Ace of Spades HQ

January 25, 2012

Top Headline Comments 1-25-12
— Gabriel Malor

Happy Wednesday.

Posted by: Gabriel Malor at 03:00 AM | Comments (131)
Post contains 10 words, total size 1 kb.

Good Morning Morons. Its Wednesday January 25^th, 2012. On this day of infamy in 1890 the United Mine Workers was formed.

Posted by: Vic at January 25, 2012 03:00 AM (YdQQY)

All the news this morning is on the shitty SOTU campaign speech. No point in trying to link. The man just has a lot of gall running on his Â“economic recordÂ” and calling for offshore drilling after defying multiple court orders to issue permits.

Amazingly F&F this morning played clips of his lies and actually called him on it. They really expanded on the Buffet secretary lie, but they didnÂ’t hit the core of it. They appear to be just as confused as the general public on effective tax rate vs marginal tax rate.

Posted by: Vic at January 25, 2012 03:01 AM (YdQQY)

3 Obama is a SCOAMF

Posted by: Flapjackmaka at January 25, 2012 03:01 AM (zv6N6)

Nanny Botox threatens to release Gingrich material. Perhaps she forgets that the Republican control the ethics committee now. But, IÂ’m sure with Boner in charge she has nothing to worry about.

http://is.gd/PgNicq

Posted by: Vic at January 25, 2012 03:01 AM (YdQQY)

It appears Rubio is siding with Romney

http://is.gd/gmV87N

Posted by: Vic at January 25, 2012 03:02 AM (YdQQY)

6 I'm feeling bold today.

Posted by: GnuBreed at January 25, 2012 03:02 AM (BhuDE)

7 Love how drudge totally ignored sotu

Posted by: Flapjackmaka at January 25, 2012 03:02 AM (zv6N6)

Obama announces financial crimes unit. WTF, I thought we had that already, its called the SEC. But hell, all they do is sit around and watch porn on gov computers.

http://is.gd/AgEjxa

Posted by: Vic at January 25, 2012 03:02 AM (YdQQY)

9 January 24, 2012 will go down in history as the Greatest SOTU Speech EVAH, so says MSPMS...

Posted by: CoolCzech at January 25, 2012 03:02 AM (niZvt)

SC Republican Tim Scott all over Obama for race baiting. I still think that since he was elected in a non-minority majority district we should have gerrymandered ClyburnÂ’s district away.

http://is.gd/w8DMYM

And West gets into the picture slamming Clyburn

http://is.gd/8ypbVn

Posted by: Vic at January 25, 2012 03:02 AM (YdQQY)

SC legislature and Haley going after unions. The NLRB screwed around with the wrong State.

http://is.gd/6i916h

Posted by: Vic at January 25, 2012 03:03 AM (YdQQY)

Navy Seals free hostages and kill Somalie pirates

http://is.gd/iFDbDc

Posted by: Vic at January 25, 2012 03:03 AM (YdQQY)

Government by edict is now the norm. Its not just Obamacare it everything now.

http://is.gd/nyJfue

Posted by: Vic at January 25, 2012 03:03 AM (YdQQY)

14 Sorry Nancy, but first we'll have to elect Gingrich before you can show us what's in him...

Posted by: CoolCzech at January 25, 2012 03:03 AM (niZvt)

15 That's it for news today. I see Pixy is still having problems. I hope ace has "taken care" of the turd that has caused all this.

Posted by: Vic at January 25, 2012 03:04 AM (YdQQY)

16 FACT CHECK: Obama pushes plans that flopped before --

The AP has slammed King Putt's bold new vision for us; they are amazingly harsh considering the source.

http://tinyurl.com/6wbhmws

Posted by: [b]GnuBreed[/b] at January 25, 2012 03:05 AM (BhuDE)

17 morning all. Thanks for the news Vic. Woke multiple times here to the sound of heavy thunder. (Woke last night to the sound of thunder.. isn't that from a song?Oh yeah, Night Moves) Got some good rain but need about oh I don't know 12 more inches, preferably in a steady soaking pattern.

Posted by: San Antonio Rose at January 25, 2012 03:05 AM (DCDCq)

18 Why doesnt rubio just endorse? Doesnt want gunk on his face like haley

Posted by: Flapjackmaka at January 25, 2012 03:06 AM (lm+B8)

19 It's been raining here on and off for the past week. We needed the rain as well.

Posted by: Vic at January 25, 2012 03:06 AM (YdQQY)

20 I didn't watch the SOTU address but every clip that F&F played this morning was an outrageous lie. It is simply amazing. He has no shame at all.

