January 24, 2012
— Ace Romney, 15%.
Biden, of course, has given literally hundreds of dollars in a year.
You see, they don't have to give money to charity; they breathe and shit charity.
Posted by: Ace at
11:15 AM
| Comments (267)
Post contains 41 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: jewells45 at January 24, 2012 11:17 AM (l/N7H)
Posted by: Serious Cat at January 24, 2012 11:18 AM (4pF/M)
Posted by: Obama at January 24, 2012 11:19 AM (fsFpl)
Posted by: jewells45 at January 24, 2012 11:19 AM (l/N7H)
Posted by: Preznit 1%er (to charity) at January 24, 2012 11:19 AM (W7ffl)
Posted by: mike at January 24, 2012 11:19 AM (RRSlp)
Posted by: EC at January 24, 2012 11:19 AM (GQ8sn)
Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize. You want the man who led us to world peace, according to the Nobel Peace Prize, to be MORE charitable?
World Peace!
Have you seen the ocean lately? It's not rising anymore. Any guess as to why?
Put you think he owes the March of Dimes some cans of beans?
Posted by: Dustin | Perrybot in need of a firmware update | at January 24, 2012 11:19 AM (8RL8E)
Posted by: Bob Saget at January 24, 2012 11:20 AM (SDkq3)
Posted by: garrett at January 24, 2012 11:20 AM (zvYKO)
Someone should check laundered muslim charities for his fingerprints.
Posted by: ontherocks at January 24, 2012 11:20 AM (ZJCDy)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, President, Curmudgeon's Union Local 427 at January 24, 2012 11:21 AM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: Barack Hussein Obama at January 24, 2012 11:21 AM (ggRof)
Romney should use that stat to beat Obama's head at the debates.
Posted by: EC at January 24, 2012 11:21 AM (GQ8sn)
Since linking here no longer works, I urge everyone to go to Hot Air and watch the Paul Ryan vid that's up. Paul Ryan is amazing. The media are still trying real hard to use Newt's words about "right wing social engineering" against him. Ryan does a GREAT job deflecting. But, damn Newt for that. Damn him.
Posted by: whatever at January 24, 2012 11:21 AM (O7ksG)
Posted by: Vic at January 24, 2012 11:21 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: ace at January 24, 2012 11:21 AM (nj1bB)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 24, 2012 11:22 AM (8y9MW)
Most democrats are cheap. All elected democrats are super cheap. That's why they want to tax you to death. To pay for their steroid infused cheapness.
Posted by: whatever at January 24, 2012 11:23 AM (O7ksG)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 24, 2012 11:23 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: Lord and King Barrance of the SCOAMF, Slayer of Freedoms at January 24, 2012 11:23 AM (d0Tfm)
They know that they are too greedy and lazy to support charities, so they assume everyone else is, too. And that's the relatively benevolent ones. The purely malignant ones, of course, are hoping to subjugate the American People, either by addicting them to the Government teet, or by making them work for the government (functionally) for most of the year, and only have enough to survive on, themselves.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 24, 2012 11:24 AM (8y9MW)
If a liberal were to give voluntarily to a charity, it would set a bad precedent. Soon, everyone out there would be giving to charities of their own choice, instead of the ones the liberal himself chooses.
That's why tax loopholes deductions for charitable giving, which millionares and billionares routinely abuse, must be abolished from our tax code.
The added revenue can be invested by motivated and compassionate people, necessarily shielded from the rigors of electoral politics, on behalf of all of us, not just the 1%.
In the spirit of fairness, it time for use to share the bounty of charitable giving equally, and not just the sacrifice. It's only fair.
Posted by: Truman North channels the DNC at January 24, 2012 11:24 AM (I2LwF)
Posted by: Aunt Cranky at January 24, 2012 11:24 AM (JoeF6)
What is Obama's?
What would Obama's be if he gave 15% of his income to charity?
Posted by: AmishDude at January 24, 2012 11:24 AM (T0NGe)
btw, Capt Shitheadio tested negative for drugs
but tested positive for guinea charm and an olive oil voice
Posted by: soothsayer at January 24, 2012 11:24 AM (sqkOB)
Every ball I slice into the out of bounds or into the water hazard is another $100 charitable donation.
Posted by: Barack Hussein Obama at January 24, 2012 11:25 AM (fYKvZ)
Yeah, but Romney's a capitalist, so he stole all that money from the workers.
Posted by: Occupy Wall Street at January 24, 2012 11:25 AM (fsFpl)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 24, 2012 11:25 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: wheatie...liking Perry more than ever at January 24, 2012 11:26 AM (ALwK/)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 24, 2012 11:26 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: Barack Hussein Obama at January 24, 2012 11:26 AM (fYKvZ)
Good point, AmishDude. Part of why Mitt pays less taxes is because if you donate a bunch to charity, your taxes get lowered.
Wish the actual Romney campaign would consider making the same point.
Posted by: Emperor of Icecream at January 24, 2012 11:26 AM (epBek)
Posted by: Occupy Wall Street at January 24, 2012 03:25 PM (fsFpl)
So what about rich lawyers?
Posted by: AmishDude at January 24, 2012 11:27 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Joe Biden, SOOOOPER Genius at January 24, 2012 11:27 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 24, 2012 03:25 PM (i6RpT)
He's spending most of this show going on and on about a white house menu. I am embarrassed for him.
Posted by: Aunt Cranky at January 24, 2012 11:27 AM (JoeF6)
Posted by: Truman North channels the DNC at January 24, 2012 11:27 AM (I2LwF)
Posted by: IreneFingIrene at January 24, 2012 11:27 AM (JNqU9)
Don't be so quick to damn him. When he said that phrase a lot of people who would have previously ignored him took a look and tuned in. Thus, the debate you had last night. Trying to take the air out of the room. If the debates weren't resonating then the media wouldn't be trying to put the kabosh (as my gram would say how i love that word) on them.
