted by: Lurker who has recently stopped lurking at November 10, 2012 04:33 AM (xfWVe)
Posted by: sven10077 at November 10, 2012 08:28 AM
Don't forget the Butthurt League.
IIRC, at least one regular commenter here sat it out on Tuesday. Since he didn't like Teh Mutt for whatever reason he couldn't get motivated to vote against Choom Boy.
I'd say the largest contingent of nonvoters came from the lazy, unmotivated wankers and the Butthurt League (Romney-haters, Palin worshipers, etc.), with the latter group being much smaller.
Posted by: MrScribbler, banned at TepidAir at November 10, 2012 04:33 AM (yKUrR)
Posted by: sunshine & the beach at November 10, 2012 04:33 AM (LpQbZ)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at November 10, 2012 04:34 AM (79ueO)
I suspect as much as well...
and that is why after my initial sorrow at the defeat I decided "fuck it let it burn."
hey Paultards you wanted Jugears you got him baby and I will NOT stop him.
Posted by: sven10077 at November 10, 2012 04:34 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: Moron Horder at November 10, 2012 04:34 AM (bS6uW)
Posted by: WarrenMuhfugginHarding at November 10, 2012 04:34 AM (LXKJo)
Posted by: Samwise Gamgee the 3rd at November 10, 2012 04:35 AM (SKX2R)
I'm something of a lapsed Palinista, the 'cuda didn't hamstring the election but Luap Nor sure as hell tried.
I will act accordingly.
Posted by: sven10077 at November 10, 2012 04:35 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: Samwise Gamgee the 3rd at November 10, 2012 04:35 AM (SKX2R)
Posted by: samsom at November 10, 2012 04:36 AM (AZuIO)
Posted by: sunshine & the beach at November 10, 2012 04:36 AM (LpQbZ)
Posted by: WarrenMuhfugginHarding at November 10, 2012 04:37 AM (LXKJo)
Now I wish I had spent a little more time on the layout.
I was just trying to sum up all the various suggestions made here by people over the last several days. I probably missed a few choices too.
164 votes! Shut it down is in the lead.
Posted by: GnuBreed at November 10, 2012 04:37 AM (ccXZP)
Orca is not the problem...The problem is there are to many people reliant on the Nanny and that is why they voted for Obama
___
That doesn't explain the women's vote, the Catholic vote, or the limo liberal vote. The results of Nov. 6 indicate an electorate in the throes of decadence and corruption. How did we get to the point where women can't see past their own cooters, or Catholics enthusiastically defy the teachings and responsibilities of their own faith? Are limo liberals such a self-hating group that they wage class warfare on themselves?
And now we have the revelations of corruption within the campaign itself re: the ORCA project.
People voting themselves free shit is also a sign of decadence, but there's a bigger picture and the entitlement crowd is only one part of it.
Posted by: kallisto at November 10, 2012 04:37 AM (jm/9g)
If people needed a Nanny to GOTV were fucked...
That is not why we lost...
Republicans lost to a group of people that want a Nanny
You have to defeat the Nanny idea in order to win...
Posted by: Chicken ala King at November 10, 2012 04:38 AM (VvvBE)
And SC Republicans love them some Palin.
Posted by: Vic at November 10, 2012 04:38 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: sven10077 at November 10, 2012 08:28 AM
This.
Romney would have destroyed the conservative faction of the party.
The GOP insider have been trying to get rid of this idealism because it clashes with their plans for a totalitarian power structure and unfettered abuse of our freedoms and fleecing the nation for everything possible. They view this direction, worldwide, as inevitable and would rather be a part of it than being swept up with the pawns and serfs.
Posted by: Dept. of Accuracy Dept. at November 10, 2012 04:38 AM (BAnPT)
Posted by: Samwise Gamgee the 3rd at November 10, 2012 04:38 AM (SKX2R)
Posted by: WarrenMuhfugginHarding at November 10, 2012 04:39 AM (LXKJo)
---
2nd comment from Red State link:
...My wife and I made the decision over a month ago that we were not going to vote in the presidential race. I had come to the conclusion that both Romney and Obama met the Biblical definition of a false teacher and we are instructed to not give such even a greeting....
---
This is the ignorance that we are plagued with in the evangelical community.
I don't think this matters though because the inner citiy folks hold different religious views from those in the bible belt. And the inner cities are where Rombley lost. Not because a bunch of BBB's sat out.
Posted by: sTevo at November 10, 2012 04:39 AM (VMcEw)
Posted by: sven10077 at November 10, 2012 08:35 AM
What I said -- and I mean it -- is that some of the backers of TEH CUDA!!11!!, who see more conspiracies against her than Art Bell saw UFOs, stayed home.
I'm quite sure she cast a vote, and would have urged her followers to do likewise.
Posted by: MrScribbler, banned at TepidAir at November 10, 2012 04:39 AM (yKUrR)
Posted by: Al From Bay Shore at November 10, 2012 04:41 AM (H7qBA)
Posted by: trickamsterdam at November 10, 2012 04:42 AM (uTBHY)
You know I am not a psychotic Palinista, what you're discussing is the butthurt brigades who can't take their pony not being the show pony.
I'll bet there were legitimately a few huntsman butthurts out there.
The average Palinista probably crawled on broken glass like I did.
Did I tell you a nice black gentleman at the polls demanded to see my Ohio Drivers' license because "your military ID ain't good enough"?
Yeah I quit Ohio this week.
Posted by: sven10077 at November 10, 2012 04:42 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: Samwise Gamgee the 3rd at November 10, 2012 04:42 AM (SKX2R)
Posted by: Lurker who has recently stopped lurking at November 10, 2012 04:42 AM (xfWVe)
Simply ignore the law the way the Dems do. Use the same banzai tactics illegals used to use in SoCal: just ignore Obamacare, fuck it; just ignore regulations, instead of putting millions into Orca and wasted ad buys, put those dollars into massive legal defense funds. Overwhelm the opposition by not being intimidated by them. Turn Holder/Napolitano into impotently squeaking gerbils.
Posted by: Peter at November 10, 2012 04:42 AM (9FQ7y)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at November 10, 2012 04:43 AM (79ueO)
Posted by: Mandy P., lurking lurker who lurks at November 10, 2012 04:43 AM (qFpRI)
Posted by: W.H. Doubter at November 10, 2012 04:44 AM (Td9D+)
Isn't that illegal in OH? If so did you file a complaint?
Posted by: Vic at November 10, 2012 04:44 AM (YdQQY)
Hey champ you "got your revenge."
Race based politics is the new normal.
See you in the funny papers.
Posted by: sven10077 at November 10, 2012 04:44 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: Al From Bay Shore at November 10, 2012 08:41 AM (H7qBA)
Please list the "GOP's attempts to support the so-con's policies which seek to regulate an individual's behavior."
Posted by: Tami at November 10, 2012 04:44 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: Moron Horder at November 10, 2012 04:45 AM (bS6uW)
Posted by: sunshine & the beach at November 10, 2012 04:45 AM (LpQbZ)
-------
It's easy to make abortion and gay marriage #1 priorities when you've lived a charmed life (that of living in America vs. anywhere else). We have everything here, even the poor with their free EBT cards, cell phones and flat screen TVs live like kings compared to the rest of the world. True economic depression has not hit the majority here. So they are free to waste their votes on shit they think makes them "stand for something."
Posted by: Lady in Black at November 10, 2012 04:45 AM (lTVJy)
Learn what the fucking word racist means.
Posted by: lowandslow at November 10, 2012 04:46 AM (GZitp)
You know in '08 I would have.
Not anymore I have been ruminating over where to go when wife's career ends.
Ohio just left the race and I sent her to two combat tours with a sign that said "Lost Ohioan" get me?
Now reverse engineering the bullshit that was ohio's vote I am sad my family will go down with the ship but fuck 'em you want new Detroit to be your best goal Ohio have at thee.
I'm done with you.
Posted by: sven10077 at November 10, 2012 04:46 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: kallisto at November 10, 2012 08:37 AM (jm/9g)
******
Sure it does...
Women ...Nanny = Government assured Birth Control...Planned Parent hood...Equal rights
Catholics... Doesn't mean they are practicing Catholics just mean they identify with the Faith...Many are Latino that put Immigration over Faith
Limo Libs don't need the Nanny for resources but need the Nanny for power and prestige..."I'm doing the right thing for the underlings"
Posted by: Chicken ala King at November 10, 2012 04:46 AM (VvvBE)
Posted by: W.H. Doubter at November 10, 2012 04:46 AM (Td9D+)
Posted by: Samwise Gamgee the 3rd at November 10, 2012 04:47 AM (SKX2R)
Posted by: AD at November 10, 2012 04:47 AM (qiQSh)
not voting is a vote for the winner.....
if Romney was not conservative enough for them I am glad that Obama is.
Posted by: sven10077 at November 10, 2012 04:47 AM (LRFds)
We want to fiscally let it burn, not culturally.
Posted by: Ring at November 10, 2012 04:47 AM (iWnmm)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at November 10, 2012 04:48 AM (79ueO)
Posted by: sunshine & the beach at November 10, 2012 04:49 AM (LpQbZ)
Posted by: Sexypig at November 10, 2012 04:49 AM (Mq0oA)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at November 10, 2012 04:49 AM (79ueO)
I'm moving to SF, maybe they'll pay for my second schvartz. I feel so despondent because I was born without two schvartzes.
Posted by: Bildo at November 10, 2012 08:31 AM (eToum)
Not sure if that's what you really want. Schvartes is a term for a black person.
You might be looking for an additional Schwantz.
Posted by: Bruce at November 10, 2012 04:50 AM (z4eur)
Posted by: Samwise Gamgee the 3rd at November 10, 2012 04:50 AM (SKX2R)
Peter, I made a note of your suggestion. I may run this poll again in a month or two as the fiscal cliff gets closer.
It's been kinda fun to do.
Posted by: GnuBreed at November 10, 2012 04:50 AM (ccXZP)
They are avoidable though if the leaders get their heads out of their ass. http://www.tinyurl.com/hit-misadventure
Posted by: MIMD at November 10, 2012 04:50 AM (fh3lh)
Posted by: Andrew at November 10, 2012 04:50 AM (Egza/)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at November 10, 2012 04:51 AM (3Y7RV)
Posted by: Sexypig at November 10, 2012 04:51 AM (Mq0oA)
Posted by: Samwise Gamgee the 3rd at November 10, 2012 04:52 AM (SKX2R)
No just letting you live with your fantasy I'm a bigot but President Get Whitey is a tans racial angel.
Oh and fuck you
Posted by: sven10077 at November 10, 2012 04:52 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: Jose/ningrim at November 10, 2012 04:52 AM (srIqv)
Posted by: WarrenMuhfugginHarding at November 10, 2012 04:53 AM (LXKJo)
Posted by: W.H. Doubter at November 10, 2012 04:53 AM (Td9D+)
I don't even thinks he gives shit, he probably feels bad we even have a CIA.
Posted by: lowandslow at November 10, 2012 04:54 AM (GZitp)
If Petraeus had any military hnor left, he'd appear and spill his guts about what really happened.
Posted by: anonymous at November 10, 2012 04:54 AM (fh3lh)
"Please list the 'GOP's attempts to support the so-con's
policies which seek to regulate an individual's behavior.'
Um, gay marriage? How you gonna tell grown folks what they can and cannot do if that which they choose to do does not infringe upon a person's natural right and God given right to property? This is the problem with the SoCons: out of one side of their mouth they are John Locke and out of the other they are Mayor Bloomberg.
Posted by: Al From Bay Shore at November 10, 2012 04:54 AM (H7qBA)
I was alt Lowes yesterday, and as always, they give Military discount when you ask for it and show ID.
