November 17, 2012
— LauraW This is a good item to re-read, vis-a-vis how leftists in academia steer the young generation wrong, every chance they get.
...the educational establishment not only indoctrinates students, but also openly discusses the best way to do it...
And here of course, the article from last week about teachers flocking to a marxist conference.
We keep talking about how this is cultural, not political. Oh really? We have a much longer-established cultural history as rugged individualists than squishy collectivists.
You say the culture has fallen; ok, yeah, but it was pushed!
They've been at this for fifty years. Our ace in the hole is that their ideas do not work outside academia, as most people learn- including former radicals- when they get out into the job force.
And certainly business schools do not promulgate this pap, by and large. And we have an advantage where local and state governments tend to be more conservative.
We have to find ways to encourage entrepreneurship and business education at the grassroots level. We have to encroach physically with these programs, into geographic areas currently hostile to conservative thought.
We do not need to overtly proselytize with a political message. We can be sneaky, just as leftists have been sneaky. They don't talk openly about collectivism, they try to hide it! They attract by pretending to be the elite, and by living off someone else's dime, and talking about eating the rich. These things are attractive.
Well, self-reliance and prosperity are also immensely attractive, as a cultural and practical matter, and carry natural economic theory and political payloads with them.
We can push back, guys. Ideas plus action. That parallel-institutions thing Breitbart was talking about. It's brilliant.
Posted by: LauraW at
08:22 AM
| Comments (250)
Post contains 289 words, total size 2 kb.
This is why I am pro-bullying.
If these academics were slapped around by their betters, it would go a long fucking way to solving this problem.
Posted by: garrett at November 17, 2012 08:26 AM (SlED8)
Posted by: longerthoughts at November 17, 2012 08:27 AM (CVVLU)
Posted by: El Kabong, Vakarian/Wrex 2016 at November 17, 2012 08:28 AM (pzmYs)
If you've ever heard Yale computer prof and ultra-conservative Jew, talk about his idea for U.S. education overhaul, you'd stand up and cheer. He's a brilliant, brilliant man. Pair him with former radical David Horowitz, who knows how the left thinks and puts their schemes into action, and you've got some major brain wattage. Now we just need the localities that are willing to implement their ideas.
Gerlenter outlined his idea on The Blaze TV, you know, the conservative station no one watches. I'll see if I can find a YT of it.
Posted by: RushBabe, up for SMOD or LIB, whichever comes first at November 17, 2012 08:30 AM (tQHzJ)
Background.... I was a full time single parent of twins... Son and Daughter... from the time they were 1 1/2... raised in the same household... same rules... same friends...
Twins are now 21.
Son is VERY conservative, and is in the US Navy, stationed in Guam.
Daugher is in College in Denver (where I'm paying for it), and is on the Liberal Gravy Train....
Best one recently, was when she accused HIM of having an entitlement mentality because he was a Privaleged White Male...
The College environment IS brainwashing our children.... I hope she comes back to reality after she graduates and hits the real world.... but their are signs of permanent damge....
Posted by: Romeo13 at November 17, 2012 08:32 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: California at November 17, 2012 08:32 AM (Lxw+T)
Letting the Left frame conservatism or even libertarianism as "rugged individualism" is foolish. No doubt, when you are burning the midnight oil alone working on an idea or a project, you are practicing some "rugged individualism", but when you roll out that idea to a willing and eager market or use that idea to inform a project willingly undertaken by your co-workers, you are practicing "voluntary collectivism".
What the Left wants to do is force you to participate in their collectivism by force of law, rather than force of persuasion or common interest.
That's the big difference, in my mind. If you have no desire to force your fellow citizen, by force of law, to work to advance your pet hobbyhorses, you are a natural conservative or libertarian.
Are there some exceptions to that? Sure, but they are exceptions, whereas the Left would like to obliterate the distinction between "forced collectivism" and "voluntary collectivism" altogether by making everything forced, with themselves as the ones doing the forcing.
So, appeal to people's natural tendency to sometimes want to disagree with the "powers that be". If those "powers that be" are adherents to the idea of small government, there's at least the inherent right to disagree and perhaps persuade them to a different course of action. If those "powers that be" are Leftist ideologues, your "right to disagree" goes out the window and you must kow-tow to whatever the Leftist ideology of the day says is "politically correct".
Posted by: Capt. Obvious at November 17, 2012 08:32 AM (P2Ufm)
Posted by: RushBabe, up for SMOD or LIB, whichever comes first at November 17, 2012 08:33 AM (tQHzJ)
Posted by: t-bird at November 17, 2012 08:34 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: Spook at November 17, 2012 08:34 AM (lp/O4)
"You're probably going to find out, as you go out there, that you're not going to amount to JACK SQUAT!"
Posted by: President Jugears McFuckstick at November 17, 2012 08:34 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: The Left at November 17, 2012 08:35 AM (Lxw+T)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at November 17, 2012 08:35 AM (3Y7RV)
Posted by: Timwi at November 17, 2012 08:35 AM (pdhxN)
Posted by: Walkers! at November 17, 2012 08:35 AM (MazXE)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at November 17, 2012 08:36 AM (3Y7RV)
Posted by: President Jugears McFuckstick at November 17, 2012 08:36 AM (8sCoq)
Weak sauce. We don't have 50 years to fight back with these "strategies". That's like trying to exterminate fire ants with weak, govt approved poisons that won't work.
Even conservatives still haven't come to terms with the fact that the system is going to undergo a collapse as there is no way to pay for the promised benefits.
The fastest and smartest way out of the situation is to let it burn. Yes, that's counterintuitive to establishment Republicans. We've never been in this situation and it requires a radical solution imo.
The fiscal cliff is a mini-SMOD. Bring it. I want to see more Americans with skin in the game.
Posted by: Meremortal, Let It Burn To The Ground at November 17, 2012 08:36 AM (1Y+hH)
Posted by: Jones in CO at November 17, 2012 08:37 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at November 17, 2012 08:37 AM (oZsll)
Posted by: The Media at November 17, 2012 08:38 AM (H4a9N)
Posted by: Walkers! at November 17, 2012 08:38 AM (MazXE)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at November 17, 2012 08:38 AM (oZsll)
Posted by: Truman North, last of the famous international playboys at November 17, 2012 08:39 AM (I2LwF)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at November 17, 2012 08:39 AM (3Y7RV)
Posted by: El Kabong, Vakarian/Wrex 2016 at November 17, 2012 08:41 AM (pzmYs)
1. Boycott the networks thru Football, and the corps that own them. Comcast, Disney, etc...
2. Microsoft, Warren Buffet( Geico etc..) are the biggest left wing masters of education funding
Posted by: Jack J at November 17, 2012 08:41 AM (4WesI)
Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at November 17, 2012 08:43 AM (X3lox)
Posted by: Jack J at November 17, 2012 08:44 AM (4WesI)
Posted by: TrueNorthist at November 17, 2012 08:44 AM (3Aixx)
So, remind them that Leftism is micromanagement applied to an entire society.
