November 08, 2012
— Ace It's terrible. It's never happened before.
A President despised by one party has won an election despite having the economy against him and a deteriorating situation in a country he invaded, and, despite growing whispers that he's simply not up to the job, he wins narrowly in a victory fueled by highly-motivated occasional voters who marched out to support him.
The candidate beaten by this weak, lame-duck president had good qualifications on the key issue of the election. Sure, that candidate lacked charisma and warmth, and was a wealthy New Englander viewed skeptically by much of the country, but he did have a background which gave him inarguable authority to speak on the most important issue of the day.
And sure, he basically won the primaries not through impressive political skill and charisma and vision, but simply because he was the only plausibly qualified would-be president among a gaggle of unlikely pretenders, many of whom were simply too extreme or too flamboyant for the country at large.
And sure, a blitz of negative ads partially turned his key qualification into a negative, by questioning his character in his dealings in his prior career.
But, overall, he was a credible candidate, and polled very close to the incumbent throughout the campaign season. He wound up losing, but by a narrow margin.
Still, that narrow margin is still a margin.
The winning party talks up a realignment that will permanently keep them in power. The losing party is despondent at that notion-- they sense it's true. How can we beat anyone, the losing party things, if we cannot beat this unqualified, dishonest, smug, man who has set the country on a suicide mission which will destroy it?
Why can't the country see through the Imperial Presidency of this corrupt corporate cronyist? What's wrong with America? What's wrong with us?
The losing party thinks they'll never win an election again.
And then... comes 2006, when the Democrats capture Congress under the sterling, brilliant, charismatic leadership of Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid. And comes 2008, when a very experienced, very qualified community organizer wins the White House.
It's happened before.
It's all happened before.
Thanks to a reader, Andrew, who pitched this basic idea in an email. Correction: It was Andrew, not Allen. Sheesh. I hate myself sometimes.
Posted by: Ace at
09:38 AM
| Comments (308)
Post contains 390 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) All Dead Inside at November 08, 2012 09:42 AM (/eBe8)
Posted by: WalrusRex at November 08, 2012 09:42 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: maddogg at November 08, 2012 09:42 AM (OlN4e)
Note that this is a different Allen than me.
For the record.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) All Dead Inside at November 08, 2012 09:42 AM (/eBe8)
Posted by: Jon (not the troll) at November 08, 2012 09:42 AM (2ihLK)
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at November 08, 2012 09:43 AM (QKKT0)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Coming not nearly soon enough. at November 08, 2012 09:43 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: t-bird at November 08, 2012 09:43 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: mlindroo at November 08, 2012 09:43 AM (RD+h6)
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at November 08, 2012 09:44 AM (zF6Iw)
the Flaw in your parable is that Democrats are not Republicans; that, and some other stuff like the culture is so f*cked and we're overrun with Demographic-Americans
Posted by: Jerry Jack in Jacksonville at November 08, 2012 09:44 AM (Dll6b)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Coming not nearly soon enough. at November 08, 2012 09:45 AM (VtjlW)
Dude. You didn't have to do this! /puke
Posted by: Pyrocles at November 08, 2012 09:45 AM (cv5Iw)
Posted by: Walkers! at November 08, 2012 09:45 AM (C4dFv)
Posted by: Tim the Enchanter at November 08, 2012 09:46 AM (izA2D)
Democrats are car salesmen. They can sell you your own mother.
Republicans couldn't sell you a Ribeye steak for $5 if you were starving.
Posted by: © Sponge at November 08, 2012 09:46 AM (UK9cE)
I said it earlier and I truly believe this -- we MUST tackle early voting laws. It won't matter how well we message if they cheat at the polls. And I saw so much fraud it would make your head spin.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at November 08, 2012 09:46 AM (pLTLS)
William Miller: Well, it was fun.
Lester Bangs: They make you feel cool. And hey. I met you. You are not cool.
William Miller: I know. Even when I thought I was, I knew I wasn't.
Lester Bangs: That's because we're uncool. And while women will always be a problem for us, most of the great art in the world is about that very same problem. Good-looking people don't have any spine. Their art never lasts. They get the girls, but we're smarter.
William Miller: I can really see that now.
Lester Bangs: Yeah, great art is about conflict and pain and guilt and longing and love disguised as sex, and sex disguised as love... and let's face it, you got a big head start.
William Miller: I'm glad you were home.
Lester Bangs: I'm always home. I'm uncool.
William Miller: Me too!
Lester Bangs: The only true currency in this bankrupt world is what we share with someone else when we're uncool.
William Miller: I feel better.
Lester Bangs: My advice to you. I know you think those guys are your friends. You wanna be a true friend to them? Be honest, and unmerciful.
Posted by: burned cut-loop [/i] [/b] at November 08, 2012 09:46 AM (SX6wc)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at November 08, 2012 09:46 AM (ZPrif)
2004: W was still riding what was left of the 9/11 patriotic wave.
2012: Dems could count on a black president to bring out minority voters in unprecedented numbers. Will they keep voting, or is it temporary like the post-9/11 GOP wave?
Posted by: CJ at November 08, 2012 09:46 AM (9KqcB)
McCain's campaign was right to go after him as a celebrity to undermine his appeal. We should have picked that attack up again this election.
Posted by: Serious Cat at November 08, 2012 09:47 AM (UypUQ)
@14 - note, kids, this is what we at the AoSHQ call a "meme." You can hear it on Ace's Greatest Hits, now available from K-Tel Records, along with such golden gassers as:
The Guys Get Shirts.
How Does It Fuckin' Work?
Stompy Boots
SMOD
SCOAMF
Marco Rubio's Trash
. . .and many more. So up your AoSHQ membership to Premium today!
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at November 08, 2012 09:47 AM (zF6Iw)
For the record.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) All Dead Inside at November 08, 2012 01:42 PM (/eBe8 )
That's funny.
As if Ace would give you credit if it actually WERE you that sent it.
Posted by: © Sponge at November 08, 2012 09:48 AM (UK9cE)
Oh, don't be such a grumpy gus. Dog food has changed lately and its pretty darn tasty now. And you can eat it while you're riding on safe, efficient government-run high speed rail!
Posted by: Gov. Moonbeam at November 08, 2012 09:48 AM (QKKT0)
Posted by: Jones in CO at November 08, 2012 09:48 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: embittered redleg at November 08, 2012 09:48 AM (NvjU1)
Know any fifth generation Irishmen? Who speak Gaelic with a brogue? Work in the 'Irish community'? ( making Jamesons or cutting peat )
Posted by: Jerry Jack in Jacksonville at November 08, 2012 09:49 AM (Dll6b)
wash it down with Brawndo and you're good to go
Posted by: Jones in CO at November 08, 2012 09:49 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: Heralder at November 08, 2012 09:49 AM (+xmn4)
Posted by: Dems at November 08, 2012 09:50 AM (FcR7P)
well it looks like the stock market is happy Obama won...
market tanking, yet gold and oil are up, interesting.
Posted by: tofer732 at November 08, 2012 09:50 AM (2zM0P)
That said, after Kerry lost the Dems did have the comfort of knowing that long term, the country's demographics were still moving in their direction.
Yup. We'd better hope Hispanics really are open to limited governent and the GOP, at least to a degree. Or it's Game Over.
Posted by: CJ at November 08, 2012 09:50 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: HeatherRadish, Crankypants at November 08, 2012 09:50 AM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: Walkers! at November 08, 2012 09:50 AM (C4dFv)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) All Dead Inside at November 08, 2012 09:50 AM (/eBe8)
Posted by: joncelli at November 08, 2012 09:51 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Soothsayer at November 08, 2012 09:51 AM (jUytm)
Yeah, I think that other Allen has a blog or something.
Posted by: Roland THTG at November 08, 2012 09:51 AM (I7O5y)
Exactly fucking right.
End the doom and gloom.
Obama won, barely...barely, and now he owns this mess.
Things are going to get much much worse for him.
The mid term election in 2014 will destroy what very little he has left.
It hurts...actually physically hurts...and still hurts me that we lost this.
But give it until January, and the country will hate this guy again.
Posted by: MrShad at November 08, 2012 09:51 AM (Xqfwb)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at November 08, 2012 09:51 AM (6zgse)
The "Irish Community" is a code word for alcoholics, isn't it?
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at November 08, 2012 09:51 AM (QKKT0)
Posted by: Soothsayer at November 08, 2012 09:52 AM (jUytm)
More than 55 million Americans receive Social Security benefits, annually, making it the nation's largest social welfare program. 725 billion dollars of your payroll and income taxes last year went to Social Security disbursements -- That's about 60 billion dollars in benefits each month. It's no wonder politicians on both sides of the aisle are always trying to convince voters that they have the plan to keep Social Security intact.
