September 18, 2012
— Open Blogger Below is the leader board after two weeks of fantasy pick'em.
Jay In Ames 21
Shredders 20
Dooley 20
boniface ballers 20
dawgyear 20
Management:
JWF 18
JohnE 14
Andy 13
CDR-M 12
Russ 12
Ben 11
[Imagine picture of hot cheerleader here]
Posted by: Open Blogger at
07:32 AM
| Comments (248)
Post contains 45 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: lowandslow at September 18, 2012 07:35 AM (GZitp)
Posted by: dogfish at September 18, 2012 07:37 AM (NuPNl)
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at September 18, 2012 07:37 AM (f9c2L)
Posted by: Clemenza at September 18, 2012 10:42 AM (afx6B)
Missouri Synod is populated by right wing extremists!!!
Posted by: ELCA at September 18, 2012 07:39 AM (YYyqq)
Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 07:40 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: joncelli, heartless Morale Officer at September 18, 2012 07:40 AM (RD7QR)
What? There's now a shortage of actual pictures of hot cheerleaders?
Posted by: HtP at September 18, 2012 07:40 AM (jx2j9)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Please? at September 18, 2012 07:41 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: tasker at September 18, 2012 07:42 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Nash Rambler at September 18, 2012 07:45 AM (LZ7QO)
Posted by: lowandslow at September 18, 2012 07:45 AM (GZitp)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at September 18, 2012 07:47 AM (qjrXu)
Posted by: lowandslow at September 18, 2012 11:45 AM (GZitp)
They're big guys but they're not that big. You need lots of surrogates to cover the events and they can't all be awesome.
Posted by: joncelli, heartless Morale Officer at September 18, 2012 07:47 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Chairface Chippendale at September 18, 2012 07:49 AM (3ZtZW)
Posted by: sans_sheriff at September 18, 2012 07:50 AM (HgwiM)
Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 07:50 AM (5H6zj)
When they took on the SCOAMF as a partner, they should have remembered this line from Goodfellas
Now the guy's got Paulie as a partner. Any problems, he goes to Paulie. Trouble with the bill? He can go to Paulie. Trouble with the cops, deliveries, Tommy, he can call Paulie. But now the guy's gotta come up with Paulie's money every week, no matter what. Business bad? Fuck you, pay me. Oh, you had a fire? Fuck you, pay me. Place got hit by lightning, huh? Fuck you, pay me.
Posted by: kbdabear at September 18, 2012 07:50 AM (wwsoB)
Posted by: joncelli, heartless Morale Officer at September 18, 2012 07:51 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Country Singer (likes teh ginger ladies) at September 18, 2012 07:51 AM (L8r/r)
Posted by: striking? deal with it at September 18, 2012 07:52 AM (LpQbZ)
Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 07:54 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: The Political Hat at September 18, 2012 07:54 AM (sZTYJ)
Posted by: striking? deal with it at September 18, 2012 07:55 AM (LpQbZ)
Posted by: Clemenza at September 18, 2012 07:56 AM (afx6B)
Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 07:56 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: striking? deal with it at September 18, 2012 11:55 AM (LpQbZ)
Well, I've got a serious bone to pick with those guys.
Posted by: The Chicken at September 18, 2012 07:56 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Chris Matthews at September 18, 2012 07:57 AM (/YJYi)
Posted by: schmoozing at September 18, 2012 07:57 AM (LpQbZ)
Posted by: The Political Hat at September 18, 2012 07:57 AM (sZTYJ)
Posted by: vomit inducing at September 18, 2012 08:00 AM (LpQbZ)
Posted by: Adam at September 18, 2012 08:00 AM (/YJYi)
Posted by: toby928© at September 18, 2012 08:00 AM (QupBk)
Posted by: Tami at September 18, 2012 08:00 AM (X6akg)
http://tinyurl.com/9owogaz
---
I'm glad that one has a sing reading "I am Free" because I'm a little short this month.
Posted by: WalrusRex at September 18, 2012 08:01 AM (Hx5uv)
Possibly [NSFW]:
http://tinyurl.com/9owogaz
There's not a single one that I would...
Posted by: BCochran1981 at September 18, 2012 08:04 AM (da5Wo)
That's exactly why I quit watching most pro sports after the 94-95 MLB strike. Unions and TV money ruin everything they touch.
I'll watch NFL playoffs after week two and the World Series. Until then, I keep up via box scores and watching fantasy league play.
Those unionized pricks don't get much of my money at all anymore.
Posted by: IdowhatIwant at September 18, 2012 08:04 AM (DzvS7)
The damage that this asshole has done to the conservative cause in mindblowing.
Posted by: lowandslow at September 18, 2012 08:04 AM (GZitp)
Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 08:05 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 08:07 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Mindy at September 18, 2012 08:07 AM (CC6tc)
Posted by: The Robot Devil at September 18, 2012 08:07 AM (136wp)
---
About thirty years ago, Barbara Tuchman wrote a book entitled the March of Folly giving several examples throughout history of idiotic policies that various governments adopted that resulted in great harm to themselves. According to her definition, such folly had to endure throughout several succeeding administrations to qualify. I think our delusion that the Palestinians are just misunderstood freedom fighters would qualify.
Posted by: WalrusRex at September 18, 2012 08:07 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: CoolCzech at September 18, 2012 08:08 AM (21izQ)
Where the hell have you been? Ain't heard you in months.
Posted by: lowandslow at September 18, 2012 08:11 AM (GZitp)
NSFW
http://tinyurl.com/8condlw
Posted by: BCochran1981 at September 18, 2012 12:10 PM (da5Wo)
DAMN those are some pointy elbows.
Posted by: The Chicken at September 18, 2012 08:11 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 08:11 AM (5H6zj)
Anyone else sick of the announcers and coaches and players using the replacement refs as their excuse for everything. Frankly I have not noticed any significant difference except for the cattawalling by the announcers and some whiney players on the losing side. The replacement refs are not making any more mistakes than the regular refs. They are just highlighted more.
