July 31, 2012
— Ace If they're in the black, why all the pink slips?
t’s not that people are leaving GM. It’s how they leave. Two weeks ago, Opel chief Karl-Friedrich Stracke presented numbers to Dan Akerson. Akerson fires him. Opel gets two interim chiefs in a week. Last Thursday, Opel’s new design chief Dave Lyon doesn’t even start his job. Today, media in the U.S. and Germany report that Lyon had been escorted from the building and to a waiting car by GM’s head of personnel. A day later, global marketing chief Joel Ewanick suddenly leaves....It all looks like Dan Akerson is panicking. The GM stock is at an all-time low. GM is losing market share. When July numbers will be announced this week, GM won’t look so good, industry oracles say. Mass executions always are great to deflect criticism – for a while.
GM's sales, meanwhile, increasingly rely on subprime lending -- lending, that is, to credit risks, who use that loan to buy GM stock. This is a problem, because these loans are issued by GM Financial, which is owned by GM, and, therefore, the American public.
Posted by: Ace at
06:40 AM
| Comments (151)
Post contains 206 words, total size 1 kb.
You are.
http://tinyurl.com/bwqqpru
And at over twice the rate of the old sponsorship.
Awesome.
Posted by: AmishDude at July 31, 2012 06:43 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at July 31, 2012 06:45 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Lilredhen at July 31, 2012 06:45 AM (IyKYr)
Oh. If you were an Obama Donor it worked out pretty well, I guess...
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at July 31, 2012 06:45 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: maddogg at July 31, 2012 06:46 AM (OlN4e)
Not Obama, obviously.
Posted by: Cicero at July 31, 2012 06:47 AM (zMouK)
Government Motors- I was smart enough to avoid Facebook; I wasn't given a choice with GM.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at July 31, 2012 06:48 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: FORD Owner Since '65 at July 31, 2012 06:48 AM (msPO3)
@11 - FB is the worse investment.
When GM finally croaks, there will be stuff to sell off. Equipment, spares, etc...
If FB were to "end," all that needs to happen is an FDISK.
Posted by: reason at July 31, 2012 06:49 AM (sPO/s)
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at July 31, 2012 06:51 AM (HLFzM)
Posted by: BurtTC at July 31, 2012 06:51 AM (TOk1P)
Posted by: The GMstapo vill ask zee questions! at July 31, 2012 06:52 AM (sPO/s)
Posted by: soothsayer jumps in without reading at July 31, 2012 06:53 AM (3Aqe5)
What are you wingnuts lying about now?
Posted by: RoyalOil at July 31, 2012 06:54 AM (imtbm)
this unexpected, and most definitely unasked for, reality stuff is definitely racist. And mean. And stuff.
Posted by: Chariots of Toast at July 31, 2012 06:54 AM (ksERZ)
GM will probably do a regular bankruptcy this time, I assume. I'd hate to be a GM supplier right now. Lots of bills are not going to get paid. More suppliers, the ones dumb enough to extend credit to GM, are going down. The auto industry will suffer even more disruption, and while foreign suppliers will be bailed out by their governments, domestic suppliers will be allowed to take the gas pipe. But perhaps this time the UAW will NOT be bailed out. That would be magnificent. They had their chance to be reasonable and help GM make it - but they did what they always do - screw the pooch.
Posted by: Reactionary at July 31, 2012 06:54 AM (xUM1Q)
Posted by: Chariots of Toast at July 31, 2012 06:54 AM (ksERZ)
I hate to say "I told you so" to 52% of the country...but you know, Glenn Beck explained how this whole mess was going to turn out back in 2009.
And he did it using a wooden Thomas the Tank Engine playset as a visual aid.
Because even a three-year-old knows which order the cars are supposed to go in.
Posted by: reason at July 31, 2012 06:55 AM (sPO/s)
GM paid zero in federal income taxes in 2011 too.
That break will reduce GM's U.S. tax bill by an estimated $14 billion in the coming years, and its global taxes by close to $19 billion, according to a company filing.
Posted by: Jay at July 31, 2012 06:55 AM (3LaGb)
They needed to fail and invalidate the union contracts. Not faail and invaldate the investors by rewarding the unions. I just want to know why the State of Indiana dropped their civil suit.