The problem is Social Security, as we know it, is currently living on borrowed time.For the first time in thirty years, Social Security payouts exceeded non-interest income in 2010 and 2011. The difference between the money coming out and going in was about $45 billion dollars in 2011.
Funny how AFTER the election the MFM is now running articles about the fiscal cliff and SS running out of money. When Paul Ryan talked about it he was out to kill granny
Posted by: TheQuietMan at November 08, 2012 09:52 AM (1Jaio)
As for Demographics Shift, as more info is coming out, it is not as bad as the media is trying to spin it. Don't buy the post election operation 'depress GOP'.
One more thing. Be prepared to loose everything (I am talking about savings, houses, etc, etc.). Pledge your lives and fortunes to this. Unless of course you'd rather the lick someone's boots.
Posted by: Comrade J at November 08, 2012 09:52 AM (6kkPP)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at November 08, 2012 09:52 AM (ZBjRZ)
Posted by: joeindc44 says choom on fuckers at November 08, 2012 09:52 AM (QxSug)
Daves, you get to the be the Jets. Allens, you're the Sharks. Annnnnd go!
The alex contingent will sit up here and continue to lord it over all y'all.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Coming not nearly soon enough. at November 08, 2012 01:45 PM (VtjlW)
Don't forget to wave your imperial paw.
Posted by: Tami at November 08, 2012 09:52 AM (X6akg)
11 How dare you attempt to inject reason and sanity into the Horde! Have you no shame, at long last, have you no shame!
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Coming not nearly soon enough. at November 08, 2012 01:43 PM (VtjlW)
No, no I do not.
http://tinyurl.com/a4h3pg2
Posted by: BCochran1981 at November 08, 2012 09:53 AM (da5Wo)
What I simply dont get is, where did this defeatist attitude came from? Republicans went into this campaign ignoring half of their own principles as if they were ashamed of them. Bush was only elected because he was a friggin culture warrior in 2004 and suddenly the whole movement act as if we must hide our believes. I just dont friggin get it. Since when are we the party that plays nice? Remember what we did to Kerry in 04 or what Rove did to McCain in 2000 in South Carolina? Where did this compulsion to be nice come from?
This was a narrow win for the Democrats because Republicans thought that it would be impressive if they waged a half-assed, apologetic Minnesota-nice campaign. Back to the roots and then we will win elections again.
Posted by: Elize Nayden at November 08, 2012 09:53 AM (8EBWh)
Posted by: Soothsayer at November 08, 2012 09:53 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: Ferb Fletcher at November 08, 2012 09:53 AM (hyP1j)
Posted by: joeindc44 says choom on fuckers at November 08, 2012 09:54 AM (QxSug)
Posted by: Sandy Fluke at November 08, 2012 09:54 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: joeindc44 says choom on fuckers at November 08, 2012 09:54 AM (QxSug)
Posted by: Jack J at November 08, 2012 09:54 AM (t4nf+)
-- Guys, you keep saying this, but there's still no -proof.- Remember how silly it was in 2004 when Democrats whined about Bush's Diebold voting scams? Yeah. We're going to sound like that unless you have some proof that's rock solid.
Posted by: Matt S. at November 08, 2012 09:54 AM (moRRg)
I disagree that this is a zero-sum game where "they got us now, but we got them last time, and we will get them next time".
The country is shifting leftwards in a significant way, and alarmingly fast.
The left has owned schools, universities, pop culture, and the media for 40-50 years. They played the long game, and did it well. We are seeing the long-time coming fruits of their efforts.
Posted by: dan-O at November 08, 2012 09:54 AM (sWycd)
Posted by: RKinRoanoke at November 08, 2012 09:55 AM (DOEXI)
Posted by: SH at November 08, 2012 09:55 AM (gmeXX)
Obama won, barely...barely, and now he owns this mess.
Things are going to get much much worse for him.
The mid term election in 2014 will destroy what very little he has left.
It hurts...actually physically hurts...and still hurts me that we lost this.
But give it until January, and the country will hate this guy again.
Posted by: MrShad at November 08, 2012 01:51 PM (Xqfwb)
No. He doesn't. GWB will still get credit and since he still has to somewhat abide by that pesky document called The Constitution, he will blame those meddling House Republicans for at least the next two years. In those two years, you won't BELIEVE how nasty the left will get to control both houses again.
We. Are. Fucked.
Our side has no backbone. There is no winning strategy coming from these guys.
Posted by: © Sponge at November 08, 2012 09:55 AM (UK9cE)
Posted by: Tim the Enchanter at November 08, 2012 09:55 AM (izA2D)
Posted by: sandy burger at November 08, 2012 09:55 AM (KDek4)
Posted by: TheQuietMan at November 08, 2012 01:52 PM (1Jaio)
The Media: "We build you up to beat you down."
Posted by: cajun carrot at November 08, 2012 09:55 AM (UZQM8)
Posted by: The Dude at November 08, 2012 09:56 AM (tw6Ar)
Posted by: justturnright at November 08, 2012 09:56 AM (HUP4X)
Posted by: cajun carrot at November 08, 2012 09:56 AM (UZQM8)
Posted by: Exasperated Expat at November 08, 2012 09:56 AM (gkfSV)
Posted by: Jack J at November 08, 2012 09:56 AM (t4nf+)
Ace
Maybe it could just be that Romney was as much of a progressive as Obama and maybe we dodged a bullet by having only 4 years left under progressive rule rather than 8 or 16 under RomneyRyan
Also look towards the 8 states we may easily pickup senate seats in 2 years. In fact in one year these 8 democrat senators who carried their state by less than 53% and all went to Romney, these 8 are not going down for Reid or Obama:
Alaska (Palin?), Colorado, Louisiana, Minnesota, New Hampshire, North Carolina,Oregon, South Dakota
Posted by: Bannable at November 08, 2012 09:56 AM (OG/Pd)
Posted by: D. Hopper at November 08, 2012 09:56 AM (AVfT8)
Posted by: rockmom at November 08, 2012 09:56 AM (qe2/V)
-- Losing. It happens. Give it a week or so, then everyone'll be back to normal. Thanksgiving, at the latest.
Posted by: Matt S. at November 08, 2012 09:56 AM (moRRg)
I am so fucking warn out and hung over and fat.
I need a break.
That is all.
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectual at November 08, 2012 09:56 AM (wR+pz)
What great conservative achievement did Bush's victory in 04 preserve forever and always?
ObamaCare is locked in now and forever. It only gets bigger and more expensive until it leads to single payer and full on government rationing.
This was probably our best chance to even make a small dent in Medicare and Medicaid. Social Security wasn't even on the table.
Will a Republican ever win the presidency again? Sure.
An actual conservative who can slow let alone reverse the slow, steady decline into statism? That hasn't happened before, so I'm not sure it will happen in the future.
Posted by: DrewM. at November 08, 2012 09:57 AM (x8U/s)
Posted by: Dr Spank at November 08, 2012 09:57 AM (4cRnj)
They said the Republican Party was dead after Nixon and Watergate. Obituary and everything.
Later, Reagan.
The pendulum swings, the wheel turns. It's not easy, it's not automatic, but it's totally f'ing doable. We didn't lose by, say, 70-30. A lot of people all over teh country voted for Romney and Ryan, and indeed, R+R gained two states over McCain-Palin.
That's not nothing. Neither are the House and the governorships.
Posted by: Lance McCormick at November 08, 2012 09:57 AM (zgHLA)
Posted by: Schwalbe: The Me-262© at November 08, 2012 09:57 AM (UU0OF)
Posted by: Paul at November 08, 2012 09:57 AM (xwVUV)
How Does It Fuckin' Work?
Ace's cover version is better than the original.
Posted by: fluffy at November 08, 2012 09:58 AM (z9HTb)
-- If that were true, it could be right. It's not, so it isn't.
Posted by: Matt S. at November 08, 2012 09:58 AM (moRRg)
---
Of which year?
Posted by: WalrusRex at November 08, 2012 09:58 AM (Hx5uv)
He promised to let the Bush tax cuts expire and go back to the Clinton levels that were fair for everybody.
He claimed he didn't create the sequester and promised it wouldn't happen.
So why don't Repubicans in the House just let Obama fulfill his promises - sometime in March, say, when Obama gets desperate - agree to a deal where tax rates remain where they then are and cut deductions as Boehner suggested yesterday.
And since Obama also claimed to cut the deficit - hold him to hit - actual cuts, no cuts in rate of growth (increases).
