January 20, 2012
— Ace Bargaining.
I'm almost to Acceptance. Give me time.
Posted by: Ace at
08:36 AM
| Comments (180)
Post contains 20 words, total size 1 kb.
of course the D governor is taking credit
but this is just part of that whole funky-December numbers thing
Posted by: soothsayer at January 20, 2012 08:38 AM (G/zuv)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Has Joined Team Meteor at January 20, 2012 08:39 AM (8y9MW)
Let's see what happens at the end of January.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Has Joined Team Meteor at January 20, 2012 08:39 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: huerfano at January 20, 2012 08:40 AM (lXi+d)
To call this a jobless revovery is an understatement.
As said before, this is indeed a jobLOSS recovery.
Posted by: soothsayer at January 20, 2012 08:40 AM (G/zuv)
Posted by: Elisabeth Kübler-Ross-Gibson at January 20, 2012 08:41 AM (h6mPj)
It doesnÂ’t matter what the unemployment rate is in Texas or Massachusetts. We already know who they are going to vote for.
Posted by: jwest at January 20, 2012 08:42 AM (FdndL)
speaking of polls...
Some polls, as you surely have heard, show Newt now in the lead in SC.
Those polls are fresh, but they don't reflect the impact of Marianne.
Newt will not win SC. He'll lose by a c-hair whisker.
Posted by: soothsayer at January 20, 2012 08:43 AM (G/zuv)
Posted by: Rodent Liberation Front at January 20, 2012 08:44 AM (lgw0N)
It doesnÂ’t matter what the unemployment rate is in Texas or Massachusetts. We already know who they are going to vote for.
Posted by: jwest at January 20, 2012 12:42 PM (FdndL)
The unemployment rate in Cali is 11.3%, yet we already know who they are going to vote for, too.
Posted by: kathysaysso at January 20, 2012 08:45 AM (ZtwUX)
Fl is down to 9.9%. Rick Scott made an announcement today, I think it was. Not one word was said about seasonal jobs that I heard.
Yeah, wait for January's figures. And if gasoline continues to rise in price, expect UE to increase.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, CEO Curmudgeons INC. at January 20, 2012 08:47 AM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: dagny at January 20, 2012 08:48 AM (Ke2m6)
If I have to vote for Romney in the general election, I'll probably do it, but that will be a second presidential election in which I have little to no enthusiasm for my vote in the general election. It really sucks.
Posted by: Slappy at January 20, 2012 08:49 AM (LTbLf)
I will view all polls and government statistics lies between now and November with the appropriate level of contempt and disinterest.
Posted by: ontherocks at January 20, 2012 08:49 AM (ZJCDy)
Posted by: supercore23 at January 20, 2012 08:50 AM (bwV72)
Posted by: c. up at January 20, 2012 08:50 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: joncelli, too stressed by half at January 20, 2012 08:51 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: SH at January 20, 2012 08:51 AM (gmeXX)
Posted by: Mr Pink at January 20, 2012 08:51 AM (FzVXi)
Posted by: BumperStickerist at January 20, 2012 08:53 AM (h6mPj)
Intrade has Newt winning SC at 65% chance to Mitt's 35%.
We'll see who's right this Sunday.
Soothsayer or Intrade.
Posted by: soothsayer at January 20, 2012 08:53 AM (G/zuv)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Has Joined Team Meteor at January 20, 2012 08:53 AM (8y9MW)
The unemployment rate in Cali is 11.3%, yet we already know who they are going to vote for, too.
Posted by: kathysaysso at January 20, 2012 12:45 PM (ZtwUX)
Where the unemployment rate will matter are states like Michigan, Ohio, Indiana, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Virginia, North Carolina etc.
Posted by: jwest at January 20, 2012 08:53 AM (FdndL)
Posted by: SH at January 20, 2012 08:54 AM (gmeXX)
Posted by: dagny at January 20, 2012 08:54 AM (Ke2m6)
"I'm with Ace on the whole Perry thing. Perry made gaffes during the debates but I never understood how candidates like Gingrich, Santorum, Cain, and Bachmann -- all of whom have had their share of gaffes during the campaign, too -- have been resonating with conservatives more than Perry, whose track record of governance is by far superior to everyone else who has been or currently is in the GOP race."
because Perry is and has always been a dumber, thinner-skinned G.W. Bush, who looks way more conservative than he is due to a very conservative Texas State Legislature?
but that's just a guess...