I also think it's a good counter to the constant Leftist charge that "Conservatives don't give specifics for where they want to take the country". Well, the reason for that is because we aren't micromanagers.
Posted by: Capt. Obvious at November 17, 2012 08:45 AM (P2Ufm)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at November 17, 2012 12:39 PM (3Y7RV)
Right. We are in a depression anyway. The cliff will broaden the tax base. One of our biggest problems is the narrow tax base which leads to people voting for goodies since they don't pay for them.
The fiscal cliff is oversold as a disaster.
Posted by: Meremortal, Let It Burn To The Ground at November 17, 2012 08:45 AM (1Y+hH)
Posted by: Jack J at November 17, 2012 08:45 AM (4WesI)
Posted by: El Kabong, Vakarian/Wrex 2016 at November 17, 2012 08:46 AM (pzmYs)
is political to the Left. Every thought, word, and deed
I've taught in the belly of The Beast for a quarter of a century. Wouldn't believe the troubles I've seen; just wouldn't believe how rotten and politically skanky and Sh*tty academia is...
Posted by: Isaac Davis White at November 17, 2012 08:46 AM (Dll6b)
Besides the two he already has?
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at November 17, 2012 08:47 AM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: garrett at November 17, 2012 08:47 AM (SlED8)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at November 17, 2012 08:47 AM (3Y7RV)
Eg.
1) Pass Obamacare which raises costs on business
2) Businesses raise prices or cut other costs in response.
3) GREEDY BUSINESSES! PUNISH THEM!
Posted by: Coldstream at November 17, 2012 08:47 AM (qrCKL)
Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at November 17, 2012 12:43 PM (X3lox)
Exactly. Anyone who thinks we "burners" are happy about having to try our strategy of resistance are wrong. We do this sadness while recognizing reality. We are well beyond any political adjustments that are going to fix this mess.
Posted by: Meremortal, Let It Burn To The Ground at November 17, 2012 08:47 AM (1Y+hH)
I'm becoming skeptical of this sentiment nowadays. That may not be the correct way to state it and is more that the state and local governments unwittingly caused this. Here's the rationale, the local govie took a very low paying gig with the promise of great retirement benies, early retirement and set for life. Local elected officials either did this without forethought (most likely) or with knowledge that that was their only hope of getting jobs done. These same local government workers are the now the very ones that refuse to give up their ridiculous, economic crippling positions and hence now are the very problem simply being "takers".
Posted by: dogfish at November 17, 2012 08:48 AM (N2yhW)
Nothing could replace those unforgettable experiences of getting to see first hand the results of socialism, communism and collectivism. The utter degradation of the human spirit. The triumph of corruption over morality. The appalling dearth of anything resembling personal initiative.
It changed me forever, and I hope for the better.
Posted by: navybrat at November 17, 2012 08:49 AM (r1ty1)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows þr0n is your constitutionally guaranteed entitlement at November 17, 2012 08:49 AM (Lxw+T)
Posted by: Meremortal, Let It Burn To The Ground at November 17, 2012 08:49 AM (1Y+hH)
Posted by: DAve at November 17, 2012 08:49 AM (XDC0v)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows þr0n is your constitutionally guaranteed entitlement at November 17, 2012 08:50 AM (Lxw+T)
Posted by: just L at November 17, 2012 08:50 AM (0PiQ4)
If these academics were slapped around by their betters, it would go a long fucking way to solving this problem.
Posted by: garrett
Care for an issue or are you all topped off?
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at November 17, 2012 08:51 AM (4h0z0)
It's not so much that the fiscal cliff is a disaster, but that federal deficit spending is hiding the depression (the real, ongoing disaster), and making it worse by misallocating resources, and the fiscal cliff will pull back the curtain.
It's a disaster for the politicians who don't want people to deal directly with how thoroughly screwed we are because of them.
Posted by: Methos at November 17, 2012 08:51 AM (hO9ad)
I do not want to live through a Euro-style 40 year descent into hell.
I want this over with as soon as possible.
Posted by: Meremortal, Let It Burn To The Ground at November 17, 2012 08:52 AM (1Y+hH)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at November 17, 2012 08:52 AM (3Y7RV)
Posted by: real joe is going Lebowski, call me Dude at November 17, 2012 08:53 AM (PD2ad)
Posted by: dogfish at November 17, 2012 08:54 AM (N2yhW)
You can buy an indoor antenna for 30 dollahs or so, and get your local channels if you aren't out in the boonies. Comcast is NBC is Universal Studios, and needs to die a quick painful death
Don't go to the movies and don't buy DVDs of movies. Starve the beast...
Posted by: Isaac Davis White at November 17, 2012 08:54 AM (Dll6b)
It's a disaster for the politicians who don't want people to deal directly with how thoroughly screwed we are because of them."
Posted by: Methos at November 17, 2012 12:51 PM (hO9ad)
And it's high time that curtain was pulled back. Liberals and many so-called conservatives are still living in la la land.
Posted by: Meremortal, Let It Burn To The Ground at November 17, 2012 08:54 AM (1Y+hH)
That was as good as it got if you were a shopper.
And of course, they were out of the actual peaches.
The cans were empty, or so I was told.
Posted by: navybrat at November 17, 2012 08:54 AM (r1ty1)
Posted by: Capt. Obvious at November 17, 2012 08:55 AM (AzwZn)
Posted by: El Kabong, Vakarian/Wrex 2016 at November 17, 2012 08:55 AM (pzmYs)
Posted by: LiveFreeOrDie at November 17, 2012 08:55 AM (6eu/y)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at November 17, 2012 08:55 AM (3Y7RV)
But this is the Obama/Axlerod/Rahm/Schumer scumbag playbook
Posted by: Jack J at November 17, 2012 08:56 AM (4WesI)
Posted by: Jenny Tries Too Hard at November 17, 2012 08:56 AM (2KBjW)
The perfessers believe that as "brilliant intellects" the spoils of society should be bestowed upon them. It galls them that someone who didn't go to the "right" universities and belong to the "right thinking" class does not deserve success
The line of thinking is "if you're so rich, why aren't you smart!"