These things are simple and clear.
Then the 47% that pay no federal taxes becomes 30% and more people will have skin in the game.
Posted by: Steven W. at November 08, 2012 09:58 AM (R9C6I)
And in 2016 the Party big wigs will call for another moderate Bush-V to lose yet again. Of course by then we will be measuring Republican turnout in the thousands instead of millions because there will be a new conservative Party.
Posted by: Vic at November 08, 2012 09:58 AM (YdQQY)
We've never really tried. I'm not convinced this is true.
Only a very small portion of blacks will see past the racial bullshit from the race-mongers like Al and Jesse. It's already too far gone to be courting them after TFG Ep IV: A New Hope and TFG Ep IV: The Barackalypse
Posted by: EC at November 08, 2012 09:58 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: The Dude at November 08, 2012 09:58 AM (tw6Ar)
Posted by: volfan at November 08, 2012 09:59 AM (RTb48)
"Puerto Rico has to be a state. There is no other option," said 25-year-old Jerome Lefebre, who picked up his grandfather before driving to the polls. "We're doing OK, but we could do better. We would receive more benefits, a lot more financial help."
I think at least one person is thinking it's time for Puerto Rico to get on the gravy train.
Posted by: Chairman LMAO at November 08, 2012 09:59 AM (9eDbm)
Easy to vet candidates backgrounds, but how do we tell them to shut the fuck up
Posted by: Jack J at November 08, 2012 09:59 AM (t4nf+)
The unemployment rate in 2004 was 5.5% and dropping, we had 14 quarters of positive GDP, we had not been attacked again when everyone thought for sure we would have been and the Dem candidate was a career politician with no accomplishments.
Does not compare to what happened in this election. This election was about the takers becoming more than the makers. Its as simple as that. The demographics have changed and they aren't going back.
Posted by: polynikes at November 08, 2012 09:59 AM (m2CN7)
that famine brought lots of Scandis and Germans, as the famine hit there, too.
Posted by: Jerry Jack in Jacksonville at November 08, 2012 09:59 AM (Dll6b)
I can't believe I'm writing this, but...
Mr Boner is the most important man in the world, right now, for us and for the GOP.
It is what he does or does not do that will shape the future of the GOP.
Posted by: Soothsayer at November 08, 2012 01:53 PM (jUytm)
[joncelli gets under desk, curls into fetal ball]
Posted by: joncelli at November 08, 2012 09:59 AM (RD7QR)
Know any fifth generation Irishmen? Who speak Gaelic with a brogue? Work in the 'Irish community'? ( making Jamesons or cutting peat )
Heh.
"It is our boast that we admit the immigrant to full fellowship and equality with the native-born. In return we demand that he shall share our undivided allegiance to the one flag which floats over all of us." -- Teddy Roosevelt
Posted by: CJ at November 08, 2012 09:59 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Coming not nearly soon enough. at November 08, 2012 09:59 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Matt S. at November 08, 2012 09:59 AM (moRRg)
Posted by: polynikes at November 08, 2012 10:00 AM (m2CN7)
Woohoo!!
I've been waiting 10 years to do that.
Posted by: BurtTC at November 08, 2012 10:00 AM (BeSEI)
Posted by: Dr Spank at November 08, 2012 01:57 PM (4cRnj)
Heh. You think President LameDuck will let that happen?
You are sorely mistaken.
Do not underestimate what will happen in the next 4 years. LEARN. A. LESSON.
Posted by: © Sponge at November 08, 2012 10:00 AM (UK9cE)
Conservatives have made in-roads at the local and state level. Its a start. A good start, but we are a generation away from overturning the liberal leviathan. But it will be overturned. Conservatives are out breeding our liberal brothers and sisters by quite a wide margin. Eventually that will bear some fruit. Just in 30 years.
Posted by: SH at November 08, 2012 10:01 AM (gmeXX)
Does HE have a blog?
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectual at November 08, 2012 10:01 AM (wR+pz)
Restate is FOS. Obama LOST 10 million voters. We expected that. We lost nearly 3 million when we expected Bush level turnout. The base sat at home.
Posted by: Vic at November 08, 2012 10:01 AM (YdQQY)
In (once) Great Britain, even the conservatives just tinker around the edges. They never try to roll back the entitlement state.
All of Europe can afford their entitlement state because the USA pays for their defense.
That needs to stop. Let the Europeans see how nicely their entitlement state survives once they have to pay the full cost of everything they consume.
Greece is the tip of the iceberg.
Posted by: Boots at November 08, 2012 10:01 AM (neKzn)
Posted by: we're choomed at November 08, 2012 10:01 AM (3MiqD)
I am aware of that.
The electorate failed.
The people failed.
Posted by: eleven at November 08, 2012 10:01 AM (KXm42)
Posted by: hannitys_hybrid at November 08, 2012 10:01 AM (zpqa2)
Posted by: tasker at November 08, 2012 10:01 AM (r2PLg)
54 This really was the mirror of 2004.
So...Romney was like our own version of John Kerry?
And that's why 68% of registered R's stayed home?
Posted by: wheatie at November 08, 2012 10:02 AM (ICEh3)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Coming not nearly soon enough. at November 08, 2012 10:02 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: RKinRoanoke at November 08, 2012 10:02 AM (DOEXI)
Posted by: T. S. Eliot at November 08, 2012 10:02 AM (5iuEW)
Posted by: Dirks Strewn at November 08, 2012 10:02 AM (VLifP)
There will definitely be specific lessons to learn from this and hopefully we will. Hell, maybe even good 'ole Harry Reid will overplay his hand (not even remotely out of the question) and give us a nice gift to use in 2014 if we pick some good candidates.
I will prepare myself for the worst from the next 4 years, since I have a wife and 4 year old to worry about, but we need to be prepared to seize every opportunity to take it back piece by piece.
Posted by: Pete at November 08, 2012 10:03 AM (+GIS3)
Posted by: The Dude at November 08, 2012 10:03 AM (tw6Ar)
You can't exclude the cumulative effects of culture.
Posted by: hannitys_hybrid at November 08, 2012 10:03 AM (zpqa2)
I am so fucking warn out and hung over and fat.
I need a break.
That is all.
I think I read last night that Ace recommends taking up smoking.
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at November 08, 2012 10:03 AM (QKKT0)
Posted by: ejo at November 08, 2012 10:03 AM (GXvSO)
Posted by: Baldy at November 08, 2012 10:03 AM (opS9C)
Posted by: elizabethe voted for Romney/Ryan at November 08, 2012 10:04 AM (ou/rY)
Posted by: The Dude at November 08, 2012 10:04 AM (tw6Ar)
I will prepare myself for the worst from the next 4 years, since I have a wife and 4 year old to worry about, but we need to be prepared to seize every opportunity to take it back piece by piece.
Posted by: Pete at November 08, 2012 02:03 PM (+GIS3)
That's too funny.
HOW MANY GIFTS did Biden and Obama give us?!?!?!?!!?
You're not paying attention.......
Posted by: © Sponge at November 08, 2012 10:05 AM (UK9cE)
Need to start with Governor Parnell in Alaska. He is term limited and should easily win that seat in 2014. Force Landriue to retire by getting Jindal to run for sake of the country in La. Governor Rounds in south Dakota etc....
Quality candidates that will clear the Field, and maybe force the Dem to retire
Posted by: Jack J at November 08, 2012 10:05 AM (t4nf+)
The problem right now, is by and large, the Democrats are dominating what is meant to be "good" in the general humanist sense. Now, I'm not saying humanism vs. religion but just in the general "what I take it to mean" sense. Until this is altered, low-info voters are going to go democrat. These people go with their hearts and their culture because that's what they use for conferral on what they should do.
I still think we need to wage an information campaign. I've been saying it since Fred Thompson was angling at the presidency I wanted him to run a strong web-campaign. We have to get into their venue. We don't have to imitate them (see, Poochy... Simpsons, Itchy and Scratchy)... but until this aura and set is pierced its going to be a hard battle because most people want to be left alone and left to do as they desire. They'd have to see how democrat protocols take away from that. You're not going to convince everyone... but if you're not playing the game then you are ceding entire generations.
Posted by: Former Mass. Resident at November 08, 2012 10:05 AM (BeB0s)
We really want to do this?
Posted by: hannitys_hybrid at November 08, 2012 10:05 AM (zpqa2)
Posted by: Soothsayer at November 08, 2012 10:06 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: Exasperated Expat at November 08, 2012 10:06 AM (gkfSV)
Posted by: Dave S. at November 08, 2012 10:06 AM (UvR6d)
Posted by: Jack J at November 08, 2012 10:06 AM (t4nf+)
Saw on Fox yesterday that former governor Richardson (D), is claiming the GOP standard bearer in 2016 will be a hispanic.
