December 06, 2012
— andy Looks like Gabe's MIA this morning.
Posted by: andy at
04:07 AM
| Comments (209)
Post contains 14 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Thorvald at December 06, 2012 04:08 AM (1V6Pv)
Posted by: Thorvald at December 06, 2012 04:09 AM (1V6Pv)
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2012 04:09 AM (YdQQY)
http://is.gd/9U8VGQ
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2012 04:10 AM (YdQQY)
http://is.gd/SAnc7h
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2012 04:10 AM (YdQQY)
http://is.gd/3PEty2
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2012 04:10 AM (YdQQY)
http://is.gd/DpwnmS
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2012 04:10 AM (YdQQY)
http://is.gd/MB99DH
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2012 04:11 AM (YdQQY)
http://is.gd/VJwENy
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2012 04:11 AM (YdQQY)
http://is.gd/nX4msw
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2012 04:11 AM (YdQQY)
http://is.gd/TuoqXD
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2012 04:11 AM (YdQQY)
http://is.gd/Tq9FM3
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2012 04:12 AM (YdQQY)
http://is.gd/3Deu9q
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2012 04:12 AM (YdQQY)
Cross-posted from the overnight thread.
I was looking for a Groucho Marx story last night, but IÂ’ll be damned if I can find it. So IÂ’ll tell it, but until I can find the reference, IÂ’ll have to substitute fake names:
Groucho was throwing a party one evening when he ran into a writer friend (we’ll call him Vic). “I’m glad you’re here, Vic,” said Groucho. “I want you to do me a favor.” He pointed across the room to. . .oh, let’s say CharlieBrown’sDildo, a director who’d just been signed to a big picture after a few years without any work.
“You see CBD over there?” Groucho asked. “This is the first time he’s been able to enjoy himself in a while. I want you to go over there and show him some money.”
“Show him what?” asked a flabbergasted Vic.
“Money,” Groucho repeated calmly. “He’s been broke, you know, and hasn’t seen any money in a long time. If you pull a five or ten-spot out of your pocket and show it to him, I know he’d be very grateful.”
So Groucho left a befuddled Vic and slowly worked his way around the party, saying hello and dropping a wisecrack here and there until he got to CBD. “Good to see you, old man,” Groucho beamed, shaking his hand. “I’m glad I got to you in time. Do you see Vic over there?” he went on, nodding across the room. “I just wanted to warn you that he’s been a little goofy lately. He insists on showing his money to people and nobody knows why. So if he pulls a bill out of his wallet, just nod and say nice things, will you?”
“Sure, Groucho. Anything you say.”
Leaving CBD, Groucho then grabbed himself a drink and a couple of friends heÂ’d let in on the joke, all of them barely containing their laughter as they watched the two men meet in the middle of the room, one holding out a five dollar bill to the other, who smiled and said it was a wonderful thing to see.
Hope you all have a wonderful day.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at December 06, 2012 04:12 AM (zF6Iw)
http://is.gd/4kOI8C
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2012 04:12 AM (YdQQY)
http://tinyurl.com/c47n2s
click on crossing web cam at the top...
It's a busy intersection where people try to recreate the Abby Road album cover and almost get run over...
Cam also good for Bird Watching !
Posted by: AmericanDawg at December 06, 2012 04:13 AM (c8hZ5)
Posted by: General Woundwort at December 06, 2012 04:13 AM (RrD4h)
http://is.gd/BlN4tr
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2012 04:13 AM (YdQQY)
http://is.gd/SFUtg7
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2012 04:13 AM (YdQQY)
Damn. Thought I fixed those tags. Need more tea.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at December 06, 2012 04:13 AM (zF6Iw)
http://is.gd/km1frM
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2012 04:13 AM (YdQQY)
At what point is someone gonna stand up, point at Boner and say "Fuck you, you fucking coward"?
I mean, no one stands up to this guy. Does he have that much power? Pics of Reps in donkey shows? What?
Posted by: BCochran1981 at December 06, 2012 04:14 AM (da5Wo)
I don't know if that's true but if it is I am going to be PO'd that they played the victim card.
Posted by: Miss Marple at December 06, 2012 04:14 AM (GoIUi)
http://is.gd/dAQyOj
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2012 04:14 AM (YdQQY)
http://is.gd/h721JC
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2012 04:14 AM (YdQQY)
http://is.gd/PKNzuY
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2012 04:14 AM (YdQQY)
http://is.gd/kLmd3T
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2012 04:15 AM (YdQQY)
http://is.gd/ctUqpL
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2012 04:15 AM (YdQQY)
http://is.gd/CeH1l6
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2012 04:15 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Al at December 06, 2012 04:15 AM (V70Uh)
http://is.gd/s7VF1M
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2012 04:16 AM (YdQQY)
Black Diamond
Attorneys Michael Knight and Lex Devlin agree to defend a jockey accused of murdering a fellow jockey while racing at Boston's Suffolk Downs. Their fast-paced investigation uncovers deception after deception as the pair digs into the seamier side of horse racing, an effort that makes them targets for Boston's Irish mafia.
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2012 04:16 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Self-reflection isn't my strong suit at December 06, 2012 04:16 AM (bS6uW)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at December 06, 2012 04:17 AM (XkWWK)
It is far to early for us to be talking about potential candidates for 2016. Not only is everyone sick of this shit but there are two other major concerns. First, we have to get by 2014 and we need to work on that to keep the House and try to take the Senate. Second, and most importantly of all, anyone we start pushing now is, by definition, an establishment candidate whoÂ’s turn it is. I want to see some damn new blood.