Posted by: Vic at July 31, 2012 06:55 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: garrett at July 31, 2012 06:56 AM (+qVLK)
Posted by: Reactionary
No way this will happen, in an election year. He needs the UAW. Especially after Wisconsin.
Posted by: Blue Hen at July 31, 2012 06:56 AM (dQKMZ)
Posted by: WalrusRex at July 31, 2012 06:56 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: Airheaded Liberal Economist, Ph.D. at July 31, 2012 06:56 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: willow at July 31, 2012 06:57 AM (TomZ9)
Posted by: BurtTC at July 31, 2012 06:57 AM (TOk1P)
Semi-rhetorical question, just want to see what y'all say.
Posted by: Chariots of Toast at July 31, 2012 06:57 AM (ksERZ)
FAIL
healthcare...... Posted by: willow
Insert 'US Post Office'
"The U.S. Postal Service affirmed it wonÂ’t make a required $5.5 billion payment due tomorrow to the U.S. Treasury for future retireesÂ’ health care, an obligation the agency said must end for it to become financially viable."
Cue sad trombone!
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at July 31, 2012 06:57 AM (5FvTK)
Posted by: Don McLean at July 31, 2012 06:58 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: Redd at July 31, 2012 06:58 AM (Lia1Q)
"One day son this will all be yours."
And laid out in neat rows vast acres of cars bleaching in the sun. Tires slowing cracking and deflating. Safety glass crazing and paint bleaching. All the cars are of such marquees as Cadillac and Corvette.
The son is puzzled. "Why mine?"
"Because this is all the great and mighty Obama could gift upon you."
Posted by: Anna Puma at July 31, 2012 06:58 AM (+SmuD)
Posted by: CNN Markets Analyst at July 31, 2012 06:59 AM (sPO/s)
Subprime lending? So what? When has subprime lending EVER been a problem? It's not like it could ever tank the economy!
(in case it's not obvious, [/sarc])
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter at July 31, 2012 06:59 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: maddogg at July 31, 2012 06:59 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Blue Hen at July 31, 2012 10:56 AM (dQKMZ)
-----------------------
-----------------------
GM will not go down before the election. Even if the news is terrible, they'll limp along a while longer. There's too much inertia in this beast. I think the next failure will probably not fully kick in until Mitt's in the oval office. The problem there is that we'll have to let them go bankrupt. Much of the country will see the justice in it, but there will also be great wailing and gnashing of teeth. The media will hammer us for it.
Posted by: Reactionary at July 31, 2012 07:00 AM (xUM1Q)
Why have one bubble when you can have three or four??
Posted by: dananjcon at July 31, 2012 07:00 AM (eavT+)
Two weeks ago, Opel chief Karl-Friedrich Stracke presented numbers to Dan Akerson. Akerson fires him.
Stracke acted stupidly.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter at July 31, 2012 07:02 AM (4df7R)
weft cute, They refuse to learn from the mistakes.
I suppose one doesn't have to when you have a Large population and They have a rapid response Team of New IRS workers..
Posted by: willow at July 31, 2012 07:02 AM (TomZ9)
Posted by: Chariots of Toast at July 31, 2012 10:57 AM (ksERZ)
-------------------
-------------------
I don't think it will happen in time to matter. But if it does, I think it will be a nice blow to Barky here. The UAW will see that he's no savior to them, and more will stay home.
Posted by: Reactionary at July 31, 2012 07:03 AM (xUM1Q)
Was it a Ford?
Posted by: Tami at July 31, 2012 07:03 AM (X6akg)
"I'm not a lawyer, nor do I play one on tv, so can anyone explain to a simple caveman like me, how did GM get the special bankruptcy, and not get sued out the wazoo by the bondholders who were left holding the empty bag? "
Because the bondholders were threatened with being called raysis and/or greedy.
These things still sorta worked back then.
Posted by: reason at July 31, 2012 07:03 AM (sPO/s)
Posted by: WalrusRex at July 31, 2012 07:03 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: Anna Puma at July 31, 2012 07:04 AM (+SmuD)
Not entirely sure. Up until this year the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation was, aka Dah Taxpayah.
"The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) is an independent agency of the United States government that was created by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) "
However,
"Last week [May 2012], General Motors announced that it will offer 42,000 of its salaried retirees the opportunity to take their lifetime monthly pension benefits as a one-time lump-sum payment. Retirees who donÂ’t take the lump-sum offer will receive an annuity equivalent to their pensions from Prudential."