I wasn't thinking, and pulled out my Retiree ID, while saying "Oh, here's my shoppers club discount card"
She had to get a manager, as she didn't know that Lowes had a Shoppers club discount card.
The manager told her , Oh, that's military ID.
Her response was "I never saw one before"
Posted by: Village Idiot's Apprentice at November 10, 2012 04:54 AM (BPyqV)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at November 10, 2012 04:55 AM (3Y7RV)
Posted by: Moron Horder at November 10, 2012 04:55 AM (bS6uW)
Posted by: Lady in Black at November 10, 2012 04:55 AM (lTVJy)
Posted by: sunshine & the beach at November 10, 2012 04:55 AM (LpQbZ)
I get that but I vote at an Air Force Base, he was wearing a USAF retiree cap and I showed my ID as a courtesy to let them see my last name.
legally in Ohio I did not have to show my ID at all and would suffer at worst my ballot being provisional.
Considering he did not ask ID of anyone else, and frankly that includes my wife who was literally beside me as this happened well...
I didn't pursue it because he was old and a bit befuddled but I am never anything but touched when a person who probably went to bed thinking i was the world's biggest racist for showing my ID as a first reflex anyway doesn't grasp the irony of demanding two forms of ID.
Posted by: sven10077 at November 10, 2012 04:55 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at November 10, 2012 04:56 AM (79ueO)
We do not have a seat at the table because we just roll over and do it again
Heres one...Stop buying UAW products and by your Cars from Right to work law states???
Make it hurt where it counts...
Bitching won't get anything done...Defeat the Nanny
Posted by: Chicken ala King at November 10, 2012 04:56 AM (VvvBE)
Posted by: WarrenMuhfugginHarding at November 10, 2012 04:56 AM (LXKJo)
Posted by: Reggie Love at November 10, 2012 04:56 AM (53riN)
Two guys or gals pretending they're married is a natural and God given right? Gee, I missed that that one in the Bible.
Posted by: lowandslow at November 10, 2012 04:57 AM (GZitp)
Posted by: Sexypig at November 10, 2012 04:57 AM (Mq0oA)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at November 10, 2012 04:58 AM (79ueO)
Do we govern by the Bible or do we govern according to the Constitution? They are NOT the same thing. You cannot have freedom in a Theocracy. Just ask the Iranians about that. Nice try though.
Posted by: Al From Bay Shore at November 10, 2012 04:58 AM (H7qBA)
Posted by: Moron Horder at November 10, 2012 04:58 AM (bS6uW)
policies which seek to regulate an individual's behavior.'
Um, gay marriage? How you gonna tell grown folks what they can and cannot do if that which they choose to do does not infringe upon a person's natural right and God given right to property? This is the problem with the SoCons: out of one side of their mouth they are John Locke and out of the other they are Mayor Bloomberg.
Posted by: Al From Bay Shore at November 10, 2012 08:54 AM (H7qBA)
That's it? Gay marriage? And what percentage of the population does that actually affect?
Gays can't even decide about marriage. Not that long ago they referred to people who married as 'breeders' with disdain. Now it's 'ZOMG...LET US MARRY!'
It's not about 'marriage' for gays....they can enter into a civil union that gives them everything they want. It's about sticking it to the church.
Paleeese....that's all ya got?
Posted by: Tami at November 10, 2012 04:59 AM (X6akg)
It doesn't really matter who Choom replaces General All In with....
they will use Stalin's wolfpack tactics to keep everyone in line.
The FBI will be more political than the "evil Hoover" days.
It's gonna get bumpy team.
Posted by: sven10077 at November 10, 2012 04:59 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at November 10, 2012 05:01 AM (dqNUA)
Posted by: onbe at November 10, 2012 05:01 AM (bfprX)
Posted by: Samwise Gamgee the 3rd at November 10, 2012 05:02 AM (SKX2R)
Posted by: trickamsterdam at November 10, 2012 05:02 AM (uTBHY)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at November 10, 2012 05:02 AM (79ueO)
They did show up in reasonable numbers. The socon issue wasn't turnout of socons. It was the two successive socon gaffes about rape that alienated persuadable swing voters.
"Palinites were butt hurt..."
Palinite here. Not butthurt. Turned out faithfully, locked vote in early.
"Gary Johnson made the difference in Florida."
A big chunk of it, to be sure, but how much of a pitch to libertarians do you recall Mitt making? Instead of clearly saying we have a gargantuan government that's out of control and needs to be cut back with a chainsaw in all areas, Mitt basically ran as the guy who would do a better job managing the existing gargantuan government.
And frankly, that was not an attractive pitch to me, either. I didn't vote for Mitt because I thought he would slash government. I voted for him because I knew the other guy would continue to grow government like a tumor, and stasis under Mitt was preferable to metastasis under Obama.
"I know one guy who hates obama, I was certain he had voted against him on Tuesday. He called me - stunned after the election. When I said, 'well at least you know you voted the right way', he replied, 'No, I let my registration expire because I didn't want to get called for jury duty.'"
I hope you call this cretin every single time Barky does something horrible in the next four years. His phone's going to be ringing four or five times a week. "Hi. Me again. Here's more of what you didn't vote to prevent."
Posted by: torquewrench at November 10, 2012 05:02 AM (ymG7s)
Posted by: Vic at November 10, 2012 05:02 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Al From Bay Shore at November 10, 2012 05:02 AM (H7qBA)
Posted by: Andrew at November 10, 2012 08:50 AM (Egza/)
FIFY
Posted by: Hrothgar at November 10, 2012 05:03 AM (Cnqmv)
Posted by: SurferDoc at November 10, 2012 05:04 AM (6H6FZ)
Posted by: Samwise Gamgee the 3rd at November 10, 2012 09:02 AM (SKX2R)
___
Right on point. And I don't want to scare the shit out of anyone, but my parents' homeland is notorious for individualistic voting and party allegiance. That nation's politics is a perennial clusterfark.
We need to join together, stop the internecine battles, or the GOP will end up as a little Italian peninsula within the world of American politics.
Posted by: kallisto at November 10, 2012 05:04 AM (jm/9g)
Posted by: Al From Bay Shore at November 10, 2012 05:05 AM (H7qBA)
Posted by: Moron Horder at November 10, 2012 05:05 AM (bS6uW)
Posted by: W.H. Doubter at November 10, 2012 05:07 AM (Td9D+)
Jesus fucking Christ, everyone here want to know why Romney lost? It's because of people like this. For two hundred some odd years we as a nation achieved greatness because of a cultural norm based on notion of what's right and what's wrong, born mostly from traditional Judeo-Christian values. But not in this fucking guys eyes, while we turn our backs on those values the nation solely turns itself into a shithole and this guy is worried about us, about Christians implementing a fucking Theocracy.
Could you be more disconnected with reality?
Posted by: lowandslow at November 10, 2012 05:08 AM (GZitp)
Posted by: Dick Nixon at November 10, 2012 05:08 AM (VrVBw)
Posted by: AD at November 10, 2012 05:09 AM (qiQSh)
Do you really think that the idea that a marriage is a union between the sexes is just from the bible?
Do you have any examples of a society that allowed gay marriages prior to the late 20th century?
Even in classical antiquity when homosexuality was accepted and condoned (and in some cities even considered a civic duty) they didn't have gay marriages.
Posted by: the guy that moves pianos for a living... at November 10, 2012 05:10 AM (BF5Y9)
Posted by: SurferDoc at November 10, 2012 05:11 AM (6H6FZ)
Jesus fucking Christ, everyone here want to know why Romney lost? It's because of people like this. For two hundred some odd years we as a nation achieved greatness because of a cultural norm based on notion of what's right and what's wrong, born mostly from traditional Judeo-Christian values. But not in this fucking guys eyes, while we turn our backs on those values the nation solely turns itself into a shithole and this guy is worried about us, about Christians implementing a fucking Theocracy.
Could you be more disconnected with reality?
Dude, once the GOP stops pandering to a contituency that wants to use the coercive force of government to impose a morality based on religious teachings, they will be more than a viable party. They will dominate nearly every election cycle. The Dems have their own version of the evangelicals and religious right, they are called Marxists and statists.
Posted by: Al From Bay Shore at November 10, 2012 05:12 AM (H7qBA)
Posted by: Lars39 at November 10, 2012 05:12 AM (3hXBH)
Posted by: Dick Nixon at November 10, 2012 05:13 AM (VrVBw)
Well played.
That's the thing for a bunch of twats who "won big" they sure aren't very happy.
It's your toy now klwons go play with it.
Captain EO can pencil whip all your dreams and desires we GET that you donks don't give a fuck about the Constitution.
Next time neither will I, I aim to nominate the guy who will fuck you up by whatever means necessary not by the rules of the US republic you killed.
Posted by: sven10077 at November 10, 2012 05:13 AM (LRFds)
That would be one way to attract more hispanics...
Posted by: Andrew at November 10, 2012 05:13 AM (9DFhi)
Posted by: Free Shit Army at November 10, 2012 05:14 AM (BPyqV)
Posted by: W.H. Doubter at November 10, 2012 05:14 AM (Td9D+)
Whatever Al, if you think that's the most important thing....have at it.
Gays are unemployed too.....
Posted by: Tami at November 10, 2012 05:14 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: Cate at November 10, 2012 05:16 AM (ogqzN)
Indeed.
Why so angry Libs?
This is my new and improved 2012-2014 GOP platform.
1) Anyone can marry anything
2) Abolish the INS
3) Spend it as you will spend spend spend...
Do not get in barry's way.
Have at it Barry show me we can tax our way to prosperity.
Posted by: sven10077 at November 10, 2012 05:17 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: W.H. Doubter at November 10, 2012 05:18 AM (Td9D+)
Posted by: Al From Bay Shore at November 10, 2012 05:20 AM (H7qBA)
Posted by: Tyrone Velvet, proprietor, Tyrone's coin operated glory hole and transgendered chicken shack at November 10, 2012 05:20 AM (3Y7RV)
Viable party? How about we set for a goal a viable nation, one that doesn't descend into some liberalist utopia where everything is based on fairness and non-discrimination yet were everything and everyone is fucking miserable .
Posted by: lowandslow at November 10, 2012 05:20 AM (GZitp)
Posted by: Baldy at November 10, 2012 05:20 AM (b+m13)
Posted by: W.H. Doubter at November 10, 2012 05:21 AM (Td9D+)
Then why do you want to use government to redefine marriage?
Posted by: the guy that moves pianos for a living... at November 10, 2012 05:24 AM (BF5Y9)
For example, the issue of potential voter fraud undermines the whole concept of an election process. If the vote counters generate the result, why bother to be a voter? Many good points have been made here concerning voter fraud, yet my predictions are that absolutely nothing will be done to resolve what happened in this election (and it just might be that this election was as pure as the driven snow); a few states will probably enact voter ID laws (watered down per SC direction) and they will all be challenged by the usual suspects and not in place in either 2014 or 2016; and no serious attempt will be made by any state to create a certifiable verifiable voting system (no purely electronic systems). The bottom line is that there are things that could be done, but I don't the Republicans, Conservatives, TEA Party, or Libertarians will do squat to resolve any aspect of this issue in a meaningful manner.
I could go on and probably will later, but right now I need another beer.
Posted by: Hrothgar at November 10, 2012 05:24 AM (Cnqmv)
Posted by: Bildo at November 10, 2012 05:25 AM (eToum)
"Viable party? How about we set for a goal a viable nation, one that doesn't descend into some liberalist utopia where everything is based on fairness and non-discrimination yet were everything and everyone is fucking miserable ."
No disagreement on this point. If you want to have a viable party then the GOP needs to be about "pure capitalism" and social freedom. Tha' hell with equality. It's all about the freedom and liberty to dispose of our property in a manner of our own choosing.