And thatÂ’s it for today.
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2012 04:17 AM (YdQQY)
There can be only One.
Apparently, it's Andy.
Posted by: BCochran1981 at December 06, 2012 04:18 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at December 06, 2012 04:19 AM (XkWWK)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at December 06, 2012 04:20 AM (5DR1j)
*******************************
So I'm still looking why Romney lost the election, and I think I've hit on something. Let me know what you think, though.
In general, Democrats win low turnout elections, and Republicans win high turnout elections (in general). So it behooves Republicans to ensure a high turnout election. So how do we do that.
The one thing that neither McCain nor Romney would do was get into conflict with Obama. Certainly they had areas of disagreement, but they wouldn't actually get into conflict. Now, this is important because conflict is exciting. People get involved in conflict; they root for one side or the other.
Take, for example, American Idol. American Idol did better every year until Simon Cowell left. Why? Because Simon Cowell was a dick. He was very specifically a dick, because it caused conflict. With him gone, there is no conflict, and the show is boring.
Or take American Wrestling (or, as we called it, "wrastling."). There was a time when no one paid attention to it. It wasn't entertaining at all. The some guy came along and decided that his wrastling persona was going to be "the bad guy." Suddenly, it wasn't two grown men in their underwear tussling in a boxing ring, it was a fight between Good and Evil. To this day, the WWE keeps that dynamic, and they do very well.
I think Republican politicians, especially on the national stage, need to court a certain kind of controversy, of conflict. Certain "well duh" rules apply here of course (if you're ever having to explain that you think rape is bad, you've already lost, for instance). But imagine if, during one of the debates, Obama had said something about having to "raise revenue," and Romney had returned with this rejoinder:
"Mr. President, I completely reject your premise. We don't have a revenue problem, I'm not particularly interested in seeing the US Government take in more money. We have a spending problem, and that is what we should be attacking."
Now, instead of his mealy mouthed "Well, I want to raise revenues, too!" we have conflict. One side wants to "raise revenue," and the other wants to "cut spending." Now we have conflict. Now we have controversy. Now we have sides.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at December 06, 2012 04:20 AM (5DR1j)
Posted by: Self-reflection isn't my strong suit at December 06, 2012 04:21 AM (bS6uW)
Posted by: Brave Sir Robin at December 06, 2012 04:21 AM (Aitxy)
Posted by: Miss Marple at December 06, 2012 08:14 AM (GoIUi)
I know I don't believe Politico and Twitter is doubtful as well. If it shows up in Fox with an attribute I may believe it.
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2012 04:22 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at December 06, 2012 04:22 AM (XkWWK)
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2012 04:22 AM (YdQQY)
tl;dr
Posted by: BCochran1981 at December 06, 2012 04:22 AM (da5Wo)
At what point is someone gonna stand up, point at Boner and say "Fuck you, you fucking coward"?
Got a fund raising letter from the GOP last night, clearly they have Mitts list as Mitt was the only individual I donated too.
I wrote "Go to hell" and sent it back.
Posted by: gdonovan at December 06, 2012 04:23 AM (DzWaE)
-- my fox, tampa bay
/Man's best friend no longer consigned to back seat drivin'.
Posted by: panzernashorn at December 06, 2012 04:24 AM (BAnPT)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at December 06, 2012 04:24 AM (5DR1j)
12More Obamacare taxes finalized by IRS. Did you know stitches are a “device” to be taxed? What is the value of a few inches of thread?
............
The lady I share an office with called yesterday to line up a rep to come to a health fair to demonstrate glucometers. He informed her that the competition just laid off 70 reps. I'm going to guess that if a suture is a medical device then so are glucometers. My office mate is a big Obama fan and was devastated saying " I know one of those guys, he has four kids!!"
Posted by: Molly k. at December 06, 2012 04:25 AM (RX2lv)
Or maybe when your opponent calls you a cancer causing, wife killing, dog abusing, heartless, ruthless, greedy, unprincipled SOB maybe you should respond with a couple of ads or get a little worked up about it at a debate or two, maybe kick over a chair?
Maybe?
Posted by: General Woundwort at December 06, 2012 04:26 AM (RrD4h)
Posted by: Retread at December 06, 2012 04:26 AM (zxitI)
Posted by: Cricket at December 06, 2012 04:26 AM (DrC22)
http://tinyurl.com/a925bm2
Posted by: BCochran1981 at December 06, 2012 04:27 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at December 06, 2012 04:28 AM (79ueO)
My thought was Romney just did not inspire a big turnout and the Free Shit Brigade (FSB) turned out in droves.
That could be due to lack of conflict on Romney's part but I don't know. I never saw a single ad on TV here issued by his campaign so I don't know how he ran it.
I know it would probably be a waste of money to run ads here because there was no way in hell Obama was going to win Sc, but it left a lot of us wondering.
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2012 04:29 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at December 06, 2012 04:29 AM (XkWWK)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at December 06, 2012 04:29 AM (79ueO)
Oh how I would love to see that.
Posted by: BCochran1981 at December 06, 2012 04:29 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat [/i] at December 06, 2012 04:29 AM (feFL6)
Posted by: Self-reflection isn't my strong suit at December 06, 2012 04:30 AM (bS6uW)
Posted by: Self-reflection isn't my strong suit at December 06, 2012 04:30 AM (bS6uW)
I think that this "positive" ad thing is because people didn't really understand why Reagan won. He won because he was a friendly TV celebrity and Carter was a sour incompetent.
