April 14, 2012

Titanic
— andy

100 years ago today, RMS Titanic struck the iceberg that would end her maiden voyage and forever disassociate the words "unsinkable" and "ship".

The exact number of passengers and crew aboard remains in dispute to this day, but in round numbers approximately 1,500 of the 2,200 people aboard the ship were lost.

There have been a couple of good new documentaries on NatGeo this week if you're interested in this sort of thing. Even the James Cameron one is good, despite the fact that his most notable association with Titanic is through that godawful movie he made.

If you watch the Cameron one, the last five minutes or so are truly remarkable, as he segues from Titanic to global warming by taking the exact wrong message from the disaster. Man can no more control the temperature of the planet than he can build an unsinkable ship.

Posted by: andy at 07:19 AM | Comments (192)
Post contains 148 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Meh.

Posted by: Y-not at April 14, 2012 07:20 AM (5H6zj)

2 BTW, the "meh" was not intended as a criticism of the thread. Thx for putting a new one up! It's just that I think the Hindenburg disaster is more interesting, as far as those sorts of things go.

Posted by: Y-not at April 14, 2012 07:21 AM (5H6zj)

3 Why are we mourning the 1% and Robber Barrons of the day on a luxury liner?

/OWS goons

Posted by: BlueFalcon in Boston would be forever alone without AoS at April 14, 2012 07:21 AM (KCvsd)

4 Cameron's Titanic  is the. worst. movie. ever to be awarded a best-picture Oscar. And not because Cameron is a lefty douchebag, either. Other than the special effects, it was just a really, really lousy movie.

Posted by: OregonMuse at April 14, 2012 07:24 AM (avUWP)

5 Shipwrecks and planewrecks fascinate me.

Posted by: soothsayer at April 14, 2012 07:24 AM (jUytm)

6

 

I'm sincerely glad you spoiled the Cameron documentary for me. Now that I know, no way in hell am I gonna watch.

Posted by: the new, improved arhooley -- now with 10% more cynicism! at April 14, 2012 07:25 AM (vuKmj)

7 meanwhile, in the Mediterranean... the Concordia still sits on her side.

Posted by: soothsayer at April 14, 2012 07:25 AM (jUytm)

8 Never saw Titanic and never will.

Posted by: Y-not at April 14, 2012 07:26 AM (5H6zj)

9 That's not the Titanic in that footage, that's her twin sister the Olympic.

The Titanic's A deck was enclosed about 2/3 of the length, while the Olympic's A deck was open the whole length

Posted by: kbdabear at April 14, 2012 07:27 AM (Y+DPZ)

10 Watching that last few minutes of him trying to use the Titanic as an analogy for everything on the leftist menu actually gave me a contact high. What a tool.

Posted by: Gromulin at April 14, 2012 07:27 AM (7Zrx4)

11 >> I'm sincerely glad you spoiled the Cameron documentary for me. Now that I know, no way in hell am I gonna watch.

Ha! Sorry.

It really is pretty good, though. Up until then, I mean.

One good thing about that shitty movie is that he made enough money from repeat viewing by 12-year old girls to actually do some pretty good science on the shipwreck.

Posted by: Andy at April 14, 2012 07:28 AM (XG+Mn)

12

Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo-intellectual at April 14, 2012 11:26 AM

-----------------

They insult him on the first page of the article.

Posted by: the new, improved arhooley -- now with 10% more cynicism! at April 14, 2012 07:28 AM (vuKmj)

13 >> They insult him on the first page of the article.

This!

That's where I stopped reading.

Posted by: Andy at April 14, 2012 07:29 AM (XG+Mn)

14 When you talk about the Titanic, don't forget about the class divisions. And bigotry. Don't forget about the bigotry. Evil capitalism kills. That's the lesson of the Titanic.

Posted by: The Media/Left at April 14, 2012 07:29 AM (jUytm)

15 All disasters are the result of a cascade of bad breaks and poor decisions.  But if they weren't, there would be no disaster.  Like a coincidence, we don't even notice the times that bad things are handled well.

Posted by: toby928© Person of Pallor at April 14, 2012 07:31 AM (GTbGH)

16 There is one out with Len Goodman, the judge on Dancing with the stars... that one is good. Its personal stories. Not sure what channel it was one.

Posted by: Jumbo Jogging Shrimp at April 14, 2012 07:31 AM (DGIjM)

17 Michelle Malkin and others already mentioned the Theresa Heinz Kerry insult two days ago, much to my chagrin.

Posted by: Soothsayer at April 14, 2012 07:32 AM (jUytm)

18 Quartermaster Hichens didn't go down with the ship and get picked up, he got off early in lifeboat 6 and was put in charge of it.

The media wasn't all that accurate back then either

Posted by: kbdabear at April 14, 2012 07:32 AM (Y+DPZ)

19 My favorite Titanic story is of the Baker, who started drinking when the berg got hit, then jumped in when the whiskey was kicked, and survived 28 degree water, they say, because of all the alcohol in his system.

Posted by: USS Diversity at April 14, 2012 07:32 AM (vpe0k)

20 I'm so glad I was saved from the frying pan in 2004. What a relief

Posted by: a strip of bacon at April 14, 2012 07:33 AM (QTHTd)

21 There is one out with Len Goodman, the judge on Dancing with the stars... that one is good.
Its personal stories.
Not sure what channel it was one.

Posted by: Jumbo Jogging Shrimp at April 14, 2012 11:31 AM (DGIjM)




It was on PBS. He was a welder for the builder

Posted by: Panzer Cat at April 14, 2012 07:33 AM (cYQg0)

22 Have I mentioned recently that Cameron stole a lot of the bullshit in his movie from a 1943 Nazi propaganda film?

It's on DVD.  I gotta watch it again, the anti-capitalism stuff is so over the top it's comic.

Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at April 14, 2012 07:34 AM (/kI1Q)

23

==Never saw Titanic and never will.== 

 

Me neither.

Posted by: SS Californian lookout at April 14, 2012 07:35 AM (vpe0k)

24 O/T

 An Arrest has been made in the  Baltimore Beatdown Of White Man By Black Mob




tweeted by Pat Dollard

Posted by: mama winger at April 14, 2012 07:35 AM (P6QsQ)

25 I was going to make a snarky comment connecting the Titanic's sinking with global warming but I see that dumbshit Cameron has beaten me to the punch.  New Zealand can have him.

Posted by: Sandra Fluke's solid gold diaphragm at April 14, 2012 07:35 AM (0d0K7)

26 Guess I'm going to have to repost my comments on the earlier thread. This one's in my wheelhouse.

Posted by: rickl supports SMOD/Supervolcano 2012 at April 14, 2012 07:35 AM (sdi6R)

27 So what's Cameron's message, that the same technology which made him a multi-millionaire will destroy the planet, and therefore everyone but him must live like the Amish?

Posted by: kbdabear at April 14, 2012 07:36 AM (Y+DPZ)

28 So what was the last song the ship's band played on the Titanic? In the popular imagination, it was "Nearer My God To Thee", and indeed many survivors said so. But wireless operator Harold Bride, who stayed at his post until the power failed and escaped in the last lifeboat (the one that floated off upside down) said that the last song he heard was "Autumn". "Songe d'Automne" was a popular waltz of the day, and is definitely known to have been in the band's repertoire. The melody is gorgeous and unbelievably haunting: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g73kOrhAai4&feature=related On the other hand, there was also a hymn called "Autumn": http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsXNjm6LsA4 So which one was Bride referring to?

Posted by: rickl supports SMOD/Supervolcano 2012 at April 14, 2012 07:37 AM (sdi6R)

29 It was on PBS. He was a welder for the builder Posted by: Panzer Cat at April 14, 2012 11:33 AM (cYQg0) Yes.. thats right, it was PBS. I liked that one. That was interesting.

Posted by: Jumbo Jogging Shrimp at April 14, 2012 07:37 AM (DGIjM)

30 Message to Cameron:  You first buddy.

Posted by: toby928© Person of Pallor at April 14, 2012 07:37 AM (GTbGH)

31 I think the wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald is fascinating, too, because of the wild weather on a lake. (What else is weird is that I used this sock before, but don't remember why.)

