November 29, 2012
— Ace Ridiculous, of course.
Mitch McConnell has had a habit of justifying substantive caves for claims that he extracted some sort of concession that will prove to be a fruitful political issue.* I imagine any Republican even thinking about this deal expects Obama to break his promise -- in fact, the promise may not even be seriously offered. Republicans might even be just saying "You have to give us a fig leaf of cover."
So, the idea is that we just give Obama everything he wants substantively but we've extracted a promise from him, which he will then of course break, and so we "win" politically later by running against his broken promise.
This is the stupidest thing I ever heard. Not only would this plan be craven and dishonest itself (the plan to extract a promise you don't even believe will be honored as a "concession," and then act surprised it's being dishonored, is itself dishonest), but it has no chance of actually working in the first place.
1. Cuts are unpopular. Unpopular but necessary, of course, but unpopular. No one holds it against someone too much for breaking a promise to do something they didn't really want him to do in the first place.
2. Any "promise to cut" will involve some sort of later negotiations, and Obama can and will claim he intended to keep his promise, but Republicans once again sabotaged the "discussions."
Thus this whole idea is an attempt to avoid a major political confrontation which Obama would probably win... by setting up a later political confrontation which Obama also would probably win.
Let's not forget why we have the sequestration deal: We have it because Mitch McConnell decided it "wasn't the right time for a real political confrontation" and so put it off into the future. And now that that moment's here, surprise surprise, they're looking to concede, again and delay the actual confrontation until later, again.
And when that moment comes, what will they do?
If you can't fight now-- when the next elections are two years away -- when precisely would be a politically opportune time to fight?
Thanks to @benk84. This is from his headlines post.
* During the initial ObamaCare voting, when it was still in the Senate, Republicans had the opportunity to keep the Senate in session through the holidays and keep a filibuster against ObamaCare going. Instead, they agreed to hold a vote on ObamaCare -- and this was the vote that created ObamaCare -- and Mitch McConnell claimed he'd won an important political victory because Obama had agreed to hold a vote on the debt ceiling at some particular time that Mitch McConnell claimed would create maximum exposure on the issue and the maximum political problems for Obama.
Does anyone even remember that vote? It wasn't a big deal at the time, and we ended up losing on it too.
Plus, we got ObamaCare. Just so the Senators wouldn't have to stay at their jobs in DC over the holidays.
McConnell is forever justifying these major sell-outs by claiming he's so cleverly extracted a dynamite political concession that will wind up making the Democrats' victory a poison pill. It's either delusional or dishonest.
Posted by: Ace at
08:47 AM
| Comments (375)
Post contains 555 words, total size 3 kb.
Posted by: L, elle at November 29, 2012 08:49 AM (0PiQ4)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at November 29, 2012 08:49 AM (XkWWK)
Posted by: Ben at November 29, 2012 08:50 AM (C2Y4l)
Posted by: Truman North at November 29, 2012 08:50 AM (uR7BD)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at November 29, 2012 08:50 AM (XkWWK)
Posted by: Truman North at November 29, 2012 08:51 AM (uR7BD)
I took 5 of 6 yesterday. Try, try again! :-)
I could of done that. But I wanted to distribute the firsts!!!!! evenly
Posted by: Bruce at November 29, 2012 08:52 AM (qB0/v)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at November 29, 2012 08:52 AM (XkWWK)
Posted by: Dr Spank at November 29, 2012 08:53 AM (b+jI9)
Posted by: DaveA at November 29, 2012 08:53 AM (Xefrb)
Posted by: L, elle at November 29, 2012 08:53 AM (0PiQ4)
Posted by: Truman North at November 29, 2012 08:54 AM (uR7BD)
Posted by: Tobacco Road, now in a serious funk at November 29, 2012 08:54 AM (4Mv1T)
Posted by: Lucy at November 29, 2012 08:55 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: Rex Harrison's Hat at November 29, 2012 08:55 AM (4136b)
For the Republican eunuchs in Congress, there is no "politically opportune time to fight." Not now, because they are trying to shore up their palships with their BFFs across the aisle. Not later, because ZOMG!!11!! There's an election coming up!!11!!
And, finally, there is no incentive from the Conservative Chattering Class to actually stand up for principles. Any effort to do so would be shot down by the squishy punditry on the grounds of "fairness" or "strategy" or similar lame shit. Blogger's Row doesn't want to upset the applecart, because they're still getting to nibble at the apples.
Why expect Bitch McConnell or Weepy Boner to change their ways now? They have theirs, and their sole goal is to keep the earmarks and cocktail party invites rollin' their way.
Posted by: MrScribbler, banned at TepidAir at November 29, 2012 08:55 AM (yKUrR)
Posted by: White Flag Industries at November 29, 2012 08:55 AM (tQHzJ)
Posted by: Dr Spank at November 29, 2012 08:56 AM (b+jI9)
Let is burn.
Give Obama and the Democrats what they wanted: sequestration. The whole idea of sequestration started with Obama's White House. Democrats lauded it.
So give it to them.
Give the wealthy who voted for Obama what they wanted - higher taxes.
Give the middle- and lower-class minorities and women who overwhelmingly voted for Obama want they wanted - higher taxes.
Maybe the electorate will so pissed off with higher taxes and a crappy economy that they will kick the Dems out of the Senate in 2014.
Posted by: Hoi Polloi Wingnutia at November 29, 2012 08:56 AM (xvtYZ)
Posted by: Thunderb at November 29, 2012 08:57 AM (Dnbau)
Posted by: DangerGirl - feeling empty at November 29, 2012 08:57 AM (pEOD8)
Posted by: soothsayer at November 29, 2012 08:57 AM (eG4bU)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at November 29, 2012 08:58 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: A certain Austrian Politician at November 29, 2012 08:58 AM (Hx5uv)
Ogabe is overtly wrecking our coalition's younger members who desire reform and counting on the senior members of it to thwart the reforms necessary and hand executive power en perpetual to the Democrats' now overt socialist caucus.
I could split my head in half screaming about it.
Posted by: sven10077 at November 29, 2012 08:58 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: ErikW on the damned phone at November 29, 2012 08:59 AM (XkQL7)
Posted by: The Mega Independent[/i] at November 29, 2012 08:59 AM (7OSWQ)
Posted by: WalrusRex at November 29, 2012 09:00 AM (Hx5uv)
Can't we at least die on the beach?
Posted by: Dr Spank at November 29, 2012 09:00 AM (b+jI9)
Posted by: Thunderb at November 29, 2012 09:01 AM (Dnbau)
Posted by: Jason at November 29, 2012 09:01 AM (7L6l7)
Posted by: Mr pink at November 29, 2012 09:01 AM (JyTRJ)
And we know how they feel about hills.
THE GOP IS A USELESS PILE OF JUNK
LIB
Posted by: General Woundwort at November 29, 2012 09:02 AM (RrD4h)
Posted by: Thunderb at November 29, 2012 09:03 AM (Dnbau)
Again, the position the Repubs need to take is the inversion of this: spending cuts this year, then , if realized, tax increase the next. Why not? Timmy can just borrow more money until the tax increase kicks in the following year. With interest rates near 0 it matters little. [PS: I am against all tax increases; just let rich libs put $ where mouth is and give in excess of their tax return.]
Posted by: jb at November 29, 2012 09:03 AM (pD1i2)
Posted by: Thunderb at November 29, 2012 09:04 AM (Dnbau)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at November 29, 2012 09:04 AM (3Y7RV)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at November 29, 2012 09:05 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Thunderb at November 29, 2012 09:05 AM (Dnbau)
The Left eked out a necessary victory, and the Republicans lack the force of character and conviction to actually fight in a meaningful way.
We are past worrying about barely losing elections - we're in a red climate here.
Posted by: Kinley Ardal, MiFB advocate at November 29, 2012 09:05 AM (b8JJF)
Why are they even talking to this asshat. Let him propose something. Let him bring up a budget. THEN PASS HIS FUCKING PILE OF SHIT!!!
Its bipartisan!
Posted by: Iblis at November 29, 2012 09:05 AM (9221z)
Posted by: L, elle at November 29, 2012 09:05 AM (0PiQ4)
Posted by: DangerGirl - feeling empty at November 29, 2012 09:06 AM (kUdlA)
Posted by: WalrusRex at November 29, 2012 09:06 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: WalrusRex at November 29, 2012 01:00 PM (Hx5uv)
Nuke it in orbit.
Posted by: Temper Tantrum at November 29, 2012 09:06 AM (AWmfW)
Posted by: dfbaskwill at November 29, 2012 09:07 AM (fRI3h)
Posted by: Thunderb at November 29, 2012 09:07 AM (Dnbau)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at November 29, 2012 09:07 AM (3Y7RV)
Posted by: Cato at November 29, 2012 09:07 AM (VYJ5B)
Posted by: RamonAllones at November 29, 2012 09:08 AM (3lLli)
Posted by: WalrusRex at November 29, 2012 09:08 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: Thunderb at November 29, 2012 09:09 AM (Dnbau)
Posted by: Fritz at November 29, 2012 09:09 AM (/ZZCn)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at November 29, 2012 09:09 AM (3Y7RV)
If you have not taken to living like a mushroom and loving it,
you see a scorched 3rd world looming..
Posted by: Clemenza at November 29, 2012 09:09 AM (Q8Pu5)
Fuck it. The House GOP needs to abstain, give the Democrats a quorum, and allow them to pass the tax hike on the "filthy rich" with only Democrat votes. It's a strategic retreat, not a surrender.
There is another recession coming and Obama knows it. He's looking for a goat because blaming Bush after "turning the corner" will not be credible. The MSM-DNC messaging machine begins with Lauer and ends with Leno - all day, every day. The only way to break through on who is responsible for this economy is to make the MSM-DNC blaming of the GOP utterly incredible.
Posted by: Alec Leamas at November 29, 2012 09:09 AM (Nfpnr)
Nah, that would be a waste of time. The problems with the GOP are institutional. Let it burn. Stop voting. Prepare.
