January 23, 2012
— LauraW Ann Coulter has been a Romney supporter for a long time, and she's a brawler; it's no surprise that she would come away from the SC primary swinging.
What's unexpected is who she's targeting. Instead of diligently investigating why Newt won, she has turned her acerbic tongue loose on the electorate instead. The very next morning after the primary, she suggested that republicans have become 'the mob' on Fox News, and has implied there and elsewhere that voters are stupid for backing Gingrich just because he can deliver an insult to the MBM. Along with a host of other sarcastic and bitchy slights.
Ann Coulter, November 17, 2004, crowing in victory:
As we wait for CBS to concede the election, Democrats are claiming Kerry lost because Americans are stupid and if there's one thing voters respond to, it's crude insults.
Hm. You don't say. Well, nobody's perfect.
Look; seeing Newt sock the MBM is always fun, but that's not really what resonated the most with me, and I have to assume that at least some of the SC electorate think the way I do, since they are members of my very common demographic (female, white, 40+ y/o, some college, hunchbacked, three large teeth that don't meet anywhere, likes pudding. Understandably. It's frickin' delicious! Also there's the tooth situation).
For me, it was the part where he stood up for work. Where he discussed the essential virtues of work. Nobody does that anymore. It was refreshing. It was important to me to hear someone say it. To hear that someone has a f*cking clue what's going on down here in Realityland. We are out of work and we want it.
This administration seems to think that Americans should view work as a vampire perceives holy water, and nearly every policy out of DC reflects that.
Well, we don't think that way. We're Americans. We want to work. Dammit, we're ready to get back to it. Give us the reins to our own lives, stick your food stamps back in your ass where they came from, and get out of the way. You're killing us.
This message resonates. That's why Gingrich won. Not just the slap at 'the elites,' but the content of the slap. The part where all work is good work and no one should consider themselves demeaned by what is *good.* Yeah, that may have been pre-formulated, and Juan Williams walked right into it. So? It needed to be said. Most of us thoroughly enjoyed hearing it clearly and unambiguously elucidated.
Currently, several of my friends and family are out of work, or underemployed. I've never seen things this bad in my life. Many of my clients who are technically self-employed simply have had nothing to do for the past three years. They are depleting their savings and selling family heirlooms at auction, while they make pocket cash at a department store to get by.
Meanwhile, the OWS crowd is complaining that no one has coronated them with cushy positions and free stuff the minute they got out of college, and resent the implication that they might have to work some menial jobs for a while until they get their stuff together, the way most everybody else in this country has had to for generations.
This is bad. This is real bad. There's an ideological rot in this country, eating away at our vitality and encouraging parasitism and sloth. The only reason Obama has gotten away with implementing his job-killing agenda is because a lot of damn people need to get their heads right. Newt Gingrich put his finger on a raw nerve, and was rewarded for it.
But no, no, Ms. Coulter. That most South Carolinians who voted in the republican primary are absolute chowderheads to not vote for Romney is a much more realistic assumption. You're smarter than all those people. You understand what makes them tick better than they do.
Go with that.
UPDATE: From Reno Dave in comments:
139 I also like Newt's comments about work, and it really disappoints me that Romney hasn't made an equally strong case for investing throughout life so that one can retire at a 15% tax rate on income from qualified dividends and long-term capital gains. I'm serious about this.CNBC's Jim Cramer on his "Mad Money" program basis a lot of his investing advice on buying and holding stocks, like Caterpillar, that pay good dividends. If people save and invest wisely, they too can gain a good deal of their retirement income from dividends and (hopefully) price appreciation of the underlying stock, which when held over a year when sold, will have the long-term gain taxed at 15%. Even the tax code on dividends favors holding stocks a long time, as dividends on stocks held a short time are taxed at normal income rates, but dividends of stocks held longer "qualify" for a lower rate of 5% - 15%, depending on other income.
And what about people with Roth IRAs, where contributions are made with income already taxed, but withdrawals are tax-free. If I were to save my money in a Roth IRA then retire at 60, start taking money from it and run for office at 62, would I see attack ads saying that I paid ZERO TAXES on that income? That's one of the things that's bugging me about Romney. He's not making a case for there to be MORE people like him.
Emphasis mine. See? There are things Romney can do, that he isn't doing. He needs to find a way to resonate, to discuss why success is good, instead of seemingly being afraid to talk positively about wealth creation- not just his time at Bain, but wealth creation in itself as a GOOD THING, and to inspire people.
Not the voters' fault if he doesn't rise to the occasion.
Posted by: LauraW at
03:08 PM
| Comments (467)
Post contains 981 words, total size 6 kb.
You don't seem to be sparing any effort in claiming this particular mantle for yourself, forthright as you are in declaring that Coulter's wrong and you're right by contrast.
Posted by: xnym at January 23, 2012 03:11 PM (xp1pq)
Posted by: Gov98 at January 23, 2012 03:11 PM (5nzZg)
PublicPolicyPolling @ppppolls
Newt pulled ahead in our Florida polling today as well, although we have him up by less than the Ras/IA polls
Mitt never actually lost support in our SC polling. He just stayed in place. He's losing support in our FL polling
Only 63% of Mitt's 2008 voters in FL supporting him again...this is a recurring problem...doesn't inspire passionate following
Posted by: Flapjackmaka at January 23, 2012 03:12 PM (+1pC6)
Posted by: Juicer at January 23, 2012 03:13 PM (rVTOu)
Posted by: ABO at January 23, 2012 03:13 PM (MbeEN)
When does Newt release his f and f contract.
Posted by: Flapjackmaka at January 23, 2012 03:13 PM (+1pC6)
Work. The one time I had a job I felt like a spy behind enemy lines .
I like to steal rich people's money and give it to government workers who do nothing but worship me.
Posted by: Barack H Obama at January 23, 2012 03:14 PM (O7ksG)
Posted by: t-bird at January 23, 2012 03:14 PM (FcR7P)
Posted by: steevy at January 23, 2012 03:14 PM (7W3wI)
Posted by: bernverdnardo at January 23, 2012 03:15 PM (xXhWA)
Posted by: lauraw at January 23, 2012 03:16 PM (DbybK)
Posted by: JFirch at January 23, 2012 03:16 PM (bu+8X)
He's a squish.
Posted by: Looking closely at January 23, 2012 03:16 PM (8vTCm)
I agree with lots of what you said here, even though I'm a dirty, stinking, Rino, Romney supporter. Nonetheless, it is painful to contemplate the notion of a K Street influence peddler as the paragon of nonparasitism. That, and my conviction that Gingrich can't win.
Posted by: pep at January 23, 2012 03:17 PM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: Pecos, hates the Long-legged Mack Daddy at January 23, 2012 03:17 PM (2Gb0y)
Posted by: Wicked Fenrir at January 23, 2012 03:17 PM (AKlwH)
Posted by: Cast Iron at January 23, 2012 03:18 PM (EL+OC)
Posted by: whatever at January 23, 2012 03:18 PM (O7ksG)
They get their first job after graduating from college, which they drive to in the new car their parents bought for them.
When I was in high school, I had a part-time job as a dishwasher. I hated it, of course. But my mom made me get one, and I liked the paycheck.
Posted by: sandy burger at January 23, 2012 03:18 PM (ErTq7)
I'd be shocked if Christie took Levin's challenge for a debate over the topic.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at January 23, 2012 03:18 PM (eHIJJ)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at January 23, 2012 03:18 PM (0q2P7)
We need someone to sock him. Though Gingrich goes off sometimes, "food stamp President" is a nice line.
Posted by: Flapjackmaka at January 23, 2012 03:19 PM (+1pC6)
We all have fears that one or the other cannot beat Obama. I will of course support Newt or Romeny. Still, we have our fears.
Posted by: whatever at January 23, 2012 03:19 PM (O7ksG)
Posted by: Bodacious at January 23, 2012 03:19 PM (9ZiIe)
Posted by: steevy at January 23, 2012 03:19 PM (7W3wI)
I just saw an Anti-Romney TV ad, tying him to medicare fraud and dredging up the old crap about Rick Scott. It even finished with a picture of Romney and Scott together.
Run by AFSMCE.
Looks like this union would rather see Obama run against Newt.
Posted by: Dave in fla at January 23, 2012 03:20 PM (Why44)
Well, people that think like us, anyway. Pity that won't be enough, and Newt is radioactive to the rest of the country.
Posted by: pep at January 23, 2012 03:20 PM (6TB1Z)
Not buying it.
Ann Coulter can go swallow another Rubik's Cube or piss her little black dress and stamp her tiny foot in anger all she wants.
She can look across the elegant table and call me a stupid hick to all her little candy-ass pals.
None of it keeps my truck from starting in the morning.
I'm backing Newt until he wins or drops out.
Posted by: sifty at January 23, 2012 03:20 PM (WsOiK)
Posted by: t-bird at January 23, 2012 03:20 PM (FcR7P)
Posted by: Darth Randall at January 23, 2012 03:21 PM (O/onO)
Posted by: dogfish at January 23, 2012 03:21 PM (N2yhW)
The democrat party is that rot. The democrats are the party that now promises to take one persons hard work and hand it to someone who doesn't do shit. All in the name "fairness". All without a budget!
Posted by: whatever at January 23, 2012 03:21 PM (O7ksG)
Maybe so. Maybe they cut the ad a week ago when Romney was in the lead. Hard to tell really.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at January 23, 2012 03:22 PM (0q2P7)
I have an unimpeachable witness that says this is BS
Posted by: Dave in fla at January 23, 2012 03:22 PM (Why44)
Posted by: steevy at January 23, 2012 03:22 PM (7W3wI)
Coulter has completely lost it. She's flinging so much sheise around I think she'll need more hair dye to combat the splatter.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at January 23, 2012 03:22 PM (eHIJJ)
Posted by: lauraw at January 23, 2012 03:22 PM (DbybK)
Nailed it. Gingrich will win probably ninety-five to one hundred percent of conservative voters. And precisely no one else.
Only conservatives are keenly aware of the inherent bias of the media, which means only conservatives will respond to his blustery attacks on the "elite media."
Posted by: Lou at January 23, 2012 03:22 PM (xp1pq)
Top capitalists have Obama's ear - see Google, Berkshire, GE, Oracle, Apple, Time Warner, Disney, etc.
The bullshit on "wealth envy" is just to get the rubes to vote GOP.
Posted by: Clarence at January 23, 2012 03:23 PM (z0HdK)
Those are my smaller fears. My larger fear is that the Republican will beat Obama, but he won't be willing or able to do that U-turn we so badly need.
Posted by: sandy burger at January 23, 2012 03:23 PM (ErTq7)
No, actually, the assumption that most of y'all are D-U-M dumb is a pretty good one.
