October 22, 2012
Update: Reuters IPSOS Ohio: 46-46, Tie
— Ace A Suffolk University poll in Ohio just published. It has it 47-47, tied.
As far as favorability, it's also a statistical tie -- Obama 50/45, Romney 50/46.
The partisan split, D/R/I, is 39/35/27, or D+4. (Not 39-34, as my typo first had it.) Captain Ed just noted in his post on the CBS/Qunnippiac poll...
In 2008, the D/R/I was 39/31/30, while in 2010 it was 36/37/28
D+4 seems ballpark plausible, if you guess (as I would) that 2012 will be somewhere between 2008 and 2010.
20% of voters say they've already voted. CAC keeps noting that polls overstate how many people have already voted -- the people claiming to have voted early in polls has been, in past polls, something like nearly double the actual number of voters who have voted early. I don't know how 20% tracks with the actual numbers at this point.
Those who already voted say they favored Obama 54-41, but those yet to vote (80%) favor Romney 48-45.
The economy/jobs is rated as the most important issue, at 52%. But then, Obama narrowly edges Romney (!!!) on this score, 45-44.
It seems there's a bias towards people who say they've already voted. Either these people are over-eager to answer pollster's questions, and wind up being overrrepresented in samples, or Democrats are just inclined to bullshit questioners about their actual level of political involvement.
Over the weekend I spent an hour or two checking the polls for 2004 and 2008 to see how the races went then. Just to get a sense of how accurate the polls were.
In 2004, Kerry seemed to be slightly head in Ohio, or tied... until about right now. There was a late break for Bush. Then again, Bush had been ahead there before the debates, so it was a bit of a coming-home effect.
But in 2008, polls had a persistent lead for Obama through the entire season. The final RCP average was +2.5 for Obama -- but he won stronger than that, +4.6%.
If this is going to be a 2004 sort of year, we should start seeing a break towards Romney pretty soon.
Weak Voter Screen: If you check the poll, you'll see its only voter screen is a question asking people to rate their likelihood of voting. Anyone who says "Very likely" is a likely voter.
That's barely a screen at all, and that's what's causing divergences between polls with more involved screens (like Gallup) and most other polls.
Look, most people do not like admitting they are not interested in something all the Smart Set tells them they should be interested in. And they don't like admitting they're not going to do what they're told is their civic duty.
So there is a socially-favored answer here: "Yes, I'm very likely to vote."
That's why Gallup asks a bunch of questions to try to smoke out the bullshitters, asking if you've voted in the previous two elections, and if you know where your local polling place is. Likely voters tend to say yes to these questions; unlikely voters tend to say no.
It now seems that Gallup is one of the few polling companies that asks a battery of LV screen questions, rather than simply asking people to rate their likelihood of voting.
Reuters IPSOS, Tied, 46-46: Is this that late-break thing starting to happen?
The online survey of likely voters found Obama and Romney were each supported by 46 percent of the electorate as they prepare for their final televised debate on Monday night.
Note that this is an online survey. They try to be scientific about these things (unlike those useless "everyone just send your people to freep this poll" fake polls), but it's still not really the same as random digit dial polling.
I think they attempt a randomization, but it's all through internet users, so who knows whether that's really representative.
Posted by: Ace at
10:04 AM
| Comments (227)
Post contains 672 words, total size 4 kb.
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka Ali Muhammad Surpra-izi Amin U'rbu T'hol wright at October 22, 2012 10:07 AM (ovpNn)
Posted by: soothsayer at October 22, 2012 10:07 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: soothsayer at October 22, 2012 10:08 AM (jUytm)
It is so close, that the polls do not matter.
GET OUT THE VOTE MATTERS!!!
VOTE!
Get your family to vote.
Get your friends to vote.
Posted by: rd does not believe the polls at October 22, 2012 10:08 AM (zLp5I)
It's D+4 and all likely voters, but with 39% D and 35% R, and 27% indies.
Something seems screwy about those numbers beyond just the already-voted numbers.
Maybe the 17% 18-35 demo group?
