November 08, 2012
— JohnE. What is Project Orca? Well, this is what they told us:
Project ORCA is a massive undertaking – the Republican Party’s newest, unprecedented and most technologically advanced plan to win the 2012 presidential election.Pretty much everything in that sentence is false. The "massive undertaking" is true, however. It would take a lot of planning, training and coordination to be done successfully (oh, we'll get to that in a second). This wasn't really the GOP's effort, it was Team Romney's. And perhaps "unprecedented" would fit if we're discussing failure.
The entire purpose of this project was to digitize the decades-old practice of strike lists. The old way was to sit with your paper and mark off people that have voted and every hour or so, someone from the campaign would come get your list and take it back to local headquarters. Then, they'd begin contacting people that hadn't voted yet and encourage them to head to the polls. It's worked for years.
From the very start there were warning signs. After signing up, you were invited to take part in nightly conference calls. The calls were more of the slick marketing speech type than helpful training sessions. There was a lot of "rah-rahs" and lofty talk about how this would change the ballgame.
Working primarily as a web developer, I had some serious questions. Things like "Has this been stress tested?", "Is there redundancy in place?" and "What steps have been taken to combat a coordinated DDOS attack or the like?", among others. These types of questions were brushed aside (truth be told, they never took one of my questions). They assured us that the system had been relentlessly tested and would be a tremendous success.
On one of the last conference calls (I believe it was on Saturday night), they told us that our packets would be arriving shortly. Now, there seemed to be a fair amount of confusion about what they meant by "packet". Some people on Twitter were wondering if that meant a packet in the mail or a pdf or what. Finally, my packet arrived at 4PM on Monday afternoon as an emailed 60 page pdf. Nothing came in the mail. Because I was out most of the day, I only got around to seeing it at around 10PM Monday night. So, I sat down and cursed as I would have to print out 60+ pages of instructions and voter rolls on my home printer. Naturally, for reasons I can't begin to comprehend, my printer would not print in black and white with an empty magenta cartridge (No HP, I will never buy another one of your products ever again). So, at this point I became panicked. I was expected to be at the polls at 6:45AM and nothing was open. I was thankfully able to find a Kinko's open until 11PM that was able to print it out and bind it for me, but this is not something I should have had to do. They expected 75-80 year old veteran volunteers to print out 60+ pages on their home computers? The night before election day? From what I hear, other people had similar experiences. In fact, many volunteers never received their packets at all.
At 6:30AM on Tuesday, I went to the polls. I was immediately turned away because I didn't have my poll watcher certificate. Many, many people had this problem. The impression I got was this was taken care of because they had "registered me". Others were as well. But apparently, I was supposed to go on my own to a Victory Center to pick it up, but that was never communicated properly. Outside of the technical problems, this was the single biggest failure of the operation. They simply didn't inform people that this was a requirement. In fact, check out my "checklist" from my ORCA packet:

Notice anything missing? My guess is the second "Chair (if allowed)" was supposed to be "poll watcher certificate" but they put chair twice. This was an instruction packet that went out to 30,000+ people. Did no one proof-read it?
So, I headed back home to see if I could get my certificate. I called their official help line. It went unanswered. I tried their legal line. Same thing. I emailed them. No response. I continued to do this for six straight hours and never got a response. I even tried to call three local victory centers. All went straight to voicemail.
While I was home, I took to Twitter and the web to try to find some answers. From what I saw, these problems were widespread. People had been kicked from poll watching for having no certificate. Others never received their pdf packets. Some were sent the wrong packets from a different area. Some received their packet, but their usernames and passwords didn't work.
Now a note about the technology itself. For starters, this was billed as an "app" when it was actually a mobile-optimized website (or "web app"). For days I saw people on Twitter saying they couldn't find the app on the Android Market or iTunes and couldn't download it. Well, that's because it didn't exist. It was a website. This created a ton of confusion. Not to mention that they didn't even "turn it on" until 6AM in the morning, so people couldn't properly familiarize themselves with how it worked on their personal phone beforehand.
Next, and this part I find mind-boggingly absurd, the web address was located at "https://www.whateveritwas.com/orca". Notice the "s" after http. This denotes it's a secure connection, something that's used for e-commerce and web-based email. So far, so good. The problem is that they didn't auto-forward the regular "http" to "https" and as a result, many people got a blank page and thought the system was down. Setting up forwarding is the simplest thing in the world and only takes seconds, but they failed to do it. This is compounded by the fact that mobile browsers default to "http" when you just start with "www" (as 95% of the world does).
By 2PM, I had completely given up. I finally got ahold of someone at around 1PM and I never heard back. From what I understand, the entire system crashed at around 4PM. I'm not sure if that's true, but it wouldn't surprise me. I decided to wait for my wife to get home from work to vote, which meant going very late (around 6:15PM). Here's the kicker, I never got a call to go out and vote. So, who the hell knows if that end of it was working either.
So, the end result was that 30,000+ of the most active and fired-up volunteers were wandering around confused and frustrated when they could have been doing anything else to help. Like driving people to the polls, phone-banking, walking door-to-door, etc. We lost by fairly small margins in Florida, Virginia, Ohio and Colorado. If this had worked could it have closed the gap? I sure hope not for my sanity's sake.
The bitter irony of this entire endeavor was that a supposedly small government candidate gutted the local structure of GOTV efforts in favor of a centralized, faceless organization in a far off place (in this case, their Boston headquarters). Wrap your head around that.
I'm on Twitter at @JohnEkdahl if you have any questions.
Posted by: JohnE. at
12:36 PM
| Comments (669)
Post contains 1239 words, total size 7 kb.
Posted by: Lee (in KY) at November 08, 2012 11:39 AM (jgXna)
Morons, Where you involved in ORCA?
Please share your story. I'm really interested to find out how it worked(or didn't work) for everyone else.
Posted by: Ben at November 08, 2012 11:40 AM (C2Y4l)
Posted by: James Tiberius Kirk at November 08, 2012 11:42 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: JohnE. at November 08, 2012 11:42 AM (nRTou)
Posted by: joncelli at November 08, 2012 11:43 AM (RD7QR)
So, is that why, in post after post after post, people were encouraged (ahem) to take part in the debacle?
Posted by: Gerry at November 08, 2012 03:40 PM (i8u8P)
So we should have... done what?
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 75% more DOOM! at November 08, 2012 11:43 AM (xAtAj)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows we are now Airstrip One at November 08, 2012 11:43 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: EC at November 08, 2012 11:43 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Dr Spank at November 08, 2012 11:44 AM (4cRnj)
Posted by: joeindc44 says choom on fuckers at November 08, 2012 11:44 AM (QxSug)
Posted by: tofer732 at November 08, 2012 11:44 AM (2zM0P)
worked fine at 503 Precinct. I don't know what Romney did with the data we sent, but we figured it out and sent the info
Posted by: Jerry Jack in Jacksonville at November 08, 2012 11:44 AM (Dll6b)
I had something similar happen with Lawyers for Romney. Long and short of it -- they didn't get me my precinct information until 8pm the night before. I had eight different precincts I had to spot-check and they waited 10 hours before I was supposed to be on-site. Eight. Fucking. PM. The. Night.Before.
Not only that -- I was supposed to have a partner that was also going to the same precincts. They gave me his name. That's it. No phone. No email. We had no way to contact one another.
As I told Ben and John, something weird went down. They were super organized leading up to election day. Hell, I initially got contacted back in May to help out. Something really melted down in the last 10-14 days before election day. I'm trying to determine who was in charge of that clusterfuck.
Good Christ....
Posted by: laceyunderalls at November 08, 2012 11:45 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: Paul Anka at November 08, 2012 11:45 AM (QKKT0)
I don't understand why they thought I might help.
Posted by: Ms. Winfrey at November 08, 2012 11:45 AM (wAQA5)
Posted by: JollyRoger at November 08, 2012 11:45 AM (t06LC)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows we are now Airstrip One at November 08, 2012 11:45 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: SpongeBob Saget at November 08, 2012 11:46 AM (SDkq3)
Posted by: joeindc44 says choom on fuckers at November 08, 2012 11:46 AM (QxSug)
Posted by: Paul Anka at November 08, 2012 11:46 AM (AZGON)
It wasn't; gave me a Very Bad Feeling. Where were the 'crawl over broken glass' voters???
Posted by: Jerry Jack in Jacksonville at November 08, 2012 11:46 AM (Dll6b)
Posted by: Blue Falcon in Boston at November 08, 2012 11:46 AM (KCvsd)
Posted by: buzz at November 08, 2012 11:46 AM (i27M5)
oh. fuck. fuckity fuckity fuckstick. I sat on those calls (ultimately rejected b/c I couldn't be there at 5 in the am - ppl have kids, how does that work?) all those times, lstnd to the rah rah, and that's what they produced? glad i didn't have to drive into boston. someone should ask truman north what the command center was like, did they know there was a problem?
Posted by: NewEnglandDevil at November 08, 2012 11:47 AM (73P68)
So, the end result was that 30,000+ of the most active and fired-up volunteers were wandering around confused and frustrated when they could have been doing anything else to help. Like driving people to the polls, phone-banking, walking door-to-door, etc. We lost by fairly small margins in Florida, Virginia, Ohio and Colorado. If this had worked could it have closed the gap? I sure hope not for my sanity's sake.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at November 08, 2012 11:47 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: Soothsayer at November 08, 2012 11:47 AM (jUytm)
Couldn't get through. About 8:40 I got a call that auto connected me to the conference call, just in time to hear it wrap up.
I never received another email. I finally went Tuesday pm to the Romney Victory/FAIL Center to make calls the rest of the afternoon. Got to see Paul Ryan roll through if nothing else.
Just saw a post on the facebooks from my lefty uncle in The Shire crowing about spending 7 hours pounding on doors Tuesday. Low tech. Works every fucking time.
As a IT developer myself, I'd say this was a world class clusterfuck. That's a technical term, btw.
Posted by: VA Gator at November 08, 2012 11:48 AM (ZZiTD)
Bitch bitch bitch, moan moan moan.
Zero suggestions.
Not surprised.
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 75% more DOOM! at November 08, 2012 11:48 AM (xAtAj)
Lots of new Tea Party people--for which I'm grateful--but they didn't know how to do strike lists and hadn't understood the explanations or something. One precinct reported back with literally NO ONE struck.
Posted by: Emperor of Icecream at November 08, 2012 11:48 AM (ZMzpb)
Posted by: Hello, it's me Donna really.really bummed at November 08, 2012 11:49 AM (9+ccr)
I look to the future hoping the GOP sees three obstacles easily to be overcome.
1) Playing nice never works. The media will still be the paid-off refs. Reagan mocked liberals. Laughed at them to their faces. mocked their tired, old 1930's ideas that have failed time and time again. And he did it with a twinkle in his eye that made you want to laugh at them too. And when voters are laughing at them (The Daily Show understands this), you're not taking them seriously. Go negative on TV, radio, print mail, email, etc. Go mocking on the stump. The media will attack, but mock the media too. The people know they're in the tank, help them put 2+2 together. You basically box-out the Dems best weapon: Media Narrative.
2) Our GOTV effort was a hat and no cattle. Steal Obama's playbook (which combined Rove's micro-targeting strategery with the leftists' creepy "I am government and I know everything about you" stat gathering. The white vote isn't declining because white voters are disappearing. It's declining because they aren't motivated to vote like they used to be. The white voters of yesteryear would have voted no matter what. They're the greatest generation. Their sons, while still white, and center-right, don't have the same conviction. Mitt assumed you could Count On Them so he didn't target them. He was wrong.
3) Independents aren't just non-partisan because they don't vote for ideology. They are also non-partisan because they also don't vote AGAINST ideology. Moving to the middle is moving to the left. Run a conservative. A real one. A happy one. Win the base, win the turnout, and the middle will follow. The middle votes on performance, and "vibe" not on ideology. They don't have time for ideology and partisanship (the same thing to them). If Obama has destroyed America like we expect him to, the middle will come. If he hasn't we're not winning anyway.
Posted by: bigpale at November 08, 2012 11:49 AM (TDbSH)
Gerry, in hindsight I'm 100% sorry I suggested people sign up for ORCA. I'm sorry that I signed up for it.
But I didn't know it at the time and I only became worried about it a week before the election. By that time it was to late. The Romney campaign told the RNC that it would take care of the poll watchers.
There really weren't any other options unless your local county committee set up an independent strikelist/poll watcher programs. Most didn't.
Not only did this fail epically, it prevented 30,000 of the most die hard volunteers from accomplishing anything on election day.
Posted by: Ben at November 08, 2012 11:49 AM (C2Y4l)
Posted by: kallisto at November 08, 2012 11:50 AM (jm/9g)
So apparently Romney was rubbing two sticks together while Obama had a Zippo. Good to know.
Incidentally, something ocurred to me in that NARWHAL post - who the FUCK actually reads any email sent to them by a political campaign??? That shit goes straight into the trash can.
Posted by: radar at November 08, 2012 11:50 AM (zmlwq)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows we are now Airstrip One at November 08, 2012 11:50 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: General Zod at November 08, 2012 11:50 AM (2+bRt)
Oh yeah, my sister voted 2 weeks before the election. She was still getting calls on election day.
Did I say clusterfuck?
Posted by: MrCaniac at November 08, 2012 11:50 AM (Zd/NW)
I wondered what was going on when I got a text message saying that the app was now working at 2:30-3:00 - I was using a normal cell phone to punch in numbers from the strike list and had no idea that the app was down. The system for keying in voters didn't seem to be working well either and the guy I talked to on the help-line couldn't verify that my info was actually getting through, so I just kept punching in info and prayed that it was getting through. We did have a bunch of young mothers with children show up in the last hour or so, one of which I know was a Romney voter, which I thought might be evidence of Orca working.
Overall, in NC it seems to have been coordinated better than other places- apart from the local Board of Elections failing to forward some paperwork during early voting and the legal hotline going down for a few days during the same period. Even here there was evidence of poor coordination and redundant training though.
It is hard not to feel lied to, given the hype. I spent 13 hours Tuesday typing in info at the polling station - at least I got a Republican governor and government out of it.
Posted by: Grey Fox at November 08, 2012 11:51 AM (DeRsD)
It seems like it has the possibility to be a good idea. It really needed to be tested before. Why uneducated terrorists understand the idea of dry runs and these guys didn't is beyond me.
Narwal was pretty genius. We need some of that.
This shit sounds dumb, but thats a point or two right here. Once you add in the systemic cheating, we're talking some real numbers.
Posted by: JollyRoger at November 08, 2012 11:51 AM (t06LC)
I live in WI and volunteered for ORCA in early Oct. Completed the training online. Participated in the conference calls. And never heard another word from them. I emailed every day and called several times. Nothing.
I checked on 6 precincts within 30 minutes of my house by asking friends who voted in them to look. There were zero ORCA volunteers in any of them. Zero. In Wisconsin.
Posted by: Muad'dib at November 08, 2012 11:51 AM (KjlbF)
Posted by: mr.frakypants at November 08, 2012 11:51 AM (2B4de)
Posted by: Baldy at November 08, 2012 11:51 AM (opS9C)
Posted by: Soothsayer at November 08, 2012 11:51 AM (jUytm)
A STUTTERING CLUSTERFUCK OF A MISERABLE FAILURE!
Posted by: General Woundwort at November 08, 2012 11:52 AM (06lNq)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at November 08, 2012 11:52 AM (bxiXv)
Posted by: Andy at November 08, 2012 11:52 AM (CofEF)
Posted by: W.H. Doubter at November 08, 2012 11:52 AM (Td9D+)
I admit to scanning the ones from "Paul Ryan" for photos.
Heh heh.
Posted by: HeatherRadish, Crankypants at November 08, 2012 11:52 AM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: Laid-off editor at November 08, 2012 11:52 AM (hyP1j)
When my "packet" didn't arrive, I was told to call the local Elections Board, whereupon I was informed that I did not have my credentials because my "birthdate couldn't be verified" and also that I wasn't signed up under the Romney campaign, but under the name of a local judge or Congressional candidate or something.
WTF.
Posted by: Filly at November 08, 2012 11:53 AM (lgXUp)
Posted by: stourma at November 08, 2012 11:53 AM (JSetw)
My credentials were mailed to me a few days after I emailed Big Dan C. --although three of us were assigned to Connie Mack XXVIII rather than Romney, and you can only have one watcher per candidate.
Posted by: Jerry Jack in Jacksonville at November 08, 2012 11:53 AM (Dll6b)
Posted by: Mrs Compton at November 08, 2012 11:53 AM (dX4hn)
You come into here day in day out demanding refunds for AOSHQ.
You can GTFO.
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 75% more DOOM! at November 08, 2012 11:53 AM (xAtAj)
Posted by: Matt S. at November 08, 2012 11:53 AM (moRRg)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at November 08, 2012 11:53 AM (bxiXv)
Posted by: Soothsayer at November 08, 2012 11:53 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: mr.frakypants at November 08, 2012 03:51 PM (2B4de)
___
Maybe the ORCA admins were donk plants
Posted by: kallisto at November 08, 2012 11:54 AM (jm/9g)
Posted by: KristenS at November 08, 2012 11:54 AM (t6c3b)
It wasn't; gave me a Very Bad Feeling. Where were the 'crawl over broken glass' voters???
Posted by: Jerry Jack in Jacksonville at November 08, 2012
The timing of the voting was weird this year. I worked a predominantly D precinct, which had overall turnout of 77%. Very heavy voting the first few hours, moderate from about 9-5 (with no uptick during lunch). It picked up a little at 5, but not much. And hardly anybody voted between 6:30 and 7. I think I read somewhere that Republicans typically turn out later in the day. If that's so ...
Posted by: buzz at November 08, 2012 11:54 AM (i27M5)
Posted by: MrCaniac at November 08, 2012 11:54 AM (Zd/NW)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows we are now Airstrip One at November 08, 2012 11:54 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: rickb223 (I am John Galt) at November 08, 2012 11:54 AM (GFM2b)
I know I seriously considered not voting in 2008 until Palin got on the ticket.
Posted by: Vic at November 08, 2012 11:54 AM (YdQQY)
I sense a bit of black humor is about to appear on this thread.
Posted by: kallisto at November 08, 2012 11:54 AM (jm/9g)
Because I'd much rather think we lost this one because of bureaucratic fuckups on the part of the Romney campaign in failing to get out the vote, as opposed to demographic shift to the left,.