Posted by: Al From Bay Shore at November 10, 2012 05:25 AM (H7qBA)
Posted by: AD at November 10, 2012 05:26 AM (qiQSh)
That wasn't really my point, Al in Bayshore thinks the two parties should be the Liberal Party and the Liberal that leans a little Fiscally sane Party. That way we can enjoy our gay pride parades and witness fucking debauchery and know it was run fiscally sound. As if that's the answer.
Posted by: lowandslow at November 10, 2012 05:27 AM (GZitp)
"Then why do you want to use government to redefine marriage?"
Bro, don't even go there. You are still using a religion a means for coercing people into behavior and accepting definitions. This is not freedom.
Posted by: Al From Bay Shore at November 10, 2012 05:29 AM (H7qBA)
Posted by: William The Conqueror at November 10, 2012 08:07 AM (ylZ5l)***** That might be good for people to see,
Posted by: Baldy at November 10, 2012 05:29 AM (b+m13)
ST. LOUIS (AP) - A coal producer owned by a longtime critic of President Barack Obama's energy policies will lay off nearly 160 workers at Illinois and Utah mines, blaming the freshly re-elected president for a "war on coal."
Ohio-based Murray Energy Corp. said in a statement supplied Friday to The Associated Press that it would give pink slips to 102 workers at its West Ridge Mine in Utah and 54 at its underground mine in the southern Illinois town of Galatia. Both mines are run by Murray Energy subsidiaries.
Murray did not specify when layoffs will take place or the total number of workers at each affected site. The company refused an email interview request, saying only that "unfortunately, we will be forced to make even more layoffs, none of which we want."
I hope that everyone who got laid off voted for Barry. It would a nice gift for their stupidity.
Posted by: TheQuietMan at November 10, 2012 05:30 AM (MV5oi)
Posted by: Mark at November 10, 2012 05:30 AM (OxMrA)
the coercive force of government to impose a morality based on religious
teachings, they will be more than a viable party."
This was the election for your ideals - stress the economy, hammer on jobs, rah rah fiscal conservatism. Run away from social issues as fast as you can!
It was a resounding failure.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at November 10, 2012 05:31 AM (uhAkr)
Posted by: The Lost Dutchman at November 10, 2012 05:31 AM (9F2c1)
Posted by: Burn the Witch at November 10, 2012 05:31 AM (uD2fR)
Posted by: Baldy at November 10, 2012 05:32 AM (b+m13)
Posted by: Al From Bay Shore at November 10, 2012 09:29 AM (H7qBA)"
So religious people have to just shut up now? Whatever atheists want, they get?
Yeah no.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at November 10, 2012 05:32 AM (uhAkr)
I think your Greek friend may be learning that socialism doesn't work as well as the theory says very soon.
I think the "modified let it burn" approach for the House would be great, but Boner and his buds cannot resist the chance to get in the history books in what they think will be a positive light.
Mr President, we await the Democrat budget written by House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and do NOT intend to oppose it. All House Republicans will, however, be voting "Present!" when the bill comes to the House floor."
Posted by: Hrothgar at November 10, 2012 05:33 AM (Cnqmv)
Posted by: Burn the Witch at November 10, 2012 09:31 AM (uD2fR)
It's the same source that said Romney was going to ban tampons. The Democrat propaganda machine churns it out and too many people believe it
Posted by: TheQuietMan at November 10, 2012 05:35 AM (MV5oi)
---Democracy in America
Americans got this mixed up some time in the 1960's and we have never really recovered. Obama sells servitude in exchange for a few pills and some near-worthless welfare checks.
I also think there is another component we have not discussed. It's the "fear of the future." Both parties play this up and I think it plays into the Democrat hands. Think about the near constant doomsday scenarios painted by our side and what we offer to the typical voter.
They offer a future with government shelter and we tell them it's better to be on your own.
Posted by: Tocquevillian at November 10, 2012 05:35 AM (iuY0Y)
What religion?
What society prior to the late 20th century had gay marriages?
In all societies throughout history marriage was a union between the sexes. You are the one trying to redefine the word.
Posted by: the guy that moves pianos for a living... at November 10, 2012 05:35 AM (BF5Y9)
Posted by: Tyrone Velvet, proprietor, Tyrone's coin operated glory hole and transgendered chicken shack at November 10, 2012 05:36 AM (3Y7RV)
"So religious people have to just shut up now? Whatever atheists want, they get?
Yeah no."
Dude, what the GOP does on behalf of the evangelicals and religious right is no better than what the Dems do on behalf of the athiests. The athiests try to deprive people of religion while the evangelicals and religious right try to impose religion. The only thing the relgious right and evangelicals should do is stand for religious freedom. Nothing more.
Posted by: Al From Bay Shore at November 10, 2012 05:36 AM (H7qBA)
"Bro, don't even go there. You are still using a
religion a means for coercing people into behavior and accepting
definitions. This is not freedom. "
Bro, the fucking definition and institution of marriage has long been defined.
You're trying to assert an inherently leftist argument in that long accepted definitions of common words are subject to change in the course of an election cycle for political reasons. You're either aware of this and hoping no one can see the flawed premise of your argument, or you're just a lefty stooge.
Considering you're peddling the "BUT, THEOCRACY!!" bullshit, I'll go with the latter.
Posted by: Burn the Witch at November 10, 2012 05:37 AM (uD2fR)
Posted by: Burn the Witch at November 10, 2012 09:31 AM (uD2fR)"
In the hearts and minds of the loser fucktard 'GOP'ers who didn't bother to turn out on Tuesday.
The people who screamed it was the SoCons that cost us this election. Of course, we SoCons all voted in high numbers. So obviously the problem is pandering to SoCons.
Fuck these people. They're irrational. You're never going to convince urban voters to give up on the gubmint checks. You might be able to convince them that Jesus hates the sinners that run their party. I say run hard on a "God" platform and paint the fucking Democrats as the sleazeball criminals that they are.
We need to play dirty and take every advantage we can. This is a war without blood.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at November 10, 2012 05:37 AM (uhAkr)
Posted by: Tyrone Velvet, proprietor, Tyrone's coin operated glory hole
and transgendered chicken shack at November 10, 2012 09:36 AM (3Y7RV)
Increasingly, I view all politics as entertainment since it appears that I have no input as to how the process unfolds.
Posted by: Hrothgar at November 10, 2012 05:37 AM (Cnqmv)
"The athiests try to deprive people of religion while the evangelicals and religious right try to impose religion."
A comment based on nothing more than the caricatures of the Right that have accumulated in your mind.
Posted by: Burn the Witch at November 10, 2012 05:38 AM (uD2fR)
Posted by: Tyrone Velvet, proprietor, Tyrone's coin operated glory hole and transgendered chicken shack at November 10, 2012 05:39 AM (3Y7RV)
"In all societies throughout history marriage was a union between the sexes. You are the one trying to redefine the word."
And if I recall, people define words and terms, not government.
Posted by: Al From Bay Shore at November 10, 2012 05:40 AM (H7qBA)
"A comment based on nothing more than the caricatures of the Right that have accumulated in your mind."
All caricatures have basis in truth. If the GOP stops feeding the caricatures with its living and breathing caricatures (and you know who I am talking about) then this would not happen to you guys.
Posted by: Al From Bay Shore at November 10, 2012 05:42 AM (H7qBA)
"And if I recall, people define words and terms, not government.
Posted by: Al From Bay Shore at November 10, 2012 09:40 AM (H7qBA) "
Yup, and the people have defined that word a long time ago. Go ahead and keep arguing against it. Should be fun.
It's always fun to watch Progressives masquerading as Libertarians.
Posted by: Burn the Witch at November 10, 2012 05:42 AM (uD2fR)
Posted by: Tyrone Velvet, proprietor, Tyrone's coin operated glory hole and transgendered chicken shack at November 10, 2012 05:43 AM (3Y7RV)
Another problem is that Federal Elections should have religion considered in terms of how the Federal government's action impact the free exercise of religion. Details of implementation (Christmas trees in a public square down to post-birth abortion on demand) should be left to the states (see Amd 10). If you don't like the way your state handles it leave!
Of course with forced public support of planned parenthood by the Feral Government this is a moot point, but it would have saved some grief during this election is we had argued along these lines.
Posted by: Hrothgar at November 10, 2012 05:43 AM (Cnqmv)
Posted by: Al From Bay Shore at November 10, 2012 09:36 AM (H7qBA)
I'm not evangelical but if imposing religion means not wanting to pay for Sandy Fuck's birth control or abortions, or not funding teaching kids that Heather has 2 mommies (while they ignore traditional education), or teaching teenagers that having kids out of wedlock leads to a life of poverty and misery for them and their kids then I stand with the evangelicals. Dude
Posted by: TheQuietMan at November 10, 2012 05:43 AM (MV5oi)
"All caricatures have basis in truth. If the GOP stops feeding the caricatures with its living and breathing caricatures (and you know who I am talking about) then this would not happen to you guys."
A basis in truth is not truth. I guess you buy into racial stereotypes too then huh? How far down that rabbit hole you want to go Champ? Your position is about to start unraveling real fucking quick. Lefties always have that problem when you scratch the surface of their arguments.
Posted by: Burn the Witch at November 10, 2012 05:44 AM (uD2fR)
Look at this way, every time you respond to one of these worthless asswipes they rub one out. Do you want to become jerk off material?
Posted by: Vic at November 10, 2012 05:44 AM (YdQQY)
"It's always fun to watch Progressives masquerading as Libertarians."
How am I progressive when I just got through saying that I support a "pure competition" model of capitalism? Bro, before you start arguing with me on words and definitions, you NEED to get your own words and definitions in order. Just sayin'.
Posted by: Al From Bay Shore at November 10, 2012 05:44 AM (H7qBA)
"Romney lost because he refused to provide an alternative for fear of being labelled a warmonger, flint-heart or social reactionary. He refused to engage with any of the issues that made this Presidential election so truly momentous. Up against the bullying of the totalitarian left, he ran for cover. He played safe, and as a result only advertised his own weakness and dishonesty. Well, voters can smell inconsistency from a mile away; they call it untrustworthiness, and they are right Â…like BritainÂ’s Conservative Party, the Republicans just donÂ’t understand that America and the west are being consumed by a culture war. In their cowardice and moral confusion, they all attempt to appease the enemies within. And from without, the Islamic enemies of civilization stand poised to occupy the void."
Posted by: SurferDoc at November 10, 2012 05:45 AM (6H6FZ)
Hey remember me from the Akin wars?
Yeah I now support RiNo finding out what a silent and inactive SoCon wing does for the party.
I am a FiCon first but I have some SoCon to me.
GOP can try to firm up the coalition while letting Barry burn the Democrats for 2014 and 2016 or they can cave while still setting themselves up for blame and try to go circular firing squad.
My gun ain't in on the circular firing squad because frankly gentlemen if shit goes real bad we all will NEED each other not just endure each other.
Keep on plugging bevel.
Posted by: sven10077 at November 10, 2012 05:46 AM (LRFds)
1. Squishes like Boehner and McConnell that we can't count on to fight the fight the way it needs to. However, we have to be smart in how we take these guys out and how we pick our candidates
2. Quit the blind, purist crap that gives us bad candidates. Being as pro-life as Akin or Mourdouck doesn't make you a bad candidate. Being a fucking idiot who can't answer questions or avoid traps and is not ready for prime time on the big stage does. No, I'm not making the "electable" argument. I'm saying if Akin, Mourdouck, Angle, O'Donnell, etc, are the best people we could find to represent our beliefs, then we're truly fucked. 4-5 seats the last 2 elections that we easily could/should have won and TFG is in solid gridlock.
