March 06, 2012
— andy Yesterday there was some consternation over a citizen petition hosted on the White House website that seeks to have Rush Limbaugh dropped from Armed Forces Radio.
In response, Iowahawk created a petition there that needs your signature: Resign.
Posted by: andy at
02:29 AM
| Comments (361)
Post contains 46 words, total size 1 kb.
But back to Bream's analysis. She has missed the point. Gonzales v Raich didn't show Scalia as a swing justice. It showed him as an "outcomist", just like the liberal wing, only on the conservative anti-drug side. Before this case students of the court considered him a textualist. He is not. He lost some luster in my eyes on the day of that ruling. It is not the job of the Supreme Court to assure that rulings are "good for the country" or fair. It is the job of the court to assure that rulings are done in accordance with exactly how the Constitution is written, no more, no less.
So in the end, Obamacare will come down to Kennedy who is the "swing" justice now and whether he is mad at Scalia the day he makes up his mind on the ruling. (See Supreme Conflict by Jan Crawford Greenberg and she looks just as good as Shannon Bream)
http://is.gd/O8ofJt
Posted by: Vic at March 06, 2012 02:33 AM (YdQQY)
http://is.gd/4rQuU0
Posted by: Vic at March 06, 2012 02:33 AM (YdQQY)
http://is.gd/ZUWGRy
Posted by: Vic at March 06, 2012 02:33 AM (YdQQY)
http://is.gd/awChJZ
Posted by: Vic at March 06, 2012 02:34 AM (YdQQY)
Quote
Attorney General Eric Holder on Monday said the Obama administration has the "clear authority" to kill U.S. citizens overseas who are believed to be a terrorist threat.
"Given the nature of how terrorists act and where they tend to hide, it may not always be feasible to capture a United States citizen terrorist who presents an imminent threat of violent attack," Holder said. "In that case, our government has the clear authority to defend the United States with lethal force."
End quote
I have no problem with the second paragraph, with the exception of "imminent" which is too vague. The problem lies in the first paragraph with this part "who are believed to be a terrorist threat". That is NOT application of due process and it is a hole big enough to drive a Mack truck through. Who determines "believed"? There needs to be a lot more that "belief" when deciding to kill a citizen. And it needs to be independently reviewed from outside the executive department. "Imminent threat" is not enough to execute someone. This should be changed to "imminent attack" and it too needs to be independently reviewed.
If GWB had come up with this the liberals would have been screaming from the roof tops. Hell look how much they bitched about reviewing library checkout records which they could already do. Here we are talking about killing someone without a trial and the press is virtually ignoring it.
Talk about double standards eh?
http://is.gd/JnNaTb
Posted by: Vic at March 06, 2012 02:35 AM (YdQQY)
Former Governor Angus King to run for the Snowe seat? But here are a couple of telling quotes:
Quote:
A popular two-term governor and professor at Bowdoin College, King has a history of working with both parties and a demonstrated appeal to the state's large swath of independent voters
Interpretation
He is a liberal
Quote:
Snowe, a popular centrist Republican, had been positioned to easily win another term in November, but announced last week she would not run again......
Interpretation
Hahahahhaha, "centrist Republican" in MFM speak means one who votes with Democrats more than Republicans, as Snowe does. It would be nice if we had A Democrat who voted with Republicans more than Dems to see what they would call them. But they do call some of them "moderates" and "Blue Dogs". Those are ones who occasionally vote for a bill that opposes tax increases or excessive spending when their vote doesn't matter.
Quote:
If King wins, he will face the choice of which party's caucus to join. He could choose to caucus with whichever party is more closely aligned with his agenda, and Republicans speculated he would probably caucus with Democrats. Two independents - Sens. Joe Lieberman (Conn.) and Bernie Sanders (Vt.) - currently caucus with the Democrats.
Interpretation
Bernie Sanders is not an independent. He is an avowed Communist. Why does the MFM continue to ignore this?
http://is.gd/5VkFsI
Posted by: Vic at March 06, 2012 02:35 AM (YdQQY)
http://is.gd/b6P2qG
Posted by: Vic at March 06, 2012 02:35 AM (YdQQY)
http://is.gd/bzZdeY
Posted by: Vic at March 06, 2012 02:36 AM (YdQQY)
http://is.gd/Q6euuH
Posted by: Vic at March 06, 2012 02:36 AM (YdQQY)
http://is.gd/WK7He7
Posted by: Vic at March 06, 2012 02:36 AM (YdQQY)
http://is.gd/vBdg0C
Posted by: Vic at March 06, 2012 02:37 AM (YdQQY)
http://is.gd/K3zwjP
Posted by: Vic at March 06, 2012 02:37 AM (YdQQY)
http://is.gd/gEpXDj
Posted by: Vic at March 06, 2012 02:37 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Vic at March 06, 2012 02:38 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Jimmah at March 06, 2012 02:41 AM (sv7B2)
Maybe through a proxy.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at March 06, 2012 02:51 AM (nEUpB)
Posted by: mugiwara at March 06, 2012 02:52 AM (KI/Ch)
of course, candles are usually made of paraffin, which is made from oil.
stupid, even by LA standards. the fact that the consulate will be closed at 7pm is just icing on the cake. be there or be somewhere else.
https://www.facebook.com/events/403713832975685/
Posted by: redc1c4 at March 06, 2012 02:53 AM (8MasJ)
Yet the recent "scientific" paper about "post-birth abortion" was greeted with a yawn by the MBM.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at March 06, 2012 02:53 AM (nEUpB)
Posted by: Lars Groteballen at March 06, 2012 02:57 AM (3A+T3)
I believe that there is an imminent threat from the domestic terrorist who calls himself "Vic." He is a shadowy personality who has never been seen, yet his writings are clearly antithetical to the continued existence of the United States, and the reign of Lord Obama the 1st.
Therefore in this directive I authorize the use of deadly force to end the sedition that that Mr. "Vic" is so clearly suggesting in his writings.
Posted by: Eric Holder at March 06, 2012 03:00 AM (nEUpB)
Posted by: ombudizen at March 06, 2012 03:02 AM (2DpoY)
Posted by: Baraka Obama at March 06, 2012 03:03 AM (KI/Ch)
Not true! This is a very important issue!
Posted by: Santorm 2012: Making Sex Special at March 06, 2012 03:06 AM (rKC2X)
Maybe through a proxy.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo
.............
My thoughts exactly..
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at March 06, 2012 03:07 AM (UTq/I)
------------------------
Read Enemies Foreign and Domestic that was referenced on the Sunday Book thread. This novel actually goes to that extent. It was free on Amazon for the Kindle, but now it is back to $7 unless you are a Prime member. If you are a prime you can still get it free.
Posted by: Vic at March 06, 2012 03:08 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: bergerbilder at March 06, 2012 03:09 AM (j+Izh)
Posted by: Insomniac at March 06, 2012 03:14 AM (GjDnP)
Gotta love those compassionate progressives.
Posted by: GrumpyUnk at March 06, 2012 03:18 AM (Gqvzi)
Posted by: coondawg68 at March 06, 2012 03:18 AM (VhcOZ)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at March 06, 2012 03:18 AM (LrDq9)
Posted by: BurtTC at March 06, 2012 03:21 AM (Gc/Qi)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at March 06, 2012 07:18 AM (LrDq9)
SoS is now my hero. He has some big ol' steelies for sure. His completely pwning the HR twerp was epic.
Posted by: Insomniac at March 06, 2012 03:22 AM (GjDnP)
http://tinyurl.com/7ccapu2
Posted by: garghhh at March 06, 2012 03:23 AM (Z77mb)
Doesn't matter. Shannon Bream is more than hot enough to make up for it.
Posted by: really ... at March 06, 2012 03:24 AM (X3lox)
I'm thinking we should flood that White House.gov site with signatures. It's time to show them that there are plenty of us who resist. There are no legal grounds for any recriminations of any type against anyone who signs it. We still have the Constitution on our side and plenty of people willing to help us.
WWBD?
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, feeling all extra curmudgeony today at March 06, 2012 03:25 AM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: ombudizen at March 06, 2012 07:02 AM (2DpoY)
BTW, my name is pronounced "Fred Waterman". The "u" is silent.
Posted by: Sandra Fluke, forcing language submission at March 06, 2012 03:26 AM (X3lox)
Posted by: dagny loved andrew at March 06, 2012 03:27 AM (u50z0)
way in hell that I am going to create a whitehouse.gov account for the
amusement value.
Maybe through a proxy.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo
.............
My thoughts exactly..
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at March 06, 2012 07:07 AM (UTq/I)
That's what I did immediately. It never occured to me to do otherwise. I was signee 27.
Posted by: dagny loved andrew at March 06, 2012 03:31 AM (u50z0)
Posted by: McLovin at March 06, 2012 03:34 AM (j0IcY)
Yes! We're not mean to women, we just want sluts to have bastard kids as a warning to other women.
Posted by: Santorum 2012: Making Sex Special at March 06, 2012 03:35 AM (rKC2X)
Posted by: San Antonio Rose at March 06, 2012 03:35 AM (oqK1o)
-------------------------
They are still claiming to be in charge at their site. So maybe they are maybe they aren't.
