September 18, 2012

Week Two Pick'em Results [Ben]
— Open Blogger

Below is the leader board after two weeks of fantasy pick'em.

Jay In Ames 21
Shredders 20
Dooley 20
boniface ballers 20
dawgyear 20


Management:
JWF 18
JohnE 14
Andy 13
CDR-M 12
Russ 12
Ben 11


[Imagine picture of hot cheerleader here]

Posted by: Open Blogger at 07:32 AM | Comments (248)
Post contains 45 words, total size 1 kb.

1 I am going with the Missouri Synod Lutherans over Muslim Terrorist.

Posted by: Clemenza at September 18, 2012 06:42 AM (afx6B)

2 Good grief, I forgot all about it after the first game. I guess that puts me in last place.

Posted by: lowandslow at September 18, 2012 07:35 AM (GZitp)

3 Is it a requirement for the cob-logger that posts this stuff to always be last?

Posted by: dogfish at September 18, 2012 07:37 AM (NuPNl)

4 Geez, Ben..  how hard would it have been to find a pic?

Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at September 18, 2012 07:37 AM (f9c2L)

5 Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry

Use your replay reel. 

Posted by: dogfish at September 18, 2012 07:38 AM (NuPNl)

6 1 I am going with the Missouri Synod Lutherans over Muslim Terrorist.

Posted by: Clemenza at September 18, 2012 10:42 AM (afx6B)

 

 

Missouri Synod is populated by right wing extremists!!!

Posted by: ELCA at September 18, 2012 07:39 AM (YYyqq)

7 I'm good at FFL, but lousy at pick 'em. Not sure what that means... Here are some cheerleaders (SFW): http://tinyurl.com/96fw73t

Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 07:40 AM (5H6zj)

8 Oy, I can't make myself look at my numbers.

Posted by: joncelli, heartless Morale Officer at September 18, 2012 07:40 AM (RD7QR)

9

What? There's now a shortage of actual pictures of hot cheerleaders?

Posted by: HtP at September 18, 2012 07:40 AM (jx2j9)

10 Man, those elbows are pointy.

Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Please? at September 18, 2012 07:41 AM (VtjlW)

11 Is Ace having a hard time making it over the two week hump? (it takes three weeks to break a habit.)

Posted by: tasker at September 18, 2012 07:42 AM (r2PLg)

12 12 Is Ace having a hard time making it over the two week hump?


ISWYDT. I think.

Posted by: joncelli, heartless Morale Officer at September 18, 2012 07:43 AM (RD7QR)

13 It's the ref's fault.

Posted by: amateurs at September 18, 2012 07:43 AM (LpQbZ)

14 [Imagine picture of hot cheerleader here]

---

I didn't even know a chick could bend that way.

Posted by: WalrusRex at September 18, 2012 07:44 AM (Hx5uv)

15 [Imagine complaint about butter face here.]

Posted by: Nash Rambler at September 18, 2012 07:45 AM (LZ7QO)

16 Since this is basically an open thread, why the hell is the Romney campaign sending Bay Buchanan out as a spokesman? First of all she talks like she has a mouthful of marbles and secondly she is one of the worst at making an argument and staying on point. Send Sununu and Newt out there.

Posted by: lowandslow at September 18, 2012 07:45 AM (GZitp)

17 Send Sununu and Newt out there.

---

Release the Newt!

Posted by: WalrusRex at September 18, 2012 07:46 AM (Hx5uv)

18 So I got 10 pts in Week 1.  8 pts in Week 2.  Guess that is okay.

Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at September 18, 2012 07:47 AM (qjrXu)

19 Send Sununu and Newt out there.

Posted by: lowandslow at September 18, 2012 11:45 AM (GZitp)


They're big guys but they're not that big. You need lots of surrogates to cover the events and they can't all be awesome.

Posted by: joncelli, heartless Morale Officer at September 18, 2012 07:47 AM (RD7QR)

20 Mitt has asked me to represent him to the media after Clint suggested it.

Posted by: Chairface Chippendale at September 18, 2012 07:49 AM (3ZtZW)

21 [image complaint removed along with picture]

Posted by: sans_sheriff at September 18, 2012 07:50 AM (HgwiM)

22 Speaking of referees, John Fox is a whiny bitch. Your team blew last night. Grow up, buttercup! The replacement refs are calling pass interference very strictly in most of the games I've seen. Maybe they shouldn't be, but it's clear that they are going to call almost anything. In baseball, players learn to adjust to the strike zone on any given night. Why can't football players do the same? Moreover, the announcers (especially at ESPN) are so in the tank for the regular refs in their lockout that they are making the games almost unbearable to watch. Every week the regular refs make mistakes, sometimes ones just as stupid as what these new guys are doing. Moreover, last night both Gruden and Tirico were announcing like "replacement announcers." All broadcast long they were referring to teams not on the field, players not playing, and rules that did not apply. Maybe they should be locked out. /rant off

Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 07:50 AM (5H6zj)

23 So now GM wants to sever the partnership with Obama because the "government motors" reputation is killing them?

When they took on the SCOAMF as a partner, they should have remembered this line from Goodfellas

Now the guy's got Paulie as a partner. Any problems, he goes to Paulie. Trouble with the bill? He can go to Paulie. Trouble with the cops, deliveries, Tommy, he can call Paulie. But now the guy's gotta come up with Paulie's money every week, no matter what. Business bad? Fuck you, pay me. Oh, you had a fire? Fuck you, pay me. Place got hit by lightning, huh? Fuck you, pay me.

Posted by: kbdabear at September 18, 2012 07:50 AM (wwsoB)

24 Gruden, for one, is such a blowhard that he's almost unbearable.

Posted by: joncelli, heartless Morale Officer at September 18, 2012 07:51 AM (RD7QR)

25 Here's your daily feel good plus cheerleader for the day (SFW). http://preview.tinyurl.com/9pnh3ow

Posted by: Country Singer (likes teh ginger ladies) at September 18, 2012 07:51 AM (L8r/r)

26 rant off Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 11:50 AM (5H6zj) ---------------- agreed

Posted by: striking? deal with it at September 18, 2012 07:52 AM (LpQbZ)

27 17 Since this is basically an open thread, why the hell is the Romney campaign sending Bay Buchanan out as a spokesman? --- Yeah, not the best choice. Here's my current frustration. Mitt is going to be in Utah today for a $1,000/plate lunch (and then I think a more expensive dinner later today). Paul Ryan was here last week. Why are Utahns, who should be totally in the bag for Romney-Ryan, making the candidates waste their precious time doing fundraising lunches? Just write the effin' checks, assholes. We need those two to spend time in swing states or at least at fundraisers near bigger pools of money. Plenty of wealth in Utah, but we're pretty remote otherwise. It makes no sense for Mitt to have to come here to sing for his supper (and checks). Grumble, grumble.

Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 07:54 AM (5H6zj)

28 Good news? Obama team tries to lower expectations for debates http://tinyurl.com/9qyrvlz

Posted by: The Political Hat at September 18, 2012 07:54 AM (sZTYJ)

29 Re: GM Chickens coming home to roost... Like Iran threatening an Obama lawsuit due to the "film." How many more chickens have to come home to roost before the voters realize they are being pecked to death?

Posted by: striking? deal with it at September 18, 2012 07:55 AM (LpQbZ)

30 @ ELCA , you people eat too much Jello Carrot mold and not enough Venison and Wild Boar

Posted by: Clemenza at September 18, 2012 07:56 AM (afx6B)

31 mini-rant back on: I wonder how much sympathy people would feel for the "real" refs if they knew what their contract demands are. These privileged jerk offs are fighting to keep their guaranteed pensions from being 401Ks. Talk about 1%ers.

Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 07:56 AM (5H6zj)

32 How many more chickens have to come home to roost before the voters realize they are being pecked to death?

Posted by: striking? deal with it at September 18, 2012 11:55 AM (LpQbZ)


Well, I've got a serious bone to pick with those guys.

Posted by: The Chicken at September 18, 2012 07:56 AM (RD7QR)

33 You've got this guy Obama.  And he's so, just so above it all.  He promised to change Washington when he was elected and he has.  You have all this turmoil going on in the world and what is Obama's response?  To remain calm, cool, collected and watch football.  The average American loves football.  That's why Obama wins in November.

Posted by: Chris Matthews at September 18, 2012 07:57 AM (/YJYi)

34 Why are Utahns, who should be totally in the bag for Romney-Ryan, making the candidates waste their precious time doing fundraising lunches? Just write the effin' checks, assholes. We need those two to spend time in swing states or at least at fundraisers near bigger pools of money. why does king O go to hollywood? same difference it's like buying an expensive bumper sticker

Posted by: schmoozing at September 18, 2012 07:57 AM (LpQbZ)

35 The Opening ceremony of headquarter of international womens movement FEMEN started with topless parade in the 18th district of Paris. Possibly [[b]NSFW]: http://tinyurl.com/9owogaz

Posted by: The Political Hat at September 18, 2012 07:57 AM (sZTYJ)

36 Fuck you, pay me.

---

It's a better business plan than Solyndra had.

Posted by: WalrusRex at September 18, 2012 07:59 AM (Hx5uv)

37 bill o'reilly and jon stewart in a 90 minute debate oct 6 give me a break

Posted by: vomit inducing at September 18, 2012 08:00 AM (LpQbZ)

38 Yeah according to the guardian the average ref last season made $150,000.  For three hours worth of work on 16 days over a few months.  Time to get back to work douches.

Posted by: Adam at September 18, 2012 08:00 AM (/YJYi)

39 @ 15-15, I'm 3 above the Mendoza Line.

Posted by: toby928© at September 18, 2012 08:00 AM (QupBk)

40 Good Lord......those weekly standard boys get the vapors quite easily.  Kristol is all spastic over Romney's remarks.



Posted by: Tami at September 18, 2012 08:00 AM (X6akg)

41 Possibly [NSFW]:
http://tinyurl.com/9owogaz

---

I'm glad that one has a sing reading "I am Free" because I'm a little short this month.

Posted by: WalrusRex at September 18, 2012 08:01 AM (Hx5uv)

42 The Opening ceremony of headquarter of international womens movement FEMEN started with topless parade in the 18th district of Paris.

Possibly [NSFW]:
http://tinyurl.com/9owogaz



There's not a single one that I would...

Posted by: BCochran1981 at September 18, 2012 08:04 AM (da5Wo)

43 I'm also pro gun control!

Posted by: Bill Kristol at September 18, 2012 08:04 AM (/YJYi)

44 Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 11:56 AM (5H6zj)


That's exactly why I quit watching most pro sports after the 94-95 MLB strike. Unions and TV money ruin everything they touch.

I'll watch NFL playoffs after week two and the World Series. Until then, I keep up via box scores and watching fantasy league play.

Those unionized pricks don't get much of my money at all anymore.


Posted by: IdowhatIwant at September 18, 2012 08:04 AM (DzvS7)

45 "Kristol is all spastic over Romney's remarks."

The damage that this asshole has done to the conservative cause in mindblowing.

Posted by: lowandslow at September 18, 2012 08:04 AM (GZitp)

46 >>why does king O go to hollywood? Hollywood, NYC, Chicago, DC are not backwaters. It is a waste of time for Mitt to come to Utah. Everyone here knows him already. These are his people. He should be spending time on the coasts where there is a more diverse set of potential funders and more media coverage.

Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 08:05 AM (5H6zj)

47 Re Romney's remarks. The Palestinian was is most definitely a plus. Not going to hurt him at all. I think the 47%er one was not great for the reason someone pointed out yesterday plenty of seniors do not pay taxes, but I also don't think it will hurt him. I do wish the campaign had tighter control over peoples' cell phones and invitation lists.

Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 08:07 AM (5H6zj)

48 Hmmm. That imaginary cheerleader has no elbows.

Posted by: Mindy at September 18, 2012 08:07 AM (CC6tc)

49 28 rant off Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 11:50 AM (5H6zj) ---------------- agreed Posted by: striking? deal with it at September 18, 2012 11:52 AM (LpQbZ) The only complaint I have about the replacement Refs is they need to control the players. There was almost a major fight last night... get them off the field when making a decision.

Posted by: The Robot Devil at September 18, 2012 08:07 AM (136wp)

50 And what's with Romney saying the Palestinians aren't interested in peace?

---

About thirty years ago, Barbara Tuchman wrote a book entitled the March of Folly giving several examples throughout history of idiotic policies that various governments adopted that resulted in great harm to themselves.  According to her definition, such folly had to endure throughout several succeeding administrations to qualify.  I think our delusion that the Palestinians are just misunderstood freedom fighters would qualify.

Posted by: WalrusRex at September 18, 2012 08:07 AM (Hx5uv)

51 "[Imagine picture of hot cheerleader here!]" Sharp elbows!

Posted by: CoolCzech at September 18, 2012 08:08 AM (21izQ)

52 Ok, cheerleader pic....

NSFW


http://tinyurl.com/8condlw

Posted by: BCochran1981 at September 18, 2012 08:10 AM (da5Wo)

53 "Posted by: CoolCzech at September 18, 2012 12:08 PM (21izQ)"


Where the hell have you been? Ain't heard you in months.

Posted by: lowandslow at September 18, 2012 08:11 AM (GZitp)

54 56 Ok, cheerleader pic....

NSFW


http://tinyurl.com/8condlw

Posted by: BCochran1981 at September 18, 2012 12:10 PM (da5Wo)


DAMN those are some pointy elbows.

Posted by: The Chicken at September 18, 2012 08:11 AM (RD7QR)

55 The only complaint I have about the replacement Refs is they need to control the players. There was almost a major fight last night... ------ Well, the ESPN guys were on and on about that, but really it comes from the coaching staff. When you have coach Fox jumping up and down like a nutter, barely in control, and other coaches coming onto the field, it's clear THEY are riled up and the players reflect that. Goodell needs to issue a warning to all of the teams mgmt/owners to get their players under control or heads will roll. There have been some judgment and procedural calls blown, more than with regular refs. There is a league guy (regular guy) in the booth, as I understand it, so just give him the ability to intervene more until these refs are up to speed. Also I really wonder if the sidelines officials (the ones holding the sticks) are part of the lockout or not. If not I think they could be screwing things up a bit just to try to generate sympathy for the locked out refs.

Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 08:11 AM (5H6zj)

56

Anyone else sick of the announcers and coaches and players using the replacement refs as their excuse for everything.  Frankly I have not noticed any significant difference except for the cattawalling by the announcers and some whiney players on the losing side.  The replacement refs are not making any more mistakes than the regular refs.  They are just highlighted more.  

Posted by: polynikes at September 18, 2012 08:12 AM (m2CN7)

57 That's also a discarded sock.

Posted by: joncelli, heartless Con and all around unpleasant guy at September 18, 2012 08:12 AM (RD7QR)

58 56 Ok, cheerleader pic.... NSFW http://tinyurl.com/8condlw Posted by: BCochran1981 at September 18, 2012 12:10 PM (da5Wo) Another pic, be forewarned, do NOT go to link if you have a weak stomach: http://tinyurl.com/9fzc77y

Posted by: The Robot Devil at September 18, 2012 08:12 AM (136wp)

59 59 The only complaint I have about the replacement Refs is they need to control the players. There was almost a major fight last night... ------ Well, the ESPN guys were on and on about that, but really it comes from the coaching staff. When you have coach Fox jumping up and down like a nutter, barely in control, and other coaches coming onto the field, it's clear THEY are riled up and the players reflect that. Goodell needs to issue a warning to all of the teams mgmt/owners to get their players under control or heads will roll. ... Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 12:11 PM (5H6zj) It wasn't only last night, I saw it in two other games on Sunday...

Posted by: The Robot Devil at September 18, 2012 08:14 AM (136wp)

60 I see the subject has already been discussed.  Nevermind.

Posted by: polynikes at September 18, 2012 08:14 AM (m2CN7)

61 Rasmussen says that Romney's ahead in Colorado.

Posted by: joncelli, heartless Con and all around unpleasant guy at September 18, 2012 08:14 AM (RD7QR)

62 Power still out. If no power by 2 I'm out of here

Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 18, 2012 08:16 AM (05RcU)

63 51 Re Romney's remarks. The Palestinian was is most definitely a plus. Not going to hurt him at all. I think the 47%er one was not great for the reason someone pointed out yesterday plenty of seniors do not pay taxes, but I also don't think it will hurt him. I do wish the campaign had tighter control over peoples' cell phones and invitation lists. Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 12:07 PM (5H6zj) It was one of the hotel staff who made the recording. Some piece of shit occupier who wanted to play spy for a day. I'm convinced of it.

Posted by: Serious Cat at September 18, 2012 08:16 AM (d2QQ4)

64 I'm guessing these are pro only picks. If it was college too now many here would go with KSU over OU this Saturday?

Posted by: teej at September 18, 2012 08:16 AM (32Scy)

65 Rasmussen says that Romney's ahead in Colorado.

---

I hope so.  I hope one day to be able to leave the house without a paper bag over my head.

Posted by: WalrusRex at September 18, 2012 08:17 AM (Hx5uv)

66 Britain's defense secretary says Prince Harry got extra protection when the Taliban attacked his base in Afghanistan last Friday. Philip Hammond says the prince, a helicopter pilot, was moved to a secure position once it was clear that the perimeter of Camp Bastion had been breached. PHOTOS: PRINCE HARRY IN AFGHANISTAN INSURGENTS ATTACK AFGHAN BASE WHERE PRINCE HARRY IS STATIONED In an interview with the BBC Monday night, Hammond said: "He is serving there as an ordinary officer but clearly there are additional security arrangements in place that recognize that he could be a target himself specifically as a result of who he is." Two U.S. Marines were killed and six planes were destroyed. The Taliban said the attack was staged to avenge a film that insulted Islam and because Harry is serving at the base. As I understand it, Harry has his very own detail of Gurkhas to protect him. I'll take the Gurkhas and give the points, they are pretty fierce fellows.

Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 18, 2012 08:18 AM (05RcU)

67 how many- oh never mind

Posted by: teej at September 18, 2012 08:18 AM (32Scy)

68 It wasn't only last night, I saw it in two other games on Sunday... Yes, but wasn't one of them the Eagles game? I mean, what do you expect. Moreover, seems to me there've been plenty of fights with the full-time refs. I guess my point is just that the coaches across the league are playing the "wah wah replacement officials" card to the hilt. These means the players have no respect for the officials and they act up. If there's a fight, Goodell should punish the teams. I think that's SOP. Besides, what are we worried about? The players union has made it clear via their support of the bounty hunter players that they are not really concerned about player safety.

Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 08:18 AM (5H6zj)

69 you're the Unknown Comic?

Posted by: soothsayer states the obvious at September 18, 2012 08:18 AM (s+8Vv)

70 The only problem with the "47%" statement was that he conflated the Obama base with the number of people who get a net gain from government. There's more nuance there, but that's could be a great advantage since the mic will be in his face for once and he can flesh out that argument. Posted by: runninrebel at September 18, 2012 12:17 PM (N/1Dm) Memo to Romney: NEVER say anything in private that you would not say exactly the same in public.

Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 18, 2012 08:19 AM (05RcU)

71 {{GONG}}

Posted by: soothsayer states the obvious at September 18, 2012 08:19 AM (0w+w3)

72 It was one of the hotel staff who made the recording. Some piece of shit occupier who wanted to play spy for a day. I'm convinced of it. ---- I guess that makes sense. Should be easy to tell from the position of the camera.

Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 08:20 AM (5H6zj)

73 LOL!


BREAKING: Obama attends his daily intelligence meeting 3 days in a row


Posted by: Tami at September 18, 2012 08:20 AM (X6akg)

74 and Rove, Kristol, wherever you are out there ....

FUCK YOU TOO !!!!

Posted by: Lt Col Frank Slade at September 18, 2012 08:21 AM (wwsoB)

75 He hoo he hoo he hook Heeeey chuckie chuckie chuckie

Posted by: teej at September 18, 2012 08:22 AM (32Scy)

76 That would be quit a stretch for the average oldie. The "47%" classification clearly represents moochers who have no stake, not people living on retirement income etc. Seniors do not consider themselves moochers and do not want to be considered moochers, nor do they like the moochers themselves. --- What I heard of Romney's comment was equating "don't pay taxes" with moochers. That's the mistake, imho. I don't think it's fatal, by any means, but it was not great. Romney has admitted that it was not well-phrased.

Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 08:22 AM (5H6zj)

77 So I was reading that article about the college professor making students sign a petition saying they would vote for Obama. Seems like a total community college thing to do, anyways I saw that it might have broken federal law. Is it in the law under Title IX? That's what says in the article, did someone just tack that on to a sports spending law, or is that a different Title IX. Kind of like California where we have two prop 8's one for gay marriage, and one that allows you to lower your home value for property tax purposes.

Posted by: Adam Smith's Invisible Pimp Hand at September 18, 2012 08:23 AM (NzBQO)

78 OT, but I would like to post this as proof of the existence of God.

From Drudge:

REPORT: Pakistani protester dies after inhaling fumes from burning U.S. flag.

Posted by: Sean Bannion at September 18, 2012 08:23 AM (sbV1u)

79 I'll take the Gurkhas and give the points, they are pretty fierce fellows.

Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 18, 2012 12:18 PM (05RcU)


Why, whatever would give you that idea? Lulz!


http://tinyurl.com/9yujqwg


Posted by: IdowhatIwant at September 18, 2012 08:24 AM (DzvS7)

80 83 So I was reading that article about the college professor making students sign a petition saying they would vote for Obama. Seems like a total community college thing to do, anyways I saw that it might have broken federal law. --- Assuming it's a publicly supported college, I think the violation would be in having public funds and public employees campaigning.

Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 08:24 AM (5H6zj)

81 bill o'reilly and jon stewart in a 90 minute debate

oct 6

give me a break

-----------

Meh.  But if it were Jon Stewart and Mark Levin, I'd tune in.  O'Reilly....not so much.

Posted by: Lady in Black at September 18, 2012 08:24 AM (lTVJy)

82

That would be quit a stretch for the average oldie. The "47%" classification clearly represents moochers who have no stake, not people living on retirement income etc. Seniors do not consider themselves moochers and do not want to be considered moochers, nor do they like the moochers themselves.

 

Bingo. They paid taxes their whole lives. They will not be angry, they will be nodding in agreement. Of course, the MSM is working mightily to anger up their blood.

 

The problem is, this is not the best time to introduce the 47% concept to voters. Not in the closing months of an election. It's like when conservatives noted Obama's socialist-like tendencies in the heat of the 2008 election. That was the wrong time to introduce the concept to voters, because you spend  most of your time waiting for the shock/blow back to die down.

 

So let's stop doing that. Let's vow that we'll get Americans familiar with these huge concepts BETWEEN election years:

 

1. Democrats want to turn the U.S. into France and here is how much it will cost. (Challenge any liberal to name an aspect of French socialism that they don't find appealing.)

 

2. The U.S. is made of married Makers and single Takers, and we are for the Makers. (You draw the marrieds and those who plan to marry, seniors who worked hard their whole lives, etc. and maybe some squishy moderates who didn't realize that not everyone receiving government aid needs it.)

 

Tweak the language as necessary. It won't guarantee victory, but it will reframe the Left v. Right debate and end this nonsense in which stating the truth actually costs us support. And don't wait until the next f-cking election to do it.

Posted by: CJ at September 18, 2012 08:26 AM (9KqcB)

83 Frankly I have not noticed any significant difference except for the cattawalling by the announcers and some whiney players on the losing side.