Posted by: runninrebel at November 29, 2012 09:09 AM (J4gw3)
Posted by: Fred at November 29, 2012 09:09 AM (is2uy)
Posted by: willow at November 29, 2012 09:09 AM (hX8cq)
Posted by: General George S. Boehner[/i] at November 29, 2012 09:10 AM (7OSWQ)
Fauxsis, this is.
If you don't know what to do, the best bet is do nothing.
Republicans should do nothing.
LiB.
Posted by: Sophistahick at November 29, 2012 09:11 AM (UhXzR)
Posted by: mikez at November 29, 2012 09:11 AM (vmyXX)
If we can just get Mel Reynolds elected, all of these problems will just disappear.
You mean if we can just get Mal Reynolds elected...
Cap'n R, Negotiator:http://tinyurl.com/c6cxrh
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit. at November 29, 2012 09:11 AM (lOmbq)
nove 8th Boehner,
The speaker also revealed that comprehensive, bipartisan immigration overhaul would be a top priority of his agenda during the 113th Congress
This issue has been around far too long," he said. "A comprehensive approach is long overdue, and I'm confident that the president, myself, others can find the common ground to take care of this issue once and for all."
Posted by: willow at November 29, 2012 09:11 AM (hX8cq)
Posted by: General George S. Boehner[/i] at November 29, 2012 09:12 AM (7OSWQ)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at November 29, 2012 09:12 AM (3Y7RV)
Pulling back does not mean not doing what I can to protect myself. It does not mean adopting the attitudes of my enemy. It does mean working for the maximum amount of separation from my enemies that I can achieve.
Saying "Let It Burn" is really just acknowledging the obvious.
Posted by: tubal at November 29, 2012 09:13 AM (BoE3Z)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at November 29, 2012 09:13 AM (3Y7RV)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at November 29, 2012 09:13 AM (GVxQo)
New Party.
Posted by: JeremiadBullfrog at November 29, 2012 01:01 PM (Y5I9o)
----
Ha. Fuck THAT.
New Country. It's the only way.
Posted by: fixerupper at November 29, 2012 09:14 AM (nELVU)
Posted by: Thunderb at November 29, 2012 09:14 AM (Dnbau)
Posted by: Truman North at November 29, 2012 09:14 AM (I2LwF)
Posted by: jjshaka at November 29, 2012 09:14 AM (R1aja)
Posted by: rickl at November 29, 2012 09:14 AM (zoehZ)
The federal government is too big and it is by for the most inefficient thing the universe has ever seen.
Kick em all out. Blow it up and start over.
Posted by: © Sponge at November 29, 2012 09:14 AM (UK9cE)
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat [/i] at November 29, 2012 09:15 AM (feFL6)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at November 29, 2012 09:15 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Fritz at November 29, 2012 09:15 AM (/ZZCn)
Posted by: Exasperated Expat at November 29, 2012 09:15 AM (gkfSV)
Posted by: Thunderb at November 29, 2012 09:16 AM (Dnbau)
Ace you're hilarious. A day or so after excoriating conservatives for calling out RINOs, you're calling out a RINO.
Irregardless, American voters deserve to get what they elected. So I say let Mitch give it to 'em, but good.
Posted by: Born Free at November 29, 2012 09:16 AM (jnJcf)
Kick em all out. Blow it up and start over.
Posted by: © Sponge at November 29, 2012 01:14 PM (UK9cE)
Where's the martians when you need them? Ack Dak...
Posted by: Hello, it's me Donna let it burn really.really bummed at November 29, 2012 09:16 AM (9+ccr)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at November 29, 2012 09:16 AM (3Y7RV)
Noting you have a problem is the first step in solving it. From that perspective, letting it burn is a good thing.
I for one, intend to remind every MFer who complains about some Obama policy that they asked for it.
"You don't like the fact you can't find a job and your unemployment just ran out? That can't be true. You MUST like it because you just VOTED for it."
I'm going to be saying that a lot the next 4 years.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at November 29, 2012 09:16 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: RWC at November 29, 2012 09:16 AM (fWAjv)
Nothing hurts like pain. Pain is honest.
Posted by: @PurpAv at November 29, 2012 09:17 AM (FfbyM)
This thread needs the Cliffhanger / Yodel Song from the Price is Right.
.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nDIRDt3eGRs
.
On autoplay.
Posted by: garrett at November 29, 2012 09:17 AM (OAbmF)
New Country. It's the only way.
Posted by: fixerupper at November 29, 2012 01:14 PM (nELVU)
You ain't creating a new country with the GOP. They are unwilling to say bad things in public about the president, let alone secede.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at November 29, 2012 09:17 AM (FkKjr)
===============
The man is a genius!
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at November 29, 2012 09:17 AM (znT2j)
Makethe Dems own it.
Let. It. Burn.
---
Either this or just don't show up and prevent a quorum.
Posted by: WalrusRex at November 29, 2012 09:17 AM (Hx5uv)
Burn it down.
Posted by: @PurpAv at November 29, 2012 01:15 PM (FfbyM)
Oh, my, yes. That's the spirit. And we'll be here to catch you. We've been making "contingency" plans.
Posted by: Granny Piven & Her Organized Community Engineers at November 29, 2012 09:17 AM (tQHzJ)
Posted by: Gerry at November 29, 2012 01:17 PM (xmffn)
I think it makes the HQ sound all cultured and European and shit.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit, rooting for SMOD or the Mayans, whichever comes first [/i][/b] at November 29, 2012 09:18 AM (4df7R)
Political issue? Really? Is that what the country wants Mitch, you bespectacled old dufus?
People want leadership and real, substantive changes. Not promises, gimmickry and "political issues".
If this ends badly, I am done with the Republican Party.
Posted by: marcus at November 29, 2012 09:18 AM (GGCsk)
:::: sits at OSP's feet ::::
Tell us again about the miracle of the jerk chicken and 40s, OSP!
Posted by: Sean Bannion at November 29, 2012 09:18 AM (sbV1u)
way forward.
putting increase revenue on the table by through reforming tax code.
Posted by: willow at November 29, 2012 09:18 AM (hX8cq)
Posted by: Born Free at November 29, 2012 01:16 PM (jnJcf)
Simpleisme.
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 45% more DOOM! at November 29, 2012 09:19 AM (xAtAj)
Posted by: Thunderb at November 29, 2012 09:19 AM (Dnbau)
96 Fire doesn't lie, ever.
Burn it down.
---------
Yep.
But I will miss the liquor stores...and the drug stores.
Life without alcohol or drugs will be hard.
Posted by: wheatie at November 29, 2012 09:19 AM (CM59X)
10 We have to fold on the budget so we can focus on the debt ceiling.
20 We have to fold on the debt ceiling because it's time for the next election
GOTO 10
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at November 29, 2012 09:19 AM (kdS6q)
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat [/i] at November 29, 2012 09:19 AM (feFL6)
I for one, intend to remind every MFer who complains about some Obama policy that they asked for it.
---
The 70% Jewish vote for Obama, for example.
Posted by: WalrusRex at November 29, 2012 09:19 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: Golan Globus at November 29, 2012 09:19 AM (7vSU0)
"You don't like the fact you can't find a job and your unemployment just ran out? That can't be true. You MUST like it because you just VOTED for it."
I'm going to be saying that a lot the next 4 years.
I've been rehearsing something in the mirror lately: "Hmm, that's too bad. Did you vote for Obama? You did? Then you got what you voted for. Have a nice life."
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit. at November 29, 2012 09:19 AM (lOmbq)
Let it burn. It's all going to come crashing down anyway. Might as well get out of the way rather than trying to catch the falling chain-saws. But Mushy Mitch and Johnny Orange just can't seem to help themselves.
Posted by: DocJ at November 29, 2012 09:19 AM (A5uiv)
Hard to do while dangling from a lamp post.
Posted by: @PurpAv at November 29, 2012 09:20 AM (FfbyM)
Posted by: Rob McNeece at November 29, 2012 09:20 AM (hNXHo)
---
they don't work, they don't pay, and they don't care.
Posted by: WalrusRex at November 29, 2012 09:20 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: L, elle at November 29, 2012 12:49 PM (0PiQ4)
And you said and accomplished nothing.
Must be nice to be satisfied with futility. Do you have a government job?
Posted by: © Sponge at November 29, 2012 09:20 AM (UK9cE)
(To be sung by children, K-12, every morning of their seven-day school week.)*
The State is my shepherd,
I shall not want.
It makes me lie down in federally owned pastures.
It leads me beside quiet waters in banned fishing areas.
It restores my soul through its control.
It guides me in the path of dependency for its namesake.
Even though our nation plunges into the valley of the shadow of debt,
I will fear no evil,
For Barack will be with me.
The Affordable Care Act and food stamps,
They comfort me.
You prepare a table of Michelle Obama approved foods before me in the presence of my Conservative and Libertarian enemies.
You anoint my head with hemp oil;
My government regulated 16-ounce cup overflows.
Surely mediocrity and an entitlement mentality will follow me
All the days of my life,
And I will dwell in a low-rent HUD home forever and ever.
Amen.
Posted by: Granny Piven & Her Organized Community Engineers at November 29, 2012 09:21 AM (tQHzJ)
Posted by: jjshaka at November 29, 2012 09:21 AM (R1aja)
Yes, that one will go something like this....
"Yeah, sorry that Israel is now a smoldering ash heap. Oh, wait, you voted for Obama so that's a win for you. Sorry. I got confused"
Posted by: Sean Bannion at November 29, 2012 09:21 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Golan Globus at November 29, 2012 09:21 AM (7vSU0)
Posted by: Queen Michelle at November 29, 2012 09:22 AM (wIgpo)
Posted by: Thunderb at November 29, 2012 09:22 AM (Dnbau)
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat at November 29, 2012 01:19 PM (feFL6)
In the short run it doesn't. In the long run, when there's no money to give out because there's no one who can pay taxes anymore, that's when the free shit army starts to take it in the shorts. Mad Max and Thunderdome, here we come!
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit, rooting for SMOD or the Mayans, whichever comes first [/i][/b] at November 29, 2012 09:22 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: soothsayer at November 29, 2012 09:22 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: Hopeless at November 29, 2012 09:22 AM (oZ6hC)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit. at November 29, 2012 09:22 AM (lOmbq)
Hey man, we got nothing.