Even if they are not I would still credit them with the efforts for preservation.
Posted by: Vic at March 06, 2012 03:38 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: San Antonio Rose at March 06, 2012 07:35 AM (oqK1o)
------------------------
My wife was just there last year for a family reunion and I thought she paid a fee. I'll have to ask her when she gets up.
I think a fee would be equitable to help maintain the place.
Posted by: Vic at March 06, 2012 03:39 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: San Antonio Rose at March 06, 2012 03:43 AM (oqK1o)
Posted by: McLovin at March 06, 2012 03:44 AM (j0IcY)
Posted by: President Chet Roosevelt at March 06, 2012 03:48 AM (mLy1V)
--
Funny, that coming from Holder whose defense against a lie under oath depends upon which fleeting thought passed through his mind as the words passed through his lips -- no thanks to what "is" is.
Posted by: Sandra Fluke at March 06, 2012 03:49 AM (lpWVn)
-------------------------------
I guess as long as TX has good non-RINO Republican governors it will be OK. But I would not trust a sacred shrine like the Alamo to Democrats who would turn it into a damn PC exhibition of bull shit in short order.
Just look at what they did to Monticello vs the Jefferson Cemetery. Monticello is the height of PC bullshit while the Cemetery remains true to its origins.
Posted by: Vic at March 06, 2012 03:49 AM (YdQQY)
--
"racist"
Posted by: Sandra Fluke at March 06, 2012 03:53 AM (lpWVn)
http://tinyurl.com/7em9rqp
Posted by: Miss Marple at March 06, 2012 03:53 AM (GoIUi)
Posted by: Vic at March 06, 2012 03:53 AM (YdQQY)
And I have, over the course of the last 30 years, headed to the basement here about 20 times.
Posted by: Miss Marple at March 06, 2012 03:55 AM (GoIUi)
http://tinyurl.com/7em9rqp
Posted by: Miss Marple at March 06, 2012 07:53 AM (GoIUi)
Our candidates are out-of-sync because they're idiots and cowards.
How about the Shannon Bream article. Do any of the Morons think there is a realistic chance that Scalia will vote with the libtards?
Posted by: Vic at March 06, 2012 07:53 AM (YdQQY)
There is no chance in Hell that Scalia would ever vote for ObamaCare. NONE.
Posted by: really ... at March 06, 2012 03:58 AM (X3lox)
Posted by: Santorum 2012: Making Sex Special at March 06, 2012 03:58 AM (rKC2X)
Posted by: McLovin at March 06, 2012 03:59 AM (j0IcY)
Yes. Otherwise I'd have signed it.
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at March 06, 2012 03:59 AM (i0App)
Property values are generally low in this area unless they are at the beach or on a lake.
Posted by: Vic at March 06, 2012 03:59 AM (YdQQY)
Bad omen, Super Tuesday falling with commemoration of the Alamo.
Posted by: Sandra Fluke at March 06, 2012 04:00 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: Miss Marple at March 06, 2012 04:01 AM (GoIUi)
-----------------------
Not only that, but didn't he turn traitor?
Posted by: Vic at March 06, 2012 04:01 AM (YdQQY)
Always with the negative, Moriarity.
Posted by: Miss Marple at March 06, 2012 04:02 AM (GoIUi)
Posted by: lowandslow at March 06, 2012 04:03 AM (GZitp)
Posted by: Miss Marple at March 06, 2012 04:03 AM (GoIUi)
Wifey says she paid but it wasn't a fee. It was a voluntary donation.
Posted by: Vic at March 06, 2012 04:04 AM (YdQQY)
----------------------
Something on the order of about 250 I believe.
Posted by: Vic at March 06, 2012 04:05 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Miss Marple at March 06, 2012 08:03 AM (GoIUi)
----------------------------
Wasn't he the one who wrote one of those BS tell-all books after he left?
Posted by: Vic at March 06, 2012 04:06 AM (YdQQY)
way in hell that I am going to create a whitehouse.gov account for the
amusement value.
Maybe through a proxy.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo
.............
My thoughts exactly..
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at March 06, 2012 07:07 AM (UTq/I)
If you post here - they already have all your information - too late to protect your ID.
Posted by: An Observation at March 06, 2012 04:08 AM (ylhEn)
Posted by: Vic at March 06, 2012 04:11 AM (YdQQY)
How was Ari Fleischer a horrible Press Sec? I was very impressed with him. He was completely unflappable and cool under fire. Under hostile hectoring from the doucheiest collection of fucknozzles on the planet he had perfect recall of Bush's policy positions and speeches, quoting them verbatim weeks or months later to parry mischaracterizations or outright misquotes.
He was the best Press Sec Bush had. Including Tony Snow. He owned those conferences.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 06, 2012 04:12 AM (DiqH3)
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at March 06, 2012 04:12 AM (mFxQX)
Witnessed against Scooter Libby in Plame Affair. Worked for Komen/Planned Parenthood, "They're a charity I believe in."
Ari Fleischer Sports Communications consults for NFL, Canadian PM Stephen Harper, Mark McGwire and Tiger Woods.
Posted by: Sandra Fluke at March 06, 2012 04:13 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: Ed, little known insensitive conservative jerk at March 06, 2012 04:13 AM (sJKFk)
Posted by: Libra at March 06, 2012 04:14 AM (kd8U8)
Plus I use Texas Independence to always remember the Atomic weight of an electron
Posted by: Zakn at March 06, 2012 04:15 AM (zyaZ1)
I don't think she is dumb. She is not an analyst. She just reads the news from the teleprompter. Her producer might have put her up to it.
No friggin' way Scalia upholds Obamacare.
Go to yahoo and create yourself another email address. Link it to NOTHING (e.g. Facebook) Sign the petition on whitehouse.gov.
Posted by: Jimbo at March 06, 2012 04:18 AM (O3R/2)
Posted by: Vic at March 06, 2012 08:06 AM (YdQQY)
No. That was that twerp McClellan.
Posted by: really ... at March 06, 2012 04:19 AM (X3lox)
Posted by: Panzer Trout at March 06, 2012 04:19 AM (j5CHE)
http://is.gd/qGSfd8
Posted by: Vic at March 06, 2012 04:21 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Valiant at March 06, 2012 04:21 AM (aFxlY)
Posted by: Rondinellamamma at March 06, 2012 04:21 AM (53riN)
Santa Anna reportedly told Captain Fernando Urizza that the battle "was but a small affair". Another officer then remarked that "with another such victory as this, we'll go to the devil". In his initial report Santa Anna claimed that 600 Texians had been killed, with only 70 Mexican soldiers killed and 300 wounded. His secretary, Ramón MartÃnez Caro, later repudiated the report. Other estimates of the number of Mexican soldiers killed ranged from 60–2,000, with an additional 250–300 wounded. Most Alamo historians place the number of Mexican casualties at 400–600 Mexicans. This would represent about one-third of the Mexican soldiers involved in the final assault, which Todish remarks is "a tremendous casualty rate by any standards". Most eyewitnesses counted between 182–257 Texians killed. Some historians believe that at least one Texian, Henry Warnell, successfully escaped from the battle. Warnell died several months later of wounds incurred either during the final battle or during his escape as a courier.
Mexican soldiers were buried in the local cemetery, Campo Santo. Shortly after the battle, Colonel José Juan Sanchez Navarro proposed that a monument should be erected to the fallen Mexican soldiers. Cos rejected the idea.
The Texian bodies were stacked and burned. The only exception was the body of Gregorio Esparza. His brother Francisco, an officer in Santa Anna's army, received permission to give Gregorio a proper burial. The ashes were left where they fell until February 1837, when Juan SeguÃn returned to Béxar to examine the remains. A simple coffin inscribed with the names Travis, Crockett, and Bowie was filled with ashes from the funeral pyres.
Posted by: Texians for Liberty at March 06, 2012 04:25 AM (lpWVn)
W blew up Anwar al-AwLaki 2 1/2 weeks after 9/11 and both wings of the bunched panty squad went nuts. I'm pretty sure there's no passport checking attachment to the Reaper drones.
Executive - Of, relating to, capable of, or suited for carrying out or executing:
Posted by: DaveA at March 06, 2012 04:25 AM (ySmNa)
Posted by: Miss Marple at March 06, 2012 08:02 AM (GoIUi)
These candidates have enough courage to run but not nearly enough courage to actually hold to a conservative line.
Sorry, but any lingering optimism I might have was beaten out of me in 2011 by the GOP Congress and leadershit.
Posted by: really ... at March 06, 2012 04:27 AM (X3lox)
Posted by: small town girl at March 06, 2012 04:28 AM (/dC9h)
Posted by: Sean Paden at March 06, 2012 04:31 AM (NiyzK)
Posted by: redneek24 at March 06, 2012 04:32 AM (/DeBx)
Can we shove a pole up his ass and bring in the puppeteers? Because I've got some great bits we act out for the howling masses.
