January 27, 2012
— Gabriel Malor Friday!
Just a day after denying reports that he was considering folding up and leaving Florida before the primary, Rick Santorum is folding up and leaving Florida before the primary. Says he'd rather do his taxes.
Survivors of the Costa Concordia will be given lump-sump compensation payments of about $14,400, I assume in exchange for signing a liability release.
NYTimes: actually, Romney paid more in taxes than he owed. Oops.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
02:51 AM
| Comments (500)
Post contains 78 words, total size 1 kb.
Fox showing a video this morning of a 13 y.o girl getting a beat down on a school bus. She wound up with a concussion. I ask you now. Who will be held accountable for this? If you say the bus driver or the school authorities, or heaven forbid the students you would be wrong.
Posted by: Vic at January 27, 2012 02:55 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Vic at January 27, 2012 02:56 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Vic at January 27, 2012 02:56 AM (YdQQY)
Your curfew is 10pm sharp.
Posted by: CNN's Wolf Blitzer, the matchmaker at January 27, 2012 03:03 AM (3raPN)
---------------------------------
Shit Gabe that would get in the way of Mutt
That is "repulsive"!
Posted by: Vic at January 27, 2012 03:04 AM (YdQQY)
I do. Mitt had his best debate yet, and Newt was knocked off his stride. All I could think was that Mitt just won the presidency. The national audience was probably small, but I imagine lots of Floridians watched.
CNN should never host another debate.
Posted by: pep at January 27, 2012 03:06 AM (YXmuI)
Posted by: Tonawanda at January 27, 2012 03:07 AM (fgysf)
Mornin' Morons. Gues who stands to benefit from the latest White House energy proposal? That's right, it's your favorite anti-Christ and mine, Mr. George Soros. http://tinyurl.com/84dm5yv
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, feeling all extra curmudgeony today at January 27, 2012 03:07 AM (d0Tfm)
-------------------------------
Yes, but you have been a Mutt musher since the beginning.
Posted by: Vic at January 27, 2012 03:08 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 27, 2012 03:10 AM (i6RpT)
------------------------------------------
We did that when we agreed to the debates and gave them credence.
Posted by: Vic at January 27, 2012 03:11 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 27, 2012 03:12 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: Vic at January 27, 2012 03:12 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 27, 2012 03:14 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 27, 2012 07:14 AM (i6RpT)
LOL, I used to have a nude photo of Vanna. Does that count?
Posted by: Vic at January 27, 2012 03:18 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 27, 2012 03:20 AM (i6RpT)
I missed the debate but from the various reports I read Newt didn't do himself any favors last night. Ain't neither one o them there boys playin' nice in FL. Ah well, ABO.
Posted by: GnuBreed at January 27, 2012 03:20 AM (BhuDE)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at January 27, 2012 03:21 AM (t6ti5)
Posted by: someguy at January 27, 2012 03:24 AM (sEXZ/)
Posted by: StrategicCorporalUSMC at January 27, 2012 03:25 AM (6c2Vl)
Posted by: Ed Anger - Certified Kos Kid at January 27, 2012 03:25 AM (7+pP9)
What you heard from me the last couple of days was that Newt had been strong and Mitt needed to respond or he could lose. He did that last night.
I can't speak for anyone else.
Posted by: pep at January 27, 2012 03:25 AM (YXmuI)
"Who's advising these pricks?" It's sad that we've sunk so low in politics that the only people attracted to the job have no core principles. What should be happening, in a sane world where everything wasn't backwards, would be that a candidate should sit the advisors down and lay out his or her governing philosophy, say, a drastically smaller government that lives within its means and only within its Constitutional powers, and tell them to start crafting ways to communicate this philosophy to the masses as effectively, as assertively, and as clearly as possible, and make sure they emphasize how their philosophy helps the Average American to be more free and prosperous.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, feeling all extra curmudgeony today at January 27, 2012 03:26 AM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: GMan at January 27, 2012 03:30 AM (sxq57)
Posted by: dogfish at January 27, 2012 03:30 AM (N2yhW)
Posted by: dogfish at January 27, 2012 03:31 AM (N2yhW)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 27, 2012 03:32 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 27, 2012 03:33 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 27, 2012 03:33 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 27, 2012 03:34 AM (piMMO)
Topped off this morning at $3.11, but most places are running $3.45-$3.50.
Posted by: HeatherRadish needs italics. And a beer. at January 27, 2012 03:34 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: President Chet Roosevelt at January 27, 2012 03:36 AM (pwuEv)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 27, 2012 03:36 AM (niZvt)
I think a lot of people attracted to the job aren't willing to sacrifice their families to the MFM.
Posted by: HeatherRadish needs italics. And a beer. at January 27, 2012 03:37 AM (ZKzrr)
I'm betting Sajak smashed that.
Vanna White's Playboy spread definitely activated the launch sequence.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at January 27, 2012 03:39 AM (DiqH3)
So, the school police were called and took the boy off the bus. Now's where the story gets interesting. I asked her if she wanted to press charges against him and she said yes. I warned her that the most likely outcome was that they would do nothing about the charges or him. She wanted to proceed.
First we tried to obtain the police report from the school. No such luck. They didn't file one. You see, if the school reports a violent incident they get downchecked by the feds which dole out that sweet sweet moola. Talk about disincentives, eh? The school did try to tell me that the student had been punished, but were unable to describe what exactly they did. Uh huh.
So off to juvie hall we go to file the complaint ourselves. Hijinks ensued. After filling out several forms, identifying witnesses, etc. they said they would be in touch.
They must have meant with their navels, cuz we NEVER heard from them. On the phone, in writing, by telepathy, nothing. My two follow up calls revealed 'We are still working on it.'
Then and only then did I say to my daughter 'I told you so'. If you want to raise a cynic, you must do it right.
Posted by: GnuBreed at January 27, 2012 03:40 AM (BhuDE)
****
The lady sitting behind me last night is a local attorney who has been considering running for a judgeship but is dreading the the nasty campaign. She's right that they can always find something to tear you apart about. In fact, in her case, I already have an issue.....she takes issue with Romney's Mormonism.
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 27, 2012 03:41 AM (piMMO)
I don't count on the subgeniuses that are advising him, like Norm Coleman, to provide that advice.
Posted by: Captain Hate at January 27, 2012 03:42 AM (yowgW)
Did Romney repudiate his campaign advisor and possible HHS Secretary nominee Norm Coleman's statement that Obamacare won't be totally repealsed if Romney wins the White House?
I didn't get to watch any of the debate or live blog to see this.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at January 27, 2012 03:42 AM (Z4nDk)
****
Dude. That's not even funny, because it's TRUE!!!
Romney hit him on his pandering last night. It's been a new boondoggle in each state thus far.
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 27, 2012 03:43 AM (piMMO)
If you want to raise a cynic, you must do it right.
Posted by: GnuBreed at January 27, 2012 07:40 AM (BhuDE)
And the damn liberal fools want to know why people take law in their own hands.
I will not say any more.
Posted by: Vic at January 27, 2012 03:43 AM (YdQQY)
I didn't get to watch any of the debate or live blog to see this.
*****
He said forcefully and repeatedly that he will REPEAL Obamacare.
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 27, 2012 03:44 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 27, 2012 03:44 AM (niZvt)
****
IIRC, there were shenanigans going on there.
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 27, 2012 03:44 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: StrategicCorporalUSMC at January 27, 2012 03:46 AM (6c2Vl)
I think a lot of people attracted to the job aren't willing to sacrifice their families to the MFM.
Posted by: HeatherRadish needs italics. And a beer. at January 27, 2012 07:37 AM (ZKzrr)
Absolute power and absolute money have corrupted absolutely. Watching the 'debate' last night, I could barely stomach what my choices are.
Posted by: Artruen at January 27, 2012 03:46 AM (fDGF1)
HA HA Joepardy Contestants can't name MSNBC host
****
Heehee. I haven' even watched it yet and I'm already giggling.
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 27, 2012 03:47 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: StrategicCorporalUSMC at January 27, 2012 03:48 AM (6c2Vl)
Topped off this morning at $3.11, but most places are running $3.45-$3.50.
Posted by: HeatherRadish needs italics. And a beer. at January 27, 2012 07:34 AM (ZKzrr)
----
Heather, were do you live? I'll be right down with a tanker truck.
I haven't seen gas prices as low as $3.45 since His Kenyaness moved to PA Ave.
Count your blessings if that is a "high" price for you.
Posted by: Mark E at January 27, 2012 03:48 AM (w5RwR)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, feeling all extra curmudgeony today at January 27, 2012 03:49 AM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: GnuBreed at January 27, 2012 07:40 AM (BhuDE)
Yet more proof that the Leftist state is the enemy, and utterlly illegitimate. In many ways a right wing military junta would be preferable to what we have now. At least then the criminal scum would be taken out to the desert and shot.
Posted by: Reactionary at January 27, 2012 03:50 AM (xUM1Q)
Is Norm Coleman still with the Romney campaign?
So Mitt said Coleman was full of shit? Thats a relief.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at January 27, 2012 03:51 AM (Z4nDk)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 27, 2012 07:33 AM (niZvt)<<
Yep...that would have been pandering, but smart pandering at least. Sigh. I said on another thread a few days ago, this contest now boils down to 1) can Romney find a few things that conservatives like that he at least can *sound* passsionate about, like he really believes them and 2) can Gingrich, after his big win in SC, learn and practice a little self-control with his shooting off at the mouth thing. Which one does those things better and faster, will be the nominee. From what I've heard about the debate (did NOT watch the thing), it sounds as if Romney at least started working on #1 a bit; Gingrich, not so much on #2.
Posted by: davidinvirginia at January 27, 2012 03:53 AM (cPJUK)
Oooh...Oooh! Pick me!
I can answer that question. Based on last night's small portion of the debate that I could stomach; Newt is a pandering douchebag who lost my vote.
Romney described his immigration policy, which seemed reasonable. Newt immediately attacked him for wanting to deport grandmothers. The problem was that Romney had specifically said that he wouldn't hunt people down and toss them out. He said that employment law enforcement would gradually "self-deport" the illegals.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at January 27, 2012 03:54 AM (nEUpB)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 27, 2012 03:54 AM (i6RpT)
34 See the sidebar story about Mitt's donations to dems that gives *another* reason to not vote for the lying db in the general.
Yeah, but that was in Massa two shits where we have your socialists and we have your liberals. And it was 20 years ago. People change. Some more than others, of course, but I don't think that's relevant. AND ONE OF THE DUDES HE GAVE MONEY TO IS NAMED DICK SWETT. YOU CAN'T FAULT A MAN FOR GIVING MONEY TO A DIDE NAMED DICK SWETT.
If he'd done it in 2004 or something, that's different.
Plus, there are a lot of other more serious things to whack Mitt about.
Posted by: Truman North at January 27, 2012 03:54 AM (I2LwF)
****
Newt can always say he was baiting the Chinese to blow $1T on the race to colonize the moon.
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 27, 2012 03:56 AM (piMMO)
Sorry, if the choice is between a democrat (Obama) and a democrat (Romney) I'm not voting for either one.
Posted by: GMan at January 27, 2012 03:56 AM (sxq57)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 27, 2012 07:44 AM (piMMO)<<
The Dems (or whatever they're called in Minnesota) stole that one, for sure, but Coleman's crappy campaign made the results close enough for them to be able to steal it.
Posted by: davidinvirginia at January 27, 2012 03:56 AM (cPJUK)
Posted by: phoenixgirl....a voter without a candidate at January 27, 2012 03:57 AM (Ho2rs)
High energy prices? Surely there must be a reason:
FirstEnergy closing 6 coal-fired power plants
FirstEnergy Corp. says it will shut six older, coal-fired power plants in Ohio, Pennsylvania and Maryland, affecting about 530 employees.
The Akron, Ohio-based utility said Thursday that the move is related to new environmental rules. The U.S. Environmental Protection agency in late December announced new national standards designed to reduce toxic pollution from coal- and oil-fired power plants.
FirstEnergy says the plants in Cleveland, Ashtabula (ash-tuh-BYOO'-luh), Oregon and Eastlake in Ohio; Adrian, Pa.; and Williamsport, Md., will be retired by Sept. 1.
http://tinyurl.com/78grbc3
Posted by: Ed Anger - Certified Kos Kid at January 27, 2012 03:58 AM (7+pP9)
Posted by: phoenixgirl....a voter without a candidate at January 27, 2012 03:58 AM (Ho2rs)
That sounds reasonable to me. I've voted De for local elections when no R was on the ballot.