Posted by: Vic at January 25, 2012 03:07 AM (YdQQY)

21 Bob Woodward on Morning Schmoe saying the "average voter" would like Obama's SOTU fail a lot more than anything the Republicans are saying. I grew up and my mom still lives about a mile away from this idiot. Just so you know, there is not an "average voter" in that entire town. Although technically, the average voter is still white, and there's not a single non-Asian minority living in that town, so maybe he means it in that sense.

Posted by: mugiwara at January 25, 2012 03:09 AM (KI/Ch)

22 Uh, teh headlines say 1/24/12. I know this can't be right because today is my 37th anniversary.

Posted by: bergerbilder at January 25, 2012 03:10 AM (j+Izh)

23 I grew up and my mom still lives about a mile away from this idiot. Just so you know, there is not an "average voter" in that entire town. Although technically, the average voter is still white, and there's not a single non-Asian minority living in that town, so maybe he means it in that sense.

LOL, that reminds me of a troll we had on here months ago who was talking about how racist Sc was when he briefly lived here. And how he had played with all his "black" friends in a small town in Maine.

I went and did some checking. Small towns in Maine have no blacks living there. I have more blacks living in my "racist" neighborhood that the average town in Maine.

Posted by: Vic at January 25, 2012 03:14 AM (YdQQY)

24 Testing.

Posted by: BackwardsBoy at January 25, 2012 03:14 AM (d0Tfm)

25 Mugiwara, just checked. New chapter out!

Posted by: Flapjackmaka at January 25, 2012 03:15 AM (lm+B8)

26 Speaking of average voters, wasn't it not too long ago we heard the average voters was firmly against Obamacare? Isn't that the main reason for the 2010 election results? So then why don't Republicans run on that, make this election a referendum on Obamacare? Oh, that's right, because we're about to nominate, not the father of Obamacare, but its grandfather.

Posted by: BurtTC at January 25, 2012 03:15 AM (Gc/Qi)

27 22 Uh, teh headlines say 1/24/12. I know this can't be right because today is my 37th anniversary. Posted by: bergerbilder at January 25, 2012 07:10 AM (j+Izh) This blog's been around for over 37 years? I bet there were some wicked sideburns back in '74.

Posted by: alppuccino at January 25, 2012 03:15 AM (ajYOJ)

28 Pixy has been fixing a few things. You can now use bold, italics, underline and strike. Use the brackets [ ] and close brackets [/ ] to add the features to your text.

Good to see those Somali assholes taking the long dirt nap.

Posted by: GnuBreed at January 25, 2012 03:16 AM (BhuDE)

29 Apparently, I can't even paste a link into this thing today.

Posted by: BackwardsBoy at January 25, 2012 03:16 AM (d0Tfm)

30 The Vic Report, brought to you by *Normal Os! Breakfast of Morons

Posted by: some dope at January 25, 2012 03:17 AM (+kznc)

Bryan York on the Gingrich ethics case - and eventual vindication. Can't image Pelosi has much on Gingrich is this is all there is to it.

http://tinyurl.com/7bkexma

Posted by: Lymond at January 25, 2012 03:17 AM (RxLT6)

32 I tried the italics earlier and they still did not work. Of course, they were intermittent before anyway.

Posted by: Vic at January 25, 2012 03:17 AM (YdQQY)

33 I can't even paste the link by itself.

Posted by: BackwardsBoy at January 25, 2012 03:17 AM (d0Tfm)

34 I guess I've been semi-banned?

Posted by: BackwardsBoy at January 25, 2012 03:18 AM (d0Tfm)

35 18 - Good question, I would assume it's not about NOT getting Mittgoo on one's face, but how much. Rubio has so sincerely and frequently dismissed the notion of him being the Veep choice, at this point I believe that means he's a virtual lock for the Veep choice.

Posted by: BurtTC at January 25, 2012 03:19 AM (Gc/Qi)

36 So to italicize, use [ i] words [/ i].....just remove the space in those brackets and you are in business.

Like so.

Posted by: GnuBreed at January 25, 2012 03:19 AM (BhuDE)

37 31 - Maybe she let him get to third base while they were sitting together on that couch?

