December 04, 2012
— Ace Interesting blog-post from a screenwriter (responsible for The Thing 2, but don't hold that against him.
Most people have heard that it's the "suits" and the process of accommodation of the corporate people's demands that make scripts (and movies) so awful. I heard that, but then I've also heard that's a lot of a crap; that that's an easy line peddled by outsiders.
This guy, on the other hand, says "No, that's actually correct."
That first notes meeting is illuminating. You learn right away who actually read your previous script and who didn’t. You also discover what the other people involved want the movie to be. NOTE: Rarely will everyone want to make the same movie. You’ll get notes like “Can we make it more like [popular movie]?” Or, “This feels like it should be more in the [obscure art film] neighborhood.”...
Perhaps finally this is the stage where it goes to the top studio execs. You attend another notes session and are tasked with notes you feel you’ve already addressed. Things like, “I don’t know what the characters are feeling,” or “What is this person’s arc and why is it so hard to figure out?”
...
This second full pass is where youÂ’re tested. The biggest problem is realizing that some readers on the studio level donÂ’t understand subtext. Or rather, they get it when theyÂ’re seeing a finished film, but with all the scripts they read (or coverage thereof) they have no subtext radar. It all blows by them. (Not every exec is like this, but itÂ’s a common problem, and can sometimes extend to producers and other people in the process.)
About this time, your agent calls again and says: DonÂ’t screw this up. For both of you.
Your new job: Spell out all the things you so artfully seeded through innuendo and subtle suggestion. Now youÂ’re writing things in ALL CAPS and talking about how this is THE TURNING POINT FOR YOUR CHARACTER because she realizes SHE MUST BETRAY HER FRIEND to SAVE HER FAMILY. If you learned how to write from a certain LOST writer, youÂ’ll be doing this already, along with statements like HOLY SHIT, this is the MOST HEARTBREAKING MOMENT WEÂ’VE EVER SEEN.
Reading the draft back to yourself makes your teeth hurt. This isnÂ’t representative of your writing, itÂ’s more like a transcript of some frat boy describing your script to his buddies. And yet this draft goes over like gangbusters at the studio. You are called and thanked by the studio, and then the producer. Once a director/movie star/both get on board, itÂ’s all systems go for this project.
Maybe that work has already been done, in which case, you’re getting notes from those people as well. If an actor is involved, the draft the studio loves to death will rankle the movie star. Why? Because in this draft you’ve written out all the subtext and given the actor no room for them to do their job. Actors hate drafts like this. It’s like a photograph of a starving child in some third-world country holding up a flag that reads “FEEL SAD.”
Movies really have become awful, haven't they? I don't mean politically; sure, there are a lot of liberal zingers put into movies for no very good reason, except to make the filmmakers think they've done something positive with the piece of shit project they're foisting on people.
Hollywood has always made most movies for a juvenile crowd. A producer, I think his name was Zanuck, worked out the logic like this: Girls will see anything boys will see, but boys will not see most things girls will see. Younger kids will see anything that older kids will see, but older kids will not see things made for younger kids. Adults will see most things that older teenagers will see, but older teenagers will not necessarily see things that adults would see. Therefore, the correct money-making demographic to make a movie for is a 17 year old boy.
Even though Hollywood turned out all sorts of juvenile dreck (and be aware, they always did; if older movies seem more adult to you, remember that's largely because only the classics survive and most of the juvenile dreck is forgotten and no longer seen), certainly they've gotten worse and worse about this lately. Virtually every movie has a number in the title-- to avoid this, some sequels and prequels avoid numbering, but even if they avoid that, we still know that X-Men: First Class is X-Men Part 0. (And that movie was halfway decent.) Everything is either a prequel, a sequel, or a remake; every movie made is an attempt at a financially "safe" exploitation of a property that's worked at least once in the past.