A lot of previous reluctant ron paul people are turning in to take another look at newt. These aren't paul bots they are oliver stone dems who were rooting for ron paul cause they are reticent to cast another vote for BO. If that phrase pulls them in newt's direction then even paul ryan would say it's a good thing.
Posted by: ambrosia at January 24, 2012 11:27 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at January 24, 2012 11:27 AM (bxiXv)
Posted by: wheatie...liking Perry more than ever at January 24, 2012 11:28 AM (ALwK/)
Posted by: Grimaldi at January 24, 2012 11:28 AM (ksQuw)
Democrats are noble and infinitely moral demigods who intend to build a just society in which there is no need for charity. Therefore, liberals don't need to give to any silly charity.
Now shut up and pay your damn taxes, suckers.
Posted by: weew at January 24, 2012 11:28 AM (koRYD)
I have given extremely valuable speeches to you people . . . for FREE!
I even understand that you backwards bitter-clingers can be blessed by my presence on your boxy TVs in your trailer parks. Charity? That's real charity.
Heck, I appointed a charity czar.
Posted by: Emperor of Obama at January 24, 2012 11:28 AM (epBek)
Posted by: Obama's income that he didn't donate at January 24, 2012 11:28 AM (BbX1b)
Posted by: Vic at January 24, 2012 11:28 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: phoenixgirl voter without a candidate at January 24, 2012 11:29 AM (Ho2rs)
I give you my Time... I give you my Leadership... and you all stick me in this OLD house... with Old Airplanes... heck... just look at this hand me down desk I got..
And you want my MONEY too?
Posted by: Precedent Obombya at January 24, 2012 11:29 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: Aunt Cranky at January 24, 2012 03:24 PM (JoeF6)
Showed up in a slinky black dress? Details, please.
Posted by: joncelli, too stressed by half at January 24, 2012 11:29 AM (RD7QR)
Anyone President-Elect Obama's nifty tax dodge when he signed a book deal, and got payed an advance, for delivery of books after he leaves office?
As long as we are talking taxes, why is no one making an issue out of the boy-king's behavior? {rhetorical question only}
Posted by: Deafdog at January 24, 2012 11:29 AM (YUwuZ)
Wait, seriously? I mean, I know that's what they actually think, but they admit to that?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 24, 2012 11:29 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Emperor of Icecream at January 24, 2012 03:26 PM (epBek)
They might. We'll never know because the media doesn't pass on good arguments to us.
Somebody ran the numbers and most middle class people don't pay an effective rate of 15%. You pretty much have to be single, have no mortgage or dependents and make a whole lot of money.
Posted by: AmishDude at January 24, 2012 11:29 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: ontherocks at January 24, 2012 11:30 AM (ZJCDy)
Posted by: wheatie...liking Perry more than ever at January 24, 2012 03:28 PM (ALwK/)
Dissecting the menu from a white house lunch he went to. The program is half over and we haven't gotten to the entree yet.
Posted by: Aunt Cranky at January 24, 2012 11:30 AM (JoeF6)
God formatting sucks ass today.
Let's see what still works...
Howzabout this?
Or this? And somebody already said that the linkything didn't work.=, it didn't work for me or Vic this morning.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at January 24, 2012 11:30 AM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 24, 2012 11:30 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: Rex Harrison's Hat of the banned at January 24, 2012 11:30 AM (f4zzG)
Posted by: Smokey Behr at January 24, 2012 11:30 AM (PaYek)
Posted by: The Mega Independent at January 24, 2012 11:30 AM (XWFiP)
Awesome.
Posted by: Grimaldi
You know who first came up with that idea? Karl Marx, I shit you not. It's called 'heightening the contradictions.' Marx used to chew out friends who gave money to homeless people.
Liberalism is preschool Marxism.
Posted by: Emperor of Icecream, Cultist for Jesus at January 24, 2012 11:31 AM (epBek)
Posted by: ontherocks at January 24, 2012 11:31 AM (ZJCDy)
Posted by: TheQuietMan at January 24, 2012 11:31 AM (1Jaio)
taxpolicycenter.org/ taxtopics/ Summary-of-Tax-Proposals-of-2012-GOP-Candidates.cfm
Newt and Santorum keep the charitable giving deduction and I'm pretty sure Mitt does, too.
Posted by: Y-not at January 24, 2012 11:31 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: AmishDude
The non-racist term is selfless servants of the People.
Posted by: Emperor of Icecream, Cultist for Jesus at January 24, 2012 11:32 AM (epBek)
Well, we blame it for everything else, why not that, too?
Heck, I blame our current crop of candidates on pixy.
And I blame the 2008 election on pixy.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 24, 2012 11:32 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at January 24, 2012 11:32 AM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at January 24, 2012 11:33 AM (Pixxe)
Posted by: wheatie...liking Perry more than ever at January 24, 2012 11:33 AM (ALwK/)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 24, 2012 11:33 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: TheQuietMan at January 24, 2012 11:33 AM (1Jaio)
Sometimes they don't realize they're admitting to it. I was having an argument with one of my wife's college friends the other day, and he basically claimed it was the job of government to build, well, pretty much everything.
I decided that fell under the "but ... but ... Roads!!!" rule in the Libertarian Drinking Game (and that I was playing), so I broke out a bottle of Val-u-Rite.
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at January 24, 2012 11:33 AM (bjRNS)
Posted by: Bill Clinton at January 24, 2012 11:33 AM (r2PLg)
I'm still waiting for that damn Skittle-shitting unicorn.