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 27, 2012 03:59 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: dogfish at January 27, 2012 07:31 AM (N2yhW******
******************************************
Newt will promise to send nuclear waste to the moon, not Yucca Mountain.
And Captain Hate, I love the word "jizzmop". Perfect!
Posted by: museisluse at January 27, 2012 04:00 AM (+P7KR)
It seems to have been a big deal that Perry was a democrat 20 years ago (I recall Mitt himself mentioning it once or twice), and no one has a problem with digging up 20 year old Newtisms.
Posted by: the guy that moves pianos for a living.... at January 27, 2012 04:01 AM (5Wj1Y)
Posted by: Kaitian at January 27, 2012 04:02 AM (et2m1)
Posted by: chemjeff at January 27, 2012 07:43 AM (7FadD)
Yeah, god help us if Mitt's the nominee, and the General election goes down to the wire. Coleman will open up his whole bag of tried-and-true recount bendover tools for Mitt. What's James Baker up to?
Posted by: 66chevelle at January 27, 2012 04:02 AM (QjSgY)
***
When Newt started talking about a program where numerous spacecraft would be launched each day I pictured the movie Gattaca.
BTW, Uma Thurman will be starring in Kill Bill 3.
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 27, 2012 04:03 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 27, 2012 07:59 AM (piMMO)
RINO!
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at January 27, 2012 04:03 AM (nEUpB)
Posted by: Kaitian at January 27, 2012 04:04 AM (et2m1)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 27, 2012 04:04 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 27, 2012 07:59 AM (piMMO)
RINO!
*****
I know. I know.
Hangs head in shame.
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 27, 2012 04:04 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: nickless at January 27, 2012 04:05 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Kaitian at January 27, 2012 04:05 AM (et2m1)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 27, 2012 04:05 AM (i6RpT)
****
I have no idea, because I didn't watch it. Maybe she'll be in flashbacks. How brutally was she killed?
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 27, 2012 04:05 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: Kaitian at January 27, 2012 04:05 AM (et2m1)
Posted by: BurtTC at January 27, 2012 04:06 AM (Gc/Qi)
My conclusion is that we conservatives blinked and thought that the TEA party advances of 2010 meant something. What they did mean was we got to make one move in a chess game had been going on a long time, with the insiders having already made lots of moves without us having a turn. We should have turned up the TEA party intensity to 11 and not looked back.
I feel sorry for leaving my grand-children the crappy legacy that I think will be theirs.
Posted by: Hrothgar at January 27, 2012 04:07 AM (i3+c5)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, feeling all extra curmudgeony today at January 27, 2012 04:07 AM (d0Tfm)
Florida is not winner take all.
Posted by: Dave in Fla at January 27, 2012 04:07 AM (Why44)
Posted by: dagny at January 27, 2012 04:07 AM (w+PM8)
Posted by: Kaitian at January 27, 2012 04:08 AM (et2m1)
He would be known as "The Sleeping President"
But at least he would be up at 3am going to pee when the phone rang.
Posted by: Panzer Trout at January 27, 2012 04:08 AM (j5CHE)
Posted by: Kaitian at January 27, 2012 04:09 AM (et2m1)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 27, 2012 04:10 AM (niZvt)
They looked smaller because CNN went out of it's way to ask STUPID QUESTIONS.
No national debt, an israel quetion to make Paul look kooky, no "How are you different from Obama, stupid boxers or briefs questions, Wolfy pitting the rich guys against each other.
I am so pissed that our TOOLS are allowing the media to frame the debate and they then argue about which one of them is BADDER because they're RICHER.
Fuck CNN
Posted by: dagny at January 27, 2012 04:10 AM (w+PM8)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 27, 2012 04:11 AM (i6RpT)
I won't vote for President if Romney is the nominee, no. I will vote downticket, but I cannot vote for a democrat. Which Romney is, or wishes he was at least.
Posted by: GMan at January 27, 2012 04:11 AM (sxq57)
Posted by: Kaitian at January 27, 2012 04:12 AM (et2m1)
Posted by: dagny at January 27, 2012 04:12 AM (w+PM8)
Or my 17-year-old who threatened not to talk to me until I took back some comment.
I asked her how she was getting to school.
Amazingly, she began to talk!
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at January 27, 2012 04:12 AM (nEUpB)
Posted by: BurtTC at January 27, 2012 04:12 AM (Gc/Qi)
As of now, I'm planning to vote...unwillingly.
The Republicans just can't seem to pick a candidate who isn't a steaming pile. After checking out some of the crap that The Inevitable Mutt and Mr Conservative Noot spew, I would think most rational people would be ashamed of themselves for having heaped so much shit on Rick Perry.
On the other hand, there's the stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure. Four more years of him will be more than the nation can survive. Unless you like living under a lying, law-breaking totalitarian communist, that is.
I don't. Apparently, Michelle Malkin does. She's continuing to express her total revulsion with any Republican candidates, while never connecting the dots about the Traitor-in-Chief. That will end when we elect President Malkin, I'm sure.
Posted by: MrScribbler at January 27, 2012 04:13 AM (tkd/a)
My theory is the while the Tea Party brought some really strong people into politics like Rubio and Rand Paul, it takes a few cycles for them to get established. What we are getting is the best of what we had prior to the Tea Party, so naturally they don't rise to our expectations.
We will start seeing much better candidates in the House and Senate this year and the next few cycles, then if we keep insisting on quality see another great President in 2020.
Posted by: Dave in Fla at January 27, 2012 04:13 AM (Why44)
Romney won as far as he came off more conservative then before, I believe solidified his lead in FL, and finally showed us some fight. Maybe that new debate coach did it for him. He took some serious misteps like being caught in a lie, mistiming his shot at Santorums angry image during a Romneycare exchange, and he still hasnt refine his Romneycare answer good enough. In the end though he was mor fiesty and its good to see that. If hes the nom, I think Newt pushing him may have helped to give us a more fiesty Mitt.
<br>
Newt was erratic. He was all for personal attacks but once Santorum dressed him and Mitt down he was suddenly offended at the personal attacks questions, wtf? He didnt own the debate like he has in the past.
<br>
Santorum did GREAT on substance, but once again his angry image gets in the way. Even though he mis-timed it, Romneys hit on Santorums angry image was cheered by some which tells you its a problem. He really needs to find his happy warrior and stop looking like hes gonna pop a blood vessel. Also he stuttered so fucking bad on that Puerto Rico question, not a big issue but as a Puerto Rican myself I was dissapointed to see the one question about it dissolve into a stuttering Santorum reply.
<br>
and finally Lupa Nor. No man tried so hard to lose the cuban vote tonight.
Posted by: AuthorLMendez HATES Primaries at January 27, 2012 04:14 AM (yAor6)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at January 27, 2012 04:15 AM (t6ti5)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 27, 2012 04:15 AM (i6RpT)
I heard Hannity really nailed her on that the other night too.
Posted by: Dave in Fla at January 27, 2012 04:15 AM (Why44)
Why is that I keep thinking that "our" candidates should be smart and disciplined enough to do a variation on the FYNQ approach and answer EVERY MSM question with a flat-out attack on Obama, socialism, the welfare state, the national debt, wealth redistribution, or unemployment?
I guess if the candidates aren't living up to my expectations, I need to lower my expectations (although drinking heavily may be a more restful alternative)!
Posted by: Hrothgar at January 27, 2012 04:16 AM (i3+c5)
Posted by: Kaitian at January 27, 2012 04:16 AM (et2m1)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 27, 2012 04:17 AM (niZvt)
No offense, but nobody gives a shit about Puerto Rican statehood. It's a non-issue.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at January 27, 2012 04:18 AM (nEUpB)
No its not.
HERE FOLLOWS THE SUMMARY:
Our full allotment of delegates is: 99
After the three officers are removed our base becomes: 96
Cutting us as the penalty, we get only: 48
The rules require proportional allocation of delegates as follows – Example:
Candidate “A” gets 30% of the vote would get 14 delegatesCandidate “B” gets 20% of the vote would get 10 delegatesCandidate “C” gets 15% of the vote would get 7 delegatesCandidate “D” gets 10% of the vote would get 5 delegatesAnd so on until the 48 delegates are gone.
The rules as adopted by the RPOF do not define proportionality – thus the RNC will decide on our definition of proportionality for us. The RNC is on record stating that they will honor the rules of state parties if proportionality is limited to state wide at large delegates. They indicated the Congressional Districts could still be awarded on a winner-take-all basis. The RPOF did not choose to define proportionality at all.
Posted by: Dave in Fla at January 27, 2012 04:18 AM (Why44)
...........
True.. But he has promised to repeal it. Good enuff.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at January 27, 2012 04:18 AM (UTq/I)
Posted by: Kaitian at January 27, 2012 08:16 AM (et2m1)
amen to that. im Puerto Rican and was dissapointed that Fortuno wasnt talked about when they talked about Hispanic Republican leaders. Then they gave the question of statehood to Santorum who utterly stuttered his way through it.
Posted by: AuthorLMendez HATES Primaries at January 27, 2012 04:18 AM (yAor6)
Posted by: Kaitian at January 27, 2012 04:19 AM (et2m1)
FirstEnergy
Corp. says it will shut six older, coal-fired power plants in Ohio,
Pennsylvania and Maryland, affecting about 530 employees.
"Affecting"? I bet they mean those guys all got raises.
Posted by: Truman North at January 27, 2012 04:19 AM (I2LwF)
Posted by: Kaitian at January 27, 2012 04:19 AM (et2m1)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at January 27, 2012 08:18 AM (nEUpB)
I care about it and so do many Puerto Ricans who live in the states, it's not a major issue right now but don't just toss it out because it's not one on your docket
Posted by: AuthorLMendez HATES Primaries at January 27, 2012 04:20 AM (yAor6)
Posted by: Panzer Trout at January 27, 2012 04:20 AM (j5CHE)
Posted by: Kaitian at January 27, 2012 04:21 AM (et2m1)
Posted by: Dick Nixon at January 27, 2012 04:21 AM (Z4nDk)
Everyone is confused because in 2008 we were winner take all, but the RNC changed the rules this year. No winner take all states before April 1 (as Vic pointed out yesterday).
Posted by: Dave in Fla at January 27, 2012 04:21 AM (Why44)
Posted by: BurtTC at January 27, 2012 04:21 AM (Gc/Qi)
Posted by: Hrothgar at January 27, 2012 04:22 AM (i3+c5)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 27, 2012 04:22 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: Kaitian at January 27, 2012 04:23 AM (et2m1)
Posted by: creeper at January 27, 2012 04:23 AM (gre5a)
When's the last time you or your wife personally gave a shit about Nebraska?
(Me, it was when Ben Nelson got heckled out of a pizza joint after he voted for Obamacare. Heh.)
Posted by: HeatherRadish needs italics. And a beer. at January 27, 2012 04:23 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: nickless at January 27, 2012 08:05 AM (MMC8rl
Please don't think about me. I would like to live a bit longer!
Posted by: Ammo Dump at January 27, 2012 04:23 AM (WUWb9)
Puerto Rico as a state? Absurd. We'd be better of granting them independence (in the long run they might be better off too). I assure you it will never happen if they're given the option - that island is on the welfare gravy train.
Giving them more representation would be to grant the Democrats greater control.
Posted by: Reactionary at January 27, 2012 04:24 AM (xUM1Q)
Posted by: chemjeff at January 27, 2012 08:21 AM (7FadD)
I think your confusing wanting to talk about the issue with what is the result we want from it. and btw while it is true that Puerto Ricans have chosen to keep themselves a commonwealth territory, the position of pro-statehood has gained momentum and the support for it has gone up since the 1960s in the Island.
Posted by: AuthorLMendez HATES Primaries at January 27, 2012 04:24 AM (yAor6)
Sort of like the EU--"Keep voting until you get it right!".
Posted by: Hrothgar at January 27, 2012 04:24 AM (i3+c5)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 27, 2012 04:25 AM (niZvt)
Yeah, I saw him say it last night at one of his campaign stops that was on the local news.
I agree that his credibility on this issue is low and makes it a tough general election issue. But he has clearly made the promise to repeal it, which is more than before where he said 50 state exemptions on Day 1.
