January 10, 2012
— Gabriel Malor Just one starter today:
Voting took place in Dixville Notch, New Hampshire at 12:00pm last night. Polls closed one minute later. There were nine votes--2 Romney, 2 Huntsman, 1 Gingrich, and 1 Paul. Obama got 3 votes.
In nearby Hart's Landing, which votes after Dixville Notch, but before the rest of New Hampshire, Romney got 5 votes, Paul 4, Huntsman 2, Gingrich 1, and Perry 1.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
02:50 AM
| Comments (122)
Post contains 74 words, total size 1 kb.
The GA-Michigan State game was better. MI squeaked by in the 3rd overtime by a field goal. Now thatÂ’s some damn nail biter football.
Posted by: Vic at January 10, 2012 02:54 AM (YdQQY)
Fox wants you to vote on whether there is time for aomeone else to enter the Republican contest
Stirring the pot is all this is. Not a chance of doing anything but muddying the water even more.
Posted by: Vic at January 10, 2012 02:54 AM (YdQQY)
The federal Judge overseeing the VA ballot case has ordered a halt in printing VA ballots
That tends to make me think Perry has a chance there.
Posted by: Vic at January 10, 2012 02:55 AM (YdQQY)
How about a “criminal enterprise”? It is long past time to name a special prosecutor and start throwing some of these assholes in jail. I have been around this planet earth for quite a while now and this is the most lawless administration I have ever seen. Think about this folks, what if the MFM was actively engaged in hiding shit? How much more would come to the surface? Yes, THESE ARE the time that try men’s souls.
Posted by: Vic at January 10, 2012 02:55 AM (YdQQY)
Haley Barbour pardons a convicted murderer for unknown reasons
Of course the Democrats in MS jump all over it. I hope he knew WTF he was doing.
Posted by: Vic at January 10, 2012 02:56 AM (YdQQY)
Glenn Beck gets a little too wound up on his show
Throws his back out jumping on a coffee table and has to be taken out on a stretcher.
Posted by: Vic at January 10, 2012 02:57 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Minuteman at January 10, 2012 02:58 AM (acEq7)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 10, 2012 02:58 AM (niZvt)
Paul Ryan weighs in against SOPOA now
This bill is a POS and is eat up with “unintended consequences”. I put skuare quotes there because it is not clear to me that the bad shit is really unintended.
Posted by: Vic at January 10, 2012 02:58 AM (YdQQY)
DHS to now monitor news organizations and journalists
I swear, it is the most lawless aspects of FDR all over again. Standby all you MFM slugs who have been masticating his nether regions. If you deviate too far from the commie party line you will get shutdown. Maybe they use some new BS instead of the FCC and “fairness”. How about this, an anonymous claimant accused you of plagiarism. We are shutting you down until a full investigation is made. It will be a short time; possibly we can get it done in a couple of years. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Posted by: Vic at January 10, 2012 02:58 AM (YdQQY)
For those of you who thought Huntsman was OK and should be the next "anointed".
Maybe is he had said he hoped the GOP would become the GOP again it would have been better. But as long as we have liberals like him in office with an R after his name the GOP is being polluted.
Posted by: Vic at January 10, 2012 02:59 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Captain Hate at January 10, 2012 02:59 AM (9AVhU)
No matter what happens folks, donÂ’t look for any meaningful changes. There is too much money for the colleges at stake here. As long as the colleges control the outcome we will still have the stupid bowl system that starts with a bowl in Podunk, Hickstate between two teams with a 6-6 record and ends in a game between what are perceived as the two best teams.
They will NEVER go to a playoff system. It is insane.
Posted by: Vic at January 10, 2012 03:00 AM (YdQQY)
An aspirin a day keeps the heart attack away? Not so fast says this article in The Telegraph
When I saw this I jumped on it right away because my cardiologist has me taking a 300 mg aspirin a day along with Plavix. In this article they maintain that for healthy people the risks associated with bleeding may outweigh the benefits. For those like me who have had previous heart attacks they say the benefits are far greater so no changes.
