September 28, 2012

The Normative Power of Law and the Emotional Power of Drama
— Ace

Suppose you accidentally click on a link and wind up seeing the raunchiest, most grotesque pornography imaginable.

What do you do?

You probably close the link and perhaps bark at whoever linked you to it.

But do you attempt to have the site shut down?

In all likelihood you do not. And that doesn't mean you approve of the pornography, or even tolerate it.

You don't attempt to have the site shut down, or stir up a rage, because you know it will be futile. The law has spoken on this point; and where the letter of the law hasn't spoken, the actions of thousands of LEO's and politicians have. There will be virtually no action taken against pornography, ever.

So you don't attempt to get the site shut down because the letter of the law, and the actions of those enforcing it, have informed you that it is a situation you'll just have to live with.

The law has become normative. You may not agree with it (or, of course, you might). But you have internalized the teaching of the law, just as a student internalizes the real rules of his school, what he can get away with, what he can't.

The law has taught you what you will have to accept, what you will have to work around, what you will have to teach yourself to ignore and come to peace with.

The law is normative. It establishes our norms.

The law is currently establishing a new norm. Some -- liberals, chiefly, are quick to line up to embrace the new norm.

The new norm is that certain religions -- oh, why be coy with the plural? One religion -- shall have the protection and sanctification of state power.

One religion, and one religion only.

Piss Christ is being shown in New York City again. There are few calls for the exhibit to be banned, and none for the artist to be arrested -- or vigorously investigated to find if there are any breaches in his past to be arrested for.

Because we know the law and the action of government in executing the law would not be responsive. Not even a little bit.

The law is normative. We have learned there is no point protesting Piss Christ, or any thousand "slanders" against the Prophet of Christianity. We have learned that we will just have to live with it, and, if such things offend us, learn to control our tempers, and learn to avoid certain things that might otherwise give us pleasure, like museums.

What norms are the laws currently teaching the most extreme and intolerant members of Islam?

That they must respect other people's rights to engage in free speech? That they must accept that their religion, like any other, is subject to critique, disrespect, and even hate?

No. They are learning that threatening violence, or actually engaging in violence, is not futile at all, but rather achieves the precise goals they seek (a de facto prohibition against Islam or Mohammad, and no other religion).

The law is normative. This is what it is teaching. This is the lesson it is currently filling minds with.

Violence works. Intolerance -- at least intolerance with a brown face -- is justified and even noble.

And Islamic values are superior to American ones. After all, when the two come into conflict, which values win out?

Why would an Islamic immigrant choose American values over Salafist ones when the American government itself (and lesser governments within America) proclaim that Salafism is superior to Americanism?

The law is normative. It teaches. It compels. It forbids. And its compulsions and prohibitions become internalized.

The law in America is championing Salafism.

If our goal is encourage a more moderate, pluralistic, freedom-oriented brand of Islam, why would our government champion Salafism? Why would it emasculate the more moderate style of Islam, and create a Conquering Hero out of Salafism?

The law is normative. The law creates certain expectations of behavior, and rewards those within the law, and punishes those without it.

What expectations of behavior is the law currently creating? That we should all respect each other's rights to express our beliefs, or that we should engage in violent behavior to suppress others' rights, knowing if we destroy enough property, or kill enough human beings, the American government will begin championing our beliefs, making them part of the official legal code of the nation?

A fire dies without oxygen. It is the expectation of government action -- of "winning" a government sanction or concession-- that drives these protests and these riots. And this jihad.

Drama is the anticipation of action. It has been so since before the Greeks. Drama is not the action; drama is the question of whether the action will be taken, and what consequences it will have.

As Hitchcock observed, a bomb's detonation isn't drama; that's just spectacle. The drama comes with wondering if the bomb will be detected before it explodes.

Human beings are driven by drama. Millions watched that stupid car chase today because they didn't know how it would turn out. Millions watched a boring static helicopter shot of a not-terribly-fast-moving car for hours, because they didn't know how it would turn out.

Drama feeds the emotions.

When Rush Limbaugh made a joke about Sandra Fluke being a "slut," the story was kept alive for weeks.

How? Dude called a 30-year-old activist a "slut" for humorous effect. How does that turn into a three week storyine?

Drama. The quip itself cannot sustain interest, but the invented, contrived jumped up drama around it can.

Will Rush apologize? That's a two day story. Now we can anticipate whether he will Stay Strong or Buckle Under Pressure. Drama -- the anticipation of action.

Two days later -- will the people who will never accept his apology accept his apology? Drama -- wondering whether this apology will be deemed adequate by people whose livelihoods depend on their deeming it inadequate.

A week after that -- will sponsors drop his show? Will it drive him off the air? Drama -- will he win or lose? Will MMFA win or lose?

And thus a three-second sentence, without any consequence whatsoever, becomes a storyline for a month.

Drama. Unscripted morality plays for the politically invested.

Now, why has this YouTube video remained a story? Why do people continue to demonstrate over it?

Drama -- will they win? Will they prevail in getting the United States to impose blasphemy laws? To arrest and prosecute the blasphemer?

It's that drama that sustains their passions.

If they knew the answer -- if they knew from the first moment the answer would be "No" -- there would be no drama.

They would realize their actions were futile, and therefore silly, and therefore unmanly, as serious men do not indulge in childish tantrums that accomplish nothing.

But what if there is a genuine hope that their actions could shape US policy, US free speech law, and US law enforcement action?

What if the Administration gave them just enough encouragement to let them know: If you keep this up long enough, we just might wind up tailoring the Constitution to protect your religion?

Drama. It feeds the passions. It creates interest. It invests what would otherwise be a childish (or thuggish) bit of acting up with heroic purpose.

And that's what Obama has done: He has poured the gasoline of heroic purpose onto the flames of anger.

He has invested the demonstrators with stature and nobility.

He could have just said "No." He could have made it plain that in no universe would a US president ever betray the Constitution in order to appease a mob.

Instead, he told them just the opposite: Maybe we will.

And, in fact: We now have.

Will this lead to fewer demonstrations, and less violence, or towards more?

When you reward a behavior, you get more of it.

That seems a well-settled point.

The law is now rewarding those who would break it.

The law is normative.

It teaches.

It's teaching people that terrorism is justified.

It is teaching people that the future must not belong to those who slander The Prophet of Islam.

And it is teaching, finally, that 9/11 was, like any other spasm of violence against those who do not bow to Islam, a justifiable expression of dissatisfaction with United States policy and American values.

Posted by: Ace at 01:54 PM | Comments (404)
Post contains 1424 words, total size 9 kb.

1 Obama is a stuttering clusterf*ck of a miserable failure.

Posted by: steevy at September 28, 2012 01:56 PM (Ts9tU)

2 Can't be reminded of this often enough:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

Posted by: Joe Mama at September 28, 2012 01:56 PM (rlba9)

3 All  hail  the  black  Muslim  in  the  White  House!

Posted by: Boring Old Madonna at September 28, 2012 01:56 PM (wIgpo)

4 War and Peace?

Posted by: dogfish at September 28, 2012 01:56 PM (N2yhW)

5 So , where's the link?

Posted by: Temper Tantrum at September 28, 2012 01:57 PM (AWmfW)

6 Some animals are more equal than others. Really, Ace, how hard is that to understand?

Posted by: Napolean at September 28, 2012 01:57 PM (6TB1Z)

7 Haven't even read the whole thing yet, but the first few sentences gave me an idea to start a burka themed porn site. Fist pic is a model in a burka holding the koran, then getting jiggy wid it.

Posted by: Up with people! at September 28, 2012 01:57 PM (kzFo5)

8 I believe the time has come. To stand our ground.

Posted by: Honey Badger at September 28, 2012 01:58 PM (GvYeG)

9 That was a lot of philosophizing there Ace. Made me read...

Posted by: the pink not panicking, but I hate the MSM,about one poll formerly known as the hobbit Donna at September 28, 2012 01:58 PM (9+ccr)

10 "The flag of Islam will fly over the White House"

Posted by: Muslim Bros in Da Hood at September 28, 2012 01:58 PM (rlba9)

11 Napolean = Napoleon

Posted by: pep at September 28, 2012 01:58 PM (6TB1Z)

12 The problem isn't what normal people learn to live with.  The problem is 99% of the population can not afford to challenge these BS laws in court.



The other problem is that FDR had decades to stack the court with a complaint Senate. We have never had 16 years of Republican conservative rule with a complaint Senate.

Posted by: Vic at September 28, 2012 01:58 PM (YdQQY)

13 It's come to this: Nick Jr. Suspends Production On 'The Almighty Muhammad's Porkalicious Toon Jihad'

Posted by: LASue at September 28, 2012 01:59 PM (wAhNv)

14 So.... was the movie good or not?

I keeeeeed.


Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 45% more DOOM! at September 28, 2012 02:00 PM (xAtAj)

15 Scene 1 - (transvestite) Model in burka holding koran. "She" opens it to reveal that its one of those books with the middle carved out. It holds a big black dildo. You get the picture....

Posted by: Up with people! at September 28, 2012 02:00 PM (kzFo5)

16 Excellent post, Ace.

Posted by: Flatbush Joe at September 28, 2012 02:00 PM (ZPrif)

17 Four feet good, two feet bad.

Posted by: Animals in Da House at September 28, 2012 02:00 PM (rlba9)

18 Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didnÂ’t pass it on to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children's children what it was once like in the United States where men were free.

Posted by: Temper Tantrum at September 28, 2012 02:00 PM (AWmfW)

19 I'll wear a burqa as long as I can keep my free birth control.

Posted by: Sandra Fluke at September 28, 2012 02:00 PM (ECYvo)

20

>Suppose you accidentally click on a link and wind up seeing the raunchiest, most grotesque pornography imaginable.

>What do you do?

>You probably close the link and perhaps bark at whoever linked you to it.


That's as far as I got, realizing some imposter is posting in ace's name.

Posted by: Dr Spank at September 28, 2012 02:00 PM (0muQ0)

21 The Normative Power of Pornography......We see it all the time, until it becomes normal.

Posted by: So Ace is still mastering his domain? at September 28, 2012 02:01 PM (S1RjJ)

22 It's important to remember that Islam is not unstoppable. Islam has been defeated in the past. The Reconquista happened. The Gates of Vienna happened. It's not true that Islam always wins. It's rock-paper-scissors Muscular Christianity beats Violent Islam But Secularism beats Christianity And Islam beats Secularism

Posted by: Flatbush Joe at September 28, 2012 02:01 PM (ZPrif)

23 I was flipping through the radio channels today.  NPR has a story about the movie, you know which one.  They referred to the movie that slandered the prophet Muhammad.  Funny, I don't recall any stories involving Christianity using the phrase "our Lord and Savior" or "God's Only Son".  Must have been an oversight.

Posted by: pep at September 28, 2012 02:01 PM (6TB1Z)

24 I'm burned out....politics....muslims.....liberals.


Can you just post kitty and puppy videos for the next few weeks?  kthx.

Posted by: Tami at September 28, 2012 02:01 PM (X6akg)

25 Pick me! Pick Me!

Posted by: Hill to Die On at September 28, 2012 02:01 PM (rlba9)

26 Good points.  So, when are Obama and Holder going to take action to stop the continuous outrage against Islam that is pornography?

Posted by: Chairman LMAO at September 28, 2012 02:01 PM (9eDbm)

27 Tonight I'm going to be watching Ruggles of Red Gap, one of the truly great conservative films, just to reminisce about a time when it was just assumed that every American loved America and all it stood for.

That, or I may torch the Obama signs in the neighborhood. . .

What the Hell! Why not both?

Posted by: Otis Criblecoblis at September 28, 2012 02:01 PM (IlZPo)

28 That reminds me  when I was looking for a recipe on line for bacon wrapped shrimp. One of the "recipes" I clicked on was a porno site . Never did get the connection to the shrimp... Oh yeah..

Posted by: t Just palin Donna , new and improved... at September 28, 2012 02:02 PM (9+ccr)

29 The other problem is that FDR had decades to stack the court with a complaint Senate. We have never had 16 years of Republican conservative rule with a complaint Senate.

I dunno, I hear lots from a complaint Senate.  Harry Reid in particular.

Posted by: pep at September 28, 2012 02:02 PM (6TB1Z)

30

You know what are fighting words? 

 

"You cannot say that, because we don't like it."

 

 

Posted by: Alex at September 28, 2012 02:02 PM (3x3F6)

31 One of my high school classmates was killed in the South Tower on 9/11.  I cannot even verbalize the fury, sadness and other emotions that I feel about this all.

Posted by: DangerGirl (@deadlyestrogen) at September 28, 2012 02:03 PM (GrtrJ)

32 Different standards have been normalized for some time now. I reject it, and also reject political correctness. My kids spout all kinds of "that's so racist!" at things which are not, it makes me wonder as I set them straight.

Posted by: Justamom in Achin' Akin's district at September 28, 2012 02:03 PM (Sptt8)

33 >>>Excellent post, Ace. thanks for reading it. I have had this in my head for like 12 days. I just decided to pour it out.

Posted by: ace at September 28, 2012 02:03 PM (LCRYB)

34 This really is your best post ever.

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 02:04 PM (nVOyV)

35 When Rush Limbaugh made a joke about Sandra Fluke being a "slut," the story was kept alive for weeks.


That is because we have a POS MFM. 

Posted by: Vic at September 28, 2012 02:04 PM (YdQQY)

36 It's teaching what every parent knows.  When your child throws a tantrum in the middle of Piggly Wiggly because he can't have the gummy bears, and you buy him the gummy bears just to shut him up, you are going to be buying gummy bears for the rest of your life.

Metaphorically speaking.

Posted by: mama winger at September 28, 2012 02:05 PM (P6QsQ)

37 Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech.


Posted by: That Pesky Charter of Negative Liberties at September 28, 2012 02:05 PM (rlba9)

38 That is the most frightening post ever.

Posted by: USA at September 28, 2012 02:06 PM (RIg+t)

39 Think I'm going to have to bookmark this particular post and pass it along.  This is a keeper.

Posted by: mama winger at September 28, 2012 02:06 PM (P6QsQ)

40 The law is normative. It establishes our norms. Not really. Law can only elucidate already existing norms. If laws try to force behaviors that society rejects then those laws do nothing but serve to destabilize society, even though the laws may live on. In those cases, we tend to get selective enforcement of such laws and the Rule of Law, in general, is seriously damaged by the unwillingness of legislatures to withdraw laws that society refuses to accept as normal. Laws don't make societies. Societies make laws - and only civilized societies even have the ability to actually make laws. Savages run on "empathy" and rule by whim of special people. Leftists don't understand this whole cause-effect thingy. Then again, leftists don't want to understand this because leftists likme to think that they can shape society by scribbling a few idiocies on a piece of paper.

Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at September 28, 2012 02:06 PM (X3lox)

41 Up with people- Before you get busy making videos, you had better make sure you don't have any old parking tickets. Or overdue library books. And for God's sake, put the flow restricters back on your plumbing!

Posted by: Justamom in Achin' Akin's district at September 28, 2012 02:06 PM (Sptt8)

42 35 When Rush Limbaugh made a joke about Sandra Fluke being a "slut," the story was kept alive for weeks.

  Like Romneys alleged "gaffes". It all fits the narrative . Obama must be re elected at any cost.Integrity and truth be damned...