Posted by: John P. Squibob at January 24, 2012 11:34 AM (FToTH)
Posted by: Wall_E at January 24, 2012 11:34 AM (48wze)
Posted by: Barack Hussein Obama at January 24, 2012 11:34 AM (fYKvZ)
Posted by: The Mega Independent at January 24, 2012 11:34 AM (XWFiP)
As I read somewhere, libs are like Scrooge before he has his epiphany. Scrooge lets those looking for donations know that he has paid his taxes and his obligation is at an end. After all, that is why his taxes support poor houses. You'll also notice that after he wakes, he doesn't run out and lobby for more government or shut his business down to go crap on police cars (horse drawn wagons). Why, he actually does things on his own initiative to foster better conditions and writes out his own check to pay for it, the exact opposite of the liberals who complain that they can't write out their own checks to the federal government.
Posted by: ejo at January 24, 2012 11:34 AM (J7B50)
Posted by: Bill Clinton at January 24, 2012 11:34 AM (r2PLg)
Mitt Romney adviser Norm Coleman, a former senator from Minnesota, predicted the GOP won't repeal the Democrats' healthcare reform law even if a Republican candidate defeats President Obama this November.
"You will not repeal the act in its entirety, but you will see major changes, particularly if there is a Republican president," Coleman told BioCentury This Week television in an interview that aired on Sunday. "You can't whole-cloth throw it out. But you can substantially change what's been done."
Posted by: Entropy, Racism Delenda Est at January 24, 2012 11:35 AM (mf67L)
Y'know, it would be useful to have a link to that quote, in context.
To use on my friends when they pull that krutz.
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at January 24, 2012 11:35 AM (bjRNS)
Posted by: Al Gore at January 24, 2012 11:35 AM (QKKT0)
Posted by: Teleprompter at January 24, 2012 11:35 AM (NbmYl)
You know what I love? That the MFM, while pointing out that Romney and his wife donated a sizeable portion of their wealth to charity, always - ALWAYS -- mention that a lot of those charitable donations went to the Mormon church. So Romney's charity should be taken with a pinch of salt because, you know, those Mormons be crazy, and he's just subsidizing the crazy.
*rolling eyes* I hate the media.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO supporter at January 24, 2012 11:35 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Emperor of Obama at January 24, 2012 11:36 AM (epBek)
I hate this line of argument.
And the riposte of "Hmmm... so how did roads and telegraph lines get built before the government basically took over that function?" just sails right past them.
One more time, for the record: You have no right to what someone else must produce. That includes roads, telephone lines, fiber-optic cable, or whatever else.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 24, 2012 11:36 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Ranty McNewGuy at January 24, 2012 11:37 AM (QcFbt)
Posted by: B. Hussein Obama at January 24, 2012 11:37 AM (f9c2L)
BackwardsBoy.....try using a 'period' followed by an 'enter' ( or return) to create a break.
.
^Like this. .....Erm, really it is an 'enter' + 'period' + 'enter' that seems to work.
Posted by: wheatie...liking Perry more than ever at January 24, 2012 11:37 AM (ALwK/)
Posted by: Teleprompter at January 24, 2012 03:35 PM (NbmYl)
Buffet's secretary's "rate" includes payroll taxes (FICA). That's the little trick he uses.
Posted by: AmishDude at January 24, 2012 11:37 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Bill "BJ" Clinton at January 24, 2012 11:37 AM (48wze)
"You can't whole-cloth throw it out. But you can substantially change what's been done."
That's complete and utter bullshit. Anything government has done, government can undo.
Hey Norm, 'splain it to me exactly why it can't be thrown out. I got time, since I only work part-time now.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at January 24, 2012 11:38 AM (d0Tfm)
I have got to get a better accountant.
Posted by: DaveA at January 24, 2012 11:38 AM (XFxB5)
Posted by: joncelli, too stressed by half at January 24, 2012 11:38 AM (RD7QR)
WTF?
Is this a repeat of yesterday's "WOO PEW PEW" brigade?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 24, 2012 11:38 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: jeannebodine at January 24, 2012 11:38 AM (byR8d)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 24, 2012 11:38 AM (i6RpT)
I blame pixy for New Coke!
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO supporter at January 24, 2012 11:38 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Teleprompter at January 24, 2012 11:39 AM (NbmYl)
Posted by: blindside at January 24, 2012 11:39 AM (x7g7t)
That's why Catholic adoption agencies have to be closed...they don't give a shit about gay couples wishing to adopt, that's just a useful thing to make sure there are people hurting so they can expand gov't. Catholic hospitals are next, btw--again, they don't care about how nurses get their morning-after pills paid for, but when they shut down the hospitals over it, the low-income people who were getting free/reduced-price care (and the rural people, who don't have any other hospitals within an hour's drive) are going to be screwed, and elected officials can ride in with Other People's Money and look like heroes.
*spit*
Posted by: HeatherRadish at January 24, 2012 11:39 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: Adam Smith's Invisible Pimp Hand at January 24, 2012 11:39 AM (tKFT6)
Posted by: StrategicCorporalUSMC at January 24, 2012 11:39 AM (zgwWv)
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at January 24, 2012 11:39 AM (Pixxe)
Posted by: Reno_Dave at January 24, 2012 11:39 AM (OL4L4)
I'll be watching anything but that
Posted by: kbdabear at January 24, 2012 11:40 AM (Y+DPZ)
Oh, this guy hit multiple points in the Drinking Game at the same time. About the only one that I remember him missing was "Somalia!"
I figured it was just time to stop talking to him.
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at January 24, 2012 11:40 AM (bjRNS)
Posted by: Cowboy at January 24, 2012 11:41 AM (tfMGP)
Posted by: WarEagle01 at January 24, 2012 11:41 AM (rkYJv)
When the left throws fits about Romney's tithing to the Mormon Church, we only need to mention Obama's donations to Trinity.
Posted by: Reno_Dave at January 24, 2012 03:39 PM (OL4L4)
It shows you he knew that Wright was poison before he started running.
I still can't believe people voted for a guy who went to that church. Adolf Hitler was more charming.