Well, I think he's partially right. One member of the ticket needs to be an unassailable member of a minority group.
Both the dems and republicans have tried women, and that didn't work.
So it'll have to be a minority, since it's racist to attack skin color so it'll be a lot harder to go after a minority than a white woman.
Posted by: Boots at November 08, 2012 10:07 AM (neKzn)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at November 08, 2012 10:07 AM (79ueO)
Posted by: hannitys_hybrid at November 08, 2012 10:07 AM (zpqa2)
Posted by: Frank Gaines at November 08, 2012 10:07 AM (5Zux8)
Posted by: The Dude at November 08, 2012 10:08 AM (tw6Ar)
Posted by: polynikes at November 08, 2012 10:08 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: yinzer at November 08, 2012 10:09 AM (/Mla1)
Posted by: Pete at November 08, 2012 10:09 AM (+GIS3)
See Herman Cain and Justice Thomas.
Posted by: EC at November 08, 2012 10:09 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: hannitys_hybrid at November 08, 2012 02:07 PM (zpqa2)
It's being a realist.
Posted by: yinzer at November 08, 2012 10:09 AM (/Mla1)
Posted by: tasker at November 08, 2012 10:10 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at November 08, 2012 10:10 AM (79ueO)
Posted by: hannitys_hybrid at November 08, 2012 10:10 AM (zpqa2)
Posted by: Dave S. at November 08, 2012 10:10 AM (UvR6d)
Posted by: The Dude at November 08, 2012 10:11 AM (tw6Ar)
Great post.
Some commentors are sounding like a caricature of the left's idea of Conservatives. "Oh noes, the dark skinned people cannot be stopped -- they are going to demand free stuff and vote in Democrats forever. Game over man."
I just walked out for lunch. I went to Chick-Fil-A, where there were 4 hard working AfAm women with smiles on their face serving people at the cash register. I walked by a shoe repair place where 2 Koreans and an Hispanic were working hard repairing shoes. Then I walked by a barber shop were some 20 somethings of a somewhat vaguely indeterminate race where cutting hair at their barber shop. I suspect a decent number (most/all?) of the people I saw voted Democratic (if they voted at all). But I don't think they are sitting there just waiting for a government paycheck. Most people (not all) want something out of their lives. They want more than to be a nothing. That desire is not specific to one race (and yes, I am not so naive as not to realize that there are some cultural disfunctions -- enabled by the noble Democrats -- that have traditionally plagued AfAms).
We can broaden our coalition without being Democratic lite. We just need to sell better (well maybe a little more than that). Hell, I would argue Reagan actually sold Americans on the idea that conservativisim was a postive good, while in reality not really governing as conservative as his rhetoric.
The good news from this election is that we have a lot of room to grow our base -- because right now sure as hell there are not enough people in it : )
Posted by: nc at November 08, 2012 10:11 AM (Cxl7g)
The numbers climb to 20,000 residents in 123 public housing buildings when you include those without heat or hot water—some also have no power—as a nor'easter blew through Wednesday night, bringing a record-breaking early snow to the city.
At least they can take comfort in the fact that Barry got a photo op out of it and drooling idiots vote for him because of it. And the people in public housing probably voted for Barry 100%
Posted by: TheQuietMan at November 08, 2012 10:11 AM (1Jaio)
Well, I think he's partially right. One member of the ticket needs to be an unassailable member of a minority group.
Both the dems and republicans have tried women, and that didn't work.
So it'll have to be a minority, since it's racist to attack skin color so it'll be a lot harder to go after a minority than a white woman.
Posted by: Boots at November 08, 2012 02:07 PM (neKzn)
Women are not a minority. We need to quit thinking that way. Plus, most women know damned well that women don't make good leaders. Most are not nearly hard-assed enough, and the ones who are, nobody wants to speak with. I am a woman, and it's clear to me.
America is the least racist country in the world. Unfortunately, we are also the most PC bound. We are atoning for things that we never did, and worrying about offending people who aren't particularly offended unless there's a payoff involved. Tort reform would fix this crap, but lawyers are in charge, so no dice.
What we need is proof of malfeasance by the Democrats that cannot be refuted. What we need is an un-pussified candidate that isn't afraid to tell it like it is and prove it outright, and then communicate it clearly and forcefully. Period.
Posted by: tcn at November 08, 2012 10:11 AM (ZOUmX)
It's also all been written before. See Sean Trende's piece "The Case of the Missing White Voters" on RCP today.
Posted by: Leo Ladenson at November 08, 2012 10:12 AM (mAm+G)
"We have zero change of convincing blacks to change their minds."
'We've never really tried. I'm not convinced this is true.'
Folks, you don't get it. Any community with a 70% illegitimacy rate CANNOT support smaller government. In such communities (the rate is closer to 90% in the inner city) government support is essential to survival. It has replaced the father in their homes.
Overall, the U.S. illegitimacy rate is 40% and climbing. How long before it is the majority? At that point, the GOP is not a viable option.
The mot significant development domestically over the last century was the shift from two-parent to single-parent homes. It has made liberal government not only desirable, but necessary.
Posted by: CJ at November 08, 2012 10:12 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: tasker at November 08, 2012 02:01 PM (r2PLg)
This a 1000 times! I found it odd that the Republican Convention made very little mention of the military. And you are right...they let the Democrats take National Security away from them. Sad...
Posted by: I Be That Chick at November 08, 2012 10:12 AM (X20+7)
Posted by: The Dude at November 08, 2012 02:04 PM (tw6Ar)
It's already happening. The nation will change to the point where a truly conservative party cannot survive but the party will survive by becoming its antithesis. Think Unity Party from Jerry Pournelle's Falkenberg novels.
Posted by: joncelli at November 08, 2012 10:12 AM (RD7QR)
Maybe, in the future, we should spend -less- money on attack ads, and make positive Republican ads? Were there any ads that had the family of the people Romney and his sons saved from drowning? What about an ad cut of the missing girl Romney's team from Bain found when she was dying in New York?
I think in the next Presidential election, we just need a PAC that has a goal to find our guy or gal's positives and highlight them, painting them for everyone to see. Because negative advertising hurts us like hell, and this is probably the only way to really counteract it. It doesn't matter -who- we run, they'll be called rabidly crazy right-wing oppressors, so we need a plan to stop that before it happens.
Positive Happy Rainbow PAC is my plan. Any counter plans?
Posted by: Matt S. at November 08, 2012 10:12 AM (moRRg)
Posted by: Exasperated Expat at November 08, 2012 10:12 AM (gkfSV)
Posted by: tofer732 at November 08, 2012 10:12 AM (2zM0P)
Posted by: Chairman LMAO at November 08, 2012 10:13 AM (9eDbm)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at November 08, 2012 10:13 AM (6zgse)
Posted by: Steve at November 08, 2012 10:13 AM (gx3/o)
That was over 30 years ago. Do you think the electorate has changed?
I'm sorry, but you are dreaming.
Posted by: hannitys_hybrid at November 08, 2012 10:13 AM (zpqa2)
McCain beat Romney in a primary
Obama beat McCain in an election
The rest is history.
I am over being 'drunk' about it but the 'hangover' lingers. I have sworn off drinking forever but we all know the value-rite will be called on again. I just hope our next candidate is up for my commitment to him/her.
Posted by: sTevo at November 08, 2012 10:13 AM (HAH9K)
Posted by: rockmom at November 08, 2012 10:14 AM (qe2/V)
Herman Cain had pizza boxes full of baggage. He had never run for anything in his life and wasn't ready to be vetted.
Justice Thomas, on the other hand, was and is a decent man who was brutally targeted. But he survived and has been a stalwart on the court.
The political climate is different now than it was back in '89 or '90 when the Thomas hearings took place. It would be much more difficult to gut punch a man like Clarence Thomas today.
Posted by: Boots at November 08, 2012 10:14 AM (neKzn)
Posted by: razor419 at November 08, 2012 10:14 AM (vNm4N)
Posted by: Chairman LMAO at November 08, 2012 10:14 AM (9eDbm)
Posted by: Exasperated Expat at November 08, 2012 10:14 AM (gkfSV)
I just walked out for lunch. I went to Chick-Fil-A, where there were 4 hard working AfAm women with smiles on their face serving people at the cash register. I walked by a shoe repair place where 2 Koreans and an Hispanic were working hard repairing shoes. Then I walked by a barber shop were some 20 somethings of a somewhat vaguely indeterminate race where cutting hair at their barber shop. I suspect a decent number (most/all?) of the people I saw voted Democratic (if they voted at all).