Posted by: t Just palin Donna , new and improved... at September 28, 2012 02:06 PM (9+ccr)

43 Since when do we, as a country, apologize for a terrorist attack against us?  Since when do we not retaliate with strength?  Since when do we bow down to a fucking "religion" cult that wants nothing more than to KILL EACH AND EVERY ONE OF US?

Posted by: DangerGirl (@deadlyestrogen) at September 28, 2012 02:06 PM (GrtrJ)

44 Oh look, it's Ace's review of Looper. At least, that's what it must be, I know a movie-review-length post when I see it.

Posted by: JDTAY at September 28, 2012 02:06 PM (a0nis)

45 Fuck islam notice the disrespectful lower case "i"

Posted by: phoenixgirl, still angry & ever vilgiliant at September 28, 2012 02:07 PM (MnXOU)

46

Reposting this because it's relevant to this thread as well:

 

279
I have a minor quibble with Ace's qualification of "strains" of Islam.

In 1979, the Shiites were the bad ones, taking our Embassy staff hostage and shouting "Death to America" in Tehran.

In 1991, it was the Sunni minority in Iraq who were oppressing the poor Shiites in Kuwait.

In 2001, it was the Wahabbi lunatics of the Afghan Taliban who were the violent ones spreading hatred of the West.

Now in 2012, it's the Salafists?

Fuck that. It's ISLAM that's the problem. Every time we attempt to stratify these fucking primates into their potential immediate danger to our security, we ignore the underlying problem:

Fucking ISLAM.

Posted by: Empire of Jeff, CEO - Jackboot Solutions, LLC at September 28, 2012 02:07 PM (ll6WS)

47 Somewhat OT but still relevant:  I'm a big fan of the BBC series "Foyle's War" about a senior British detective during WWII.  Last week they had an episode in which he tells a malefactor he caught that his contribution to the war effort will be to hang.  I can't imagine any story about a modern day detective being so blunt and bloodthirsty.  Britain has fallen so far.

We are on the same trajectory.

Posted by: pep at September 28, 2012 02:07 PM (6TB1Z)

48

That'll do, Ace.  That'll do.

Posted by: Count de Monet channeling Farmer Hoggett at September 28, 2012 02:07 PM (BAS5M)

49 Here's a look at how Sharia is sneaking into our courts from multiple directions (in my nic).
 
Also, ace says >> And it is teaching, finally, that 9/11 was, like any other spasm of violence against those who do not bow to Islam, a justifiable expression of dissatisfaction with United States policy and American values.
 
Ward Churchill certainly agrees with this statement/ideology.

Posted by: GnuBreed at September 28, 2012 02:07 PM (ccXZP)

50 The soft bigotry of low expectations. Liberals assume Muslims are children incapable of controlling their tantrums. So let's indulge the sweet little bastards.

Posted by: John the Libertarian at September 28, 2012 02:08 PM (bJQRu)

51 36  Precisely.  Some battles you must win decisively or you will be fighting them the rest of your life.  When did we don't negotiate with terrorists become we're so sorry we hurt your feelings?   

Posted by: no good deed at September 28, 2012 02:08 PM (mjR67)

52 I don't think this is anything more than fear.  Liberals are always afraid.  They are afraid Blacks will call them racists or worse act violently.  They are afraid women will act out either violently, as Code Pink has done, or through  ridicule.  They are afraid Hispanics are really just gang members who will act violently, as they do in Mexico.  They are afraid that Muslims will be violent.  That's really all it is...fear.  And now we have a person as President who leads from fear .  Liberals have come full circle from the days of Bill Ayers, the real Black Panthers, the SDS, etc. They intimidated but now are the ones being intimidated.  Which is worse?   Personally...I'd rather not be intimidated. 

Posted by: Deanna at September 28, 2012 02:08 PM (hh9tk)

53 Is normalization just another way to say "overton window"?


We have been shifting steadily left since the late 1800s. In the 60s we started giving up the desire to actually defend the country.


Now we have a lying shit-weasel for a President who apologizes for breathing when a group of 6th century savages invades an embassy and kills the ambassador because the same shit-weasel decided not to defend it.


If the founders could have magnets attached to their bones we would have a never ending power source.  The only problem is they would be spinning so fast it would take a massive number of poles to reduce the frequency.

Posted by: Vic at September 28, 2012 02:09 PM (YdQQY)

54

kill enough human begins

Pointing out the typo, because it is worth fixing.

Posted by: fluffy at September 28, 2012 02:09 PM (3SvjA)

55 Well done, ace.  Golf clap.  Sadly.

Posted by: eureka! at September 28, 2012 02:09 PM (cTjRR)

56 phoenixgirl. I do the same with muslim, islam, mohammed ,allah and president obama.None of them deserve  my respect

Posted by: t Just palin Donna , new and improved... at September 28, 2012 02:09 PM (9+ccr)

57 This post is brilliant, and I agree wholeheartedly with it. Regarding my previous conversation with Reactionary and others, this goes to my previous point: will. Our culture lacks the will to win and Islam does not. We have many many advantages over Islam including in terms of raw power and capability. And we'll eventually lose.

Posted by: Random at September 28, 2012 02:10 PM (u8eBQ)

58

A Canadian website's motto is

 

"Not showing up to riot" is a failed conservative policy.

Posted by: rd at September 28, 2012 02:10 PM (9sUlj)

59

My husband said yesterday...."Everything he does, is a part of his plan to destroy this country".

["he" = Barky] 

Now, mind you, my dearly beloved does not engage in political conversation with me very often.

[He hates politics, but contributes and votes.]

And he is not a 'conspiracy theorist'. 

 

But he is right...

When you look at everything that Barky has done...ever...it is all 'things that do harm' to our country.

So, what other conclusion could a thinking person come to?

Other than...'Barky is doing all of this on purpose, to destroy us'.

 

I ask you...what is One Thing....just one, single, thing...that TFG has done that is a good thing for the country?

 

'Destroying Our Laws' --- the subject of this thread, is a big one.

It's something that's been in the works for a while.

I fear that it is one of the final nails in our coffin.

 

We do ourselves a disservice, I think...by saying that TFG is a 'failure'.

He is succeeding at his prime directive -- to destroy us -- and succeeding at this rather well.

 

Posted by: wheatie at September 28, 2012 02:10 PM (l5RhJ)

60 I hope Obama wins and Texas secedes, I no longer wanted to associated with a people who are basically pussies.

Posted by: Dr Spank at September 28, 2012 02:10 PM (0muQ0)

61 This shows the creeping beliefs of the left on the rest of us. They believe that norms, mores, &c. are created by the state via the Volonté Générale. Thus they try to convince us that in order to have "freedom" then the state must promote the "freedom" (however the left defines it) and destroy criticism of the approved norms and morality. You have the legal freedom to do what you want, but you have no right to have people accept and agree with that, and ultimately you have to face the consequence of those choices. In truth, the government allowing something is not the same thing and that thing being acceptable. One can oppose it, be intolerant of it, and even try to stop it, without invoking the state to do so. The state, properly, is limited in its power and ought to have little to no effect other than to be conducive to virtue -- but not have the power to enforce it. The genius of America is that we have the freedom to choose wrong, but the virtue to do right. But that freedom is not one of being able to force others, via the law, to accept you, your actions, or your beliefs on others, just as other don't have the same power to do that to you. Society will self-regulate, and only rarely will it be great. Norms, mores, &c. will naturally evolve and setting into a somewhat stable equilibrium. What we are seeing here is the kneecapping of society to regulate itself, and substituting the state and the elite few who always exercise that power to impose their norms on others. Ultimately the goal of the left is clear: It is not to support anyones right to live their life the way they want, but the "right" to live the life that the elite few want you do live. Thus, they destroy the norms, mores, &c. of our civilization to impose their own. This will not end well...

Posted by: The Political Hat at September 28, 2012 02:11 PM (XvHmy)

62

Yeah, what Mama Winger said.  We've been treating the Middle East like a giant bad neighborhood for about three generations now.  Now we have a South Side of Chicago that reaches from the Pillars of Hercules to China.  And they're flash-mobbing the shopping malls and suburbs.

Great job there, best and brightest.  Great fucking job.  You thought your degrees and suits and power lunches and press conferences and book contracts meant you could ignore basic human nature and the universe would alter itself to suit your needs.  Now your kids and grandkids are going to have to beat the World Jihad or live with the consequences.  Rot in hell.

Posted by: Secundus at September 28, 2012 02:11 PM (t2Zxt)

63 Folks, if this scares you, it's time to get every breathing person to the polls in November.

Don't forget the next President will leave an everlasting mark on SCOTUS.

Any additional Obama nominees will cement our future as indentured servants of a socialist state.

Posted by: exile at September 28, 2012 02:11 PM (GGCsk)

64 This is ace's version of Wake The F*ck Up!, only with reasoned arguments and you know, proper English and stuff.  

Posted by: Joe Mama at September 28, 2012 02:12 PM (rlba9)

65 Lookit, weren't you a lawyer, or something? If the law is a viewpoint-based restriction, then the law is presumptively unconstitutional. the only barely constitutional viewpoint-based restriction is a Virginia ban on cross burning. That's it. Whatever it takes, huh, ace?

Posted by: Andrew Breitbart at September 28, 2012 02:12 PM (bTzlP)

66 True dat...now what?

Posted by: rukiddingme? at September 28, 2012 02:12 PM (MbeEN)

67 Wow, that was beautiful ace. Gotta send that one around.


Er, I mean: So how many death stars did this movie get?

Posted by: mugiwara at September 28, 2012 02:12 PM (XT2y5)

68 I find this post insulting and enraging and hope no harm is done in it's name.

Posted by: Mohammad Jackson at September 28, 2012 02:13 PM (0muQ0)

69 Really excellent work. Both Ace's post, and TPOP's rejoinder.

Posted by: B5D, from the phone at September 28, 2012 02:13 PM (5noOE)

70

"Suppose you accidentally click on a link and wind up seeing the raunchiest, most grotesque pornography imaginable.

What do you do?

You probably close the link and perhaps bark at whoever linked you to it."


I'd click on the related vids for more.

But seriously, that was a bit of good writing. I'm going to copy/paste this to some friends and claim it as my own.


Posted by: toliver at September 28, 2012 02:14 PM (fCAbm)

71

Islamic values are superior to American ones. After all, when the two come into conflict, which values win out?

_________________________

Hey, it's not like we were not warned ahead of time:  "If the political winds should shift in an ugly direction, I'll side with the Muslims."  Thus wrote Barry Hussein Obama, in Dreams From My Kenyan Commie Father Who Abandoned Me.

Posted by: Bystander at September 28, 2012 02:14 PM (/sohm)

72 Good read Ace. And it is teaching, finally, that 9/11 was, like any other spasm of violence against those who do not bow to Islam, a justifiable expression of dissatisfaction with United States policy and American values. Naturally...

Posted by: Rex Harrison's Hat at September 28, 2012 02:14 PM (4136b)

73 Just to add my 2 cents: It's important to note that Leftists are not opposed to norms or mores. What they are opposed to is established norms and/or mores and norms and/or mores which they deem to sustain/perpetuate "the patriarchy" / the Hegemony/Superiority of Western Civilization. It is also important to note that Leftists are not "anti-nomial." They are in fact hypernomial. They love laws and imposing laws (as long as they are the ones making the laws and imposing them, as is the case with mores and norms). In fact, their infatuation with Government and its (destructive) potential comes from their "nomophilic" nature. However, while Leftists embrace the Nomos, they reject Logic and consistency as they prefer absolutism and view Logic as an outdated Western and/or patriarchal value/construct which favors those with superior cognitive abilities and "discriminates" against the "cognitively challenged." And a final point on art: It is not only the law which teaches, but also art, and all the art that Leftists produce does serve to teach the previously mentioned "Leftist values," and consists, in fact, of little more than thinly veiled "morality plays" (at least when it is coherent.)

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 02:14 PM (nVOyV)

74 Well said, Ace.

Posted by: Sgt. York at September 28, 2012 02:14 PM (HMsD9)

75 phoenixgirl. I do the same with muslim, islam, mohammed ,allah and president obama.None of them deserve my respect ----- I do the same by spelling it "moslem". They consider it disrepectfull to spell it like that, even though just prior to 9/11 it was the common spelling. Checking CNN archives prior to that date proves that fact. Have never spelled it the other way.

Posted by: Up with people! at September 28, 2012 02:14 PM (kzFo5)

76 Well done Ace. Really appreciated the use of powerful one sentence paragraphs. I found it quite effective.

Posted by: JFirch at September 28, 2012 02:15 PM (Rq32D)

77

60 I hope Obama wins and Texas secedes, I no longer wanted to associated with a people who are basically pussies.

 

I think Oklahoma, Arkansas and Louisianna would join in with Texas.


 

Posted by: wheatie at September 28, 2012 02:15 PM (l5RhJ)

78 Makes me wonder if we're going to start seeing more violence at stupid lefty shit. Makes me wonder.

Posted by: EC at September 28, 2012 02:16 PM (doBIb)

79 Please report to FEMA Camp #235. Once there, you will be enlightened.

Posted by: Government Sensitive Religious Squad at September 28, 2012 02:16 PM (F6KtL)

80
Fuck it.....bottoms up mate!

Posted by: Hogs Breath Saloon, Key West, FL at September 28, 2012 02:16 PM (ndqJC)

81

Obama is a stuttering clusterf*ck of a miserable failure.

In view of current events I would suggest a small addition:

Obama is a stuttering clusterf*ck of a miserable failure and Mohammed was a pedophile.

Posted by: Secundus at September 28, 2012 02:16 PM (t2Zxt)

82 77 60 I hope Obama wins and Texas secedes, I no longer wanted to associated with a people who are basically pussies.

I think Oklahoma, Arkansas and Louisianna would join in with Texas.

Posted by: wheatie at September 28, 2012 06:15 PM (l5RhJ)

 If they were to do that there would be a stampede to those States...

Posted by: t Just palin Donna , new and improved... at September 28, 2012 02:16 PM (9+ccr)

83 I want to see every Islamic city destroyed in a nuclear fire.  I am so angry about this now, I want to see every goddamn Muslim and all of Islam annihilated, root and branch.

Posted by: BeckoningChasm at September 28, 2012 02:17 PM (DuH+r)

84 Is it time to spit on my hands, hoist the black flag, and slit some throats, yet?

Posted by: Normal Man That Is Tempted To at September 28, 2012 02:17 PM (S1RjJ)

85 83 I want to see every Islamic city destroyed in a nuclear fire. I am so angry about this now, I want to see every goddamn Muslim and all of Islam annihilated, root and branch.

Posted by: BeckoningChasm at September 28, 2012 06:17 PM (DuH+r)


  Pretty much what they would like to see happen to us..

Posted by: t Just palin Donna , new and improved... at September 28, 2012 02:18 PM (9+ccr)

86 83 Or, or, we could try converting some of them to Christianity first. "Convert or die" is still more moral than "Die!!!1"

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 02:18 PM (nVOyV)

87 It's not THAT bad...he's pretty tiny down there...

Posted by: Mohammed's Nine-Year Old Wife at September 28, 2012 02:18 PM (F6KtL)

88 thanks for reading it. I have had this in my head for like 12 days. I just decided to pour it out.

Posted by: ace at September 28, 2012 06:03 PM (LCRYB)


What's even worse, I dont think this appeasement is made by mistake , it's done by Obama and the likes to suppress freedom. MSM doing their part too.