Posted by: Shoey at January 20, 2012 08:54 AM (jdOk/)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at January 20, 2012 12:52 PM (ZKzrr)
That's also the temperature, so you have part of the explanation.
(I'm not kidding, the temp is about 6 degress Farenheit right now.)
Posted by: AmishDude at January 20, 2012 08:54 AM (T0NGe)
Remember when we had 5.4% UE and gas was around $1.75, groceries cost about half what they do today and the MFM said we we were on the cusp of a recession and Bushitler McChimpy was killing the economy with his right wing fascism?
*sigh* I miss the good old days...
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, CEO Curmudgeons INC. at January 20, 2012 08:54 AM (d0Tfm)
Least wormy apple in the bushel?
Posted by: WalrusRex at January 20, 2012 08:55 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: mrshad at January 20, 2012 08:55 AM (Xqfwb)
because Perry is and has always been a dumber, thinner-skinned G.W. Bush, who looks way more conservative than he is due to a very conservative Texas State Legislature?
but that's just a guess...
Then it's a wrong guess. We have to fight our Legislature almost as much as we fight the US Congress. We're just closer to them so we win more often.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Has Joined Team Meteor at January 20, 2012 08:56 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Anti-Shoey at January 20, 2012 08:56 AM (TRlpJ)
Sounds like someone needs a montage (montage!)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at January 20, 2012 08:56 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: joeindc44 - tebow's new lifting coach at January 20, 2012 08:57 AM (QxSug)
Posted by: Brisco_County at January 20, 2012 08:57 AM (4fWSu)
Ace,
I am still in Perry camp with you, but being from TX I have found a silver lining in that we get to keep Perry here creating jobs and fighting Washington. And most importantly we don't get stuck with Dewhurst for Gov. Hopefully Cruz will be able to beat Dewhurst to replace KBH.
Posted by: Texas Fluke at January 20, 2012 08:57 AM (NrtjZ)
Should we start a pool on what will finally win ace over to Romney - what metaphor/aspect of Mitt will be the straw that broke the ewok's back and won his heart?
The First Blood style shower and time spent in 'the box' on the roof should have been enough.
Posted by: Mittens Rombley, vexed at January 20, 2012 08:58 AM (JgNE0)
Posted by: dagny at January 20, 2012 12:54 PM (Ke2m6)
Oh, but they are the most bigoted people on earth. Where did you go to school, who were your parents, etc. Even in matters of race, they are fully cognizant of it. But they'll never judge a person based on merit or objective criteria.
This is what "social justice" is all about. "Justice" is socialized. That is, you get yourself in your little group, the group gets some sort of consideration or benefit and you get your piece from that.
Posted by: AmishDude at January 20, 2012 08:58 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: joeindc44 - tebow's new lifting coach at January 20, 2012 08:58 AM (QxSug)
Should we start a pool on what will finally win ace over to Romney - what metaphor/aspect of Mitt will be the straw that broke the ewok's back and won his heart?
SCoaMT the only other one on the ballot?
Posted by: Julie at January 20, 2012 08:59 AM (O/fK8)
It's because continuous debate flubs meant he could never escape the C-minus stupid meme.
Posted by: taylork at January 20, 2012 08:59 AM (5wsU9)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Has Joined Team Meteor at January 20, 2012 09:00 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: SH at January 20, 2012 09:00 AM (gmeXX)
Posted by: Darel Finkbeiner at January 20, 2012 09:00 AM (Z1WKS)
Posted by: Truman North at January 20, 2012 09:00 AM (I2LwF)
Newt did have some damn good moments last night, though.
For instance: Elect us and your kids can get a job and move out.
Heh
Posted by: soothsayer at January 20, 2012 09:01 AM (G/zuv)
Posted by: Truman North at January 20, 2012 09:01 AM (I2LwF)
Posted by: dagny at January 20, 2012 09:01 AM (Ke2m6)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at January 20, 2012 09:01 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: joeindc44 - tebow's new lifting coach at January 20, 2012 09:01 AM (QxSug)
Just a small observation.
FWIW, I'm no longer funemployed after three years. My costs have gone up more with the gas I have to buy now.