Posted by: kbdabear at November 17, 2012 08:57 AM (wwsoB)
Posted by: DAve at November 17, 2012 08:57 AM (XDC0v)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at November 17, 2012 12:52 PM (3Y7RV)
___ _____ ____ ___
They will see it when their specific benefits are ravaged, and only then will they see it. When their pension is cut in half, when their social security payments are cut, when their unemployment isn't extended, and so forth.
Posted by: Meremortal, Let It Burn To The Ground at November 17, 2012 08:57 AM (1Y+hH)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at November 17, 2012 08:57 AM (3Y7RV)
But it won't actually burn. We will limp along for a while and eventually recover, and those in charge (Democrats) will get the credit for it. And socialism, American-style, will have been "proved" to have worked. That's the problem with the "let it burn" strategy.
Posted by: chemjeff at November 17, 2012 08:57 AM (d/5qf)
Posted by: Jack J at November 17, 2012 08:57 AM (4WesI)
Posted by: Trump at November 17, 2012 08:57 AM (6cVBc)
Well, self-reliance and prosperity are also immensely attractive, as a cultural and practical matter, and carry natural economic theory and political payloads with them.
Wellllll....unfortunately, self-reliance is not terribly attractive when there is an alternative being sold. As has been stated here before, conservatism is not natural. We need to get that into our heads. It's not natural. What's natural is doing the least amount of work necessary to survive. That's what liberalism appeals to. Fatherhood is not natural. It's a societal construct. Once society stopped expecting it, and subsidized its replacement, more people began choosing the alternative: government aid.
Government growth in a free society with regular elections is natural. Every two years politicians identify a problem and say "Vote for me, and I will get governent to fix that problem." What's not natural is a politician saying "Vote for me, I promise to do less." But that is what conservative candidates essentially have to campaign on.
Conservatism is not, on the surface, as attractive as liberalism ("There is nothing government can't do if we're all willing to pay our fair share.") The result of conservatism - individual freedom, limited taxation, work ethic, prosperity - is very attractive.
We keep talking about how this is cultural, not political. Oh really? We have a much longer-established cultural history as rugged individualists than squishy collectivists.
Keep in mind, the generation that brought us entitlements was not the Baby Boomer generation, but their parents, the Greatest Generation. The Boomers weren't old enough to vote for the Great Society and the War on Poverty; that was their parents. If you want to peg the start of the Entitlement Age with the implementation of Social Security, our rugged individualism was dying off quite some time ago.
The Left could not have done without its stranglehold on all of the opinion-shaping machinery: adademia, news and entertainment media -- everything that shapes opinion, they dominated. We'll never match their numbers in those fields, but if the battle is about ideas - which it is - the Internet gives us a chance to break the monopoly.
Posted by: CJ at November 17, 2012 08:58 AM (9G+G5)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows þr0n is your constitutionally guaranteed entitlement at November 17, 2012 08:59 AM (Lxw+T)
Posted by: The Media at November 17, 2012 12:38 PM (H4a9N)
This one is my favorite. His half brother lives in crushing poverty in an African shithole, he left four guys to die in Libya, he threw away Jeremiah Wright (sorry, no 'Reverend' for that clown) like a Kleenex when he became a liability...
...And you think he cares about YOU?
Posted by: Secundus at November 17, 2012 08:59 AM (CKZA8)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at November 17, 2012 12:57 PM (3Y7RV)
See my #76. They will see it only when the pain is felt directly. The sooner that happens the better.
Posted by: Meremortal, Let It Burn To The Ground at November 17, 2012 08:59 AM (1Y+hH)
Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at November 17, 2012 09:00 AM (X3lox)
Posted by: navybrat at November 17, 2012 09:00 AM (r1ty1)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at November 17, 2012 09:00 AM (3Y7RV)
Posted by: Artemus Khan, Supervillain-Billionaire-Layabout at November 17, 2012 09:00 AM (27tUc)
And that got British PM Brown fired, German Marxist Chancellor Schroeder canned, and Socialist Zapetero dumped in Spain. also add Canadian PM Martin to that group
Posted by: Jack J at November 17, 2012 09:00 AM (4WesI)
Posted by: RondinellaMamma at November 17, 2012 09:01 AM (53riN)
Humans can adapt to horrific conditions if they come about slowly over time. It's take a shock to wake people from such a slumber of slow decline.
We need the shock. It's coming anyway. Make it sooner rather than later.
Posted by: Meremortal, Let It Burn To The Ground at November 17, 2012 09:01 AM (1Y+hH)
Posted by: just L at November 17, 2012 09:03 AM (0PiQ4)
Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at November 17, 2012 01:00 PM (X3lox)
Republicans in office aren't going to do a damn thing about any of this, surely you know that.
Posted by: Meremortal, Let It Burn To The Ground at November 17, 2012 09:03 AM (1Y+hH)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at November 17, 2012 09:03 AM (3Y7RV)
OK, but how will the 52% that voted for the bag O shit, who did not see the problem then, see it now?
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at November 17, 2012 12:57 PM (3Y7RV)
Because we keep trying to enlighten them during the heat of a presidential campaign. Meanwhile, the Left works tirelessly BETWEEN campaigns. The issues need to be framed before presidential elections. People have already made up their minds about what kind of governance they want by then; at that point they're looking to see which candidate matches it. We have to stop simply selling candidates, and start selling ideas.
Posted by: CJ at November 17, 2012 09:03 AM (9G+G5)
Posted by: Jenny Tries Too Hard at November 17, 2012 09:03 AM (2KBjW)
The currently blissfully ignorant, when faced with unavoidable reality, will no doubt think a disaster has occurred. But the change that produces that awareness is the consequence of the problem, not the problem itself.
The actual problem was capitalism (which is about lending surplus resources to business ventures as a means of expanding the economy according to usefulness) was bastardized into credit (loaning money printed out of thin air to loan out for mortgages, credit cards, student loans, auto loans, and any other crap that let's people live beyond their means-the federal debt is the same madness, they just needed to apply the debt to the nation because most of the time people aren't stupid enough to make unlimited loans to the poor).
Posted by: Methos at November 17, 2012 09:04 AM (hO9ad)
Posted by: eman at November 17, 2012 09:04 AM (sRus3)
They're growing the very Free Shit Army who they'll be battling in later years over what's left over after they've killed the producers.
Posted by: kbdabear at November 17, 2012 09:05 AM (wwsoB)
Posted by: RondinellaMamma at November 17, 2012 01:01 PM (53riN)
They're True Believers. You'd be better off arguing with a doorknob.