So, I'm still going with Dah Taxpayah but who knows...
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at July 31, 2012 07:04 AM (5FvTK)
That's to say nothing that the control arm bushings that are totally wrecked within the first years of ownership for everyone. The coilovers need to be replaced and even steering intermediate shafts including any purchase replacements have have "Obamad" right out the gate because of a bad design and lack of lube.
First and Last GM ever!
Posted by: Shiggz RoketSturgeon at July 31, 2012 07:04 AM (RfvTE)
50 -
So they did sue, and got tossed by the Supremes? On what grounds, and how were we not calling for their impeachment, long before they got a chance to rule on Obamacare?
Egad, we're just like Liberia. No rule of law, but at least we're not drinking the blood and eating the hearts of our enemies. Yet.
Posted by: BurtTC at July 31, 2012 07:04 AM (TOk1P)
I don't know why everyone's being so stupid. GM makes the Chevy Volt, right? And India is, having another really big, blackout, right? So there's lots of, Indian people, who don't, have power. So GM should sell, the Volts, to India so that the India people, will have power! GM makes money and, India has the Voltage necessary to, feed their holy cows or whatever.
Win win!
Posted by: Meggy Mac, RINO Braintrust at July 31, 2012 07:05 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Anna Puma at July 31, 2012 07:05 AM (+SmuD)
Posted by: #OccupyResoluteDesk at July 31, 2012 07:05 AM (iSpik)
Posted by: TheQuietMan at July 31, 2012 07:06 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at July 31, 2012 07:06 AM (Ec6wH)
>>Because the bondholders were threatened with being called raysis and/or greedy
I am pretty sure it went to the courts.
Posted by: garrett at July 31, 2012 07:06 AM (+qVLK)
Posted by: Squaw Elizabeth Warren at July 31, 2012 07:06 AM (msPO3)
GM's sales, meanwhile, increasingly rely on subprime lending -- lending, that is, to credit risks, who use that loan to buy GM stock. This is a problem, because these loans are issued by GM Financial, which is owned by GM, and, therefore, the American public.
"Hey! We invented that dodge -- using company stock to finance sales at our Special Purpose Entities. Where's our cut -- make with the royalties!" --- Ghost of Ken Lay and Inmate #8675309 in Federal POUND ME IN THE ASS Prison (aka Jeff Skilling).
You know, the Smartest Guys In The Room.
Posted by: Count de Monet at July 31, 2012 07:06 AM (BAS5M)
Posted by: WalrusRex at July 31, 2012 07:07 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: Tim the Enchanter at July 31, 2012 07:07 AM (izA2D)
@57 - Indeed. I had one as a loaner on a trip not too long ago. Horrid. Not even 10K on it, and it already rattled like someone spilled a bag of M&M's into the dash.
Before that, I had gotten an Avenger. Another insight into why GM is still floundering.
Posted by: reason at July 31, 2012 07:07 AM (sPO/s)
Posted by: dogfish at July 31, 2012 07:08 AM (N2yhW)
Posted by: Tax Payersteen at July 31, 2012 07:09 AM (hnhBR)
Egad, we're just like Liberia. No rule of law, but at least we're not drinking the blood and eating the hearts of our enemies. Yet.
Posted by: BurtTC at July 31, 2012 11:04 AM (TOk1P)
Unless you count the sudden onset of rampant cannibalism that's erupted out of thin air this summer.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter at July 31, 2012 07:09 AM (4df7R)
Them vehicles is Chrysler produx. The OTHER floundering auto "maker", which is owned by an Italian company- you know, Italy- which is about to implode.
Posted by: Chariots of Toast at July 31, 2012 07:09 AM (ksERZ)
Posted by: soothsayer jumps in without reading at July 31, 2012 07:10 AM (vuIm8)
Posted by: willow at July 31, 2012 07:10 AM (TomZ9)
Posted by: nickless at July 31, 2012 07:12 AM (MMC8r)
And I just noticed my new hash : +SmuD. I am not the SMOD you are looking for. Be thankful.