Telling people they're dumb will get you nowhere, of course. Coulter's being dumb too. But people are still dumb.
90% of everything is crap, including voters.
Posted by: Emperor of Icecream at January 23, 2012 03:23 PM (epBek)
Posted by: thirtyandseven at January 23, 2012 03:24 PM (Ctqbp)
Posted by: James at January 23, 2012 03:24 PM (IoTd/)
I thought the chowderheads (New England, ya' know) would have voted for Mitten? Palmettoheads would have worked bettah'.
Posted by: John P. Squibob at January 23, 2012 03:24 PM (FToTH)
Posted by: lauraw at January 23, 2012 07:22 PM
Now that wasn't so hard, was it?
Posted by: huerfano at January 23, 2012 03:24 PM (lXi+d)
Posted by: steevy at January 23, 2012 03:24 PM (7W3wI)
Do I want Newt for POTUS? Heck, I don't know - I'm in Texas, so I've got time to see how things shake out.
All I can say is that if Romney wants my vote, he's going to have to convince me that he WANTS it, and so far, he just hasn't done that. And I'm not happy about voting for someone who thinks that it's "his turn".
Perry was my choice, but he isn't in the race any more.
So until I see some passion from Romney (and I just can't vote for Santorum or Paul), I'm going to back the (very) flawed Newtser.
Because I want someone who is willing to take no prisoners when it comes to Obama and these crooks who are currently in charge.
"I can't spare the man - he FIGHTS!!!!!" (Stuff Lincoln Mighta Said)
Posted by: Teresa in Fort Worth, TX at January 23, 2012 03:25 PM (0xqzf)
Posted by: some dope at January 23, 2012 03:25 PM (+kznc)
Exactly. She needs to start lobbing those bombs the other way.
Posted by: huerfano at January 23, 2012 03:25 PM (lXi+d)
Posted by: steevy at January 23, 2012 03:25 PM (7W3wI)
Posted by: robtr at January 23, 2012 03:27 PM (MtwBb)
Yup....well said.
An additional point to be made is that - regardless of who the Republican nominee is - I wish we would go after the African-American vote with vigor. Obama's economy sucks, but the statistics are absolutely horrendous for African-Americans. It's time that they stop automatically pulling the lever for the D just because that means more free stuff. Newt kind of touched on that in his 'work' diatribe to Juan Williams, and I liked it.
Posted by: Deafdog at January 23, 2012 03:27 PM (fOPv7)
Oh goody. I really needed the comedy relief to show up tonight. Thanks Clarence.
Posted by: dogfish at January 23, 2012 03:27 PM (N2yhW)
Posted by: Hollowpoint at January 23, 2012 03:28 PM (X3vSL)
Posted by: Oldcat at January 23, 2012 03:28 PM (z1N6a)
Posted by: The Political Hat at January 23, 2012 03:28 PM (XvHmy)
Posted by: pep at January 23, 2012 03:28 PM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: Car in at January 23, 2012 03:28 PM (Qx7bj)
I agree. I've had a job since I was 12 and made sure my son had one in high school. He chose to work while in college, mostly because his Dad wasn't into sending him spending money.
Posted by: MCPO Airdale at January 23, 2012 03:28 PM (tYaDf)
Posted by: Stephen Price Blair at January 23, 2012 03:29 PM (2v+KF)
She is wealthy enough to live in one of the high end neighborhoods in Connecticut. She spends too much time with liberals and thinks she has an understanding of the electorate based on that experience.
Posted by: Dave in fla at January 23, 2012 03:29 PM (Why44)
Posted by: Hollowpoint at January 23, 2012 07:28 PM (X3vSL)
that's why all the crap talk before we actually got them in front of voters was a waste of time. The voters decide who makes it, like it or not.
Posted by: Oldcat at January 23, 2012 03:29 PM (z1N6a)
Not really. She sells red meat to avowed carnivores. It makes her oodles of money. And satisfies a lot of folks appetite but doesn't convince anyone of the merits of our ideology if they aren't already a believer. She makes it harder to convert people. In that way I dislike her style, and I avoid contributing to her commercial success as a result.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at January 23, 2012 03:29 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: lauraw at January 23, 2012 07:22 PM (DbybK)
Exactly, just like people weren't stupid for backing Christine O'Donnell. Was she a shitty candidate? Absolutely. But that was against the establishment backed prick who flipped the bird to conservatives every chance he got.
If I lived in DE, I'd have probably bit the bullet and voted for Castle, hell, I'm in NY and voted Lazio over Paladino for the same reason. But I don't think the voters here nor there were "stupid" not to pick the soft liberal losers pushed by the establishment. Though I don't think it's all that "smart" of the super-genius crowd to push such candidates in a year when the conservative base is fired up...
Posted by: mugiwara at January 23, 2012 03:30 PM (KI/Ch)
Posted by: palerider at January 23, 2012 03:30 PM (dkExz)
Posted by: Stephen Price Blair at January 23, 2012 03:30 PM (2v+KF)
Posted by: lauraw at January 23, 2012 07:22 PM (DbybK)
Great point. Newt & Mitt both have their strengths and weaknesses, our differences are all matters of opinion. Neither are that bad, I'm leaning Newt but in the end I really don't care who wins.
Its going to be a hard election against the Boshevik machine. I think its an uphill battle and the nominee will need to think outside the box this time.
Posted by: bernverdnardo at January 23, 2012 03:30 PM (xXhWA)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 23, 2012 03:31 PM (niZvt)
Posted by: MLK Jr. at January 23, 2012 03:31 PM (rkF8V)
Also, Newt's hair style rocks.
Posted by: al-Cicero, Tea Party Jihadist at January 23, 2012 03:32 PM (QKKT0)
Posted by: steevy at January 23, 2012 03:33 PM (7W3wI)
Posted by: pep at January 23, 2012 07:20 PM (6TB1Z)
I seem to remember that's what many people were saying about Newt in SC and FL too. Oh, and to you spineless, pussed-out whiners out there. The SCOAMT is going to lose in a fucking landslide, no matter if it's Romney or Newt.
Posted by: Soona at January 23, 2012 03:33 PM (cqLNL)
FIFY. And I actually do like Newt's style, as a political commentator. As a presidential nominee he has the wrong style. And yes, Romney needs to show some spunk, too.
Posted by: pep at January 23, 2012 03:34 PM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: Rick at January 23, 2012 03:34 PM (Gfgj6)
Posted by: pep at January 23, 2012 03:34 PM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: Soona at January 23, 2012 07:33 PM (cqLNL)
For someone who is so electable, Mitt sure has problems with actual elections.
Posted by: Oldcat at January 23, 2012 03:34 PM (z1N6a)
The estimates are that gas will hit $5 to $6 a gallon this summer, and then fuel oil will be through the roof by the time November rolls around. The new EPA regulations will cut 8 percent of our energy-producing capabilities, and about 70 coal plants will close in the next few months. Electricity bills will double, and the price of food will be much higher due to gas prices.
Come November, nobody is going to be talking about how they think Newt is radioactive, especially when the GOP runs millions of ads of Obama saying in his own words, "Under my plan, energy costs will necessarily skyrocket," as well as reminders of how he killed Keystone.
Also, doctors are finally waking up to the fact that they're all going to be put out of business in 2014, and they're telling all their patients.
Newt was never popular. He's always had high negatives, yet he won elections. The exit polling in South Carolina showed that he beat Romney in every single demographic, including women and married women.
I think you far overstate his negatives currently, but by November of this year the entire nation is going to be screaming for mercy from Obamanomics.
Posted by: Llarry at January 23, 2012 03:35 PM (Rnfm0)
Posted by: steevy at January 23, 2012 03:36 PM (7W3wI)
He actually spoke about how to on jobs, how to get the children out of the house with jobs,m talked about OIL in america not being beholden to anyone else, He speaks of americas greatness.
i guess some think us jobless are stupid and shouldn't be concerned that it isn't mentioned with fervor. We know he worked on contract with america, welfare reform. even if not everything.
we also know he can be a jerk.
But others assume we only care that he rants at the media . while a plus, (it's certainly better than kissing their feet hoping for a kind word from them), it certainly isn't the reason
as far as calling people stupid , it is just not helpful.
Ann you Can do better than that.
!abo!
Posted by: willow at January 23, 2012 03:36 PM (h+qn8)
Posted by: Llarry at January 23, 2012 07:35 PM (Rnfm0)
Which is why we should be choosing the most conservative candidate possible. Not McRomney...
Posted by: 18-1 at January 23, 2012 03:36 PM (3aXbg)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 23, 2012 03:37 PM (niZvt)
If we operate under that presumption then we have already lost and we might as well go home. Despite the polling data about self identification most folks are not "conservative" otherwise Obama would never have gotten elected. If we can't go after the middle and show them the light we are a lost nation.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at January 23, 2012 03:37 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Sleeping with a Co-worker at January 23, 2012 03:37 PM (F6KtL)
Posted by: S Daniel at January 23, 2012 03:37 PM (fM4AU)
Coulter is ignorable in my book. Strident harpy, meet Ann.
Newt is the only one on the stump now to call out the SCoaMF as an Alinsky socialist/Marxist. I admire that. Plus it's true -- just look at his appointment record. Let's see Mitts take off the gloves where they really matter. Then he can move up in esteem points with me.
Punch up, Mitt. Not down. Loser to McCain is no way to go through life, chump. No fancy 59 point plan is going to fix that. Nope, you need to articulate why you are going to bring a wrecking ball to the dance.
Posted by: GnuBreed at January 23, 2012 03:37 PM (BhuDE)
Posted by: Hollowpoint at January 23, 2012 03:38 PM (X3vSL)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 23, 2012 03:39 PM (niZvt)
a photo of a student working at a fast food restaurant with the caption, Life’s too important to ask, “would you like fries with that?”
I hate hate hate the sneering classism many people have towards fast food workers. (It's not exclusively a liberal thing, but I see it much more on the left than on the right.)
There is intrinsic dignity to doing honest work.
Posted by: sandy burger at January 23, 2012 03:39 PM (ErTq7)
No but it doesn't hurt him to talk about it in the primary. What's Obama going to do, take a primary snippet with newt bashing Alinsky and make it into a campaign ad? not likely. Newt is a politician, and an eminently moderate one at that. He will tack left for the general.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at January 23, 2012 03:39 PM (0q2P7)
I said some time ago that Romney would have a harder time in the primary than in the general. I stand by that. For all of you Newtonians, if Newt wins, I hope to God you are right. But I don't think you are.
And Soona, grow up.
Posted by: pep at January 23, 2012 03:39 PM (6TB1Z)
Does Newt REALLY think talking about Saul Alinsky will get moderates and independents and disgruntled Democrats behind him?