Posted by: tod von oben at October 22, 2012 10:08 AM (UaxA0)
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka Ali Muhammad Surpra-izi Amin U'rbu T'hol wright at October 22, 2012 10:09 AM (ovpNn)
Posted by: mallfly at October 22, 2012 10:09 AM (bJm7W)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Now with extra impact. at October 22, 2012 10:09 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Mr. Mojo Risin at October 22, 2012 10:09 AM (xXhWA)
Posted by: Ball of Hate at October 22, 2012 10:10 AM (AREf/)
Posted by: soothsayer at October 22, 2012 02:08 PM (jUytm)
-----
... and Mom jeans.
And a bike helmet.
Posted by: fixerupper at October 22, 2012 10:10 AM (C8hzL)
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka Ali Muhammad Surpra-izi Amin U'rbu T'hol wright at October 22, 2012 10:10 AM (ovpNn)
It's called a "handicap" sooth.
and it's racist. Why should we need to boost the points of a minority president? Can't he compete on merits once he's "on the job"? Isn't that the point of AA?
Posted by: tod von oben at October 22, 2012 10:10 AM (UaxA0)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at October 22, 2012 10:10 AM (oSFWF)
Compete to have your fro Nancy Pelosi plastered on this mobile billboard.
Then we'll drive around her office in San Francisco for a day.
http://lolapelosi.com/
Posted by: National Republican Congressional Committee at October 22, 2012 10:10 AM (e8kgV)
Posted by: 15 days at October 22, 2012 10:11 AM (LpQbZ)
The media has been using weaponized polling with Democrat Oversamples this entire cycle. Their propaganda value is about spent. With a week to go before the counting actually starts we can expect the Dem +5 to Dem +9 samples to go away and get Dem +2 (which is still too high IMHO) samples on average.
These pollsters cannot afford huge misses on election day.
Because of this and with late deciders breaking for the challenger, I expect to see polls running around 53/47 day before the election. The whole 47 thing is just amusing as hell.
Posted by: Bill Mitchell at October 22, 2012 10:11 AM (hlUJY)
OT: Russell Means, that Indian that is still fighting the American-Indian wars and trying to stop the Santa Maria from landing has died.
Odogeater is likely to give a shout out tonite.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at October 22, 2012 10:12 AM (PHb2k)
========
They either think 'requesting a ballot' is the same as voting or, the SOS website isn't updated very often?
Oh wait...they could also be lying.
Posted by: Tami at October 22, 2012 10:12 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: Ball of Hate at October 22, 2012 10:12 AM (AREf/)
Thumbnail analysis:
Given that the Obama campaign has sunk the Enterprise, Bismarck, Musashi, Victory, and various relics from the Titanic into Ohio and can only manage a dubious tie as the incumbent makes me think that I need to check my pudding reserve levels because a cosmic shit-ton will not be enough.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at October 22, 2012 10:12 AM (B+qrE)
Posted by: soothsayer at October 22, 2012 10:12 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: TheQuietMan at October 22, 2012 10:12 AM (6G7z4)
Posted by: Adam at October 22, 2012 10:12 AM (/YJYi)
Posted by: Mr. Mojo Risin at October 22, 2012 10:13 AM (xXhWA)
Posted by: Bill Mitchell at October 22, 2012 10:13 AM (hlUJY)
Posted by: Obama-supporting Idiot (But I repeat myself) at October 22, 2012 10:13 AM (IC6Er)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channeling Breitbart at October 22, 2012 10:14 AM (nUH8H)
Yeah, I know, preaching to the choir and that c-sucker Greg, but I won't be surprised if the actual vote is less close than the polls suggest.
Posted by: mallfly at October 22, 2012 10:14 AM (bJm7W)
Posted by: Chris at October 22, 2012 10:14 AM (gI9Bk)
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at October 22, 2012 10:15 AM (f9c2L)
----
Remember that show (Jimmy Kimmel?) that questioned those Obamabots last week about who won the debate, their favorite questions and answers etc. the day before the debate? They couldn't say that they hadn't watched it even though they couldn't have watched it. And I don't recall any who answered other than tht Obama won the imaginary debate.
Democrats: The party of imaginary people voting for imaginary candidates for imaginary reasons.
Posted by: WalrusRex at October 22, 2012 10:15 AM (XUKZU)
Posted by: dogfish at October 22, 2012 10:16 AM (N2yhW)
Darden's CEO Clarence Otis is also a Dem donor.