3. Take over the party. Get involved in the party structure at the bottom levels and make it ours.
4. Messaging - our main problem. The frontal assault, guns-a-blazing method doesn't win us votes and allows the media and Dems to easily vilify us. They got us to this point using Death by 1,000 Slices. We need to undo it the same way, piece by piece with logical arguments. Use their tactics against them.
Posted by: Pete at November 10, 2012 05:46 AM (q6gSc)
Posted by: Bildo at November 10, 2012 05:49 AM (eToum)
Posted by: Tyrone Velvet, proprietor, Tyrone's coin operated glory hole and transgendered chicken shack at November 10, 2012 05:49 AM (3Y7RV)
"A basis in truth is not truth. I guess you buy into racial stereotypes too then huh? How far down that rabbit hole you want to go Champ? Your position is about to start unraveling real fucking quick. Lefties always have that problem when you scratch the surface of their arguments."
I don't think so. In fact I know so. Gay marriage? You want to keep grown folks from doing making a mutually acceptable and agreed upon decision? This exactly what the gay marriage ban is about. AND its not just that either. What's up with the social conservativew who support the drug prohibition? You do know about that? The thing that is causing crime and violence in the country and swelling our prison populations? C'mon now. The so-cons fail to understand and acknowledge their nanny state tendencies. Just sayin'.
Posted by: Al From Bay Shore at November 10, 2012 05:50 AM (H7qBA)
Posted by: Al From Bay Shore at November 10, 2012 09:44 AM (H7qBA)"
You're a progressive when you use progressive argumentative tactics. For example: Now you're switching the subject. I was responding to your flawed premise about definitions (another fundamentally leftist tactic) AND your completely unsupportable THEOCRACY!! non-argument, but either you can't fucking read, can't focus, or intentionally change the subject.
You NEED to focus, or just leave and stop wasting your time and ours Tiger.
Posted by: Burn the Witch at November 10, 2012 05:50 AM (uD2fR)
Posted by: the guy that moves pianos for a living... at November 10, 2012 05:52 AM (BF5Y9)
wrt the poll, you need to re-examine your strategy and tactics(even if you don't re-examine your premises and political philosophy). That option's not listed.
You've blamed the losses on everyone and everything else, though, haven't you! ...except for your strategy and tactics, let alone your underlying political philosophies.
...if you use the same strategy and tactics, over and over, and keep losing... or if you don't know - and fully understand - the difference between the two, to begin with...or, if those strategies and tactics don't work in support of your politcal philosophies...
Posted by: Warren Bonesteel at November 10, 2012 05:53 AM (WwR1j)
Posted by: not the mama at November 10, 2012 05:53 AM (kzCIn)
"You're a progressive when you use progressive argumentative tactics. For example: Now you're switching the subject. I was responding to your flawed premise about definitions (another fundamentally leftist tactic) AND your completely unsupportable THEOCRACY!! non-argument, but either you can't fucking read, can't focus, or intentionally change the subject.
You NEED to focus, or just leave and stop wasting your time and ours Tiger."
No dude, I just caught you out there. It was clear that you didn't know what the hell you were talking about. You just labeled a staunch supporter of pure capitalism a "progressive". That makes no sense. In a nutshell, my philosophy is about making that small special interest groups to not intrude upon my private life. In fact, I'll shorten it to three simple words: "Mind ya' bidness".
Posted by: Al From Bay Shore at November 10, 2012 05:55 AM (H7qBA)
You know...never mind.
John Boehner could have the streets of Troy ohio paved with gold if inclined b/c of his power instead he tries to be a fair leader.
You won't beat Boehner at home.
If John boehner is the problem with the GOP and he is not welcome you'll never win Ohio again.
Posted by: sven10077 at November 10, 2012 05:55 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: ontherocks at November 10, 2012 05:56 AM (aZ6ew)
"I don't think so. In fact I know so. Gay marriage? You want to keep grown folks from doing making a mutually acceptable and agreed upon decision?"
No, child. I'm talking about simple, long accepted definitions of common words. My point was directly addressing that in plain, clear English. You keep beating the shit out of that strawman though Champ.
"What's up with the social conservativew who support the drug prohibition? You do know about that? The thing that is causing crime and violence in the country and swelling our prison populations? C'mon now. The so-cons fail to understand and acknowledge their nanny state tendencies. Just sayin'."
That's not a SoCon position you fuckwit. You can keep trying to change the subject though. That has fuckall to do with God and THEOCRACY ZOMGZ!!
Posted by: Burn the Witch at November 10, 2012 05:56 AM (uD2fR)
The cleveland rot has spread too far.
I quit Ohio you want to nuke Boehner go ahead I won't help.
Posted by: sven10077 at November 10, 2012 05:56 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: AD at November 10, 2012 05:57 AM (qiQSh)
"No dude, I just caught you out there. It was clear that you didn't know what the hell you were talking about. You just labeled a staunch supporter of pure capitalism a "progressive"."
No dude, you can't fucking read. Keep talking in circles. That shit may work on your fellow lefties, but here it just reveals you for the imbecile you are.
Peace out bro.
Posted by: Burn the Witch at November 10, 2012 05:58 AM (uD2fR)
-
Since 1965 Republicans have been signing on for things that were bound to lead to bad consequences, just not immediately.
What is the attraction?
Posted by: The Lightworker at November 10, 2012 05:58 AM (Qjl6X)
I didn't really get drawn in on Akin too much. I
"Yeah I now support RiNo finding out what a silent and inactive SoCon wing does for the party."
I don't understand what you wrote. Sometimes I can be a bit slow.
"GOP can try to firm up the coalition while letting Barry burn the Democrats for 2014 and 2016 or they can cave while still setting themselves up for blame and try to go circular firing squad."
Tell the Fiscons to shut up about it then. I only respond when some social lib moron starts up about how we need to jettison SoCons to get on the path to success.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at November 10, 2012 05:59 AM (uhAkr)
Posted by: Truman North at November 10, 2012 06:00 AM (h1GB+)
Brother-sister marriage then?
"ICKY NO ICKY GROSS! It's against the laws of nature! ICKY NO ICKY GROSS!"
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at November 10, 2012 06:01 AM (uhAkr)
Posted by: Gerry at November 10, 2012 06:05 AM (+lJ43)
I don't think the GOP is ever winning ohio again. I don't think they are ever winning the presidency again, period. Socialism is coming because the GOP can't get their shit together and control their message. So yeah, I want all the GOP leadership out. They're all failures. They took all that hard-earned good money desperate Americans gave them to win this election and flushed it down the toilet. Let 'em all burn.
Posted by: not the mama at November 10, 2012 06:05 AM (kzCIn)
There would need to be an opposition party for such a thing to occur.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at November 10, 2012 06:06 AM (uhAkr)
The libertarians say Rs would have more success by dropping abortion as an issue. How does turning the south blue by suppressing evangelicals and SoCons translate into success for limited government? I don't get it.
Posted by: Ranger02 at November 10, 2012 06:06 AM (osb5c)
Posted by: andycanuck at November 10, 2012 06:07 AM (nkiQM)
If Puerto Rico can petition for statehood.WHY NOT??
Peacefully grant the State of Louisiana to withdraw from the United States of America and create its own NEW government.
http://tinyurl.com/d32c95y
Posted by: T. Hunter at November 10, 2012 06:07 AM (EZl54)
Posted by: Al From Bay Shore at November 10, 2012 09:55 AM (H7qBA)
Yo bro, whut up. Just chillen, want no rulez. I'm so hip and progressive but don't touch my cash. Yeah yo. Peace out
Posted by: TheQuietMan at November 10, 2012 06:09 AM (MV5oi)
- the employers who hired the illegals who put Obama over the top while illegally running their competitors into bankruptcy
- the fucks who got theirs first by selling the defective ORCA to the Romney campaign. They should be made into such pariahs that the homeless end up being the only neighbors who take them in
- everyone else who sold out conservatives to selfishly benefit themselves first and last
Instead, the Chicago thugs successfully brought guns to a knife fight, and many of you are now arguing over which dessert spoon is most fashionably appropriate to retaliate with.
It's fucking time to go Bluto, people.
Posted by: Peter at November 10, 2012 06:10 AM (9FQ7y)
Posted by: Truman North at November 10, 2012 06:11 AM (h1GB+)
Posted by: Caustic at November 10, 2012 06:13 AM (/b8+5)
This isn't a criminal enterprise that's going for a bust out where they crank out as much stolen property as they can manage to convince legitimate vendors to loan them, this is a spear aimed at the heart of American cohesiveness and power.
They intend to cripple the US, bring it to it's knees and restructure the country to the exact specification they seeing as keeping them in power in plain sight and no longer behind the scenes.
Overloading of the benefit system, the planting of and the push for certain dangerous and immoral banking and accounting practices (which were crimes until recently) has ballooned our debt and our frangibility to the point where experts say it can't be stopped.
when the system collapses and the overseas markets also collapse (one will abet the other) there will be NO MORE STUFF. Nor will our money be worth anything (that's if you have any hard currency).
Anarchy will ensue and desperate people will be rioting and stealing all over the country. The Government will then have or be given the authority to act, by the few entities still functioning, and IT WILL.
Martial law will be declared Nation wide and NO ONE whether they are prepared or not will be exempt. In fact, those prepared will be targets and they will find themselves facing overwhelming force surrounding them one by one. No one will have enough firepower or organization to remain unaffected or be left alive.
Sorry for the gloom but I just watched a video presentation by Ann Barnhardt about how we got here and where it will end. (goto barnhardt.biz to view. it's about 2 1/2 hour presentation divided into 6 segments so you can skip anything you already think you know.)
the only real question, is WHEN will it happen. The time is uncertain but from what I as a layman can see, I would guess less than 10 years. During that time, you can bet that any administration in the US is going to be creating systems and developing protocols for dealing with that collapse.
The people will be the target.Those that are ignorant and react emotionally will be shot or herded into enclaves where they can more easily be controlled (and where they can be slowly and efficiently liquidated out of sight). Those that are not and prepare will be sought and engaged militarily all possessions and preparation property will be seized (for the greater good) and the owners sent to the enclaves. Those that fight will be murdered.
All Totalitarian governments have eventually engaged in war against the people they have taken charge of. Every. One.
Anyone who thinks it can't happen here needs to open their eyes to the huge financial poison pills we've swallowed. The financial collapse (whether you want to believe it was engineered or just happenstance) will be the reason (as it has been in the past. read your history of russia and germany) for the initial takeover.
From there it will be like it's written in stone for anyone to see the next step or steps.
May God have mercy on our souls.
Posted by: Jcw46 at November 10, 2012 06:18 AM (SP4jC)
I'm tonr between giving them what they voted for, and refusing to raise the debt ceiling.
The thing I would want to focus on is voter ID though. It makes me sick how they gleefully rob me of my vote.
Posted by: disa at November 10, 2012 06:18 AM (Zfbfs)
Posted by: Redman Bluestate at November 10, 2012 06:20 AM (sRIFP)
Posted by: nip at November 10, 2012 06:21 AM (11Tdq)
Posted by: Scobface at November 10, 2012 06:27 AM (qNZ3I)
All Totalitarian governments have eventually engaged in war against the people they have taken charge of. Every. One.
___
Unless a hostile foreign government gets to us first. And with the current weak regime in power, I do see that as a distinct possiblity.
The only weak link I see in the chain of your scenario, besides the fact that we could be attacked from without, rather than within...
is that the very people who would be armed and prepared for an assault by a totalitarian government are also those in the producer class. If the totalitarians get rid of the makers, how will the takers continue to exist?