I don't have a problem with those people who work for a living. It's the obamaphone lady and Peggy Joseph types who want everyone else to do the working for a living to support their vices. If you went up to those same people you saw working and asked them what they thought of the Peggy Josephs and obamaphone ladies of the country, they too would be telling them to FOAD. Whatever their voting habits, there are more takes than makers now.
Posted by: EC at November 08, 2012 10:14 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Pete at November 08, 2012 02:09 PM (+GIS3)
You'll have to define "us" then.
The blogosphere on our side was out there. We're fighting the MSM, Print, Soros.......
The RNC and Republican party has no balls. They have their tail between their legs and will do NOTHING.
Tea Party rallies gained momentum and did damage in 2010, then the RNC turned on them and denigrated them, giving the left even MORE ways to defeat us.
It will take full on revolution by the end of Obama's term. WE....the people in this blog....HAVE no representation in politics. Sad but true. We are a dying breed.
Posted by: © Sponge at November 08, 2012 10:15 AM (UK9cE)
"And what's the other option? Obama can structurally or fundamentally, if you will, transform America now. What is going to stop him? I know we have the House, but still?
As far as I'm concerned the only person that can do anything about this is God."
Now that we have tipped, there is no strategic option other than to wait for the pendulum to swing back by way of the lessons the electorate is yet to learn.
Posted by: hannitys_hybrid at November 08, 2012 10:15 AM (zpqa2)
I focused on the swing states - states that if Romney had carried would have given him the EVs necessary to win.
In 2012 Florida, Obama received 20,158 more votes than in 2008. Romney received 173,867 more than McCain did in 2008. No undervote for either.
In 2012 Virginia, Obama received 73,182 less votes than in 2008. Romney was plus 46,249. Undervote for Obama, overvote for Romney.
In 2012 Ohio, Obama received 11,377 less votes than in 2008. Romney was plus 91,932. Undervote for Obama, overvote for Romney.
In New Hampshire, Obama received 17,260 less votes than in 2008. Romney was plus 9,744.
Winning FL, VA, OH, and NH would have given Romney 270 EVs.
If Romney overperformed in these swing states, where did the undervoting happen?
Well, in California, Romney received 738,884 less votes in 2012 than McCain received in 2008.
In New York, he received 500,041 less.
And in Texas, he received 88,051 less.
It appears that this undervote came from two things: Republicans in populace, deep blue state stayed home because it was futile; and Republicans in populace, deep red states took their foot on the gas because their participation was not necessary to carry the state.
This doesn't account for the whole 3 million, but it explains a lot.
Bottom line, it doesn't look like the 3 million's non-participation made much of a difference.
Posted by: angler at November 08, 2012 10:15 AM (SwjAj)
Of the two presidents compared, one at least followed the letter and spirit of the law. The current dictator-elect has no use for the law unless it suits him.
Bush had a couple of wars and rampant spending.
Obama has done what Reagan warned us against decades ago; taken control of our healthcare. Obamacare is now as much a part of our increasingly socialist state of being as medicare, welfare and social security.
This is a step from which we cannot walk back.
And there is much worse damage to come...
Posted by: Sgt. York at November 08, 2012 10:16 AM (NCrX2)
Posted by: Chairman LMAO at November 08, 2012 02:13 PM (9eDbm)
MFM: Wanna bet?
Posted by: TheQuietMan at November 08, 2012 10:16 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: © Sponge at November 08, 2012 02:15 PM (UK9cE)
So, step up. Run for office. Get out there.
Posted by: tcn at November 08, 2012 10:16 AM (ZOUmX)
Posted by: Boots at November 08, 2012 02:07 PM (neKzn)
If 2008 taught me anything is that the one thing women hate more than men is other women.
Posted by: Adam Smith's Invisible Pimp Hand at November 08, 2012 10:16 AM (NzBQO)
Are you kidding me? It's not about colour, it's about party. Conservative minorities will never be given the same kind of slack when compared with democrat or liberal minorities.
Posted by: EC at November 08, 2012 10:16 AM (GQ8sn)
I just walked out for lunch. I went to Chick-Fil-A, where there were 4 hard working AfAm women with smiles on their face serving people at the cash register.
Thanks for the condesending Public Service Announcement. Growing up in Philadelphia, I never really knew any real live brown people.
How many of those AfAm women have children? How many are married to their children's father? It's not unrealistic, given the statistics, that even though they work and smile they still need a level of government support that will not make the GOP message appealing.
Posted by: CJ at November 08, 2012 10:18 AM (9KqcB)
Good thing I'm coming around the corner, then.
Posted by: Fiscal Cliff at November 08, 2012 10:18 AM (5iuEW)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at November 08, 2012 10:18 AM (6zgse)
Posted by: toby928© for TB at November 08, 2012 10:18 AM (evdj2)
"Remember that map liberals sent around after 2004, with "Jesusland" and "Canada"? They thought the same thing, that the people of Jesusland had taken over and would never retreat, that the Neocons had brought us endless war, etc. etc. Remember, we even had both houses of Congress after that election. Yet just two years later they won back the House and Senate, and in another two they won the White House.
Absolutely no reason we can't do the same thing."
Other than the fact that in this case, the takers actually have tipped. This is a much different scenario, rockmom. Think Santa. Who are you going to run against HIM?
Posted by: hannitys_hybrid at November 08, 2012 10:19 AM (zpqa2)
Posted by: tcn at November 08, 2012 02:16 PM (ZOUmX)
I'd be shredded. I don't have the education. I don't have the money. I don't have the gift of "baffle 'em with your bullshit."
I've thought about it. For sure. I don't have that Jekyll and Hyde ability to be on and off. I would quickly be perceived to have an attitude like McCain.
Posted by: © Sponge at November 08, 2012 10:20 AM (UK9cE)
I think I read last night that Ace recommends taking up smoking.
And masturbation. Lots of masturbation via the internet. Posted by: Soothsayer at November 08, 2012 02:06 PM
Ha. Just now realizing Ace's self improvement suggestion was e-cigs. He was so passionate about the joys of e-cigs I wanted to try them. I am just shy of 50 and have never smoked in my life but I was considering e-cigs. Heck it could be my new hobby like knitting. Plus you smoke e-cigs on planes. Knitting can be problematic because bringing long sharp pointy things is frowned upon now. E-Cigs!!!!!!
Posted by: Long Island at November 08, 2012 10:20 AM (EsJl1)
And how long was Maxine Waters under ethics investigation? And it was dropped earlier this fall!!!
Posted by: EC at November 08, 2012 10:20 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Tsar Nicholas II at November 08, 2012 10:21 AM (pmsMR)
Bottom line, it doesn't look like the 3 million's non-participation made much of a difference.
Posted by: angler at November 08, 2012 02:15 PM (SwjAj)
Thanks for crunching the numbers.
Posted by: CJ at November 08, 2012 10:21 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: The Dude at November 08, 2012 10:21 AM (tw6Ar)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at November 08, 2012 10:21 AM (79ueO)
You wuld think that the college graduates who have a FIFTY PER CENT unemployment rate would have gone for Romney. Most did not, because they have been brainwashed.
And OWS was blaming BANKS for their huge student loans, when the real villains are the government and the universities themselves, who are grinding out unemployable kids with useless degrees and using the guaranteed money from the student loans to raise professor salaries and hire lots of diversity coaches and such.
Student loans cannot be discharged by bankruptcy.
So basically, the schools and the government are pushing these kids into indentured servitude. He will probably forgive student loans next and that will be borne by the taxpayer.
We have to make the kids understand this scam by the universities, and we have to have some sort of control over what is taught there. I am not advocating censorship, but state taxpayers should not be funding a school which refuses to have a balanced staff make-up in the history department (ideological).
Posted by: Miss Marple at November 08, 2012 10:22 AM (GoIUi)
@160
I saw Trende's article today. We weren't outdone by demographics - yet.
Just spitballing, what if there are a number of minorities like this who aren't persuaded by the democrats (I'm thinking asians here) who have never been reached out to by republicans and just don't vote at all? Maybe there are some. Maybe thats the start we need.
And yes, this was 04 again, just like Obama wanted. He could only win a base election, Romney wanted a change election. Obama won.
Posted by: JollyRoger at November 08, 2012 10:22 AM (t06LC)
I could see this, although they are still counting votes. I was still shocked to see he got below 40% of the vote. Obviously there is no point for him to bother out here, but the guy had no presence out here period. But then why was Obama constantly on my TV, what was his purpose. I saw two Romney ads the entire cycle, easily over 100 Obama ads, why is this? He has the state locked up why waist the money?