They think they can use the raged mob to control civilized citizens.

Posted by: Temper Tantrum at September 28, 2012 02:18 PM (AWmfW)

89 It is a magnificent post, Ace. It's a real call to action.

My wife's a Deputy DA here in LA County. She runs a court calendar, and as chance would have it the attorney for TFG's latest political prisoner--you know, the Blasphemer--appeared in her court on an unrelated matter.

She knows him, so she talked to him a bit about that whole thing. He said (paraphrasing), "The media is now nothing but a Federal agency." He said that he received calls at 2 AM harassing him about a Bar disciplinary matter from years ago that didn't even involve him directly, merely his firm.

He also said that he is being harassed by his peers simply for defending the guy.

When my wife expressed our support for him, she said he was effusive in expressing his gratitude, and got visibly emotional.

I feel for the guy. I mean, one of the bedrock tenets of the legal profession is that everyone deserves representation, and there is no dishonor in representing any defendant, no matter how heinous the charges. It must be a horrible slap in the face to be thrown under the bus by the very people he expected would defend him.

For my part, I'm surprised that his peers aren't at least paying him lip service. It just shows how close we are to the edge in this country when so many people are so ready to flush the First Amendment like this.

Seriously, I need to look into some shootin' lessons.

Posted by: Otis Criblecoblis at September 28, 2012 02:18 PM (IlZPo)

90 The stuff Ace has discussed has been going on for a long long time in Europe, Canada, and increasingly in the US.  Though there has been some discussion of the issue, it mostly did not get major attention until now. 

I've been waiting for the right wing bloggers to wake up to this issue and become suitably outraged about violation of free speech rights due to fear of one particular violently inclined religion, and the patently biased approach to dealing with mockery of religion in our media and government.

Glad to see this thoughtful post. I hope more follows.

Posted by: CanadianGuy at September 28, 2012 02:18 PM (95GHD)

91 46 EoJ "279 I have a minor quibble with Ace's qualification of "strains" of Islam. ... ... I think your spellchecker helped you when you cut-and-pasted this passage. ... the word should be "stains". His points are then a bit clearer ...

Posted by: Arbalest at September 28, 2012 02:18 PM (FUwsR)

92 I want to see every Islamic city destroyed in a nuclear fire. I am so angry about this now, I want to see every goddamn Muslim and all of Islam annihilated, root and branch. ---- Mecca first, then medina.

Posted by: Up with people! at September 28, 2012 02:18 PM (kzFo5)

93 Much awesomeness, Ace, but could I register a quibble (maybe more than a quibble) about this "prophet of Christianity" business?  The analogy Muhammad:Islam::Jesus:Christianity is out of whack.  Christians don't believe that Jesus is a particularly great -- even the uniquely greatest -- prophet.  We believe that he's God.  Creator of the freaking universe.  Muslims revere Muhammad; Christians actually worship Jesus.  So insulting Jesus, demeaning Jesus, is infinitely worse in the eyes of a Christian than insulting Jesus is in the eyes of a Muslim.

And we put up with it anyway, and we don't get all stabby about it.

Posted by: Sockpuppet Czar at September 28, 2012 02:18 PM (XMEwl)

94 Imagine a debate where Romney honestly discussed the issues. Obama's view on killing babies born alive from botched abortions proves he does not have the moral character to lead this nation. Obama's view that the killing an Ambassador is a bump in the road proves he does not have the fortitude to be Commander in Chief. Obama's scapegoating the director of a video proves he has no understanding of the Constitution's First Amendment freedoms. Really, Romney could go on for hours, methodically destroying this little man.

Posted by: USA at September 28, 2012 02:18 PM (RIg+t)

95 I have been wondering a lot lately whether or not Obama is "evolving" on his own personal religious position. Wouldn't it be a hoot if he announced he had converted to Islam during his second term?

Posted by: janetoo at September 28, 2012 02:19 PM (R+fMx)

96 Closed integral, ace. Each sub-argument you present hits its target. But bring it all together, and you're right back where you started. So long as the idea of "needs killing" remains excised from the definition of "American Values," the paradox of islam as our de facto state religion will prevail. Same goes for the looks-like-a-person-but-who-can-be-sure Obamaphone bot. Same goes for the we-had-it-coming-that-Stevens-had-his-corpse-ass-raped jackass whose vote will count exactly as much as yours. There's an us. There's a them. Think hard about where the line between them is drawn.

Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at September 28, 2012 02:19 PM (ogdab)

97 For my part, I'm surprised that his peers aren't at least paying him lip service. It just shows how close we are to the edge in this country when so many people are so ready to flush the First Amendment like this.

Seriously, I need to look into some shootin' lessons.

Posted by: Otis Criblecoblis at September 28, 2012 06:18 PM (IlZPo)


  That story is chilling...

Posted by: t Just palin Donna , new and improved... at September 28, 2012 02:19 PM (9+ccr)

98 88 This.

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 02:19 PM (nVOyV)

99 Insulting Muhammad, I mean.  I may be a priest, but I live the approved AoSHQ lifestyle, and it's well past the Valu-Rite hour.

Posted by: Sockpuppet Czar at September 28, 2012 02:20 PM (XMEwl)

100 Just so's you know: The Islamists regard this capitulation as a victory, sure, but also Dawa. They're saving you, see, by this slow, corrosive method. Maybe not you, but they figure your grandkids will be muslims. Every tic in their favor proves it to them.

Posted by: uterus cannon at September 28, 2012 02:20 PM (RLTt1)

101 Suppose you accidentally click on a link and wind up seeing the raunchiest, most grotesque pornography imaginable. What do you do? On a more lighter note this reminds me of the first time I received a video via email, circa 1998 on Microsoft Mail. I was running a very quiet department of computer artists diligently working away. The subject was vague so I opened it - the video played immediately, filling the office with the sounds of an act you only hear about happening south of the border. I desperately slapped my keyboard with both hands until I hit the keyboard combo for quit. Most people had headphones on, thankfully.

Posted by: Rex Harrison's Hat at September 28, 2012 02:20 PM (4136b)

102

perhaps, Christians should riot in the street, with slapping cheeks over Piss Christ thing. seems to work for others.

 

I would ask this of the leadership we have.

Have any countries in the ME after the 'Arab Spring' (sounds pleasant doesn't it)   chosen a moderate or secular leadership for themselves?

 Remember this was a Choice for Msulims , and what was chosen?

see being a paranoid fool as i am , i would say that bodes ill for the idea that Islamic countries desire friendship / peace/ and gentle kindness to women, children or  countries existign around them.

Posted by: willow at September 28, 2012 02:20 PM (TomZ9)

103 Well done, Ace.

Posted by: Osoloco at September 28, 2012 02:20 PM (5Tzma)

104 Is Steevy "special"?

Posted by: nip at September 28, 2012 02:21 PM (11Tdq)

105 >>> Is normalization just another way to say "overton window"? Ace is referring to a subtly different concept, that of being normative in a philosophical sense. Normative refers to what one OUGHT to do. As Wikipedia currently puts it, "Generically, it means relating to an ideal standard or model." It'd different than, say, "descriptive": that which IS (but not necessarily what ought to be) or "methodological": that which is useful to accomplish a result, but isn't necessarily what is true or what ought to be the case.

Posted by: Random at September 28, 2012 02:21 PM (u8eBQ)

106 Arent libs big important people when it comes to lecturing about bullying, dont they have all the answers? Sooo....the answer is give up. No wonder they got all mealy over Clint. Amazing.

Posted by: Rev dr e buzz islam at September 28, 2012 02:21 PM (lAt8c)

107 All you need to make a video is a little HD GoPro and a box full of Legos. And imagination. Any mall in America has a kiosk where some friendly East Asian will sell you those little Lego action figures. All the Lego weapons, also. If your mall ain't got em, go on line. You can use Pla-Doh to mold some little turbans. Watch some Keshen8 vids for inspiration. Then get out your whiteboard, and story out a script, starring The Prophet.

Posted by: The littl shyning man at September 28, 2012 02:21 PM (PH+2B)

108 Okay, okay, stop me if you've heard this one before...A Jew, a Christian, and a Muslim walk into a bar...*BOOM!*

Posted by: Thanks, I'll Be Here All Day at September 28, 2012 02:21 PM (F6KtL)

109 "And it is teaching, finally, that 9/11 was, like any other spasm of violence against those who do not bow to Islam, a justifiable expression of dissatisfaction with United States policy and American values." (sorry, I condensed it for twitter) That's a strong, scary point, that's totally true and the end result of the liberal pathology. Something that Michael Moore expressed btw when he said, if this was done to punish booosh, then you hit the wrong people, the violence was ok to him otherwise.

Posted by: joeindc44 at September 28, 2012 02:22 PM (QxSug)

110

Would you say I have a plethora of words?

Posted by: el Guapo at September 28, 2012 02:22 PM (LHewR)

111  I was flipping through the radio channels today. NPR has a story about the movie, you know which one. They referred to the movie that slandered the prophet Muhammad. Funny, I don't recall any stories involving Christianity using the phrase "our Lord and Savior" or "God's Only Son". Must have been an oversight.

Posted by: pep at September 28, 2012 06:01 PM (6TB1Z)

___________________ 

Yes, and if we're going to have laws forbidding blasphemy against major religious figures, then we need to start with the blasphemies that Muslims routinely speak (and teach their children) against Jesus Christ. 

I refer to the Islamic tenets that hold that Jesus Christ was "just a prophet," that He was not divine, that He was not crucified on the cross, and that He did not rise from the dead on the third day after his crucifixion. 

These Islamic teachings are outrageous and offensive blasphemies against my religion, and I demand that the utterance of these types of anti-Christian blasphemy and "hate speech"  henceforth be punishable by law.

Posted by: Bystander at September 28, 2012 02:23 PM (/sohm)

112 or when the Noam Chomsky's of the world said we deserved it. It's basically, now, a non-agression pact being pro-offered by the left to Islamic terror.

Posted by: joeindc44 at September 28, 2012 02:23 PM (QxSug)

113

Posted by: Sockpuppet Czar

Maybe.  But I always thought cursing God would be kind of useless.  Like the roaches shaking their tiny roach fists at the Orkin guy--  You don't like me?  So what? 

But Mohammed?  He's just a guy who was lucky enough to be picked by God (or whoever it was who was talking to him--yeah, I went there).

Posted by: Secundus at September 28, 2012 02:23 PM (t2Zxt)

114

There is something that you're missing, Ace.  Free speech may be law as defined in the law of the land, our Constitution, but it'd also one of the inalienable rights give to us by God.  A lot of people take the inalienable right element a lot more seriously than a  law written by men.

 

Yeah, it breaks my heart, but this nation is going to split sooner or later if this keeps up.  And, yes, OK would  stand with TX if they decide to separate from DC.

Posted by: Soona at September 28, 2012 02:23 PM (3jiPV)

115 96 Actually, most problems can be resolved without killing anyone. Turn off your TV and think things through.

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 02:23 PM (nVOyV)

116 History is normative too, and American history teaches us that when a government becomes unresponsive to the ideals, values and just demands of the people and has demonstrated over time it will not change, it should be replaced--with no dishonor accruing to those needing to so do. In fact, the opposite.

Posted by: A. at September 28, 2012 02:24 PM (EiODI)

117 Ace, I don't need to remind you that liberals are not logical or factual. They deal in projection, supposition and desires.

They appeal to people sensory perceptions; what feels good, sounds good or is pleasing to their ego.

That's why liberal supporters are flocking to Obama over contraception, free health care and free cell phones.

It appeals to their inner, unadulterated desires and needs. It's not an intellectual appeal or interrupted by logical factual thinking and conclusions.

For example, free is never "free". Someone pays for it. But the recipients supporting Obama either don't care or even consider that. They believe there is an endless supply of "free" stuff and they are going to take theirs.

So, they don't care about the deficit, federal budget or anything else. They care about themselves and what they get. That only "normative" in the sense it is about or relating to their needs, desires and feelings.

So they largely don't care or understand the usurpation and diminishing of their rights. That's a logical, factual argument that largely related to "us" as a nation and they don't care until it affects them. Provided they continue to get their "free" stuff, irrespective of cost, they don't care. Even if it makes them subjects or slaves of a tyrannical government.

Posted by: marcus at September 28, 2012 02:24 PM (JxQPs)

118 And to add context to my previous, Ace is saying that this is what the law is teaching us we ought to do, what is "normative". And that it's scary as fuck.

Posted by: Random at September 28, 2012 02:24 PM (u8eBQ)

119 >>>"slanders" against the Prophet of Christianity

I beg to differ. Christ wasn't the "prophet" of Christianity, he was its Messiah. He was not a man, but God made man to speak his word directly to us. Islam, calls Christ a prophet. We call him Lord of lords, and King of kings, Mighty God, Father, the Prince of Peace.

Islam calls Mohammad Prophet of Allah. We say Christ IS God. To compare the desecration of the name of a Prophet (In Christianity like Isaiah or in the new testament John who wrote Revelations) to that of God himself? There isn't any equivalence.

Yet we act like civilized people in the face of what is clearly meant as an insult.

Posted by: MikeTheMoose Regular! With Full Stomping Power! at September 28, 2012 02:24 PM (0q2P7)

120 The moslems also have three separate words for peace. Each gets translated as "peace" in english but the word they use is: (google the phrase for the article) The three Arabic words translated as “peace” in English are salaam, hudna, and suhl. Salaam is the peace of submission. It’s the drawn out pronunciation of “slm” in “Islam,” (written Arabic has no vowels) the Arabic word for submission and obedience, and in “Moslem” or “Muslim,” the Arabic word for “one who submits.” There is peace, salaam, among Moslems when they submit to Allah and the teachings of the Koran. There is peace, salaam, between Moslems and kafirs, infidels, only when the latter submit to the rule of the former. In other words, salaam, Moslem peace, is not the absence of violence as it is for us, but the absence of disobedience. Just like it was for the Communists. In Lenin’s words:

Posted by: Up with people! at September 28, 2012 02:24 PM (kzFo5)

121 Nice rant, Ace. Sometimes, when I can't sleep at night, which happens often, I return to the computer. I look at time lapse videos taken from the ISS as the Milky Way unfurls in front of their eyes. Amazing stuff. Then I try to ponder the 250 billion other galaxies out there, like the Milky Way. Each with 200 billion stars. Each star with possibly one to tens of planets. Yet with the best possible optics available, we can only conjecture as to whether they have life on them. The best available evidence to date is that they are all inconsistent with life. So we are quite possibly alone in the incredibly unfathomable universe, on a planet with maybe 5,000 religions all proclaiming they are the one and only. If this is all God's plan, so be it. But I hope he doesn't mind that I'm gonna kill any summabitch child-rape endorsing religious zealot long before he kills me.

Posted by: Schrödinger's cat at September 28, 2012 02:24 PM (feFL6)

122 Somehow, I think, the 53% of us paying taxes should be concerned.

Posted by: joeindc44 at September 28, 2012 02:24 PM (QxSug)

123 >>>Ace, but could I register a quibble (maybe more than a quibble) about this "prophet of Christianity" business? The analogy Muhammad:Islam::Jesus:Christianity is out of whack. Christians don't believe that Jesus is a particularly great -- even the uniquely greatest -- prophe I know, I was going for a parallelism. He is A prophet, is he not?