Are you completely shit-faced by kickoff?  They're giving away extra timeouts, fucking up two-minute warnings, spotting the ball full yards off...

Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at September 18, 2012 08:26 AM (/kI1Q)

84 OT, but I would like to post this as proof of the existence of God.
---

Dogs are proof that God loves us.

Posted by: WalrusRex at September 18, 2012 08:27 AM (Hx5uv)

85 The U.S. is made of married Makers and single Takers

Go fuck yourself with Michelle Obama's dick.

Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at September 18, 2012 08:27 AM (/kI1Q)

86 Seems like a total community college thing to do, anyways I saw that it might have broken federal law. --- Assuming it's a publicly supported college, I think the violation would be in having public funds and public employees campaigning. Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 12:24 PM (5H6zj) She was breaking Federal Law also by trying to coerce someone to vote a certain way against their will.

Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 18, 2012 08:27 AM (05RcU)

87 But I'm looking out for you folks!

Posted by: Bill O'Reilly at September 18, 2012 08:28 AM (/YJYi)

88 Go fuck yourself with Michelle Obama's dick.

Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at September 18, 2012 12:27 PM (/kI1Q)



Now that is damn funny.

Posted by: BCochran1981 at September 18, 2012 08:28 AM (da5Wo)

89 >>I do wish the campaign had tighter control over peoples' cell phones and invitation lists.

Don't worry, we got it covered.

Posted by: Transportation Sodomy Administration at September 18, 2012 08:28 AM (SDkq3)

90 The U.S. is made of married Makers and single Takers

Go fuck yourself with Michelle Obama's dick.

Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at September 18, 2012 12:27 PM (/kI1Q)


Yeah, you probably over-generalized dude.  I've remained single lo these many years, and you don't want to know how much of my paycheck goes to the Takers.

Posted by: eastvalleyphx says fuck islam at September 18, 2012 08:29 AM (GRvW4)

91

66 re: CO saw some info from another poll last week in CO that Romney was up there

Posted by: Honey Badger the Dense Rethuglican Nazi Bastard at September 18, 2012 08:29 AM (GvYeG)

92 59 The only complaint I have about the replacement Refs is they need to control the players. There was almost a major fight last night... ========== This is becoming difficult because both the coaches and players are not taking the refs seriously. If you listened to the Fox NFL team (bradshaw and friends), then you would have noticed how they snickered about how coaches and players try to play and fight and ignore the refs... how it has always been done - trying to take advantage of them. And, these are replacement refs. Imagine how ugly it is really getting. Are we going to go to all of the refs who are striking's Facebook page and see if they advocate for a certain team, or tweets - then take them out? How much cleansing of these sites by the striking refs do you think has gone on since they pulled that one replacement ref due to his FB page?

Posted by: thuggery and contemp at September 18, 2012 08:29 AM (LpQbZ)

93

Meh. But if it were Jon Stewart and Mark Levin, I'd tune in. O'Reilly....not so much.

 

Stewart will see it as a way to argue the liberal viewpoint and eviscerate conservativism, and O'Reilly will see it as great TV. Ugh.

Posted by: CJ at September 18, 2012 08:29 AM (9KqcB)

94 There was almost a major fight last night... ========== That was the highlight of the game

Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 18, 2012 08:30 AM (05RcU)

95 She was breaking Federal Law also by trying to coerce someone to vote a certain way against their will. ----- Yes, but is it coercive because of her status as a public employee? If she worked at a private university, would it be coercive? If I have a voluntary relationship with someone, say for example with a business person I buy some services from, and that person says "I won't sell to you unless you vote for Obama" I'm not sure that's coercive.

Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 08:30 AM (5H6zj)

96 90 OT, but I would like to post this as proof of the existence of God. --- Dogs are proof that God loves us. Posted by: WalrusRex at September 18, 2012 12:27 PM (Hx5uv) I love dogs, too. But here's Godels proof http://sas.uwaterloo.ca/~cgsmall/ontology.html

Posted by: The Robot Devil at September 18, 2012 08:30 AM (136wp)

97 OT, but I would like to post this as proof of the existence of God.
---

Dogs are proof that God loves us.

Posted by: WalrusRex at September 18, 2012 12:27 PM (Hx5uv)


Tigers are proof Gods cool with thinning out the herd a bit.

/Yesterday'd

Posted by: Adam Smith's Invisible Pimp Hand at September 18, 2012 08:30 AM (NzBQO)

98 >>Posted by: thuggery and contemp at September 18, 2012 12:29 PM (LpQbZ) This +1

Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 08:30 AM (5H6zj)

99

Well, this is cute.   Via Drudge:

 

Chinese General: Prepare for Combat    With    Japan

http://freebeacon.com/chinese-general-prepare-for-combat/

 

ChinaÂ’s most powerful military leader, in an unusual public statement, last week ordered military forces to prepare for combat, as Chinese warships deployed to waters near disputed islands and anti-Japan protests throughout the country turned violent...

 

 

Sound and fury because America is distracted?   Or genuine militant intent?   That's my question.  

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/b][/i][/u] at September 18, 2012 08:32 AM (4df7R)

100 Meh. But if it were Jon Stewart and Mark Levin, I'd tune in. O'Reilly....not so much. Posted by: Lady in Black at September 18, 2012 12:24 PM (lTVJy) ========== Jon Stewart would pee his pants at the thought of debating Levin...

Posted by: o'reilly is safe at September 18, 2012 08:32 AM (LpQbZ)

101 Yes, but is it coercive because of her status as a public employee? If she worked at a private university, would it be coercive? If I have a voluntary relationship with someone, say for example with a business person I buy some services from, and that person says "I won't sell to you unless you vote for Obama" I'm not sure that's coercive. Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 12:30 PM (5H6zj) ??? NOt sure. May be any position of authority and threatening punishment ( low grade ) if you do not comply?

Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 18, 2012 08:32 AM (05RcU)

102 Speaking of change, I think a lot of Americans are eager to have a President who doesn't bullshit us... for a change.

Posted by: sherlock at September 18, 2012 08:32 AM (2DD2m)

103 91 >>>>>I don't think it's fatal, by any means, but it was not great. Romney has admitted that it was not well-phrased. ---- I think it only hurts him if he listens to the Kristols of the world and gets defensive. --- Basically agree. And it sounds like he's not doing that, so that's good. Jim Acosta (CNN) tweeted this morning that Romney seems very relaxed on the trail even behind the scenes with reporters.

Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 08:32 AM (5H6zj)

104 I can't find it in me to feel bad for the ref who got pulled.  He is a New Orleans fan.

Posted by: Adam at September 18, 2012 08:33 AM (/YJYi)

105 Sound and fury because America is distracted? Or genuine militant intent? That's my question. Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter at September 18, 2012 12:32 PM (4df7R) I would guess just bluster. China does not need a shooting war with Japan, and Japan, is not paper tiger

Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 18, 2012 08:33 AM (05RcU)

106 Imagine picture of hot cheerleader here

Good gawd, how does she keep from falling over?!?!  I can't even see her face!

Posted by: EC at September 18, 2012 08:33 AM (GQ8sn)

107 Yeah according to the guardian the average ref last season made $150,000. For three hours worth of work on 16 days over a few months. Time to get back to work douches.



They spend a LOT more time at work than just what the average moron sees on TV.  Plus, the point of having full-time referees means that they don't have to take another job where they can be influenced in various ways.

Posted by: NC Ref at September 18, 2012 08:33 AM (dVJLS)

108 @92- heather, we and other singles like us, that is if you're single which I can't imagine, are exceptions. Ive been hit with a lot of blanket statements over the years while working for the state DOT too.

Posted by: teej at September 18, 2012 08:34 AM (0MVzQ)

109 Sound and fury because America is distracted? Or genuine militant intent? That's my question. Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter at September 18, 2012 12:32 PM (4df7R) I think it's more to distract the Chinese from how sh*tty their life is... add Godwin's reference if necessary...

Posted by: The Robot Devil at September 18, 2012 08:34 AM (136wp)

110 ??? NOt sure. May be any position of authority and threatening punishment ( low grade ) if you do not comply? ----- Yeah, but the relationship is voluntary. I *have* to pay public employees' salaries (through my taxes), so I am unwillingly subsidizing a campaign if they campaign during their work hours or in their official capacity. I don't have to attend a private university and pay that prof's salaries. Don't get me wrong, it would suck, but I think it might not be illegal if the prof were from a private college.

Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 08:35 AM (5H6zj)

111

"bill o'reilly and jon stewart in a 90 minute debate "

 

The only possible plus to this is I think Bill might actually bring his A-game.

 

Whenever he brings Jon onto his show, I can't help but think that he intentionally shoots for a tie.  Keep the tally close.  Keep people on both teams wanting one more...just one more debate, so they can finally see "their guy" take it home.

 

When he's got  Jon on his show, he wants to keep his ratings high.  Plus, if he only slightly-beats here, slightly-loses-to   there with Jon,  then maybe he might appeal to some of the pro-Jon viewers that tuned in.  He and Jon don't compete in the same time-slot, so he wins the viewer, who now watches both.  If he absolutely POUNDS Jon, and sends him  running off the set crying, then that viewer will never tune in again.

 

Maybe if this is on "neutral territory" with no reliance on one's show or the other's show, then Bill won't  do this, and actually feel like mopping the floor with his opponent.

Posted by: reason at September 18, 2012 08:35 AM (CGjum)

112

102....If I have a voluntary relationship with someone, say for example with a business person I buy some services from, and that person says "I won't sell to you unless you vote for Obama" I'm not sure that's coercive.

 

Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 12:30 PM (5H6zj)

 

-------------

 

Well, yeah...still coercive.

Just not as powerful...because the level of power over you is less.

 

Posted by: wheatie at September 18, 2012 08:35 AM (Z7b/q)

113 Yeah, but the relationship is voluntary. If your a student at a private college and pay tuition and need that class? That is not a voluntary association

Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 18, 2012 08:36 AM (05RcU)

114 They spend a LOT more time at work than just what the average moron sees on TV. Plus, the point of having full-time referees means that they don't have to take another job where they can be influenced in various ways. ----- Pretty sure most of these guys are either retired from other careers or still working. They've been being described by the slobbering media as part-time employees.

Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 08:36 AM (5H6zj)

115 If your a student at a private college and pay tuition and need that class? That is not a voluntary association --- Sure it is. You are a consumer. You can choose to go elsewhere.

Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 08:36 AM (5H6zj)

116 I can't find it in me to feel bad for the ref who got pulled. He is a New Orleans fan.

Posted by: Adam at September 18, 2012 12:33 PM (/YJYi)


Let's be honest, a lot of older people don't understand social networking. It's not a bad thing, but that's just the way it is. They haven't grown up with it, they don't understand the full power of what they say on these sights. Information travels so fast now. A lot of them are still trying to work their way through it, I see a lot more stupid stuff from 40+ age then I think I should see on sites like facebook and twitter.

Posted by: Adam Smith's Invisible Pimp Hand at September 18, 2012 08:37 AM (NzBQO)

117 109 Speaking of change, I think a lot of Americans are eager to have a President who doesn't bullshit us... for a change. Posted by: sherlock at September 18, 2012 12:32 PM (2DD2m) Or, even show up for work. Romney, as of late, seems to be filling a void that Obama is leaving with his empty chair in the oval office. While Obama is MIA, Romney is being questioned more so. He could really use this to his advantage. He turned this "smoking gun" video around and around already. His response was great. And, he got air time for it.

Posted by: o'reilly is safe at September 18, 2012 08:38 AM (LpQbZ)

118 123 I can't find it in me to feel bad for the ref who got pulled. He is a New Orleans fan. Posted by: Adam at September 18, 2012 12:33 PM (/YJYi) hehe, okay, understood but, keep in mind, there is not one ref alive who doesn't have a favorite team.

