August 20, 2012
— Gabriel Malor Happy Monday.
The Romney-Ryan campaign had a statement last night on Rep. Akin's idiotic rape comment: "Governor Romney and Congressman Ryan disagree with Mr. Akin's statement, and a Romney-Ryan administration would not oppose abortion in instances of rape." Ugh.
Politico's Glenn Thrush has a report and a new ebook out on the flailing Obama campaign's personal rivalries. The ebook also has some interesting details on Obama's personal issues; for example, Obama was reluctant to play golf with Speaker Boehner, because he knew Boehner would beat him. Obama also told a Rubio supporter in Florida that Rubio should "watch it" because "he might get his ass kicked."
Yesterday in Pakistan: three drone strikes in 24 hours. The third strike was aimed at militants cleaning up after the first two.
More ugh. King of the Clowns Donald Trump will have a convention role. Everyone's mum about what he's doing, but here's the word: he won't be a speaker; instead he's doing some retarded skit about "firing" an Obama look-alike.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
02:53 AM
| Comments (412)
Post contains 175 words, total size 1 kb.
The "Solid South" was a political fact, benefiting Democrats for generations and then Republicans, with Bible Belt and racial politics ruling the day.
and this one
Obama won both states (NC and FL) and Virginia four years ago, propelled by young voters, nonwhites and suburban independents. Virginia, long a two-party state in down-ballot races, had not sided with Democrats on the presidency since Lyndon Johnson in 1964. Jimmy Carter in 1976 had been the last Democratic nominee to win North Carolina. Each state is in play again, with Romney needing to reclaim Florida and at least one of the others to reach the White House.
Actually if you look at the exit polls he won minority men and women. What got him VA and NC was the Republican base failing to turnout and the Dems did. That will turn around this time as the Dems sit at home. And FL has always been a toss-up State thanks to all the retired Yankees in the Miami area. VA is now a toss-up State as well thanks to DC. As for “young voters, there was no huge turnout. Only 10% of the voters in 2008 were in the 18 – 24 category. They will go Republican this time.
This article is AP whistling past the graveyard.
http://is.gd/UdKSoN
Posted by: Vic at August 20, 2012 02:54 AM (YdQQY)
http://is.gd/rED9Zg
Posted by: Vic at August 20, 2012 02:55 AM (YdQQY)
http://is.gd/t5GQpe
Posted by: Vic at August 20, 2012 02:55 AM (YdQQY)
Midnight in Austenland
In this follow-up to Shannon Hale's popular Austenland, a feisty new heroine is introduced, frightening twists abound, and a romance that might transcend the proper bounds of the Austen fantasy world appears. It's a well-balanced blend of romance and mystery. How could it not turn out right in the end?
ThatÂ’s it for today.
Posted by: Vic at August 20, 2012 02:56 AM (YdQQY)
He "misspoke". What a stupid way to end a campaign.
Posted by: Vic at August 20, 2012 02:57 AM (YdQQY)
He would have to hire it done.
Posted by: Vic at August 20, 2012 02:58 AM (YdQQY)
Well, it was either that or the equally moronic non-apology, "I apologize to anyone who was offended by my remarks."
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 20, 2012 02:59 AM (sbV1u)
--------------------
They kinda have to issue a statement like that if they're going to demand that Obama walk away from the Ugly that Biden puts out.
Posted by: A One-Eyed Cat Peepin' in the Seafood Store at August 20, 2012 02:59 AM (eMtQ2)
Posted by: kg1982 at August 20, 2012 02:59 AM (ycGF+)
Do what Kos does.
Make shit up.
Anything you came up with certainly wouldn't be anymore insane than Kos.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 20, 2012 03:02 AM (sbV1u)
Piss on the UN.
Posted by: Vic at August 20, 2012 03:03 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: BurtTC at August 20, 2012 03:11 AM (2pG7H)
Posted by: Vic at August 20, 2012 03:13 AM (YdQQY)
Market futures way down
Which markets? I'm seeing the U.S. market futures (Dow, S&P, Nasdaq) basically unchanged this morning.
The rally in the U.S. markets this summer is nothing but vaporware imo and will not end well when reality sets in. But today doesn't look to be the day for that, at least not from where the futures are.
Posted by: crisis du jour at August 20, 2012 03:15 AM (J1eJz)
Posted by: chris at August 20, 2012 03:15 AM (LWiW8)
I really think it's his use of the term "legitimate rape." Is here such thing as a "legitimate rape"? If so, when would rape be "legitimate"? I'd love to hear him discourse on that, just so I could point and laugh.
Also, when you look at all he said, he's out and out wrong on the physiology of it. Politicians shouldn't try to be doctors. They suck at it.
His idiocy just provides more ammo to the left.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 20, 2012 03:15 AM (sbV1u)
<On those drone strikes the UN is making noises now wanting the video so they can "investigate".>
The UN better watch it, or it might get it's ass kicked. That shit is my personal ET.
Jokin' guys. But seriously. "Campaign", muthafuggas....do you speak it? Oh, that's right. None of you are elected. So STFU.
Posted by: Preezy at August 20, 2012 03:19 AM (QjSgY)
Morning, 'rons and 'ronettes. Hope you all had a better weekend than I did. And thanks, Gabe and Vic for the news.
On Friday, I promised you a Hollywood practical joke story. It concerns the composers Max Steiner (Jezebel, Casablanca, Gone With The Wind) and Victor Young (My Favorite Spy, The Quiet Man). It's a little long, so depending on your time zone, grab a cup of coffee or an adult beverage and settle in. . .
In the 1940's, a number of Hollywood composers would play cards at Young's house once a week. Because Steiner's eyesight wasn't so good, he'd given up driving, so Young would drive to Warner Brothers and pick Steiner up.
One week, during the scoring for Now, Voyager, Young arrived a little early at the studio. The red light on the soundstage had just come on, so he stood there listening to the love theme Steiner had written for the movie - this big, lush, grandiose piece of music - when he got an idea. He listened, took out a piece of paper and jotted down the notes of Steiner's new theme. Then he went inside, picked up Steiner and took him to the card game.
The next day, Young was scoring a picture at Paramount. He took Steiner's theme to one of his own arrangers, who did a quick orchestral scoring. Young then went to his own recording session, and before the day was over, he had the Paramount orchestra make a full recording of it.
Young was a gadget freak, especially for electronics, and his house was loaded with equipment and speakers. When he took the recording home, he spliced it into a recording he'd already made of a local LA news broadcast. Then he was ready.
The next week, Steiner arrived and the game began. Around 11.00, somebody suggested they listen to the news, so on it went. Over the speakers came the voice of the local announcer presenting the local program. . .and then the full orchestration of Steiner's Now, Voyager theme.
Steiner jumped up like he'd been shot. "Listen to that!" he yelled. That's my theme!"
"Don't be silly," Young deadpanned. "Deal the cards."
"Listen to them - they've stolen my music!" Steiner spluttered.
"How could they steal your music?" Young said, innocently wide-eyed. "That's a program that's been on five times a week, fifty-two weeks a year, for years and years, and they've used that signature ever since they first went on the radio."
"It can't be!" Steiner shrieked. "I just wrote it!"
He was about to go into hysterics when Young started laughing and finally admitted what he'd done.
And that's it for today. Hope you all have a wonderful day.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at August 20, 2012 03:21 AM (zF6Iw)
There is absolutely no reason to even debate this crap.
R/R are going to have to devote time to this dipshits fuckup unnecessarily.
Posted by: General Woundwort at August 20, 2012 03:21 AM (06lNq)
Posted by: bbarkow at August 20, 2012 03:22 AM (+t1cq)
I really think it's his use of the term "legitimate rape." Is here such thing as a "legitimate rape"? If so, when would rape be "legitimate"?
I bet the Duke Lacrosse team could explain the difference.
Posted by: Larsen E. Whipsnade at August 20, 2012 03:22 AM (6BgmB)
That was his first mistake. We don't understand wimmenz or the vajayjay and any discussion of them is fraught with danger.
Posted by: Andy at August 20, 2012 03:22 AM (OZPoa)
But this shit is what the dems were gagging for. This was the lead story on the radio this morning.in Chicago, with fucking Felicia fucking race card fucking Middlebrooks: "Republican Todd Akins...."
And we're off.
Posted by: Gem at August 20, 2012 03:23 AM (zw+pb)
Posted by: General Woundwort at August 20, 2012 03:24 AM (06lNq)
And now for the rest of the story...
This assumes all rapes are reported. Which they are not. DoJ estimates and other victim advocacy groups put the under-report figure at anywhere from 52% to 60%. Therefore we have no possible way of accurately determining whether or not that 5% figure bears any relation to reality.
The chance of becoming pregnant when you actually want to is about 30%, as I found out when my wife and I were trying to start a family.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 20, 2012 03:25 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Scobface at August 20, 2012 03:27 AM (IoNBC)
Right. That's sorta my point above. When you're that frickin' tone deaf as to how the phrase "legitimate rape" would sound to the average Joe, you're probably a touch too stupid to be a Senator.
This of course does not explain Harry Reid.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 20, 2012 03:27 AM (sbV1u)
Politicians should not try to be funny. It never ever ends well.
Oh. Yay. Gigantic Horror Thread. Yaaaay.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD 2012 at August 20, 2012 03:27 AM (Gk3SS)
Posted by: bigfakehand at August 20, 2012 03:28 AM (fotBh)
Indeed, the va-jay-jay itself it fraught with danger, as any 'ette will point out.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 20, 2012 03:28 AM (sbV1u)
Mitt Romney's 2008 tax return has taken three people hostage and barricaded itself inside a house in Davenport, Iowa.
Developing....
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at August 20, 2012 03:29 AM (B+qrE)
Romney attracts white crowds, Bark's crowd is more diverse.-NYT
Oh, I don't know about that NYT. Could be Romney attracts "white" hispanics and "white" native-americans, etc. Besides, you liberal pukes, aren't we suppose to be color blind? Seems like you are counting according to skin color. Talk about racist.
Posted by: Case at August 20, 2012 03:29 AM (QwurB)
The sins of the sperm forcer MUST be carried by the baby.
Posted by: DaveA at August 20, 2012 03:31 AM (DVJEd)
The NYT is concerned about every single kind of diversity except the one that actually makes a difference.