The former is fixable, and no doubt WILL be fixed well by whomever is the next GOP candidate. The latter. . .that's a perpetual problem.
Posted by: looking closely at November 08, 2012 11:54 AM (PwGfd)
Posted by: KristenS at November 08, 2012 11:55 AM (t6c3b)
You got a link?
Posted by: Vic at November 08, 2012 11:55 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Rich at November 08, 2012 11:55 AM (arczc)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Coming not nearly soon enough. at November 08, 2012 11:55 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: toby928© for TB at November 08, 2012 11:56 AM (evdj2)
Posted by: Matt at November 08, 2012 11:56 AM (ljiM/)
Posted by: Rich at November 08, 2012 11:56 AM (arczc)
"Because I'd much rather think we lost this one because of bureaucratic fuckups on the part of the Romney campaign in failing to get out the vote, as opposed to demographic shift to the left,."
You have tens of millions of votes to try and blame on bureaucratic fuckups then. Good luck.
Posted by: hannitys_hybrid at November 08, 2012 11:57 AM (zpqa2)
laceyunderalls:
Â@
I did the Lawyers for Romney thing as well. In my area, it actually worked reasonable well. The guy who headed up the program in my state did a great training program. We had the precinct lists a week before the election. We had several conference calls and I had good communication with the headquarters.
However, we had a god awful time touching base with our Poll Observers as half of them did not show up. Let me be clear, they were not barred from the site, they were not turned away, they were not unassigned, THEY JUST DID NOT SHOW UP.
Posted by: nc at November 08, 2012 11:57 AM (Cxl7g)
Did Romney ever fight for military ballots to be properly issued, voter ID?
Posted by: joeindc44 says choom on fuckers at November 08, 2012 03:46 PM (QxSug)
Not only is Mitt's under McCain's, but so is fucking Barry's by nearly 2 Mil. Wrap your head around that one.
Posted by: Duh! at November 08, 2012 11:57 AM (Zs83Q)
Posted by: toby928© for TB at November 08, 2012 11:57 AM (evdj2)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows we are now Airstrip One at November 08, 2012 11:57 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Grey Fox at November 08, 2012 11:57 AM (DeRsD)
WELL, this needs to be changed immediately. And I plan to do something about it.
First, constant outreach over the next two years in high R propensity voting blocks, i.e., regular church goers and nursing homes.
Second, a system THAT FUCKING WORKS in place and BANK EACH AND EVERY FUCKING VOTE IN EARLY VOTING STATES, period.
How has this not been done already. Are we run by a party of fucking idiots.
Third, how do you get in touch with grass roots organizers/volunteers who work as poll watchers, etc. Is there such a list?
Posted by: Prescient11 at November 08, 2012 11:57 AM (tVTLU)
Posted by: Elize Nayden at November 08, 2012 11:58 AM (8EBWh)
Posted by: kallisto at November 08, 2012 03:54 PM (jm/9g)
Please be sure to complete the user satisfaction survey that you will be receiving via email in the next few days.
Posted by: The Stuxnet Co. at November 08, 2012 11:58 AM (QKKT0)
Posted by: Juji Pill at November 08, 2012 11:58 AM (4DvER)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at November 08, 2012 11:58 AM (79ueO)
Posted by: joeindc44 says choom on fuckers at November 08, 2012 11:58 AM (QxSug)
Gen Woolworth in the thread below asks how can Obama win coal country PA?!?!?
Easy.
Mitt Romney never drove home the point to those idiots that Obama hates coal.
If Mitt Romney did his job, the coal industry workers would've been shitting their pants at the prospect of another 4 years of Obama.
Posted by: Soothsayer at November 08, 2012 03:51 PM (jUytm)
In 2004, Kerry carried coal country in Virginia 60-40. In 08, Obama carried coal country in Virginia 55-45. In 2012, Romney won coal country in Virginia 70-30. His message rang out here.
Posted by: MrCaniac at November 08, 2012 11:58 AM (Zd/NW)
Posted by: exceller at November 08, 2012 11:59 AM (ROGMG)
Posted by: JohnE. at November 08, 2012 11:59 AM (nRTou)
Posted by: rickb223 (I am John Galt) at November 08, 2012 11:59 AM (GFM2b)
Posted by: toby928© for TB at November 08, 2012 03:57 PM (evdj2)
The Bore-man who can't say Corpsman over the Mormon?
Apologies to Emily Hartley.
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at November 08, 2012 11:59 AM (QKKT0)
Posted by: Paul Anka at November 08, 2012 03:45 PM (QKKT0)
Teh funny.
Posted by: wooga at November 08, 2012 12:00 PM (vjyZP)
Posted by: USA at November 08, 2012 12:00 PM (RIg+t)
Exceller,
We lost by a total of 366k votes in four states. Yes, I'd say these failures were very very decisive.
Posted by: Prescient11 at November 08, 2012 12:00 PM (tVTLU)
That should sink in: Not. A. Conservative.
Posted by: Jerry Jack in Jacksonville at November 08, 2012 12:00 PM (Dll6b)
Posted by: Soothsayer at November 08, 2012 12:00 PM (jUytm)
Posted by: NCKate at November 08, 2012 12:00 PM (MsQkt)
Posted by: Tammy al-Thor at November 08, 2012 12:00 PM (2rMmy)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows we are now Airstrip One at November 08, 2012 12:00 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: Rob McNeece at November 08, 2012 12:01 PM (hNXHo)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at November 08, 2012 03:58 PM (79ueO)
Me neither, but neither one of us are in a swing State. You are in a guaranteed blue State and I am in a guaranteed red State.
Posted by: Vic at November 08, 2012 12:01 PM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Ken Royall at November 08, 2012 12:01 PM (x0g8a)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at November 08, 2012 12:01 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: toby928© for TB at November 08, 2012 12:01 PM (evdj2)
This, perhaps, was the bitterest irony of all.
Posted by: Clint Eastwood at November 08, 2012 03:55 PM (lgXUp)
That. Is the funniest shit I have seen in some time.
Posted by: JollyRoger at November 08, 2012 12:02 PM (t06LC)
Posted by: Rich at November 08, 2012 12:02 PM (arczc)
Posted by: mr.frakypants at November 08, 2012 03:51 PM (2B4de)
Someone really needs to look into who designed this thing... what company...
And who THEY supported... a quick perusal of Campaign contributions may be enlightening.
Posted by: Romeo13 at November 08, 2012 12:02 PM (lZBBB)
Posted by: The Free Shit Mafia at November 08, 2012 12:02 PM (NIZHJ)
And we still lost VA?
Posted by: Soothsayer at November 08, 2012 04:00 PM (jUytm)
Sequestration will take care of that. That it is Oshitforbrains doesn't just replace all the military bureaucrats with socialist bureaucrats.
Posted by: Vic at November 08, 2012 12:03 PM (YdQQY)
Posted by: tasker at November 08, 2012 12:03 PM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Soothsayer at November 08, 2012 12:03 PM (jUytm)
Posted by: Rich at November 08, 2012 04:02 PM (arczc)
__
It explains the inflated turnout on the part of African-Americans anyway. I have a feeling Philadelphia was not the only city where this occurred.
Posted by: kallisto at November 08, 2012 12:03 PM (jm/9g)
Hey, a new constituency that needs enfranchising!
Posted by: The Democrats at November 08, 2012 12:03 PM (QKKT0)
Posted by: t-bird at November 08, 2012 12:04 PM (FcR7P)
Posted by: maddogg at November 08, 2012 12:04 PM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Harrison J. Bounel on the Down Low at November 08, 2012 12:04 PM (C34KJ)
Posted by: Soothsayer at November 08, 2012 12:04 PM (jUytm)
Posted by: Rich at November 08, 2012 12:04 PM (arczc)
I also signed up for ORCA. The first time I signed up I never heard back. So I signed up again. This time I got an email saying it would take a couple days to process me into their system. After that I was asked to particiapte in the above mentioned "training call" which wasn't really training. Then I was told I'd get a packet. I never got it. When the morning of election day rolled around and I didn't have a packet, I just decided to call an audible and went to the Fairfax County GOP Headquarters and asked for some walk lists. I ended up knocking on close to 150 doors which in the end didn't do any good but was probably more effective than the ORCA deal.
Oh well. Live and learn. I think in the future we gotta just go old school like Jesse Ventura when he ran for governor. Instead of trying to divide up the electorate by likely voters based on consumer habits and voter history, we should just knock on ever damn registered voter's door and ask for their vote. Grassroots, bottum up campaigning. Go into every neighborhood and ask for their vote. We've given up totally on vast segments of the population becase we assume they'll never vote our way. In truth they don't vote our way because we don't bother to stop by and ask for their vote.
That is all, Morons. Carry on.
Posted by: DC Zombie at November 08, 2012 12:04 PM (b96e6)
Would a better run operation have made a difference -- I'd like to think so. Because it is a fixable thing.
Â@
I agree with the early commenter who noted the difficulty of having a large centralized operation try to coordinate this across thousands of precincts, each with different voting laws and rules, over a huge country.
Posted by: nc at November 08, 2012 12:04 PM (Cxl7g)
I would love to just find a farm in Canada or something and just grow enough to survive on without making any money so that I don't have to fork any over to these mobsters anymore.
Posted by: Aaron at November 08, 2012 12:05 PM (Tlix5)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) All Dead Inside at November 08, 2012 12:05 PM (/eBe8)
Posted by: Soothsayer at November 08, 2012 04:03 PM (jUytm)
__
He said as much earlier in the day. Told a reporter: "I expect a solid win."
Meanwhile, preznit was already thanking his campaign workers for a job well done "no matter what happens tonight".
Bizzarro.
Posted by: kallisto at November 08, 2012 12:05 PM (jm/9g)
>>I think you've sufficiently flogged this one to death. we get it, bad execution which added to the frustration of losing the election. was this decisive in any way? of course not.
Yes. It was. We lost VA, OH, CO and FL by a combined total of 375,000 votes. An effective GOTV effort may have turned this election to Romney.
So yes, it was consequential.
Posted by: Ben at November 08, 2012 12:05 PM (C2Y4l)
Posted by: Michael Babbitt at November 08, 2012 12:05 PM (p/jtE)
"We lost by a total of 366k votes in four states. Yes, I'd say these failures were very very decisive."
Even if decisive, the main takeaway should be that the election was close when it should not have been. So in 2016 do you want to count on having a better GOTV effort carrying the day? How much more do you think the adolescent electorate will have shifted by then? It will be worse, not better.
People are not getting smarter, they're getting more dependent. And worse economic times will breed more dependency, until it all comes down. Maybe before then.
Posted by: hannitys_hybrid at November 08, 2012 12:06 PM (zpqa2)
Posted by: supercore23 at November 08, 2012 12:06 PM (bwV72)
I made phone calls on election day and was grateful for the paper list I was calling from, the striker used florescent pink highlighter.
On election day, worked from a Cong.campaign headquarters not a Victory Center and they were very organized and had their certificates ready for striker/watchers by Sat. AM.
Posted by: Deli LLama at November 08, 2012 12:06 PM (lGu1O)
I hate my generation.
Posted by: Jones in CO at November 08, 2012 12:06 PM (8sCoq)
Posted by: Iblis at November 08, 2012 12:06 PM (9221z)
Yep, tens of millions didn't stay away because THIS year they weren't called up on Election Day and reminded to go to the polls. "Hello? Oh, is that today? Ok."
So what's your point here? Next time around, you want to say 'Fuck GOTV' and just run a couple extra ads instead?
Posted by: entropy at November 08, 2012 12:06 PM (TULs6)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at November 08, 2012 03:52 PM (bxiXv)
Right. Additionally, I would add naive. As in, it's "naive" to think that appealing to traditional American values is gonna cut it, considering the electorate. Or "love of country", rather than "revenge". The revenge voters won. America is not what it was, we need to deal with it.
The revenge voters need to suffer greatly in order to have a come to Jesus moment. Our job is to do all we can not to suffer along with them.
Posted by: tubal at November 08, 2012 12:06 PM (BoE3Z)
Posted by: Roy at November 08, 2012 12:06 PM (VndSC)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 08, 2012 12:06 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: runner at November 08, 2012 12:06 PM (WR5xI)
Posted by: Boned to the Max at November 08, 2012 12:06 PM (gkiG+)
Soothsayer, I agree 1000000%.
fuck this. We need to take control of grass roots efforts at the grass roots. NEVER AGAIN...........
Posted by: Prescient11 at November 08, 2012 12:06 PM (tVTLU)
So, it's odd to hear about others having these issues, because it seemed to work fine for me.
Posted by: Chris at November 08, 2012 12:06 PM (gI9Bk)
Posted by: USA at November 08, 2012 12:07 PM (RIg+t)
Posted by: tasker at November 08, 2012 12:07 PM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Highsmith at November 08, 2012 12:07 PM (uwaMU)
Posted by: RushBabe at November 08, 2012 12:07 PM (tQHzJ)
Posted by: Cricket at November 08, 2012 12:07 PM (DrC22)
Posted by: Not and Artist at November 08, 2012 12:07 PM (uRumV)
Oh, and we went for legal weed in a big way.
I hate my generation.
Obama is promising to crack down on it. GOP could make up some new ground with younger voters if they stopped trying to lock people in cages because they disapprove of their use of satanic vegetables.
Posted by: entropy at November 08, 2012 12:08 PM (TULs6)
Posted by: ColoradoMoron at November 08, 2012 12:08 PM (jJ0sR)
Posted by: Ace O'Dale at November 08, 2012 12:08 PM (yHbsV)
Posted by: maddogg at November 08, 2012 12:08 PM (OlN4e)
Posted by: tasker at November 08, 2012 12:08 PM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Soothsayer at November 08, 2012 12:08 PM (jUytm)
Posted by: toby928© for TB at November 08, 2012 12:08 PM (evdj2)
Posted by: supercore23 at November 08, 2012 12:08 PM (bwV72)
Posted by: joeindc44 says choom on fuckers at November 08, 2012 12:08 PM (QxSug)
123 -- yea -- the 90% turnout number is a might tough to believe. The 99% number in favor of Obama -- that I can believe.
127 -- you are probably right. Look, better Republican GOTV may make a difference around the edges, but Democrats are probably always likely to be better about it.
Posted by: nc at November 08, 2012 12:08 PM (Cxl7g)
Posted by: Rich at November 08, 2012 12:08 PM (arczc)
Posted by: phreshone at November 08, 2012 12:09 PM (MAhUT)
Obamacare is a massive undertaking – a new, unprecedented and technologically advanced plan too.
Big fuckin' deal.
Posted by: Roy at November 08, 2012 12:09 PM (VndSC)
Posted by: DCPensFan at November 08, 2012 12:09 PM (ma/2m)
Posted by: Truman North at November 08, 2012 12:09 PM (+EYUY)
GOP, you have probably thousands, maybe tens or hundreds of thousands of IT professionals who do this for a much more demanding customer set than the government- from banks to (my current client) energy sector companies to people who even just run their own blogs. Any 5 of us could have done this better.
First, I don't have a problem with a javascript web-page designed to be accessible on any internet enabled device (laptops, phones, tablets, whatever). In fact, that sounds like one thing they did right- no reason to right potentially 5 different versions of the UI, and all the crunching can be done server-side.
That said, the rest of that is completely unacceptable. My company would get fired in a heart-beat if we tried to deliver a product in that fashion.
GOP, please, you have lots of tech savvy resources. Please use them.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) All Dead Inside at November 08, 2012 12:09 PM (/eBe8)
Posted by: NCKate at November 08, 2012 04:00 PM (MsQkt)
My house got a crap-load of calls too - 4-5 a day for weeks on end. I just assumed they were calling to encourage my sister to vote, since she is registered Republican and hasn't voted here in the last couple elections (because she has been married and living in Kansas for eight years....).
Posted by: Grey Fox at November 08, 2012 12:09 PM (DeRsD)
Explaining VA is very simple - DC. DC is growing like crazy (ugh) and all sorts of leftist shitheads are moving in to get on the gravy train. They're not going to live in the District proper among all those dangerous minorities, and taxes are higher in Maryland, so they flock to northern VA. Simple as that.
Posted by: radar at November 08, 2012 12:09 PM (zmlwq)
hannity's.
We need both. I mean, let's be honest here, who gives a fuck if we help some lazy voter get going and get to the fucking polls.
There should be NO ONE left on those rolls as high propensity voters, they should be contacted before election day with the words, can we "count on you to vote" on election day.
The rolls should be checked to make sure that they voted. AND IF NOT, THEN WE SHOULD BE THERE IN A FUCKING VAN TO HOLD THEM TO THEIR PROMISE.
That is what is needed, pure and simple. There is a month to fucking early vote in Ohio. That's a month where we need to confirm or bank millions of early votes. Pure and simple.
Posted by: Prescient11 at November 08, 2012 12:10 PM (tVTLU)
Posted by: Jones in CO at November 08, 2012 12:10 PM (8sCoq)
Posted by: ColoradoMoron at November 08, 2012 12:10 PM (jJ0sR)
Posted by: Ms. Winfrey at November 08, 2012 12:10 PM (wAQA5)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at November 08, 2012 12:10 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: Soothsayer at November 08, 2012 12:11 PM (jUytm)
Posted by: joeindc44 says choom on fuckers at November 08, 2012 12:11 PM (QxSug)
Posted by: rickb223 (I am John Galt) at November 08, 2012 12:11 PM (GFM2b)
I'd get people killed if I delivered a product like that, so let me add my professional disapproval.
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at November 08, 2012 12:11 PM (4+LTj)
Posted by: MJ at November 08, 2012 12:12 PM (TR60b)
Legal weed vs illegal?
IMO, might as well have legal, and keep the money here, instead of sending it to Mexican cartels. Really, if adults want to smoke weed at home, let them.
If his last term is any indication, Obama will wait until he's in political trouble again, before starting the real crackdown in CO as a distraction.
Posted by: looking closely at November 08, 2012 12:12 PM (6Q9g2)
Because I'd much rather think we lost this one because of bureaucratic fuckups on the part of the Romney campaign in failing to get out the vote, as opposed to demographic shift to the left,.
The former is fixable, and no doubt WILL be fixed well by whomever is the next GOP candidate. The latter. . .that's a perpetual problem.