Posted by: ace at September 28, 2012 02:25 PM (LCRYB)

124 I will never submit, never surrender!

Posted by: JoeinTX at September 28, 2012 02:25 PM (s+/GC)

125

Leftists don't understand this whole cause-effect thingy. Then again, leftists don't want to understand this because leftists likme to think that they can shape society by scribbling a few idiocies on a piece of paper.  Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at September 28, 2012 06:06 PM (X3lox)

...

Liberals are always afraid. Posted by: Deanna at September 28, 2012 06:08 PM (hh9tk)

...

Liberals assume Muslims are children incapable of controlling their tantrums. Posted by: John the Libertarian at September 28, 2012 06:08 PM (bJQRu)

...

...

I'm in awe of how much you horse gagging bronto sockets think that you know.  Complete awe.  Speaking of which, when you lose the presidency and the senate, there's gonna be a collective "awwwwww" from the electorate -- to you.  thanks again for all your efforts, as miniscule as they may actually be.

 

 

Posted by: Rupert Pupkin, Esq. at September 28, 2012 02:25 PM (icwKQ)

126 Or, or, we could try converting some of them to Christianity first.

------------


This truly is the only hope for islam.  For its people to convert from that monstrous ideology.  Might I suggest some sources that do a remarkable job in trying to help make that happen.  Voice of the Martyrs is one, Persecution.org is another.  I support both with a monthly check.

Posted by: mama winger at September 28, 2012 02:25 PM (P6QsQ)

127 scary as fuck, well summarized, duly ignored by everyone else. Gee, you know, maybe Carter is now the best case scenario because it's more like FDR is our worst case scenario complete with totalitarians marching across borders overseas (and here)

Posted by: joeindc44 at September 28, 2012 02:26 PM (QxSug)

128

'Actually, most problems can be resolved without killing anyone.


Turn off your TV and think things through.'

 

 

 

Exactly! And don't worry about the killing, our side has that covered.

Posted by: Mohammed...Not THAT one, just the terrorist down the street at September 28, 2012 02:26 PM (F6KtL)

129 No. They are learning that threatening violence, or actually engaging in violence, is not futile at all, but rather achieves the precise goals they seek (a de facto prohibition against Islam or Mohammad, and no other religion).
---
It's worse than that even. Everyone now knows that the video had nothing to do with the embassy attack, and only is related to the rest of the rioting insofar as someone told them about it. Obama is teaching the savages that engaging in violence amongst themselves is enough to sway us. It's like how the fakestinians whine about how the Israelis are going to slaughter them the next time they pick a fight-which the damn europeans fall for every time.

Posted by: Methos at September 28, 2012 02:26 PM (6LvlL)

130 Caveat emptor, my foolish fellow Americans. Well said Ace.

Posted by: TD at September 28, 2012 02:26 PM (JmO0O)

131 Nice piece.

Posted by: JackStraw at September 28, 2012 02:26 PM (TMB3S)

132 Why is Islamophobia considered a bad thing. In almost all Islamic countries I would be arrested, if not murdered,for saying what I believe --- that Muhammad was not a prophet and that Islam is false. I think I have a pretty good reason for being scared (phobic) of Islam.

Posted by: Flatbush Joe at September 28, 2012 02:27 PM (ZPrif)

133 Suppose you accidentally click on a link and wind up seeing the raunchiest, most grotesque pornography imaginable. What do you do?
Ask Ace to ban her and her cats.

Posted by: andycanuck at September 28, 2012 02:27 PM (vDl/w)

134 behead those whole call jesus a prophet!

Posted by: joeindc44 at September 28, 2012 02:28 PM (QxSug)

135

islam can't exist without coecion from the State.

I am of the opinion that this makes it something other than a religion.

Posted by: garrett at September 28, 2012 02:28 PM (LHewR)

136 >>> Free speech may be law as defined in the law of the land, our Constitution, but it'd also one of the inalienable rights give to us by God. A lot of people take the inalienable right element a lot more seriously than a law written by men. Soona, as an atheist, my initial temptation is to want to dismiss this, but actually I think you're on to something important. One reason why I fear (and believe it is likely) that Islam will win this class of civilisations, is that they have more genuine religious belief than do western societies. Now western societies USED to have lots of genuine, religious belief, but science has allowed more people to abandon their beliefs as more plausible explanations for things have been forthcoming. But Islam is less susceptible to this both the number of believers and -- even more importantly -- the amount of genuine belief per believer, for the simple reason that they kill or otherwise seriously socially punish apostates. This tips the genuine "belief" scale toward Islam, and results in greater, more unified will.

Posted by: Random at September 28, 2012 02:28 PM (u8eBQ)

137 The problem with converting moslems to Christianity is that they would simply lie.  Remember, their religion says lying is perfectly justifiable to non-believers.  So they'd lie, say Hi we're Christians now, and slit our throats.  They have chosen to be savages.  They have chosen badly.

Posted by: BeckoningChasm at September 28, 2012 02:28 PM (DuH+r)

138 Really well done, ace.
Thanks.

Posted by: MrShad at September 28, 2012 02:29 PM (Xqfwb)

139 Dang, had to step away and the point is probably already made, but you are spot on with one exception Ace.  It is not the law that is allowing this; it is as you said later because it is being ignored.  It is Obama's unfitness for the job, his lack of understanding, that is causing this.  Unfortunately, I cannot chide Obama without also chiding the 52.9%.  How many voted for this man simply because of the color of his skin?  They too are to blame and hopefully ashamed.

Posted by: dogfish at September 28, 2012 02:29 PM (N2yhW)

140 *clash

Posted by: Random at September 28, 2012 02:29 PM (u8eBQ)

141

'islam can't exist without coecion from the State.
I am of the opinion that this makes it something other than a religion.'

 

 

WHAT? HOW DARE YOU! OFF TO RE-EDUCATION CAMP  FOR YOU MISTER!

Posted by: Teh State! at September 28, 2012 02:29 PM (F6KtL)

142 The first mistake and the nearly constant mistake in considering anything to do with radical moozlims is projectionism. We ascribe our qualities to them, as a matter of our civilization. After the fact they walk on two legs, there's nothing they have in common with us. Most of us could never understand them.

Posted by: Justamom in Achin' Akin's district at September 28, 2012 02:29 PM (Sptt8)

143 Thanks Ace- well stated!

Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at September 28, 2012 02:29 PM (ND7TC)

144 Brilliant analysis as usual,  Ace my brother! (Yeah- I'm usually just a lurker, but I've decided to be more vocal. Well... if typing can be considered "vocal."

Posted by: Civenti Tu Vergens (formerly known as Coach Marty) at September 28, 2012 02:29 PM (g4fjO)

145 117 Some good points in this one.

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 02:30 PM (nVOyV)

146 >>>He is A prophet, is he not?

No he is Messiah in Christianity. That's a whole different category than Prophet. It's like saying a text message is the same thing as a full set of Encyclopedias because they both have words.

Posted by: MikeTheMoose Regular! With Full Stomping Power! at September 28, 2012 02:30 PM (0q2P7)

147

Nice piece.

 

Thanks.

Posted by: Ron Jeremy at September 28, 2012 02:30 PM (LHewR)

148 This is a big reason we need to change our immigration system. We should only allow high-skilled, high IQ immigrants. We should do everything possible to limit immigration of Muslims. Mainly by limiting immigration from Muslim countries. We are doing the opposite in reality. In particular we have dramatically increased immigration from black Muslim countries. 70% of our immigrants are family reunification. Canada has 70% of their immigrants are high-skilled job applicants.

Posted by: Flatbush Joe at September 28, 2012 02:31 PM (ZPrif)

149 >>> He (Jesus) is A prophet, is he not? I'm an atheist, but theologically speaking, I'm thinking He's more the one who was prophesized. He's GOD, after all.

Posted by: Random at September 28, 2012 02:32 PM (u8eBQ)

150 Actually, most problems can be resolved without killing anyone. Turn off your TV and think things through. Please explain to me how to reach muslims through any method other than showing them that an inability to pull their heads out of their medieval-thinking asses will result in grievous pain they will be unwilling to bear. At work, this can be done with the threat of firing. When it comes to existential questions, what is the parallel?

Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at September 28, 2012 02:32 PM (ogdab)

151 121 It wasn't a rant. (And you're not going to kill anyone. People who brag about that stuff almost never do.)

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 02:32 PM (nVOyV)

152 @148, how dare you! We must import only those who will be quickly molded into cradle to grave, spoonfed democrat voters.

Posted by: joeindc44 at September 28, 2012 02:32 PM (QxSug)

153 I have never heard of that movie that Ace jus reviewed

Posted by: The Jackhole at September 28, 2012 02:32 PM (DU15A)

154

the video is  only a useful tool to use for the lefts goals anyway. will it stop at videos?

believe it will stop at disrespestive ads ?

 

 

how convenient for them.

that half the country are fools that would sell themselves out for a cell phone.

Posted by: willow at September 28, 2012 02:33 PM (TomZ9)

155 148-I have been assured there is no conspiracy, just dumb luck. Post itself gets me quoting Mencken.

Posted by: nip at September 28, 2012 02:33 PM (11Tdq)

156 123 Founder would have gotten the parallelism across better.

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 02:33 PM (nVOyV)

157 Ace: Excellent post. Well said. "The law is normative. It teaches. It compels. It forbids. And its compulsions and prohibitions become internalized." ... and who controls (the making of) The Law? We do, or would, if we stood up more. It seems about time to stand up to the NY MTA. (Yes, I live in CA, and haven't been to NY in 10 years. I can only speak up and wait for CA to follow NY)

Posted by: Arbalest at September 28, 2012 02:33 PM (FUwsR)

158 I know Jesus was prefigured and prophecized but did he not also prophecize?

Posted by: ace at September 28, 2012 02:33 PM (LCRYB)

159 how convenient for them.
that half the country are fools that would sell themselves out for a cell phone.

Posted by: willow at September 28, 2012 06:33 PM (TomZ9)


  And 11 dollars an hour from the seiu...

Posted by: t Just palin Donna , new and improved... at September 28, 2012 02:34 PM (9+ccr)

160 125 ?

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 02:34 PM (nVOyV)

161 So if someone runs an ad: 9/11 the Act of Savages Is that allowed-in NYC?

Posted by: tasker at September 28, 2012 02:34 PM (r2PLg)

162 Ah, reminds me of when I was a student at the University of Washington and the library rooms would be closed off for Muslim students to pray. Or when the Muslim Student Association booth would be next to The LGBT booth. Irony at its finest.

Posted by: Zach at September 28, 2012 02:34 PM (F6KtL)

163 Jesus is prophet, priest and king. Ace knows his stuff better than most militant atheists. (Drawing contrast not calling him one )

Posted by: Hobojerky at September 28, 2012 02:34 PM (fH34O)

164

He is A prophet, is he not?<<<<<<

 

Jesus is considered a prophet.  In Islam.

Posted by: Empire of Jeff, CEO - Jackboot Solutions, LLC at September 28, 2012 02:34 PM (JDIKC)

165 I know Jesus was prefigured and prophecized but did he not also prophecize?

Posted by: ace

He is about whom was prophecized.

Posted by: dogfish at September 28, 2012 02:35 PM (N2yhW)

166 126 Thanks. I'll look into them.

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 02:35 PM (nVOyV)

167 Since erg and Retard have chimed in, I remind everyone: Trolls. Cock. Choice.

Posted by: mediumheadboy at September 28, 2012 02:35 PM (aHR5E)

168 128 Did you turn off your TV and think things through?

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 02:36 PM (nVOyV)

169 Guys, Jesus is a prophet of the father as well in Christianity. Prophet, priest and king.

Posted by: Hobojerky at September 28, 2012 02:36 PM (fH34O)

170 In Islamic World-- Religion submits the State!

Posted by: Sheikh Smirnoff at September 28, 2012 02:36 PM (r2PLg)

171 167 Since erg and Retard have chimed in, I remind everyone:

Trolls.

Cock.

Choice.

Posted by: mediumheadboy at September 28, 2012 06:35 PM (aHR5E)


  Yeah, they have been unusually quiet today...

Posted by: t Just palin Donna , new and improved... at September 28, 2012 02:36 PM (9+ccr)

172 "Jesus is considered a prophet. In Islam." This is exactly right. Whereas Christians consider him Messiah/God.

Posted by: Random at September 28, 2012 02:36 PM (u8eBQ)

173 Did you turn off your TV and think things through? Go fuck yourself.

Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at September 28, 2012 02:36 PM (ogdab)

174 **153 I have never heard of that movie that Ace jus reviewed** Well, I assure you, it was vile and disgusting, quite particularly vile and not of any artistic merit, simply the exact moral equivalent of yelling fire in a movie theater.

Posted by: joeindc44 at September 28, 2012 02:37 PM (QxSug)

175 These first amendment posts need some support from the second, google: NRA Project Appleseed Cheaper then dirt Impact guns

Posted by: Jean at September 28, 2012 02:37 PM (ilc7b)

176 132 Because Leftism is strong and we are weak. That's why.

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 02:37 PM (nVOyV)

177 Which of the Founding Fathers said that in order for this republic to work and for its people to remain free, its citizens had to be people of a religious foundation,  that is wasn't suited for people without that?    There are certain norms that the law is based on.  We used to share these norms because we shared a certain moral foundation.  Now many, and the majority of the left, have abandoned that guiding foundation and have substituted their own heavy-handed one, subject to the fashions of the day, and without a moral compass to ground it. The one they have inserted is foreign to our founding documents, and now we have to choose which way we want to go.  They say their way is "forward".  I think it is just the opposite.  Their way  descends into slavery.


Posted by: mama winger at September 28, 2012 02:37 PM (P6QsQ)

178 but it's racist to criticize brown people or to react to their violence

Posted by: joeindc44 at September 28, 2012 02:37 PM (QxSug)

179 And I would wholly agree the law is normative in this particular case. Mr Obama has established that believers in islam will receive special treatment ESPECIALLY when they use violence.

Things aren't moving according to  islam's liking? Violent action will follow and be rewarded.

Which doesn't bode well for the future- does it?

What was the excuse for September 11th? Isn't there more than adequate excuse for a repeat?

Will people call our Mr. Obama for the dangerous game he is playing and of another attack falls upon us- the result?

No of course not/ Look at Libya, the deception and dishonest game the press is playing.

Posted by: marcus at September 28, 2012 02:37 PM (JxQPs)

180 Truly chilling Ace, excellent post. And our current society is raising a generation of passive, good little conformists, despite all the hip slogans out there to the contrary. I hope the budding Reagans and Thatchers and Churchills out there stand up and stand strong, to help us beat back the waves of tyranny advancing on us from all sides. Thanks for being one of those leading the charge.

Posted by: LizLem at September 28, 2012 02:37 PM (8wqqE)

181
>>>Our culture lacks the will to win and Islam does not.


Oh but we have a binary culture. The red/blue state thing is not just a political divide.
Which states have stand your ground laws? Which a duty to retreat?

More importantly, which states do not despise Christianity and martial vigor?

Posted by: typo dynamofo at September 28, 2012 02:38 PM (pjT+p)

182 hey, man, not all muslims are violent or support violence. Just enough do.

Posted by: joeindc44 at September 28, 2012 02:38 PM (QxSug)

183 we need a new era of cultural confidence.