Posted by: Fritz at March 06, 2012 04:33 AM (/ZZCn)
Posted by: Texians for Liberty at March 06, 2012 04:34 AM (lpWVn)
My DOG would be better than Obama. And that is what I am shooting for, getting him out. I have grandchildren I care about, and I do not want Obama ruining their future.
Plus I am sick of seeing him on TV, along with his obnoxious wife.
Good luck with looking for perfection in candidates. I haven't seen one yet, and I am 63.
Posted by: Miss Marple at March 06, 2012 04:35 AM (GoIUi)
Posted by: Vic at March 06, 2012 04:36 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Texians for Liberty at March 06, 2012 04:37 AM (lpWVn)
The last think we need is a traitorous pimp like Holder justifying the commie/statist rationale for Big Brother acting in our behalf without consulting anyone.
Like he gives a shit about anything lawful anyway, what a farce.
W let the genie out of that bottle and these marxists are just pushing the envelope to be used for anything they want.
Posted by: ontherocks at March 06, 2012 04:38 AM (ZJCDy)
Posted by: Lars Groteballen at March 06, 2012 04:39 AM (wLw68)
My dog would be better than Mitt.
...my dog's better than your dog.../kennel rations
Posted by: Texians for Liberty at March 06, 2012 04:40 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: Sean Paden at March 06, 2012 08:31 AM (NiyzK)
Go to gmail or hotmail or whereever from a roaming IP address, like starbucks. Open an email acct. Do not use your real name. Remind me not to ever partner with any of you guys for a secret activity
Posted by: dagny loved andrew at March 06, 2012 04:43 AM (u50z0)
--
"Miss Me Yet? Huh?"
Posted by: GWB at March 06, 2012 04:43 AM (lpWVn)
Santorum signs....EVERYWHERE.
We're so very, very fucked.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at March 06, 2012 04:44 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: TimisKim at March 06, 2012 04:46 AM (6FJrz)
Way to have the pulse of the country in mind, Ohio District 2 voters.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at March 06, 2012 04:48 AM (pLTLS)
I voted this morning, bithcez. I pulled the lever for Mitt, may God have mercy on my soul. But there was a write-in open for County Commissioner. And I wrote in SWEET METEOR OF DEATH, dammit.
But the ABSOLUTE BEST PART of voting this morning? I found out that I AM NO LONGER IN OH-9! Not having Marcy as my Congressman? Priceless!!!
Posted by: ex voLeraT at March 06, 2012 04:48 AM (wtvvX)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO supporter at March 06, 2012 04:49 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 06, 2012 04:50 AM (Iaxlk)
Posted by: Jimbo at March 06, 2012 04:50 AM (O3R/2)
--
Birth Control? "I'll Attack China!" bravely from the Oval Office.
Posted by: Proxy Potus at March 06, 2012 04:50 AM (lpWVn)
I just read the McFarlane/Breitbart article. It's good, and it looks like McFarlane is a decent person, despite being a Hollywood lefty. But the comments are kind of depressing. It's depressing that a liberal that isn't a total douche scumbag is so rare that everyone is tripping over themselves to pat the guy on the back.
Posted by: yinzer at March 06, 2012 04:50 AM (/Mla1)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at March 06, 2012 04:50 AM (SsmZP)
Posted by: The Munchkin Lollipop Guild at March 06, 2012 04:51 AM (Iaxlk)
Posted by: Tex Lovera at March 06, 2012 04:51 AM (wtvvX)
Posted by: GWB at March 06, 2012 08:43 AM (lpWVn)
Ah, No.
Nice, patriotic, neighborly Christian man but a complete big government tool.
And I don't see Jeb as any kind of savior either. If we're going to go down in liberal Republican flames we can do it just as easily with Romney as another Bush.
Posted by: ontherocks at March 06, 2012 04:52 AM (ZJCDy)
^^^
How does this conversation help us lower unemployment and gas prices?
Posted by: laceyunderalls at March 06, 2012 04:52 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 06, 2012 04:53 AM (Iaxlk)
Posted by: Sandra Fluksalot at March 06, 2012 08:49 AM (WUWb9)
We all have!
Posted by: The Munchkin Lollipop Guild at March 06, 2012 08:51 AM (Iaxlk)
Teeeeheeee. I'm such a slut.
Posted by: Sandra Fluke-It at March 06, 2012 04:53 AM (WUWb9)
Santorum signs....EVERYWHERE.
We're so very, very fucked.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at March 06, 2012 08:44 AM (pLTLS)
Yes we are fucked. And because of Republicans, it won't be safe!
Posted by: Sandra "Sexual Justice" Fluke at March 06, 2012 04:53 AM (/Mla1)
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 06, 2012 04:54 AM (Iaxlk)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at March 06, 2012 04:56 AM (SsmZP)
I recenly had a discussion that very poor people on MEDICAID do not want obamacare because they already have good medical care. Why share? lol
Posted by: stu at March 06, 2012 04:56 AM (uhPd1)
Posted by: blaster at March 06, 2012 04:56 AM (7vSU0)
^^^
I had the same experience. I think we're going to see a seriously depressed turnout in most of the states.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at March 06, 2012 04:57 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: Sandra Fluke-It at March 06, 2012 04:58 AM (WUWb9)
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 06, 2012 04:59 AM (Iaxlk)
Something tells me we're doing it wrong and that is not a winning general election strategy.
I thought the goal was to beat Obama but apparently I was mistaken - sorry.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at March 06, 2012 05:01 AM (pLTLS)
I will pull the lever in the gen for Romney just for the sheer hope of pleasure @ watching Ms Obama give Anne Romney the tour of the WH. And seeing Mr and Ms O sitting by while Romney is sworn in. I imagine some very sour pusses.
This is all we're left with, sadly. Spite and malice @ what these people have done. With most of America's blessing. Oh well.
Posted by: Lizabth at March 06, 2012 05:03 AM (JZBti)
Posted by: blaster at March 06, 2012 05:03 AM (7vSU0)
Posted by: willow at March 06, 2012 05:04 AM (TomZ9)
So you will have to choose between Mitt and Obama.
Mitt doesn't hate the country. There you go. Easy-peasy.
Posted by: Miss Marple at March 06, 2012 05:04 AM (GoIUi)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at March 06, 2012 05:04 AM (SsmZP)
Posted by: blaster at March 06, 2012 05:05 AM (7vSU0)
--
I just didn't want Ron Paul thinking he's doing well.
--
Thank yourself for the better organized Obamalite curse, blaster.
Posted by: C'est la Vie at March 06, 2012 05:06 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: Lincolntf at March 06, 2012 05:07 AM (hiMsy)
Way to have the pulse of the country in mind, Ohio District 2 voters.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at March 06, 2012 08:48 AM (pLTLS)
I have to respectfully disagree, lacey. The folks of Ohio 2 -- including yourself!
-- should be voting their own conscience, not paying attention to national opinion. That goes for every primary and caucus voter. I strongly suspect Romney will end up winning Ohio regardless.
I've just never been a fan of telling folks who to vote for in the primaries, or mocking their choices after the fact. It just rubs me the wrong way. Persuasion, sure, but if they aren't persuaded, I respect that. Now as for the general election, you bet I'll be out there whacking ambivalent GOP voters over the head with a clown hammer to get them to the voting booths to vote for our candidate, whoever that may be.
Speaking of which, anyone know where I can buy a good secondhand clown hammer? My last one got ruined when I tried to beat some sense into an SEIU dingbat downtown who was protesting Right to Work legislation.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO supporter at March 06, 2012 05:07 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: chemjeff at March 06, 2012 08:43 AM
Yesterday someone mentioned that in place of the now-sadly-retired DOOM thread, we could have a daily HAPPY WARRIOR thread, where topics like you mentioned could be posted, along with stories such as the Saga of SOS could be shared. Kind of an ongoing "fight back" theme.
Posted by: mama winger at March 06, 2012 05:07 AM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: maddogg at March 06, 2012 05:08 AM (OlN4e)
Andy, thanks for posting that link again. I said it yesterday but I'll repeat: Yes, you have to get on the White House list to sign that petition. But if you're posting here, you probably went on a list much worse years ago.
Sign that thing. Do it for Breitbart. Iowahawk will be grateful.
Posted by: creeper at March 06, 2012 05:08 AM (gre5a)
Something tells me we're doing it wrong and that is not a winning general election strategy.
I thought the goal was to beat Obama but apparently I was mistaken - sorry.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at March 06, 2012 09:01 AM (pLTLS)
The Democrats and MFM can't let it be about the economy because in spite of all of their spin people know it's bad. So they have to create BS like this to make an "election issue". The Republicans need to brush off these things and continue to hammer away about the economy
Posted by: TheQuietMan at March 06, 2012 05:08 AM (1Jaio)
He could say that his PERSONAL views on these subjects are well documented but the election is about the size of government, especially its expansion with Obamacare, and how the economy is being strangled because of it.
He understands the necessity to allow women the freedom to make their own decisions based on their beliefs within current law, and that they should be insulted with these phony attempts to co-opt their votes through fear.
The fact that Santorum doesn't seize this opportunity should be self defeating.