The celebrity portion of Reagan's personna was why he won, not his campaign style. For 30 years we have been following that idea and it is completely wrong.
I don't blame Romney for following what EVERY GOP EXPERT has been saying for 30 years. But we had better wake up about the effectiveness of negative ads and quit counting on the good sense of the American people.
Posted by: Miss Marple at December 06, 2012 04:31 AM (GoIUi)
dog abusing, heartless, ruthless, greedy, unprincipled SOB maybe you
should respond with a couple of ads or get a little worked up about it
at a debate or two, maybe kick over a chair?
Yeah, that, too.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at December 06, 2012 04:31 AM (5DR1j)
Disagreeing in public for the record might make us look mean and principled and stuff.
Trust me, my vast successful political experience tells me that conflict is NOT the way to run a campaign. Reasonable moderate voters are not interested in ideas, principles, or policies, they want candidates that will grow in office and reach across the aisle to do the people's work!
Posted by: Karl Rover at December 06, 2012 04:31 AM (Cnqmv)
Posted by: Jean at December 06, 2012 04:31 AM (hrAg/)
1 internetz fine, and a turn in the barrel.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at December 06, 2012 04:32 AM (5DR1j)
Posted by: alex at December 06, 2012 08:31 AM (uFY4s)
Someone asked for them after a Tuesday depressing dump of bad news.
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2012 04:32 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Self-reflection isn't my strong suit at December 06, 2012 04:34 AM (bS6uW)
Breaking: Weekly jobless claims fall 25,000 to 370,000. Economists expected 380,000.
Oh goody.....
Posted by: Tami at December 06, 2012 04:34 AM (X6akg)
Maybe times have changed.
Posted by: Al at December 06, 2012 04:34 AM (V70Uh)
Posted by: Jean at December 06, 2012 08:31 AM (hrAg/)
That has been going on for a long time. Thieves stole all the copper coils out of the A/C units for the animal shelter here in the middle of the Summer. Almost killed all the little doggies and kittehs.
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2012 04:34 AM (YdQQY)
...obedience training -- re-educate the political candidates. Enforce term limits already available via loss in re-election bid.
Elections yada yada -- try this consequence: Rather than salivating per paid commercial, train yourself to reject at face value whatever propaganda until you've researched the criticisms and fine printed foot notes, certainly beyond whatever shallow but swift PC group think "is" at the moment.
Posted by: panzernashorn at December 06, 2012 04:37 AM (BAnPT)
Morning.
You may recall back in October there was a huge explosion here in NW Louisiana. Turned out to be a company that was improperly storing explosives at Camp Minden.
Well, last week inspectors were back there, looked out a window and found a million pounds of explosive powder, sitting around in boxes outside.
Then when they started looking around, they determined that it was more like 6 million pounds of "M6 smokeless gunpowder".
A local town, Doyline, has been partially evacated for several days now while authorities try to move the boxes out of there.
I'll post a couple links separately.
Posted by: Mama AJ at December 06, 2012 04:37 AM (SUKHu)
Posted by: Tami at December 06, 2012 08:34 AM (X6akg)
I always thought it would be interesting for Faux (or economist) to post the original data (UE, jobless claims, inflation rate, etc.) as well as the corrected data (that generally invalidates the original data) AND the error value (raw correction value).
Posted by: Hrothgar - LIB or SMOD (for the Children) at December 06, 2012 04:37 AM (Cnqmv)
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat [/i] at December 06, 2012 04:38 AM (feFL6)
Posted by: Self-reflection isn't my strong suit at December 06, 2012 04:38 AM (bS6uW)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at December 06, 2012 04:38 AM (XkWWK)
It happened at my brother's company about four years ago. The thieves went up on the roof and took all the copper they could get from four roof units. Cost him over $20K to replace.
Posted by: Retread at December 06, 2012 04:38 AM (zxitI)
Posted by: Mama AJ at December 06, 2012 04:40 AM (SUKHu)
It might be nice to push back on the liberal bastardization of language as well: revenues vice taxes, pro-choice vice pro-abortion, etc.
Posted by: Hrothgar - LIB or SMOD (for the Children) at December 06, 2012 04:40 AM (Cnqmv)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at December 06, 2012 04:40 AM (XkWWK)
On-line sales tax bill added to the defense authorization bill...has now passed the Senate 98-0. The House has a similar sales tax bill so this is a likely done deal.
Posted by: Vic
So, an up to 11.5% regressive tax increase. Thank goodness we have the Republicans around to hold the line on "revenues".
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at December 06, 2012 04:40 AM (kdS6q)
Posted by: Jean at December 06, 2012 04:40 AM (LnQr8)
1 - How are you going to make my taxes lower?
2 - How are you going to reduce the size, scope and reach of the federal/state/local government?
And that's pretty much it.
If those become base principles, sign me up!
I DON'T WANT TO HEAR ANY POLITICIAN TELL ME WHAT GREAT THINGS THEY WANT TO DO FOR ME!
Posted by: General Woundwort at December 06, 2012 04:41 AM (RrD4h)
Posted by: Retread at December 06, 2012 08:26 AM (zxitI)
Actually, Groucho danced on Hitler's grave. From an article in the Sarah Lawrence College Magazine:
The late comedian Groucho Marx, famous for his quick wit, performed some of his best work in 1958 on a pile of East Berlin rubble for an audience of five.