Posted by: Vic at January 10, 2012 03:01 AM (YdQQY)
Note that is “near”. We are not talking about digging mine shafts in the face of the canyon. They are placing over 1 million acres off limits and killing 40% of the nation’s supply of Uranium. There is no logical or scientific reason for doing this.
Posted by: Vic at January 10, 2012 03:01 AM (YdQQY)
WOW, a pictorial essay for the Morons to drool over
No it is not women with bigunsÂ’. It is a CA junkyard that has a classic car collection worth millions. Yes, a junkyard.
Posted by: Vic at January 10, 2012 03:02 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 10, 2012 03:02 AM (niZvt)
And that is it for this morning. I will be in and out this morning, mostly out. Am hitting the rocking chair.
Posted by: Vic at January 10, 2012 03:03 AM (YdQQY)
It's a beautiful morning here in Casa Backwardio after the stunning defeat and humiliation of the nation's former #1 ranked team at the hands of my Crimson Tide.
Nice kitty, sit here on Bear's lap and be still...
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at January 10, 2012 03:03 AM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: Captain Hate at January 10, 2012 03:03 AM (9AVhU)
This bill is a POS and is eat up with “unintended consequences”. I put skuare quotes there because it is not clear to me that the bad shit is really unintended.
Have you ever noticed how “unintended consequences” in legislation always gives democrats the justification in their mind to expand their powers?
They are like destructive cockroaches on two legs, spreading pestilence and profiting from the results.
Posted by: Minuteman at January 10, 2012 03:04 AM (acEq7)
Posted by: Captain Hate at January 10, 2012 03:07 AM (9AVhU)
on the BCS game I posted the following on facebook, please don't take this as a diss Bama fans, its more of my continous pissed off attitude w/ the BCS:
Posted by: AuthorLMendez, Doesn't Hide Behind Socks To Make A Point at January 10, 2012 03:08 AM (3XDPM)
too early to make NH predictions:
1. Romney
2. Paul
3. Hunstman
4. Santorum
5. Gingrich
6. Perry
and don't forget I got Iowa 7/7 correct
Posted by: AuthorLMendez, Doesn't Hide Behind Socks To Make A Point at January 10, 2012 03:09 AM (3XDPM)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 10, 2012 03:09 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: Lincolntf at January 10, 2012 03:10 AM (hiMsy)
Also, on YouTube there is a video of Frank Luntz mocking Perry and Bachman until he sees there is a camera on him. Search on "Frank Luntz Unplugged."
Posted by: Miss Marple at January 10, 2012 03:11 AM (GoIUi)
Posted by: Bertram Cabot Jr. at January 10, 2012 03:12 AM (4Wc+9)
Posted by: Miss Marple at January 10, 2012 07:11 AM (GoIUi)
I saw that, why Hannity puts so much stock in a guy that has been proven to have focus groups that have been found to be easy to sneak into and lie about is beyond me
Posted by: AuthorLMendez, Doesn't Hide Behind Socks To Make A Point at January 10, 2012 03:13 AM (3XDPM)
Posted by: Miss Marple at January 10, 2012 03:15 AM (GoIUi)
Posted by: BurtTC at January 10, 2012 03:15 AM (Gc/Qi)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 10, 2012 03:15 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 10, 2012 03:16 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: BurtTC at January 10, 2012 07:15 AM (Gc/Qi)
actually when you look at his record on paper Hunstman would be a much better conservative alternative to Romney then all the other none-Romneys seem like but that being said Hunstman is the political equivalent of my brother. He gets off on flipping off the base and being mr. high and mighty and then wonders why folks dont like him. when folks rather have Romney then you and would back Santorum before they consider you a none-Mitt you're in pretty bad shape.
Posted by: AuthorLMendez, Doesn't Hide Behind Socks To Make A Point at January 10, 2012 03:18 AM (3XDPM)
Posted by: BurtTC at January 10, 2012 03:18 AM (Gc/Qi)
Agreed that the BCS needs a serious overhaul. IIRC, the crawler on ESPN said that their committee would be meeting soon and that "all kinds of things" would be discussed.
With some 35 total bowl games, it seems as though they could devise some sort of playoff system within that framework. But we all know better than that.
And, just a refute, Bama didn't "back in" to the game: they had the best defense in the country all season long and losing to the (now formerly) #1 ranked team in the toughest conference in the country is not a disqualifier.
