April 25, 2012
— Ace Sources suggested Gingrich might drop out if he failed to win or come in a close second in Delaware. He didn't (56% Romney, 27% Gingrich), so now sources say he's going to exit.
The former House speaker will "more than likely" endorse Mitt Romney when he makes his announcement to either suspend or end the campaign, a source said.
This seems gratuitous:
Gingrich's exit is a stark turnaround from his public posture just a few months back, when in December he confidently declared following his rise in national polls that he's "going to be the nominee."
That's like saying Tom Brady lied when he said he'd win the Super Bowl. "This score represents a stark flip-flop from Tom Brady's previous 'I intend to win the game' position."
Tom Brady
He lies like The Devil.
Joke h/t Misfit Politics' Attack Watch ad. I just can't think of anything right now.
Posted by: Ace at
08:18 AM
| Comments (86)
Post contains 163 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at April 25, 2012 08:20 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Dr Spank at April 25, 2012 08:21 AM (Sh42X)
Then I remember the Bain Capital attacks from South Carolina and Florida, and I think "fuck him."
But eh, time to let bygones be bygones.
Posted by: Jeff B. at April 25, 2012 08:22 AM (irCrF)
It is a little different, in that Gingrich was asked specifically about staying in even if he wasn't gaining traction and he'd said yes. Now he's saying, "well... no." So it is a reversal.
It's a completely rational and expected reversal- but still a reversal.
I do agree it's gratuitous, though: I'm trying to figure out what the point of that statement is, other than just another dig at Gingrich.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at April 25, 2012 08:22 AM (8y9MW)
This term "jumped the shark"...I do not think it means what you think it means.
Posted by: Jeff B. at April 25, 2012 08:23 AM (irCrF)
Posted by: Y-not at April 25, 2012 08:23 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Rocks at April 25, 2012 08:23 AM (Q1lie)
Posted by: dananjcon at April 25, 2012 08:25 AM (eavT+)
Newt will be back on Fox and giving speeches for 5 figures a pop by the end of next month. Plus now he has materiel for another book.
Posted by: Rocks at April 25, 2012 08:25 AM (Q1lie)
See, we could have had Perry as the nominee, but you purists had to insist on someone who could speak English.
Posted by: jwest at April 25, 2012 08:26 AM (ZDsRL)
Posted by: Jimbo at April 25, 2012 08:27 AM (O3R/2)
Posted by: kathysaysso at April 25, 2012 08:28 AM (ZtwUX)
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at April 25, 2012 08:28 AM (CvvhS)
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at April 25, 2012 08:28 AM (CvvhS)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at April 25, 2012 08:29 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: tasker at April 25, 2012 08:29 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Jumbo Jogging Shrimp at April 25, 2012 08:29 AM (DGIjM)
Posted by: navycopjoe waiting for da cubs to win a f**king game at April 25, 2012 08:29 AM (iBaHp)
Um...no he won't. Have you been keeping up at the mini-war Newt has waged against Fox during the waning stages of his campaign? Roger Ailes literally said in public that Newt wasn't going to be getting his old gig back.
And seriously, who is going to give a crap about Newt's book now? He has done massive damage to his public standing with the GOP folks who used to think of him as an interesting public intellectual.
Newt's not stupid, so I wouldn't be at all surprised to find that, three years from now, he's managed to climb his way back up above ground. But he's starting from behind after this campaign.
Posted by: Jeff B. at April 25, 2012 08:30 AM (irCrF)
like the total retard ely manig so what if he had alot of confidense about
win a big game becuase thats is what you do if youre are a winner
you see it in youre mind than you tell sports center guys what you saw
plus also tom barady has a super hot wife ely manig probally dating
his fat cousen take her to church than apple bees to for twenty deal lol
#JusticeForSpelford
Posted by: Jose Canseco's Gristle Encased Head at April 25, 2012 08:31 AM (+lsX1)
Posted by: slug at April 25, 2012 08:31 AM (k4L1l)
Posted by: Jumbo Jogging Shrimp at April 25, 2012 08:32 AM (DGIjM)
Posted by: JWF at April 25, 2012 08:32 AM (1l37M)
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at April 25, 2012 08:33 AM (CvvhS)
Posted by: navycopjoe waiting for da cubs to win a f**king game at April 25, 2012 08:34 AM (iBaHp)
Posted by: SantaRosaStan, on a darkling plain at April 25, 2012 08:34 AM (Dll6b)
Posted by: Jumbo Jogging Shrimp at April 25, 2012 08:36 AM (DGIjM)
Yeah, but that's just Tony Romo. If there's ever a game where he has to be "on his game" we're probably going to lose.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at April 25, 2012 08:36 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Boots at April 25, 2012 08:36 AM (neKzn)
Posted by: SH at April 25, 2012 08:37 AM (gmeXX)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 25, 2012 08:37 AM (mJMH5)
OT: If you're a military models nerd, you could waste a lot of time here:
http://preview.tinyurl.com/6r8pbh8
It is absolutely amazing.
Posted by: WalrusRex at April 25, 2012 08:37 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: navycopjoe waiting for da cubs to win a f**king game at April 25, 2012 08:38 AM (iBaHp)
Posted by: maddogg at April 25, 2012 08:38 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Tsar Nicholas II at April 25, 2012 08:38 AM (f8XyF)
Posted by: X at April 25, 2012 08:39 AM (KHo8t)
Posted by: maddogg at April 25, 2012 12:38 PM (OlN4e)
to be replaced by whom?