You won, YOU ARE "the man with the plan", we'll go along with whatever you want. The electorate trusts YOU.
Posted by: @PurpAv at November 29, 2012 09:22 AM (FfbyM)
Posted by: WalrusRex at November 29, 2012 01:17 PM (Hx5uv)
----
Nope. Then the R's get blame for taking their ball and going home.
Draft legislation giving Obama what he wants.... name the damn bill after him. Make a speech about how elections matter and Obama deserves to get his way. Give it name like we did Obamacare...... Barack O-budget... I dont care. Hang what he wants around his neck.
Posted by: fixerupper at November 29, 2012 09:22 AM (nELVU)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at November 29, 2012 09:23 AM (C8mVl)
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat [/i] at November 29, 2012 09:23 AM (feFL6)
Posted by: RWC at November 29, 2012 09:23 AM (fWAjv)
Posted by: Fred at November 29, 2012 09:23 AM (0GJri)
No they don't. They made it quite clear on Nov 6th that they do in fact want promises, gimmickry, teleprompters, and a "balanced approach" which kicks the can down the road.
And don't dare touch anything that might possibly affect them personally or their sacred cows.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at November 29, 2012 09:23 AM (SY2Kh)
>>>The 70% Jewish vote for Obama, for example.
We encompass 2% of the US population.
I am sure you don't need Amishdude to come along and do that math for you.
Posted by: garrett at November 29, 2012 09:25 AM (OAbmF)
He is dead on about the Donkey having plans for the 401k system...
Will the idiot professional Class middle get the message when they are handed IOUs every bit as valid as the Social Security "solemn promise?"
I doubt it.
Gonna flip the thing off though. No offense to Limbaugh but the Horde got the gag in 2009.
You brought it on yourself GOP crossovers and sit this one outs.
Those saying "new party" you're a great help. The Donks are getting their way now....you'll LOVE handing them a supermajority forever by running as the Luap Nor Cult with 20% of the electorate and then a GOP with 25%.
Run Red or run into the wall....
3d partiers prefer "the wall"....
Posted by: sven10077 at November 29, 2012 09:25 AM (LRFds)
---
they don't work, they don't pay, and they don't care.
Posted by: WalrusRex at November 29, 2012 01:20 PM (Hx5uv)
Have you listened to the latest Empire of Jeff Whisky rant? Or is it Scotch.....regardless. It's fucking epic and SPOT. ON.
Posted by: © Sponge at November 29, 2012 09:25 AM (UK9cE)
Let freedom ring.
What has killed this country is two political parties who have operated in thei own self interest, not those of there constituency.
I therefore say a deal that neither of them thought would come to fruition is best for all of us.
Posted by: marcus at November 29, 2012 09:26 AM (GGCsk)
Posted by: Rob McNeece at November 29, 2012 09:26 AM (hNXHo)
Posted by: alans4 at November 29, 2012 09:26 AM (V2OI+)
No the purpose of the 3d party is to give Barack even more power.
Go to it I could give 5 fucks anymore.
The donkey will rape the corpse or Luap Nor cult either way it's over.
Posted by: sven10077 at November 29, 2012 09:26 AM (LRFds)
I am going to do it.
Posted by: Marmo at November 29, 2012 09:27 AM (QW+AD)
Except every four years during a presidential election when 20 million more of them come out to vote then during the mid-terms. Then they care because they wanna make sure that Uncle Sugar keeps them satisfied.
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat at November 29, 2012 01:23 PM (feFL6)
I fear the day, coming soon I'm afraid, (because I'm a cynic) when the bottom tier of the middle-class will look up from busting their asses, at the Free Shit Gang standing in front of them at Wal-Mart and say ---"fuck it, work is for chumps".
Posted by: tubal at November 29, 2012 09:27 AM (BoE3Z)
Posted by: soothsayer at November 29, 2012 01:22 PM (jUytm)
Norquist is the new Emmanuel Goldstein. The MFM is running its 2 minutes of hate on him quite a bit lately
Posted by: TheQuietMan at November 29, 2012 09:27 AM (1Jaio)
awesome please tell me you sat out this last cycle empowering Giggles to do as he will?
If so I salute you.
No really it's the new economical salute involves one finger and savings.
Posted by: sven10077 at November 29, 2012 09:28 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: Cricket at November 29, 2012 09:28 AM (DrC22)
Posted by: JeremiadBullfrog at November 29, 2012 09:28 AM (Y5I9o)
Posted by: Golan Globus at November 29, 2012 09:28 AM (7vSU0)
The electorate is a Stuttering Clusterfuck of Miserable Shitfail.
Posted by: eleven at November 29, 2012 09:28 AM (KXm42)
L.I.B.
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at November 29, 2012 09:28 AM (HDgX3)
The University of LouisvilleÂ’s move to the Atlantic Coast Conference is winning praise from a major Cardinals fan. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., took to the Senate floor today to praise Tom Jurich, UofLÂ’s athletic director.
In what looks like a 900 or so word speech.
Team Republican: Focused on the Issues That Concern You
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at November 29, 2012 09:29 AM (kdS6q)
BJ's have certainly changed over the years.
Posted by: eleven at November 29, 2012 09:29 AM (KXm42)
Oh. Something might affect them.
Posted by: your $20 Big Mac at November 29, 2012 09:29 AM (jPVBi)
Posted by: Max Entropy at November 29, 2012 09:29 AM (YHkjy)
Posted by: RWC at November 29, 2012 09:29 AM (fWAjv)
Posted by: Thunderb at November 29, 2012 09:29 AM (Dnbau)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at November 29, 2012 09:30 AM (lBRx+)
Posted by: L, elle at November 29, 2012 09:30 AM (0PiQ4)
Posted by: Witchfinder at November 29, 2012 09:30 AM (pLTLS)
We encompass 2% of the US population.
I am sure you don't need Amishdude to come along and do that math for you.
---
Oh, there's plenty of blame to go around, alright.
Posted by: WalrusRex at November 29, 2012 09:30 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: Hopeless at November 29, 2012 09:31 AM (oZ6hC)
Yeah, I've come to the same conclusion. We're a nation where the dependent parasites have all the say and the culture reviles conservatives and classical liberal ideals. Even our so-called Leaders don't have the stomach to stand up for the principles that made this a great country. Maybe they're just too complicated to explain to the proles who only care about getting shit.
As conservatives we can get used to living in land that holds us in contempt or we can move.
This is so depressing.
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at November 29, 2012 09:31 AM (QKKT0)
Yep - and they should get it, good and hard.
It will suck for us too, but at least we can we see it coming and can get the lube ready for the epic screwing that's due.
Posted by: DocJ at November 29, 2012 09:31 AM (A5uiv)
Multiply this by several million
Posted by: Thunderb at November 29, 2012 01:29 PM (Dnbau)
-----
Too fucking late. That train has left and is moving too fast to jump off.
Train wreckage will ensue. Count on it.
Posted by: fixerupper at November 29, 2012 09:31 AM (nELVU)
Yeah I've played that game they do not give a fuck.
Barry is a religious movement and they believe that the FreeShit Fairy will give them their one shiny damn the torpedos.
Freeshit Medical voter is perhaps quite literally the most retarded fucker walking Earth.
Posted by: sven10077 at November 29, 2012 09:31 AM (LRFds)
The University of LouisvilleÂ’s move to the Atlantic Coast Conference is winning praise from a major Cardinals fan. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., took to the Senate floor today to praise Tom Jurich, UofLÂ’s athletic director.
In what looks like a 900 or so word speech.
Team Republican: Focused on the Issues That Concern You
__________________________
Yeah but again this is politicians giving the masses what they want. Ask 100 people in Kentucky what the fiscal cliff means, maybe 30 will know. Ask them who the startig QB is for Louisville and 90 will know. And this isn't a knock against KY. The same ratio would be found in any state.
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at November 29, 2012 09:31 AM (HDgX3)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at November 29, 2012 09:32 AM (3Y7RV)
Posted by: J. Wellington Geithner at November 29, 2012 09:33 AM (QKKT0)
Multiply this by several million
Posted by: Thunderb at November 29, 2012 01:29 PM (Dnbau)
They never want to confront reality. Reality is mean to them. I think they are just too stupid or intellectually lazy to understand reality
Posted by: TheQuietMan at November 29, 2012 09:33 AM (1Jaio)
The tipping point in this country came when working people began to suck at the trough as well. Look at the welfare cliff chart or go see how more people ABOVE the poverty line are on food stamps than those BELOW it. We are in this mess fiscally and culturally because people in the middle and the top are getting free stuff and voting for more of it. Our dependent class are those who are using government benefits as a means to supplement their lifestyles. There was an article in the NYT last summer detailing all the government benefits middle class families derive. Free school lunch, etc., etc. yet somehow the family detailed also had a boat and vacations in Florida. We have to stop subsidizing those peoples lifestyles first if we are ever going to reverse this thing.
Posted by: Exasperated Expat at November 29, 2012 09:33 AM (gkfSV)
Posted by: ErikW on the damned phone at November 29, 2012 09:33 AM (XkQL7)
Posted by: ace shakespeare at November 29, 2012 09:33 AM (OAbmF)
Posted by: Thunderb at November 29, 2012 09:33 AM (Dnbau)
Nobody really cares for my ideas, but I'll offer mine anyway. We need a cynical, despicable, leftist style campaign of fear. Americans need to FEAR POWER. This needs to be the central theme in media, entertainment, news, and any conduit we have access to.
Most Americans have no clue who Kim Jong Un is. They have no idea what life is like in DPRK. Why isntt this the humanitarian issue of our time? Doesn't an examination of that situation lead to some conclusions about the dangers of power? This ought to be our pet cause, for strategic reasons as well as moral.
Provoke conflicts between state and federal authorities, the new marijuana laws are a perfect opportunity. One-size-fits-all government won't prease the left or the right. We need to make this apparent for everyone.
Pretend you're a libertarian and scared of a right wing theocray. Make the point that NOBODY in the federal government, left or right, should have the power to make sweeping laws on abortion or anything else. In the end, we might rely on the Libetarian party anyway if the Republican image is too tarnished.
