March 14, 2012
— Gabriel Malor WEDNESDAY. Halfway there. Keep moving. Here's the news:
Counterintuitively, until yesterday, even if Santorum and GingrichÂ’s votes had been combined, it would have swung just a handful of delegates, and not a single winner-take-all state.
A new species of frog was discovered . . . on Staten Island.
WSJ has a piece on diet saboteurs: coworkers who keep trying to fatten you up. The article has a very pre-2008 feel to it; on the other hand, if you're buying the WSJ for its "lifestyle" articles, I suppose you've probably got coworkers.
The front page of the NYTimes, by contrast, has a piece on global warming-caused sea level rise (that has yet to even come close to climate scientists' estimates) leading to coastal flooding. To illustrate this fantasy, the NYTimes found it appropriate to include a photograph of streets flooded during Hurricane Irene.
Both papers, to me, seem to be living in an alternate universe.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
02:49 AM
| Comments (385)
Post contains 162 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2012 02:53 AM (YdQQY)
Fox is reporting that even though he came in third, Mutt got more delegates than the others. Now how is that possible? The other issue out there that they ignore is that held of these delegates being counted by Mutt and the media are "uncommitted".
Of course Fox is pushing the anti-Mormon bigotry in the South again. It is bullshit and even their own exit polls show that. Meanwhile evangelical pundits say that evangelicals, Mormons, and religious Catholics are actually allied on current issues. (Ralph Reed)
Voter turnout was mixed. It was up greatly in MS but the 2008 primary from MS was after almost everyone had dropped out. The AL primary in 2008 was earlier and turnout was up slightly from 2008, but given population increases was virtually unchanged.
http://is.gd/aQnlrr
Noot says no to dropping out, again.
http://is.gd/PQxa3a
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2012 02:54 AM (YdQQY)
http://is.gd/3Z8tkQ
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2012 02:54 AM (YdQQY)
http://is.gd/LV8Ib3
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2012 02:54 AM (YdQQY)
http://is.gd/bfJ3l2
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2012 02:55 AM (YdQQY)
http://is.gd/ra5sww
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2012 02:55 AM (YdQQY)
http://is.gd/SrOjrJ
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2012 02:55 AM (YdQQY)
Washington Examiner
http://is.gd/34PQBV
The Hill
http://is.gd/dG3OFF
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2012 02:56 AM (YdQQY)
http://is.gd/qmK8rT
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2012 02:56 AM (YdQQY)
http://is.gd/0K5ZZu
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2012 02:56 AM (YdQQY)
http://is.gd/ZWV5p9
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2012 02:57 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2012 02:57 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2012 02:58 AM (YdQQY)
-------------------------
Research I have done on sea level is that there has been NONE. The measurements are statistically nothing more than static noise.
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2012 02:59 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: nickless at March 14, 2012 03:00 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Lars Groteballen at March 14, 2012 03:06 AM (MlAd8)
Posted by: Trimegistus at March 14, 2012 03:08 AM (co3zr)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 14, 2012 03:08 AM (/bVc5)
Thanks for all the crazy updates Vic. Politics is the most corrupt "profession."
Posted by: stu at March 14, 2012 03:10 AM (uhPd1)
Posted by: BurtTC at March 14, 2012 03:11 AM (Gc/Qi)
Yeah..my kids are being told in school not to eat meat. Things are changin for the youngens.
Posted by: stu at March 14, 2012 03:11 AM (uhPd1)
-----------------
Of course it didn't go down overnight but over a relatively short period of time needed to develop the infrastructure it went from a luxury item to common use.
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2012 03:14 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: BurtTC at March 14, 2012 03:14 AM (Gc/Qi)
Posted by: BurtTC at March 14, 2012 07:11 AM (Gc/Qi)
------------------------
Steele may "propose" rules but they are actually set by voting from the State Party leads. Now what sets the voting is the number of votes allowed per State.
I suspect that the liberal Blue States are getting a lot more votes even though they NEVER actually go Republican.
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2012 03:17 AM (YdQQY)
I still get the WSJ because my husband is prehistoric. Their lifestyle articles are filled with living the green lifestyle, their news reporting is liberal as hell and they shill for open borders on their op-ed pages once a week. Luckily (for my husband) they keep delivering the paper even though I canceled it last year in fit of pique.
Posted by: jeannebodine at March 14, 2012 03:18 AM (byR8d)
Posted by: BurtTC at March 14, 2012 03:20 AM (Gc/Qi)
Posted by: Rondinellamamma at March 14, 2012 03:20 AM (53riN)
Second, the fact that anyone, anyone including King Doofus Rush is taking Steele's media-grabbing boasts seriously is an indication of their own stupidity. Steele wants a little attention. Rush and the rest of the MBM seem happy to give it to him.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at March 14, 2012 03:21 AM (+zL0z)
"I tend to believe most food "allergies" are psychosomatic, so I can't really use that excuse at work or anywhere else. And incidentally, most people don't want to hear that their so-called allergies are all in their head. "
Me too. I never, ever heard of anyone being allergic to peanuts when I was growing up. Contrast that to today.
I tend to think that in our highly feminized society, overprotectiveness is to blame. BTW, when was the last time anyone saw a child climbing a tree?
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at March 14, 2012 03:21 AM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: toby928© at March 14, 2012 03:22 AM (GTbGH)
FOA !..........Friends of Andrew
Posted by: Dr. Jellyknuckles at March 14, 2012 03:22 AM (Kb7dA)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 14, 2012 03:23 AM (/bVc5)
Posted by: BurtTC
..........
This is essentially true. States that chose to hold their primaries earlier were forced to assign delegates proportionally. It is usually over by the time our Illinois primary rolls around. But this year, there will actually be some meaning to our vote next week!
Morning 'rons!
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at March 14, 2012 03:23 AM (UTq/I)
Posted by: nickless at March 14, 2012 03:25 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2012 03:26 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 14, 2012 03:28 AM (/bVc5)
Actually, no. All the states that broke the rules except for first-in-the-nation Iowa (Santorum win) and New Hampshire (Romney win) got half their delegates cut.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at March 14, 2012 03:29 AM (+zL0z)
I am not "jealous" and I don't "see you as a threat"--I am trying to get through the work day without being harassed by people who think they're better than me because they deny themselves the pleasure of food.
It's the last acceptable form of bullying--and it's slowly becoming federal policy. WTF!
Imagine having a chat with any of the Founders about how food is a sin but promiscuity is encouraged.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 14, 2012 03:29 AM (hO8IJ)
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at March 14, 2012 07:29 AM (+zL0z)
------------------------
No, they got their delegates cut for moving the primary. They got nothing for not following the proportional delegate rule.
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2012 03:30 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Starving Ethiopian Boy Hand Feeding Sally Struthers Li'l Debbie Cakes at March 14, 2012 03:32 AM (4ixH5)
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2012 03:32 AM (YdQQY)
The front page of the NYTimes, by contrast, has a piece on global warming-caused sea level rise... of up to 1 meter by 2100!!!!!! OMG!!!!
For another perspective see: Holland
ps. I did note that finally they quoted a skeptic, without making him sound like a whacko or implying he is a shill for big oil. Oh, the walkback is going to have to be looooooong and smooooth, don'tcha know?
Posted by: sherlock at March 14, 2012 03:32 AM (2DD2m)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 14, 2012 03:34 AM (/bVc5)
I'm that guy. I order lunch from all the awesome Polish and Italian deli's and pizzarias in town. then call out my work buddies for being panty wastes for not eating a manly lunch. Sometimes I succede and they join me in my decadence other times they avoid me like the plague while eating their yogurt and granola bars.
**
I am the evil fat bastard.
***
Morn ya'als
Posted by: dananjcon's dingy is bigger than yours at March 14, 2012 03:35 AM (8ieXv)
10 re the 2 articles on OCare, you would think they are talking about two entirely different programs.
It was pleasant yesterday to have my MS vote actually matter a bit in the primaries. We came close Noot.
Posted by: GnuBreed at March 14, 2012 03:36 AM (ccXZP)
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2012 03:37 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2012 03:38 AM (YdQQY)
Morons...The conservatives are just as corrupt as the libs these days..
Posted by: stu at March 14, 2012 03:38 AM (uhPd1)
"Government issues permit to kill bald eagles to tribe in WY. We have these around here and they are seen increasingly in rural and suburban areas all over the South. But if you or I kill one of these suckers and get caught we would be under the jail house..."
Critical Race Theory and shut up, that's why!
Posted by: Derrick Bell's Astral Taint at March 14, 2012 03:38 AM (QjSgY)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 14, 2012 03:41 AM (vanqS)
Vic, you evil, evil man. Hey, got any doughnuts left?
Ok, I'm off. And I'm going to my little dead-end job that they want me to resign from. Take care Vic and moki, we're pulling for you.
Have fun and try not to trash the place, 'k?
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at March 14, 2012 03:41 AM (d0Tfm)
Those are skateboarder sneakers--note the thick tongue that will keep the skateboard from hurting the top of your foot when you flip it. So the market for those shoes are already so stupid and so stoned they think a black and tan is just an ale if they even think at all. Duuuude.
Posted by: dagny at March 14, 2012 03:43 AM (u50z0)
Posted by: McLovin at March 14, 2012 03:44 AM (j0IcY)
Go figure.
Keep voting those liberals into office CA. Wtg.
Posted by: GnuBreed at March 14, 2012 03:45 AM (ccXZP)
Hey Vic:
Check out this article:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whiskey_Rebellion
I posted it yesterday but you had already left the room.
It turns out that in President Washington's time "the west" was considered western Pennsylvania. So the article I posted about PA distilleries was correct.
Posted by: Ed Anger - Certified Kos Kid at March 14, 2012 03:48 AM (7+pP9)
Yesterday we were making fun of the mentally ill for seeking treatment, but don't you dare question someone whose special snowflake got diarrhea once...
Looking for that study that showed the number of British parents reporting their child had a peanut allergy was ten times higher than the number of Israeli parents (and several times higher than the number of British pediatricians reporting peanut allergies)...conclusion was that when your children are in actual physical danger every day, you don't look for things to worry about.