Posted by: looking closely at November 08, 2012 03:54 PM (PwGfd)
It would make me feel better too if I didn't think the GOP would go right back out in 2016 and nominate exactly the same sort of candidate again. But, it's the GOP, so they will. Romney might be a sharp guy, but seems like a lot of the folks working for him, well, not so sharp.
Posted by: davidinvirginia at November 08, 2012 12:12 PM (qEkGZ)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at November 08, 2012 12:12 PM (79ueO)
It should have been a walk.
Posted by: toby928© for TB at November 08, 2012 04:01 PM (evdj2)
Ask a hundred Americans if they think Obama is a "marxist". See how many "yes" answers you get---compared to the Funny Faces and rolling eyes
But yes, a ham sandwich should have walloped Obama. A conservative ham sandwich....
Posted by: Jerry Jack in Jacksonville at November 08, 2012 12:12 PM (Dll6b)
Posted by: Harrison J. Bounel on the Down Low at November 08, 2012 12:12 PM (C34KJ)
Posted by: WalrusRex at November 08, 2012 12:12 PM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: jakeman at November 08, 2012 12:12 PM (96M6e)
Romney screwup aside, this was probably the last time I'm going to vote on actual election day. If I can vote early, I'm doing so from now on.
Posted by: looking closely at November 08, 2012 12:14 PM (6Q9g2)
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at November 08, 2012 04:11 PM (4+LTj)
Like I said earlier.... we need to find out which company supposedly built this thing.... and do a little investigation.
Posted by: Romeo13 at November 08, 2012 12:14 PM (lZBBB)
Posted by: tasker at November 08, 2012 04:08 PM (r2PLg)
Western VA. A very red precinct. I checked later, and Romney got more votes there than McCain did in '08, so at least where I was they did get turn out up. Too bad it was a clusterfark everywhere else.
Posted by: Chris at November 08, 2012 12:14 PM (gI9Bk)
Posted by: tasker at November 08, 2012 12:14 PM (r2PLg)
This story is kind of funny - if the outcome weren't so tragic. It's the same 'original genius' you see at all large unwieldy corporations. (I spent 20 years in these environments.) It's the ego-maniacal GM that says, 'yah, forget what $12 MIL of high-end product marketing research/impact studies say - I KNOW THIS MARKET!' While not as dire, it also shares the bug of having really expensive consequences 99 times out of 100. Funny shit. While it was a complete clusterf*ck, I'll applaud their vision and hope its something the party will continue to develop - hopefully in time for '14.
Posted by: Is what JQ Public is thinking... at November 08, 2012 12:14 PM (NBj0d)
It's a sad day in the world when Democrats are smarter and do things that much better than Republicans.
Thanks for fucking my country.
Posted by: © Sponge at November 08, 2012 12:14 PM (UK9cE)
Posted by: joeindc44 says choom on fuckers at November 08, 2012 12:14 PM (QxSug)
Posted by: Liberal Cat at November 08, 2012 12:14 PM (UypUQ)
Posted by: Soothsayer at November 08, 2012 12:14 PM (jUytm)
Posted by: Rich at November 08, 2012 12:14 PM (arczc)
Posted by: Iblis at November 08, 2012 12:15 PM (9221z)
Posted by: WalrusRex at November 08, 2012 12:15 PM (Hx5uv)
Damn. I guess all those poly sci dinks in the Democratic party new what they were doing when they selected that major. I guess you can engineer a slick atom splitter, but if you donÂ’t control the gumÂ’nt purse you have to stand in line behind the people wanting Obama phones and food stamps. He who has the gold rules.
Posted by: DumboTheAvenger at November 08, 2012 12:15 PM (BvTwT)
I was an ORCA volunteer in Central PA.
Got my "Watcher" Certificate in the mail from county party guy, no problem.
My problem came when I attempted to log-in. Evidently all in PA were given 7-digit passwords when the "app" would only take 5 digits.
They called with new password, but then the "app" didn't work. Turns out the default browser on my Samsung Galaxy S III wouln't work with their site. They didn't have any suggestions when I called about it. I figured "What the hell" and downloaded Chrome for my phone then it worked.
So I used the app from 11 am till closing.
Like you...not really sure how effective it was.
Posted by: Scott at November 08, 2012 12:15 PM (Lvp63)
Posted by: Jerry Jack in Jacksonville at November 08, 2012 12:16 PM (Dll6b)
Posted by: Buzzsaw at November 08, 2012 12:16 PM (tf9Ne)
Posted by: Hussein in the Membrane at November 08, 2012 12:17 PM (EX+sq)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at November 08, 2012 12:17 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: Rich at November 08, 2012 04:14 PM (arczc)
I always go back to the fact that it took a Constitutional Amendment to make alcohol illegal.... but somehow only a Federal Law to make Pot Illegal....
It seems to me, that the precedent was set by alcohol.....
Posted by: Romeo13 at November 08, 2012 12:17 PM (lZBBB)
Posted by: Ben at November 08, 2012 12:18 PM (C2Y4l)
Posted by: soothsayerwing plover at November 08, 2012 12:18 PM (jUytm)
When I keep saying how the depressed turnout, especially among Randomly Selected White Dudes, happened because Romney (and the campaign he ran) is "offputting"—how he in fact *did* send out this vibe that, like Obama said (meaning something completely different), he's "not one of us" and disdains "us"—this is what kind of thing I mean.
The Dems should be the *only* party of petty, desperately climbing, hothouse shits. They're *better* at it. When the GOP acts like that (as it has, increasingly, from Bush I on), it just seems gross and time-sharey to real top-of-the-food-chain guys (and the women who gush for them, and the people whose aspirations lie elsewhere)—and in Randomly Selected White Dude's daily life, this is what the people who make his life *suck* are like.
The most he can do to resist them is not help them. So he does it.
Posted by: oblig. at November 08, 2012 12:18 PM (cePv8)
Pretty cool, I thought! First, they'll actually tell me what I'm supposed to do and when my app and info is coming, since I haven't heard from anyone yet. Second, Mitt and Paul might patch into the call for a couple of minutes. Or Marco Rubio. Newt? Dick Morris? Anyone?
Well no. There was no additional info, just the introduction of our two VERY special guests, pollster Neil Newhouse and Rich Beeson. I only knew Beeson's name from spam emails, but I knew Newhouse from supposedly leaked internal polls. Kind of a letdown, but hey, maybe I am getting some inside info from the campaign to fire me up! Internal polls!
Newhouse gets on and tells us that Romney is up by one nationally in Rasmussen and Gallup. Which of course everyone on the call already knew 12 hours earlier because we are freaking enthusiastic supporters volunteering to take time off work and sit in a polling place all day. So thanks for telling us nothing. But then the internals...cool! He's going to tell us that we're going to shock the world tomorrow! Or he'll say we've locked down VA, FL, NC and CO, and are surging in OH and WI. Or maybe a tease to expect at least one state to go in our column that nobody is talking about. Something, anything. No. He says that internals show 6 races in swing states within two points. So get out there and do good work, because these are margin of error races. Thanks. That was it. Not "we're up by very small margins within MoE", or "we're leading a couple and trailing a couple". No, just "6 races within 2 points", which is really saying "we're down in six swing states and can't even say any that we are winning. It was the most demoralizing call they could have had. They simply should not have even done it. I told my aunt about it (she was supposed to be on the call, but couldn't get through). She was completely demoralized too. Of course, 24 hours later I understood. The internals were right. They trailed in every single freaking swing state. But why even have that call? And why tease it as getting to hear from a couple of special guests, when it is a couple of people nobody cares about?
For people who don't want to hear about ORCA stories, then read another thread. This didn't cause Romney to lose, but it was a telling, frustrating experience.
Posted by: Matt at November 08, 2012 12:18 PM (ljiM/)
Posted by: madamex at November 08, 2012 12:18 PM (+kvQd)
Posted by: thunderb at November 08, 2012 12:18 PM (QrCl7)
ace, rubio is going to iowa in a couple weeks
Posted by: Flapjackmaka at November 08, 2012 12:18 PM (iEujK)
Posted by: runner at November 08, 2012 12:19 PM (WR5xI)
Posted by: Hussein in the Membrane at November 08, 2012 12:19 PM (EX+sq)
Re-Posted from earlier thread:
I have to say that the call from home app was kinda shitty from a user-interface criteria. The page was too long, forcing you to scroll up and down between calls... sometimes froze when trying to start it up... and WORST OF ALL, the buttons were just static images... nothing happens at all when you press them to signify your action was triggers. No depression-state of image, no animation or anything on the screen indicating you've moved to the next step in the process. Also, overlooking someone in my family doing the calls, I noticed that he failed to notice the two first questions, "do/who do you plan to vote for?" and jumped right into the script instead.
A billion dollars and that's your Call From Home Ap? C'mon GOP, get your stuff together.
Posted by: Serious Cat at November 08, 2012 12:19 PM (UypUQ)
Posted by: Tammy al-Thor at November 08, 2012 12:19 PM (2rMmy)
Of course it was. We lost by ~2% (well, 3-4, I guess). A well coordinated GOTV could have made that up fairly easily.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) All Dead Inside at November 08, 2012 12:19 PM (/eBe8)
Posted by: Harrison J. Bounel on the Down Low at November 08, 2012 12:19 PM (C34KJ)
Posted by: USA at November 08, 2012 12:20 PM (RIg+t)
Posted by: Burn the Witch at November 08, 2012 12:20 PM (uD2fR)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at November 08, 2012 12:20 PM (ojOys)
He was the funny looking guy who smoked cigars in those old black and white movies. So there.
Posted by: Typical Swing Voter at November 08, 2012 12:20 PM (SY2Kh)
It's not technology - it's people. 99% of this comes down to ground game at the precinct level on Election Day. The County Party has to have Precint Captains that are organized, dedicated, and willing to hand-hold volunteers. Think platoon sergeant or squad leader. I worked in Northern Virginia - PWC. I started out with a very motivated and dedicated precinct captain - phone calls and emails weeks and days in advance. On Election day at 0530 she had a portable tent set up at the poll, a table, stickers and literature, a portable propane heater, coffee, phones and phone numbers for everybody and their grandmother in Party, and a rock solid schedule with volunteers that promised to show up. Every little hiccup and snafu was promptly reported up the chain of command and resolved
I was later dispatched to another precinct, one on the east side of Route 1 - a heavy blue area, because that captain or the person above him had failed to secure an adequate number of reliable volunteers ahead of E-Day. The contrast could not have been deeper. It was like the precinct captain was just going through the motions. I ended up spending the rest of the day there, freezing my ass off, doing what I could to get as many R's cast as I could. We were totally outmatched, however. I could not believe the number of voters that were driven to the polls by Obama's team. Parking was really tight (it was a school with poor parking) and the entrance to the poll was at the middle of the bus loop, so I could see the Obama drag and drop operation first hand. They had quite the operation going.
If you look at the PWC precinct data for the D-rich precincts in the east end of the county, you will see how we were simply slaughtered by the GOTV effort in "their" precincts in what used to be a reliably Republican county.
Stay turgid, morons.
Posted by: SnakePlizzken at November 08, 2012 12:20 PM (CWJ0q)
Posted by: toby928© for TB at November 08, 2012 12:20 PM (evdj2)
I am a PM for one of the largest technology integration firms in the country.
Creating a nationwide on demand, highly available and instantaneously updated database of voters who have voted and who have not voted is child's play.
You could even have the system dispatch drivers to pick up voters to be chauffered to their polling site.
This is not complex stuff.
We can create rocket propelled sky cranes but a simple and effective GOTV implementation is beyond these idiots.
Maddening!!
Posted by: General Woundwort at November 08, 2012 12:20 PM (06lNq)
Posted by: Rob McNeece at November 08, 2012 12:21 PM (hNXHo)
Posted by: tasker at November 08, 2012 12:21 PM (r2PLg)
Orcas eat sharks---see what they did there? Clever, no? Snarky,,,,,
Posted by: Jerry Jack in Jacksonville at November 08, 2012 12:21 PM (Dll6b)
Who the hell came up with the name ORCA anyway?
Should have been named TURD.
I wish everyone would quit it with the nicknames already.
Posted by: Ms. Winfrey at November 08, 2012 12:21 PM (wAQA5)
Posted by: Rich at November 08, 2012 12:21 PM (arczc)
Posted by: t-bird at November 08, 2012 12:21 PM (FcR7P)
ace, rubio is going to iowa in a couple weeks
Sweet. I'm going to get in liberal's faces and ask why they aren't voting for Rubio. WHY ARE YOU RACIST?? WHY DO YOU HATE CUBANS!!!??
Posted by: Zac at November 08, 2012 12:22 PM (F6KtL)
Posted by: JollyRoger at November 08, 2012 12:22 PM (t06LC)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at November 08, 2012 12:22 PM (Ho2rs)
Posted by: t-bird at November 08, 2012 12:22 PM (FcR7P)
Posted by: New to New Orleans at November 08, 2012 12:23 PM (lhX9P)
Posted by: Janetoo at November 08, 2012 12:23 PM (/TVdO)
Pot is just another "States rights" issue. That was actually Ryan's position on this. . .that the Federal gov't shouldn't get involved.
My take on this is that, in a manner somewhat analogous to gay marriage, or handgun concealed carry, legal marijuana is mostly a demographic issue. We already have some sort of "medical" marijuana program, at least on paper, in a dozen plus states, though quite a few of these have been stonewalled by internal State politics.
Polling shows that nearly 50% of American adults support legalization right now, and the numbers continue to increase a bit each year, to the point where in ten years, we'll probably have a number of other states with decriminalized cannabis.
In contrast, they still effectively have versions of residual ALCOHOL prohibition in some of the red states, so I don't think we're going to be seeing legal weed in many of these places during our lifetimes.
Posted by: looking closely at November 08, 2012 12:23 PM (6Q9g2)
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at November 08, 2012 12:23 PM (PHb2k)
General woundwort, please contact me regarding your thoughts, anonymously or whatever.
That is exactly what needs to be done.
Posted by: Prescient11 at November 08, 2012 12:24 PM (tVTLU)
Posted by: GroverMuhfugginCleveland at November 08, 2012 12:24 PM (LXKJo)
Posted by: thunderb at November 08, 2012 12:24 PM (QrCl7)
One vote, two votes, three votes for Obama! No votes, no poll watchers, no election judges for Romney!
Posted by: Philly Poll Watcher at November 08, 2012 12:24 PM (F6KtL)
Posted by: JollyRoger at November 08, 2012 04:22 PM (t06LC)
------
Sounds like while we were urging our folks to get to the booths..... The Obamabots went out and drug theirs to the boths.
Posted by: fixerupper at November 08, 2012 12:24 PM (yzX2R)
Posted by: soothsayer at November 08, 2012 12:25 PM (jUytm)
Posted by: dananjcon at November 08, 2012 12:25 PM (jvd3N)
Posted by: Lady in Black at November 08, 2012 12:25 PM (lTVJy)
Posted by: Hussein in the Membrane at November 08, 2012 12:25 PM (EX+sq)
It would make me feel better too if I didn't think the GOP would go right back out in 2016 and nominate exactly the same sort of candidate again. But, it's the GOP, so they will. Romney might be a sharp guy, but seems like a lot of the folks working for him, well, not so sharp.
Doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results is the definition of insanity.
Maybe it's finally time to give Libertarians a shot.
You've got 4 years to build them up and make them look viable as a replacement for the GOP. If a bunch of conservatives and tea partiers put their mind to it, it could be pulled off.
The Libertarians don't have any Akins or Murdochs that like to free riff on the theology of rape.
Regardless of what party banner you move forward on, I really think republicans need to read this Washington Examiner article: tinyurl.com/b9b3dyt
Posted by: entropy at November 08, 2012 12:25 PM (TULs6)
Posted by: MoeRon at November 08, 2012 12:25 PM (yWDpP)
Posted by: USA at November 08, 2012 12:25 PM (RIg+t)
Posted by: GroverMuhfugginCleveland at November 08, 2012 12:25 PM (LXKJo)
Posted by: Ben at November 08, 2012 12:26 PM (C2Y4l)
I don't know about "child's play." It seems that's what team R/R thought. But it is actually astoundingly straight-forward once you know the nuts and bolts.
Heck, sans the scalability and javascript UI (I'm no good, personally, with UI) I could have built something to do this in a day or two. Given several months, I'd not only have added the scalability and the UI, I would have load tested the F out the thing, had redundancy plans in place, and provided solid documentation well ahead of the night before.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) All Dead Inside at November 08, 2012 12:26 PM (/eBe8)
Posted by: Chris Knight at November 08, 2012 12:27 PM (Iae/W)
@274
Sweet. That's exactly what we need to do. Someone asks for gas money next time. Fuck 'em. Go to City Hall and ask them.
Posted by: Philly Poll Watcher at November 08, 2012 12:27 PM (F6KtL)
When I was in Houston in 08 i tried to volunteer at the Republican HQ. I was getting out of law school and had visions of doing... fuck something.... constructive with my spare time there.
Turns out the thing I could do that was constructive was empty out boxes of old fliers and posters into the dumpster. Otherwise sit around. This was in the fall of the election season mind you. Besides being mind numbingly boring, I thought a more consrutive use of my time would be fapping at home.
Posted by: JollyRoger at November 08, 2012 12:27 PM (t06LC)
There is no reason we can't have communist agitprop put in service of conservatism.
You look at something like regulatory licensing schemes in all the blue cities and blue states - it is rigging ownership of the means of production, to create class barriers.
But we don't even bother to contest the socialist vote. We won't win it - well duh. But you don't need to win it to cut into it.
Posted by: entropy at November 08, 2012 12:27 PM (TULs6)
Posted by: tasker at November 08, 2012 12:27 PM (r2PLg)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Coming not nearly soon enough. at November 08, 2012 12:27 PM (VtjlW)
Posted by: GroverMuhfugginCleveland at November 08, 2012 12:28 PM (LXKJo)
(CNBC) All the problems investors face-from a fiscal meltdown to the various economic woes around the world-add up to one daunting prospect: Another possible recession just over the horizon.
As the financial world puts Tuesday's presidential election behind it, the light in the tunnel could be an economic freight train.
Funny how all of these stories are coming out after the election. I'm sure it's still all Bush's fault
Posted by: TheQuietMan at November 08, 2012 12:28 PM (1Jaio)
They are obviously hapless and soft, not worth getting your heart broken over.