Its going to take a lot of wark, swallowing some pride, and several elections but this is the only way out I see. We need federalism. Leftists will be leftists, fine so long as we can quarantine their (ond our) bullshit.
Posted by: the lone lemon at November 29, 2012 09:34 AM (xXhWA)
Heh. Talking about all the handguns in CA. How old is that video.
_______________
I should have prefaced my comment with where on that video to look. It's that bit about London cops saying stop, or I'll say stop again. This is the GOP, as effective a London cop without a gun chasing a criminal.
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at November 29, 2012 09:34 AM (HDgX3)
Norquist is an idiot but he holds no one hostage. He just attracts other idiots and is attracted to jihadis.
The Democrats have some compulsion to attack people with no political power or responsibility. I guess they got tired of attacking Rush Limbo and have moved on to the idiot tax pledgeite.
Posted by: RioBravo at November 29, 2012 09:34 AM (eEfYn)
Yeah it is a genius move handing the donks total power at the local, state, and federal level.
I was really tired having read the Constitution and billof Rights for 35 years anyway.
So what do you think Schumer's new bill of rights will look like?
I've never been the untermenschen before, I spent my life trying to thwart the Uberman from hurting the untermenschen.
US Military?
Gone....I'm mentally preparing myself to get a lot more noble.
"Noble" in this case being "unemployed, broke, and clingy"....
Fuck it I am growing my hair out and going for the polar refugee lifestyle.
Posted by: sven10077 at November 29, 2012 09:35 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: Picric at November 29, 2012 09:35 AM (RTUf7)
The post WWII economic boom is completely spent at this point. Several generations grew up during that boom and have no concept of what bad really is.
They think 3rd world is something you see on TV. That's all going to change.
Posted by: @PurpAv at November 29, 2012 09:35 AM (FfbyM)
Posted by: Thunderb at November 29, 2012 01:29 PM (Dnbau)
A first the idiots of the Free Shit Army will turn their frustration and agression on their perceived oppressors, the so-called "Rich People." In their pea brains, "Rich People" will be anyone who appears to be even marginally better off than they are, regardless of reason. It doesn't matter if you bought a new car because you're a member of the Kennedy Clan or because you saved and scrimped for ten years to be able to buy a current year model -- either way, you will be viewed as "the Rich." The FSA will attack your home, your person, your belongings. You will be looted and mugged and probably killed as they take your earthly wares.
Eventually they'll run out of "Rich People" to target, and they'll turn their attention to The Government. At first The Government will be able to mobilize some kind of military action against the violent riots and aggression of the Free Shit Army, but there will simply be too many of them. Washington will fall and the FSA will pile into the Oval Office and say, "WOO-HOO! Now we can have all the money, food, and free shit we want!"
Then they'll try to call out for pizza, only to realize that there's no one left who knows how to make pizza anymore.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit, rooting for SMOD or the Mayans, whichever comes first [/i][/b] at November 29, 2012 09:35 AM (4df7R)
Hold a daily presser and say the same thing. Every day. Same words.
Posted by: eureka! at November 29, 2012 09:36 AM (HPRku)
Posted by: L, elle at November 29, 2012 09:36 AM (0PiQ4)
but i've come to the conclusion that many Republicans really aren't as intelligent as they claim.
Posted by: Shoey at November 29, 2012 09:36 AM (jdOk/)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at November 29, 2012 09:36 AM (3Y7RV)
they are not frozen in their positions
especially the less informed they are
reality of high inflation, high unemployment, high taxes can change world views
I know, I know, it already should have
-----------------------
Posted by: Thunderb at November 29, 2012 01:33 PM (Dnbau)
How's that working out for western Europe?
Posted by: DocJ at November 29, 2012 09:37 AM (A5uiv)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at November 29, 2012 09:37 AM (C8mVl)
Posted by: Aaron at November 29, 2012 09:37 AM (Tlix5)
Posted by: RWC at November 29, 2012 09:38 AM (fWAjv)
Posted by: Brother Cavil, hacking Soledad's earpiece at November 29, 2012 09:39 AM (GBXon)
Posted by: RWC at November 29, 2012 09:39 AM (fWAjv)
This is one thing the central American immigrants bring with them. They don't trust the police, banks, or any government institutions. Many walk around with their whole life savings, 20,30, 40 thousand dollars, literally, in their pocket.
Posted by: @PurpAv at November 29, 2012 09:39 AM (FfbyM)
This makes me laugh:
Katy Perry and other artists, including Ludacris, Britney Spears, Rihanna, Cee Lo Green, Sheryl Crow, Maroon 5, Pink Floyd and Rush...have joined up with Grover Norquist to oppose the 'Internet Radio Fairness Act'.
Hah!
This 'Internet Radio Fairness Act' would hit recording artists in the pocket, by artificially limiting their earnings.
It's a Dem-sponsored proposal.
Link to story at Breitbart in my nic.
Posted by: wheatie at November 29, 2012 09:39 AM (CM59X)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at November 29, 2012 09:40 AM (lBRx+)
Posted by: fluffy, negotiator at November 29, 2012 09:40 AM (z9HTb)
Awesome plan, duder.
Even if 49% understood the trouble we're in (and it's nowhere near that high), 48-49% of the vote is still a loss.
But you go ahead and keep believing in your little fantasy of a True Conservative party that not only stuck to conservative principles, but won majorities doing it.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at November 29, 2012 09:40 AM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: Obama 'en pee pee at November 29, 2012 09:40 AM (YAGzS)
No the military will be fired by then.
Illegal affirmative action in the downsizing will hit the combat arms leadership disproportionally which means a lot of people who are allied with free shit army by blood will be in charge.
Gonna be fun.
Posted by: sven10077 at November 29, 2012 09:41 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: Brother Cavil, hacking Soledad's earpiece at November 29, 2012 09:41 AM (GBXon)
Need regulatory fix but tell @Applebees @redlobster @olivegarden u don't support doing this 2 #workers over #Obamacare signon.org/sign/tell-papaÂ…
-------
Economy. How do it fucking werk.
Person of the Year baby!
Posted by: RWC at November 29, 2012 01:38 PM (fWAjv)
And 10 people nod their support. Make that 9 one was just nodding off
Posted by: TheQuietMan at November 29, 2012 09:41 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at November 29, 2012 09:41 AM (3Y7RV)
Posted by: Lucius at November 29, 2012 09:41 AM (Ofs+N)
Posted by: Brother Cavil, hacking Soledad's earpiece at November 29, 2012 09:41 AM (GBXon)
Posted by: somebody else, not me at November 29, 2012 09:42 AM (nZvGM)
McConnell's mode of thought:
1. Tax hikes.
2. Obama's promise not to allow something unfortunate to happen in my mouth.
3. Winning!
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at November 29, 2012 09:42 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: no good deed at November 29, 2012 09:42 AM (mjR67)
Indeed.
Run Red as you fall and split is likely the ONLY way.
This fanstasy that Luap Nor eleventy or whatever the SuperCon will be can win is folly.
The media is a big part to blame, but the idiot asshole electorate is as much to blame.
We are about to get what we deserve in spades.
Posted by: sven10077 at November 29, 2012 09:43 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: Brother Cavil, hacking Soledad's earpiece at November 29, 2012 01:41 PM (GBXon)
Anyone with any kind of skill, from being able to sew to being able to make fire without matches, will be forced into service of the Free Shit Army. So it will be in the best interest of anyone with knowledge of skills to keep their traps shut and feign dumb. Anyone who is perceived as having intelligence -- someone who was once a teacher, for example, or a government employee -- will either show the trogs of the Free Shit Army how to make the lights work, or they'll be disposed of.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit, rooting for SMOD or the Mayans, whichever comes first [/i][/b] at November 29, 2012 09:44 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Evilpens at November 29, 2012 09:44 AM (ck76k)
Fuck it, get what you can from the gubmint. Drag it down.
LiFB
Posted by: Marmo at November 29, 2012 09:44 AM (QW+AD)
Hah!
This 'Internet Radio Fairness Act' would hit recording artists in the pocket, by artificially limiting their earnings.
It's a Dem-sponsored proposal.
Link to story at Breitbart in my nic.
Posted by: wheatie at November 29, 2012 01:39 PM (CM59X)
So Tits Perry loved her some Barry and his socialism but now she's howling because it's going to hit her bank account. Hypocrites
Posted by: TheQuietMan at November 29, 2012 09:44 AM (1Jaio)
Well a nice thing about Free Shit Army is when it finally goes Visigoth on Senate version 3.7 and friends those who grasp organized violence and practice the restraint to hang back is we can use the chaos to get space.
Posted by: sven10077 at November 29, 2012 09:44 AM (LRFds)
Canada has lower tax rates than the US right now. Top marginal rate is 29%. And payroll taxes are 1/2 what the are in the US.
They've had a c enter-right government for the past 3 elections. The prime minister is from Alberta. Imagine a state that combined Texas, Wyoming and Montana and that's Alberta both culturally, economically and geographically.
One of the key reasons the economy is doing quite well is oil. Canadians are drilling every drop they can find and exporting most of it to China. The country pretty much told enviro-nazis to go fuck themselves.
As to the weather...If you go to Edmonton yeah it will be horrible. If you go to Toronto or Vancouver, no worse than cities like Detroit, Boston or Seattle.
The obvious downside is govt run health care. But after 2014 when Obamacare fully kicks in will you even notice the difference? At least in Canada it is 100% free for everyone. Obamacare is only "free" if you're part of the Free Shit Army.
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at November 29, 2012 09:45 AM (HDgX3)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at November 29, 2012 09:45 AM (3Y7RV)
Posted by: Soona at November 29, 2012 09:45 AM (oy/E2)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at November 29, 2012 09:45 AM (lBRx+)
You know they were the ones who expected Gingrich to lead the party to ruin with his extreme agenda in 1994. The one's who pissed away the Tea Party supporters by being moderate.
yeah, we're bonerred.