And the incidence of people clinically diagnosed with celiac disease to people who decided gluten was evil because they saw a segment on Dr Oz?
On the bright side, when Mrs SCOAMF finally gets us Food Justice we're only going to be allowed to purchase what's on our ration card (which is not a photo ID because photo ID is raaaaaaacist) and all this will be moot. Mmmm. Beets. (Can I turn those into vodka?)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 14, 2012 03:48 AM (hO8IJ)
Posted by: navycopjoe at March 14, 2012 03:50 AM (aiMuM)
http://www.gocomics.com/nonsequitur/2012/03/12/
It has a ring of the familiar.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 14, 2012 03:50 AM (hO8IJ)
Posted by: Bertram Cabot Jr. at March 14, 2012 03:50 AM (4Wc+9)
Thanks, Heather. I read the article but could not figure out why it was so wrong.
It is because I sit at lunch with a bunch of people that are the same amount overweight as I and they are scarfing down seven pounds of lettuce and grapefruit asking me why I be eating cookies. I get kinda sick of them.
Posted by: Artruen at March 14, 2012 03:50 AM (fDGF1)
"The partisan hacking on the late threads last night is a sight to behold. Your guy sucks! No, your guy sucks, moreover, only my guy can win!!"
That's why I avoid RedState like the plague during an election year; Wall to wall 24/7 Ultimate True Believer Combat. The partisans here are all Van Driessens compared to the slam-dancers over there. Not to mention the comment mechanism at RedState is much more conducive to epic, eye-gouging private duels.
Posted by: Derrick Bell's Astral Taint at March 14, 2012 03:53 AM (QjSgY)
Posted by: Lars Groteballen at March 14, 2012 03:55 AM (MlAd8)
Posted by: 66chevelle at March 14, 2012 03:56 AM (QjSgY)
Posted by: McLovin at March 14, 2012 03:56 AM (j0IcY)
I tend to believe most food "allergies" are psychosomatic, so I can't really use that excuse at work or anywhere else. And incidentally, most people don't want to hear that their so-called allergies are all in their head.
Food allergies are like any other kind of allergies. The body's immune system is reacting to a benign substance as if it were an invader. The runny nose/itchy eyes of hay fever is an example of that, and so is a nut allergy.
Me too. I never, ever heard of anyone being allergic to peanuts when I was growing up. Contrast that to today ... overprotectiveness is to blame. BTW, when was the last time anyone saw a child climbing a tree?
There's mounting evidence that that's accurate (and which is not at all the same as saying that allergies are psychosomatic). Basically, exposing kids while they're young to bacteria and other baddies strengthens their immune system, like a sparring partner hones the skills of a boxer. Keeping kids from playing in the dirt - which is increasingly the case, especially among the smother-mother types - hobbles kids' immune systems and can lead to immune system disorders later in life.
btw, I have a rare autoimmune disease (inherited) called ITP. Basically my immune system thinks my blood platelets are foreign invaders, so it attacks and destroys them. Platelets are what clots blood, so the effect is like hemophilia although the cause is very different. I promised my doc I won't go bungee jumping, but apart from that, no lifestyle changes.
So is socialism the immune-system disorder of the body politic?
Posted by: crisis du jour at March 14, 2012 03:57 AM (J1eJz)
Posted by: real joe at March 14, 2012 03:57 AM (w7Lv+)
Posted by: stu at March 14, 2012 03:59 AM (uhPd1)
Posted by: sickinmass at March 14, 2012 04:00 AM (bcNec)
Posted by: Ed Anger - Certified Kos Kid at March 14, 2012 04:05 AM (7+pP9)
Posted by: Panzer Trout at March 14, 2012 04:10 AM (j5CHE)
If it's not the eagles it's the falcons:
Birds do it, bees do it, but falcons might not do it if they are disturbed by the noise and dust of Allentown's arena work.
Out of concern for the love life of a certain semi-famous falcon couple, the Pennsylvania Game Commission gave city officials until Feb. 15 to complete demolition to avoid intruding on their alone time, also known as their nesting period.
But some unexpected delays pushed demolition of the Rite Aid and Family Dollar stores on Hamilton Street past that date. It took Rite Aid longer than expected to leave its building, and once the pharmacy was gone, engineers discovered asbestos had to be removed.
Then it turned out that Rite Aid's west wall was unexpectedly attached to, and appeared to be holding up, the east wall of the Farr Lofts, an occupied apartment building that will remain after the hockey arena is built. Demolition had to be stopped until both problems were fixed. The Game Commission offered an extension till Thursday.
...
Luckily, Allentown's falcons have been nesting under the Eighth Street bridge for the last few years, which is far enough from the arena that they probably won't be bothered unless they move back to PPL Tower, where they established a sort of falcon starter home in 2007. But the Game Commission wants to take no chances, and wants the arena demolition done by Thursday.
http://tinyurl.com/7nhq5zz
The Game Commission is a bunch of birdbrains.
Posted by: Ed Anger - Certified Kos Kid at March 14, 2012 04:10 AM (7+pP9)
AUTHOR. Nothing like another fiction supporting the necessity to drug the world's entire population in order to prevent implicit (not explicit) racism, though Propranolol is ineffective combating sexual or religious prejudice. Required drug abuse to make our minds conform are meant to gain credibility from incredible studies related (somehow, but not specified by CBS) to a most elite Oxford University. Note well, it only referenced white people, the only "real" racists in the world, at least the only ones suffering from IMPLICIT racism.
The following adverse events were observed and have been reported in patients using Propranolol.
http://tinyurl.com/7forbzc
Cardiovascular: Bradycardia; congestive heart failure; intensification of AV block; hypotension; paresthesia of hands; thrombocytopenic purpura; arterial insufficiency, usually of the Raynaud type.
Central Nervous System: Light-headedness; mental depression manifested by insomnia, lassitude, weakness, fatigue; catatonia; visual disturbances; hallucinations; vivid dreams; an acute reversible syndrome characterized by disorientation for time and place, short-term memory loss, emotional lability, slightly clouded sensorium, and decreased performance on neuropsychometrics. For immediate release formulations, fatigue, lethargy, and vivid dreams appear dose related.
Gastrointestinal: Nausea, vomiting, epigastric distress, abdominal cramping, diarrhea, constipation, mesenteric arterial thrombosis, ischemic colitis.
Allergic: Hypersensitivity reactions, including anaphylactic/anaphylactoid reactions; pharyngitis and agranulocytosis; erythematous rash; fever combined with aching and sore throat; laryngospasm; respiratory distress.
Respiratory: Bronchospasm.
Hematologic: Agranulocytosis, nonthrombocytopenic purpura, and thrombocytopenic purpura.
Autoimmune: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).
Skin and mucous membranes: Stevens-Johnson Syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, dry eyes, exfoliative dermatitis, erythema multiforme, urticaria, alopecia, SLE-like reactions, and psoriasisiform rashes. Oculomucocutaneous syndrome involving the skin, serous membranes, and conjunctivae reported for a beta-blocker (practolol) have not been associated with Propranolol.
Genitourinary: Male impotence; Peyronie's disease.
...But at least you might quit being such an implicitly racist bigot, or so you're told.
Posted by: maverick muse at March 14, 2012 04:16 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: dagny at March 14, 2012 04:17 AM (u50z0)
The canine version of that killed my sister's Border Collie early last December. It cam on almost overnight and after a week of expensive treatment it was a lost cause.
There are very real food allergies and there is neurotic allergies. Real allergies can be determined by tests that don't allow the patient to know exactly what substance is being profiled at the moment. Likewise, neurotic allergies are easily exposed by placebo tests.
For instance, the majority of people declaring themselves allergic to MSG produced the same symptoms if they were merely told the food they ate contained it, even though the food used had no MSG in it. But MSG had become the allergy du jour. (What people had against the Michael Schenker Group I'll never know.)
You know a person wasn't kidding about an allergy when they get horribly ill and cannot understand why because they thought they had carefully observed their dietary restrictions. I knew one person who had some allergies but a very poor idea of what foods the problem items appeared in. To say she lacked a practical response to motivation was understating her whole approach to life.
Posted by: epobirs at March 14, 2012 04:17 AM (kcfmt)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 14, 2012 04:23 AM (8y9MW)
The Left spent decades laying the ground work for this. Not Obama specifically, but somebody like him they could pawn off as an answer to the guilt they'd been intensively inculcating in us all.
Think about it, everybody. Despite knowing what an extraordinarily bad choice Obama was, how many of us at a deep uncontrollable level had a feelgood response to the knowledge that a black man had been elected President. (If that man had been Thomas Sowell it would have been a very good feeling.)
Nobody is immune. The only people who lack a vestige of this reaction have endured being told they are most awful possible people their whole lives because they don't conform. Some of them may be actual racists who just instinctively hate certain groups of people outside their perceived group but a lot of them are just very strong willed and react negatively to any attempt to program them.
Posted by: epobirs at March 14, 2012 04:25 AM (kcfmt)
http://tinyurl.com/6rk9goc
Posted by: Jones in CO at March 14, 2012 04:26 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: moki at March 14, 2012 04:26 AM (dZmFh)
Posted by: dagny at March 14, 2012 04:26 AM (u50z0)
Hey, don't be hating on my WSJ! We subscribe, and I love it. The sports writer Jayson Gay "The Couch" is awesome, Joe Queenan is pretty darn funny, and they always have a quirky but interesting article on the front page (bottom middle). Despite all the eliteism and pro-amnesty crap, and the very annoying lefty car review guy, the book and movie reviews are often very balanced (exposing left wing bias of books and movies reviewed), a lot of the op-ed section is awesome, the letters to the editor are for the most part written by right minded, smart, funny people, and I always find stuff out in the business section that contradicts the "Great Recovery" other news organizations are propagandizing at the moment.
A couple of snippets from two letters to the editor about an pro-Fluke op ed: "This could have been the 'Rosa Parks' moment for the young doyenne of social justice if only Rosa Parks had also demanded that her bus fare be paid for by someone else."