Posted by: joeindc44 at September 28, 2012 02:38 PM (QxSug)

184 In Christianity, Mohammad is not considered at all.

Posted by: Dr Spank at September 28, 2012 02:38 PM (0muQ0)

185 Think of it this way, Ace: God (the father) made numerous statements about how things were going to be, but we still don't class Him as a prophet. Likewise Jesus to Christians. Muslims, on the other hand, consider Jesus merely a prophet.

Posted by: Random at September 28, 2012 02:39 PM (u8eBQ)

186

Did you turn off your TV and think things through?

 

 

 

NO! MY RAGE IS UNCONTROLLABLE! YOU MUST SUBMIT TO OUR WILL OR....OR...OUR RAGE IS UNCONTROLLABLE!!

Posted by: Mohammed...Not THAT one, but will kill you nevertheless at September 28, 2012 02:39 PM (F6KtL)

187 not all muslims are violent or support violence. --- True, but the ones that aren't/don't rarely speak out against those who are/do.

Posted by: mediumheadboy at September 28, 2012 02:39 PM (aHR5E)

188 136 Also, it could be that Arabs and other Muslims understand the value of theism (even from an atheistic perspective) whereas millions of sexy blond (wannabe) "Western atheists" seem to completely miss it.

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 02:39 PM (nVOyV)

189

didnt we pay for piss christ

Posted by: california red at September 28, 2012 02:39 PM (Ho3p+)

190

Posted by: ace at September 28, 2012 06:33 PM (LCRYB)

___

There's a story from the bible where he stood on a hill overlooking Jerusalem and cried because he knew the fate of the city.

Posted by: kallisto at September 28, 2012 02:39 PM (jm/9g)

191 183 we need a new era of cultural confidence.

Posted by: joeindc44 at September 28, 2012 06:38 PM (QxSug)


  Well that's difficult in a Country that defines itself as hyphenated Americans...

Posted by: t Just palin Donna , new and improved... at September 28, 2012 02:39 PM (9+ccr)

192 What was the excuse for September 11th? Isn't there more than adequate excuse for a repeat? That's not the core question. The core question is, "What was it that emboldened the backwards-ass perpetrators of 9/11 to do what they did?" The answer: The western left.

Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at September 28, 2012 02:39 PM (ogdab)

193

176 132

Stop this annoying shit.

Posted by: fluffy at September 28, 2012 02:39 PM (3SvjA)

194

Yes, and if we're going to have laws forbidding blasphemy against major religious figures, then we need to start with the blasphemies that Muslims routinely speak (and teach their children) against Jesus Christ.
I refer to the Islamic tenets that hold that Jesus Christ was "just a prophet," that He was not divine, that He was not crucified on the cross, and that He did not rise from the dead on the third day after his crucifixion.
These Islamic teachings are outrageous and offensive blasphemies against my religion, and I demand that the utterance of these types of anti-Christian blasphemy and "hate speech" henceforth be punishable by law.

Posted by: Bystander at September 28, 2012 06:23 PM (/sohm)

 

This is one way of fighting back.  And  preferable to some of the ideas I have.  This is a good first step.  Make the supporters of these savages live up to their rules. 

 

 

 

Posted by: rd at September 28, 2012 02:40 PM (9sUlj)

195 Ace, Jesus' stature is also the difference between Christianity and Judaism.  The Jews didn't make the connection that the one prophecized about in the Old Testemant is Jesus.  Jews too simply look upon Jesus as a prophet and not the One.

Posted by: dogfish at September 28, 2012 02:40 PM (N2yhW)

196 thus, the end result of multi-culti america bashing, no cultural confidence

Posted by: joeindc44 at September 28, 2012 02:40 PM (QxSug)

197 Speaking of the law,
A guy gets a great deal on a Tahoe and after the deal is done, funded and finalized. The guy gone home for a while and loving his new ride, the dealership realizes they fucked up and sold the Tahoe $5600 under their cost. So they call the guy up and say "We need you to come back and give us more money."
He says "A deal is a deal, I have a contract. Fuck off."
So the dealership calls the police and claim he stole the vehicle, an arrest warrant is issued and the guy goes to jail. The DA sees this whole thing is bogus and drops the charges with prejudice.
The dealership now says,"Let's let bygones be bygones, M'kay?"
"Keep the Tahoe with our blessing."
He's suing for 2.2 extra large plus attorney fees.

http://tinyurl.com/byetwomillion
Fuckin' Democrats too

Posted by: panzernashorn at September 28, 2012 02:40 PM (BAnPT)

198 137 I'm willing to risk it at least for the purpose of empiricism. (And I'm not convinced that they're the only ones who chose to be savages. In fact, They didn't have a choice at all.)

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 02:40 PM (nVOyV)

199 Jesus arguably refers to himself as a prophet at Mark 4:6 and John 4:44, and Peter speaks of Jesus as a prophet in Acts 3.  And the phrase "prophet, priest, and king" is reasonably common as a description of Jesus in Christian theology and hymnody.  But because Christians regard Jesus as so much more than a prophet -- in a way that Muslims certainly don't regard Muhammad is more than a prophet -- you can see why the expression "prophet of Christianity" would make us a little uneasy.

Posted by: Sockpuppet Czar at September 28, 2012 02:41 PM (XMEwl)

200 Ace is right-

Jesus- "I will destroy the temple and raise it up in 3 days."


Posted by: typo dynamofo at September 28, 2012 02:41 PM (pjT+p)

201 not all muslims are violent or support violence.

---

True, but the ones that aren't/don't rarely speak out against those who are/do.

Posted by: mediumheadboy at September 28, 2012 06:39 PM (aHR5E)

 

This ^ x eleventy

Posted by: The Jackhole at September 28, 2012 02:41 PM (DU15A)

202 134behead those whole call jesus a prophet!

Posted by: joeindc44 at September 28, 2012 06:28 PM (QxSug) ..

...

...

...

here's a thought - just behead the deists altogether, especially the ones who just PRETEND to love jeebus and his daddy, like the horse gobbling sub-normals that populate this grungy little pathetic corner of the Liberturdian Republicunt broom closet.

Posted by: Rupert Pupkin, Esq. at September 28, 2012 02:41 PM (icwKQ)

203

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney

Control your aspberger's

Posted by: fluffy at September 28, 2012 02:41 PM (3SvjA)

204 >>>I know Jesus was prefigured and prophecized but did he not also prophecize?

He told of prophecy, that doesn't make him a prophet. Technically those that wrote down what he said were the prophets. You see prophets are ordinary humans who get (a) message(s) from God. Their lives outside the dutiful dissemination of that message is unimportant.

Christ, was God. Everything he did on Earth, from when he washed his feet, to when he was doodling in the sand is studied and interpreted as a direct action of God.

God is not a Prophet, God has Prophets. If God gives you a prophecy God isn't the Prophet, you are.

Posted by: MikeTheMoose Regular! With Full Stomping Power! at September 28, 2012 02:41 PM (0q2P7)

205

"It's teaching people that terrorism is justified."

 

Good point but par for the course for these assholes.

 

Occupy Wall Street, Bill Ayers and countless others agree.  To them this society deserves to be terrorized.

Posted by: little billy badass at September 28, 2012 02:41 PM (xXhWA)

206 Da derp dee derp! I made poopies on myself.

Posted by: Retard Fuckwit Esq. at September 28, 2012 02:42 PM (aHR5E)

207 139 The law is whatever those with power say it is. That is the "natural human way" and we are all "natural humans" now (and equal, too).

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 02:42 PM (nVOyV)

208

Posted by: Rupert Pupkin, Esq. at September 28, 2012 06:41 PM (icwKQ)

___

 

You know how I know Jesus is God? Because God is Love and Jesus loves even ignorant corny asswipes such as yourself.

Posted by: kallisto at September 28, 2012 02:43 PM (jm/9g)

209 >>>Now western societies USED to have lots of genuine, religious belief, but science has allowed more people to abandon their beliefs as more plausible explanations for things have been forthcoming. But Islam is less susceptible to this both the number of believers and -- even more importantly -- the amount of genuine belief per believer, for the simple reason that they kill or otherwise seriously socially punish apostates.

I'm picking this out of many posts that I'd have earlier responded to, but generally:

-Islam isn't as monolithic as it appears at first glance. The typical goatherd that goes to mosque regularly often isn't entirely literate and doesn't think deeply on topics within Islam. There is an entire class of clerics that interpret how you should wipe your bum for just these kinds of muslims.

- Islam is vulnerable in exactly the parts where they scream the loudest. Isn't that obvious? They cannot tolerate mockery. They cannot tolerate critical inquiry into the origins of the Koran. They cannot tolerate depictions of their scumbag prophet and his actions.

- There are varieties within that faith, with the basic first division being those who think the koran is third revelation from God in line after the Torah and the Bible, and those who think that it existed before any of those any those earlier Books are therefore perversions. The latter are extremists. If you can show the Koran as having changed over time, they fold. There is very little Koranic archeology or lit crit - wonder why?

Posted by: uterus cannon at September 28, 2012 02:43 PM (RLTt1)

210 Baer just admitted FOx News uses a sampling weighted D +3. 


Party registration overall in the USA is now R + 3



so...

Posted by: Major _____ de Coverly at September 28, 2012 02:43 PM (Dll6b)

211 I know Jesus was prefigured and prophecized but did he not also prophecize?

Posted by: ace at September 28, 2012 06:33 PM (LCRYB)

While He's refered to as prophet, priest, and king I don't think it's meant the same way. When Isaiah prophecied, he was repeating what God told him (possibly via an angel). When Jesus 'prophecied' it was more a matter of saying "Here's what I'm going to do."



Posted by: Methos at September 28, 2012 02:43 PM (6LvlL)

212

So this is how Liberty dies....with thunderous dhimmitude.

Posted by: Firing the Sith in the White House in November at September 28, 2012 02:43 PM (S1RjJ)

213 >>> "True, but the ones that aren't/don't rarely speak out against those who are/do." And quite understandably, considering the degree of violence and social consequences short of violence that they'd face in doing so. I mean, how many people "spoke out" against the Church during the Inquisition? Comparatively Islam makes that period look cozy.

Posted by: Random at September 28, 2012 02:44 PM (u8eBQ)

214 Jews too simply look upon Jesus as a prophet and not the One. Posted by: dogfish at September 28, 2012 06:40 PM (N2yhW) Jews don't consider Jesus a prophet. I don't know where you heard this. Jews consider Jesus to have been a Jew. That's about it.

Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at September 28, 2012 02:44 PM (X3lox)

215 142 I can understand them. (And you could too.) Their actions are hardly incomprehensible. Few things ever are.

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 02:44 PM (nVOyV)

216 Bret Baier may be the last true journalist.

Posted by: LASue at September 28, 2012 02:45 PM (wAhNv)

217 There are entire Christian dissertations and arguments around the meaning of Dt 18:15. Not sure why you are being so coy. I suppose there is a point, but I am not following.

Posted by: marcus at September 28, 2012 02:45 PM (JxQPs)

218 This whole post just about sums up the whole push for gay marriage.. The normative effect of the law.

Posted by: rlly at September 28, 2012 02:45 PM (8nysw)

219 Baier; eine echte Deutsche Name


Alles klar auf die Andrea Doria....

Posted by: Major _____ de Coverly at September 28, 2012 02:45 PM (Dll6b)

220 Jesus did indeed prophecy, in that He described events as they would unfold, and encouraged His listeners to act on that information.  The use of the descriptor "Jesus as Prophet" is not used particularly in Christian circles as it tends to narrow and under-represent His greater  mission and being, which was primarily as Messiah, Redeemer, and Savior, and as the Word of God made flesh.

Posted by: mama winger at September 28, 2012 02:45 PM (P6QsQ)

221

Baer just admitted FOx News uses a sampling weighted D +3.


Party registration overall in the USA is now R + 3



so...

 

 

BUT WHAT ABOUT ROMENY'S GAFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFESSS??????

Posted by: TEH TROOF MEDIA!!! at September 28, 2012 02:45 PM (F6KtL)

222 Great post, ace.   This war against freedom of expression re Islam has been an OIC-Muslim Brotherhood-Left plan for ten years at least.  The last two provisions of the Cairo Declaration of Human Rights in Islam should have been a warning back in 1990.   Instead we're following Europe into another stupid idea. 

Posted by: Beagle at September 28, 2012 02:45 PM (sOtz/)

223 I'm certainly no spokesman for the Jew, so fine Jews don't even look upon Jews as a prophet.

Posted by: dogfish at September 28, 2012 02:45 PM (N2yhW)

224

Please explain to me how to reach muslims through any method other than showing them that an inability to pull their heads out of their medieval-thinking asses will result in grievous pain they will be unwilling to bear. Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at September 28, 2012 06:32 PM (ogdab)...

 ..

.

.. ..

medieval-thinking?  have you ever seen catholics in costume?  what century do you think governs their clothing style and philosophy? 

Posted by: Rupert Pupkin, Esq. at September 28, 2012 02:46 PM (icwKQ)

225 150 That works. (And it doesn't necessitate murdering them all.) (In fact, if you murder them all, you're missing the full potential of that tactic.)

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 02:46 PM (nVOyV)

226 wth 202? sic semper tyranis if not a meta-ironic-troll, we've seen enough of that last century.

Posted by: joeindc44 at September 28, 2012 02:46 PM (QxSug)

227 err Jesus <--> Jew

Posted by: dogfish at September 28, 2012 02:46 PM (N2yhW)

228 >Suppose you accidentally click on a link and wind up seeing the raunchiest, most grotesque political pornography imaginable. -------- That's MSNBC featuring Big Ed wearing a gimp suit, Larry Odon in assless chaps and Maddow sporting a strap on modeled from Jason Bigg's diseased manhood.

Posted by: Wonkish Rogue at September 28, 2012 02:46 PM (AjH+Y)

229 Other than having to drive the Tahoe, seems like a good case.

Posted by: Jean at September 28, 2012 02:46 PM (OTtAK)

230 Bravo Ace, I agree 100%.

Posted by: lael at September 28, 2012 02:46 PM (QSB5R)

231

Go for it, Rupert.  Full Libtard.  It's not like you're going to be banned.

 

What else you got, bitch?

Posted by: Empire of Jeff, CEO - Jackboot Solutions, LLC at September 28, 2012 02:46 PM (JDIKC)

232 Has Special Report changed formats today? The panel section started early. I mainly watch FoxNews from 6:40-7:00 PM to watch the panel and Kraut's Hammer. Sometimes O'Reilly's opening Talking Points just to see. Otherwise it's Drudge, Ace, HotAir, and WZ for my political news.

Posted by: Flatbush Joe at September 28, 2012 02:46 PM (ZPrif)

233 Funny statue that requires police protection. Googling the phrase below will bring up the article: Two years ago, on April 16, 2006, during the height of the Danish cartoon affair, this website published a photo of the pulpit to show that there is a long tradition of depicting Mohammed in European iconography. Last Friday the Turkish newspaper Yeniçag reprinted our picture on its front page with the caption “Stop this hideous insult.” Yeniçag demands that Belgium remove the pulpit. The paper writes that “We have had the crusades and now they are still trying to humiliate us. This is as bad as the Danish cartoons and Geert Wilders’s Fitna movie in the Netherlands. Even Pope Benedict does nothing to stop these humiliations.”