Intellectual diversity.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 20, 2012 03:31 AM (sbV1u)
Jeez, Donald! Nice optics ... let's definitely conjure up new race cards. Or perhaps it's a stealth trick to get Biden to sing "Ol' Man River" this time.
alexthechick has it just exactly right: "It never ends well" when politicians try to be funny. And the corollary: Republicans always pay a heavy price for their particularly ham-handed hilarity.
Posted by: Fred Baumann at August 20, 2012 03:31 AM (IrZP0)
When did "political conventions should be funny" start?
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at August 20, 2012 03:31 AM (B+qrE)
Posted by: Will Not Assimilate For Food at August 20, 2012 03:32 AM (yCf0j)
Posted by: toby928© at August 20, 2012 03:32 AM (QupBk)
Posted by: nickless at August 20, 2012 03:33 AM (MMC8r)
I would say it goes the other way. I have seen statistics that say that between 50 and 60 percent of all reported rapes are false.
Posted by: Vic at August 20, 2012 03:33 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: chris at August 20, 2012 07:15 AM (LWiW
Agreed. But our lack of progress on this front no longer bothers me as much as it used to. I still believe that abortion is the murder of a person who has committed no wrong. That includes incidences of rape/incest, of course. But the fact is that human history is damned ugly, and infanticide is not a new thing. Right now the bulk of the abortions going on in this country are had by those who are our cultural and political enemies. Our enemies are destroying their own children, not ours. I am increasingly accepting of the idea of allowing them to continue doing so. They are doing great evil - and they will answer for it at the final judgment. But this is war, and if they want to destroy their own, perhaps we should let them.
And that said, I'd like to see a new public health service offered - any time a person has an abortion, offer them free sterilization. Better yet, mandatory.
Posted by: Reactionary at August 20, 2012 03:33 AM (xUM1Q)
But he completely missed that issue and went for the face plant.
This. If you are running for office and the words "rape" and "abortion" appear together in a response, you did it wrong.
It was a totally unforced error.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at August 20, 2012 03:35 AM (B+qrE)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 20, 2012 03:35 AM (XvQlt)
They''ll end up thinking babies come from Overstock.com or UPS or some other well researched finding.
Posted by: ontherocks at August 20, 2012 03:36 AM (aZ6ew)
I'd like to see a reputable source on that. My stats are from DoJ.
No, not the Eric Holder DoJ. These figures pre-date the chinless wonder.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 20, 2012 03:36 AM (sbV1u)
Yeah go with that line of reasoning see how far that gets you with the women a vote.
Let's start talking about rape and incest, I love it. That's a winning strategy.
Posted by: General Woundwort at August 20, 2012 03:37 AM (06lNq)
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 20, 2012 07:25 AM (sbV1u)
Is that per act, and under more or less random conditions, or is that when you're intentionally trying to figure out the best time, etc?
Posted by: Reactionary at August 20, 2012 03:37 AM (xUM1Q)
Posted by: Hillary Clinton just emailed to tell you to stop stealing her lines at August 20, 2012 03:37 AM (qZXps)
THIS.
Worse still, he opened up the door for McCaskill. One that had been closing rapidly.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 20, 2012 03:37 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: kg1982 at August 20, 2012 03:38 AM (ycGF+)
In other words, differentiating between where a sexual assault has actually occurred versus the cases where a woman might say she has been raped in order to qualify for an abortion, were abortion to be restricted to cases of rape and incest.
Posted by: mama winger in Paul Ryan's district at August 20, 2012 03:38 AM (P6QsQ)
Random conditions. However, even when you're timing to try and get pregnant the stats do not improve all that much. I just can't remember the actual figure.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 20, 2012 03:39 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: General Woundwort at August 20, 2012 07:21 AM (06lNq)
This is a free country and those who are against abortion, even in the cases of rape, should be allowed to say so. I am against abortion in such cases because a baby is a baby. Either you believe that life begins at conception and it's murder or you don't. Period. Anything else is hypocritical (in fact, Ryan, who voted for the act/bill that life begins at conception, is now having to say that he's for MURDER all based on how the baby was conceived. UGH!)
Akin was also pointing out, as far as I can tell, that in the hypothetical situation where abortion is outlawed except in the case of rape, then there will be women claiming rape simply in order to get an abortion. After the Duke Lacrosse case it's certainly not unheard of and abortion wasn't even on the line in that case.
Posted by: Aslan's Girl at August 20, 2012 03:39 AM (KL49F)
Posted by: BurtTC at August 20, 2012 07:11 AM (2pG7H)
He's a so-con opposed to homo marriage so Gabe will present him in the worst possible light.
Posted by: Captain Hate (dagny solidarity) at August 20, 2012 03:40 AM (uIPTz)
Your 30% is based on knowing when a woman is ovulating. One can assume that rapes are distributed randomly across women's cycles, so the probability is approximately 2/28 = 7%. But that assumes that rapes occur only in the fertile population, which is clearly not the case. Post-menopausal women are raped, and pre-pubertal girls are raped also. So I would guess the extreme upper limit is 5%
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at August 20, 2012 03:40 AM (2b4yb)
Here. Lemme start a fight about something else. The assumption that the rally is vaporware is based upon the assumption that the US stockmarket is trading shares whose value is based on an evaluation of the worth of the issuing company rather than the market trading the value of the stock itself, independent of the underlying economics of the company. I do not believe this is the case and probably hasn't been for far longer than anyone would like to admit. This is my issue with HFT, HFT takes that to eleventy. When money is being made off being able to leverage share price fluctuations that occur on a fractional second basis, this contributes to the decoupling of price of the stock from the valuation of the company. Now, the immediate and obvious counter example is the plummeting of the Facebook stock. Additionally, the problem isn't exclusively caused by HFT, I would place more blame on the trend for compensation to be linked to hitting certain stock price benchmarks. If your bonus is linked to that, then your concern will be to take the steps necessary to hit your quarterlies, without regard to longterm impact on the company.
I should also note that there's nothing inherently wrong with the market trading the perceived value of the stock itself. It's simply that the majority of those in the financial industry seem to be wedded to selling the idea that the market is doing something other than that. I also don't blame those who want to make their quarterly bonuses. That's the behavior that's being incentived so of course there's more of it.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD 2012 at August 20, 2012 03:40 AM (Gk3SS)
Posted by: BurtTC at August 20, 2012 03:41 AM (2pG7H)
Right. I got that. I assumed that's what he was saying. But again, and someone said it upthread, when you are a politician, the words "rape" and "abortion" should never occur in the same sentence, and preferably not in the same paragraph. Hopefully not even in the same speech.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 20, 2012 03:41 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: wierd flunky at August 20, 2012 03:41 AM (X+nFp)
The Belmont Club has an interesting article about how environmentalists always get it wrong. It includes a cute little video comparing Hiroshima to Detroit 65 years after the A Bomb.
Posted by: Ed Anger at August 20, 2012 03:42 AM (tOkJB)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 20, 2012 03:42 AM (Q7wUg)
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at August 20, 2012 03:42 AM (qZXps)
It doesn't matter what he meant unless he can cogently and forcefully explain what it was he was trying to communicate, he's toast.
I believe I understand what he meant, I am Pro-Life so I am receptive Pro-Life talking points, but Akins thoughts were so muddled that it's unclear what he was on about.
Posted by: General Woundwort at August 20, 2012 03:42 AM (06lNq)
No its not. See #63
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 20, 2012 03:43 AM (sbV1u)
This of course probably is not SOP in Catholic hospitals.
Posted by: mama winger in Paul Ryan's district at August 20, 2012 03:43 AM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: mama winger in Paul Ryan's district at August 20, 2012 07:38 AM (P6QsQ)
Exactly. Anyone with any sort of brain can figure out what Akin meant and that is why he said he "mispoke" b/c he honestly just said it wrong. DUH.
Where are the conservatives who defended Cain the Cad? They defended that idiot where there was tons of proof that he cheated on his wife but they won't defend Akin who stated a FACT in a slightly mis-worded way? Bunch of Chicken Littles running scared b/c the big, bad Libs might be upset.
If we let the Left get away with crucifying Akin, then they will be emboldened to do it again and again and again. They will know it worked. George Allen was enough. No more.
Posted by: Aslan's Girl at August 20, 2012 03:43 AM (KL49F)
Maybe Gabe is presenting him in the worst possible light because he said a profoundly stupid and ignorant (as in empirically incorrect) thing?
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at August 20, 2012 03:44 AM (2b4yb)
Posted by: BurtTC at August 20, 2012 03:44 AM (2pG7H)
Posted by: Highsmith at August 20, 2012 03:44 AM (uwaMU)
Posted by: Vic at August 20, 2012 03:45 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: wierd flunky at August 20, 2012 03:45 AM (X+nFp)
I agree. This was politically dumb. However, it was not evil. I can think of plenty of policies on the other side that are purely evil.
Posted by: mama winger in Paul Ryan's district at August 20, 2012 03:45 AM (P6QsQ)
Let's start talking about rape and incest, I love it. That's a winning strategy.
It's not a "line of reasoning" it's the simple truth. If the unborn is a human being it is innocent of it's conception.
Try and figure the steps between "winning strategy" and Reactionary's "never fails to disgust" vile nonsense @51.
Posted by: DaveA at August 20, 2012 03:46 AM (DVJEd)
Posted by: mama winger in Paul Ryan's district at August 20, 2012 07:43 AM (P6QsQ)
So Catholics support pregnancy as a result of rape? Do they send out rape teams to increase the number of Catholics in the world?
Posted by: Kos & Friends at August 20, 2012 03:46 AM (2b4yb)
Posted by: General Woundwort at August 20, 2012 03:46 AM (06lNq)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 20, 2012 03:46 AM (bmHOj)
Posted by: Harry Reid, flushed with excitement at August 20, 2012 03:47 AM (qZXps)
Why do I believe that's the EXACT line of "logic" that Kostards would actually use.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 20, 2012 03:47 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: You're hysterical at August 20, 2012 03:48 AM (CofEF)
Posted by: 66chevelle at August 20, 2012 03:48 AM (QjSgY)
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 20, 2012 07:41 AM (sbV1u)
Wrong. More and more politicians are beginning to say that they oppose abortion even in the case of rape. I've been heartened seeing it the last four years or so because I've been waiting a long time for it. I believe that is Palin's stance (and why I used to like her very much). Even Phil Donahue once pointed out that it's absolute hypocrisy to say you are pro-life and life begins at conception and abortion is murder and then turn around and condone it simply based on how the child was conceived. When even Donahue can see how stupid it is, you know it's bad.