Among the five was Judith Dwan Hallet Â’64, then 16 and the daughter of Robert Dwan, the long-time director of GrouchoÂ’s radio and TV shows. She and her father, along with MarxÂ’s wife and 11-year-old daughter, had accompanied him on the tour of Europe. In Dornum, the German town where MarxÂ’s mother had been born, the travelers discovered that the Nazis had obliterated all Jewish graves, and removed from the local church the old register of inhabitants from his parentsÂ’ generation. Marx hired a car with a chauffeur, and told the driver to take the group to Adolph HitlerÂ’s grave in Berlin.
It was surprisingly easy to get there. The car slipped through a checkpoint into a devastated gray and brown city of people in solemn clothing. Marx told the chauffer to drive to the bunker where Hitler was said to have committed suicide, where he was supposedly still buried.
The rubble at the site was about 20 feet high. Wearing his characteristic beret but without the trademark cigar, Marx alone climbed the side of the debris. When he reached the top, he stood still for a moment. Then he launched himself, unsmiling, into a frenetic Charleston. The dance on HitlerÂ’s grave lasted a minute or two.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at December 06, 2012 04:41 AM (zF6Iw)
I don't know why they evacuated people. Smokeless powder is not much more than a fire hazard unless you confine it in strong metal containers with no blowout baffles.
Maybe they were worried about the quantity of it for a fire.
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2012 04:41 AM (YdQQY)
http://tinyurl.com/akj6rml
Fucking brilliant.
Posted by: BCochran1981 at December 06, 2012 04:41 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: alex at December 06, 2012 04:42 AM (uFY4s)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at December 06, 2012 04:43 AM (XkWWK)
Exactly. Even Reagan talked about it ("Uplifting" Campaign notwithstanding): "Bold Colors," he said. A clear distinction between "us" and "them."
And, truthfully, this won't always mean that Conservatives have to be mean SOBs. But when that's called for, we shouldn't shy from it.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at December 06, 2012 04:43 AM (5DR1j)
Posted by: Self-reflection isn't my strong suit at December 06, 2012 04:44 AM (bS6uW)
Posted by: Jean at December 06, 2012 04:45 AM (LnQr8)
This, too.
"Mr. President, do you mean you want to raise revenue, or do you want to raise taxes? Because, historically, you can do one or the other, but not both."
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at December 06, 2012 04:45 AM (5DR1j)
Call them out on their lies, mischaracterizations, obfuscations and false premises. Ridicule and demean their beliefs and worldview at every opportunity. Hit back with the truth and hit back hard.
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at December 06, 2012 08:38 AM (XkWWK)
This!
Posted by: Ammo Dump at December 06, 2012 04:45 AM (YYyqq)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at December 06, 2012 04:46 AM (5DR1j)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at December 06, 2012 08:45 AM (5DR1j)
Who, exactly, is going to ask him that question?
Posted by: BCochran1981 at December 06, 2012 04:46 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at December 06, 2012 04:47 AM (XkWWK)
Yeh, Vic, it was the quantity and the fact that they were moving it around. They are separating some of it, so that if any exsplodes, it won't set off *all* of it.
There was a thunderstorm Monday and this stuff is in boxes ouside...
Posted by: Mama AJ at December 06, 2012 04:47 AM (SUKHu)
Exactly! They can't do anything FOR us without doing something TO us.
Posted by: no good deed at December 06, 2012 04:48 AM (mjR67)
Posted by: Mama AJ, insufficiently caffinated at December 06, 2012 04:49 AM (SUKHu)
Don't get Big Brother in on the act of domestic surveillance -- oops, Patriot Act and DHS to watch over us, for our own good, of course. As if tax funded bureaucratic enterprise amounts to more than squandering capital principal and capitol principles down the drain with more corruption to show. (See Benghazi for open communication between national intelligence bureaus.)
And to think that Big Brother must have the world's text messages stored forever, in order to incriminate you all the more easily in whatever concoction they have brewing. ex: Joe the Plumber, George Zimmerman, etc., character and professional assassination via trial by media. Anything for an easy profit. Anything to pirate.
Posted by: panzernashorn at December 06, 2012 04:49 AM (BAnPT)
Posted by: Jean at December 06, 2012 04:49 AM (LnQr8)
Allen, you are correct. Obviously Obama has been playing like he's John Stewart, and with the Hollywood-ization of politics, it's only going to get worse. So putting up a guy who sounds like Mitt against a guy who sounds like he's a talk show host makes it tough.
On the other hand, act too much like their clown, and you turn off your base. So it's tricky. Can't go out there sounding like Mark Levin, can't go out there sounding like Bob Dole. Gotta find the sweet spot.
Miss M has it partly correct, but I believe there's an extra portion to Reagan that damn near every single politician and analyst continually fails to spot, even with my help, down here in comment-land. As Ace wrote recently, Reagan had a way of telling you uncomfortable things in a comfortable way (or something like that). More importantly, though is that Reagan had a knack for chopping through the loaded question crap from the press. SPECIFICALLY the loaded questions that bogged Santorum (to name one conspicuous example) down every single day he spoke to the media: God, Gays, Guns, Evolution, Global Warming. The gotcha questions.
Reagan had a way of answering the leftist hacks in short, tight messages that were difficult to raise an objection to. My favorite example was on abortion. Reagan gave some really great speeches on abortion, but those were well written to be solid arguments. But when interviewed, he always kept his answer short and sweet: "Until science catches up to the question of where does life begin, I always say, 'err on the side of life.'"
Pitch Perfect.
Not one dog in the race in 2012 ever bothered to study that answer.
No one ever bothered to analyze why it was so full of win.