Posted by: o'reilly is safe at September 18, 2012 08:39 AM (LpQbZ)

119 If your a student at a private college and pay tuition and need that class? That is not a voluntary association
---
Sure it is. You are a consumer. You can choose to go elsewhere.

Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 12:36 PM (5H6zj)


Please tell that to a few people who went to my evangelical christian college and bitched about having required chapel, or not allowing homosexuals to live on campus.

Posted by: Adam Smith's Invisible Pimp Hand at September 18, 2012 08:39 AM (NzBQO)

120 Y-not, do you think the media is any more accurate in discussing the ref situation than they are in other aspects of reporting?

Yes most guys have jobs or are retired from other careers, but that doesn't mean that the only time they spend on NFL referee issues is the 3 hours a week someone suggested.  I don't know how much time they do spend, but if the expectations are anything like the sport I work, it's a pretty big commitment.

Posted by: NC Ref at September 18, 2012 08:40 AM (dVJLS)

121 He turned this "smoking gun" video around and around already. His response was great. And, he got air time for it.

Posted by: o'reilly is safe at September 18, 2012 12:38 PM (LpQbZ)


As somebody suggested in the headline thread, these sorts of "gaffes" wherein the media runs with it and Romney turns it around on them might be the only way to get around the media embargo on the Romney campaign.

Posted by: joncelli, heartless Con and all around unpleasant guy at September 18, 2012 08:40 AM (RD7QR)

122 It is so nice to hear a former Dem and Obama voter turn from the King due to listening to Rush. Kudos to Rush for turning another voter.

Posted by: flowers & chocolate at September 18, 2012 08:40 AM (LpQbZ)

123

"Are you completely shit-faced by kickoff? "

 

*crosses Heather off his list of Moronettes he'd be willing to watch football with*

Posted by: reason at September 18, 2012 08:40 AM (CGjum)

124

Yes, but is it coercive because of her status as a public employee? If she worked at a private university, would it be coercive?

 

Since she works at a public community college,    and is therefore a state employee,      it's a pretty cut and dry violation of Florida's election laws.   As Campus Reform quotes:

 

SweetÂ’s actions may have also violated FloridaÂ’s election laws.

 

[Florida election law] Section 104.31, of Title IX in chapter 104, states that “no officer or employee of the state... shall... use his or her official authority or influence for the purpose of interfering with an election or nomination of officer or influencing another person’s vote or affecting the result thereof.”

 

 

If she worked at a   private university it would be coercive, but I don't know that it would be illegal.   It COULD be a breach of a college or university's code of ethics, which would   likely lead to some kind of censure by the institution in question.

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/b][/i][/u] at September 18, 2012 08:41 AM (4df7R)

125 As somebody suggested in the headline thread, these sorts of "gaffes" wherein the media runs with it and Romney turns it around on them might be the only way to get around the media embargo on the Romney campaign. Posted by: joncelli, heartless Con and all around unpleasant guy at September 18, 2012 12:40 PM (RD7QR) Exactly. And, the reason it works for Romney is because he does not pander. He is talking straight from the heart. He knows what he is saying, he believes it, and speaks with conviction. It's easy to respond to attacks at what he believes and won't back down on.

Posted by: flowers & chocolate at September 18, 2012 08:42 AM (LpQbZ)

126 Looked at Ras' site and Romney still up, and up in so-called "swing" states, as well.  I would not be surprised to see the lead expand a point or so after all the play of Romney's comments sink in further.

His comments help solidify the conservative base.  The comments strike the voters we are going for as "no shit, Sherlock" remarks and will only help relieve any lingering doubts about Romney amongst these voters.

The people who are offended weren't voting for him anyway. 

I liked that he was on top of the story with the press avail in LA last night.  Every story I've heard today has those comments last night about "please release the whole video" included.  If he had said something bad or had something to hide, why ask for the whole thing to be released, thinks the average listener.  That's a good thing.

One of two possibilities: Romney's people fed the story to MJ through duplicity counting on the libs to run it when the libs thought it necessary to change the topic from an inevitable Obama fuck-up.  Or, MJ legitimately undercovered Romney and released it to change the topic from Obama;s fuck-ups, but sooner than anticipated. 

In any case, it helps Romney where he needs help and the libs are too stupid to understand that.  Putting the Pali tape out today helps Romney even more as the ME burns and the Obama dead-ambassador story unravels.  Makes Romney look like the sensible one for making a "water is wet" statement about the Palis.

The libs can't help themselves, they just keep punching that tar baby.

I denounce myself.

Posted by: trumpetdaddy at September 18, 2012 08:42 AM (dcoFe)

127 I can't remember; did I mark this thread, yet? /lifts leg pssssssssssssss

Posted by: Soothsayer at September 18, 2012 08:42 AM (jUytm)

128 Sure it is. You are a consumer. You can choose to go elsewhere. Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 12:36 PM (5H6zj) YOu think it is easy to switch schools, get accepted, transfer credits? I guess you never did that?

Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 18, 2012 08:43 AM (05RcU)

129 128 Y-not, do you think the media is any more accurate in discussing the ref situation than they are in other aspects of reporting? ---- The media is backing the regular refs. So, yes, they are biased --- for the refs. I doubt anyone believes the refs don't do things to prepare. We know (because their rep said so) they spend a couple of weeks coming up to speed and doing physical conditioning. That's why just before week 1 the refs said they would not be ready for the first week of games even if the lockout ended. But even without looking I know from years of watching football that these guys were mostly drawn from professional careers -- lawyers and such. This is a second gig for most of them. I think it is beyond tone deaf for the officials to be demanding guaranteed pensions for a part-time, second career job. They should be wiling to take the 401k offer.

Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 08:43 AM (5H6zj)

130 As somebody suggested in the headline thread, these sorts of "gaffes" wherein the media runs with it and Romney turns it around on them might be the only way to get around the media embargo on the Romney campaign. Posted by: joncelli, heartless Con and all around unpleasant guy at September 18, 2012 12:40 PM (RD7QR) ____________________ Exactly. I was thinking the same thing.

Posted by: tasker at September 18, 2012 08:44 AM (r2PLg)

131 YOu think it is easy to switch schools, get accepted, transfer credits? I guess you never did that? -- I said it would suck. I am not sure it's illegal. That was the initial question being addressed.

Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 08:44 AM (5H6zj)

132 Posted by: reason at September 18, 2012 12:35 PM (CGjum) ==== Well, it sounds like you mean O'Reilly will shoot for the middle, or the sitting on the fencer's. If so, fine - as long as he gets conservative views across.

Posted by: flowers & chocolate at September 18, 2012 08:44 AM (LpQbZ)

133

I enjoyed being told by a caller on Mark Davis' show this morning that I was not voting for Romney, but still only voting  against Obama.

 

Being told what I think by liberals never gets old.  Never.  Gets.  Old.

Posted by: reason at September 18, 2012 08:45 AM (CGjum)

134 136 Sure it is. You are a consumer. You can choose to go elsewhere. Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 12:36 PM (5H6zj) YOu think it is easy to switch schools, get accepted, transfer credits? I guess you never did that? Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 18, 2012 12:43 PM (05RcU) __________________ It's a bad analogy. Students do not equal consumer in this picture. The teacher to student is not an equal relationship.

Posted by: tasker at September 18, 2012 08:45 AM (r2PLg)

135

Go fuck yourself with Michelle Obama's dick. Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at September 18, 2012 12:27 PM (/kI1Q)

 

I see, you missed my previous, longer lectures on this in which I took the time to shield anyone from panty-bunching misunderstanding. As someone who lived most of his live as a proud single American, I'll add the qualifiers.

 

Gender Gap: There is none. Republicans win the vote of married women. Own it. Mention it. The vote we don't have? Young singles - they're young. The closer they get to starting a family, the closer they'll get to the GOP. Single-parents-by-choice. Fuck them. They are the single most significant driving force in larger government.

 

The nonmarried vote is mostly: Young voters, who will always tend to vote liberal. And older, singler parents, who, statistically are more likely to need government support. That's reality.

 

Gallup:

Married registered voters prefer Republican challenger Mitt Romney over Democratic President Barack Obama by 54% to 39%, according to Gallup data collected from June to August. On the other hand, nonmarried voters break strongly for the president over Romney, 56% to 35%. Marriage is a significant predictor of presidential vote choice even after income, age, race, gender, education, religiosity, region, and having minor children are statistically controlled for.

http://tinyurl.com/99cyqbl
 

 

TO REPEAT: A lot of conservatives get the vapors when the subject of declining marriage rates come up, they figure itÂ’s one of them social issues, has nothing to do with winning elections. But in a Makers v. Takers electorate, those are our people.

 

Less marriage = more Takers. More out-of-wedlock births = more Takers. More Takers = bye bye GOP.

 

Time to start talking about this, openly. For tactical reasons. We cannot win elections if this trend continues unchallenged. Can. Not. Win.

 

I'm not interested in politics for the theater and the witting bloggytalk. I'm here to win. The demographics and cultural trends (40% out of wedlock births) mean that all our talk here about "smaller government" is just talk. It will soon be, if it is not already, statistically impossible to achieve.  If anyone takes that personally, congratulations for the Mrs. Crabapple impersonation (SKINNER: "Edna, I've always admired your ability to be personally offended at broad social change.")

 

The 'small government' won't work as more Americans - due to lifesyle choices - need bigger government to survive. Your beef is with reality, not me.




Posted by: CJ at September 18, 2012 08:45 AM (9KqcB)

136 >>>YOu think it is easy to switch schools, get accepted, transfer credits? I guess you never did that? Posted by: Nevergiveup You're right. Decades ago, I worked in the L&S dept of a large university. They make it extremely difficult.

Posted by: Redd at September 18, 2012 08:45 AM (Z8Qnh)

137 I think it is beyond tone deaf for the officials to be demanding guaranteed pensions for a part-time, second career job. They should be wiling to take the 401k offer.

Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 12:43 PM (5H6zj)

 

Agreed.   Especially when the NFL's    other, full-time employees are NOT provided with a pension plan.   Why would the NFL provide a pension to these men who, while vital to the sport, are nonetheless part-time?  

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/b][/i][/u] at September 18, 2012 08:45 AM (4df7R)

138 OT, by why is someone messing with bringatrailer.com?

Posted by: The Robot Devil at September 18, 2012 08:46 AM (136wp)

139 Agreed. Especially when the NFL's other, full-time employees are NOT provided with a pension plan. Why would the NFL provide a pension to these men who, while vital to the sport, are nonetheless part-time? Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter at September 18, 2012 12:45 PM (4df7R) Part-time workers? Racist

Posted by: Teacher's Union at September 18, 2012 08:47 AM (136wp)

140

122 If your a student at a private college and pay tuition and need that class? That is not a voluntary association
---
Sure it is. You are a consumer. You can choose to go elsewhere.

 

Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 12:36 PM (5H6zj)

 

----------

 

True...if you have the money to pay more tuition somewhere else, mid-semester.

If not. You're screwed.

 

Taking someone's money...and then making new demands on them, that were not disclosed until after the money was paid...is coercive.

 

It's sort of like, when you are at a drive-thru window at a restaurant.

They take your money....then say, "It's going to be a while. So you have to pull up, and park over there at the side. We will bring you your order".

They have altered the conditions of the implied contract.

You have lost most of your power...because you have already paid.

 

I have learned, however...that you can balk at that, and say..."No. I think I'll sit right here...or you can give my money back."

But then you run the risk of them hocking a loogey in your food.

 

Posted by: wheatie at September 18, 2012 08:47 AM (Z7b/q)

141 MOTHER JONES.  All the tenacity of  Breitbart / O'Keefe.  None of the  forethought.

Posted by: reason at September 18, 2012 08:47 AM (CGjum)

142 Exactly. I was thinking the same thing. Posted by: tasker at September 18, 2012 12:44 PM (r2PLg) ==== yep, and this is what Rush has been harping about all day today so far. these are opportunities and he hopes his advisers/campaign team don't play it too safe amen to that

Posted by: flowers & chocolate at September 18, 2012 08:47 AM (LpQbZ)

143 I am not sure it's illegal. That was the initial question being addressed. Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 12:44 PM (5H6zj) _________________ If it is a state school funded by taxpayers.... there might be an argument that it is illegal to campaign in the classroom when you are a teacher whose salary is funded by taxpayers.