And my personal favorite: "...Ms. Fluke will never be a constitutional scholar, but rather is at Georgetown as a plaintiff class action lawyer-in-training? Her innate ability to find purported harm to many out of actual harm is extraordinary. Inflating a $108 per year expense that everyone but her must pay into a $1000 per year expense is what makes a great plantiff's lawer. They should waive the bar exam for her so she can get right to work."
That is some epic snark right there!
Posted by: runningrn at March 14, 2012 04:27 AM (vJ9tV)
Posted by: BurtTC at March 14, 2012 04:30 AM (Gc/Qi)
Posted by: stu at March 14, 2012 07:10 AM (uhPd1)
whereas a prostitute will tell you up front that you're getting screwed, and at what price
Posted by: Jones in CO at March 14, 2012 04:31 AM (8sCoq)
I didn't. I don't care about race. I'm not a racist. I love Alan West and it has absolutely nothing to do with the color of his skin. If people are happy a black man is president then they are racists.
Posted by: dagny at March 14, 2012 04:31 AM (u50z0)
Stupid people get offended by the stranfest things:
Bobblehead dolls of Abraham Lincoln's killer have been removed from the bookstore at the Gettysburg Museum & Visitor Center.
The bobbleheads of John Wilkes Booth drew criticism last week from some visitors and a distinguished historian who said they felt Lincoln's death should not be trivialized, nor his killer celebrated with such a souvenir.
Prominent Lincoln scholar Harold Holzer said he was glad to hear the figurines had been taken down.
http://tinyurl.com/7hvyk8u
Posted by: Ed Anger - Certified Kos Kid at March 14, 2012 04:32 AM (7+pP9)
Okay, Math Morons. Explain this to me.
I know that any fraction that cannot be converted into a decimal which either ends, or repeats forever (1/3, for instance) is considered "irrational." Why that term? Given that such things specifically indicate ratios (Pi is the ratio of a Circle's Circumference to it's Radius (Diameter? I can never remember which). e, similarly, is an "irrational number" which specifically denotes a ratio.
So why the term "irrational?"
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 14, 2012 04:34 AM (8y9MW)
Kind of like a Snicker commercial, though no incident of my transforming into an abrasive celebrity has been documented.
Posted by: epobirs at March 14, 2012 04:35 AM (kcfmt)
Posted by: nickless at March 14, 2012 04:35 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: runningrn at March 14, 2012 04:37 AM (vJ9tV)
I read Joe Queenan a lot in the Spy Magazine days and bought several of his books but as I got more conservative he got less amusing. A lot less.
Posted by: epobirs at March 14, 2012 04:37 AM (kcfmt)
I don't think anyone means to disparage people with real allergies. The problem is that the panic over food allergies in the last twenty years, to the point where upper middle class schools go into lock down whenever a kid inadvertently brings in a box of Cracker Jacks, is insulting to those people with real allergies. People like you have learned to live with the limitations that your immune systems place on you.
And yes, there are a lot of people who convince themselves that they are allergic to everyday items, or are convinced by family and friends. The peanut allergy "epidemic" is one such example.
Posted by: Alex at March 14, 2012 04:38 AM (XzxB+)
Could we combine the two and chain Native Americans to stationary bikes to run generators? That we get rid of the bird killing windmills and the NA's are too busy to pester birds.
Posted by: epobirs at March 14, 2012 04:39 AM (kcfmt)
Posted by: dagny at March 14, 2012 04:39 AM (u50z0)
Recall, Obama isn't worried about HIS kids' insulated future. And he sure as hell isn't worried about ours, either: Fresh Meat. His administration's designs already segregate and perform reverse discrimination -- Obama "inherited" all that from Bush, Clinton, Bush yada yada.
The Marxist judicial system, already at our nation's helm, directs the wrath, fury and massive powers of our federal government against our States as well as against each citizen. And as resulted from Sherman's March, there won't be anything left for the physical survival of the vanquished American. Our finest youth, as with Pat Tillman, already joined the military in order to protect our constitutional government. But they're not permitted, regardless of which party pulls virtual strings.
Black Swan. Nassim Taleb, risk based person, Independent voter.
http://tinyurl.com/7uzol4a
Posted by: maverick muse at March 14, 2012 04:41 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: Jean at March 14, 2012 04:42 AM (wwZVW)
Posted by: runningrn at March 14, 2012 04:43 AM (vJ9tV)
Example: Pi is an irrational number
Posted by: Jimbo at March 14, 2012 04:44 AM (O3R/2)
Once upon a time, there was actual argument over whether these number were real and of value for application. There were a lot of accusations of 'you're doing it wrong' over the math because an endless number couldn't be correct.
http://www.andrew-may.com/mm.htm
Posted by: epobirs at March 14, 2012 04:45 AM (kcfmt)
Posted by: dagny at March 14, 2012 04:45 AM (u50z0)
Posted by: Ed Anger - Certified Kos Kid at March 14, 2012 08:32 AM (7+pP9)
I think they should hand out John Wilkes Booth bobble-heads instead of Oscars. He was a famous thespian, after all.
"The Boothies"...has a nice ring to it, no? And Lincoln was a Republican, so there's that.
Posted by: 66chevelle at March 14, 2012 04:45 AM (QjSgY)
Posted by: runningrn at March 14, 2012 04:46 AM (vJ9tV)
Posted by: maverick muse at March 14, 2012 08:16 AM (lpWVn)
Is this for real? Or some kind of spoof?
The day they try to drug me, or a friend/family member, to fix our racism, is the day that bullets fly. I'll take a lot of BS before I snap, but this goes WAYYYYY too far.
Posted by: Reactionary at March 14, 2012 04:46 AM (xUM1Q)
But Pi, at least, is specifically a ratio.
Pi is defined as: "the ratio of the circumference of a circle to it's diameter"
I'm not as sure with e, but I believe it is a ratio as well.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 14, 2012 04:46 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: sickinmass at March 14, 2012 04:47 AM (bcNec)
So "irrational" wasn't "Not a ratio" it was math-geek for RINO.
Got it.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 14, 2012 04:49 AM (8y9MW)
Religious exemption due to the use of the feathers (?) in native american religious practice.
Yeah. Some religious exemptions are OK.
Posted by: f2000 at March 14, 2012 04:49 AM (c7Pp2)
One of my pet peaves is talkings heads, usually Al Michaels, using the word "differentiate" when the word "difference" works just fine.
Posted by: Jimbo at March 14, 2012 04:49 AM (O3R/2)
Posted by: jeannebodine at March 14, 2012 07:18 AM (byR8d)
Forbes magazine is going to hell, too. And when they bundle it with ForbesLife, that goes straight in the trash---I mean recycle--bin.
Posted by: 66chevelle at March 14, 2012 04:50 AM (QjSgY)
Tech geeks are just as bad. "Utilize?" WTF. Didn't we have a perfectly good word that meant "use?"
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 14, 2012 04:51 AM (8y9MW)
The problem Allen had was that he asked math people, not english people and of course the math people didn't read his question and started defining irrational numbers not answering why they were called irrational.
Posted by: dagny at March 14, 2012 04:52 AM (u50z0)
Posted by: runningrn at March 14, 2012 04:52 AM (vJ9tV)
You may want to look up a Brit named Charlie Brooker. He covers a lot of the same ground as Queenan, with a lot of the same defects. But when he isn't being a political idiot he can be pretty funny.
Posted by: epobirs at March 14, 2012 04:53 AM (kcfmt)
They interviewed Ben Jealous (appropriate name), head of NAACP. He was on his way to Geneva to pleadfor the UN Human Rights Council to intervene on voter id, because it would prevent 5 million people (mostly black) from voting. When reporter asked him if there were so many people denied the vote, how did Obama get elected, he said that this was GOP governors trying to deny Obama a second term.
Now I thought the NAACP was supposed to be a non-partisan (ha-ha) group. If Jealous is specifically targeting GOP governors, I think that violates some sort of rule about non-profits. Of course, as Vic says, Jealous is protected by Blackdemocratium, but this goes with the other racial politics stuff we have been hearing.
I REALLY want to see the UN send some people here to Indiana. That will go over well.
Posted by: Miss Marple at March 14, 2012 04:53 AM (GoIUi)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at March 14, 2012 04:53 AM (Ho2rs)
Posted by: Jean at March 14, 2012 04:54 AM (OfinX)
Posted by: runningrn at March 14, 2012 04:54 AM (vJ9tV)
Posted by: Jimbo at March 14, 2012 04:54 AM (O3R/2)
Posted by: awkward davies at March 14, 2012 04:54 AM (Jp1VY)
Posted by: dagny at March 14, 2012 04:54 AM (u50z0)
Posted by: steve walsh at March 14, 2012 04:55 AM (D2AyO)
Posted by: Jimbo at March 14, 2012 04:55 AM (O3R/2)
I'm not sure how I'd managed to avoid hearing that abomination of language, but I feel somehow violated now that I've been exposed to it.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 14, 2012 04:57 AM (8y9MW)
Seriously?
And what the hell happened to the word, "effect"?
Also, I want my L Y's back. As in adverbs.
Posted by: kdny at March 14, 2012 04:57 AM (vrYVY)
Interesting etymology there. Before compasses influenced cartography, East was always at the top of a map. Thus a maps orientation was East, with everything to the East becoming known as the Orient.
Posted by: epobirs at March 14, 2012 04:57 AM (kcfmt)
DAYTON, Ohio — President Obama came to see March Madness, but he also got lobbied by Republican Gov. John Kasich of Ohio on developing natural gas in the state.
Mr. Obama flew here on Air Force One Tuesday with British Prime Minister David Cameron to watch a first-round NCAA menÂ’s game between Western Kentucky University and Mississippi Valley State. They were joined by Mr. Kasich and sat in the student section behind one of the baskets at the University of Dayton arena.
At a cost of roughly $180,000 per hour to operate Air Force One, the trip cost taxpayers at least $365,000, not including the staff costs and other expenses.