But I'm making less than I was when I was drawing UE, so there's that.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, CEO Curmudgeons INC. at January 20, 2012 09:01 AM (d0Tfm)
Perry spent what seemed like two hours preparing for what Mitt and Newt have been gunning for their entire lives. He simply was not ready either in detail or in delivery.
I'm resigning myself to Romney and giving cash to some congressional elections and Walker's defense up in Wisconsin.
Sigh.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at January 20, 2012 09:01 AM (B+qrE)
Posted by: Jypsea Rose~AoSHQ Graveyard Shift at January 20, 2012 09:01 AM (digkk)
Posted by: taylork at January 20, 2012 09:01 AM (5wsU9)
Only the second? Consider yourself lucky. For many of us, it's the the sixth.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at January 20, 2012 09:02 AM (SY2Kh)
Gov McDonnell of VA endorsed Mitt.
That's the Veep, by the way.
----------------------------------------
Will you bet your leftnut on it?
Posted by: soothsayer at January 20, 2012 09:02 AM (G/zuv)
What are you bummed at re: Perry?
The guy had an awful showing.
If Herman Cain and Michele Bachmann hadn't have been there to take the heat off of him, he never would have lasted as long as he did.
Posted by: garrett at January 20, 2012 09:02 AM (JgNE0)
I'm resigning myself to Romney and giving cash to some congressional elections and Walker's defense up in Wisconsin.
Sigh.
Should have joined me on the Huntsman band wagon for a time. Going to Newt or Mittens feels like trading up.
Posted by: taylork at January 20, 2012 09:03 AM (5wsU9)
Cruz really hasn't gotten any traction. It doesn't help that this is the first state-wide race he's running in, and he's running against the very popular David Dewhurst.
Honestly, though, I'm not sure who I support in that race. Cruz and Dewhurst are both lawyers, and I think we've got too many lawyers in congress anyway, but Leppert was liberal enough to get voted into office in Dallas, which is probably too liberal for me.
Though I am looking forward to my congressional race- (Roger) Williams vs (Michael) Williams. That should be a Conservative Smack-Down.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Has Joined Team Meteor at January 20, 2012 09:03 AM (8y9MW)
Should we start a pool on what will finally win ace over to
Romney - what metaphor/aspect of Mitt will be the straw that broke the
ewok's back and won his heart?
SCoaMT the only other one on the ballot?
Posted by: Julie at January 20, 2012 12:59 PM (O/fK
+10+++ = !!!!ELEVENTY!!1!111!111111
Posted by: kathysaysso at January 20, 2012 09:04 AM (ZtwUX)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, CEO Curmudgeons INC. at January 20, 2012 09:04 AM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: WalrusRex at January 20, 2012 09:04 AM (Hx5uv)
True 'dat. I have lived in Utah for most of my life, and the only thing we ever really know about Huntsman was who his dad is, and that he signed whatever the legislature put on his desk. I have said it before; it is kind of hard to screw up here when you have the most conservative congress in the nation.
Posted by: mrshad at January 20, 2012 09:04 AM (Xqfwb)
All that matters are congressional races.
This, by the way, is not true. If you know who gets four more years, he will rule by executive order and litigation. We need to win the whole thing...even if it is Romney.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at January 20, 2012 09:04 AM (B+qrE)
Romney 35%
Gingrich 35%
Santorum 15%
Paul 15%
If Gingrich beats Romney by 5-10 pts, then he could build on that in Florida. I hate having Paul in there at all.
Posted by: Lincolntf at January 20, 2012 09:04 AM (Qjh0I)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at January 20, 2012 09:05 AM (21lBC)
Posted by: c. up at January 20, 2012 12:50 PM (oZfic)
I understood the comparisons to Bush and a significant portion of the country not being enthused about another Texas governor becoming POTUS right now, but the Al Gore thing was always ridiculous. Not only was the Gore of the '80s a different type of candidate ideologically, Perry was in his last days as a Democrat. Reagan switched from the Democratic to Republican Party and ran as a GOP presidential candidate only six years later (1962-6
Posted by: Slappy at January 20, 2012 09:05 AM (LTbLf)
Posted by: SH at January 20, 2012 01:00 PM (gmeXX)
Agreed!