Posted by: polynikes at September 18, 2012 08:12 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: joncelli, heartless Con and all around unpleasant guy at September 18, 2012 08:12 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: The Robot Devil at September 18, 2012 08:12 AM (136wp)
Posted by: The Robot Devil at September 18, 2012 08:14 AM (136wp)
Posted by: polynikes at September 18, 2012 08:14 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: joncelli, heartless Con and all around unpleasant guy at September 18, 2012 08:14 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 18, 2012 08:16 AM (05RcU)
Posted by: Serious Cat at September 18, 2012 08:16 AM (d2QQ4)
Posted by: teej at September 18, 2012 08:16 AM (32Scy)
---
I hope so. I hope one day to be able to leave the house without a paper bag over my head.
Posted by: WalrusRex at September 18, 2012 08:17 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 18, 2012 08:18 AM (05RcU)
Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 08:18 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: soothsayer states the obvious at September 18, 2012 08:18 AM (s+8Vv)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 18, 2012 08:19 AM (05RcU)
Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 08:20 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Lt Col Frank Slade at September 18, 2012 08:21 AM (wwsoB)
Posted by: teej at September 18, 2012 08:22 AM (32Scy)
Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 08:22 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Adam Smith's Invisible Pimp Hand at September 18, 2012 08:23 AM (NzBQO)
From Drudge:
REPORT: Pakistani protester dies after inhaling fumes from burning U.S. flag.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at September 18, 2012 08:23 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 18, 2012 12:18 PM (05RcU)
Why, whatever would give you that idea? Lulz!
Posted by: IdowhatIwant at September 18, 2012 08:24 AM (DzvS7)
Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 08:24 AM (5H6zj)
oct 6
give me a break
-----------
Meh. But if it were Jon Stewart and Mark Levin, I'd tune in. O'Reilly....not so much.
Posted by: Lady in Black at September 18, 2012 08:24 AM (lTVJy)
That would be quit a stretch for the average oldie. The "47%" classification clearly represents moochers who have no stake, not people living on retirement income etc. Seniors do not consider themselves moochers and do not want to be considered moochers, nor do they like the moochers themselves.
Bingo. They paid taxes their whole lives. They will not be angry, they will be nodding in agreement. Of course, the MSM is working mightily to anger up their blood.
The problem is, this is not the best time to introduce the 47% concept to voters. Not in the closing months of an election. It's like when conservatives noted Obama's socialist-like tendencies in the heat of the 2008 election. That was the wrong time to introduce the concept to voters, because you spend most of your time waiting for the shock/blow back to die down.
So let's stop doing that. Let's vow that we'll get Americans familiar with these huge concepts BETWEEN election years:
1. Democrats want to turn the U.S. into France and here is how much it will cost. (Challenge any liberal to name an aspect of French socialism that they don't find appealing.)
2. The U.S. is made of married Makers and single Takers, and we are for the Makers. (You draw the marrieds and those who plan to marry, seniors who worked hard their whole lives, etc. and maybe some squishy moderates who didn't realize that not everyone receiving government aid needs it.)
Tweak the language as necessary. It won't guarantee victory, but it will reframe the Left v. Right debate and end this nonsense in which stating the truth actually costs us support. And don't wait until the next f-cking election to do it.
Posted by: CJ at September 18, 2012 08:26 AM (9KqcB)
Are you completely shit-faced by kickoff? They're giving away extra timeouts, fucking up two-minute warnings, spotting the ball full yards off...
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at September 18, 2012 08:26 AM (/kI1Q)
---
Dogs are proof that God loves us.
Posted by: WalrusRex at September 18, 2012 08:27 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 18, 2012 08:27 AM (05RcU)
Posted by: Bill O'Reilly at September 18, 2012 08:28 AM (/YJYi)
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at September 18, 2012 12:27 PM (/kI1Q)
Now that is damn funny.
Posted by: BCochran1981 at September 18, 2012 08:28 AM (da5Wo)
Don't worry, we got it covered.
Posted by: Transportation Sodomy Administration at September 18, 2012 08:28 AM (SDkq3)
Go fuck yourself with Michelle Obama's dick.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at September 18, 2012 12:27 PM (/kI1Q)
Yeah, you probably over-generalized dude. I've remained single lo these many years, and you don't want to know how much of my paycheck goes to the Takers.
Posted by: eastvalleyphx says fuck islam at September 18, 2012 08:29 AM (GRvW4)
66 re: CO saw some info from another poll last week in CO that Romney was up there
Posted by: Honey Badger the Dense Rethuglican Nazi Bastard at September 18, 2012 08:29 AM (GvYeG)
Posted by: thuggery and contemp at September 18, 2012 08:29 AM (LpQbZ)
Meh. But if it were Jon Stewart and Mark Levin, I'd tune in. O'Reilly....not so much.
Stewart will see it as a way to argue the liberal viewpoint and eviscerate conservativism, and O'Reilly will see it as great TV. Ugh.
Posted by: CJ at September 18, 2012 08:29 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 18, 2012 08:30 AM (05RcU)
Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 08:30 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: The Robot Devil at September 18, 2012 08:30 AM (136wp)
---
Dogs are proof that God loves us.
Posted by: WalrusRex at September 18, 2012 12:27 PM (Hx5uv)
Tigers are proof Gods cool with thinning out the herd a bit.
/Yesterday'd
Posted by: Adam Smith's Invisible Pimp Hand at September 18, 2012 08:30 AM (NzBQO)
Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 08:30 AM (5H6zj)
Well, this is cute. Via Drudge:
Chinese General: Prepare for Combat With Japan
http://freebeacon.com/chinese-general-prepare-for-combat/
ChinaÂ’s most powerful military leader, in an unusual public statement, last week ordered military forces to prepare for combat, as Chinese warships deployed to waters near disputed islands and anti-Japan protests throughout the country turned violent...
Sound and fury because America is distracted? Or genuine militant intent? That's my question.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/b][/i][/u] at September 18, 2012 08:32 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: o'reilly is safe at September 18, 2012 08:32 AM (LpQbZ)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 18, 2012 08:32 AM (05RcU)
Posted by: sherlock at September 18, 2012 08:32 AM (2DD2m)
Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 08:32 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Adam at September 18, 2012 08:33 AM (/YJYi)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 18, 2012 08:33 AM (05RcU)
Good gawd, how does she keep from falling over?!?! I can't even see her face!