Posted by: tasker at September 18, 2012 08:48 AM (r2PLg)

144

Yeah, you probably over-generalized dude. I've remained single lo these many years, and you don't want to know how much of my paycheck goes to the Takers. Posted by: eastvalleyphx says fuck islam at September 18, 2012 12:29 PM (GRvW4)

 

I was refering to single parenthood. How many shorties you got?

Posted by: CJ at September 18, 2012 08:48 AM (9KqcB)

145 Please tell that to a few people who went to my evangelical christian college and bitched about having required chapel, or not allowing homosexuals to live on campus. --- Or Sandra Fluke demanding Georgetown pay for her birth control. It's a very messy thing these days because almost every college/university accepts federal funds, so they give the feds a toehold to muck around on these issues. I think there are a few places that have managed to keep that at bay and run their institutions as they see fit, but I'm not sure about that. Frankly, I'm kind of amazed BYU gets away with some of the things that they require in their code of conduct. Pretty sure that they accept federal research funds, but maybe they don't accept Pell grants etc because the students' tuition is subsidized by the church. Maybe that's enough of to keep them out of federal regulation.

Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 08:49 AM (5H6zj)

146 It's kind of ridiculous to talk about consumer movement when you talk about higher education. The economic model is considerably fucked up.

Posted by: Adam Smith's Invisible Pimp Hand at September 18, 2012 08:49 AM (NzBQO)

147 these are opportunities and he hopes his advisers/campaign team don't play it too safe ______________ Heh. Has Rush seen and/or talked about that Prairie Fire ad the Romney campaign has put out?

Posted by: tasker at September 18, 2012 08:49 AM (r2PLg)

148 Heather, you probably already saw this. STOP THE PRESSES!! Kos has an important message for their red army. I will put it together for you. (links removed) ------------------------------------ Subject: You will never guess who is voting for Obama [redacted], why would a white, tobacco-chewing, Republican millionaire decide to vote for President Obama? Click here to find out, and share his story with friends over Facebook, Twitter or other social networks you belong to. Keep fighting, Chris Cocksucker Bowers Campaign Director, Daily Kos [So who is it?] My white male millionaire friend is voting for WHO!?! by 4democracy [eyeroll] I got a call from my buddy last night to come watch Sunday Football, drink a couple beers, and just catch up. We talk politics like we watch football: We mutually respect each other's right to be who we are, but also take great pleasure in giving each other crap about our teams, our candidates, and our economic philosophies. On my way over last night, I was smiling to myself while coming up with my top ten list of reasons why he should vote for Obama. Not to change his vote, mind you, but just to get him riled up and fire something back over beers. Deep down, I knew he was going to vote for Romney. His business ventures put him in the top one percent, income-wise; He is a big critic of the welfare state; He's a socially-moderate, fiscally conservative Catholic (rarely attending, though); He thinks and works hard to fulfill his own self-interest in his business and personal life, and feels no need to apologize for that. So, I got to his place and settled into my beer, passed a round of chewing tobacco over to him (you can take the boy out of Missouri, but you can't take the Missouri out of the boy), smiled a smartass smile, and asked him the question I had been waiting for. "So, who are you voting for for president?" "I'm not sure," he said completely seriously, "but I think I'm going to vote for Obama." I nearly choked on my Skoal. If there's a slam dunk vote for Romney, I thought, this guy was it. I even half-heartedly tried to talk him out of it (I wasn't going to give up easily on having at least SOME sort of debate), telling him that his income bracket would seem to lend itself to Romney's economic promises just as much as his business management needs would find relevance with Romney's promises to ease the regulations governing short-term lending or whether he provided his employees with health-care. I talked about how critics of Obama's economic policies say that all of this uncertainty about government intervention/regulation makes banks/investors more skeptical about investment and has slowed the recovery. As devoid of legitimate talking points as the (R) platform is, there's enough nuggets there when, turned over the right way, are worthy of debate. I mean, who did he think he was, ruining my sparring match by freaking agreeing with me? But, aside from not really liking that Romney is a Mormon, he said that his decision was based on, of all things, economics and prospects for his business. Without revealing too much personal information about him, his business caters to low to middle class families in an area with a large (nearly 50%) Latino population. He just said matter of factly (to paraphrase) - "I'm a numbers guy - and my numbers have been better under Obama, just like they were under Clinton. If those guys keep my customers coming through the door, I'll pay the 35% tax and not blink." He added that a big part of it was that he can take (the equivalent of) food stamps for his business as well, so in a way the artificially-expanded middle class as a result of low-income entitlements is a big help to his bottom line. As long as a government is committed to maintaining a certain level of support for low income people, he will maintain the volume he needs to succeed as a business. In addition, he provides health care voluntarily anyway for all of his full-time employees ("It's just smart", he says, "because it allows me to find the right people, keep them healthy and happy, and keep them around."), so he's really not worried about Obamacare running him out of business - it will actually save him money to the extent that it makes health care cheaper. On the Latino population, he also worried about what the immigration crusade mentality will do to his customer and employee base. This includes losing business from undocumented, poorly documented, or even legally documented families depending on how far the anti-immigration people (which includes Romney and more prominently Ryan) take that. In an area with a 50% latino base, this could devastate him. He also related a story to me of one of his regular employees, a green card holder who is paying the $800 to get her citizenship process dealt with. She was really nervous about the test and figuring out where to get the cash to go through the process, but she was more nervous about what people who advise that community are saying will likely happen if Romney is elected. Though most people think Obama is going to win, she didn't want to take the chance of being too far back in the line for citizenship that would rapidly form if Romney is elected and the Republicans start trying to get rid of Mexicans. Life is Interesting. Vote for Obama.

Posted by: Soothsayer at September 18, 2012 08:50 AM (jUytm)

149 Heh. Has Rush seen and/or talked about that Prairie Fire ad the Romney campaign has put out? Posted by: tasker at September 18, 2012 12:49 PM (r2PLg) not that I am aware of, I listen in and out while working on other things he just said the wondered if the media wanted to hold onto this tape until october... but needed to use it early hehe

Posted by: flowers & chocolate at September 18, 2012 08:52 AM (LpQbZ)

150

I am not sure it's illegal. That was the initial question being addressed.
Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 12:44 PM (5H6zj)

 

Y-not, if    the allegations are true then yes, it was illegal.   See my comment   @132.   Were she employed by a private institution the legality question    is less clear-cut.   But as a public employee at a state college (community colleges are state-operated), it's illegal for an instructor to use their role to influence an election.

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/b][/i][/u] at September 18, 2012 08:52 AM (4df7R)

151 Washing post poll in virginia has obama up... 8 points.... DOOM!

Posted by: fe at September 18, 2012 08:52 AM (/FxuJ)

152 If it is a state school funded by taxpayers.... there might be an argument that it is illegal to campaign in the classroom when you are a teacher whose salary is funded by taxpayers. --- I agree. Just to summarize b/c some people seem confused. I assume this community college prof is tax-payer supported. Therefore, I assume that the campaign violation exists because taxpayer funds are supporting her campaign efforts for Obama. I do not think that "coercion" of the nature I described in hypotheticals (voluntary business relationship) would necessarily be against the law. The student is paying the salary of the professor. He/she has recourse through that relationship to either force the administration to stop the activity or to sever the relationship with the school. It would nevertheless suck the big one if a student's professor at a private college did this.

Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 08:52 AM (5H6zj)

153 the only thing amiss with the above is the words "straight" and "Christian" are missing it should be "My white straight millionaire Christian friend is voting for WHO?!?" I mean if you're gonna write fiction, you might as well go for the whole kit 'n kaboodle.

Posted by: Soothsayer at September 18, 2012 08:53 AM (jUytm)

154 a big part of it was that he can take (the equivalent of) food stamps for his business as well

---

Parasite.  Just as the little parasites don't know and don't care about the long-term effects of Obamunism, this big parasite doesn't care about the long-term effects.  There's free government money to be had and he's going to have it.

Posted by: WalrusRex at September 18, 2012 08:54 AM (Hx5uv)

155 My christian college wanted to build a chapel with federal funds for higher education after WW2, they wouldn't let them so they built a dorm instead and added a huge bottom level that worked as a chapel area for about twenty years. I think a lot of govt. spending types tended to look the other way back then, not sure how they do that now.

Posted by: Adam Smith's Invisible Pimp Hand at September 18, 2012 08:54 AM (NzBQO)

156 you see, the illegal population is actually good for the white tobacco-chewin millionaire's bottom line who knew

Posted by: Soothsayer at September 18, 2012 08:55 AM (jUytm)

157 From the Daily Caller re the Florida teacher:


In a statement left as a comment on the Franklin CenterÂ’s blog, Brevard Community College vice president for academic affairs Linda Miedema wrote that the college has “specific procedures related to the political activity of faculty and staff. The expectation is that no employee of the College shall solicit support of any political candidate during regular work hours or on College property.”

“The college is taking appropriate actions,” Miedema added. “We do not want any student to feel coerced.”


http://tinyurl.com/8qtcwag


Posted by: Tami at September 18, 2012 08:55 AM (X6akg)

158 OT, but I would like to post this as proof of the existence of God. --- Dogs are proof that God loves us. Posted by: WalrusRex at September 18, 2012 12:27 PM (Hx5uv) Beer is proof that God loves us. Espeically when it is served to us by hot cheerleaders with big boobies.

Posted by: Benjamin "I'm on the $100 bill, bitches" Franklin at September 18, 2012 08:55 AM (sZTYJ)

159 Since we are on the subject of hitting above your weight, I always wondered what the big deal was about Taylor Swift dating a Kennedy (besides the risk factor inherent in associating with any Kennedy). I knew there was an age difference - she 22, he 18. What I didn't know was that he is still in freaking high school. In fact, he just turned 18 in July. So not only was he in high school, he was only 17 when they started dating. I hope she doesn't knock him up...

Posted by: Redd at September 18, 2012 08:55 AM (Z8Qnh)

160 Washing post poll in virginia has obama up... 8 points.... DOOM!

---

And on Hot Air, Lieawatha up over Brown, DOUBLE DOOM!!

Posted by: WalrusRex at September 18, 2012 08:56 AM (Hx5uv)

161 It would nevertheless suck the big one if a student's professor at a private college did this.

Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 12:52 PM (5H6zj)

 

I suspect all    private    universities and/or colleges    have enforceable codes of conduct for their faculty and staff.   The teeth of that enforcement may be considerably stronger in one school as opposed to another, and the code of conduct itself may be looser    in one school than another.   I would imagine "Telling your students who to vote for and making them sign a pledge" would be    considered a serious violation, similar to sexual harassment. 

 

"If you don't sleep with me,    I'm not going to SAY    you'll get an F,   but I'm going to imply the hell out of it."

 

"If    you don't     promise to vote for Barack,   I'm not going to SAY you'll get an F, but I'm going to imply the hell out of it."

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/b][/i][/u] at September 18, 2012 08:56 AM (4df7R)

162 Washing post poll in virginia has obama up... 8 points.... DOOM!

Posted by: fe at September 18, 2012 12:52 PM (/FxuJ)

 

D+12

Posted by: Velvet Ambition at September 18, 2012 08:57 AM (R8hU8)

163

4pm this afternoon RT: : Romney campaign has added a Fox News interview to their schedule.