Posted by: BurtTC at January 25, 2012 03:21 AM (Gc/Qi)

38 Backwards boy, links still don't work. Use tinyurl and paste it; then others can highlight it and open in a new tab.

Posted by: GnuBreed at January 25, 2012 03:22 AM (BhuDE)

39 Let me try this. Somebody at LightSquared tried to bribe Sen. Grassley.http://tinyurl.com/6lj29vs

Posted by: BackwardsBoy at January 25, 2012 03:23 AM (d0Tfm)

40 This blog's been around for over 37 years? I bet there were some wicked sideburns back in '74. 2012 - 1974 = 38 38 is over 37. And, the lambchops are still trimmed 2/yr.

Posted by: bergerbilder at January 25, 2012 03:23 AM (j+Izh)

41 OK. Gnu, that seems to work, thanks.

Posted by: BackwardsBoy at January 25, 2012 03:24 AM (d0Tfm)

42 If pelosi knows anything, then the republicans on the commitee would know as well and thus tell mitt. And i find it hard to believe they did not drop all their nukes to get rid of gingrich in the 90s. Besides, mitts hounddogs should be able to find something

Posted by: Flapjackmaka at January 25, 2012 03:25 AM (lm+B8)

43 31 Posted by: Lymond at January 25, 2012 07:17 AM (RxLT6)

That was the other article I was going to post...good job. Yeah, Byron goes into a lot of detail why the whole Newt ethics investigation/fine was a big nothing burger.

It eased my mind on that particular point about Gingrich quite a bit.

Posted by: GnuBreed at January 25, 2012 03:25 AM (BhuDE)

44 Vic, please put the link in your name.

Posted by: Eddie Baby at January 25, 2012 03:28 AM (OJLC+)

45 Maybe she let him get to third base while they were sitting together on that couch?

Posted by: BurtTC

Disturbing image.

Posted by: Crying Boner at January 25, 2012 03:29 AM (N2yhW)

It eased my mind on that particular point about Gingrich quite a bit. And IIRC Pelosi can't disclose anything from the committee hearings without getting in trouble herself, which under this regime, doesn't mean much these days...

Posted by: BackwardsBoy at January 25, 2012 03:29 AM (d0Tfm)

47 Sprays sock-a-way.

Posted by: dogfish at January 25, 2012 03:29 AM (N2yhW)

48 Posted by: SchrÃ¶dinger's cat at January 25, 2012 07:28 AM (phlKA)

Yeah, plus all the locks used to lock up every ounce of metal in the US before the thieves cart it all off for scrap.

Posted by: GnuBreed at January 25, 2012 03:30 AM (BhuDE)

49 Like so?

Posted by: Empire of Jeff at January 25, 2012 03:31 AM (DiqH3)

50 26 Mugiwara, just checked. New chapter out!

Posted by: Flapjackmaka at January 25, 2012 07:15 AM (lm+B

I know, and I'm off to work, damnit! Don't spoil it for me!

Posted by: mugiwara at January 25, 2012 03:33 AM (KI/Ch)

51 Vic, please put the link in your name.

I did that once yesterday but I gathered from the comments that Pixy would rather we didn't do that. That is what created this mess to begin with. Someone putting html in the name slot.

Posted by: Vic at January 25, 2012 03:33 AM (YdQQY)

52 I mean in URL: slot.

Posted by: Eddie Baby at January 25, 2012 03:35 AM (OJLC+)

From the Obamacare article link above,

"A government of laws, not men" is among the most famous maxims produced by the American Revolution and the authors of the Constitution which was its ultimate fruit.

Alas - what people forget is that laws are simply the tools of men, used to govern. Only men who are willing to make themselves subject to law can operate in a system where there is what we like to call "rule of law." I think it would be more accurate to call it "rule BY law" which is a more accurate descriptor of what is happening in such a case. Anyway, the last couple Dem presidents have shown that if they choose not to obey the laws, they are not compelled to do so. They can do as they wish without consequence to themselves.

Only by having the right men in power, who can only be the product of a healthy culture, can we hope to have a just and orderly system. Right now we're ruled by a gang of thugs, who use the law as nothing more than a tool to impute guilt to their enemies. I'm not confident that our culture produces good men, suitable for political leadership, in adequate suppply to rememdy the situation.