Posted by: Dave in Fla at January 27, 2012 04:25 AM (Why44)
Posted by: Kaitian at January 27, 2012 04:26 AM (et2m1)
Posted by: HeatherRadish needs italics. And a beer. at January 27, 2012 04:26 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: Reactionary at January 27, 2012 08:24 AM (xUM1Q)
bullshit. Ive debated this back when everyone was freaking out about this back in 2009. Puerto Rico is not the Democrat solid support folks want to think it is, as a matter fof fact Hispanic Democrats have been busting their ass to not give Puerto Rico statehood. And lets go ahead and say they are a solid blue region, how does that keep them joining the Union via statehood? because we don't like how they vote? well damn let's expell Hawaii as well
Posted by: AuthorLMendez HATES Primaries at January 27, 2012 04:26 AM (yAor6)
Posted by: Dick Nixon at January 27, 2012 04:26 AM (Z4nDk)
I may be wrong, but I always felt that PR had carved out a special caste of citizenship for themselves and weren't about to lose the perks by voting them away.
Posted by: Hrothgar at January 27, 2012 04:26 AM (i3+c5)
Yay. Another Kill Bill movie. Because the first two didn't suck enough.
Tarantino's only decent movie was True Romance.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff is hung like David Carradine at January 27, 2012 04:27 AM (mOyDx)
After the last several debates it appears clear that I inadvertently stumbled on to the truth as is my habit.
I lasted an hour, but Wolfie just pissed me off way passed the point of proper health maintenance.
Niedermeyer, I looked for you in the audience last night but it seems you've largely exaggerated your nic.
Posted by: ontherocks at January 27, 2012 04:27 AM (ZJCDy)
As I watch MSNBC really really really really really push romney, it just makes you a little uncomfortable.
They are saying the crowd was "pro romney".
Last night I heard someone say that the fact that all the next bunch of primaries favor romney, by design. How stupid I felt. Who knew that the connections of the romney people with the state people would allow them to manipulate the primary. The guy who said this was Dick Morris.
Santorum was Santorum only he got a chance to actually speak without being treated like he didn't belong. I wonder if the voters will appreciate consistency.
MSNBC is saying that Newt never showed up as romney was able to trounce him right away and make him cower. They are also saying that the attacks from republicans of all stripes all week had its effect on newt. I think maybe newt might have been offended that he was being portrayed as sort of an empty suit whose only skill was debating. Every answer he gave was like a teaching moment. Either people will appreciate this or not.
A good friend has always said that BO wants to run against mitt. He's said "he's prepared to run against mitt and he will get his way". He's pretty confident that mitt will be the nominee because of this. I've argued that the people are voting and he just can't be that confident as you never know. He's not backing down as he says "they want to run against romney, he's the most beatable and they are going to run against him, you'll see" To me, that is a frightening thought but yet I watched what happened the last time with McCain. The more he says this, the happier he gets the more I think that this election is going to result in such a rift in the republican party that it won't be reparable.
Ron Paul has some sense of humor.
They are saying gingrich never showed up.
Posted by: ambrosia at January 27, 2012 04:28 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: BurtTC at January 27, 2012 08:21 AM (Gc/Qi)
now they were cheering the angry guy slam, even jeffB was stunned that he heard some cheers for that. folks arent fans of the angry guy whos gonna pop a blood vessel act santorums doing.
Posted by: AuthorLMendez HATES Primaries at January 27, 2012 04:28 AM (yAor6)
Besides, I thought that Puerto Rico was a colony of Mexico!
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at January 27, 2012 04:29 AM (nEUpB)
Posted by: Kaitian at January 27, 2012 04:29 AM (et2m1)
Didn't he also have sex with Frank Marshall Davis?
Posted by: Samuel Adams at January 27, 2012 04:29 AM (yGl9Q)
what does my wife bring , "The first time in my adult life i'm proud of my country"
otherwise the debate stunk, questions to keep the candidates at eachother than dealing with issues that need answers.
Posted by: willow at January 27, 2012 04:29 AM (TomZ9)
Posted by: BurtTC at January 27, 2012 04:29 AM (Gc/Qi)
Posted by: Nash Rambler at January 27, 2012 04:30 AM (oxgwp)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 27, 2012 04:30 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: Kaitian at January 27, 2012 04:31 AM (et2m1)
Posted by: MrScribbler at January 27, 2012 08:13 AM (tkd/a)****
******************************************
Malkin is schizophrenic due to her years at Oberlin College, that bastion of over-the-top leftism.
Posted by: museisluse at January 27, 2012 04:31 AM (+P7KR)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff is hung like David Carradine at January 27, 2012 08:27 AM (mOyDx)
Certainly his best, and he didn't direct it; he only wrote it. (I did like Inglorious Basterds)
Tarantino may be the most overrated director in Hollywood.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at January 27, 2012 04:31 AM (nEUpB)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 27, 2012 04:32 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Dick Nixon at January 27, 2012 08:26 AM (Z4nDk)
I think we can expect Mittens to grow in office and decide that Obamacare can't simply be repealed (or waivered) until a comprehensive study of the problem has been conducted. Until the study is completed, the best thing to do is let Obamacare proceed until it can be replaced by the Oromneycare legislation (based on the MA healthcare program that is so beloved by the liberals in MA).
Posted by: Hrothgar at January 27, 2012 04:33 AM (i3+c5)
Posted by: BurtTC at January 27, 2012 08:29 AM (Gc/Qi)
I never said I disagreed with sweatervest' answer or he didnt talk about Fortuno. But when they were asked about Hispanic Leaders in the Republican party no one mentioned him until the question on Puerto Rico came up. Santorum stuttered all throughout his answer.
Posted by: AuthorLMendez HATES Primaries at January 27, 2012 04:33 AM (yAor6)
Posted by: Grim at January 27, 2012 04:34 AM (Q1vB9)
Tarantino's only decent movie was True Romance.
Are you kidding? Pulp Fiction is his best by far. He has been trying to remake it ever since.
Posted by: real joe at January 27, 2012 04:34 AM (w7Lv+)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 27, 2012 04:34 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 27, 2012 04:34 AM (i6RpT)
*****
Dave, you're correct in that it usually isn't. It's a new development that came about in the process of punishing the state for holding an early primary. Also, they are stripping away half the total number of delegates.
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 27, 2012 04:34 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: BurtTC at January 27, 2012 04:34 AM (Gc/Qi)
Posted by: Kaitian at January 27, 2012 04:35 AM (et2m1)
Posted by: BurtTC at January 27, 2012 04:36 AM (Gc/Qi)
****
What? You didn't see the flies circling the cute fat girl that open up the questioning?
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 27, 2012 04:36 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 27, 2012 04:36 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: AuthorLMendez HATES Primaries at January 27, 2012 04:37 AM (yAor6)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 27, 2012 04:37 AM (niZvt)
---
I guess that I'm just the kind of person who goes with the first things out of a politician's mouth being true and subsequent "clarifications", "adjustments" and "revise and extend" as lying because the realize that their true belief's are not what the people they have to fool want to here.
The first thing that Mittens said about Obamacare were that he didn't want to repeal it, he wanted to repair it.
He also said that he didn't want to repeal it, he wanted to grant each state a waiver so that (if they wanted to) they could not be forced into Obamacare. Unfortunately, Mitten's solution here would not stop the Feds from continuing implementation and also would not stop him, or a future president of eliminating the waivers.
He has also said this campaign cycle that he is proud of what he did with Romneycare in MA.
So, someone on his staff was smart enough to tell him to SAY that he will repeal obamacare, but is that a current core belief?
Now, can people change over time? Sure, I do not have all of the same beliefs that I did 20 of 30 years ago. New facts, conditions change, acceptance that I was younger & dumber. But I am substantially the same person as I was in early December 2011
In early December 2011Mittens was praising obamacare as something that just needed to be improved, not eliminated.
Posted by: Mark E at January 27, 2012 04:37 AM (w5RwR)
Posted by: BurtTC at January 27, 2012 08:36 AM (Gc/Qi)
no, he stuttered through it instead of just spitting out an answer. I liked his answer but he stuttered through it. like most of Perry's answers. there is no pandering here, I just happen to care about an issue more then you. No need to get mad little buddy becase sweatervest is doing so bad
Posted by: AuthorLMendez HATES Primaries at January 27, 2012 04:38 AM (yAor6)
when all he was doing was telling Santorum to calm down, and he wasn't even talking about Obamacare when he said it.
+1
Posted by: AuthorLMendez HATES Primaries at January 27, 2012 04:39 AM (yAor6)
****
Not to me. He sounded like a man in awe of his wife.
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 27, 2012 04:39 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: BurtTC at January 27, 2012 04:40 AM (Gc/Qi)
+1
****
Santorum resorted, about halfway through the debate, to mumbling to himself and making faces. He managed to keep it together for about a full half of the debate. He sounded strong, but he looked weak.
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 27, 2012 04:40 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: pep at January 27, 2012 08:39 AM (YXmuI)
Puerto Ricans are swing voters but are idelogically conservative
Posted by: AuthorLMendez HATES Primaries at January 27, 2012 04:41 AM (yAor6)
Agreed. Competition is a beautiful thing, and has never increased costs.
But...we have no right to the pursuit of happiness. That's in the Declaration of Independence, which has no force of law.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at January 27, 2012 04:41 AM (nEUpB)
They had an investigative reporter tell us that Newt's financial support comes from a JOOO in Las Vegas who is a big supporter of (wait for it) ISRAEL and an enemy of Unions. A F*king investigative reporter to tell us where Newt's money is coming from - like it is Fast and Furious with 300 felony murders they're investigating. Ass wipes.
If this isn't enough to tell everyone Newt has the Obama campaign pissing on its feet nothing is.
Posted by: An Observation at January 27, 2012 04:42 AM (ylhEn)
Posted by: AuthorLMendez HATES Primaries at January 27, 2012 04:42 AM (yAor6)
Bullshit.
First off, most parents aren't actually on board with covering their "kids" until age 26.
Second, it's the "popular" stuff that is the most poisonous. Pre-existing conditions, for example. It must all be removed. And, given that over 50% (last I heard it was still near 60%, but I haven't seen anything all that recent), want to see the thing repealed, I don't think we need to play this game at all.
If we _do_ then the correct answer is to say, "Look there's so much crap here, and it's so interconnected, that the only thing we can do is repeal it. Then we'll go and look at what parts actually made sense and enact those each separately."
And, again, I don't think we need to play the game. I think we can simply say, "This thing was passed over the overwhelming objections of the American people, it will inevitably increase costs for the government, insurers, and patients, while simultaneously decreasing compensation for hospitals and medical staff. It must be repealed." And I bet you'll get close to 60% of the nation that agrees with you.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 27, 2012 04:42 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Kaitian at January 27, 2012 04:42 AM (et2m1)
Posted by: Kaitian at January 27, 2012 04:44 AM (et2m1)
Posted by: BurtTC at January 27, 2012 04:44 AM (Gc/Qi)
Posted by: AuthorLMendez HATES Primaries at January 27, 2012 08:26 AM (yAor6)
If I could expell Hawaii I would. Alas, that's a done deal. The place should never have been more than a colony, in my opinion. A VERY NICE colony, but still.
Tell you what - promise me that we will not have to add a 51st star to Old Glory, and I'll go along. Otherwise, no deal.
Posted by: Reactionary at January 27, 2012 04:45 AM (xUM1Q)
Are you seriously suggesting that PR is as conservative as Utah?
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at January 27, 2012 04:45 AM (nEUpB)
But really stuff like healthcare belongs as a state decision, not a federal one.
Posted by: ambrosia at January 27, 2012 04:46 AM (oZfic)
Not sure why the surprise though.
They have been ignoring and smearing the 10s of millions of tea party members and conservatives for a long time too.
(BTW, I agree with your statement on the very high level of patriotism of people from the island)
Posted by: Mark E at January 27, 2012 04:46 AM (w5RwR)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 27, 2012 04:46 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: ambrosia at January 27, 2012 04:46 AM (oZfic)
Self interest will often trump ideology. I wouldn't count on Puerto Rico being a solid Republican voting bloc.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at January 27, 2012 04:48 AM (nEUpB)
Posted by: AuthorLMendez HATES Primaries at January 27, 2012 04:48 AM (yAor6)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 27, 2012 04:48 AM (niZvt)
Maybe not quite that conservative, but my guess is that it's pretty darn close. I know several Puerto Ricans, and about the only reason they're not rabid Republicans is that the Republicans largely ignore Puerto Rico- which means they get all their "facts" from Democrats and democrat leaning sources.