Posted by: AmishDude at January 24, 2012 11:41 AM (T0NGe)
One of Romney's key advisors says he, or any other Republican, won't overturn Obamacare;
http://tinyurl.com/747t8xt
**** ****** ********* ***********
Posted by: 18-1 at January 24, 2012 11:41 AM (7BU4a)
Just throwing it out there... a significant portion of Romney's charitable donations are to his favorite organization, the Mormon Church.
A couple years ago, Barack Obama held a fundraiser for his favorite charity too! Raised over $800 billion, he did.
Posted by: BurtTC at January 24, 2012 11:41 AM (TOk1P)
BackwardsBoy.....try using a 'period' followed by an 'enter' ( or return) to create a break.
.
^Like this. .....Erm, really it is an 'enter' + 'period' + 'enter' that seems to work.
Like
.
this?
Also, the Italics have become self-aware. I tried it in the previous comment; they showed up on the comment box but not the actual comment. When I pasted in your comment, it came up Italianicised in the comment box.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at January 24, 2012 11:41 AM (d0Tfm)
Cover for "I'm a cheap SOB who would rather buy the best Chardonnay than give money to someone I don't know, but I don't want anyone to think I'm a bad person"
Posted by: kbdabear at January 24, 2012 11:42 AM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: jd at January 24, 2012 11:42 AM (lduvP)
Posted by: maddogg at January 24, 2012 11:42 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: ambrosia at January 24, 2012 11:42 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: Marybeth at January 24, 2012 11:43 AM (TU1z+)
So I was just looking to see if a live webcam was available for the Concordia. No joy. But I did see the cool satellite images. http://tinyurl.com/75wq8x6
Posted by: soothsayer at January 24, 2012 11:43 AM (sqkOB)
----------------------------------------
Oooh. That's a shocker.
Posted by: really ... at January 24, 2012 11:43 AM (X3lox)
So...we're going to do the out-of-context quote thing to boost our guy now.
Nice. Very lefty.
Posted by: AmishDude at January 24, 2012 11:43 AM (T0NGe)
Nevermind, I looked it up -- 2.6% per Businessweek on an AGI of $3.1 million in 2010.
Posted by: GnuBreed at January 24, 2012 11:43 AM (BhuDE)
Posted by: Cowboy at January 24, 2012 11:43 AM (tfMGP)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO supporter at January 24, 2012 11:44 AM (4df7R)
Actually, I think Republicans realize that Charity that can be written off of your income taxes is much easier than that which is just "from the heart."
Don't think they're not cold and calculating about it- they're politicians, too.
But I do wish Republicans would run a series of commercials comparing the relative ease and effectiveness of obtaining private charity to the bureaucracy and mismanagement of Government Welfare.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 24, 2012 11:44 AM (8y9MW)
Not "won't". "Can't".
And unless Newt plans to appoint farm animals to the Senate, he can't either.
Posted by: AmishDude at January 24, 2012 11:44 AM (T0NGe)
Also: I found a website that has links to dozens of cruise ship webcams.
Pretty neat. For 5 minutes, anyway.
Posted by: soothsayer at January 24, 2012 11:44 AM (sqkOB)
Posted by: wheatie...liking Perry more than ever at January 24, 2012 11:44 AM (ALwK/)
Posted by: Buffalobob at January 24, 2012 11:45 AM (qiFDD)
Posted by: Meiczyslaw
The Communist Manifesto denounces "philanthropists, humanitarians, improvers of the condition of the working class, organisers of charity, members of societies for the prevention of cruelty to animals, temperance fanatics, hole-and-corner reformers of every imaginable kind". That's in Chapter III, Part 2. In Chapter III, Part 1, the Manifesto also denounces "clerical socialism," which appears to mean church-sponsored charity and church preaching against greed and oppression.
Posted by: Emperor of Obama at January 24, 2012 11:45 AM (epBek)
Posted by: Marybeth at January 24, 2012 03:43 PM (TU1z+)
I can relate, Marybeth. That's how I was for NH's primary. In the end, I wasn't 100% sure who to vote for... even after I'd cast my vote!
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO supporter at January 24, 2012 11:46 AM (4df7R)
'Can't' is a flat lot of bullshit.
If you can't, than none of it is of any use and we may as well let Obama win.
The Libertarians do not say 'they can't.'
Posted by: Entropy, Racism Delenda Est at January 24, 2012 11:46 AM (mf67L)
Posted by: maddogg at January 24, 2012 11:46 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Wall_E at January 24, 2012 11:46 AM (48wze)
------------------------
Heh. Liberals think that their beloved government built all those hospitals called Saint Something of Something and Mt. Sinai of Somewhere ... LOL.
Liberals would be funny if they weren't so damn dangerous in their demented nihilism.
Posted by: really ... at January 24, 2012 11:46 AM (X3lox)
I'm not sure what the Mormon Church spending habits are (lot of underwear). My understanding from Mormons I know they are obligated to donate to the church. But in Progressive Land church donations and church missions don't count as charity or helping the poor.
Posted by: Adam Smith's Invisible Pimp Hand at January 24, 2012 11:46 AM (tKFT6)
Posted by: Reno_Dave at January 24, 2012 11:46 AM (OL4L4)
Posted by: wheatie...liking Perry more than ever at January 24, 2012 11:46 AM (ALwK/)
Posted by: Entropy, Racism Delenda Est at January 24, 2012 11:47 AM (mf67L)
But that 1% went to things that were better than what Mitt Romney gave to, which was rich people and the 1%!!!
Posted by: Rev Dr E Buzz at January 24, 2012 11:47 AM (iKmTn)
Posted by: Mary Cloggenstein, Brattleboro, VT at January 24, 2012 11:47 AM (jiwQf)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at January 24, 2012 11:47 AM (jucos)
To use on my friends when they pull that krutz.