They would have done the same thing, only worse, to any other team. Also, if you aren't brought up watching SEC football, you just don't appreciate defense, especially Bama's. If that had been offense, the score would've been 70-0.
In the first half.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at January 10, 2012 03:18 AM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: Lincolntf at January 10, 2012 03:20 AM (hiMsy)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 10, 2012 03:20 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: BurtTC at January 10, 2012 03:20 AM (Gc/Qi)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at January 10, 2012 03:20 AM (d0Tfm)
Yes, I knew that, it was a literary quote.
Posted by: Vic at January 10, 2012 03:21 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: AuthorLMendez, Doesn't Hide Behind Socks To Make A Point at January 10, 2012 03:21 AM (3XDPM)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 10, 2012 03:22 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: Newt "B-List" Gingrich. at January 10, 2012 03:23 AM (jiwQf)
And, just a refute, Bama didn't "back in" to the game: they had the best defense in the country all season long and losing to the (now formerly) #1 ranked team in the toughest conference in the country is not a disqualifier.
and here lies the problem w/ the BCS, we can go tit for tat, as I said Bama got LSU at home and lost earlier in the season, meanwhile OK State had a tougher schedule and more wins VS winning teams
I mean w/ the BCS format, I dont see why LSU fans can't argue they deserve the National title every bit as Bamaor OK State does
Posted by: AuthorLMendez, Doesn't Hide Behind Socks To Make A Point at January 10, 2012 03:24 AM (3XDPM)
Posted by: McLovin at January 10, 2012 03:24 AM (j0IcY)
OK going into the kitchen and cranking up music . bbl
Posted by: Vic at January 10, 2012 03:25 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: AuthorLMendez, Doesn't Hide Behind Socks To Make A Point at January 10, 2012 07:13 AM (3XDPM)
They purport to be the "wise undecided", people who calmly weigh the arguments "fer" and "agin" and then choose vote their consciences for the "best" candidate. In reality, they're American Idol, Jersey Shore and The Kardashians watchers who can't be bothered to pay attention to anything but those triumphs of American culture.
IOW, the Fredo Corleones of the electorate: I can handle things! IÂ’m smart! Not like everybody saysÂ… like dumbÂ… IÂ’m smart and I want respect!
Posted by: Jeremiad was a Bullfrog at January 10, 2012 03:28 AM (Og1Kk)
Posted by: AuthorLMendez, Doesn't Hide Behind Socks To Make A Point at January 10, 2012 03:29 AM (3XDPM)
I mean w/ the BCS format, I dont see why LSU fans can't argue they deserve the National title every bit as Bamaor OK State does
IIRC, the title got split a few years back. And yeah, the BCS is hoplessly screwed, kinda like we are with teh Pubbie candidates. If it weren't for two little numbers (one of them is a 21 and the other one is a zero) LSU might have an argument for the title.
The idea of the Number One versus the Number Two team sounds good, and is how it should be, but the execution is seriously flawed with the BCS.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at January 10, 2012 03:29 AM (d0Tfm)
So I guess that means the presidency is decided then. Four more years of Obama with Romney the top failure from the GOP.
Whew! Our work here is done.
Posted by: Your Media & Political Betters at January 10, 2012 03:31 AM (eHIJJ)
Posted by: wheatie at January 10, 2012 03:32 AM (oPkw3)
Posted by: wheatie at January 10, 2012 07:32 AM (oPkw3)
+1
Posted by: AuthorLMendez, Doesn't Hide Behind Socks To Make A Point at January 10, 2012 03:34 AM (3XDPM)
23 Rasmussen weighs in on Romney and the Primary process
It's heartening to hear him talk about what a fucked up primary process we have.....and that he thinks it won't survive this way much longer.
Posted by: wheatie at January 10, 2012 03:37 AM (oPkw3)
Posted by: AuthorLMendez, Doesn't Hide Behind Socks To Make A Point at January 10, 2012 03:39 AM (3XDPM)
The federal Judge overseeing the VA ballot case has ordered a halt in printing VA ballots
That tends to make me think Perry has a chance there.