See, this is the advantage of being known as a professor: Newt can talk about Alinsky and Joe Six-pack will blank on the name, but assume -- because Newt's smart -- that he knows what he's talking about.
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at January 23, 2012 03:39 PM (bjRNS)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 23, 2012 07:37 PM (niZvt)
Wait, are we in the general election now.So Newt won?
Posted by: Flapjackmaka at January 23, 2012 03:39 PM (+1pC6)
Posted by: creeper at January 23, 2012 03:40 PM (gre5a)
Posted by: steevy at January 23, 2012 03:40 PM (7W3wI)
Simply, the conservative movement isn't acting in a manner that maps to it's rhetoric:
The movement claims to be against insiders and crony capitalism -- Newt Gingrich was reprimanded by a 395–28 margin in the House for ethics vioaltions. The Ethics Committee's Special Counsel, James M. Cole, concluded that Gingrich had violated federal tax law and had lied to the ethics panel in an effort to force the committee to dismiss the complaint against him.
The movement claims to be Evangelical and pro-family values -- I don't need to reiterate that's have 3 marriages that have 'overlapped' on two occasions while his former wife was sick an illness (cancer/tumor and MS).
The movement claims to be pro-free market capitalism -- yet, has embraced a candidate who has attacked the core tenants of this in a way that #OWS has failed to. Hell, Michael Moore has commented on his agreement.
The movement claims to desire a leader, unlike SCOAM, who can accomplish things, not just talk about them in nebulous terms -- yet they have have embraced the candidate who almost no-one who previously worked with him wants to support, endorse or acknowledge as being up to the task.
The movement has derided the retards on the left and center for buying into an ephemeral idea of a man with a questionable past, yet one who could articulate well and sell a vision.... and now their doing the same thing.
Ann is 100% correct. As I've been stating, after 6 years of being beaten up over supporting the Bush Administration, after the 2008 election and the vision of Obama; the conservative movement wants blood, not the best outcome. Witness candidates like Christine O'Donnell, Sharon Angle, and Linda McMaghn who were all picked over viable candidates. In the former two, viable centerist candidates who likely would have won.
It has regressed toward more primal desires: I'd rather lose it all than sacrifice anything. Smart policy, Der Fuhrer. That no-retreat-at-any-cost-order worked out splendenly on the Eastern Front, I'm glad you didn't listen to the 'establishment' generals, it's not like they knew more than you...
Simply, the base wants a spectacle.
Are You Not Entertained?
Is This Not Why You Are Here?
Posted by: Uriah Heep at January 23, 2012 03:41 PM (447Af)
So basically we're so far down the shitter that Newt is scaring the straights?
Posted by: Not Drinking Nearly Enough at January 23, 2012 03:41 PM (HtUdo)
I have to tell you, O-bah-muhh is a decent person, and a person that you don't have to be afraid of as the president of the United States.
Posted by: John 'Fight with me' McCain at January 23, 2012 03:41 PM (rkF8V)
heh, Teh SARAH!!!! should give ann 'the stick' the same advice she gave the fat man: 'don't get your panties in a wad'
Posted by: navycopjoe at January 23, 2012 03:41 PM (aeve0)
Posted by: steevy at January 23, 2012 07:33 PM (7W3wI)
More to the point, IMO, those that are persuadable will not be moved by complex arguments. If they considered politics deeply they wouldn't be moderates...
In 2008 Obama won them by claiming I'm just the change *you* want. Whatever that change was.
I think in 2012 a core theme for the Republicans will be similar, but slightly more concrete - do you want 4 more years of stagnation? Unemployment? High energy costs? Then vote Obama.
Posted by: 18-1 at January 23, 2012 03:41 PM (3aXbg)
Fine call them stupid. You folks who think Mittens has the nads to do anything to avert or reverse our course are equally stupid. And voting for someone guaranteed to kick the can down the road is stupid stupid stupid.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at January 23, 2012 03:41 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: HusseinthePlumber at January 23, 2012 03:41 PM (jx2j9)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 23, 2012 03:42 PM (niZvt)
I think you far overstate his negatives currently, but by November of this year the entire nation is going to be screaming for mercy from Obamanomics.
Posted by: Llarry at January 23, 2012 07:35 PM (Rnfm0)
The only election Newt has ever won in his entire life was for a safe congressional district in a red state. Saying Newt wins elections is like saying Maxine Waters wins elections. He has never won a statewide election other than one republican primary in a red state.
Posted by: robtr at January 23, 2012 03:42 PM (MtwBb)
I am still pro-Constitution.
Posted by: Clarence at January 23, 2012 03:42 PM (z0HdK)
Most people aren't persuadable anyway.Ever tried to persuade a liberal?Even thoughtful ones are almost impossible to move off their positions.
I used to be a left-winger. I changed, due to persuasive arguments and evidence. It took time.
We don't need to persuade "most" people. Honestly, just a few percent would make a huge difference.
Posted by: sandy burger at January 23, 2012 03:42 PM (ErTq7)
Are You Not Entertained?
Is This Not Why You Are Here?
Perfect.
Posted by: pep at January 23, 2012 03:42 PM (6TB1Z)
When I was in high school, I had a part-time job as a dishwasher. I hated it, of course. But my mom made me get one, and I liked the paycheck.
About that. When I was in the sixth grade, I got lunches free if I swept and mopped the cafeteria, which I did. I thought nothing bad of it then and still don't today.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at January 23, 2012 03:42 PM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: Jack at January 23, 2012 03:43 PM (zKFOT)
Posted by: creeper at January 23, 2012 07:40 PM (gre5a)
--------or where a presidential contender Kerry tells them to go to college or they'll end up in the military.
Posted by: willow at January 23, 2012 03:43 PM (h+qn8)
What kind of judge would Mitt put up for Supreme Court?
Which of those questions leaves you the most uneasy?
Posted by: mama winger at January 23, 2012 03:43 PM (P6QsQ)
The caller was this blogger who promised to find out more about the background of the nominees.
Posted by: ambrosia at January 23, 2012 03:44 PM (oZfic)
They are depleting their savings and selling family heirlooms at auction
Oh you peasants will love the fiscal flying circus of my tax returns. Here's a quarter so you can watch the news on a bus station TV.
Posted by: Mitt Romney
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at January 23, 2012 03:45 PM (3wBRE)
Posted by: willow at January 23, 2012 03:45 PM (h+qn8)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 23, 2012 03:46 PM (niZvt)
Posted by: doug at January 23, 2012 03:46 PM (gUGI6)
Posted by: Stephen Price Blair at January 23, 2012 03:46 PM (2v+KF)
Perfect.
Posted by: pep at January 23, 2012 07:42 PM (6TB1Z)
Yelling at voters is never productive. If your candidate isn't catching fire, it's because he sucks.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at January 23, 2012 03:46 PM (uhAkr)
Posted by: Nora at January 23, 2012 03:46 PM (VxqUc)
Posted by: Reno_Dave at January 23, 2012 03:47 PM (OL4L4)
Posted by: dogfish at January 23, 2012 03:47 PM (N2yhW)
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at January 23, 2012 03:47 PM (bjRNS)
Christie nominates two for state Supreme Court, including gay African-American mayor"
Should have just said Christie appoints guaranteed Obama supporter to Court.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at January 23, 2012 03:47 PM (3wBRE)
Posted by: Nora at January 23, 2012 07:46 PM (VxqUc)
Oh I thought it was menopause.
Posted by: ambrosia at January 23, 2012 03:48 PM (oZfic)
love your hump, lauraw
...too bad you have such good teeth or I would have thrown you a genuine montuckey mating call of, 'Show us your Tooth!'.
Posted by: garrett at January 23, 2012 03:48 PM (OWXM2)
Posted by: Hollowpoint at January 23, 2012 07:38 PM (X3vSL)
At least those shitty candidates were espousing some principles that their base constituency was looking for. I question who is stupider? The base voting their principles, or the establishment pushing candidates that the base can't vote for, at a time when the base is in ascendancy no less?
Posted by: mugiwara at January 23, 2012 03:48 PM (KI/Ch)
<<<<I said some time ago that Romney would have a harder time in the primary than in the general. I stand by that.>>>>....
Gee maybe he should have realized that and not been looking past the primaries and already running for the general elections.
Posted by: buzzion at January 23, 2012 03:48 PM (GULKT)
Sorry, that dog won't hunt.
Posted by: GnuBreed at January 23, 2012 03:48 PM (BhuDE)
Posted by: Stephen Price Blair at January 23, 2012 03:48 PM (2v+KF)
Posted by: Reno_Dave at January 23, 2012 03:48 PM (OL4L4)
Posted by: Harold at January 23, 2012 03:48 PM (wmfzA)
Posted by: jaimo at January 23, 2012 03:49 PM (rv9tS)
I believe the likability numbers are BS. Supposedly Obama's likability is very high. He's a pompous, aloof, race-baiting, monarch jetting around the world on our dime, a pedantic stuttering goof. He wants to change America which shows he doesn't like what America is and has been. He has presided over a lousy economy for more than three years and he can't accept responsibility. These aren't things that make someone likable to anyone but sycophants.
Newt isn't a warm and fuzzy type. I know that. He's an intellectual with a lot of personal baggage. I do believe he loves and believes in the greatness of our country. Even if people don't personally like him I believe they will vote for him if they think he is the best man to turn this country around. That extends to the conservatives and the folks in the middle. People have given up on Obama and the Democrats to do that.
I think people want a hard ass like Newt and he will have a Republican House and Senate to boot. If my scenario works we could be in for great things in this country. Does anyone expect great things from Romney? I don't.
Posted by: Ohio Dan at January 23, 2012 03:49 PM (JKNDp)
Heh. You know I've got to say that whatever else may come of this, I may not have finished internalizing it yet and I'm not perfect, but I think I learned a fundemental lesson of rhetoric.
Thanks for a wonderful What-Not-To-Do, How To Lose Friends And Alienate People, you 2012 GOP Presidential Nomination candidates.
Posted by: Entropy, Racism Delenda Est at January 23, 2012 03:49 PM (Ci0JG)
"hunchbacked, three large teeth that don't meet anywhere"
This thread is worthless without pix.
And you must think we're too dumb to notice you didn't mention your elbows.
Posted by: Average SC voter at January 23, 2012 03:49 PM (zqDrC)
Sorry for all the tech jargon.
Posted by: lauraw at January 23, 2012 03:49 PM (DbybK)
138 Coulter needs to get laid.
since i'm a giver, what the hell, i'll do it
if i break her boney ass hips by accident, oh well
Posted by: navycopjoe at January 23, 2012 03:50 PM (aeve0)
the article about the justice nominations is from new jersey dot com
and the blogger is bulldog pundit dot com
Posted by: ambrosia at January 23, 2012 03:50 PM (oZfic)
You have to add the carriage returns in the comment tool yourself. You can't rely on carrying them over from what you quote.
