February 24, 2012
— LauraW Obama says that he is planning to have the federal government support 'biobased products' in order to create jobs. Geoff, at Innocent Bystanders:
You can see that the biobased industry is dwarfed by the industries itÂ’s seeking to replace, so even assuming the best-case scenario where the 50% increase in federal purchases will result in a 50% increase in jobs, the President is creating a paltry number of positions.But thatÂ’s been the hallmark of the Obama administration: lots of fanfare and grandiose claims; ridiculous implementation and no results.
If by results you mean net jobs gains, then no. But if he ever gave a damn about job creation, he wouldn't squander the opportunities he's had to assist it, just to score obnoxious political points.
All this is, is more crooked leftism; another batch of Solyndras coming down the pike. Why should Obama change his tack? Why should the leftists in this administration stop bending the course of government in order to help their friends loot the treasury?
Why, when they keep getting away with it?
Here's another example of what I'm talking about, in terms of taking the lamprey's-eye view of just absolutely everything.
Here's one Deveda Francois, a former campaign office manager for Obama in 2004 (somebody screencap that for me?).
Deveda Francois was dismissed from a $72,400 job at the Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity in February 2011 after the agency alleged she distributed confidential information and pressured grant recipients on hiring, according to a review of state documents and interviews by the AP and the Better Government Association.
----------------------
Jakubek said the agency discovered Francois' wrongdoing, referred allegations to authorities and dismissed her in February 2011. Francois was fired for pressuring grantees to hire certain people, sharing confidential information with people who could benefit from it, reviewing and discussing grant requests with applicants, using her state computer to do work for Diamonds in the Ruff and more.
She also allegedly used the power of her position to 'punish' a grantee who did not obey her hiring demands.
It looks for all the world like there is absolutely no valuable part of Francois' public sector job that wasn't sold, misallocated, or used as a lever. And she's just one of the little fish.
This is Obama's background. This is where he grew up, politically. How he learned to behave with power. And so now we all have to live in Cook County.
Naturally Francois has been rehired with back pay and a bonus. Gotta love those Chicago judges.
Not sure what the point to this post was. My outrage-meter already redlined and exploded a couple of years ago, and apparently there's no political will to enforce the law in this country anymore. Just registering disgust, I guess.
Posted by: LauraW at
12:41 PM
| Comments (38)
Post contains 478 words, total size 3 kb.
Government: The rapacious monster. I know many people who've never paid attention to what our government was doing have been sitting up and noticing now. I think it's because their assholes are getting sore.
Posted by: Soona at February 24, 2012 12:51 PM (uBZfB)
Posted by: alppuccino at February 24, 2012 12:52 PM (zijOs)
Where the hell are they on this? McConnell? Boehner? Issa?
Bueller.......
Posted by: ontherocks at February 24, 2012 12:52 PM (ZJCDy)
Environmentalists who approve of this sort of activity on the part of the Obama administration don't even seem to realise that he is actually killing any hope of future alternative energy sources. Politicizing every grant can only lead to failure and prove to the general voting public that they are all scams.
Just as well then that there are plenty of conventional sources of energy and all that is needed is a change of government and a change of policy to get things going.
Posted by: Decaf at February 24, 2012 12:52 PM (0okHd)
Question for the legal beagles here. My son distributes a product for a company and he's one of many. Do not want to state the company's name so will make one up. Here's the situation. An attorney acting on the behalf of the company "FranksWiperBlades" just sent him a letter trying to get him to turn his domain names over to them. He has website which sells the products but the domain name (to aid in getting traffic) has the specific product name such as franks2200wiperblades. The attorney is suggesting the use of the company name in the website domain name violates trademark reglations.
He has a distribution agreement with the company and has had it for more than two years. This is the first he's heard any such claim by the manufacturer. He helped them build up their business by selling their product. The attorney wants him to sign over the domain names and "may" license them back to him. Is this legal? Is he just out of luck? Does he have any legal recourse?
Thanks!
Posted by: Ammo Dump at February 24, 2012 12:56 PM (WUWb9)
Posted by: Decaf at February 24, 2012 04:52 PM (0okHd)
--------------------------------------
I was thinking about that yesterday. A quick remedy, even though a repub president and congress may release the oil and coal industries, is not going to be. Too many liberal civil lawyers and judges. They're going to be throwing roadblocks at every turn on the road to energy recovery.
Posted by: Soona at February 24, 2012 12:59 PM (uBZfB)
Posted by: Ammo Dump at February 24, 2012 01:06 PM (WUWb9)
Posted by: Ken at February 24, 2012 01:07 PM (fFh95)
Thanks!
Unless the domain name is *exactly* their trademark there is room to contest.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Now Researching How to Awaken Azathoth at February 24, 2012 01:15 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at February 24, 2012 01:20 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: Wyatt's Torch at February 24, 2012 01:21 PM (zxrQh)
Posted by: Ammo Dump at February 24, 2012 01:24 PM (WUWb9)
This broad got her PhD in Community Psychology.
What the hell is that?
Isn't it taught in business courses as consumer behavior? It's finding out what people will go for or how far you can push something before a backlash.
Posted by: Decaf at February 24, 2012 01:28 PM (0okHd)
What the hell is that?
It's what we used to call mob rule.
Posted by: pep at February 24, 2012 01:28 PM (6TB1Z)
What the hell is that?
>>>It's what we used to call mob rule.
More like herd thinking 101.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Now Researching How to Awaken Azathoth at February 24, 2012 01:31 PM (0q2P7)
Fuck you, Todd Paglia. I'd say Canada is doing what it needs to do to compete in the world market. Go try to save forests in China, see how well you do.
Posted by: huerfano at February 24, 2012 01:31 PM (fIuC0)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at February 24, 2012 01:47 PM (VitMz)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at February 24, 2012 01:48 PM (VitMz)
Science! tells me that Oil comes from the bio-material of dead animals of long ago, and Coal comes from the bio-material of dead plants of long ago.
Why not just burn Oil and Coal?
Posted by: Inquiring Minds Want To Know at February 24, 2012 01:55 PM (8dlg4)
Why not just burn Oil and Coal?
Posted by: Inquiring Minds Want To Know at February 24, 2012 05:55 PM (8dlg4)
-------------------------------------------------
And make Gaia die twice? Are you kidding?
Posted by: Soona at February 24, 2012 02:02 PM (uBZfB)
Posted by: rockmom at February 24, 2012 04:56 PM (YPgCz)
What, you don't trust me to do it?
Posted by: Eric 'Gun Runner' Holder at February 24, 2012 07:11 PM (eHIJJ)
Posted by: steevy at February 24, 2012 07:32 PM (7W3wI)
Yes, I follow my own advice. I don't comment much but I'm always lurking. In fact, I use a lot of your stuff on my radio show (with proper acknowledgement of course!)
Posted by: Nick Shaw at February 25, 2012 04:06 PM (H9Gtg)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.252 seconds, 166 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Dr. Varno at February 24, 2012 12:42 PM (QMtmy)