Posted by: kallisto at November 10, 2012 06:29 AM (jm/9g)
Posted by: specialkayel at November 10, 2012 06:30 AM (qnFaF)
Posted by: andycanuck at November 10, 2012 06:30 AM (nkiQM)
Warren, as I understand it you have banned from here and choose to continue to post. I saw in the thread above that you served as a Marine so I'll give you the courtesy of an answer.
The New Party option on the poll was my shorthanded attempt to describe exactly what you said. The poll place doesn't allow long winded choices.
Truman, actively taking over the party would make it in essence a new Party, no? Besides, the Tea Party tried for it and just got co-opted. Now Boehner is making fun of the Tea Party Caucus. No lie. I saw that over at HA (or maybe Breitbart) as a regular post yesterday.
Posted by: GnuBreed at November 10, 2012 06:31 AM (ccXZP)
Posted by: AnnaS at November 10, 2012 06:31 AM (IpHyk)
Posted by: specialkayel at November 10, 2012 06:31 AM (qnFaF)
Remember those enclaves I spoke of?
Not all will be liquidated. Just those that won't cooperate.
How do you think china set up all their government owned factories?
you're still thinking in terms of the normal process of a capitalist financial and production system where investors invest and profit is made.
These enclaves will make what ever goods are required for the existence of the state. The existence of those in the enclaves will be provided for by the state (as it does to many now). the requirements for those in the enclaves for material goods and shelter and health care will be joining a collective as a worker.
all political power comes from the barrel of a gun and all wealth comes from a human beings labor.
It will be slavery in most aspects except the chains. (for some even the chains will be used. they may be electric or even chemical but they will be chains nonetheless.)
Posted by: Jcw46 at November 10, 2012 06:36 AM (SP4jC)
Also, these reports of Romney getting less of the Mormon vote than Bush did, didn't they say they were cutting out states from exit polling to save money and one of those states was Utah? I don't know how much faith I have in those numbers.
Posted by: Uncle Milty at November 10, 2012 06:39 AM (sCI7M)
Posted by: nip at November 10, 2012 06:40 AM (11Tdq)
Yeah it's going to come as a shock to many of a certain ethnicity that what they've signed on for has lead them to their original state in this country 250 years ago.
The "takers" won't be taking from the state anymore. Only those worthy of the states largesse will remain alive. They are worthy now of the states' largesse because the state needs their votes. Once the state has what it wants, then the takers are no longer needed for their vote and they will be required to show their worthiness in other ways.
In a way it will be poetic justice for them but too bad about the collateral damage to get to that point.
Posted by: Jcw46 at November 10, 2012 06:41 AM (SP4jC)
Posted by: Witchfinder at November 10, 2012 06:42 AM (s/PhC)
Posted by: Soona at November 10, 2012 06:43 AM (h8o92)
Nothing will change until people change. And people won't change unless they are adversely affected by the people in power.
I'm in the "let it burn" camp. Raise taxes, open the borders, take money from the rich. Pile up regulations on business. Have the government spend, spend, spend. I'm doing research to see what kind of benefits I can get from the government. I'm going to apply for as many things as I can. The sooner it all crashes, the sooner we can rebuild it.
Plus, I'll be cutting back on my spending. I definitely won't willingly support businesses run by liberals.
Posted by: Marmo at November 10, 2012 06:44 AM (pcgW1)
Posted by: Jcw46 at November 10, 2012 10:36 AM (SP4jC)
___
To date, totalitarian states have seized power in nations that were not built on the basis of sovereign citizens enjoying liberty that is a natural effect of our God-given inalienable rights. Those of us who still subscribe to that quaint notion will not come out of a violent takeover scenario alive, IMO.
We will kill our families first, and then ourselves, Masada style.
Give me liberty or give me death.
If the totalitarian ruling class wants to enslave the useful idiots that applauded and idolized them all the way to the crisis, it'll be no skin off my nose.
Posted by: kallisto at November 10, 2012 06:45 AM (jm/9g)
Haven't done my homework on Orca yet, so this is firing from the hip. But wasn't Romney supposed to be the master of the universe guy who knew how to make businesses work, was able to fix broken companies, could run large organizations, and would bring some of the efficiency of the private sector to government?
So WTF with ORCA?
Just sayin'
Posted by: RM at November 10, 2012 06:46 AM (ixDYs)
We're the wrong kind of makers. Marxists want Proletariat makers, not Bourgeois makers.
Many people would probably be surprised to learn that the notion "He who will not work shall not eat." is considered the guiding dictate of Communism. If you were fifteen minutes late three times in one month under Stalin, your ass went to a fucking gulag because you were a 'wrecker.'
So what about the layabouts? Why are Marxists now paying people to not work?
Because they want to destroy the Capitalist system. They are building a large mob of able-bodied people who want free stuff and will break things when the system can't deliver.
Once the system is replaced, everybody will be expected to go to the factory in gray overalls. Hey, you got no choice at that point. You gotta eat, so you gotta work.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at November 10, 2012 06:47 AM (uhAkr)
Posted by: Marmo at November 10, 2012 10:44 AM (pcgW1)
I'm in the same camp. And corporation/store/business that supports liberals or liberal causes won't get a penny from me.
Posted by: TheQuietMan at November 10, 2012 06:48 AM (MV5oi)
Secession would open the US to physical occupation by foreign powers. They may even be invited in by those currently occupying those areas as a means of protection or survival.
Anyone think that SF would balk at asking the Japanese or Chinese or more likely the UN for assistance if the Midwest seceded? Or the Northeast from Russia or Germany the UN?
As a nation all our parts have their function. At least some of what one area provides is limited or nonexistent in the others. This would result in economic wars and each secessionary state would wind up with totalitarian/socialist states in order to survive.
Some areas may even survive for a while with most freedoms intact but at a cost of blood and those will most likely be in areas that no one really wants to bother about. AT THAT TIME.
Secession is the worst of our choices. Actual civil war is the best that can be hoped for and that's only if the Federal Government is unable or unwilling to exert the force necessary at the beginning to ensure that no area has enough power or material to sustain themselves separate from the Federal Government.
the Federal Gov't may even be the first to bring in foreign troops to quell any disturbances.
Posted by: Jcw46 at November 10, 2012 06:50 AM (SP4jC)
Posted by: Soona at November 10, 2012 06:52 AM (h8o92)
Posted by: nip at November 10, 2012 06:53 AM (11Tdq)
Posted by: Brother Cavil at November 10, 2012 06:53 AM (x8wJs)
It's part of an international campaign to cut down on meat consumption for health and environmental reasons.
Her motion posted 12-0 in a council session Friday.
Reyes said it is easy for individuals to feel helpless in the face of issues as big as global warming or the obesity epidemic, "but the small changes we make every day can have a tremendous impact. That's why this 'Meatless Monday' resolution is important. Together we can better our health, the animals and the environment, one plate at a time.''
But it's the social conservatives who are telling people how to live
Posted by: TheQuietMan at November 10, 2012 06:54 AM (MV5oi)
Poppin' Fresh and Ace don't like the only answer I have.
if it is okay for the Philly donks to throw the GOP out and magically get 108%+ turnout we need to play the same game everywhere the REed is over blue.
Fuck it no mercy by any means necessary who's with me?
Yeah exactly I'm awful lonely all the sudden.
Let it burn show me barry.
Posted by: sven10077 at November 10, 2012 06:54 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: TheQuietMan at November 10, 2012 10:54 AM (MV5oi)"
Well I don't agree when the left does it either.
(However, I will forget about this and continue to rail against social conservatives, because I don't hate it when the government controls people. I hate religion.)
Posted by: A 'fiscal' conservative at November 10, 2012 06:56 AM (uhAkr)
sorry was not trying to be overly cryptic I was hard on the Akin thing and was a lot harder on the Socons who tried to defend him than I was comfortable with.
Now the screw SoCons want to blame SoCon?
Nope no way in hell the only group of people I know who turned out hard for certain were the SoCons.
I still am pissed at Akin and here in indiana Mourdock but we as a party either need to decide whether to make the mules own late term hard every time it is brought up or let it go.
Akin and Mourdock make more sense on abortion than barack Broom Closet Babies Obama but I fear as a nation we are at peace with the baby butchery.
If so we deserve all we get.
Posted by: sven10077 at November 10, 2012 06:57 AM (LRFds)
Teach them basic survival skills, how to reason out a problem, Mathematics, language skills, physical exercise, basic health and first aid.
help them find a sport or hobby that they enjoy that also improves their abilities and makes them feel worthwhile and self reliant.
have them learn at least one skill in what used to be called industrial arts: machining, wood working, carpentry, repair, plumbing, engine mechanic, electrician.
Posted by: Jcw46 at November 10, 2012 06:57 AM (SP4jC)
Posted by: Soona at November 10, 2012 10:52 AM (h8o92)
Obama ran a campaign to actively suppress votes. It's a constant war.
Posted by: Temper Tantrum at November 10, 2012 06:57 AM (AWmfW)
Enough with the gurus!
What the GOP should be doing now is analyzing why the 2M didn't vote. Maybe it was that Romney took the advice of the gurus and let the Bain plutocrats attacks go unanswered for months? Just a thought.
They should also go out and get involved in middle and working class activities in the population. Obama voters are afraid of Repubs, as I've said before.
Posted by: PJ at November 10, 2012 06:58 AM (ZWaLo)
Yup....so let it burn make it fall inward before Fuckstick is ready.
Fuck them I hate you democrats.
Posted by: sven10077 at November 10, 2012 06:59 AM (LRFds)
Foodstamps Surge By Most In One Year To New All Time Record, In Delayed Release
This time the USDA delayed its release nine days past the semi-official deadline, far past the election, and until Friday night to report August foodstamp data. One glance at the number reveals why: at 47.1 million, this was not only a new all time record, but the monthly increase of 420,947 from July was the biggest monthly increase in one year.
http://tinyurl.com/atcllxg
Posted by: Tami at November 10, 2012 07:01 AM (X6akg)
Expect much, much more bullshit like this in the coming months.
Thanks Boner! And thanks to you Reason fucktards who think there just couldn't be ANY downside whatsoever to open borders.
Posted by: Burn the Witch at November 10, 2012 07:03 AM (8JpQH)
Posted by: Y-not at November 10, 2012 07:04 AM (5H6zj)
This time the USDA delayed its release nine days past the semi-official
deadline, far past the election, and until Friday night to report August
foodstamp data. One glance at the number reveals why: at 47.1 million, this was not only a new all time record, but the monthly increase of 420,947 from July was the biggest monthly increase in one year.
http://tinyurl.com/atcllxg
Posted by: Tami at November 10, 2012 11:01 AM (X6akg)
No politics there. Delay reports on foodstamps, Iranian attacks on drones, cooked employment numbers. Welcome to the Banana Republic of America
Posted by: TheQuietMan at November 10, 2012 07:05 AM (MV5oi)
Posted by: nip at November 10, 2012 07:06 AM (11Tdq)
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie ® at November 10, 2012 07:06 AM (1hM1d)
Nice try Boehner never made fun of the Tea party he said there is "no caucus" b/c they were responsible for the GOP having the majority period.
It's bad enough it is natural for the coming self-flagellation but allowing Tepid and breitbart to mislead on Boehner to accelerate it is just voluntary stupidity.
I am rapidly getting to the "okay so what keep on going" phase.
The GOp shows defitively that the "PureCon tea party" wants to ratfuck the GOP main body I quit.
Posted by: sven10077 at November 10, 2012 07:06 AM (LRFds)
If so we deserve all we get."
I agree with this.
If we as a nation are willing to accept prosperity while babies get murdered, fuck it. We aren't worth a damn thing.