Posted by: mallfly at November 29, 2012 09:46 AM (bJm7W)
Posted by: TheQuietMan at November 29, 2012 01:44 PM (1Jaio)
-----
Soooo..... why is Norquist opposing this bill???? Somebody get him a LIB button and put that bill on a fast track...
Posted by: fixerupper at November 29, 2012 09:46 AM (nELVU)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at November 29, 2012 01:45 PM (3Y7RV)
MFM: Vacation, what vacation? George Bush at his ranch!!! George Bush at his ranch!!! George Bush at his ranch!!! George Bush at his ranch!!!
Posted by: TheQuietMan at November 29, 2012 09:46 AM (1Jaio)
Indeed.
Run Red as you fall and split is likely the ONLY way.
This fanstasy that Luap Nor eleventy or whatever the SuperCon will be can win is folly.
The media is a big part to blame, but the idiot asshole electorate is as much to blame.
We are about to get what we deserve in spades.Posted by: sven10077 at November 29, 2012 01:43 PM (LRFds)
Yeah, there's not really an information gap going on, that "remessaging" can cure. People damned well knew what they voted for. When you look at the Red/Blue map, the issue is obvious. Urban is Blue. And there's more of them. There's no jawboning away the math.
Posted by: tubal at November 29, 2012 09:46 AM (BoE3Z)
NEWSFLASH:
Obama doesn't give a shit about raising taxes...
This is all a charade.
Did we have an opportunity to KILL obamacare in the Senate by keeping a filibuster going over the holidays. If so, and we didn't do it, that is unfuckingforgiveable...
Posted by: Prescient11 at November 29, 2012 09:46 AM (tVTLU)
Posted by: Max Entropy at November 29, 2012 09:47 AM (YHkjy)
How I wish we all could go fiscal cliff diving.
Doesn't matter, the deal is already made, all of these statements from these DC elitists are just for show.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at November 29, 2012 09:47 AM (n/ubI)
Posted by: Brother Cavil, hacking Soledad's earpiece at November 29, 2012 09:48 AM (GBXon)
Posted by: L, elle at November 29, 2012 09:48 AM (0PiQ4)
Posted by: RioBravo at November 29, 2012 09:48 AM (eEfYn)
He won't be offended. Pretty sure he uses that thing to play baseball.
Posted by: fluffy, honorary tribesman at November 29, 2012 09:48 AM (z9HTb)
Posted by: General Zod at November 29, 2012 09:48 AM (2+bRt)
Yeah but Canada is sorta funny about immigration for voting. Add in that they find no hypocrisy in telling us we need to let Mexico annex us but enforce hard control themselves.....
I'm looking forward to trying to human wave Canada if the SHTF here.
Hard red types should run north.
Let FSA take the sunbelt.
Posted by: sven10077 at November 29, 2012 09:48 AM (LRFds)
______________________________
In my socialist utopia of Washington state, you can get food stamps if you make up to $46,000 a year for a family of 4. And once you get FS, you automatically qualify for WIC and free lunches for kids and an Obamaphone. Not kidding.
http://www.dshs.wa.gov/pdf/food/BFQAs.pdf
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at November 29, 2012 09:49 AM (HDgX3)
ONe of these days, I'd love Charlie Brown to take a run at that football, but before he goes to kick it only to have Lucy pull it away, I want him to stop short, pull out a knife/gun/syringe full of rat poison, and tell Lucy, "You know what? You get to kick the fucking football this time, you bitch."
Then he pulls the football away and shoots her anyway, because fuck her, that's why.
(Can you tell I've long had an irrational dislike of Lucy? it goes along with my seething hatred of Tweety Bird.)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit, rooting for SMOD or the Mayans, whichever comes first [/i][/b] at November 29, 2012 09:49 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Queen Michelle at November 29, 2012 01:22 PM (wIgpo)
It doesn't taste like chicken, that's for sure. . .
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at November 29, 2012 09:49 AM (zF6Iw)
No, I see a more hopeless future in store. The FSA won't be doing much rioting and pillaging past their comfort zones. They'll settle down and hunker back to their local areas of control and just......wait....
....waiting for their gov't to come back from the dead to rescue them. We saw it in Katrina and Sandy. They have absolute faith their beloved uncle gov't will eventually come and rescue them with care packages and topped-off EBT cards once again. Soon, once they realize that maybe this is the one time uncle gov't isn't going to come, they'll start cannibalizing each other. Again, we saw it in Katrina and Sandy. They will prey on each other.
Hopefully, the Moron Horde will have left town a long time ago, for the safety of the hills with plenty of ammo and rifles with scopes.
Posted by: EC at November 29, 2012 09:49 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at November 29, 2012 09:50 AM (3Y7RV)
233....So Tits Perry loved her some Barry and his socialism but now she's howling because it's going to hit her bank account. Hypocrites
Posted by: TheQuietMan at November 29, 2012 01:44 PM (1Jaio)
----------
Yah. Don't you love it?
The entertainers who campaigned for Barky...are now looking to Conservatives to 'save them' from the socialist policies that will hurt them.
Posted by: wheatie at November 29, 2012 09:50 AM (CM59X)
Posted by: Olaf at November 29, 2012 09:50 AM (t1NLo)
Posted by: ErikW on the damned phone at November 29, 2012 09:50 AM (XkQL7)
Posted by: Brother Cavil, hacking Soledad's earpiece at November 29, 2012 01:48 PM (GBXon)
And I will laugh, and laugh, and laugh, and laugh...
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit, rooting for SMOD or the Mayans, whichever comes first [/i][/b] at November 29, 2012 09:51 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at November 29, 2012 09:51 AM (jucos)
Yeah but Canada is sorta funny about immigration for voting. Add in that they find no hypocrisy in telling us we need to let Mexico annex us but enforce hard control themselves.....
_____________________________________________
Canada actually has a sane immigration policy. It's based on economics not family reunions. If you have a skill that is in demand, you can immigrate easily. There's a point system. Say you need 100 points to get in. You get 10 points for having a college degree. 5 points for speaking English, 15 points for experience in profession XYZ. I'm making up the point numbers, but in essence that's how it works. Get enough points and you get the equivalent of a green card.
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at November 29, 2012 09:51 AM (HDgX3)
Moron Horde would be well served mass migrating to TX, MS, and LA.
If we pooled our resources to bootstrap to density we can stall the rot.
Posted by: sven10077 at November 29, 2012 09:52 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: Olaf at November 29, 2012 09:52 AM (t1NLo)
Sven, Canada has a very lax refugee policy. I'm still a Canadian passport holder so I know these things. All you have to do to claim refugee status is to plant both your feet on Canadian soil and tell the first Border Agent to come up to you, "I am a refugee seeking asylum". Once you say those magic words, they can't touch you. It's like asking for an attorney in front of cops, they have to abide by it.
Canada is still wide open country, perfect for ex-pats to settle and take over.
Posted by: EC at November 29, 2012 09:52 AM (GQ8sn)
What is WIC? And why doesn't everybody on food stamps get a free Government Motors Chevy Volt?
Posted by: Marmo at November 29, 2012 09:53 AM (QW+AD)
Step up and spell out exactly what you want cut, GOP. But of course they won't. Posted by: Olaf at November 29, 2012 01:50 PM (t1NLo)
It goes without saying, they'd like to remain uncontested in their primaries, and today's inside stock tips. Everything else is some Kabuki show Pelosi came up with.
Posted by: the lone lemon at November 29, 2012 09:53 AM (xXhWA)
Coming in at number 10, "Baby, Of Course I Love You"
Dropping 2 spots to number 9, "I Wasn't Looking At Porn, I Was Googleing 'Scamper Exams'"
Holding Steady at number 8, "No, That Dress Doesn't Make Your Ass Look Big"
At number 7, "Your Mom Spending the Week With Us Sounds Great"
Moving up 3 big notches this week to number 6, "I Just Had A Couple of Beers Ocifer"
At number 5, "The Check Is In the Mail"
Number 4 is the former number 1, "I Promise I Won't Nut In You"
Up from last week's number 4 is "Honey, This Meal is Just As Good as Mom's"
At number 2, last weeks number 1, and the lie that has spent a whopping 79,469 weeks at number 1, "I'll Just Put The Tip In"
Which brings us to our new number 1, the highest debut of an excuse ever, "I'll Promise To Cut Spending 10 Years From Now, If You Just Raise Taxes Now, I Pinky Swear".
That's it for this week and remember to keep your feet on the ground and keep reaching for the stars!!
Posted by: Casey Kasem at November 29, 2012 09:53 AM (Zd/NW)
Yes yes it is sane. It is also touchingly hypocritical. I am getting my EMT qualification and probably a CDL. I really wish I'd of learned Machining in high school rather than History Honors since it doesn't mean shit anymore.
Posted by: sven10077 at November 29, 2012 09:53 AM (LRFds)
Let it go over the cliff, repubs. In the long term, Obama will get the blame. At this point all we should care about is making democrats look toxic to American capitalism. It may be our only hope of survival.
Posted by: Obama 'en pee pee at November 29, 2012 09:54 AM (YAGzS)
Hopefully, the Moron Horde will have left town a long time ago, for the safety of the hills with plenty of ammo and rifles with scopes.
Posted by: EC at November 29, 2012 01:49 PM (GQ8sn)
Oh, I'm sure we will have. We'll have to cluster together, though. Better fortification that way.
I'm sure most of teh FSAers will stay in their ghettoes and knife each other for cheese and crackers. But there will be the militant few -- those who wear their Che t-shirts while standing in the unemployment line, or who stand in front of polling stations in jackboots with black berets and billy clubs -- who will prefer a more hands on approach. And since the FSAers in the ghettoes are a bunch of idiot sheep, they'll let themselves be conscripted into the jackbooted, goose-stepping Free Shit Army Proper, because they'll be promised money and shiny things and all the free poontang they could ever want.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit, rooting for SMOD or the Mayans, whichever comes first [/i][/b] at November 29, 2012 09:55 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at November 29, 2012 09:55 AM (3Y7RV)
yeah, we're bonerred.