And everything is written for that 17 year old boy. The more years that separate me from 17 the more this grates. Almost every script is some kind of coming-of-age story about a young man with limitless potential if only he can learn to [x] (control his emotions, come to peace with his father's death or his living father's authority, etc., etc.). Those are not bad stories, necessarily. A lot of classics are in that mode. But when almost every movie is that sort of Edge-of-17 I-Can't-Wait-To-Find-Out-What-I'll-Be-When-I-Grow-Up power fantasy (competence fantasy, career fantasy, etc.), that's an awful lot of movies with the same basic theme and only the slightest differentiation between them.
Even in the Beach Party Bingo days of the late sixties, Hollywood still put out a decent number of movies made for adults. They weren't literally all for that 17 year old boy. Just most of them, and most of the exploitative ones. But they did attempt to target adult audiences, and produce some movies that weren't all about What I'll Be When I Grow Up but about the problems you face when you have grown up.
It's very hard to name movies made in the last 20 years which are made for adults. You can name a few, but they're few and far between. And they're increasingly mostly small-operation independent movies.
I used to despise independent and foreign movies. I wouldn't see them on principle. But with the major studios just churning out one adolescent power-fantasy after another (and usually poorly done adolescent power-fantasies at that), I am beginning to see the appeal.
Television used to be a vast wasteland of insipid corporate least-common-denominator writing, while movies used to be a notch above that. Now that situation is entirely reversed, and with a vengeance. I still prefer the form of the movie over television (I don't like episodic stories-- I like beginning, middle, and end), but there's little doubt that if you want to write interesting stories that aren't about a boy-man on the cusp of adulthood finding a Power Ring and learning to control his Go For It impulses, you should write for television rather than the movies.
A documentary called American Grindhouse discussed exploitation films. One point, I think made by John Landis, was that despite the low budgets, exploitation films actually offered a writer or director (or, commonly, a writer/director) a great deal of freedom, because so long as one delivered the Exploitation (whether Bikinis, Bikers, Black Revolutionaries, or Blood), the producers did not care at all what you made the story about. Deliver the three or four bits of nudity, shock material, or Current Teenager Fad material and you could otherwise do whatever you wanted.
I get that feeling about TV, now. Most shows are still pretty formulaic (every episode is mostly just a rehash of the basic situation and conflicts in the pilot episode, which, actually, they sort of must be), but you do occasionally see some things you weren't expecting, and hear some dialogue you weren't expecting, on TV.
In the movies, it's all entirely predictable. Almost every studio movie is just an assemblage of things that have worked in other movies for the last 20 years. And as Hollywood's hits are fewer and further between, every movie seems to be rehashing the same Moments That Worked from previous movies. Even in the very small creative space they're working in (movies for 17 year old boys looking to become awesome I Win At Life adults), they're not offering much variation or novelty.
For God's sake, do we really need Ridley Scott's Monopoly-- The Movie of The Game?
It's my guess that, given the ease of distribution via the internet, and plummeting costs of making a movie in the first place (making a cheap movie I mean-- as cheap movies become cheaper, the regular big-budget studio picture explodes in price), we'll see more and more micro-studios pop up, offering low-budget movies (but made by veterans who aren't idiots) offering more "alternative fare," and alternative will usually mean "featuring adults or adult themes." The actor Michael Biehn (Aliens, Terminator) was talking about this sort of thing on Adam Carrola. Although it was a TV show rather than a movie, "It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia" illustrates this idea -- if your budget is low enough, you have the liberty to do whatever you like, and you might just wind up making something that hasn't been seen sixty three thousand times before.
Posted by: Ace at
08:27 AM
| Comments (349)
Post contains 1551 words, total size 10 kb.
I never pay for a movie. Saw the stupid Batman movie on a flight from Spain. Did people actually pay to see that and think it was worth seeing?
So fucking trite and formula. I thought I was watch a WWF movie. Same plot, same stupid people.
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectual at December 04, 2012 08:33 AM (wR+pz)
Posted by: ace at December 04, 2012 08:33 AM (LCRYB)
Posted by: BumperStickerist at December 04, 2012 08:33 AM (RuUvx)
No, I think I will hold that against him.