Posted by: Up with people! at September 28, 2012 02:46 PM (kzFo5)

234 Check this out. Jay-Z told MTV: “I don’t even like the word politics,” Jay-Z told MTV News. ”It implies something underhanded and I think we need less government.”
Then he said he was voting for Obama... because he's black.
I mean... you don't have to be an idiot to be a rapper do you?

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at September 28, 2012 02:47 PM (r4wIV)

235 158 That's actually a good point. Well done.

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 02:47 PM (nVOyV)

236

176  Because Leftism is strong and we are weak. That's why.

We aren't weak, our leaders and media figures are weak and they assume we share their views and want to bend over and kiss the behinds of the unwashed protesting masses in the Middle East to avoid the 'trouble' it will cause. 

If all of the American people shared the values of the policital and media 'elites' we wouldn't have a military. We wouldn't have gun ownership. I think most people have given up paying attention to the media and the politicians since most of what they put out isn't even useful for fertilizer.

Posted by: AdamPM at September 28, 2012 02:47 PM (KQUMx)

237 Posted by: Rupert Pupkin, Esq. at September 28, 2012 06:46 PM (icwKQ)


what's that smell????

Posted by: Major _____ de Coverly at September 28, 2012 02:48 PM (Dll6b)

238 Excellent post, Ace. Makes me want to go eat a shotgun because my country has died.

Posted by: Inspector Asshole at September 28, 2012 02:48 PM (T+lH2)

239 NPR has a story about the movie, you know which one. They referred to the movie that slandered the prophet Muhammad. Funny, I don't recall any stories involving Christianity using the phrase "our Lord and Savior" or "God's Only Son". Must have been an oversight.
If a leftie/Islamic apologist ever says something like "but when a newspaper uses 'Christ', that's giving Jesus his honorific just like when a paper uses 'the Prophet Mo'!" you can ask them if they've ever heard a MSM source ever (and challenge them to a Google search) using the honorific "the Prophet Joseph" for the Mormons' Joseph Smith? (That one struck me last Monday when a Mormon used it on the U.S. Antiques Roadshow from Salt Lake City--a usage I'd never heard before.)

Posted by: andycanuck at September 28, 2012 02:48 PM (vDl/w)

240 What else you got, bitch?

Posted by: Empire of Jeff, CEO - Jackboot Solutions, LLC at September 28, 2012 06:46 PM (JDIKC)

___

 

throat chlamydia?

Posted by: kallisto at September 28, 2012 02:48 PM (jm/9g)

241 >>>have you ever seen catholics in costume


Yeah! and just the other day I struck down a blasphemer with my poleax!

Posted by: typo dynamofo at September 28, 2012 02:48 PM (pjT+p)

242

I know Jesus was prefigured and prophecized but did he not also prophecize?





Posted by: ace

 

-----------------------------------------------------

 

 

Yes indeedy he did.   I'm paraphrasing a tad here but he said, there's some bad shit gonna be headin' your way.  Be ready.....and steady.

Posted by: Soona at September 28, 2012 02:48 PM (3jiPV)

243

 

We have empowered the Islamists....with our money. 

We didn't used to care much about Islam.

But maybe some are too young to remember back that far.

 

Before we started importing their Oil...which was cheap at first, just like a drug dealer does it...we were aware of the "problems in the Mideast".

But it was a very distant concern.

 

We began importing their Oil....and Islam rode in along with it.

 

We got drug into their conflicts, to protect our addiction to their Oil.

It is the only thing that we 'need' from that area of the world.

 

We have shit-tons of our own Oil and Natural Gas.

 

But Barky and the Dems have done nothing but sabotage to our own domestic production.

They are more friendly to other countries who come here to exploit our natural resources...than to our own use of them.

 

This is the first thing we must do, to take away power from the Islamists...

Throw off all the shackles to our own domestic production, and stop the hemorrhage of our dollars going overseas...into the pockets of those who want to enslave us.

 

Any 'leader' who is not onboard with this, does not have our best interests at heart.

 

 

Posted by: wheatie at September 28, 2012 02:49 PM (l5RhJ)

244

235

 

Fucking annoying assmonkey.

Posted by: Empire of Jeff, CEO - Jackboot Solutions, LLC at September 28, 2012 02:49 PM (JDIKC)

245 173 I'll take that as a "no."

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 02:49 PM (nVOyV)

246 If FNC was smart they split up the panel section to keep people like me watching. I hope they don't do that.

Posted by: Flatbush Joe at September 28, 2012 02:49 PM (ZPrif)

247 >>Well that's difficult in a Country that defines itself as hyphenated Americans... That's very true. Obama had a unique opportunity to really pull the country together had he wanted to as he said he did. He could have been a sort of Nelson Mandela type figure. Instead he has made things worse by constantly trying to divide America and pit one group against another. He has put America into a very dangerous place, a lot more than most people realize.

Posted by: JackStraw at September 28, 2012 02:49 PM (TMB3S)

248 It's really hard to type with one finger up your nose and another one up your butt. Trust me on this one.

Posted by: Retard Fuckwit Esq. at September 28, 2012 02:49 PM (aHR5E)

249 Well, if we ever do defeat the twin scourges of totalitarian twits (believing they are liberals) and Islamists, it will definitely be a case of the meek inheriting the earth. I prefer a little Joe McCarthy and Charlesmagne

Posted by: joeindc44 at September 28, 2012 02:50 PM (QxSug)

250 177 Excellent.

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 02:50 PM (nVOyV)

251 I'm certainly no spokesman for the Jew, so fine Jews don't even look upon Jews as a prophet. Posted by: dogfish at September 28, 2012 06:45 PM (N2yhW) No. We had prophets - in the book Prophets. Jesus wasn't one of them. That is where Jews and Christians split. Jews at the time did have declared messiahs, such as Bar Kochba, whom Rabbi Akiva had, basically, declared the messiah, but he ultimately failed and that notion died with him.

Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at September 28, 2012 02:50 PM (X3lox)

252 Jesus also prophesied by saying "I'll be back." And next time he won't be meek and mild.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at September 28, 2012 02:51 PM (r4wIV)

253 231
Go for it, Rupert. Full Libtard. It's not like you're going to be banned.

What else you got, bitch?

Posted by: Empire of Jeff, CEO - Jackboot Solutions, LLC at September 28, 2012 06:46 PM (JDIKC)

...

...

...

christ, I hope that's not all I got -- jeezus, I'm not even warmed up, YPLOCHC.  You Pathetic Load Of Communal (whiny, undereducated, incestuous) Horse Cum.

Posted by: Rupert Pupkin, Esq. at September 28, 2012 02:51 PM (icwKQ)

254 Forgive my seeming pedantry, but the verb form of "prophecy" is "prophesy" (pronounced praw-fe-sigh).

Posted by: Otis Criblecoblis at September 28, 2012 02:51 PM (IlZPo)

255 This isn't you personally they're talking about, AdamPM. Nor are they referring to the members of SEAL Team 6, or the local choir for that matter, all of whom may be wonderful, strong-willed people. They're referring to our culture writ large. And Barack Hussein Obama was chosen to be leader even after his association with a domestic terrorist WHO BOMBED THE FRIGGIN' PENTAGON was disclosed. This is not evidence of anything like strong, unified will to triumph over Islam. Further, our law enforcement practices are rewarding Muslims for engaging in violence against us (and others). Again, more data that our culture is seriously lost, however resolved you may personally be.

Posted by: Random at September 28, 2012 02:51 PM (u8eBQ)

256 153 "I have never heard of that movie that Ace just reviewed"

This is just the review of the trailer. If we do things right, the movie Ace is laying out will never come to pass in our lifetimes; we won't let it. A rewrite of the script is still possible, but time is of the essence.

Posted by: LizLem at September 28, 2012 02:51 PM (8wqqE)

257 Control your asperger's
That's why I can't have asperger's after 8:00 (especially with onions).

Posted by: andycanuck at September 28, 2012 02:51 PM (vDl/w)

258 I've been around for awhile. 

This is the greatest Ace post ever.  Ever. 

Thank you for putting all this into a coherent train of thought. 

Posted by: Washington Nearsider at September 28, 2012 02:52 PM (u0MHM)

259 We definitely need to cut all funding for the jihadi camel-fuckers in Egypt. Every dollar given to the Muslim Brotherhood is blood money.

Posted by: Flatbush Joe at September 28, 2012 02:52 PM (ZPrif)

260 Beautifully written, posts like this are the reason I lurk here.

Posted by: goat lover at September 28, 2012 02:52 PM (7cL1O)

261 Speaking of horse cum, I really love sucking donkey dicks.

Posted by: Retard Fuckwit Esq. at September 28, 2012 02:52 PM (aHR5E)

262 err Jesus <--> Jew Posted by: dogfish at September 28, 2012 06:46 PM (N2yhW) Too late. I already answered it the other way

Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at September 28, 2012 02:52 PM (X3lox)

263 "When you reward a behavior, you get more of it."





See; trolls, ace of spades HQ.

Posted by: Tami at September 28, 2012 02:52 PM (X6akg)

264 (And you're not going to kill anyone. People who brag about that stuff almost never do.) I remember an incident where a teenage boy threatened my daughter with cutting off her hair. He repeated the threat a number of times. I finally called him up and told him quite simply that if he ever took scissors to my daughters head he would have to deal with me. I then asked him if he understood. I then repeated what I said. Because I knew he was going to take what I said and twist it, then his parents would get excited and twist what I said, and I would be explaining to the police what I said. So I wrote very carefully exactly the words I said beforehand, then repeated them twice. It was an 'if this, then this'. Sort of like computer code. A conditional threat/promise. Oh there was noise, much noise. My statement was read many times to the parents, who could not believe their little snowflake could ever say such a thing. But the harassment stopped. I drew a line in the sand. This is how you deal with bullies. Let them know there are consequences and act with a conviction that makes it abundantly clear that you have every intention of following through with your promise. Instead, we are in the process of enduring 9/11 as a yearly celebration of debauchery, with an enabling Commander in Chief still bowing before those he should be sticking his finger in their faces.

Posted by: Schrödinger's cat at September 28, 2012 02:52 PM (feFL6)

265

Jesus cannot be considered a prophet.

 

He claimed to be the son of God.  That makes him the son of God or a liar.  Theres really no middle road.

Posted by: little billy badass at September 28, 2012 02:52 PM (xXhWA)

266 @257 Tell me more about this ass burger thing.

Posted by: Barney Frank at September 28, 2012 02:52 PM (IlZPo)

267

anyway i think many of the left's ideas are formulated from the standpoint of being a world citizens. no pride in being an american, no living better than any other country (which shows how far we must fall).

abdicating citzens of  all under UN enforced mandates. re global poverty act.

distribution of funds from all that have anything to those that do not.

 

Posted by: willow at September 28, 2012 02:52 PM (TomZ9)

268 What is the name of the movie being reviewed?

Posted by: RWC at September 28, 2012 02:53 PM (t+Sdx)

269

I've been following the BarkingMoonbatEarlyWarningSystem blog for some time now. This is exactly what's going on over there. Wimpy ass judges siding with "the victimes" and all they want is more. "He insulted me arrest him." "It would be cruel to deport me back to my country." We won't move out of your house because you left it for two weeks." "We won't decamp from you field until we feel like it." "We have sued you to prevent your doing anything about it for at least six months."

If we continue with the current system of appeasment we will be right behind them.

I appologize to our forefathers for this mess. The time has come to DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT.

Posted by: harleycowboy at September 28, 2012 02:53 PM (wSTfB)

270 **Excellent post, Ace. Makes me want to go eat a shotgun because my country has died.** Um, not to get conspiracyery on you but: http://tinyurl.com/cn2l5fn Warning, this will blow your fucking mind.

Posted by: joeindc44 at September 28, 2012 02:53 PM (QxSug)

271 I think in addition to kowtowing to the Islamists, libs see an opportunity to back door their "fairness doctrine" here. Never let a crisis go to waste.

Posted by: The Mega Independent at September 28, 2012 02:53 PM (6JMZR)

272 Anyone who speaks the Word of God to people as a spokesman for God is a prophet. Jesus was a prophet. He was also an apostle. He was just more than that.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at September 28, 2012 02:54 PM (r4wIV)

273 193 ?

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 02:54 PM (nVOyV)

274

I consider myself a Christian despite the fact that I reject most supernatural and non-scientific elements of the bible.  Essentially I beleive that the fundamental message of flawed human being offered salvation is a relief and according to the golden rule is the way I want to live my life. 

With that said, I know that Jesus can stand being submerged in piss.  He is that strong.  I know that he can stand up to blasphemy and heresy.  He is that powerful.  there is nothing that anyone can say or do to take away the power of Christ for those that chose to beleive. 

If your prophet needs the protection of the State, I'm thinking he isn't that great.

 

Posted by: california red at September 28, 2012 02:54 PM (Ho3p+)

275 Brett Baier doing devastating time line report of the JEF and the ME the last 2 weeks

Posted by: thunderb a conservative jew at September 28, 2012 02:55 PM (Dnbau)

276 I find that guy's series of comments to be particularly vile and disgusting and to be without merit of any kind, I think I am going to go grab my mortars.

Posted by: joeindc44 at September 28, 2012 02:55 PM (QxSug)

277

That's why I can't have asperger's after 8:00 (especially with onions).

When fuckstick finally gets around to reading this, he will correct my spelling and totally miss the point.

Posted by: fluffy at September 28, 2012 02:55 PM (3SvjA)

278

Inquisition!  Crusades!  Ever seen a grown man lick his own anus?

 

 

 

 

Posted by: Rupert Pupkin, Esq. at September 28, 2012 02:55 PM (sOtz/)

279

The birth and life of the Christ was prophesized by the Jewish prophets, Isaih in particular.

John the Baptist was a prophet who foretold the imminent arrival of the Christ.

 

Jesus Christ himself said He was not a prophet and did not come to supplant the Laws of Judaism (the Commandments), but to fulfill them.  He also knew that He would be rejected, and ultimately crucified for His stand.  He then taught the 12 disciples to be Apostles for His new Church.  He knew there would have to be a break with Judaism, because conventional Judaism of that time would reject him.  And yet the kingdom of Judea was the only place that Jesus could actually have thrived in His ministry, because the people were already monotheistic, and were ready to believe.  A great many of the early "Christians"  were Jews who came to reject their religion.  Hence, Saul of Damascus saw himself as the great cleanser who would persecute the converted Jewish Christians. And on the road to Damascus.....

Jesus was God incarnate as Man.  He came to teach and inspire and begin a universal Church that would be for all Men for all time. By that statement alone, he was not a conventional Jewish prophet.

He was a teacher. His own disciples called him "Rabbi", which means teacher.  He did not prophesize as much as try to teach through parables.  Although he did make one clear prophesy, which was misunderstood. He said "If this Temple is destroyed, I will rebuild it again in three days." Which His followers thought He meant the Temple in Jerusalem.  But Jesus meant Himself as the Temple.

 

Jesus spoke clearly on one particular issue with is directly relevant to this whole argument.  There would be no other prophets to follow Him.  Either you believe Jesus Christ, or you accept Islam.  If you are a believing Christian, then you have to reject Islam as an apostasy. There is no other alternative in your choices.  Rejection does not have to be violent, as I would  not advocate violence against non-believers (atheists). It is, as has been said, a free country.  And a philosophical tenent of Christianity is there  can be no coercion in belief (contra to Islam).