The same people bitching about Boehner today bitched about Newt in '96
Gingrich wasn't tossed out by The Establishment RINOs. He was shown the door by conservatives who got tired of his shit and getting constantly played by Clinton.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at November 29, 2012 09:55 AM (SY2Kh)
Then he pulls the football away and shoots her anyway, because fuck her, that's why.
Note to self: Don't cross MWR
Posted by: fluffy, southerner at November 29, 2012 09:55 AM (z9HTb)
Posted by: toby928© for TB at November 29, 2012 09:55 AM (evdj2)
I just invested in upgrading my cabin that sits on 40 acres in the north woods. The FSA will run out of members and gas way before they even find me and mine.
Posted by: Buzzsaw at November 29, 2012 09:55 AM (tf9Ne)
__________________________________________________________
5% across the board. Too much? Ok 1% across the board. But even then you libtards would scream about how a 1% cut in welfare would lead to millions of people dying of starvation.
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at November 29, 2012 09:55 AM (HDgX3)
But you go ahead and keep believing in your little fantasy of a True Conservative party that not only stuck to conservative principles, but won majorities doing it.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at November 29, 2012 01:40 PM (SY2Kh)
------------------------------------------------------
Fuck you and your smugness Hollowpoint. We have no idea how the electorate would vote having a true conservative as a candidate. People like you have precluded us from running any conservatives since the 80's.
You're part of the problem.
Posted by: Soona at November 29, 2012 09:55 AM (oy/E2)
EC I've lived up North and been within a week of dropping the hammer to migrate twice.
ONE nation is exempt from the magic words.
You're living in it.
Saw that with the "peace operatives" who ran from deployments.
I hope you're right, but I am planning on trying to get a green card.
The funny thing is Canada's ruling coalition could 'vote a new electorate' tomorrow that just wants left alone.
"We'll see."
Posted by: sven10077 at November 29, 2012 09:56 AM (LRFds)
What is WIC?
It stands for "Women, Infants and Children." It's basically assistance for single mothers. What about single fathers? Fuck them, that's what.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit, rooting for SMOD or the Mayans, whichever comes first [/i][/b] at November 29, 2012 09:56 AM (4df7R)
Will they search my trailer?
Posted by: fluffy at November 29, 2012 09:57 AM (z9HTb)
Yes yes it is sane. It is also touchingly hypocritical. I am getting my EMT qualification and probably a CDL. I really wish I'd of learned Machining in high school rather than History Honors since it doesn't mean shit anymore.
_____________________________
Why is it hypocritical?
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at November 29, 2012 09:57 AM (HDgX3)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at November 29, 2012 09:57 AM (C8mVl)
That's what's gonna happen. And when it does, I'm never voting GOP again.
Posted by: Warden at November 29, 2012 09:57 AM (nmqlp)
Posted by: ErikW on the damned phone at November 29, 2012 09:59 AM (XkQL7)
But then again I am talking about the stupid party here.....
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at November 29, 2012 09:59 AM (HDgX3)
Posted by: fluffy, southerner at November 29, 2012 01:55 PM (z9HTb)
*looks up from sharpening knife* Who, me? I'm a pillar of justice and good will, dammit. I'm so angelic I could dance on the head of a fucking PIN!
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit, rooting for SMOD or the Mayans, whichever comes first [/i][/b] at November 29, 2012 09:59 AM (4df7R)
FUCK YOU OLAF.
Cut the fucking welfare, and cut it hard. Cut Section 8 housing to the fucking bone. Section 8 and chronic welfare should be front and center on pubs list of things to cut.
How about the dhimmis, I mean, demorats. What are they gonna do?
Posted by: Prescient11 at November 29, 2012 09:59 AM (tVTLU)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at November 29, 2012 01:55 PM (HDgX3)
-----
Dont even try Moo. They.Dont.Get.It.
The only way they might understand is when the whole thing collapses and EVERYTHING goes to ZERO..... maybe they might get get it then..... but I doubt it.
Posted by: fixerupper at November 29, 2012 10:00 AM (nELVU)
I have been a Canadaphile my whole life. I am always amused when Calvin the Canuck goes on about why the US has a duty to allow amnesty while also setting up a system that locks Americans out of simply hopping the border themselves.
I miss Calgary like the deserts miss the rain.
I knew the new olden age for the prairies was coming in 1982, I fucked up and let the war blind me to hard economic realities.
Posted by: sven10077 at November 29, 2012 10:00 AM (LRFds)
I base my assumptions on their future behaviour by looking at what happened in the OWS protests. Those protest groups were in fact, a microcosm of what would happen in a large scale anarchy breakdown. You'd have a very select handful of people in the know running things, while most of the proles would make up the lower rungs of the group, gathering food, dispersing food, taking care of odd job duties, etc. What struck me as amusing and surprising was the fact that a movement that loudly claimed to be anti-establishment, quickly organized themselves as closely to the establishment as they could. Do you remember how all the donations flowing to the Zucotti Park OWS group went to only one or two individuals that had set up bank accounts? Never mind the rape-tents, but there were only a small handful of people in charge of organizing the daily activities and a few deputized enforcers. The rest just sat around inbetween meals waiting to be told when and where to march.
That's what the FSA will devolve into.
Posted by: EC at November 29, 2012 10:01 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Olaf at November 29, 2012 10:01 AM (t1NLo)
Posted by: sven10077 at November 29, 2012 01:43 PM (LRFds)
Sven, I have no idea what you mean by 'run red.'
If I assume it means somehow support the GOP, that's been a dismal failure. That's a fact. It isn't future-casting like your guarantees of a third party defeat.
It's time for a new group to step up. Once it does, I suspect the GOP will melt away and we'll have basically the Republican party with new leadership and a clean slate. I base this on the fact that it's happened before historically.
Time and again history has shown us that the GOP does not win any policy victories. I see no reason to keep pursuing that strategy because of fear that we might 'really' lose with a 'pure' party. We are losing with this abominable whore-party.
If I'm going to lose, I'll lose with my principles instead of looking sad and pathetic like Scott Brown.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at November 29, 2012 10:01 AM (FkKjr)
That's what's gonna happen. And when it does, I'm never voting GOP again.
Posted by: Warden at November 29, 2012 01:57 PM (nmqlp)
-----------------------------------------------
It'll be the same shit, different year. Rush is right. What's happening in DC right now is nothing but theater.
Posted by: Soona at November 29, 2012 10:01 AM (oy/E2)
Screw the republicans saying what they want cut, its Oblubber who needs to say in return for tax raises, here are the $1Trillion in cuts this year. And yep, they should be written down and presented.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at November 29, 2012 10:01 AM (n/ubI)
283...Will they search my trailer?
Posted by: fluffy at November 29, 2012 01:57 PM (z9HTb)
-----------
Yeah, and you can't take your firearms with you into Canada.
They even took our pepper spray, the time we went there.
Posted by: wheatie at November 29, 2012 10:02 AM (CM59X)
___________________________________
It's another form of food stamps for young kids.
If you're over the threshold, cut back hours or go part time until you're just under the threshold.
Say you make $60K. If you drop to $46K, you lose $14K. But after taxes, that's really a loss of $9K. But getting under the magic $46K you more than make that up through free government shit.
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at November 29, 2012 10:02 AM (HDgX3)
Cut the fucking welfare, and cut it hard. Cut Section 8 housing to the fucking bone. Section 8 and chronic welfare should be front and center on pubs list of things to cut.
How about the dhimmis, I mean, demorats. What are they gonna do?
Posted by: Prescient11 at November 29, 2012 01:59 PM (tVTLU)
Nobody's going to cut anything. The lifers in government know better. Either party. You get reelected by giving people things.
Posted by: tubal at November 29, 2012 10:02 AM (BoE3Z)
Posted by: Rob McNeece at November 29, 2012 10:02 AM (hNXHo)
Run Red is holding out as long as you can but when the end hits going to red states to keep them red and prepare for the break-up if/when it comes.
I looked at the water, I made up my mind.
America is a Debtoholic, and you can't save drunks from themselves.
Let it burn, Run red.
Posted by: sven10077 at November 29, 2012 10:03 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: lucius at November 29, 2012 10:03 AM (4/OZR)
"That doesn't mean they need to completely roll over and cave, but the No Compromise Take No Prisoners crowd needs to face the fact that negotiations do, in reality, entail negotiation.
Posted by: Hollowpoint"
As stated in the post, how do you negotiate with a party that has broken every compromise in the past and has signaled they will do it again?
'82 compromise yielded little to no cuts. Ditto '92. Bobama welshed on 2009 deal before they signed it.
Knowing with 100% certainty that they will tear up any deal, isn't the idea of negotiating, um, insane?
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at November 29, 2012 10:03 AM (JEpGb)
Posted by: Olaf at November 29, 2012 10:04 AM (t1NLo)
WARNING: remove and secure soul before engaging MWR.
Posted by: EC at November 29, 2012 10:04 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: joeindc44 at November 29, 2012 10:04 AM (3zQJl)
Waking up in a dirty Chicago alleyway with double vision, empty pockets, and wondering what that sharp stinging sensation between their buttocks might be.
Posted by: torquewrench at November 29, 2012 10:04 AM (ymG7s)
I suspect it's because he's not a fascist.
The premise of the bill is that paying royalties--you know, compensating the people most responsible for making the stuff that gets sold--is such an unjust and innovation-stifling *cost* to giant media companies, that the government needs to step in and save them from having to pay it (to the degree that they even do pay it, which, as anyone in the business knows, is minimal).
Norq's right. And so is Katy Perry. The bill's a massive stolen-goods gift to Big Media. The people who sell *their* work via Big Media--not people who *work for* Big Media, who just have regularly paid jobs--is who'd get fucked. Worse than they already do.
It's absolutely vile. And if you doubt that it is, look up who supports it.
Posted by: oblig. at November 29, 2012 10:04 AM (cePv8)
Someone making $46K a year qualifies for food stamps. How about cutting that to $15K. You know for the actual poor of the country and not the middle class?
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at November 29, 2012 10:04 AM (HDgX3)
Posted by: EC at November 29, 2012 02:01 PM (GQ8sn)
------------------------------------------------
There'll be a lot of chanting, though. And uptwinkles.