Posted by: Soothsayer Lightfoot at April 14, 2012 07:37 AM (jUytm)

32 Nice tits on Miz Winslet.

Posted by: The littl shyning man at April 14, 2012 07:38 AM (ndp2I)

33 As for "Nearer My God To Thee", it turns out that there were three versions of it, set to different music. They're known as "Bethany", "Horbury", and "Propior Deo". The Bethany version is most widely known to Americans, and is almost certainly NOT the version that was played on Titanic. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCEfqj9pDAI&feature=related The ship's bandleader, Wallace Hartley, was familiar with the other two, which were more popular in England. Here is Horbury: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RYmyZCxNCX4 And indeed, that was the version featured in the 1958 British movie, "A Night to Remember": http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pj-1b1Yvep8&feature=related I've only been able to find one example of "Propior Deo" on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0NBy02bQuZo

Posted by: rickl supports SMOD/Supervolcano 2012 at April 14, 2012 07:38 AM (sdi6R)

34 Ocean liners had been rapidly growing in size for the previous 20 years as design and construction techniques advanced. Titanic was not only the most luxurious ship ever built, it was also the safest. It was cutting-edge, state-of-the-art technology. Most of us today remember where we were and what we were doing when we heard the news of the space shuttle Challenger's explosion. Likewise with 9/11. In the world of 1912, Titanic was a cross between Challenger and 9/11. It was literally unthinkable. People had trouble wrapping their minds around the enormity of the disaster.

Posted by: rickl supports SMOD/Supervolcano 2012 at April 14, 2012 07:40 AM (sdi6R)

35 Titanic wasn't that bad of a movie.  It wasn't anything great, but a one time watch... it's not that bad.  I wouldn't go out of my way to watch it again, but I'd give it three stars.

The only real problem was that it had that Celine Dion song.  That's a huge problem. 

Posted by: Dustin at April 14, 2012 07:41 AM (z36s0)

36 Everybody knows that the ship would have avoided the iceberg if those two snaggletoothed limey closet homos hadn't been watching Jack and Rose swapping spit instead of looking for icebergs!

75 percent of young people polled today believe that to be the cause, and who are you wingnuts to deny polls!!!


Posted by: James Fuckin' Cameron at April 14, 2012 07:41 AM (Y+DPZ)

37 Baltimore beatdown guy shares cell with Zimmerman. What happens?

Posted by: The littl shyning man at April 14, 2012 07:42 AM (ndp2I)

38 Does anyone remember any noteworthy trainwrecks? Me neither.

Posted by: Soothsayer at April 14, 2012 07:42 AM (jUytm)

39 Five Feet of Fury has a huge list of retarded women who were shocked to find that the Titanic was a real boat. Then she concludes: women should not vote.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at April 14, 2012 07:44 AM (r4wIV)

40 >> So what's Cameron's message, that the same technology which made him a multi-millionaire will destroy the planet, and therefore everyone but him must live like the Amish?

He turns a lesson on the dangers of hubris into "we're ignoring the warnings". You know, like faked data, models that utterly fail to have predictive value and the lack of actual warming for the last 10 years while CO2 emissions have increased. Warnings like that.

It's straight out of the "Two Days Before the Day After Tomorrow" episode of South Park. We were warned this would happen, and we didn't listen!

Posted by: Andy at April 14, 2012 07:44 AM (XG+Mn)

41 Man can no more control the temperature of the planet than he can build an unsinkable ship. Well, I'm off to the printing press. You can never run out of money...

Posted by: HRH Titanic Failure at April 14, 2012 07:45 AM (FcR7P)

42

Damn.  If only global warming had melted those icebergs a little earlier. 

Posted by: The 1500 at April 14, 2012 07:45 AM (zw+pb)

43 http://youtu.be/D9vQt6IXXaM

This is not Titanic, but you must watch this!  Really powerful video from Catholics re: the election.

Posted by: Timwi at April 14, 2012 07:45 AM (pdhxN)

44 You mean like how Ray Nagin was warned about Hurricane Katrina and did nothing? Like that, James Cameron?

Posted by: Soothsayer at April 14, 2012 07:45 AM (jUytm)

45 If you watch the Cameron one,

As likely as me pounding nails through my own genitals.


Posted by: Jazz at April 14, 2012 07:46 AM (NzrVU)

46 #26 mamma winger

The arrest was big on our local Baltimore news last night.

But, there might be a little bit of the story that is being downplayed.
Initial reports said that at the end of the one original video, that the victim received a final insult of being teabagged by one of our fine urban utes.
Funny that apparently a black male is video taped inserting his scrotum into the mouth of an unconscious white male assault victim, and the news sort of misses that part.

Posted by: Village Idiot's Apprentice at April 14, 2012 07:46 AM (FEUhD)

47 I've seen Titanic at least a half dozen times. Acting is horrible. You dont notice just how awful it is until the second time you see it. Still.. I think the story of that ship is fascinating.

Posted by: Jumbo Jogging Shrimp at April 14, 2012 07:47 AM (DGIjM)

48 driving that train, high on cocaine

Posted by: casey jones at April 14, 2012 07:47 AM (9OuDF)

49 You mean like how Neville Chamberlain ignored the rantings and threats by Adolph Hitler and then was responsible for parts of London getting turned into rubble?

Posted by: Soothsayer at April 14, 2012 07:47 AM (jUytm)

50 Soon after Cameron's movie came out there was a cartoon showing  a line of teens waiting in line at the movie theater, and an older couple walking by. Older gent says, 'The ship sinks.'



Posted by: Retread at April 14, 2012 07:48 AM (joSBv)

51 oh, I see what James Cameron is saying. We're ignoring the warnings of the bees! The bees know.

Posted by: Soothsayer at April 14, 2012 07:48 AM (jUytm)

52 Look at how dignified all those people look in that interesting clip.

Fast forward to the OT in this thread and talk of degenerates 'tea-bagging' a man they beat into oblivion.

I think I'd rather live in 1912.

Posted by: laceyunderalls at April 14, 2012 07:49 AM (Z+Q/A)

53 The "A Night To Remember" movie version is the best.

Posted by: Count de Monet at April 14, 2012 07:50 AM (4q5tP)

54

8 Never saw Titanic and never will.

 

I did. ....It was a love story. Disillusioned rich girl, falls in love with cute, witty poor boy. ....The ship sinks. The boy dies. 

Posted by: wheatie at April 14, 2012 07:50 AM (+5U+B)

55 You mean like the warnings that there aren't enough millionaires in the world to finance O'ShitForBrains' programs?

Posted by: t-bird at April 14, 2012 07:50 AM (FcR7P)

56 The Titanic disaster proved human error beats technology every time. All Captain Smith had to do is order the ship to drift until daylight, like plenty of ships nearby did that night. Ships that went on their merry way the next day. The number of lifeboats didn't matter either. Even if they had been there, there wasn't enough time to get them all loaded and launched.

Posted by: eman at April 14, 2012 07:51 AM (SkRNT)

57 Yup, I think there are catastrophic train wrecks but I don't know if any were in the U.S. I used to have a great (relatively speaking) book that gave short stories about some of the deadliest disasters in modern history. Everything from the Shirtwaist fire and the Molasses flood to hurricanes and mine collapses. Haven't seen it in years but I think a huge train disaster happened in India.

Posted by: Lincolntf at April 14, 2012 07:51 AM (hiMsy)

58
There were not enough lifeboats on the Titanic and the owners of the Titanic had provided enough lifeboats to satisfy the current regulatory standard but no more. The regulators themselves were complacent and those building the Titanic were content to provide what was officially necessary rather than what might have been prudent. Regulation, one could say, had made them complacent.

This is a distressingly common problem. Governments find it easy to implement regulations but tedious to maintain existing ones—politicians gain little political benefit from updating old laws, only from introducing new laws.

And regulated entities tend to comply with the specifics of the regulations, not with the goal of the regulations themselves. All too often, once government takes over, what was private risk management becomes regulatory compliance.

It's easy to weave the Titanic disaster into a seductive tale of hubris, social stratification and capitalist excess. But the Titanic's chroniclers tend to put their moral narrative ahead of their historical one.

At the accident's core is this reality: British regulators assumed responsibility for lifeboat numbers and then botched that responsibility. With a close reading of the evidence, it is hard not to see the Titanic disaster as a tragic example of government failure.

Here we see, once again, that regulation has results that are far different than might have been expected. Regulatory authorities have allowed regulations to be used to create a faux-industry that likely would not otherwise exist – or certainly not in its current brazen condition.

In the modern age's hyper-regulatory environment, such distortions prosper because regulations undermine private watchdog efforts without effectively replacing them.

Ultimately, every regulation is a price fix – transferring wealth from those who create it to those who don't and may not know how to use it. Regulations, by definition, create market distortions. Markets work better than government. Private sector competition is surely preferable to dysfunctional regulation.