In one small way, this election was rather liberating. I don't have to waste the time or the blood pressure disliking Progs or wishing bad things on them anymore. Because it's going to happen to them, by their own hands. They have completed the temple to their god, who will eat them.
Posted by: Secundus at November 17, 2012 09:05 AM (CKZA8)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at November 17, 2012 01:00 PM (3Y7RV)
No Sailer, it isn't. All the goodies are still flowing. People are suffering, but nothing like they are going to suffer when the actual cuts come.
Posted by: Meremortal, Let It Burn To The Ground at November 17, 2012 09:05 AM (1Y+hH)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at November 17, 2012 09:06 AM (3Y7RV)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at November 17, 2012 09:06 AM (GEICT)
Posted by: navybrat at November 17, 2012 09:06 AM (r1ty1)
Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at November 17, 2012 09:06 AM (X3lox)
I like that you are pro-winning, Humplady.
I wish the party, and its pundits were. West was willing to man the barricades. The party is betraying him as we speak.
Posted by: Beautiful Loser at November 17, 2012 09:06 AM (OQpzc)
Academia sees themselves as The Professor who has figured out multiple times how to get the castaways off the island, but Gilligan (stoopid republicans) always mess it up for him
Posted by: kbdabear at November 17, 2012 09:07 AM (wwsoB)
I'd need a breakdown of what percentage of the GG was over 21 when FDR was elected, but I'm pretty sure the GG's parents can a huge chunk of the blame. By the time LBJ took office, people had been expecting the government to give people money to stay alive for almost thirty years--over a generation at the time.
We've been boned for a very, very long time.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at November 17, 2012 09:07 AM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: Meremortal, Let It Burn To The Ground at November 17, 2012 09:07 AM (1Y+hH)
Republicans in office aren't going to do a damn thing about any of this, surely you know that.
Posted by: Meremortal, Let It Burn To The Ground at November 17, 2012 01:03 PM (1Y+hH)
Republicans in office care about the same things as Democrats in office: doing whatever it takes to attract a majority of votes for re-election. Ultimately, our task is not to strongarm Republican office holders, it's to convince a majority of their constiuents.
Posted by: CJ at November 17, 2012 09:07 AM (9G+G5)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at November 17, 2012 09:07 AM (3Y7RV)
Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at November 17, 2012 09:09 AM (X3lox)
Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at November 17, 2012 01:06 PM (X3lox)
Agreed. I realized it in 2007 and left the party. They are worse than useless, they are enablers of the doomed welfare state. They are betting they can delay the inevitable long enough to stack up some dough and get the hell out. in time to save themselves.
Posted by: Meremortal, Let It Burn To The Ground at November 17, 2012 09:09 AM (1Y+hH)
Posted by: AES at November 17, 2012 09:10 AM (GXQaK)
Posted by: just L at November 17, 2012 09:12 AM (0PiQ4)
Posted by: Bloody Mary at November 17, 2012 09:13 AM (ZRoGl)
Posted by: eman at November 17, 2012 09:13 AM (sRus3)
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at November 17, 2012 01:07 PM (/kI1Q)
That's true. Of course, the type of entitlements -- income for elderly widows v. welfare for ablebodied young people - are quite different. But I guess once you go down that road, you don't stop. Probably what all those heartless Republicans were trying to get acorss to people when the New Deal was being implemented.
The Left derided Republicans who warned about the slipperty slope -- and then did everything they could to prove them right.
Posted by: CJ at November 17, 2012 09:13 AM (9G+G5)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC Waiting for the Sun at November 17, 2012 09:13 AM (2Rwdk)
If you want a shock, I suggest you read a book from 1991 or 2 entitled "The Great Boom Ahead" by Harry S. Dent. Dent has been ridden hard for stock market misses but his predictions of today's situation are stunning to read.
That book is why I'm happily retired today. I saw what Dent was predicting and prepared accordingly, investing in real estate and stocks and then getting out of most of that before the crash.
Dent even predicted the rise in terrorism almost 10 years before 9/11.
Posted by: Meremortal, Let It Burn To The Ground at November 17, 2012 09:15 AM (1Y+hH)
The DEBT LIMIT is where the rubber meets the road. Not the retarded sequester.
Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at November 17, 2012 01:09 PM (X3lox)
I got a thousand bucks that says they raise the debt limit. Hell, make it $10,000, I like easy money.
Posted by: Meremortal, Let It Burn To The Ground at November 17, 2012 09:16 AM (1Y+hH)
Posted by: eman at November 17, 2012 09:16 AM (sRus3)
Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at November 17, 2012 01:09 PM (X3lox)
Which is why the Administration is already talking about the Argument that the Consitution gives the PRESIDENT the ability to raise the debt limit by himself... so the 'full faith and credit' of the US is maintained...
Cherry picking one piece of the Constitution over the rest of it... is a hallmark of the Liberal mindset.
Posted by: Romeo13 at November 17, 2012 09:17 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: eman at November 17, 2012 09:18 AM (sRus3)
Posted by: eman at November 17, 2012 01:16 PM (sRus3)
That is the deal breaker for me. I've written off quite a few pundits recently. As far as I'm concerned, they can rot in hell. There is no recovering from that.
I will no longer vote for people who profit from betraying me.
Posted by: Beautiful Loser at November 17, 2012 09:19 AM (OQpzc)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC Waiting for the Sun at November 17, 2012 01:13 PM (2Rwdk)
And that was just the end of the reconfiguing of the Constiution they did in the very early 1900's.... THAT was the true begining of the End of the Republic... THAT was when they started to push we were a Democracy, NOT a Republic.
Posted by: Romeo13 at November 17, 2012 09:20 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows þr0n is your constitutionally guaranteed entitlement at November 17, 2012 09:20 AM (Lxw+T)
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at November 17, 2012 09:20 AM (azHfB)
Posted by: Leigh at November 17, 2012 09:20 AM (1eJh0)
The attitude right now is "the economy always bounces back".
Until it doesn't. It's only sudden and unexpected because they thought there was more road left over to kick the can down
Posted by: kbdabear at November 17, 2012 09:21 AM (wwsoB)
Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at November 17, 2012 09:24 AM (X3lox)
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at November 17, 2012 01:20 PM (azHfB)
Could you define "win?" I've been voting for Rs since Reagan and I must be missing how the things I care about have won a damn thing.