What we should have done with Akin or Mourdock is to run ads about Barack and late-term abortion, or that fucktard in Connecticut who considers it a baby when it's out of the birth canal. Show the pictures of late-term abortion. Show the evil done by guys like Kermit Gosnell. Make Barry defend his votes on that. The best defense is a strong, strong offense, not melting away from a guy and saying he did something wrong.
We'd win easily. Nobody - layabout or no - likes seeing dead babies. It's inherent in us. We'd make inroads with women too - women love their children more than anything else. Seeing a baby hurt or in pain makes all the women I know go nuts.
Instead, we ran away. We left the field open to attacks, and in so doing let them define us.
Look at how the left handled Granny Warren's faux-Cherokee heritage - they attacked people who brought it up as racist and insensitive. It worked.
The left defends with attacks. We surrender the guy to them and say we don't want anything to do with him.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at November 10, 2012 07:07 AM (uhAkr)
Posted by: Y-not at November 10, 2012 07:07 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Y-not at November 10, 2012 07:08 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: sven10077 at November 10, 2012 10:57 AM (LRFds)
There are many socons that suspect or know that what is coming to pass is due to the last 45 years and the murder of 50 million innocents.
We no longer enjoy the blessings of God because we have turned our backs on God and our pride makes us believe we don't need God nor are required to obey God.
God has always pointed out what the consequences will be when a nation takes those actions.
All one needs to do is look at Israel to see how even the Chosen of God will be punished for their sin and pride and their rejection of God.
I've always thought that the US's main reason for existence and continued prosperity was it's help in the recreation and the assistance we gave Israel
( God made a covenant with Abram: "And I will make you a great nation, And I will bless you, And make your name great; And so you shall be a blessing; And I will bless those who bless you, And the one who curses you I will curse. And in you all the families of the earth will be blessed'" (Genesis 12:1-3))
With Obama and his crypto muslim cabinet and advisors, we have turned our backs on God, on Israel and embraced Satan.
Is it any wonder that our situation is getting worse?
And you atheists can scoff all you want but the truth is the timing of our troubles and the facts of what this administration values and supports cannot be denied. Just that will bring us down let alone any God. We've turned our back on an ally of 40 years and embraced Islam a murderous death cult that was instituted by Satan as a counter to Christianity. (look at the timing)
Posted by: Jcw46 at November 10, 2012 07:09 AM (SP4jC)
113 - "Right on cue, the libs think businesses are getting revenge for tfg's re-election and obamacare by firing and hiring freezes"
Let 'em think that. Why should they think they get to win at everything? Let the unemployed think that their victory cost them their livelihood; I want to think of them seething and unable to get the last word. "He took my job!" "He gggk by jmb!' "Ee oook mmmr cchhhmm!"
Posted by: Dr. Mabuse at November 10, 2012 07:09 AM (FkH4y)
The Federal government is the source of the coming tyranny not the defense.
Nothing would make me happier than watching the left get their clocks cleaned and killing the idea of the UN superstate once and for all by sending home lots of body bags to "helpers."
It's time to settle accounts and start over if need be.
let it burn then try to leave.
Fuck it.
Posted by: sven10077 at November 10, 2012 07:10 AM (LRFds)
His budget also btw was never a budget that CUT a damn thing. It was a budget of the reduction IN THE RATE OF INCREASE and never cut anything.
Some may say that that would be a start, but I would say it's just smoke and mirrors so as to allow the charade to go on a little longer.
Posted by: Jcw46 at November 10, 2012 07:11 AM (SP4jC)
Posted by: Y-not at November 10, 2012 07:14 AM (5H6zj)
>>Posted by: Y-not at November 10, 2012 11:07 AM (5H6zj)
Good questions all, and I'd like answers myself, but there is no escaping the fact that NONE of this is possible with an honest, cohesive and pervasive media to replace the MFM.
That should be the easiest of solutions for deep pockets like the Kochs an Adelson and the like.
Posted by: ontherocks at November 10, 2012 07:15 AM (aZ6ew)
Shut it down!
http://tinyurl.com/b7j69z7
Nicholas Eberstadt about Entitlements: 'Who's Asking for Them and Who's Giving Them Out' [Shock and Awe: Republicans even more than Democrats]
Nicholas Eberstadt is a political economist who holds the Henry Wendt Chair in Political Economy at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI). He is also author of 'A Nation of Takers: America's Entitlement Epidemic'.
Nicholas Eberstadt, details the exponential growth in entitlement spending over the past fifty years. As he notes, in 1960, entitlement payments accounted for well under a third of the federal governmentÂ’s total outlays. Today, entitlement spending accounts for a full two-thirds of the federal budget.
Posted by: panzernashorn at November 10, 2012 07:17 AM (BAnPT)
Your guys wait until the polls close, then they go through the voting record and fake a signature to go with a pre-stamped mail in ballot and viola! presto chango
It's a little extra work but worth it when the alternative is gubberment spending less.
I'm gonna go make me another waitress sammich.
See ya next Holloween boooooyaaaa!
Posted by: Zombie Ted Kennedy at November 10, 2012 07:17 AM (QX1B1)
As an example, I had a friend that works for a prominent and well-funded outside conservative group that had a massive turn out the vote effort in Nevada. They did all of the traditional get out the vote that had nothing to do with ORCA, and he was saying it was unprecedented and genuinely thought Romney would capture the state. He's normally very pessimistic and was high up in several successful campaigns around the country, but genuinely thought Romney would win the White House.
Some sort of disconnect happened, and it actually happened on both sides of the aisle.
Usually, the diagnosis is "the base stayed home because x issue wasn't emphasized" but just to flip that around, there's a lot of moderate Republicans that aren't on board with the "700 Club" wing that maybe said "enough!" with Santorum talking about the dangers of birth control andAkin and Mourdock talking about abortion and rape. I was reading where the gender gap has never been more pronounced in several generations.
If we can't beat a President and Senate with an 8% unemployment rate, that's not a GOTV problem, we have an "issues" problem.
Posted by: Jeepers at November 10, 2012 07:17 AM (XDRsa)
Posted by: Mindy at November 10, 2012 07:18 AM (6jLT3)
Posted by: eman at November 10, 2012 07:20 AM (sRus3)
So they didn't vote for Mitt Romney, mister moderate himself? What lunacy.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at November 10, 2012 07:23 AM (uhAkr)
Great just what we need more Ras fantasy numbers
Posted by: kevinw at November 10, 2012 07:23 AM (wrzBP)
Posted by: Jcw46 at November 10, 2012 10:50 AM (SP4jC)
--------------------------------------------------
Secession could be achieved with an agreement with mutual defense against foreign adversaries like a "continental army" so to speak (I know, I know, just give me a minute).
Each side though, would get the chance to live by the types of government they choose. The DC governed most likely would choose marxism. The seceded states the Constitution.
Since it's obvious that a free and industrious people would prosper more, the class warfare types would do what they always do; covet the prosperity of freedom. They will use their share of their defense force to take that prosperity.
Except now there are defined borders to fight for. Having a civil war as the physical form of this country is right now would be nothing but chaos because the enemy wouldn't and couldn't be defined. We'd be distrusting our next door neighbors and they us. Bad juju.
We're eventually going to have a hot civil war. This country is way to polarized now. But I'd rather it be with defined borders and a knowledge of exactly who it is I'm fighting. In the long run, it would be less bloody than the free-for-all chaos otherwise.
Posted by: Soona at November 10, 2012 07:23 AM (H9hVa)
Posted by: Y-not at November 10, 2012 07:24 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: OCD Con at November 10, 2012 07:26 AM (uUlWl)
Posted by: Y-not at November 10, 2012 07:28 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: mrp at November 10, 2012 07:28 AM (HjPtV)
I don't see a way to counter that. People might laugh at the idea of "President Biden" but I see no way to prevent it.
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at November 10, 2012 07:28 AM (P7hip)
Wait until after Sequestration.
Secession would be a mess. The red states all have blue cities and the blue states all have red counties. The red county remnant wouldn't be too happy and the blue cities in seceded states would probably complain as well.
This is a divide between rural/suburban and urban. How you split that is like splitting the yoke and whites in a scrambled egg.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at November 10, 2012 07:29 AM (uhAkr)
That's why an honest brokered media is the quickest solution.
The Cloward and Piven game plan is hanging out there for all to read, complete with contemporary evidence and fans in power.
We know about it but we are a distinct minority due to the machinations of the MFM.
If the idea that the free lunch for moochers is only a temporary ploy, or means to a REAL END maybe even a small percentage of them would get a little healthy fear.
The obliviously busy and overly educated might need a slap across the snout but even they might see the totalitarian state beyond the Finished Line.
Posted by: ontherocks at November 10, 2012 07:30 AM (aZ6ew)
Posted by: Jordan at November 10, 2012 07:32 AM (jRfn3)
Posted by: JEM at November 10, 2012 07:33 AM (o+SC1)
The more questionable thing is that the RNC doesn't have something like ORCA ready to go for its nominee. Dem organizations spend all sorts of time developing organizations for the explicit point of synergizing with the campaign.
I always get the feeling that with Republicans a lot of them a "college republicans"... business aping tools who are just trying to climb ahead of the other guy using very shallow rhetoric and tactics. When we look at these "internal campaign issues" it always seems to get back to these types of people. Its all about the game playing and not about doing the job... so loyalty is a not a 100% proposition.
Dems probably have similiar traits except if they don't express loyalty to the cause they're punted hard and fast. Republicans probably don't have to express loyalty to the cause and are much more loyal to themselves and their ladder climbing aspirations. At best they have to express loyalty to the inner circle if there really is one (and when you see shit like amnesty brought up 10 minutes after the election...)
(That being said, I have talked to a Dem true-believer hack who worked for Hillary in Bill's administration... he expressed a lot of the same ladder-climbing behavior and backstabbing once the campaign was over. The guy I know is a loyal soldier type... I think that's what makes him resistant to changes despite that he'll express occasional misgivings. Its politics, this happens. But if you want to go on why things fail... there you go.)
Posted by: Former Mass. Resident at November 10, 2012 07:33 AM (BeB0s)
Posted by: OCD Con at November 10, 2012 11:26 AM (uUlWl)
--------------------------------------------
The more I think about this the more I agree with the fraud side. There was a reason Holder fought voter ID laws or any of the tweaks states wanted to do to avoid fraud.
Allen West's election (non-election) I believe is the tip of the iceberg. Cleveland is another example. The military ballot problems were criminal. I'm sure others will be uncovered as well.
Posted by: Soona at November 10, 2012 07:33 AM (H9hVa)
Posted by: Sassy at November 10, 2012 07:36 AM (HINxj)
Posted by: Y-not at November 10, 2012 07:37 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: eman at November 10, 2012 07:37 AM (sRus3)
Posted by: fark, farkety, fark fark fark at November 10, 2012 07:38 AM (bT79U)
Allen West's election (non-election) I believe is the tip of the iceberg. Cleveland is another example. The military ballot problems were criminal. I'm sure others will be uncovered as well.
Posted by: Soona at November 10, 2012 11:33 AM (H9hVa)"
What we need now is evidence. There are some strong indicators, but we need more than that.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at November 10, 2012 07:39 AM (uhAkr)
Posted by: Y-not at November 10, 2012 07:41 AM (5H6zj)
sven, I didn't read the article, I just saw the title of the article. Since either HA or Breitbart should be 'sympathetic to the cause', I saw no reason to plow into the details. If you say he didn't put down the TP, I believe you. It just hurt my eyes to see a title like that.
Mindy, 'I have no earthly idea' is another good choice for a poll possibility.
fwiw, I threw that poll together, literally, in 30 minutes this am when the fancy struck me. I guess quite a few M-nMs were hungry for a poll like that and I wish I had done a more thorough job.
Over 2000 votes now.