Posted by: Vic at January 10, 2012 06:55 AM (YdQQY)
Good morning, Vic, and thanks for the links.
I might agree except that I know how my luck usually runs (seems Perry has similar luck, like that old song they used to sing on Hee Haw), so there's no chance in hell I'll end up getting to vote for him. But it's nice to hope, I suppose. (shrug)
Posted by: davidinvirginia at January 10, 2012 03:40 AM (cPJUK)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at January 10, 2012 03:40 AM (d0Tfm)
It's heartening to hear him talk about what a fucked up primary process we have.....and that he thinks it won't survive this way much longer.
Posted by: wheatie at January 10, 2012 07:37 AM (oPkw3)
time for my dream of a National 1 day primary?
Posted by: AuthorLMendez, Doesn't Hide Behind Socks To Make A Point at January 10, 2012 03:41 AM (3XDPM)
Posted by: davidinvirginia at January 10, 2012 03:42 AM (cPJUK)
Marshalling all the strategic intellect and tactical experience he and his crack team of advisors have, Rick Perry has jumped on the Bain Capital is evil/”I like to fire people” meme.
The flow of stupid creates a vortex that sucks the air out of the room.
It is inexplicable how Perry can still be polling at half of Buddy RoemerÂ’s total. Who are these 1%?
Posted by: jwest at January 10, 2012 03:43 AM (FdndL)
Posted by: Captain Hate at January 10, 2012 06:59 AM (9AVhU)
Yes.
Posted by: davidinvirginia at January 10, 2012 03:44 AM (cPJUK)
69....time for my dream of a National 1 day primary?
--------
I have the same dream, Author.
It's the only fair way to do it. .....The media, and this small handful of early states, are using our primary system for monetary gain, and to unfairly exert power over the election. It is an outrage.
Posted by: wheatie at January 10, 2012 03:44 AM (oPkw3)
@2. ".....Alabama won the BCS game in a really crappy contest. First shutout in BCS history."
Some folks just don't apprciate defense.
Perhapse the Alamo Bowl was more to their liking. Baylor-67, Washington-56. The highest-scoring regulation bowl game in history. Without defense you have a basketball score. Congrats Baylor btw. and Heisman Trophy winner Robert Griffin III, QB, Baylor.
Without defense you go to the Alamo Bowl. With defense you play for the National Championship. That's the difference. Alabama-21, LSU-0.
Posted by: Case at January 10, 2012 03:45 AM (DYR2Q)
You mad, bro?
Posted by: toby928© at January 10, 2012 03:45 AM (GTbGH)
I have the same dream, Author.
It's the only fair way to do it. .....The media, and this small handful of early states, are using our primary system for monetary gain, and to unfairly exert power over the election. It is an outrage.
Posted by: wheatie at January 10, 2012 07:44 AM (oPkw3)
yep and it creates the 50 state on the ground strategy that will help for the General w/o wishing for a close primary that goes until June and into the convention
Posted by: AuthorLMendez, Doesn't Hide Behind Socks To Make A Point at January 10, 2012 03:50 AM (3XDPM)
time for my dream of a National 1 day primary?
Posted by: AuthorLMendez, Doesn't Hide Behind Socks To Make A Point at January 10, 2012 07:41 AM (3XDPM)
Wouldn't that just benefit the guys with the most money and largest campaign organizations?
Posted by: Robert at January 10, 2012 03:52 AM (4ixH5)
Posted by: wheatie at January 10, 2012 07:32 AM (oPkw3)
Credibility went out the window at FNC a long, long time ago.
Posted by: davidinvirginia at January 10, 2012 03:53 AM (cPJUK)
Posted by: toby928© at January 10, 2012 07:45 AM (GTbGH)
Not especially. I generally try to make it a point not to support corrupt systems when it's possible. Which is why I don't bother following college football anymore, at least not the professional division.
Posted by: davidinvirginia at January 10, 2012 03:57 AM (cPJUK)
78....Wouldn't that just benefit the guys with the most money and largest campaign organizations?
----------
How so? ......Seems to me that it would help all of the campaigns, small and large. They wouldn't have to start so early, if all the primaries were held on one day, in the Spring of the election year.