Posted by: Beautiful Loser at November 17, 2012 09:24 AM (OQpzc)
It was pretty well known to Dems that Todd Akin was a loose cannon and a dim bulb. Far better candidates in the primaries were there, but McCaskill's people did a search and destroy mission on them, leaving the worst candidate as her opponent
They knew what Todd Akin was, and that if he was asked a rape question that he'd be dumb enough to answer it
Posted by: kbdabear at November 17, 2012 09:25 AM (wwsoB)
Agreed. Our mechanism for that is what? The GOP? I guess that's our challenge. Find and develope a mechanism.
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at November 17, 2012 01:06 PM (3Y7RV)
Were the Democrats the mechanism for the Left? No. I think that is what people are trying to say with the culture v. politics 'chicken or the egg' discussion. Which drives which? I think the Right wins on culture, but we just don't have as many ways to express it. Yet.
Breitbart showed the way. The Marxist teachers story from a top would give plenty of parents pause. But not if they don't hear about it, or just hear it from partisans. Another nonliberal news channel would be nice. "Sirs, may we have a SECOND conservatives news channel, please?"
Posted by: CJ at November 17, 2012 09:25 AM (9G+G5)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC Waiting for the Sun at November 17, 2012 09:26 AM (2Rwdk)
Posted by: eman at November 17, 2012 09:26 AM (sRus3)
Posted by: A. at November 17, 2012 09:27 AM (Wn5aN)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at November 17, 2012 09:27 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: AmishDude at November 17, 2012 09:28 AM (xSegX)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at November 17, 2012 09:28 AM (C8mVl)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at November 17, 2012 09:28 AM (3Y7RV)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at November 17, 2012 09:30 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at November 17, 2012 09:31 AM (ZPrif)
Yep. It was the electorate that voted Roosevelt in that brought us the initial entitlement wave. Very few of the Greatest were of voting age.
That generation was the one who was enamored with fascism and were the first progressives.
Also, eugenics.
Posted by: AmishDude at November 17, 2012 09:31 AM (xSegX)
Posted by: Mountains Landbarons and Serfs at November 17, 2012 09:31 AM (frxVF)
Posted by: eman at November 17, 2012 09:31 AM (sRus3)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at November 17, 2012 09:32 AM (3Y7RV)
Posted by: Al From Bay Shore at November 17, 2012 09:33 AM (H7qBA)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at November 17, 2012 01:30 PM (ZPrif)
My Econ prof was really into five year plans. Oh, and the only reason africans are starving is evil white europeans once grew bananas there and depleted the soil. I asked if he thought blacks were too stupid to understand fertilizer. He flunked me.
Posted by: Beautiful Loser at November 17, 2012 09:33 AM (OQpzc)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC Waiting for the Sun at November 17, 2012 09:34 AM (2Rwdk)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows þr0n is your constitutionally guaranteed entitlement at November 17, 2012 09:36 AM (Lxw+T)
At the School of Journalism? Oooooooooh. So that explains it.
Posted by: OldHardHead at November 17, 2012 09:37 AM (nkBm0)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC Waiting for the Sun at November 17, 2012 01:26 PM (2Rwdk)
The Left has proven us right on culture time and time again. Remember how often they mocked the time Ed Sullivan would only show Elvis from the hips up on his show, because it was deemed too tawdry? Sure, seems silly. I mean, it's just a grown man shaking his hips.
Now, we can turn on TV and watch teenage girls shake their ass for the fun and profit of gray-ponytailed record execs. That Ed Sullivan sure was weird, wasn't he.
Posted by: CJ at November 17, 2012 09:38 AM (9G+G5)
Posted by: eman at November 17, 2012 09:38 AM (sRus3)
I asked if he thought blacks were too stupid to understand fertilizer. He flunked me.
Sounds like you it a little too close to home.
These "progressives" are the biggest racists you'll find.
Posted by: AmishDude at November 17, 2012 09:38 AM (xSegX)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC Waiting for the Sun at November 17, 2012 09:39 AM (2Rwdk)
Find a picture of Jon Stewart.
Caption it with his income and the fact he buys very expensive real estate through trusts so he does not have to pay high taxes.
Print hundreds of copies and spread them everywhere.
Posted by: eman at November 17, 2012 01:31 PM
Jon Stewart is rich because he's so funny and talented! He deserves what he makes, and what business is it of YOURS how much he makes!!!!!!!
Posted by: Lefty pounding a square peg into a round hole at November 17, 2012 09:39 AM (wwsoB)
This Saturday, the Midwest Marxist Conference
And how is it that "progressives" are still worshiping this guy who died, what, 150 years ago?
Posted by: AmishDude at November 17, 2012 09:40 AM (xSegX)
Posted by: Hopeless at November 17, 2012 09:41 AM (ven16)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at November 17, 2012 09:41 AM (ZPrif)
The photo campaign should work really well against almost all Dem politicians, like John Kerry, Nancy Pelosi, Chris Dodd (yes I know he is out of there, but he deserves special mention), Bill Clinton, etc.
Posted by: Hrothgar - L.I.B or SMOD for the Children at November 17, 2012 09:41 AM (Cnqmv)
Caption it with a his/her name and a remark that sends a clear message.
Like "Champion of the People" or "Does your house look like this?" Posted by: eman at November 17, 2012 01:38 PM
Bruce and Kanye are playing for FREE to help the Sandy victims. What are YOU doing for those poor homeless victims, you HATER !!!!
Posted by: Lefty pounding a square peg into a round hole at November 17, 2012 09:41 AM (wwsoB)
Posted by: eman at November 17, 2012 09:41 AM (sRus3)
Posted by: AmishDude at November 17, 2012 01:38 PM (xSegX)
The hell of it was this was at CSU- Fresno. They have strong Ag dept. I couldn't believe most of the wide eyed students just uncritically soaked that crap up. I guess I benefitted from doing six years in the USN before doing the college thing.
Posted by: Beautiful Loser at November 17, 2012 09:42 AM (OQpzc)
Chris Dodd (yes I know he is out of there, but he deserves special mention),
I believe he's head of the RIAA.
As for me, I'm a mathematician and I'm really having a hard time not advocating for the elimination of intellectual property rights.
My profession has been giving it away for free for 5000 years and I'm not sure how the Disney corporation gets to hold the rights to a property created by a man long dead.
Posted by: AmishDude at November 17, 2012 09:45 AM (xSegX)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC Waiting for the Sun at November 17, 2012 09:45 AM (2Rwdk)
Posted by: eman at November 17, 2012 09:45 AM (sRus3)
Posted by: Beautiful Loser at November 17, 2012 01:42 PM (OQpzc)
That kind of real world experience has screwed up many college students that should have been easy to herd!