No, but it's perfect for yesterday's "Fifty Shades of Gray" discussion.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter at July 31, 2012 07:12 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: @PurpAv at July 31, 2012 07:12 AM (apjdA)
Posted by: soothsayer jumps in without reading at July 31, 2012 07:12 AM (3dufx)
Posted by: Anna Puma at July 31, 2012 07:14 AM (+SmuD)
Posted by: Mephitis at July 31, 2012 07:14 AM (ehXLT)
GM will go bankrupt again. The question is what will be done then. Do they sell off the assets and break GM apart? If so, who would buy it and operate it? If you shut them down entirely the disruption to the market would be unfathomably huge. Suppliers would fall like dominos across the nation, inflicting great harm on the other auto makers. The rest of the car makers can't fill the hole without disruptions that will thrown product quality and logistical control into the toilet. SO - I assume that no matter what it will have to be an orderly process, and the State will step in to make sure that's how it goes. GM is the original Too-Big-To-Fail.
Posted by: Reactionary at July 31, 2012 07:15 AM (xUM1Q)
We really don't have any firm numbers on how much the JEF and his lackeys have inflated the sales of GM products.
Posted by: RoyalOil at July 31, 2012 07:15 AM (imtbm)
Posted by: Tim the Enchanter at July 31, 2012 07:16 AM (izA2D)
If we are still talking about the investors in GM they did sue but failed to get standing in federal court. Surprisingly they (State of IN) never took it past the initial levels. It never made it to the Supremes.
Posted by: Vic at July 31, 2012 07:16 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Marie at July 31, 2012 07:17 AM (P9OJs)
but...but...but...Earflaps the wonderworker has already stated several times that he saved the auto industry-
Heh. Earflaps the wonderworker. I'm SO stealing that.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at July 31, 2012 07:18 AM (TIIx5)
Posted by: Anna Puma at July 31, 2012 07:18 AM (+SmuD)
Sharp suppliers could take payment in the form of title to varioushard assets like robots, computers, etc, then lease them back to GM for a token amount. Then when the collapse happens, they can just walk in and recover"their" lease equipement.
Posted by: @PurpAv at July 31, 2012 11:12 AM (apjdA)
-------------------------
-------------------------
Well, maybe - but good luck to anybody who tries it. For one, if the Union pukes figured out that was going on they'd have a sabotage plan ready. Also, GM dare not put liens on their equipment because it would give the supplier some power - which they hate above all things. But let's say that could be done and went off without a hitch - it's still useless. If I make dash assemblies or wheels or molded parts or whatever, GM's welding robots, desktop computers, etc are of no interest to me. It's just more useless junk to manage, plus I'd have the costs of having to get with the sherriff and go get my stuff. Finding it would a challenge, then uninstalling it, etc etc.
Posted by: Reactionary at July 31, 2012 07:20 AM (xUM1Q)
Posted by: TheQuietMan at July 31, 2012 07:20 AM (1Jaio)
Yes, they really do.
The Cadillac CTS is a solid entry. The new ATS is looking to be outstanding. The Buick Regal's top-three in its class, and far better looking than the weirdball Japanese products like the bottle-opener Acuras etc. it competes against. The Corvette is still sui generis, and the GM trucks/Tahoe/Suburban are still the best designs in the business. Even the small Chevys (yeah, okay, so they're all Korean designs and two out of three are Korean-made) are finally competitive. The Volt is a technical success and a second-gen Volt could actually be a very good car. The big crossovers are very good.
The problem is this: that's at best two divisions worth of first-rate product scattered across the whole company. The company's best mass-market products are still not compliant with Barky's ecoloon-driven future. Chevy's small cars might be good but Ford's are better. And GM's small crossovers suck.
Akerson was an Obama bacillus inserted into the GM body and, unlike Mulally at Ford* he hasn't managed either to bend the corporate culture to his will or adapt himself to the needs of running a profitable car company (the basic needs of which are utterly at odds with those of his political minders.)
And I'm sure the White House is just paralyzed with fear at the prospect that the whole house of cards will collapse before November.
* Mulally's managed to get profits out of Ford and do a lot of good things to the company culture, but there's still a lot of weak spots in that company's product line too. They're kinda in the right place at the right time, with good small cars, the Escape, and the midsize Fusion that picks up all the buyers who think its Japanese competition is just weird, ugly and uncomfortable. But if the economy comes back, they've got absolutely no interesting, competitive, high-margin product beyond the GT500. The Lincoln line is a catastrophe. The cop-car/black car market is gone now that the Crown Vic and its derivatives are out of production.