Posted by: Aslan's Girl at August 20, 2012 03:48 AM (KL49F)
1) The guy interviewing him finds nothing amiss in what Akin says at all and moves on to the next question. Thus, it does require some parsing of his statement to decide it's the most horrendous thing a politician has uttered in the last week. It's not as though the interviewer goes, "What the hell are you saying?"
2) What he means by legitimate rape is to distinguish it from a woman who wanted an abortion and only claimed to be raped. If abortion were illegal except in the case of rape and incest, it is not out of the realm of possibility that you would produce a legal incentive for a woman seeking an abortion to cry rape, regardless of the actual circumstance that caused her pregnancy. Current statistics are very few rape pregnancies occur--at least in the US. If you want to increase the number of very young men being accused of rape, make rape one of the only ways an unwed teen girl can legally get an abortion. (And as someone mentioned upthread, Whoopi Goldberg has made a similar distinction in defending Roman Polanski. She still has her job.)
3) The science he claims doctors have explained to him he muddles, but it is not entirely fiction either. See this study: http://www.cosmosmagazine.com/node/3511. "Robertson said sperm was more likely to fail if the woman had not previously been exposed to that man's semen for at least three months." Perhaps (perhaps) he's more informed on this subject than many of his detractors assume, but that he might have relied on hearsay from such a study only reinforces what I said earlier about the likelihood he will embarrass himself again in the future. The media will helpfully point out these mitigations for a Democrat, not a Republican.
4) We have a sitting--Democratic--Congressman who believes the presence of marines on Guam could cause it to tip over. That doesn't mean we need to elect even more idiots to the Senate, but it establishes perspective on this brouhaha.
Posted by: Nicholas Kronos at August 20, 2012 03:48 AM (yxz7s)
From the Politico piece:
"Bored with the traditional one-city format for national conventions, they briefly considered a groundbreaking plan to stage four nights of events in four cities in 2010. The plan turned out to be a logistical nightmare, and would have cost the party and networks millions more. It was quickly scrapped."Open admission of political coordination between the current occupant of the oval office and 'the networks'. Bias? What bias?
Posted by: wtd at August 20, 2012 03:49 AM (79199)
Posted by: mama winger in Paul Ryan's district at August 20, 2012 03:49 AM (P6QsQ)
For the record, that's my position.
Also for the record, every time a politician talks about it, they fuck it up.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 20, 2012 03:50 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: mama winger in Paul Ryan's district at August 20, 2012 03:51 AM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at August 20, 2012 07:44 AM (2b4yb)
So fucking what. Obama and Biden say dumber shit than this every week. Yes I wish this hadn't happened and people like that ought to know when to keep their fucking yaps shut on potential "gotcha" topics. But if this single fucking issue ends up turning an election around, we're a more stupid population than deserves a representative government.
Posted by: Captain Hate (dagny solidarity) at August 20, 2012 03:51 AM (uIPTz)
Posted by: 66chevelle at August 20, 2012 07:48 AM (QjSgY)
See link at #3
Posted by: Vic at August 20, 2012 03:52 AM (YdQQY)
-------
That's my position too. I don't think this will happen until it's most everyone's position. This involves a change of heart, not a change of law.
Posted by: mama winger in Paul Ryan's district at August 20, 2012 03:52 AM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at August 20, 2012 03:52 AM (qZXps)
THIS.
And it's happening, slowly. Too slowly. But it's happening.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 20, 2012 03:53 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC at August 20, 2012 03:53 AM (NVtue)
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at August 20, 2012 07:42 AM (qZXps)
Damn good post. I'm sick of being what I can and cannot talk about by my fellow conservatives! What the hell do we have a 1st Amendment for? I thought conservatives were for the Constituion?
Posted by: Aslan's Girl at August 20, 2012 03:53 AM (KL49F)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 20, 2012 03:55 AM (p/Sn/)
Heh.
From a BFH commenter:
<Good thing he took the Prius, or we would have seen a headline like “SUV Drives Director to his Death”>
(not a BFH link)
Posted by: 66chevelle at August 20, 2012 03:55 AM (QjSgY)
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 20, 2012 07:53 AM (sbV1u)
-----
I agree. I think the technology revolution is contributing to that. When it was impossible to see a baby inside the womb, or when it was impossible for a very young baby to survive outside the womb, abortion was a much easier sell.
Posted by: mama winger in Paul Ryan's district at August 20, 2012 03:56 AM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 20, 2012 07:50 AM (sbV1u)
Can you name another time? I can't. More Repubilcans than ever before on stating this as their position and they are not "fucking up". Akin worded this wrong/left out a word but his statement is factual and consistent.
Posted by: Aslan's Girl at August 20, 2012 03:56 AM (KL49F)
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at August 20, 2012 03:56 AM (qZXps)
Posted by: Will Not Assimilate For Food at August 20, 2012 03:57 AM (yCf0j)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at August 20, 2012 03:57 AM (cubpP)
Posted by: Vic at August 20, 2012 03:58 AM (YdQQY)
In colloquial English that would be known as a "fuck up."
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 20, 2012 03:58 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at August 20, 2012 03:59 AM (qZXps)
Posted by: Vic at August 20, 2012 07:52 AM (YdQQY)
Yeah, I know. Just trying to bring it up in the mix.
Posted by: 66chevelle at August 20, 2012 03:59 AM (QjSgY)
EXACTLY.
Again, someone said it up-thread. The correct response was, "That's not an issue in this election. What IS an issue is McCaskill's support for every job killing measure that's emanated from the White House. So let's talk about that."
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 20, 2012 03:59 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Hawker Flyer at August 20, 2012 04:00 AM (WMmhK)
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at August 20, 2012 04:00 AM (qZXps)
But by trotting that linkage out, its *BAM* emotions at 12 alert. And it becomes third rail.
Anyone stupid enough to fall in such an obvious pitfall needs to be kept to dull objects like sporks and get nappy times with Joe Biden.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at August 20, 2012 04:02 AM (cubpP)
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at August 20, 2012 07:59 AM (qZXps)
No but when he started sucking up to the likes of Sharpton and Jackson, I was glad to see him go by any means possible.
Posted by: Captain Hate (dagny solidarity) at August 20, 2012 04:02 AM (uIPTz)
Posted by: nickless at August 20, 2012 04:03 AM (MMC8r)
Your statistics are incorrect.
28 day cycle.
pregnancy can occur during 1-3 of those days.
Random distribution of intercourse across those 28 days yields approximately 3%-11% impregnation, with a lower incidence of pregnancy, and an even lower rate of carrying to term.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at August 20, 2012 04:03 AM (2b4yb)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at August 20, 2012 04:03 AM (05RcU)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at August 20, 2012 04:04 AM (cubpP)
And the vet would tell them, "Get ready for puppies. There's no way I'm going in there and kill them."
And there's no one in that office that would have assisted him either.
Posted by: mama winger in Paul Ryan's district at August 20, 2012 04:05 AM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 20, 2012 07:58 AM (sbV1u)
No, you posted that "every time" this is talked about, the politician "fucks up". Outside of this from Akin, what other time has this happened? I can't name one...
Posted by: Aslan's Girl at August 20, 2012 04:05 AM (KL49F)
Thank you. I'll be sure to tell our OB/GYN that she fails at math and she wasted 8 years in medical school.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 20, 2012 04:06 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 20, 2012 04:07 AM (cCrvC)
If we want to discuss the solvency of Social Security and Medicare, 30 million people (roughly...extrapolating from 50 million since 1972, but leaving out those under 20, homemakers, etc) who aren't paying the aforementioned payroll taxes because their mother had them killed might be relevant.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ should have gotten knocked up and dropped out instead of graduating high school at August 20, 2012 04:07 AM (/kI1Q)
Since I haven't had enough coffee for a Lexis-Nexis and Google marathon this morning, you win.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 20, 2012 04:07 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at August 20, 2012 04:07 AM (cubpP)
I respect his stance (incoherent as it may be) on abortion.
What I reject is the tone deafness of the statement, and the stupidity of making such a statement in the midst of a political race.
I would love to have a 4th Estate that is fair to both sides of the political debate.
I also want to have a threesome with Kate Upton and Eva Mendez.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at August 20, 2012 04:08 AM (2b4yb)
Posted by: Wyatt's Torch at August 20, 2012 04:09 AM (pmDdf)
Posted by: mama winger in Paul Ryan's district at August 20, 2012 08:05 AM (P6QsQ)
Aw! What a great doctor. I wish my grandma's vet had been as nice. She brought in her new female kitty for spaying and instead of checking to see if she was pregnant first, he just went ahead and aborted! He didn't even ask if grandma wanted the kittens. Everyone in the family would've given one a good home. I still think about that to this day and it was nearly 20 yrs ago. Makes me so mad.
Posted by: Aslan's Girl at August 20, 2012 04:09 AM (KL49F)
Open admission of political coordinationbetween the current occupant of the oval office and 'the networks'. Bias? What bias?
This kind of coordination is expected between both campaigns. Asking the networks if changing up the convention format would screw with their coverage is just good sense.
Posted by: Alex at August 20, 2012 04:09 AM (KFBsH)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at August 20, 2012 04:09 AM (05RcU)
I am not talking about your specific circumstances (none of my business, and extremely tacky to boot).
I am analyzing the numbers. Please check my data and my math if you think I am incorrect.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at August 20, 2012 04:10 AM (2b4yb)
Posted by: Museisluse at August 20, 2012 04:10 AM (pQ1p8)
That's a campaign I can get behind! IYKWIMAITTYD
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 20, 2012 04:10 AM (sbV1u)
What a vile idea. I remember the discussion. Awful.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at August 20, 2012 04:11 AM (2b4yb)
I'm just giving you that stats she gave to me. I didn't make it up.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 20, 2012 04:11 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 20, 2012 08:07 AM (sbV1u)
I wasn't trying to "win", I honestly wanted to know if you knew of another. I follow this closely since I'm so glad to see more politicians take this stand and didn't want to have missed it.