Posted by: Washington Nearsider at October 22, 2012 10:16 AM (fwARV)
Posted by: soothsayer at October 22, 2012 10:16 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channeling Breitbart at October 22, 2012 10:16 AM (nUH8H)
On the eve of the third and final presidential debate, the Green party's Jill Stein said Obama's failure to speak out about environmental concerns made him virtually identical to Republicans who deny the human causes of global warming.
The absence of climate change from the elections, after a year of record temperatures, wildfires and drought, has hugely frustrated environmental campaigners.
Obama and Mitt Romney, who has expressed doubt about the human causes of climate change and the viability of renewable energy such as wind power, have failed to address the issue in their last two presidential debates.
But no campaigner has gone as far as Stein, who said Obama was "another climate denier who basically sold out with just a little bit of window dressing".
Posted by: Jared Loughner at October 22, 2012 10:16 AM (e8kgV)
Posted by: SH at October 22, 2012 10:17 AM (gmeXX)
Posted by: MaxMBJ at October 22, 2012 10:17 AM (lOlyY)
Posted by: Chris at October 22, 2012 02:14 PM (gI9Bk)
I've reweighted your comment to D+8 and it now reads "I love Obama, he is the light-bringer!"
Posted by: Oldcat at October 22, 2012 10:17 AM (z1N6a)
Posted by: Walther von Brauchitsch at October 22, 2012 10:17 AM (8g9qq)
There is one big difference right now...that makes this year different from any other year:
We have a Thug in the White House.
When has that ever been the case?
When have there ever been so many people who are afraid to say who they are voting against?
You cannot tell me that this is 'not a factor' in all these polls.
People weren't afraid to say who they were voting for in 2004...and 2008.
Posted by: wheatie at October 22, 2012 10:17 AM (ipkPX)
And fuck Ohio State.
Posted by: Wyatt Earp at October 22, 2012 10:17 AM (Agn5J)
So what you're saying is that Mr. Otis is a self-interested hypocrit.
Posted by: EC at October 22, 2012 10:17 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Uncledave at October 22, 2012 10:17 AM (nJ32z)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Now with extra impact. at October 22, 2012 10:17 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: tasker at October 22, 2012 10:18 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: WalrusRex at October 22, 2012 10:18 AM (XUKZU)
Russell Means, that Indian that is still fighting the American-Indian wars and trying to stop the Santa Maria from landing has died.
---- ---- ----- ----- ---- - ---- ---- -- --
One less guy to throw horse dung at the Italians on Columbus Day in Denver. Oh well....
Posted by: Meremortal at October 22, 2012 10:18 AM (1Y+hH)
"Those who already voted say they favored Obama 54-41, but those yet to vote (80%) favor Romney 48-45."
Because of the free rides to the polls for Obamabots and in a vain attempt to suppress Repub. votes on election day.
I just voted early on my lunch hour here in East TX and the polling place was completely packed - with retired white people. I do not think they are the type of voters that will re-elect Glowbama.
Posted by: MWTexas at October 22, 2012 10:18 AM (N05oL)
Posted by: Big Bird, Binders, and Birth Control at October 22, 2012 10:19 AM (NWLVJ)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channeling Breitbart at October 22, 2012 10:20 AM (nUH8H)
Q37. Despite who you are personally supporting for president, when all the votes are counted in November, who do you think will be elected president - Barack Obama or Mitt Romney?
Obama 52%???
Bandwagon effect?
Posted by: tod von oben at October 22, 2012 10:20 AM (UaxA0)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQIDP-tVcUU
Folks, Ann Romney is a giver.
Posted by: scottst at October 22, 2012 10:20 AM (2S8JC)
The meme from the pundits on Nov 7 will be that the Republicans threw a tantrum, and the Dems didn't turn out because, VOTER SUPRESSION!!!
Posted by: Meremortal at October 22, 2012 10:21 AM (1Y+hH)
The main thing Barack Obama and Bill Clinton have in common is when they're cornered they both hide behind Hillary's skirt.
Posted by: Jones in CO at October 22, 2012 10:21 AM (8sCoq)
I think the single MOST SHOCKING TAKEAWAY from this election will be an R +2 electorate.