Posted by: Texas Fluke at January 20, 2012 09:05 AM (NrtjZ)
Posted by: Tari at January 20, 2012 09:06 AM (+Z6FM)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at January 20, 2012 09:06 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: dagny at January 20, 2012 09:06 AM (Ke2m6)
Posted by: Hobbitopoly at January 20, 2012 09:07 AM (qgwNu)
I wouldn't bet a nut, but I also believe McDonnell will be Romney's VP pick. He'll deliver VA. He's got some fairly good conservative bona fides. He's clean and articulate.
Yeah, it'll either be McDonnell or Palin :-)
Posted by: Havedash at January 20, 2012 09:07 AM (sFD5n)
truth hurts, and your pain fills me with joy.
knee-jerk Republicans are as bad as knee-jerk Democraps.
Romney will lose to Obama, therefor a vote for Romney is a vote for Obama.
Newt will be destroyed by the MSM, they have it out for him and he isn't any different than Romney on politics &policy anyway.
i've gone full "burn the m-f'er down! and vote Ron Paul" crazy.
Why?
because none of the GOP (canidates or Party Leaders) are serious about cutting spending/reducing the size and power of the central government.
just as the Repubs replaced the Whigs, the Repubs can be replaced with something new, and don't even try to trot out the "but there's no time!" lame-ass bullshit, that's just Bernise/Alinsky hyperboyle.
Posted by: Shoey at January 20, 2012 09:08 AM (jdOk/)
Posted by: Hollowpoint at January 20, 2012 01:02 PM (SY2Kh)
I had no problem voting for Bush in '88, but grudgingly did so in '92. I also voted unethusiastically for Dole in '96, but had no problem voting for Bush in '00 and '04. So, the 2012 will be the fourth for me overall.
Posted by: Slappy at January 20, 2012 09:08 AM (LTbLf)
Posted by: joncelli, too stressed by half at January 20, 2012 09:09 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: dagny at January 20, 2012 09:09 AM (Ke2m6)
This, by the way, is not true. If you know who gets four more years, he will rule by executive order and litigation. We need to win the whole thing...even if it is Romney.
I'm not so sure. If enough conservative Pubbies get elected like they did in the last midterms and we manage to take the Senate, depose Boehner and McConnell and start pushing back against the SCOAMF, there might be a chance to save the Republic. They could always start defunding agencies and take away some of the power they've given to the president over the past few years.
I know, I know, but a Boy can fap, can't he?
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, CEO Curmudgeons INC. at January 20, 2012 09:10 AM (d0Tfm)
Another possibility is Pawlenty.
Why did he bow out so soon? Why did he never attack Mitt? Perhaps he made an early deal with Mitt.
Pawlenty brings something to the table in that he's articulate, likable, and has a good record. Plus he's from the midwest.
Posted by: soothsayer at January 20, 2012 09:10 AM (G/zuv)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at January 20, 2012 09:11 AM (B+qrE)
Screw you, joo lover.
I'll get you if it's the last thing I do!
Posted by: Richard Milhouse Nixon at January 20, 2012 09:11 AM (nEUpB)
Posted by: Jypsea Rose~AoSHQ Graveyard Shift at January 20, 2012 09:12 AM (digkk)
I'd say the jury is still out on who is going to destroy whom.
Posted by: WalrusRex at January 20, 2012 09:12 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: dagny at January 20, 2012 09:12 AM (Ke2m6)
Posted by: blaster at January 20, 2012 09:12 AM (7vSU0)
Take the heat off him? When they weren't constantly attacking him you mean?
Hell, I think Cain still carries around a little Perry doll that he sticks pins into while muttering "from Hell's heart I stab at thee".
Posted by: Hollowpoint at January 20, 2012 09:12 AM (SY2Kh)
VP candidate will be Kasich, whether its Romney or Newt.
Nope. I like Kasich, always have, but his numbers in Ohio are not good right now.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at January 20, 2012 09:13 AM (B+qrE)
Posted by: High Priestess Jypsea Rose~AoSHQ Graveyard Shift at January 20, 2012 09:13 AM (digkk)
Posted by: dagny at January 20, 2012 09:13 AM (Ke2m6)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Has Joined Team Meteor at January 20, 2012 09:13 AM (8y9MW)
I thought it was just the next step in political correctness. All blacks are now to be addressed as "The Reverend" and if you don't do it, you're racist.