Once they actually get here and have a chance to look around, they get disillusioned by the Democrats really dang quickly.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 27, 2012 04:48 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: AuthorLMendez HATES Primaries at January 27, 2012 04:48 AM (yAor6)
Sure. Make Puerto Rico a state. They're not even Americans ferchrissake. We're trying to get rid of illegal immigrants. I fail to see how making citizens out of millions of saltwater Mexicans is the answer.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff is hung like David Carradine at January 27, 2012 04:49 AM (mOyDx)
Posted by: AuthorLMendez HATES Primaries at January 27, 2012 04:50 AM (yAor6)
Ah, so if they are socially conservative that will translate into conservative votring tendencies on all other issues?
American Blacks tend to be socially conservative with respect to gay marriage. So I can expect them to vote for the Republican presidential candidate?
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at January 27, 2012 04:50 AM (nEUpB)
How about you go back and read the whole comment, then tell me what I want to do?
I want it all gone. All of it. All I'm saying is _if_ you take the position (with which I disagree- but it's not an uncommon one) that some parts are "too popular" to repeal, the answer to that is easy: tell people you have to repeal it all, and then you'll look at adding things back one at a time.
That doesn't mean you actually have to put anything back, by the way. Politicians lie- at least this one would be used for something good.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 27, 2012 04:51 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: lael at January 27, 2012 04:51 AM (KHapD)
Allen, our spineless betters never repeal anything outright!
Posted by: Hrothgar at January 27, 2012 04:52 AM (i3+c5)
Posted by: lael at January 27, 2012 08:51 AM (KHapD)
*waves hands* exactly!
Posted by: AuthorLMendez HATES Primaries at January 27, 2012 04:52 AM (yAor6)
Posted by: Kaitian at January 27, 2012 04:52 AM (et2m1)
Come on, that was funny.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at January 27, 2012 04:52 AM (nEUpB)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 27, 2012 04:52 AM (i6RpT)
*sigh* I wish I disagreed with you.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 27, 2012 04:53 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 27, 2012 04:53 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: TendStl at January 27, 2012 04:53 AM (kjCtb)
Ahem.
Posted by: ACLU at January 27, 2012 04:54 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Truman North at January 27, 2012 04:54 AM (I2LwF)
Posted by: AuthorLMendez HATES Primaries at January 27, 2012 04:55 AM (yAor6)
Posted by: Fritz at January 27, 2012 04:55 AM (/ZZCn)
Posted by: Kaitian at January 27, 2012 08:52 AM (et2m1)
This is a fundamental misunderstanding of what the melting pot was.
Come to America!
1. Learn English and the social mores of the country
2. Become a citizen
3. Renounce loyalty to country of origin
4. Live the American dream
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at January 27, 2012 04:55 AM (nEUpB)
Posted by: TendStl at January 27, 2012 08:53 AM (kjCtb)
ha! wait until he wins FL w/ more then 26%, I gurantee it. and btw when your folks start polling better against Obama then maybe ill believe they can beat him
Posted by: AuthorLMendez HATES Primaries at January 27, 2012 04:56 AM (yAor6)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 27, 2012 08:52 AM (i6RpT)
PR statehood, CUBA!, the moon, which wife would be the best first lady, medical records of the candidates, .....all really, really important topics. Alas, they didn't even touch on Teri Schiavo.
Mornin' 'rons.
Posted by: Tami at January 27, 2012 04:56 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 27, 2012 07:32 AM (i6RpT)
Depends on what the phrase "we had to build" means doesn't it? As in a Soviet style "we had to build".
Posted by: An Observation at January 27, 2012 04:56 AM (ylhEn)
Posted by: Kaitian at January 27, 2012 04:57 AM (et2m1)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at January 27, 2012 04:57 AM (nEUpB)
Posted by: AuthorLMendez HATES Primaries at January 27, 2012 04:57 AM (yAor6)
Posted by: AuthorLMendez HATES Primaries at January 27, 2012 04:57 AM (yAor6)
Okay- some Romney supporter explain this to me.
You know- know with absolute certainty- that only about 1/4 of the base wants anything to do with Mitt Romney. Yet, instead of looking at Mitt Romney and saying, "Yeah, he's flawed here and here. Hey, Mitt, maybe you want to throw a bone to conservatives, every now and again. Oh, and acknowledge your flaws and explain to us why we shouldn't be worried," or even explaining to us who detest the man why you already aren't worried and why we shouldn't be either- you blame us for wanting someone else. Why?
Oh- and before you say "Conservative Congress"- I'm pre-throwing the bullshit flag on that. Congress won't move any president to the Right. The President will need to pull Congress to the Right.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 27, 2012 04:58 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 27, 2012 04:58 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: TendStl at January 27, 2012 04:58 AM (kjCtb)
Who the hell knows?
Some greasers upthread started it. I think we should just return the damned island to Mexico and be done with it.
Posted by: Typical troublemaking moron at January 27, 2012 04:58 AM (nEUpB)
Posted by: AuthorLMendez HATES Primaries at January 27, 2012 04:58 AM (yAor6)
My wife is Hispanic. I do see some bias against her. But it's all from elite, effete, snobby pseudointellectuals who think she's the help; or government officials who start in speaking to her in Spanish.
Normal people, and espcially anyone under 35, nobody treats her any differently than they treat (caucasian) me.
Posted by: Truman North at January 27, 2012 04:59 AM (I2LwF)
Posted by: AuthorLMendez HATES Primaries at January 27, 2012 04:59 AM (yAor6)
Posted by: Kaitian at January 27, 2012 08:52 AM (et2m1)
This issue isn't whether business should be allowed to operate in Spanish. The bigger issue is whether the government will be bi-lingual. That's a BAD idea. English is the dominant language. It is also the international language, and no other will change that for at least 100 years, if ever. All government activity should be English only. It is not in our interest to subsidize those who refuse to communicate in it.
But more important than that, the melting pot concept worked for as long as the foundational American cultural norms, which is to say Northern European and chiefly Anglo-Saxon norms, remained dominant. Language is a key determiner of culture, because it heavily influences what ideas one is exposed to. Maintaining English as the primary, official language helps preserve that culture. Allowing our culture to deviate from that has done ZERO good, and much ill. Why encourage a greater balkanization of the US?
Posted by: Reactionary at January 27, 2012 04:59 AM (xUM1Q)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 27, 2012 04:59 AM (niZvt)
Try hitting enter twice for each line break. Other than that, I have no other workarounds.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at January 27, 2012 05:00 AM (nEUpB)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 27, 2012 08:58 AM (8y9MW)
so we lose the election w/ Santorum and Newt?
Posted by: AuthorLMendez HATES Primaries at January 27, 2012 05:00 AM (yAor6)
I disagree with you here, English should be the go to language in the USA
Posted by: AuthorLMendez HATES Primaries at January 27, 2012 05:01 AM (yAor6)
Well, I learned one thing today. Puerto Ricans have no sense of humor! ;-)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at January 27, 2012 05:01 AM (nEUpB)
Posted by: Sarahw at January 27, 2012 05:01 AM (LYwCh)
223 All Puerto Ricans are already American citizens. <<<
Nonsense. That's why we require them to hang Puerto Rican flags from their rearview mirrors. It's like a visa.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff is hung like David Carradine at January 27, 2012 05:01 AM (mOyDx)
nominee Norm Coleman's statement that Obamacare won't be totally
repealsed if Romney wins the White House?
*****
He said forcefully and repeatedly that he will REPEAL Obamacare.
And you bought it, I suppose? He also said forcefully and repeatedly that Romneycare was a great program of which he is proud. I hope you at least got a dinner before Mutt did sex to you.
Posted by: montgomery burns at January 27, 2012 05:02 AM (K/USr)
Posted by: Reactionary at January 27, 2012 05:02 AM (xUM1Q)
<br>
ok im sorry guys, I guess I always have these JeffB type meltdowns over sweatervest Santorum and anything pertaining to Latinos. It just that Ive seen some intolerance towards my folks and our culture and it comes from the party I vote for. So I tend to get uptight about it
Posted by: AuthorLMendez HATES Primaries at January 27, 2012 05:03 AM (yAor6)
WTF?
No wonder the urge watch this channel is far less frequent with each passing day.
Posted by: ontherocks at January 27, 2012 05:04 AM (ZJCDy)
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat at January 27, 2012 07:48 AM (phlKA)
That is correct - according to the lawyers I've talked to you could say that in open court and nothing could be done to you.
Posted by: An Observation at January 27, 2012 05:05 AM (ylhEn)
I only watch Fox forThe Five now. It sucks ass.
Posted by: Truman North at January 27, 2012 05:05 AM (I2LwF)
Posted by: Kaitian at January 27, 2012 05:05 AM (et2m1)
Posted by: The Mega Independent at January 27, 2012 05:06 AM (r1H6z)
It's full of pwotein!
Posted by: The Majestic Frilled Ren at January 27, 2012 05:06 AM (wRQ/Z)
Posted by: ambrosia at January 27, 2012 05:07 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: TendStl at January 27, 2012 05:07 AM (kjCtb)
Posted by: AuthorLMendez HATES Primaries at January 27, 2012 05:07 AM (yAor6)
You call that a meltdown?
Piker.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at January 27, 2012 05:08 AM (nEUpB)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 27, 2012 05:08 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: AuthorLMendez HATES Primaries at January 27, 2012 05:08 AM (yAor6)
Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars at January 27, 2012 05:08 AM (IpqAT)
Posted by: AuthorLMendez HATES Primaries at January 27, 2012 05:09 AM (yAor6)
279--Are you fucking kidding me? Now we are defending socialized medicine?
If you are a pro-Romney Republican, you end up there sooner rather than later.
Posted by: montgomery burns at January 27, 2012 05:09 AM (K/USr)
Dude, there's cat piss all over that comment.
Check the hash.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at January 27, 2012 05:10 AM (nEUpB)
Do you not realize you just did exactly the thing for which I'm requesting an explanation?
I don't believe in "electability." That's the same argument that brought us Bob Dole and John McCain. The simple fact of the matter is that any poll this early is inaccurate at best. So drop that line of argument- it's a weak cop-out and you know it.
Don't tell me the other two can't win- I doubt if Santorum would (though I know he could), but I'm pretty sure Newt would win- even if in a squeaker. But I also think that Romney only wins in a squeaker, and possibly loses- since he actively turns off a fair portion of the base.
So- give me enough positive reasons to vote for Mitt that they outweigh both his liberal governing record and Newts conservative legislative record.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 27, 2012 05:11 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 27, 2012 05:11 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: Kaitian at January 27, 2012 05:12 AM (et2m1)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 27, 2012 05:12 AM (niZvt)
"Fox showing a video this
morning of a 13 y.o girl getting a beat down on a school bus. She wound up with a concussion. I ask you now. Who will be held accountable
for this? If you say the bus driver or the school authorities, or heaven forbid
the students you would be wrong."
My guess would be that in the final analysis, no one will really be held fully accountable.
"Being a cop" isn't written into the bus driver's job description; school authorities will do everything they can to stonewall and make this go away; and the precious kiddies who did the beatdown are juveniles who have one excuse or another for bad behavior. And typically when the kid is an a**hole, their parents are at least as bad, if not worse.
Much easier to zero tolerance a kid for bringing an aspirin to school or something along those lines, than it is to sort through all the political implications of a beatdown and do the right thing.
Posted by: RM at January 27, 2012 05:12 AM (TRsME)
@288 yes my meltdown caused me to not notice that. its my punishment for being a grumpy fuck this morning
Posted by: AuthorLMendez HATES Primaries at January 27, 2012 05:13 AM (yAor6)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at January 27, 2012 05:13 AM (t6ti5)
@ 250 This! +1000
Mittens needs to reach out or Coulter will be proved correct. He wins the primary and loses to SCoaMF/T.
I want a candidate who doesn't force me to leave all my principles outside the voting booth.
Posted by: Larsen E. Whipsnade at January 27, 2012 05:13 AM (6BgmB)
When he was in his 60s, with emphysema and other health issues, he volunteered to go to the Gulf as a combat surgeon. He came back babbling about how good the MREs were compared to the shit he ate in Korea.
I'll take Puerto Ricans like that any day.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at January 27, 2012 05:14 AM (nEUpB)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 27, 2012 05:14 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 27, 2012 09:11 AM (8y9MW)
I wasnt a McCain guy in 2008 because I didnt think he was electable so that wont work with me there. as for Dole, Reagan wouldnt have won in 96 with an economy like that and Clinton governing like a Republican President. if you didnt learn your lesson from the Sharron Angle and Christine ODonell debacle then I dont what will since you guys just want to keep the Romney Derangment Syndrome glasses on.