The 20th century saw the overwhelming growth of "regulatory democracy." Hopefully, the 21st century shall moderate (or even reverse) this growth.

Posted by: sickinmass at April 14, 2012 07:51 AM (bcNec)

59 The only "warnings" we ignored at our own peril were the warnings of Sen Joseph McCarthy. /dead serious

Posted by: Soothsayer at April 14, 2012 07:52 AM (jUytm)

60 @45... Excellent!!

Posted by: Jumbo Jogging Shrimp at April 14, 2012 07:52 AM (DGIjM)

61 I liked Cameron's movie. As far as I was concerned, the ship itself was the real star. (Not that there was anything wrong with Kate Winslet.) The filmmakers knew that they had better get the ship right, because if a single rivet was out of place, Titanic buffs from around the world would have thrashed them severely.

Posted by: rickl supports SMOD/Supervolcano 2012 at April 14, 2012 07:52 AM (sdi6R)

62 >> All disasters are the result of a cascade of bad breaks and poor decisions.

Absolutely true.

The oddest of these to me on Titanic is that the glancing blow they made on the iceberg did her in, but if they had rammed straight into the 'berg the ship would have been badly damaged but would likely have stayed afloat.

Posted by: Andy at April 14, 2012 07:52 AM (XG+Mn)

63 36 Ocean liners had been rapidly growing in size for the previous 20 years as design and construction techniques advanced. Titanic was not only the most luxurious ship ever built, it was also the safest. It was cutting-edge, state-of-the-art technology.

Posted by: rickl supports SMOD/Supervolcano 2012 at April 14, 2012 11:40 AM

Actually it wasn't the top of the line in technology or safety, it was just the biggest because use of the A deck for the Cafe Parisien enabled it to statistically add 1,000 gross register tons (useable interior space) over her twin sister the Olympic. It was the most luxurious

The Cunard twins of Mauritania and Lusitania had double hulls all the way up to the main deck, while the Titanic had only a double bottom. The watertight bulkheads on the Cunards also extended up to the main deck, while Titanic's only reached E deck. The reason was that Cunard was British owned and subsidized and had to meet those requirements as they were subject to appropriation by the Royal Navy for wartime. The White Star Line was American owned and therefore not subject to those hull requirements.

As for technology, the Cunards used four steam turbine engines while the Titanic used one turbine and 2 old style reciprocating (piston) steam engines.



Posted by: kbdabear at April 14, 2012 07:53 AM (Y+DPZ)

64 This is not Titanic, but you must watch this! Really powerful video from Catholics re: the election.
Posted by: Timwi at April 14, 2012 11:45 AM (pdhxN)

I'm Catholic.  I bristle at ads like that. It feels patronizing, and I certainly don't need three minutes of a "Game of Thrones" forge scene to get my dander up over governmental intrusions on religion. I appreciate the attempt, but the ad is a big "FAIL" in my book - I watched for about twenty seconds and then started skipping ahead to figure out where it would get interesting.  It didn't.


Posted by: Jazz at April 14, 2012 07:54 AM (NzrVU)

65

Colonel Gracie denied that the band was playing "Nearer, My God to Thee" at the end.  He said that the whole point of the music was to keep passengers calm; to start playing that hymn would be an indication of impending death, and could have started a panic.

 

As a drama, Cameron's "Titanic" is terrible, but as far as what happened to the ship goes, it was quite good.  And he had the money to do things that amounted to recreating parts of the disaster.  There's a scene which shows the empty dining room filling up with water.  All the tables are set for the next morning's breakfast, and as the water gets higher, the place settings start floating!  We even hear the plates clinking gently as they strike against each other.  No one was in the dining room by that point, so there are no witnesses to what happened, but by building a model of the dining room and actually flooding it, we can see what was happening even where there were no people to experience it. 

Posted by: Dr. Mabuse at April 14, 2012 07:54 AM (KOHFD)

66

>>There were not enough lifeboats on the Titanic

 

Sure about that? One thing I do know, they didn't bother learning how to use the lifeboats. They were actually built to hold something like 64 people each but no one knew, so some of them were launched with only about 12 people in them.

Posted by: the new, improved arhooley -- now with 10% more cynicism! at April 14, 2012 07:55 AM (vuKmj)

67 I was the target demographic for the Titanic. I am sad to say I fell into the hysteria. I should watch it again just to see how absurd it all was. Also, just read a really I interesting first hand account. It was written by a second class passenger. According to him, 2nd class had the lowest survival rate.

Posted by: Lauren at April 14, 2012 07:56 AM (F8LL/)

68 I let myself get dragged to a Titanic museum/attraction in Branson, and was surprised at how well done it was. I don't go in for anything morbid as a rule. I was assigned a passenger identity at the beginning, and at the end found out I had perished. Kind if a downer.

Posted by: Justamom at April 14, 2012 07:59 AM (Sptt8)

69 This is a distressingly common problem. Governments find it easy to implement regulations but tedious to maintain existing ones—politicians gain little political benefit from updating old laws, only from introducing new laws.
-------------------------




The U.S. regulatory system is a frakin disaster itself.  Regulations never accomplish what they are supposedly written for.  In today's environment there may even be a regulation requiring life boat capacity equal to the number of passengers.  What that means is that there will be a check mark on a form that must be submitted to the regulatory agency saying that they have said life boats. 



Honest cruise ships will have that capacity, crooked ships will simply check off the form and don't care.  after all filling out forms costs money and life boats are unnecessary unless the ship sinks or catches on fire and that never happens.

Posted by: Vic at April 14, 2012 07:59 AM (YdQQY)

70

>>I was assigned a passenger identity at the beginning

 

Hmm, kind of a good gimmick.

 

Maybe they should do that in Holocaust museums.

Posted by: the new, improved arhooley -- now with 10% more cynicism! at April 14, 2012 08:01 AM (vuKmj)

71 The Titanic was scuttled to hide its secret cargo of Unobtainium. Icebergs! Feh!

Posted by: eman at April 14, 2012 08:02 AM (SkRNT)

72 65 Posted by: kbdabear I bow to your superior knowledge.

Posted by: rickl supports SMOD/Supervolcano 2012 at April 14, 2012 08:02 AM (sdi6R)

73 1st rule of night driving.
Don't go faster than your headlights.

Posted by: DaveA at April 14, 2012 08:03 AM (onSRg)

74

45 http://youtu.be/D9vQt6IXXaM

 

This is not Titanic, but you must watch this! Really powerful video from Catholics re: the election.

 

------

 

Good video. ....I'm not Catholic....but anything that helps wake people up and helps us get rid of Barky, is a good thing.

Posted by: wheatie at April 14, 2012 08:03 AM (+5U+B)

75 The plot of the movie was just awful.

Our heroin Rose, to be blunt,  was a complete and total c-word. She laid there, floating on that door and let her  'love' just turn into an icicle. Cruel bitch.

Posted by: laceyunderalls at April 14, 2012 08:03 AM (Z+Q/A)

76 52 Soon after Cameron's movie came out there was a cartoon showing a line of teens waiting in line at the movie theater, and an older couple walking by. Older gent says, 'The ship sinks.'

---------------

Reminds me when we were on line for Gangs of NY and two old Italian couples are in front of us. One old guy says "It's about the Irish."

Posted by: real joe at April 14, 2012 08:04 AM (w7Lv+)

77 @ 73 Just what I thought. What a haunting place that is.

Posted by: Retread at April 14, 2012 08:04 AM (joSBv)

78

Maybe they should do that in Holocaust museums.

 

Not sure if you are saying that because you already know this, but they do that at the National Holocaust Museum in DC. It is really haunting actually to find out what happens to your identity. Of course I went about 3 months into the museum being opened, so maybe they don't do it anymore.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 14, 2012 08:05 AM (RZ8pf)

79 70 A model of the Queen Mary was used in the Poseidon Adventure, but I'm getting off-topic.

Posted by: rickl supports SMOD/Supervolcano 2012 at April 14, 2012 08:05 AM (sdi6R)

80 The oddest of these to me on Titanic is that the glancing blow they made on the iceberg did her in, but if they had rammed straight into the 'berg the ship would have been badly damaged but would likely have stayed afloat.

Posted by: Andy at April 14, 2012 11:52 AM

That's speculation due to what happened to a similar ship when it hit an iceberg head on. The Titanic was moving a much larger bulk at a much faster speed, and an iceberg doesn't usually have a straight wall like a cliff. The ship could have rolled if it hit straight on.