Assuming, of course, this post works.
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at January 23, 2012 03:50 PM (bjRNS)
and while businesses struggle, Kobe Bryant and Warren Buffet are sitting untouchable. The dems don't want to tax the ultra wealthy. No - 250K+ you are fucked. That's how you destroy business in America.
Posted by: whatever at January 23, 2012 03:50 PM (O7ksG)
- Newt Gingrich
good pics guys! That'll show Baracky the idiot! Make commercials FOR him. Newt, you remember that you're a republican?
I cannot believe anyone is for this jerk. Gingrich? evil rich people
Posted by: Total Asshole at January 23, 2012 03:51 PM (bcmD0)
Posted by: buzzion at January 23, 2012 03:51 PM (GULKT)
Posted by: Z as in Jersey at January 23, 2012 03:51 PM (jF5A4)
Me? I want to tell Paul Ryan to move his cuts up nine years. The GOP doesn't have the balls to comply.
Posted by: Clarence at January 23, 2012 03:51 PM (z0HdK)
Know what else is for real?
Sperm on my face! I love it when liberal nancy boys blow their wad on me!
I'm starring in gay bukkake festivals on MegaPorn, if you're interested.
Posted by: Clarence! at January 23, 2012 03:51 PM (JILBp)
ATF sold them to Mexican drug cartels.
Posted by: Not Drinking Nearly Enough at January 23, 2012 03:51 PM (HtUdo)
Posted by: whatever at January 23, 2012 07:21 PM (O7ksG)
====
Someday someone is going to explain to me how that is different than slavery. Oh, I get that the open air slave auctions are gone, and I know that selling family members to separate owners is gone, too.
But, isn't the rest of slavery still comprised of confiscating what one person produces for the benefit of another? How in hell did we ever let those assholes start calling that "fairness?"
Posted by: jc at January 23, 2012 03:52 PM (i8c5b)
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at January 23, 2012 03:52 PM (bjRNS)
Posted by: Hollowpoint at January 23, 2012 03:52 PM (X3vSL)
Posted by: pep at January 23, 2012 07:39 PM (6TB1Z)............................ You and some of the other commenters are lacking wisdom and/or not observant enough to see what's going on around you. Don't blame me that you're operating with your eye ansd ears closed.
What you don't remember as I'm sure you were far from being born yet, is that people were making the same poo-pooing remarks about Reagan in '79 and '80. But we had Carter as the president. Need I go on?
Posted by: Soona at January 23, 2012 03:52 PM (cqLNL)
Ace is cutting back on paragraph breaks, it's a recession.
Hah, more seriously, all formatting is down. If you look over comments, there is no Bold or Italics. My post looked nothing like that either.
Posted by: Uriah Heep at January 23, 2012 03:52 PM (447Af)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 23, 2012 03:52 PM (niZvt)
Posted by: steevy at January 23, 2012 03:52 PM (7W3wI)
Posted by: whatever at January 23, 2012 03:52 PM (O7ksG)
Sorry for all the tech jargon.
Just keep rubbing the pudding on that hump and you get as technical as you wantwith your jargon.
Posted by: garrett at January 23, 2012 03:53 PM (OWXM2)
Posted by: Stephen Price Blair at January 23, 2012 03:53 PM (2v+KF)
Posted by: Rondinellamamma at January 23, 2012 03:53 PM (XgXT2)
I'm going to blame the webmaster for that one. It's a great way to screw with the blog, and the only reason it hadn't happened before now is because none of the trolls had taken the time to figure it out.
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at January 23, 2012 03:53 PM (bjRNS)
Ann Coulter was entertaining before the conservative blogosphere exploded around 2003 and talk radio was undisputed king of conservative media.
Now I can get better analysis and wittier commentary on any of a dozen sites, daily.
Ann, if you're not entertaining us, informing us or showing us your titties, you're useless. Much like our resident dipshit Asperger's shut-in catlady, "curious."
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at January 23, 2012 03:54 PM (DiqH3)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 23, 2012 03:54 PM (niZvt)
Posted by: Stephen Price Blair at January 23, 2012 03:54 PM (2v+KF)
Posted by: Senator NoJackKennedy at January 23, 2012 03:54 PM (a/1Yt)
link to ppp poll
Posted by: Flapjackmaka at January 23, 2012 03:54 PM (+1pC6)
Posted by: jaimo at January 23, 2012 03:54 PM (rv9tS)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 23, 2012 07:52 PM (niZvt) ------------------------ The one on the back is for dancing.
Posted by: Al Bundy at January 23, 2012 03:54 PM (GULKT)
I'm talking 30+ points underwater at times.
Posted by: Uriah Heep at January 23, 2012 03:55 PM (447Af)
Posted by: Dave at January 23, 2012 03:55 PM (HPcQF)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 23, 2012 03:55 PM (i6RpT)
Posted by: Jumbo Jogging Shrimp at January 23, 2012 07:51 PM (qjUnn)
You are going to a 140 character limit instant quip site for cogent political analysis?
Good luck son.
Posted by: Oldcat at January 23, 2012 03:55 PM (z1N6a)
"hunchbacked, three large teeth that don't meet anywhere"
Strangely enough, that's simultaneously replusive and arousing.
Posted by: Count de Monet at January 23, 2012 03:55 PM (4q5tP)
Ann, if you're not entertaining us, informing us or showing us your titties
--/+/-- I'd imagine those look like fried eggs.
Posted by: garrett at January 23, 2012 03:55 PM (OWXM2)
Posted by: bergerbilder at January 23, 2012 03:55 PM (j+Izh)
Posted by: torabora at January 23, 2012 03:55 PM (fs5u6)
Posted by: Stephen Price Blair at January 23, 2012 03:55 PM (2v+KF)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 23, 2012 03:56 PM (niZvt)
The problem is that folks have gotten candidate derangement syndrome. I think this comes from the fact that two things have to exist in order for this nation to continue and for this whole exercise to even matter.
1. We to win the election.
2. The guy who we win with has to be real leader. Not necessarily Reagan, but damn close.
Because these things *have* to exist in order for the exercise to be meaningful, and, because neither one is apparent, folks simply assume those qualities exist in one of the candidates, as to make their efforts meaningful.
As far as I can see those things don't exist, we are DOOMED, the candidates suck; even if we could win, they wouldn't do anything but maybe buy a year or so. So I simply don't like the folks calling other folks stupid because they are harboring *different* delusions about electability or candidate quality.
At this point the only realistic way to approach this election is in a "it probably won't but just in case it matters" sort of way. If you aren't ready to adopt a fatalistic view, I understand, but continuing to believe that this will all work out some how, will lead you to make assumptions and believe things that aren't true.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at January 23, 2012 03:56 PM (0q2P7)
I'd imagine those look like fried eggs.<<<<
Any whore in a storm. Just like Grandpa used to say.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at January 23, 2012 03:56 PM (DiqH3)
Every poll says they/we are the majority...only the media/rinos want you to believe you HAVE to get the moderate squishes...romney's base
Posted by: ABO at January 23, 2012 03:57 PM (MbeEN)
Posted by: katya, the designated driver at January 23, 2012 03:57 PM (bMLFV)
Posted by: dogfish at January 23, 2012 03:57 PM (N2yhW)
Posted by: Tmitsss at January 23, 2012 03:57 PM (Rk/YN)
Posted by: lowandslow at January 23, 2012 03:58 PM (GZitp)
That's why I think/hope he will choose Allen West for VP. It's the perfect, thumb-in-the-eye pick and like Newt, West will throw the msm/establishment premises right back in their faces.
That's the only way to beat Obama, to knock him off his game. You can't be afraid to go right at him.
Posted by: Jose at January 23, 2012 03:58 PM (srIqv)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 23, 2012 07:54 PM (niZvt)
Wow, that's gotta be more angels than you could fit on the head of a pin!
Posted by: mugiwara at January 23, 2012 03:58 PM (KI/Ch)
Posted by: dogfish at January 23, 2012 03:58 PM (N2yhW)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 23, 2012 03:58 PM (i6RpT)
Posted by: catman at January 23, 2012 03:58 PM (NYdB8)
Posted by: Trump at January 23, 2012 03:58 PM (hK2Ya)
Posted by: Flapjackmaka at January 23, 2012 03:59 PM (+1pC6)
Tits or GTFO? I guess we really have fallen as a political movement.
Posted by: Not Drinking Nearly Enough at January 23, 2012 03:59 PM (HtUdo)
Coulter, Bill Maher, deserving of uber ridicule for this alone - enough said.
Oh, and Ann, you're not as hot as you think you are. Go sprew your scrawny-assed, high-brow northeastern moderate criticisms to your dinner party fan-boys. Morning Joe has a seat waiting for you. Don't let the southern screen door hit your 10 year old looking skinny ass on the way out.
Posted by: Havedash at January 23, 2012 04:00 PM (JfvbF)
Posted by: jaimo at January 23, 2012 07:54 PM (rv9tS)
Why was she so hot & heavy for Bill Maher?
Posted by: bernverdnardo at January 23, 2012 04:00 PM (xXhWA)
Posted by: SoCalMe at January 23, 2012 04:00 PM (s72/N)
40% is not a majority.
Also, keep in mind that the polls are based on self-description. I know a few liberals who claim to be moderate, because the media tells them so.
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at January 23, 2012 04:00 PM (bjRNS)
Yeah that's a pretty big demotion for a former speaker.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at January 23, 2012 04:00 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Hollowpoint at January 23, 2012 04:00 PM (X3vSL)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 23, 2012 04:00 PM (niZvt)
I mean, a semen coated throat restricts air flow and naturally increases the pitch. At the gay bars they call me cockwhistle!
Posted by: Clarence! at January 23, 2012 04:01 PM (JILBp)
Posted by: steevy at January 23, 2012 04:01 PM (7W3wI)
Excellent analysis. It is not a small thing to state what is real. Newt, whatever his flaws and there are many, is the only one at the moment saying to voters what Reagan said many years ago: "Don't be afraid to see what you see."
The people have lost confidence in their own eyes. The MFM lies to them on a daily basis, political correctness constrains the truths we tell each other. Neighbor A is afraid to tell Neighbor B what he really thinks of Obama for fear of seeming to be a bigot. It is a self-imposed conspiracy of silence, a mutually agreed upon pact of "see no evil, speak no evil."
Newt is standing up and saying 'I see it. And I'm calling you out on it. '
At some point a domino effect will begin to happen and there will be a tipping point when men and women will no longer be silent about what they see. At least this is my fervent wish. To the extent that Newt contributes to the dominoes beginning to fall against the MFM and Obama, I applaud him and support him.