Posted by: ontherocks at March 06, 2012 05:09 AM (ZJCDy)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at March 06, 2012 05:10 AM (SsmZP)
or a one issue voter.
i mean really" partial birth abortion." creeps me right out. what happened to hillarys, " want to make safe it rare ?"
Posted by: willow at March 06, 2012 05:10 AM (TomZ9)
Posted by: Sandra Fluke-It at March 06, 2012 08:49 AM (WUWb9)
You left it in the locker room. You may want to wash it...
Posted by: Georgetown basketball team at March 06, 2012 05:11 AM (3jGS1)
The IRS, SSA, and probably half a dozen other federal agencies already have your info.
How hard would it be to go through the IRS get a list of everyone who took a deduction for contributions to a pro-life or other conservative non-profit? Query might have to run for a few days :-) but I bet it could be done.
Anyway, just wait until President NotObama uses whitehouse.gov for furthering his agenda.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 06, 2012 05:12 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: mama winger at March 06, 2012 05:12 AM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: Sandra Fluke at March 06, 2012 07:41 AM (lpWVn)
As I had hoped. If they are smart they put the remains in an unmarked grave on a missile base in Nebraska, wrote down the GPS coordinates of the grave, put the piece of paper with the coordinates on it in the DCI's safe, and forgot about the location.
Posted by: joncelli at March 06, 2012 05:12 AM (RD7QR)
^^^
I get that. But this isn't just any election. This is THE ELECTION that decides if the country survives.. My conscious tells me there's not one single decent candidate on that ticket.
And I"m not too concerned about 'mocking' Santorum voters. After all anyone who voted for Romney is branded a RINO or worse so we've seen our fair share of the mocking. But I don't really concern myself w/such things.
What interesting to me is that the guy that was seen as fairly conservative (at least in comparison to McCain) in 2008 is now apparently seen as the anti-Christ and I just don't understand that logic.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at March 06, 2012 05:13 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: C'est la Vie at March 06, 2012 05:13 AM (lpWVn)
164 Worst economy since The Great Depression and we're talking about funding for Planned Parenthood.
Something tells me we're doing it wrong and that is not a winning general election strategy.
I'm still not clear on why a discussion of funding for Planned Parenthood CAN'T in turn be a discussion about the economy. If you don't want to take the moral or social highground, then make it pure mathematics. How much money is funneled to Planned Parenthood and other abortion providers every year? How many babies are murdered? Can we AFFORD to continue funding this? No, of course we can't. And don't tell me that PP's funding is just a drop in the bucket; I know that. But if we aren't willing to stop the drips, what the hell makes anyone think we'll be able to stem the flood that IS the entitlement system?
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO supporter at March 06, 2012 05:13 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: TimisKim at March 06, 2012 05:14 AM (6FJrz)
Link on Drudge:
Sandra Fluke is being sold by the left as something she's not. Namely a random co-ed from Georgetown law who found herself mixed up in the latest front of the culture war who was simply looking to make sure needy women had access to birth control. That, of course, is not the case.
As many have already uncovered Sandra Fluke she is, in reality, a 30 long time liberal activist who enrolled at Georgetown with the express purpose of fighting for the school to pay for students' birth control. She has been pushing for mandated coverage of contraceptives at Georgetown for at least three years according to the Washington Post.
However, as I discovered today, birth control is not all that Ms. Fluke believes private health insurance must cover. She also, apparently, believes that it is discrimination deserving of legal action if "gender reassignment" surgeries are not covered by employer provided health insurance. She makes these views clear in an article she co-edited with Karen Hu in the Georgetown Journal of Gender and the Law.
She's a radical feminist lesbo.
Posted by: TheQuietMan at March 06, 2012 05:16 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: dagny loved andrew at March 06, 2012 05:16 AM (u50z0)
And I"m not too concerned about 'mocking' Santorum voters. After all anyone who voted for Romney is branded a RINO or worse so we've seen our fair share of the mocking. But I don't really concern myself w/such things.
I get that. It's a shame. This entire election has been awful for our side. The ad hominems are repellant.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO supporter at March 06, 2012 05:17 AM (4df7R)
i mean really" partial birth abortion." creeps me right out.
It should creep you out as it is infanticide, plain and simple.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD 2012 at March 06, 2012 05:17 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Lars Groteballen at March 06, 2012 05:18 AM (wLw68)
--
Mandate Mittens?! /Shirley, you jest./ At least in comparison to McCain's '08 campaign pledges, "Promise them anything, just get their votes!" Romney campaigned from the Corporatist Left as central.
Posted by: C'est la Vie at March 06, 2012 05:18 AM (lpWVn)
I've never understood that argument. It makes no sense to me. If there is nothing wrong with abortion, why does it need to be rare?
If it's a valid choice, why does it need to be used rarely?
If it's just tissue, why does it need to be anymore rare than removal of gall stones?
Posted by: mama winger at March 06, 2012 05:18 AM (P6QsQ)
She was lying.
>>How does this conversation help us lower unemployment and gas prices?
There's the whole part where businesses, especially smaller ones, aren't hiring because they don't know what kind of fines/fees/taxes they're going to get hit with because of Obamacare, which also requires them to pay higher insurance premiums so their employees' adult daughters can get free birth control and abortifacients. But yeah, that's not helpful, because "moderates" would rather enable their neighbors' daughters' bad life choices than have a job.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 06, 2012 05:18 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: blaster at March 06, 2012 05:19 AM (7vSU0)
Posted by: Jimmah at March 06, 2012 05:19 AM (sv7B2)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at March 06, 2012 08:57 AM (pLTLS)
----------------------------------
I think everyone knows by now that I don't give a rat's ass for any of the candidates left, but this is the remaining thing that really worries me. I have been tracking this turnout thing since we got knocked down to the final 4 and it is damn scary.
In any case, that's my short check for now in between filling my insulated mug with bourbon.
And if you are out there NJ con , this next one's for you. (well even if you are monitoring this next one's for you)
bbl
Posted by: Vic at March 06, 2012 05:20 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at March 06, 2012 05:21 AM (pLTLS)
Have I mentioned here that flukes are naturally hermaphroditic?
Learned a lot about trematodes this week.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 06, 2012 05:21 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD 2012 at March 06, 2012 09:17 AM (VtjlW)
exactly, sometimes i look at these neighbors of mine and think wth, it isn't a normal thought is it> to kill babies, if they had been born to a mother that wanted them they'd be a baby, but otherwise just a waste of tissue? hard to reconcille it in my head, all i know is once i know they approve i can no longer look at them.
Posted by: willow at March 06, 2012 05:21 AM (TomZ9)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO supporter at March 06, 2012 09:17 AM (4df7R)
RINO.
Posted by: GergS(Dirty Scandi Dog Whistle) at March 06, 2012 05:22 AM (2okAn)
I toured the Alamo a couple of years ago when I was in San Antonio for my oldest son's graduation from Air Force basic training. Its a very humbling site, and the folks in charge treat it very reverently; they do not allow pictures to be taken inside the actual Alamo building (which was a church originally, I believe). The sad part is that most of the actual area of the battle itself is now covered with buildings. There is a federal building where the wall was (if I remember correctly) and the place where the Texians were all burned is now a bridge over the River Walk.
Posted by: DaveinNC at March 06, 2012 05:23 AM (boNGU)
Posted by: Y-not at March 06, 2012 05:24 AM (5H6zj)
I thought about knocks in the middle of the night and Black Marias and the Soviet Union before setting my my whitehouse.gov account and then I thought about all the other people who blog every day under their own names and decided that I would just have to take the chance. I live in an incredibly intolerant city, but I just have to start ignoring this silly town and take some chances.
Posted by: Tonestaple at March 06, 2012 05:25 AM (i8XsD)
And I"m not too concerned about 'mocking' Santorum voters. After all anyone who voted for Romney is branded a RINO or worse so we've seen our fair share of the mocking. But I don't really concern myself w/such things.
Posted by: laceyunderalls
While you're trying to drag Mitt across the finish line, remember to lift with your legs. That way you won't hurt your back.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at March 06, 2012 05:25 AM (kdS6q)
If it's a valid choice, why does it need to be used rarely?
If it's just tissue, why does it need to be anymore rare than removal of gall stones?
Posted by: mama winger at March 06, 2012 09:18 AM (P6QsQ
uh hmm, strange isn't it. i think perhaps she was tyring to leave the door open in her constituents minds, "well you know in case of rape"
Posted by: willow at March 06, 2012 05:25 AM (TomZ9)
Short of a stock market collapse, I'm really not seeing how Republicans can get the subject of the national conversation switched back to the state of the economy if the MFM and the left (BIRM) don't want to talk about it. Like it or not, they set the tone of what is discussed. They control the networks. They own the ink. Tales of their demise and the resulting loss of influence have been greatly exaggerated.
Posted by: Jaws at March 06, 2012 05:26 AM (4I3Uo)
I am starting to get over my pissed off at AB for up and dying. Make an account, sign up. You are already on their no-no list anyway.