Posted by: GnuBreed at November 10, 2012 07:41 AM (ccXZP)
Boehner and McConnell inspire nothing but disgust and annoyance.
There needs to be a complete house cleaning or a wrecking ball.
Aside from Allen West, there doesn't seem to be anyone willing to even mention fraud, let alone fight it.
Posted by: ontherocks at November 10, 2012 07:42 AM (aZ6ew)
Why?
He is not getting removed without blood count on it.
They were SCARED he'd lose too I think we beat their margin of fraud right up until joisey buddah's blowjob.
No give them all they wany but the Bill of rights.
Fuck 'em let it burn
Posted by: sven10077 at November 10, 2012 07:42 AM (LRFds)
as an outsider looking in, may I?
the gop has 3 major problems:
1: you have governors up the ying yang but not all the sec. of states..take the voting process away from from them and have it controlled by a panel selected by the governor. itll help prevent fraud
2. in states controlled by rethugican'ts, let the world know as best you can that its your ideas that are helping the economy, not the fed's. you state helps create 100,000 jobs? make it obvious its you and not Obama
3. as I've said here for almost 6 years...CLOSE YOUR FUCKING PRIMARY!!!
Posted by: navycopjoe at November 10, 2012 07:43 AM (NJEvi)
The GOp is having all its punditry try to hail mary to get what they want.
HotAir has been wobbly for 18 months.
I have no idea what the hell Breitbart is up to but go read the innards of their headlines they are in fact outright lying on several fronts right now.
The GOp would rather have a civil war at home than gear up to try to prevent or win one with the dems.
That's why I'm saying if the GOP won't form a Phalanx I quit.
Posted by: sven10077 at November 10, 2012 07:44 AM (LRFds)
Newsweek to GOP: 'You're Old, You're White, You're History!'
http://tinyurl.com/apv62r8
Your days are done, GOP white man. In its November issue, Newsweek and writer David Frum want you to know that youÂ’re old, youÂ’re white, and youÂ’re finished.
Posted by: kbdabear at November 10, 2012 07:45 AM (wwsoB)
Posted by: Cowboy at November 10, 2012 07:45 AM (WcgMM)
Perhaps Mia Love lost because her region is populated by a lot of relocated Californians.
Not every good candidate wins their first campaign or any subsequent election. Nothing is preventing Mia Love from running again, and winning next round. If she needs a larger coalition of voters, then she must address that in her platform. If she wants Libertarian votes, then campaign on strict constitutional governance, protected Liberty, smaller government, limited spending and low taxes. Did she meet with the Libertarians in advance to see what common ground there was, perhaps prior to a Libertarian candidate running in opposition? It's rare that Libertarians are on the ballot for every office in any given election. Also, ask yourself why should Libertarians sign on to the Republican ticket any more than Republicans should sign on to the Libertarian?
You are wrong to call Libertarians all pot heads, just as it would be wrong to call Republicans all racists, homophobes, hard-core alcoholic elitists and warmongers.
Radio show host Libertarians privacy rights Katheryn Albrecht and former Army nurse Joyce Riley of the Power Hour and nutritional pharmacist Ben Fuchs of the Bright Side prove your premise misguided to say the least. Visit their sites:
http://tinyurl.com/5bphz4
http://tinyurl.com/coa986
http://tinyurl.com/bbbzex
Your bitter irony is in the absurd neoconservative claim to be "Reagan Conservatives." Take his word on that.
"I believe the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism. I think conservatism is really a misnomer, just as liberalism is a misnomer for the liberals . . . The basis of conservatism is a desire for less government interference or less centralized authority or more individual freedom, and this is a pretty general description also of what libertarianism is."
Ronald Reagan
http://tinyurl.com/b8363a4
Posted by: panzernashorn at November 10, 2012 07:45 AM (BAnPT)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at November 10, 2012 11:23 AM (uhAkr)"
It's actually starting to crack me up when these fucking idiots come in talking about the "700 Club wing" of the party fucking this all up. Sorry guys, Akin and Mourdock had nothing to do with FL and VA or really the national stage at all.
So keep on raging against the SoCons who, by all accounts so far, seem to have dragged Mr. Electability as far as he got. SoCons don't depress Republican turnout. Think about it by the numbers - if that's true, don't waste your time voting ever again.
Until you ZOMG ANTI-THEOCRACY folks get some actual evidence to back up your rants, you're just showing your ass.
Posted by: Burn the Witch at November 10, 2012 07:45 AM (8JpQH)
David Frum would be well served to go home to canuckistan they're wealthier than we are now and freer.
Brooks and frum are about to get nutshot.
Posted by: sven10077 at November 10, 2012 07:47 AM (LRFds)
He is not getting removed without blood count on it.
Posted by: sven10077 at November 10, 2012 11:42 AM (LRFds)"
'
If voter fraud happened, there should be a war. The government is an illegitimate banana republic.
But nobody is going to want that kind of horror without an ass-load of proof.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at November 10, 2012 07:47 AM (uhAkr)
This is a divide between rural/suburban and urban. How you split that is like splitting the yoke and whites in a scrambled egg.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at November 10, 2012 11:29 AM (uhAkr)
-----------------------------------------------------
Easily solved. States like TX, OK, AR, KS, AZ and others would be no-brainers. Have state referendums. A mandate, let's say 55% for secession would be enough. No state will ever be rid of the liberal mind-set.
And sucession could mean just a split from the edicts of DC. Free commerce could still be exercised with non-seceded states.
As far as taxes go, the states collect all taxes and state legislatures give to DC enough to cover national defense, and national infrastructure. No more.
If DC cuts off the money supply, the seceded states cut off the energy supply. Then use oil and gas to back up a new currency. It could be done.
Posted by: Soona at November 10, 2012 07:50 AM (H9hVa)
Posted by: mrp at November 10, 2012 07:50 AM (HjPtV)
Posted by: eman at November 10, 2012 07:51 AM (sRus3)
Here is your opponent:
http://www.nytimes.com/
Here is your opponent:
http://www.nbcnews.com/
Your opponent will win sometimes, lose sometimes.
Here is your enemy:
http://theamericanconservative.com/
Your enemy will offer to babysit your children, then sodomize them when you turn your back. Your enemy will always win by using your own efforts to defeat you until you finally remove him from the board.
If you bought advertizing or product from Wick Allison or Ron Unz, if you swapped recipes with Rod Dreher or helped Daniel Larison avoid getting a job for another year, you eagerly volunteered to help elect Barack Obama.
Posted by: Peter at November 10, 2012 07:52 AM (9FQ7y)
Posted by: Y-not at November 10, 2012 07:52 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Y-not at November 10, 2012 07:53 AM (5H6zj)
493 ding ding!!!! winna!!!!
if you run a guy where you say 'I'll hold my nose and vote for him', guess what?
you lost before you began
you need someone who will get the base fucking pumped!!!
a perfect example was palin...people wanted to vote for her..not mclame
and there was no way in hell that election was going to won anyway because of the mfm and history!!!!
Posted by: navycopjoe at November 10, 2012 07:55 AM (NJEvi)
Posted by: Cowboy at November 10, 2012 07:56 AM (WcgMM)
Posted by: Targeted Victory, FLS Connect, and The Stevens and Schriefer Group at November 10, 2012 07:57 AM (FcR7P)
re the '700 Club group' -- Pat Robertson did run in the Repub primary one year, and got a whopping 5% of the primary vote before crawling back into the hole he crawled out of.
And if I've offended anyone by that, sorry, but I cannot stand that slimeball.
Posted by: GnuBreed at November 10, 2012 07:58 AM (ccXZP)
---------------------
Until the political tides turn, and the blacks and browns are surely not endearing themselves to the old white guys.
Not very smart.
(and what idiot programmed this user interface that will not let me canel the italics after pasting in italicized text? Could it be the ORCA crew? Bwahahaha....)
Posted by: Anon at November 10, 2012 07:58 AM (fh3lh)
Let 'em think that. Why should they think they get to win at everything? Let the unemployed think that their victory cost them their livelihood; I want to think of them seething and unable to get the last word. "He took my job!" "He gggk by jmb!' "Ee oook mmmr cchhhmm!"
Posted by: Dr. Mabuse at November 10, 2012 11:09 AM (FkH4y)
I've been saying that since Wednesday. Fire anyone who voted for Obozo and let them know they are losing their job because Barry is going to make their cost of running the business skyrocket. It's Obamacare or you and you're SOL. Pound it into their empty skulls that Barry's re-election cost them their job
Posted by: TheQuietMan at November 10, 2012 07:59 AM (MV5oi)
Posted by: Anon at November 10, 2012 07:59 AM (fh3lh)
I'd choose the following 3.
Government shutdown -- Ask the House to refuse to up the national debt limit.
Go galt -- Come on, you know you want to.
Cloward Piven -- Sign up for every benefit you can.
That will bring on the let it burn without the GOP having to take credit for increased spending.
Posted by: Flounder at November 10, 2012 08:01 AM (Kkt/i)
Posted by: Cowboy at November 10, 2012 11:56 AM (WcgMM)
-------------------------------------------
Yup. Both the northeast and west coasts are diseased and we should treat them as such. We'd love to get your businesses and make you prosperous again but leave your people behind, please.
Posted by: Soona at November 10, 2012 08:02 AM (H9hVa)
Posted by: specialkayel at November 10, 2012 08:04 AM (ch7LG)
Move the Border Patrol from San Diego and Caliexico to Lake Havasu, Stateline, Lake Tahoe, and Klamath Falls
Posted by: kbdabear at November 10, 2012 08:04 AM (wwsoB)
Posted by: fark, farkety, fark fark fark at November 10, 2012 08:05 AM (bT79U)
Posted by: booger at November 10, 2012 08:05 AM (HI6wa)
Posted by: Cowboy at November 10, 2012 08:06 AM (WcgMM)
But maybe, just maybe, we could have found a way to co-opt them to our side in greater numbers. Like by throwing in a pot plank. Seventeen states now allow medical MJ and 2 now have full legalization, with Alaska also allowing people to grow it in their homes.
Full disclosure -- I don't smoke the stuff.
Posted by: GnuBreed at November 10, 2012 08:06 AM (ccXZP)
Posted by: eman at November 10, 2012 08:06 AM (sRus3)
Posted by: L, just L at November 10, 2012 08:06 AM (0PiQ4)
512 another problem is the gop is scared of being called racist.
The SARAH!!! is the only one in a speech who actually came out and said such
lets be real, you're not getting the black vote or the majority of the latino vote...not happening..sorry, racism lives
also, on scare tactics? use them!!!! hey granny, guess what? you vote for the idiots in charge and you're going to eat cat food. think before you vote
that shit works
Posted by: navycopjoe at November 10, 2012 08:10 AM (NJEvi)
But maybe, just maybe, we could have found a way to co-opt them to our side in greater numbers. Like by throwing in a pot plank.
I doubt it, put the weed plank in and they'll still scream that R's are neocon warmongers and Jesus freaks. L's aren't really a small government party anymore, they're a left wing social issues party, doubt there's anything R's could to get their vote outside of becoming democrats.
Posted by: booger at November 10, 2012 08:11 AM (HI6wa)
Posted by: specialkayel at November 10, 2012 08:12 AM (HP6sa)
oh, for the record I am still a palinista but you know who should run next time?
ALLEN "I'LL FUCK YOU UP!!" WEST
Posted by: navycopjoe at November 10, 2012 08:12 AM (NJEvi)
Posted by: eman at November 10, 2012 08:14 AM (sRus3)
Flounder, that poll place did have that option. With all the suggestions I've gotten for other options, when I do this again in a month or so I'll probably allow multiple picks.
One thing is for sure, there's lots of anger at the status quo based on the results. One thing I'm surprised is that how few people weren't mostly interested in just dropping out of politics entirely (the SMOD option as I called it).
