February 29, 2012
— Gabriel Malor Happy Wednesday.
Salt Lake Trib: Sen. Snowe's retirement is a blow to Sen. Hatch's reelection strategy.
NASA is cannibalizing its budget to fund a Mars mission.
INTERPOL arrested 25 Anonymous hackers in Europe and South America yesterday. Anonymous responded by knocking out the Interpol and Spanish police websites for an hour or so. That'll show 'em.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
02:53 AM
| Comments (109)
Post contains 66 words, total size 1 kb.
As expected Mutt easily won AZ 47% to 27%. They are crediting Mutt with getting all AZ delegates which is another violation of the rules. If Santorum doesnÂ’t challenge that he is a fool.
Turnout there was 463,257 compared to 541,035 in 2008. So turnout in the tight MI race increased while turnout in the predictable AZ race decreased. So not much can be said for turnout from these two races. Next up will be OH and GA coming on March 6. Current polls show Santorum leading in OH and Noot blowing them all away in GA. But this is Super Tuesday and there are a lot out there on this day.
Posted by: Vic at February 29, 2012 02:55 AM (YdQQY)
http://is.gd/v7Gptv
Posted by: Vic at February 29, 2012 02:55 AM (YdQQY)
So how about this Mr. Kwame Kenyatta, lets disband the Detroit government and let businesses hire their own private armies. I expect business will flourish and crime will drop to almost nothing. Hell, get rid of the Communist corruption in Detroit and the city may actually recover.
http://is.gd/RGwHY1
Posted by: Vic at February 29, 2012 02:56 AM (YdQQY)
http://is.gd/hBrG6n
Posted by: Vic at February 29, 2012 02:56 AM (YdQQY)
It is time for some congressional action except that a law passed in 2007 is what required this POS. The commies controlled both Houses then, but why didnÂ’t Bush veto it?
http://is.gd/yQSIGp
Posted by: Vic at February 29, 2012 02:57 AM (YdQQY)
When did this country decide that there were no private property rights? It has been a gradual thing over the decades. When you agree to allow local and national bureaucrats to regulate a thing, you have agreed to strip freedom from that thing and all persons associated with it.
This is not the America of 1790.
http://is.gd/3EwoJH
Posted by: Vic at February 29, 2012 02:57 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at February 29, 2012 02:57 AM (Af3Wg)
When I saw this I was instantly outraged.
http://is.gd/L8tTH7
Posted by: Vic at February 29, 2012 02:57 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Vic at February 29, 2012 02:58 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Vic at February 29, 2012 02:58 AM (YdQQY)
We can no longer afford a department of incompetent fools whose mission is Muzzie outreach.
Posted by: Vic at February 29, 2012 03:01 AM (YdQQY)
I see 10% of MI voters were Dems - Santorum sucks even more than usual for courting them. He's pretending they were Reagan Dems who are now part of his coalition and would help him beat Obama. He's utterly delusional or just plain lying. In fact, he looks like he's lying while pretending to be delusional; not good. Last night was the beginning of the end for Mr. Even-straight-sex-within-marriage-makes-me-want-to-vomit.
Posted by: Blacksheep at February 29, 2012 03:07 AM (jA4Zy)
Let's hear it for the American taxpayer!
Posted by: Fritz at February 29, 2012 03:08 AM (Ohmaj)
INTERLOL took time off from their busy sharia-enforcement schedule? INTERLOL and Anonymous deserve each other. They should all be moved (families and everything) to Tehran or Kabul to live out the rest of their worthless, pathetic lives with the people they have been fighting so hard for.
Posted by: really ... at February 29, 2012 03:09 AM (X3lox)
Posted by: Vic at February 29, 2012 06:57 AM (YdQQY)
They also forgot to take into account how many idiots think that having a back-up camera will allow them to drive in reverse as if they were going forward. My group has estimated that we will see an added 405.6 annual deaths due to fools thinking the back-up cameras are there for driving in reverse at high speeds.