Posted by: Reactionary at January 25, 2012 03:36 AM (xUM1Q)

54 Pxy fixed it so we can use bb code, so...

Test

Posted by: Robert at January 25, 2012 03:36 AM (4ixH5)

55 Nevermind, guess that doesn't work.

Posted by: Robert at January 25, 2012 03:37 AM (4ixH5)

56 Gahhh... this formatting issue is so annoying.

Posted by: Reactionary at January 25, 2012 03:37 AM (xUM1Q)

OK, y'all, I'm off to the salt mine once more. Have fun and let's hope Pixy gets this AceTML fixed soon.

Posted by: BackwardsBoy at January 25, 2012 03:42 AM (d0Tfm)

58 Awww, little Nancy knows something. For someone who's first job as a child was collecting kickback envelopes of cash to her corrupt daddy, she outta know better. Don't open your cannoli hole until it is time.

Posted by: Innernet Idjit at January 25, 2012 03:43 AM (j84s0)

59 56 Robert, just the 4 commands I listed work for now -- bold, italics, strike and underline......I think.

Also, if you fail to close a command it will not carry forward to the next post. So you might italicize your entire post as a result but it won't wreck the whole thread.

And yes, the commands work in your sig.

Pixy is working hard and I offer thanks.

Posted by: GnuBreed at January 25, 2012 03:43 AM (BhuDE)

SOTU word cloud from zerohedge

http://tinyurl.com/7z6sgy8

The relative prominence of 'now' and 'new' caught my eye. That fits well with his auto industry like slogan for the economy: Built to Last.

Posted by: Nash Rambler at January 25, 2012 03:44 AM (oxgwp)

61 Go Pixy! You da wo(man)?

Posted by: bergerbilder at January 25, 2012 03:45 AM (j+Izh)

62 46 - I'm only partially kidding. All politicians lie, of course, so you can't be sure she's not completely bluffing, but I think she's hinting that she has something. As has been pointed out, I don't think it's anything subject to non-disclosure in his ethics probe, and if not, what else? Imagine the joy the Dems would have if they could damage an R nominee for President with a sex scandal. We all know about Newt's marital problems, so the only sex-related thing that could do real damage now... is if they had proof he cheated on the current wife.

Posted by: BurtTC at January 25, 2012 03:45 AM (Gc/Qi)

63 The only thing I remember about Newt ethics violations was something about he was teaching at some college while he was a member of congress. For some reason they had a rule against it. Sounded stupid to me.

Posted by: Case at January 25, 2012 03:47 AM (DYR2Q)

64 65 - Yeah, speaking fees or a book deal or something like that. Needless to say, they tend not to enforce those sorts of "ethics" rules unless and until it's politically useful to do so.

Posted by: BurtTC at January 25, 2012 03:49 AM (Gc/Qi)

65 What did the Obamas do to earn $1.8M last year?

Posted by: toby928© at January 25, 2012 03:51 AM (GTbGH)

66 Morning folks....thanks for the links, Vic.

The SOTU must have been boring even by President Petulant standards. The usual DNC groupies at my regular business news web site who generally go into orgasmic happy dances every time The One emits gas of any sort are deathly quiet about his speech this morning. If they're not excited about it, odds are no one outside the Beltway and various F&F hosts and hostesses ("ho"s for short) will be either.

And the weather is really nice for late January in the mountains...supposed to be sunny and upper 50s today. You could almost forget the SCoaMT even exists.

Posted by: davidinvirginia at January 25, 2012 03:52 AM (cPJUK)

67 Oh, and one of those previous Speakers, I don't think it was Foley, but I can't remember his name now, got slapped on the wrist for "writing" a book that was a collection of his speeches or something like that. They supposedly raised a ton of campaign cash that way, and he got caught. I don't remember if he resigned or had to give back money or what. I think that was the basis they used to go after Newt, or something similar. It was essentially payback.

Posted by: BurtTC at January 25, 2012 03:52 AM (Gc/Qi)

68 Newt was supposed to be on a morning show wasnt he? Today i believe

Posted by: Flapjackmaka at January 25, 2012 03:52 AM (lm+B8)

69 67 - Sold Ipods loaded with his melodious speeches?

Posted by: BurtTC at January 25, 2012 03:53 AM (Gc/Qi)

70

So to italicize, use [ i] words [/ i].....just remove the space in those brackets and you are in business.