Until candidates do that, they cannot break through the iron dome the media puts up around the leftist du jour.
Posted by: K~Bob at December 06, 2012 04:49 AM (oi6KG)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at December 06, 2012 04:51 AM (XkWWK)
I suspect the previous huge explosion was bomb filler material. Something like Octol(sp?) which is more explosive than dynamite.
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2012 04:51 AM (YdQQY)
Well, it would have been nice if Romney had, wouldn't it? Paul Ryan and Rand Paul certainly should.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at December 06, 2012 04:51 AM (5DR1j)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at December 06, 2012 04:51 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit. at December 06, 2012 04:52 AM (yiIja)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at December 06, 2012 04:53 AM (XkWWK)
No, we only wish we were screwed. Screwed would be so much better than what we are, that to compare the two is nonsensical.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at December 06, 2012 04:53 AM (5DR1j)
Posted by: SpongeBob Saget at December 06, 2012 04:53 AM (epxV4)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at December 06, 2012 04:54 AM (XkWWK)
I wonder where he got all his chemical weapons?
Posted by: Vizzini at December 06, 2012 04:55 AM (O7Q1u)
In the West, Fresh & Easy supermarkets are about to get their plug pulled by their British parent company. 199 stores to close.
Green shoots!
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at December 06, 2012 04:55 AM (kdS6q)
I hope not.
Octol is expensive, extremely powerful, and really easy to form into pretty much anything. Like suicide vests.
If we have lost control of stuff like that it does not bode well for the future.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at December 06, 2012 04:56 AM (GsoHv)
From another article:
Authorities are slowly moving some of the 6 million pounds of explosives improperly stored at a munitions recycling facility because they feared a chain reaction blast could have spread through corridors packed with explosive materials, the sheriff of the threatened area said Tuesday.
...
Webster Parish Sheriff Gary Sexton said Tuesday that the buildings operated by Explo Systems Inc. are several hundred yards apart but connected by above-ground corridors wide enough for a fork lift to shuttle materials between them.
He said state police who discovered the storage problems found the corridors stuffed with explosives, including a propellant called M6 that is used in artillery shells.
I'm still shaking my head about how the explosion was in Oct. but "investigators" just found this stuff last week.
Oh, and the owners of the company are out of the country, but expected to return.
Sure they will.
From the town next door:
Sexton said a trio of burglars apparently thought they could take advantage of the evacuation and attempted to break into the home of an elderly couple just outside the city limits early Saturday.
When they tried to break into a rear window, the 77-year-old woman shot one with a .44-caliber handgun. Sexton said the injured suspect was hospitalized in critical condition and the other two suspects were arrested. He did not have their identities.
"She dropped the hammer on one of them. One is fighting for his life," said Sexton, 59, who is in his third term as sheriff.
Posted by: Mama AJ, insufficiently caffinated at December 06, 2012 04:56 AM (SUKHu)
Posted by: Itzamna at December 06, 2012 04:56 AM (/ZZCn)
Posted by: alex at December 06, 2012 04:57 AM (uFY4s)
I wonder where he got all his chemical weapons?
Posted by: Vizzini at December 06, 2012 08:55 AM (O7Q1u
While I was eating my oatmeal Fox reported they have confirmed he is loading the material on bombs now.
Hillary is going to speak in a few minutes. I really don't give a damn if he gasses the Taliban. we don't have a dog in that fight.
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2012 04:58 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Mama AJ, insufficiently caffinated at December 06, 2012 04:58 AM (SUKHu)
Save us, SMOD!!!
Posted by: Sean Bannion at December 06, 2012 04:58 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat [/i] at December 06, 2012 04:58 AM (feFL6)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at December 06, 2012 04:58 AM (XkWWK)
http://is.gd/SFUtg7
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2012 08:13 AM (YdQQY)
We have a number of clients typical wealthy liberals who voted for Barry and the Dims because of social issues (war on womyn). Now they are howling like Banshees over their taxes going up next year and want to find any and all ways to avoid paying the higher taxes. Reality, how do it work?
Posted by: TheQuietMan at December 06, 2012 04:58 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at December 06, 2012 08:56 AM (GsoHv)
The control they lost of it was it exploded on site and destroyed the building and killed a bunch of people.
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2012 04:59 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Will spare the calming manatees at December 06, 2012 04:59 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Iraqi Truck Driver [/i] at December 06, 2012 05:00 AM (feFL6)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at December 06, 2012 05:00 AM (XkWWK)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at December 06, 2012 08:51 AM (5DR1j)
I hope so. Ryan has certainly shown a willingness, eagerness even, to go toe to toe with TFG. I wonder if he chafed under the campaign directives?
Posted by: BCochran1981 at December 06, 2012 05:00 AM (da5Wo)
Short version;
New Jersey
New York
Ohio
Indiana
California
http://tinyurl.com/a2u4ln3
// For some reason higher taxes is correlated with
desire to leave the state. I've always said that politicians should be required to take at least one stinking class in psychology before being permitted to take office. Maybe a statistics class, too.
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat at December 06, 2012 08:38 AM (feFL6)
I can't believe that Illinois is not on that list. Oh well, something to shoot for
Posted by: TheQuietMan at December 06, 2012 05:00 AM (1Jaio)
Pushing back on leftist language would be really nice to see.
But what I've been yammering about for years is that our rummies have got to stop sounding like their rummies when talking about an issue. Wehn we use the language of the left, we're pre-screwed in the debate.