Posted by: really ... at February 29, 2012 03:14 AM (X3lox)
http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/118799
In all seriousness; all leap year means is my employer gets an extra day work but I don't get extra pay. This "salaried-regular employee" thing is for the birds.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at February 29, 2012 03:15 AM (hO8IJ)
Posted by: epobirs at February 29, 2012 03:15 AM (kcfmt)
-----------------------
Don't you just love the Fair Wage and Labor Act?
Posted by: Vic at February 29, 2012 03:17 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: McLovin at February 29, 2012 07:20 AM (RJWcf)
He meant 0.9. It's in percentages.
Posted by: really ... at February 29, 2012 03:23 AM (X3lox)
Posted by: Wyatt's Torch at February 29, 2012 03:24 AM (zxrQh)
First, he was the candidate who couldn't breach 20% or so. Then we had the endless succession of challengers who "split the conservative vote". Now, we're really down to 2, and Romney keeps winning. Strange for such a weak candidate to do that, isn't it?
Could he be stronger? Sure, and IMO, he will be as the campaign moves into the general. I have long thought that winning the nom would be harder for him than the general, and I think that's the foundation of his strategy.
Posted by: pep at February 29, 2012 03:25 AM (YXmuI)
Posted by: Matt in Maine at February 29, 2012 03:26 AM (gWLRb)
Posted by: pep at February 29, 2012 07:25 AM (YXmuI)
Sounds like what McShame did in 2008. What's your point?
Posted by: really ... at February 29, 2012 03:26 AM (X3lox)
Posted by: Vic at February 29, 2012 03:27 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: BurtTC at February 29, 2012 03:28 AM (Gc/Qi)
-----------------------------
Yeah, we didn't hear all that outrage when Mutt won the heavy Democrat districts in SC which also has an open primary. in fact, that was the only districts he won.
Posted by: Vic at February 29, 2012 03:29 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: BurtTC at February 29, 2012 07:28 AM (Gc/Qi)
It's disingenuous. It's what we used to call "cheating". The primary is not for dems to have any vote in, at all. NONE.
Posted by: really ... at February 29, 2012 03:30 AM (X3lox)
On the radio this morning, they mentioned that in MI Romney won the women's vote and college graduates. Think about that. If Santorum can't carry women, the election is over, and Romney is their preference. Likewise, the college vote tends to be more liberal. If Romney siphons off more of those, it's a big deal.
Posted by: pep at February 29, 2012 03:31 AM (YXmuI)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at February 29, 2012 03:31 AM (DiqH3)
-----------------------
The women and youth vote typically goes to Dems. Think about that.
Posted by: Vic at February 29, 2012 03:32 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: BurtTC at February 29, 2012 03:34 AM (Gc/Qi)
Posted by: Matt in Maine at February 29, 2012 03:35 AM (gWLRb)
That his "weakness" is deceptive.
Posted by: pep at February 29, 2012 07:28 AM (YXmuI)
Deceptively understated?
Mittens' weaknesses (and they are legend) will not matter in the general, as it is just Barky against America, but if it were any sort of normal election Mittens' would be dismembered in the general, especially given the way he's fought the primary. If I didn't have to vote for Mittens (i.e. if anything other than an ineligible America-hating Indonesian retard were running for the dems) Mittens wouldn't get even a look from me in the general, let alone my vote. I'm hostage to the GOP for 2012, but that is the absolute end of the line for me (and many others, I suspect).
Posted by: really ... at February 29, 2012 03:35 AM (X3lox)
Posted by: Case at February 29, 2012 03:35 AM (GxTMf)
Glad you're back, Vic. Prayers for you and Mrs. Vic.
As usual, Pixy's hamsters still won't let me link to anything, so curious Morons can click my nic for today's contributions.
It's the old in-out for me this morning. Y'all have fun and try not to trash the place, 'k?
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at February 29, 2012 03:37 AM (d0Tfm)
Like it or not, you have to get folks in the middle to win. That's what he's doing. Or, you can be purer, and lose. I'll take winning. Not at any cost, but what Romney is doing is tolerable and smart.
Posted by: pep at February 29, 2012 03:37 AM (YXmuI)
These Anonymous douches are so pathetically ineffective.
Their "retaliation" consists of calling your phone and asking if you have Prince Albert in a can. Hey, I bet that makes your loser friends feel better as Bubba pounds their boy pussy into scaloppini, sooper scary haXX0rz!