Like so.

Posted by: GnuBreed at January 25, 2012 07:19 AM (BhuDE)

Do you have to do it in the editor window?

Posted by: Ed Anger - Certified Kos Kid at January 25, 2012 03:54 AM (7+pP9)

71 test yes?

Posted by: toby928© at January 25, 2012 03:54 AM (GTbGH)

72 Burt...Foley, IIRC, lost an election shortly after that and got removed from Congress the old fashioned way. I don't remember offhand if his book thing played a big role in that, but seems likely it did.

Posted by: davidinvirginia at January 25, 2012 03:55 AM (cPJUK)

73

test

Posted by: Ed Anger - Certified Kos Kid at January 25, 2012 03:56 AM (7+pP9)

74 Pelosi can't disclose anything from the committee hearings without getting in trouble herself

She's never been put on the hot seat about her sleazy deal regarding tuna, Samoa, and her husband either. I always sensed there was something prison worthy about that scandal that the media ignored.

Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 25, 2012 03:58 AM (0I4YH)

75 Posted by: Vic at January 25, 2012 07:02 AM (YdQQY)

Re the financial crimes unit: The SEC is a worthless group and has done little to actually enforce any laws, but they have a set of rules in place for how they are to operate. The reason for a NEW financial crimes "agency/czar" is that Obama will now be able to write new rules on the fly to further the goals of his kleptocracy.

Posted by: Hrothgar at January 25, 2012 03:58 AM (i3+c5)

76 @78
Not to mention Mitt would've found something by now and the repubs who used to be on the commitee would squeal.

I doubt Pelosi is smart enough to save a nuke to deploy it just in case of a presidential run

Posted by: Flapjackmaka at January 25, 2012 04:00 AM (zv6N6)

77 Anyone who believes anything Pelosi says is a fool.

Posted by: Vic at January 25, 2012 04:01 AM (YdQQY)

78 Well I used the editors window, clicked apply, and test showed up in italics. Then it posted in plain text.

I used carats, though, so I'll try again using brackets

I give up. it won't work for me.

Posted by: Ed Anger - Certified Kos Kid at January 25, 2012 04:02 AM (7+pP9)

79 If Newt's ethics transgressions had been done by a Dem, he would have received a standing ovation every time he entered the House.

Posted by: Hrothgar at January 25, 2012 04:03 AM (i3+c5)

80 Pelosi is pretty dim bulb. More feral than intelligent.

Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 25, 2012 04:03 AM (0I4YH)

81 I just heard Newt tell Bill Bennett that, "trickle-down bureaucracy is the only thing worse than trickle-down capitalism." Not good, Newt. I can think of quite a few things that are worse...and you're still dodgy on the Kerry book thing, Pelosi couch thing and the Fannie & Freddie gig. Don't make me come over there!

Posted by: 66chevelle at January 25, 2012 04:03 AM (QjSgY)

82 Yeah, he did try to "partially" walk back the couch sitting but he still believes in the AGW scam. So does Mutt.

What is amazing to me is the only people who openly mocked the AGW fraud were bounced out because they either can't get traction (Santorum) or because they did not do "beat the press" soundbites (Perry) in the debates.

Now they will get the impression that the public wants some kind of AGW scam.

Posted by: Vic at January 25, 2012 04:07 AM (YdQQY)

83 So how was Mitch Daniels responce to the SCOAMF?

Posted by: dananjcon at January 25, 2012 04:08 AM (8ieXv)

84 When Newt is confronted by Pelosi's statements by "Does she know anything big?" He should respond by saying, "yeah she doesnt, that's why she is one of the most unpopular speakers in history" or something like that. But Pelosi knows shit.

Gingrich's SOTU reply talks about Joe the Plumber as well. C'mon a Newt vs Obama debate would be awesome compared to Mitt vs Obama. I cant even remember the 2008 debates

Posted by: Flapjackmaka at January 25, 2012 04:08 AM (zv6N6)

85 Posted by: 66chevelle at January 25, 2012 08:03 AM (QjSgY)

I am afraid that AGW is with us to stay, primarily because it is a noble cause that justifies enslavement of the US population, resources, and money. It doesn't have to be real to be useful to an establishment politician (and beneath their masks, they are all establishment politicians).