Posted by: Meiczyslaw
The Communist Manifesto denounces "philanthropists, humanitarians, improvers of the condition of the working class, organisers of charity, members of societies for the prevention of cruelty to animals, temperance fanatics, hole-and-corner reformers of every imaginable kind". That's in Chapter III, Part 2.
In Chapter III, Part 1, the Manifesto also denounces "clerical socialism," which appears to mean church-sponsored charity and church preaching against greed and oppression.
Marx also specifically attacked charity because it postponed the revolution, but I don't have those quotes handy.
Posted by: Emperor of Obama at January 24, 2012 11:47 AM (epBek)
************
Too bad when Coleman got thrown out he didn't get buried at the dump.
If the GOP doesn't purge itself of these pathetic, cringing, MFM pandering eunuchs, Conservatives are going to have to establish a new party.
If it's not a one party totalitarian state at that point.
Posted by: ontherocks at January 24, 2012 11:48 AM (ZJCDy)
Posted by: Marybeth at January 24, 2012 11:48 AM (TU1z+)
Posted by: wheatie...liking Perry more than ever at January 24, 2012 03:46 PM (ALwK/)
----------
So say we all, amen.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO supporter at January 24, 2012 11:48 AM (4df7R)
If you can't, than none of it is of any use and we may as well let Obama win.
The Libertarians do not say 'they can't.'
Posted by: Entropy, Racism Delenda Est at January 24, 2012 03:46 PM (mf67L).
Yeah, the Libertarians just `don't.'
What law have Libertarians repealed?
If you would actually read the quote instead of having some slimy partisan hack take it out of context, Coleman says we can dismantle a lot of it. The context, of course, being that he's eager to do so.
Posted by: AmishDude at January 24, 2012 11:48 AM (T0NGe)
That's not exactly the problem. See O'Keefe, James E. III.
A Charity actual cares that its help goes to people who need it. The bureaucrat just wants to keep from getting a negative evaluation from the scam artist, so avoids the hassle by approving the welfare anyway.
The law-abiding won't make a big stink about being rejected, while the criminal will.
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at January 24, 2012 11:48 AM (bjRNS)
Posted by: AmishDude at January 24, 2012 03:44 PM (T0NGe)
---------------------------------------
"Won't"
And they won't.
Posted by: really ... at January 24, 2012 11:49 AM (X3lox)
Posted by: Wall_E at January 24, 2012 11:49 AM (48wze)
I do not want a president who's advisers say we can't do anything.
Romney should fire that dickhead Coleman immediately.
He won't, but he should.
Posted by: Entropy, Racism Delenda Est at January 24, 2012 11:49 AM (mf67L)
But what about the forgotten 99%, Rommney doesn't care about them, he's a fascist, not like Ronald Redford, who cares about the forgotten 99%!!!
Posted by: Rev Dr E Buzz at January 24, 2012 11:50 AM (iKmTn)
"You will not repeal the act in its entirety, but you will see major
changes, particularly if there is a Republican president," Coleman told
BioCentury This Week television in an interview that aired on Sunday.
"You can't whole-cloth throw it out. "
*********** ******************* *********** ********** ********** ******
Jumping Hay-soos on a pogo stick!
That this douche-bag is associated with Romney is enough to make me look seriously at the fat populist clown.
Posted by: imp at January 24, 2012 11:50 AM (UaxA0)
Posted by: Wall_E at January 24, 2012 11:50 AM (48wze)
I did those tax calculations last week. A family of 4 doesn't hit 9% until they are well above 100K. Most people make around 50K to 60K and below 50K they don't pay any taxes.
Posted by: Vic at January 24, 2012 11:50 AM (YdQQY)
Coleman says we can dismantle a lot of it.
All of it.
Failshit rear guard action will not save this country, it just slows the rot down slightly.
Posted by: Entropy, Racism Delenda Est at January 24, 2012 11:51 AM (mf67L)
Romney should fire that dickhead Coleman immediately.
He won't, but he should.
Posted by: Entropy, Racism Delenda Est at January 24, 2012 03:49 PM (mf67L)
He should fire him AFTER he beats him unconcious with a hose sheathed length of 1 inch cable.
Posted by: maddogg at January 24, 2012 11:51 AM (OlN4e)
I want repeal, and then replace, and then I want DeMint and Paul to obstruct and filibuster the replace so we have nothing.
Nothing.
Posted by: Entropy, Racism Delenda Est at January 24, 2012 11:51 AM (mf67L)
Posted by: soothsayer at January 24, 2012 03:43 PM (sqkOB)
Tables and chairs and anything that floats is making it's way out of the ship causing the Coast Guard to start cleaning up the mess so it doesn't become a hazard to navigation.
Carnival is asking them to just find a dump site on the island to deposit the debris and the Italians are none too happy about that.
Posted by: ErikW at January 24, 2012 11:51 AM (98qlF)
Posted by: Dave at January 24, 2012 11:51 AM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: really ... at January 24, 2012 03:49 PM (X3lox) .
Give us the full quote, then.
Posted by: AmishDude at January 24, 2012 11:51 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: jukin at January 24, 2012 11:52 AM (5oKRH)
143 -
So you're saying that when Mitt says he'll repeal it, he's lying? Or is the word "lying" too strong, should we call it something else?
Posted by: BurtTC at January 24, 2012 11:52 AM (TOk1P)
Mormons I know they are obligated to donate to the church.
******* ******* ******* *******
10% off the gross, not the net.
Or no temple recommend for YOU!
Posted by: imp at January 24, 2012 11:52 AM (UaxA0)
Posted by: Vic at January 24, 2012 03:50 PM (YdQQY).
I wonder what percent of taxpayers actually pay an effective rate of 14%.
Posted by: AmishDude at January 24, 2012 11:52 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: maddogg at January 24, 2012 11:53 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: GnuBreed
So Mitt gave 15%, Newt gave 2.6%, and Barack gave 1%.