Those damn Republicans just don't understand the middle class
Posted by: TheQuietMan at March 14, 2012 04:58 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: Jimbo at March 14, 2012 04:59 AM (O3R/2)
The disturbing part of the Critical Race theory isn't that Whitey is bad. The disturbing part is that it is a MARXIST theory that is CRITICAL (changing/breaking down) of the Constitution of the United States of America
======================
You stop your lies, WHITEY!
Obama was merely a law student hanging around with a law professor!
What is so controversial about that!?!!!?
Oh, and I'm shocked the Holder DOJ is fighting the Texas voter ID law.
Posted by: Jay at March 14, 2012 05:00 AM (3LaGb)
My sister likes to make a big show of cutting everything in half, or taking no bun. They then spend an hour trying to see how small a piece of dessert they can get. I'm concerned they're going to split the atom and cause an explosion.
This has been the pet peeve of my life.
Posted by: dagny at March 14, 2012 05:02 AM (u50z0)
For that much money you could put an 80 inch flat panel in every damn room of the White House and a cable/satellite box so every one could be tuned to a different game or show, including the subscription costs for his entire term.
You'd still have enough cash left over to order pizza for the whole administration.
Posted by: epobirs at March 14, 2012 05:02 AM (kcfmt)
As noted yesterday: by DoJ logic, driving, buying paint, opening a bank account, drinking, smoking, cashing a check, and crossing a National Border are all racist.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 14, 2012 05:03 AM (8y9MW)
Do you have to have an ID to register to vote in TX (or Wisconsin where the goofball judge referenencing William Scalia struck it down)?
Anybody know?
When I moved recently I was able to register in my new state by showing either: 1. my old DL AND SSN 2. A passport
Which gets you the new DL and a voter registration.
So registering to vote is like racist, right?
Posted by: Jay at March 14, 2012 05:06 AM (3LaGb)
Posted by: dagny at March 14, 2012 05:07 AM (u50z0)
Posted by: maddogg at March 14, 2012 05:09 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: sickinmass at March 14, 2012 05:09 AM (bcNec)
Because they can. It's their version of 'negro.'
There are some vague arguments about treating a massive portion of the world as a single homogenous entity but it doesn't hold up very well. Was there ever a time when Arabs and Japanese were being treated as a single entity for any practical purpose other than extremely broad geography?
One of the people who did a lot to make it a dirty word was Edward Said, a Middle eastern studies professor beloved of the left, especially the Israel hating portion. His big axe to grind was that people in the West were given a picture of his native land that a native wouldn't recognize but he same could easily be said for how somebody who grew up in Jerusalem views the West.
My feeling is, as long as they're killing each other in box lots for utterly barbaric and unfathomable reasons, they either name to smacked around hard or up their game and get it over with.
Posted by: epobirs at March 14, 2012 05:10 AM (kcfmt)
Posted by: DaveA at March 14, 2012 05:11 AM (P2PvA)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 14, 2012 05:11 AM (eCnLg)
Posted by: Jimbo at March 14, 2012 08:59 AM (O3R/2)
My Republican Chinese wife can't figure that one out either, but her Dem professor Chinese BIL can expound mindlessly on it for hours. They're building their own Racial Grievance Industry, and they're very good at copying things...oh wait that's racist of me, sorry. Heard it from my wife.
On a side note, a guy in Communist China once told me that Westerners call China "China" because of the porcelain, and it was demeaning and derogatory. I had to school him about the Xin Dynasty. Apparently, Mao didn't teach much about that stuff.
Posted by: 66chevelle at March 14, 2012 05:12 AM (QjSgY)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at March 14, 2012 05:12 AM (Ho2rs)
My sister likes to make a big show of cutting everything in half, or taking no bun. They then spend an hour trying to see how small a piece of dessert they can get. I'm concerned they're going to split the atom and cause an explosion.
Wow. I bet she's just a tiger in the sack. Asceticism is teh hawt. Especially proclaiming your miserable self esteem is a virtue.
I bet
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 14, 2012 05:13 AM (/urwq)
There are allergic reactions that are psychosomatic in basis and there are those that are not.
Of those that are not....the psychological temperment and reaction of the patient can drastically alter the course of the reaction, for the better or for the worse.
As someone who's dealt with seasonal "pollon" allergies all my life I can tell you with certainty that how I choose to react and handle the issue is almost as important as any medication I take.
Posted by: Mr Obvious at March 14, 2012 05:14 AM (2uovW)
Posted by: moki at March 14, 2012 05:15 AM (dZmFh)
Posted by: epobirs at March 14, 2012 09:02 AM (kcfmt)
Nope. ESPN only. I want my staff fully informed about the things that matter.
Posted by: Barkahlounger at March 14, 2012 05:16 AM (QjSgY)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at March 14, 2012 09:12 AM (Ho2rs)
The GOP doesn't need a hill to die on. They are content to go quietly extinct.
As a side note: this blog is fucked up. I am so sick of the fucking mess with formatting. How long do we have to put up with this shit?
Posted by: maddogg at March 14, 2012 05:16 AM (OlN4e)
My old office once started up a Biggest Loser type competition with teams and the whole bit. I politely declined to participate but I did stop putting out the bowls of m&ms and reese's cups that I used to keep on my desk. Just because I wasn't participating didn't mean I would sabotage everyone else. This is when I discovered that apparently there was a new crack flavored m&m that I had been buying. Seriously, people would come in and stare at the spot on my desk where the bowl had been as if I had shot a puppy in front of them. Then I would get all virtuous and say "but I'm trying to help you!" Good times, good times.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD 2012 at March 14, 2012 05:17 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Lincolntf at March 14, 2012 05:17 AM (hiMsy)
Fuck Panetta and every fuckin asshole in this administration and without any lubricant
It's going to get worse, especially if the JEF wins a second term. I wouldn't be surprised if there were rumblings then of "disloyalty" by the military, and calls for reforming the officer corps.
Posted by: Alex at March 14, 2012 05:19 AM (XzxB+)
http://en.wikipedia.org /wiki/ Irrational_number
In mathematics, an irrational number is any real number that cannot be expressed as a ratio a/b, where a and b are integers, with b non-zero, and is therefore not a rational number.
Wiki is pretty good at this sort of thing.
Posted by: DaveA at March 14, 2012 05:20 AM (P2PvA)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 14, 2012 05:20 AM (eCnLg)
Ok, I'm really turned on right now. Like, I may need to see a doctor in four hours.
Posted by: Alex at March 14, 2012 05:21 AM (XzxB+)
A good question to ask would be why Santorum, who has been running for at least 1 1/2 years, hasn't raised more money and hasn't got much of an organization.
Posted by: Miss Marple at March 14, 2012 05:21 AM (GoIUi)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 14, 2012 05:22 AM (eCnLg)
Last time around I'd have far rather seen Obama have to face Sarah Palin in a debate than McCain. But imagine the excitement of a McCain-Biden debate. People would be digging tunnels to escape!
Posted by: epobirs at March 14, 2012 05:22 AM (kcfmt)
Posted by: Bobby Brady at March 14, 2012 05:24 AM (nBE5A)
Anybody know?
In Wisconsin you do not need a photo ID to register to vote. You can bring in a piece of mail with your name and address on it. You can even bring a friend who is registered to vote, who can vouch for you and say, "Yeah, this is so and so and he lives next door to me, so ya, he's good."
What makes this especially wonderful is that you can register at the exact same time as you cast your ballot.
Same day voter registration with no proof that you are who you say you are or live where you say you live. What could go wrong?
Posted by: mama winger at March 14, 2012 05:25 AM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 14, 2012 05:25 AM (eCnLg)
Because no one believed that Romney wouldn't sail to the nomination. Many in the party are angry that we have this massive nasty primary, but the conditions were set for this a long time ago and they just never noticed. The hostility towards conservatives and the TEA party, the inability to demonstrate any sort of aggressiveness when it came to challenging the SCOAMF, all that played into the situation that we have now.
Personally, I love that the primary has gone on this long. I think it's better for our country if we get rid of this stupid notion that politics should be genteel. The wishy washy "independents" will learn to grow a thicker skin and endure the horror of listening to grown men and women openly criticize each other for past decision and policy stances, and then maybe we can finally have some real differences between the parties.
Posted by: Alex at March 14, 2012 05:26 AM (XzxB+)
Yup. It's the same here.
Posted by: Alex at March 14, 2012 05:27 AM (XzxB+)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 14, 2012 05:28 AM (eCnLg)
Posted by: Dave in Fla at March 14, 2012 05:28 AM (pHn5R)
I didn't know the history behind the black and tan drink either. Thanks for the history lesson.
While people are enjoying pies today, is anyone eating pancakes on Friday to remember the patron saint of pancakes?
Posted by: BishopWash at March 14, 2012 05:29 AM (liT8W)
Ed, IIRC Vic has already seen the Whiskey Rebellion Wiki and/or already knew the relevant history when he brought it up several months ago.
Posted by: DaveA at March 14, 2012 09:11 AM (P2PvA)
Yeah -- but he responded to the article I posted yesterday with an air of disbelief. He talked about farmers "out west" as if they were out past Ohio or maybe in the Rockies. Western Pennsylvania was the frontier in Washington's time
Posted by: Ed Anger - Certified Kos Kid at March 14, 2012 05:29 AM (7+pP9)
Posted by: thisheavenlyhell at March 14, 2012 05:30 AM (XWb4y)
Posted by: Alex at March 14, 2012 05:30 AM (XzxB+)
Posted by: Lincolntf at March 14, 2012 05:31 AM (hiMsy)
Posted by: DaveA at March 14, 2012 05:32 AM (P2PvA)
Posted by: thisheavenlyhell at March 14, 2012 05:33 AM (XWb4y)
Posted by: President Chet Roosevelt at March 14, 2012 05:33 AM (Ag6fu)
Take a run around the lefty blogs &/or comment sections. They are so excited about a potential Santorum nomination.
Posted by: rectal exam at March 14, 2012 05:33 AM (O7ksG)
Not like they would ever do that , mind you.