Posted by: Hrothgar at January 25, 2012 04:09 AM (i3+c5)

86 The other blatantly illegal thing Pelosi does is maintain the fiction that she lives in her liberal SF district. She actually lives in a central CA wine district that would NEVER elect her communist bony ass.

Posted by: Vic at January 25, 2012 04:09 AM (YdQQY)

I can't concentrate on today's headlines. The ONT has got me too busy thinking about what kind of lanyard I'm going to buy to keep my driver's license at the ready for purchasing highlighters, instant cameras, etc.

Only time I'll get to put that thing away is at the voting booth, apparently.

Posted by: Gem in IL at January 25, 2012 04:09 AM (zw+pb)

88 What Pelosi has said twice now (at least) is enough to do the kind of damage that she wants to do - muck up the undecideds via the Drive By MFM.
**********
She doesn't need to reveal any more even if she were to have something. And if she were to say that she's prevented by law or congressional regs to reveal it, that's almost as damaging.
**********
There doesn't have to be any there there.
**********
But can you imagine the truck load of dirt that would be dumped on her by the MFM if she were GOP talking trash about a Dem.

Posted by: ontherocks at January 25, 2012 04:09 AM (ZJCDy)

89 81 84 Pelosi also predicted that the Dems would increase their hold on the House in 2010.

Maybe she could be used as a reverse barometer......or even better as a toilet plunger.

Posted by: GnuBreed at January 25, 2012 04:09 AM (BhuDE)

90 heh, Biden doesnt like Newt's food stamp comments.

Posted by: Flapjackmaka at January 25, 2012 04:12 AM (zv6N6)

91 Wow, cant link either

http://tinyurl.com/89y6kmz

Posted by: Flapjackmaka at January 25, 2012 04:13 AM (zv6N6)

92 94 81 84 Pelosi also predicted that the Dems would increase their hold on the House in 2010.

Maybe she could be used as a reverse barometer......or even better as a toilet plunger.

Posted by: GnuBreed at January 25, 2012 08:09 AM (BhuDE)

I would not soil my toilet with that wench.

Posted by: Killerdog at January 25, 2012 04:13 AM (CZrbJ)

93 "The usual DNC groupies at my regular business news web site who generally go into orgasmic happy dances every time The One emits gas of any sort are deathly quiet about his speech this morning."

The proggs I know in meatspace haven't said a word about SCOAMF but are into snark hyperdrive over Mitch. "Can he really believe that stuff the RNC wrote for him to read?" Talk about projection.

Posted by: HeatherRadish needs italics. And a beer. at January 25, 2012 04:16 AM (ZKzrr)

94 I think I've finally decided on voting for Newt next week. It was something Steyn said in a joke filling in for Rush yesterday that tipped it for me.

The mistake that the GOP and the "establishment" has been making is to not take this election seriously. This one is not politics as usual. We face an existential threat to the fabric of our country. Even if you don't buy into the concept of limited government, just the massive overload of sovereign debt and fundamental unseriousness on entitlements makes this one of the most important elections in our nation's history.

Newt, with all of his baggage, is the only guy in the race that seems to be taking it seriously. He is the only one who will tell people the stark choice we face. Even Santorum doesn't rhetorically address the stark reality, even though he is a "better" conservative.

I thought Steyn had a great suggestion for Newt. Just lay out all of the baggage that people dredge up and say, "So? Do you want to re-litigate the past, or save the future?"

Posted by: Dave in Fla at January 25, 2012 04:16 AM (RI0fC)

95 The silly FACTS on what really happened to Gingrich in the ethics probe...squat

http://bit.ly/wrKaj5

Let's see if these "silly little facts" matter one bit...doubt it

Posted by: ABO at January 25, 2012 04:17 AM (MbeEN)

96 <In italics>
In his speech, the President mentioned Master Lock's decision to bring

jobs back to their unionized plant in Milwaukee, which is now running at

capacity for the first time in fifteen years.

<End italics>

So after bashing Scott Walker all spring, now he's taking credit for Walker's work.

Not surprising, I guess.

Posted by: HeatherRadish needs italics. And a beer. at January 25, 2012 04:18 AM (ZKzrr)

97 I would not soil my toilet with that wench.

Posted by: Killerdog at January 25, 2012 08:13 AM (CZrbJ)

Yeah, but if someone posted a video of Nancy bobbing for toilet turds on youtube you would watch though.

Toilet cam FTW.