Posted by: WalrusRex at January 20, 2012 09:13 AM (Hx5uv)
I thought that was jwest. Hmm, perhaps they got them at the same store.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at January 20, 2012 09:13 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: Y-not at January 20, 2012 09:14 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, CEO Curmudgeons INC. at January 20, 2012 09:14 AM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: High Priestess Jypsea Rose~AoSHQ Graveyard Shift at January 20, 2012 09:16 AM (digkk)
That won't keep our beer cold when SCOAMF keeps closing power plants.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at January 20, 2012 09:16 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: dagny at January 20, 2012 09:16 AM (Ke2m6)
I didn't have a problem voting for HWB or GWB, but I wasn't exactly enthusiastic about it either.
None were "Hey I really really like this guy" so much as "Meh, I guess he'll do".
Posted by: Hollowpoint at January 20, 2012 09:16 AM (SY2Kh)
How? If "Mr Moderate" Mitt Romney can't put them at ease, why would T-Paw?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Has Joined Team Meteor at January 20, 2012 09:16 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Cerebral Paulsey at January 20, 2012 09:16 AM (kgU8m)
Posted by: WalrusRex at January 20, 2012 09:17 AM (Hx5uv)
Welcome, everyone to Thunderdome 2012: Two candidates enter, one candidate gets elected
Posted by: Francesco Schettino, Capitano Supremo at January 20, 2012 09:17 AM (UqKQV)
We just keep blocking until we get to a brokered convention.
Then we start with a brand-new candidate, all fresh and clean with the party united behind him (or her).
Posted by: jwest at January 20, 2012 09:17 AM (FdndL)
Posted by: dagny at January 20, 2012 09:17 AM (Ke2m6)
Posted by: dagny at January 20, 2012 09:18 AM (Ke2m6)
If Perry had just arrived on the scene, looking all craggy faced and handsome, and good hair--and not opened his mouth--he might just be in the lead now.
Posted by: Sphynx at January 20, 2012 09:18 AM (fEmj2)
He still has some negatives here thanks to the 3:1 spending the union scum did to repeal SB5.
Brutal.
I still can't talk about that.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at January 20, 2012 09:18 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: dagny at January 20, 2012 09:19 AM (Ke2m6)
Posted by: Jumbo Jogging Shrimp at January 20, 2012 01:05 PM (qjUnn)
You don't have to like or dislike him to recognize that he made a series of awful appearances and squandered the tremendous momentum he carried after entering the race.
From that point on, he was flailing in rough seas...I am glad to see it come to an end. Not because I thought he'd be a bad President, but because I thought he'd be eviscerated on the campaign trail should he achieve the nomination.
Posted by: garrett at January 20, 2012 09:20 AM (JgNE0)
Posted by: dagny at January 20, 2012 01:16 PM (Ke2m6)
Benissimo, Signora. Bravo
Posted by: Francesco Schettino, Capitano Supremo at January 20, 2012 09:21 AM (UqKQV)
I really wanted Perry to get nominated. How could he have been such a bad candidate? All his wounds were self-inflicted.
He's like that model who walked into the propeller. "STOP," the pilot told her.
"There's a PROPELLER there. Walk BEHIND the plane." So what does she do?
She walks directly into the propeller.
Same with Perry. Given the opportunity to run and win as a conservative, he chose to alternate between liberal populism and general dipshittery. He never ONCE recaptured the essence of the day he announced: getting government out of the way.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at January 20, 2012 09:21 AM (j7/ZK)
Then we start with a brand-new candidate, all fresh and clean with the party united behind him (or her).You keep on riding the Crazy Train, jwest. Your insane fantasy of a brokered convention Palin nomination isn't going to dream itself.
Just don't complain when they insist you keep the hockey helmet on. It's for your own good.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at January 20, 2012 09:22 AM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: CrankyTrex at January 20, 2012 09:23 AM (08O0O)
Posted by: dagny at January 20, 2012 01:12 PM (Ke2m6)
True, but voting for Romney is nothing like voting for a conservative either. Considering the situation the country is in right now, Romney managing the decline of the country, which is what I think he will do, is not exactly providing me with a lot of enthusiasm to vote for him in the general election, if he's the nominee. With a President Romney, everyone opposed to ObamaCare can pretty much forget about that program getting derailed, too, unless the Supreme Court stops it in its track (which, to me, is about a 50/50 proposition right now) because Romney has already hinted at tweaking the program (i.e., keepin the "good" and getting rid of the "bad") instead of trying to get rid of it. This is a similar path to the one Europe took over the years, with conservatives simply giving up reducing the size of the federal government and campaigning on their ability to manage the continually expanding federal government better than their political opposition.