Of course, Clinton raping and sexually harassing his employees didn't stop him from being a feminist icon. Barack doing nothing to help people doesn't stop him from being a CompassionBringer.
Posted by: Emperor of Obama at January 24, 2012 11:53 AM (epBek)
Posted by: a Dem at January 24, 2012 11:54 AM (71LDo)
Posted by: whatever at January 24, 2012 11:54 AM (O7ksG)
He won't, but he should.
Posted by: Entropy, Racism Delenda Est at January 24, 2012 03:49 PM (mf67L)
Romney is in full agreement with him. Romney NEVER intended to do anything to repeal ObamaCare. Not one thing. He might have signed a repeal, if forced, but that was as much as anyone could expect out of him.
Romney is an idiot.
Posted by: really ... at January 24, 2012 11:54 AM (X3lox)
Of 'taxpayers?' I'm going to guess (somebody go look it up, 'cause now I want to know, too) somewhere north of 10%. Call it 15 - 20.
Of US Residents, of course, that percentage number goes way down.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 24, 2012 11:54 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Wall_E at January 24, 2012 11:54 AM (48wze)
>>Sometimes they don't realize they're admitting to it. I was having an argument with one of my wife's college friends the other day, and he basically claimed it was the job of government to build, well, pretty much everything.
****
I've heard the same argument, or variation of it.
You see, many charitable organizations are backed by religious institutions, and by lefty logic they're only helping to poor to indoctrinate them into a theocracy or something.
Also, I've heard them argue that even if they don't openly discriminate against those of other faiths, the display of religious symbols and the like is a grievous act of discrimination anyways which might make the poor people getting charity uncomfortable and offended- the worst crime imaginable.
In liberal land, helping others simply because it's the right thing to do or because one's religion calls for it is unthinkable unless it's done through government. Otherwise, there MUST be a sinister, self-serving motive behind it.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at January 24, 2012 11:54 AM (SY2Kh)
***
QFT. We've got plenty of leftwing Republicans, and Republicans that wouldn't fight if a Libyan rebel was about to give them a Mummar special with his bayonet.
Where the hell are the Republicans that will fight?
Almost half the country accepts an unconstitutional law (Obamacare) passed by an unconstitutional method (Demonpass). Don't claim repealing is impossible without actually trying it first - and no just holding one vote and going home doesn't count.
Posted by: 18-1 at January 24, 2012 11:55 AM (7BU4a)
So you're saying that when Mitt says he'll repeal it, he's lying? Or is the word "lying" too strong, should we call it something else?
Posted by: BurtTC at January 24, 2012 03:52 PM (TOk1P).
.
Mitt says that on day 1, he'll issue waivers to all 50 states and day 2 will work to do more.
But he won't get a repeal bill on his desk. He will not. Neither would Newt if he manages to get elected. Remember the games Reid played to prevent repeal? It's a total mess.
Look, I realize we're at the "let's lie about the other POS so that we can get our POS elected, but I'm really not into lying.
Posted by: AmishDude at January 24, 2012 11:55 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Fritz at January 24, 2012 11:55 AM (/ZZCn)
Posted by: Wall_E at January 24, 2012 11:56 AM (48wze)
I wonder what percent of taxpayers actually pay an effective rate of 14%.
Posted by: AmishDude at January 24, 2012 03:52 PM (T0NGe)
Not many.
Posted by: Vic at January 24, 2012 11:56 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Soona at January 24, 2012 11:56 AM (mmKMz)
Posted by: maddogg at January 24, 2012 11:57 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Reno_Dave at January 24, 2012 11:57 AM (OL4L4)
RoE you say? Once upon a time me and my Team were walking down a trail at a fast pace when 3 dinks walked right into us, after we neutralized all 3 we got a call on the radio from a chaplain that told us to be sure to bury them, so I told my guys to toss them under the bank of a dry stream and we tossed a couple of grenades so it would cave in on them, end of story.
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at January 24, 2012 11:57 AM (mNQe4)
cheap·skate noun \ˈchēp-ˌskāt\ a miserly or stingy person; especially : one who tries to avoid paying a fair share of costs or expenses
Posted by: mpfs at January 24, 2012 11:57 AM (iYbLN)
***
Yep, Romney's going to repeal the "Obama" part and replace it with "Romney". Because the healthcare mandate is the "conservative solution" don't ya know? By the way, nice name calling - winning hearts and minds I see.
Posted by: 18-1 at January 24, 2012 11:58 AM (7BU4a)
Posted by: Wall_E at January 24, 2012 11:58 AM (48wze)
Posted by: BurtTC at January 24, 2012 11:58 AM (TOk1P)
Posted by: really ... at January 24, 2012 11:58 AM (X3lox)
***
And that kind of thinking is why we we lose again and again. 51 votes is all you need.
Posted by: 18-1 at January 24, 2012 11:59 AM (7BU4a)
For AmishDude, who asked for the Coleman quote:
-----------------
"You will not repeal the act in its entirety, but you will see major changes, particularly if there is a Republican president.. You can't whole-cloth throw it out. But you can substantially change what's been done.
"If there's a Republican president, what you'll see is states getting waivers Â… granted and then starting again, making sure that we lower costs, which this act hasn't done, while we provide better access.
"I don't think the act works financially Â… if you don't have the individual mandate, because your costs are going to go so far through the roof."
----------------
In my username I've linked to the BioCentury This Week page where you can find video of the interview.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO supporter at January 24, 2012 12:00 PM (4df7R)
Posted by: Juan McLame at January 24, 2012 12:00 PM (jucos)
I DON'T denounce myself.
Posted by: mpfs at January 24, 2012 12:01 PM (iYbLN)
Posted by: Reno_Dave at January 24, 2012 12:02 PM (OL4L4)
***
A point I've been trying to bang home. Beating Obama the man is nice. Beating Obama's policies though is the task at hand.
If you hold to the former nominate Hillary. I guarantee with Republican support she sends Obama packing.