Posted by: Aslan's Girl at August 20, 2012 04:11 AM (KL49F)
I guarantee you that happens more often than abortion from rape or incest. Pro life politicians always get hammered with the tough cases, but pro choice politicians get a pass on theirs because the MSM is clearly pro choice.
Posted by: Nicholas Kronos at August 20, 2012 04:11 AM (yxz7s)
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ should have gotten knocked up and dropped out instead of graduating high school at August 20, 2012 04:11 AM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at August 20, 2012 08:09 AM (05RcU)
Just as long as I don't have to watch!
When I was a kid we took a trip through the Sinai and dived at Sharm El Sheikh. Amazing!
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at August 20, 2012 04:13 AM (2b4yb)
Posted by: Lizabth at August 20, 2012 04:14 AM (JZBti)
Posted by: mama winger in Paul Ryan's district at August 20, 2012 04:15 AM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at August 20, 2012 04:15 AM (05RcU)
I am not suggesting that you made it up! We are having a (hopefully) friendly disagreement. If I seem contentious it is not my intent.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at August 20, 2012 04:15 AM (2b4yb)
You should see the parties we had down there.
Posted by: Yeshua at August 20, 2012 04:16 AM (/kI1Q)
I would love to have a 4th Estate that is fair to both sides of the political debate.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at August 20, 2012 08:08 AM (2b4yb)
I think we're on the same side on this. My problem is that by yammering about it incessantly, such as making it the lead item in "Headline Comments", we're helping the cocksuckers. I'm not saying it should be ignored but it's really nothing but a sideshow and, considering how the JEF is tailoring his appeal to the Sandra Flukes of the world, probably not as damaging as a lot of people are acting.
Posted by: Captain Hate (dagny solidarity) at August 20, 2012 04:17 AM (uIPTz)
I was 11.
This was before we gave it all back. We took a camping trip all over the Sinai, including a hike up Mt. Sinai and a visit to St. Catherine's Monastery.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at August 20, 2012 04:18 AM (2b4yb)
Posted by: mama winger in Paul Ryan's district at August 20, 2012 04:18 AM (P6QsQ)
The fact that Obama is contemptuous of Romney is wonderful. The odds of him losing his cool on national TV during a debate are way up.
On the Akin thing. It was a dumb statement, and the media are going to run with it 24/7, since it fits the narrative they want to use. It is going to make it harder for Akin to win, if he stays in. But it is survivable if he does, if he plays it right. He'll need to do an apology tour for a week. In the end, no one who was going to vote for him was going to be swayed by abortion. Everyone for whom that is the top topic was going to vote for McCaskill anyway.
It will have zero effect on the national race, since R&R did the smart thing and put a statement out now. When the press start badgering them on it, they can just refer to the statement and say it is an issue in Missouri.
Now if the GOP had complete control here, they would pull a Lautenberg and replace Akin with Steeleman, but I'm sure Akin would have to believe he has no path to victory.
Posted by: Dave in Fla at August 20, 2012 04:19 AM (ZJNI6)
Naaah. We're good. Always are.
Where's your old hash?
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 20, 2012 04:19 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at August 20, 2012 04:20 AM (05RcU)
I agree. But around here we hold our politicians to a very high standard, because the MBM will pounce on these kinds of errors and blow them completely out of proportion.
However, you ignored the most important part of my comment:
I also want to have a threesome with Kate Upton and Eva Mendez.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at August 20, 2012 04:20 AM (2b4yb)
Posted by: Aslan's Girl at August 20, 2012 04:22 AM (KL49F)
That's where I am also coming from. You have to expect the press to NOT be fair to the Republican and that's why talking about it at all, especially in an election which should be focused on the economy, is a bad idea.
If you DO opt to talk about it, then it had better be well-rehearsed with no possibility of "inartful phrasing." It was an unforced error and it opens the door for McCaskill to claw her way back in.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 20, 2012 04:22 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Vic at August 20, 2012 04:23 AM (YdQQY)
You realize, of course, that your new router now makes it more difficult to spot the borderline clever/insane socks you will now post.
Dammit, now I am going to have to spend the next 20 minutes memorizing this hash.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 20, 2012 04:24 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 20, 2012 04:24 AM (r4/6a)
Posted by: Skyway Moaters at August 20, 2012 04:25 AM (jNNWD)
Posted by: Scobface at August 20, 2012 04:25 AM (IoNBC)
---------
No surprise there. I bet the Team Obama/MSM is beside themselves with glee that they have a new shiny object with which to distract the voters. I bet they went to church and prayed for something like this yesterday morning.
Oh wait.
Posted by: mama winger in Paul Ryan's district at August 20, 2012 04:25 AM (P6QsQ)
------
Easy. 2b4yb.
He's a 2 by 4.
Posted by: mama winger in Paul Ryan's district at August 20, 2012 04:28 AM (P6QsQ)
The guy is a shmuck. That would be my defense of his remark.
And we should get back to making SCOAMF defend the only part of his history that he can't hide, an economy strangled by massive government spending and regulation.
Intentionally.
Posted by: ontherocks at August 20, 2012 04:28 AM (aZ6ew)
Posted by: Tsar Nicholas II at August 20, 2012 04:28 AM (r2PLg)
I suppose you're all going to claim you didn't give me this cold.
<glares anyway>
Actually, I'm pretty sure it was EoJ's follow Friday Tweet...
Posted by: Mama AJ at August 20, 2012 04:29 AM (SUKHu)
Why can't all Tea Party candidates be Ron Johnson?
I'd have thought by now the mad scientists at the Evil RethugliKKKan lab would have cloned a couple dozen by now.
In other news, Paul Ryan will be in West Chester PA tomorrow.
Posted by: kallisto at August 20, 2012 04:30 AM (jm/9g)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 20, 2012 04:30 AM (Zegef)
The majority of voters will look at this and say "Yep, that was a stupid thing to say. Now how exactly does this help me get a job?"
It is either a 2 day squirrel, or a jump the shark moment.
Posted by: Dave in Fla at August 20, 2012 04:30 AM (ZJNI6)
http://is.gd/nu7fOo
(link to NY Slimes)
Think any of the parents will make a connection between the tyranny of centralized government and their kids having to eat processed meals?
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at August 20, 2012 04:31 AM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at August 20, 2012 04:32 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: mama winger in Paul Ryan's district at August 20, 2012 08:28 AM (P6QsQ)
What are you saying? I'm as dumb as a post?
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at August 20, 2012 04:33 AM (2b4yb)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 20, 2012 04:33 AM (4FvdX)
Not on Drudge
Posted by: Nicholas Kronos at August 20, 2012 04:34 AM (yxz7s)
I talked with my parents in the retirement community yesterday, and all of their friends are on board with the Ryan plan. They were shocked to learn about the $700B. No one knew about it, and they are PISSED now.
Posted by: Dave in Fla at August 20, 2012 04:35 AM (ZJNI6)
Posted by: Thorvald at August 20, 2012 04:36 AM (1V6Pv)
You know. When it's rape-rape.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at August 20, 2012 04:37 AM (8y9MW)
>>What are you saying? I'm as dumb as a post?
No, nooooo, she's saying that when you make a good point, we'll say "he whacked that with a 2x4."
Posted by: Mama AJ at August 20, 2012 04:38 AM (SUKHu)
Yum.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at August 20, 2012 04:39 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 20, 2012 04:43 AM (N6l/o)
Posted by: Will Not Assimilate For Food at August 20, 2012 04:44 AM (yCf0j)
If they are pro-abortion they're not Catholic. They're Protestants who haven't gotten clued in yet.
Although even some Protestant denominations are stepping up lately.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 20, 2012 04:47 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: nickless at August 20, 2012 04:49 AM (MMC8r)
They were laughing and high fiving each other over it.
___
What's to celebrate? The election that would be affected is in Missouri, and that state doesn't seem to be a hotbed of feminazi rage and foment. I don't know who Akins is, but if he can stay on message and compare his record to McCaskilll's rubberstamping of every Obama plan, especially Obamacare, he should be OK.
Posted by: kallisto at August 20, 2012 04:54 AM (jm/9g)
Assuming that's correct: why the hyperventilating? That's a lot more defensible than just about any position the Democrats take. It's not that baby's fault you got raped, and killing him/her is not going to un-rape you. (That's harsh, but I'm tired of dancing around the issue).
Now, It may be true that it is politically ill-advised to say it, and frankly I'd rather the Federal position on abortion at all to be that it doesn't have a position. But from a right v wrong standpoint, that's not a wrong idea.
Also- why do we always include "incest?" Either it's rape, or its consensual. If it's rape (even if it's "just" authority figure type rape, where the girl (or boy) technically "consents" because they don't feel like they have another option), then any exclusion would be under the "rape" portion, wouldn't it?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at August 20, 2012 04:56 AM (8y9MW)
Democrats target Paul Ryan on women's issues
But President Barack Obama's re-election team and its allies have also been highlighting the congressman's staunchly anti-abortion stance, hoping to buttress its argument that the Republican ticket is hostile to women's rights.
In a statement, the Obama campaign said, "American women know they can't trust a Romney/Ryan ticket to stand up for them."
"It's incredibly clear that Paul Ryan is an extreme anti-choice candidate," said Lissy Moskowitz, general counsel for NARAL Pro-Choice America. "He's a leader on this issue."
Maybe they can trot cartoon character Julia out again and have Ryan as the villain in the next installment
Posted by: TheQuietMan at August 20, 2012 04:59 AM (1Jaio)
I don't know of any Protestant denomination who is okay with abortion. Well, maybe those weirdo Unitarians (I'm not even sure they know what they believe, so how could I?), but other than that, I've never heard of any denomination that says, "Hey, abortion? Whatever. That's just between you and God."
Protestant religions (with few exceptions) don't have the concept of "excommunication" or the denial of communion, so they're not as public about their disapproval.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at August 20, 2012 04:59 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Gerry at August 20, 2012 05:00 AM (pGFQJ)
Posted by: Y-not on the phone at August 20, 2012 05:02 AM (5H6zj)
Oh, geez. So it's not his position on abortion, it's that he has no clue how procreation works. Awesome.