Posted by: Slappy at January 20, 2012 09:24 AM (LTbLf)
Personally, I wonder if there shouldn't be.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at January 20, 2012 09:24 AM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: dagny at January 20, 2012 09:25 AM (Ke2m6)
True, but voting for Romney is nothing like voting for a conservative either.
Hey, everyone raise your hand if you have ever said on this blog that Mitt Romney is a dreamy conservative.
...
...
...
Damn, that's a shitload of crickets.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at January 20, 2012 09:26 AM (B+qrE)
Posted by: dagny at January 20, 2012 09:26 AM (Ke2m6)
Personally, I wonder if there shouldn't be.
This.
The primary schedule is too front loaded. Back when, it would still be possible for someone to jump in here in late January.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at January 20, 2012 09:27 AM (B+qrE)
I really wanted Perry to get nominated. How could he have been such a bad candidate? All his wounds were self-inflicted.
..and a Prsidential run would have solved this prdiliction?
Posted by: garrett at January 20, 2012 09:27 AM (JgNE0)
Posted by: CrankyTrex at January 20, 2012 01:23 PM (08O0O)
Doesn't that laissez-faire management style pretty much describe the approach that conservatives want at the federal level?
Posted by: Slappy at January 20, 2012 09:28 AM (LTbLf)
..and a Prsidential run would have solved this prdiliction?
'Zactly.
"Governor Perry, why are you racist?"
"Governor Perry, why are you a warmonger?"
"Governor Perry, why are you exactly like George W. Bush and Adolf Hitler?"
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at January 20, 2012 09:30 AM (B+qrE)
Sometimes God's ways are not our ways. Quite often in fact.
Here is an example: When Clinton was impeached but the Senate refused to convict him, I was completely bummed out. I wanted Gore (who wasn't as insane then) to assume office and end the constant soap opera in the White House. The answer for our country was "No."
Then Bush beat Gore and was the president when those planes flew into the Twin Towers. I have always been grateful that Gore wasn't in charge at that time.
So maybe sometimes we don't get the outcome we want, but maybe we get the outcome we NEED. Maybe Romney will surprise us. At any rate, I would suggest patience and watching.
Posted by: Miss Marple at January 20, 2012 09:33 AM (GoIUi)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at January 20, 2012 09:34 AM (j7/ZK)
Hey, everyone raise your hand if you have ever said on this blog that Mitt Romney is a dreamy conservative.
...
...
...
Damn, that's a shitload of crickets.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at January 20, 2012 01:26 PM (B+qrE)
I don't recall writing that anyone on this blog called Romney "a dreamy conservative". I was just reiterating a point that I learned when I lived in NH and watched Romney run against Ted Kennedy in '94 and then serve as Massachusetts governor.
Romney's not a conservative nor will he govern as one unless forced to by a Congress with large Republican majorities (and large numbers of conservatives) in both the House and Senate. Here's to hoping if Romney is the nominee and somehow beats Obama in the general election that the Republicans end up with those large congressional majorities, including large numbers of conservatives. Because if not, get ready to spend a lot of time over the following four years rationalizing why you voted for the guy.
Posted by: Slappy at January 20, 2012 09:35 AM (LTbLf)
Posted by: CrankyTrex at January 20, 2012 09:39 AM (08O0O)
You should hear the head of the Carl's Jr. company talk about the difference in conducting business in TX v CA. Just astounding,
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 20, 2012 09:45 AM (piMMO)
If everything were already running smoothly, yes. But at this point in history things have to be turned completely around and pointed in the other direction.
We need someone who can see the broken mess, figure out a way to fix it, and then convince people to go along with the fix even if they might not like it.
Perry's pretty much the only governor in the country who never has to do that because Texas takes care of itself. He just has to not actively work to screw the state up. He could spend all day every day doing absolutely nothing and the state would run fine.
If one looks at his campaigning, he clearly sucks at leading. He had no real solutions beyond the usual platitudes and/or he is absolutely terrible at even describing them. That doesn't even get to the part about convincing people to follow his lead, and if "you don't have a heart" is any indication, he can't do that either.