Posted by: AuthorLMendez HATES Primaries at January 27, 2012 05:15 AM (yAor6)
Posted by: Mallamutt, RINO President for Life at January 27, 2012 09:00 AM (OWjjx)
Disagree, we have plenty of nationally significant issues to discuss, but PR statehood is a classic "won't you step into my minefield?" issue asked by an MFM hack for the sole purpose of hoping that a minority group will wind up being upset at a Republican!
Posted by: Hrothgar at January 27, 2012 05:16 AM (i3+c5)
Her commenters seem like LGF loons. Everything is laudatory. It makes me want to puke.
I wonder if she's good in the sack?
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at January 27, 2012 05:17 AM (nEUpB)
Mendez is still pissed that we had to drop a couple of atom bombs on Puerto Rico in WW II.
Shouldn't have attacked Pearl Harbor, then Mendez. Or killed Tony with a zip gun.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff is hung like David Carradine at January 27, 2012 05:17 AM (mOyDx)
Posted by: Lincolntf at January 27, 2012 05:17 AM (hiMsy)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 27, 2012 05:17 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: Kaitian at January 27, 2012 05:18 AM (et2m1)
>>My wife is Hispanic. I do see some bias against her. But it's all from elite, effete, snobby pseudointellectuals who think she's the help; or government officials who start in speaking to her in Spanish.
Yeh, you don't want to get me started on the shit I went through growing up with liberal teachers/administrators in California. And I don't look at all Hispanic, but just had the last name that let them know I needed some soft bias of low expectations 'n stuff.
Posted by: Mama AJ at January 27, 2012 05:18 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 27, 2012 05:18 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: Bawney Fwank's Special Donkey Punch at January 27, 2012 05:19 AM (wRQ/Z)
No, no, a thousand times no.
Take away the mandate, take away the state exchanges, take away the "death panels," if you got rid of everything except the requirement to cover pre-existing conditions and covering "chidren" until they're 26 (btw, most states already require to 25 as long as the "child" is a full-time student- OCare extends that one year and removes the full-time-student requirement), you have already guaranteed socialized medicine.
Health Insurance companies cannot- absolutely cannot- operate under "shall insure" (which is part of the pre-ex thing) AND have to cover "pre-existing conditions." Not without pricing out anyone short of a high-profile professional Athlete.
The "dependent" until age 26 is less problematical- but really not that much. Dependents are typically insured at lower cost than the primary insured and spouse (Okay ICP- time for a new song: "F*ing Actuarial Tables- How do they work?" cause I want to know), and getting them onto their own policy actually helps reduce rates for the general population.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 27, 2012 05:20 AM (8y9MW)
That's 'cause they screw like rabbits and use the rhythm method because birth control is too complicated.
Posted by: Typical troublemaking moron at January 27, 2012 05:20 AM (nEUpB)
You're using too much starch on my collars.
Posted by: Typical troublemaking moron at January 27, 2012 05:21 AM (nEUpB)
Posted by: Ammo Dump at January 27, 2012 05:22 AM (WUWb9)
Not "Allahu Akbar", which is what he was shouting. I'm not kidding. They might as well be NBC with that trash.
Posted by: The Mega Independent at January 27, 2012 05:22 AM (r1H6z)
Posted by: Kaitian at January 27, 2012 05:23 AM (et2m1)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at January 27, 2012 05:24 AM (t6ti5)
Yeah, the status quo stays stuck on stupid hyping their version of "electability", a Siren's Song.
Posted by: Panzer Trout at January 27, 2012 05:24 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: Truman North at January 27, 2012 05:24 AM (I2LwF)
Posted by: ontherocks at January 27, 2012 05:25 AM (ZJCDy)
Thanks!
Click!!
11!
Posted by: Hrothgar at January 27, 2012 05:25 AM (i3+c5)
Are you really that thick?
Yes, I've already stipulated that I will never, ever vote for Mitt Romney in a Primary. It's not going to happen. But I know I'm not the only one asking for this kind of thing- and a lot of the others still are persuadable.
The fact is you're not even trying. You're all acting like arrogant asses and robots who don't think it's necessary to actually persuade people- you'll just bull over them and keep on going.
Okay, it's just possible that will work in the Primaries- but I guarantee you it will turn off a huge number of Republican voters- and all your cries of "Not supporting the R candidate is the same as voting for Obama" will ring rather hollow in their ears- especially if they haven't been satisfied regarding Mitt Romney's liberal record of governance.
So, fine, don't try to persuade me- you're right, it won't work- but you should be trying to persuade others.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 27, 2012 05:26 AM (8y9MW)
Right now, we're a lot more like a vomitorium pot. The Hyphenated-Americans are the easily identifiable chunks of dinner...Americans of European descent whose ancestors emigrated before 1965 are the watery bile holding the mess together (that the folks going through to catalog and fetish the chunks alternately ignore and despise...). Bile used to dissolve the chunks, but it's been decades since anyone's been allowed to chew....
Posted by: HeatherRadish needs italics. And a beer. at January 27, 2012 05:26 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at January 27, 2012 05:27 AM (t6ti5)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 27, 2012 05:28 AM (niZvt)
Right now, we're a lot more like a vomitorium pot. The Hyphenated-Americans are the easily identifiable chunks of dinner...Americans of European descent whose ancestors emigrated before 1965 are the watery bile holding the mess together (that the folks going through to catalog and fetish the chunks alternately ignore and despise...). Bile used to dissolve the chunks, but it's been decades since anyone's been allowed to chew....
Posted by: HeatherRadish needs italics. And a beer. at January 27, 2012 09:26 AM (ZKzrr)
Seems like someone is planning stew for dinner. I picked the wrong week to give up watery bile.
Posted by: Ammo Dump at January 27, 2012 05:28 AM (WUWb9)
Posted by: The Mega Independent at January 27, 2012 09:22 AM (r1H6z)
They're hoping their audience is too stupid to understand arabic and its relation to islamic jihad? What other reason can there be?
Posted by: Hrothgar at January 27, 2012 05:28 AM (i3+c5)
Posted by: Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain at January 27, 2012 05:29 AM (bj+Nc)
Some of those PR chicks are smokin' hot too!
Although...I was at a wedding in Idaho a long time ago and sat next to the then current Miss Utah. Unfortunately she made it very clear that premarital sex was out of the question. Too bad, because she was gorgeous.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at January 27, 2012 05:29 AM (nEUpB)
Posted by: AuthorLMendez HATES Primaries at January 27, 2012 08:42 AM (yAor6)
No the polls are completely fictional this time of year. They say whatever the MFM wants them to say depending on the narrative. The polls only become accurate around election time when the pollster's credibility is on the line.
When my brother was in college the Chief Editor of Time magazine spoke to his class and admitted to them that they just make the poll numbers up.
Posted by: An Observation at January 27, 2012 05:29 AM (ylhEn)
Posted by: TendStl at January 27, 2012 05:30 AM (kjCtb)
Judging by his writing...clearly not English.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at January 27, 2012 05:31 AM (nEUpB)
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at January 27, 2012 05:31 AM (mFxQX)
I'm going to try this again.:
The single most poisonous part of ObamaCare is the requirement that insurance companies cover- from day one- pre-existing conditions. If that's the ONLY thing that was left, it would still guarantee (in short order, too) single-payer, socialized health care. It. Would. Guarantee. It.
The things that are "the most popular" are the ones that are most disconnected from reality and do the most damage.
They are the ones that must be repealed.
The Individual Mandate is bad because it's unconstitutional and it turns people from "Citizens" into "Subjects." But it's far less likely to lead to actual socialized healthcare than the requirement to cover pre-existing conditions.
If you're not willing to repeal "the candy" (yes, even though it costs you, politically) you may as well not repeal any of it. Yes. Really.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 27, 2012 05:33 AM (8y9MW)
O.K. by me in America!
Ev'rything free in America
For a small fee in America!
Posted by: jwest at January 27, 2012 05:33 AM (FdndL)
Because the White dominated adoption agencies would never, ever allow a White child to be adopted by some colored person.
You need to read Kos more.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at January 27, 2012 05:34 AM (nEUpB)
Posted by: Lincolntf at January 27, 2012 05:34 AM (hiMsy)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 27, 2012 05:34 AM (niZvt)
It's funny cause Mark Levin has been vociferously defending newt, with witnesses, guests.
I's love to see that debate. It would be nice to see beck cowering in the corner after levin decimated his arguments as he did on his program in the last two days.
Posted by: ambrosia at January 27, 2012 05:35 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at January 27, 2012 09:31 AM (nEUpB)
If they speak 3 languages between them there must be some pretty fancy smantzy smooching going on.
Posted by: ontherocks at January 27, 2012 05:35 AM (ZJCDy)
Posted by: TendStl at January 27, 2012 05:36 AM (kjCtb)
I don't wanna have to buy a Batman Costume.
Posted by: DaveA (Butters gets some great lines) at January 27, 2012 05:36 AM (XFxB5)
Will vote for any non-communist GOP candidate. On the website infowars there is an article about Ogabe signing a SOPA-like "executive agreement" and claiming it has the force of a treaty (without Senate approval). Ogabe against SOPA and this agreement is worse as it gives other countries SOPA type powers over copywrite content on US websites. ISPs can be taken down without due process. Well past time to rise up against this tyranny. Commie controlled Senate is helping to flush our liberties down the crapper.
Posted by: Ammo Dump at January 27, 2012 05:38 AM (WUWb9)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 27, 2012 05:40 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: TendStl at January 27, 2012 05:40 AM (kjCtb)
Posted by: Truman North at January 27, 2012 05:40 AM (I2LwF)
+1000
But it's "popular" and it's one of the so-called "good parts" of Obamacare/Romneycare, so let's keep parroting the talking points just like libs do even though it's completely unsustainable and against tenet of insurance.
Posted by: jeannebodine at January 27, 2012 05:41 AM (byR8d)
Chemjeff, thanks for being the first Romney supporter to tell the truth, Mitt Romney will not totally repeal Obamacare.
Guess us Perry people were right when we said it and were heckled by your brethren on this site.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at January 27, 2012 05:42 AM (kaOJx)
If the 2% left still leads to socialized medicine (as the requirement to cover pre-existing conditions will do)? Yes.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 27, 2012 05:42 AM (8y9MW)
There's no one resorting to Newt who doesn't know that he's undisciplined and susceptible to a concert attack via friendly fire. He's that way. It's understood.
Mitt is similar. though. he got seriously ruffled and pocket in the hands when he felt it all slipping away....but he just gets kind of irritable and some one got to HIM too...with good advice for making the jeebies fade.
"Not worth getting angry about." If my party has come to this... it's the end of America. If you aren't angry about ORomnacare and your future VAT just walk right up that chute.
A quick slide in to nationalized health care and Herd medicine. Welcome to your veterinary future.
Posted by: Candidate math at January 27, 2012 05:42 AM (LYwCh)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 27, 2012 05:42 AM (i6RpT)
BULLETIN: After 2 disappointing debate performances this week, Newt Gingrich has annouced he is firing his grandchildren.
Posted by: JewishOdysseus at January 27, 2012 05:42 AM (hRH92)
Why did the attorneys Santorum leave Pennsylvania to relocate in Virginia, except to attempt living like Newt, influence peddling as consultant lobbyists?
The nightmare of listening to "I'll Attack China!" Santorum's perpetual harangue could easily drive idiots who prefer Obama's voice to disable the oppositional force to remove Obama from office.
Posted by: Panzer Trout at January 27, 2012 05:43 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: ambrosia at January 27, 2012 05:43 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 27, 2012 05:43 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 27, 2012 09:34 AM (niZvt)
Just jabbin' ya CoolCzech, you can speak drooling Czechlish for all I care, so long as you and the wife are on the ABO Express.
Posted by: ontherocks at January 27, 2012 05:43 AM (ZJCDy)
Posted by: TendStl at January 27, 2012 05:44 AM (kjCtb)
Posted by: The Mittbot argument at January 27, 2012 05:45 AM (t6ti5)
Posted by: jeannebodine at January 27, 2012 05:46 AM (byR8d)
And besides, who gives a shit about Massachusetts?
It's not like it's Puerto Rico!
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at January 27, 2012 05:50 AM (nEUpB)
You know- know with absolute certainty- that only about 1/4 of the base wants anything to do with Mitt Romney. Yet, instead of looking at Mitt Romney and saying, "Yeah, he's flawed here and here. Hey, Mitt, maybe you want to throw a bone to conservatives, every now and again. Oh, and acknowledge your flaws and explain to us why we shouldn't be worried," or even explaining to us who detest the man why you already aren't worried and why we shouldn't be either- you blame us for wanting someone else. Why?