Posted by: EC at September 18, 2012 08:33 AM (GQ8sn)
They spend a LOT more time at work than just what the average moron sees on TV. Plus, the point of having full-time referees means that they don't have to take another job where they can be influenced in various ways.
Posted by: NC Ref at September 18, 2012 08:33 AM (dVJLS)
Posted by: teej at September 18, 2012 08:34 AM (0MVzQ)
Posted by: The Robot Devil at September 18, 2012 08:34 AM (136wp)
Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 08:35 AM (5H6zj)
"bill o'reilly and jon stewart in a 90 minute debate "
The only possible plus to this is I think Bill might actually bring his A-game.
Whenever he brings Jon onto his show, I can't help but think that he intentionally shoots for a tie. Keep the tally close. Keep people on both teams wanting one more...just one more debate, so they can finally see "their guy" take it home.
When he's got Jon on his show, he wants to keep his ratings high. Plus, if he only slightly-beats here, slightly-loses-to there with Jon, then maybe he might appeal to some of the pro-Jon viewers that tuned in. He and Jon don't compete in the same time-slot, so he wins the viewer, who now watches both. If he absolutely POUNDS Jon, and sends him running off the set crying, then that viewer will never tune in again.
Maybe if this is on "neutral territory" with no reliance on one's show or the other's show, then Bill won't do this, and actually feel like mopping the floor with his opponent.
Posted by: reason at September 18, 2012 08:35 AM (CGjum)
102....If I have a voluntary relationship with someone, say for example with a business person I buy some services from, and that person says "I won't sell to you unless you vote for Obama" I'm not sure that's coercive.
Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 12:30 PM (5H6zj)
-------------
Well, yeah...still coercive.
Just not as powerful...because the level of power over you is less.
Posted by: wheatie at September 18, 2012 08:35 AM (Z7b/q)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 18, 2012 08:36 AM (05RcU)
Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 08:36 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 08:36 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Adam at September 18, 2012 12:33 PM (/YJYi)
Let's be honest, a lot of older people don't understand social networking. It's not a bad thing, but that's just the way it is. They haven't grown up with it, they don't understand the full power of what they say on these sights. Information travels so fast now. A lot of them are still trying to work their way through it, I see a lot more stupid stuff from 40+ age then I think I should see on sites like facebook and twitter.
Posted by: Adam Smith's Invisible Pimp Hand at September 18, 2012 08:37 AM (NzBQO)
Posted by: o'reilly is safe at September 18, 2012 08:38 AM (LpQbZ)
Posted by: o'reilly is safe at September 18, 2012 08:39 AM (LpQbZ)
---
Sure it is. You are a consumer. You can choose to go elsewhere.
Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 12:36 PM (5H6zj)
Please tell that to a few people who went to my evangelical christian college and bitched about having required chapel, or not allowing homosexuals to live on campus.
Posted by: Adam Smith's Invisible Pimp Hand at September 18, 2012 08:39 AM (NzBQO)
Yes most guys have jobs or are retired from other careers, but that doesn't mean that the only time they spend on NFL referee issues is the 3 hours a week someone suggested. I don't know how much time they do spend, but if the expectations are anything like the sport I work, it's a pretty big commitment.
Posted by: NC Ref at September 18, 2012 08:40 AM (dVJLS)
Posted by: o'reilly is safe at September 18, 2012 12:38 PM (LpQbZ)
As somebody suggested in the headline thread, these sorts of "gaffes" wherein the media runs with it and Romney turns it around on them might be the only way to get around the media embargo on the Romney campaign.
Posted by: joncelli, heartless Con and all around unpleasant guy at September 18, 2012 08:40 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: flowers & chocolate at September 18, 2012 08:40 AM (LpQbZ)
"Are you completely shit-faced by kickoff? "
*crosses Heather off his list of Moronettes he'd be willing to watch football with*
Posted by: reason at September 18, 2012 08:40 AM (CGjum)
Yes, but is it coercive because of her status as a public employee? If she worked at a private university, would it be coercive?
Since she works at a public community college, and is therefore a state employee, it's a pretty cut and dry violation of Florida's election laws. As Campus Reform quotes:
SweetÂ’s actions may have also violated FloridaÂ’s election laws.
[Florida election law] Section 104.31, of Title IX in chapter 104, states that “no officer or employee of the state... shall... use his or her official authority or influence for the purpose of interfering with an election or nomination of officer or influencing another person’s vote or affecting the result thereof.”
If she worked at a private university it would be coercive, but I don't know that it would be illegal. It COULD be a breach of a college or university's code of ethics, which would likely lead to some kind of censure by the institution in question.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/b][/i][/u] at September 18, 2012 08:41 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: flowers & chocolate at September 18, 2012 08:42 AM (LpQbZ)
His comments help solidify the conservative base. The comments strike the voters we are going for as "no shit, Sherlock" remarks and will only help relieve any lingering doubts about Romney amongst these voters.
The people who are offended weren't voting for him anyway.
I liked that he was on top of the story with the press avail in LA last night. Every story I've heard today has those comments last night about "please release the whole video" included. If he had said something bad or had something to hide, why ask for the whole thing to be released, thinks the average listener. That's a good thing.
One of two possibilities: Romney's people fed the story to MJ through duplicity counting on the libs to run it when the libs thought it necessary to change the topic from an inevitable Obama fuck-up. Or, MJ legitimately undercovered Romney and released it to change the topic from Obama;s fuck-ups, but sooner than anticipated.
In any case, it helps Romney where he needs help and the libs are too stupid to understand that. Putting the Pali tape out today helps Romney even more as the ME burns and the Obama dead-ambassador story unravels. Makes Romney look like the sensible one for making a "water is wet" statement about the Palis.
The libs can't help themselves, they just keep punching that tar baby.
I denounce myself.
Posted by: trumpetdaddy at September 18, 2012 08:42 AM (dcoFe)
Posted by: Soothsayer at September 18, 2012 08:42 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 18, 2012 08:43 AM (05RcU)
Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 08:43 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: tasker at September 18, 2012 08:44 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 08:44 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: flowers & chocolate at September 18, 2012 08:44 AM (LpQbZ)
I enjoyed being told by a caller on Mark Davis' show this morning that I was not voting for Romney, but still only voting against Obama.