Bill Paxton's line in the movie pretty much summed up why the accident happened in the first place; "Smith figured that anything big enough to sink the ship he'd see in time to turn"

Moonless night, very unusual calm for the North Atlantic which didn't create visual breakers on the iceberg, and cold water air refraction contributed to them not seeing the berg in time to avoid it. As it was, a few seconds earlier and it would have just been a close call.

Posted by: kbdabear at April 14, 2012 08:07 AM (Y+DPZ)

81 Too bad it broke in half. Now we will never get a chance to fill it with pingpong balls and bring it back to the surface.

Posted by: eman at April 14, 2012 08:08 AM (SkRNT)

82

And now an actual Titanic thread where I can post the weird Titanic conspiracy theory I heard on the Medved show this week. I know I posted it before but it seems appropriate here too. What's interesting to me is that right away after the Titanic disaster there were conspiracy theories about its sinking. The more humans change, the more they stay the same I guess, since fire doesn't melt steel. (grin)

 

Anyway, the theory goes that the sinking of the Titanic was insurance fraud, that it was really the Olympic, which had been damaged by a Royal Navy ship earlier in the year but the Olympic was at fault and White Star line couldn't afford to fix it, so they decided to sink it, changed it to "Titanic" the ship that wasn't finished yet, and then sank the Olympic, thereby getting money for it after all. They didn't expect people to die though.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 14, 2012 08:08 AM (RZ8pf)

83 Interview w/ Second Officer Charles Lightoller, broadcast 1936: http://tinyurl.com/2ehx7ty Interview w/ Fourth Officer Joseph Boxhall, broadcast 1962: http://tinyurl.com/bwq5pvo

Posted by: Miss80sBaby at April 14, 2012 08:09 AM (d6QMz)

84 Titanic? Bleh, they'd all be dead by now anyway, even if the boat didn't sink, so... Too soon?

Posted by: BurtTC at April 14, 2012 08:10 AM (Gc/Qi)

85 I've been a Titanic buff since childhood, and I really liked the Cameron movie. As I said earlier, the ship itself was the real star. But the fictional love story between Jack and Rose was a good dramatic plot device, because it threw the loss and heartbreak right in your face in a way a straightforward telling of the story would not have done. Wives lost husbands, husbands love wives, children lost parents, and parents lost children all over that ship.

Posted by: rickl supports SMOD/Supervolcano 2012 at April 14, 2012 08:12 AM (sdi6R)

86 An Iceberg killed all them people?

I told you them Jews are gonna kill us all!!!

Posted by: The Right Rev Al Sharpton at April 14, 2012 08:13 AM (Y+DPZ)

87

Okay. ....I now get why there is such a fascination with the Titanic. Thanks to all, for the perspective that you have forwarded.

 

While the Titanic should still serve as an example for creating safer cruise liners. .....There is little that US regulations can do about ships that are registered in other countries.....which, from what I've read, most of them are.

 

And the most important thing onboard a ship....is the good judgement of the Captain.  .....Something that was sadly lacking in that recent Costa Concordia disaster.

Posted by: wheatie at April 14, 2012 08:14 AM (+5U+B)

88 40
Does anyone remember any noteworthy trainwrecks?

Me neither.

Posted by: Soothsayer at April 14, 2012 11:42 AM (jUytm)
-- -- --


The Obama administration?

Posted by: Marmo at April 14, 2012 08:15 AM (pcgW1)

89 Just spent 15 minutes hunting up my copy of  Night to Remember. Good time to read it, I think.

Posted by: USS Diversity at April 14, 2012 08:15 AM (vpe0k)

90 On the heroism of shipbuilder Thomas Andrews: http://tinyurl.com/72zrkmq http://tinyurl.com/79kne4d http://tinyurl.com/cmtuh57

Posted by: Miss80sBaby at April 14, 2012 08:18 AM (d6QMz)

91

85...Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 14, 2012 12:08 PM (RZ8pf)

 

It was the Dark Fae. ....They thought that the Blood King was onboard, so they sent that iceberg to sink the ship. ...*wink* 

Posted by: wheatie at April 14, 2012 08:19 AM (+5U+B)

92 Interesting epilogue to 2nd officer Lightoller's life.

At the age of 66, he participated in the Evacuation of Dunkirk in 1940, using his own sailboat



Posted by: kbdabear at April 14, 2012 08:21 AM (Y+DPZ)

93 RE A Night to Remember (195 : In my opinion, while ANTR is at a technical disadvantage, it is still the better film. Baker is able to capture the history*, emotions, and heroism without schmaltz or histrionics. Conversely, Cameron apparently felt it necessary to tar some of the heroes for dramatic and other purposes. That does not mean ANTR is perfect when it comes to portrayals-- Captain Smith did not immediately take-charge and the focus on Lightoller somewhat crowd-outs the deeds of some of the other officers, as well as those of Mr. Andrews-- but that is preferable to Cameron's adding an almost villainous aspect to Lightoller and Murdoch. But my biggest problem with Titanic is the way that Cameron fixates on class differences through his 20th-Century socialist lense. Second-class men and crew members had the lowest survival rates, yet Cameron would have you believe that hardly anyone in steerage survived. *As known at the time

Posted by: Miss80sBaby at April 14, 2012 08:21 AM (d6QMz)

94

One semester in college I had some time between classes and used to check out the micro-films in the Library. They had the NY Times, and the coverage of the Titanic sinking is amazing. As has already been posted, some of the richest, best and brightest of NY Society were on board.

 

The coverage goes on day after day.  Very interesting if you ever get a chance.

Posted by: HH at April 14, 2012 08:22 AM (KB0hv)

95 Looking at the film of the ship at dock, it looks like a cardboard toy. Seriously. A cardboard toy with ton of little holes punched in the side.

I don't know if it's true that some passengers were locked up to prevent them from over-running the lifeboats, but if it is, then damn them.

For those who survived, well, there was no such thing as PTSD back then. The just had to pick up and keep going. The hell they would have been through.

Cameron, although I wasn't crazy about the premise of his movie, admire the hell out of the fact that he was mad in his determination to recreate the Titanic to precise specifications. And, now despite him being a pompous ass, he is also one of the bravest and most adventurous men on earth, It is unfathomable that a man would descend to the darkest, coldest, deepest, loneliest place on earth as he has, regardless of the technology.

That sidebar map from last week that showed the depths of the oceans as compared to oil drilling and sunken ships really made the crazy clear.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at April 14, 2012 08:23 AM (piMMO)

96

My least favorite passenger story is about Rambler cousin Frederick Kimber Seward, an attorney in 1st class.  He managed to survive by getting into lifeboat 7, the first lifeboat to depart.  You know the old saying "women, children and attorneys first."  When he got to land, he sued White Star.

 

White Star was indirectly owned by cousin J.P. Morgan and insured by another cousin whose name escapes me.  Also in the cousin tree?  James f'n Cameron.

Posted by: Nash Rambler at April 14, 2012 08:24 AM (HLv97)

97 If you want to get into an argument as fierce as longbows vs crossbows, discuss Capt Stanley Lord and The Californian

Walter Lord (no relation) summed it up best; "Capt Lord's defenders can say whatever they want, but they can't get around those rockets. They saw those rockets and sat until morning"

Posted by: kbdabear at April 14, 2012 08:24 AM (Y+DPZ)

98 >>But my biggest problem with Titanic is the way that Cameron fixates on class differences through his 20th-Century socialist lense.

There's some disagreement over whether he stole that perspective from the Nazi-propaganda film (see how horrible the British class system is, compared to us!) along with the love plot and other stuff, or just a happy coincidence that Cameron thinks like Goebbels.  Heh.

Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at April 14, 2012 08:27 AM (/kI1Q)

99 @96 And just to beat us over the head with his message, Cameron made Rose's rich fiance a douche.

Posted by: Retread at April 14, 2012 08:27 AM (joSBv)

100 Oh, and I was just wondering, 'cause I really don't know. Was the Titanic trying to set a speed record on that run?

Posted by: HH at April 14, 2012 08:28 AM (KB0hv)

101

>>There were not enough lifeboats on the Titanic

Sure about that? One thing I do know, they didn't bother learning how to use the lifeboats. They were actually built to hold something like 64 people each but no one knew, so some of them were launched with only about 12 people in them.

 

Had all the lifeboats been full, they still would have held only about half the passengers. The early ones were launched half-full partly because not many were willing to get in them--they still couldn't believe the ship was going to sink--and partly because the crew were worried the new lifeboats would buckle if filled to capacity (which they sometimes did). No one had bothered to hold a lifeboat drill beforehand, so they didn't know if the boats would hold or not; they all held up fine, as it turned out.