Oh- and before you say "Conservative Congress"- I'm pre-throwing the bullshit flag on that. Congress won't move any president to the Right. The President will need to pull Congress to the Right.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 27, 2012 08:58 AM (8y9MW)
You won't like this, but the fact is that Mitt Romney doesn't care. It's a feature, not a bug. He's trying to yank the Republican Party back to some position of perceived sanity so that average voters won't see it as The Crazy Party. He's trying to do for the Republicans what Bill Clinton did, all too briefly unfortunately, for the Democrats. We can stomp and scream all day long that we aren't crazy, but we have largely lost that battle due to the relentless spinning of the MFM. Mitt is being a realist by deciding he can't change what the MFM does, and he doesn't want any part of The Crazy. He's not going to pander to us, he's not going to "acknowledge our anger and frustration." He's trying to run a campaign as Generic Republican, in a year when he knows that people rally want to throw the SCOAMF out but won't do it if the alternative is The Crazy.
You probably violently disagree with this characterization, and I get it. Just trying to explain to you what's going on here.
Posted by: rockmom at January 27, 2012 05:50 AM (aBlZ1)
Posted by: dagny at January 27, 2012 05:50 AM (0BpYu)
There are ways that they can insure everyone and still lower costs and still make a profit and not go out of business. I know beck is always saying the goal is single payor government run insurance and others add with death panels but the industry itself can make sure this doesn't happen. Problem is if they pass legislation that makes it impossible. But if the playing field is as it is now, there is a lot the insurance industry can do to prevent itself from becoming the financial industry or the auto industry.
Posted by: ambrosia at January 27, 2012 05:51 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: Obama 2012 at January 27, 2012 05:51 AM (e8kgV)
But it will have already proven "impossible" to get rid of the 2%. Proven by the fact it wasn't repealed in the first place.
It will never be easier to repeal those parts of ObamaCare than it will be come January 2013. Never. So if it's too hard then, it will always be too hard.
If ObamaCare is just politics to you- or if you think "just politics" will get rid of it, you're sadly mistaken. ObamaCare will fundamentally transform a Republic in name and fact into a Republic in name only, and a Feudal State in fact.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 27, 2012 05:52 AM (8y9MW)
Good analysis, Rockmom. I think although the base is besotted with consternation for this foppish 'gentleman' Romney (and I use the word in its palest and thinnest connotation), his campaign has been perfect so far. The base and a good majority of independents will crawl over broken glass to vote Obama out. Turnout will not be a problem.
While you and I and those here are not excited about Romney, and with good reason, he's uniquely positioned at the moment to win.
Posted by: Truman North at January 27, 2012 05:53 AM (I2LwF)
Posted by: jeannebodine at January 27, 2012 05:53 AM (byR8d)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 27, 2012 05:54 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 27, 2012 05:55 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: Nash Rambler at January 27, 2012 05:56 AM (oxgwp)
Until Norm Coleman publicly admitted that A Romney Presidency would not lead to a total repeal of Obamacare, the mantra from MItt's supporters has gone from "total repeal" to "98% repeal". The party line was total repeal until Norm let the cat out of the bag.
Am I the only one seeing the hypocrisy regarding this issue from Mitt and fan club?
Math hint for you people, 98<100.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at January 27, 2012 05:56 AM (kaOJx)
Posted by: Lincolntf at January 27, 2012 05:57 AM (hiMsy)
Posted by: TheQuietMan at January 27, 2012 05:57 AM (1Jaio)
" All I'm saying is, I would rather accept 98 percent victory than NO victory."
So now the party line is "98% or nothing at all"?
What a difference 48 hours makes.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at January 27, 2012 05:57 AM (kaOJx)
Posted by: Truman North at January 27, 2012 05:58 AM (I2LwF)
Posted by: dagny at January 27, 2012 05:58 AM (0BpYu)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 27, 2012 06:00 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: Truman North at January 27, 2012 06:00 AM (I2LwF)
Posted by: Lincolntf at January 27, 2012 09:57 AM (hiMsy)
Try Chris Plante at WMAL dot com. He's on 9-12 eastern. I promise you will love him. He is not only a moron at heart but funny, smart, and unafraid. He's also alot easier to listen to than the other guys.
Posted by: dagny at January 27, 2012 06:00 AM (0BpYu)
Oh yeah, I will add that I fully acknowledge that we are not going to get a fundamental change in direction if Mitt Romney is elected President. We'll get better budgets, some whittling down of the debt, conservative judges, maybe some good revisions to Dodd-Frank, and some partial repeal of Obamacare. I'll settle for that 7 days a week. Your mileage may vary.
And you know what? If all Romney does is NOTHING for four years, it will probably work. The economy will heal itself without a lot of "policy" from Washington, in fact I would argue that the gridlock of the last year is already having a salutary effect. If we get back to 4% growth and nnon-exposive federal budgets for a few years it will have a large impact on the debt and the deficit. If we stop the regulatory madness it will help even more.
We won the 2010 elections because Obama and especially Pelosi and Reid took the country too far to the left, where it didn't want to go. It wasn't just Obamacafre, it was the failed $800 billion stimulus and a the huge deficits and the mortgage bailouts and the GM takeover and all sorts of stuff that just shocked people. The correct repsonse is not necessarily to yank the country back the same distance to the right. If we try that, we'll meet the same fate in 2014 that the Democrats did in 2010.
Most of America is not ideological and people are tired of the ideological fights and the constant point-scoring that doesn't seem to get the nation anywhere. This is why I think Romney will beat Obama, and possibly very badly, because Obama will not be able to resist a hard-left class-warfare campaign against Romney, and the public is really tired of that kind of bomb-throwing and demonizing. It will make Obama look small and petty, which is not what people want their President to look like. And if gasoline hits $4 a gallon this summer, and Obama still refuses to apprive the Keystone pipeline, it's Katy bar the door, we'll be looking at a landslide with epic gains in the Senate and House to go with it.
Posted by: rockmom at January 27, 2012 06:01 AM (NYnoe)
Posted by: TheQuietMan at January 27, 2012 09:57 AM (1Jaio)
Yes
Posted by: dagny at January 27, 2012 06:02 AM (0BpYu)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 27, 2012 06:03 AM (niZvt)
http://www.breitbart.tv/who-is-rachel-maddow/
"I'll take the penis mightier for $400"
Posted by: kbdabear at January 27, 2012 06:03 AM (Y+DPZ)
Welcome Back Kotter" actor Robert Hegyes has died. Hegyes is best known for playing Juan Epstein on "Welcome Back Kotter," the 1970s sitcom, which starred John Travolta and Gabe Kaplan. He was 60.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at January 27, 2012 06:03 AM (XrrP7)
Posted by: Bain Das Capital at January 27, 2012 06:04 AM (tJa5V)
Posted by: Lincolntf at January 27, 2012 06:05 AM (hiMsy)
Posted by: dagny at January 27, 2012 06:05 AM (0BpYu)
" If we get back to 4% growth and nnon-exposive federal budgets for a few years it will have a large impact on the debt and the deficit."
f
Entitlements will blow the budget along with the Obamacare spending called for in the act.
Without some fundamentals changes in the tax code and cutting the budget, the USA is fucked. Plain and simple.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at January 27, 2012 06:05 AM (kaOJx)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 27, 2012 06:06 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: BlackOrchidHeartlessAgain at January 27, 2012 06:06 AM (SB0V2)
Why did the attorneys Santorum leave Pennsylvania to relocate in Virginia, except to attempt living like Newt, influence peddling as consultant lobbyists?
The nightmare of listening to "I'll Attack China!" Santorum's perpetual harangue could easily
drive idiots who prefer Obama's voice to disable the oppositional force to remove Obama from office.
Posted by: Panzer Trout at January 27, 2012 09:43 AM (lpWVn)
I'm not a big Santorum fan, but he moved his family to Virginia pretty early on in his first Senate term. He has 7 kids. It's their home and his wife is homeschooling them. Virginia has very favorable laws for homeschooling and the Santorums probably have a large network of friends who homeschool. Rick knew when his Senate term ended that he was done politically in Pennsylvania. There wasn't much else he could do professionally in Virginia to make enough money to support a family of 9, except go the law firm/lobbying route.
Posted by: rockmom at January 27, 2012 06:06 AM (NYnoe)
-------------
but but but you'd miss the whalers on the moon!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=60BjkUtqxPE
Posted by: Homer Rommel at January 27, 2012 06:08 AM (6fER6)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 27, 2012 06:09 AM (i6RpT)
" It will make Obama look small and petty,"
Who is going to run with this theme? The media? The same media that calls pointing out the deficit under Obama as "racist"?
Nothing from the media will say this.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at January 27, 2012 06:09 AM (kaOJx)
I never followed politics before Obamacare, have read all I can of the bill and articles about it during my Obama-imposed funemployment and I want the candidate who will get rid of it.
I will vote for the R nominee regardless.
Posted by: jeannebodine at January 27, 2012 06:12 AM (byR8d)
Don't have a problem with lobbyists. Wish I had gotten into that early. It's not illegal, maybe should be, but isn't.
Va is full of homeschoolers. I'm near the Pentagon, so right in the mix of things, and in my little neighborhood we have 4 sets of homeschoolers. If you're not Catholic or don't want to use their schools, and you're not wealthy enought to pay $30 thou/year starting in K for private, home schooling is your only option.
Posted by: dagny at January 27, 2012 06:12 AM (0BpYu)
Posted by: Lincolntf at January 27, 2012 06:13 AM (hiMsy)
Entitlements will blow the budget along with the Obamacare spending called for in the act.
Without some fundamentals changes in the tax code and cutting the budget, the USA is fucked. Plain and simple.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at January 27, 2012 10:05 AM (kaOJx)
Possibly. But it will be a lot easier to take these issues on when the economy has improved and people are feeling better about the future. Now is exactly the wrong time to do it.
Entitlements are not going to be discussed in this campaign, because neither candidate will want to. They will have to be faced by the next President, though. I would rather have a good numbers guy in there. It's perhaps the best argument of all for Romney. The guy knows how to turn around failing enterprises, there is no doubt about that. I wish he would make that the center of his campaign from now on.
Posted by: rockmom at January 27, 2012 06:13 AM (NYnoe)
Posted by: BlackOrchidHeartlessAgain at January 27, 2012 06:13 AM (SB0V2)
Last night some of them were arguing that Obamacare won't be a factor in the general. Not because Mitt would want to avoid the subject, but because, you know, it's just, like, so two years ago.
Posted by: runninrebel at January 27, 2012 09:59 AM (N/1Dm)
UNBELEIVABLE
Posted by: SarahW at January 27, 2012 06:14 AM (LYwCh)
"But it will be a lot easier to take these issues on when the economy has improved and people are feeling better about the future."
And this will happen when without serious changes in DC? Never. But hey, we can always hope for change.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at January 27, 2012 06:15 AM (kaOJx)
Posted by: dagny at January 27, 2012 06:15 AM (0BpYu)
Posted by: BlackOrchidHeartlessAgain at January 27, 2012 06:15 AM (SB0V2)
Posted by: Bain, McBain at January 27, 2012 06:18 AM (tJa5V)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at January 27, 2012 06:18 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: jeannebodine at January 27, 2012 06:18 AM (byR8d)
OT. My son Chris and his sweetie Cori have entered a contest and I need some Moron help. Chris was in the 4th Brigade of the 1st Inf. Div. when it made the early surge buildup into Bagdad. He spent 15 months there and came back with 2 Purple Hearts and a disabality from the VA. He is doing good now and he and Cori made a great video for this contest. If you folks could watch it and leave a comment ( Chris and Cori ), you could help put him over the top. Thanks
Posted by: Haze Gray at January 27, 2012 06:19 AM (bzsEk)
In one case, the trustee for one of the Romney trusts sent two letters to the Internal Revenue Service electing to use an apparently irrelevant section of the tax code, and in the process misstated the facts involved.
That mistake did not affect the taxes owed, but another error was more
significant. It appears that the return filed by that trust overstated
capital gains realized by nearly $300,000, causing Mr. Romney and his
wife to pay about $44,000 more in taxes than they owed.
Good help is hard to find.
Posted by: Obama 2012 at January 27, 2012 06:19 AM (e8kgV)
>>Posted by: rockmom at January 27, 2012 10:01 AM (NYnoe)
I admire your optimism, but at this point it appears a bit rosy.
We are a bit far gone economically, and entitlementwise for a steady as she goes type at this point, and frankly that is what the commies have always counted on in their long march.