The one that makes me want to grab folks by the necktie (yeah, I know the kids don't wear 'em anymore) and slap them with each word is: Stop Calling It An "immigration" Problem. Stop. It.
We do not have an immigration problem. We have an illegal alien problem, a porous border problem, and a law enforcement problem. NONE of which will ever get solved by screwing around with immigration law. Bear with me: Why? Because they never deal with any of those issues in immigration law.
Hell yes it would be nice if some crafty rascal on our side slipped an end to the anchor baby problem into page 90,310 of the next omnibus bill. That would be really great. But that doesn't fix the illegal alien problem. It just reduces it enough to allow politicians to keep it un-fixed.
And for the nit-pickers, sure, we need to actually change the immigration laws to reflect at least nineteenth century issues, if not all the way to the present. But fix that stuff later, after the bigger problem has been dealt with.
Posted by: K~Bob at December 06, 2012 05:01 AM (oi6KG)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at December 06, 2012 05:03 AM (XkWWK)
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat [/i] at December 06, 2012 05:03 AM (feFL6)
We will NEVER fix the illegal problems until we first start jailing people who hire them, quit giving them benefits, and eliminate the anchor baby interpretation.
If we quit giving them incentives to come and stay they will leave on their own.
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2012 05:04 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Miss Marple at December 06, 2012 05:04 AM (GoIUi)
Posted by: TheQuietMan at December 06, 2012 08:58 AM (1Jaio)
I realize that it doesn't bode well for you in terms of keeping / getting clients if you told them, "you're going to pay these taxes, and I'm going to make sure you pay these taxes, because your precious Obama orders you to pay your fair share. So cough it up, jackhole!"
But do you at least obliquely tell them, "you broke it, you bought it?"
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at December 06, 2012 05:05 AM (zF6Iw)
Yeah, I'm not sure what it's going to take to un-screw us. I'm all for testing politicians on their knowledge of American life and law, with the results being made public. I advocated that for a while.
But these days, I'm liking the idea of a Conservative Boot Camp for potential candidates, preferably with someone like Gunny Sargeant Ermey in charge. I'd like to see them doing pushups while getting yelled at to reinforce a few principles of freedom and crawling through mud while protecting a copy of the Constitution.
"You think Thomas Jefferson would have dodged that question in such a pathetic way from some piece of shit who thinks he's a journalist? You disgust me. Drop and give me 20, you RINO pussy! If you can't make it here, how do you expect to stand up to anything once you make it to the front lines in Washington! Hell, my grandmother would turn that question around on that little bitch and make him look like the Progressive asshole he is with a smile on her face. She's twice the man you are, and she's dead!!!"
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit. at December 06, 2012 05:05 AM (yiIja)
I couldn't cut n paste so I typed from memory. Memory not good. Bad OS.
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat at December 06, 2012 09:03 AM (feFL6)
I just read the article and it is Illinois. We're #1!!!!!! in suckiness.
Posted by: TheQuietMan at December 06, 2012 05:06 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at December 06, 2012 05:06 AM (APmL9)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Will spare the calming manatees at December 06, 2012 05:06 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at December 06, 2012 09:00 AM (da5Wo)
___
There was a report that Ryan had a War on Poverty campaign pitch but the smartest guys in the room shot him down. He could bring all the charisma and energy and conservative values to the ticket that anyone could hope for, but unfortunately he had little decision making power insofar as campaign strategy.
The GOP is going to die a slow death choking on its own stuffed shirts.
Posted by: kallisto at December 06, 2012 05:07 AM (jm/9g)
But do you at least obliquely tell them, "you broke it, you bought it?"
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at December 06, 2012 09:05 AM (zF6Iw)
It's hard to keep a straight face talking to these idiots who would rant on about Republicans war on womyn and other idiot liberal talking points before the election and now are doing everything in their power to avoid what they voted for. I'd love to tell them they need to pay their fair share but it won't go over well. Hypocrites everyone of them.
Posted by: TheQuietMan at December 06, 2012 05:08 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: alex at December 06, 2012 05:08 AM (uFY4s)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at December 06, 2012 05:08 AM (APmL9)
People aren't fleeing FROM Indiana. They're fleeing TO Indiana, from Illinois.
Posted by: Ashley Puff at December 06, 2012 05:09 AM (/kI1Q)
Vic, Amazon WANTS that bill. They figured out that they could charge their affiliated vendors for handling the sales tax calculations for them. It also creates a barrier to entry for competitors who might try to compete with them, as they probably don't have the resources to manage the ever changing database. Crony capitalism marches on, and now picks up Amazon in it's clutches.
Posted by: Jeff Weimer at December 06, 2012 05:10 AM (rqlRk)
Psychology?! Damn choice, mandating that manipulators (leaders) take "how to fuck with voters 101," especially if a little knowledge is a dangerous thing.
96 "How about history and the Constitution at Hillsdale College. Let Mark Levin teach them. Heh..." -- Posted by: J.J. Sefton
I'm with 96. Require every candidate to pass an exam on the US Constitution. But I'd certainly require the candidates to also pass a math and book keeping course, proof positive that they KNOW how to balance a budget before they get elected.
Politicians including Hillary Clinton who overspend in campaigns and refuse to repay debts should be barred from government. Of course she isn't alone in that practice. The BILLIONS of dollars spent barraging voters with crap! Just to end up with the same old same old liars.
Given the internet's relative inexpensive format, as a voter I'd rather all political advertising simply be at the home page per candidate. If a voter wants the scoop, just go to the home page per candidate. The media? pfft. Get off the televisions and radios, screeching the same old same old "promise them anything, just get their votes" crapola commercials.