Coming this fall, Scapegoat IV: Writer for shitty films that everybody knew would be shitty complains it's Not His Fault his movies were shitty.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at December 04, 2012 08:34 AM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama at December 04, 2012 08:35 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: EC at December 04, 2012 08:35 AM (GQ8sn)
If the budget is fairly low you can make stuff for smaller audiences. the bigger the budget, the more you have to make sure "It's for Everybody!" (which means 17 year old boys). A lower budget and you can write it for adults.
The lower the budget and the more exploitive the material, the better you'll do. If it's on TV you can get it slotted into a late enough time slot that the network would expect it to get relatively low ratings. Give it a genuninely interesting story with good characters, though, and it WILL attract an audience. Make sure the writing is top notch and you'll have a hit that DOESN"T have to appeal to the Michael Bay formula of all flash and no substance.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit [/b][/i][/u] at December 04, 2012 08:36 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: ace at December 04, 2012 08:36 AM (LCRYB)
I was watching Jurassic Park on Sunday probably for the first time since it came out, and I came to a somewhat shocking conclusion: Steven Spielberg sucks at making movies.
His early stuff could be good (Jaws) and he did have some moments (Schindler's List (he did that, right?)) but I think the Chrystal Skulls outnumber the Lost Arks at this point.
Posted by: Jollyroger at December 04, 2012 08:36 AM (t06LC)
Posted by: OregonMuse at December 04, 2012 08:36 AM (9GaPd)
The new paradigm is making movies for 17 year old girls, e.g. Twilight. How much money has that franchise made so far?
Posted by: EC at December 04, 2012 08:37 AM (GQ8sn)
When you're in high school or the early years of college, what are your choices for going out? You can't drink legally, so any bar that doesn't like risking huge liability issues for admitting underage kids is closed to you. It seems like the 18+ parties where 18-20 year olds get in with 'x's on their hands to signify they can't drink are increasingly a relic of the past. So what can you do on a weekend night with friends? Either house parties or go to the movies.
I know I went to the movies more before I turned 21 than after I did. And with more the audience composed of people aged 16-20, that puts a premium to appeal to this crowd. If you wonder why comic book movies rule the Hollywood business paradigm, this is why
Posted by: Chris P at December 04, 2012 08:37 AM (LuvqF)
Coming this fall, Scapegoat IV: Writer for shitty films that everybody knew would be shitty complains it's Not His Fault his movies were shitty.
The man's got to make a living somehow. If that's what gets him his paycheck, I can't blame him for doing it.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit [/b][/i][/u] at December 04, 2012 08:37 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Hopeless at December 04, 2012 08:37 AM (zLsg3)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at December 04, 2012 08:38 AM (5DR1j)
Posted by: ace at December 04, 2012 08:38 AM (LCRYB)
Posted by: Adam at December 04, 2012 08:39 AM (/YJYi)
Posted by: Jean at December 04, 2012 08:39 AM (BNuW6)
Posted by: Jollyroger at December 04, 2012 08:39 AM (t06LC)
Reminds me of the story about the blonde Polish beauty who came to Hollywood to become an actress but got nowhere. She was sleeping with a writer.
There was the recent release of "Hope Creek" which was made for post-menapausal women.
As to old classics, just saw "The Wake of the Red Witch" on DVD starring John Wayne and Lon Cheney. Now that was a great movie!
Posted by: Whitehall at December 04, 2012 08:40 AM (FmPSC)
Well, that explains a lot.
No wonder I stopped going to the theater 20 years ago.
Posted by: © Sponge at December 04, 2012 08:41 AM (UK9cE)
Posted by: Bat Chain Puller at December 04, 2012 08:41 AM (SCcgT)
Posted by: EC at December 04, 2012 12:37 PM (GQ8sn)
I think a lot of this is less about appealing to a broader audience and more about movie recidivism (if you'll pardon the term). Teenage girls will go see movies with their favorite actors and actresses in them multiple times. I used to do this all the time. I saw "Speed" four times in theaters when I was 14. Do guys in that same age bracket go see "The Avengers" or "Dark Knight Rises" four or five times?