Posted by: Hrothgar - L.I.B or SMOD for the Children at November 17, 2012 09:45 AM (Cnqmv)
Barack Obama and his commie cabal may be exactly what these younger generations need get this country back on the right track.
That, or a world war.
Posted by: Fritz at November 17, 2012 09:47 AM (mqdAz)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows þr0n is your constitutionally guaranteed entitlement at November 17, 2012 09:48 AM (Lxw+T)
People worship celebrities because they always carry the illusion that the celebrities love them back.
Obama is a celebrity. 81 percent of the voters believe that "Obama cares about people like me"
Let me let you in on a little secret, TV Nation. Your favorite celebrity privately has nothing but contempt for you. Your favorite celebrity is surrounded by an army of sycophants who tell him or her how awesome they are. You're the scum who they hate because they have to pretend to like you in order to keep the gravy train fueled.
Celebrities detest tabloids and papparazi and TMZ. Why? Because it shows them in a way that's different from the publicity machines that keep their facades standing. They hate them even more because they need the publicity and buzz that keeps their names on the tongues of TV Nation shoppers at the checkout lines
Posted by: kbdabear at November 17, 2012 09:49 AM (wwsoB)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC Waiting for the Sun at November 17, 2012 09:49 AM (2Rwdk)
Posted by: AmishDude at November 17, 2012 01:45 PM (xSegX)
Someone once said the current length of copyright protection is what ever it takes to keep Mickey Mouse from becoming public property!
I think an inventor should have some rights to profit from his invention for a period of time, but then it should become publicly available. I too have a problem with unbounded intellectual property rights. The claim that a rectangle with rounded corners is a cornerstone of intellectual achievement and worthy of legal protection is absurd.
Posted by: Hrothgar - L.I.B or SMOD for the Children at November 17, 2012 09:51 AM (Cnqmv)
I am going to buy a printer and follow my own advice.
I am going to start a website with the same theme.
The site will contain no posts, no yakking, just images and videos with brief captions and notes.
That's it. Post them and spread them everywhere by whatever means available. Posted by: eman at November 17, 2012 01:45 PM
Blogspot and Wordpress are free. If you do it and link your site to your nic, I'll promote it to others.
Posted by: kbdabear at November 17, 2012 09:51 AM (wwsoB)
Posted by: eman at November 17, 2012 09:52 AM (sRus3)
Posted by: eman at November 17, 2012 09:53 AM (sRus3)
Sure they do and no one cares.
Care? How many average Americans KNOW what the Left's scorecard on cultural issues is? Few. Because folks like us prattle on an on about Washington, and elections and sequestration and tax code and...
The Left must wake up every morning amazed to find that no one has yet called them on their utterly disasterous cultural record.
Posted by: CJ at November 17, 2012 09:54 AM (9G+G5)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows þr0n is your constitutionally guaranteed entitlement at November 17, 2012 09:54 AM (Lxw+T)
Posted by: DeusExMachina at November 17, 2012 09:54 AM (6RTwM)
*****
I am reminded of this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=YlVDGmjz7eM
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at November 17, 2012 09:54 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: Ms Choksondik, sunbathing on the shores of a nightmare at November 17, 2012 09:56 AM (YOZSv)
Why?
Because they suddenly discover that what they impulsively thought was brilliance and wit comes across as galactically stupid in the real world, and they didn't delete in time
Posted by: kbdabear at November 17, 2012 09:57 AM (wwsoB)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC Waiting for the Sun at November 17, 2012 09:58 AM (2Rwdk)
Posted by: Hopeless at November 17, 2012 09:59 AM (r4GuR)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC Waiting for the Sun at November 17, 2012 10:00 AM (2Rwdk)
Your enemy has children? The school board must be seized, and pressure applied to teachers to ensure their children fail classes.
Are you fucking serious? Is this how you imagine the Left took the lead in the culture war? It's not. It might be comforting to think so, but it's fantasy. You win the culture war by, first, fucking engaging in it.
And as a guy who had to fight his way onto my local school board, I can tell you it takes all the work in the world to scrounge together enough savings to pay for the teacher union largesse and keep the lights on. No time for fantasy shit.
Posted by: CJ at November 17, 2012 10:02 AM (9G+G5)
Voting majorities want corruption because they think the corruption will enrich them.
I'm reminded of those Obama frescos. They basically implied that if Obama (or others) were successful, that would "trickle down" to everybody else.
This philosophy is ingrained in identity politics and if you think about it for 5 minutes, you realize what a scam the whole thing is, just to enrich a select few like, say Jesse Jackson, Jr.
Posted by: AmishDude at November 17, 2012 10:02 AM (xSegX)
Posted by: Cato at November 17, 2012 10:03 AM (9DB70)
But I fucking hate every teacher I know with a purple passion.
Where the hell do you live? That might be the problem.
Posted by: CJ at November 17, 2012 10:04 AM (9G+G5)
Posted by: Jenny Tries Too Hard at November 17, 2012 10:04 AM (2KBjW)
Posted by: Hopeless at November 17, 2012 10:06 AM (r4GuR)
Celebs hate Twitchy with a passion
I thought Twitchy was an unsustainable idea but it has impressed me.
Posted by: AmishDude at November 17, 2012 10:07 AM (xSegX)
Posted by: Jenny Tries Too Hard at November 17, 2012 10:07 AM (2KBjW)
Posted by: Cato at November 17, 2012 10:08 AM (9DB70)
Posted by: occam at November 17, 2012 10:09 AM (hgDJr)
He's funny, and his public shtick is to make fun of his own huge ego
Privately, his ego is still huge, and he's known to be a huge dick. His "GET A LIFE" skit on SNL was a case of art imitating life
Posted by: kbdabear at November 17, 2012 10:10 AM (wwsoB)
Posted by: CJ at November 17, 2012 02:04 PM (9G+G5)
Raleigh, NC
Posted by: Ms Choksondik, sunbathing on the shores of a nightmare at November 17, 2012 10:10 AM (YOZSv)
Posted by: Jenny Tries Too Hard at November 17, 2012 10:11 AM (2KBjW)
Posted by: Hopeless at November 17, 2012 10:14 AM (r4GuR)
You obviously haven't been paying attention to what has been going on in the culture wars, have you?
Actually, yes I have. One of the few conservatives to do so. I don't know you, so I can't say that I know more about the culture wars than you do, But...I know more about the culture wars than you do.