Posted by: Adam Smith's Invisible Pimp Hand at November 08, 2012 10:22 AM (NzBQO)
Posted by: Keith Eppich at November 08, 2012 10:23 AM (fklK7)
Posted by: Dahlia at November 08, 2012 10:23 AM (yBwO7)
Posted by: The Dude at November 08, 2012 02:21 PM (tw6Ar)
You can't use cigars, pipes or knit on planes. You can use e-cigs!
Posted by: Long Island at November 08, 2012 10:24 AM (EsJl1)
Posted by: radar at November 08, 2012 10:24 AM (zmlwq)
"Bottom line, it doesn't look like the 3 million's non-participation made much of a difference."
Even if it did, who cares? It's over.
We need to focus on why this past election was not a landslide in our favor, and the answer is, "We've tipped."
This is huge. Sell the takers on conservatism. Go ahead, I'll wait...
Posted by: hannitys_hybrid at November 08, 2012 10:25 AM (zpqa2)
How about some from column A, some from column B?
Posted by: EC at November 08, 2012 10:25 AM (GQ8sn)
I think dems have to face a more daunting reality - thier majority was bought and paid for. Eventually, the money will run out. (Math said so)
When this happens, your paid for mercenaries will scramble over who gets the spoils. I say, let Boehner raise taxes in exchange for a hard debt limit that shall not be raised nor negotiated. Let it hit. Sit back and watch the factions fight.
Posted by: JollyRoger at November 08, 2012 10:25 AM (t06LC)
The math in question is the graph of total goverment spending as a fraction of the economy. From 1950 to the present, it's literally almost a straight line marching steadily upward. It started around 20% and is currently well north of 40%. No Republican in more than half century has stopped that relentless increase. Whether or not another Republican ever sits in the oval office is almost irrelevant. The line will continue its upward march until collapse. No AoS pep talk will change that.
Derb was right. We are doomed.
Posted by: Matt at November 08, 2012 10:25 AM (rg9OU)
Posted by: Tammy al-Thor at November 08, 2012 10:25 AM (2rMmy)
Posted by: tofer732 at November 08, 2012 10:25 AM (2zM0P)
Hell with cigars or pipes - pick up a can of dip. If you know what you're doing, you can do that anywhere and everywhere.
Posted by: radar at November 08, 2012 10:26 AM (zmlwq)
Conservative minorities can force the white-guilt MSM to give them a fair hearing, as long as they don't leave any obvious handles to grab on to.
So Herman Cain was not the ideal candidate, too much baggage.
I agree a leftist/democrat candidate like Obama can have boxcar loads of baggage and never get vetted, but the white-guilters can be guilted into shutting the hell up with an attractive candidate.
They are out there, and it's the job of the RNC to find them and work with them.
Start with various chambers of commerce and other civic organizations.
Posted by: Boots at November 08, 2012 10:26 AM (neKzn)
Posted by: In the bunker at November 08, 2012 10:26 AM (R7H3g)
Posted by: Analytics at November 08, 2012 10:26 AM (1d6WV)
Why can't the country see through the Imperial Presidency of this corrupt corporate cronyist? What's wrong with America? What's wrong with us?
Hot damm we know how to keep the low information voter low on information.
*takes bow*
Posted by: The MFM at November 08, 2012 10:27 AM (1PE/J)
Posted by: The Dude at November 08, 2012 10:27 AM (tw6Ar)
So you think the soft socialism that we're in the midst of can continue forever?
Posted by: burned cut-loop [/i] [/b] at November 08, 2012 10:27 AM (SX6wc)
152
I can tell you in some AfAm parts of NC, there were precincts were Obama probably did legitimately get 99% of the vote. While I was going from my precinct to precinct on Tuesday, in one Af-Am neighborhood, I saw 20 houses in a row with Obama signs. As much as 2008, this was a quasi- religous event for AfAms (and I am not saying that in a derogatory way). I disagree with the vote choice, and I think paradoxically their overwhelming devotion to the Democratic party has hurt them politically and economically (Pres. O notwithstanding). But its there and its real. No one, but no one would have changed that this time. But over the 20 years or more, we can start making some real progress.
Posted by: nc at November 08, 2012 10:27 AM (Cxl7g)
He had both Bushes appear at the Republican convention. He chose Paul Ryan for the Tea Party. Gold standard for the Ron Paul supporters. Santorum, Cruz and Rand were all at the convention
That is BS. Ryan is not "gold standard". Ryan supported TARP and other BS as well. Ryan is Bronze standard, at best a compromise with Paul supporters who have an iota more respect for Ryan than they do for most republicans, but don't particularly love the guy.
Paul wanted a trillion dollars in cuts, immediately. Ryan had a plan to balance the budget in 75 years (balanced, assuming congress sat on it's hands and spent absolutely nothing for the entire 75 years the plan would have taken).
Posted by: entropy at November 08, 2012 10:28 AM (TULs6)
Posted by: Jon at November 08, 2012 10:28 AM (uhGPg)
____________
I think you mean approx. 4 million compared to McCain, but the point is still the same.
I would argue that they are not lost. Those 3/4 million Republicans in California who stayed home this year because they knew their vote had no meaning might very well move to states where it does. In fact, I'll bet you it's already happening, to some degree.
Posted by: angler at November 08, 2012 10:28 AM (SwjAj)
Posted by: Fritz at November 08, 2012 10:29 AM (0yCoM)
Posted by: Jon at November 08, 2012 10:29 AM (t1NLo)
Posted by: tofer732 at November 08, 2012 10:30 AM (2zM0P)
Posted by: Tommy V at November 08, 2012 10:31 AM (ZYlKz)
Posted by: angler at November 08, 2012 02:15 PM (SwjAj)
Good information that no one else is talking about. Thanks.
Posted by: jwest at November 08, 2012 10:32 AM (ZDsRL)
Posted by: The Poster Formerly Known as Mr. Barky at November 08, 2012 10:32 AM (qwK3S)
Posted by: Miss Marple at November 08, 2012 02:22 PM (GoIUi)
Yeah the thing is it's not in the best interest of the universities to blame themselves. You think a polysci prof is going to come in and talk about govt. subsidies increasing the cost of college seven fold counting for inflation since 1970? How they have not figured out to turn their blame to the govt and their alma maters is beyond me. They sure as hell aren't going to blame their own decision making. I would also point out from their perspective, after having Occupy movement for over a year, the republicans chose in their mind Moneybanks the IV. That's not Romney's fault it's just really band timing. Every Republican candidate was a caricature for many college age students. The rich investor (Romney), the southern christian (Santorum), Bush III (Perry).
Posted by: Adam Smith's Invisible Pimp Hand at November 08, 2012 10:32 AM (NzBQO)
But we really need to get leadership with spine. Who have the courage to go over the fiscal cliff, and implement sequestration and hang it on the Dems.
I'd love it if we started calling black Obama voters racist. And White Obama voters Uncle Toms. Just to mess with them.
Oh, and you want to cripple the MSM, stop watching ESPN. Go Galt. Pirate the games. Rip movies and music (if you're not already). Punish Hollyweird. Get to be Kim Dotcom's best friend. Deny them the revenues they'd use to cripple us and buy votes.
We have 30 governorships now. By the next election we should have 30 right to work states (if we don't already) that refuse automatic deduction of union dues.
Worried about demographic changes favorable to Dems, start bringing over skilled workers from the former East Bloc, and India. Register them as Republicans. If the law doesn't count for Dems, it doesn't count for us. If they don't have to obey immigration laws, we don't have to obey tax laws! If they won't follow the constitution, we don't follow their regulations. We can't keep handicapping ourselves by playing by the rules. Unless the rules are impartially administered, we'll never have a victory again.
And stop listening to the media explain how we lost because we're too racist, to old, to uncool. They don't want us to win anyway! We should do the exact opposite of what they tell us to do. If they say dump the So-Cons and Tea Party, we should be running to embrace them! They tell us who they're afraid of!
Posted by: Iblis at November 08, 2012 10:33 AM (9221z)
Posted by: Jon at November 08, 2012 10:33 AM (t1NLo)
Lovely. This is optimistic. I am optimistic about 2014. I am nervous about the candidates that we choose to represent the Republican party for Senate races in 2014, however.