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit [/b][/i][/u] at December 04, 2012 08:41 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Cricket at December 04, 2012 08:41 AM (DrC22)
@19
If you would have turned the script in a year ago and could have dropped it for an opening in September, that mormon movie would have been green lit and you could have gotten Clooney (who, by the way is a shitty actor)
Posted by: Jollyroger at December 04, 2012 08:41 AM (t06LC)
Like Transformers? How many times can they go back to that well? I don't have the numbers in front of me, but I'm willing to bet the Twilight movies have made more money and have been more profitable than the Transformer movies.
Posted by: EC at December 04, 2012 08:42 AM (GQ8sn)
I am really tired of the messiah trope that's often included with that. "You are Teh One~! Teh One we have been waiting for!"
Every damned sci-fi/fantasy movie has this thing. Harry Pooper, The Matrix, Twilight (gag), Eragon (double gag), Star Wars prequels (triple gag).
As a plot device it couldn't be more worn. As part of moral instruction, it's just horribly misleading. If you aren't born Teh One, you aren't able to do squat in life.
Stop with the f'in messiahs already!
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at December 04, 2012 08:43 AM (JEpGb)
Posted by: Darth Chipmunk at December 04, 2012 08:43 AM (cRIVA)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at December 04, 2012 08:43 AM (5JmKY)
Posted by: ace at December 04, 2012 08:44 AM (LCRYB)
Posted by: Cliff in TX at December 04, 2012 08:44 AM (9ppEA)
Posted by: Adriane at December 04, 2012 08:44 AM (gh+mp)
In the past maybe, but with tickets costing $10-$12 a pop there's less of that now. Besides, that's what the internet is for.
Posted by: EC at December 04, 2012 08:44 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: MrCaniac at December 04, 2012 08:44 AM (Zd/NW)
Posted by: Jollyroger at December 04, 2012 12:44 PM (t06LC)
Rifftrax, my friend. Rifftrax.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit [/b][/i][/u] at December 04, 2012 08:44 AM (4df7R)
Inception and Fight Club come to mind as two large-budget movies written exclusively for adults.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at December 04, 2012 12:43 PM (5JmKY)
Inception was the shit. Had to get in before the H8ers.
Posted by: Jollyroger at December 04, 2012 08:45 AM (t06LC)
Posted by: rickb223 Let. It. Burn. at December 04, 2012 08:45 AM (mDN3d)
Yet, more often that not what makes these movies shitty is the writing.
Did the studios come to him and say "We want you to write another Final Destination sequel because it'll be easy money for us. But don't do too good a job writing it. Give it a shitty plot, OK?"
He'd be a bit more credible if he had at least one good movie to his name. His own experience comes exclusively from writing for shit movies. Question is, would a writer who has worked on good movies agree with him?
Posted by: Hollowpoint at December 04, 2012 08:45 AM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: Orson Wells at December 04, 2012 08:45 AM (RuUvx)
Leo and Brad? Teenage girls will go see them.
And look who else was backing them up: Joseph Gordon-Levitt and Ed Norton.
Posted by: EC at December 04, 2012 08:46 AM (GQ8sn)
that chronicles a writers run through the Hollywood guantlet of stupidity.
It's about a TV writer (obviously) but it mirrors thae same problems this guy is talking about.
Posted by: eleven at December 04, 2012 08:46 AM (KXm42)
Posted by: Hopeless at December 04, 2012 08:46 AM (AjH+Y)
Fuck them.
Posted by: © Sponge at December 04, 2012 08:46 AM (UK9cE)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at December 04, 2012 08:46 AM (vCK/R)
Disappearing spaces again. This site tries to take posts into Cormac McCarthy land: "he took from the mochila his blanketlined duckingcoat..."
Posted by: Bat Chain Puller at December 04, 2012 08:46 AM (SCcgT)
Sarc. I don't watch many movies because most of them suck, and I'm almost always disappointed, but I thought Get Shorty was pretty good. A movie about making a movie lol. The last movie I paid to watch in a theater was Real Steel, the movie version of Rock'em Sock'em Robots which I thought was pretty good too.
Posted by: NC Ref at December 04, 2012 08:47 AM (dVJLS)
Posted by: ace at December 04, 2012 08:47 AM (LCRYB)
Leo and Brad? Teenage girls will go see them.