That's just a lie becasue 2010 never happened. Or something.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at October 22, 2012 10:21 AM (B+qrE)
Posted by: joncelli at October 22, 2012 10:22 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: MaxMBJ at October 22, 2012 10:23 AM (lOlyY)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Regular! With Full Stomping Power! at October 22, 2012 10:23 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Jumbo Shrimp at October 22, 2012 10:24 AM (DGIjM)
So what you're saying is that Mr. Otis is a self-interested hypocrit.
Posted by: EC at October 22, 2012 02:17 PM (GQ8sn)
-- ------------ ----------- -------------
Pretty much.
Posted by: Washington Nearsider at October 22, 2012 10:24 AM (fwARV)
Posted by: Mullaney at October 22, 2012 10:25 AM (s8XaI)
Tip for Romney: at top of broadcast, ask Schieffer to provide ball scores every 20 minutes.
Posted by: Tami at October 22, 2012 10:25 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: Whoever this is, it's definitely not Michael at October 22, 2012 10:25 AM (JVCVF)
Posted by: Marsellus Wallace at October 22, 2012 10:25 AM (PnC0I)
Posted by: Torch-Wielding Villager at October 22, 2012 10:26 AM (sTS/8)
Posted by: ace at October 22, 2012 10:26 AM (LCRYB)
74Worrying about this goddam election is going to make me lose my job.Posted by: joncelli at October 22, 2012 02:22 PM (RD7QR)
For a lot of people, losing this election means losing their jobs.
Posted by: Mr. Mojo Risin at October 22, 2012 10:26 AM (xXhWA)
The other day I told somebody I was undecided because I didn't want to have the conversation.
In my poll of one, Obama theoretically has a chance of getting 100% of my vote. Practically speaking though...
Polls are still inaccurate because they are. You can wring your hands between now and election day. Afterwards, when you are all breathing your sighs of relief? You'll know how I've felt for the last 2 years.
Posted by: BurtTC at October 22, 2012 10:26 AM (TOk1P)
Posted by: A Serious Question at October 22, 2012 10:27 AM (71LDo)
----
Hillary!'s skirt is like Athena aegis.
Posted by: WalrusRex at October 22, 2012 10:27 AM (XUKZU)
Posted by: tasker at October 22, 2012 10:27 AM (r2PLg)
ZIONIST ILLUMINATI LIARS. RON PAUL won that poll with 98% of the vote!!!
Posted by: Cult of the Paulistinian at October 22, 2012 10:27 AM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: Marsellus Wallace at October 22, 2012 10:27 AM (PnC0I)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at October 22, 2012 10:28 AM (oSFWF)
Posted by: In before the troll at October 22, 2012 10:28 AM (TIIx5)
Posted by: Jumbo Shrimp at October 22, 2012 10:28 AM (DGIjM)
Posted by: Joe(Pull my Finger) Biden at October 22, 2012 10:29 AM (I7O5y)
Posted by: SH at October 22, 2012 10:29 AM (gmeXX)
Posted by: Arms Merchant at October 22, 2012 10:29 AM (Mtlzn)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channeling Breitbart at October 22, 2012 10:29 AM (nUH8H)
Posted by: Whoever this is, it's definitely not Michael at October 22, 2012 10:29 AM (JVCVF)
Posted by: WalrusRex at October 22, 2012 10:30 AM (XUKZU)
67 When has that ever been the case?
1944 Just called...
------------
You're saying that people were afraid to say they were voting against FDR?
Nah.
I don't think they were afraid of him...we were in World War II then, AllenG.
Most people had someone in the military.
They'd been listening to those 'fireside chats' and felt comfortable with FDR.
Posted by: wheatie at October 22, 2012 10:30 AM (ipkPX)
Posted by: Romney Loses Anna Wintour's Vote at October 22, 2012 10:30 AM (/YJYi)
Posted by: runner at October 22, 2012 10:30 AM (WR5xI)
Posted by: tasker at October 22, 2012 10:31 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Jaws at October 22, 2012 10:31 AM (4I3Uo)
Now PPP and Huff Po, those are some good pollsters.
Posted by: Nate Silver at October 22, 2012 10:31 AM (wR+pz)
95 -
Follow-up question: I mean, just look at his skin. Like chocolate syrup it is... I know that's not a question, but come on!
Posted by: Bob S. at October 22, 2012 10:31 AM (TOk1P)
tl;dr analysis: Unlike other swing states, in Ohio Romney doesn't need to swing any people that say they're voting for the empty chair. He just needs to win the undecideds by a comfortable but not extreme margin.