Posted by: GnuBreed at January 25, 2012 04:18 AM (BhuDE)

98 The only reason anyone would say they believe in AGW is if they are making money off it. Only the young (who are being brainwashed by government schools) and the gullible fall for that crap.

Posted by: Case at January 25, 2012 04:19 AM (DYR2Q)

99 haha i just googled "what is pelosi's secret about newt" and up popped.....newt hid his male pregnancy from wife........lol

Posted by: phoenixgirl....a voter without a candidate at January 25, 2012 04:19 AM (Ho2rs)

100 wow, Noot drew up 10,000 yesterday at rallies in SW fla. I cant believe people get excited over a simple not romney.

http://tinyurl.com/893ooxg

Posted by: Flapjackmaka at January 25, 2012 04:20 AM (zv6N6)

101 @88 Daniel's couldn't hold my interest. If he's the leading candidate to be the nominee of a brokered convention, then I don't think we've moved the ball forward.

Posted by: Nash Rambler at January 25, 2012 04:20 AM (oxgwp)

102

Greetings from Down Under from your lurking Aussie!

Wish I could link - it's Australia Day today and apparently we're racist if we fly Aussie flags on cars etc What a load of BS

Just turned the news on and Geoffrey Rush (actor) who's Australian of the Year was rabbiting on about asylum seekers (we have a problem with Afghanis, Pakistanis etc travelling through several Muslim countries but usually just flying to Indonesia, hopping on a leaky boat after paying people smuggling sharks $10,000 and ending up here with well rehearsed sob stories and then spending their lives living in OZ on welfare) - well I've had enough and I'm not taking it anymore!

No wonder I only watch sports (love my cricket and footy) and get my news online from selected sites like here

Feels good having a bit of a rant occasionally doesn't it?

Posted by: aussie at January 25, 2012 04:21 AM (ormtC)

103 If we're going for a brokered convention, I want to be able to get stiffies by hearing the candidate speak. Not scared turtles like that sotu response

Posted by: Flapjackmaka at January 25, 2012 04:24 AM (zv6N6)

104 I Newt slept with Pelosi, that's a deal breaker.

Posted by: Panzer Trout at January 25, 2012 04:24 AM (j5CHE)

105 I know this can't be right because today is my 37th anniversary.
Posted by: bergerbilder at January 25, 2012 07:10 AM (j+Izh)

------------

I like seeing stuff like that. Congrats.

Posted by: Blacksheep at January 25, 2012 04:25 AM (Nt+Kn)

106 Seeing that cackling cadaver scrunt with the IQ of a turnip try to blackmail Newt (and the country) does more to make me vote fro Newt in the primary than anything else.

Posted by: jeannebodine at January 25, 2012 04:25 AM (byR8d)

107 The idea of Newt having Nancyfinger makes my skin crawl.

Posted by: Blacksheep at January 25, 2012 04:25 AM (Nt+Kn)

108 >>The idea of Newt having Nancyfinger<<

If you could package that as an appetite suppressant, you could make a fortune.

Posted by: HeatherRadish needs italics. And a beer. at January 25, 2012 04:28 AM (ZKzrr)

109

>>Posted by: aussie at January 25, 2012 08:21 AM (ormtC)

After reading your comment I'm not clear on whether Rush was sympathetic to muzzie wetbacks or railing against.

Which?

Posted by: ontherocks at January 25, 2012 04:28 AM (ZJCDy)

110 Posted by: aussie at January 25, 2012 08:21 AM (ormtC)

Good to hear from The Land Down Under. Ranting here is about the only thing keeping me sane.

At one time I thought 'well, if the US goes to hell I can always escape to Australia.' But your politicos are busy screwing your nation up faster than ours are.

And that takes some doing.

Posted by: GnuBreed at January 25, 2012 04:28 AM (BhuDE)

111 Wow, I did not do that spacey thing, sorry anyhoo.

Posted by: ontherocks at January 25, 2012 04:29 AM (ZJCDy)

112 Anybody figured out why Obama looked so jaundiced last night? I wasn't aware that coke did liver damage.

Posted by: katya, the designated driver at January 25, 2012 04:40 AM (bMLFV)

113

115 Rush wants more sympathy etc - most Aussies do not want economic refugees who decide we are a soft touch

I wish that he would have just said how proud he was to be an Aussie rather than get into preaching mode about economic refugees who mostle do not integrate and who gladly live off taxpayers like me

Posted by: aussie at January 25, 2012 04:40 AM (ormtC)

114

116 Gnubreed

Geez our pollies are worse than yours! This country is stuffed so much so we were thinking of getting a boat and seeking political asylum in New Zealand!