Posted by: Soona at November 29, 2012 10:04 AM (oy/E2)
Oh the economy is frightful
But obama is so delightful
The voters show no concern
Let it burn, let it burn, let it burn
Posted by: Hard Right at November 29, 2012 10:05 AM (uhftQ)
Yes, if only we had listened to the Senility Set who assured us that Romney wouldn't win the nomination because Sarah Palin would swoop in and save us all after winning the presidency in a landslide.
But you go ahead an be consistently wrong while I get proven right again and again.
Now if you'll excuse me, I have an appointment with the All Powerful RINO Establishment Committee to reminisce about how we used our secret mind control powers to deny Herman Cain his rightful place as nominee.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at November 29, 2012 10:05 AM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: EC at November 29, 2012 02:04 PM (GQ8sn)
It's the ginger in me. Sometimes it just takes control and I have to go drink one of the souls I have on ice.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit, rooting for SMOD or the Mayans, whichever comes first [/i][/b] at November 29, 2012 10:05 AM (4df7R)
Jokes on you then, because then they become automatic. As it turns out, I want to go over the cliff too.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at November 29, 2012 10:06 AM (n/ubI)
Posted by: Olaf at November 29, 2012 10:06 AM (t1NLo)
Posted by: BVBigBro at November 29, 2012 10:07 AM (jRTeM)
Posted by: Olaf at November 29, 2012 10:08 AM (t1NLo)
The gop wants obama to move first because regardless of what you guys here "believe" (like the unskewed polls a few weeks back) cutting entitlements is enormously unpopular.
Yes. We know. Everyone knows cutting entitlements is unpopular, and we all know it's the only thing that will have any effect on our fiscal survival. That's why entitlement reform has always been the "third rail" of politics.
Hence, LIB.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit, rooting for SMOD or the Mayans, whichever comes first [/i][/b] at November 29, 2012 10:08 AM (4df7R)
But obama is so delightful
The voters show no concern
Let it burn, let it burn, let it burn
Posted by: Hard Right at November 29, 2012 02:05 PM (uhftQ)
---------------------------------------
Thread winner!
Posted by: Soona at November 29, 2012 10:08 AM (oy/E2)
May I use that line?
If I try to steal it, I'll get my hair parted with a hatchet.
Posted by: fluffy at November 29, 2012 10:09 AM (z9HTb)
When the military is gutted that pretty much guarantees that there will be a spectacular act of Islamic terrorism on the order of nuking one or more American cities. Look at the electoral map. Those cities voted for this to happen. When it happens, there will be less blue on the map. How would Pennsylvania vote without Philadelphia?
Elections have consequences. Let the consequences begin.
Posted by: Obnoxious A-hole at November 29, 2012 10:09 AM (dGtaD)
Posted by: Exasperated Expat at November 29, 2012 10:09 AM (xV30b)
Posted by: Olaf at November 29, 2012 10:10 AM (t1NLo)
Why can't we put him, McConnell, Cantor, and several others on a block of ice and chip it off and let them float off into the the ocean?
Posted by: Terrance and Phillip at November 29, 2012 10:10 AM (YE14Z)
But you go ahead an be consistently wrong while I get proven right again and again.
This election was the perfect 'electability' republican's fantasy - a moderate Republican with a great business record ran a campaign on the economy and jobs. He stuck to those issues and raised tons of money.
It was a spectacular failure.
If you think continuing that strategy is a good idea, I don't think you are being proven right over and over.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at November 29, 2012 10:10 AM (FkKjr)
Nope, Odipshit needs to say what cuts he can live with. But if he doesn't I am totally fine with the fiscal bump. I don't care about what people think of the gop, cause I know where we are headed anyway. Make Odickless sweat.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at November 29, 2012 10:11 AM (n/ubI)
Quite.
Olaf is funny he hates people who will happily let him have what he has built.
Tx, LA, and MS can make more cash per capita than whatever stays with Ogabe Lenin Inc in a decade.
Fuck you Olaf, fuck your EPA, fuck your Ponzi scheme.
If we leave you will not want to knock on our door.
Posted by: sven10077 at November 29, 2012 10:11 AM (LRFds)
But you go ahead an be consistently wrong while I get proven right again and again.
Now if you'll excuse me, I have an appointment with the All Powerful RINO Establishment Committee to reminisce about how we used our secret mind control powers to deny Herman Cain his rightful place as nominee.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at November 29, 2012 02:05 PM (SY2Kh)
-----------------------------------------------
You've just proven my point.
Posted by: Soona at November 29, 2012 10:11 AM (oy/E2)
Posted by: Warden at November 29, 2012 10:11 AM (nmqlp)
Tubal:
This is simply not true... We are so overwhelmed by the Free Shit Army argument and the LIB crowd, that WE ARE MISSING THE FUCKING POINT.
Examine the facts. We lost hispanic vote in a big way. Immediately everyone is pro amnesty until we understand that immigration had NOTHING to do with how they voted.
Same thing with the "FSA". We FUCKING OWN MISSISSIPPI, ALABAMA, ARKANSAS.
Those states have very high black populations and a shit ton of poverty across the board.
40% of welfare IS IN ONE FUCKING STATE, CALIFORNIA.
Telling the welfare junkies to fuck off IS ONE OF THE MOST POPULAR POLITICAL POSITIONS THAT ANYONE, AND I MEAN ANYONE, CAN ESPOUSE.
And I mean the true welfare (not SS, not Medicare). WINNING!!!
Posted by: Prescient11 at November 29, 2012 10:11 AM (tVTLU)
Posted by: Olaf at November 29, 2012 02:08 PM (t1NLo)
Oh, isn't that you, Jon? Hi! Done fucking your mother?
Anyway, as I was saying, why must it be on the Republicans, and only the Republicans, to propose spending cuts? If Obama and the Democrats want their tax increases, I find it curious that not one of them will go on the record as saying, "Here, we'll give you a trillion in cuts here, here, here, and here, effective immediately." Would that be so hard for them to do? Hmm?
But that's right. Entitlement cuts are political suicide, and the democrats are as big a bunch of pussies as the Republicans.
let it burn.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit, rooting for SMOD or the Mayans, whichever comes first [/i][/b] at November 29, 2012 10:11 AM (4df7R)
I miss Calgary like the deserts miss the rain.
I knew the new olden age for the prairies was coming in 1982, I fucked up and let the war blind me to hard economic realities.
___________________________________________________________
My dad was transferred to Toronto and then Montreal in the 80s and we (mom, sisters) moved with him. I loved it. Toronto back then was NYC without the garbage on the street. Montreal was (and is) the coolest city in N. America. We stayed there close to 5 years then came back to AmeiKKKA in the early 90s.
The 90s were tough economically for Canada. The $CAD was worth 60 cents. It took 10 years of liberal rule to finally crash the economy to the point where people woke up and said enough is enough. They elected conservatives in the mid 00s and haven't looked back. This is my one hope for the US. Canadians went full blown socialist and came back from the abyss. Maybe, Americans can do the same.
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at November 29, 2012 10:12 AM (HDgX3)
FIFY, asswipe. The downside of winning is responsibility.
Own it, Bitches.
Posted by: fluffy at November 29, 2012 10:12 AM (z9HTb)
Why don't you get your fucking hero, who's run the Senate the last 6-years, to pass a budget first (which would be the first in over 1300-days), then blow me.
Posted by: DocJ at November 29, 2012 10:12 AM (A5uiv)
The gop is too cowardly to say out loud which exact cuts they want to make. Because it is political suicide.
No shit, dogfucker. You apparently suffer from the delusion that this place is a bastion of love and support for the GOP.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at November 29, 2012 10:13 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: Olaf at November 29, 2012 10:14 AM (t1NLo)
Posted by: fluffy at November 29, 2012 10:15 AM (z9HTb)
Posted by: Olaf at November 29, 2012 02:04 PM (t1NLo)
First sensible thing you've said. Hope that thought keeps you warm at night when you're selling your bone marrow to afford the downpayment on a carbon-neutral quartz heater.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at November 29, 2012 10:15 AM (zF6Iw)
Taxes are at historically low levels.
And spending is at an all-time historical high.
Posted by: EC at November 29, 2012 10:15 AM (GQ8sn)
Recall the history of Reagan and those same promises.
"Sometimes Reagan went along with a pragamatist like chief of staff James Baker, who persuaded the president to accept the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA) ... Baker assured his boss that Congress would approve three dollars in spending cuts for every dollar of tax increase. To Reagan, TEFRA looked like a pretty good '70 percent' deal. But Congress wound up cutting less than twenty-seven cents for every new tax dollar. What had seemed to be an acceptable 70-30 compromise turned out to be a 30-70 surrender. Ed Meese described TEFRA as 'the greatest domestic error of the Reagan administration'..."
http://www.reagansheritage.org/html/reagan_edwards12.shtml
Posted by: torquewrench at November 29, 2012 10:15 AM (ymG7s)
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at November 29, 2012 02:13 PM (zF6Iw)
It's t1NLo, aka Jon, the troll from during the campaign. He's taken a break from being fucked up the ass by his uncle to come here a pule. I guess that means the Dems are worried about what the GOP might be planning, so they've sent out their whoredogs to suss out the feeling of the GOP "base."
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit, rooting for SMOD or the Mayans, whichever comes first [/i][/b] at November 29, 2012 10:16 AM (4df7R)
Obviously the GOP shouldn't rely on promises of spending cuts and entitlement reform someday in the future, date to be determined. Maybe.
However, the main point still stands- what can be done today can be undone (and then some) in 2014 should we lose the House. We can't pretend that's beyond the realm of possibility.
Know why we kept hearing Romney, Obama, and every politician under the sun talking about compromise and bi-partisanship? Because that's what people want to hear, even if it's a lie. Even if they know it's a lie.
So yes, by all means we should try and push for the best deal we can. There's zero chance that deal will fulfill all our hopes and dreams though. No amount of willpower or stubbornness will change that.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at November 29, 2012 10:16 AM (SY2Kh)
Olaf you're stealing 401ks Giggles ran up 6 trillion and growing out of 16 trillion total simple debt and 100trill plus of unfunded liabilities.
Fuck you.
Own it.