I don't see Mitt doing anything to tip the dominoes.
Posted by: mama winger at January 23, 2012 04:02 PM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: Live Free Or Die at January 23, 2012 04:02 PM (rkF8V)
------------
We are the [largest catagory] when you consider [Left], [Right],
Posted by: Uriah Heep at January 23, 2012 04:02 PM (447Af)
Posted by: Paulbot at January 23, 2012 04:02 PM (VxqUc)
Deep down most people (who aren't mindless leftists) are terrified that President Obama is going to win reelection. They are so consumed by this fear and the certainty of its consequences that they are fearful that one candidate or another is the only possible hope to in and if they fail we're all doomed. So when their guy is defeated, they freak out and respond out of fear, not reason.
Its the fearbiter response the left was using in the Bush administration; they were absolutely certain that president Bush was every bit as completely evil as the idiotic extremists were screaming, and they flailed around in nearly insane terror constantly.
President Obama is easy to beat. he sucks as a candidate, we'd be aghast if he was the guy we were hoping to win. He polls teerribly even with Democrats, he can't win most of the states he took away from Republicans last time, he has nothing whatsoever going for him that he did last time except a sycophantic press, but now people dislike him and fear his policies. And last time he only won 43% of the vote.
Unless something significant changes, Obama is doomed. Calm down everyone.
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at January 23, 2012 04:02 PM (r4wIV)
If Newt is the nominee, and of course I will do everything I can to support him if he is, I'm quite certain we will all be in mortal shock this November. If you have followed Newt's career you know there is a 90% chance he will make a monumental, election altering gaffe before E-Day. He will be baited by the media, and they will crucify him when he makes any assertion that they can twist.
This will end........badly.
Posted by: Alamo at January 23, 2012 04:02 PM (LWmyU)
Posted by: really ... at January 23, 2012 04:03 PM (X3lox)
Posted by: Stephen Price Blair at January 23, 2012 04:03 PM (2v+KF)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at January 23, 2012 07:56 PM (0q2P7)
Welcome Aboard!
Posted by: Team Meteor at January 23, 2012 04:03 PM (KI/Ch)
Posted by: garrett at January 23, 2012 04:04 PM (OWXM2)
Posted by: tits-N-tats at January 23, 2012 04:04 PM (tKWAs)
Posted by: lowandslow at January 23, 2012 07:58 PM (GZitp)
Kettle/black much?
Posted by: Havedash at January 23, 2012 04:05 PM (JfvbF)
You see? We can all get along!
Posted by: Clarence at January 23, 2012 04:05 PM (z0HdK)
Well, a guy can dream, can't he?
Posted by: Z as in Jersey at January 23, 2012 04:05 PM (jF5A4)
No slash.
Of course, if youÂ’re in the 99% using Firefox or IE, you can use the HTML editor thingie.
Posted by: Stephen Price Blair at January 23, 2012 04:05 PM (2v+KF)
Posted by: fluffy at January 23, 2012 04:05 PM (Lpgtj)
Posted by: Wink Martindale at January 23, 2012 04:05 PM (W5IpF)
The Silent Treatment.
Try it.
It might take a while, be patient.
Posted by: ontherocks at January 23, 2012 04:06 PM (ZJCDy)
Let Coulter shoot off her mouth. Never bought her books and never would. Like the Dixie Chicks she has a negative IQ. Like the Chicks she will destroy what career she has. Speaking of stupid, Sean Hannity. When are you going to get some new guests? The old ones are getting boring....zzz.
Posted by: burt at January 23, 2012 04:07 PM (OzqQM)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 23, 2012 04:08 PM (i6RpT)
There will always be 30% disapproval of any of our candidates. The 30% are the hardcore left. The Barkytrons. We'll never win that faction. But we can beat 'em with the rest of the population.
Posted by: Soona at January 23, 2012 04:08 PM (cqLNL)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose
Lighten up Mike, it's a joke.
Posted by: dogfish at January 23, 2012 04:08 PM (N2yhW)
I can't find the BR key.
Posted by: libtarded at January 23, 2012 04:09 PM (X3lox)
Posted by: tasker at January 23, 2012 04:09 PM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Go F*ck yourself Ann at January 23, 2012 04:10 PM (Vq4oV)
Posted by: Soona at January 23, 2012 04:10 PM (cqLNL)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose
Lighten up Mike, it's a joke.
Hey, I'm available...
Posted by: Denny Hastert at January 23, 2012 04:10 PM (HtUdo)
Posted by: Soona at January 23, 2012 08:08 PM (cqLNL)
He doesn't have a 30% disapproval. He has a 29% favorblity rating vs. a 56% unfavorablity rating.
The 30% roughly is how much he is underwater.
Posted by: robtr at January 23, 2012 04:10 PM (MtwBb)
People who are out of work, paying all their money for gas, heating oil, and food are going to refuse to vote for Newt because he makes a gaffe? They'll say, "You know what? I don't have any money and I've been out of work for four years, but I'm going to give Obama a second chance, because Newt said something I don't like."
Posted by: Llarry at January 23, 2012 04:11 PM (Rnfm0)
Posted by: baldilocks at January 23, 2012 04:11 PM (T2/zQ)
Sorry, no. IIRC, even that question was posed in that self-satisfied "don't you see that?" format that presupposes that the point is correct and that the person being questioned "just doesn't get it". The answer was all about saying F-U to that crap.
Personally, I'm disappointed that no pundit I know of has replied to the "insulting to blacks" suggestion by pointing out that the question is insulting to janitors. Note that janitors - who do actual, and unambiguously useful, work - are dismissed as somehow being worthy of insults by the elitists of the left. They're not in some protected victimhood class.
Posted by: Optimizer at January 23, 2012 04:12 PM (As94z)
It could happen.
Posted by: Jennifer Rubin at January 23, 2012 04:12 PM (HtUdo)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 23, 2012 04:13 PM (i6RpT)
Oh, and pies for sale over here!
Posted by: Corona at January 23, 2012 04:13 PM (fh2Y7)
Posted by: steevy at January 23, 2012 04:13 PM (7W3wI)
But anyone who thinks either one is going to have cakewalk in the general election is kidding themselves.
Posted by: MarkC at January 23, 2012 04:14 PM (D9INj)
Posted by: PowerLifter at January 23, 2012 04:14 PM (MnTwj)
Posted by: buzzion at January 23, 2012 04:14 PM (GULKT)
Posted by: Avi at January 23, 2012 04:15 PM (iSFyV)
Posted by: lowandslow at January 23, 2012 07:58 PM (GZitp)
Coulter's so skinny she only has two sides, and both are conceited bitches.
Posted by: Havedash at January 23, 2012 04:15 PM (JfvbF)
Posted by: tasker at January 23, 2012 04:16 PM (r2PLg)
What sex stuff. I've read their books, it's Newt and Bill Forstchen, neither of whom wrote bizarre sex stuff. Unless maybe your version of "bizarre" and mine differ.
Posted by: USS Diversity at January 23, 2012 04:17 PM (PddVe)
This is a true story. Not special, but true. One of my clients is from Michigan and he knows the entire Romney family. Anyway, he was invited to a local fund raiser for Romney at someone's big beautiful mansion in Denver. (this was a few years back) Romney walked into this large home and said "you know, democrats would see this beautiful house and say.. "nobody should live like this". Republicans would say... "everyone should live like this.""
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at January 23, 2012 04:17 PM (O7ksG)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 23, 2012 04:17 PM (i6RpT)
As the incumbent, Obama is the fronteunner regardless of who we nominate. He has the biggest soapbox, and will be swimming in money.
Like it or not, most people don't harbor the same disdain for Obama that we do.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at January 23, 2012 04:17 PM (X3vSL)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 23, 2012 04:18 PM (i6RpT)
The conservative base is angry. We hate the SCOAMF, his band of Merry Marxists and what they're doing to our country (with the help of the MFM) with the white-hot heat of a thousand suns.
If Newt can tap into .0000001% of that hate like he did in the last debate, that will resonate with the country and those of us who are currently working for less than we made on UE, or for about 1/5th of what we were making just a couple of years ago (I'm both) will unite behind Newt.
It. Is. Time. For. This. Shit. To. Stop.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at January 23, 2012 04:18 PM (d0Tfm)
I live on the WC, it is delayed 3 hours here.
Posted by: robtr at January 23, 2012 04:19 PM (MtwBb)
Posted by: Ann, Top HOTTIE Conservative at January 23, 2012 04:19 PM (gj4aA)
Posted by: Zombie Abe Lincoln at January 23, 2012 04:20 PM (4q5tP)
How do you know this to be true?
Posted by: mama winger at January 23, 2012 04:20 PM (P6QsQ)
It bothers me to no end that the Ivy League pundit class inside the GOP sees this weakness in Romney and insists that it is not a problem. They seem to think argue that the same consultants who sapped the energy from Bush 41, Dole and McCain campaigns will somehow get Romney over the top. I've never watched Mitt in person but I have been at events with the other three and they all came across as less uptight than Romney. As Jonah Goldberg wrote today “His Al Gore like inability to break through his android shell is really grating on me.”
Posted by: NC Mountain Girl at January 23, 2012 04:20 PM (d1WtL)
Llarry at January 23, 2012 08:11 PM
It won't be "something I don't like", it will be probably multiple statements that the press will use to paint him as dangerous, or uncaring.
Look I am as conservative as they come, and I appreciate Newt's candor, but mark my words his candor will allow the MSM to position him as the guy who will take away the "net" saving all of those folks you speak of. I know we need to wean these people off the dole, but you have to get elected to do that. I sincerely hope I am wrong, but I'm old enough that I have seen Newt flame-out before. This guy has a history of major political mis-steps; huge, reckless mistakes.