Posted by: JEM at July 31, 2012 07:21 AM (o+SC1)
Turn it over to Lizzie Warren. She knows how to save capitalism.
Which makes her latest ad about how we should be more like China quite funny.
Posted by: soothsayer jumps in without reading at July 31, 2012 11:12 AM (3dufx)
China knows how to budget. Charging the executed political prisoner's family for the bullet is revenue-neutral, y'know.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at July 31, 2012 07:22 AM (TIIx5)
Remember the millions of workers in defense related industries who were scheduled to get a notice they faced losing their jobs because of the defense spending cutbacks? Scheduled to receive it 60 days before said cutbacks, meaning they would receive it on November 1st?
Well, Obama's Department of Labor conveniently ruled yesterday that their employers couldn't sent out the notices -- because they were "too speculative."
Posted by: Ed Anger Issues at July 31, 2012 07:22 AM (7+pP9)
So, GM has been pumping up dealer inventory (whether the dealer likes it or not) to inflate "sales".
Any sales figure GM releases will be bogus and at the behest of the Commie in Chief's Central Planning Committee.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at July 31, 2012 07:22 AM (f9c2L)
instead of refund checks the irs should just ship all taxpayers a new chevy volt. that will fix everything.
Posted by: Marie at July 31, 2012 11:17 AM (P9OJs)
Please, in the name of all that is holy, NOOOOO!
My company makes some parts for that vile vehicle - a customer of our transferred some tools to us to do so. Nothing pleases us more than when order volumes drop. The suppliers knew that car would be a low volume waste of time. Thus, many of them cheaped-out the tooling that went into the project. It's largely crap, made as cheaply as possible in anticipation of the inevitable failure.
Posted by: Reactionary at July 31, 2012 07:22 AM (xUM1Q)
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at July 31, 2012 07:23 AM (Ec6wH)
Posted by: Marie at July 31, 2012 07:24 AM (P9OJs)
Posted by: Dang at July 31, 2012 07:26 AM (Ky1+e)
Posted by: JEM at July 31, 2012 11:21 AM (o+SC1)
I always thought the Crown Vic was the best car Ford ever made. They moved all the civilian model production to Lincoln/Mecury and the killed that division.
I will probably buy a Toyota next.
Posted by: Vic at July 31, 2012 07:29 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: WalrusRex at July 31, 2012 10:56 AM
I knew when I saw it that it would be a flop. It doesn't have a unique "look at me I care" shape like the Prius
http://tinyurl.com/cabkkdr
Posted by: kbdabear at July 31, 2012 07:29 AM (Y7XKa)
Posted by: 66chevelle at July 31, 2012 07:31 AM (QjSgY)
A government-subsidized car that catches on fire.
Posted by: Fritz at July 31, 2012 07:35 AM (/ZZCn)
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at July 31, 2012 07:36 AM (HLFzM)
Attn American Citizens: KY Jelly will go on sale immediately for the inevitable GM bankruptcy. Bend over and take it like a man.
Funny story... I was talking with a nurse last night who was asked about the most embarrassing story she could remember from her job.
The story ended up being of a woman who had been prescribed KY jelly downstairs due to some issues.
The lady came back in a couple of days later with an infection and, when asked about it, said "I ran out of KY, so I just used grape instead."
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at July 31, 2012 07:41 AM (e0xKF)
The Australian Falcon and Territory.
Ford's never, EVER sold anything that good in the US.
Back in the '60s it started off as a derivation of the US Falcon. By the mid '70s it was pretty uniquely Australian, though still sharing some chassis design with the earlier cars. The EA-series car of the '80s was a big platform update, and the AU-series car of the late '90s put it on a par, structurally and mechanically, with the Germans.
Ford's tried to kill it off a couple times. They built a RHD version of the '96 Tuna Taurus and sold it in competition with the Falcon in AU/NZ. No one wanted a big FWD sedan, and while US buyers didn't think much of the shape the Australians HATED it viscerally.
It went over with such a thud that the wonderful AU-series Falcon introduced in '98 was scorned by buyers due to its rounded shape, and Ford quickly scooted back to the studio to put some corners on it.
Ford's apparently trying to kill it again, with another FWD blandmobile. Maybe gas prices will finally kill off the big RWD Australian sedan. Would be a shame.