Posted by: Tami at September 18, 2012 08:57 AM (X6akg)

164 I found this over at the American Thinker site: Rodeo clown media frantically distract from Obama's foreign policy disaster by Thomas Lifson Speaking of "writing off" voters, remember this golden oldie from The New York Times? Obama campaign abandons white working-class voters President Barack Obama's 2012 re-election campaign will be the first in modern political history to abandon white working-class voters, strategists claim. the link to the NY Times piece is in the article.

Posted by: flowers & chocolate at September 18, 2012 08:57 AM (LpQbZ)

165 I do not think that "coercion" of the nature I described in hypotheticals (voluntary business relationship) would necessarily be against the law. The student is paying the salary of the professor. He/she has recourse through that relationship to either force the administration to stop the activity or to sever the relationship with the school. ___________________ Actually it's shocking how much of the teacher salary at state schools--I am unfamiliar with community colleges--is subsidized by the state taxpayer. Campos the law prof did an ongoing blog exposing the game of how much law profs are paid to do "research" and for writing papers. Also I still think the teacher -student relationship is unique because it denotes one sided "authority" to the teacher. The student is by definition--in a lesser role.

Posted by: tasker at September 18, 2012 08:57 AM (r2PLg)

166 Dogs who will fetch you a cold beer and opened it with its teeth are a sign God loves us.

Posted by: Redd at September 18, 2012 08:59 AM (Z8Qnh)

167 Since we are on the subject of hitting above your weight, I always wondered what the big deal was about Taylor Swift dating a Kennedy (besides the risk factor inherent in associating with any Kennedy). I knew there was an age difference - she 22, he 18. What I didn't know was that he is still in freaking high school. In fact, he just turned 18 in July. So not only was he in high school, he was only 17 when they started dating. I hope she doesn't knock him up...

Posted by: Redd at September 18, 2012 12:55 PM (Z8Qnh)


The more I read about her the less I like her. She seems to be moving from guy to guy, she dated Jake Gyllenwhateverhisnameis. Think of that age swing, he's in his thirties probably and now she wants the Kennedy lifestyle. I mean the kid just lost his mom right? Where is his father in all th...oh right a Kennedy.

Posted by: Adam Smith's Invisible Pimp Hand at September 18, 2012 09:01 AM (NzBQO)

168

The problem was created and sustained by expansive government. That's the source of the incentive to not get married etc. You aren't going to be able to talk people into marriage any better than you can talk them into being self-sufficient, responsible, hard working, drug free, healthy, etc., etc. You have to remove the incentive to not be any of those things.

 

You're not quite getting it. We're not talking to THEM. We appealing to the voters who married before they had kids, and the ones who plan to marry. They suspect that a growing percentage of the welfare state is going to people who are not in need through no fault of their own, but through a selfish decision to start a family without a spouse, but no party has tapped into that suspicion.

 

You tell me how the GOP survives when single parenthood is the majority (out of wedlock births are now 40%.) Tell me who votes Republican in that America, when the majority are, statistically, more likely to need government aid.

 

I'd really like to know.

 

Posted by: CJ at September 18, 2012 09:01 AM (9KqcB)

169 1 I am going with the Missouri Synod Lutherans over Muslim Terrorist. Posted by: Clemenza at September 18, 2012 10:42 AM (afx6B) Hey, thanks, as a member of the MLS, I will tell the folks so you are not assualted with a barrage of Jello molds.

Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at September 18, 2012 09:02 AM (9TTOe)

170

Unfortunately,  most liberals are gonna tl;dr that story, maybe skim for their talking-point-of-choice,  and then forget to even put the link up on FB.

 

Why unfortunately?  Because if they actually took the time to read it, they'd realize it is a complete YARN.

Posted by: reason at September 18, 2012 09:03 AM (CGjum)

171 Where is his father in all th...oh right a Kennedy. _______________ Digging up the wife after she was buried and moving her remains to a different plot. I shit you not.

Posted by: tasker at September 18, 2012 09:03 AM (r2PLg)

172 Obama up by a whopping 1 on Gallup today.

Posted by: VBJonny at September 18, 2012 09:04 AM (bED4B)

173

"Hey, thanks, as a member of the MLS, I will tell the folks so you are not assualted with a barrage of Jello molds."

 

This is huge.  They are amazingly  accurate  with those things.  And some of the more nefarious cottonheads will load theirs up with tactical fruit-cocktail!

Posted by: reason at September 18, 2012 09:04 AM (CGjum)

174 OK, on to happier subjects. Last night our local university had as its kick off to Constitution Week a lecture by David McCullough. It was excellent. We also hear briefly from the university president, who is himself a constitutional scholar. Part of his talk referenced some writing by Lincoln (he's also a Lincoln scholar) that I had not heard of before (hangs head in shame). Anyway, here's an article about that subject some of you might enjoy: http://quod.lib.umich.edu/j/jala/2629860.0029.104/--word-fitly-spoken?rgn=main;view=fulltext

Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 09:05 AM (5H6zj)

175 How's that gun control working out for ya, Briton? Gunned down in cold blood: Two policewomen aged 32 and 23 lured to estate by false burglary report and shot dead before one-eyed fugitive hands himself in http://tinyurl.com/8lawpdo

Posted by: The Political Hat at September 18, 2012 09:05 AM (sZTYJ)

176 Let me vent.

What moron (not us) would go on strike in this economy?

The replacement refs aren't doing that bad of a job.  Let the striking regular refs take a hike.

Posted by: Bart who lurks with SMOD 2012, master of his domain at September 18, 2012 09:05 AM (he2LC)

177 GALLUP: OBAMA 47% ROMNEY 46%

Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 18, 2012 09:06 AM (05RcU)

178

" Part of his talk referenced some writing by Lincoln (he's also a Lincoln scholar)"

 

Big deal.  I'm a Rode Scholar!

Posted by: Sandra Fluke at September 18, 2012 09:06 AM (CGjum)

179 Also I still think the teacher -student relationship is unique because it denotes one sided "authority" to the teacher. The student is by definition--in a lesser role.

Posted by: tasker at September 18, 2012 12:57 PM (r2PLg)

 

It really depends on the school's administration.   If you have a school    with an administration that views the students as customers and the faculty and staff as employees meant to cater to that student, then the chances of a student's complaint causing problems for an instructor are    fairly high.   This is good in cases like this one, where the instructor clearly did something wrong.   But college kids are just as likely to go to the Dean or the University President to complain because "Professor    Smith gave me an F because she said I plagiarized my thesis!   It's not fair!"  as they are to go    to upper administration with a genuine complaint.  

 

If,   on the other hand,   the school's administration views the student/school relationship as "an   opportunity, not a right," then    instructors are less likely to be reprimanded on the word of a student .    But you're also more likely to have students who feel their voices are unheard and their money is   being taken in exchange for a     demeaning educational experience.  

 

It all lies with the administration.   You don't want a squishy administrator -- you want one who can tell the difference between shit and shinola.   Unfortunately,   a lot of college Deans and    Presidents and other administrators are too busy fussing over fundraising, faculty and staff salaries, and    fighting with    legislators to really give cases of faculty or student malfeasance the proper amount of scrutiny. 

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/b][/i][/u] at September 18, 2012 09:07 AM (4df7R)

180 Digging up the wife after she was buried and moving her remains to a different plot.

---

Yeah, the Kennedys, they're America's royalty.  What I can't understand is how they could have left him off the the DNC speaker list to give a speech about the Republican war on women.

Posted by: WalrusRex at September 18, 2012 09:08 AM (Hx5uv)

181

185....What moron (not us) would go on strike in this economy?

 

Chicago teachers.

 

Posted by: wheatie at September 18, 2012 09:08 AM (Z7b/q)

182 This is huge. They are amazingly accurate with those things. And some of the more nefarious cottonheads will load theirs up with tactical fruit-cocktail! It's all fun and games until someone busts out the Nilla wafers.

Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Please? at September 18, 2012 09:08 AM (VtjlW)

183

"What moron (not us) would go on strike in this economy?"

 

I'm sorry.  I couldn't hear you over the crunching  sound  the  Funyuns make  when I chew them...

 

And the screaming  child wedged  between my  fifth and sixth  fatfold.

 

Oh.  There it stopped.  The child,  not the Funyuns.

Posted by: Karen Lewis at September 18, 2012 09:09 AM (CGjum)

184

Since we are on the subject of hitting above your
weight, I always wondered what the big deal was about Taylor Swift
dating a Kennedy (besides the risk factor inherent in associating with
any Kennedy). I knew there was an age difference - she 22, he 18. What I
didn't know was that he is still in freaking high school. In fact, he
just turned 18 in July. So not only was he in high school, he was only
17 when they started dating. I hope she doesn't knock him up...

 

I think the whole Taylor Swift/Kennedy thing is only a story because of what the Kennedy clan (may they roast in hell forever) are known for doing to women who marry into the family.    They either end up    drunk,   dead,    or divorced,   more or less in that order.    Why ANYONE would willingly bring that upon themself   is a mystery to me.

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/b][/i][/u] at September 18, 2012 09:09 AM (4df7R)

185 Obama up by a whopping 1 on Gallup today. Is that still RVs?

Posted by: toby928© at September 18, 2012 09:09 AM (QupBk)

186 Big deal. I'm a Rode Scholar! Posted by: Sandra Fluke at September 18, 2012 01:06 PM (CGjum) With a minor in testes studies!

Posted by: Sandra Fluke's Vajayjay at September 18, 2012 09:09 AM (sZTYJ)

187 NEW WASHINGTON COMPOST POLL!

Obama 52 Romney 44 in Virginia

http://tinyurl.com/9ss2z5b


Q: Generally speaking, do you usually think of yourself as a...

Democrat 32%

Republican 24%

Independent 35%

(VOL.) No Pref./Other 5%

Don't know 4%


D+8 poll

significant under sample of republicans 

and 

over sample of independents (35 + 5 + 4 = 44%)

DOOM I TELL YOU

DOOM AND CHOOM

Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka muhammad hussein jihadi Peace Loving soetero blame bush wright at September 18, 2012 09:09 AM (ovpNn)

188 @186.  And that is with registered voters.

Yeah, these comments and those he gave last week about the Cairo embassy statement sure hurt Romney.

I really want to believe that Romney's people fed that tape to Mother Jones because I honestly feel sorry for the libs if they are actually so stupid as to believe that they hurt Romney.  Makes me want to give them a big hug, put on their protective headgear, pat them on their butts, and help them up the steps to the short-bus myself.

I don't think any patriotic American really wants his fellow countrymen to be that stupid.

Be not afraid.

Posted by: trumpetdaddy at September 18, 2012 09:10 AM (dcoFe)

189 Government officials blame unfair competition from China for the collapse of solar panel manufacturer Solyndra, but such concerns didnÂ’t stop the federal government from breaking stimulus program rules to use Chinese solar panels atop a federal building housing the offices of a senator, congressman and several agencies. Even the contractor questioned whether Chinese-made panels could be used under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, the stimulus program that mandated use of U.S.-made products. His query in early 2010 was dismissed and the General Services Administration moved forward with using the Chinese panels on the Sen. Paul Simon Federal Building in Carbondale, Ill., records show. ??? Any wonder we owe China the ranch?

Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 18, 2012 09:10 AM (05RcU)

190 It all lies with the administration. You don't want a squishy administrator -- you want one who can tell the difference between shit and shinola. Unfortunately, a lot of college Deans and Presidents and other administrators are too busy fussing over fundraising,faculty and staff salaries, and fighting with legislators to really give cases of faculty or student malfeasance the proper amount of scrutiny. Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter at September 18, 2012 01:07 PM (4df7R) _________________________ Seems like you know this... I was thinking even with the specific Florida law that you posted upthread this would still be bullshit but that specific law really makes it an open and shut case--(or as much of one as you could hope for.)

Posted by: tasker at September 18, 2012 09:10 AM (r2PLg)

191 WE CAN FORGET ABOUT VIRGINIA!  OMG DOOM!

Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka muhammad hussein jihadi Peace Loving soetero blame bush wright at September 18, 2012 09:11 AM (ovpNn)

192

"Yeah, the Kennedys, they're America's royalty."