Girls would go see "Fight Club" because of Brad Pitt's abs. They'd spend the whole movie wrinkling their noses and going, "Eww, gross!" whenever there was blood splattering about. I know this because I know these women.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit [/b][/i][/u] at December 04, 2012 08:47 AM (4df7R)
There Will Be Blood. Anything by the Coen Bros.
Yeah yeah yeah I know everyone hates TWBB. I love it. Kiss my grits.
Posted by: eleven at December 04, 2012 08:48 AM (KXm42)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit [/b][/i][/u] at December 04, 2012 08:49 AM (4df7R)
@49
GI Joe. Those fuckers are drafted into this spec ops group upon which they set all the records for badassery ever recorded within thier first day of training. Because I guess.
Of course, that is the least of my complaints about that steaming pile of shit.
Posted by: Jollyroger at December 04, 2012 08:49 AM (t06LC)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at December 04, 2012 08:49 AM (5JmKY)
You should definitely take all the pills your Dr prescribes without question. You should consult the USDA, ADA, AHA, etc., etc., and eat the diet they tell you is healthy. You should do what they say, they have authority on the matter.
The film industry is no different. It is a centralized information delivery system that is populated by talentless hacks.
Originality, competence, utility, and results are threats in these Old World structures.
Posted by: runninrebel at December 04, 2012 08:49 AM (J4gw3)
Posted by: zombie bob crane at December 04, 2012 12:48 PM (jPVBi)
Almost a thread winner there.
Posted by: © Sponge at December 04, 2012 08:50 AM (UK9cE)
Posted by: RWC at December 04, 2012 08:50 AM (fWAjv)
To some degree, this is unavoidable in Movies. Big team movies (like the stuff Joss Whedon does) can mostly avoid it. But anything that has a single "hero" has to have a reason for that character to be "the hero."
That reason can be self driven ("anyone" could have been Batman or Iron Man), or not self driven. If not self driven, then it's "the messiah" all over again.
Now, that can be more or less egregious. For instance, Harry Potter and The Matrix highlight the self-sacrificial nature of the Hero, especially at the "very" end. Eragon (what I could stomach of it) and the Star Wars prequels are more about the protagonist being the one-and-only-born-to-be-the-chosen-one who never makes hard choices, and never has to be willing to sacrifice himself. Those are really freaking annoying.
Where it's hard to avoid in movies that focus on one character, it's much easier to avoid in TV, where you're more likely to have a good ensemble cast in the first place.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at December 04, 2012 08:50 AM (5DR1j)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit [/b][/i][/u] at December 04, 2012 08:50 AM (4df7R)
James O'Barr, the creator of 'The Crow' graphic novels, once related how he went with his friend, the late Brandon Lee, to their first big Hollywood suit meeting to sell the concept of a 'Crow' movie and get money for production. Brandon was a fan of the comic book and closely identified with the Eric Draven character, so it was more or less his (and his late father's) clout that got them the meeting. O'Barr was a stranger to the whole process.
Anyway, at one point in the meeting, one of the suits says, 'Hey! I've got an idea! Let's cast Michael Jackson as The Crow!' Both O'Barr and Brandon Lee burst out laughing--laughing, that is, until they saw the guy was serious. O'Barr threatened to walk out then and there but Lee managed to insert some sanity into the proceedings.
That story sums up Hollywood, at least for me. I keep thinking of something Stuart Brand, the guy who originated the Whole Earth Catalogue, said a few decades ago: "Imagine if TV and movies were really good." Truth is, they aren't, not really. We're just accustomed to mediocre and call some of the less mediocre 'great' because we just don't know any better.
Posted by: troyriser at December 04, 2012 08:50 AM (vtiE6)
Posted by: Jollyroger at December 04, 2012 08:51 AM (t06LC)
Posted by: The Mega Independent[/i] at December 04, 2012 08:51 AM (4QUIa)
Posted by: The Mega Independent[/i] at December 04, 2012 08:52 AM (4QUIa)
I have people come in for jobs that you would never knew attended college. To the point you start to wonder of their credentials are fraudulent. Basic math, writing skills and the ability to skillfully carry a conversation that doesn't include gratuitous, nonsensical bullshitting are no existent.