Posted by: Alamo at January 23, 2012 04:20 PM (LWmyU)
First "job" at 12, working at a berry farm for a couple months, paid by the quart for strawberries and the pint for raspberries
at 13, worked the berry farm again, this time worked after picking season working the plants and the rows, culling the dead wood out so next years crop would be plentiful. - 45cents an hour
14, gas station, 18 hrs a week, 67 cents an hour
15, started working part time at an auto parts store/junkyard, 95cents hr
16,17,18 not a lot of work, even part time, spent too much time cutting school and working on my weed smoking skills
18 after quitting school, worked as a truckers helper at a meat packing plant, guaranteed 48 hour week, 11 bucks an hour, worked a month till a sudden death in family ( mother ) then just stopped
19 got a job at a bakery, actually making the donuts, had to get up at 3 to go in, good pay, 10 bucks an hour ( back in 1974 ) quit after 2 months because makin donuts is hard
there followed a period of general malaise and being a hippie that stopped my life in its tracks for a couple years, about 3
23 1978, jimmy carter era, bad time, 35 hours a week for a year, diesel mechanics training and welding school, it was worth it, I can still weld and can still fix almost anything and have a full toolbox at the age of 56
24, due to a wildcat strike, got the best job i ever had, railroad repairman, working in the shop, fixxing track equipment, union job but cushy, railroad closed the shop in 6 years and moved to a right to work state
30 till 39 many and various poor poor paying jobs, went to college associate degree, and had to self pay due to not being a single mother and being white
39 got a job as an engineering contractor at the main local manufacturer, now 56 still working there, but being a contractor means lower wages than I would like and less benefits, but i am not complaining
Posted by: Tom_Ohio at January 23, 2012 04:20 PM (7U2lm)
"This is bad. This is real bad. There's an ideological rot in this country, eating away at our vitality and encouraging parasitism and sloth. The only reason Obama has gotten away with implementing his job-killing agenda is because a lot of damn people need to get their heads right. "
You ain't kiddin'. I told the wife that the word was Obama was going to talk about "economic (blank)", and asked her if she could fill in the blank. She never did guess right, because the real answer is over-the-top insane. It's "economic fairness".
As bad as the employment situation is, while the economy languishes, this guy is actually doubling down.
The really scary thing is that few people seem to now that it's code for "marxist redistribution of wealth." How come Mitt & Newt aren't all over that? Oh, yeah - maybe Newt's not the one to expect that from.
Posted by: Optimizer at January 23, 2012 04:20 PM (As94z)
Posted by: Pecos, hates the Long-legged Mack Daddy at January 23, 2012 07:17 PM (2Gb0y)
And Jimmie "J.J." Walker. Yikes on both counts.
Posted by: baldilocks at January 23, 2012 04:21 PM (T2/zQ)
Posted by: Ms Choksondik at January 23, 2012 04:22 PM (fYOZx)
Posted by: GINGRICH, 2012 at January 23, 2012 04:22 PM (gj4aA)
Posted by: tasker at January 23, 2012 04:24 PM (r2PLg)
Posted by: whatever at January 23, 2012 04:25 PM (O7ksG)
Posted by: tasker at January 23, 2012 04:25 PM (r2PLg)
Posted by: jaimo at January 23, 2012 04:26 PM (rv9tS)
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at January 23, 2012 04:27 PM (FsqHK)
Posted by: tasker at January 23, 2012 04:27 PM (r2PLg)
Posted by: cackfinger at January 23, 2012 04:28 PM (a9mQu)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 23, 2012 04:28 PM (i6RpT)
Posted by: Zakn at January 23, 2012 04:28 PM (zyaZ1)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 23, 2012 04:29 PM (niZvt)
Most voters liked him well enough to vote for him once already. The GOP candidate will have the difficult task of convincing those voters that they were wrong.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at January 23, 2012 04:29 PM (X3vSL)
Heh. And then I told them that were idiots, which is why they were racists and bigots. They loved me! ... the assholes.
Posted by: John Murtha, Dickless at January 23, 2012 04:30 PM (X3lox)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 23, 2012 04:30 PM (piMMO)
Posted by: ambrosia at January 23, 2012 04:31 PM (oZfic)
Posted by: Ann Coulter, Super Hottie! at January 23, 2012 04:31 PM (gj4aA)
Posted by: red meat Noot at January 23, 2012 04:31 PM (O7ksG)
Posted by: cackfinger at January 23, 2012 04:32 PM (a9mQu)
Posted by: Cyn at January 23, 2012 04:32 PM (8+KS1)
Posted by: robtr at January 23, 2012 04:32 PM (MtwBb)
By Jove, I think I've got it
Newt is engaging in class warfare just like Obabble. But it's the working class vs the won't-work class.
And, it's working!
Posted by: bergerbilder at January 23, 2012 04:33 PM (j+Izh)
Posted by: Ann, Top HOTTIE Conservative at January 23, 2012 08:19 PM (gj4aA)
*barfs*
Posted by: Flapjackmaka at January 23, 2012 04:33 PM (+1pC6)
Can't argue with that except to say I don't know anyone who holds more disdain than I do for Obama. Guilty as charged. In view of this truth, I'll vote for anyone over the SCoaMT. Anyone. Even Biden. I simply don't care anymore about purity. Let the GOP get as violent against each other as possible. The bloodied victor will get my hearty endorsement and as much money as I can scrape from a diminishing supply. I think more of the nation than not agrees the debacle that is Obamanation is real and will be inspired to vote it out.
And Coulter again goes simply hysterical on O'Reilly tonight. Coulter can go Eff herself. I think I'll go burn her books.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at January 23, 2012 04:33 PM (eHIJJ)
The conservative base is angry.
yep. And it's always a great idea to make big decisions during fits of rage.
Posted by: whatever at January 23, 2012 04:34 PM (O7ksG)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 23, 2012 08:29 PM (niZvt)
The SCOAMF's negatives are palpable and provable. Newt will point them out (he's already started and slapped Juan Williams pee-pee when he challenged him on it) and get the crowd fired up. Mitt will not: Mitt's already been far too kind to OFuckup.
Newt may be a prick, but he's our prick.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at January 23, 2012 04:34 PM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: Bob Saget's other computer is banned 99.129.23.42 at January 23, 2012 04:35 PM (dBvlk)
O'Reilly defends Newt from Coulter attack. The bitch must be menstruating?
Posted by: Doctor Fish
I assure you, at Coulter's age her fish-tank is empty except for a few handfuls of aquarium gravel.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at January 23, 2012 04:35 PM (3wBRE)
Posted by: other super hotties at January 23, 2012 04:37 PM (O7ksG)
I think there were lots of other factors that went in to people voting for Obama last time. I don't know if "liking him" made the top five.
"The GOP candidate will have the difficult task of convincing those voters that they were wrong."
The fact that people are worse off than they were 3 years ago might also play a part in that.
Posted by: mama winger at January 23, 2012 04:37 PM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: Ann Coulter, Super Hottie! at January 23, 2012 04:38 PM (gj4aA)
Posted by: robtr at January 23, 2012 04:38 PM (MtwBb)
Troglodyte. You are so clearly not Ivy League material. We, in the Ivy League, know that a scholar would say, "he's already started and got Juan Williams all wee wee'd up".
And to think that I lower myself to rule over you people ... you illiterates and stuff.
Posted by: King Barky, Your Better at January 23, 2012 04:38 PM (X3lox)
Hm. You don't say. Well, nobody's perfect.
Democrats are elected officials who need "voters", she's an opinion columnist who needs "readers".
Posted by: The Mega Independent at January 23, 2012 04:39 PM (AlYnQ)
Posted by: StrategicCorporalUSMC at January 23, 2012 04:39 PM (zgwWv)
Most voters liked him well enough to vote for him once already. The GOP candidate will have the difficult task of convincing those voters that they were wrong.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at January 23, 2012 08:29 PM (X3vSL)
It should not be that difficult, if we had the right candidate and party leadership; in the mold of William T Sherman or George Patton rather than Prince Reebus and Mutt Rombley.
Posted by: Count de Monet at January 23, 2012 04:39 PM (4q5tP)
Posted by: cackfinger at January 23, 2012 04:40 PM (a9mQu)
Posted by: SoCalMe at January 23, 2012 04:40 PM (s72/N)
Posted by: GINGRICH 2012 at January 23, 2012 04:41 PM (gj4aA)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 23, 2012 04:41 PM (piMMO)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 23, 2012 04:42 PM (i6RpT)
Posted by: mpfs at January 23, 2012 04:43 PM (2s/B4)
Coulter on O'Reilly a moment ago.
Can you imagine actually being married to this woman? After having just conducted such a thought experiment, I can also imagine myself after three weeks in that state saying these words to any random passerby on the street: "Please, I'm begging you... just take my service revolver and shoot me through the head to put me out of my misery."
Posted by: Commissioner Gordon at January 23, 2012 04:43 PM (L00d6)
Posted by: other super hotties at January 23, 2012 04:44 PM (O7ksG)
Thanks for this!
Posted by: Peaches, Pats fan for life at January 23, 2012 04:44 PM (YmCr3)
Posted by: GINGRICH 2012 at January 23, 2012 04:45 PM (gj4aA)
Posted by: Ann Coulter, Super Hottie! at January 23, 2012 08:38 PM (gj4aA)
Look, I don't care if Bozo The Fucking Clown is our nominee, as long as he beats Obama. (Oh, wait, Ron Paul). Electability is all that matters. Would I prefer a more conservative candidate than Romney? Of course. But Gingrich would lose by 100 electoral votes. It is critical we win this election. Buckley rule
Posted by: Ombudsman at January 23, 2012 04:45 PM (AxHOT)
Posted by: steevy at January 23, 2012 04:45 PM (7W3wI)
Posted by: baldilocks at January 23, 2012 08:11 PM (T2/zQ)
Drat no html: http://tinyurl.com/87yp5x6
Posted by: baldilocks at January 23, 2012 04:47 PM (T2/zQ)
Posted by: bergerbilder at January 23, 2012 04:47 PM (j+Izh)
The conservative base is angry. yep. And it's always a great idea to make big decisions during fits of rage.
Don't you get tired of holding traditional American values and being mischaracterized and called all kinds of provably wrong things for it, up to and including "racist" when you know it's not true? Aren't you tired of the MFM distorting all things conservative with a fervor that borders on the psychotic? Aren't you tired of having all these things you didn't vote for shoved up your ass by people you didn't vote for?
We seem to be forgetting a big difference between '08 and this year: a lot of the mindless, squishy middle were employed. Today, not so much. They are easily led, incapable of thinking for themselves and will follow whichever crowd is larger. They are the reason we're in this mess.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at January 23, 2012 04:47 PM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: steevy at January 23, 2012 08:45 PM (7W3wI)
I can beat that. I'm watching IFC and one of the ads is for a Trojan vibrator ... and the ad makes pretend that men use them, too. WTF?
Posted by: really ... at January 23, 2012 04:48 PM (X3lox)
"I believe the Federal government has grown out of control, threatening the Rights, Liberties, and Property of the People.
"This is being done at the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial level. This is in direct opposition to the Constitution and the Founding Fathers vision for the Federal government.
"Because I believe this, today I exercised my right as a Free Citizen, and did not visit the White House. This was not about politics or party, as in my opinion both parties are responsible for the situation we are in as a country. This was about a choice I had to make as an INDIVIDUAL.
"This is the only public statement I will be making on this topic. TT"
Tim Thomas is really laying it on the line. The statement is on his fb but yahoo also comments.