Fuck you and your off the shelf DDoS bots. Mac fags have more computer skills and creativity.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at February 29, 2012 03:38 AM (DiqH3)
--------------------------------
Mutt will lose close States in the South like NC and VA as a small percentage of conservatives stay home. Sanatarium will lose close States in the North that favor liberals.
Thus neither of these candidates are electable. But my MAJOR concern is the depression of turnout of the Republican base, who has NEVER liked Mutt.
If that happens, not only will we not win the Senate, we will lose ground there and in the House. We could even be back to Dems owning everything again.
In short, it is McShitty and 2008 all over again. And if that happens it will be the end of the Republican Party.
Posted by: Vic at February 29, 2012 03:39 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: San Antonio Rose at February 29, 2012 03:42 AM (yLfyz)
Posted by: BurtTC at February 29, 2012 03:44 AM (Gc/Qi)
http://tinyurl.com/7ymsded
Pretty soon, the diet will be halal, just to be sure!
Posted by: Hrothgar at February 29, 2012 03:44 AM (i3+c5)
Posted by: Vic at February 29, 2012 07:39 AM (YdQQY)
It is the end of the GOP. I think they sealed that deal after they nailed the base in the squeakhole right after the 2010 elections and spent 2011 beating the base senseless as they colluded with and surrendered to the Indonesian Imbecile and his lunatic junta. 2012 is just one last go-round, but right after that I doubt many will stay with the GOP as America's fate will be pretty much known - whether Barky wins or loses - and there will no longer be any reason, at all, to be connected to the GOP. Come 2013, it's either third party time or second country, depending on whether America is is barely saved by voting in the GOP turd or declared officially dead with a re-election of the ineligible America-hating retard.
Posted by: really ... at February 29, 2012 03:46 AM (X3lox)
Posted by: Ed Anger - Certified Kos Kid at February 29, 2012 03:46 AM (7+pP9)
Posted by: San Antonio Rose at February 29, 2012 03:46 AM (yLfyz)
Posted by: CoolCzech at February 29, 2012 03:47 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: BurtTC at February 29, 2012 03:52 AM (Gc/Qi)
As for our wonderful candidates, I will quote Chief Dan George in Josey Wales; "We must endeavor to persevere".
Posted by: Vic at February 29, 2012 03:54 AM (YdQQY)
Super Tuesday is March 6th, we shall see what we shall see.
And I think I can still vote for Perry a week later in Alabama.
Posted by: toby928© at February 29, 2012 03:55 AM (GTbGH)
Posted by: Vic at February 29, 2012 07:54 AM (YdQQY)
And then declare war
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at February 29, 2012 03:59 AM (mFxQX)
Poor baby:
Mechanicsburg District Judge Mark Martin and his staff temporarily relocated to the Cumberland County Courthouse in Carlisle today due to threats his office has received and public criticism of his ruling in the "Zombie Muhammad" case. The county courthouse will make it easier to provide extra security.
For security reasons, Martin did not want to say how long he will be in the county courthouse, but noted his staff will be understanding to those impacted by the change. He said his office received more than 200 phone calls and emails from being criticizing his December ruling.
In addition, some online posts suggested he should be executed, Martin said.
http://tinyurl.com/7e3yrug
Posted by: Ed Anger - Certified Kos Kid at February 29, 2012 04:00 AM (7+pP9)
I think many here have finally seen through the mask worn by the "conservative republican" party for many years. The party establishment has helped immensely in this by screwing any nascent conservative movement whatsoever, even after it was clear that the 2010 gains were due solely to the TEA Party. The problem is that I do not see how a viable third party can be constructed, given the funding and national organization required to field candidates. Passion only gets you so far, but dollars and negative ads get you to home base it seems.
The very real possibility of four more years of an unconstrained anti-American, pro-muslim, corrupt, criminal, socialist, and extra-Constitutional administration scares the heck out of me, but that possibility is exactly what the RINO establishment has given us.
The only positive that I can see here, is that like drilling now, even though nothing will happen for ten years, we need to continue education and fielding Consitutionally based candidates for every level of office with the (faint) hope that we can eventually reclaim the country.