I hate perpetual campaigning. My $.02 ad? As an American citizen tax payer and registered voter, "I approve this message."
Posted by: panzernashorn at December 06, 2012 05:10 AM (BAnPT)
Posted by: Mama AJ at December 06, 2012 05:10 AM (SUKHu)
If that's true, and I have no reason to doubt it, then that's two elections in a row where the enthusiasm and charisma was purposely dialed back and choked off by the "professionals." My response to them is the same as I had for Boner earlier, "Fuck you, you fucking cowards."
Posted by: BCochran1981 at December 06, 2012 05:10 AM (da5Wo)
NO consultants who tell you what to do. That should be the candidate's job to decide, not some guy who gets paid by a per cent of ads (effective or not).
Then these same consultants trash other GOP candidates when they are unemployed. (Murphy, Schmidt, Rove, etc.) I am quite tired of them.
Posted by: Miss Marple at December 06, 2012 05:11 AM (GoIUi)
Posted by: Brave Sir Robin at December 06, 2012 08:21 AM
I hope Krampus visits you tonight and drinks all your best hooch. Lol. Dammit.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at December 06, 2012 05:11 AM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: Blacksheep at December 06, 2012 05:11 AM (bS6uW)
Posted by: Jeff Weimer at December 06, 2012 09:10 AM (rqlRk)
___
Big winners: online vendors based in DE and NH
Posted by: kallisto at December 06, 2012 05:11 AM (jm/9g)
Dems would just cheat. AFTER demanding the test for black candidates be dumbed down and a Spanish-language test be made available.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at December 06, 2012 05:12 AM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: CarolT at December 06, 2012 05:12 AM (z4WKX)
After I saw the results of that stupid poll I could already sense that Republican party-ism is going to trump restoration again this cycle.
We have some really great "values" conservatives. Perry, Rubio, Romney, etc, etc.
None of those guys gives a shit about restoration. (which is why Mitt lost.)
And I'll say it again clearly: Rubio is not a Restoration guy. He's not a Tea Party guy. He's a values conservative. A good guy, but like Mitt, he' not what we need right now. I wish to hell he was.
Reagan DID care about restoration, a lot. Those early speeches J.J. was referring to showed that clearly. He actually believed in what the founders were trying to do. Romney, like Bush 41, never seemed the least bit interested in that boring old "Constitutional" stuff.
Posted by: K~Bob at December 06, 2012 05:12 AM (oi6KG)
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat [/i] at December 06, 2012 05:13 AM (feFL6)
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat at December 06, 2012 09:03 AM (feFL6)
Reboot and try this virus killer:
http://tinyurl.com/b25yooq
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at December 06, 2012 05:13 AM (GsoHv)
certainly require the candidates to also pass a math and book keeping
course, proof positive that they KNOW how to balance a budget before
they get elected.
I clear majority would fail. Perhaps as high as 90% on the Dem side
Posted by: TheQuietMan at December 06, 2012 05:14 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat at December 06, 2012 09:03 AM (feFL6)
Reboot and try this virus killer:
http://tinyurl.com/b25yooq
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at December 06, 2012 05:14 AM (GsoHv)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at December 06, 2012 09:10 AM (da5Wo)
___
It's a problem, no doubt. But I really wonder if anything would have kept preazy from a second term, it's like the American electorate is in a big time self destruct mode.
Posted by: kallisto at December 06, 2012 05:14 AM (jm/9g)
Time to stock up on Atropine injectors.
Sarin, coming soon to a mall near you.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at December 06, 2012 05:15 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Will spare the calming manatees at December 06, 2012 05:16 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Ammo Dump at December 06, 2012 05:18 AM (YYyqq)
If Assad goes down, then you can COUNT on that stuff getting loose.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at December 06, 2012 05:19 AM (sbV1u)
If we quit giving them incentives to come and stay they will leave on their own."
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2012 09:04 AM (YdQQY)
Sure. I'm aware of that. But it absolutely will not be a winnable argument as long as our guys keep tripping over their own bootlaces calling it "immigration" issues. This country has always been open to immigrants and for many more years it should remain so. Somehow the racists on the left have managed to plaster the mask of "latino" over the word "immigrant" in people's minds.
We need to plaster the mask of "jihadist" and "lawbreaking scum" on the word "illegal alien." and shoe it back hard, with enough mental discipline to never let TEHM get away with calling it an immigration problem.
Posted by: K~Bob at December 06, 2012 05:20 AM (oi6KG)
Posted by: panzernashorn at December 06, 2012 05:21 AM (BAnPT)
Winning argument for who?
This country has always been open to immigrants and for many more years it should remain so. Somehow the racists on the left have managed to plaster the mask of "latino" over the word "immigrant" in people's minds.
No it hasn't. The door has opened and closed several times as the number of immigrants grew too large for assimilation. And not only that, at the time those were legal immigrants. Not a flood of migrants streaming across the border for no tax work and welfare benefits.
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2012 05:25 AM (YdQQY)
I really think a good investigation of all of the consultants is in order.
Posted by: Miss Marple at December 06, 2012 05:28 AM (GoIUi)
Posted by: Ed Anger at December 06, 2012 05:30 AM (tOkJB)
Posted by: TheQuietMan
Exactly, a clear majority of the corrupt bastards would get cleared out of the way for the next batch of fresh meat. Keep flushing the rot and maintain the plumbing.