Memo to Rep. Akins: Stop Helping.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at August 20, 2012 05:05 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: cynder ella at August 20, 2012 05:05 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: Will Not Assimilate For Food at August 20, 2012 05:06 AM (yCf0j)
# 190
When I was still working in White Plains New York, one of my ultra lib 'co workers' had a thing for Sarah Palin, and often remarked on her statement about seeing Russia from her back yard. It didn't matter how many times I corrected her, and informed her that statement originated in an SNL skit, she was convinced in her liberal heart that SP actually said that.
Like so many liberals, they're more interested in the fantasy that liberalism promises, rather than the reality it produces. There's no other way to explain people that are going to vote for Obama this time around.
Posted by: Sticky Wicket at August 20, 2012 05:08 AM (L7hol)
Got it.
http://tinyurl.com/9b37zst
Oil look to be creeping up.
I was one of the people pissed, and I am gonna be around a lot less. Need to figure out who to give to now that I maxed my Romney contribution this cycle. Akin's being singled out is not fair and despite lowandslow's inferences it is possible to be against abortion and yield to the obstacles in the lay of the battle area making the hyperbole counterproductive.
The democrats due to media collusion have the benefit of "understood you" as in English class, when a democrat says they support abortion on demand there is "an understood you" granted them that "of course it should be rare". Lamenting about or raging about this bias will not change the presence of it. Losing nobly on the purest position possible on abortion does nothing to end the matter because it is not important enough or hyped enough nonstop to make it a prime issue.
The GOP has within it's coalition a range of views from pro-choice(usually a milder form than democrats) to strictly pro-life. If the issue can depress and create schisms within our own caucus I can't see the good of someone so inarticulate they allow themselves to use the words "legitimate, rape, abortion" in the same sentence. The average female voter has been bombarded her entire reproductive life with messages about the nobility of the planned parenthood position, and the fact you are not supposed to resist rape, and Akin no matter how noble his intentions took the rhetorical equivalent of a popgun to a howitzer fight.
It is my opinion the issues to beat Obama with could not be more clear and we should have a laser like focus on beating Obama not trying to defeat abortion with magic thinking. Attacking abortion will require at worst a true Constitutional amendment, and at a minimum a gradual approach to find the point where the SCotUS and public desire intersect. Our batting average on cases brought before the court lead me to believe it will likely take a different court, or an amendment so this is not a single cycle issue for a Congressman or a Senator and is definitely not the ideal lead position on which a Presidential campaign should pivot.
Akin has given the press a free fire mission in a box they nicely prepared with Barack with regards to "war on women". Barack *should* be on the ropes about Medicare and getting softened up for his pandering on fuel costs at the last minute after blocking petrochem development and a VERY elegant deal from Canada. Now he gets to state "I support the right to choose" without being raked over the coals as we will be.(the understood you in action)
Never mind he supports live babies being left in closets to die so his then pre-pubescent daughters would not "be punished with a baby". He never gets called on anything, held to any standard, and can do the EXACT same policies as Bush and get a pass. Rage at, or desire to hold the press accountable for the aforementioned behavior matrix while sincere and not in all likelihood offered as a distraction obscures the fact that the only way to punish Barack and the media is to defeat them by as wide a coalition as possible.
I feel Akin's mangling of his phrasing, no matter how noble his heart is is a disservice to stopping a dangerous man. Stopping Obama *is* a single cycle matter. We already have a stacked deck against us, I am aghast that a candidate for the upper chamber of the legislature does not understand the long game well enough to act like a politician on a loaded matter.
The morning round up has always been a pleasure, I do look forward to popping in when I can and missed you guys a lot during my latest absence. Even when not here Vic it is always a pleasure to read your gathering and analysis of the day to come. Be well, stay focused, and as always state your case politely to the world around you.
Monty if you read this I miss DOOM! immensely, perhaps my most cogent and well presented posts were inspired by the morning crew's rapport there
I hope you are a success at whatever you are doing and sincerely feel you could do a column in a major e-pub.
Be safe all,
sven.
Posted by: sven10077 at August 20, 2012 05:09 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: cynder ella at August 20, 2012 05:09 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: Gerry at August 20, 2012 05:09 AM (pGFQJ)
You should see the parties we had down there.
Posted by: Yeshua at August 20, 2012 08:16 AM (/kI1Q)
Remember when Eve stunk up all the fish?
The look on your face... I'd never seen you so pissed off.
Posted by: Adam at August 20, 2012 05:10 AM (qus7E)
Posted by: Polliwogette, Teahada hobbit who wants some R&R at August 20, 2012 05:14 AM (8sEhR)
The media use it as a cudgel and a caucus divider aimed at us when the democrats are in trouble in an election.
The abortion issue matters to be, but I feel a modular alteration of the battlescape is the long term way we can guide the evolution of the electorate to our ends.
The poster who stated the reduction in the abortion issue's intensity made a good point. I went deep in to debt lacking healthcare to take my now wife to the ob/gyn's when our first pregnancy was going oddly. Was well worth it despite the data we received.
Again be well all.
sven
Posted by: sven10077 at August 20, 2012 05:14 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: cynder ella at August 20, 2012 05:15 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: Serious Cat at August 20, 2012 05:16 AM (Ezq3m)
Speaking with CBS' " Entertainment Tonight," Obama recounted laboring with Clooney on the troubled region when he was a senator.
"That was an issue that I was working together on a bipartisan basis, and George, who had traveled there, done documentaries there, and was very well-informed, came to testify in Congress," he said. "And so we got to know each other, and he is a good man, and a good friend."
Nothing else to do all day but a softball interview with ET and blow his buddy Clooney
Posted by: TheQuietMan at August 20, 2012 05:17 AM (1Jaio)
Like so many liberals, they're more interested in the fantasy that liberalism promises, rather than the reality it produces.
___
That accounts for some of them, but most liberals just want to be identified with the "kewl" crowd, and who defines that crowd? The MSM. They're basically just pop culture junkies, it has nothing to do with understanding government or policy or having any vision for our nation at all. They're just desperate to fit in with the Hollywood/Manhattan acceptability narrative.
Essentially, they are insecure people looking for validation. That's how you get Catholics who support Obama: they validate their Catholic faith by loving the religion's figurehead. And they validate their worth as a citizen by supporting the MSM preazy boyfriend of the moment.
Posted by: kallisto at August 20, 2012 05:19 AM (jm/9g)
Posted by: cynder ella at August 20, 2012 05:19 AM (oZfic)
I'm much more worried about the fact he seems to think that George Clooney is a good source for advice on foreign policy.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at August 20, 2012 05:22 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: SurferDoc at August 20, 2012 05:24 AM (6H6FZ)
Posted by: nickless at August 20, 2012 05:24 AM (MMC8r)
Aslan's Girl: I'm pro-life too, but for god's sake, look at the political reality here. We still live in a country where babies can have their brains sucked out a day before the due date. Or they can be left on a table to die after they're born. Most Americans are repulsed by that, and yet it's A-OK with the Dems. If we're going to ever win the debate on abortion, let's start with the things that most people in this country agree are horrible and disgusting. For most people, that's not abortion after rape.
(/b>It's like conservatives who are angry with Ryan because his plan doesn't go far enough. We should just end Medicare, axe a bunch of federal agencies and programs, and go for a bare-bones federal government and any GOP pol who argues otherwise is a RINO. Yes, I'm all in favor of small government - but to expect it to happen overnight is absurd and suicidal, and people like Ryan understand that. Jeez, just asking for a cut in the rate of spending gets you labeled a wild-eyed extremist who is going to toss granny over the cliff.
Posted by: Donna V. at August 20, 2012 05:25 AM (EflcN)
Actually, that hasn't been true for about a decade now. America is more or less on board with the Pro-Life agenda (better than 50% last I looked). That said: it is a distraction, and it's hardly an issue that is necessary to discuss.
It also doesn't help when your "stance" on abortion flies in the face of biology.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at August 20, 2012 05:26 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Donna V. at August 20, 2012 05:31 AM (EflcN)
Posted by: Hawkins1701 at August 20, 2012 05:33 AM (MRcfR)
Posted by: cynder ella at August 20, 2012 05:34 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: SurferDoc at August 20, 2012 05:34 AM (6H6FZ)
Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at August 20, 2012 05:36 AM (hjRtO)
Or is provably wrong with a minimal amount of research.
But you are right, being pro-life is not a losing issue. I think Gallup was last to show a plurality of the electorate is pro-life, and almost at the 50% point (49% is what I remember).
Posted by: Dave in Fla at August 20, 2012 05:36 AM (ZJNI6)
Don't they come with a suicide note?
Looks like Bill OhReally told him "Fuck it, we'll do it live."
Posted by: Fareed at August 20, 2012 05:36 AM (qaVK+)
“Well,” he said, chuckling, according to a person who witnessed the encounter. “Tell your boy to watch it. He might get his ass kicked.”
Boy? That tough talk is really funny coming from Urkel.
Posted by: TheQuietMan at August 20, 2012 05:36 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: Donna V. at August 20, 2012 05:38 AM (EflcN)
Posted by: thunderb at August 20, 2012 05:40 AM (Dnbau)
Wait. I thought that the word "boy" was racist. I was reliably told by no less than the New York Times that the word "boy" was racist. Even when you don't say it; if someone just "hears" that word at then of your statement- heaven forbid you actually say it- the word "boy" is racist.
I demand an apology.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at August 20, 2012 05:40 AM (8y9MW)
Yeah, Barry that rebound is just around the corner. Funny how it will wait to show up until he's out of office
Posted by: TheQuietMan at August 20, 2012 05:40 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: nickless at August 20, 2012 09:24 AM (MMC8r)
I hate to bring it up...but if we are going to have the discussion.
- how does rape fit into 'natural selection'?
I ask because I don't think he was talking about date rape v. rape rape.
I have heard this line of argument before. It centers around the increased fertility due to arousal in mating (consensual sex) rather than mere fornication (rape-rape).
Without getting into the mechanics of it, there is a 'scientific' argument to be had about such a stance.
We don't need to have the actual argument to see where it leads us re: 'Natural Selection'. It boils down to the difference between women doing the 'selection' or men doing the 'selection'.
The answer to the question is an uncomfortable one (for the Progressive Left) if we deny the (potential) biologic function of arousal and attraction in succesful mating.