Posted by: aussie at January 25, 2012 04:42 AM (ormtC)

115 67 What did the Obamas do to earn $1.8M last year? ------------------------------ $400,000 salary Book Royalties Investments Merchandise Etc..............

Posted by: Helpful Pundit at January 25, 2012 04:46 AM (jiwQf)

116 Didn't Obama just "recess" appoint some guy to the Fed to do this?

Posted by: Jean at January 25, 2012 04:47 AM (pawS5)

117 118 ask Kal

Posted by: Jean at January 25, 2012 04:48 AM (pawS5)

118 I italicize, therefor I am.

Posted by: Helpful Pundit at January 25, 2012 04:54 AM (jiwQf)

119 test test test

Posted by: Nash Rambler at January 25, 2012 05:05 AM (oxgwp)

120

Posted by: Helpful Pundit at January 25, 2012 08:54 AM (jiwQf)

And leaning to the right, I may add.

Posted by: HH at January 25, 2012 05:10 AM (KB0hv)

121 The brits are trying to put a cap on welfare benefits and a bunch of bishops are trying to stop it. Who made the bishops elected officials? The brits are so fucking generous it's ridiculous. A muzzie family didn't like their free digs so they put them inn a million dollar house in Stephen Fry's neighborhood. They refuse to deport terrorists and instead give them free rent and a monthly stipend. It's ridiculous.

Posted by: mike at January 25, 2012 05:15 AM (RRSlp)

122 Last night, after a few cocktails, I posted the speech from Billy Madison (.."we are all dumber for having listened to your speech"), oparaphrasing to fit the SOTU. Now, I'm almost afraid to see the moonbat responses.....

Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at January 25, 2012 05:21 AM (YmPwQ)

123 Has somebody told Andy that the Gingrich-ethics violation link leads to the Quinnipack poll? Andy, fix the interwebz, pls!

Posted by: Elize Nayden at January 25, 2012 05:46 AM (1ZoqB)

124 My friends.....

Posted by: John McCain at January 25, 2012 05:56 AM (3uiM5)

125 @99 I'm right there with you!

Posted by: Rondinellamamma at January 25, 2012 06:02 AM (XgXT2)

126 Wrong *linky* on sidebar Gingrich ethics post.

but that won't stop-

**The undeniable Star Power of Newt Gingrich**

http://tinyurl.com/6sz7e29

Posted by: naturalfake at January 25, 2012 06:06 AM (I49Jm)

127 Slow Joe responds to Newt's "food stamp president" charge: "Do they really think President Barack Obama wants to put everyone on food stamps? There must be some base they're trying to appeal to. I don't know." Hear that, you racist Republican base? The Vice President of the U. S. says you can be appealed to through your prejudice of black people.

Posted by: Helpful Pundit at January 25, 2012 06:20 AM (jiwQf)

128 It appears Rubio is siding with Romney

Another TP traitor.

Posted by: Cast Iron at January 25, 2012 06:22 AM (EL+OC)

129

Cast Iron, I saw that article Rubio was quoted in about Gingrich. Yet on his last appearance on FF he complimented Gingrich.

Sounds like Rubio wants to keep both sides happy in this race.

Posted by: Dick Nixon at January 25, 2012 06:28 AM (kaOJx)

130 Ok, Newt was instrumental in getting James Wright (D) removed as Speaker of the House. Wright had written a book and was selling it to unions and other groups in bulk for the cash. Basically it was a kickback operation. Then Foley became Speaker and Newt the Minority Whip and Newt engineered the 94 success and became Speaker. I always get a sense that there is a large contingent of Republicans in Congress that rather be in the minority.

Posted by: President Chet Roosevelt at January 25, 2012 07:04 AM (yhJsm)

131

@118 "Anybody figured out why Obama looked so jaundiced last night? I wasn't aware that coke did liver damage."

Barry's doctor did recently recommend that he cut back on the booze. Maybe

Posted by: 66chevelle at January 25, 2012 08:31 AM (QjSgY)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.

129kb generated in CPU 0.0568, elapsed 0.273 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.2403 seconds, 259 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.