Posted by: Hrothgar at February 29, 2012 04:02 AM (i3+c5)
He is unresponsive to the will of our people. In a second term, he would be unrestrained by the demands of re-election. If there is one thing we cannot afford, it is four years of Barack Obama with nothing to answer to.
Concentrate on that, folks.
Posted by: Miss Marple at February 29, 2012 04:02 AM (GoIUi)
Posted by: HeatherRadish
............
So.. then you're saying you should only be paid for 29 days this month?
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at February 29, 2012 04:03 AM (UTq/I)
Ha!
Fuck you, Judge Martin! Worried someone is going to cut your head off? I thought you admired that shit. Please impeach this traitorous fucking scum.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at February 29, 2012 04:04 AM (DiqH3)
I said this last night in the ONT, and I am serious about it.
If the SCOAMF agrees to prosecute those soldiers for burning Korans, we need to start a movement to occupy the White House.. a one day march of a couple million voices.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at February 29, 2012 04:06 AM (UTq/I)
http://tinyurl.com/7e3yrug
Posted by: Ed Anger - Certified Kos Kid at February 29, 2012 08:00 AM (7+pP9)
Not executed. Just dropped off naked in the middle of Somalia. After that, he can do whatever he wants.
Posted by: really ... at February 29, 2012 04:08 AM (X3lox)
Posted by: really ... at February 29, 2012 07:30 AM (X3lox)
You'd think that the geniuses at the RNC would address this instead of hiring and firing Michael Steele like a couple senile fucking codgers at Duke and Duke in "Trading Places". This has been a known problem for over four years yet the cocksuckers who know better than we do about what is right for us haven't done a fucking thing about it. At some point those shitstains have to take some responsibility for what they do and don't do.
Posted by: Captain Hate at February 29, 2012 04:12 AM (mpxAj)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at February 29, 2012 07:31 AM (DiqH3)
What he said.
Posted by: Darth Randall at February 29, 2012 04:15 AM (O/onO)
1. Require everyone to register as rep, dem, or indy.
2. For primary voting, you must be on record as registered for party 6 months before primary.
Voila!
Posted by: Miss Marple at February 29, 2012 04:15 AM (GoIUi)
Posted by: Case at February 29, 2012 04:19 AM (GxTMf)
Posted by: really ... at February 29, 2012 07:14 AM (X3lox)
They also forget to take into account the number of stupid idiots that think running to squeeze between a backing up car and another to "get by" is a good idea. I CANNOT tell you the number of times that I have had to stop backing up, particularly in a pre-school or school parking lot when some idiot mother or more often some idiot nanny thinks, child or chidren in tow and sometimes a stroller, squeezes between my bumper and the other side of the aisle. If the backer up doesn't see you stupid you get squashed. I bet 99% of the backing up deaths are because of this. Cameras won't help because these TWITS run to get between the cars.
Pet peeve.
Posted by: dagny at February 29, 2012 04:20 AM (u50z0)
Pet peeve.
Posted by: dagny at February 29, 2012 08:20 AM (u50z0)
Don't worry. A side camera mandate and required HUD will be coming online in 2016.
Posted by: really ... at February 29, 2012 04:23 AM (X3lox)
Posted by: really ... at February 29, 2012 08:23 AM (X3lox)
Plus external airbags in 2020!
Posted by: Hrothgar at February 29, 2012 04:26 AM (i3+c5)
Posted by: dagny at February 29, 2012 04:31 AM (u50z0)
Great. A real innovation. We would have had this fifty years ago if cheap electronics made it possible then. We don't need a coercive law. We just needed companies competing with increased feature sets on their products.
Posted by: epobirs at February 29, 2012 04:39 AM (kcfmt)
Posted by: JewishOdysseus at February 29, 2012 04:41 AM (hRH92)
Posted by: JewishOdysseus at February 29, 2012 04:45 AM (hRH92)
Posted by: JewishOdysseus at February 29, 2012 04:49 AM (hRH92)
Posted by: Burke at February 29, 2012 04:54 AM (9N3G1)
Posted by: Truman North at February 29, 2012 04:55 AM (I2LwF)
“Does it affect our race? No, not really. But you always hate to see a Republican senator retiring. That’s too bad she is leaving.” [Hatch campaign response to O.Snowe Senate retirement. As if a new Republican won't win her seat. ]
[Green card low wage imported work force] The Hatch campaign manager thinks Republicans should support Hatch at the state convention because he has served the state well during the past 36 years and he has a chance to chair the Finance Committee if Republicans take control of the Senate. [Bring home the bacon!]