Posted by: Artruen at March 06, 2012 05:28 AM (fDGF1)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at March 06, 2012 05:28 AM (SsmZP)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at March 06, 2012 09:21 AM (pLTLS)
Not at all, lacey! Trust me, I can empathize with your frustration. I'm crossing my fingers and knocking on wood and praying for a good result today. I don't know what a good result would necessarily look like, but still -- here's hoping!
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO supporter at March 06, 2012 05:29 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 06, 2012 05:30 AM (Iaxlk)
RINO.
Posted by: GergS(Dirty Scandi Dog Whistle) at March 06, 2012 09:22 AM (2okAn)
LOL!
Normally I get slammed with the "intractable purist" label.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO supporter at March 06, 2012 05:30 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Professor Oilfields Amazing Reverse Unit at March 06, 2012 05:30 AM (SiOVz)
Posted by: jenny tries too hard at March 06, 2012 05:31 AM (snRY5)
Posted by: McLovin at March 06, 2012 05:31 AM (j0IcY)
You are a heathen libertarian. Big government is good, the only problem is what big government is doing.
He understands the necessity to allow women the freedom to make their own decisions based on their beliefs within current law, and that they should be insulted with these phony attempts to co-opt their votes through fear.
I believe in women's freedom, but freedom is not absolute. Your freedom to do what you want needs to be balanced against my freedom to throw your ass in jail for being a sick fucking pervert.
Posted by: Santorum 2012: Making Sex Special at March 06, 2012 05:32 AM (rKC2X)
Posted by: mama winger at March 06, 2012 09:18 AM (P6QsQ)
This reminds me of a conversation I overheard my daughter having with someone. She is very pro-life. She was talking to someone on the phone who was telling her about someone that had had an abortion. The person she was talking to was pro-choice. She said to my daughter that she felt bad that the other girl had to go through that. My daughter said to her, 'You're pro-choice....so according to you, you should feel no more badly for her than if she went to have a wart removed. Just tissue, right?"
Shut the other girl up quick.
Mornin' all....my ears are still ringing from the clanging sound of SOS's balls yesterday.
Posted by: Tami at March 06, 2012 05:32 AM (X6akg)
It goes further than just that Romney failed to even attempt to dissuade other states or the federal government on going the route that MA did as regards Romneycare. He actively "encouraged" the mandate at the federal level.
Posted by: GMan at March 06, 2012 05:33 AM (sxq57)
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 06, 2012 05:34 AM (Iaxlk)
I live in an incredibly intolerant city, but I just have to start ignoring this silly town and take some chances.
Posted by: Tonestaple at March 06, 2012 09:25 AM (i8XsD)
I call that, "Doing a Breitbart." Good on you!
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO supporter at March 06, 2012 05:35 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at March 06, 2012 05:36 AM (SsmZP)
Posted by: shibumi at March 06, 2012 05:36 AM (z63Tr)
Don't forget the 100+ new federal bureaucracies, half of which discriminate based on race or gender.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 06, 2012 05:36 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 06, 2012 05:37 AM (Iaxlk)
Posted by: McLovin at March 06, 2012 05:38 AM (j0IcY)
I'd be more inclined to believe him if he'd actually admit that it was a bad idea in general. But he won't do that.
Posted by: GMan at March 06, 2012 05:38 AM (sxq57)
I think the key thing is that it's clear that *since* 2008 Romney was still pimping Masscare as a model for the federal government to follow. So that's the big policy flaw he has that was not apparent last time.
Ding ding ding, we have a winner. In 2008, there was no Obamacare. Masscare was an issue but it wasn't as major because the presumption was that there was no way it would pass on a national level so Romney's continued defense of it was discounted. Not so much now.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD 2012 at March 06, 2012 05:38 AM (VtjlW)
Shut the other girl up quick. - Tami
You have a wise daughter.
To me, the underlying subtext of the "abortion should be rare" mantra is this: We all know it's horrible, so we're all going to pretend that we really won't do it too often.
Posted by: mama winger at March 06, 2012 05:38 AM (P6QsQ)
WASHINGTON (AP) -- A senior administration official says President Barack Obama will announce housing initiatives to help members of the military as well as homeowners with mortgages insured by the Federal Housing Administration.
Obama will spell out the housing efforts during a news conference Tuesday. The official spoke on condition of anonymity to describe the programs before the president unveiled them.
FHA-insured borrowers would be able to refinance their loans at half the fee that the FHA currently charges. That could save a typical FHA borrower more than $1,000 annually. Two million to 3 million borrowers would be eligible, the administration says.
For service members, Obama will announce that major lenders will review foreclosures on members of the military. If wrongly foreclosed upon, service members will be paid their lost equity and receive additional compensation
All the votes money can buy
Posted by: TheQuietMan at March 06, 2012 05:38 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: Y-not at March 06, 2012 05:38 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Ammo Dump at March 06, 2012 05:39 AM (WUWb9)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at March 06, 2012 05:40 AM (SsmZP)
That's not how it was. McShame was the most despised person in the GOP by miles - and rightfully so, the miserable piece of shit. Mittens was only preferred after it was clear that there was no other. Before that no one was excited about Mittens and conservatives certainly had no interest in him, at all.
Posted by: really ... at March 06, 2012 05:40 AM (X3lox)
1930 – International Unemployment Day demonstrations globally initiated by the Comintern
Nothing new under the sun.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 06, 2012 05:40 AM (ZKzrr)
?
Half of RomneyCareÂ’s new spending was financed by the federal government through the Medicaid program, which is financed through federal taxes, which fall on taxpayers in all 50 states. That means that when Romney financed half of RomneyCareÂ’s new spending by pulling down more federal Medicaid dollars, he increased taxes on residents of all 50 states.
Posted by: willow at March 06, 2012 05:40 AM (TomZ9)
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 06, 2012 05:41 AM (Iaxlk)
Posted by: rectal exam at March 06, 2012 05:41 AM (O7ksG)
Posted by: Kaitian at March 06, 2012 05:42 AM (et2m1)
Posted by: Kaitian at March 06, 2012 05:43 AM (et2m1)
Posted by: Krypt0nite at March 06, 2012 05:44 AM (qpstS)
Remember when Daniel Knauf 'went Breitbart' on his twitter feed last week, said it would prolly end his career in Hollywood?
Looks like Kirk Cameron is about to get him some of that career-endy-thingy too. His thought-crime? Answering a question honestly on CNN on what he believes about gays and gay marriage.
Quoth the famous moral philosopher Roseanne Barr in the wake of the incident: "Kirk or kurt or whatever Cameron is an accomplice to murder with his hate speech. So is rick warren. Their peers r killing gays in Uganda."
Just so we're clear on that. Thanks for enlightening us, Roseanne.
Posted by: crisis du jour at March 06, 2012 05:44 AM (v4USE)
He hasn't though...because he *doesn't* think it was a mistake. He seems to have chosen Romneycare to be the one thing he sticks to "principle" on. Why is that?
Posted by: GMan at March 06, 2012 05:44 AM (sxq57)
Posted by: Y-not at March 06, 2012 05:46 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Y-not at March 06, 2012 05:48 AM (5H6zj)
I understand that in a heavily, heavily blue state at least Romneycare prevented the outright socialization ("single payer") of healthcare in Massachusetts.
I think this is the intellectual divide on this topic. There are those who argue the pragmatic response and those on the other side who arge the philosophical response that Masscare or any other similar type program is simply a step towards full single payer. I am not saying that either side is totally correct as those of the philosophical bent do need to recognize the pragmatic difficulties and the pragmatists need to contemplate where the pragmatic position will uttely lead from a theoretical viewpoint. But there is a distinct division there. That's why there are those of us, including myself, who simply do not believe that Romney will be on the front lines of attempting to repeal Obamacare. He may say that he supports such an appeal but his prior actions and his continued defense of Masscare are emblematic that he believes that such a program, in some form, is appropriate.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD 2012 at March 06, 2012 05:48 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 06, 2012 05:48 AM (Iaxlk)
I was signature number 1000 on the Resign petition.
Posted by: davisbr at March 06, 2012 05:49 AM (EuWFS)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at March 06, 2012 05:49 AM (SsmZP)
Posted by: phoenixgirl, rip andrew at March 06, 2012 05:50 AM (Ho2rs)
Posted by: Tekato Fukuta at March 06, 2012 05:50 AM (dsvkY)
When she told the children of OWS that rich people should be beheaded, they should have taken her up on it. You could buy a lot of birth control pills with her money.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 06, 2012 05:50 AM (ZKzrr)
At this point - Rush should not mention Fluke ever again.
Last night on a local pro-obama pro-democat newscast, the "news" show had an entire segment about "will Rush Limbaugh bring down the entire GOP?"
Let the libs have their fun, but for heavens sakes Rush - shut up about it.
Posted by: rectal exam at March 06, 2012 05:51 AM (O7ksG)
Posted by: Krypt0nite at March 06, 2012 05:52 AM (qpstS)
Posted by: GMan at March 06, 2012 05:52 AM (sxq57)
When she told the children of OWS that rich people should be beheaded, they should have taken her up on it. You could buy a lot of birth control pills with her money.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 06, 2012 09:50 AM (ZKzrr)
And feed a lot of starving children with her fleshy corpse. Soylent Green, folks. Soylent Green.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO supporter at March 06, 2012 05:53 AM (4df7R)
WWBD?