But if you want to change course in DC, you can't just replace one Liberal (D) with another Liberal (R)
Posted by: 18-1 at January 24, 2012 12:02 PM (7BU4a)
Posted by: Reno_Dave at January 24, 2012 12:04 PM (OL4L4)
Unfortunately we will not have 60 in the Senate. Hell with the candidates for President we have we may be lucky to even take the Senate.
Posted by: Vic at January 24, 2012 12:04 PM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Schwalbe: The Me-262© at January 24, 2012 12:04 PM (UU0OF)
Mormons I know they are obligated to donate to the church.
******* ******* ******* *******
10% off the gross, not the net.
Or no temple recommend for YOU!
Posted by: imp
------- ------------- ---------- ------------- ----------- -----------
Individual Mormons get to choose whether they pay gross or net. You are supposed to tithe 10% of your income, but what you define as income is up to you. I personally tithe on net.
Looking at Mitt's returns, it looks like he only pays net, unless he's also donates stocks (donated stocks don't show up on your income tax return, IIRC).
The Mormon Church has tons of humanitarian projects, and its religious efforts do a good job of supporting people in being decent people, good citizens, and rasiing strong families. So yes, donations to religions and churches count as charity and should. But if for some reason you take the liberal line that churches don't count, then Mitt *only* gave 5 times as much of his income as the President and *only* twice as much of his income as Newt.
Posted by: Emperor of Icecream, Non-Christian Cultist for Jesus at January 24, 2012 12:04 PM (epBek)
Posted by: Reggie at January 24, 2012 12:05 PM (KM86p)
Posted by: 66chevelle at January 24, 2012 12:06 PM (QjSgY)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at January 24, 2012 03:57 PM (mNQe4)
I've seen similar memorials to dinkdom.
Posted by: Soona at January 24, 2012 12:06 PM (mmKMz)
Yup, BackwardsBoy......it's all pretty screwy right now. Sometimes my spaces drop out and words run together. .....Can't really trust what you're seeing in the comment box, because there is no telling what it will look like when it's posted.
.
I'm really not intending to be snarky. I did some dabbling in markups ten years ago, so I'm hoping it'll help out a little whilst Pixy retools AceTML.
.
Kinda like going to a doctor and saying, "Doc, it hurts when I do this..." And I also give an Amen to the upthread prayer that the perpetrator(s) of this foul deed are beset with diseased fleas from a thousand camels in their nether regions.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at January 24, 2012 12:06 PM (d0Tfm)
***
Using the constitutional option is one route. Reconciliation another.
Posted by: 18-1 at January 24, 2012 12:06 PM (7BU4a)
Those "charitable" donations were payoffs to southside rev'runs for endorsements. I guess you don't know how churches work in Chicago. Their charitiable arms are usually wrapping the rev in a brand new Caddy and the rev's missus in a new mink.
Posted by: ejo at January 24, 2012 12:08 PM (J7B50)
Unless the Republicans are willing to "go nuclear", moving a bill to a final vote in the Senate requires 60 votes for cloture.
***
Using the constitutional option is one route. Reconciliation another.
I'll give you a 3rd - shut the fucking government down and ball up to their faces. Prioritize services, prioritize what you want, then shut it down and send them home.
We only need 1 branch to do that, we can sure as HELL do it if we have 3.
No more Bush era bullshit. We ain't buying Medicaid Part Q so Romney can surpass his daddies legacy.
Posted by: Entropy, Racism Delenda Est at January 24, 2012 12:08 PM (mf67L)
Posted by: Newt Gingrich at January 24, 2012 12:09 PM (J3/db)
Posted by: Marybeth at January 24, 2012 12:09 PM (TU1z+)
Reconciliation should work. Reconciliation allows you to get around filibusters for budget bills.
Since funding parts of Obamacare have already been stripped away, its no longer revenue neutral. So repealing it can be scored as a budget measure.
Coleman is out to lunch.
Posted by: Emperor of Icecream, Non-Christian Cultist for Jesus at January 24, 2012 12:09 PM (epBek)
Posted by: Emperor of Obama at January 24, 2012 12:11 PM (epBek)
Posted by: Emperor of Obama at January 24, 2012 12:11 PM (epBek)
Posted by: ejo at January 24, 2012 12:12 PM (J7B50)
Yeah, you couldn't make Hope, either. So what else is new?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 24, 2012 12:12 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Marybeth at January 24, 2012 12:15 PM (TU1z+)
I remember the Powerline gang telling us that Norm Coleman was a real trial attorney who was going to tear George Galloway apart during hearings. He sounded like a douche at the hearing, got his ass kicked by Galloway and then got his ass kicked by the least credible opponent to run in a senatorial race (and rolled over to get his ass kicked more as that opponent cheated his way to the win). Let's hear it for Norm Coleman, Lion of Conservatism.
--------------
This is the guy Romney picks as advisor.
All his advisors are like a whos-who of Frankfurt School marxists.
Posted by: Entropy, Racism Delenda Est at January 24, 2012 12:15 PM (mf67L)
Reconciliation should work. Reconciliation allows you to get around filibusters for budget bills.
I'm hoping the SCOTUS knocks this shitwad of a mess down this summer. Then we won't have to deal with repeal, just cleaning up the fiscal chaos that it's already caused. They can do that with a 51 vote majority.
Posted by: Soona at January 24, 2012 12:15 PM (mmKMz)
Posted by: EBL at January 24, 2012 12:15 PM (IgakF)
Hell maybe that's why his campaign sucks.
Romney is running with the B team. All his usual staff quit to work for Obama.
Posted by: Entropy, Racism Delenda Est at January 24, 2012 12:15 PM (mf67L)
***
Yep. I had high hopes Boehner would do this...but he doesn't have the guts.
And sadly, out of a Boehner/McConnell/Romney triumvirate, he'd be the most conservative too...