Utah GOP rival Dan Liljenquist noted that with SnoweÂ’s retirement, Idaho Sen. Mike Crapo would be next in line in the Finance Committee if Hatch is ousted. Crapo is one of the SenateÂ’s most conservative members, according to the recent National Journal ratings.
Posted by: panzernashorn at February 29, 2012 04:58 AM (lpWVn)
Two things on Snowe's retirement:
1) It happened suddenly. Why?
2) Even though Maine is pretty blue, they went hard right in the 2010 race statewide. No question, it's in play. If anything, Snowe's main challenger may have been a primary challenger from the right.
Posted by: Truman North at February 29, 2012 05:03 AM (I2LwF)
Posted by: JewishOdysseus at February 29, 2012 08:49 AM (hRH92)
Hear hear. Btw I noticed in that Stedman clip that the chinless scrotum is getting pretty thin hairwise up top. I'm thinking he's not sleeping too well at night.
Posted by: Captain Hate at February 29, 2012 05:08 AM (mpxAj)
By Tara Steele, AGBeat.com
1/13/12
Letter to Bernanke, Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT), ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee, harshly criticized a lengthy white paper Federal Reserve Board Chairman Ben Bernanke unexpectedly submitted to Congress last week.
Hatch responded to the white paper by warning that the Federal Reserve Board was treading “too far into fiscal policy advice and advocacy” and noted that the central bank risked “being perceived as advocacy for particular policy options.”
Posted by: panzernashorn at February 29, 2012 05:09 AM (lpWVn)
Carrying the water for Obama and China's Manchurian candidate, not to mention carrying 0% of the Republican support.... why the fuck was he even running?
Posted by: befuddled at February 29, 2012 05:15 AM (xJU23)
The Honorable Ben Bernanke, Chairman
Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System
Washington, D.C. 20551
Dear Mr. Chairman:
...Because many of those Fed activities involved government intervention into private markets and government assumption of private risks on behalf of taxpayers, I believe they constituted bailouts and fiscal policy actions, independent of whether the Fed ends up making money or losing money. The Fed is not a hedge fund, and profit and loss on its extraordinary asset purchases are not the appropriate metric by which to judge the efficacy of those actions. Many Fed actions led to increased moral hazard, which will unfortunately persist.
The Fed’s recent “Operation Twist,” intended to alter interest rates across the yield curve by altering relative supplies of and demands for short- and long-term Treasury securities is something that the Treasury itself could conduct acting as a fiscal agent of Congress. And the Fed’s recent extension and expansion of its U.S. dollar liquidity swap arrangements with foreign central banks arguably constitute fiscal policy actions (indeed, a dissenting vote against such actions on the grounds that they amount to fiscal policy is noted in the minutes of the December 13, 2011 Federal Open Market Committee meeting).
...
The Fed often blurred the distinction between monetary policy and fiscal policy during the financial crisis, and it is time to move back toward a clearer distinction between the two. Public dissemination of your staffÂ’s recent housing white paper is a move in the wrong direction.
Sincerely,
ORRIN G. HATCH
Posted by: panzernashorn at February 29, 2012 05:17 AM (lpWVn)
would be unrestrained by the demands of re-election. If there is one
thing we cannot afford, it is four years of Barack Obama with nothing
to answer to.
Concentrate on that, folks.
Posted by: Miss Marple at February 29, 2012 08:02 AM (GoIUi)
As sub-optimal as I think all of these candidates are, this is what people need to remember in November. Any Republican has got to be better than Barry and his commie agenda
Posted by: TheQuietMan at February 29, 2012 05:18 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: JewishOdysseus at February 29, 2012 05:29 AM (hRH92)
Boehner: Can you wait until after the weekend?