 

Second verse!  Same as the first!

Teddy the Eighth I am!  Teddy the Eighth I am I am...

Posted by: Teddy VIII, a knight in Chivas armor at September 18, 2012 09:11 AM (CGjum)

193 Egypt's general prosecutor has issued arrest warrants for seven Egyptian Coptic Christians and a Florida-based American pastor and referred them to trial on charges linked to an anti-Islam film that has sparked riots across the Muslim world. The prosecutor's office says the seven men and one woman, all of whom are believed to be outside of Egypt, are charged with harming national unity, insulting and publicly attacking Islam and spreading false information. The office says they could face the death penalty. (AP) Yeah lets' sell these people tanks? What could possibly go wrong?

Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 18, 2012 09:11 AM (05RcU)

194 Posted by: Soothsayer at September 18, 2012 12:50 PM (jUytm)


So vote for TFG, because the rich redneck who takes advantage of poor undocumented workers is.  Think about that for a minute.  The mental gymnastics of those fucktards is unreal.

Posted by: Country Singer (likes teh ginger ladies) at September 18, 2012 09:12 AM (L8r/r)

195 True...if you have the money to pay more tuition somewhere else, mid-semester.  If not. You're screwed.

A lot of places allow cross registration with no additional tuition.  ex. RPI and Hudson Valley CC had open cross registration.   When I was there, HVCC's engineering science program made it a point to use the same text books RPI used.  If an RPI course was full, RPI students overflowed into HVCC and vise versa.  A lot of HVCC students took electives at RPI at CC tuition rates.

RPI was cool with this arrangement.  The HVCC people transferring into RPI for years 3-4 tended to see a GPA increase after the transfer, while transfers from other CC's tended to see a GPA decline.  RPI knew if they sent a student over to HVCC for a year 1-2 course, they'd come back better off than if they'd taken it at RPI.

Posted by: @PurpAv at September 18, 2012 09:13 AM (Qva0e)

196 did any body see new wapo VA poll having obama by 8 points. Their sample D+8, when VA is acutually R+3

Posted by: Pinky at September 18, 2012 09:13 AM (x2qiO)

197

Egypt's general prosecutor has issued arrest warrants for seven Egyptian Coptic Christians and a Florida-based American pastor and referred them to trial on charges linked to an anti-Islam film that has sparked riots across the Muslim world.

 

Let me guess.   The Florida-based American pastor wouldn't happened to be named "Terry Jones," would he?

 

Fucking ridiculous.

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/b][/i][/u] at September 18, 2012 09:14 AM (4df7R)

198 WSJ: The Data Behind RomneyÂ’s 47% Comments http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/09/18/the-data-behind-romneys-47-comments/

Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 09:15 AM (5H6zj)

199 Gallup vindicates Romney: 47% for Obama.

Posted by: LASue at September 18, 2012 09:15 AM (wAhNv)

200 Epic "You Didn't Build That" video by MC Bama

http://tinyurl.com/9w67ysz

Posted by: Sgt. York at September 18, 2012 09:15 AM (m3N3j)

201 (_(|)_) <--- Sandra Fluke's vagina is angry that you don't want to pay for her 9 dollar monthly birth control pills.

What is wrong with you people? 

Do you want her popping out babies left and right?

Do we really need more Sandra Flukes?

Rethuglicans just don't understand how hard 30 year old perpetual students in ivy league law schools have it.

Heartless monsters.

Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka muhammad hussein jihadi Peace Loving soetero blame bush wright at September 18, 2012 09:15 AM (ovpNn)

202

>> [Imagine picture of hot cheerleader here]<<

 

Is it OK if I imagine a hot biker chick instead?

Posted by: Joe Biden at September 18, 2012 09:15 AM (xvtYZ)

203 What moron (not us) would go on strike in this economy?

Chicago teachers.

---

All of the whining parents I've heard on this issue say give the teachers whatever they want.  But I notice they also make no comment about the quality of the education their child is getting.  It is all "parents have to work, they can't look after their kids."  They couldn't care less if their child knows the difference between the Pythagorean theorem and a pachyderm's hymen.  They just want free government child care.

Posted by: WalrusRex at September 18, 2012 09:16 AM (Hx5uv)

204 The Gallup tracking for Obama went from-- +7% for Obama to- +1% for Obama. that is a 6% point swing. That's pretty damn close to significant and the Middle East situation and Obama's handling of that is getting-- negative reviews. It could even get worse by Thursday--I think Gallup tracking has 7 day rolling averages IIRC. Also while we are at it--three swing state polls came out today. Romney is ahead in two of those polls--Rasmussen in Colorado +2% and Gravis Marketing in Florida + 1% but the one you are going to hear about? Washington Post and Virginia.

Posted by: tasker at September 18, 2012 09:16 AM (r2PLg)

205 Yeah lets' sell these people tanks? What could possibly go wrong?>>

Well as long as we reverse the reactive armor it might work quite well.

Posted by: Buzzsaw at September 18, 2012 09:16 AM (tf9Ne)

206 Sandra Fluke is a "rode hard and put away wet" scholar.

Posted by: Bart who lurks with SMOD 2012, master of his domain at September 18, 2012 09:16 AM (he2LC)

207 Government officials blame unfair competition from China for the collapse of solar panel manufacturer Solyndra

What a crock of shit.  They weren't even competing in the same market space.  Solyndra was trying to make esoteric expensive high efficiency shit, the Chinese are cranking out low efficiency cheap polysilicon panels.

Posted by: @PurpAv at September 18, 2012 09:16 AM (Qva0e)

208 My new thing is going to be government funded "sex addition" operations.  Then I can pleasure myself whenever I want!

Posted by: Sandy Flukey at September 18, 2012 09:17 AM (/YJYi)

209

A lot of places allow cross registration with no additional tuition. ex. RPI and Hudson Valley CC had open cross registration. When I was there, HVCC's engineering science program made it a point to use the same text books RPI used. If an RPI course was full, RPI students overflowed into HVCC and vise versa. A lot of HVCC students took electives at RPI at CC tuition rates.

 

It depends on the colleges.      Here in NH     sometimes it feels like you have to sacrifice your firstborn to get    credits to transfer from one institution to another,     ESPECIALLY going from the community colleges to UNH     (which should be a no-brainer).      And the private unis are even worse.

 

It's not done to be deliberately obstructive,      though.   Depending on the instructor,  the curriculum, the syllabus,   the pre-requisites, and everything else that    one college uses,   that student's learning experience may not be sufficient to transfer to another college that has a different curriculum, syllabus, and pre-requisites.   There's a lot of work done behind the scenes between schools to make credit transfers less of a headache, but it's never going to be easy.

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/b][/i][/u] at September 18, 2012 09:19 AM (4df7R)

210 Here's another interesting thing about that Washington Post poll in Virginia-- they want you to believe - Obama +8% The results for Obama against McCain was- Obama +6.3% So after an abysmal performance and a crappy economy Obama is going to outperform his results against McCain--the candidate who suspended his campaign.

Posted by: tasker at September 18, 2012 09:19 AM (r2PLg)

211 It's only week 2, but #1 looks good. I'll be joining y'all at the bottom, post haste.

Don't worry.

2 pushes in week 2, nice.

Posted by: Jay in Ames at September 18, 2012 09:20 AM (i2Lsf)

212 Yes, Gallup is a 7-day rolling average of [so far] registered voters. Obama's number is only going to get worse the later into the week we get.  This poll is still including numbers from last Tuesday, less than a week after the DNC closed out.

We are less than two weeks out from the Bill Clinton DNC speech and Obama's numbers have gone to nearly complete shit.  We are exactly where we were in RV polling before the two conventions.  Needle not moved.  Fundamentals not changed.  Still Romney's election to lose.

Be not afraid.

Posted by: trumpetdaddy at September 18, 2012 09:21 AM (dcoFe)

213 Chinese mob attacks Italian Conulate's car... because it is Japanese http://tinyurl.com/9j7ax7h

Posted by: The Political Hat at September 18, 2012 09:21 AM (sZTYJ)

214 221, they had oversample dems by 8 to get that result.

Posted by: Pinky at September 18, 2012 09:21 AM (x2qiO)

215 212 >> [Imagine picture of hot cheerleader here]<<

Is it OK if I imagine a hot biker chick instead?

Posted by: Joe Biden at September 18, 2012 01:15 PM (xvtYZ)


Why imagine when you can visit this link.


http://tinyurl.com/8pc6l8l


Warning Not Safe For Work!  You can definitely see that she hasn't waxed her pie hole recently.


Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka muhammad hussein jihadi Peace Loving soetero blame bush wright at September 18, 2012 09:21 AM (ovpNn)

216

209....Gallup has 47/46 Obama....WITH REGISTERED VOTERS!!  Down from 52/43!!!  So much for that Bounce and Clinton Ace??

 

Obama has dropped over 5 points and Romney is up 3 points....and this is with Registered Voters!! 

 

I here Crickets from the Obama Camp...the ones that were promoting that BIG DNC BOUNCE??? 

 

Obama is campaigning in Wisconsin....hmmm....

 

Finding out that the Carter loser grandson..Has had tapes for over 3 weeks....and those videos were posted originally in June?  I would imagine this October Surprise was moved way up with Obama's DNC Joke taking a dive!  Problem is these videos are firing up Conservatives behind Romney and I feel what Romney said is how SOOOO MANY people truly feel.  The Producers are sick of paying for the Takers!!  This is a win with Seniors as well who feel too many people today want a handout, are lazy, do not work and take things for granted!   

 

Rush calls this a Golden Opportunity for Romney!  He likes it!  Who is crying left wing jerks and the inside the Beltway losers on the GOP like Bill Kristol....what a surprise!

 

By the way were is the whole video like Romney mentioned last night?  Major portions are missing?

Posted by: bluerose75 at September 18, 2012 09:22 AM (HDcKc)

217

Most of the few who actually  bother to read the story will do so with their nose crinkled in disgust.

 

The nannies will be angry that these people  ruin their bodies with beer and chaw, which everyone  will ultimately pay for in the Age of Obamacare.

 

The fymynysts will sigh  with disdain for these two menz and their adoration of such a cliched patriarchical fascination as football.

 

The Elitist Coastals  will roll their eyes at the fact that this rube hails from anywhere in Flyover Country in the first place.

 

The greenies will gnash their teeth over this  inconsiderate  consumer using his own vehicle instead of taking the opportunity to talk up  the  awesome public transportation or altnerate-power-travel options available to him, instead of his vile fossil-fuel mobile.

 

All in all, many will   be too distracted by their own causes to really take the story seriously.

Posted by: reason at September 18, 2012 09:22 AM (XiVKO)

218 The prosecutor's office says the seven men and one woman, all of whom are believed to be outside of Egypt, are charged with harming national unity, insulting and publicly attacking Islam and spreading false information. The office says they could face the death penalty.

----

I watched Fail Safe the other night, the 1964 movie starring Jane's dad, Henry Fonda, as the American president.  The story is about an accidental US nuclear strike on Moscow.  To prevent WWIII, the president then drops an atomic bomb on New York City, you know, to make it all fair and stuff.  Let's hope TFG didn't see that movie or these seven men and one woman are going to on a one way trip to Cairo.

Posted by: WalrusRex at September 18, 2012 09:23 AM (Hx5uv)

219

Have   any of the pollsters ever bothered to explain WHY they use    poll   disproportionate  numbers of Democrats over Republicans?   I mean, we KNOW why, but has anyone questioned the    actual methodology?   Because    I'm sure they'd say something like, "We're just using the model from the last Presidential election to gauge expected turnout."    Which is complete and utter horseshit.   Yes, I know it's a common model, but ARRRGH!  It's without any kind of basis!  It assumes that 2010 never happened and everyone is still stuck in their October 2008 mindset.