All I want is government off my back as much as is reasonable, and allowed to live my life, paying a fair share.
Where the hell do I go now?
Posted by: tubal at November 08, 2012 12:29 PM (BoE3Z)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at November 08, 2012 12:29 PM (LROPO)
Maybe I'll just keep reposting this on every thread until it sinks in.
They don't like us. They want us to lose. They will do everything they can to make us lose. Ethical or not. They won't avoid wedge issues they will make the whole appearance about them. They won't edit out gaffes, they will replay them in slow motion from different angles. They won't ask about reasonable stances and give you time to explain they will only ask about the most extreme positions and demand a yes or no. The more face time you have with them is only more opportunity to F* up and give them exactly what they *WANT* to ruin your candidacy.
The only way this gets solved is not by appearing on liberal media and therefore giving them the clips they want AND ratings which mean revenue AND more influence; instead working on reinvigorating and creating conservative media and culture alternatives.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at November 08, 2012 12:29 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at November 08, 2012 12:29 PM (PHb2k)
You've got 4 years to build them up and make them look viable as a replacement for the GOP. If a bunch of conservatives and tea partiers put their mind to it, it could be pulled off.
I am highly intrigued by your insanely idealistic and ridiculous fantasy which will never, ever happen.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at November 08, 2012 12:30 PM (SY2Kh)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hP5KzBJ42r4
Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at November 08, 2012 12:30 PM (vd7A8)
"Ask Obama for the money."
My new mantra."
I think I will get some cards printed up with that obscene logo.
Posted by: hannitys_hybrid at November 08, 2012 12:30 PM (zpqa2)
It's not that they don't know, it's that they don't think it matters, or they don't think anyone "cares" about them.
Go look at my blog (yes, I have one) "Stories from the (Phone) Line: Cindy." She's a veteran of GOTV campaigns. One of the biggest parts of GOTV is the connection, the relationship, between two real human people.
It's one thing to know, in a kind of abstract way, that things suck and it'd be nice if they'd change. It's another to know someone is counting on you; that what you do is important to them.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) All Dead Inside at November 08, 2012 12:30 PM (/eBe8)
Posted by: tasker at November 08, 2012 12:30 PM (r2PLg)
Posted by: YIKES! at November 08, 2012 12:30 PM (1PE/J)
Posted by: Hussein in the Membrane at November 08, 2012 12:31 PM (EX+sq)
Notice how Barry's reelection factors into this "problems investors face" not at all. It's the Euro, I tells ya....the Euro!!
Posted by: Lady in Black at November 08, 2012 12:31 PM (lTVJy)
Bush never governed as a fiscal conservative so in many respects it is.
Posted by: burned cut-loop [/i] [/b] at November 08, 2012 12:31 PM (SX6wc)
Posted by: Mrs. Dang at November 08, 2012 12:31 PM (6jAtn)
I think its because Romney (anti medical pot) and Ryan (States rights) were in conflict here, and that always means the VP candidate shuts up and adopts the Presidential's candidates position.
Here it is, if you want to see it:
http://tinyurl.com/c3mq7c7
Posted by: looking closely at November 08, 2012 12:31 PM (PwGfd)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at November 08, 2012 12:32 PM (79ueO)
Posted by: joeindc44 says choom on fuckers at November 08, 2012 12:32 PM (QxSug)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at November 08, 2012 12:32 PM (5tpzF)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at November 08, 2012 12:32 PM (6Hf3R)
First I've heard of it. Why wasn't this mentioned more?
Because it's a tribal culture thing.
If you think you should be able to eat pretty much whatever the hell plant you want without a federal regulatory agency getting in the way, well, that makes you liberal.
Actually it does... but not the way they mean it.
GOPers really need to get over this shallow shit and unify toward the greater cause of ending the leviathan state. You don't have to approve of what your neighbor does, you just have to acknowledge it's his right.
Posted by: entropy at November 08, 2012 12:32 PM (TULs6)
Posted by: Whatev at November 08, 2012 12:33 PM (2t6Gz)
Posted by: tasker at November 08, 2012 12:33 PM (r2PLg)
This explains a lot.
I think I'm going to go throw up now. Romney was supposed to be this uber-competent guy, but I guess they were too inexperienced in this sort of thing.
Posted by: Optimizer at November 08, 2012 12:33 PM (Mxt9o)
The second disaster occurred when the agreed to allow the MFM to host the primary debates.
The third disaster was when they allowed the MFM to host the Presidential debates.
Sure the MFM was instrumental in getting Obama elected. But the damn RNC gave them every opportunity. No MFM host, no Candy Crowley ambush.
Posted by: Vic at November 08, 2012 12:33 PM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Harrison J. Bounel on the Down Low at November 08, 2012 12:33 PM (C34KJ)
'I am a PM for one of the largest technology integration firms in the country.
Creating a nationwide on demand, highly available and instantaneously updated database of voters who have voted and who have not voted is child's play.
You could even have the system dispatch drivers to pick up voters to be chauffered to their polling site.
This is not complex stuff....'
Posted by: General Woundwort at November 08, 2012 04:20 PM (06lNq)
Respectfully sir, then get on it.
Posted by: Is what JQ Public is thinking... at November 08, 2012 12:33 PM (NBj0d)
Posted by: Rob McNeece at November 08, 2012 12:34 PM (hNXHo)
AllenG
Out of curiousity, how hard do you think it would be to create a program that assembled voting info in a County from a publicly available Co. Board of Election site.
In my county, just as a completely random example, all voter information is online -- including a voter's name, party registration, address and voting history (the EU data privacy laws would have a field day with that).
Posted by: nc at November 08, 2012 12:34 PM (Cxl7g)
Posted by: Santa (D-Everywhere) at November 08, 2012 12:34 PM (zpqa2)
Posted by: t-bird at November 08, 2012 12:34 PM (FcR7P)
This right here is one of the only sensible things that has been said at the HQ in the past 2 days. Abide it or fail for life.
--
Clearly you know what you're talking about in terms of how to engage people to get them on your side.
Posted by: Mayday at November 08, 2012 12:34 PM (F3s39)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at November 08, 2012 12:34 PM (79ueO)
Posted by: Scobface at November 08, 2012 12:34 PM (IoNBC)
It is estimated that more black people, not fewer, voted in 2012 than 2008. More Latinos voted, not fewer, and an even greater percentage of them supported Obama this time. The youth vote did not decline from 2008. All this despite flagging enthusiasm for the president.
HereÂ’s a telling anecdote related by a senior Obama aide to the press pool on WednesdayÂ’s flight from Chicago back to Washington.
During flight, a campaign official talked about the ground game on background . . .
In describing the ground game, the official told of a conversation he had with a top field director on Monday. The GOP had tweeted that they had knocked on 75,000 doors in Ohio the day prior. Not to worry, the director said, “we knocked on 376,000.”
Posted by: eureka! at November 08, 2012 12:34 PM (UL+ny)
Posted by: tasker at November 08, 2012 12:35 PM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Whatev at November 08, 2012 12:35 PM (2t6Gz)
"Sure. For $5."
Posted by: Jones in CO at November 08, 2012 12:35 PM (8sCoq)
Posted by: soothsayer at November 08, 2012 12:35 PM (jUytm)
They paid them or they threatened them with union or Black thugs. Old people in cities are easy to manipulate.
Additionally, as an IT professional, I can tell you that electronic voting on screen with no paper ballot to serve as a way to verify what the vote actually was would be so easy to manipulate. Just write some code to work only on 11/6/12 that makes every 3rd or 4th vote for one guy flip to the other guy. You bury it deep in the code and then have it delete itself and change the compiler and other logs. My Goodness, SciFi novels have been pointing this out forever. With a half a billion dollars in your campaign chest you can find some programmers to do this in key states. Some would do it for free for hacker bragging rights.
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Wily Wrepublican Wench at November 08, 2012 12:35 PM (kXoT0)
Posted by: Cricket at November 08, 2012 12:35 PM (DrC22)
Posted by: Duhgee at November 08, 2012 12:35 PM (26gda)
I don't have any proof, only what she told me when she got the training.
Posted by: Miss Marple at November 08, 2012 12:36 PM (GoIUi)
The "crawl over broken glass voters" voted. I got up off of my sick bed and dragged myself around to the polls. I was one of the 95,000 in Philly who voted correctly. Yay me.
Problem is, we seemed to think that there were many more of those "broken glass" voters than there were. Again, I'm blinded by my environment......but my normally apolitical friends did not like Obama but saw no reason to vote for Romney. I tried and tried and tried.
Posted by: Greepeace at November 08, 2012 12:36 PM (YmPwQ)
I am highly intrigued by your insanely idealistic and ridiculous fantasy which will never, ever happen.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at November 08, 2012 04:30 PM (SY2Kh)
Yeah... no way a third party ever gets into power...
Posted by: The Whigs at November 08, 2012 12:36 PM (lZBBB)
Let's leave the stupid to the GOP. They're good at it.
Posted by: hannitys_hybrid at November 08, 2012 12:36 PM (zpqa2)
the GOP could start their primaries in the following 3 states in any order:
1. Texas
2. Missouri
3. Alabama
that would give any acceptable conservative a level field to start before Iowa, or New Hampshire. Liberal GOP'ers wouldn't have huge momentum right off of the bat with those three starting points.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at November 08, 2012 12:36 PM (VrVBw)
Well at least you guys spanked them.
Damn VA was maddeningly close Election Night --hell we were ahead there most of the night.
I think half of Fairfax came in late and won it for Obama.
Posted by: tasker at November 08, 2012 04:27 PM (r2PLg)
I was very optimistic while I was watching all those people-most of whom were Republicans-come in to vote. I thought, man, if this is what it's like across the country, we've got this. Heard also about packed polling places elsewhere in red parts of VA. Very disappointing to go home after spending 13 hours straight at the polling place and discover that not only did Dems come out, too, but that Republicans hadn't. Not only that, but to have VA go blue again? Ugh. Felt very much like a wasted day and a wasted last few months of effort in general.
Posted by: Chris at November 08, 2012 12:37 PM (gI9Bk)
Posted by: soothsayer at November 08, 2012 12:37 PM (jUytm)
Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at November 08, 2012 12:37 PM (YmPwQ)
Posted by: Gerry at November 08, 2012 12:37 PM (i8u8P)
My check list was different from the one above - mine did note to not forget my credentials and only listed bring you chair once.
My problem came when I couldn't get onto the website at all. Tried a couple of different browsers and still nothing. At this point, I manually checked off names and then would leave to call them in every hour. I did receive a call around 10am from the Romney guy who emailed me my credentials to let me know that the Orca 'app' didn't work in Rochester and Dover and wanted to know if I had a hard copy of the list (which I did) otherwise they would bring me one. He told me to keep doing what I was doing.
It was difficult to hear the names being called off and that there were two separate lines split alphabetically so I would miss half the people coming in. I have no idea if what I did was received anywhere or if it helped at all.
Every person who worked at the polls and had worked there in 2008 said that the turn-out was bigger than they had ever had - they were afraid they were going to run out of ballots.
Throughout the day most of the people were seniors and middle age folks - very few young people where showing up. This changed around 5pm - a ton of young people started coming in and surprisingly enough - they were all first time voters who got to register to vote right there! I would not imagine that these were Romney voters - I could be wrong.
Romney lost my ward by 61 votes!
Posted by: smc1225 at November 08, 2012 12:37 PM (Kw6aj)
Posted by: 80sBaby at November 08, 2012 12:38 PM (YjDyJ)
My county actually flipped this time (narrowly went for Obama in 2008 before I got here) but went for Romney this time...but, like someone said, the cows can't vote here so only 1300 or so registered voters in the entire county.
Posted by: davidinvirginia at November 08, 2012 12:38 PM (qEkGZ)
Posted by: Whatev at November 08, 2012 12:39 PM (2t6Gz)
Posted by: USA at November 08, 2012 12:39 PM (RIg+t)
Posted by: 25 year old female college grad with 75k in student debt at November 08, 2012 12:40 PM (++kZl)
I think the GOP is divided here. You've got libertarians who take the "Gov't stay out of it" with respect to marijuana, and then social conservatives with the "Say no to drugs" position.
I'd actually love to see the pro/anti marijuana support stats by political affiliation, then crosstabbed with age and marital status.
My understanding is that, again, like gay marriage, support for legal pot correlates fairly well with age of the demographic in question. I'd assume it skews more Democrat, but I don't know that to be true for sure.
In the relatively near future, say over the next 2-3 cycles as the demographic inevitably shifts, this may become more of a live electoral issue.
Posted by: looking closely at November 08, 2012 12:40 PM (PwGfd)
@337
Good. And no more fucking litmus tests that are unacceptable to voters. Wink and a nod like the dems do. Get elected and then govern conservative. No more saying what you believe if it loses votes.
Problem with Murdock was he was trying to thread the needle. "I support life but would make exceptions for rape and incest" Boom. Welcome senator.
Posted by: JollyRoger at November 08, 2012 12:40 PM (t06LC)
Posted by: Hussein in the Membrane at November 08, 2012 12:40 PM (EX+sq)
1. Texas
2. Missouri
3. Alabama
that would give any acceptable conservative a level field to start before Iowa, or New Hampshire. Liberal GOP'ers wouldn't have huge momentum right off of the bat with those three starting points.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at November 08, 2012 04:36 PM (VrVBw)
Amen, letting those Liberal Republicans in NH and Iowa pick a candidate. It has enraged me for years to watch a damn caucus--which is so easy to manipulate decide who runs.
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Wily Wrepublican Wench at November 08, 2012 12:40 PM (kXoT0)
I posted here on Sunday that things were FUBAR with ORCA, but later asked Ace to delete the post as I didn't want to provide aid and comfort to the opposition.
Here in Jefferson County, Colorado, I was told on Monday by a worker at the Victory (ha!) HQ that not only was my name not on "the list", but that over 200 people had shown up looking for poll-watcher "credentials"(!).
She sounded quite put-out about it too. She wanted to know how I had signed up, who told me I was work watching the polls. She then asked if I was a registered Republican. In other words, the local office acted as if ORCA was something they'd never heard of before Monday afternoon.
When I asked for the contact given me by Dan Centinello (natl coordinator) she hung up on me.
After hours of "training", even more hours spent trying to get my materials from my local HQ, Tuesday morning I gave up.
Having already voted early as suggested by the ORCA folks, I decided my part was done, so I hit the links later for a relaxing afternoon.
Always have a plan B.
Posted by: Joe Mama at November 08, 2012 12:41 PM (JJ+PT)
Posted by: tasker at November 08, 2012 12:41 PM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Whatev at November 08, 2012 12:41 PM (2t6Gz)
Depends on the website and how Fd up it is.
Now, if I can get access to their underlying data somehow (sometimes you can, but not usually) it wouldn't be difficult at all. If I'm limited to what's actually on their web page, then I'm screen scraping, and that's always iffy.
However, if it's public data, you should be able to issue a FOIA request to get your hands on a copy of that data- which you could then import in a number of ways.
Respectfully sir, then get on it.
Respectfully, this is our living, we don't do it for free. More specifically, we don't *also* do it for free. With the exception of playing games, I don't even normally like to look at my PC when I get home- and I love being a software developer.
Can't speak for the General, but if the Romney Campaign had offered to hire us (as they did for so many other positions) I might well have taken them up on the offer. They didn't. They made those decisions without seeking out the best talent in the country.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) All Dead Inside at November 08, 2012 12:41 PM (/eBe8)
Obama won 99.5% of the vote with 90% turnout in Philly? coughBScough
Posted by: Jones in CO at November 08, 2012 12:41 PM (8sCoq)
Posted by: Cricket at November 08, 2012 12:41 PM (DrC22)
That would require taking over the party and purging the lunatic fringe. Could be doable, though.
Yes. You have a problem, you fell a few million short. Clearly, not enough purging was done. Needs moar purging.
I guess we don't want to win in 2016 either then.
Posted by: entropy at November 08, 2012 12:41 PM (TULs6)
Posted by: james at November 08, 2012 12:42 PM (aFFFO)
Didn't know then. Still don't know now. Because I don't like your fucking tone.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at November 08, 2012 04:32 PM (6Hf3R)
I would have explained it had I ever seen anyone asking questions. As it was, I never said anything about it because I thought it was a secret and I didn't want to be the proverbial loose lips....
Posted by: Grey Fox at November 08, 2012 12:42 PM (DeRsD)
If you can't find examples post-Civil War, you have your answer.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at November 08, 2012 12:42 PM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at November 08, 2012 12:42 PM (79ueO)
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Wily Wrepublican Wench at November 08, 2012 04:35 PM
You won't hear anything about it. The new meme will be that those who suspect massive vote fraud from a campaign that did not hesitate to lie or break the law is on a par with "birferism."
We lost because Romney!, that's why. Harboring any thoughts critical of the Dem campaign is beneath the dignity of our wonderful oh-so-plugged-in pundits.
Even if it is easy.
Posted by: MrScribbler, banned at TepidAir at November 08, 2012 12:43 PM (yKUrR)
Posted by: Whatev at November 08, 2012 12:43 PM (2t6Gz)
Posted by: The Bolsheviks at November 08, 2012 12:43 PM (5tpzF)
Posted by: Jones in CO at November 08, 2012 12:44 PM (8sCoq)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at November 08, 2012 12:44 PM (79ueO)
You think it's bad now? Wait 'til Choom Boy's second term ramps up.
Posted by: MrScribbler, banned at TepidAir at November 08, 2012 12:44 PM (yKUrR)
I was thinking Texas and Utah first, myself.
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at November 08, 2012 12:45 PM (4+LTj)
FORWARD
Posted by: Jones in CO at November 08, 2012 12:45 PM (8sCoq)
Posted by: DrewM. at November 08, 2012 12:45 PM (x8U/s)
Posted by: Vic at November 08, 2012 12:45 PM (YdQQY)
Gee amazing, me agreeing with Ron Paul
Posted by: Nevergiveup at November 08, 2012 04:34 PM (79ueO)
Said the guy (not you NGU) that didn't support the Republican candidate.....
Posted by: Tami at November 08, 2012 12:45 PM (X6akg)
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Wily Wrepublican Wench at November 08, 2012 12:45 PM (kXoT0)
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Wily Wrepublican Wench at November 08, 2012 12:46 PM (kXoT0)
Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at November 08, 2012 12:47 PM (YmPwQ)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at November 08, 2012 12:49 PM (Ho2rs)
The Dem operatives did it because their jobs depended on winning.