Btw, you'd be disgruntled to find that Republicans spent more than Democrats. See the research by Nicholas Eberstadt, a political economist who holds the Henry Wendt Chair in Political Economy at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI). He is also author of 'A Nation of Takers: America's Entitlement Epidemic'.
http://tinyurl.com/d8evac5
Posted by: panzernashorn at December 06, 2012 05:30 AM (BAnPT)
i]Posted by: Sean Bannion at December 06, 2012 09:19 AM (sbV1u)
It's binary, so we could just carpet bomb the storage sites to prevent anyone from getting it.
That's what B-52s are for.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at December 06, 2012 05:30 AM (GsoHv)
"Winning argument for who?"
What?
Posted by: K~Bob at December 06, 2012 05:31 AM (oi6KG)
Posted by: Mama AJ, insufficiently caffinated at December 06, 2012 05:31 AM (SUKHu)
Sure they did. The quotas have grown up and down for various ethnic groups, and in some cases all of them.
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2012 05:33 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Brother Cavil at December 06, 2012 05:36 AM (GBXon)
I don't get what's going on. You seem to be argumentative for argument's sake here. Immigration was never "totally" shut down. Not even during wartime (see "scientists, German" for example). "For various ethnic groups" is a qualifier that does not apply to the word "totally". Why are we arguing when we clearly agree on probably 99% of the illegal problem? Do you think our folks should continue using the language of the left? Is that why the push back?
Posted by: K~Bob at December 06, 2012 05:40 AM (oi6KG)
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2012 09:25 AM (YdQQY)
Exactly.
Up until the 1960s (Ted Kennedy, I hope you are enjoying Satan's attention), we let people into the country based on what they could do for us. If we needed labor we relaxed the restrictions, etc.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at December 06, 2012 05:41 AM (GsoHv)
Posted by: Citizen Anachronda at December 06, 2012 05:42 AM (1c58W)
Exactly! They can't do anything FOR us without doing something TO us.
-
If they made it so that you were legally equal and had a fair shot at winning jobs you were qualified for, what would that do TO you? If they got rid of affirmative action, quotas, set-asides and disparate impact, what would that do TO you?
Posted by: The Lightworker at December 06, 2012 05:45 AM (/5JaH)
Buyer beware.
They got what they paid for.
What goes around comes around.
Shit hit the fan.
So really, at this point, who really cares what douchebags say about fools who hire them?
Rather, care about replacing the "leadership" bent on corruption.
Conservative? Conserving the right of elitists to twist and break rules they make for lesser mortals to suffer the "benefits" of obedience to their "betters". The Republican Party is NOT the party of fiscal conservatism, or the US Debt would not have doubled during the administrations of GWBush. And the Republican Leadership? At the emergence of the outraged conservative Americans during 2008 who rallied 'round the "Tea Party" 2010 elections to impact results, the Republican national leadership declared that the GOP would simply usurp the Tea Party. It isn't as if they didn't accomplish the knife in the back after the conservative voter "victory" that amounted to Republican treachery when George W. Bush was initially elected with what he called "political capital" to spend, and spend and spend.
A pox on both major parties' leadership, Republican and Democrat each according to their own mannerisms, enforcing authoritarianism while dissolving our Constitutional Rule of Law. Our US Government is every bit as corrupt today as any Union or criminal organization. Perhaps different mannerisms while conducting business, different phraseology, but the same methods regardless of decorum or lack of decorum with the same results in the end. Corruption. Loss of Liberty. Tyranny and terrorism.
Posted by: panzernashorn at December 06, 2012 05:48 AM (BAnPT)
Exactly! They can't do anything FOR us without doing something TO us.
** All at OUR tax funded expense.
Posted by: panzernashorn at December 06, 2012 05:50 AM (BAnPT)
Heh.
Posted by: Jack Kemp at December 06, 2012 06:07 AM (/kI1Q)
114 I DON'T WANT TO HEAR ANY POLITICIAN TELL ME WHAT GREAT THINGS THEY WANT TO DO FOR ME!
Exactly! They can't do anything FOR us without doing something TO us.
** All at OUR tax funded expense.
-
Then politicians can do a lot of great things for you, at zero expense, or at least they can try. You should demand that they concede all Whites the full legal and financial equality that elites do not need (because they are doing so well anyway) but that non-elite Whites do need, and that they are actively being deprived of every day, by enforcing anti-White laws and policies through highly expensive bureaucracies.
This is not too much to ask. This is not unthinkable. This is necessary. And this plus an end to mass immigration and forced integration and assimilation (by which I mean that the Whites are forced to integrate and assimilate, though the non-Whites enjoy cultural separatism and identity politics) has to happen, or else Whites have no future.
This is not a call for supremacy. This is a call for the minimum conditions of life: to be free, to be equal, and to have a future where your posterity will not be wiped away by government policies that are guaranteed to put an end to people like you.
How can this be "at your tax-funded expense" when all that's necessary is to pass and repeal the right laws and abolish malign bureaucracies that already exist at tax-funded expense?
How can it be too much to dream and demand, when non-Whites, when they were so much less powerful than Whites in historically White countries, already got all their legal disabilities removed? They have everything I ask for: full legal equality, full access to jobs, and a future, where they can foresee their posterity extending endlessly, the way America's founding fathers did. It must be possible.
Posted by: The Lightworker at December 06, 2012 01:54 PM (EE56y)
Posted by: Mr_Write at December 06, 2012 02:54 PM (CLkAH)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.1985 seconds, 337 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Thorvald at December 06, 2012 04:08 AM (1V6Pv)