This one's in the bag.
Posted by: Sayyid at October 22, 2012 10:31 AM (7x3Pu)
Yes. He should remain as a warning to future generations.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at October 22, 2012 10:31 AM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: Soona at October 22, 2012 10:32 AM (V6eom)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channeling Breitbart at October 22, 2012 10:32 AM (nUH8H)
Posted by: tasker at October 22, 2012 10:32 AM (r2PLg)
So did Arafat. I'll keep company with people who *don't* have Nobel Peace prizes, thanks.
DING DING DING
C'mon down and pick up the keys to your NEW BUICK
Posted by: Jones in CO at October 22, 2012 10:32 AM (8sCoq)
Mitt should do the debate with the empty chair and buy the time to do it.
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectual at October 22, 2012 10:32 AM (wR+pz)
Russell Means. Although not a old line liberal, he got mucho assistance from the libs for his bs cause and instigated some of the tactics still used by the left today.
I hope he goes to the unhappy hunting ground or wherever Indians call Hell.
Posted by: Jcw46 at October 22, 2012 10:33 AM (Vh0f5)
Posted by: wheatie at October 22, 2012 10:33 AM (ipkPX)
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at October 22, 2012 10:33 AM (DRgeg)
Posted by: Jimmy "Peanut" Carter at October 22, 2012 10:33 AM (XUKZU)
Posted by: Whoever this is, it's definitely not Michael at October 22, 2012 10:33 AM (JVCVF)
Posted by: USA at October 22, 2012 10:33 AM (RIg+t)
Posted by: andrew at October 22, 2012 10:34 AM (cq0FO)
Posted by: Evilpens at October 22, 2012 10:34 AM (ck76k)
As of the 20th of Oct Ace....11.1 percent of Ohio had early voted/absentee.......So the 20 percent is inaccurate....they cannot vote Sundays so that total will be updated today...it will probably reach about 12 to 13 percent by Weds...Cuyahoga County, which is Obama's strength, reported about 14.5 percent as of Saturday in that county had early voted/absentee.
But take for a minute the 54-41 percent in Obama's alleged edge in early voting....that is 13 percent...that is down 7 percent from 2008 already in which it was 20 percent...already a very big improvement.
Posted by: bluerose75 at October 22, 2012 10:34 AM (HDcKc)
Mr Romney, tell us how it feels to know that because you are a warmonger who supports Bush's Cowboy Diplomacy, you will never get a Nobel Peace Prize.
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka Ali Muhammad Surpra-izi Amin U'rbu T'hol wright at October 22, 2012 10:34 AM (ovpNn)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channeling Breitbart at October 22, 2012 10:34 AM (nUH8H)
----
I think they call it Lizzie Warren's bedroom.
Posted by: WalrusRex at October 22, 2012 10:34 AM (XUKZU)
Foward!
http://tinyurl.com/9v6nqe8
Posted by: USA
Which word did they mis-spell? Forward or Coward?
Posted by: Roy at October 22, 2012 10:35 AM (VndSC)
Posted by: Whoever this is, it's definitely not Michael at October 22, 2012 10:35 AM (JVCVF)
Posted by: soothsayer at October 22, 2012 10:35 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at October 22, 2012 10:35 AM (oSFWF)
13% say they could change their mind.
Of the 5% of likely voters who are undecided/didn't answer, they lean to Romney 32-16.
Posted by: TD, one of the proud 53% at October 22, 2012 10:36 AM (DQMcq)
Posted by: Bob Schieffer at October 22, 2012 10:36 AM (sTS/8)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at October 22, 2012 10:36 AM (8Hnjw)
Is she wearing the naughty librarian glasses?
No, that's our special Election Night treat
Posted by: Jones in CO at October 22, 2012 10:36 AM (8sCoq)
Mr Romney, Dont you feel embarrassed for jumping the gun?
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka Ali Muhammad Surpra-izi Amin U'rbu T'hol wright at October 22, 2012 10:37 AM (ovpNn)
Posted by: DangerGirl (@deadlyestrogen) at October 22, 2012 10:37 AM (cDwCa)
Posted by: bluerose75 at October 22, 2012 10:37 AM (HDcKc)
I like the idea of Megyn Kelly talking about polls...