Posted by: wheatie at January 10, 2012 03:57 AM (oPkw3)
Posted by: Case at January 10, 2012 07:45 AM (DYR2Q)
Five field goals... an effin' Garabed Sarkis "Garo" Yepremian Bowl, called by Brent Mushmouthberger. Watched nearly all of second quarter before moving on at halftime to watch paint dry.
Posted by: Jeremiad was a Bullfrog at January 10, 2012 03:58 AM (Og1Kk)
Posted by: The Committee to Elect Jeb Bush in 2016, K. Rove, Chairman at January 10, 2012 04:03 AM (kkQ6Q)
Hope the Boeing plant in SC works out!
Posted by: Hrothgar at January 10, 2012 04:03 AM (i3+c5)
1. Candidates would need more staff because they couldn't move them from state to state as they do now.
2. Candidates without money for private planes would be hampered by the airline schedules.
3. Large delegate states would get all of the appearances. Small states would be expected to decide based on cable and network TV appearances.
4. More money would be needed for TV ads.
5. A candidate with a large following but a murky record could win, only to have dirty laundry aired after the nomination was decided.
Posted by: Miss Marple at January 10, 2012 04:06 AM (GoIUi)
Posted by: moki at January 10, 2012 04:09 AM (dZmFh)
1. Candidates would need more staff because they couldn't move them from state to state as they do now.
2. Candidates without money for private planes would be hampered by the airline schedules.
3. Large delegate states would get all of the appearances. Small states would be expected to decide based on cable and network TV appearances.
4. More money would be needed for TV ads.
5. A candidate with a large following but a murky record could win, only to have dirty laundry aired after the nomination was decided.
Posted by: Miss Marple at January 10, 2012 08:06 AM (GoIUi)
I agree. We surely need a different setup than now, but a national one-day primary is not the way to go. You'd just get the current MSM/Beltway GOP shoving-the-chosen-guy-down-our-throats system pumped up on steroids with that.
Maybe have multi-state regionals on a rotating basis...or just have 4-5 primaries in states from different regions on the same day, and make sure they're balanced between faux-Republican states and real ones unlike now. Most anything that would get rid of this "first in the nation" BS would help. And no damn open primaries or caucuses unless you want your state to be last in line to vote.
Posted by: davidinvirginia at January 10, 2012 04:14 AM (cPJUK)
I have come to loathe Iowa and New Hampshire, and not just for this year. New Hampshire's demanding and arrogant voters who think they are the smartest, and the Iowa caucus-goers who vote based on what their pastor says have completely disgusted me. I will not visit either state, ever. If I have to drive the Interstate through Iowa I will fill my tank and eat a meal and then drive straight through, so they won't get a nickle from me.
Posted by: Miss Marple at January 10, 2012 04:21 AM (GoIUi)
Posted by: Andy at January 10, 2012 04:22 AM (XG+Mn)
I have come to loathe Iowa and New Hampshire, and not just for this year. New Hampshire's demanding and arrogant voters who think they are the smartest, and the Iowa caucus-goers who vote based on what their pastor says have completely disgusted me. I will not visit either state, ever. If I have to drive the Interstate through Iowa I will fill my tank and eat a meal and then drive straight through, so they won't get a nickle from me.
Posted by: Miss Marple at January 10, 2012 08:21 AM (GoIUi)
I mostly enjoyed the 6 years that I lived in New Hampshire, but a state with the demographics of NH has no business having this much influence in picking a presidential nominee. No one state should. And it was way more conservative back then than it is now, after the flood of refugees from the surrounding socialist enclaves moved there.
Posted by: davidinvirginia at January 10, 2012 04:35 AM (cPJUK)
Huntsman failed to qualify for Arizona's February 28 presidential preference election after his filing paperwork -- which was turned in only two hours before Monday's 5 p.m. deadline -- was rejected due to a "notary issue," according to Secretary of State spokesman Matt Roberts. Huntsman's nomination forms were ruled "incomplete" because they were "missing the candidate's original notarized signature,"
When the qualifying period closed, 29 candidates -- six Green Party contenders, and 23 Republicans -- had filed the necessary paperwork for the February 28 ballot. Among them were Huntsman's five major opponents for the Republican presidential nomination, all of whom will appear on the Arizona ballot after their paperwork was approved.