Being told what I think by liberals never gets old. Never. Gets. Old.
Posted by: reason at September 18, 2012 08:45 AM (CGjum)
Posted by: tasker at September 18, 2012 08:45 AM (r2PLg)
Go fuck yourself with Michelle Obama's dick. Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at September 18, 2012 12:27 PM (/kI1Q)
I see, you missed my previous, longer lectures on this in which I took the time to shield anyone from panty-bunching misunderstanding. As someone who lived most of his live as a proud single American, I'll add the qualifiers.
Gender Gap: There is none. Republicans win the vote of married women. Own it. Mention it. The vote we don't have? Young singles - they're young. The closer they get to starting a family, the closer they'll get to the GOP. Single-parents-by-choice. Fuck them. They are the single most significant driving force in larger government.
The nonmarried vote is mostly: Young voters, who will always tend to vote liberal. And older, singler parents, who, statistically are more likely to need government support. That's reality.
Gallup:
Married registered voters prefer Republican challenger Mitt Romney over Democratic President Barack Obama by 54% to 39%, according to Gallup data collected from June to August. On the other hand, nonmarried voters break strongly for the president over Romney, 56% to 35%. Marriage is a significant predictor of presidential vote choice even after income, age, race, gender, education, religiosity, region, and having minor children are statistically controlled for.
http://tinyurl.com/99cyqbl
TO REPEAT: A lot of conservatives get the vapors when the subject of declining marriage rates come up, they figure itÂ’s one of them social issues, has nothing to do with winning elections. But in a Makers v. Takers electorate, those are our people.
Less marriage = more Takers. More out-of-wedlock births = more Takers. More Takers = bye bye GOP.
Time to start talking about this, openly. For tactical reasons. We cannot win elections if this trend continues unchallenged. Can. Not. Win.
I'm not interested in politics for the theater and the witting bloggytalk. I'm here to win. The demographics and cultural trends (40% out of wedlock births) mean that all our talk here about "smaller government" is just talk. It will soon be, if it is not already, statistically impossible to achieve. If anyone takes that personally, congratulations for the Mrs. Crabapple impersonation (SKINNER: "Edna, I've always admired your ability to be personally offended at broad social change.")
The 'small government' won't work as more Americans - due to lifesyle choices - need bigger government to survive. Your beef is with reality, not me.
Posted by: CJ at September 18, 2012 08:45 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: Redd at September 18, 2012 08:45 AM (Z8Qnh)
Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 12:43 PM (5H6zj)
Agreed. Especially when the NFL's other, full-time employees are NOT provided with a pension plan. Why would the NFL provide a pension to these men who, while vital to the sport, are nonetheless part-time?
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/b][/i][/u] at September 18, 2012 08:45 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: The Robot Devil at September 18, 2012 08:46 AM (136wp)
Posted by: Teacher's Union at September 18, 2012 08:47 AM (136wp)
122 If your a student at a private college and pay tuition and need that class? That is not a voluntary association
---
Sure it is. You are a consumer. You can choose to go elsewhere.
Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 12:36 PM (5H6zj)
----------
True...if you have the money to pay more tuition somewhere else, mid-semester.
If not. You're screwed.
Taking someone's money...and then making new demands on them, that were not disclosed until after the money was paid...is coercive.
It's sort of like, when you are at a drive-thru window at a restaurant.
They take your money....then say, "It's going to be a while. So you have to pull up, and park over there at the side. We will bring you your order".
They have altered the conditions of the implied contract.
You have lost most of your power...because you have already paid.
I have learned, however...that you can balk at that, and say..."No. I think I'll sit right here...or you can give my money back."
But then you run the risk of them hocking a loogey in your food.
Posted by: wheatie at September 18, 2012 08:47 AM (Z7b/q)
Posted by: reason at September 18, 2012 08:47 AM (CGjum)
Posted by: flowers & chocolate at September 18, 2012 08:47 AM (LpQbZ)
Posted by: tasker at September 18, 2012 08:48 AM (r2PLg)
Yeah, you probably over-generalized dude. I've remained single lo these many years, and you don't want to know how much of my paycheck goes to the Takers. Posted by: eastvalleyphx says fuck islam at September 18, 2012 12:29 PM (GRvW4)
I was refering to single parenthood. How many shorties you got?
Posted by: CJ at September 18, 2012 08:48 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 08:49 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Adam Smith's Invisible Pimp Hand at September 18, 2012 08:49 AM (NzBQO)
Posted by: tasker at September 18, 2012 08:49 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Soothsayer at September 18, 2012 08:50 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: flowers & chocolate at September 18, 2012 08:52 AM (LpQbZ)
I am not sure it's illegal. That was the initial question being addressed.
Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 12:44 PM (5H6zj)
Y-not, if the allegations are true then yes, it was illegal. See my comment @132. Were she employed by a private institution the legality question is less clear-cut. But as a public employee at a state college (community colleges are state-operated), it's illegal for an instructor to use their role to influence an election.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/b][/i][/u] at September 18, 2012 08:52 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: fe at September 18, 2012 08:52 AM (/FxuJ)
Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 08:52 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Soothsayer at September 18, 2012 08:53 AM (jUytm)
---
Parasite. Just as the little parasites don't know and don't care about the long-term effects of Obamunism, this big parasite doesn't care about the long-term effects. There's free government money to be had and he's going to have it.
Posted by: WalrusRex at September 18, 2012 08:54 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: Adam Smith's Invisible Pimp Hand at September 18, 2012 08:54 AM (NzBQO)
Posted by: Soothsayer at September 18, 2012 08:55 AM (jUytm)
In a statement left as a comment on the Franklin Center’s blog, Brevard Community College vice president for academic affairs Linda Miedema wrote that the college has “specific procedures related to the political activity of faculty and staff. The expectation is that no employee of the College shall solicit support of any political candidate during regular work hours or on College property.”
“The college is taking appropriate actions,” Miedema added. “We do not want any student to feel coerced.”
http://tinyurl.com/8qtcwag
Posted by: Tami at September 18, 2012 08:55 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: Benjamin "I'm on the $100 bill, bitches" Franklin at September 18, 2012 08:55 AM (sZTYJ)
Posted by: Redd at September 18, 2012 08:55 AM (Z8Qnh)
---
And on Hot Air, Lieawatha up over Brown, DOUBLE DOOM!!