Posted by: mama winger at March 14, 2012 05:34 AM (P6QsQ)
When confronted with people like that I try to loudly exclaim how wonderful whatever fattening food I am eating is, and that if they had just added more butter to the cream sauce it would have been even better.
Life's too short to drink bad wine, eat bad food, or not enjoy eating.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at March 14, 2012 05:34 AM (nEUpB)
I find myself admiring Mitt's 2008 decision to drop out and give McCain a chance to get a campaign going a lot more.
Posted by: Dave in Fla at March 14, 2012 09:28 AM (pHn5R)
Romney was just playing by the GOP establishment's rules. He knew 2008 was McCain's turn and if he played his cards right 2012 would be his turn. Nothing there to respect, really.
Posted by: Ed Anger - Certified Kos Kid at March 14, 2012 05:34 AM (7+pP9)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 14, 2012 05:35 AM (eCnLg)
konnichiha ill-tempered females
I have my grandfather's Coolidge lapel pin, a charging elephant with trunk and tusks raised for battle and "Coolidge" engraved on it. In comparison, today's Republican party isn't symbolized by an elephant charging but by a dull, listless zoo elephant standing passively in his cage while giggling teenagers bounce peanuts off his skull.
That dull-eyed zoo elephant perfectly represents the moral cowards in congress who seem more than willing to let Obama and Holder off the hook for Fast and Furious.
Posted by: Larsen E. Whipsnade at March 14, 2012 05:35 AM (6BgmB)
Posted by: maddogg at March 14, 2012 05:37 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Alex at March 14, 2012 09:19 AM (XzxB+)
Indeed. I hope the officer class is considering every eventuality. Stalin's purge is probably looking like a good idea to Obie by now. I'd not blame our military leaders for acting in self defense.
Personally I'd cheerfully embrace a military junta rather than see a 2nd term for the communist party USA. I'm sure quite a few people are with me. As happens in many nations, in the US the best people trust the military more than any other segment of the government. In its natural state, the army is always a bastion of nationalistic and generally rightward leaning thought.
Posted by: Reactionary at March 14, 2012 05:37 AM (xUM1Q)
More sure you jest.
Wouldn't a compass with a potato needle be a pain to carry?
Posted by: DaveA at March 14, 2012 05:37 AM (P2PvA)
Never once did he say anything about the 'religion Liberals shall not name'. He blamed the ethnic cleansing on - are you ready for this - oil. The south Sudan has the oil and the North has the refineries - so the people in the North Sudan have to kill the people in the south to get the oil - or something.
Of course any cognitive dissonance being an acceptable one to a Liberal - if it involves "Oil" or "Haliburton" - so long as it doesn't mention the obvious fact that this is simply more Muslim violence against non Muslims.
Posted by: An Observation at March 14, 2012 05:38 AM (ylhEn)
It is really confusing to most folks that anybody could be starving, hungry perhaps, but starving when Michelle Obama has been telling us for 3 years that too many of us are obese.
Apparently the CDC does not track deaths from starvation, or rather they call it malnutrition. I wonder why ?
Posted by: Jack LaLanne at March 14, 2012 05:39 AM (e8kgV)
THE WORD 'IRRATIONAL.' He asked about why that WORD is used. It means not a ratio not just insane. He didn't not get what irrational numbers meant but why they were called "insane" (irrational).
Jesus
Posted by: dagny at March 14, 2012 05:40 AM (u50z0)
Posted by: Hopped up on Something at March 14, 2012 05:40 AM (9/zVj)
Posted by: thisheavenlyhell at March 14, 2012 05:41 AM (XWb4y)
Posted by: moki at March 14, 2012 05:42 AM (dZmFh)
Posted by: sickinmass at March 14, 2012 05:43 AM (bcNec)
If you're afraid you're own troops will shoot you, you're doing it wrong.
Posted by: DaveA at March 14, 2012 05:44 AM (P2PvA)
Posted by: Charles Ponzi at March 14, 2012 05:45 AM (e8kgV)
Oh, no you wouldn't. You would tortured to death with phone calls and news articles and "Prevention" magazine perscriptions, running shoes, gym memberships, and fruit. "Charlie, we need to talk, your sister and I were talking about your flagrant disregard for your life this weekend. We are so worried (weeping). So worried. We were wondering if you may need to seek help."
I actually eat less than they do and exercise more but I refuse to PROCLAIM my virtue from the highest stump. My self esteem is not based on the size of my piece of pie.
Posted by: dagny at March 14, 2012 05:45 AM (u50z0)
Posted by: maddogg at March 14, 2012 05:47 AM (OlN4e)
Of course any cognitive dissonance being an acceptable one to a Liberal - if it involves "Oil" or "Haliburton" - so long as it doesn't mention the obvious fact that this is simply more Muslim violence against non Muslims.
Posted by: An Observation at March 14, 2012 09:38 AM (ylhEn)
Indeed. What's even more sicking to me about this mess is that the libtards have their panties in a twist over the violence in Syria (which is wonderful and should be encouraged) and want us to intervene. Yet in Syria it's people who hate us killing others who hate us. It's a win for us. Whereas in the Sudan you have people who hate us (muslim subhumans) killing people who are indifferent to us (the local Christians and prolly some animists) and they Do. Not. Give. A. Shit. No calls for intervention. No calls to arm the victims of the muz attrocities. None of that. Apparently the muz cutting off womens' breasts is no big deal. Not nearly as important as insuring women get free contraception in the US.
If it were me in charge, I'd have special forces on the ground in the South already training them hard, and arms shipments being dropped in daily. That, and I'd be doing whatever I could to prolong the Syrian disorder.
Viva La Meurte.
Posted by: Reactionary at March 14, 2012 05:47 AM (xUM1Q)
secretary to speak to them were abruptly asked by their commander to get up, leave their weapons — M-16 and M-4 automatic rifles and 9 mm pistols — outside the tent and then return unarmed.
If you're afraid you're own troops will shoot you, you're doing it wrong.Posted by: DaveA at March 14, 2012 09:44 AM
Indeed.
Posted by: mama winger at March 14, 2012 05:47 AM (P6QsQ)
Why is paying a "fair share" not good enough for liberals?
Posted by: Johnny at March 14, 2012 05:47 AM (uhPd1)
Posted by: Hopped up on Something at March 14, 2012 05:51 AM (9/zVj)
LOL. Well, the pukes in this admin are just being cautious. They saw that one soldier went a little nuts and started shooting muz (which should have been our policy from the start). Given that everyone in this administration is a shameless and gutless muslim sympathizer, they no doubt felt a little threatened.
Posted by: Reactionary at March 14, 2012 05:51 AM (xUM1Q)
my cultural-lib friends {nearly ALL of my friends} either live in a world filled with nightmarish scenerios and conspiracies or a wonderful-rainbow and unicorn type of place where my beliefs can upend the natural rule of things...liberals sure are strange.
and yes, western PA has a funny history of angry, whiskey drinking people.
Posted by: george lucas's neck-pouch at March 14, 2012 05:53 AM (ns1cq)
Posted by: Death Chipmunk hunting fluke uterus at March 14, 2012 05:53 AM (pVvkk)
Posted by: reformed prostitute at March 14, 2012 05:53 AM (nBE5A)
Posted by: Lincolntf at March 14, 2012 05:54 AM (hiMsy)
Posted by: sickinmass at March 14, 2012 05:54 AM (bcNec)
Sorry, but you are incorrect. There is at least one number that is both irrational and insane.
52%
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at March 14, 2012 05:55 AM (nEUpB)
Posted by: SurferDoc at March 14, 2012 05:55 AM (6H6FZ)
I take offense in proxy for my small mammal bretheren, everywhere.
Posted by: Darth Chipmunk at March 14, 2012 05:58 AM (pVvkk)
The Israeli army allows (and maybe requires) its soldiers to carry their weapons at all times while in uniform, usually when they are traveling.
Shockingly, those traveling soldiers have used their weapons to stop terrorist attacks!
Those sneaky Jews!
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at March 14, 2012 05:58 AM (nEUpB)
Turns out adding meth has not improved this.
And no it was not a fun Thanksgiving visit!
Posted by: DaveA at March 14, 2012 05:58 AM (P2PvA)
Posted by: reformed prostitute at March 14, 2012 09:53 AM (nBE5A)
What's fun is to see them gain it all back over the course of the next year. All of a sudden they start to learn a little humility.
Ahh, the schadenfreude. It's delicious.
I don't know why all these health nuts bother anyway. They're only adding years to the END of their life - you know - the depends-diapers and alzheimers years. Screw that. I want to die before any of that BS kicks in.
My grandad's in his 90s now. He can't remember much. I have to re-introduce myself when I visit. He doesn't get out and do anything. SCREW THAT. Give me death.
Posted by: Reactionary at March 14, 2012 05:59 AM (xUM1Q)
Remember that time I put ghost pepper extract into your salsa and you wound up in the hospital? That was hilarious.
Posted by: food prankster at March 14, 2012 06:00 AM (nBE5A)
Remember that time I punched you so hard in the abdomen that it burst your appendix and you had to go to the hospital? That was hilarious.
Posted by: food prank victim at March 14, 2012 06:00 AM (nBE5A)
...blame the pagans hahaha
poor pittsburgh, youve lost your soul ol' man.
Posted by: george lucas's neck-pouch at March 14, 2012 06:01 AM (ns1cq)
Posted by: housecat with fake mouse at March 14, 2012 06:01 AM (9/zVj)
..."Then when they have a major health crisis and get into shape and they realize just how awful they felt, and they want to help other people feel better and be happier too.
But it can be a little annoying."
--- more than a little annoying. its all they ever fucking talk about. pictures on facebook of their gym-sessions, the endless cycle of marathons they run etc. sumtimes i wish they woulda just stayed fat.
Posted by: george lucas's neck-pouch at March 14, 2012 06:04 AM (ns1cq)
Posted by: housecat with fake mouse at March 14, 2012 06:04 AM (9/zVj)
No Stuckon Update last night? After happening across a couple of his updates, I found the "unabridged works" post he left and LOVED IT.