I am also not as confident that Obowbow fatigue translates to voter enthusiasm for Captain Miquetoast.
Posted by: ontherocks at January 27, 2012 06:19 AM (ZJCDy)
Mine was for Bob Dole.
So I'm trying to debug this shit code that don't work, and when I go to get more engineering fuel, the SCOAMF is on the breakroom TV telling a bunch of stupid kids he's going to "keep college affordable"...no doubt with my money.
It's just not worth getting out of bed anymore.
Posted by: HeatherRadish needs italics. And a beer. at January 27, 2012 06:19 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: BlackOrchidHeartlessAgain at January 27, 2012 06:19 AM (SB0V2)
My son's was for McCain.
*sigh*
Posted by: Jane D'oh at January 27, 2012 06:19 AM (UOM48)
America- so two years ago.
Posted by: SarahW at January 27, 2012 06:20 AM (LYwCh)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at January 27, 2012 06:20 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: BlackOrchidHeartlessAgain at January 27, 2012 06:20 AM (SB0V2)
Who is going to run with this theme? The media? The same media that calls pointing out the deficit under Obama as "racist"?
Nothing from the media will say this.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at January 27, 2012 10:09 AM (kaOJx)
People will see it, just like they saw it in Jimmy Carter when he ran around calling Reagan a dangerous warmonger. The media were echoing him right up until Election Day, but the people decided Carter was not man enough for the job. The race card won't work against Romney, he's not from the South and in fact his father was considered one of the real leaders in corporate America on civil rights. His father was actually instrumental in getting the Mormon Church to open up to blacks in the 1970s.
Obama tried setting up the Occupy "movement" as a way to frame the election against Romney and get people more riled up about "inequality" than they are about 25 million people still unemployed or underemployed. It was pretty much a Hail Mary effort to try to frame the election in a way that would favor Obama. But it fizzled. The polls are consistently showing that people are still more concerned about jobs than anything. Obama's Kansas speech and the SOTU haven't moved the needle at all.
Posted by: rockmom at January 27, 2012 06:21 AM (NYnoe)
Posted by: BlackOrchidHeartlessAgain at January 27, 2012 06:21 AM (SB0V2)
Entitlements are not going to be discussed in this campaign, because neither candidate will want to.
No one ever wants to discuss entitlements which is why we are now utterly fucked. I'm upper end Gen X and I've been subjected nearly all my life to yammering about how Social Security won't be there and Medicare is going to bankrupt the country and Something Must Be Done. Nothing is ever done and the can gets kicked down the road.
I'll be blunt, I am to the point where I believe nothing will ever be done until it's far past too late. The math doesn't lie and there's no political will to address the problems. The shit is going to hit the fan and it will be horrific.
Posted by: alexthechick at January 27, 2012 06:23 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: jeannebodine at January 27, 2012 06:23 AM (byR8d)
And I'm telling you that the 2% you're willing to keep IS "NO victory."
If we repeal every jot and tittle except for the requirement of insurance companies to cover pre-existing conditions, we have failed to repeal the single most devastating piece of ObamaCare. Devastating to the point it will- it must- lead to single payer, socialized medicine.
Are vic or any of the other Cancer-stricken morons around? I'm going to be using old numbers, here, so they might be able to help me.
I used to process claims for BlueCross BlueShield here in Texas. I worked with the Texas Health Insurance Risk Pool- we saw a lot of (not surprisingly) "high risk" members (high risk normally defined as "diagnosed with high blood pressure" but often enough defined as "has lymphoma" or something similar.) That means we saw a lot of cancer treatment claims. Now THIRP was (is) a Plan with a Very High Deductible- the largest one we had was $5000 (yep, yearly deductible) with a $2500 Co-Insurance maximum (for a total Out-of-Pocket Maximum of $7,500/yr -not including prescriptions).
If, on January 1st you went in for Chemo- that entire visit (the drugs, the hospital facility charges, the doctor, etc.) would completely knock out your Deductible, and you'd still wind up paying about another $1,000. The second Visit would finish your out-of-pocket maximum, and the insurance company would be on the hook for the rest of your sessions (plus any other medical expenses) for the rest of the year. The absolute highest premiums we charged were (try not to feint) $1,500/mo. On the seriously high-risk patients (probably about 55 - 60% of our membership) we lost more money than their premiums paid.
So trust me when I say- if insurance companies had to cover pre-existing conditions, they would go out of business in a hurry. We survived for two reasons- under current law, you still have to cover "pre-existing conditions" but you can require proof of continuous insurance coverage for the preceeding 12 months- we did that, and if you didn't produce that "Proof of Creditable Coverage" your coverage for that condition didn't kick in for a year (more complicated than that, really, but this is already a long comment). Second- because we were subsidized by the other insurance companies in Texas (basically, they paid us to handle those cases so they wouldn't have to). And we never, ever made a profit- those subsidies were just enough to keep our final balance for the year at 0.00.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 27, 2012 06:23 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at January 27, 2012 06:24 AM (UOM48)
" The race card won't work against Romney, he's not from the South"
Take your bigoted view and shove it. Herr Moby.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at January 27, 2012 06:24 AM (kaOJx)
That is Mitt's only strength - being lackluster and uninspiring enough to get sadder but wiser Obots of yore to shrug their shoulders and let it all go....
However, Mitt won't get those votes exactly. More likely the dispirited will just not really get out the vote.
That's a strength with a definite downside and may be more liability than gain.
Posted by: SarahW at January 27, 2012 06:24 AM (LYwCh)
Watched Judge Napolitano last night, and he went over all the new fees and taxes that Romney raised in MA and the ones he wanted to, so many in fact that the liberal legislature had to rein it in.
Romney may end up the nominee, but he in no way is a conservative.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at January 27, 2012 06:24 AM (XrrP7)
Posted by: Bain, McBain at January 27, 2012 06:25 AM (tJa5V)
It isn't just about the content of that particular bill, which is still defying attempts to understand all of its consequences. It's about the immensity of the bill itself. The sheer page count declares it to be a great steaming mound of shit full of gotchas, loopholes, special favors, etc.
If some brave Congress Critter put forth a bill limiting the sheer size of bills to rein in the 'baffle them with bullshit' approach to legislation, I'd be deeply interested. This is a weapon that needs to be taken out of their hands. They've made it plain they cannot be trusted to write a simple straightforward proposal when they know the individual components of their wish list will not stand up to scrutiny.
Time to make it a requirement.
Posted by: epobirs at January 27, 2012 06:25 AM (kcfmt)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 27, 2012 06:25 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: BlackOrchidHeartlessAgain at January 27, 2012 06:25 AM (SB0V2)
Posted by: jeannebodine at January 27, 2012 06:25 AM (byR8d)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 27, 2012 10:25 AM (i6RpT)
He really likes his corpseman(tm). By the way, my ghey hair stylist is a former Navy corpseman! heh
Posted by: Jane D'oh at January 27, 2012 06:26 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: Jimmuy at January 27, 2012 06:27 AM (7jkW7)
capital gains realized by nearly $300,000, causing Mr. Romney and his
wife to pay about $44,000 more in taxes than they owed."
--------------------------
So, when a Republican makes as mistake on his taxes the result is an overpayment. You all remember Turbo Tax Timmy's little mistake, don't you?
Mitt ought to be able to make a campaign ad out of that.
Posted by: Retread at January 27, 2012 06:28 AM (joSBv)
Posted by: eman at January 27, 2012 06:28 AM (pn8u0)
The end of America, really. The death blow; and I'm not trying to be hyperbolic. Either we are free men with the right to own property and direct its use or we are slaves. <===== It's all so Liberty or Death, I know but it's absolutely true.
Posted by: SarahW at January 27, 2012 06:29 AM (LYwCh)
Posted by: SurferDoc at January 27, 2012 06:30 AM (6H6FZ)
Exactly. If you keep any part of the Trojan Horse, it's going to turn out to have enemies hiding inside. The only safe thing to do is push it back outside the gate and light it on fire as you withdraw.
Course, the heart of the medical care cost problem is market distortion and that is a direct result of the rise of employer provided health care, with Medicare adding to the mess a few years later. A lot needs to change before we can get back to a sane system where people can simply pay for what they need based on realistic numbers.
Posted by: epobirs at January 27, 2012 06:30 AM (kcfmt)
Oh, Epobirs. It's "not worth getting angry about."
Posted by: SarahW at January 27, 2012 06:31 AM (LYwCh)
Posted by: Bain, McBain at January 27, 2012 06:31 AM (tJa5V)
Didn't some candidate have a platform that included cupcakes? I'd like to hear more.
Team Meteor is proud to present it's platform for a grand new dawn in America. Team Meteor promises to stand ready with cookies, cupcakes with sprinkles and cheesecake as the proud spirit of the American citizenry comes face to face with the problems facing the future. Team Meteor has full confidence that the American people are capable of dealing with a post-apocalyptic world after impact.
Team Meteor - Cookies, cupcakes with sprinkles, cheesecake and ELE for all!
Posted by: Team Meteor at January 27, 2012 06:31 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 27, 2012 06:32 AM (niZvt)
^^^
Is this in reference to the tests you were talking about last week? Really disappointing to hear that was in Catholic school. That's the crap you should only expect from public schools.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at January 27, 2012 06:32 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: jeannebodine at January 27, 2012 10:25 AM (byR8d)
Now there's a candidate I'd like to learn more about!
Posted by: Meggy MacnCheese at January 27, 2012 06:33 AM (GsBJY)
" But I'm telling you, the odds heavily stacked against that, and I don't see how Moonbeam Newt would change that."
Mitt never said any of this, nor his supporters, until the past two days.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at January 27, 2012 06:34 AM (kaOJx)
By being willing to start from a position of full repeal. A position which (sorry, it's been lost in all the nuance and revision) I don't believe that Mitt Romney would take.
Just like Congressional Republicans- if you start from your "Compromise" Position, you'll end up accepting their starting position. Or something much closer too it, at least.
If we don't start from "It all has to go. All of it," then we'll certainly not get rid of all of it, will we? And Mitt has stated- early and often- that he doesn't see any reason to start form "It all has to go."
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 27, 2012 06:35 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Troll Media at January 27, 2012 06:36 AM (tJa5V)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 27, 2012 06:37 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 27, 2012 06:37 AM (niZvt)
Yeah I guess I am an optimist, I just have lived long enough to have seen pretty much everything happen in a Presidential campaign, but actual campaign tactics hardly ever matter, especially when an incumbent is running for reelection. Voters either decide the incumbent has done a good job and deserves another term, or they don't.
It's been obvious to me for months that the Obama people really know he is toast. The Democratic Party cannot afford to dump him or they'll lose the black vote for the next 50 years. They're stuck with him and they're going down with him. Look at all the Dems retiring in the House and Senate. They know this election is gonna be brutal. They tried one last desperation move to launch the Occupy movement to try to recapture the "movement" feeling of Obama's 2008 campaign, but it quickly got taken over by the professional anarchists and thugs and the White House itself pulled the plug on it. Now they are painting Obama into a smaller and smaller populist/leftwing corner trying to hang on to their base for dear life so the entire election is not a total wipeout for them like 2008 was for us.
Watch the professional Democrats like Begala and Brazile on TV. Listen to them closely. You will hear the resignation in their voices. They know Obama is going to lose.
The GOP nomination fight has been so hard and the field so crowded precisely because everyone who knows anything in the GOP also knows Obama is going down. This nomination is worth having because whoever gets it is going to be the next President.
Posted by: rockmom at January 27, 2012 06:38 AM (aBlZ1)
Posted by: tasker at January 27, 2012 06:39 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Troll Santorum Subconscious at January 27, 2012 06:39 AM (tJa5V)
Posted by: jeannebodine, Team Meteor-Bot at January 27, 2012 06:39 AM (byR8d)
cupcakes? I'd like to hear more." Beware the Christian Terrorists! It begins with cupcakes and the next thing you now, they're washing your car...
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, feeling all extra curmudgeony today at January 27, 2012 06:40 AM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: BlackOrchidHeartlessAgain at January 27, 2012 06:41 AM (SB0V2)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at January 27, 2012 06:41 AM (awv7l)
Posted by: Troll Herman Cain, McBain McCain at January 27, 2012 06:42 AM (tJa5V)
Posted by: tasker at January 27, 2012 06:43 AM (r2PLg)
Bet the IRS goes over her taxes with a fine-toothed comb this year though.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at January 27, 2012 06:43 AM (UOM48)
He's not even Hispanic, I believe. IIRC, he's also a cousin to Jon Bon Jovi.