Is she wearing the naughty librarian glasses?
Nope.
Come to think of it...I haven't seen her wear those glasses in a long time.
Posted by: wheatie at October 22, 2012 10:37 AM (ipkPX)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channeling Breitbart at October 22, 2012 10:38 AM (nUH8H)
Pat "F you up" Cadell said he has seen some private polling in PA showing Romney up or tied. Just now on fox.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at October 22, 2012 10:38 AM (PHb2k)
We're not scared. We're horrified.
Posted by: Phthirus pubis at October 22, 2012 10:38 AM (Vh0f5)
Posted by: Jones in CO at October 22, 2012 10:39 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: bluerose75 at October 22, 2012 10:39 AM (HDcKc)
My beloved Tar Heels lost to Duke and now Ohio is tied?
Next thing you know NC State will beat the Tar Poots Saturday.
I picked the wrong time to stop sniffing glue.
Posted by: Chris "tingle legs" Mathews at October 22, 2012 10:40 AM (wR+pz)
I don't think even the MFM would be quite that brazen. In fact, the perception of the Mormons is that they're pacifists, remember?
I don't think one like that will come up. I expect the Nobel Prize one, however, and hope Romney has prepared for it.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channeling Breitbart at October 22, 2012 02:38 PM (nUH8H)
WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU SMOKING?
Did you NOT watch the last debate?
In front of 70 million people that cocksucker lied and the fat assed twinkie snuffler lied to back him up!
Nothing is beyond the pale for these mother fuckers.
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka Ali Muhammad Surpra-izi Amin U'rbu T'hol wright at October 22, 2012 10:40 AM (ovpNn)
Posted by: soothsayer at October 22, 2012 10:40 AM (jUytm)
They'll burn the last Helo he uses. So as not to contaminate the upcoming President.
Jimmy will light the fire.
Posted by: Phthirus pubis at October 22, 2012 10:41 AM (Vh0f5)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at October 22, 2012 10:41 AM (oSFWF)
Posted by: Soona at October 22, 2012 10:41 AM (V6eom)
150...Outlier means one poll that runs in contrast to the consensus of others....for example....if four polls show one person up 3-6 but then all of a sudden one shows the other person up...that is considered an outlier....usually a poll that seems out of whack or in such contrast to the others.
Posted by: bluerose75 at October 22, 2012 10:42 AM (HDcKc)
Posted by: Golan Globus at October 22, 2012 10:42 AM (7vSU0)
Posted by: Dante at October 22, 2012 10:42 AM (NWLVJ)
what is an 'outlier' ?
Posted by: Jones in CO at October 22, 2012 02:39 PM (8sCoq)
Out-Liar
When Barack Obama steps Out of the Oval Office and into the Rose Garden to deliver a set of remarks thats he later Lies about making.
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka Ali Muhammad Surpra-izi Amin U'rbu T'hol wright at October 22, 2012 10:43 AM (ovpNn)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at October 22, 2012 02:36 PM (8Hnjw)
Don't give him a ride if he's a stone cold lib.....he'll just use your gas and vote for Obama!
Waterboard him....just to be sure.
Posted by: Tami at October 22, 2012 10:43 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: tasker at October 22, 2012 10:43 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channeling Breitbart at October 22, 2012 10:44 AM (nUH8H)
Posted by: Interested Party at October 22, 2012 10:44 AM (7rghc)
Posted by: Serious Cat at October 22, 2012 10:44 AM (UypUQ)
Posted by: soothsayer at October 22, 2012 10:44 AM (jUytm)
Meremortal's first rule of polls. You can't have too many polls. Keep them coming. Good, bad whatever. They do give a sense of what's going on, as long as the internal info is included.
It's all about the trend when it's this close.
Posted by: Meremortal at October 22, 2012 10:45 AM (1Y+hH)
Posted by: Trying to catch up at October 22, 2012 10:45 AM (71LDo)
Huh?
Outlier is a French word....pronounced "oot-lee-ay."
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at October 22, 2012 10:45 AM (2b4yb)
Posted by: dananjcon at October 22, 2012 10:45 AM (eavT+)
Posted by: Serious Cat at October 22, 2012 10:45 AM (UypUQ)
---
Statistics is based on sampling. Let's assume we want to know the ratio of red marbles to blue marbles in a sack. The true ratio is one to one but we don't know that. If you draw a conclusion based upon ten samples each of 100 marbles, it is possible that one of those samples will contain eighty blue marbles. The other nine sample are somewhere around fifty/fifty. The eighty blue marble sample is an outlier which resulted from a statistically improbable result and should not be believed.