I signed that fucker yesterday. It was one, small way I could go Breitbart. I'm #200-something.
My husband signed it as well. Obama goons coming after his business in 3...2..1...
Bring it, Barky.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at March 06, 2012 05:53 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: Mac Gootbone at March 06, 2012 05:54 AM (XCSw/)
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 06, 2012 05:54 AM (Iaxlk)
Kaitian you have no grasp of who Reagan was or what he stood for. Read some of his speeches. He wasn't just a conservative, he helped define modern conservatism. No one would have called him a RINO.
When you say stupid stuff like this, it makes me less likely to vote for your guy.
Posted by: Sad Dad at March 06, 2012 05:54 AM (3PHCO)
Posted by: stu at March 06, 2012 05:55 AM (uhPd1)
Posted by: Y-not at March 06, 2012 05:55 AM (5H6zj)
Sarah Fluke wins Nobel peace prize for being a women right's activist. Later that day, the Darwin award goes to Republicans for shooting themselves in the head, while playing Russian Roulette.
Posted by: befuddled at March 06, 2012 05:56 AM (xJU23)
Posted by: stu at March 06, 2012 05:56 AM (uhPd1)
Posted by: Krypt0nite at March 06, 2012 05:56 AM (qpstS)
I registered yesterday at whitehouse.gov to sign the petition. (Ate my words to do that.) There was a box to check to specify no mailings. Other than the confirmation e-mail I have heard nothing from them.
We HAVE to do this, people. Iowahawk created that petition in memory of Andrew. If you think YOU are sticking your neck out signing it, consider poor David Burge, who created it. If he has guts enough to do this the least we can do is support him.
Sign it, dammit. Stand up and be counted.
Posted by: creeper at March 06, 2012 05:56 AM (gre5a)
Posted by: stu at March 06, 2012 09:55 AM (uhPd1)
Rich white man? How about middle class white men. And white women. And blacks, and hispanics, and asians and...shit, all of us.
Posted by: joncelli at March 06, 2012 05:57 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 06, 2012 05:57 AM (Iaxlk)
Posted by: Lady in Black at March 06, 2012 05:57 AM (F+Xfj)
Come on, Moron Horde. We can do better than that at the "Resign" petition.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at March 06, 2012 05:58 AM (UOM48)
way in hell that I am going to create a whitehouse.gov account for the
amusement value.
Maybe through a proxy.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo
.............
My thoughts exactly..
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at March 06, 2012 07:07 AM (UTq/I)
.............
Mine also, especially considering that my name is recognizably Kenyan.
Posted by: baldilocks at March 06, 2012 05:58 AM (T2/zQ)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 06, 2012 05:58 AM (i6RpT)
Well, in some regards he's better than Mitt "Hey, you guys at the federal level should *totally* use mandates" Romney.
Posted by: GMan at March 06, 2012 05:59 AM (sxq57)
Since my candidate for 2012 is Liver Failure. The drinking never stops. I have chosen this candidate since only I can let him drop out of the race so he can't just quit on me.
Posted by: Buzzsaw at March 06, 2012 06:00 AM (tf9Ne)
Posted by: Y-not at March 06, 2012 06:01 AM (5H6zj)
re petition: website would not allow me to register from the "resign" page (i never got the enrollment email) so i went o the 'oppose Rush Limbaugh' page and registered from there, then went back and signed the "resign" petition instead of the offensive one. Far be it from me to assume that this is more than sheer coincidence...anyway, if you have trouble getting registered, this approach might work for you as well.
I'm sure its just a coincidence....
Really...
Posted by: cp at March 06, 2012 06:01 AM (2D3sq)
Posted by: mike at March 06, 2012 06:01 AM (WHwZF)
Does the email have to be confirmed by clicking through on a link? Otherwise, I'd imagine mailinator.com would be a good junk email to make up on the fly use.
Posted by: Lady in Black at March 06, 2012 09:57 AM (F+Xfj)
Yes, you have to confirm your email address via a link. I have a SPAM account that I usually use for these kinds of things. The only info the White House site itself asks for is your first and last name and your email address. You have the option of including your ZIP code, but it's not required. If your email account is sufficiently "clean" of most of your identifying information, then I think you should go for it. Hotmail and Yahoo are good choices. And if you worry about your IP address -- understandable! -- try using a public computer at a library, or somewhere similar.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO supporter at March 06, 2012 06:01 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Y-not at March 06, 2012 06:02 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 06, 2012 06:02 AM (Iaxlk)
Yeah, my man Perry had that same strange phenomenon happen to him as well.
Posted by: Lady in Black at March 06, 2012 06:02 AM (F+Xfj)
Milwaukee's a great stadium to catch the Cubs game at.
Posted by: mama winger at March 06, 2012 06:02 AM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 06, 2012 06:03 AM (Iaxlk)
Posted by: davisbr at March 06, 2012 06:03 AM (EuWFS)
The Oreo, the familiar chocolate wafers sandwiching a layer of creme filling, turns 100 Tuesday. Produced at the National Biscuit Co.'s (Nabisco's) Chelsea Market bakeries in Manhattan, N.Y., the first Oreos were sold in Hoboken, N.J. on March 6, 1912.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at March 06, 2012 06:05 AM (kdS6q)
Why is Santorum whining about money now? Does he somehow think Obama won't have any?
Posted by: robtr at March 06, 2012 06:05 AM (MtwBb)
Posted by: Kaitian at March 06, 2012 06:05 AM (LrD3a)
Since my candidate for 2012 is Liver Failure. The drinking never stops. I have chosen this candidate since only I can let him drop out of the race so he can't just quit on me.
Posted by: Buzzsaw at March 06, 2012 10:00 AM (tf9Ne)
Valu-Rite/Mill's Best '12: The Right Cheap Swill for America!
Posted by: joncelli at March 06, 2012 06:06 AM (RD7QR)
Vaya con Leche, mi amiga!
Isn't that... "Go with milk?" Am I missing something?
*utterly confused and flashing back to high school spanish class*
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO supporter at March 06, 2012 06:06 AM (4df7R)
-----
We are doing fine right now. Wifey's mom is about to come over to take her "shopping". Before all the crap she was out every day.
Posted by: Vic at March 06, 2012 06:07 AM (YdQQY)
A lot of us were liberals in our youth and over the years have grown out of it. Ask David Mamet.
Btw, the economic reason for discussing abortion is simple. "The Population Bomb" is bullshit. If 50 million American babies had not been murdered in the last 40 years, we would NOT be suffering from the demographic "recession" that Europe is currently "enjoying." Social Security would not be bankrupt.
Posted by: Jimbo at March 06, 2012 06:07 AM (O3R/2)
test ...test ...test
...does this work yet?Posted by: davisbr at March 06, 2012 06:08 AM (EuWFS)
Posted by: Kaitian at March 06, 2012 06:08 AM (LrD3a)
Posted by: Lauren at March 06, 2012 06:09 AM (cz84q)
Posted by: davisbr at March 06, 2012 06:09 AM (EuWFS)
256- "No one on our side should have ever mentioned her to BEGIN WITH. ... "
Exactly.
I think Rush should take a few months off and let his best stand in hosts take over. Then, I prefer his stand-in hosts. My favorite is Jason Lewis. If the left wing machine could milk this story until November, they will. The only positive is that the leftwing machine inevitably overplays their hand. It's always fun to watch the left's insane boomerang smack em' in their surprised faces.
Posted by: rectal exam at March 06, 2012 06:11 AM (O7ksG)
It should creep you out as it is infanticide, plain and simple.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD 2012 at March 06, 2012 09:17 AM (VtjlW)
Wait, are you saying that delivering a baby breech until only its head is still in the birth canal, then stabbing scissors into the base of its skull and suctioning out its brain isn't about women's health?? Who knew?
Posted by: Hedgehog at March 06, 2012 06:11 AM (3jGS1)
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 06, 2012 06:12 AM (Iaxlk)
@ davisbr: Instead of using the "<" and ">" symbols to enclose your HTML tags, use standard square brackets: "[" and "]."
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO supporter at March 06, 2012 06:12 AM (4df7R)
--
The only platform addressing that symbiosis is Ron Paul's. Secure the US Dollar without which America is no longer independent, and contain government agencies and policies within constitutional bounds, including the military defense of the American Constitutional Republic.
Keynesians including Romney will pursue the economic status quo spending rut course. With "Repo Men" Romney the authoritarian will NOT consider the value of citizens' rights, nor will Mitt in the Oval Office tolerate being challenged ideologically. The America Romney loves is himself and what's in it for him and his, VERY distinct from "others". Just go along to get along and keep on whining that nothing improves while paddling your barrel along the current over the falls.
Readers claim to admire BIG Breitbart's balls? Only because you agreed with his views. In that, at least demand his promised March 1st promised BOlinksy show immediately released for scrutiny. And don't hold your breath waiting for Mitt Romney to touch Breitbart's ghost, having had nothing to do with him in life. Sure, condolences were properly expressed at Breitbart's passing except by Barack Obama.