Posted by: garrett at August 20, 2012 05:40 AM (4s44r)
Posted by: katya, the designated driver at August 20, 2012 05:42 AM (DoZD+)
Because Barry is more important than the country or anything else for that matter
Posted by: TheQuietMan at August 20, 2012 05:43 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: toby928© at August 20, 2012 05:45 AM (QupBk)
Posted by: cynder ella at August 20, 2012 05:45 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: Islamic Rage Boy at August 20, 2012 05:46 AM (XN0LR)
But somehow, the Vice President saying Blacks are going to be put back in chains is no big deal.
Posted by: Dave in Fla at August 20, 2012 05:47 AM (ZJNI6)
"King of the Clowns Donald Trump will have a convention role.".
Great. Mobies are getting convention roles now?
Posted by: Burn the Witch at August 20, 2012 05:47 AM (eoedh)
Posted by: thunderb at August 20, 2012 05:49 AM (Dnbau)
"Does this mean the end of the world? Does this mean the world will turn upside down? Does it mean that we are going into the 4th dimension? And, what does this have to do with the Collective Consciousness and World Healers?"
Ugh! The wife is into this shit. I take solace in the fact that she's no liberal and is a rock solid Republican voter.
Posted by: Burn the Witch at August 20, 2012 05:49 AM (eoedh)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 20, 2012 05:50 AM (kjwIf)
Posted by: Y-not, old lady at August 20, 2012 05:50 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: cynder ella at August 20, 2012 05:51 AM (oZfic)
“Tell your boy to watch it. He might get his ass kicked.”
Looks like President Skidmark just couldn't keep his little racist union thug side hidden for 10 fucking seconds could he?
Posted by: Burn the Witch at August 20, 2012 05:52 AM (eoedh)
Posted by: Y-not, old lady at August 20, 2012 05:52 AM (5H6zj)
It's a rachet. Like the No Bodily Pleasures Except Non-Procreative/Deviant Sex fascists started with smoking, then moved on to all forms of tobacco, and now are coming after soda, and candy and cheeseburgers. Except we're on the side of good here.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at August 20, 2012 05:53 AM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: Y-not, old lady at August 20, 2012 05:53 AM (5H6zj)
A dem sent me an email "see, her health is an issue"... They wrote back: "and she too much baggage, you'll see"...
Well, then get zombie Roosevelt up here and I'll work him in after the next grandma.
Posted by: Paul Ryan, on the cliff at August 20, 2012 05:54 AM (Bm0GP)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 20, 2012 05:54 AM (2liOw)
Posted by: Burn the Witch at August 20, 2012 09:47 AM (eoedh)
Never doubt the ability of Top Men to squander and misplay a winning hand.
Posted by: Captain Hate (dagny solidarity) at August 20, 2012 05:56 AM (uIPTz)
Is it wrong to not be upset by mass suicides after Romney wins? Because I really won't be, as long as they aren't harming innocent people (there's a special place in Hell for people who commit suicide by semi-truck).
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at August 20, 2012 05:56 AM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 20, 2012 05:56 AM (2liOw)
Does this mean the end of the world?
___
Only if endless.com stops running sales on Michael Kors shoes and bags.
Posted by: kallisto at August 20, 2012 05:57 AM (jm/9g)
Posted by: thunderb at August 20, 2012 05:57 AM (Dnbau)
Posted by: Burn the Witch at August 20, 2012 05:57 AM (eoedh)
Posted by: cynder ella at August 20, 2012 05:58 AM (oZfic)
So, if you don't mind, I'll wait to slit my wrists until after the convention.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at August 20, 2012 05:58 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: thunderb at August 20, 2012 05:58 AM (Dnbau)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 20, 2012 05:59 AM (2liOw)
Posted by: pyromancer76 at August 20, 2012 06:00 AM (i0aYq)
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at August 20, 2012 09:56 AM (/kI1Q)
I've been openly advocating Jonestown 2 Arsenic Boogaloo for a long time; but the useless wanks JUST DON'T FUCKING LISTEN.
Posted by: Captain Hate (dagny solidarity) at August 20, 2012 06:02 AM (uIPTz)
Posted by: Y-not, old lady at August 20, 2012 06:02 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: toby928© at August 20, 2012 06:03 AM (QupBk)
Yeah, on a college campus when you change your mind about having slept with a guy while you were both drunk, you can just call the Dean of Women and get him kicked out of school without ever having a real trial.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at August 20, 2012 06:04 AM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: Y-not, old lady at August 20, 2012 06:04 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: cynder ella at August 20, 2012 06:04 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: thunderb at August 20, 2012 06:05 AM (Dnbau)
"You're talking about President Mom Jeans who needs Valerie Jarrett to shake it after he goes wee wee?"
Of course. After all, we know very well that this clown has never Walked The Walk, but can stutter the talk like nobody's business.
Posted by: Burn the Witch at August 20, 2012 06:06 AM (eoedh)
Posted by: Y-not, old lady at August 20, 2012 06:06 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: cynder ella at August 20, 2012 06:06 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 20, 2012 06:07 AM (kf9WN)
Posted by: Polliwogette, Teahada hobbit who wants some R&R at August 20, 2012 06:07 AM (8sEhR)
Posted by: cynder ella at August 20, 2012 06:10 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: thunderb at August 20, 2012 06:10 AM (Dnbau)
"I never need to hear from Cain, Gingrich or Santorum again."
Same here. Except for maybe Newt. He's a decent proxy attack dog.
The final nail in Cain's coffin for me was the other day listening to him sub for Boortz when he used the "both sides do it" line with a caller. There's a time to utter that line, and this wasn't the right time.
Posted by: Burn the Witch at August 20, 2012 06:11 AM (eoedh)
Posted by: cynder ella at August 20, 2012 06:11 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: archie goodwin at August 20, 2012 06:11 AM (ctjsq)
Posted by: cynder ella at August 20, 2012 06:13 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 20, 2012 06:14 AM (2liOw)
Posted by: thunderb at August 20, 2012 06:14 AM (Dnbau)
Posted by: cynder ella at August 20, 2012 06:16 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: cynder ella at August 20, 2012 06:16 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 20, 2012 06:18 AM (NCkFb)
Hey was thinking about your post on the treadmill.
You recall the conversation you, Monty, and I had on the death of dividenditure as a primary concern due to the rise of the day trader and their bent for playing the stock market like roulette? This tactic seems to ally itself with the HFT, Bonus situation as well. One thing about the way the market worked for the most part in the run up to the mid to late 90s was that the Company prospectus was geared to explain the utility of capital shifted to organizational improvements.
People knew something was up with RJR/Nabisco based on the case study for new ovens for the Nabisco lines, and that was read as an indicator there was an attempt being made at a shedding of the Nabisco operation rightly or wrongly.
A different era, and perhaps, arguably the beginning of the rise of the "pump up price for its own sake" period we now "enjoy".
all the best,
sven
Posted by: sven10077 at August 20, 2012 06:20 AM (LRFds)
It's fucking stupid and needless at this time.
The general consensus is that Republicans are backwards thinking knuckledraggers and this disphit talking about women having some kind of psyiological rape sperm sensing killbots is fucking retarded.
WE SHOULD NOT BE TALKING ABOUT RAPE!!!!
Posted by: General Woundwort at August 20, 2012 06:20 AM (06lNq)
Look, he is wrong about the physiology of conception
Only he isn't...or at least he might just be misinformed as to the accuracy of his understanding, thereof.
(Assuming he is making the argument I believe him to be making.)
It's not rocket science. The PH of the Vagina is inhospitable to sperm. Arousal creates a 'buffer' to that PH level allowing sperm to survive long enough to achieve conception.
This is the root of the Ham Fisted argument this guy was making. Is he an idiot to make the argument in the time and place he did? Absolutely.
Is he wrong? That remains to be demonstrated. If he can be proven wrong, the Progs might have to admit that women have no affect on Natural Selection.
Posted by: garrett at August 20, 2012 06:20 AM (fW3WV)
I wouldn't be surprised if he politely declined an invitation, behind the scenes. His popularity is considerably less solid now than it was before that pathetic excuse for a Presidential run. Reminding Texans that he lost to Mitt Romney is probably not high on his list of priorities.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at August 20, 2012 06:21 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: cynder ella at August 20, 2012 06:22 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 20, 2012 06:24 AM (9hekj)
Look, if you oppose abortion in all cases, including rape or incest, then your response should simply be "I feel very badly for victims of rape, but abortion is murder, no matter how the baby was conceived, and I oppose it." You should not jump to some line of reasoning based on false rape allegations or dubious medical claims.
Posted by: not the mama at August 20, 2012 06:26 AM (96Kco)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 20, 2012 06:27 AM (9hekj)
Posted by: and irresolute at August 20, 2012 06:28 AM (Q492A)
Someone suggested, above, that roughly 5% of rape results in pregnancy. I'm not sure about the veracity of that statistic, and I don't think a source was cited (if it was, please correct me). However, it's even close, that's actually a pretty high rate, which would suggest that he's wrong.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at August 20, 2012 06:28 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 20, 2012 06:30 AM (9hekj)
I'm sort of "meh" about Marco Rubio, and actively dubious of Cruz. As I lamented several times during the primary- the best Texas could do was David Dewhurst, A Lawyer, The Man Liberal Enough to be elected Mayor of Dallas, and a Sports Caster whose claim to fame was getting one of the most beloved coaches in Texas Tech history fired.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at August 20, 2012 06:31 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 20, 2012 06:34 AM (9hekj)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 20, 2012 06:36 AM (9hekj)
Posted by: thunderb at August 20, 2012 06:37 AM (Dnbau)
Saint Augustine wrote that conception could not occur without female orgasm.
Posted by: comatus at August 20, 2012 06:38 AM (qaVK+)
Posted by: Y-not, old lady at August 20, 2012 06:40 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 20, 2012 06:41 AM (9hekj)
>>Couldn't ovulation create a buffer as well? The cervical mucus thickens to help the sperm out. I thought they could live in your vagina for up to five days, too?
Yes. Ovulation is/would be a mitigating factor of this argument.
The argument is, at least in its biology, an interesting one.
Like I stated previously, the implications for the Theory of Natural Selection are great as well. .