I believe it's a byproduct of a society that's become lazy, an education system more interested in passing people than teaching, unrealistic expectations set be overbearing, unreasonable pushy parents who don't know or care their kid is really a dumb-ass, juvenile delinquent with no morals who likes to doink the neighbors cat and has been pushed along simply because people don't want to deal with their bullshit or don't give a shit because they are also inept- yet they think he is really Einstein reborn with the potential to do anything.
The human race; it's only a matter of time before we too are extinct.
Posted by: marcus at December 04, 2012 08:52 AM (GGCsk)
The Game (w/ Michael Douglas)
Memento
District 9
Casino Royal
Batman Begins
Crimson Tide
A Beautiful Mind
Black Hawk Down
Posted by: Joshua at December 04, 2012 08:52 AM (o4CbT)
Posted by: Dr Spank at December 04, 2012 08:53 AM (4cRnj)
I've got to disagree with you on Fight Club. It was a movie that sold (whether it delivered it or not is a different question) mindless violence for the sake of mindless violence. The 17-year-old male audience went in droves.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at December 04, 2012 08:53 AM (5DR1j)
Posted by: ace at December 04, 2012 12:47 PM (LCRYB)
Old fantasy book I read years ago... I think it was 'Whose Song was Sung' or somthing which had a great premise...
It was the story of the Minion... the Wing Man... the guy who helps the hero.... but with a twist.... HE was the one who was doing almost everything, while the hero would get the credit...
Always liked the premise...
Its like the Babylon 5 episode that features a couple of Low Level Maintenence guys... the Main story is happening in the background, while they go around fixing stuff.... always liked that one...
Posted by: Romeo13 at December 04, 2012 08:53 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: choogle at December 04, 2012 08:53 AM (N9r8M)
Posted by: Orson Wells at December 04, 2012 08:54 AM (RuUvx)
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at December 04, 2012 08:54 AM (i0App)
After reading that screenwriters essay about all of the different people involved giving all different kinds of advice about what should go in/stay out of a movie, one phrase from my youth came to mind:
Too many Chiefs, not enough Indians!
And yes, movies(read: Hollywood) do suck nowadays. There are only 3 or 4 during a year that even tempt me to go to a theatre. As a kid I would go to at least one movie a week and sometimes more.
Posted by: phil mupp at December 04, 2012 08:54 AM (VDovR)
Posted by: taylork at December 04, 2012 08:55 AM (ppNDn)
Posted by: Romeo13 at December 04, 2012 12:53 PM (lZBBB)
Still one of my top 5 favorite Babylon 5 episodes. Genius.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit [/b][/i][/u] at December 04, 2012 08:55 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Hopeless at December 04, 2012 08:55 AM (WFZEf)
I think Nolan puts some time and thought into what he does.
Momento, The Prestiege, Dark Knight, and Inception are great, Batman Begins, TDKR were good.
Posted by: Jollyroger at December 04, 2012 08:55 AM (t06LC)
I don't blame him for taking the job. But if your cooking skills are such that you can't get a better job than fry cook at Applebees, don't come to me complaining about how bad chain restaurants suck.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at December 04, 2012 08:55 AM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: Sharon at December 04, 2012 08:55 AM (DtEq4)
Posted by: Shoot Me at December 04, 2012 08:55 AM (qiXMt)
Posted by: Otis Criblecoblis at December 04, 2012 08:55 AM (IlZPo)
Posted by: marcus at December 04, 2012 08:55 AM (GGCsk)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit [/b][/i][/u] at December 04, 2012 08:55 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: BumperStickerist at December 04, 2012 08:56 AM (RuUvx)
Posted by: Adriane at December 04, 2012 08:56 AM (gh+mp)
"The King's Speech." Best movie I've seen in a long time. No teenagers in the audience.
How could you like a movie about a rich welfare family that has no obligations or responsibilities to society!!eleventytard!1!1@!!