Posted by: mrp at November 08, 2012 12:49 PM (HjPtV)
--
Why did/would Obama crack down? I'm surprised he would, as the majority affected are likely his base.
Posted by: Mayday at November 08, 2012 12:50 PM (F3s39)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at November 08, 2012 04:49 PM (Ho2rs)
Yes, I got thank you emails from all the candidates win or lose regarding my donations--except Romney.
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Wily Wrepublican Wench at November 08, 2012 12:50 PM (kXoT0)
Posted by: DC Zombie at November 08, 2012 12:51 PM (b96e6)
Posted by: rockmom at November 08, 2012 12:52 PM (qe2/V)
Posted by: W.H. Doubter at November 08, 2012 12:52 PM (Td9D+)
Posted by: Serious Cat at November 08, 2012 12:54 PM (UypUQ)
Posted by: crosspatch at November 08, 2012 12:55 PM (YRCZD)
--
So true! I've been in marketing research my entire career (20+ years). Worked on New Coke research after it was introduced (my firm was not involved in research for that product before; we would have caught the mistakes). I could cite another example of a very well known company that ignored research findings and is all but gone now because of it (confidentiality prevents disclosure)
Posted by: Mayday at November 08, 2012 12:55 PM (F3s39)
Posted by: harleycowb at November 08, 2012 12:56 PM (wSTfB)
Posted by: crosspatch at November 08, 2012 04:55 PM (YRCZD)
By hijacking the Libertarian Party's access and building our own redundant operation to run side by side the GOP's ORCA.
Posted by: Serious Cat at November 08, 2012 12:57 PM (UypUQ)
Posted by: ericinva at November 08, 2012 12:58 PM (qJQ6s)
This ORCA thing really bothers me. Who from the Romney campaign bought it? Did they buy it from Microsoft or was that just an assumption my friend made? I know they explained it to Priebus as some sort of great thing because he was very enthusiastic about the GOTV effort.
Didn't anyone ask for tests and demonstrations? Was the system compromised? Who was in charge of contacting volunteers? Who was in charge of getting those emails sent out? I myself volunteered and never heard a thing.
Also, I have a friend who ordered stuff from the Romney store and it took over 2 months to arrive. She got her shirt about a week before the election. That is crappy. So who was in charge of that?
I really want the story on this because if this was a case of hubris or incompetence, that's one thing. If there were infiltrators and sabotage, that's another.
Posted by: Miss Marple at November 08, 2012 12:59 PM (GoIUi)
Posted by: crosspatch at November 08, 2012 12:59 PM (YRCZD)
Posted by: crosspatch at November 08, 2012 01:00 PM (YRCZD)
I know I seriously considered not voting in 2008 until Palin got on the ticket.
Posted by: Vic at November 08, 2012 03:54 PM (YdQQY)
We don't know that yet. The votes have not all been counted this year. Can't compare incomplete vote counts to '08, yet.
Posted by: Aslan's Girl at November 08, 2012 01:01 PM (KL49F)
Posted by: Serious Cat at November 08, 2012 01:01 PM (UypUQ)
Posted by: Comrade Arthur at November 08, 2012 01:01 PM (eEev7)
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Wily Wrepublican Wench at November 08, 2012 04:50 PM (kXoT0)
I got thank-yous from Romney, Mandel in Ohio, Brown in Mass., West in Florida and Love in Utah...the other 6 or 7 senate candidates I gave money to? Not a peep.
Posted by: davidinvirginia at November 08, 2012 01:01 PM (qEkGZ)
Posted by: Y-not at November 08, 2012 01:01 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: crosspatch at November 08, 2012 01:01 PM (YRCZD)
Posted by: Serious Cat at November 08, 2012 05:01 PM (UypUQ)
And if the drone detects that you have voted for an unacceptable candidate, it will zap you with a Hellfire as you leave the polling station.
Posted by: davidinvirginia at November 08, 2012 01:02 PM (qEkGZ)
Posted by: harleycowb at November 08, 2012 01:03 PM (wSTfB)
Posted by: crosspatch at November 08, 2012 01:04 PM (YRCZD)
Posted by: crosspatch at November 08, 2012 01:05 PM (YRCZD)
Posted by: trickamsterdam at November 08, 2012 01:06 PM (uTBHY)
Posted by: crosspatch at November 08, 2012 01:07 PM (YRCZD)
Really? So it's not only our responsibility to convince them to vote for us, but we have to ensure they do it or it's 100% on us? Screw that noise, I'll buy a 1-2% push in what should be a close race. But this race? No combination of circumstantial factors make it acceptable that more people in this country pulled the lever for Obama than Romney, that is a people that deserve a tyrant, that deserve chains, that deserve every inch of what is going to F* them in the next 10 years. They are the lukewarm and they are about to be spit out.
This is my going forward thinking. If you didn't vote (barring some extreme unforseen couldn't make it to the polls circumstance) for Romney, F* you. You willingly participated in the destruction of your country.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at November 08, 2012 01:07 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Prescient11 at November 08, 2012 04:00 PM (tVTLU)
In an election like this 300,000 votes is paltry, we were supposed to win much bigger.
I'm digesting ORCA's clusterfark, but I'm still going with voter fraud, esp. with what I'm reading from Ulsterman's Insider and the comments there (Insider himself has admitted to cheating elections and he smells a major rat).
Posted by: Aslan's Girl at November 08, 2012 01:08 PM (KL49F)
OS/2 2.0 GA
It wasn't until Warp, which came after 2.0 SP, 2.1, and 2.11, that the promise was eventually delivered on.
What happened here sounds very typical of a developer driven effort with little actual testing. Something of this magnitude would need 6 months of testing minimum, with a test staff of at least 50 to ensure success...
...documentation and usability needs to be "tested" too on green walkins off the street - people who have never heard of the thing.
Posted by: @PurpAv at November 08, 2012 01:09 PM (al6zW)
There may be many other problems diagnosed in an election post-mortum for Romney, but Ace of Spades has the finger of truth on the massive fail of ORCA
Posted by: DC Calamity at November 08, 2012 01:10 PM (PGPO9)
Posted by: Y-not at November 08, 2012 01:10 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: ericinva at November 08, 2012 01:10 PM (qJQ6s)
Posted by: Steve J. at November 08, 2012 01:11 PM (xKDMF)
Posted by: Y-not at November 08, 2012 01:13 PM (5H6zj)
Flabbergasted to see people arguing that it doesn't matter. It's an election, you win with votes Not ideas, not advertising, not anything but VOTES. The gotv effort is the most fundamental aspect of the campaign, where the rubber meets the road. It's the only tangible thing in the process that directly impacts the outcome for goodness sakes.
Would be great if 51% of the population were motivated, hardcore conservatives like us, but they aren't. They aren't on the other side either, but they are kicking our butt on targeting the actual people and getting the actual votes on election day (and before).
After all this mental masturbation the last 2 days about messaging, philosophy, demographics, here is one where there's no discussion or debate necessary. We will improve our chances to win by simply getting better at targeting and gotv. They are better at it than we are. This is the first place we should start.
And thanks for sharing your experience. Hopefully someone in the organization reads it.
Posted by: briancspam@yahoo.com at November 08, 2012 01:15 PM (ByFcb)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at November 08, 2012 01:18 PM (0q2P7)
Glad it wasn't just me that had trouble. I signed up to help with Project ORCA in August. Did the online certification, waited for my packet to come in the mail. Never received anything just e-mails about training calls at times I was never able to attend. Received a call Thursday before the election from a local person who had a list she received from Boston. They had placed me to watch the polls in a little tiny town 50 miles from where I live (guess in Boston they don't realize that these big states out west have big counties). I said no, I didn't have time to add an hour each way to the time I had to volunteer. She said maybe they could use me in another town about 15 minutes away. I said great. She said she would call when my credentials and packet were ready to be picked up from headquarters. Never heard back - went down on Monday to check. Nope, they had all the poll watchers they needed, but would call if something came up. I could help make phone calls if I wanted to. Personally I was so annoyed with all the calls I had been receiving didn't want to bother anyone else with phone calls so didn't go back. Tried to connect to the last conference call Monday night to listen to the 2 special guests - just kept getting system busy tone and never could connect.
Especially given the outcome was very disappointed this system didn't work. It seemed like such a great, efficient tool - using people with smart phones to track votes, unfortunately, it obviously didn't work. Wonder how much money was spent on a system that didn't work - guessing if you could follow the money you might be surprised who benefited the most.
Posted by: RLP at November 08, 2012 01:20 PM (gCbIq)
Posted by: Y-not at November 08, 2012 01:20 PM (5H6zj)
A bracero program for community organizers?
Posted by: RioBravo at November 08, 2012 01:21 PM (eEfYn)
Posted by: Stirner at November 08, 2012 01:22 PM (Ytuz8)
Unfortunately they probably will. Only it will be our heads, and the heads of our children.
Posted by: mama winger, stranger in a strange land at November 08, 2012 01:23 PM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: mama winger, stranger in a strange land at November 08, 2012 01:23 PM (P6QsQ)
It's twue, it's twue.
Posted by: Andy at November 08, 2012 01:24 PM (5Rurq)
Posted by: joest73 at November 08, 2012 01:24 PM (h6Xwq)
80 I'm like a broken record, but it shouldn't have mattered. Not this time in this election. Not with this guy. We should have been able to run a damn martian and won. People shouldn't have needed to have been told to, you know, vote. Country is lost not because of poor GOTV efforts, but because the electorate is stupid as fuck.
is correct.
Posted by: Timwi at November 08, 2012 01:24 PM (pdhxN)
ORCA smells like "saboteur", but I don't think we lost because of it. We had the enthusiasm naturally, without call lists. I've never once been called on election day to GOTV, and yet, I go to the polls with bells on every cycle. Let me repeat: we had so much enhusiasm we should've won this without "strike-lists". Which leads me back to fraud.
Posted by: Aslan's Girl at November 08, 2012 01:25 PM (KL49F)
The RNC had a system (no word on whether it was any good or not - we'll likely never know). Team Romney bigfooted them.
This is all on Team Romney.
Posted by: Andy at November 08, 2012 01:25 PM (5Rurq)
I did it. It was kinda fucked up but it worked. My little precinct went from something like 80% turnout in 08 to around 81% in 12.
I am in Pennsylvania so it didn't matter.
Posted by: i am mad as hell - period at November 08, 2012 01:26 PM (cgxNI)
This is all on Team Romney.
Posted by: Andy at November 08, 2012 05:25 PM (5Rurq)
---------
If it's the same system Reince used here in Wisconsin, it worked pretty well.
Posted by: mama winger, stranger in a strange land at November 08, 2012 01:27 PM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: Timwi at November 08, 2012 01:28 PM (pdhxN)
By the way, I happen to be President of Council of my little borough. We have a total of 310 registered voters in my entire borough. I am up for re-election next year.
I got to see all of my constituents. All of the ones that vote at least.
Posted by: i am mad as hell - period at November 08, 2012 01:30 PM (cgxNI)
Sorry.
Posted by: mama winger, stranger in a strange land at November 08, 2012 01:31 PM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: Y-not at November 08, 2012 01:31 PM (5H6zj)
Another thing, the GOP obsession w/ tv ads defies explanation. SuperPACs could have spent another $100 million this month on ads for Romney and the outcome would have been the same. The ones that are effective are targeted and saying something that stands out or that people don't know aobut. For example, those dumb Obama ads on Romney's tax returns and private equity experience really helped him, b/c the average person didn't know Romney yet and b/c Romney wasn't on the air himself during that time. Or like radio ads targeting specific groups like w/ Obama to women on contraception. I mean, think how devestating radio ads on spanish channels could have been telling people the Catholic church was actually suing Obama. Or ads in blue collar white areas in Ohio about how Obamacare was leading full time jobs to become part time. TV ads are expensive and have to address big, broad subjects, while they kick our butts on the small things. The small things are perfect for radio and direct mail, and since they're cheaper you can target exactly the group you want with an ad that matters to them and might actually change a mind.
And if someone had a SuperPAC to develop innovative gotv systems and databases for targeting, I'd invest in that, as it woul dactually be a competitive advantage, not another ad on tv. The value of TV ads is long since passed, they don't really work, the return on investment on them has become very small relative to the cost.
Posted by: briancspam@yahoo.com at November 08, 2012 01:33 PM (ByFcb)
Posted by: Timwi at November 08, 2012 01:33 PM (pdhxN)
Posted by: Aslan's Girl at November 08, 2012 05:08 PM (KL49F)
--
Glad to see I'm not the only one questioning the possibility of major or systematic fraud. With the reports about the military votes, machines flipping votes from R to O, Philly poll watchers getting kicked out and just flat out low numbers compared to everything pointing to a high turnout, I can't believe there aren't more people asking questions.
I wish Romney hadn't conceded so fast, would have waited until all issues could be identified and investigated. Check to make sure there weren't lots of dead, illegal or felons voting. Conduct research among non-voters to be sure they in fact did not vote. I hope work is being done to ensure the election wasn't stolen, and to take steps if there is any doubt. I'll go read Ulsterman now too, thanks for the tip.
Posted by: Mayday at November 08, 2012 01:34 PM (F3s39)
House of Lies
Posted by: EnemyOfStatists at November 08, 2012 01:36 PM (d7MnY)
Posted by: fred at November 08, 2012 01:37 PM (QKcJx)
Posted by: Whatwesettlefor at November 08, 2012 01:37 PM (T0krV)
Posted by: Brian at November 08, 2012 01:38 PM (ByFcb)
Posted by: JeffinBL at November 08, 2012 01:38 PM (CXoi4)
they already have it and used it for 2012 - successfully it turns out; micro tagetting, based on profile, etc. - part of project narwhal
Posted by: runner at November 08, 2012 01:43 PM (WR5xI)
"80
I'm like a broken record, but it shouldn't have mattered. Not this time
in this election. Not with this guy. We should have been able to run a
damn martian and won. People shouldn't have needed to have been told to,
you know, vote. Country is lost not because of poor GOTV efforts, but
because the electorate is stupid as fuck."
100% correct, don't disagree. But we didn't win. And we lost Senate seats in Montana and North Dakota too for goodness sakes. A lot of things shouldn't matter, but there's still no excuse for being worse them than at anything in the process. We are behind them here, so it should get fixed b/c the point is winning, the electorate and their stupidity is what it is. If only they had to live with the consequences, I'd say #### it, but we have to live with it too. So in addition to all the discussion about how we have to get more people to agree w/ us, let's first do the easiest thing and match or exceed the Dems in gotv.
Posted by: Brian at November 08, 2012 01:43 PM (ByFcb)
It's that way at all levels of government and corporate. Come up with some grand scheme that everybody around the conference table signs off on and then implement it.
Whether or not it worked - or won the election - was immaterial.
Posted by: Bea Arthur's Dick at November 08, 2012 01:48 PM (dM1NM)
Posted by: runner at November 08, 2012 01:50 PM (WR5xI)
So I finally stumbled on the call from home app. Damn thing crashed on me twice before it finally started working. I started making calls. The script was awful. It was a poll on who are you going to vote for. WTF? You're calling Republican likely voters and that's what you want to know, who are you likely to vote for...again 4 days before the election? The script should be Hi this is John calling to remind you to vote. Do you need a ride to the polls? None of this hi this is John and I'm doing a quick survey about the election. Last thing anyone in Ohio or Iowa wants is another polling company calling.
And here's the best part...before doing all this, on Friday I sent an email to the campaign saying basically I live in this city, my state is solid blue but I want to help out in other ways. Here's my phone number, here's my email address. Get in touch with me. I still have yet to get a reply to that email.
Absolutely pathetic GOTV operation all around. This is why IMO Obama won. He used Faceboo, Twitter to perfection. He used data mining to find out to the street level who voted and got someone out there to drag them kicking and screaming to the polls. They did early voting campaigns, again micro targeted at the people they knew would be too lazy to get to the polls on election day.
What do we do? Not even answer an email from someone asking to volunteer.
Pathetic. Just fucking pathetic.
And the even more pathetic thing is in 2016 it will be the same thing.
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at November 08, 2012 01:54 PM (HDgX3)
Posted by: phreshone at November 08, 2012 01:56 PM (MAhUT)
I called and emailed the ORCA people several times. The 'Command Center' phone line said on Monday night: "Call back at 5 am when we open. Click". Called at 7 am, couldn't 'log in'. Told to call back every 10 minutes. Really? Tried once per hour until 6 pm-- FAIL. EPIC FAIL.
Here's the official message from the republican HQ battleground district of Eastern or Scott County Iowa:
These ORCA folks were like Baghdad Bob : IT's all good! We have good information coming, call in 10 minutes, get to the polls at 6:45 am, here's your packet at 9pm the evening before via email, print out 30 pages, nevermind you've been doing this for 30 years and there are three hour shifts in every precinct, go all day, nevermind you can't use cell phones in the polling places. Just no clue about how things are done, no training, nothing.
Epic fail and it didn't just hurt Romney, it's why we lost ground in the house and Senate as well. Notice it happened in Ohio too. Iowa, Ohio, Virginia... noticing a trend ANYONE? HELLO?
Posted by: Harry Coin at November 08, 2012 01:56 PM (XWXFw)
My county GOP chairman emailed me the above information. On Monday. Because he had suddenly gotten word of some secret Project ORCA, didn't know what the hell it was but wanted to inform those of us who intended to participate that we wouldn't be permitted in the polling place.
Strangely, it's good to know that I wasn't the only one who got caught up in this "great idea".
Posted by: antisocialist at November 08, 2012 01:57 PM (j/nZn)
Posted by: Susan g at November 08, 2012 01:57 PM (F2Ehe)
The campaign made a strategic decision earlier on (like back in the summer) that they were going to go after the independents in certain counties
in the key swing states, specifically Ohio and Virginia. Like, they
spent ALL the money in the 4 Northern Virginia counties up until only 6
weeks ago, when they realized that after looking at the data, they had
to get the base to turn out, and then decided to spend money in the red
Virginia counties. Nor did campaign state hq actually have registered
republican voter canvassing lists, or phone lists ready to go AND they
did not want to issue them to the precinct captains who wanted to turn
out their areas. They eventually relented, after heated words and
emergency meetings.