Posted by: SantaRosaStan, on a darkling plain at April 25, 2012 08:39 AM (Dll6b)
Isn't that something like a 50 yard dash between Hussein Bolt and Stephen Hawking?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at April 25, 2012 08:39 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Jumbo Jogging Shrimp at April 25, 2012 08:39 AM (DGIjM)
Maybe Denver will pick him up. We need a QB controversy now.
Posted by: jwb7605 who ignores oZfics at April 25, 2012 08:40 AM (Qxe/p)
Posted by: newtprompter at April 25, 2012 08:42 AM (HOOye)
Wait....Moon bases?!
Posted by: eleven - all in for Newt!! at April 25, 2012 08:43 AM (KXm42)
It can't be all that heavy.
****
I don't know. If his campaign includes his ego, it could weigh a ton.
Posted by: WalrusRex at April 25, 2012 08:43 AM (Hx5uv)
still fond of him .
Posted by: willow at April 25, 2012 08:43 AM (TomZ9)
Romo broke my damaged heart; Obama is trying to destroy my country
Posted by: SantaRosaStan, on a darkling plain at April 25, 2012 08:44 AM (Dll6b)
Posted by: Tami at April 25, 2012 08:50 AM (X6akg)
"Supreme Court justices took a dim view of the Obama administrationÂ’s claim that it can stop Arizona from enforcing immigration laws, telling government lawyers during oral argument Wednesday that the state appears to want to push federal officials, not conflict with them."
This is big. Article is worth reading, and has immediate implications on the election: http://tinyurl.com/72upu9v
Posted by: jwb7605 who ignores oZfics at April 25, 2012 08:51 AM (Qxe/p)
Posted by: Jean at April 25, 2012 08:51 AM (WkuV6)
Why bother? Luap Nor is a non-entity in this race.
That said: he should make a speech criticizing the Fed- not because it has any bearing on Luap Nor, but because the Fed needs to be criticized.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at April 25, 2012 08:54 AM (8y9MW)
So someone better versed in party politics explain this to me. If Newt endorses Romney, do his 150 or so delegates get transferred accordingly?
Secondly, if we can get Santorium to endorse would that push enough delegates to Romney to force Ron Paul out of his "delegate hunting" craziness?
Posted by: tsrblke at April 25, 2012 08:58 AM (22rSN)
Frankly, I think it might be fun to support Ron Paul, at least here on the ol' AoSHQ. Why?
To see if we can't make Jeff B's head explode, of course.
Posted by: BurtTC at April 25, 2012 08:59 AM (TOk1P)
70 -
I'm going to guess (and it's only a guess) there are enough delegates that haven't yet been allocated that if it's essentially Mitt running unopposed (my time on the RP bandwagon, so short) he'll gather enough between now and convention time that he won't need anybody else's.
I think that's what they meant when they suggested it was darned near impossible to have a brokered convention.
Posted by: BurtTC at April 25, 2012 09:02 AM (TOk1P)
Posted by: Kaitian at April 25, 2012 09:04 AM (et2m1)
Posted by: BurtTC at April 25, 2012 01:02 PM (TOk1P)
I supsect as much too, I'd just like to change "air of inevitablity" to "Over" at this point (officially). Then I don't have to listen to Ron Paul anymore. (I'm fine with much of his domestic stuff, but his foreign policy is wack, and he doesn't actually have any plans to accomplish most of it. "End the Fed" sounds awesome, but I want to see a freaken plan for it.)
Posted by: tsrblke at April 25, 2012 09:05 AM (22rSN)
Ron Paul appeals to the college age demo that Barky O'DogEater is going after with his free college loans BS. Get behind some of Paul's good ideas, such as bashing the fed, and give that demo a reason to pay attention to Mitt.
Posted by: Boots at April 25, 2012 09:06 AM (neKzn)
@Kaitian
My understanding (and I may be wrong) is that the canidates themselves can unbind delegates and/or bind them to someone else pre-convention. Also various states/localities differ on the binding (and how many rounds of voting such binding holds.)
Posted by: tsrblke at April 25, 2012 09:06 AM (22rSN)
Posted by: Boots at April 25, 2012 01:06 PM (neKzn)
I don't think the college demographic likes "End the fed" as much as they like "legalize drugs" and "End the wars" (which Obama ran on, won and then abandoned, which is why they're flocking to the only canidate embracing the end the war position.)
Posted by: tsrblke at April 25, 2012 09:07 AM (22rSN)
Posted by: Kaitian at April 25, 2012 09:16 AM (et2m1)
Posted by: Kaitian at April 25, 2012 01:16 PM (et2m1)
I don't disagree, but Ron Paul is running on a campaign of technicalities and pipe dreams. I'd rather just crush that now personally.
Posted by: tsrblke at April 25, 2012 09:28 AM (22rSN)
Posted by: steevy at April 25, 2012 10:33 AM (7W3wI)
Posted by: Adjoran at April 25, 2012 10:47 AM (VfmLu)
Posted by: The Last Boyfriend iBooks at April 26, 2012 02:25 AM (Z538h)
Posted by: The Passage of Power Ibookstore at April 26, 2012 02:39 AM (3XtiQ)
Posted by: Reggie1971 at April 26, 2012 09:56 AM (nwlh1)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2071 seconds, 214 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: willow at April 25, 2012 08:20 AM (TomZ9)