The only thing you got right was the passion necessary to fight it. Everything else is factually wrong Internet tough guy blather that no one will attempt and if they did will assuredly make our task more difficult with 0 percent chance of success.
The Left altered culture legally and openly, by appealing to the liberal urges imbedded in everyone. Liberalism is natural. Conservatism is not. It takes restraint. It's hard. It's easy to get people to turn away from it in favor of big government and wealth distribution and nonjudgmental approaches to nontraditional lifestyle choices. The Left has been winning this war because they are the only side engaging in it.
Posted by: CJ at November 17, 2012 10:15 AM (9G+G5)
Posted by: Jenny Tries Too Hard at November 17, 2012 10:17 AM (2KBjW)
How about public releasing all the files of teachers in your district who have sexually abused kids? It's war. Ruin their union. Scorch the earth if necessary.
Uh, no files exist. If we knew about such abuse, the teacher would be gone. Folks frown on such behavior.
Scott Walker neutered unions without this nonsense. Can we try a sane approach first?
Posted by: CJ at November 17, 2012 10:17 AM (9G+G5)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at November 17, 2012 10:20 AM (C8mVl)
Posted by: Hey_Ange at November 17, 2012 10:21 AM (O6Na9)
Posted by: Jenny Tries Too Hard at November 17, 2012 02:11 PM (2KBjW)
Am I the only person around here who knows a real live liberal?
Does everyone really believe they are less likely to be moral, as individuals, than a conservative? Focus on their ideas. That's our target. The more you portray them as monsters, the more you lose focus. It's comforting to think that only monsters could advocate left-wing ideology, but it's not true.
Posted by: CJ at November 17, 2012 10:22 AM (9G+G5)
Posted by: soothie at November 17, 2012 10:25 AM (kvcfI)
I work at a college, the amount of sick bastards and bitches is incredible. I heard a woman say one day that we have to stop teaching "young people of color" White middle class values.
Obama's former church includes in its Mission Statement, just that: rejection of "middle classness." He spent 20 years in that church. I remember posting it here (it is on the church's web site) and no one seemed to think it was of interest. (We pass on talking points the Left would never pass on.)
Now you suggest it's a more widely held belief than from just one church. Perhaps we should draw attention to this, especially as "the middle class" seems to be a popular campaign target.
Posted by: CJ at November 17, 2012 10:25 AM (9G+G5)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at November 17, 2012 10:27 AM (C8mVl)
Posted by: Hopeless at November 17, 2012 10:27 AM (3ryAQ)
Posted by: Jenny Tries Too Hard at November 17, 2012 10:28 AM (2KBjW)
Posted by: Hey_Ange at November 17, 2012 10:29 AM (O6Na9)
He taught the kids a lesson: When you get into trouble, get on your knees and grovel to your rich Uncle Federal Government.
*****
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at November 17, 2012 10:29 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: vivi at November 17, 2012 10:30 AM (uGAD+)
*****
It's been known to happen.
Bully teachers
Obama choirs
Suppression of speech
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at November 17, 2012 10:32 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: Jenny Tries Too Hard at November 17, 2012 10:33 AM (2KBjW)
Posted by: Hey_Ange at November 17, 2012 02:29 PM (O6Na9)
Send it to John Nolte or one of the other editors.
Posted by: Ms Choksondik, sunbathing on the shores of a nightmare at November 17, 2012 10:34 AM (YOZSv)
Still think you know what's going on with the culture wars?
Posted by: Hopeless at November 17, 2012 02:27 PM (3ryAQ)
First, you've got to be kidding me if you think that the culture war has anything to do with child molestation.
Second, there IS NO FILE of currently employed teachers who knowingly abused children. That's reality
If you know of a school district with such files, report them. If you want to help fight the Left, get real.
Posted by: CJ at November 17, 2012 10:35 AM (9G+G5)
Posted by: Artemus Khan, Supervillain-Billionaire-Layabout at November 17, 2012 10:37 AM (27tUc)
Posted by: Jenny Tries Too Hard at November 17, 2012 02:28 PM (2KBjW)
Jenny, I really think we're giving teachers WAY too much credit and blame here. Trust me, in 2012 no school district could employ a known child molester, union or no union. It's not that I trust unions, it's just that it could not be done. No reason for a district to do it.
Posted by: CJ at November 17, 2012 10:38 AM (9G+G5)
Posted by: CJ at November 17, 2012 10:40 AM (9G+G5)
Posted by: Hopeless at November 17, 2012 10:41 AM (H1od7)
Actually, Laura, they've been at this since at least The Progressive Era.
Christian socialists were instrumental in starting the now infamous 'long march' through our American institutions and culture.
iow, they've been at this - in America - for about a hundred and fifty years, give or take a bit.
Posted by: Warren Bonesteel at November 17, 2012 10:43 AM (WwR1j)
Hopeless,
If you think the stated goal of the Left in 2012 is child sex - or that such a twisted goal is closer to become reality than other goals such as irreversible government growth, open borders, etc. - then we just disagree.
Posted by: CJ at November 17, 2012 10:43 AM (9G+G5)
Posted by: Hopeless at November 17, 2012 10:45 AM (NKWFJ)
Forget public education: the only solution is promoting school choice and starving the beast. Our local h.s. is now teaching critical theory in English AP lit class to fill the kids with patriarchy-hate early. *sigh*
The obvious place to start is to have people like AEI or Heritage start summer programs or after school programs for kids. Parents are desperately in need of babysitting during school holidays, and you could slip in the truth there.
Stop sitting around like W. F. Buckley exchanging bon mots with other eggheads and engage!
Posted by: PJ at November 17, 2012 10:49 AM (ZWaLo)
To me, it appears that this "we were pushed" or "the teachers did it" or "a small minority of leftists have corrupted our culture over time" is a conspiracy theory writ, not so much large, but "broad." It is the idea that "if only it weren't for those dastardly X, everything would be fine!" The simple fact of the matter is that you're putting the cart before the horse.
Actually, that's not accurate either. The horse would be the culture, and the politics is merely the manifestation of the cultural rot - but how did the culture rot? Was it a conspiracy (not in the formal sense of people getting together in back rooms, twirling little black mustaches and smoking cigars as they figure out a way to crush their enemies - instead, in a non-formal, ideological lock-step fashion. Because they all believe the same thing, they tend to act the same way, giving the *appearance* of conspiracy where there really isn't one)? Or was it the inevitable result of cultural rot that started LONG before?