 

The Prophet Mohammed was a man that was allegedly "purified" by God.  He made war to expand his religion in Asia Minor, making war on Christians and Jews alike to spread Islam.  The similarity to Jesus and the claim by Islam that he was a "prophet" is clearly an invented piece of non-sense.  That is just one of the insidious ways in which Islam fights against Christianity.

 

Posted by: Reader C.J. Burch (fake Internet person) writes.... at September 28, 2012 02:55 PM (RFeQD)

280 The truth is, though, that law cannot promote good behavior. It cannot get people to do what is right by anyone's definition. At best all it can do is punish people for doing what it declares to be wrong. Being good and doing right has to come from within.
That's why the more lawless and immoral a society has become, the more laws it has. That internal encouragement to do right is damaged or gone, so external pressure not to do what is declared wrong is all that's left.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at September 28, 2012 02:56 PM (r4wIV)

281 Back to Ace's real point which I think is the cavalierness with which the Chocolate Jesus views American values and heritage and the damage it has done.  This is the reason why Romney *must* be most bold and outspoken.  we cannot take many more years of this without devastating effect.

Posted by: dogfish at September 28, 2012 02:57 PM (N2yhW)

282

273

People can't hear the context inside your head, Stupid.

Posted by: fluffy at September 28, 2012 02:57 PM (3SvjA)

283

The point you  made about  TFG not saying "No"  when he could have is the  salient point in your post.

 

The effeminate black muzlim in the White House will not say no to his heart's desire. He wants this, this great capitulation to islam.

 

We have been betrayed.

Posted by: BackwardsBoy at September 28, 2012 02:57 PM (lOmbq)

284 202 Go on...

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 02:57 PM (nVOyV)

285 #277 Yes, fluffy. Unfortunately.

Posted by: andycanuck at September 28, 2012 02:57 PM (vDl/w)

286 Brett Baier finishes with statement that FBI still has not set foot in Benghazi. Coverup, all the way to the top

Posted by: thunderb a conservative jew at September 28, 2012 02:57 PM (Dnbau)

287 Well the Democrat response to-- the Khobar Towers, the bombing of the US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania and the USS Cole-- led us to-- 9/11. It looks like we are right back where we started. The circle of terrorism.

Posted by: tasker at September 28, 2012 02:58 PM (r2PLg)

288

250

 

Idiot.

Posted by: Empire of Jeff, CEO - Jackboot Solutions, LLC at September 28, 2012 02:58 PM (JDIKC)

289 203 And your issue is?

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 02:58 PM (nVOyV)

290 what is it about the name Peterson these days.

Posted by: willow at September 28, 2012 02:58 PM (TomZ9)

291 Ace- I

t depends on which Christianity you adhere to. Catholic doctrine is that Jesus is fully God and was fully man, thus prophet and Savior.

Posted by: typo dynamofo at September 28, 2012 02:58 PM (pjT+p)

292 >>>He then taught the 12 disciples to be Apostles for His new Church.

That is the best irony of the new testament. The 12 Apostles start following Christ because they think HE'S the prophet. It turns out they were.

Posted by: MikeTheMoose Regular! With Full Stomping Power! at September 28, 2012 02:58 PM (0q2P7)

293 203 Aside from illiteracy, I mean.

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 02:58 PM (nVOyV)

294 Jesus also prophesied by saying "I'll be back." And next time he won't be meek and mild.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at September 28, 2012 06:51 PM (r4wIV)


----------


He also said, take a lesson from the trees.  Just like when  you see the leaves start popping out, you know summer is coming.  And when you see certain things start happening around you, listen up.  Get a clue. Know that the season is at hand. 



Starting to feel a bit seasonal lately.




Posted by: mama winger at September 28, 2012 02:58 PM (P6QsQ)

295 The truth is, though, that law cannot promote good behavior. It cannot get people to do what is right by anyone's definition. At best all it can do is punish people for doing what it declares to be wrong. Being good and doing right has to come from within.

True but not completely buying it.  If society doesn't accept the lawless behavior the crowd tends to conform.  In this case, if general society won't tolerate the behavior of the savages then the fringe won't either.

Posted by: dogfish at September 28, 2012 02:59 PM (N2yhW)

296 As a student of the various books written about Jesus and his being the fulfillment of the Jewish Law, there are two obscure verses not found in the collected books of the New Testament. One where Jesus tells someone inquiring about being a disciple, "Cursed is he who having set his hand to the plow, leaves it in the field to rust." and about his "Day of the Lord" "Do not look forward to the Day of the Lord for it will be like running into your house to escape a Lion in the night and seeking a lamp finding a bear instead."


Posted by: Beto at September 28, 2012 02:59 PM (BAnPT)

297 This is a simplistic screed, unhelpful in a nuanced and complicated world. Ms. Fluke was victimized and degraded by a misogynistic troglodyte who commands a national army of mentally unstable minions. Her very life was threatened -- with assault or rape or worse. Drama, indeed, drove the story, a story which continues to this day as polemicists like yourself continue to demonize her. It is precisely because of the threat of violence that the First Amendment must be interpreted to honor its spirit. The voices of the weak and oppressed must not be silenced by hate speech which impairs their ability to be heard. So, too, must words which provoke the oppressed to defend themselves be regulated, in an even-handed and responsible fashion.

Posted by: Andrew Trevor-Reeves at September 28, 2012 02:59 PM (NCkFb)

298 489

Oh, sure, right. You go ahead and think that.

Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at September 28, 2012 02:59 PM (CdCPN)

299 I'm starting to think that "a justifiable expression of dissatisfaction with United States policy" is in order.  And I don't mean jihad at the hands of Islamists.  We threw off an oppressive government once to be free men, and we can do it again.

"...whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these
ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it..."

Posted by: Keith Arnold at September 28, 2012 02:59 PM (Jdtsu)

300

Well put.  Cross posting.  One question remains:  At what point do we get the pitchforks and torches? 

 

Posted by: Penultimatum at September 28, 2012 02:59 PM (EEUs4)

301 Geez. It's as if the Obama administration is doing all of this on purpose.

Posted by: Henry in Des Moines at September 28, 2012 03:00 PM (EuW9O)

302 208 Excellent.

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 03:00 PM (nVOyV)

303 >>> The truth is, though, that law cannot promote good behavior. Yeah, but that's fine, it's not (or shouldn't be) the point of the law to force good behavior, merely to prevent bad behavior. Whether a person chooses to do positively good things or not SHOULD be their own business. Otherwise you have a kind of tyranny.

Posted by: Random at September 28, 2012 03:00 PM (u8eBQ)

304 yeah you uneducated wingnuts, you're the dumb ones.  Me?  I enjoy sucking muslim dick.  It's by choice.  I don't care that muslims stand against almost everything I as a libtard supposedly stand for.  Hanging, stoning, beheading gays?  Go for it!  It's just their culture!  I also like the fact that Chicago Jesus is killing Pakistani civilians and lying about. 

Posted by: Rupert I like to eat my poopeypants, Esq at September 28, 2012 03:00 PM (/YJYi)

305

284

 

Splendid in its stupidity.

 

!!!

Posted by: Empire of Jeff, CEO - Jackboot Solutions, LLC at September 28, 2012 03:00 PM (JDIKC)

306 I hope when Romney's inaugurated, someone makes another  offensive film about Islam just to  show that this only worked under OBAMA that O does not make the laws in this country.

Posted by: Aslan's Girl at September 28, 2012 03:00 PM (KL49F)

307 >>>Being good and doing right has to come from within.

No. There is an aspect outside of the law that is much more effective because it is ubiquitous- culture. You can in fact shame people into behaving in different ways.

Posted by: typo dynamofo at September 28, 2012 03:00 PM (pjT+p)

308 279 excellent

Posted by: Beto at September 28, 2012 03:01 PM (BAnPT)

309 I also have this thing for horse semen.  I like to rub it all over my face. 

Posted by: Rupert I like to eat my poopeypants, Esq at September 28, 2012 03:01 PM (/YJYi)

310

275 Brett Baier doing devastating time line report of the JEF and the ME the last 2 weeks

 

Yes he did.

Actually...it was a timeline of the last 3 weeks, beginning with the DNC Convention.

 

He pulled together the epic bragging that went on then...about 'killing Bin Laden' and thus 'destroying Al Qaeda'....

And tied it to being their reason for Lying About the Attacks On 09/11 of this year.

 

Brett Baer rearranged the format of his show, to do this.

It was really very cool.

 

Posted by: wheatie at September 28, 2012 03:01 PM (l5RhJ)

311 Where would a photo of a naked woman, eating bacon, with the words "Fuck The False Prophet, Muhammad" writen across her chest rate on the "fighting words" scale?

Posted by: Just askin at September 28, 2012 03:02 PM (wsGWu)

312 That piece by Bret Baier on Libya was devastating. There is a massive coverup going on and most of the msm seems completely uninterested. Wow.

Posted by: JackStraw at September 28, 2012 03:02 PM (TMB3S)

313

13 from Tuesday's Top Headline thread:

 

Indeed.

Posted by: Empire of Jeff, CEO - Jackboot Solutions, LLC at September 28, 2012 03:02 PM (JDIKC)

314 >>>.The voices of the weak and oppressed must not be silenced by hate speech which impairs their ability to be heard. So, too, must words which provoke the oppressed to defend themselves be regulated, in an even-handed and responsible fashion.

These words make me want to punch you in the face and so according to your reasoning should not have been typed.

Asshole

Posted by: typo dynamofo at September 28, 2012 03:03 PM (pjT+p)

315

"That's why the more lawless and immoral a society has become, the more laws it has. That internal encouragement to do right is damaged or gone, so external pressure not to do what is declared wrong is all that's left."

So a tolerant society evolves into an amoral society.

Posted by: harleycowboy at September 28, 2012 03:03 PM (wSTfB)

316

I can just see Insty excerpting and then posting "Read the whole thing".

 

Finished with setup.  Got my Rube Goldberg but killer bass amp sound happening  for tonight's gig.  Here's  the  signal  chain  for  the few that are into such things:

 

Fender Jazz 24 or Fender Jazz Fretless  to  wireless, to  compressor,  to distortion effect,  to  '67  Ampeg  B-15  head,  to dummy load,  to Carvin BX 1200 head,  to 4-10 inch Avatar speakers, also miked into PA system. 

 

Nasty, ballsy rock sound. Stand back and get some girls on this dance floor.

Posted by: Meremortal at September 28, 2012 03:03 PM (jTKU5)

317 That piece by Bret Baier on Libya was devastating.

There is a massive coverup going on and most of the msm seems completely uninterested.

Wow.

Posted by: JackStraw at September 28, 2012 07:02 PM (TMB3S)

 

I was surprised CNN was actually talking about this today as well

Posted by: The Jackhole at September 28, 2012 03:04 PM (DU15A)

318 Suppose you accidentally click on a link and wind up seeing the raunchiest, most grotesque pornography imaginable. I never knew Sandra Fluke was so limber. And so familiar with cephalopods.

Posted by: George Orwell what knows Harry Reid is a pederast and a strangler at September 28, 2012 03:04 PM (AZGON)

319 So I guess my Book "Before The Purification, The Infidel Years" won't get published now?

Posted by: Beto at September 28, 2012 03:04 PM (BAnPT)

320 220 Und was soll Baier bedeuten?

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 03:04 PM (nVOyV)

321 >>I was surprised CNN was actually talking about this today as well They are right now as well and Eli Lake is giving new information. He's the guy who broke this thing.

Posted by: JackStraw at September 28, 2012 03:05 PM (TMB3S)

322 Suppose you accidentally click on a link and wind up seeing the raunchiest, most grotesque pornography imaginable. Rule 34, baby.

Posted by: George Orwell what knows Harry Reid is a pederast and a strangler at September 28, 2012 03:05 PM (AZGON)

323 220 Und deine Rechtschreibung is schwach.

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 03:05 PM (nVOyV)

324 >>>rate on the "fighting words" scale?

Depends. Dcup or better?

Posted by: typo dynamofo at September 28, 2012 03:05 PM (pjT+p)

325 I was thinking this very same thing today, vis a vis the subway poster capitulation.  I was done thinking it after about 3 sentences worth, though.

Posted by: gramar nazi at September 28, 2012 03:05 PM (Id+W0)

326 I'm not sure if I used "vis a vis" properly there but it felt good.

Posted by: gramar nazi at September 28, 2012 03:06 PM (Id+W0)

327 Meremortal what type of rock?

Posted by: willow at September 28, 2012 03:06 PM (TomZ9)

328 To be thorough, the law CAN be used to force people to do good for others: military service, paying taxes, good Samaritan laws, laws against depraved-indifference homicide, child-abuse reporting requirements, etc. So Christopher Taylor's statement isn't blanket true. But the main point of criminal law is to stop misbehavior.

Posted by: Random at September 28, 2012 03:07 PM (u8eBQ)

329 Well endowed, unless we want to make a subtle commentary on Mo's pedophilia.

Posted by: Just askin at September 28, 2012 03:07 PM (wsGWu)

330

Suppose you accidentally click on a link and wind up seeing the raunchiest, most grotesque pornography imaginable.

What do you do?







I'm confused. Which AoSHQ meme joke is most appropriate here?

Ace Movie Review Joke
Accidental Busty Lesbian Pron Joke
Longbow Joke

Nah, I've got it.

http://tinyurl.com/3mqu5b

NSFW.......of course

Posted by: IllTemperedCur at September 28, 2012 03:07 PM (TIIx5)

331 I mean, how many people "spoke out" against the Church during the Inquisition? Comparatively Islam makes that period look cozy.
Not that it affects your point that people didn't criticize the Church when it was powerful but civil governments of the time killed alot more than any of the official or unofficial Inquisitions did and both of these are dwarfed by the toll taken by 20th Century secular states.

BTW, everyone who appeared before the Spanish Inquisition had a legal representative and you probably weren't expecting this but the Spanish Inquisition declared witchcraft to be a delusion about 100 years before England did.

courses.washington.edu/hsteu205/Spanish witch trials.htm

Posted by: andycanuck at September 28, 2012 03:07 PM (vDl/w)

332 Ace, I really love the way you write.  That is why I come here.  Mostly.

That said, you are so correct.  And I am just SICK over it.  This SOB has to go.  Today is payday.  Romney gets some more of my money.   I will try to persuade the persuadable.  I will volunteer on election day.  This SOB has got to go.

Posted by: small town girl at September 28, 2012 03:08 PM (KyP5E)

333

The law most certainly can COMPEL good behavior  (if you don't think so, try breaking the law in some obvious manner in front of the police) , but it can also ideally encourage good behavior.  The law is our teacher,

If

1) the law is reasonable and understandable

2) the law is seen by the majority as fair and just

 

Unreasonable laws and usurpations have been grounds for.....revolution. If you lose the respect and silent consent of the majority, it is only a matter of time until things come apart. I, personally, refuse to live as a slave to the State, or see my rights as a Citizen be diminished by that which is unjust and wrong, which infringes on my inalienable rights as a free man.

None dare call it treason......

Posted by: Reader C.J. Burch (fake Internet person) writes.... at September 28, 2012 03:08 PM (RFeQD)

334 Jesus did the Will of the Father. That's orthodoxy. The Trinity is still quite mysterious to me but this we know.

Posted by: Hobojerky at September 28, 2012 03:09 PM (fH34O)

335 234 Perhaps not (although there is no proof, except perhaps Will Smith), but it certainly helps.