Posted by: WalrusRex at October 22, 2012 10:46 AM (XUKZU)
127,148....Seq was the first to catch the trending in PA that shows the race in PA getting closer and closer. In fact, Seq Poll shows Mitt up 4...and this poll has one of the BEST track records in PA....so I am not surprised Caddell would see private polling showing Mitt up in PA....
As for Gravis on PA....not surprising either...again Obama is stuck in that 47-48 area and he is KNOWN!
But look Gravis uses Plus 8 Dem sample in PA in 2012 yet in 2008 Obama won PA by double digits! Yet Gravis also uses Plus 8 Dem sample in OH yet Obama only won OH by 4.7 percent (5). So think about that? Shows you how skewed the OH polls really are!
Posted by: bluerose75 at October 22, 2012 10:46 AM (HDcKc)
Seriously, who is undecided at this point?
I don't think there are that many undecided here. They either a) don't want to admit that they aren't voting for Obama, or b) are only undecided in the sense that they don't know if they wan to vote for Romney or not vote at all. I can't imagine anyone here is undecided about Obama.
Posted by: Mullaney at October 22, 2012 10:47 AM (s8XaI)
Outlier is a French word....pronounced "oot-lee-ay."
--
Outlier is what happens after she wears a bustier for you
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at October 22, 2012 10:47 AM (DRgeg)
150 somebody school me-
what is an 'outlier' ?
Posted by: Jones in CO at October 22, 2012 02:39 PM (8sCoq)
Which of these is not like the others?
An outlier is a fluke. E.g. - if women typically sleep with someone after 3 to 5 dates, a fluke would sleep with anyone on the first date.
Posted by: Roy at October 22, 2012 10:47 AM (VndSC)
Posted by: tasker at October 22, 2012 10:47 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: tasker at October 22, 2012 02:43 PM (r2PLg)
--------------------------------------
Or opinions that always call out pointy elbows.
Posted by: Soona at October 22, 2012 10:47 AM (V6eom)
I think the name you're looking for is Hatshepsut.
Posted by: comatus at October 22, 2012 10:47 AM (qaVK+)
1. He won the Nobel Peace Prize(to which Romney can say, so what)
2. He got us out of Iraq (no he didn't, that was already agreed to, and he managed to screw that up)
3. Europe loves him (except he didn't get the Chicago Olympics)
Posted by: Miss Marple at October 22, 2012 10:48 AM (GoIUi)
Posted by: Trying to catch up at October 22, 2012 02:45 PM (71LDo)
**
Jug Eared Fuck and This Fuckin Guy.
Posted by: dananjcon at October 22, 2012 10:48 AM (eavT+)
More accurately....the probability of an outlier being correct is less than the probability of the other samples that cluster together on the graph.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at October 22, 2012 10:48 AM (2b4yb)
I Know!
Say you were asking people, "Just how fucking dumb are you?" and were able to assign a numeric value to the dumbness.
Someone from Ohio would be an outlier, towards the really really dumb end of the scale.
It's Science.
Posted by: VW Zao at October 22, 2012 10:49 AM (I7O5y)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at October 22, 2012 10:49 AM (jucos)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channeling Breitbart at October 22, 2012 10:49 AM (nUH8H)
Posted by: BignJames at October 22, 2012 10:50 AM (j7iSn)
NOTHING, except four dead Americans that were "bumps in the road".
This is going to be a blood bath. It is going to seal the deal!
Pudding and popcorn futures sky rocket.
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectual at October 22, 2012 10:50 AM (wR+pz)
Posted by: fluffy at October 22, 2012 02:47 PM (z9HTb)
Oh, fuck! I almost choked on my coffee.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at October 22, 2012 10:50 AM (2b4yb)
Saturday Night Live did a skit about that part of the last debate...where Mama Cowley asissted Barky in his lie.
And they continued the fucking Lie!
They portrayed Mitt as the one who was making a whine to Crowley!
They portrayed Barky as the one who was telling the truth!