I think it is the latter. A small minority of people holding onto an ideology that we assume, in this "we were pushed" scenario, the "rest of us" abhor couldn't get a foothold on a culture that was predominantly the product of "the rest of us." Not even gradually. This can only happen if "the rest of us" fail in some way. Either we didn't teach our children well enough and "they" were able to "poison" them in the school systems, or "the rest of us" failed in pop culture by being more concerned about what we liked instead of what was right and consumed pop culture products (music, movies, tv, what-have-you), or . . . whatever. Without PRE-EXISTING cultural weakness, "they" could never have gotten in, so to speak.
I guess one analogy is "if you hadn't stopped brushing your teeth when you decided to start eating sugar by the spoonful, you wouldn't have gottenthose cavities." So, in the end, it wasn't "they." It was "the rest of us."
I mean, that is, if you try to keep this on a secular historical level. Which I don't think is realistic.
the sinner,
Patrick
Posted by: Patriack at November 17, 2012 10:49 AM (Qi6dG)
Posted by: Hopeless at November 17, 2012 10:52 AM (ven16)
Posted by: Jenny tries too hard at November 17, 2012 10:59 AM (2oFSo)
Good article, though the idea that conservative states have less radical universities than others is groundlessly optimistic. The other thing we need is a way to market real liberal arts education, the kind where people learn to write coherently and read classic books and appreciate western civilization. That kind of education isn't so bad for making a living -- there's usually a market for people who can think and write -- and it's very important for citizenship, as all the Founders believed. Maybe offer online non-degree certificate programs or some variation on the Great Courses idea. In the Old West, the most popular clean entertainment was traveling Shakespeare companies -- Jim Bridger once traded a yoke of cattle, about a month's wages, for a volume of Shakespear. Then he hired a boy for forty dollars a month to read it to him. "Ordinary" people can, dammit, learn to appreciate the good stuff. It's our K-12 education disaster that hold them back.
Posted by: OldWhig at November 17, 2012 11:01 AM (8nop5)
Posted by: Virgil at November 17, 2012 12:04 PM (sZTYJ)
the sinner,
Patrick
Posted by: Patriack at November 17, 2012 12:07 PM (Qi6dG)
The problem is that it is a long term game they are playing. When Bill Ayres put away his bombs back in the 60's, he went into 'education' and the left has taken over total control of public education from kindergarten through grad school. In order to undo the damage it is going to take at least as long a time. It cannot be done on a national scale, but governors in some red states have to take the bull by the horn and purge the progressives from power in education. The lefts reaction will make the Scott Walker recall stuff look like kids play, so if you don't have enough hair on your ass it is probably best not to start.
By the way, I think a lot of people went to sleep on the education thing because we say "the facts of life are conservative". In other words, once people get out of school and into the work force they will become conservative by experience. I don't think that holds water any more. The nanny state has prolonged childhood for so many people that by the time they get out of school in their early 30's they are just accustomed to getting everything 'free' and letting other people do their thinking for them.
Posted by: BigDaddyD at November 17, 2012 12:21 PM (S4N/h)
We need to purge these monkeys from academia.
Put conservatives in charge of state-funded colleges and universities, and start removing them for political advocacy.
Start removing academic accreditation from libtard private colleges that cannot teach, thus removing federal money from them.
Posted by: Kristophr at November 17, 2012 12:44 PM (wYVte)
Posted by: Ace's liver at November 17, 2012 01:01 PM (1+XRG)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at November 17, 2012 01:11 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at November 17, 2012 01:11 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: Clyde Shelton at November 17, 2012 01:37 PM (vUK/h)
Posted by: OCD con at November 17, 2012 03:22 PM (uUlWl)
That old fat jackass at the end?
Dude - come to me with that attitude. You'll be choking on that waddle within a NY minute.
Posted by: Hoi Polloi Wingnutia at November 17, 2012 03:31 PM (OPWiP)
Posted by: jacke at November 17, 2012 05:46 PM (5Cwv4)
Posted by: 2plus2is5 at November 17, 2012 07:02 PM (96AeH)
Modern academic intelligentsia took that to heart.
Posted by: SFC MAC at November 18, 2012 04:03 AM (TLbgU)
Patrick wrote in #234:
"Classics" won't "save" us. That was what the West was built on - and look where we are now!
Uh, Patrick, did you ever hear of "Progressive Education"? It's the way of educating children that, well, Progressives came up with in order to reach their longterm goals. One of the main critiques of traditional education by Progressives is that it stifled diversity and creativity in favor of uniformity. That is, it taught a set of basic skills and a canon of classic texts in order to enable students to participate in western civilization. In order to produce students who were diversity-loving (i.e. relativistic) and critical (i.e. clever fools with no respect for their heritage) the Progressives took aim at the very idea of classics and described initiation into western civilization as authoritarian indoctrination.
The young adults who voted en masse for Obama were certainly not raised on Homer and Shakespeare. They were raised on propaganda novels and revisionist history.
Your words imply that western civilization is the problem, that somehow socialism and the politics of envy were produced by Homer and Shakespeare. I think that the alienation of several generations from western civilization by progressive educators has been the necessary groundword for our political and social idiocy.
I never said that the classics will save us. But an electorate raised to be shallow relativists who have never faced any deep questions about the human condition will most surely damn us.
Posted by: OldWhig at November 18, 2012 07:45 AM (8nop5)
So, the necessary groundwork was done without them. They merely fomented the disease and were, quite honestly, a *product* of that disease. That disease was inherent in Western culture. That egocentrism, that worship of man, even through proxy, that had been growing in leaps and bounds in the West, accelerated through events that are often praised as "good" in the West (like the so-called Enlightenment. Few events in human history have accelerated the cultural worship of man like the Enlightenment).
As Blessed Seraphim Rose wrote in 1961, where we are was inevitable. So, yes, Shakespeare was partly to blame - but only in the sense that he was nothing more than a product of his time. And that's all the West ever is, for nearly a thousand years - a product of its time: ever influenced by humanism. So places rot faster (Europe), others slower (the US). But the rot is inevitable.
Homer was too early, but it is still pagan. And that is ALSO my point - this nation was founded, politically speaking, really on pagan political ideals. NOT Christianity, as it is often mistakenly believed.
the sinner,
Patrick
Posted by: Patriack at November 18, 2012 08:10 AM (LrlHu)
Posted by: Skid Marx at November 18, 2012 01:56 PM (Kflw4)
Posted by: Mistress Overdone at November 18, 2012 03:19 PM (2/oBD)
Posted by: A Conservative Teacher at November 19, 2012 02:21 PM (idosS)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3186 seconds, 378 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: garrett at November 17, 2012 08:25 AM (SlED8)