Making the rejection all the more embarrassing for Huntsman is the fact that Arizona has some of the easiest ballot requirements in the country: Candidates needed only to submit a notarized statement of application to qualify -- no voter signatures, no petitions, nothing.
D'oh!
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at January 10, 2012 04:44 AM (3wBRE)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 10, 2012 07:20 AM (niZvt)
Yeah, don't remind me. We don't like them and want them to go back where they were spawned.
I really would not be surprised to see Nor Luap receive a strong showing here in the Granite State today. Drive around the state a while and you will see a lot of Romney signs, heavy pockets of Gingrich or Perry signs, but Nor Luap posters, signs, bumper stickers, handmade banners, etc, etc, all over the place. Tacked up on overpasses, strung between trees along the highway, everywhere.
I think I'm going to go ahead and vote for Perry. If Romney is "destined" to win my state, my family and I have agreed that the least we can do is show him that the best he's going to get is a plurality not a majority, to remind him that he's not the anointed one, he's just a mildly palatable Not Obama. It's between Perry and Gingrich for me, and I'm just more inclined to Perry's conservative record of recent years.
So, y'all know how I'm gonna vote. Let's see who else among my New Hampshirite lads and lassies agree with me!
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit at January 10, 2012 04:50 AM (4df7R)
http://bit.ly/A27EnF
And surprise of surprises, the NAACP seems to be trying to spin the story that using slavery in math class was some sort of anti-black plot instead of the usual jam the multi-culti agenda down the kiddies' throats. Despite the fact the school is 60% Hispanic, 28% Black, 5% Asian & 4% White.
Posted by: jeannebodine at January 10, 2012 04:51 AM (byR8d)
Posted by: Miss Marple at January 10, 2012 08:21 AM (GoIUi)
Miss Marple, I must politely disagree. As a NH voter, I can say most of us DON'T think we're the "smartest" voters out there. Only the snobby ones who seem to end up on television believe that, and I imagine that's the same in every state.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit at January 10, 2012 04:56 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: rightlysouthern at January 10, 2012 05:06 AM (EP6th)
Star Wars: Underworld
Producer and longtime George Lucas collaborator Rick McCallum dropped some key hints about the long-planned live-action Star Wars TV show. McCallum revealed the show's working title is Star Wars: Underworld, it is indeed set between Revenge of the Sith and A New Hope, that "it's about that period when the Empire is trying to take things [over]", and that the show's primary focus will be on the criminal underbelly of the Star Wars universe.
McCallum elaborates:
"It's underneath what's going on. It's the criminals and the gangs. The guys who are running Wall Street, basically. The guys who are running the United States."
IO9
Occupy Coruscant
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at January 10, 2012 05:09 AM (3wBRE)
WASHINGTON-- When Michelle Obama worked in Mayor Daley's City Hall in the early 1990s, she was "distressed" by how a small group of "white Irish Catholic" families -- the Daleys, the Hynes and the Madigans -- "locked up" power in Illinois.
But a picture of her as Marie Antoinette is racist
Posted by: TheQuietMan at January 10, 2012 05:19 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit at January 10, 2012 08:50 AM (4df7R)
This is especially true up north in The White Mountain/North Conway area.Ron Paul somehow strikes a chord up here.
NH is not a easily classified. The built up areas just north of MA where you get the TV coverage are far different than the more rural areas further North.
Voting for Perry but under no illusions that this will help at all.
The Dixville Notch BS is way, way overdone and really is a media novelty only.
Posted by: ontherocks at January 10, 2012 05:20 AM (HBqDo)
Posted by: Gem at January 10, 2012 05:21 AM (zw+pb)
With hope in one hand and MrWinkieCzech in the other?
Posted by: DaveA at January 10, 2012 05:26 AM (t/mAc)
I should have known NORMAL people wouldn't be interviewed by the TV crews. They do the same thing here in Indiana, only they look for fat, toothless people.
I apologize sincerely. I must need more coffee!