Last I heard, he'd gotten a soda dumped on his computer, then a replacement, and we're waiting to see:
a) what the che-leaders do to continue their retailiation
b) what tricks IT had up their sleeve with his new install
c) what flavor of delicious schadenfreude we shall all enjoy as a result!
Although I'm thinking that there's a possible anti-climatic ending that could stem from the doofuses that tried to vandalize his car the second time. They caught both of them, and I'm going to assume that their relation to the che-leader(s) is probably limited to an online association. In other words, they're both part of the same local "Occupy!" blog / chat. Couple hours in a holding cell and I'd wager that they'd give up what little information they had to give up. If that's enough to directly link them to che-leader (an actual name, not just his sock on DU, for example), then that would be that.
I doubt that once he's gone, his followers would probably fizzle rather than continue their campagin against Stuck.
Posted by: reason at March 14, 2012 06:05 AM (q/kmn)
Posted by: housecat with fake mouse at March 14, 2012 06:06 AM (9/zVj)
If they were truly happy, they wouldn't be so fucking snarly every time anyone else eats. They're miserable, and they can't stand that other people aren't, so they bully everyone else into being miserable too. See SCOAMF, Mrs. Bloomberg, Nanny. See Public Interest[sic], Center for Science[sic] in the.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 14, 2012 06:07 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: dagny at March 14, 2012 06:09 AM (u50z0)
Posted by: housecat with fake mouse at March 14, 2012 06:10 AM (9/zVj)
If I go to the gym will you do my dishes too?
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at March 14, 2012 06:11 AM (nEUpB)
*checks pocket*
I got a dime and some dryer lint. Think she'll take it?
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 14, 2012 06:11 AM (ZKzrr)
....he had no idea what the fuck i was talking about.
Posted by: george lucas's neck-pouch at March 14, 2012 06:12 AM (ns1cq)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 14, 2012 06:12 AM (ZKzrr)
Exactly.
I sense a theme...could it be....fucking liberals can't seem to butt out of everyone else's business?
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at March 14, 2012 06:12 AM (nEUpB)
Posted by: dagny at March 14, 2012 06:13 AM (u50z0)
Posted by: Sandra Fluke at March 14, 2012 06:13 AM (ggRof)
Around here? I can get good pizza, but the cheese steak? Don't keep secrets from the NJ morons!
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at March 14, 2012 06:14 AM (nEUpB)
Posted by: sickinmass at March 14, 2012 06:14 AM (bcNec)
Posted by: Jimbo at March 14, 2012 06:15 AM (O3R/2)
I probably wouldn't put the cheesesteak on the pizza, though.
Maybe the next time someone gets all smug about their dry carrot stick lunch (glycemic index, people!), I'll assume it's just their iron deficiency talking.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 14, 2012 06:15 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: dagny at March 14, 2012 06:15 AM (u50z0)
Santorum is benefiting from being the last guy left from a string of failures. The question is whether he can win in the fall. Brit Hume called him a whiner last night on Twitter. In a competition of 2 whiners, I think Obama wins with the incumbent advantage.
We will see. I will vote for whoever gets the nomination, as my largest concern is getting Obama out. I think Romney has a better chance of doing that, but this is a strange year.
Posted by: Miss Marple at March 14, 2012 06:17 AM (GoIUi)
....in the 70s we rode our big wheels over gigantic wooden plank ramps....over and over again.
show me a kid doing that these days...you cant. it just doesnt happen.
Posted by: george lucas's neck-pouch at March 14, 2012 06:17 AM (ns1cq)
You don't even have to know all the latest, just make it up. All those people will believe anything they "hear". Tell them that jicama is a miracle food.
Posted by: dagny at March 14, 2012 06:18 AM (u50z0)
Morning, all!
Courtesy of Taki's (via Five Feet of Fury), I bring you THE story of the year. It appears certain blood pressure medications can actually CURE RACISM.
Link to fultext HTML of the study in the journal Psychopharmacology: http://tinyurl.com/7kwtj34
I wish to God I was making that up.
The fact that the "study" had a grand total of 36 participants, all white males, only 18 of whom actually received the drug in question (the other 18 received a placebo) would seem to me to make the "findings" little more than wishful thinking. But the lefties will latch onto even the most inane scientific "studies" if it makes them feel better about themselves. See? It turns out bigoted white people really ARE mentally inferior. They just need medication, and then they'll be happy lefties!
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO supporter at March 14, 2012 06:18 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: housecat with fake mouse at March 14, 2012 06:18 AM (9/zVj)
Posted by: Johnny at March 14, 2012 06:18 AM (uhPd1)
You should be able to get a lot more furniture moving out him. That is what you meant, right?
Posted by: epobirs at March 14, 2012 06:19 AM (kcfmt)
Posted by: dagny at March 14, 2012 06:19 AM (u50z0)
How do we know it didn't just get into Jethro's whiskey stash?
Posted by: franksalterego at March 14, 2012 06:19 AM (9XykO)
A failure to prosecute anyone at MF Global would be,
if anything, even worse. It would mean that executives at a broker-dealer can
indeed steal customer money and get away with it — so long as it was
“unintentional.” And it would only deepen the cynicism so many people feel about
government. IÂ’ve heard it suggested, for instance, that the Justice Department
wonÂ’t prosecute Corzine because it would hurt President Obama. (Corzine, the
former governor of New Jersey, had been a big fund-raiser for the president.) I
donÂ’t happen to subscribe to that theory, but I certainly understand why others
might.
Why would anyone think that?
Posted by: TheQuietMan at March 14, 2012 06:19 AM (1Jaio)
Our 17-year-old brat has a dear friend whose parents regularly plague her with the newest fad diets. The real lunatic stuff -- acai juice and white beans for a week, then a fast, then a high vegetable week, etc.
She comes to our house for normal food.
It's actually sort of sad.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at March 14, 2012 06:20 AM (nEUpB)
The scientific method is clearly racist.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at March 14, 2012 06:21 AM (nEUpB)
happy pi day
Posted by: phoenixgirl at March 14, 2012 08:53 AM (Ho2rs)
Me, too. This is irrational
Posted by: cobbler gobbler at March 14, 2012 06:22 AM (nBE5A)
Look at the exit polls for Alabama (http://tinyurl.com/82woegz) and Mississippi (http://tinyurl.com/7hr6brj). Only 5% and 7% respectively believe romney is a conservative. In Mississippi 59% think Gingrich has the right experience, not romney and in Alabama 51% think Gingrich has the right experience, again, not romney. In Alabama 62% think Santorum has "strong moral character", romney took second on this one gingrich had like 7%. In Mississippi 65% think Santorum has "strong moral character", while 8% think this of Gingrich.
So I'm thinking the romney camapign will try to give Rick the Cain treatment. And they will continue to point out how morally bankrupt gingrich is. while never giving you any reason why romney is great except that there is a myth out there that he is the only guy who can beat obama.
Posted by: wondering at March 14, 2012 06:23 AM (oZfic)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propranolol
The stuff is also used to treat anxiety and panic. Are they not just saying people who are doped up experience less emotional reaction than normal? By that measure you could eliminate racism by legalizing marijuana.
None of my three blood pressure meds are that stuff or an analog. I guess that's why can still manage to loathe Obama. not because of his wretched policies, propensity for lying and distortion, and general worthlessness.
Posted by: epobirs at March 14, 2012 06:24 AM (kcfmt)
Around here? I can get good pizza, but the cheese steak? Don't keep secrets from the NJ morons!
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at March 14, 2012 10:14 AM (nEUpB)
**
Pizza Mania
390 Midland Ave
Garfield, NJ 07026
973-859-0855
**
Crazy Steak: 12" peppers, onions, yeallow cheese, FRENCH FRIES
Buffalo Cheese Steak" 12" Blue cheese dressing, hot sauce, melted mozzarella.
**
Cause I care.
Posted by: dananjcon's dingy is bigger than yours at March 14, 2012 06:24 AM (8ieXv)
it seems those people usually come down with other symptoms too...neat-freakiness, bottles of hand sanitizer everywhere, sterilized-uncharacteristic home etc...it can get loopy can't it?
one of the people i know like this is a girl, who by nature anyway has a bit of OCD {women like 'order', once thats disrupted...look out} so i like to move stuff around her home, little things like glasses...maybe skirt a chair over or sumthin. she will literally put everything back in place and give me the cute evil-stare. lol
the only way to deal with these people is to fuck with em.
Posted by: george lucas's neck-pouch at March 14, 2012 06:25 AM (ns1cq)
I went gluten free last summer and have never felt better. I'm fruit free too except for one serving of blueberries. Protein and vegetables. I fell off the wagon over Christmas but just knowing the difference in feeling got me back on it. However, I wish they made a protein with "crunch". Like a protein dorito.
Posted by: dagny at March 14, 2012 06:26 AM (u50z0)
When an attractive woman tells me she feels great,my reaction is that this is a purely subjective opinion and I can only trust the evidence of my own sense. Thus agreement on this greatness can only be obtained if I feel her.
They don't talk to me about their diets anymore.
Posted by: epobirs at March 14, 2012 06:27 AM (kcfmt)
Behold and laugh and laugh and laugh at that MoveOn JEF loving dumbass.
Posted by: jimmuy at March 14, 2012 06:29 AM (c/XSR)
You run out of volunteers very fast when you say you want to see if their nuts go crunch between your teeth.
Posted by: epobirs at March 14, 2012 06:29 AM (kcfmt)
Posted by: housecat with fake mouse at March 14, 2012 06:31 AM (9/zVj)
Ah, the important things in life. Thanks.
Have you tried Steve's Burger in Garfield (rte.46)?
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at March 14, 2012 06:31 AM (nEUpB)
Posted by: sickinmass at March 14, 2012 06:31 AM (bcNec)
Posted by: wondering at March 14, 2012 06:31 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: chemjeff at March 14, 2012 10:30 AM (7FadD)
Anything short of Whipped Cream on Titties and it is weakness not sabotage.
Posted by: garrett at March 14, 2012 06:32 AM (WzE97)
Does anyone know how to contact ace to put a you tube up?
There is a wonderful one about 0b0z0 health scare and of course, it refuses to post.