One PC decided to disobey campaign orders
and worked his district and guess what? Second highest turnout of all
state precincts and his precinct managed to go from 53% turnout to
nearly 69% GOP (87% all registered voters). This precinct captain has
now been offered a job at the state level GOP.
Not to malign
Romney personally, because he is a plainly decent guy whom I believe
truly loves this country, but sometimes it boils down to decisions at
these levels, which was replayed in Ohio, too.
Oh, and PA was a
ruse. It was a head fake to get the dems to spend money there. PA was
never in play. A good idea, and it had the left panicked about it.
Posted by: Hidajunshinette at November 08, 2012 02:07 PM (20NzC)
"In 2008, the Obama campaign ran a poll-watching project called Project Houdini. Trevelyan said that the system was powered by an interactive voice response system made by another vendor that melted down under the load and was rendered unusable."
Posted by: 80sBaby at November 08, 2012 02:09 PM (YjDyJ)
I never received official credentials before I arrived at 5:45am, was turned away at the polling site, and had to call Richmond GOP HQ to have then email me a blank PDF of my credentials--and did not receive it until two hours of voting had passed, and 798 people had already voted. The ORCA helpline was never answered any time during the day--who could blame them for ignoring it?
And of course, I never was able to access the Website at all--and until I read this article had no idea it was the "s" in https: that was causing my smartphone to fail to connect. The paper backup ballot was not much help with almost 20% of the voters casting ballots by the time I arrived back at the polling station at 8:30am and was legally allowed to observe.
Unmitagated disaster is exactly what this lousy ORCA project was. The two other Romney pollwatchers and I gave up at about 3pm when nothing was working, and over 50% of the polling district had voted. I would not be a bit surprised if this software disaster cost Romney the election in Virginia.
I wouldn't pay the programmers a dime.
Posted by: @krbaylor618 at November 08, 2012 02:09 PM (D9HVE)
"Instead of just being limited to being used by volunteers watching the polls for the presidential campaign, NGP VAN's smartphone reporting tool is likely to be used by volunteers on a large number of Democratic campaigns from President Obama's re-election effort on down, meaning that there should be more people updating the database of people who have voted. The system is designed to update the central database every time that the end-user enters the names of five additional voters.
The feature enables campaign volunteers with smartphones trained as pollwatchers to log into a mobile-optimized web site, and to check off in near real-time the names of voters who show up at their polling places. But instead of checking off names, the volunteers will be punching in five-digit codes representing the voters. The idea is that monitoring turnout will enable the campaigns to more efficiently manage their GOTV efforts and stop pestering people who have already voted."
Posted by: 80sBaby at November 08, 2012 02:13 PM (YjDyJ)
and worked his district and guess what? Second highest turnout of all
state precincts and his precinct managed to go from 53% turnout to
nearly 69% GOP (87% all registered voters). This precinct captain has
now been offered a job at the state level GOP.
--------------------------------------
Unbelievable.
Posted by: mama winger, stranger in a strange land at November 08, 2012 02:17 PM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: Hidajunshinette at November 08, 2012 02:22 PM (20NzC)
---------------
This.... that the campaign was so inept that he had to go against orders, and that in doing so he got out the vote better than anyone else. It appears the Romney campaign tried to fix something that wasn't broken and royally screwed that up too.
Posted by: mama winger, stranger in a strange land at November 08, 2012 02:26 PM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: Silk at November 08, 2012 02:30 PM (8Tq14)
Posted by: Scott at November 08, 2012 02:32 PM (v8S35)
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/83439.html
You see, it wasn't all about Romney. There were tight house and senate races and local state house races where 'get out the vote' efforts make a HUGE difference. The ORCA system washed out all of that in favor of 'their way'. Most of us have been doing this for a decade or more. The Romney people led our people to 'trust them' and now not only is Mitt out, so our many of our people who could have made it.
Where were the adults a week out who should have noticed is wasn't ready for prime time, and told all the people in the field to rev-up and print out the voter lists and do it as we've known how these many years?
Posted by: Harry Coin at November 08, 2012 02:41 PM (XWXFw)
Posted by: Harry Coin at November 08, 2012 02:44 PM (XWXFw)
Posted by: Abigail Adams at November 08, 2012 02:45 PM (oEafF)
Posted by: Silk at November 08, 2012 02:48 PM (8Tq14)
Posted by: Doug Winship at November 08, 2012 02:51 PM (ohp21)
Posted by: GlitterDove at November 08, 2012 02:52 PM (Z3ckx)
Posted by: JimCA at November 08, 2012 03:11 PM (ogUCJ)
Posted by: Rex the Wonder God at November 08, 2012 03:16 PM (21TJo)
Posted by: Diz at November 08, 2012 03:19 PM (8S+r3)
Posted by: EV at November 08, 2012 03:25 PM (JtkMz)
Posted by: Mickey at November 08, 2012 03:28 PM (d1NnG)
Posted by: Folly at November 08, 2012 03:39 PM (TdMND)
Posted by: JsB at November 08, 2012 03:43 PM (4Q6rG)
Posted by: msmulan at November 08, 2012 03:49 PM (vSWyU)
Posted by: msmulan at November 08, 2012 04:00 PM (vSWyU)
Posted by: LiZ at November 08, 2012 04:10 PM (8S+r3)
Easy.
Mitt Romney never drove home the point to those idiots that Obama hates coal.
If Mitt Romney did his job, the coal industry workers would've been shitting their pants at the prospect of another 4 years of Obama.
-----------------------------
If they don't know it by now, they don't want to know or they don't care. You can't fix stupid.
Posted by: Steve at November 08, 2012 04:15 PM (vK6ug)
---------------
Hate to break it to you, but there is no taking it back at this point. Haven't you been paying attention the past few days? The republicans can't wait to hand the country over to the Hispanic lobby, and when that happens, we will never win another election again. Well, maybe we will if we out lib the libs, but that ain't taking the country back.
Posted by: Steve at November 08, 2012 04:22 PM (vK6ug)
Barack Obama
50.5% 61,062,730 EV 303
Mitt Romney
48.0% 58,073,013 EV 206
_________
2008 (Wikipedia)
Barack Obama
52.93% 69,498,215 EV 365
John McCain
45.66% 59,948,240 EV 173
Posted by: Baldy at November 08, 2012 04:28 PM (opS9C)
Posted by: bbbustard at November 08, 2012 04:33 PM (1MRlF)
several comments:
Willful, arrogant, self-important, and technology-obsessed. Oh, and a bad case of Not Invented Here. Sounds like the typical consultant.
Evidently we had to buy it to find out if it would work. (h/t Nancy Pelosi about the Unaffordable Care Act.)
I've always believed we were the practical, down to earth, party. The one that could get things done.
Heartsick - for all the good people who put their faith in this, and for our beloved country.
Posted by: John Von Neumann at November 08, 2012 04:36 PM (khZbv)
Posted by: LiZ at November 08, 2012 04:40 PM (8S+r3)
I'm still so amazed that a week out the adults in the Republican establishment couldn't see this disaster in the making, rightly assess the tragedy it would impose on local candidates as well as state and congressional, and downsize it. Who was drinking all this technology koolaid?
Posted by: Harry Coin at November 08, 2012 04:47 PM (XWXFw)
Posted by: Micihgan and Oiho at November 08, 2012 04:51 PM (wVKQg)
I was an ORCA in Jax Fl. My training experiences closely track the author's. Got to my precinct, got my first 25 pins to text. Entered about 20 and the call went dead. I reconnected and a recording saying that I had input 3.
None of the help numbers ever answered. I finally contacted local GOP who told me the that the project had crashed. This was the first tickle in my throat that sickness was upon us.
My life experiences have taught me that when a huge event or project goes wrong and or makes no sense from the level of effort involved, look to what it is a cover for.
Hunkering down in Duval.
Posted by: buck schotte at November 08, 2012 04:58 PM (ju2yV)
Posted by: Baldy at November 08, 2012 05:03 PM (opS9C)
Posted by: Ernie at November 08, 2012 05:12 PM (fgccB)
Posted by: Lurker who doesn't copy/paste from Word at November 08, 2012 05:17 PM (xfWVe)
Posted by: SarahT at November 08, 2012 05:35 PM (GXZ22)
Plenty of spanish speakers calling those similar and asking them to go for Mitt.. how different would be all the 'official analysis based on exit polls'.
We risk so much on 'exit polls' when the project of getting people to the polls was botched so badly!
Posted by: Harry Coin at November 08, 2012 05:46 PM (XWXFw)
And the ludicrous caricature of President Obama as incompetent and extreme, a hater of America, is another reason for this loss. "Clear eyes," right?
What I'd like to see is some true conservatism in this country. Not the identity politics, self-delusion, mindlessness and hatred that puts money into the pockets of media fools that win no matter what the outcome. We need a healthy two party system for the betterment of the country, and right now the Republican party isn't holding up its end of the bargain.
Losing the popular vote in 5 of the last 6 presidential elections should set off warning bells. It's not the bogeymen, it's you.
Posted by: Biff Pow at November 08, 2012 05:56 PM (RtvTz)
Without NBC, CNN, NPR, PBS, ABC and CBS in the tank for D's and only FOX there on the other side.... outspent by O with the power of the incumbency.... No, the R's have some work to do. Doable work.
Posted by: Harry Coin at November 08, 2012 06:05 PM (XWXFw)
Posted by: Micihgan and Oiho at November 08, 2012 06:07 PM (wVKQg)
Posted by: Bonnie at November 08, 2012 06:09 PM (RMvaE)
Posted by: Scott Hammond at November 08, 2012 06:29 PM (BIIzb)
Posted by: buck schotte at November 08, 2012 08:58 PM (ju2yV
****
Howdy, neighbor.
You'll find there are a few of us here.
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at November 08, 2012 06:31 PM (piMMO)
I had the same problem with my HP printer. Don't know how yellow cartridge ran out, I never printed in color. Had an important doc to print, printer told me I "must" put in a yellow cartridge for "printer health." Conspiracy theory: more $$ in colored ink, printers add a little when they print black to sell the color ones. Took my doc to office max and my printer to the garbage chute.
I live in MA if you want to visit for commiseration.
Posted by: Stuart Van Tine at November 08, 2012 06:35 PM (N2lSd)
Posted by: JoBeth at November 08, 2012 06:37 PM (I/LFk)
Posted by: Trialkat at November 08, 2012 06:40 PM (rO3Au)
Posted by: josh at November 08, 2012 06:43 PM (A1Tvx)
Obama's much slicker GOTV drew in 10 million fewer voters than 2008 despite far more resources being devoted to it. Sometimes, it's just a cycle where people choose not to vote, it has nothing to do with actual system.
After all that was thrown at this election, I have my doubts that a phone call from a random volunteer on Election Day would have made much difference. Really? You live in Ohio and you're a Republican and one more phone call on Election Day and you would have voted?
Posted by: Jeepers at November 08, 2012 06:45 PM (XDRsa)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at November 08, 2012 06:52 PM (piMMO)
Posted by: Jeff at November 08, 2012 07:04 PM (QFlua)
Posted by: Dan at November 08, 2012 07:11 PM (qxjpY)
Posted by: Stirner at November 08, 2012 07:27 PM (Ytuz8)
Posted by: Rocky at November 08, 2012 07:28 PM (YxD0b)
I've read the Ds took their punch lists of voters and actually got them to the polls, but with our vaunted ORCA program and its failures, did anyone actually use this data to find voters who did not make it to the polls and actually take them there to cast their ballot?
That's the question no one is answering.
(Thank you, ORCA person in MA, for your analysis of what happened in the Boston HQ with the NC pod. That was very illuminating.)
Posted by: @krbaylor618 at November 08, 2012 07:29 PM (D9HVE)
Posted by: JustLikeDavidHasselhoff at November 08, 2012 08:16 PM (71iUa)
Posted by: JoBeth at November 08, 2012 08:33 PM (I/LFk)
Posted by: Rick P at November 08, 2012 08:34 PM (iMH+l)
Posted by: Stirner at November 08, 2012 08:40 PM (Ytuz8)
Posted by: recess supervisor at November 08, 2012 08:43 PM (Ocy8p)
Posted by: Amy at November 08, 2012 08:55 PM (QjRRw)
By 2012 anyone could have made a simple system like ours into sophisticated ipad or smart phone app with vast improvements. and surely our side had the brains to develop such a system from scratch in less than few months if not to find a system that is already working. In business, the chief executive and his staff gets replaced. We need to make sure the next one and his staff can build a better mousetrap. We, the side of free enterprise and unleashing human creativity, apparently lost GOTV to the side of crony capitalism and stealing others ideas.
Failure is just a milesetone on the road to success. We can beat the dems at GOTV eventhough we rarely have.
Those who comment that GOTV does not matter have not fought a ground campaign. A good GOTV campaign could not have saved McCain, change a 6 point loser into a winner, but it could have given Romney the votes he need to be the next President of the United States, changing a 3 point loser into a 1 point winner in key states.
And the stuff about poll watching is horrendous. Every federal election cycle I have my students do 6-8 hours of pollwatching and write a paper about it for my Law of Politics course.
Setting up people to poll watch with the materials needed to be a poll watcher is a no brainer.
I was astounded our side did not have every precinct covered in Cuyahoga County and did not anticipate what would happen in Philly.
I know volunteer organizations are difficult to manage but one reason Romney was supposed to be qualified to be president was his business acumen and being a manager in some form or other is required for great business leaders. The professional staff should have been first rate.
All this is in the past. We don't need to change our conservative creed or move to the center. We need more effective leadership and organization
Posted by: Alan Sager at November 08, 2012 09:06 PM (LxECQ)
Posted by: Paul F at November 08, 2012 09:19 PM (r6u9j)
Posted by: Ray at November 08, 2012 09:25 PM (2jona)
Posted by: Gator at November 08, 2012 09:27 PM (1zDZL)
Look at this list:
Reagan over Carter. Reagan over Mondale. Clinton over Bush. Clinton over Dole. Bush over Gore. Bush over Kerry. Obama over McCain. Obama over Romney.
It's a cult of personality for both parties. If you can't put a guy out there who can engage voters and make them feel like he can talk over a beer, enjoy himself, and let loose a bit, then you cannot win presidential elections. Some will decry this, but Reagan was elected more for his personality than his policies. Substance is important to govern, but style and presentation is important to the vast majority of voters.
Posted by: ARomneySad at November 08, 2012 10:36 PM (Yp0MW)
I am so glad that this post came out. I had seen many explainations for what had happened, and having sorted out what was going on - quantitatively - none of them made sense. Votes were missing. I didn't see how the hell the Obama camp could have "stolen" them, but being of the Chicago machine, they were my primary suspect.
We've been hearing "the polls were right, after all," even by Morris. That's CRAP!! Just look at that last CNN Poll. Sure, it said the vote would be close, but that was obviously fixed, to be non-commital. They had FUDGED the numbers to make it come out that way, using internals (and that's the REAL part of the poll) that were WRONG. They had it D+11, I's by +22, when the reality was something like D+6, I's +5. They were WAY off.
Even these guys who supposedly got the D+ right, did so FOR THE WRONG REASON. Last time, there was a lot of enthusiasm for Obama. This time he managed to replace most of the support he lost by competently scraping the bottom of the barrel. This wasn't about things being the same as last time, at it wasn't a bunch of new Hispanics suddenly materializing in two years, it was about Republicans completely screwing up the ground game on the day of the Big Dance. The guys who got it right didn't estimate things better, or magically predict the unpredictable - they were just lucky.
The rough formula is 0.8*(R-D)+0.3*I. D+6 means R-D = -6, so that's a 4.8 point deficit. His +5 edge with Indies was worth +1.5. Hurricane Sandy - due, apparently to the Homer Simpsons out there - cost Romney about 10 points with the Indies, or 3 points in the popular vote. But the Ground game should have been R+1 instead of D+6, and so this ground game thing cost us about 0.8*7 = 5.6. So Sandy cost us about 3, and ORCA cost us at least 5.
The Republicans were there - we just failed to go get them - badly.
We missed out on what may have been our only chance to get out of this financial crisis with a modest amount of pain because our candidate was the great miracle worker who can turn around financially-troubled organizations, but he was horribly inexperienced in politics, and apparently the Republican National organization was no help. Where the hell does anybody get the idea that a massive change to a crucial component of an election - involving brand-new, untested software - was a good idea? OMFG.
And - realistically - Mitt had managed big money organizations, but not orgs with huge numbers of people.
Our main problem is that we have to deal with the media. A Republican candidate is like a Tuskeegee Airman - they were required to be a lot better than the white guys, just because there were relatively few slots, and no room for error in their little experiment. We must neutralize the media. We can't win things if you have to be so goddamn perfect. For all the hype, Mitt made very few REAL gaffes and serious blunders. Sure, there's a lot of Monday morning quarterbacking, and some may be real, but if there was an even SOMEWHAT even playing field, mediawise, Obama wouldn't have had a chance in hell.
Screw the demographics. If you have the media brainwashing everybody against you 24/7, and you still win sometimes, your problem isn't the message, or the demographics. Obama could launch a nuclear attack against Houston, and the f-ing media wouldn't cover it and the Senate wouldn't impeach him.
Posted by: Optimizer at November 09, 2012 12:18 AM (Mxt9o)
Posted by: Mark s at November 09, 2012 01:15 AM (Mv8ef)
Posted by: DaMav at November 09, 2012 01:45 AM (rT08W)
Posted by: Sheesh at November 09, 2012 03:54 AM (C0Ppg)
I'm an IT wonk too -- data warehouses and big data mostly. I cannot comprehend why a national candidate would not have surrounded himself with competent people. I KNOW they abound.
Posted by: Mark Meed at November 09, 2012 03:55 AM (0/ww0)
@532:
Throw feces? Please admit that had Romney won, rather than 'throwing feces', Twitter would have crashed from all the assassination threats against Romney. There is much blame to go around, and soul-searching for the losers, but spare us all the lectures on losing with decorum.
Posted by: Gabriel Syme at November 09, 2012 04:10 AM (g84Si)
Posted by: Susanna K. at November 09, 2012 04:18 AM (v5It8)
Posted by: RWC at November 09, 2012 04:27 AM (fWAjv)
Posted by: Mike at November 09, 2012 04:55 AM (eZY6x)
I'm a web developer too, and you're right...there were clear signs that this application and site were not properly developed. It worked when the site was up, but clearly there were problems, and likely associated with not being able to handle the load. The http vs https thing probably threw a lot of people as well.