 

I HATE THAT.

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/b][/i][/u] at September 18, 2012 09:23 AM (4df7R)

220 Let's hope TFG didn't see that movie or these seven men and one woman are going to on a one way trip to Cairo. Posted by: WalrusRex at September 18, 2012 01:23 PM (Hx5uv) Kinda sad that you and I both would not be surprised if that happened? G-D save us all

Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 18, 2012 09:24 AM (05RcU)

221 225 221, they had oversample dems by 8 to get that result. Posted by: Pinky at September 18, 2012 01:21 PM (x2qiO) _______________ Ya I was going to go look at they're turn out modeling--I might still go look at it--but on its face it is ludicrous. No way in hell Obama is outperforming his results in 2008 against McCain and after the reality of his administration. If Ace comes in with just a post on this polling Ima gonna smack him silly.

Posted by: tasker at September 18, 2012 09:24 AM (r2PLg)

222 How about those Chargers?  How do you think they will do against Atlanta this Sunday?


Posted by: Bart who lurks with SMOD 2012, master of his domain at September 18, 2012 09:25 AM (he2LC)

223

205....A lot of places allow cross registration with no additional tuition. ex. RPI and Hudson Valley CC had open cross registration. ...

 

So, if a student who was fleeing from coercion at one college...expect to find an environment that was free of that...if they transfered to a 'sister college', that was tied to the other one?

 

I guess students are going to have to require something...in writing, up front...that assures them that they will not be bullied into voting a certain way, by their professors...before they pay their tuition.

 

 

Posted by: wheatie at September 18, 2012 09:25 AM (Z7b/q)

224

Let's hope TFG didn't see that movie or these seven men and one woman are going to on a one way trip to Cairo.
Posted by: WalrusRex at September 18, 2012 01:23 PM (Hx5uv)

 

With the Blind Sheikh along for the ride.

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/b][/i][/u] at September 18, 2012 09:25 AM (4df7R)

225 Posted by: The Political Hat at September 18, 2012 01:21 PM (sZTYJ)

For all the throwing around of the race card in this country, I have never been in a more racist part of the world than the Far East. The Chinese, Japanese, and Koreans all think that they are truly the master race, and not collectively.  The worst are the Koreans (I even had a Korean co-worker admit that to me).  They feel that they are the top tier of humanity, with the Chinese and Japanese second tier, and everyone else sub-human.  They make the Klan look like an interracial orgy.

Posted by: Country Singer (likes teh ginger ladies) at September 18, 2012 09:26 AM (L8r/r)

226

If you want to stop that scenario then we have to remove the incentives, which means reducing the role of government.

 

So where exactly is the GOP platform item to "remove incentives"? When do we hear that talking point? We haven't heard it because there is no plan to remove incentives, because it is not politically feasible. Because we've let the shear number of single-parent families needing - not just wanting, but needing - government handouts to grow too large.

 

So, you're saying 'we can't address this as a culture, we need to change it at the government level' while at the same time having to acknowledge that, no, no one has plans to change this at the government level.

 

Which means we win fewer and fewer elections.  

Posted by: CJ at September 18, 2012 09:27 AM (9KqcB)

227 tasker, its all part Mother fucking media to say Romney is losing by cooking some bull shit that came out TFG's ass.

Posted by: Pinky at September 18, 2012 09:27 AM (x2qiO)

228 Yes, Gallup is a 7-day rolling average of [so far] registered voters. Obama's number is only going to get worse the later into the week we get. This poll is still including numbers from last Tuesday, less than a week after the DNC closed out. ___________ Thanks trumpet daddy, that's what I suspected.

Posted by: tasker at September 18, 2012 09:27 AM (r2PLg)

229 235 Let's hope TFG didn't see that movie or these seven men and one woman are going to on a one way trip to Cairo. Posted by: WalrusRex at September 18, 2012 01:23 PM (Hx5uv)

With the Blind Sheikh along for the ride.

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter at September 18, 2012 01:25 PM (4df7R)


If the Blind Sheikh sees the movie, we are really in trouble.

Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka muhammad hussein jihadi Peace Loving soetero blame bush wright at September 18, 2012 09:27 AM (ovpNn)

230 Speaking of football Steve Sabol died R.I.P.

Posted by: Adam Smith's Invisible Pimp Hand at September 18, 2012 09:28 AM (NzBQO)

231

WaPo....in Virginia its home turf....LOL!!!  Say no more....hey WaPo you oversampled Dems...shocking....just shocking! Who did they do poll their offices in DC?

 

People lets cut the crap...any poll that is right of 2008 is rubbish and any poll with more than 3 Dems is rubbish except in New York, California, Oregon, Mass and othe liberal bastions!

 

WaPo...lol....whatever...NEXT?

Posted by: bluerose75 at September 18, 2012 09:28 AM (HDcKc)

232 How's this for blasphemy?

There is no God but the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit and Mohammed was a bastard, pederast, con-man, thief and murderer.


Posted by: Bart who lurks with SMOD 2012, master of his domain at September 18, 2012 09:28 AM (he2LC)

233 226 212
>> [Imagine picture of hot cheerleader here]<<



Is it OK if I imagine a hot biker chick instead?

Posted by: Joe Biden at September 18, 2012 01:15 PM (xvtYZ)

Why imagine when you can visit this link.
http://tinyurl.com/8pc6l8l
Warning Not Safe For Work! You can definitely see that she hasn't waxed her pie hole recently.

Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka muhammad hussein jihadi Peace Loving soetero blame bush wright at September 18, 2012 01:21 PM (ovpNn)


Its actually not NSFW.  I know some of you are dying to click.


Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka muhammad hussein jihadi Peace Loving soetero blame bush wright at September 18, 2012 09:28 AM (ovpNn)

234 Its actually not NSFW. I know some of you are dying to click.

---

Yeah, it's some '70s porn star with a big cheesy mustache.

Posted by: WalrusRex at September 18, 2012 09:30 AM (Hx5uv)

235

Speaking of football Steve Sabol died R.I.P.

 

Steve? Not his father Ed?

Posted by: CJ at September 18, 2012 09:30 AM (9KqcB)

236

"did any body see new wapo VA poll having obama by 8 points. Their sample D+8, when VA is acutually R+3"

 

IF ONLY GEOFF WERE STILL AMONG US!

 

He could do a tracking-poll of how skewed the polls go +D in order to keep   the race close.

 

I mean, we all know that all these polls are going to do all they an to keep Barry ahead, or at worst, the two of them within the MOE.  So now the interesting number becomes how far from reality they must skew in order to make this happen.

 

I'd be interested in seeing that.  Either just as the pure +D  number  or as a deviation from the actual  makeup of the sample-set.

Posted by: reason at September 18, 2012 09:30 AM (XiVKO)

237 Depending on the instructor, the curriculum, the syllabus, the pre-requisites, and everything else that one college uses, that student's learning experience may not be sufficient to transfer to another college that has a different curriculum, syllabus, and pre-requisites.

HVCC was a major feeder for RPI, so there was a lot of course coordination.  I think people did better at the CC than RPI because the CC profs were GOOD, and you could get access to them a lot easier than the RPI profs.

If the 4-year+ colleges viewed CC's as transfer feeders like the New York CC system and SUNY do, a lot of problems lessen.  Any decent 4 year college should have a significant washout rate among undergrads, and needs replacement bodies to fill those dropout slots.

UC San Diego's undergrad dropout rate was about 75%.  My incoming grad school class's dropout rate was 50% after the 1st semester.  Back in the 80's they weren't giving degrees away with a box of Cracker Jacks ;->

Posted by: @PurpAv at September 18, 2012 09:30 AM (Qva0e)

238 Like I've said many times before, media needs content.  This is especially true of online media.  Which is why everyday mundane stuff is trumpeted as Game Changer!!!!!!11!1eleventy! all the freaking time.  This site is no exception.

  I'm sure the doom and gloom brigade will be out in full force at least two dozen more times before the end of September and especially once the MSM hails Obama as a combination of Cicero and Daniel Webster if he manages not to bite his own tongue off and bleed all over the stage in the first debate. 

Nothing fundamental in this election has changed.  Nothing fundamental in this election is likely to change.  Even this Libya deal has only confirmed what we already knew about both candidates.

We are three or four minutes into the second half and the game is tied.  Everybody needs to chill and let the coach run his damn offense.

Posted by: trumpetdaddy at September 18, 2012 09:31 AM (dcoFe)

239 Because we've let the shear number of single-parent families needing - not just wanting, but needing - government handouts to grow too large. >>

It wont ever happen but this problem used to be solved with poor farms and orphanages. Both of which were a very large deterrent to having children out of wedlock or picking a "cute" loser for a husband.

Posted by: Buzzsaw at September 18, 2012 09:31 AM (wrS2o)

240 Wow, Bart's back!

Posted by: Redd at September 18, 2012 09:31 AM (Z8Qnh)

241 I think I would have just signed that "pledge" and voted for Romney anyway...and started recording their choicest moments on a cell phone.  Once the class was OVER and you'd gotten your grade, that's the time to lower the boom with the least risk to yourself.

Posted by: @PurpAv at September 18, 2012 09:35 AM (Qva0e)

242 Obama is a stuttering clusterf*ck of a miserable failure.

Posted by: steevy at September 18, 2012 09:35 AM (6o4Fb)

243

"I watched Fail Safe the other night, the 1964 movie starring Jane's dad, Henry Fonda, as the American president. The story is about an accidental US nuclear strike on Moscow. To prevent WWIII, the president then drops an atomic bomb on New York City, you know, to make it all fair and stuff."

 

So we'd get rid of:

- Pooty-poot.

- Bloomberg.

- ozfic

- the entire cast of SNL

 

...this might grow legs, man...

Posted by: reason at September 18, 2012 09:36 AM (XiVKO)

244 ...this might grow legs, man...>>

I think you're forgetting the location of the owner of this place.

Posted by: Buzzsaw at September 18, 2012 09:38 AM (tf9Ne)

245 247 "did any body see new wapo VA poll having obama by 8 points. Their sample D+8, when VA is acutually R+3"

IF ONLY GEOFF WERE STILL AMONG US!

He could do a tracking-poll of how skewed the polls go +D in order to keep the race close.

I mean, we all know that all these polls are going to do all they an to keep Barry ahead, or at worst, the two of them within the MOE. So now the interesting number becomes how far from reality they must skew in order to make this happen.

I'd be interested in seeing that. Either just as the pure +D number or as a deviation from the actual makeup of the sample-set.

Posted by: reason at September 18, 2012 01:30 PM (XiVKO)


unskewedpolls.com is your friend

Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka muhammad hussein jihadi Peace Loving soetero blame bush wright at September 18, 2012 09:40 AM (ovpNn)

246

It wont ever happen but this problem used to be solved with poor farms and orphanages. Both of which were a very large deterrent to having children out of wedlock or picking a "cute" loser for a husband.

 

Well...we now have schools being asked to consider offering School Dinners for some students. At that point, I say just add cots and call it an orphanage.

 

I just can't get any of these smart morons to explain to me how we win in the long run. I need someone to tell me how we are going have smaller government while the number of people needing bigger government grows each year.

 

I know it's not as fun as the day-to-day developments of a campaign, but we have no long range plan, so all of this short-term strategizing comes off as a bit delusional.

Posted by: CJ at September 18, 2012 09:47 AM (9KqcB)

247 Jill!  Rinse my eyes!  I clicked the link and it was a big effin deal!

Posted by: Joe Biden at September 18, 2012 09:58 AM (xvtYZ)

248 Sure helps to be sober when making my picks...

Posted by: Dooley at September 18, 2012 10:28 AM (AVfT8)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
238kb generated in CPU 0.0868, elapsed 0.277 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.2211 seconds, 376 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.