Posted by: No Fan at March 14, 2012 06:33 AM (rsOPT)
http://bit.ly/wi9Fg3
Posted by: mama winger at March 14, 2012 06:33 AM (P6QsQ)
....my god....thats beautiful.
Posted by: george lucas's neck-pouch at March 14, 2012 06:34 AM (ns1cq)
Of course, it would have been nice if I'd also known the best way to get rid of the flab was to be doing a strength training regimen, but we do what we can. Now getting red of the paunch left over from getting rid of a large child/small woman worth of weight is giving me fits.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 14, 2012 06:35 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Jimbo at March 14, 2012 06:36 AM (O3R/2)
Behold and laugh and laugh and laugh at that MoveOn JEF loving dumbass.
Posted by: jimmuy at March 14, 2012 10:29 AM (c/XSR)
*
Bwahaha, And the tank happened all while the Nasdaq broke records yesterday.
*
Shoddenboner**
Posted by: dananjcon's dingy is bigger than yours at March 14, 2012 06:37 AM (8ieXv)
http://bit.ly/wi9Fg3
Posted by: mama winger at March 14, 2012 10:33 AM (P6QsQ)"
"John McCain Accidentally Endorses President Obama Instead of Mitt Romney [VIDEO]"http://tinyurl.com/7zbsqm2
Posted by: wondering at March 14, 2012 06:37 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: wondering at March 14, 2012 10:23 AM (oZfic)
Except for those annoying polls that keep showing him beating Obama. I am not crazy about Mitt, I wish he was a more solid conservative, but if he has the best chance of beating president scumbag, then I am all in for Romney.
Posted by: real joe at March 14, 2012 06:37 AM (Fv1d1)
Gabe, the Romney shill, get your facts right before you spew propaganda.
Your 'handful' of delegates really amounts to over 75 delegates that would have been taken away from Romney and given to Santorum, that doesn't count any that would have been taken away from Newt to give to santorum if he wasn't there.
And one of those winner take all states was Virginia with their pathetically rigged election.
Assuming Santorum would have had Newt's numbers, then the delegate count would be 393 for Mitt and 409 from Santorum.
I saw that propaganda article earlier and had to laugh at they way it portrayed the situation.
If Newt leaves, Santorum will keep Mitt from getting a majority of delegates and it's quite possible that Newt's plus Santorums would equal a majority.
Posted by: doug at March 14, 2012 06:38 AM (gUGI6)
Posted by: mama winger at March 14, 2012 06:39 AM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: Say What? at March 14, 2012 06:39 AM (b7L99)
Ah, the important things in life. Thanks.
Have you tried Steve's Burger in Garfield (rte.46)?
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at March 14, 2012 10:31 AM (nEUpB)
**
No, but I will certainly investigate the situation.
Posted by: dananjcon's dingy is bigger than yours at March 14, 2012 06:41 AM (8ieXv)
Posted by: dagny at March 14, 2012 06:41 AM (u50z0)
Posted by: housecat with fake mouse at March 14, 2012 06:43 AM (9/zVj)
One of the biggest diet saboteurs is Church Ladies. They can't stand to see anyone trying to eat healthy. They're like the Grandmother from Hell, shoving pie and cake at you all the time.
Posted by: katya, the designated driver at March 14, 2012 06:44 AM (bMLFV)
If they were truly happy, they wouldn't be so fucking snarly every time anyone else eats. They're miserable, and they can't stand that other people aren't, so they bully everyone else into being miserable too.
God knows I need to lose weight and I used to tell the smokers in our office that once I lost the weight, then I would feel free to bitch at them. Of course, I also used to have grand fun pointing out to the marathon runner in my old office who would be a huge bitch to me whenever she saw me eating, well, pretty much anything, that my blood pressure was lower than hers, I hadn't had to have four knee surgeries, my cholesterol levels were the lowest in the office and my blood sugar was perfect. Oh the glaring glares I would get.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD 2012 at March 14, 2012 06:44 AM (VtjlW)
mashed purple sweet potatoes drowning in coconut oil, and roasted
broccoli swimming in grass-fed butter."
....my god....thats beautiful.
Posted by: george lucas's neck-pouch at March 14, 2012 10:34 AM (ns1cq)
**
I'm choked-up, teary eyed. That is indeed beautiful man.
**sniff**sniff**
Posted by: dananjcon's dingy is bigger than yours at March 14, 2012 06:44 AM (8ieXv)
Posted by: Svelte Moron at March 14, 2012 06:44 AM (/ZZCn)
Posted by: sad housecat at March 14, 2012 06:45 AM (9/zVj)
---jus get a job at walmart....oh yeah, youll lose weight.
Posted by: george lucas's neck-pouch at March 14, 2012 06:46 AM (ns1cq)
No free contraceptives? No leftard nookie for you!
(click on da nic)
Heh. That's what comes from reading Lysistrata and not bothering to look in the mirror.
Posted by: joncelli, heartless Con and all around unpleasant guy at March 14, 2012 06:47 AM (RD7QR)
“I’m not here to talk about President Obama. I think he is great. I’m
here to talk about my dad and what he would bring to the country,” said
Matt Romney, while on the campaign trail.
http://bit.ly/wi9Fg3
How did you get to post that? Mine is always rejected, because it is too long, unbroken etc., etc.
Posted by: No Fan at March 14, 2012 06:49 AM (rsOPT)
Like the annoying polls yesterday (trumpeted by Drudge, for a while at least) showing Romney winning in AL and MS? One poll matters- the election. And in actual election contests, Romney is not actually out-performing his competition nearly as much as he'd like you to believe.
This is what I and others have been trying to get across- "Electability" is a stupid argument, because nothing can prove electability except getting elected. And everyone in the race (including Luap Nor) has shown more success at that than Mitt Romney. Newt won more elections. Santorum won more elections. Luap Nor won more elections. Rick Perry won more elections. I'm pretty sure TPaw won more elections than Mitt Romney.
So- other than polls which are virtually meaningless, give me some evidence of his electability. I'm finally seeing some in the Primaries (because he has, indeed, won some, and they've been important ones) but not nearly as much as the Romney cheer-leaders would have you believe.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 14, 2012 06:49 AM (8y9MW)
Soy chips? That's protein isn't it?
Posted by: Heorot at March 14, 2012 10:45 AM (Nq/UF)
Too much soy makes you grow a vagina if you're male, though.
Posted by: Insomniac at March 14, 2012 06:51 AM (DrWcr)
Personal responsibility? Self control?
You are one of those bitter clingers aren't you?
Posted by: The nanny state at March 14, 2012 06:52 AM (nEUpB)
Posted by: No Fan at March 14, 2012 10:49 AM (rsOPT)
Hopefully you'll find a partner that's more accepting.
Posted by: Insomniac at March 14, 2012 06:52 AM (DrWcr)
Posted by: Y-not with random 80s references at March 14, 2012 06:53 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Y-not with random 80s references at March 14, 2012 06:53 AM (5H6zj)
http://preview.tinyurl.com/6rgrbrw
Posted by: WalrusRex at March 14, 2012 06:54 AM (Hx5uv)
Heard on local radio this morning:
Unemployment down to seven percent, from 7.8 percent earlier this year.
Time to find a new station for the alarm clock. I don't enjoy starting my day with a leftist radio jock pissing down my back and telling me its raining.
Posted by: turbodan at March 14, 2012 06:54 AM (NtzE6)
Posted by: turbodan at March 14, 2012 06:54 AM (NtzE6)
Still looking for crunchy protein.
Have you tried one of Ace's yellow gym socks?
He keeps them in the bottom of the hamper.
Posted by: garrett at March 14, 2012 06:55 AM (WzE97)
Posted by: turbodan at March 14, 2012 10:54 AM (NtzE6)
Oooo, thend me hith phone number!
Posted by: Bawney Fwank at March 14, 2012 06:55 AM (DrWcr)
****
"From the mid-1980s to 2005, California's population grew by 10 million, while Medicaid recipients soared by seven million; tax filers paying income taxes rose by just 150,000..."
Posted by: WalrusRex at March 14, 2012 06:58 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: I am the egg man, . . . at March 14, 2012 07:00 AM (lUmCB)
If you need to rely on polls and primaries to tell you why Santorum and Newt aren't very electable compared to Romney, you've not been paying sufficient attention.
As to Romney, he's not in the habit of saying stupid shit on the campaign trail (Newt, Santorum), he's got exectutive experience (unlike Santorum), and doesn't have a scandal-filled history (Newt). He's organized, disciplined, and has the ability to raise money- areas Newt and Santorum are both weak.
Is Romney a sure thing? Definitely not, but he's not a sure loser either.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at March 14, 2012 07:01 AM (SY2Kh)
I'm not runninrebel, but I'm pretty sure that soy is full of various forms of estrogens.
Posted by: GMan at March 14, 2012 07:02 AM (sxq57)
It cannot be overstated. People who feels their taxes are too high will find ways to avoid paying. High earners tend to either be of high intelligence or able to hire those of high intelligence to expedite tax avoidance for them.
Posted by: epobirs at March 14, 2012 07:03 AM (kcfmt)
Posted by: Y-not at March 14, 2012 07:06 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Hollowpoint at March 14, 2012 11:01 AM (SY2Kh)
Which is fine, but not to the point. The post I was responding to was specifically citing polls. I was pointing out why polls are somewhat less than reliable.
As to the rest: Dumb Statements (A Mandate is Fundamentally Conservative.)- Check. He doesn't have a scandalous past, but I'm still unsure of the effect of the Anti-Mormon media blitz which will inevitably come once (if) he's the nominee, so I'll concede that, with the proviso that it may be a wash.
And I'm not saying that he's unelectable. I'm saying that it's not actually evident that Santorum or Newt are. So drop the whole "electability" argument all together, and let's see who represents us best. For some it will still be Romney. For others, it'll be Santorum or Newt. My horse fell dead from self-inflicted wounds long ago, and the Feds have declared that my primary vote doesn't count anyway, so I'm just here to kibitz from the sidelines and hopefully help people make up their minds.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 14, 2012 07:07 AM (8y9MW)
Primaries are irrelevant.