Posted by: CrankyTrex at January 20, 2012 01:39 PM (08O0O)
Fair enough. You make a persuasive point. I just question why so many Republicans think that some of the other conservative darlings, like Santorum, Bachmann, Cain, et al., would be superior to Perry in regards to fixing the "broken mess." This is potentially one of Romney's selling points, but I'm reasonably sure his "fixes" will not be conservative in nature (unless, as I already mentioned, he's dragged to conservative solutions by Congress).
As for the Perry campaign, there is no doubt that he was weak as a candidate, though I think the "you don't have a heart" comment was overplayed. It came across to me like he was grasping for a persuasive retort since he was being attacked from multiple sides on the issue of immigration, which, in Texas, needs to be dealt with differently than in most other states (especially considering that the federal government has the authority and power to deal with the issue more than the state). It was a bad response by Perry and it happened in one of the first presidential debates he took part in, but, once again, my overall view of the guy's stint as governor is more positive than those of the other GOP candidates. He may not be the perfect conservative but I still believe he was the best in the primary field.
For the record, I was far more upset with Perry moving to the Left of Romney by bashing him for his work with Bain. That, to me, was a bigger mistake than any of the others he made during his time in the race.
Posted by: Slappy at January 20, 2012 10:02 AM (LTbLf)
Posted by: mcg at January 20, 2012 10:09 AM (YCfVb)
Posted by: Jimmuy at January 20, 2012 10:09 AM (pbKln)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Has Joined Team Meteor at January 20, 2012 01:03 PM (8y9MW)
tom leppert is the reason i moved to flower mound.
Posted by: chas at January 20, 2012 10:21 AM (xAq1C)
Posted by: CrankyTrex at January 20, 2012 01:39 PM (08O0O)
actually the easiest, quickest and best way to fix what ails american is to stop doing things. govt needs to just quit and that is what perry was proposing. to stop doing things, to get out of the way, to roll back what has been done the last 20ish years. none of the others are even talking like that. they want to provide govt solutions, and even a conservative govt solution is the wrong way to go.
Posted by: chas at January 20, 2012 10:23 AM (xAq1C)
Posted by: CrankyTrex at January 20, 2012 10:31 AM (08O0O)
CrankyTrex at January 20, 2012 02:31 PM (08O0O)
cain may have done some good work at godfather's but there is no chance in hell he could replicate taht to this country. as a ceo he had much more power to get things done. as president he has to convince approx 270 other people his way is the way to do things. and that aint easy when all 535 of those people have their own ideas and agendas. business succes in no way translates to political success. of course perry worked w/ the legislature here in texas and got lots of things down, medical tort reform and loser pays lawsuits are 2 of the more recent successes.
Posted by: chas at January 20, 2012 10:38 AM (xAq1C)
CrankyTrex at January 20, 2012 02:31 PM (08O0O)
and how timely is it that you bring up herb cain. just as he is about join in w/ colbert to trash repubs in the SC primary!! damn shame we didnt elect that guy
Posted by: chas at January 20, 2012 10:40 AM (xAq1C)
Posted by: CrankyTrex at January 20, 2012 10:42 AM (08O0O)
Posted by: CrankyTrex at January 20, 2012 10:48 AM (08O0O)
Posted by: joeindc44 - tebow's new lifting coach at January 20, 2012 10:51 AM (QxSug)
Posted by: CrankyTrex at January 20, 2012 10:54 AM (08O0O)
Posted by: ReadyorNot at January 20, 2012 11:22 AM (ErUlJ)
I don't care.
Making the federal government inconsequential was some powerful speechifying.
You rombots, paulbots, and gingrenches can KISS MY ASS.
Posted by: Blacksmith8✡ at January 20, 2012 04:28 PM (Q1qy3)
Posted by: Shoey at January 20, 2012 12:54 PM (jdOk/)
Go read the article at the link, dumbass; then read the comments. Especially note the second comment. Written just for you, it seems.
Posted by: JoAnne commiserates with Ace at January 20, 2012 04:48 PM (8DdAv)
Same here.
Ditto.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Has Joined Team Meteor at January 20, 2012 01:00 PM (8y9MW)
Double ditto.
Posted by: JoAnne commiserates with Ace at January 20, 2012 04:52 PM (8DdAv)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2549 seconds, 308 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








6.8% in MA
Posted by: soothsayer at January 20, 2012 08:37 AM (G/zuv)