I...really....do....hate...NBC.
Posted by: wheatie at October 22, 2012 10:50 AM (ipkPX)
Posted by: Honey Badger at October 22, 2012 10:51 AM (AiZkN)
Ewwwww geroff me. argggghhhh.
quick someone douse me in gasoline and light it .
NO wait!!!
Posted by: Jcw46 at October 22, 2012 10:51 AM (Vh0f5)
I really, really, REALLY hope Romney surprises Barack tonight with the fact that Valerie Jarret gets tax-funded secret-service protection.
That is the kind of ugly fact that can make the public turn on you in a bad way.
Posted by: Serious Cat at October 22, 2012 10:51 AM (UypUQ)
Posted by: BignJames at October 22, 2012 02:50 PM (j7iSn)
-----------------------------------------------
We need a poll polling pollsters. Seriously.
Posted by: Soona at October 22, 2012 10:52 AM (V6eom)
NSFW language. I denounce myself in advance, but this is funny.
http://tinyurl.com/9c3cko5
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectual at October 22, 2012 10:52 AM (wR+pz)
193 Geez wheatie. What? Do you think this is the Over Night Thread or something?
:0
Is this a fucking joke?
Posted by: wheatie at October 22, 2012 10:53 AM (ipkPX)
Since my son is out of school tomorrow we are going to the Romney/Ryan rally tomorrow at the Henderson Pavillion.
Posted by: Agent P at October 22, 2012 10:55 AM (fPmeR)
It's Science.
Why the hate on Ohio? Ohio is at least in play. What about those Democratic strongholds like California, Massachusetts, etc.? Hell, what about Minnesota? They were the only state to vote for Mondale for crissakes.
Posted by: Mullaney at October 22, 2012 10:56 AM (s8XaI)
Posted by: mikey at October 22, 2012 10:57 AM (kmxWt)
Posted by: joeindc44 will start talking like biden. like. biden. at October 22, 2012 11:04 AM (QxSug)
Posted by: Andy Sullivan at October 22, 2012 11:04 AM (KZi9D)
Posted by: joeindc44 will start talking like biden. like. biden. at October 22, 2012 11:08 AM (QxSug)
You haven't seen us naked.
Posted by: Code Pink at October 22, 2012 03:08 PM (L7hol)
No, that would be a unilateral disarmament treaty
Posted by: Red Shirt at October 22, 2012 11:08 AM (FIDMq)
@216 Sharron Angle was not a strong candidate at all. I still voted for her, but it was more of a "Anyone but Reid" vote.
Posted by: Agent P at October 22, 2012 11:09 AM (fPmeR)
Posted by: Meremortal at October 22, 2012 11:10 AM (1Y+hH)
Posted by: tasker at October 22, 2012 11:16 AM (r2PLg)
several other restaurants. That's a lot of people having their hours and
income cut.
Darden's CEO Clarence Otis is also a Dem donor.
Posted by: Washington Nearsider
Might be the plan. They will need a lot more employees if they want the same work done with lesser hours from each employee. The net result is bogus more jobs in the next report, despite there being no increase in employment (total hours). Everything about Obama has big asterisk next to it.
Posted by: Dirks Strewn at October 22, 2012 11:24 AM (VLifP)
Posted by: miikeb at October 22, 2012 11:52 AM (3hezO)
46 Darden owns Olive Garden, Longhorns, Red Lobster, Bahama Breeze and several other restaurants. That's a lot of people having their hours and
income cut.
Darden's CEO Clarence Otis is also a Dem donor.
Darden was one of those chosen few who got a Waiver from Obamacare.
Just like McDonalds.
Most restaurants offer a pared-down version of Health Insurance...called 'Mini Med'.
It's based on hours...I think.
Posted by: wheatie at October 22, 2012 11:57 AM (ipkPX)
Posted by: tbozz at October 22, 2012 12:30 PM (x9s9/)
Posted by: joeindc44 will start talking like biden. like. biden. at October 22, 2012 12:45 PM (QxSug)
Posted by: steevy at October 22, 2012 02:14 PM (6o4Fb)
Both those polls are "Romney takes Ohio."
Posted by: Greg Q at October 22, 2012 02:38 PM (cQAlw)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2239 seconds, 355 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: soothsayer at October 22, 2012 10:06 AM (jUytm)