PS the football thread is up.
Posted by: GnuBreed at November 10, 2012 08:14 AM (ccXZP)
Posted by: eman at November 10, 2012 08:15 AM (sRus3)
I'm in the same camp. And corporation/store/business that supports liberals or liberal causes won't get a penny from me.
Is there a list of anyh kind?
Ace - will you post it if so?
Posted by: Anon at November 10, 2012 08:16 AM (fh3lh)
oh, something to remember
next election you're going up against HILLARY
bring some weak ass candidate and she will eat you up
you're back against the mfm and history!!!
Posted by: navycopjoe at November 10, 2012 08:17 AM (NJEvi)
Posted by: Jordan at November 10, 2012 08:17 AM (jRfn3)
Posted by: fark, farkety, fark fark fark at November 10, 2012 08:17 AM (bT79U)
ncj, lol. I had Empire of Jeff for President yesterday, with the slogan
"Vote for me or I'll fuck you up"
Posted by: GnuBreed at November 10, 2012 08:18 AM (ccXZP)
Posted by: nip at November 10, 2012 08:19 AM (11Tdq)
524 fight it? FORCE IT!!!
ask ten random people on the street who is paul ryan and who is honey boo boo and see who can recognize the names
our country is fucked right now, our kids want shit, not want to earn shit
fuck it, burn
Posted by: navycopjoe at November 10, 2012 08:20 AM (NJEvi)
529 I need a slogan for my run
i'm want to run with 'vote for joe cause the other choice just sucks'
Posted by: navycopjoe at November 10, 2012 08:22 AM (NJEvi)
Posted by: L, just L at November 10, 2012 08:24 AM (0PiQ4)
And yes Orca was the name of Quint's boat.
We need to purge the RINOs and these asshat consultants who think conservatives (of all stripes) are the problem.
We now know that its not our principles. We now know that fraud and media malfeasance were major factors. (We knew all along, but apparently our vaunted republican leadership didn't).
We need Palin, Breitbart, and Newt types who aren't afraid of the media and willing to take the fight to them.
Posted by: Iblis at November 10, 2012 08:30 AM (g+kk2)
Posted by: specialkayel at November 10, 2012 08:31 AM (HP6sa)
Posted by: Jordan at November 10, 2012 12:17 PM (jRfn3)"
It's not hate for America. It's being pissed at what has happened to it.
We're angry because we are watching something we love commit suicide in its own stupidity.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at November 10, 2012 08:31 AM (uhAkr)
Posted by: Islamic Rage Boy at November 10, 2012 08:33 AM (e8kgV)
Posted by: specialkayel at November 10, 2012 08:34 AM (HP6sa)
The thing we should be analyzing is why it was close enough to care about GOTV in the first place. But the answer to that is too painful so we're gonna jerk off on ORCA for months now.
Please leave teh stupid to the GOP. They've got it down.
Posted by: hannitys_hybrid at November 10, 2012 08:35 AM (MmH0Z)
Posted by: hannitys_hybrid at November 10, 2012 08:37 AM (MmH0Z)
Posted by: Jordan at November 10, 2012 12:17 PM (jRfn3)
It's not hate for America, it's hate for the bastards who hate America and vote for anti-American assholes like Barry or don't care or sat at home and didn't vote against Barry
Posted by: TheQuietMan at November 10, 2012 08:38 AM (MV5oi)
Posted by: msmulan at November 10, 2012 08:39 AM (vSWyU)
Posted by: specialkayel at November 10, 2012 12:12 PM (HP6sa)
-------------------------------------------
I would suggest, then, moving to a red state. We're going to be the calm in the storm. The problem is going to be in the blue states when they don't have any more free shit to give. The burning will come. Oh, yes. But the red states will be relatively peaceful, except from the spillover from the blue states. And for that reason is why we like guns.
Posted by: Soona at November 10, 2012 08:40 AM (mUr1V)
Posted by: Iblis at November 10, 2012 08:41 AM (g+kk2)
Posted by: fark, farkety, fark fark fark at November 10, 2012 08:44 AM (bT79U)
Posted by: L, just L at November 10, 2012 08:44 AM (0PiQ4)
Posted by: eman at November 10, 2012 08:46 AM (sRus3)
Posted by: eman at November 10, 2012 08:48 AM (sRus3)
I know exactly how you feel. I am so depressed I've cut down on all of my political blogs, don't watch the news, and kind of secretly hate lots of people I know.
Mayan Apocalypse/ SMOD can't come soon enough for me.
Posted by: shibumi at November 10, 2012 09:00 AM (z63Tr)
Posted by: L, just L at November 10, 2012 09:01 AM (0PiQ4)
Posted by: fark, farkety, fark fark fark at November 10, 2012 09:01 AM (bT79U)
In any case, it's evident this will get much, much worse.
Posted by: Caninepundit at November 10, 2012 09:02 AM (PlKIC)
Posted by: Son of Liberty at November 10, 2012 09:03 AM (BPKIW)
Posted by: L, just L at November 10, 2012 09:07 AM (0PiQ4)
Posted by: Caninepundit at November 10, 2012 09:12 AM (PlKIC)
Since it's a prominent issue lately, there's been a lot of polling about that, and the rub is this: It would net *many* more male votes and *many* fewer female votes. It might be a winning net, but the GOP doesn't want it. "Demographic reality," etc. Imagine what the TV would say!
The reason Democrats, despite their occasionally decrying it as wasteful/racist/etc., never do anything to reduce federal drug-enforcement power (and tend to increase *displays* of that power), is because the Dems' statistically most important constituency—women of all races—are really intensely pro-drug-war.
The GOP is in a similar quandary. The "socons" are women, mostly, and the party seems to need them.
So, oh well.
Posted by: oblig. at November 10, 2012 09:12 AM (cePv8)
Posted by: L, just L at November 10, 2012 09:13 AM (0PiQ4)
Posted by: txconservative at November 10, 2012 09:14 AM (5UMyr)
Posted by: crosspatch at November 10, 2012 09:27 AM (ZbLJZ)
Posted by: Iblis at November 10, 2012 09:29 AM (g+kk2)
Just got back from a few errands and mailing out my "Denial of donation" slips.
Filled out the form stating all future donation requests should be fowarded to 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.
Used whenever I could their prepaid postage envelope.
Refused to put a stamp on the others.
But since the return address says My Daddy Barack, Washington DC.
I wonder what the post office will do with these?
Posted by: CallmeGalt at November 10, 2012 09:32 AM (fl8vK)
On the comment menu bar all the way to the right is a less than = more than symbol (not equal in some quarters)
click this and you can directly edit the html that you have pasted in your comment. click apply click ok and you're back to the comment box.
NOW you can format to the minimal level we are allowed.
bon apetit
Posted by: Jcw46 at November 10, 2012 09:40 AM (SP4jC)
Posted by: someone (OG) at November 10, 2012 09:44 AM (oDtYC)
We should study how they did it and be ready. You can be sure George Soros and the Obamas are doing just that.
Posted by: PJ at November 10, 2012 09:48 AM (ZWaLo)
1. I don't care what the GOP does. I'm pretty much done with voting. I'll pick it up again on the other side.
2. SMOD - I will continue to fantasize about a post-apocalyptic reality where I am a free man struggling to survive in a world populated mainly by curvy women.
3. Let it burn - I will not try to fight against the Free Shit Army. They won. Let them suffer the consequences. See #4.
4. Government Shutdown - This isn't at all incompatible with letting it burn. It should be a part of the Let It Burn strategy. If fact it will hasten the burning. The question is: Do you want to be blamed for it happening now or later? It happens either way.
5. I will continue to go Galt, sort of. I am withdrawing as much as possible from the Progressive State. But I will not be living under a bridge or in a hobo camp. I will be supporting parallel systems based on voluntary cooperation and liberty. I am already engaged in parallel systems for health, education, and income, and I will continue to focus on supporting those systems that will hasten the end of the Progressive State and become the mainstream systems in the era after.
6. Cloward-Piven - I will engage in this strategy selectively when it doesn't require any calories burned on my end. Anything to hasten the inevitable.
7. Form a new party - I think it's much too early for that. A new party will form (or come to power if it already exists) if and when there is a demand.
Posted by: runninrebel at November 10, 2012 09:52 AM (J4gw3)
"Dude, once the GOP stops pandering to a contituency that wants to use
the coercive force of government to impose a morality based on religious
teachings, they will be more than a viable party."
Sentiments like these are the biggest load of bunk'em. They are learned in faculty lounges and aped by their stooges. Look around at where the coercive force of government has injected itself in you life over the past 30 years. What kind of lightbulb can you buy? How did that bureaucrat get there, between you and your doctor? Who just took over the entire school loan industry? Who is running a war on salt, soda-pop, transfats? Who designed that school lunch your kid won't eat? Why is there 40% ethanol in your overpriced gasoline, which comes in a maddening array of mandated seasonal blends, while the silos for livestock forage lie empty? Who has it been calling for new bans on every day that they aren't calling for new mandates? It has NOT been social conservatives. No, it has been another group who is seeking to impose its own vision of America, how life is lived in America, how business is done in America, and dictating what relationships and new dependencies Americans are to have with their government. And they are doing so according to a certain eschatology and morality, ie., with religous verve and bent.
Posted by: Cowboy at November 10, 2012 09:56 AM (WcgMM)
Reading comments and thinking. What if the dems in congress start demanding Choomboy start tacking to the right.
Okay. Daydream over.
Posted by: Comrade Soona at November 10, 2012 10:01 AM (mUr1V)
Posted by: deadite at November 10, 2012 10:13 AM (8YVZT)
Posted by: Dirks Strewn at November 10, 2012 10:15 AM (Rrc6j)
For my fictitious person: with Social Security and a pension, and $50,000 in savings, low monthly expenses. I still would be eligible for $175 per month!
Wonder why we're broke?
Oh, and the first screen redirects you to register to vote. IOW you want the food stamps, vote for Dems!
Posted by: PJ at November 10, 2012 10:16 AM (ZWaLo)
Posted by: notsothoreau at November 10, 2012 10:16 AM (uPhCY)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's mobile at November 10, 2012 10:27 AM (DYWM0)
Repubs in the House should introduce a comprehensive tax reform proposal, preferably with a flat rate, cap on deductions, one page return, increased revenues largely derived from real GDP increases, and let Paul Ryan explain it to the public.
Posted by: Fiscal Cliff at November 10, 2012 10:49 AM (vQgte)
Posted by: The Teller of Hard Facts at November 10, 2012 11:52 AM (5CDB2)
Posted by: Adorno at November 10, 2012 01:22 PM (3UZKf)
Man I can't understand why the blue states bled electoral votes to the south then?
Why didn't these people magically show up for the census?
How fortuitous that magically they all voted for King Putt.
Posted by: sven10077 at November 10, 2012 01:39 PM (LRFds)
Posted by: kagai at November 10, 2012 01:42 PM (3eTJD)
"An inside look behind Romney's loss: An epic failure of its Orca big-data app"
By Preston Gralla
Seeing Through Windows, Computer World
November 09, 2012 10:40 AM EST
No matter your politics -- whether you're a Romney supporter or Obama supporter -- you should read the Ace of Spades account as a cautionary tale about how not to deploy a big-data app in politics or business.
Preston Gralla is a contributing editor for Computerworld and author of more than 40 books, including "Windows 8 Hacks" and "How the Internet Works".
Posted by: panzernashorn at November 10, 2012 02:57 PM (BAnPT)
Posted by: Anatoly at November 10, 2012 08:45 PM (Rh0bZ)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3199 seconds, 710 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: lowandslow at November 10, 2012 03:09 AM (GZitp)