Bobby Jindal would crush Landrieu by 30 points, but what if LA decides to select the Southern stepchild of Akin and Mourdock? Nothing is certain. But I'm more determined than ever to reclaim the Senate from the Democrats. We've had so many unforced errors with primary winners going back to 2010. We should have control of the Senate right now by 52-48 if we picked the right candidates. And I'm anxious to help push the Speaker's majority to 260 Republican votes. Bring on 2014.
Posted by: Schnack at November 08, 2012 10:33 AM (whIcL)
I don't think the data support your conclusion. In the key swing states of FL, VA, OH, and NH, Romney received a total of 321,792 more votes than McCain did in 2008. Not only did the 2008 voters NOT stay home, more were added.
The people who stayed at home live in states where their vote wouldn't have mattered much anyway because the state was either severely blue or severely red.
Posted by: angler at November 08, 2012 10:34 AM (SwjAj)
Posted by: radar at November 08, 2012 10:34 AM (zmlwq)
Posted by: toby928© for TB at November 08, 2012 10:35 AM (evdj2)
Posted by: Jon at November 08, 2012 10:35 AM (t1NLo)
I think I get what you are saying, but we lost in the swing states not in the red ones, yes? No?
Posted by: burned cut-loop [/i] [/b] at November 08, 2012 10:36 AM (SX6wc)
Posted by: Jon at November 08, 2012 10:37 AM (t1NLo)
Sure he is. He's a gold-standard professional Republican.
He looks like a politician from a movie, talks like he flipped through an accounting textbook a couple times, and he votes like an Italian fascist.
He's a Winner. Just look at him! Can't lose with that guy.
Posted by: oblig. at November 08, 2012 10:37 AM (cePv8)
You missed something som3where because Romney pulled in a lot less than McCain in VA and OH according to the results tables I looked at this morning.
I didn't check FL because the election was over before they finished counting FL.
Posted by: Vic at November 08, 2012 10:38 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Matt S. at November 08, 2012 10:38 AM (moRRg)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at November 08, 2012 10:38 AM (6zgse)
I think most low information voters don't see a connection between what happens in DC and their own daily lives.
Except when it's giveaway time before elections, or we kill bin Laden.
Posted by: PJ at November 08, 2012 10:39 AM (ZWaLo)
The Bush people - Karl Rove - did not understand the battles that are fought every day in the world of public opinion.
They didn't understand that you need to "always be closing" every single day as Dennis Miller says.
If you are not actively fighting back against the way you are being portrayed in the media, then you are allowing your enemies to steal a little bit of your soul every single day.
When George W and Laura Bush left the White House, I caught part of an interview with Laura. Her take on it was that eventually the country would come around to viewing his legacy positively.
They don't understand that if you want to be viewed positively you have to work at it. If the media won't give you positive press, then hire a firm to do it for you. Celebritards do that all the time. Would Kim Kardashian be a household name without a pr firm?
Posted by: Boots at November 08, 2012 10:39 AM (neKzn)
Posted by: Keith Eppich at November 08, 2012 10:39 AM (fklK7)
Folks, you don't get it. Any community with a 70% illegitimacy rate CANNOT support smaller government. In such communities (the rate is closer to 90% in the inner city) government support is essential to survival. It has replaced the father in their homes.
Um... what about the men then?
Posted by: entropy at November 08, 2012 10:39 AM (TULs6)
There will probably be a couple other guys coming too (Euro Collapse, Chinese Real Estate Bubble, Regional Mideast War, etc.), but, you know what, I like surprises. Don't you?
Posted by: Fiscal Cliff at November 08, 2012 10:39 AM (5iuEW)
186 CJ
Was not trying to be condecending. And, I don't disagree with part of your point. I grew up in a small Southern town in one of the first integrated schools. We were surrounded by an AfAm housing project. And yes, I saw and see the dysfunctions (as I noted in my post). In our school we had to do the California Achievement Test (and I have no earthly idea why a NC school was doing those so don't ask me). In my homeroom the whites would score typically in the 75th percentile or better, the black kids would score in the lower quartile. I remember one kid (Erick something or other) scored a 3. This is a problem. The Democrats want to ignore the problem. They think Affirmative Action solves the problem, but I can goddamned tell you that no affirmative action program will get a kid who scored a 3 on achievement tests into any school or job. I think Affirmative Action (or diversity programs as they are now euphemastically called) are heinous programs designed by igorant liberals to buy off middle class minorities.
Â@
But I digress.
Â@
My point in my original comment was not to be sanctimonious, but to start reaching people we can reach and to stop lumping everybody into the free loader category. Its not a winning electoral strategy.
Posted by: nc at November 08, 2012 10:41 AM (Cxl7g)
Posted by: Mullaney at November 08, 2012 10:41 AM (wXcfQ)
Posted by: DMH at November 08, 2012 10:41 AM (s1Np6)
Am I saying the GOP should just be obstructionists now? No. In fact I kinda hope they cave on tax hikes just to take that wedge issue away from the Dems in 2014 and 2016. But they need to do what they've been doing since January 2011. Do not give in on left-wing fantasies like blanket amnesty or climate change. Keep holding the line on spending, prevent anymore gutting of the military, and use Benghazi and any fallout from the turmoil on Staten Island to weaken Obama's standing. If the economy goes into recession as many anticipate over the next year or two, that will put the GOP in the same prime position to come roaring back that the Dems found themselves in back in 2006. And at that point we'll be 2 years away from the next Presidential election when you'll start to see Democrat contenders frantically distancing themselves from Obama as they seek the nomination.
Posted by: Adam_ME at November 08, 2012 10:41 AM (J+jRf)
According to the data I reviewed:
Republican vote VA 2008: 1,726,053
Republican vote VA 2012: 1,772,302
Republican vote OH 2008: 2,501,855
Republican vote OH 2012: 2,593,787
Posted by: angler at November 08, 2012 10:42 AM (SwjAj)
Posted by: radar at November 08, 2012 10:43 AM (zmlwq)
Try this on for size:
Michelle Obama will be the dem nominee in 2016.
She will be unbeatable, the Oprah of politics.
The entire campaign will be waged on The View and GMA.
Posted by: Boots at November 08, 2012 10:45 AM (neKzn)
256 From your mouth to God's ears.
I would love to have M. Obama on the top of the Democratic ticket. Won't happen though.
Posted by: nc at November 08, 2012 10:46 AM (Cxl7g)
Posted by: America Fuck Yeah! at November 08, 2012 10:47 AM (HINxj)
How do you see bankrupt Federal entitlements and $16 trillion dollars lasting a long time?
When the US loose another credit notch, bond interest must rise. That's not an if, and the when part is sooner than later.
I don't see the US being able to control either of those factors. If that's the case, there will be a crisis before any thoughts of coups or succession manifest themselves.
If you can't win an election, you can't win a revolution.
Posted by: burned cut-loop [/i] [/b] at November 08, 2012 10:47 AM (SX6wc)
Posted by: Jon at November 08, 2012 10:48 AM (uhGPg)
Posted by: The Dude at November 08, 2012 10:48 AM (tw6Ar)
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at November 08, 2012 10:48 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: PH at November 08, 2012 10:51 AM (2LwhS)
Posted by: Botec at November 08, 2012 10:53 AM (xWnzk)
In-depth analysis of vote totals VA and OH
VA
2012
R = 1,781,445
D = 1,891,486
2008
R = 1,725,005
D = 1,959,532
R down by about 30K, D down by 70K
OH
2012
R - 2,586,467
D - 2,686,609
2008
R - 2,677,820
D - 2,940,044
R down by ~ 100K, D down by ~ 254K
Posted by: Vic at November 08, 2012 10:53 AM (YdQQY)
And for those who think this is hilarious, just wait. My democrat sister loves Michelle, because she is so "caring" and is so "fashion forward."
I am skipping Thanksgiving this year, by the way.
Posted by: Miss Marple at November 08, 2012 10:53 AM (GoIUi)
Posted by: America Fuck Yeah! at November 08, 2012 10:54 AM (3p/jD)
One thing I've never understood: the GOP should make school choice one of its featured issues. I mean, front and center, all the time, and make the focus how union-run public schools harm poor black students. School choice is one issue that the Dems hold a losing hand when it comes to minorities. They are too deeply reliant on the NEA to ever give ground.
Get ahead of the Donks on marijuana decriminalization and beat them over the head with it. We're the uptight old fogies now, but some of that label can be stuck on them as the mean old guys who want to keep weed illegal. Make sentencing reform for drug convictions a corollary issue. You know who loves them some huge incarceration rates? Prison guard unions, who are yet another public employee union pouring millions into the Dems' pockets. End the drug war, reduce prison populations and cut all that money spent on all that.