I may buy you a ticket to NYC to stay so when it is incinerated by Jihadi jim you get a front row seat.
Fuck you.
I pray YOU burn.
Posted by: sven10077 at November 29, 2012 10:16 AM (LRFds)
Yep - Medicare, Social Security, Food stamps, Medicaid, WIC, AFDC... they can just grow, and grow, and grow forever.
Because of magical skittle-shitting unicorns, I suppose.
Posted by: DocJ at November 29, 2012 10:17 AM (A5uiv)
Posted by: Olaf at November 29, 2012 10:17 AM (t1NLo)
Not me....
I'll live in a swamp or the tundra first and burn junk mail for heat.
I hate them and if ever history allows revenge I'll take it.
Hammer and nails.
Posted by: sven10077 at November 29, 2012 10:18 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: Hard Right at November 29, 2012 10:19 AM (uhftQ)
Posted by: Olaf at November 29, 2012 10:19 AM (t1NLo)
No Olaf giggles can steal billions from Medicare and it is "increased efficiency" to come...
I hope to be settled and watching you ride the SS SCOAMF down the drain.
You believe in the Unicorn Prince I believe in math twinkle toes.
Fuck you.
Posted by: sven10077 at November 29, 2012 10:19 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: Hard Right at November 29, 2012 10:21 AM (uhftQ)
Yeah ask Amb Stevens a gay man who found shelter in the party of Big brother how well "nothing burns.'
I will never be within 36 miles of a big city again.
I am so looking forward to laughing my ass off when Democrats get their reward.
Fuck you.
Run red and bury the blue.
Posted by: sven10077 at November 29, 2012 10:21 AM (LRFds)
Let's note that there are tax RATES, and then there are tax COLLECTIONS.
We have low rates right now, but collections are even less than the low rates would suggest they should be.
Why is that? It's because Obamanomics have strangled economic activity. Want to know what stagflation feels like? You're soaking in it! Raising tax rates won't fix the problems of tens of thousands of new pages of clumsy, costly regulations being added to the Federal Register. Raising tax rates won't bring back the corporate bond investors who were scared out of US markets by Obama's crude expropriation of GM bondholders.
Beyond that, though, Hauser's Law says that no matter where you set tax rates, you are going to actually collect about 20% of GDP as a practical maximum. You can set rates with the goal of collecting more than 20%, but people simply stop complying and start gaming the system when the rates go that high. Capital vanishes from the working economy into tax shelters.
So we have an empirical cap of 20% on what we can reasonably suggest to raise in revenue, and Obama is going to spend 25% of GDP this fiscal year. How if not with cuts do you propose to square that circle?
Posted by: torquewrench at November 29, 2012 10:23 AM (ymG7s)
Anyone going on about "crying boner" and "Mitch mcConnel" doesn't get it...
the Red need to start working around the government and getting ready for the storm.
There is NO GOP leadership who is not part of the gag, and the gag is we're about to have our retirements stolen and 40 million new amigos to use the raided retirement pools for for "buying future votes."
At best we're looking at national decline and supplication to islam.
At worst we're gonna face what the guys from the Steppes faced in China and the Chinese economy in 250-400 AD.
Fuck it move on.
Posted by: sven10077 at November 29, 2012 10:25 AM (LRFds)
You seem to be operating under the assumption that I was a Romney booster, and that The Establishment was squarely in Mitt's corner all along. Neither is true.
The Establishment had many of the same concerns and doubts about Romney and his electoral chances that you and I did. That's why they were desperately trying to find someone else to fill the gap- remember the big effort by GOP insiders to convince Daniels to run? That wasn't being done out of confidence in Romney's electability.
After Pawlenty dropped out to no fanfare at all and Perry stepped on his dick once too many times, he was the only plausible choice left. Unfortunately.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at November 29, 2012 10:26 AM (SY2Kh)
We have it because Mitch McConnell decided it "wasn't the right time for a real political confrontation" and so put it off into the future. And now that that moment's here, surprise surprise, they're looking to concede, again and delay the actual confrontation until later, again.
Ahh, now we're getting it.
The republicans will never, ever ever actually fight. They want what the democrats want, they just don't want credit for wanting it.
Which is just as well. Burn it down. MOAR spending. 2nd star to the right and straight on until default/hyperinflation.
Posted by: entropy at November 29, 2012 10:29 AM (TULs6)
So, make a deal because we know the DEMs are lying? Again, I must be missing something, but that sounds like a losing proposition.
We *will* lose the House if we don't have anything to stand on. If we're just the Dem-Lite™ party, it's insane to think we will win another race.
What do you say to a voter after we're $20trillion in debt, at 10% unemployment, and watching investment move overseas? "We made a deal but, gee, we was wrong again. Sorry?"
Amigo, if you can't negotiate from a position of strength, it's insane to pretend that you are doing anything but losing.
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at November 29, 2012 10:30 AM (JEpGb)
The gop wants obama to move first because regardless of what you guys here "believe" (like the unskewed polls a few weeks back) cutting entitlements is enormously unpopular.
_________________________________
Moron:
Taxes on the rich: $80B/year
Social Security deficit: $22 trillion and growing daily
Math is hard for libtards.
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at November 29, 2012 10:31 AM (HDgX3)
In the 80s the top tax rate was 28%. Today it's 35%.
Liberals are such liars!
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at November 29, 2012 10:34 AM (HDgX3)
Posted by: Well and truly fucked - see you next lifetime at November 29, 2012 10:35 AM (WYR8b)
The electorate is delightfully enslaved and very happy with themselves and their "prosperity." They don't know where Libya is, who Rice is, or what "tax" means (because most don't pay any)--UNLESS you tax their, now, legal weed in Colorado, their abortions, and their birth control pills. Frankly, they don't even mind paying that...so long as they can exercise their rights to be high and kill babies.
Posted by: WittyMermaid at November 29, 2012 10:37 AM (tr3oO)
The Establishment had many of the same concerns and doubts about Romney and his electoral chances that you and I did. That's why they were desperately trying to find someone else to fill the gap- remember the big effort by GOP insiders to convince Daniels to run? That wasn't being done out of confidence in Romney's electability.
The RNC was touting Mitt as their candidate in December of 2011. There was that RNC woman who famously said he was their guy. They were in his corner early into the process.
The post by Erickson over at Redstate (yeah, I know) does point out the incestuous relationship between consultants, the RNC, and Mitt's campaign. This was their campaign, where Romney made all the 'correct' moves but still lost.
Hell, how many times did we hear people assure us that the debt ceiling vote in August 2011 'guaranteed' our electoral victory? How many times were we told to just 'listen' to Boehner because, electability?
These people have been wrong about everything. 2012 proved they didn't know what they were talking about.
I have no confidence in our leadership or their strategies. It is time for a new approach, but the GOP is committed to John Boehner. That's a commitment to failure. There's no point in standing behind it.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at November 29, 2012 10:40 AM (FkKjr)
Everyone who's advocating the position of "let the Democrats own it - THEN everyone will come around to our way of thinking" are missing something. Everyone DID see what Obama and Democrats have done since 2008 - they owned it - and a majority of voters put them all back in office.
Saw it. Never felt it. That's what I'm counting on. That smug asshole Obamafellators like olaf (BIRM) feel the economy go medieval on their buttocks. If it takes the single mother mentioned upthread losing her job before Christmas, running out of unemployment bennies and having to offer cut-price handjobs on the exit ramp to afford clean underwear for her kid to wake the hell up, then that's what I want.
You voted Obama because it felt good? Great. Now it's time for you to feel something else. Good and hard. LiB.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at November 29, 2012 10:42 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: Tours Lepanto Vienna at November 29, 2012 10:42 AM (KvKOu)
Posted by: toby928© for TB at November 29, 2012 10:45 AM (evdj2)
Well, that's the problem. The GOP isn't in a position of strength. Not when they only hold a House majority.
Posted by: Howie Kurtz at November 29, 2012 10:48 AM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: calbadger at November 29, 2012 10:55 AM (TaWQc)
Sorry to keep you in this thread, but if we're not in a position of strength any and all bargains will be losing propositions.
How's this?
Pass another House budget, march physically over to the Senate during session, and demand they take it and the 18 jobs bills that the Senate tabled. Reid tables them all again, and the GOP goes nuclear declaring the Dems AWOL, evil, and FUBAR. Non-stop 24/7 shit cannon time.
That's fighting. That's not losing more slowly.
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at November 29, 2012 10:57 AM (JEpGb)
Well, that's the problem. The GOP isn't in a position of strength. Not when they only hold a House majority.
Posted by: Howie Kurtz at November 29, 2012 02:48 PM (SY2Kh)
Uh... you do realize that without the consent of the House, the government can spend NO MONEY? Bills MUST pass the House...
Posted by: Romeo13 at November 29, 2012 10:59 AM (lZBBB)
Maybe....I think an unshackled by Socialist Sierra Club EPA Red nation will do just fine.
The way to get that nation is to run red and then one day tell Blue America "fuck you."
Posted by: sven10077 at November 29, 2012 11:01 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: torquewrench at November 29, 2012 02:15 PM (ymG7s)
And that deal was not even real CUTS.... it was Cuts in Growth...
The Government has NEVER actualy decreased it total cost in modern times.
Posted by: Romeo13 at November 29, 2012 11:07 AM (lZBBB)
If you can't fight now-- when the next elections are two years away -- when precisely would be a politically opportune time to fight?"
Ronald Reagan: "If we continue to accommodate, continue to back and retreat, eventually we have to face the final demand—the ultimatum. And what then—when Nikita Khrushchev has told his people he knows what our answer will be? He has told them that we're retreating under the pressure of the Cold War, and someday when the time comes to deliver the final ultimatum, our surrender will be voluntary, because by that time we will have been weakened from within spiritually, morally, and economically."
Posted by: JohnJ at November 29, 2012 11:29 AM (Tt6ky)
Posted by: poots at November 29, 2012 02:22 PM (gDytV)
Posted by: Yenober at November 29, 2012 04:40 PM (+edcN)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3321 seconds, 503 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: L, elle at November 29, 2012 08:48 AM (0PiQ4)