Posted by: WalrusRex at September 18, 2012 08:56 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 12:52 PM (5H6zj)
I suspect all private universities and/or colleges have enforceable codes of conduct for their faculty and staff. The teeth of that enforcement may be considerably stronger in one school as opposed to another, and the code of conduct itself may be looser in one school than another. I would imagine "Telling your students who to vote for and making them sign a pledge" would be considered a serious violation, similar to sexual harassment.
"If you don't sleep with me, I'm not going to SAY you'll get an F, but I'm going to imply the hell out of it."
"If you don't promise to vote for Barack, I'm not going to SAY you'll get an F, but I'm going to imply the hell out of it."
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/b][/i][/u] at September 18, 2012 08:56 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: fe at September 18, 2012 12:52 PM (/FxuJ)
D+12
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at September 18, 2012 08:57 AM (R8hU8)
4pm this afternoon RT: @scottwfoster: Romney campaign has added a Fox News interview to their schedule.
Posted by: Tami at September 18, 2012 08:57 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: flowers & chocolate at September 18, 2012 08:57 AM (LpQbZ)
Posted by: tasker at September 18, 2012 08:57 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Redd at September 18, 2012 08:59 AM (Z8Qnh)
Posted by: Redd at September 18, 2012 12:55 PM (Z8Qnh)
The more I read about her the less I like her. She seems to be moving from guy to guy, she dated Jake Gyllenwhateverhisnameis. Think of that age swing, he's in his thirties probably and now she wants the Kennedy lifestyle. I mean the kid just lost his mom right? Where is his father in all th...oh right a Kennedy.
Posted by: Adam Smith's Invisible Pimp Hand at September 18, 2012 09:01 AM (NzBQO)
The problem was created and sustained by expansive government. That's the source of the incentive to not get married etc. You aren't going to be able to talk people into marriage any better than you can talk them into being self-sufficient, responsible, hard working, drug free, healthy, etc., etc. You have to remove the incentive to not be any of those things.
You're not quite getting it. We're not talking to THEM. We appealing to the voters who married before they had kids, and the ones who plan to marry. They suspect that a growing percentage of the welfare state is going to people who are not in need through no fault of their own, but through a selfish decision to start a family without a spouse, but no party has tapped into that suspicion.
You tell me how the GOP survives when single parenthood is the majority (out of wedlock births are now 40%.) Tell me who votes Republican in that America, when the majority are, statistically, more likely to need government aid.
I'd really like to know.
Posted by: CJ at September 18, 2012 09:01 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at September 18, 2012 09:02 AM (9TTOe)
Unfortunately, most liberals are gonna tl;dr that story, maybe skim for their talking-point-of-choice, and then forget to even put the link up on FB.
Why unfortunately? Because if they actually took the time to read it, they'd realize it is a complete YARN.
Posted by: reason at September 18, 2012 09:03 AM (CGjum)
Posted by: tasker at September 18, 2012 09:03 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: VBJonny at September 18, 2012 09:04 AM (bED4B)
"Hey, thanks, as a member of the MLS, I will tell the folks so you are not assualted with a barrage of Jello molds."
This is huge. They are amazingly accurate with those things. And some of the more nefarious cottonheads will load theirs up with tactical fruit-cocktail!
Posted by: reason at September 18, 2012 09:04 AM (CGjum)
Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 09:05 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: The Political Hat at September 18, 2012 09:05 AM (sZTYJ)
What moron (not us) would go on strike in this economy?
The replacement refs aren't doing that bad of a job. Let the striking regular refs take a hike.
Posted by: Bart who lurks with SMOD 2012, master of his domain at September 18, 2012 09:05 AM (he2LC)
" Part of his talk referenced some writing by Lincoln (he's also a Lincoln scholar)"
Big deal. I'm a Rode Scholar!
Posted by: Sandra Fluke at September 18, 2012 09:06 AM (CGjum)
Posted by: tasker at September 18, 2012 12:57 PM (r2PLg)
It really depends on the school's administration. If you have a school with an administration that views the students as customers and the faculty and staff as employees meant to cater to that student, then the chances of a student's complaint causing problems for an instructor are fairly high. This is good in cases like this one, where the instructor clearly did something wrong. But college kids are just as likely to go to the Dean or the University President to complain because "Professor Smith gave me an F because she said I plagiarized my thesis! It's not fair!" as they are to go to upper administration with a genuine complaint.
If, on the other hand, the school's administration views the student/school relationship as "an opportunity, not a right," then instructors are less likely to be reprimanded on the word of a student . But you're also more likely to have students who feel their voices are unheard and their money is being taken in exchange for a demeaning educational experience.
It all lies with the administration. You don't want a squishy administrator -- you want one who can tell the difference between shit and shinola. Unfortunately, a lot of college Deans and Presidents and other administrators are too busy fussing over fundraising, faculty and staff salaries, and fighting with legislators to really give cases of faculty or student malfeasance the proper amount of scrutiny.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/b][/i][/u] at September 18, 2012 09:07 AM (4df7R)
---
Yeah, the Kennedys, they're America's royalty. What I can't understand is how they could have left him off the the DNC speaker list to give a speech about the Republican war on women.
Posted by: WalrusRex at September 18, 2012 09:08 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Please? at September 18, 2012 09:08 AM (VtjlW)
"What moron (not us) would go on strike in this economy?"
I'm sorry. I couldn't hear you over the crunching sound the Funyuns make when I chew them...
And the screaming child wedged between my fifth and sixth fatfold.
Oh. There it stopped. The child, not the Funyuns.
Posted by: Karen Lewis at September 18, 2012 09:09 AM (CGjum)
Since we are on the subject of hitting above your
weight, I always wondered what the big deal was about Taylor Swift
dating a Kennedy (besides the risk factor inherent in associating with
any Kennedy). I knew there was an age difference - she 22, he 18. What I
didn't know was that he is still in freaking high school. In fact, he
just turned 18 in July. So not only was he in high school, he was only
17 when they started dating. I hope she doesn't knock him up...