And one other thing that I've thought the GOP should embrace ever since they got killed for this shit in 2006 - make the GOP brand one of anti-corruption. Make corruption a capital offense within the party and take a stand against crony capitalism. Illustrate to people how "big business" does not equal "the free market". Be seen as the party that's fighting for the little guy, the small business owner, rather than Wall Street. There are ways to use populist sentiment without being socialist or anticapitalist.
Posted by: radar at November 08, 2012 10:55 AM (zmlwq)
Once people taste success and self-reliance, they don't want to go back.
Heather Mcdonald agrees with me: it's not amnesty. http://tinyurl.com/atarcvm
Posted by: PJ at November 08, 2012 10:58 AM (ZWaLo)
Posted by: radar at November 08, 2012 11:02 AM (zmlwq)
Posted by: KG at November 08, 2012 11:03 AM (p7BzH)
Now, they're right back there. They haven't had a real opportunity to make money and fend for themselves, so they have no appreciation of their hardship (particularly if Mom and dad are willing and able to support them) and what opportunity they are losing.
It's all a matter of perspective, so you have to think about how you're selling the point to them. I think more of these kids are just clueless as opposed to having OD'd on barky's kool-aid.
Posted by: Pete at November 08, 2012 11:05 AM (+GIS3)
Posted by: Hartsell at November 08, 2012 11:06 AM (E58Uj)
Posted by: shoeless hunter at November 08, 2012 11:09 AM (9196u)
Posted by: shoeless hunter at November 08, 2012 11:09 AM (9196u)
Voters lined up for hours waiting to get into their polling places. Lineups as far as the eye can see all over America. After the votes are counted we're told that there was millions less voting than the last lackluster turnout in 2008.
And we all believe them?
It is over.
Posted by: Doowleb at November 08, 2012 11:13 AM (r+Gn+)
Posted by: jasonf at November 08, 2012 11:15 AM (n0jSX)
Posted by: Texas Repub at November 08, 2012 11:28 AM (Pt2p2)
Posted by: JTK at November 08, 2012 11:32 AM (VnIQw)
Posted by: mkn at November 08, 2012 11:41 AM (SXu8/)
1) Playing nice never works. The media will still be the paid-off refs. Reagan mocked liberals. Laughed at them to their faces. mocked their tired, old 1930's ideas that have failed time and time again. And he did it with a twinkle in his eye that made you want to laugh at them too. And when voters are laughing at them (The Daily Show understands this), you're not taking them seriously. Go negative on TV, radio, print mail, email, etc. Go mocking on the stump. The media will attack, but mock the media too. The people know they're in the tank, help them put 2+2 together. You basically box-out the Dems best weapon: Media Narrative.
2) Our GOTV effort was a hat and no cattle. Steal Obama's playbook (which combined Rove's micro-targeting strategery with the leftists' creepy "I am government and I know everything about you" stat gathering. The white vote isn't declining because white voters are disappearing. It's declining because they aren't motivated to vote like they used to be. The white voters of yesteryear would have voted no matter what. They're the greatest generation. Their sons, while still white, and center-right, don't have the same conviction. Mitt assumed you could Count On Them so he didn't target them. He was wrong.
3) Independents aren't just non-partisan because they don't vote for ideology. They are also non-partisan because they also don't vote AGAINST ideology. Moving to the middle is moving to the left. Run a conservative. A real one. A happy one. Win the base, win the turnout, and the middle will follow. The middle votes on performance, and "vibe" not on ideology. They don't have time for ideology and partisanship (the same thing to them). If Obama has destroyed America like we expect him to, the middle will come. If he hasn't we're not winning anyway.
Posted by: bigpale at November 08, 2012 11:48 AM (TDbSH)
Posted by: Robert Winkler Burke at November 08, 2012 11:50 AM (SHtOj)
At best the GOP becomes the Tories. They take turns with the Dems in managing the decline.
So, game over, man. Game over.
The optimist in me says that it will be a slow, smoldering decline. But I'm not that optimistic.
Posted by: Eric at November 08, 2012 11:56 AM (+n4Qh)
Posted by: In the bunker at November 08, 2012 11:56 AM (R7H3g)
Posted by: Not2Shr at November 08, 2012 11:58 AM (0APJ3)
Posted by: Exasperated Expat at November 08, 2012 12:04 PM (gkfSV)
McCain beat Romney in a primary
Obama beat McCain in an election
The rest is history.</blockquote>
Elections aren't transitive like that.
Ford beat Reagan in a primary.
Carter beat Ford in an election.
But Reagan beat Carter in an election.
Posted by: Joshua at November 08, 2012 12:15 PM (oCZ4e)
Posted by: Joshua at November 08, 2012 12:16 PM (oCZ4e)
Posted by: Esau's Message at November 08, 2012 12:18 PM (6c62F)
Posted by: LaurieK at November 08, 2012 12:21 PM (mnajP)
"The presidential election will take place on November 6, the very same day as Mercury goes retrograde. Mercury is at its worse at the front and end points, what I call "bookend" dates, so this is not good news. That night we will be getting ready for three-and-a-half weeks of a retrograde, with miscommunications, static, and forgetfulness.
The last time Mercury retrograde coincided with a presidential election it was in the year 2000, when we had the Bush-Gore election."
Posted by: Astro Girl at November 08, 2012 12:29 PM (ZWaLo)
Posted by: gerry at November 08, 2012 12:31 PM (TvQgY)
And what is the solution? The Republicans are just as much to blame as the Dems. The people of this country are the losers. The states that keep voting Democrat will end up like New York and California, low growth and poverty everywhere. The Republican states keep on growing. But the yardsticks always move in the direction of socialism, not against it.
Things are that bad!
GM
Posted by: Gary Marshall at November 08, 2012 12:33 PM (at1Ek)
Posted by: chuck at November 08, 2012 01:05 PM (HUgKv)
Posted by: TFR at November 08, 2012 01:11 PM (H8nxQ)
Posted by: That Guy at November 08, 2012 01:27 PM (LmEvg)
Posted by: Conrad Baylor at November 08, 2012 02:01 PM (HhtFR)
Posted by: Clyde Shelton at November 08, 2012 03:38 PM (vUK/h)
Posted by: Pyrrho of Elis II: The Secret of the Ooze at November 08, 2012 03:50 PM (Kd6lF)
That's the problem. Not whether one side or the other got to have a post-election party after this or that election.
Suppose two universities have a regular basketball game every four years for many generations, but by a law which one side pushed for and the other stupidly accepted, with every game, Team A has to field a team that's an inch taller on average or Team B has to restrict who it fields so that it's an inch shorter than before on average. Sure, Team B can still win games, increasingly against the odds. But what's the average result going to be over time?
Now suppose that winning that basketball game confers the right to make more laws of the same type. That's the kind of advantage the left has gotten.
The way the right has reacted since 1965 is to cheer every four years and say it's not hopeless yet. Well it's not. But it's also downhill all the way.
Posted by: The Lightworker at November 08, 2012 04:03 PM (mnulr)
-
When may we expect a revival of the Whig Party?
Posted by: The Lightworker at November 08, 2012 04:23 PM (mnulr)
-
Yes, the GOP has a bad habit is supporting big institutions which are also leftist institutions. Compulsory cultural Marxist indoctrination is a bad thing, and the GOP ought to help parents who want their kids to escape from it.
When I talk about how the Republican Party should explicitly help its supporters, who are 90% White, this is the sort of thing I mean.
Mom and Dad don't want junior to be mugged or made a cultural Marxist. They need some help. Can you get them some relief from a bad school? A party that talks big on Free Enterprise and Universal Values but doesn't help with this stuff is useless.
Posted by: The Lightworker at November 08, 2012 04:37 PM (50nXF)
Posted by: Bruce Fancher at November 08, 2012 09:53 PM (ly8Dq)
Posted by: Michael Coughlin at November 09, 2012 05:03 AM (m6PZO)
Posted by: tannngl at November 09, 2012 06:34 AM (UsRyD)
Obama now has four more years of Supreme Court appointments, including the chance to potentially replace a conservative (or a "conservative") or two. Obama now has four more years to flex his executive muscles, using executive orders and the power of the regulatory machine to change the country in horrific ways.
Sure, it's theoretically possible that a Republican president could be elected in 2016 and start the process of dismantling what Obama has done. But history says it never happens, except here and there around the edges maybe.
Regardless of what happens in 2014 or 2016, you will not recognize this country four years from now. No amount of happy talk or "perspective" can change that reality.
Posted by: Ben at November 09, 2012 08:23 AM (rEsVN)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2907 seconds, 436 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Jon (not the troll) at November 08, 2012 09:40 AM (2ihLK)