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 03:10 PM (nVOyV)

336 >>> Where would a photo of a naked woman, eating bacon, with the words "Fuck The False Prophet, Muhammad" writen across her chest rate on the "fighting words" scale? Should be an 18-year old and the caption: "Mohammed wanted to fuck me, but I got too old for him."

Posted by: Random at September 28, 2012 03:10 PM (u8eBQ)

337 236 Our leaders and media figures control us, instead of the other way around. We are weak.

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 03:11 PM (nVOyV)

338 I remember the old fashioned mantra of the 80's and 90's, quoted in lots of films like "Air Force One." it said, "We don't negotiate with terrorists." Why? Because, they said, if you negotiate with one terrorist you give thousands of others the motivation to do the same thing. The only way to keep terrorism in check is to make absolutely sure the terrorists never get what they want. Every good parent knows you don't reward bad behavior.

Posted by: Galadriel at September 28, 2012 03:12 PM (WFZEf)

339

336

First show me the picture.

Posted by: harleycowboy at September 28, 2012 03:12 PM (wSTfB)

340 No. There is an aspect outside of the law that is much more effective because it is ubiquitous- culture. You can in fact shame people into behaving in different ways.
Again, that doesn't make them do right it makes them avoid what they are taught is wrong. The lawmost certainly canCOMPEL good behavior (if you don't think so, try breaking the law in some obvious manner in front of the police)
That's not good behavior, that's an absence of lawbreaking behavior.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at September 28, 2012 03:12 PM (r4wIV)

341

Hi willow...

 

We cover a wide swath from Roy Orbison to Red Hot Chili Peppers. We have about 150 cover tunes from 1964 to very recent.

Posted by: Meremortal at September 28, 2012 03:13 PM (jTKU5)

342 #331 Inspiration of the stairwell addition: I've got a feeling that modern Islamic states and terrorists like Iraq and Iran (even excluding their war as being more secular, perhaps, despite the Shiite/Sunni split) have killed more people than the medieval/renaissance Church did.

Posted by: andycanuck at September 28, 2012 03:13 PM (vDl/w)

343 I mean, how many people "spoke out" against the Church during the Inquisition?
Lots did. They got burned and tortured, but they spoke out. Eventually the inquisition was wiped out, mostly by the Reformation.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at September 28, 2012 03:14 PM (r4wIV)

344 244 Good point. I'm sorry I'm not as intelligent as you.

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 03:14 PM (nVOyV)

345 >>> BTW, everyone who appeared before the Spanish Inquisition had a legal representative and you probably weren't expecting this but the Spanish Inquisition declared witchcraft to be a delusion about 100 years before England did. I'm not aware of all the details, but I know that the body count was much less than popularly assumed, and I did refer to it being "cozy" compared to Islam. Point being, since we are survival and reproduction machines biologically, it's entirely predictable that few people would speak out against their society's religion when that religion will then turn around and officially kill them and/or everyone they know and love will hate them (and some will likely try to kill them). I hate Islam, but I am hardly surprised that people don't raise their hands against it too often in Muslim countries. For God sakes, we're mostly using aliases here, and we're mainly worried about JOB consequences for sharing our political views. Also, social consequences. And being beheaded by Islamists. And we live in the West. The lack of public anti-Islamists in Beirut is no mystery.

Posted by: Random at September 28, 2012 03:15 PM (u8eBQ)

346 247 I don't know. There are parallels between Mandela and Obama.

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 03:16 PM (nVOyV)

347 Which, incidentally, is why the law in western countries must protect people who protest against Islam. If we don't HERE, why would we think they could THERE?

Posted by: Random at September 28, 2012 03:17 PM (u8eBQ)

348 Meremortal, it sounds like fun and  also a  fulfilling  lifestyle.

Posted by: willow at September 28, 2012 03:19 PM (TomZ9)

349

Ther are about  1.3  billion Muslims  on the planet. We are told that the radicals are a tiny minority. Apparently that tiny minority  has already intimidated the "moderates" into silence as we hear almost nothing from them.

 

Can anyone explain how there won't be an ongoing, escalating war for decades with Islam that will result in hundreds of thousands,  perhaps millions of deaths?

Posted by: Meremortal at September 28, 2012 03:20 PM (jTKU5)

350
247

I don't know.


There are parallels between Mandela and Obama.

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 07:16 PM (nVOyV)










The two obvious ones being skin color (which is irrelevant) and being closely affiliated with terrorism at some time in their lives.

Posted by: IllTemperedCur at September 28, 2012 03:21 PM (TIIx5)

351 264 If/then is different from what you said.

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 03:22 PM (nVOyV)

352 I'm sorry I'm not as intelligent as you.

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 07:14 PM (nVOyV)

 

---       -----        ----          -----          -----         ---- ---         ----         ----

 

The typical inanimate object is more intelligent than you.

Posted by: I Am A Rock at September 28, 2012 03:22 PM (jTKU5)

353 Meremortal, as i said earlier, it seems to me they have Chosen a non moderate  a more aggresive form of Islam leadership  re turkey with elections , and then again  after having seen the results of chosen leaders aftr the arab spring..

Posted by: willow at September 28, 2012 03:24 PM (TomZ9)

354 277 And your point was what?

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 03:25 PM (nVOyV)

355

1.3 billion,

 

and we are to believe they are in a minority status to be protected from fearsome words.

Posted by: willow at September 28, 2012 03:27 PM (TomZ9)

356 what a crock this all is!

Posted by: willow at September 28, 2012 03:27 PM (TomZ9)

357

Posted by: willow at September 28, 2012 07:19 PM (TomZ9)

 

 

Thanks willow, it is a ball, especially at 63. I was a pro and fairly successful  when I was young, and  started playing for fun again about 12 years ago. Music is my main interest again  now that I have retired from gainful employment. The sad thing for the cats that are still pros is that the money for bar bands hasn't gone up in 40 years. Session pay is a little better, but not much.

Posted by: I Am A Rock at September 28, 2012 03:28 PM (jTKU5)

358 280 Very good point.

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 03:28 PM (nVOyV)

359 >>> Can anyone explain how there won't be an ongoing, escalating war for decades with Islam that will result in hundreds of thousands, perhaps millionsof deaths? >>> Posted by: Meremortal at September 28, 2012 07:20 PM (jTKU5) I would consider that a best-likely-case scenario. I'm predicting a longer war culminating in our defeat.

Posted by: Random at September 28, 2012 03:28 PM (u8eBQ)

360 @296 Being a god, I'm sure time was all eternal and concurrent to The Christ, but the rustable plow did not exist at the time you attribute the statement. Those listening would have been, like, all, "Huh?"

Sounds like it could be the Gospel according to John Deere, though.

Posted by: comatus at September 28, 2012 03:29 PM (qaVK+)

361 282 The context is your "insight." But don't worry about it.

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 03:30 PM (nVOyV)

362 "So when you are requested to pay up or be molested
You will find it better policy to say --

"'We never pay anyone dangeld,
No matter how trifing the cost;
For the end of that game is oppression and shame,
And the nation that pays it is lost!'"

--Kipling, "Danegeld"

And danegeld is not necesarrily financial.  We have been paying it for some time, and they will continue demanding it.

Posted by: Empire1 just got a new kitten at September 28, 2012 03:30 PM (q11YS)

363

Posted by: willow at September 28, 2012 07:24 PM (TomZ9)

 

Didn't see that post but I'm  down with it.

Posted by: I Am A Rock at September 28, 2012 03:30 PM (jTKU5)

364 Thank you, Random. And, yes, it was mainly the "cozy" part that I disputed.

Posted by: andycanuck at September 28, 2012 03:30 PM (vDl/w)

365 The Inquisition thing? The fuck?

Posted by: joeindc44 at September 28, 2012 03:31 PM (QxSug)

366 285 I fail to see what's unfortunate about it. I'm sure you have another "insightful" comment which will enlighten me coming up though.

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 03:31 PM (nVOyV)

367 288 I already apologized for not being as intelligent as you. Cut me some slack. Have some mercy.

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 03:32 PM (nVOyV)

368 295 The problem, at the moment, is one of too much conformism, not too little.

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 03:33 PM (nVOyV)

369 Careful, joeindc44, or I'll get the... comfy cushions!

Posted by: andycanuck at September 28, 2012 03:35 PM (vDl/w)

370 306 Good point.

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 03:37 PM (nVOyV)

371 fighting words, duly noted, the civilized person will retreat.

Posted by: joeindc44 at September 28, 2012 03:37 PM (QxSug)

372 BTW, two new(ish) threads up.

Posted by: andycanuck at September 28, 2012 03:37 PM (vDl/w)

373 307 Culture and shame are hardly the same thing.

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 03:37 PM (nVOyV)

374 LOL. Good one, joeindc44.

Posted by: andycanuck at September 28, 2012 03:38 PM (vDl/w)

375 313 Good point.

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 03:39 PM (nVOyV)

376 315 There's no such thing as a tolerant society. All societies are intolerant. It is their nature. The question is intolerant of what?

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 03:40 PM (nVOyV)

377 315 And contemporary society is immoral, not amoral.

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 03:41 PM (nVOyV)

378 People tolerate what they don't like, you can't tolerate stuff you like or are apathetic toward.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at September 28, 2012 03:42 PM (r4wIV)

379 And I'm gonna keep trolling this thread all night, 'cause that's what I do.

Posted by: MirrorMirrorOnTheWall-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 03:43 PM (feFL6)

380 I suggest that you don't try to understand the mystery that is the Holy Trinity while drinking val-u-rite.

Nice post ace.

Posted by: Bart who lurks with SMOD 2012, master of his domain at September 28, 2012 03:43 PM (he2LC)

381 Good point.

Posted by: MirrorMirrorOnTheWall-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 03:44 PM (feFL6)

382 This war has hit close to home; two people I've worked with professionally have died. The next time we are attacked, we need to secure the homeland once and for all before we go off to slay Muslims overseas. I would much rather have a nation of 100 million people of known loyalty than a nation of 300 million with a large number of ideological or religious traitors.

Posted by: Cobalt Shiva at September 28, 2012 03:44 PM (1iauC)

383 343 Sure, why not.

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 03:47 PM (nVOyV)

384 yeah, like most hate filled lefties I know are quite intolerant of anything that doesn't agree with them completely, unless it's a brown person, then it's ok.

Posted by: joeindc44 at September 28, 2012 03:48 PM (QxSug)

385 345 Religions, ideologies...

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 03:48 PM (nVOyV)

386 350 That, and seriously "progressing" their respective countries. But thanks for mentioning that first one. That was definitely what I was thinking.

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 03:50 PM (nVOyV)

387 260We definitely need to cut all funding for the jihadi camel-fuckers in Egypt.  Every dollar given to the Muslim Brotherhood is blood money.

Posted by: Flatbush Joe at September 28, 2012 06:52 PM (ZPrif)

...

...

...

there's no latent racism in the libertrudian republicunt fringe.  nooohhh.  c'mon, that's an unfair stereotype perpatrated by liberals!  gimme a break -- nooo -ohh - ooohhhhhh ... !

Posted by: Rupert Pupkin, Esq. at September 28, 2012 03:50 PM (icwKQ)

388 352 Good point.

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 03:51 PM (nVOyV)

389 357 You're 63 and you spend your time calling people "retarded" over the internet? Nice.

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 03:53 PM (nVOyV)

390 378

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 03:55 PM (nVOyV)

391 379 Maybe you should find a better hobby?

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 03:56 PM (nVOyV)

392 381 Good point.

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 03:56 PM (nVOyV)

393 314>>> .The voices of the weak and oppressed must not be silenced by hate speech  which impairs their ability to be heard. So, too, must words which
provoke the oppressed to defend themselves be regulated, in an
even-handed and responsible fashion. These words make me want to punch you in the face and so according to your reasoning should not have been typed.

Asshole

Posted by: typo dynamofo at September 28, 2012 07:03 PM (pjT+p)

....

....

hey douche, your intolerance is worthy of Muslim Jihadi.  All you have to do is replace "punch you in the face" with "behead", and replace "asshole" with "infidel."  man, put a feather in your cap - you're halfway there !  kudos !

Posted by: Rupert Pupkin, Esq. at September 28, 2012 03:57 PM (icwKQ)

394 387 So, shall we gas all those accused of racism? For Progress, of course.

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 03:58 PM (nVOyV)

395 393 So, are we in agreement that Islam is a terrible religion, then?

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 03:59 PM (nVOyV)

396 384yeah, like most hate filled lefties I know are quite intolerant of anything that doesn't agree with them completely, unless it's a brown person, then it's ok. Posted by: joeindc44 at September 28, 2012 07:48 PM (QxSug), ...  ... ... ... .no, no no !! I'm sure he's being merely jocular, a tad sarcastic.  there's no latent racism in teh libeturdian, horse-gagging, bronto socket fringe.  NONE at ALL !

Posted by: Rupert Pupkin, Esq. at September 28, 2012 04:01 PM (icwKQ)

397 395393

So, are we in agreement that Islam is a terrible religion, then?

Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 28, 2012 07:59 PM (nVOyV)

 

 

 

...

dude - get a grip.  they're ALL terrible, its just that Islam is particularly distasteful to Americans, even though the 'mer'kins on this thread manifest an intolerance of thought and a vehemence of ignorance that would meld nicely with the lunatic Islamic fringe.  a fringe, is a fringe, fucktards.

Posted by: Rupert Pupkin, Esq. at September 28, 2012 04:03 PM (icwKQ)

398 Da derp dee derp! Made poopies again.

Posted by: Retard Fuckwit Esq. at September 28, 2012 04:08 PM (aHR5E)

399 Oh a 6 page rant broken into single sentence paragraphs. Must be Ace has decided to gift us with his erudite jingoism.

Posted by: ig at September 28, 2012 05:36 PM (5Cwv4)

400 I'm impressed, ig. Commenting on a dead thread. You're a real fucking hero.

Posted by: andycanuck at September 28, 2012 05:47 PM (vDl/w)

401 The drama, or the lack of it, from the media is why the American people largely don't care about what's happening over there.  No screaming headlines, no special editions. It's ho hum.

The media are smart that way. Evil, but smart.

Posted by: PJ at September 28, 2012 06:23 PM (DQHjw)

402 If I heard right, ubama said something like this 'the future should not belong to those who blaspheme against the prophet mohamad' at the U.N. What he was doing there was submitting to islam, and he was doing it in his 'official' capacity on behalf of America. The average American won't see the significance of his words, but the average moslem will damn sure know what he meant. Now, here's the thing. I don't care if he submits to islam on his own, but he has absolutely no business talking for me. Screw him, olla, mohamad, islam, and the buraq he rode in on.

Posted by: EROWMER at September 28, 2012 06:46 PM (kxlCQ)

403 You had me at "suppose"...

Posted by: Dogbert at September 28, 2012 06:59 PM (dgcv0)

404 "What influence, in fact, have ecclesiastical establishments had on society? In some instances they have been seen to erect a spiritual tyranny on the ruins of the civil authority; on many instances they have been seen upholding the thrones of political tyranny; in no instance have they been the guardians of the liberties of the people." -- Madison Note to the hypocritical Left: Christianity is not the only religion. A separation of Church and State applies to all churches, or it applies to none.

Posted by: GrimV at September 29, 2012 12:41 PM (a7I+J)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
310kb generated in CPU 0.1529, elapsed 0.382 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.3284 seconds, 532 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.