Posted by: T at April 14, 2012 08:31 AM (zun+U)

102 The thread above, which is dead, killed this thread. This is what happens.

Posted by: Soothsayer at April 14, 2012 08:32 AM (jUytm)

103 The train wreck in "8mm"?(kids, aliens,recent), was awesome to watch.

Posted by: nip at April 14, 2012 08:34 AM (uRVaX)

104 Actually, as a "Titanic follower" since I first read A Night To Remember in 1959 as a 12 year old, James Cameron's Titanic was excellent. Especially for we "Titanic junkies". The recreation was right on (with what was known at the time of filming), the sets were perfect recreations and, it WAS the first time that the disaster was shown from the viewpoint of people trapped aboard the ship during her final moments. I saw it six times in the theater, along with my son and my late dad, seeing something different each time we viewed the film. The "love story" aside, it was a very well made film. However, it HAD to be seen in a decent venue, with huge screen and digital sound. Those two things enhanced to realism tremendously.

Posted by: thatcrazyjerseyguy who is also a film buff at April 14, 2012 08:35 AM (MbeR6)

105 I just went to a Titanic exhibit with a friend.

Most interesting thing? Well, there is sheet music in pristine condition which I found bizarre.

Also, guys in crows nest were not watching people make out. They did NOT have binoculars- they were lost in the rush to leave. It was a moonless night.... they were doomed from the beginning.

Posted by: shibimi, existentialist at April 14, 2012 08:36 AM (z63Tr)

106 Gaia sent the iceberg to kill the humans who were causing her to overheat.  If only Titanic had used green energy like the wind or solar, they might have excaped her wrath.

Posted by: nickless at April 14, 2012 08:38 AM (MMC8r)

107

98....And, now despite him being a pompous ass, he is also one of the bravest and most adventurous men on earth, It is unfathomable that a man would descend to the darkest, coldest, deepest, loneliest place on earth as he has, regardless of the technology.

 

Cameron is a techno-junky. He fell in love with diving, and found a way to make money doing it, and fund it his habit. ....Which is all well and good.

 

But it is Cameron's embrace of the man-caused-global-warming bullshit, and demonizing corporate mining....that make him a world class hypocrite.

 

All of the wonderful technology that he loves, and uses to make his millions with....is manufactured by corporations which need all those bits of raw materials from mining.

 

Cameron has said, that he would like to see the world become less industrialized....in order to preserve the natural wonders of Mother Nature. And that he envisions people making their livings in communications and art. .....Well, where are all those communication devices going to come from, without industrialization? 

Posted by: wheatie at April 14, 2012 08:39 AM (+5U+B)

108 I'll never forgive the owners of the White Star Line for extending the career of Leonardo De Crappio.

Posted by: nickless at April 14, 2012 08:40 AM (MMC8r)

109 I think the wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald is fascinating, too, because of the wild weather on a lake.

*****

In recent years they've concluded that it was a rogue wave which did her in.

Can you imagine that for millennia men had returned from sea (those fortunate enough to return) with stories of such waves and had been accused of lying to cover of up shitty seamanship.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at April 14, 2012 08:40 AM (piMMO)

110 Some Titanic myths and misconceptions;

Myth - There weren't enough lifeboats due to greed.

Fact - Due to traveling on the most heavily traveled shipping lane in the world, the lifeboats purpose was to ferry passengers to rescuing ships

Myth - The Titanic steamed at full speed in spite of iceberg warnings because White Star president Bruce Ismay wanted to break the transatlantic speed record

Fact -  The top design speed of the Titanic was 22.5 knots, not even close to the record held by the Mauritania's 29.5 knots. Ismay's haste was most likely due to avoiding adverse headlines in the press about a delayed arrival. The purpose was to show that White Star's giants could deliver passengers in far greater comfort without a significant sacrifice in speed. The Mauritania was capable of much faster speeds, but rarely went over 23 knots due to extreme and uncomfortable vibration at speeds over that


Posted by: kbdabear at April 14, 2012 08:41 AM (Y+DPZ)

111

Another Rambler cousin on the Titanic was Bess Waldo Daniels whose family was apparently portrayed in the movie.  A brief account is here:

 

http://tinyurl.com/76v9cl4

Posted by: Nash Rambler at April 14, 2012 08:41 AM (HLv97)

112

 

I loved Cameron's idea at the end of the show  of how you could have saved more people by rowing to the iceberg and putting people on it then rowing back to get more passengers, what a douche

Posted by: kj at April 14, 2012 08:42 AM (zdvxY)

113 wheatie, that was funny. It was totally the dark fae.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 14, 2012 08:43 AM (RZ8pf)

114 Some people (ie, Democrats) didn't know it was a true story:

15 People Who Didn't Know The Titanic Actually Sank

http://tinyurl.com/7hdurcg

Posted by: nickless at April 14, 2012 08:44 AM (MMC8r)

115 Geez, Nash Rambler, that is an amazing number of connections to the Titanic in your family.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 14, 2012 08:44 AM (RZ8pf)

116 In recent years they've concluded that it was a rogue wave which did her in. Because of global warming.

Posted by: Soothsayer Cameoron at April 14, 2012 08:45 AM (jUytm)

117

 

Its a fact that the 3rd class passengers on the ship enjoyed a level of luxury that that they would have been unaccustomed to in their evreryday life,that was the White Star Lines big drawing.card

Posted by: kj at April 14, 2012 08:47 AM (zdvxY)

118 Cameron is a techno-junky. He fell in love with diving, and found a way to make money doing it, and fund it his habit. ....Which is all well and good.

****

Oh no. He's a prick. That is unquestionable. Yet it does not distract from the brass balls it took to do what he has done. Sure, there are braver, better men who could have gone down, but it was him, and that makes him the only human being on earth to have done so, and to have remained there for hours.

The claustrophobia alone would have overcome most.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at April 14, 2012 08:47 AM (piMMO)

119 I loved Cameron's idea at the end of the showof how you could have saved more people by rowing to the iceberg and puttingpeopleon it then rowing back to get more passengers, what a douche


*****

If only they had leashed the polar bears and penguins, they could have towed them in.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at April 14, 2012 08:49 AM (piMMO)

120 Michelle Malkin and others already mentioned the Theresa Heinz Kerry insult two days ago, much to my chagrin.

Didn't realize. Thanks for that sooth.

Posted by: The Mega Independent at April 14, 2012 08:50 AM (AlYnQ)

121 "The recreation was right on"
Other than the total reversal of the first mates personality and actions. He died on the ship trying to help people get to safety. Cameron was making an idiotic 99% statement and did horrendous injustice to the people on that ship.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at April 14, 2012 08:50 AM (r4wIV)

122 Cameron has said, that he would like to see the world become less industrialized....in order to preserve the natural wonders of Mother Nature. And that he envisions people making their livings in communications and art. .....Well, where are all those communication devices going to come from, without industrialization?

Posted by: wheatie at April 14, 2012 12:39 PM

Cameron doesn't hate modern living enough to sell off his personal fleet of Corvettes and Hummers parked in the driveway of his Malibu estate. The man is such an asshole that even other sanctimonious assholes in Hollywood can't stand the guy.

An old joke in Hollywood goes like this;

This Hollywood producer dies and is at the Pearly Gates when he sees this bearded guy screaming at film crews from a camera boom. The producer says to St Peter; 'isn't that Jim Cameron, when did he die?' and St Peter replies; "no, that's God, he just thinks he's James Cameron"

Look up "hypocrite" in the dictionary, you'll see Cameron's picture next to it



Posted by: kbdabear at April 14, 2012 08:51 AM (Y+DPZ)

123 h, and I was just wondering, 'cause I really don't know. Was the Titanic trying to set a speed record on that run?

Posted by: HH at April 14, 2012 12:28 PM (KB0hv)

----------------------



That is a myth created by William Randolph Hearst to sell papers. It didn't have all of its boilers on line at the time and was even sailing on a longer southern route in order to try to avoid ice.  (ironic)



As for the signal rockets that were not interpreted correctly about the Californian, at the time every shipping line used a different signal system for trouble so it is easy to see why the signal rockets were not interpreted correctly.  In addition, the wireless system was still in its infancy and not widely used.


There were 16 life boats aboard Titanic on its maiden voyage and two cutters with a capacity of 40. Each life boat had a capacity of 65.  There were just over 2200 passengers so even if every one of them had been filled to capacity it would not have been enough.