Posted by: JEM at July 31, 2012 07:42 AM (o+SC1)
Unpossible! In Feb 2011, our tax dollars bought a Super Bowl commercial that declared the Motor City was filled with hard workers with know-how that runs generations deep. "This is what we do." [finger point] -- eminem
In Feb 2012, Clint told us all how (in another taxpayer funded Super Bowl commercial) Detroit was going to show us how to come from behind and win the big game in the 2nd half.
Yup, annnnyy minute now, we're gonna start kicking some automotive ass!
Posted by: Count de Monet at July 31, 2012 07:42 AM (BAS5M)
If it weren't for the Tahoes, Silverados, Suburbans, and Escalades, they'd have gone tits up again by now
Look at the smaller cars from Kia and GM, and the Kias actually look like they're better built for less money
Posted by: kbdabear at July 31, 2012 07:42 AM (Y7XKa)
And when was the last time you actually bought a hot cake? That long ago, eh? If they're selling, who's buying?
Posted by: Dang at July 31, 2012 07:45 AM (Ky1+e)
Posted by: JEM at July 31, 2012 11:42 AM
I love Aussie muscle cars, the older ones have a kind of "parallel world" look to them.
The 5th generation Camaro is built on the Holden Commodore platform and was designed by the Aussies.
Posted by: kbdabear at July 31, 2012 07:46 AM (Y7XKa)
"And I'm sure the White House is just paralyzed with fear at the prospect that the whole house of cards will collapse before November."
If we hit that bullseye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards. Checkmate.
Akerson is turning out just like one would expect a political appointee. He's running GM based not on what is good for the company but based on what makes him look good and preserves the illusion that GM is a functioning company.
With the reelection looming, Akerson is doing the best he can for his boss (B.H. Obama), not what is best for the shareholders (including American taxpayers). If he were anywhere else the board would have thrown him out on his ass by now.
Posted by: egd at July 31, 2012 07:46 AM (XVGEg)
Posted by: JEM
"The last of the V8 Interceptors! Would have been a shame to blow it up."
Posted by: Dang at July 31, 2012 07:48 AM (Ky1+e)
Posted by: The Poster Formerly Known as Mr. Barky at July 31, 2012 07:49 AM (AIHXt)
Posted by: StrongBad, Marketing Genius at July 31, 2012 07:51 AM (CGjum)
Posted by: Daryl Herbert at July 31, 2012 07:51 AM (SK3DU)
Posted by: Penfold at July 31, 2012 07:52 AM (1PeEC)
Posted by: cicero skip at July 31, 2012 07:52 AM (3m9Uc)
I can do something about that. Can you give me a ride?
Posted by: That fat kid who's farts smell like maple syrup at July 31, 2012 07:53 AM (Ky1+e)
Obama saved GM just like I'm going to save capitalism!
Let me do my war-on-povety dance I learned from my tribe---
"hey, ho. western civ has go to go....woo wooo woo"
(Repeat as neccessary)
Posted by: Elizabeth Warren at July 31, 2012 07:53 AM (f+TdG)
If something is 'selling like hotcakes' and it's actually hotcakes, it would be 'selling as hotcakes'. Like telling a bad driver "I didn't say you were driving like a fool, I said you were driving as a fool": the latter clearly implies that he doesn't just resemble a fool, he is one.
Posted by: Dr. Weevil at July 31, 2012 08:15 AM (IEmXK)
Posted by: Ian S. at July 31, 2012 08:15 AM (tqwMN)
My older brother was a freshly minted accountant at Ford when The Deuce purged Iacocca and his team. He said the blood was ankle deep in the Glass House.
Former top execs waited by the guard house for a ride after being unceremoniously escorted out, stripped of their company cars.
Posted by: jwest at July 31, 2012 08:22 AM (ZDsRL)
From WSJ: GM also ousted their Global Marketing Chief, Joel Ewanick on Sunday for "failing to properly vet the financial details of a European soccer-sponsorship deal that he struck recently, according to people familiar with the matter."
"As recently as 2 weeks ago, Mr. Akerson said he was pleased with Mr. Ewanick's work, described him as 'fundamental' to the company and said he was doing 'a good job.'"
"GM has lost market share in the U.S. this year and faces an economic crisis in Europe. The auto maker's stock price is languishing and execs have acknowledged recently that the company's turnaround efforts since its exit from bankruptcy court in 2000 aren't moving as quickly or smoothly as planned. On Wednesday, GM is expected to disclose July U.S. sales figures that show it lost more ground against Japanese rivals that are regaining U.S. strength as they recover from last year's earthquake and tsunami."