I'm not seeing a downside to Democrats gaining control of the house.
Posted by: befuddled at February 29, 2012 05:30 AM (xJU23)
If Barky and his lunatics had been in charge in the late 19th century, as commercial electricity came around, they'd have certainly mandated DC power distribution for the nation and every single house everywhere (with AC being illegal because of dangerous radiation emanating from the electrical oscillations; the science was settled) and US industrial advancement would have been stopped dead in its tracks - with a major power station (federal government approved!) required on every block and power companies required to build power stations in the poor "power deserts" in the rural areas ... for the kids.
Posted by: really ... at February 29, 2012 05:33 AM (X3lox)
Posted by: JewishOdysseus at February 29, 2012 09:29 AM (hRH92)
Any Republican (let alone a supposed Conservative one) that could claim to be a close friend of Teddyquiddick knowing what he HAD to know about him, is classic evidence of the corrupting influence of that exclusive Senate club, DC in general and the necessity of term limits.
Posted by: ontherocks at February 29, 2012 05:47 AM (ZJCDy)
Posted by: DangerGirl at February 29, 2012 05:51 AM (bKHXb)
Posted by: Avi at February 29, 2012 06:06 AM (Gx3Fe)
Hatch at the state convention because he has served the state well during the past 36 years
==============
We don't need people to "serve" for 36 years.
Good grief.
Posted by: Jay at February 29, 2012 06:12 AM (3LaGb)
Who hasn't filed yet with two weeks to go?
I don't know anything about Maine, but in other states that's kinda weird.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at February 29, 2012 06:20 AM (/kI1Q)
http:// astore.amazon.com /aoshq-20 /detail/ B0037WNONS
Less than re-painting the bumper cover. And I realize it's another !@#$%^& regulation.
Posted by: DaveA at February 29, 2012 06:29 AM (6O45Q)
-------------
Insty has a link to Blackfive that will piss off lots of morons. Army chaplains can no longer give Korans to Christian soldiers:
http://tinyurl.com/7htx3zo
Link goes to Blackfive.
Posted by: Retread at February 29, 2012 06:34 AM (joSBv)
Posted by: mike at February 29, 2012 06:45 AM (jHJ1n)
Posted by: Roy at February 29, 2012 07:16 AM (VndSC)
As usual, I post first and work my way up.
Didn't get very far before seeing the same secure koran link.
Posted by: sTevo at February 29, 2012 07:46 AM (xTDNn)
Q: Is it halal for the boots of infidels to sully the sacred moon?
A: Yes. Now you see where this muslim outreach business is going.
One of these days, allah...Bang! Zoom! straight to the moon!
Posted by: 66chevelle at February 29, 2012 08:43 AM (QjSgY)
Posted by: TheQuietMan at February 29, 2012 09:18 AM (1Jaio)
And we won't have to see President Dole's beard on any more magazine covers ever again...at least until she buys herself a Senate seat.
Posted by: 66chevelle at February 29, 2012 09:01 AM (QjSgY)
http://tinyurl.com/6qm42t9
Posted by: JonathanEllis at February 29, 2012 09:55 AM (BdzEV)
I wouldn't be surprised if he's, shall we say, somewhat "compromised"...
Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at February 29, 2012 10:00 AM (1rHeD)
Posted by: steevy at February 29, 2012 12:38 PM (7W3wI)
Hm. This looks funny, but it is MSNBC. "...when the White House released its 2013 budget request earlier this month. NASA's overall budget would drop less than 1 percent, to $17.71 billion, but planetary science would see a 21 percent reduction, with Mars exploration hit even harder. After taking a 40 percent hit in 2013, the Mars budget would continue its steep decline, bottoming out in 2015 at $188 billion — about one-third its current level."
$188 billion? If that's 1/3 current level, then NASA is struggling by on $564 billion a year for Mars now? Even Wikipedia says NASA's 2011 budget is only $18.44 billion a year. Good thing they have all those layers of fact checkers at the major news outlets or somebody could make a metric to standards unit conversion error.....
Posted by: Georg Felis at March 01, 2012 06:45 AM (eG/MC)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3037 seconds, 237 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Vic at February 29, 2012 02:54 AM (YdQQY)