I think the whole Taylor Swift/Kennedy thing is only a story because of what the Kennedy clan (may they roast in hell forever) are known for doing to women who marry into the family. They either end up drunk, dead, or divorced, more or less in that order. Why ANYONE would willingly bring that upon themself is a mystery to me.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/b][/i][/u] at September 18, 2012 09:09 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: toby928© at September 18, 2012 09:09 AM (QupBk)
Posted by: Sandra Fluke's Vajayjay at September 18, 2012 09:09 AM (sZTYJ)
Obama 52 Romney 44 in Virginia
http://tinyurl.com/9ss2z5b
Q: Generally speaking, do you usually think of yourself as a...
Democrat 32%
Republican 24%
Independent 35%
(VOL.) No Pref./Other 5%
Don't know 4%
D+8 poll
significant under sample of republicans
and
over sample of independents (35 + 5 + 4 = 44%)
DOOM I TELL YOU
DOOM AND CHOOM
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka muhammad hussein jihadi Peace Loving soetero blame bush wright at September 18, 2012 09:09 AM (ovpNn)
Yeah, these comments and those he gave last week about the Cairo embassy statement sure hurt Romney.
I really want to believe that Romney's people fed that tape to Mother Jones because I honestly feel sorry for the libs if they are actually so stupid as to believe that they hurt Romney. Makes me want to give them a big hug, put on their protective headgear, pat them on their butts, and help them up the steps to the short-bus myself.
I don't think any patriotic American really wants his fellow countrymen to be that stupid.
Be not afraid.
Posted by: trumpetdaddy at September 18, 2012 09:10 AM (dcoFe)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 18, 2012 09:10 AM (05RcU)
Posted by: tasker at September 18, 2012 09:10 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka muhammad hussein jihadi Peace Loving soetero blame bush wright at September 18, 2012 09:11 AM (ovpNn)
"Yeah, the Kennedys, they're America's royalty."
Second verse! Same as the first!
Teddy the Eighth I am! Teddy the Eighth I am I am...
Posted by: Teddy VIII, a knight in Chivas armor at September 18, 2012 09:11 AM (CGjum)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 18, 2012 09:11 AM (05RcU)
So vote for TFG, because the rich redneck who takes advantage of poor undocumented workers is. Think about that for a minute. The mental gymnastics of those fucktards is unreal.
Posted by: Country Singer (likes teh ginger ladies) at September 18, 2012 09:12 AM (L8r/r)
A lot of places allow cross registration with no additional tuition. ex. RPI and Hudson Valley CC had open cross registration. When I was there, HVCC's engineering science program made it a point to use the same text books RPI used. If an RPI course was full, RPI students overflowed into HVCC and vise versa. A lot of HVCC students took electives at RPI at CC tuition rates.
RPI was cool with this arrangement. The HVCC people transferring into RPI for years 3-4 tended to see a GPA increase after the transfer, while transfers from other CC's tended to see a GPA decline. RPI knew if they sent a student over to HVCC for a year 1-2 course, they'd come back better off than if they'd taken it at RPI.
Posted by: @PurpAv at September 18, 2012 09:13 AM (Qva0e)
Posted by: Pinky at September 18, 2012 09:13 AM (x2qiO)
Egypt's general prosecutor has issued arrest warrants for seven Egyptian Coptic Christians and a Florida-based American pastor and referred them to trial on charges linked to an anti-Islam film that has sparked riots across the Muslim world.
Let me guess. The Florida-based American pastor wouldn't happened to be named "Terry Jones," would he?
Fucking ridiculous.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/b][/i][/u] at September 18, 2012 09:14 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2012 09:15 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: LASue at September 18, 2012 09:15 AM (wAhNv)
What is wrong with you people?
Do you want her popping out babies left and right?
Do we really need more Sandra Flukes?
Rethuglicans just don't understand how hard 30 year old perpetual students in ivy league law schools have it.
Heartless monsters.
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka muhammad hussein jihadi Peace Loving soetero blame bush wright at September 18, 2012 09:15 AM (ovpNn)
Chicago teachers.
---
All of the whining parents I've heard on this issue say give the teachers whatever they want. But I notice they also make no comment about the quality of the education their child is getting. It is all "parents have to work, they can't look after their kids." They couldn't care less if their child knows the difference between the Pythagorean theorem and a pachyderm's hymen. They just want free government child care.
Posted by: WalrusRex at September 18, 2012 09:16 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: tasker at September 18, 2012 09:16 AM (r2PLg)
Well as long as we reverse the reactive armor it might work quite well.
Posted by: Buzzsaw at September 18, 2012 09:16 AM (tf9Ne)
Posted by: Bart who lurks with SMOD 2012, master of his domain at September 18, 2012 09:16 AM (he2LC)
What a crock of shit. They weren't even competing in the same market space. Solyndra was trying to make esoteric expensive high efficiency shit, the Chinese are cranking out low efficiency cheap polysilicon panels.
Posted by: @PurpAv at September 18, 2012 09:16 AM (Qva0e)
Posted by: Sandy Flukey at September 18, 2012 09:17 AM (/YJYi)
A lot of places allow cross registration with no additional tuition. ex. RPI and Hudson Valley CC had open cross registration. When I was there, HVCC's engineering science program made it a point to use the same text books RPI used. If an RPI course was full, RPI students overflowed into HVCC and vise versa. A lot of HVCC students took electives at RPI at CC tuition rates.
It depends on the colleges. Here in NH sometimes it feels like you have to sacrifice your firstborn to get credits to transfer from one institution to another, ESPECIALLY going from the community colleges to UNH (which should be a no-brainer). And the private unis are even worse.
It's not done to be deliberately obstructive, though. Depending on the instructor, the curriculum, the syllabus, the pre-requisites, and everything else that one college uses, that student's learning experience may not be sufficient to transfer to another college that has a different curriculum, syllabus, and pre-requisites. There's a lot of work done behind the scenes between schools to make credit transfers less of a headache, but it's never going to be easy.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/b][/i][/u] at September 18, 2012 09:19 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: tasker at September 18, 2012 09:19 AM (r2PLg)
Don't worry.
2 pushes in week 2, nice.