--
WhatÂ’s Andrew Breitbart Going to Hit Mitt Romney With?
Posted on January 9, 2012 by Kevin DuJan // 2012 GOP Candidates
hillbuzz.org:
“The Party of Stupid” never learns.
You are beyond any help if you think that Democrats need anyone to give them ideas. The Left has been eagerly and aggressively rooting for Romney to be the 2012 nominee because their opposition research file on him goes all the way back to 1994. It is not appropriate or acceptable to take any vetting of Romney off the table because you think “that’s mean” or insist “you’re giving Democrats material!”. Sister mister, the Democrats have more material on Romney than you or I or even Andrew Breitbart could dream. Romney is the wrong candidate for 2012 when jobs are one of the two big issues (the other being Obamacare, which Romney’s also terrible regarding). --
"Is Mitt Romney a Keynesian?"
By Daniel J. Mitchell, February 23, 2012
International Liberty:
What is it about Mitt Romney? The United States desperately needs smaller government, lower taxes, and less intervention, yet his comments and track record on issues such as the value-added tax, healthcare, Social Security reform, budget savings, ethanol subsidies, and the minimum wage leave a lot to be desired.
We can now add something else to the list. The former Massachusetts governor has come out of the closet as a Keynesian. "Romney admits Budget Cuts Slow the Economy." [youtube]
Posted by: C'est la Vie at March 06, 2012 06:12 AM (lpWVn)
Petition to have Obama return the $1M from Bill Maher.http://tinyurl.com/7aqustx
Posted by: HumpBot at March 06, 2012 06:14 AM (FaT1K)
The mistake people make about Santorum vs. Romney is that one is a social con and one is a fiscal con. Romney is not a fiscal con.
Posted by: Sad Dad at March 06, 2012 06:14 AM (3PHCO)
Yeah, a sense of humor. That was a JOKE, son!
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 06, 2012 10:12 AM (Iaxlk)
Well I figured that. Lol! I just don't know what it was a joke about!
I'm clearly not awake enough this morning. I've already finished my coffee, though. Bah.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO supporter at March 06, 2012 06:14 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 06, 2012 06:14 AM (Iaxlk)
Posted by: nickless at March 06, 2012 06:15 AM (Y/TXB)
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 06, 2012 06:16 AM (Iaxlk)
Posted by: befuddled at March 06, 2012 06:17 AM (xJU23)
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 06, 2012 06:17 AM (Iaxlk)
-1,000,000,000,000,000 for expecting me to provide the data this administration would need to gather me up for the inevitable vernichtungslager.
When they come for me, they'll have to work for it.
Posted by: The Atom Bomb of Loving Kindness at March 06, 2012 06:18 AM (jqHOY)
If it's a valid choice, why does it need to be used rarely?
If it's just tissue, why does it need to be anymore rare than removal of gall stones?"
Because those of us who believe in access to early abortion recognize the zygote as a potential human being and we DO take its existence seriously. Isn't that what you want? We simply cannot see a clump of cells as a person.
Pro-choice advocates still want abortion to be rare. Where is the bad in that?
Wandering only slightly afield here, it never ceases to amaze me that the same people who would outlaw abortion are the ones screaming to the skies about the skyrocketing cost of welfare. Does the correlation not occur to them?
Posted by: creeper at March 06, 2012 06:18 AM (gre5a)
...test
...test
Posted by: davisbr at March 06, 2012 06:19 AM (EuWFS)
I realize that I am old and gray, but I would never use the words in polite company, unless the topic is forbidden words.
Posted by: Jimbo at March 06, 2012 06:19 AM (O3R/2)
Posted by: TheQuietMan at March 06, 2012 06:19 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: Kaitian at March 06, 2012 06:20 AM (LrD3a)
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 06, 2012 06:20 AM (Iaxlk)
Posted by: polynikes - Texan for Romney at March 06, 2012 06:22 AM (jTVGC)
Posted by: nickless at March 06, 2012 06:23 AM (Y/TXB)
Sigh. Italics I can have. That is good.
...Bold I can have, too. That is good, too.
...apparently I should go read about tags someplace. Since those brackets aren't for just everything.
Posted by: davisbr at March 06, 2012 06:26 AM (EuWFS)
Perhaps that explains the depressed signature count. This petition is all over the blogosphere and yet it only has 1030 sigs as of now. Doesn't make sense. Are we that cowardly?
Posted by: creeper at March 06, 2012 06:28 AM (gre5a)
Posted by: Jimbo at March 06, 2012 06:29 AM (O3R/2)
Posted by: Kaitian at March 06, 2012 10:20 AM (LrD3a)
He wants to raise the minimum wage when the highest unemployment rate is among the young, uneducated. His man made global warming stance will weaken him on that front. He believes spending cuts right now without tax reform will hurt the economy, yet has promised not to change tax rates. He continues to defend government managed healthcare, despite the cost overruns in Massachusetts.
Posted by: Sad Dad at March 06, 2012 06:29 AM (3PHCO)
Posted by: Jimbo at March 06, 2012 06:30 AM (O3R/2)
"recognize the zygote as a potential human being" AND "cannot see a clump of cells as a person"
You are psychotic. Thank you for posting your obviously sociopathic, disassociative perspective. You have no self awareness at all do you?
Posted by: Bob_B at March 06, 2012 06:33 AM (pVvkk)
308 @ davisbr: Instead of using the "<" and ">" symbols to enclose your HTML tags, use standard square brackets: "[" and "]." Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO supporter at March 06, 2012 10:12 AM (4df7R)According to my tests, the brackets work for italics, bold, underline, and strikethrough. This is the test for "quote" (since blockquote did not work).
Posted by: davisbr at March 06, 2012 06:35 AM (EuWFS)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at March 06, 2012 06:35 AM (SsmZP)
"America's longest war will leave no trace"
Mark Steyn, March 2, 2012
ocregister.com
In the past couple of months, two prominent politicians of different
nations visiting their troops on the ground have used the same image to
me for Western military bases: crusader forts. ... Safely back within the
gates, a man can climb out of the full RoboCop and stop pretending he
enjoys three cups of tea with the duplicitous warlords, drug barons and
pederasts who pass for Afghanistan's ruling class.
The last crusader fort I visited was Kerak Castle in Jordan a few years ago. It was built in the 1140s, and still impresses today. I doubt there will be any remains of our latter-day fortresses a millennium hence. Six weeks after the last NATO soldier leaves Afghanistan, it will be as if we were never there. Before the election in 2010, the New York Post carried a picture of women registering to vote in Herat, all in identical top-to-toe bright blue burkas, just as they would have looked on Sept. 10, 2001. We came, we saw, we left no trace. America's longest war will leave nothing behind.
They can breach our security, but we cannot breach theirs – the vast impregnable psychological fortress in which what passes for the Pushtun mind resides. Someone accidentally burned a Quran your pals had already defaced with covert messages? Die, die, foreigners! The president of the United States issues a groveling and characteristically clueless apology for it? Die, die, foreigners! The American friend who has trained you and hired you and paid you has arrived for a meeting? Die, die, foreigners! And those are the Afghans who know us best. To the upcountry village headmen, the fellows descending from the skies in full body armor are as alien as were the space invaders to Americans in the film "Independence Day."
The Rumsfeld strategy that toppled the Taliban over a decade ago was brilliant and innovative: special forces on horseback using GPS to call in unmanned drones. They will analyze it in staff colleges around the world for decades. But what we ought to be analyzing instead is the sad, aimless, bloated, arthritic, transnationalized folly of what followed. The United States is an historical anomaly: ... and in some ways that speaks well for it, and in other ways, in a hostile and fast-changing world of predators and opportunists, it does not.Posted by: Mark Steyn at March 06, 2012 06:36 AM (lpWVn)
"Quote" obviously did not work.
...sorry for muddying up the thread, everyone. I thank you ever so much MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO supporter
last little test (just seeing if I have to use the html editor, even, to add the bracketed tags).
Posted by: davisbr at March 06, 2012 06:37 AM (EuWFS)
Posted by: crisis du jour at March 06, 2012 09:44 AM (v4USE)
There were a surprising number of comments in support of Kirk Cameron, even from people who disagreed with him.
Posted by: Insomniac at March 06, 2012 06:38 AM (DrWcr)
that state's legal/constitutional requirement.
Posted by: Mark Steyn at March 06, 2012 06:38 AM (lpWVn)
You do not have to use the html editor to add italics & bold. This is my last test (mostly to see if embedding tags within tags also works).
...thanks for your patience, all.
Posted by: davisbr at March 06, 2012 06:40 AM (EuWFS)
I'll pull the lever for Newt. even if Mitt is "inevitable" I'd like Newt to stay in so that he can get another swat or two in against the press and the president. It won't hurt the eventual nominee ...and might help.
I'm in Kaptur's district and will enjoy the Kucinich/Kaptur show..