Posted by: Miss Marple at January 10, 2012 05:28 AM (GoIUi)
Posted by: mike at January 10, 2012 05:29 AM (4DTcG)
Posted by: graywolf at January 10, 2012 05:35 AM (x+SpT)
@105
While Barbour's office hasn't responded to messages about the pardons, he told the AP in 2008 that releasing the trusties who live and work at the mansion is a tradition in Mississippi that goes back decades. Work by trusties would typically include kitchen duty, waiting tables, cleaning and washing vehicles, officials said.
Barbour created a similar stir by releasing convicted killer Michael Graham in 2008. Barbour later defended "the custom" of governors reducing the sentences of the mansion's inmate workers if they behave.
Barbour's three predecessors, dating back to 1988, gave some type of early release or pardon to a total of 12 Governor's Mansion trusties. All but two of them had been convicted of murder. One was serving time for forgery and another for armed robbery and aggravated assault.
Epps, the corrections commissioner, told the AP in 2008 that the inmates who end up working at the Governor's Mansion are often convicted murderers because they are the ones who serve long enough sentences to build the trust needed for such a task.
Da heck?
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at January 10, 2012 05:46 AM (3wBRE)
Thankfully, this comes out early enough to preclude Barbour being put on a VP candidate list.
Posted by: Miss Marple at January 10, 2012 05:52 AM (GoIUi)
Posted by: mike at January 10, 2012 05:57 AM (4DTcG)
Posted by: Gem at January 10, 2012 06:03 AM (zw+pb)
In this article they maintain that for healthy people the risks associated with bleeding may outweigh the benefits. For those like me who have had previous heart attacks they say the benefits are far greater so no changes.
Yeah, that's the way a lot of these things go -- recommendations for people with issues get inappropriately extended to healthy people. My feeling is that if you are a healthy person and you have to down a handful of pills each morning, you're doing it wrong. I'm always amused that at those "health food" grocery stores about a quarter of the space is allotted to pills/supplements.
Posted by: Y-not at January 10, 2012 06:04 AM (5H6zj)
Here's an article about her.
I don't know anything about her yet -- and I think I'm still in Chaffetz's district with the new lines drawn -- but I'll see if I learn anything. It would be nice to get rid of Matheson.
Posted by: Y-not at January 10, 2012 06:09 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: real joe at January 10, 2012 06:34 AM (w7Lv+)
Posted by: rockmom at January 10, 2012 06:55 AM (NYnoe)
Posted by: rockmom at January 10, 2012 06:57 AM (qE3AR)
Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at January 10, 2012 07:13 AM (YmPwQ)
Solution for the BCS? Limit state-supported schools to recruiting only from their own and contiguous states, reimplement core curriculum, require a 2.5 grade average. Bookies will starve. Why, it will ruin the game forever. The military academies will start looking like the big time.
Anybody watch the NCAA non-bowl playoffs? Pretty good games, mostly.
Posted by: comatus at January 10, 2012 07:33 AM (ySTXt)
Posted by: mike at January 10, 2012 07:36 AM (4DTcG)
Posted by: Smart Trust ePub at January 10, 2012 11:04 PM (DLvML)
Posted by: A Universe from Nothing iBooks at January 10, 2012 11:26 PM (+M9J5)
Posted by: Greedy Bastards ePub at January 11, 2012 12:07 AM (wwGAA)
Posted by: The Obamas ePub at January 11, 2012 12:16 AM (Cndsw)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2145 seconds, 250 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Good Morning Morons. Its Tuesday January 10th and I guess the Tide rolled in last night. “These are the times that try men’s souls”. I quote that because on this day in 1776 Thomas Pain started the news pamphlet Common Sense. So Jossen, take heart, we may no longer have a Thomas Jefferson but we have hundreds of Thomas Paines out there penning today’s version of “Common Sense”. The trick will be getting the general public to see those modern day pamphlets. The news pamphlet of 1776 has become the MFM today and it is no longer balanced and no longer cares about freedom. We have to push conservative blogs. Get the readership of these up and the public will swing our way. When the public swings our way, the politicians will follow. Because no matter what there is one thing they are ALWAYS concerned with and that is getting elected. Now on the news.
Posted by: Vic at January 10, 2012 02:52 AM (YdQQY)