Posted by: ambrosia at January 23, 2012 04:48 PM (oZfic)
Are you sure you aren't watching a political panel retrospective of the northeastern GOP primary process?
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at January 23, 2012 04:48 PM (eHIJJ)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 23, 2012 04:49 PM (niZvt)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 23, 2012 04:49 PM (i6RpT)
Posted by: SoCalMe at January 23, 2012 04:50 PM (s72/N)
What? No way.
Posted by: runninrebel at January 23, 2012 08:23 PM (N/1Dm)
Yep. Didn't she date Mayer too. That girl's taste in men is frightening.
Posted by: baldilocks at January 23, 2012 04:50 PM (T2/zQ)
Posted by: steevy at January 23, 2012 04:50 PM (7W3wI)
Troll alert! It's the wacko.
Posted by: ambrosia at January 23, 2012 08:48 PM (oZfic)
Posted by: Doctor Fish at January 23, 2012 08:49 PM (TkGkA)
I am not a troll nor a "wacko".
What, are you a hockey hater?
Posted by: ambrosia at January 23, 2012 04:51 PM (oZfic)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 23, 2012 04:51 PM (piMMO)
nevergiveup, No I am not kidding. I for one would like to know why Fanny and Freddie were paying Newt $1.6 Million while we were and still are bailing them out to the tune of $160 Billion and I would also like to know how some of you are making paragraphs.
Posted by: robtr at January 23, 2012 04:51 PM (MtwBb)
Posted by: cackfinger at January 23, 2012 08:40 PM (a9mQu)
I don't give a shit what those assholes say. (Well, except for Noonan, she can be annoying at times, but damn, can the woman turn a phrase. Look back at her 911 columns- pure poetry)
Posted by: Ombudsman at January 23, 2012 04:51 PM (AxHOT)
Posted by: Bob Saget's other computer is banned 99.129.23.42 at January 23, 2012 04:51 PM (dBvlk)
Posted by: Lincolntf at January 23, 2012 04:51 PM (Qjh0I)
Posted by: eman at January 23, 2012 04:51 PM (g08ab)
Posted by: BurtTC at January 23, 2012 04:52 PM (Gc/Qi)
Posted by: steevy at January 23, 2012 04:52 PM (7W3wI)
Posted by: ambrosia at January 23, 2012 08:51 PM (oZfic)
You make Joe Biden sound intelligent.
Go hang out with your antisemitic friends.
Posted by: buzzion at January 23, 2012 04:53 PM (GULKT)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 23, 2012 04:53 PM (i6RpT)
Rather than this bullshit "I'm better than you" schtick, these imbeciles need to use every media question to fire back at Obama. Yeah, most voters don't know the depth of MFM bias. But rather than being general, the candidates could get a little more specific.
Genius Newt could have defended Romney and made some points. When the MFM dicks ask about "when's Romney releasing his tax returns," say as soon as you ask Obama where he's hiding his college transcripts. . ."
Romney on Bain could say "at least I didn't get it from some sleazy solar tax credits."
"Doesn't matter if Obama is a nice guy or not. Your kids can't find work. And if they do manage to find work, he's going to tax them to death and give it to bankrupt solar companies who give him political donations."
Posted by: The Poster Formerly Known as Mr. Barky at January 23, 2012 04:53 PM (qwK3S)
And "steevy"? He is a little fag - a dickspittle - a cum-fart.
Posted by: Clarence at January 23, 2012 04:53 PM (z0HdK)
Posted by: ambrosia at January 23, 2012 08:48 PM (oZfic)
Posted by: Doctor Fish at January 23, 2012 08:49 PM (TkGkA)
I am not a troll nor a "wacko".
What, are you a hockey hater?
Posted by: ambrosia at January 23, 2012 08:51 PM (oZfic)
I would prescribe psychotropics for your delusional scribbling. Consult with your friends for a proper diagnosis.
Posted by: Doctor Fish at January 23, 2012 04:53 PM (TkGkA)
Posted by: steevy at January 23, 2012 04:54 PM (7W3wI)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 23, 2012 04:54 PM (niZvt)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 23, 2012 04:54 PM (i6RpT)
Posted by: buzzion at January 23, 2012 08:53 PM (GULKT)
I often wonder why you lie. I have no anti semetic friends, none, nada. Just because people might be independent or a lib/dem doesn't mean they are anti semetic.
Posted by: ambrosia at January 23, 2012 04:55 PM (oZfic)
She's on the Romney payroll--emotionally, if not literally.
Posted by: tsj017 at January 23, 2012 04:55 PM (vOH26)
Posted by: tsj017 at January 23, 2012 04:56 PM (vOH26)
Posted by: whatever at January 23, 2012 04:56 PM (O7ksG)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 23, 2012 08:54 PM (niZvt)
Thank you, CoolCzech. And, let's face it, she's a lot better off than all the people that psycho killed that day, eh?
Posted by: Peaches, Pats fan for life at January 23, 2012 04:56 PM (YmCr3)
Posted by: ambrosia at January 23, 2012 04:56 PM (oZfic)
Posted by: Hollowpoint at January 23, 2012 04:56 PM (X3vSL)
Posted by: steevy at January 23, 2012 04:57 PM (7W3wI)
Posted by: Vyceroy at January 23, 2012 04:58 PM (gBH3u)
Posted by: robtr at January 23, 2012 04:58 PM (MtwBb)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 23, 2012 08:54 PM (niZvt)
Fuck her. She had enough brain matter left to understand that if she hung on this long, she has a gauranteed pension.
Her husband is liberal cocksucker too.
Posted by: ErikW at January 23, 2012 04:58 PM (JILBp)
Mitt does need to explain, "Yes, I pay federal income taxes of 15% on my investment income. This is not 'cheating', this is the law. I pay 15% on the interest I make in part because I already paid 35%+ income tax on the principal from which I derive that investment income. My opponents will have you believe that I am somehow paying half or less the taxes I should. The reality is that I am paying almost half-again the taxes on money I already paid taxes on...and unlike public sector pensions no investment is ever guaranteed."
Newt is a stem-winder when he's on his game, but he does have crypto- and not-so-crypto-statist leanings at times, and while ideas are great the left wing of America is what happens when you fall in love with your ideas instead of getting the job done and paying attention to reality now and then. One of the problems with a lot of "ideas guys" (and I say this as an ENFP personality type, the "ideas guy") is that coming up with ideas is not the same as implementing those ideas. If Newt has coattails then maybe he'll get some traction early on with a Congress that is GOP-dominated and feels like it owes him some things. If not, he's going to have to do a lot of glad-handing and arm-twisting to get even one of these great ideas off the ground.
There's also the issue of leading with the wrong ideas. In the midst of the worst economic crisis in roughly 70 years, the current POTUS decided it was time to improve access to health insurance. Bad idea, and wrong time. If he had focused on getting people back to work, he might have a better shot at reelection but as it stands his reelection is in serious doubt. If Newt knocks off the SCOAMF, his honeymoon will last about as long as it takes him to drop his right hand to his side after the oath of office, and it will be uphill both ways in the snow after that with the media.
Nothing the government does at the Congressional level will put people back to work immediately, there is some hope that Executive-level things like repealing scads of EPA stuff and begging the Canadians to reconsider Keystone XL could get things rolling in very short order -- or at least, once the court challenges to those actions are dealt with. I can guarantee you that the first thing we will hear is "failed policies of the past" followed by angry glances at watches wondering why unemployment hasn't dropped to 5% by January 21st. Any non-Obama President will get zero slack on the economy or anything else and after all the flak our side has thrown at the "I inherited this economy" line BHO probably says in his sleep by now, there will be little response to be made. President Mitt Romney will be recast as patrician, aloof and out-of-touch GHW Bush, and Newt will be George W. who talks purty.
I don't know why anyone wants the job.
Posted by: Darren at January 23, 2012 04:59 PM (cKoDv)
Posted by: Clarence at January 23, 2012 04:59 PM (z0HdK)
Posted by: Hollowpoint at January 23, 2012 04:59 PM (X3vSL)
Well, unfortunately, Obama won't be on the stage tonight. The article did seem to concede that what he had done wasn't outside the letter of the law "but....".
I just expect them to make an issue of it if they can.
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 23, 2012 05:00 PM (piMMO)
Posted by: steevy at January 23, 2012 05:00 PM (7W3wI)
That's actually the wisest thing to do. i shall try to follow the example of not attacking any of them. this is what we have left. it is what it is.
Posted by: willow at January 23, 2012 05:01 PM (h+qn8)
Thank you, CoolCzech. And, let's face it, she's a lot better off than all the people that psycho killed that day, eh?
Posted by: Peaches, Pats fan for life at January 23, 2012 08:56 PM (YmCr3)
C'mon... there are some things that transcend politics. God bless this wonderful woman. We should all rejoice and praise God for her miraculous recovery.
Posted by: Ombudsman at January 23, 2012 05:02 PM (AxHOT)
Posted by: robtr at January 23, 2012 08:58 PM (MtwBb)
Well ... that track record is off-the-charts weird.
Ann was one of the best conservative voices around for years. She was always on the right side and expressed it in a clear and sharp manner. But, she's gone off the rails this primary. First, it was this weird love affair with Christie (who never even wanted to run, and would have been a terrible national candidate) and then she got all odd about Mittens. It's very strange. The first time (two times) that I can remember her being wrong. But she is spectacularly wrong. Hopefully, she gets herself straightened out, soon. She has a very important and effective voice.
Posted by: really ... at January 23, 2012 05:02 PM (X3lox)
Posted by: Anyone But ROMNEY!!!! at January 23, 2012 05:02 PM (piMMO)
Posted by: robtr at January 23, 2012 08:58 PM (MtwBb)
Well I did add some serious commentary on her long-demonstrated elitism which had nothing to do with Newt or who she has dated, so dismount from thy high horse.
Posted by: baldilocks at January 23, 2012 05:02 PM (T2/zQ)
Posted by: ambrosia at January 23, 2012 05:02 PM (oZfic)
Posted by: wheatie at January 23, 2012 05:03 PM (ALwK/)
Posted by: Tasmaniac at January 23, 2012 05:03 PM (YfcON)
Posted by: ErikW at January 23, 2012 08:58 PM (JILBp)
C'mon... there are some things that transcend
politics. God bless this wonderful woman. We should all rejoice and
praise God for her miraculous recovery.
Posted by: Ombudsman at January 23, 2012 09:02 PM (AxHOT)
Posted by: Ombudsman at January 23, 2012 05:03 PM (AxHOT)
Posted by: willow at January 23, 2012 05:04 PM (h+qn8)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 23, 2012 05:04 PM (piMMO)
The only difference between Romney and and a ham sandwich has always been an assertion.