Yesterday at one of the busiest interersections in town there was a group with black suits and red banners with some anti-abortion signs but ALSO signs saying "Honk if you want to stop Obamacare" "Honk if you hate socialism" LOTS of honking thumbs up...a "hope"ful sign.
Posted by: jeff talbut at March 06, 2012 07:04 AM (V5auc)
...wondering, of course, whether sometime between now and November there'll be any sort of positive correlation between petition signatories and IRS enforcement action.
When the history of this administration is written (assuming an honest writer) it's gonna make Nixon look like the Easter Bunny.
Posted by: JEM at March 06, 2012 07:09 AM (o+SC1)
And you need to return to elementary school. Perhaps they can teach you the meaning of "potential".
Unbelievable how quickly the epithets start flying. I went from everyday poster to "psychotic" in the blink of an eye. If you're having trouble winning your arguments, Bobby, there may be a clue here.
Posted by: creeper at March 06, 2012 07:35 AM (gre5a)
Apparently the internet tough guy act doesn't hold up in FBI custody. Bright flourescents vs. lava lamps?
Maybe they'll bag some serious jerks while scaring the crap outta the kidz.
Posted by: DaveA at March 06, 2012 07:39 AM (ySmNa)
Posted by: Average Guy at March 06, 2012 08:01 AM (JGXZ3)
Wandering only slightly afield here, it never ceases to amaze me that the same people who would outlaw abortion are the ones screaming to the skies about the skyrocketing cost of welfare. Does the correlation not occur to them?
Posted by: creeper at March 06, 2012 10:18 AM (gre5a)
Are you fucking serious? Killing a good part of a generation kills a good part of our nations wealth. You cannot justify abortion as anything other than what it is. Are you fucking stupid?
Posted by: Artruen at March 06, 2012 08:15 AM (fDGF1)
Posted by: Artruen at March 06, 2012 08:17 AM (fDGF1)
Ah yes, the shut up about abortion and we will fix it later approach. I'm sorry, but I come from this crazy viewpoint the Republican Party is supposed to not be ashamed of its platform. I know, that guarantees our electoral
Ruin for some reason. We're supposed to pretend we're Democrats who want low taxes, apparently.
Jeebus, you're fucking stupid. Who's ashamed? But does it have to be FUCKING FRONT AND CENTER ALL THE GOD DAMN TIME???
Posted by: Dumb_Blonde at March 06, 2012 08:48 AM (gieMe)
"Our nations (sic) wealth"??? You're joking, right? What wealth? Have you looked at the US balance sheet lately? How does forcing unwanted children to be born into a life of welfare increase our nation's wealth?
And I CAN justify abortion because your position is, like mine, only an opinion. You believe personhood begins at conception. I believe it begins when a fetus is viable. These days that's somewhere around twenty-four or twenty-five weeks, given excellent care. Even more important, I believe what a woman does in consultation with her physician is none of your business. You are no more right than I am and I resent the hell out of being labeled "stupid" and "psychotic" for a reasoned opinion.
Posted by: creeper at March 06, 2012 08:53 AM (gre5a)
Wandering only slightly afield here, it never ceases to amaze me that the same people who would outlaw abortion are the ones screaming to the skies about the skyrocketing cost of welfare. Does the correlation not occur to them?
Let's see, we've made abortion a sacred right of women (1973, Roe vs. Wade) , and we have skyrocketing costs of welfare (1930s New Deal, 1960s Great Society). The correlation you want us to notice is that devaluing human lives leads to ... more welfare?
Or do you want us to play with a hypothetical scenario where if we currently had a more traditional society that despised abortion, shamed young singles from premarital sex, and pushed shotgun weddings, that we'd be even deeper in the hole in welfare? (does not follow; that's a society that encourages individual responsibility)
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at March 06, 2012 08:54 AM (sGtp+)
The skyrocketing costs of welfare are, of course, not the result of Roe v. Wade but of a society which increasingly accepts children born out of wedlock. Think for a moment of how many more families we would have on welfare absent Roe.
Screw it. You guys are a bunch of pussies who won't even sign a petition to remove a guy you all acknowledge to be the worst president in history but would bully any woman with an unwanted pregnancy. Classy.
Posted by: creeper at March 06, 2012 09:03 AM (gre5a)
I believe personhood begins at 18, when the teenager's addled mind finally begins to gain some semblance of intelligence.
Your opinion is as good as mine, no more right or wrong. What a family chooses to do with a teenager that they've fed and raised for 18 years, in the privacy of their own home, is none of your business. After all, it doesn't affect you.
And I'll make sure to keep my damn opinions to myself when a serial killer decides that you're not a person and to pay you a visit. It's all just our opinions, and they're all equally valid and nice and good.
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at March 06, 2012 09:04 AM (sGtp+)
Posted by: Ole Texas Chic at March 06, 2012 09:13 AM (lLXZV)
The skyrocketing costs of welfare are, of course, not the result of Roe v. Wade but of a society which increasingly accepts children born out of wedlock. Think for a moment of how many more families we would have on welfare absent Roe.
Screw it. You guys are a bunch of pussies who won't even sign a petition to remove a guy you all acknowledge to be the worst president in history but would bully any woman with an unwanted pregnancy. Classy.
Simple economics question: What happens when you increase the gas efficiency of cars? Do we use more or less gas?
Correct answer: We use more gas, because higher efficiency makes it cheaper to drive, so people DRIVE MORE, to the point it exceeds the higher gas efficiency. Why does that happen? Societies aren't static, and people respond to incentives. Changing one variable can cause MULTIPLE effects. This is why we call it the "Law of UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES".
So you're performing a simple analysis of what happens if we changed our society's underlying principles on abortion and only looking at one effect - more people. There may be more people - but without easy abortions, we'd have less casual sex, more long term relationships and marriages (since men want to get some of that sweet sweet booty), and a less dysfunctional society.
If I'm a grade-schooler, what does that make your one-bit understanding of this issue?
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at March 06, 2012 09:14 AM (v3pYe)
I really want to drive home how incoherent your point is:
The correlation we can observe is this: 70 odd years ago, greatly restricted abortion, no welfare state. Now, mostly unrestricted abortion, bankrupt welfare state.
What you want us to do is to make an extrapolation - without abortion, we'd have more poor people (cause only poor people get abortions, apparently), and we'll assume that those poor people would all be on welfare, and thus our welfare state would be deeper in the hole. Basically, your thesis is that we've only aborted unproductive people, so our society is better off with all of them dead.
If you could do better than grade school level analysis, you might see a flaw with that train of thought.
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at March 06, 2012 09:23 AM (v3pYe)
Ole Texas Chic, thanks for adding "baby-killer" to "psychotic" and "stupid". I'm accumulating quite a stack of pejoratives today. Happily, watching Sarah Palin deal with crap like this has taught me how to cope with name-callers.
Wish StuckOnStupid would get home so we could talk about something a little more au courant than a forty-year-old SCOTUS ruling which is supported in principle by more than sixty percent of the population.
Link? Why, yes. I have a link:
http://tinyurl.com/76bag
Posted by: creeper at March 06, 2012 10:03 AM (gre5a)
Where is trashcan man when you need him?
Posted by: Bob Saget at March 06, 2012 10:06 AM (SDkq3)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at March 06, 2012 10:38 AM (bxiXv)
When winning friends and influencing people is obviously not in the cards, though, you may as well say what's on your mind.
Got that from some guy who died last week.
Posted by: creeper at March 06, 2012 11:00 AM (gre5a)
Link? Why, yes. I have a link:
http://tinyurl.com/76bag
Your same source notes that 60% would support restricting abortion to a greater degree.
37% support tighter restrictions than now, 23% say it should be banned.
So yes, abortion isn't likely to be banned from our current society any time soon because people want to "care" for that girl who needs it for incest or rape or some horrid horrid (and unlikely) circumstance completely out of her control. At the same time, people can see that unrestricted abortion is pretty horrible as well.
People don't like either "extreme" - but we as a society still make a choice about what we're going to accept. Where we land between the two extremes does matter, and it's worth fighting for. The leftists are always fighting for their vision of society - we can adopt the leftist view, or we can push our alternative.
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at March 06, 2012 11:22 AM (sGtp+)
Posted by: steevy at March 06, 2012 12:30 PM (7W3wI)
Posted by: Conservative Crank voted for Perry, dammit at March 06, 2012 01:26 PM (1zwZo)
Grow a pair
Posted by: marine43 at March 06, 2012 02:17 PM (XqNRH)
Sorry, I am way to busy to read all comments. As of the past 10 minutes I have been flood-calling carbonite. I will be canceling all 3 of my accounts tomorrow. Hit them in the wallet. It is time we are heard.. No more of this Mr. Moral crap. They do this over and over.
Walk on and let your voice be the big stick...
Posted by: zombiegop at March 06, 2012 04:31 PM (dGFBe)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3373 seconds, 489 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








The Alamo as it existed in the early 1900s.
http://is.gd/bWPhYN
The Alamo as it exists today surrounded by San Antonio.
http://is.gd/ENOFuT
Posted by: Vic at March 06, 2012 02:32 AM (YdQQY)