Posted by: Jay in Ames at September 18, 2012 09:20 AM (i2Lsf)
We are less than two weeks out from the Bill Clinton DNC speech and Obama's numbers have gone to nearly complete shit. We are exactly where we were in RV polling before the two conventions. Needle not moved. Fundamentals not changed. Still Romney's election to lose.
Be not afraid.
Posted by: trumpetdaddy at September 18, 2012 09:21 AM (dcoFe)
Posted by: The Political Hat at September 18, 2012 09:21 AM (sZTYJ)
Posted by: Pinky at September 18, 2012 09:21 AM (x2qiO)
Is it OK if I imagine a hot biker chick instead?
Posted by: Joe Biden at September 18, 2012 01:15 PM (xvtYZ)
Why imagine when you can visit this link.
http://tinyurl.com/8pc6l8l
Warning Not Safe For Work! You can definitely see that she hasn't waxed her pie hole recently.
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka muhammad hussein jihadi Peace Loving soetero blame bush wright at September 18, 2012 09:21 AM (ovpNn)
209....Gallup has 47/46 Obama....WITH REGISTERED VOTERS!! Down from 52/43!!! So much for that Bounce and Clinton Ace??
Obama has dropped over 5 points and Romney is up 3 points....and this is with Registered Voters!!
I here Crickets from the Obama Camp...the ones that were promoting that BIG DNC BOUNCE???
Obama is campaigning in Wisconsin....hmmm....
Finding out that the Carter loser grandson..Has had tapes for over 3 weeks....and those videos were posted originally in June? I would imagine this October Surprise was moved way up with Obama's DNC Joke taking a dive! Problem is these videos are firing up Conservatives behind Romney and I feel what Romney said is how SOOOO MANY people truly feel. The Producers are sick of paying for the Takers!! This is a win with Seniors as well who feel too many people today want a handout, are lazy, do not work and take things for granted!
Rush calls this a Golden Opportunity for Romney! He likes it! Who is crying left wing jerks and the inside the Beltway losers on the GOP like Bill Kristol....what a surprise!
By the way were is the whole video like Romney mentioned last night? Major portions are missing?
Posted by: bluerose75 at September 18, 2012 09:22 AM (HDcKc)
Most of the few who actually bother to read the story will do so with their nose crinkled in disgust.
The nannies will be angry that these people ruin their bodies with beer and chaw, which everyone will ultimately pay for in the Age of Obamacare.
The fymynysts will sigh with disdain for these two menz and their adoration of such a cliched patriarchical fascination as football.
The Elitist Coastals will roll their eyes at the fact that this rube hails from anywhere in Flyover Country in the first place.
The greenies will gnash their teeth over this inconsiderate consumer using his own vehicle instead of taking the opportunity to talk up the awesome public transportation or altnerate-power-travel options available to him, instead of his vile fossil-fuel mobile.
All in all, many will be too distracted by their own causes to really take the story seriously.
Posted by: reason at September 18, 2012 09:22 AM (XiVKO)
----
I watched Fail Safe the other night, the 1964 movie starring Jane's dad, Henry Fonda, as the American president. The story is about an accidental US nuclear strike on Moscow. To prevent WWIII, the president then drops an atomic bomb on New York City, you know, to make it all fair and stuff. Let's hope TFG didn't see that movie or these seven men and one woman are going to on a one way trip to Cairo.
Posted by: WalrusRex at September 18, 2012 09:23 AM (Hx5uv)
Have any of the pollsters ever bothered to explain WHY they use poll disproportionate numbers of Democrats over Republicans? I mean, we KNOW why, but has anyone questioned the actual methodology? Because I'm sure they'd say something like, "We're just using the model from the last Presidential election to gauge expected turnout." Which is complete and utter horseshit. Yes, I know it's a common model, but ARRRGH! It's without any kind of basis! It assumes that 2010 never happened and everyone is still stuck in their October 2008 mindset.
I HATE THAT.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/b][/i][/u] at September 18, 2012 09:23 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 18, 2012 09:24 AM (05RcU)
Posted by: tasker at September 18, 2012 09:24 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Bart who lurks with SMOD 2012, master of his domain at September 18, 2012 09:25 AM (he2LC)
205....A lot of places allow cross registration with no additional tuition. ex. RPI and Hudson Valley CC had open cross registration. ...
So, if a student who was fleeing from coercion at one college...expect to find an environment that was free of that...if they transfered to a 'sister college', that was tied to the other one?
I guess students are going to have to require something...in writing, up front...that assures them that they will not be bullied into voting a certain way, by their professors...before they pay their tuition.
Posted by: wheatie at September 18, 2012 09:25 AM (Z7b/q)
Let's hope TFG didn't see that movie or these seven men and one woman are going to on a one way trip to Cairo.
Posted by: WalrusRex at September 18, 2012 01:23 PM (Hx5uv)
With the Blind Sheikh along for the ride.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/b][/i][/u] at September 18, 2012 09:25 AM (4df7R)
For all the throwing around of the race card in this country, I have never been in a more racist part of the world than the Far East. The Chinese, Japanese, and Koreans all think that they are truly the master race, and not collectively. The worst are the Koreans (I even had a Korean co-worker admit that to me). They feel that they are the top tier of humanity, with the Chinese and Japanese second tier, and everyone else sub-human. They make the Klan look like an interracial orgy.
Posted by: Country Singer (likes teh ginger ladies) at September 18, 2012 09:26 AM (L8r/r)
If you want to stop that scenario then we have to remove the incentives, which means reducing the role of government.
So where exactly is the GOP platform item to "remove incentives"? When do we hear that talking point? We haven't heard it because there is no plan to remove incentives, because it is not politically feasible. Because we've let the shear number of single-parent families needing - not just wanting, but needing - government handouts to grow too large.
So, you're saying 'we can't address this as a culture, we need to change it at the government level' while at the same time having to acknowledge that, no, no one has plans to change this at the government level.
Which means we win fewer and fewer elections.
Posted by: CJ at September 18, 2012 09:27 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: Pinky at September 18, 2012 09:27 AM (x2qiO)
Posted by: tasker at September 18, 2012 09:27 AM (r2PLg)
With the Blind Sheikh along for the ride.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter at September 18, 2012 01:25 PM (4df7R)
If the Blind Sheikh sees the movie, we are really in trouble.