Posted by: Vic at April 14, 2012 08:52 AM (YdQQY)

124

Speaking of disasters, I'd  better  check my weather radio.

 

Something tells me I'm going to need it on tonight...

Posted by: HH at April 14, 2012 08:53 AM (KB0hv)

125 IIRC, Titanic had four more lifeboats than regulations required but not as many as Mr. Andrews wanted. As for the loading of the lifeboats, Smith did not relay the fact that the ship was going to sink to the officers and some of the passengers were initially unaware of the danger. The cabins seemed safer and people thought the ship unsinkable, so it was sometimes difficult for the officers to get enough people into the lifeboats. Also, the officers interpreted the order as to who could board the lifeboats differently and it was also thought by many that they were going to be rescued by a neighboring ship.

Posted by: Miss80sBaby at April 14, 2012 08:53 AM (d6QMz)

126 Jack and Rose's adventures were just an excuse to get around as many areas of the ship as possible. 1st class would ordinarily not meet third class until the very end, and no passengers but they would be running through the boiler room and cargo hold. "Rose benefits" also include her wardrobe of attractive period clothing - which is interesting all by itself. The plot was silly, silly and ridiculous, but it showed off the time and the ship.

Posted by: SarahW at April 14, 2012 08:54 AM (LYwCh)

127 Bush did it.

Posted by: nickless at April 14, 2012 08:55 AM (MMC8r)

128 The only reason I want to see the 3d version is to see the revised night sky. Neil De Grasse wrote Cameron that it was all wrong for the time of year, and Cameron said - ok how WOULD it look and made the new accurate sky.

Posted by: SarahW at April 14, 2012 08:55 AM (LYwCh)

129 Bush did it.


****

I' surprised it took so long.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at April 14, 2012 08:55 AM (piMMO)

130 Lifeboat to water is what 80'?, lowered with ropes? scary shit

Posted by: nip at April 14, 2012 08:56 AM (uRVaX)

131 As a side note, about 15 years ago, I discovered that my grandmother's sister (my mom's aunt) was aboard the Carpathia on her way back to Hungary with her very young son. She was heading back to bring her husband back to America when the Carpathia was rerouted to assist the Titanic. My grandmother and her family on both sides of the Atlantic became concerned when they hadn't received word of her arrival back in "the old country". By the time the Carpathia picked up survivors and assisted with body recovery, plus sailing back to NY to resupply the ship, almost a month had gone by before the family found out though "Julia's letters" what had transpired. She never did return to America. War broke out and her husband was conscripted into the military. They lived out their days (having another child) in Hungary.

Posted by: thatcrazyjerseyguy who is also a film buff at April 14, 2012 08:56 AM (MbeR6)

132 120
Its a fact that the 3rd class passengers on the ship enjoyed a level of luxury that that they would have been unaccustomed to in their evreryday life,that was the White Star Lines big drawing.card

Posted by: kj at April 14, 2012 12:47 PM

The Titanic was luxurious to draw the rich clientele

The Titanic was huge to carry more of the lucrative and competitive immigrant clientele. They had better accommodations to sell those passages to those immigrants

It didn't stop in Queenstown just to pick up the mail in Ireland

Posted by: kbdabear at April 14, 2012 08:56 AM (Y+DPZ)

133

125....Look up "hypocrite" in the dictionary, you'll see Cameron's picture next to it.

 

Heh. Yup. .....He's doing Avatar2 underwater. ....So I suspect that he is using the money he is making off of exploiting the Titanic some more, to fund the underwater filming of Avatar2.

 

Which will require the use of the latest state-of-the-art technology.....the best that can be made available to him by evil industrialized corporations.

Posted by: wheatie at April 14, 2012 08:59 AM (+5U+B)

134 127  Speaking of disasters, I'dbetter check my weather radio.

  Something tells me I'm going to need it on tonight...

 

Posted by: HH at April 14, 2012 12:53 PM (KB0hv)

 

Yes....if you're located anywhere in the Bullseye Zone. Which is across Oklahoma, Kansas and Nebraska, this afternoon and tonight.

Posted by: wheatie at April 14, 2012 09:02 AM (+5U+B)

135 It should also be pointed out that the Titanic sinking is what made the New York Times' reputation. At the time there probably a dozen newspapers in New York City. The Times was just one of them. But a young technogeek named David Sarnoff was listening to the wireless traffic on the North Atlantic that night, heard the distress calls, and notified a friend who worked for the NYT. The next morning, newspapers on both sides of the Atlantic were saying that the Titanic had been in an accident, but was being towed to port and all passengers were safe. Only the New York Times ran with a front page story that the Titanic had sunk with great loss of life. They've been coasting on their reputation ever since.

Posted by: rickl supports SMOD/Supervolcano 2012 at April 14, 2012 09:02 AM (sdi6R)

136 Bob Ballard finding Titanic in connection with a covert mission for the US Navy > anything James Cameron ever did.

Posted by: Andy at April 14, 2012 09:04 AM (XG+Mn)

137

PGIS, there were at least 30 Rambler cousins on the Titanic, mostly in first class, but I know of one in second class and one employee.

 

One of my grandparents descended from boatloads of prominent early families.  Other branches of the tree got the fame and fortune;  I got the interenet connection.

Posted by: Nash Rambler at April 14, 2012 09:04 AM (HLv97)

138 128 IIRC, Titanic had four more lifeboats than regulations required but not as many as Mr. Andrews wanted. As for the loading of the lifeboats, Smith did not relay the fact that the ship was going to sink to the officers and some of the passengers were initially unaware of the danger. The cabins seemed safer and people thought the ship unsinkable, so it was sometimes difficult for the officers to get enough people into the lifeboats. Also, the officers interpreted the order as to who could board the lifeboats differently and it was also thought by many that they were going to be rescued by a neighboring ship. Posted by: Miss80sBaby at April 14, 2012 12:53 PM

Murdoch and Moody obviously knew as they were on the bridge when the ship struck. The other officers were either sleeping or on other parts of the ship, and were notified once summoned and Andrews determined that the ship could not be saved and estimated the rate it would founder.

It's true that the senior officers determined lifeboat boarding rules differently. Lightoller and Wilde on the port side determined "women and children ONLY" which is why JJ Astor was turned away by Lightoller. Murdoch interpreted it as "women and children FIRST", which allowed for men to board provided there was room after the women and children were loaded.

They did think that the ship spotted on the horizon would come to their aid, which happened to be the Californian (much heated debate over the years as to if the ship was indeed Capt Lord's ship they saw).





Posted by: kbdabear at April 14, 2012 09:09 AM (Y+DPZ)

139 Anyone know if Lady Astor's OK?

Posted by: Waterhouse at April 14, 2012 09:10 AM (k8AjP)

140 Remember LADY CHATTERLY?

Posted by: soothsayerwing plover, prOn edition at April 14, 2012 09:13 AM (jUytm)

141 124 "The recreation was right on" Other than the total reversal of the first mates personality and actions. He died on the ship trying to help people get to safety. Cameron was making an idiotic 99% statement and did horrendous injustice to the people on that ship. I felt the only two characters in a position of power that Cameron got right were Andrews (mostly) and Fifth Officer Lowe. Captain Smith did not properly take charge but he was not a buffoon. As for Murdoch, there are conflicting stories about whether he committed suicide towards the end. But it should not really matter; regardless of the debate over how he should have handled the iceberg, he was heroic in his attempts to try to save the passengers. With regards to Lightoller, he has been condemned for not allowing more men on the lifeboats but his actions make sense if you consider he did not realize the ship was going to sink. Something that was also missing in the portrayal of the officers and a bit with Andrews is that they were shown as being more panicky than they reportedly were.

Posted by: Miss80sBaby at April 14, 2012 09:16 AM (d6QMz)

142 George Zimmerman is responsible for the loss of life of all those poor immigrants on the Titanic.

If he'd been looking out for icebergs instead of black kids walking around the deck, he'd have seen it. He also should have stayed in the crow's nest like Capt Smith instructed him after he called the bridge

Posted by: NBC News at April 14, 2012 09:18 AM (Y+DPZ)

143 I was surprised Cameron didn't give Billy Zane a mustache to twirl in his piece of shit version, seeing as how he bashed his audience over the head with every other cartoon cliche of 'bad man'.

Posted by: Waterhouse at April 14, 2012 09:18 AM (k8AjP)

144 5
Shipwrecks and planewrecks fascinate me.

Posted by: soothsayer at April 14, 2012 11:24 AM (jUytm)

 

Then you're gonna love my second term.