Posted by: Lady in Black....{sigh} at January 27, 2012 06:43 AM (F+Xfj)
A national health mandate is the camel straw, while also installing centrally planned government as the focal point of all personal, civic, and career interactions - irrevocably.
It and its intentially tangled 2000+ page morass needs incineration ASAP.
Posted by: ontherocks at January 27, 2012 06:44 AM (ZJCDy)
I don't think you understand the concept of the melting pot.
Posted by: Kerry at January 27, 2012 06:45 AM (a/VXa)
Oh, and as for Obamacare, we already HAVE socialized medicine now for nearly half the population. The reason fixing the rest of it is so impossible is because so much of the system is already on a single-payer government basis. Government keeps ratcheting down what it pays under Medicare and Medicaid to save money, so the costs get shifted to the rest of us who are actually paying our way.
My own preference would be to at least have the next Congress come up with a budget that fully funds Medicare, so the public can see what kind of charades have been played with it over the years and see what the real choices are. It would probably cost close to $800 billion for Medicare to actually pay 100% of charges and pay for every procedure and device that people want. Now, we can either pay for that up front with tax dollars, which would be pretty efficient and cause costs to drop dramatically for the rest of us, or we can keep up this stupid Rube Goldberg system we have now where the costs get shifted and the pain gets spread around, and we need things like the Death Panels to start determining who gets treatment.
Posted by: rockmom at January 27, 2012 06:45 AM (aBlZ1)
Beware the Christian Terrorists! It begins with cupcakes and the next thing you now, they're washing your car...
Don't forget sending pound cake and raking the leaves and cleaning up after the riot . . .
Posted by: alexthechick at January 27, 2012 06:45 AM (VtjlW)
The electorate is different than it was 30 years ago. More ignorant, more dependent, more shallow.
Posted by: HeatherRadish needs italics. And a beer. at January 27, 2012 06:45 AM (ZKzrr)
Sorry Czech, Romney's campaign never said anything about partial repeal only til this week. Romney hasn't campaigned on a partial repeal. His supporters are only starting this mantra this week.
Face it, there will be no total repeal of Obamacare under a Romney Presidency. Win for the left.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at January 27, 2012 06:46 AM (kaOJx)
No.
As if lobbying is the only professional route for attorneys in Virginia. The most lucrative, obviously. Yes, "enough money" always excuses the rotating door from legislating to lobbying legislation. So you admit that you see no problem with members of Congress and of the Military retiring from office in order direct Boards and Lobby to profit from the legislation they sponsored.
How much is "enough money" to home school? Btw, Rick Santorum seems as far removed from his emigrant mining grandfather as you are since in all of his career, what has he accomplished to improve the working lot for miners, Nada? He blows his own horn so loud, we'd already know of the improved working conditions for miners or the non-profit charity for miners, or whatever good works (aside from his own personal success, on the taxpayer's dime, directly/indirectly) that he's achieved for the benefit of those who yet mine today. No, he left that world behind, washed his hands of hard work.
Posted by: Panzernashorn at January 27, 2012 06:47 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: polynikes - Texan for Romney at January 27, 2012 06:48 AM (fuUYY)
Posted by: tasker at January 27, 2012 06:48 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 27, 2012 06:48 AM (i6RpT)
So he voted for SCOAMF, still supports him, and doesn't think the fuckwit has done anything to make things worse.
The hate, it burns.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at January 27, 2012 06:48 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: tasker at January 27, 2012 06:49 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 27, 2012 06:49 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: rockmom at January 27, 2012 06:49 AM (aBlZ1)
2008 "Promise them anything; just get their votes!" loser Romney attacking 2012 Newt for stealing his line.
Posted by: Panzernashorn at January 27, 2012 06:49 AM (lpWVn)
Your optimism is much needed around here, and I truly pray you are right. Every thread seems to turn to DOOM. Gets quite depressing, especially when people on our side are facing such a bleak lineup of characters for the R nomination. Hardly anyone has any passion for supporting any of them. Only resigned realization that we've got to vote ABO.
Posted by: Lady in Black....{sigh} at January 27, 2012 06:50 AM (F+Xfj)
Posted by: BlackOrchidHeartlessAgain at January 27, 2012 06:52 AM (SB0V2)
If Puerto Rico is so gung-ho to become the 51st state, why do they maintain their own set of Olympic athletes, and march into the stadium as a sovereign nation?
Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at January 27, 2012 06:52 AM (YmPwQ)
Posted by: rockmom at January 27, 2012 10:38 AM (aBlZ1)
.
So....you're agreeing that Newt could win just as easily as Mitt could.
.
The big problem that I have had with Romney, all along, is that the Dims and the JEF have been campaigning against "the evil rich" for years. .....So it seems insane to me, for us to give them the guy that they have already been campaigning against.
.
Oh, and with Romney there is that added bonus of him being a Mormon. .....So they can replay all those anti-Mormon shows 24/7, in order to creep people out about him.
Posted by: wheatie at January 27, 2012 06:53 AM (ALwK/)
I'm actually doing awesome. Had a great day yesterday talking to son's speech and reading support team and feeling really positive now.
What's going on? Tests? Catholic schools? Accomodations? I've been there and there and there and there. I know a few tricks. What's going on?
Posted by: dagny at January 27, 2012 06:53 AM (0BpYu)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, feeling all extra curmudgeony today at January 27, 2012 06:53 AM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 27, 2012 06:54 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 27, 2012 06:55 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at January 27, 2012 06:55 AM (XrrP7)
BlackOrchidHeartlessAgain at January 27, 2012 10:52 AM
So you think $800 billion in new entitlement spending will fix Medicare and that if Romney did nothing with spending in DC that the economy will magically turn around?
Ok. You are entitled to your beliefs.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at January 27, 2012 06:56 AM (kaOJx)
Posted by: tasker at January 27, 2012 06:56 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at January 27, 2012 06:58 AM (jucos)
Posted by: tasker at January 27, 2012 06:59 AM (r2PLg)
" I know some ally of Romney's mentioned it "
Norm Coleman is a campaign advisor for the Romney Campaign and has been mentioned as the possible HHS Secretary in a Romney Administration. He said it in a health care discussion during a interview.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at January 27, 2012 06:59 AM (kaOJx)
511...."Not worth getting angry about."
......It also plays badly to Romney's out of touch, too rich to get what everyone is mad about image.
.
Yeah, tasker.....the arrogant dismissiveness of that remark was beyond cringeworthy.
Posted by: wheatie at January 27, 2012 07:00 AM (ALwK/)
Posted by: polynikes - Texan for Romney at January 27, 2012 07:00 AM (fuUYY)
The strangling of small businesses is one of the intended unintended consequences built in by the commiecrats.
You can't make everyone dependent on the government until you crush upwardly mobile middle class aspirations and its practical applications.
This marxist strategy in a national health mandate is a stealth feature for them and not a bug.
Posted by: ontherocks at January 27, 2012 07:01 AM (ZJCDy)
Yeah, the Community Efficiency Standards Panels will let people die slowly instead of shipping them to gas chambers. So it's not *really* Aktion T4...
Posted by: HeatherRadish needs italics. And a beer. at January 27, 2012 07:01 AM (ZKzrr)
Saying Obamacare is not worth getting angry about makes me angry enough to support Newt Gingrich.
Posted by: Entropy, Racism Delenda Est at January 27, 2012 07:01 AM (mf67L)
From Boston.Com October 2007.
"
On the presidential campaign trail, Romney brags about a $3 billion budget shortfall he said he closed as governor, without any tax increases. He doesn't mention the more than $400 million in fees he raised instead. He also raised more than $300 million by closing so-called corporate loopholes, a revenue-raising measure the business community calls a tax increase.
"He should be held accountable for fee increases and closing the loopholes," said former Massachusetts governor Paul Cellucci, who now supports Rudy Giuliani in his bid to win the GOP nomination."
Posted by: Dick Nixon at January 27, 2012 07:02 AM (kaOJx)
Posted by: tasker at January 27, 2012 07:02 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: BlackOrchidHeartlessAgain at January 27, 2012 07:02 AM (SB0V2)
In more ways than one.
I would like to impale Yoshie on 5/8 rerod and urinate on his mug.
Posted by: ontherocks at January 27, 2012 07:03 AM (ZJCDy)
Gee, who should I believe, you or Judge N. Yeah, I think I know.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at January 27, 2012 07:04 AM (XrrP7)
truce over ObamaCare due to the mutual self interests of both Romney and Obama.
----
I want a damn white riot if that happens. I want to burn a starbucks down and then go out for sushi.
Posted by: Entropy, Racism Delenda Est at January 27, 2012 07:05 AM (mf67L)
Posted by: polynikes - Texan for Romney at January 27, 2012 07:05 AM (fuUYY)
Posted by: Mandy P. at January 27, 2012 07:07 AM (qFpRI)
So companies paying more taxes polynikes is not raising taxes.
Thanks for pointing that out. Have a great day.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at January 27, 2012 07:07 AM (kaOJx)
Posted by: Mandy P. at January 27, 2012 07:16 AM (qFpRI)
Posted by: Mandy P. at January 27, 2012 11:07 AM (qFpRI)
I think that the preference cascade is colliding with the normalcy bias.
Hopefully good blogspeak like that will get ace up and at 'em.
Posted by: ontherocks at January 27, 2012 07:21 AM (ZJCDy)
Posted by: Haze Gray at January 27, 2012 10:19 AM (bzsEk)
Done! Very cute couple...Hope they win!
Posted by: Tami at January 27, 2012 07:28 AM (X6akg)
Mitt's answer to last night's religious faith affecting his presidential agenda question was disconcerting to the skeptic. Mitt reiterated his Mormon Missionary POTUS Faith of My Fathers grounds for his ultimate determinations directing our nation. Who has a link to that prepared "testimony" from last night?
Too many Republicans endorse Mitt's god-man-universal-creator self-image as the 21st Century revision of "American Global Exceptionalism" superimposed as better-than "grandiose" Newt. Such "exceptionalism" excuses the most heinous of crimes against humanity, promoting "humanitarian" wars of genocide.
Sharp tongue and wit intact, Newt fell his own victim, proving a lie that deceit will conquer Obama-deceit in debate. Falling beneath Obamalite hardly qualifies Obamalite as America's champion against Obama's agenda. Rather, Newt simply illustrates the need for this election's oppositional candidate to be a man of constitutional integrity.
And those advocating we forfeit the repeal of ObamaCare that's proven to ruin a healthy economy and bury a poor economy, this far away from Nov.2012, in the name of "sanity" proves another deceit. When ObamaCare taxation kicks in during these coming 4 years, doing nothing won't "overcome" the expenditures to augment this Depression's economic pain. Never fear, Obama said it best (for Obamalite), "I'm not afraid for my kids future."
AFFORDABLE HEALTH CARE was a Democratic talking point leading up to the 2008 campaign, the name attached to Obama's unaffordable law. Republicans waited so long in a Party Agenda response, that even now reaching the end of January 2012, there STILL is no concise Republican Party unified legislation prepared (spearheaded by the Congressional Caucus of Physicians, the Tea Party House Caucus and Senate Caucus!) for a vote that will REPLACE the "law" of ObamaCare with what measures are proven that actually lower the cost of health care insurance. Vote the platform best supporting a strong economic recovery.
Posted by: Panzernashorn at January 27, 2012 07:29 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: Larsen E. Whipsnade at January 27, 2012 07:49 AM (6BgmB)
I tried to read his "Abrams is lying about Newt" article, but the writing is so crappy my eyes glaze over every time I look at it. I got as far as this quote:
"President Reagan's strong rhetoric, which is adequate, and his administration's weak policies, which are inadequate and will ultimately fail."
You know what? I don't give a shit who else also said that. What I care about is that Newt did say that, and was completely wrong.
I also don't give a shit about "oohhh, all these people are being mean to Newt" whining. Give me the facts, then give me your interpretation.
Lord didn't do that, so his article #FAILs.
Posted by: Greg Q at January 27, 2012 09:54 AM (/0a60)
I think you're out of your mind for thinking Mitt is a winner; and I don't want him on my side. The dog story alone will kill him in the general.
Posted by: SarahW at January 27, 2012 12:17 PM (LYwCh)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3151 seconds, 628 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Good Morning Morons today is Friday January 27, 1012. On this day in 1880 Thomas Edison got a patent for one of those shitty lights that are now illegal. And I have to say it peaked out at 75.1° here yesterday. Damn all that AGW shit
Posted by: Vic at January 27, 2012 02:54 AM (YdQQY)