An assertion of electability, based on year-out polls and technical performance during prior losses, while blatantly ignoring the Newteyness currently rampaging through the party.
To say nothing else at all about Romney - noting else at all - as a matter of plain fact, he is not some super-electable inevitable win.
I don't know if you swallowed that line yourself or if you still think it's the best sale, but until people reconnect with reality I don't see a way foward. Romney must change, or something must change, or else Newt.
You don't see me going around clinging to past wisdom that seemed so obvious and certain at the time. Perry was a flop. You're not going to see me pining for a brokered convention with a miraculous Perry win either - that's preposterously absurd, that such a brokered convention would pick the guy they all hated, abruptly changing their minds.
And in some regards, Romney is now in a similar situation. I hope you Romney guys don't cling on as long as we Perry people did, cause there's not that much time left and you'll still be singing Romney's inevitability well into Joe Biden's 2nd term.
Posted by: Entropy, Racism Delenda Est at January 23, 2012 05:06 PM (Ci0JG)
we see a lot of disagreement here, do we honestly believe those that want to vote for romney or those that want to vote for newt are really idiots?
i don't i just think we have two not great candidates and are trying to figure out who can win/.
Posted by: willow at January 23, 2012 05:08 PM (h+qn8)
I'M SO ANGRY I HATE HER SHE'S AN UGLY POOPY HEAD!!!
Posted by: Hollowpoint at January 23, 2012 05:08 PM (X3vSL)
Posted by: cackfinger at January 23, 2012 05:08 PM (a9mQu)
Posted by: polynikes - Texan for Romney at January 23, 2012 05:09 PM (gPLWS)
C'mon... there are some things that transcend politics. God bless this wonderful woman. We should all rejoice and praise God for her miraculous recovery.
Posted by: Ombudsman at January 23, 2012 09:03 PM (AxHOT)
Sorry but no. She was a progressive lib that was big on abortion rights.
She can go to hell.
Posted by: ErikW at January 23, 2012 05:09 PM (JILBp)
Posted by: willow at January 23, 2012 05:10 PM (h+qn8)
Posted by: Torquemada at January 23, 2012 05:11 PM (j+Izh)
Posted by: steevy at January 23, 2012 05:11 PM (7W3wI)
Posted by: bergerbilder at January 23, 2012 05:16 PM (j+Izh)
Posted by: ErikW at January 23, 2012 05:17 PM (JILBp)
Posted by: baldilocks at January 23, 2012 05:18 PM (T2/zQ)
You'll see.
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at January 23, 2012 05:31 PM (r4wIV)
They think guns are magic kill sticks that cannot be survived.
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at January 23, 2012 05:35 PM (r4wIV)
I don't think this math things works like you think it does.
Posted by: brainpimp at January 23, 2012 05:37 PM (mwlsF)
I don't think this math things works like you think it does.
Posted by: brainpimp at January 23, 2012 05:48 PM (mwlsF)
Posted by: sydney jane at January 23, 2012 05:49 PM (D1A3M)
America changes its opinion of public figures all the time. Clinton, Bush, and Obama all had highs and lows during their careers. But Gingrich has never made a comeback. Independents hate his guts. They may be unsure about their jobs or what to do about Iran or drilling in ANWR, but they know one thing: Newt sucks.
It is silly to believe somehow a clever debate line will change that. Newt was also glib, that's not his problem.
His problem is he isn't a very good person, and it shows.
Posted by: Adjoran at January 23, 2012 06:33 PM (VfmLu)
Posted by: Comanche Voter at January 23, 2012 06:40 PM (3ESDJ)
Posted by: Lee Reynolds at January 23, 2012 06:43 PM (rJMw2)
Whoa, research reveals that Newton has toiled the Dickensian streets of academia. Sorry.
But looking at him you would think the most work he ever does is attempt to button that shirt button at navel level.
Posted by: Bobby Ahr at January 23, 2012 06:55 PM (f2ir3)
Posted by: mot at January 23, 2012 07:12 PM (sgKMX)
So at this point we're looking at Mitt who probably cant beat Obama and a Newt who imo absolutely cannot possibly beat Obama (and who would I believe jeopardize a GOP Senate backstop of HopenChange 2: the Wrath of Barack).
Arguably the worst performing President in nearly a century, and the major opposition party in a country of 300+ million cant produce a better candidate than either of these two, one of whom will almost certainly face Obama in November.
It appears to me today that one would lose to Obama by a Clinton-Bush 41 margin and one by a Clinton-Dole margin. That says a lot to me about where this nation is headed.
Posted by: Mike D. at January 23, 2012 07:19 PM (p8QOg)
Honor roll of the Best of the Best of Harvard's Best and the Brightest
Barack Obama Jr. & Sr, Michelle Obama, G W Bush, Mike Dukakis, Pierre Trudeau, Jaques Chirac, Mitt Romney, Al Gore Jr., Duval Patrick, Scott Harshbarger, Ben Bernanke, Joseph P. Kennedy, JFK, Ted Kennedy, Chuck Schumer, Dick Blumenthal, John Vitter, Carl Levin, Jim Guy Tucker, Jim Jeffords, Barney Frank, Alan Grayson, Mel Reynolds, Christopher Cox, Hank Paulson, Larry Sommers, Elena Kagan, Lawrence Tribe, Charles Ogletree, Skip Gates, William "Freezer" Jefferson, Ted Kennedy, Robert Toricelli, Elliot Spitzer, Al Franken, Michael Huffington, Patsy Schroeder, Joe Sestak, Hank Cisneros, Alan Krueger, John Holdren, Cass Sunstein, Harold Koh, Chris Lu, Willard Tom, Jason Bordoff, David Kris, (DOJ) Samantha Power, Julius Genachowski, Franklin Raines, Daniel Mudd, Jamie Gorelick, Robert Zoellick, Jeff Skilling, Hassan Nemazee, Henry Kissinger, Robert McNamara, Sandy Berger, Brock Adams, Alberto Gonzalez, J. Paul Bremer, Douglas Feith, Lloyd Blankfein, Jamie Dimon, Kenneth Chennault, Franklin Raines, Stan O'Neal, Jamie Gorelick, Daniel Mudd, Robert Zoellick, John Thain, Jeff Immelt, John Paulson, Sumner Redstone, Robert Belfer (founder of Enron), Jeff Skilling (Enron), James B. Lockhart III, Robert "bailout Bob" Rubin, Penny Pritzker, Rick Wagoner, Philip Falcone (Lightsquared), George Kaiser (Solyndra), Peter Rouse (F & F, Solyndra, Lightsquared), Vin Weber, Jacob Lew (Lightsquared), David Barron (DOJ F & F), Ian H. Gershengorn, Tom Perez (DOJ F & F), Steven Spinner (Solyndra), Jonathan Silver (Solyndra), Chai Feldman, Klaus Schwab, Eric Mindich, Richard Whitney (of 1929 infamy), Thomas Lamont (banker to Mussolini), Patrick Fitzgerald, David Baron, Todd Stern, Zbigniew Brzmezinski, Harry Dexter White, Ted Hall, Alger Hiss, Amy Bishop, Timothy Leary, Alfred Kinsey, Al Gore III, Robert Tunnell Jr, Cardinal Bernard Francis Law, Rajat Gupta, Marc Stuart Dreir, Oded Aboodi, Eugene Plotkin Andrew Schliefer, Ephren Taylor Marc Stuart Dreier. Hemy Zvi Neuman, Noah Freeman....
The screening process now for Harvard students practically ensures that they are going to be leftist-liberal globalists who care nothing about the rest of the country. Harvard and Cambridge are just swimming in money while the rest of the country (except for DC, Martha's V Frisco, Berkeley, U of Chi, Ivy League schools), is taking it on the chin.
Posted by: anti-Romney at January 23, 2012 07:55 PM (FRnn5)
Note: I just read the article and not the comments, so I sure hope I'm repeating someone's take.
Posted by: currently at January 23, 2012 08:11 PM (flA6l)
Posted by: misty at January 23, 2012 08:12 PM (HuIV7)
Posted by: Soona at January 23, 2012 07:52 PM (cqLNL)
I've got to call BS on this. I am old enough to remember 1980 - as are most of thhe people here. The only ones who thought Reagan would lose against Carter were liberals and political media. I remember counting votes in a school poll at that time, and the students voted something like 25-1 for Reagan. Oklahoma, at that time, was moderately Democrat, unlike today.
Posted by: also from Oklahoma at January 23, 2012 08:14 PM (Rwrs+)
Posted by: EBL at January 23, 2012 08:14 PM (IgakF)
Posted by: misty at January 23, 2012 08:19 PM (HuIV7)
Ann Coulter doesn't often make the case there ought to be more like Romney, either. As tough as she is on leftists, she doesn't really do the, "I'm successful and unapologetic about it," schtick, like say, Rush does.
Posted by: K~Bob at January 23, 2012 09:13 PM (jyZeS)
Newt Gingrich is unelectable....and deservedly so. He is a very unattractive human being in every way.
Romney is the only Republican candidate who has a shot at beating Obama.
If it's Gingrich against Obama I won't vote (and I think there aare millions of people like me).
Posted by: middyfeek at January 24, 2012 03:56 AM (Qi04R)
Ann didn't believe Mittens was electable 11 months ago; I wonder if some of that sweet Mittens campaign cash changed her mind.
Posted by: Larsen E. Whipsnade at January 24, 2012 05:06 AM (6BgmB)
Ann Coulter wanted us to pick her man Romney because she anointed him. Yet, Romney never tried to earn our vote.
But, what do I know, I'm just an angry Palinista, Perrykrisna :-)
Posted by: texas at January 24, 2012 05:16 AM (/jtUL)
Posted by: SpasticToad at January 24, 2012 06:26 AM (mbzLN)
I don't often listen to political punditry from a woman, but when I do, I prefer for that woman to not have an adams apple. Stay thirsty my friends.
Posted by: Stacy B Slay at January 24, 2012 07:43 AM (7qrQU)
Posted by: Thorvald at January 24, 2012 09:34 AM (OhenJ)
So you think he can't win and you'll do your best to make sure Obama does instead? Got it.
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at January 24, 2012 10:02 AM (r4wIV)
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at January 24, 2012 10:08 AM (r4wIV)
If he can't win (and anyone with a three digit IQ can see he can't win) don't blame me. Blame the jerkoffs who can't see he's unelectable.
I'm tired of seeing the Republicans hand the Presidency to the Democrats.
Posted by: middyfeek at January 24, 2012 10:11 AM (Qi04R)
Posted by: Sharpening Plane Blade at January 31, 2012 04:21 AM (mIhy6)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2492 seconds, 595 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: GOProud at January 23, 2012 03:10 PM (EL+OC)