Posted by: garrett at August 20, 2012 06:42 AM (fW3WV)
Posted by: Y-not, old lady at August 20, 2012 10:40 AM (5H6zj)
As long as we're inspecting paperwork, I demand to see your old lady credentials.
........yeah, just like I thought kiddo.
Posted by: ontherocks at August 20, 2012 06:46 AM (aZ6ew)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 20, 2012 06:47 AM (9hekj)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 20, 2012 06:50 AM (9hekj)
Posted by: thunderb at August 20, 2012 06:51 AM (Dnbau)
Posted by: Comrade Arthur at August 20, 2012 06:51 AM (d9tUw)
Posted by: Y-not, old lady at August 20, 2012 06:52 AM (5H6zj)
LOS ANGELES – In the age of Facebook and Twitter, a new crime has hit America: "Sharpie parties," gatherings of party revelers armed with "Sharpie" magic markers and lured by social media invitations to wreak havoc on foreclosed homes.
Five years into the U.S. foreclosure crisis, Sharpie parties are a new form of blight on the landscape of boarded-up homes, brown lawns and abandoned streets. They are also the latest iteration of collective home-trashing spurred by social media.
Yeah...here's praying we don't "get the government we deserve" if/when these little darlings come of political sensibility age.
regards,
sven
Posted by: sven10077 at August 20, 2012 06:54 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 20, 2012 06:57 AM (9hekj)
Women see this as blaming the victim. And it is offensive as hell. (For the record I am a woman.)
Posted by: Yermo at August 20, 2012 06:57 AM (E3/4A)
Raped Mom Who Chose Adoption Meets Daughter 77 Years Later http://t.co/HCBbDHbK #Todd #Akin pro-life #prolife
Unpossible!
Posted by: Y-not, old lady at August 20, 2012 10:52 AM (5H6zj)
What a story! I thought your '77 years later' must have been a typo.
Posted by: Tami at August 20, 2012 07:01 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at August 20, 2012 07:03 AM (Ec6wH)
Posted by: thunderb at August 20, 2012 07:03 AM (Dnbau)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 20, 2012 07:04 AM (fP+1P)
Posted by: Y-not, old lady at August 20, 2012 07:04 AM (5H6zj)
I am not defending anyone and I am certainly not the champion of this argument.
I am just pointing out the argument I believe that this guy was making. I don't think he was making a distinction between flase claims of rape and actual rape.
The fact that he mentioned a feminine 'mechanism' is what leads me to believe this is, in fact, his claim.
That being the case, I am trying to flesh out the argument.
Like I said, I find the appeal to this argument in the implication it has for the Theory of Naturla Selection.
Posted by: garrett at August 20, 2012 07:09 AM (fW3WV)
Jesus...are y'all still on about Akin?
Its no big deal chill.
Everyone knows women have magic vaginas that can stop rape sperm cold.
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka Wright at August 20, 2012 07:10 AM (ovpNn)
Women see this as blaming the victim. And it is offensive as hell. (For the record I am a woman.)
what? come on, women aren't offended when some ignorant male says something stupid....look at Biden.
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka Wright at August 20, 2012 07:12 AM (ovpNn)
Posted by: thunderb at August 20, 2012 07:12 AM (Dnbau)
and by appeal, I mean intellectual appeal.
It brings something to the table re: the' Power of Procreation', that pervades the Feminist Academic Agenda.
Posted by: garrett at August 20, 2012 07:12 AM (fW3WV)
I am pretty sure the earth is 12,012 years old at least...I saw that Roland Emerich Movie 10,000 B.C.
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka Wright at August 20, 2012 07:14 AM (ovpNn)
Posted by: thunderb at August 20, 2012 07:14 AM (Dnbau)
That's mean-spirited. Good.
Posted by: Comrade Arthur at August 20, 2012 10:51 AM (d9tUw)
Have to say that it gave my shriveled little heart a warm fuzzy. Surprised to see such a practical application though.
Posted by: Polliwogette, teahada hobbit who wants some R & R at August 20, 2012 07:14 AM (8sEhR)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 20, 2012 07:15 AM (cCrvC)
Posted by: Y-not, old lady at August 20, 2012 07:15 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: JewishOdysseus at August 20, 2012 07:15 AM (R8MB3)
Posted by: Y-not, old lady at August 20, 2012 10:52 AM (5H6zj)
The (I assume former since it's been a few years) mayor of Ft. Collins wrote a book about growing up in the CO orphanage system and searching for his birth-mother as an adult. He was pro-life to begin with, but finding his birth-mother and learning that he was the result of a rape when she was a young teen-ager really deepened his belief that life is precious.
Posted by: Polliwogette, teahada hobbit who wants some R & R at August 20, 2012 07:18 AM (8sEhR)
Posted by: sven10077 at August 20, 2012 10:54 AM (LRFds)
Why would they need to when the forclosedees often take anything of any value ( like the wiring and plumbing fixtures) out of the house when they leave already?
Posted by: Polliwogette, teahada hobbit who wants some R & R at August 20, 2012 07:19 AM (8sEhR)
Its highly unlikely he could say anything else stupid. I am pretty sure he exceeded his stupid allotment for the year...the real problem is that he cosponsored a bill with our dreamy Paul Ryan and that tenuous connection is going to be used to connect this asshat and his ignorant comments with Paul to drag him down and demonize him.
I dont want to sound hysterical, but if he stays in the race its a bad thing for Missouri, for the GOP winning the senate majority, and for the presidential ticket in regards to women voters and independants.
This numbnuts just fucked the republicans big time.
And if you don't think thats true, enjoy the coverage of the "Legitimate Rape Party" Convention thats about to hit.
Republicans - Using social issues to beat themselves through shear stupidity.
Democrats - Lying about social issues to beat republicans every time.
We dont get to play by the same rules...stop thinking that we do.
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka Wright at August 20, 2012 07:19 AM (ovpNn)
Posted by: thunderb at August 20, 2012 07:20 AM (Dnbau)
If they are smart they will beg palin to be point man on this and call for his head and push steelman.
Then they can come behind and say the groundswell of conservative base wants this moron out so he is out.
But are they smart?
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka Wright at August 20, 2012 07:22 AM (ovpNn)
Posted by: Y-not, old lady at August 20, 2012 07:24 AM (5H6zj)
Oh yeah i can see that going well.
all it will take is one democrat rape child plant with incindiary questions to get in his face and get him to make another unforced error about magic vaginas and their anti rape superpowers, or that rape isn't really legitamate if they were carried to term, cause obviously their mamma liked it or they would have shut it down....please....lets not stick his hand in the garbage disposal again...once was enough...just get him out of the kitchen.
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka Wright at August 20, 2012 07:25 AM (ovpNn)
from post 293 in the other thread:
The issue the Dems are trying to run on, abortion, is dead last in voter importance.
___
Just trying to add a little perspective here. Pat Toomey won a senate seat in BLUE Pennsylvania. His solid conservative voting record wasn't exactly a state secret. I'm not in Missouri, but the sense I get is that they hate McCaskill with the heat of a thousand suns. Whatever traction the dems think they get with the Akins gaffe, McCaskill can't take back her obamacare vote, period.
Posted by: kallisto at August 20, 2012 07:27 AM (jm/9g)
>>Moreover, it's unnecessary.
agreed. completely.
>>BTW, I am not discounting that there might be some studies that have been used to argue you need orgasms to conceive (or that rape is very unlikely to result in conception)....
Well, the famous 'Fellating Fruit Bat' study seemed to indicate that (feminine arousal and) willing participation in coitus results in much higher rates of pregnancy...among fruit bats.
As for studies that examine the effects of arousal on succesful reproductive activity in Primates...I can't point to a specific example.
My formal training is in argumentation, not the specific argument at hand.
Posted by: garrett at August 20, 2012 07:27 AM (fW3WV)
Posted by: Brother Cavil, straight outta New Cap City at August 20, 2012 07:27 AM (GBXon)
Posted by: thunderb at August 20, 2012 07:27 AM (Dnbau)
Posted by: Y-not, old lady at August 20, 2012 07:28 AM (5H6zj)
My reading of Cali is that the sharpie party thing is in otherwise non catastrophically abused structures.
This behavior is a large part of why California is the living embodiment of the Blue vision for the United States under their current Cloward-Piven gambit.
Force banks to make loans to low margin of error buyers and then argue a kabuki theater production of a morality play about the sob story reasons why banks are ethically required to screw their investors out of any recovery of lost investment potential.
That is why this election matters to me, we are facing the end of the 2d of three stages of their attack on the idea of self-reliance and personal responsibility and too many people are responding for my comfort.
Regards,
sven
Posted by: sven10077 at August 20, 2012 07:29 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: The Dogs at August 20, 2012 07:29 AM (dZq0z)
Posted by: thunderb at August 20, 2012 07:30 AM (Dnbau)
Seriously? I'm sorry but what the what?
Guy needs to go. The sooner the better. If he can step in it this massively, it's only a matter of time before he does it again because he is too dumb to be in national politics. He's probably done stupid shit like this before, but no one was paying attention.
Posted by: Yermo at August 20, 2012 07:31 AM (E3/4A)
Posted by: thunderb at August 20, 2012 11:27 AM (Dnbau)
Thunderb I can't remember if you're from MO or not. If you're not, and want them to drop Akin, demanding he be dropped isn't going to get you far. Appearing to find him sad and pathetic and worthy of pity for being so stupid *might* work. There's a reason the mule is a sumbol of Missouri.
Posted by: Polliwogette, teahada hobbit who wants some R & R at August 20, 2012 07:32 AM (8sEhR)
What kind of a parent tells a child they were the product of a rape?
I was talking about the suggestion about akin meeting with children.
Posted by: Yermo at August 20, 2012 07:33 AM (E3/4A)
Posted by: Polliwogette, teahada hobbit who wants some R & R at August 20, 2012 07:34 AM (8sEhR)
Posted by: thunderb at August 20, 2012 07:34 AM (Dnbau)
Posted by: naturalfake at August 20, 2012 07:36 AM (54vf8)
Posted by: thunderb at August 20, 2012 07:39 AM (Dnbau)
thats a winning argument right there.
Mail that to the Romney campaign...i am sure it will help them with the women and independent voting block.