Posted by: trinity76 at November 09, 2012 04:59 AM (vI8R6)
My husband also volunteered to do ORCA....he has worked for Microsoft for a number of years, and knows his way around programs, apps, etc. He was being told this was just happening just in Colorado, apparently not true. He had the exact same problems described in this article, was frustrated with the masses being given the wrong PIN numbers, phone numbers that no one ever answered, etc.....as he watched the Dems do their jobs efficiently- working with strike lists(they would come in compare the lastest Dem voters names to what was on their list and leave to make phone calls or visits to get ppl out to vote). He is now curious as to who designed this program? How many trial runs were done? He wonders if the system was hacked or perhaps, was designed by someone on the "other side" knowing it would be a huge failure? Boy, if it was the latter......I don't know. I heard that ORCA had 37,000 volunteers, and if each one of those volunteers could've brought in at least 20 voters, that this election probably would've had a different outcome. If that number is true - heads should roll. I'd like to know who first suggested this system, who designed it, etc.?
By the way, how many states reported problems with ORCA? Were there any states that were problem free? Just curious.
Posted by: Deb B. at November 09, 2012 05:24 AM (+n62J)
I got my poll watcher certificate to print off and did print off my packet a couple days before. Although the website was down for a bit it worked fine when I needed it to (to update who voted.)
I called the help line periodically throughout the day and got immediate responses.
I'm surprised that you had all those issues.
Posted by: burnadams at November 09, 2012 05:59 AM (/ZYFC)
Posted by: Paula M at November 09, 2012 06:10 AM (2hOFY)
Posted by: locomotivebreath1901 at November 09, 2012 06:25 AM (tld2a)
Posted by: J.S. Morales at November 09, 2012 06:26 AM (QBiGF)
Posted by: Leslie at November 09, 2012 06:44 AM (56Nfh)
Posted by: Brian at November 09, 2012 06:53 AM (Mcg54)
Posted by: Gabriel Syme at November 09, 2012 07:11 AM (g84Si)
Posted by: Dennis in VA at November 09, 2012 07:29 AM (0dbUv)
The white voters of yesteryear would have voted no matter what. They're
the greatest generation. Their sons, while still white,....
Thank god for small blessings.
Joking aside if Romney screwed the GOTV that badly what would he have done with the executive branch? It's not as if he was short of money. Wasn't he supposed to be the management genius? He got his rear end handed to him by the community organizer.
Posted by: kevinw at November 09, 2012 07:40 AM (ncq1x)
Posted by: Karina B at November 09, 2012 07:42 AM (d5tQn)
Posted by: Humble at November 09, 2012 07:46 AM (y3z+E)
Posted by: Bob Morris at November 09, 2012 08:03 AM (sAlf7)
When the face of the party stops shouting about how wonderful they are and how much better they would do stuff (than, well, just about everyone else on earth, especially women) and actually sets to work to actually, gee, WORK (and I don't count raking casino profits work, I'm sorry) and do a decent job instead of demonstrating incompetence and blame-thy-neighbor for everything then I'll reconsider them. Until then, Democrats, Libertarians and the Neonpurplesocks party will be getting my votes.
Posted by: sonia at November 09, 2012 08:03 AM (TvZ7i)
Posted by: Tom S at November 09, 2012 08:07 AM (a5ehm)
Posted by: PJ at November 09, 2012 08:18 AM (m4TDu)
Posted by: Procyon at November 09, 2012 08:31 AM (A945k)
Posted by: cyr at November 09, 2012 09:00 AM (//tKm)
Posted by: axon at November 09, 2012 09:02 AM (097UI)
Posted by: Pam at November 09, 2012 09:03 AM (gu8s/)
Posted by: Kevin at November 09, 2012 09:17 AM (mdnpb)
Posted by: Tzippi Zach at November 09, 2012 09:50 AM (7ZVHb)
Posted by: April at November 09, 2012 10:00 AM (RqjII)
Election day I showed up at my local polling place in Philadelphia, presented my credentials and was made welcome. Tried to log onto the site for hours with no luck. Called the help line and was told that no one could log in for Pennsylvania, Ohio and North Carolina (sounds suspicious right there). They allegedly reset my password and told me they'd call me back in an hour. I never heard anything so after two hours I called them back and they said they were still having problems and to use the phone line to call in names. I did that and punched in 180 PIN numbers for people who had voted that day, sometime during which the system crashed. Tried the helpline again and got someone at 'The Garden" who said the system was down again and to try again later. Tried again later and logged more PINs. Never got any response from anyone about anything; and I'm sure all of the information I gathered was totally wasted. Was a huge waste of time and effort. I have a hard time understanding how something that had such importance to the election could be such an enormous, gigantic pile of garbage.
Posted by: Matt at November 09, 2012 10:09 AM (jm3fE)
Posted by: isaac32767 at November 09, 2012 10:25 AM (s+k3j)
@563 Agree with much of what you said but "You guys are letting yourself be led around by the nose by incompetent fools whose only talent is making you hate the other side" is a bit much.
Et tu?
Posted by: Gabriel Syme at November 09, 2012 10:30 AM (g84Si)
Posted by: Claudius at November 09, 2012 10:49 AM (zAU8E)
Posted by: Equal Opportunity Cynic at November 09, 2012 10:50 AM (21dFr)
Posted by: Lori Carlson at November 09, 2012 10:52 AM (lpxIE)
Posted by: Dave at November 09, 2012 11:02 AM (N1UbI)
@568 "It seemed so carefully planned out when they were pitching it."
Ironic that we conservatives make the 'style over substance' argument in cases like this. I've seen this time and again in grad school and the office, where people spend ten times as long on the PowerPoint as they do on the product. It usually goes exactly as you think it would. But at least the font size is consistent.
Posted by: Gabriel Syme at November 09, 2012 11:12 AM (g84Si)
Posted by: IT_Pro at November 09, 2012 11:16 AM (YcD+g)
Posted by: JR55 at November 09, 2012 11:21 AM (V2Z8k)
Posted by: Sid at November 09, 2012 11:21 AM (dMupl)
Posted by: Lenny Pincus at November 09, 2012 11:25 AM (LWDqG)
Posted by: Equal Opportunity Cynic at November 09, 2012 11:29 AM (21dFr)
So, Team Romney HQ gets infiltrated by libs who sabotaged the works. What did you expect? It's in Boston... Wasn't MA the only state that sent mass mailings to welfare recipients to vote?
Posted by: ray at November 09, 2012 11:32 AM (aQ95b)
Posted by: Sara at November 09, 2012 11:44 AM (SiQnc)
Posted by: emmi at November 09, 2012 11:45 AM (+GZld)
Posted by: axon at November 09, 2012 12:04 PM (097UI)
Posted by: WellAdjustedAndroid at November 09, 2012 12:06 PM (mVsvr)
Posted by: Michigan Mom at November 09, 2012 12:22 PM (uBvii)
As someone who's been playing the "ground game" since 1967, I find Ken's remark to be very naive.
I recount my own experience of Orca at http://tinyurl.com/b7ndjy3
Posted by: Bob Waters at November 09, 2012 12:40 PM (aGAzY)
Posted by: ZZMike at November 09, 2012 01:45 PM (CZwl9)
I am constantly amazed at the basic typos on company websites; esp given that there are *free* plugins for firefox that will spell check apage for you (the free one I have doesn't have a big dictionary; I assume for 50 bucks you can get a good one..)
Today, I was looking at the website of a company that sells 5-20K equipment used mainly in the packaging industry; a real B2B site.
They had a picture with numbers in the picture (1) (2) (3)
The numbers were (obviously) on the wrong things in the picture
I could go on and on; I'm not talking about poor design, where it takes 5 clicks to get a pdf manual (or, god forbid, the product page doesn't have a link to the manual !!)
I'm talking basic spelling
Posted by: ezra abrams at November 09, 2012 01:49 PM (y5ks1)
Posted by: DG at November 09, 2012 02:09 PM (252Xe)
Posted by: Bart at November 09, 2012 02:17 PM (vvf/J)
Posted by: Leesburg Liz at November 09, 2012 02:21 PM (+w93/)
Posted by: John Q at November 09, 2012 02:21 PM (a8eM5)
Posted by: Oscar at November 09, 2012 02:38 PM (KcR6g)
Posted by: Edward at November 09, 2012 02:51 PM (VgRel)
Posted by: steve at November 09, 2012 03:03 PM (1hNQS)
Posted by: Sara at November 09, 2012 03:05 PM (SiQnc)
Posted by: Brandon at November 09, 2012 03:11 PM (luIy8)
Posted by: zaq.hack at November 09, 2012 03:24 PM (CDSQD)
Posted by: Hugh Glass at November 09, 2012 04:14 PM (JS0eP)
Posted by: crossmyheart at November 09, 2012 04:34 PM (lSJnL)
Posted by: larrysouth at November 09, 2012 04:54 PM (yUgcE)
Posted by: Laker at November 09, 2012 05:05 PM (ofh9g)
I signed up. I've watched polls every election since Ford-Carter, taking the day off to sit in what usually are the most democrat precincts. RNC would hand you list of felons that were registered to vote...usually only four or five names. After an hour or so of talking with the poll workers I would casually ask if these people had voted yet. It's really quite simple. The poll workers know those people or at least know their families and sure enough one would get up a few minutes later and go to the phone. Never...ever saw one of those people vote.
I had a phone call from Romney Campaign (Robo) stating that I would be receiving email with all the information to get certified and trained. It never arrived. So I went to work. Second election in a row that I have not poll watched. McCain campaign refused to use volunteers in the polls, at least that is what they told me; they wanted only paid lawyers to work as poll watchers. Rove's second campaign was something to behold. I was in a precinct off Myrtle Avenue in Jacksonville Fl; I was not calling in names that had voted I was reporting vote totals every two hours via phone. At the end of the day I reported the actual votes. Bush had 97 votes out of that precinct out of 1800 cast. Rove knew who had won Florida about 30 minutes after the polls had closed. He had people reporting in just about every precinct in the state.
Posted by: Budahmon at November 09, 2012 05:25 PM (wjNVE)
Posted by: Fidelity at November 09, 2012 05:37 PM (w9BG7)
Posted by: LAF in Boston at November 09, 2012 06:19 PM (IVpYB)
Posted by: LAF in Boston at November 09, 2012 06:32 PM (IVpYB)
...Basically, do you think, possibly, that all of that might indicate you're playing for the wrong team? That reality-based politics--rather than self-aggrandizing, disdainful, "the 47-percent are losers, we're the only folks who matter, we can bend reality to our will, if we say it's so, it's so" politics--is the politics with a future?
I know this is crazy-talk amongst this crowd, but do yourself a favor: Force yourself to read Paul Krugman's blog and columns for a couple of months. Read even the posts that make fun of people like you. But especially the ones that offer data-based economic analysis, with charts and graphs and stuff. Keep in mind: Reality Rules.
I know it's hard. Most of us choose our politics in no small part for the emotional charge we get from rooting for Our Team. I get that. I'm the same way.
But I also think there's just a lot of denial of reality on Team Republican, for starters on economic policy (and on what's actually happening in the economy). That matters.
One more thing: FOX News is not a reliable source of information! However much you enjoy it, THEY MAKE CRAP UP! A LOT!
BTW, to commenter no. 3 above: Obama in 2012 got about 3 million (5%) more votes than McCain got in 2008. Yeah, case in point. You guys really need to stop listening only to each other.
Posted by: John at November 09, 2012 06:50 PM (JCREZ)
Posted by: Karen at November 09, 2012 07:46 PM (6gk77)
It's disappointing to hear that so many other people had major problems with the system.
Posted by: SueF at November 09, 2012 08:01 PM (8MmUq)
Posted by: John at November 09, 2012 08:35 PM (eyP7f)
Posted by: WestCoastPhysicist at November 09, 2012 09:08 PM (JsjdR)
Posted by: LilyO at November 09, 2012 09:36 PM (cDscd)
You insult your own intelligence when you argue that this result was because you didn't have an effective GOTV or that your candidate wasn't conservative enough, or even that the demographics are against you.
We're not stupid; we haven't seen enough evidence that tax cuts will get us out of this mess or that unfettered free enterprise can cure all ills, don't agree that the end of the world is nigh and that this is Obama's fault (or that he's a Muslim or a Marxist or anything close to it), don't want to further a rigid, intolerant and backwards-looking social agenda, don't want an erosion of the separation of church and state, and on top of this are really, really tired of listening to y'all shouting at us and each other 24/7?
I've found it interesting lately that the comments I hear from Republicans sound almost verbatim like what Democrats were saying in 2004. But the world didn't end then and it won't now. I'm actually more open to discussion since I realized this, but on the other hand I'm no fool and I won't be treated as such.
I want to like you. Try offering something new and positive that will actually make most of our lives better, okay? You can start by working on your bipartisanship.
Posted by: SHuD at November 09, 2012 09:45 PM (eNYQr)
Posted by: ORCA at November 09, 2012 11:15 PM (4DnpU)
Posted by: Hal at November 10, 2012 12:45 AM (mwYQX)
Posted by: Capt Joe at November 10, 2012 02:02 AM (dGsh+)
Mmmmm, mmh! Oh, that's good schaudenfreude! Let me lick your salty, salty wingnut tears, ohhh, oohhh, tasty!
So if there was any doubt about it at all, this election debacle with ORCA should have put it to rest for all of you mysogynist, racist, jingoistic douchebags, God Hates Republicans.
That's right, God hates you for all your un-Christian thoughts, words, & actions. So get a clue Republicans, this is how it's going to be from now on, remember 2016 is just around the corner, & when it arrives I'll be saying Hey, GOP, BOHICA!
Posted by: Stentor at November 10, 2012 02:57 AM (1hDg0)
Your post is sad and rather poignant, John, but to be honest, what the fuck did you expect? You were working for a candidate who was utterly and demonstrably politically inept, and he'd been proving that to everyone who listened to and watched him for the past six months.
There were all sorts of indications: his gaffes when he was in the UK before the Olympics in August (you don’t insult your hosts, even if you think they are not ready for/not interested in the Olympics); his “47%” speech in Florida (didn’t anyone think to check the smartphones of people attending the fundraiser? Didn’t Romney realise how easy it is to record private conversations?); alienating Hispanic voters with his support for “self-deportation”; his continued support for halfwits like Akin and Mourdock, when he should have dropped them like a hot brick; his pick of Paul Ryan as vice-president (another right-wing numpty); and his continual changing of his message (was he a strongly conservative right-winger, or a consensus moderate?). And those are just the obvious ones.
And apart from Romney’s own incompetence, didn’t you look at his most vocal supporters and spokespeople and wonder what the hell you had signed up for? Check them out: Fox News, the Tea Party, the Drudge Report, Erick Erickson and RedState, Slug Limbaugh, Palin, Sheldon Adelson, Trump, the Koch brothers, Karl Rove: what a fucking collection – and you were working for them and promoting their message!
Romney was their responsibility, no matter how they want to deny it now, because they outshouted whatever moderate voices there were in the Republican Party, with the result that Romney was the best of an appallingly bad bunch of candidates in the primaries. IÂ’m a Brit, and I have to tell you that even conservatives on this side of the pond were genuinely gobsmacked that Republican voters were choosing between numbskulls like Gingrich, Santorum and Romney.
I repeat: what the fuck did you expect, when you signed up for Team Romney?
Posted by: Martyn Wilson at November 10, 2012 03:02 AM (ODPFE)
Posted by: Martyn Wilson at November 10, 2012 03:03 AM (ODPFE)
John (605 & 602) I don't know where you got your statistics, but here are the actual popular vote totals from 2008
Totals
Obama - 66,882,230 (53.0%) 365 Electoral Votes
McCain - 58,343,671 (46.0%) 173 Electoral Votes
A difference of more than 8.5 million votes. Romney got more votes than McCain, Obama beat McCain's numbers, & Obama definitely had a mandate back in 2008 from the electorate, if he isn't awarded one this time around. Remember Electoral College wins are amplifications of the Popular Vote.
Posted by: Stentor at November 10, 2012 03:16 AM (1hDg0)
THIS WILL NOT BE PROOFED FOR GRAMMAR OR SENTENCE STRUCTURE....THANK YOU FOR OVERLOOKING AND READING MY THOUGHTS.
I enjoyed the article John E, thanks for an honest account of your day and yes very possible if the GOP had better systems in place the results may have been different. Honestly, I don't think the results would have changed any, and I will explain why later. Okay, so I am going to b e speaking only for myself and sharing my viewpoints; if they offend or annoy anyone, allow me to say in advance thank you for giving me your power and putting so much energy into what a single person thinks. Instead of getting mad use that energy to make sure a hungry child does not go without food today (is it the child's fault they don't have any food?) If you answer is yes, well...I hope if you are ever in need there are not people like you around you depend on because they will watch you die before offering a hand.
Moving forward, as for the election personally I have never wanted to be labeled as a Repulican or a Democate...why? Because I am neither, not an independence nor what have you. When deciding to vote I first look upon the person, the man or woman and who they are, what kind of feeling I get from their works. Frankly, Obmam is a good man, seems to want to do the right thing for this country. It's people and the rest of the world. I am sure he plays some political games as they all have to at some point. However, he was never bought and paid for by a few very deep pockets of trillionaire or maybe they were just billionaires, who knows it is all a secret. How can anyone vote for someone who sold the White House from the get go and SUBSEQUENTLY proud of it? OF ALL THE STUPID THINGS ROMNEY SAID AND THEN TO ACCEPT SUPER PAC MONEY MADE MY MIND UP AT THE FIRST CONFIRMED TRUTH. FORGET THE OTHER LESS THEN INTELLIGENT THINGS HE SAID OR DID. SUCH AS: THE WOMEN'S RIGHTS ISSUES, GAY RIGHTS (WHO BUSINESS IS IT WHO YOU LOVE OR SLEEP WITH? MOST OF THE WORLD PROPBLEMS WOULD BE SETTLED IF WE WOULD JUST STOP TELLING OTHERS HOW TO LIVE THEIR LIFE AND WORRY ABOUT OUR OWN. THE government DOES NOT NEED T TELL US WHAT OUR STANDARDS ARE, PEOPLE WITH MINDS THINK!) CHILDREN RIGHTS, IMMINGATION REFORM, ANIMALS RIGHTS, GUN CONTROL (PLEASE WHO NEEDS THAT MUCH FIREPOWER?) TO GIVE R CREDIT, HIS MIND WAS TRUE AND LASER FOCUSED ON T/BILLIONAIRE RIGHTS WHICH WAS THE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUES OF HIS CANDIDACY. Romney only has the interest of his social group and corporations. is that in the best interest of the whole, the country and it's people? The money both sides spend would do so much good in areas needed, but instead they put it back into the pockets of the super rich. Thoughts...iF I had the money,Super Pac, go into small rural town and do an Oprah and change the future of America one mind at a time , one at a time and most importantly oneheart ata time.