Posted by: 18-1 at January 24, 2012 12:16 PM (7BU4a)
If theyre stIll here when he gets here, should be interesting. Wonder if he'll tell them to take a bath? Posted by: Marybeth at January 24, 2012 04:15 PM
Best thing to do is fuck with their "mike checks", then they get all flustered and tongue tied
Posted by: kbdabear at January 24, 2012 12:16 PM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: Entropy, Racism Delenda Est at January 24, 2012 12:16 PM (mf67L)
Posted by: jeanne! with two N's and an E at January 24, 2012 12:17 PM (GdalM)
As are the rest of the limousine liberals; filthy rich bastards that give nothing back in the real sense of the word.
Posted by: Lady in Black....{sigh} at January 24, 2012 12:17 PM (F+Xfj)
@30 "OT but Miss Shepard Smith finally ran off the rails today and is still going full speed ahead."
Probably safer just taking that parking space space out near the mall entrance tonight until we know where he's headed.
Posted by: 66chevelle at January 24, 2012 12:17 PM (QjSgY)
Posted by: EBL at January 24, 2012 12:20 PM (IgakF)
Posted by: Kensington at January 24, 2012 12:20 PM (/AHDz)
Democrats think that the government is the answer to all the problems. They think that government programs should be set up to help people when help is needed and even when a republican would say no help is needed a democrat would say yes help is needed at least take some food stamps. They don't give a lot to charity cause they think of their taxes as their charitable contribution since their charity is done through the government.
But yet, they are big on "giving back" with your time. It's odd.
Posted by: ambrosia at January 24, 2012 12:24 PM (oZfic)
I'm reading 'the forgotten man' right now, and the title is based on the man who doesn't fit into a grievance group who gets free shit, and someone who doesn't game the system, and is suffering because of it. He's paying higher taxes because some sociopath thought up a new law that requires him to pay more, even though he doesn't benefit. Perfect for whats happening today. The book is about the great depression, but I swear its like a day to day diary of what O'dipshit is doing now. Playing by the rules, and being white (its true, sorry) is a surefire way of living like a dog if you lost your job because of o'dipfuck
I thought teh bernank was a 'student' of the great depression? You'd think they wouldn't match word for word the mistakes made. The biggest one is uncertainty, just like now. So many huge laws being passed that nobody wanted to hire anyone. Sound familiar?
These savages are so stupid you have to wonder how they got so far in politics... oh wait, he's a grievance monger.. nevermind.
Posted by: Total Asshole at January 24, 2012 12:25 PM (bcmD0)
@233
I bet the Occutard Rage Boy from the Santorum glitter-bombing will show up. Newt ought to have the little goat's picture distributed amongst his security team. My guess is the dude slithers in at Newt's event wearing the same clothes he had on when he was dragged out of Santorum's shindig.
Posted by: 66chevelle at January 24, 2012 12:28 PM (QjSgY)
Obama's 1% is from a few years back.
If you look at just last year . . .
Romney gave 14%.
Obama gave 14%.
Gingrich gave 2.5%.
Posted by: Emperor of Obama at January 24, 2012 12:33 PM (epBek)
By the way, despite making less than a tenth as much as Obama did in 2000, I give more than ten times as much to charity.
Our Democratic "betters" are miserable, selfish haters.
Posted by: Emperor of Obama at January 24, 2012 12:34 PM (epBek)
Posted by: Barack Hussein Obama at January 24, 2012 12:42 PM (ggRof)
Posted by: ejo at January 24, 2012 12:43 PM (J7B50)
Posted by: Obama the One at January 24, 2012 12:44 PM (ia9oR)
Posted by: ejo
Charlie Crist?
Posted by: Emperor of Obama at January 24, 2012 12:45 PM (epBek)
Posted by: ejo at January 24, 2012 12:45 PM (J7B50)
Posted by: ejo at January 24, 2012 12:46 PM (J7B50)
Posted by: DANEgerus at January 24, 2012 01:25 PM (e3/KR)
I was talking about Citizens, not the 535 or so. I am cynical, too. Yet I prefer believing in the goodness of man 51 to 49. A weak version of American Exceptionalism, but a version of it. I'd prefer spreading any excess and spendable real money out over millions and millions counting on econimic soundness in a capitalist economy rather than giving carte blanche to 535 or so in charge of trillions of dollars yet to be earned. Otherwise, we should all just say fuck it and vote for Obama and straight Democrat tickets this fall.
Posted by: i like anchors 2012 at January 24, 2012 03:24 PM (LCZ3l)
reminds me of every Presidential election I have voted in. At least it can't be McCain. He didn't fare well in the debates against Obama. Liked Trump for a second because he would destroy Obama in a debate. Like Newt for that. Not sure if Obama will flip the checkers over and run away (even though he should be playing chess by now). Mitt would do great in debates with Obama as long as he ratchets up the passion a bit. Anywhere between Eeyore & Howard Dean would work.
Posted by: i like anchors 2012 at January 24, 2012 03:35 PM (LCZ3l)
Posted by: ddiddly at January 24, 2012 04:45 PM (XKLL8)
Posted by: Rgs at January 24, 2012 04:59 PM (ssO4R)
Posted by: Bernie Maddof at January 24, 2012 05:06 PM (PKV+6)
While I cannot stand the guy, or his black racist wife, I am willing to cut him a break on this. Whatever he gave to charity is more than he had to give. He didn't have to give shit to them. That he did so is worthy of praise, particularly considering the millions of Americans who don't give anything. That is why it is called charity after all, because it is voluntary to do it.
Posted by: USMC Steve at January 25, 2012 08:56 AM (SwZSo)
Posted by: How to turn wooden bowls on lathe at January 31, 2012 04:37 AM (mIhy6)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.196 seconds, 395 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: B J Clinton at January 24, 2012 11:17 AM (jucos)