It's interesting to note that Akerson "within 6 months of becoming Chief Executive, put Ewanick in charge of the company's global marketing, a new position."
Posted by: runningrn at July 31, 2012 08:23 AM (WGmy2)
Posted by: Mekan at July 31, 2012 09:02 AM (hm8tW)
Buick's US results a decade ago would have comfortably justified killing the name, but just about that time the Chinese market took off and Buick is their flagship brand there. Has something to do with it having been very, very successful in '30s Shanghai, supposedly. So it's been all about carrying a weak Buick name in the US in order to support the booming Chinese market.
A decade ago I was flogging a different way of positioning the company's brands.
Right now GM is obsessed with making Chevrolet their 'cheap-car' division. Maybe that's a bit of legacy thinking, but if you look at the products that carry the brand image - the Corvette, the Camaro, the trucks - what it really comes down to is 'the cheap V8 division'. GM's been pushing the Chevrolet name into other markets, Europe and Asia, where it really means 'Daewoo'. Even in the US the 'little' Chevies - the Spark, Sonic, and Cruze - are Daewoo designs, and the first two are built in Korea. But there's no real branding reason those had to be Chevrolets other than trying to push them out of as many Chevy showrooms as possible.
I'd have liked to see GM set Saturn (or maybe Pontiac) up as the cheap-car brand (pick one, kill the other), and kick Chevrolet up just a tick as the 'traditional American car' brand building stuff more like the Australian Holdens. That might or might not have left room for Buick between Chevy and Cadillac.
Pontiac had been devalued out of its 'flashy upmarket Chevrolet' role by three decades of absurd plastic nonsense, and Saturn had been starved of capital investment almost since day one. Give the Chevy dealerships a Saturn sign for the Cruzes and Sonics.
Posted by: JEM at July 31, 2012 09:04 AM (o+SC1)
Everyone believes with every fiber of their being that:
1. GM has paid back every last cent of gubberment cash.
2. GM, as a company, is healthy. VERY healthy.
Posted by: shibumi at July 31, 2012 09:13 AM (z63Tr)
Dood, put your clown shoes away. The Volts that don't catch fire were a success for the 1920s.
Posted by: DaveA at July 31, 2012 10:00 AM (DVJEd)
As long as they don't have Aussie paint, glass, bushings or interiors they might be ok.
Slightly complaining 06 GTO owner.
Posted by: DaveA at July 31, 2012 10:02 AM (DVJEd)
So, this administration literally stole 90% of the legitimate GM bondholders' money,
So who were the bondholders who got screwed? IIRC, various Indiana public sector unions' retirement funds.
You have to laugh.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at July 31, 2012 12:17 PM (BE1hB)
Posted by: harleycowboy at July 31, 2012 01:06 PM (wSTfB)
Or were they? When was the last time they were seen?
Posted by: PJ at July 31, 2012 01:09 PM (DQHjw)
Posted by: steevy at July 31, 2012 04:17 PM (6o4Fb)
My S-10 was refusing to crank and the local Chevy dealer kept saying it was the starter, yet every starter they placed on it failed Those three starters were replaced after the first one and all I paid was $150.00 per starter for labor.
After the third failure I sought out a non Chevy auto mechanic who informed me the problem was a bad ground on the battery which he replaced and then my problems went away.
I called Chevy dealer and asked why it took three starters and close to $400.00 to fix starter problems when it was an undiscovered ground wire fault, he stated, "We don't want to fix your truck we here at Chevy prefer you buy a new truck". No shizzle fart brain BUT I couldn't afford a new or used truck at the time.
All I needed was a fix so I could still operate with a vehicle until I could buy another.
I told Chevy Dealer, " I may yet buy a new vehicle BUT it won't be a Chevy nor a GM product" So we went out when we were able and Bought a Ford.
GM can go down the drain, I don't care.
Posted by: HEP-T at August 01, 2012 08:55 AM (KcZYD)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.4093 seconds, 279 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








You know how I knew GM was doomed?
When the production Camaro came out, and the window was so short, you can't fit a Route 44 Ocean Water from Sonic through it upright.
Posted by: reason at July 31, 2012 06:42 AM (sPO/s)