Posted by: larry at November 10, 2012 04:46 AM (5wS+D)
John:
I was working the call center in the Boston Garden. Would love to have you blog on my views -- it was nearly as frustrating being there with 1000 other volunteers that were trying to support you guys in the field.
Walt
Posted by: Walt Crosby at November 10, 2012 05:48 AM (q6f7q)
I'm a liberal-leaning independent and it was clear to me right off the bat that there was nothing behind Romney other than clean-cut face, artfully greying hair, and a bright smile. I was paying attention to his speeches and what I heard was a one-note candidate who tailored his remarks on all other issues to try to appeal to whatever crowd he was addressing - even if those comments directly contradicted things he had said somewhere else a day or two before. He stressed cutting taxes and growing jobs when anyone with half of a working brain quickly realized that a) cutting taxes would benefit him the most, and b) he really has no practical history of job creation other than creating firms that dismantle other firms - and that's not job creation. And this isn't even addressing the GOP's platform that deliberately marginalized anyone who wasn't a Christian white male.
You can argue that that's not what it did, but as a white American woman who has lived all her life in an ethnically, economically, and racially diverse area, it was clear to me that the folks I saw around me in my every day life weren't the people the GOP wanted in their world, and whose lives they would do their darnedest to restrict. That was my perception of this GOP campaign, whether or not it was the one intended. And even though that was pointed out many times during the course of the campaign, it was never addressed nor rectified; allowing the only conclusion to be drawn that it was the correct perception.
Hearing how truly screwed up Romney's election targeting campaign was makes me really think that this country dodged a bullet - because as someone earlier pointed out, the folks running his campaign would have been the ones appointed by him to positions of political power after his inauguration. Thinking about what has been said here, the ORCA fiasco was just a microcosm of the Romney campaign's lack of understanding of the larger voting population. It sounds like with ORCA they didn't even understand their own volunteer base; as was mentioned, there are a lot of older poll watchers who aren't necessarily the most technologically-savvy people on earth (not knocking them, I've got them in my family) who can't flip on a dime and cope with a lot of new digital techniques all at once. (Not to mention having to print out that .pdf file would tick a lot of them off because they'd have to use that much of their own paper and ink - lol.)
My advice to the GOP? Jettison the racist elements of your party. They have only done you a disservice and are marginalizing you more and more. Jettison the fundamentalist Christian influences in your party platform. Being a Christian doesn't make one any more or less of an American patriot; ethics and morals aren't dependent on a particular religion. Jettison the misogynistic elements of your party. Women are the majority and we know what is best for our own bodies; we don't need men telling us what we should do with them. Stop with the "my way or the highway" attitude. Go back to the principles that once made your party great. Provide the country with alternative ideas to the Democratic ones; we are a diverse nation and the only way to move into the future is if we take the best ideas from both parties and mold them into one that will benefit the most of us while harming the least.
Really listen to ALL the people and understand that compromise is the key, not an anathema.
Posted by: Keri Q at November 10, 2012 07:04 AM (E3UUP)
Reading the recounting of this disaster and most of the comments (yes, I have the day off) reminds me why I keep shocking people by saying that elections do not guarantee anything except mob rule.
Taking the high road intellectually does not equate to winning over the majority of registered voters - who have been raised in schools taught largely by teachers who graduated from liberal arts colleges stocked mostly with professors who are either openly or closeted socialists - voters, many of whom were barely raised by parents who abdicated their parenting roles in favor of their pursuit of the Joneses rather than the Cleavers.
The above is today's example of a run-on sentence, class.
Posted by: Tim Blosser at November 10, 2012 09:13 AM (wFDE7)
In POLITICS, "there are NO Accidents".. This election went just as planned by the people who financed both oblunder and romney. (duuuh!!SAME PEOPLE).
If you believe this was jusst "Tech Errors" I've got some Oceanfront Property in Phoenix I'd love to sell ya!!. Mebe a Bridge to Nowhere? You could do worse , having thrown the election by ignorance.
Posted by: Bobw. at November 10, 2012 09:35 AM (x3HjN)
We should have. Romney won the white vote, the married vote, the married women vote, the white woman vote. We lost the election with minority voters, who apparently cared less about $6 trillion in debt and double-digit unemployment among minorities and more about the guy who 'cares'. Obama got 95% of the black vote, and about 105% of the vote in Philly and Chicago.
At least with a martian we might have done better with those who have illegal aliens in their family.
Posted by: Harry P Ness Reid at November 10, 2012 10:00 AM (WhCZZ)
Someone missing a tinfoil hat?
Sure there are. Prior to Hurricane Sandy, Romney was up in RCP poll averages. He dropped under Obama only in the last 5 days. WE might be talking about President Romney had it not been for that.
Posted by: Harry P Ness Reid at November 10, 2012 10:03 AM (WhCZZ)
RE: Heh
Sounds like stuff going on inside my own county's political party.
Members of the Executive Committee—few having much of an idea about computers, systems and reliability—wouldn't do diddly to implement systems that could have helped with local elections.
Indeed. Some of them actually BLOCKED implementation of some systems. And the day before they might have been useful, I got calls asking to set them up. To which I replied....has So-and-So FINALLY allowed for us to establish a 3G account with AT&T? So-and-So was—for unknown reasons of very strange paranoia—afraid of giving the phone company our EIN so we could open a 3G account for data transfer.
We're talk'n SERIOUS self-inflicted-wounds here.
Regards,
Chuck(le)
[A wound and dishonour shall he get; and his reproach shall not be wiped away. -- Proverbs]
Posted by: Chuck Pelto at November 10, 2012 10:42 AM (7BguH)
...."No".
Dumber than dirt.....
Posted by: Chuck Pelto at November 10, 2012 10:44 AM (7BguH)
Posted by: MBH at November 10, 2012 11:24 AM (u9LMb)
On the other side Obama has now proven twice that he knows how to hire people and get the job done. Yes, they were really thrifty. The field offices were run on a shoestring and outfitted with all kinds of donated furniture. No money for yard signs. But they got the job done and spent the money where it was needed most.
Obama's people did the best job they possibly could of managing both human and financial resources. I would have expected nothing less than that from Romney's campaign.
Posted by: The Dog Did It at November 10, 2012 12:41 PM (W7SKu)
Posted by: Lawrence J. Richardson at November 10, 2012 01:33 PM (ydnMz)
Posted by: Ormond Otvos at November 10, 2012 01:51 PM (6tmMO)
As another person that was in the Garden on Election Day, poster #600 is on the money with his comments. I would like to add a few things.
On the night before the election, the Boston volunteers were asked to come to Boston for an in-person training, with laptops. It was perplexing that none of us were asked to take out the laptops to test the system that night.
We had been told in conference calls that the JumboTron would be utilized as a resource for information throughout the day. It was used for nothing until Fox News Channel was put on in the evening.
Communication about problems was sporadic and often vague. Maybe being more open and upfront about the problems would have been alleviated some of the frustration and confusion.
One Task Force member said that it felt like we were in a glorified "call center"
When asked who was #1 in charge "on the floor," none of the volunteers we asked could give an answer.
I believe there were only 2 IT people there for support. I could be wrong, but that is the impression I had.
The first sign of a long day, after the parking garage debacle, was during our "wake up" calls. Second person on my list, he was clearly still asleep, and not happy to recieve a call from me before 6am. There was at least one other person on my list that called back, having no idea what I was talking about.
My main method for communication was text messaging from my own cell phone, since in VA people can not be on phone in polling places.
After polls had started closing, many of us were searching the web for info from Drudge, Fox, CNN, Boston.com, etc. We were told to stay off the web because that was impacting the system.
There was never any announcement that we were free to leave. Some left around mid-evening. Once the race was called, most, if not all, of the task force left.
I believe the idea was good, in theory. The fact that there was not a true test run before hand is crazy. I appreciate that members of the Task Force had their parking cost covered, and that we were provided with continental-style breakfast, a box lunch, and dinner which included chicken, beef, salad and other items. We had also unlimited access to soda, coffee, water and other drinks - no alcohol, unfortunately. Snacks and fruits were also available all day. Call those things the icing on a stale cake.
In no way does the breakdown of the ORCA project affect how I feel about Mitt Romney as a person and a candidate. I was a supporter long before he had aspirations of becoming President. And, I can imagine he has already said "the buck stops with me" as far as taking accountability for this. I don't think it is fair to primarily blame him for the failure, he put trust in others that clearly dropped the ball.
I was expecting some type of "thank you" e-mail after things had settled down on Wednesday or Thursday. As of today, still no formal "thanks" for my efforts with the project.
I hope that this adds a little more to the picture of what was happening in the Garden that day.
Posted by: DS at November 10, 2012 02:12 PM (JmcQN)
Posted by: KM at November 10, 2012 02:33 PM (8I6vf)
but go to Targeted Victory's site, look at the devs on "our team" and ask yourself whether these likely Obama voters really worked for Romney as well as they could.
Posted by: Catherine Fitzpatrick at November 10, 2012 04:05 PM (xPiev)
Virginia: Bush(2004): 1716959
Virginia: McCain(200
Virginia: Romney(2012): 1745397 vs Virginia: Obama(2012): 1852123
Ohio: Bush(2004): 2859764
Ohio: McCain(200
Ohio: Romney(2012): 2571539 vs Ohio: Obama (2012): 2672302
Florida: Bush(2004): 3964522
Florida: McCain(200
Florida: Romney (2012): 4162174 vs Florida: Obama(2012): 4236032
Colorado: Bush(2004): 1101255
Colorado: McCain(200
Colorado: Romney(2012): 1094435 vs Colorado: Obama(2012): 1180573
My take. Loss is not due to GOTV, other than in Ohio maybe.
Posted by: ss at November 10, 2012 04:25 PM (rvYqT)
Posted by: ZM at November 10, 2012 05:52 PM (O1Iyj)
Looks like somebody's looking for a scapegoat. First off, do you bring your driver's license with you when you drive? Then why wouldn't you bring your POLL WATCHER CERTIFICATE WITH YOU TO WATCH POLLS?
Every poll watcher book, pamphlet, class, pdf and notice contains a warning to bring your certificate with you.
Secondly, my materials didn't have two separate items in the checklist for "Chair (if allowed by poll manager)." In fact, it looks like this supposed copy supposedly quoted above was photoshoped. Notice that for every item in the checklist there is an equal distance between the box and the item to be checked off-except for the second "Chair (if allowed by poll manager)." Nice try.
Thirdly, everything worked fine for me because I'm not braindead. If you had a problem then you're braindead or YOU DIDN'T WORK HARD ENOUGH. So, when you next want to look for a scapegoat, Look in the MIRROR!
Posted by: Marvin Johnstone at November 10, 2012 06:05 PM (qIklg)
Posted by: Cathy Heyworth Harris at November 10, 2012 06:34 PM (cb5aP)
to, the middle will come. If he hasn't we're not winning anyway."
In other words: "Obama has destroyed our country! We won!" This is why your side did not win.
Posted by: Tracy at November 10, 2012 07:14 PM (dZUv0)
Posted by: Ceryle Alcyon at November 10, 2012 07:30 PM (NVDqN)
Posted by: Dave H at November 10, 2012 08:15 PM (i45Nb)
Posted by: Actual Patriot at November 10, 2012 08:27 PM (4B0FU)
Posted by: doubleM at November 11, 2012 12:18 AM (AFoum)
Maybe Mitt's vaunted business management skills aren't really as hot as advertised. Running technology amateur-hour like this in the middle of your most important political campaign is actually quite telling.
Posted by: Steve at November 11, 2012 08:44 AM (Nw3+U)
Would you really want someone running a campaign that inept in the position of the presidency?? It boggles the mind. Top that with the campaign fundraising scandals/alleged fleecing by consultants, the etch-a-sketch nature of the ever-changing positions of the candidate, day after day yet more lies and deceptions--and you have the most disasterous campaign in modern times. It went on so long and just bore into the brain.
Posted by: Hue and Cry at November 11, 2012 02:14 PM (c9P+g)
Does anyone in the know feel the need to provide us with the name of this talented firm? Perhaps we can let them be the only American firm allowed to do business with Iran? They could be encouraged to write their drone-control software.
Posted by: John at November 11, 2012 04:50 PM (SANcu)
Posted by: Pat D at November 11, 2012 05:24 PM (iIEhF)
1) It smells like on November 5 they were still writing code. Software projects are quite unpredictable relative to shipping date. That mens that like in this case have a deadline written in stone you <b>must</b> have a plan B. If the software you have asked for has nopt ben shipped <b>and</b> tested <b>and</b> stress tested by at most deadline minus one month then you should go with plan B. And when I say tested I am not referring only to software not crashing but about usability.. Actually if your pockets are deep enough you should run two projects so if one fails then you still have the other. Two projects <b>and</b> a plan B.
2) It appears like there was no attention paid to the organizational aspects of the project. This si a gross blunder since in fact they shoulod have been treated before the first line of code was ever written like they did in Cobol times: it is to the computer part to mold itself in the physical word not the opposite. To begin with if you are requiring sixty years old volunteers read a sixty pages PDF in order to use your system then you are doing something wrong. Still more wrong, if it is only for a one day effort meaning that people will be uinable to learn by doing
3) Given that a presidential election is in fact fifty small elections there was no need to have a national server. It not only made for a single point of failure it made more likely the system (or its connectivity) would be unable to handle the load. It would have been far better to have fifty servers. One for each state. And it not even expensive.
4) When the fate of your country is at stake you don't trust Windows
Posted by: JFM at November 12, 2012 03:47 AM (RUl7u)
I would tend to lay some of the blame at the feet of Ron Paulnutties': on election day the old fool was saying there was no difference between Obama and Romney.
Posted by: JFM at November 12, 2012 06:51 AM (avBnI)
Posted by: OLM at November 12, 2012 08:10 AM (718mo)
Darwinism in action.
If you can't run an election competently then it's just as well you lost as you couldn't run a country ...
Posted by: Robin at November 12, 2012 11:03 AM (6/dbB)
I agree with Robin. If this was any indication of how skilled team Romney was, we all dodged the bullet when he lost.
Can you imagine them in charge of anything important?
Posted by: JB at November 12, 2012 11:39 AM (k2q0V)
If anyone is still reading down here -
I want to affirm some of the other, less-taunting comments by liberals that say we want you guys to do better; we want a real opposition party. I may have come to different conclusions than you on how we need to address our problems, but more that my individual stance I strongly feel that better solutions get made when there are opposing philosphies IF AND ONLY IF both views are subject to reason, reflection, and evidence-based revision.
I know that large numbers of people that voted for Obama actually think this same thing. We want you guys. We want ideas to be held up to scrutiny, if that scrutiny is being made in good faith. We want alternate points of view. We want to be challenged on the measures we use to grade an idea.
And this is why there actually is no liberal conspiracy. We just want you to stop being crazy, and start proposing something besides tax cuts as the only solution.
Please. We miss having you at the table. Just like it's more fun to have an intellectual discussion with someone who stymies you than scoring points on an idiot, it's no fun to win the votes when it's like shooting fish in a barrel. A very rape-y barrel.
Posted by: Fizziks at November 12, 2012 02:21 PM (49RO7)
Posted by: oldwhiteguyDEM at November 12, 2012 02:31 PM (YCOzW)
Posted by: Francis L. Holland at November 12, 2012 03:13 PM (j3rM8)
Posted by: madhaus at November 12, 2012 05:11 PM (IwaKF)
Posted by: madhaus at November 12, 2012 05:19 PM (IwaKF)
Posted by: Lisa s at November 12, 2012 07:58 PM (tqvO5)
Posted by: MrsD at November 12, 2012 09:04 PM (irqHA)
Posted by: Albert Nielsen at November 12, 2012 11:57 PM (yA3hY)
Posted by: Seamus McBoogie at November 16, 2012 08:23 AM (IjEYj)
Posted by: Seamus McBoogie at November 16, 2012 11:52 AM (PALjS)
Posted by: Seamus McBoogie at November 16, 2012 11:55 AM (PALjS)
Posted by: bryan at November 16, 2012 04:11 PM (JoMmF)
Posted by: Raven at November 17, 2012 11:34 AM (SZ6Bx)
On Fox News Channel, Karl Rove certainly acted as if something was wrong when the election was called for the President-----> and Rove went into real time drama, unwilling to believe "the numbers."
And did we hear Rove, who heads a Super Pac, say that he was in touch minute by minute with the Romney campaign chairman in the state of Ohio?? ....aren't Super Pacs not to coordinate with campaigns per Citizens United Ruling?
all things considered: IF THE FINAL POPULAR VOTE COUNT HAS MITT ROMNEY AT 47% --- IT WILL BE deliciously IRONIC
Posted by: Hue and Cry at November 18, 2012 03:54 PM (c9P+g)
Posted by: Ed at November 27, 2012 04:39 PM (iY74J)
Posted by: Morris Wilson at November 28, 2012 11:35 AM (ZmPXA)
"Ask Obama for the money."
My new mantra."
Brilliant. Just a brilliant move, Corky. Having worked in retail, I can guarantee you that the Costco cashier is not impressed with you in the least little bit, unless it's in associating "Republican/conservative = Stupid whiny jerks that I want nothing to do with at all." As a liberal, I say to keep up the good work!
Seriously, comment #654 nailed it in the first and last paragraphs.
Posted by: Oarboar at December 01, 2012 12:51 PM (JzWk7)
Posted by: jdkinpa at December 01, 2012 05:41 PM (BynZY)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.385 seconds, 797 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Ken Royall at November 08, 2012 11:37 AM (x0g8a)