Posted by: SCOAMF at April 14, 2012 09:25 AM (iXSO+)

145 Hate Billy Zane for doing that anti-American piece of shit film with Gary Busey that was produced by Turks, not his role in Titanic

Posted by: kbdabear at April 14, 2012 09:27 AM (Y+DPZ)

146 On the other hand, there was also a hymn called "Autumn":

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsXNjm6LsA4


What a poignant tune.

Posted by: Waterhouse at April 14, 2012 09:28 AM (k8AjP)

147 If you like Bill Whittle, check out his video about all the Millenials who didn't know that the Titanic was real.  Now they all think that Cameron's version is what really happened and they believe his slander of a good man, the first officer Murdoch.

Posted by: fozzy at April 14, 2012 09:31 AM (FEzSe)

148 148 Hate Billy Zane for doing that anti-American piece of shit film with Gary Busey that was produced by Turks, not his role in Titanic

Posted by: kbdabear at April 14, 2012 01:27 PM (Y+DPZ)


I can't figure out why Billy Zane was a star in the first place.  He has the dullest personality of anyone on screen.

Posted by: fozzy at April 14, 2012 09:33 AM (FEzSe)

149 And we never talk about the shuttle Columbia. Weird.

Posted by: Soothsayer at April 14, 2012 09:34 AM (jUytm)

150 The worst slander of Murdoch in the movie wasn't his suicide, which some passengers claimed to have witnessed so it's possibly true. The worst is his initial acceptance of a bribe by Zane's character "Cal" for a spot on the last lifeboat. It was so egregious that Cameron had to issue an apology to his descendants and donated to a scholarship in Murdoch's name

Posted by: kbdabear at April 14, 2012 09:35 AM (Y+DPZ)

151 Billy Zane became a star for his hotness in a purple rubber suit in The Phantom. ....It's been all downhill from there.

Posted by: wheatie at April 14, 2012 09:40 AM (+5U+B)

152 Did anyone notice that after Murdoch blows his brains out with a large revolver and falls overboard, there's still blood from "Tommy Ryan" whom he shot, but not one drop of blood or piece of flesh on the deck, nor in the water

Posted by: kbdabear at April 14, 2012 09:40 AM (Y+DPZ)

153 Anything I can do to avoid giving James Cameron my money, I will do.

Posted by: JEM at April 14, 2012 09:41 AM (o+SC1)

154 Hate Billy Zane for doing that anti-American piece of shit film with Gary Busey that was produced by Turks, not his role in Titanic

I can do both!

Posted by: Waterhouse at April 14, 2012 09:41 AM (k8AjP)

155 Murdoch was under no threat from Tommy Ryan, he only shot him because of racial profiling. He thought Ryan was a drunken Black Irish who was up to no good

Our audio experts analyzed Cameron's film and just before Murdoch kills Ryan, you can hear him muttering "fuckin' Micks!"

Posted by: NBC News at April 14, 2012 09:44 AM (Y+DPZ)

156 141 128 Murdoch and Moody obviously knew as they were on the bridge when the ship struck. The other officers were either sleeping or on other parts of the ship, and were notified once summoned and Andrews determined that the ship could not be saved and estimated the rate it would founder. Andrews and his engineers relayed their conclusions to Smith and Ismay but Smith never held a formal meeting of the officers. Andrews did tell some who asked about the full extent of the damage but he did not tell a majority of people onboard because it would have caused great panic. But he was forceful in making sure that everything that could be done to save the passengers was done, even if it meant forcing people into lifeboats. As for the officers, Murdoch came to the right conclusion regarding the boarding of the lifeboats but I do not feel Lightoller had any malicious intent. He wanted as many innocents as he could find off as quickly as possible and he also thought that they could load more passengers later. The officers were also initially unaware of how many people they could actually put in the lifeboats.

Posted by: Miss80sBaby at April 14, 2012 09:44 AM (d6QMz)

157 Wait, the Titanic was REAL???? Wow!

Posted by: Andy at April 14, 2012 09:47 AM (3gfGS)

158 Okay, I put a sarcastic Twitter HTML with my last comment and it got edited out. I'm not THAT big of a moron!

Posted by: Andy at April 14, 2012 09:50 AM (3gfGS)

159 I have only seen Cameron's version once, on the big screen. I was able to put aside my feelings about the director and actors and just enjoy the movie, I thought it was well done.

Posted by: real joe at April 14, 2012 09:51 AM (w7Lv+)

160 162 I have only seen Cameron's version once, on the big screen. I was able to put aside my feelings about the director and actors and just enjoy the movie, I thought it was well done.

Posted by: real joe at April 14, 2012 01:51 PM (w7Lv+)


But all the lies he told in the movie make it a piece of shit.

Posted by: fozzy at April 14, 2012 09:53 AM (FEzSe)

161 Is that you, Andy? If it's you, perhaps it's time for a nood post with no content. a tabula rasa, if you will

Posted by: Soothsayer at April 14, 2012 09:54 AM (jUytm)

162 Anyone see The Three Stooges last night?

Posted by: Soothsayer at April 14, 2012 09:58 AM (jUytm)

163 There was no intentional detention of 3rd class passengers belowdecks by the officers or most of the crew

First, the ship had no PA system so everything was word of mouth. The stewards were not trained on how to handle these emergencies and pretty much had to decide on their own. Contrary to the feckless clowns they were depicted as in Cameron's film, the majority of them did not survive, stayed with the ship and did their job as best they could, and did not rush to the lifeboats as those on the Andrea Doria or Concordia did.

There was also an issue of language. 3rd class had many passengers who knew little or no English and could not understand the instructions of the crew.  There were also no exit routes indicated in steerage, and since they boarded through ramps and doors through the hull, there was confusion about how to reach the boat deck. More than a few of the stewards rather than imprison the passengers aided them to the boat deck or to the poop deck

The plight of the 3rd class passengers was due mostly to confusion and some incompetence, not to intent or bigotry



Posted by: kbdabear at April 14, 2012 10:01 AM (Y+DPZ)

164 only 4 more hours until the chess post!

Posted by: Soothsayer at April 14, 2012 10:02 AM (jUytm)

165 The Convergence of the Twain

(Lines on the loss of the "Titanic")

-Thomas Hardy

  I In a solitude of the sea Deep from human vanity, And the Pride of Life that planned her, stilly couches she.
II Steel chambers, late the pyres Of her salamandrine fires, Cold currents thrid, and turn to rhythmic tidal lyres.
III Over the mirrors meant To glass the opulent The sea-worm crawls — grotesque, slimed, dumb, indifferent.
IV Jewels in joy designed To ravish the sensuous mind Lie lightless, all their sparkles bleared and black and blind.
V Dim moon-eyed fishes near Gaze at the gilded gear And query: "What does this vaingloriousness down here?" ...
VI Well: while was fashioning This creature of cleaving wing, The Immanent Will that stirs and urges everything
VII Prepared a sinister mate For her — so gaily great — A Shape of Ice, for the time far and dissociate.
VIII And as the smart ship grew In stature, grace, and hue, In shadowy silent distance grew the Iceberg too.
IX Alien they seemed to be; No mortal eye could see The intimate welding of their later history,
X Or sign that they were bent By paths coincident On being anon twin halves of one august event,
XI Till the Spinner of the Years Said "Now!" And each one hears, And consummation comes, and jars two hemispheres.

Posted by: Barney's Frank in Freddie's Fannie at April 14, 2012 10:07 AM (XBEWJ)

166 Cameron worked very hard to get the technical details of the ship perfect. The people, not so much. It's like the Asperger's version of the story. Even the NatGeo thing is concerned with his hyper-focus on things like the angle of the ship when it broke apart.

Posted by: Andy at April 14, 2012 10:08 AM (VJ9oj)

167

 

hated the movie,especially hated the end when the old bitch drops the dimond back into the sea,no way she could have given it to her grandaughter whos been taking care of her or donated it to be sold and finally make repreations to the famlies of the people lost who never got a dime.

Posted by: kj at April 14, 2012 10:08 AM (zdvxY)

168 The portrayal of Bruce Ismay in the film was probably exaggerated, although his grave has been pissed on so much during the years it could probably float a similar ship

Ismay DID order Smith to maintain speed the day before the sinking, there were witnesses who overheard the conversation and testified to it at the American hearings

His behavior during the rescue was not callous, as he assisted even the steerage passengers onto the lifeboats. He waited until the last one was launched (collapsible C) before jumping in. His death would have not saved one life and would have deprived the committees in both hearings of valuable information

His behavior on the Carpathia on the way to New York however was craven, he locked himself in a private cabin and refused to speak with anyone, claiming shock. He also wired the WS Line's NY offices to have the Celtic ready to take him and the Titanic's crew back to England immediately, knowing subpoenas were awaiting him in NY.