You will be assimilated.
Resistance is futile.
Posted by: The Mittens Collective at March 14, 2012 11:07 AM (7FadD)
Do we get made taller, better-coiffed and well-heeled as part of the assimilation process?
Posted by: Insomniac at March 14, 2012 07:09 AM (DrWcr)
Being in a supporting role would give him some cover from that.
Posted by: epobirs at March 14, 2012 07:09 AM (kcfmt)
Posted by: wondering at March 14, 2012 07:11 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: dagny at March 14, 2012 07:11 AM (u50z0)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 14, 2012 07:12 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: wondering at March 14, 2012 07:13 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: Y-not at March 14, 2012 07:13 AM (5H6zj)
My latest snack is fake crab (it's just pollack) dipped in malt vinegar. Yum.
Posted by: dagny at March 14, 2012 07:14 AM (u50z0)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 14, 2012 07:14 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 14, 2012 10:49 AM (8y9MW)
If the polls show him beating Obama by the greatest margin, what else is there to go by? Are you say Luap is a better candidate because he won more elections? Comparing this presidential election to local elections of the past is comparing apples and bananas. Of the crop that is left, I like Newt best when electability is not considered, but the polls say he can't win. Santorum is terrible, just doesn't come across well. You don't believe in polls, fine.What is your criteria?
Posted by: real joe at March 14, 2012 07:14 AM (Fv1d1)
Yup. Thin does not automagically equal healthy. Unthin does not automagically equal unhealthy.
And why should non-runners have to pay for the knee surgeries of people who chose to abuse their bodies with running?!
Happy New Year to our Sikh morons!
I'm off for lunch, which will include both red meat and chocolate, so I don't kill anyone this afternoon.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 14, 2012 07:15 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: wondering at March 14, 2012 07:15 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: real joe at March 14, 2012 07:16 AM (Fv1d1)
Posted by: dagny at March 14, 2012 07:16 AM (u50z0)
Posted by: Larsen E. Whipsnade at March 14, 2012 07:16 AM (6BgmB)
Posted by: wondering at March 14, 2012 07:17 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: Y-not at March 14, 2012 07:18 AM (5H6zj)
http://www.biocab.org/carbon_dioxide_geological_timescale.html
Posted by: Feynmangroupie at March 14, 2012 07:19 AM (oI744)
Posted by: wondering at March 14, 2012 07:19 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: Y-not at March 14, 2012 07:19 AM (5H6zj)
1) Who is most conservative?
Sadly, at this point, that's a toss-up. How did we let that happen?
2) Who is actively trying to promote my interests?
Right now, that's Rick Santorum, with Newt close behind.
The thing is, though (not letting you get away with changing the subject here): polls are useless. And, yes, I agree with you that just because someone won previous elections doesn't mean he'll win this one. The whole point is that "electability" is a stupid measure by which to select a candidate.
You're trying to read other peoples' minds, and that seldom (if ever) works. So focus, instead, on the the issues that are important to you, and pick the guy who best represents you on those issues.
It would be even better if you'd given thought to the philosophical foundations of your beliefs on those issues- but virtually no one does, so that's more in the nature of "nice to have" than any kind of requirement.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 14, 2012 07:20 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: wondering at March 14, 2012 07:20 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: President Chet Roosevelt at March 14, 2012 07:22 AM (Ag6fu)
Posted by: Y-not at March 14, 2012 07:22 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: dagny at March 14, 2012 07:23 AM (u50z0)
It's like that scene in the movie Hall Pass Where they all are talking about some hot chick. Then one guy shows that if you remove her uglier friends from view she's ugly too.
Any of the candidates we have been offered are going to require beer goggles to pull the lever for.
Posted by: Buzzsaw at March 14, 2012 07:23 AM (tf9Ne)
Posted by: wondering at March 14, 2012 07:24 AM (oZfic)
As I said last night, a social conservative that isn't a fiscal conservative isn't really a social conservative.
Posted by: Jimbo at March 14, 2012 07:24 AM (O3R/2)
I had already corrected that, thanks. It was a typo.
Posted by: dagny at March 14, 2012 07:25 AM (u50z0)
287, I'm pretty sure I've driven by this place about eight thousand times. Will have to try it now
Posted by: thisheavenlyhell at March 14, 2012 07:26 AM (XWb4y)
Here's a stupid policy idea from Mitt - he says he'll grant waivers from Obamacare to all fifty states.
Don't forget the indexing the minimum wage to inflation or an additional $2.00 a gallon gas tax. Simply brilliant Willard.
Posted by: Larsen E. Whipsnade at March 14, 2012 07:29 AM (6BgmB)
and, the attack on Catholics continues....
Posted by: wondering at March 14, 2012 07:29 AM (oZfic)
Obama's a better alternative? really?
Posted by: Darth Chipmunk at March 14, 2012 11:21 AM (niW49)
------------------
Obama would beat Santorum - that is our doom. I was not suggesting a vote for JEF. Never happen.
Posted by: real joe at March 14, 2012 07:29 AM (Fv1d1)
Posted by: real joe at March 14, 2012 07:30 AM (Fv1d1)
Posted by: Y-not at March 14, 2012 07:30 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Y-not at March 14, 2012 07:32 AM (5H6zj)
I have an alergy to soy. Have you looked at the packaging labels ....everything have soy in it!!
soups, mayo, salad dressings, frozen foods & resturants use it to cook in. Ya' killin me, Smalls!
Posted by: Say What? at March 14, 2012 07:33 AM (b7L99)
And now we're back to theoretical "electability." It's crap. It's nonsense. It's irrational.
Any of our candidates are capable (doesn't mean they will, just that they could) of beating SCOAMT. Any of them. Well, maybe not Luap Nor, but I don't count him anyway. There have been polls showing Santorum close to- and even a few show him beating- Obama. There have been polls showing Obama beating Romney. Polls, especially polls 8 months out, are worse than useless.
I say "worse than" because, by paying them too much attention, you can convince yourself to support the candidate you support the least "because he can win." Don't do that.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) SMOD 2012 at March 14, 2012 07:33 AM (8y9MW)
I heard this morning on talk radio that at this point it's all about quashing the inevitability of romney. I wonder why there are no polls asking the republican base if they would vote only down ticket if romney is their nominee?
Posted by: wondering at March 14, 2012 07:34 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: President Chet Roosevelt at March 14, 2012 07:34 AM (Ag6fu)
Posted by: wondering at March 14, 2012 07:36 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: wondering at March 14, 2012 07:41 AM (oZfic)
If I am called a Romneybot, that is hilarious. I like Palin, Perry, Newt and probably many others ahead of Romney, but I think he is better than Rick (and obviously Luap).
Posted by: real joe at March 14, 2012 07:44 AM (Fv1d1)
Instead of the narrative being about Conscientious Objections, Santorum has framed the narrative about Contraception. "How to lose the Independents 101"
Posted by: Jimbo at March 14, 2012 07:50 AM (O3R/2)
Posted by: President Chet Roosevelt at March 14, 2012 07:53 AM (Ag6fu)
If the JEF wins, maybe I'll go back to smoking pot. Haven't done that in 20 years.
Posted by: Jimbo at March 14, 2012 07:54 AM (O3R/2)
Posted by: real joe at March 14, 2012 07:55 AM (Fv1d1)
Posted by: President Chet Roosevelt at March 14, 2012 07:55 AM (Ag6fu)
translation, "please republicans, we are ready to run against romney, it's all laid out, don't screw with us now"
via drudge upper left
Posted by: wondering at March 14, 2012 08:07 AM (oZfic)
This morning, they captioned a surveyor shot of the Washington Monument as "to see if it sunk since last year's earthquake."
I thought, why not say "done sunk" and be done with it?
Posted by: comatus at March 14, 2012 08:21 AM (ZOlM3)
Can one of you smarties please explain to a schlub what all of this "glycemic index" stuff is? It sounded to me like a bunch of snakeoil that Dan Marino was trying to use to get me to buy NutriSystem...
Now you all talking about starts to lend it actual credibility.
Posted by: reason at March 14, 2012 08:47 AM (V40IZ)
Posted by: Cast Iron at March 14, 2012 08:49 AM (EL+OC)
Kony: The activists - mostly liberal/progressive - wants the US to send military 'advisors' to Uganda...which has already happened.
Now, they want more...more money for their 501(c)3, which uses less than 30% of the money for the purposes claimed...and they more US troops 'in country.'
Problem, is, Kony is no longer in Uganda...and he currently has less than three hundred troops of his own...
Posted by: Warren Bonesteel at March 14, 2012 08:57 AM (MpJXw)
(No personal vendetta against them, but I'm going to be dealing with liberals who will probably pull the "Fox News is biased" card)
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at March 14, 2012 09:07 AM (v3pYe)
For those still not understanding why romney isn't gaining steam, why Santorum and Gingrich are still in the race, maybe you should read the entire letter, it's well worth your time.
via zero hedge http://tinyurl.com/87o2eqy
Fascinating way to resign.
Posted by: wondering at March 14, 2012 10:11 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: President Chet Roosevelt at March 14, 2012 11:06 AM (CoaN7)
"ItÂ’s a rare moment indeed when Catholic priests speak from the pulpit on political issues, but across the country, pastors and bishops are taking a stand in opposition to ObamacareÂ’s attack on religious liberties." http://tinyurl.com/7lv5g8q
"Cliff Kincaid: Maryland priest Father Larry Swink "nails" Obama in Sunday homily" http://tinyurl.com/6rwbdxpPosted by: wondering at March 14, 2012 11:59 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: steevy at March 14, 2012 03:03 PM (7W3wI)
Posted by: wondering at March 14, 2012 06:48 PM (oZfic)
With Pics!
Where were these chicks when I was in HS?
http://tinyurl.com/77got7o
Posted by: Lord Monochromicorn at March 14, 2012 07:52 PM (TwHzK)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3009 seconds, 513 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: mugiwara at March 14, 2012 02:51 AM (KI/Ch)