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka muhammad hussein jihadi Peace Loving soetero blame bush wright at September 18, 2012 09:27 AM (ovpNn)
Posted by: Adam Smith's Invisible Pimp Hand at September 18, 2012 09:28 AM (NzBQO)
WaPo....in Virginia its home turf....LOL!!! Say no more....hey WaPo you oversampled Dems...shocking....just shocking! Who did they do poll their offices in DC?
People lets cut the crap...any poll that is right of 2008 is rubbish and any poll with more than 3 Dems is rubbish except in New York, California, Oregon, Mass and othe liberal bastions!
WaPo...lol....whatever...NEXT?
Posted by: bluerose75 at September 18, 2012 09:28 AM (HDcKc)
There is no God but the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit and Mohammed was a bastard, pederast, con-man, thief and murderer.
Posted by: Bart who lurks with SMOD 2012, master of his domain at September 18, 2012 09:28 AM (he2LC)
>> [Imagine picture of hot cheerleader here]<<
Is it OK if I imagine a hot biker chick instead?
Posted by: Joe Biden at September 18, 2012 01:15 PM (xvtYZ)
Why imagine when you can visit this link.
http://tinyurl.com/8pc6l8l
Warning Not Safe For Work! You can definitely see that she hasn't waxed her pie hole recently.
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka muhammad hussein jihadi Peace Loving soetero blame bush wright at September 18, 2012 01:21 PM (ovpNn)
Its actually not NSFW. I know some of you are dying to click.
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka muhammad hussein jihadi Peace Loving soetero blame bush wright at September 18, 2012 09:28 AM (ovpNn)
---
Yeah, it's some '70s porn star with a big cheesy mustache.
Posted by: WalrusRex at September 18, 2012 09:30 AM (Hx5uv)
"did any body see new wapo VA poll having obama by 8 points. Their sample D+8, when VA is acutually R+3"
IF ONLY GEOFF WERE STILL AMONG US!
He could do a tracking-poll of how skewed the polls go +D in order to keep the race close.
I mean, we all know that all these polls are going to do all they an to keep Barry ahead, or at worst, the two of them within the MOE. So now the interesting number becomes how far from reality they must skew in order to make this happen.
I'd be interested in seeing that. Either just as the pure +D number or as a deviation from the actual makeup of the sample-set.
Posted by: reason at September 18, 2012 09:30 AM (XiVKO)
HVCC was a major feeder for RPI, so there was a lot of course coordination. I think people did better at the CC than RPI because the CC profs were GOOD, and you could get access to them a lot easier than the RPI profs.
If the 4-year+ colleges viewed CC's as transfer feeders like the New York CC system and SUNY do, a lot of problems lessen. Any decent 4 year college should have a significant washout rate among undergrads, and needs replacement bodies to fill those dropout slots.
UC San Diego's undergrad dropout rate was about 75%. My incoming grad school class's dropout rate was 50% after the 1st semester. Back in the 80's they weren't giving degrees away with a box of Cracker Jacks ;->
Posted by: @PurpAv at September 18, 2012 09:30 AM (Qva0e)
I'm sure the doom and gloom brigade will be out in full force at least two dozen more times before the end of September and especially once the MSM hails Obama as a combination of Cicero and Daniel Webster if he manages not to bite his own tongue off and bleed all over the stage in the first debate.
Nothing fundamental in this election has changed. Nothing fundamental in this election is likely to change. Even this Libya deal has only confirmed what we already knew about both candidates.
We are three or four minutes into the second half and the game is tied. Everybody needs to chill and let the coach run his damn offense.
Posted by: trumpetdaddy at September 18, 2012 09:31 AM (dcoFe)
It wont ever happen but this problem used to be solved with poor farms and orphanages. Both of which were a very large deterrent to having children out of wedlock or picking a "cute" loser for a husband.
Posted by: Buzzsaw at September 18, 2012 09:31 AM (wrS2o)
Posted by: @PurpAv at September 18, 2012 09:35 AM (Qva0e)
Posted by: steevy at September 18, 2012 09:35 AM (6o4Fb)
"I watched Fail Safe the other night, the 1964 movie starring Jane's dad, Henry Fonda, as the American president. The story is about an accidental US nuclear strike on Moscow. To prevent WWIII, the president then drops an atomic bomb on New York City, you know, to make it all fair and stuff."
So we'd get rid of:
- Pooty-poot.
- Bloomberg.
- ozfic
- the entire cast of SNL
...this might grow legs, man...
Posted by: reason at September 18, 2012 09:36 AM (XiVKO)
I think you're forgetting the location of the owner of this place.
Posted by: Buzzsaw at September 18, 2012 09:38 AM (tf9Ne)
IF ONLY GEOFF WERE STILL AMONG US!
He could do a tracking-poll of how skewed the polls go +D in order to keep the race close.
I mean, we all know that all these polls are going to do all they an to keep Barry ahead, or at worst, the two of them within the MOE. So now the interesting number becomes how far from reality they must skew in order to make this happen.
I'd be interested in seeing that. Either just as the pure +D number or as a deviation from the actual makeup of the sample-set.
Posted by: reason at September 18, 2012 01:30 PM (XiVKO)
unskewedpolls.com is your friend
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka muhammad hussein jihadi Peace Loving soetero blame bush wright at September 18, 2012 09:40 AM (ovpNn)
It wont ever happen but this problem used to be solved with poor farms and orphanages. Both of which were a very large deterrent to having children out of wedlock or picking a "cute" loser for a husband.
Well...we now have schools being asked to consider offering School Dinners for some students. At that point, I say just add cots and call it an orphanage.
I just can't get any of these smart morons to explain to me how we win in the long run. I need someone to tell me how we are going have smaller government while the number of people needing bigger government grows each year.
I know it's not as fun as the day-to-day developments of a campaign, but we have no long range plan, so all of this short-term strategizing comes off as a bit delusional.
Posted by: CJ at September 18, 2012 09:47 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: Joe Biden at September 18, 2012 09:58 AM (xvtYZ)
Posted by: Dooley at September 18, 2012 10:28 AM (AVfT8)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2211 seconds, 376 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Clemenza at September 18, 2012 06:42 AM (afx6B)