Posted by: kbdabear at April 14, 2012 10:15 AM (Y+DPZ)

169 hated the movie,especially hatedthe end when the old bitch drops the dimond back into the sea,no way she could have given it to her grandaughter whos been taking care of her or donated it to be sold andfinally make repreations to the famlies of the people lost who never got a dime. Posted by: kj at April 14, 2012 02:08 PM

Yeh, that old white bitch should have sold the diamond to pay reparations to all the slaves who built that ship!

Posted by: The Right Rev Jesse Jackson at April 14, 2012 10:17 AM (Y+DPZ)

170 Mandatory Titanic related comedy gold: http://michael-ende-schule.bildung-rp.de/titanic%202004/titanic-Zeitung.jpg Yes, I blame negro jazz.

Posted by: Chris R, red in NY-9 at April 14, 2012 10:20 AM (NFcOS)

171 @171 - so you're saying Ismay did exactly what any good 21st century American lawyer would have advised him to do ...

Posted by: JEM at April 14, 2012 10:20 AM (o+SC1)

172 Exactly one hundred years to the day after Titanic struck the iceberg (The Iceberg?) I got a positive pregnancy test.
I'll be 40 in June.

UNSINKABLE EGGS!

Posted by: Cathy at April 14, 2012 10:23 AM (XD+u1)

173 174 @171 - so you're saying Ismay did exactly what any good 21st century American lawyer would have advised him to do ...
Posted by: JEM at April 14, 2012 02:20 PM

Unfortunately, you're very right

Posted by: kbdabear at April 14, 2012 10:24 AM (Y+DPZ)

174 His behavior on the Carpathia on the way to New York however was craven

Sounds like good sense to me, rather than picking out horns to make himself look like the best sort of scapegoat

Posted by: Boulder Toilet Hobo at April 14, 2012 10:24 AM (QTHTd)

175 My wife ruined the film for me when she told me the ship sinks at the end.

Posted by: Dr. Varno at April 14, 2012 10:24 AM (KEtcL)

176 Cathy, congratulations!

Posted by: Boulder Toilet Hobo at April 14, 2012 10:24 AM (QTHTd)

177 Thanks, Toilet Hobo!

Posted by: Cathy at April 14, 2012 10:25 AM (XD+u1)

178 Had he at least visited and spoken with the survivors, he might have had a good number of defenders of his reputation. At least it would have been the decent thing to do

When Eastern Airlines flight 401 crashed in the Everglades, CEO Frank Borman himself went to the scene and assisted with aid and rescue

The public can be very forgiving of a company involved in a large tragedy if the aftermath is handled correctly, or even perceived as doing so

Posted by: kbdabear at April 14, 2012 10:34 AM (Y+DPZ)

179 Y'all should really watch the Nazi Titanic documentary on H2 tonight. In fact, you can watch the movie in it's entirety on youtube. You will be shocked to see how much Cameron stole from it.

Posted by: Chris R, red in NY-9 at April 14, 2012 10:38 AM (NFcOS)

180 3D BOOBEHS!!!!!!!!! Perhaps the only thing that could make that insufferable movie suffereable.

Posted by: kjl291 at April 14, 2012 11:02 AM (cYMja)

181 Wow. You actually do get a result if you to go to youtube and search "nazi titanic."

Posted by: shibimi, existentialist at April 14, 2012 11:04 AM (z63Tr)

182 I watched James Cameron's two hour documentary on National Geographic. Until those last few minutes, its fascinating.  James Cameron shows himself to be a real wonk to get things right.  The artist who made a life from depicting RMS Titanic getting emotional talking about how his beloved ship actually looked was moving.  And then those last few minutes.

It wasn't that Cameron drew the wrong message from the sinking that got me.  It was something else.  For being shown to be such a wonk as to get the correct angle RMS Titanic was at before it snapped by using computer models, the faith he has in imprecise climate models is disturbing.  Only a fetish could explain such a dichotomy of thought, that he is a true believer.

Because of his movie Avatar and his personal mania, he will never get another dime from me.  Even if he manages to finally produce Battle Angel Alita, a property he had the rights on for more than a decade.  Never again.

And when I walked out of a cinema earlier this year after watching John Carter I saw the giant cardboard mock-up promoting Cameron's Titanic.  And I muttered, "It still sinks."

As you are reading A Night to Remember by Walter Lord, another momentous event he wrote on is coming up.  The book is called Incredible Victory and it's about the Battle of Midway.  This is the 70th Anniversary of that turning point in the Pacific War.  So few WWII vets are left, when the Doolittle Raiders meet next week in Dayton OH, only five of them are left.  Talk to them before they are finally gone.

Posted by: Anna Puma at April 14, 2012 12:05 PM (sHN/G)

183 @185

Bob Ballard also found the wreck of the USS Yorktown (CV-5) which was sunk @ Midway.

Posted by: Gran at April 14, 2012 12:34 PM (hl09R)

184

The only thing that kept Cameron's Titanic from sinking was Kate's hooters.

Posted by: Libra at April 14, 2012 12:41 PM (kd8U8)

185 Congrats, Cathy @2:23!

Posted by: it's just sense at April 14, 2012 03:18 PM (tSxym)

186 Obama is a stuttering clusterf*ck of a miserable failure.

Posted by: steevy at April 14, 2012 04:25 PM (6HIQG)

187 185 I haven't watched the new Cameron documentary yet, but I did see the short video of the computer re-enactment of the breakup and sinking. Cameron does seem to have a touching faith in computer modeling. He also is apparently a supporter of the high-angle breakup theory. In my opinion, the low-angle breakup theory which has been proposed in recent years is the most important advance in our understanding of the sinking since the fact of the breakup itself became known in 1985. The last wireless messages received from Titanic said that the engine room was flooding. Even as a child, I could never understand how that was possible if the stern was sticking up out of the water at a high angle. With the low-angle theory, it makes perfect sense. I continue to be intrigued by the "Jack Thayer drawing": http://www.photolib.noaa.gov/bigs/expl3052.jpg This was made aboard the Carpathia on April 15, mere hours after the sinking. It unequivocally shows that the ship broke up at the surface, yet the conventional wisdom for over 70 years held that it sank in one piece. The fifth and sixth panels accurately depict what we now know of the stern's behavior after the breakup. The stern does indeed lie on the bottom rotated 180º with respect to the bow's position. And Lightoller, who believed that it sank in one piece, did say that the stern stood "absolutely perpendicular" before the final plunge. But it's the fourth panel that interests me the most. It shows that the ship jackknifed during the breakup, and both the bow and stern were visible above the water at one point. Practically nobody has ever taken that seriously, but I wonder...

Posted by: rickl supports SMOD/Supervolcano 2012 at April 14, 2012 05:46 PM (sdi6R)

188 This is what happens to Ruthuglikkkans.

Posted by: Sherriff Joe Biden at April 14, 2012 06:23 PM (PevdC)

189 Have read several books on this; one of them has a theory that there was a fire in one of the coal bunkers that burned for nearly a week, resulting in weakened steel of a watertight door and bulkhead. This burst under the pressure of tons of water and helped to flood the lower portions of the ship. Also. most portholes were left open by passengers, which increased the water intake as the ship got lower in the water.

Posted by: grasshopper at April 14, 2012 06:37 PM (QCDQ6)

190 I see dead people!!!!eleventy!!!!111

Posted by: torabora at April 14, 2012 06:42 PM (PevdC)

191 190 I mean, for crying out loud, the caption actually reads, "Forward end floats, then sinks." Yet no depictions of the sinking, either pre-1985 or post-1985 have ever addressed that. What part of that phrase don't you understand?

Posted by: rickl supports SMOD/Supervolcano 2012 at April 14, 2012 07:07 PM (sdi6R)

192 I don't know if it's true that some passengers were locked up to prevent them from over-running the lifeboats, but if it is, then damn them.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at April 14, 2012 12:23 PM (piMMO)

.

Actually, the barred doors from third class to the upper decks were there to comply with US immigration laws, so now you know whom to damn.

Posted by: Vashta Nerada at April 15, 2012 06:34 PM (9lQzN)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
176kb generated in CPU 0.165, elapsed 0.3449 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.3101 seconds, 320 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.