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka Wright at August 20, 2012 07:41 AM (ovpNn)
Posted by: thunderb at August 20, 2012 11:34 AM (Dnbau)
Well , if you believe that Akin going will help Romney then you're going to have to lay off of him. I know that's hard, and certainly counter-intuitive, but you'll have to *show* the people of MO how it's in *their* interest to get rid of him and not simply demand that they do so.
Posted by: Polliwogette, teahada hobbit who wants some R & R at August 20, 2012 07:41 AM (8sEhR)
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka Wright at August 20, 2012 07:42 AM (ovpNn)
Posted by: thunderb at August 20, 2012 07:42 AM (Dnbau)
Posted by: thunderb at August 20, 2012 11:42 AM (Dnbau)
Well, there is a fairly large contingent of MO commenters here. If you want to convince us that this is really going to sink Akin so that *we* will work to influence our state, then you're going to need something besides emotional demands.
Posted by: Polliwogette, teahada hobbit who wants some R & R at August 20, 2012 07:45 AM (8sEhR)
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka Wright at August 20, 2012 07:46 AM (ovpNn)
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at August 20, 2012 07:46 AM (Ec6wH)
Posted by: sven10077 at August 20, 2012 11:29 AM (LRFds)
So they take whatever homes *may* be able to recoup the loss and prevent those from doing so as well? We need another one of those speeches from "It's a Wonderful Life" reminding people just whose money that is that's being lost in those cases.
Posted by: Polliwogette, teahada hobbit who wants some R & R at August 20, 2012 07:47 AM (8sEhR)
Posted by: garrett at August 20, 2012 07:48 AM (fW3WV)
Well, there is a fairly large contingent of MO commenters here. If you want to convince us that this is really going to sink Akin so that *we* will work to influence our state, then you're going to need something besides emotional demands. Posted by: Polliwogette
Well think of it this way, if the msm makes this front and center and tars ryan with it because he cosponsored bills with Akin and the net result is it turns off 1-3% of the female vote and romney loses a swing state or two because of that, is it worth it to keep Akin?
This is not the election to fight this issue.
Its time to save the country.
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka Wright at August 20, 2012 07:49 AM (ovpNn)
Posted by: The Dogs at August 20, 2012 07:51 AM (dZq0z)
--
I read that as the "Power of Procrastination" and thought finally, a feminist agenda I can get on board with.
--says Mayday, who is keeps putting off a work project
Posted by: Mayday at August 20, 2012 07:53 AM (F3s39)
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka Wright at August 20, 2012 11:49 AM (ovpNn)
Much better. Honestly, I don't know if it's *possible* to dump him at this point (and I'm worried what the next MFM attack will be if we do) but that's at least a coherent argument whose points can be weighed.
Posted by: Polliwogette, teahada hobbit who wants some R & R at August 20, 2012 07:54 AM (8sEhR)
I am really surprised by this. I have followed Ridley Scott's career for years, but never Tony's. They both seemed very well adjusted and balanced from any interviews where they were together, and Ridley always struck me as very centered....I just never expected this from a Scott.
RPatz or KSew, sure....although i suspect KStew would have put on a lifejacket and called the press before jumping.
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka Wright at August 20, 2012 07:54 AM (ovpNn)
We are going to get hit with all kinds of shit between now and november, but this is an issue we can easily defang so it doesnt continue to bite us along with all the other bullshit.
He can be replaced and ideally with a female replacement. The optics of that are excellent actually.
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka Wright at August 20, 2012 07:56 AM (ovpNn)
It's a wonderful life happened in an era where people were told that fascism was making gains at easing worker pain in Europe so they happily allowed Hoover and FDR to dabble in the dark art of it. At their core they had living memory of relatively unencumbered free market in action economics. They were taught in civis how an economy worked and what was needed for growth.
You want to understand a sliver of my pessimism audit a civics course if your district even offers it anymore. Ask to see the course materials for an hour as a concerned taxpayer. Nancy, Harry, and Barry passed CORE a national standardization of curricula standards and baseline POV that it to be implemented in another 5 years.
I'll go out on a limb and say the NEA and Donks are gonna go full Jar Jar and encourage even more indoctrination to education ratio stick time.
The only kids coming out of high school with an unencumbered grasp of the free market are the drug dealers and a small percentage of kids who learn it from mom and dad or econ honors students.
Them's the facts I fear.
regards,
sven
Posted by: sven10077 at August 20, 2012 07:58 AM (LRFds)
Not everyone who commits suicide is clinically depressed.
There's not enough information about Tony Scott to know either way.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at August 20, 2012 08:01 AM (/kI1Q)
Donald Trump is getting a speaking role at the Republican Convention...
Sarah Palin is NOT getting a speaking role and isn't even invited...
Fucking Morons...seriously...we wont stand by Sarah after all she has done for the party, but Mr Hairpie and his birtherism is good for the party to put on the national stage.
Where do they come up with these brilliant ideas? Did Obama send the GOP some holiday CHOOM?
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka Wright at August 20, 2012 08:02 AM (ovpNn)
The penultimate thing the abortion-uber-alles crowd wants is for people to know science.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at August 20, 2012 08:03 AM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: JParker at August 20, 2012 08:07 AM (8HhF2)
Posted by: thunderb at August 20, 2012 08:07 AM (Dnbau)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 20, 2012 08:08 AM (i330i)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 20, 2012 08:12 AM (i330i)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 20, 2012 08:17 AM (i330i)
Posted by: naturalfake at August 20, 2012 08:21 AM (54vf8)
That's the surest sign someone is a complete freak. You really think if someone's wife or daughter was raped and they were pregnant, they would want to raise that child as their own? Would you want to adopt a baby conceived in rape?
For the 1% of the population that has this view? Fine, if you're raped, have the child, but leave the rest of us alone and don't completely undermine the argument of abortion as a form of birth control. It's too the point where I'm willing to go pro-choice just because I'm so sick of these weirdos.
Posted by: Brady at August 20, 2012 08:22 AM (0kf1G)
Posted by: sven10077 at August 20, 2012 11:58 AM (LRFds)
Agreed. Which is why I started homeschooling recently.
Posted by: Polliwogette, teahada hobbit who wants some R & R at August 20, 2012 08:23 AM (8sEhR)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 20, 2012 12:17 PM (i330i)
Wouldn't it be hard for them to be taken seriously *as* a conservative if that was their platform?
Posted by: Polliwogette, teahada hobbit who wants some R & R at August 20, 2012 08:24 AM (8sEhR)
Posted by: joe at August 20, 2012 08:26 AM (i3OIF)
Posted by: Brady at August 20, 2012 12:22 PM (0kf1G)
Yeah, makes perfect sense..../s
And I suspect you already are pro choice.
Posted by: Tami at August 20, 2012 08:28 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: Y-not, old lady at August 20, 2012 08:28 AM (5H6zj)
Women actually do this, so yes.
Would you want to adopt a baby conceived in rape?
What did the baby do wrong that it's unworthy of life?
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at August 20, 2012 08:30 AM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: naturalfake at August 20, 2012 08:30 AM (54vf8)
Best of luck sincerely. I decided against it because of my own experiences with my history education degree pursuit experience. I have a severe temper for student apathy and had an "interesting" upbringing, so even though unacted on almost always I have a very high fight or flight response matrix. My son is my only chance at parenthood and I was uncomfortable gambling on my ability to not have our relationship suffer from the increased stress.
You have my partial envy, and my sincerest hopes for success.
All the best,
sven
Posted by: sven10077 at August 20, 2012 08:32 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: FPW at August 20, 2012 08:36 AM (BDNF5)
Posted by: Y-not, old lady at August 20, 2012 08:38 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: @PurpAv at August 20, 2012 08:41 AM (LK8M1)
Posted by: Y-not, old lady at August 20, 2012 08:45 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 20, 2012 08:45 AM (i330i)
Posted by: cynder ella at August 20, 2012 08:50 AM (oZfic)
pregnant, they would want to raise that child as their own?
Women actually do this, so yes.
Would you
want to adopt a baby conceived in rape?
What did the baby do wrong that it's unworthy of life?
That doesn't answer the question.
If YOU were raped (assuming you're a female) would you give birth to it and raise the child as your own? What about if was your daughter?
Would YOU adopt a baby that was the product of a rape?
How about this, would you take a morning after pill? Should that also be illegal?
Posted by: Brady at August 20, 2012 08:56 AM (0kf1G)
Posted by: cynder ella at August 20, 2012 08:58 AM (oZfic)
Because in reality, Huckabee is neither conservative or a republican, he's just religious. The constraints of Republic don't appeal to him particularly, and fiscal restraint isn't something he's fond of either.
Posted by: @PurpAv at August 20, 2012 09:01 AM (LK8M1)
Mike Huckabee's problem with Barack Obama's imperial use of power is he is NOT Barack Obama.
well put friend
Posted by: sven10077 at August 20, 2012 09:04 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 20, 2012 09:05 AM (i330i)
Posted by: naturalfake at August 20, 2012 09:46 AM (54vf8)
Posted by: steevy at August 20, 2012 10:32 AM (6o4Fb)
Back in the early 70's, pre Roe v Wade, there were a few of big issues for feminists: equal pay for equal work, language changes (chairperson for chairman,etc) and changing the rape laws. At that time, in many states, a charge of rape could not be brought unless semen was found in the victim's vagina. Feminist argument was that rape is not a sexual act but rather an act of power. They also claimed that most rapists are non-functional and are unable to ejaculate normally so there is very seldom any semen in the vagina after a rape. If this is true, there would be very few pregnancies after rape. This of course was before abortion became the only thing that feminists care about. Now to listen to pro aborts, every act of rape results in a pregnancy. Neither stance is true. Pregnancy can result from rape. This does not mean that the child conceived deserves the death penalty for the crimes of the father. And, yes, if I became pregnant as the result of rape, I would bear the child. Whether I parented the child or placed him for adoption would depend on other circumstances, but I would not execute him.
Posted by: Terentia at August 20, 2012 12:16 PM (Z2s5P)
Posted by: Benson II at August 20, 2012 04:02 PM (LaNrP)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.5132 seconds, 540 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Vic at August 20, 2012 02:54 AM (YdQQY)