Posted by: Lurking Canuck at December 04, 2012 08:56 AM (NF2Bf)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at December 04, 2012 08:56 AM (vCK/R)
Posted by: Romeo13 at December 04, 2012 12:53 PM (lZBBB)
Still one of my top 5 favorite Babylon 5 episodes. Genius.
A View From The Gallery
I guess if we're going to include scifi tv eps, I gotta say "By The Pale Moonlight" as one of the best. Tight writing, tension, plot twists, and awesome character acting.
Posted by: EC at December 04, 2012 08:56 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: taylork at December 04, 2012 12:55 PM (ppNDn)
Already in production. I hear Rosanne Barr and Rosie O'Donnel are angling hard for the title rolls.
Posted by: Jollyroger at December 04, 2012 08:56 AM (t06LC)
Along with crappy movies, we plagued by crappy movie reviews.
Most movies that come out these days, my interest in them is largely determined by how badly I want to see them riffed by Rifftrax. Seriously. It's the one and only reason I would ever watch "The Happening."
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit [/b][/i][/u] at December 04, 2012 08:57 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at December 04, 2012 08:57 AM (vCK/R)
Posted by: Lurking Canuck at December 04, 2012 12:56 PM (NF2Bf)
lol!
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit [/b][/i][/u] at December 04, 2012 08:58 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Fritz at December 04, 2012 08:58 AM (/ZZCn)
12 O'clock High - Gregory Peck.
I am totally serious BTW.
Posted by: marcus at December 04, 2012 08:59 AM (GGCsk)
Posted by: Joshua at December 04, 2012 08:59 AM (o4CbT)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at December 04, 2012 08:59 AM (5JmKY)
Posted by: soothsayer at December 04, 2012 08:59 AM (jUytm)
@93
I bet the Twilight Rifftrax is amazing. BTW, my wife won't let me see them with her anymore (Oh Hell Yes) because I make fun of them too much during the movie.
Posted by: Jollyroger at December 04, 2012 08:59 AM (t06LC)
Posted by: Fritz at December 04, 2012 12:58 PM (/ZZCn)
I dearly want to see how well or poorly that movie does based on Jamie Foxx's messiah worship of Teh One.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit [/b][/i][/u] at December 04, 2012 08:59 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Sharon at December 04, 2012 12:55 PM (DtEq4)
Liked the first season of 'Hell on Wheels' too...
Waitin for the second season to be on the web now...
Posted by: Romeo13 at December 04, 2012 09:00 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: Hopeless at December 04, 2012 09:00 AM (WFZEf)
F*ck them. F*ck them all. F*ck Casper Gomez. And f*ck the f*cking Diaz brothers. I bury those cockaroaches.
Posted by: The Mega Independent[/i] at December 04, 2012 09:00 AM (4QUIa)
Posted by: Jamie Foxx at December 04, 2012 09:00 AM (ypzqs)
Posted by: Bender Bending Rodríguez at December 04, 2012 09:00 AM (YKUmW)
I am totally serious BTW.
How old are you?<
Not that old.
Do you realize that film is so good it is still being used in military training for leadership?
That a real movie. One that stands the test of time.
Posted by: marcus at December 04, 2012 09:00 AM (GGCsk)
But I volunteered to be an "assistant moderator" when I had time, and made a pledge to myself to not push either longbows OR crossbows, but let the students decide on their own which they prefer.
Posted by: NC Ref at December 04, 2012 09:00 AM (dVJLS)
I liked Secondhand Lions come to think of it. But it had Robert Duvall and Michael Caine in it. I think I would pay money to see them read the instructions for setting up an Ikea desk.
Posted by: Jollyroger at December 04, 2012 09:01 AM (t06LC)
Remo Williams The Adventure Begins
Big Trouble In Little China
Really off wall
Ice Pirates
Eat And Run
The Toxic Avenger
Dark Star
Posted by: minometer at December 04, 2012 09:01 AM (PwwAS)
I agree. It was a surprisingly good movie. But it was sold to the 17 year old male demographic. Which is why it was green-lit in the first place.
To a lesser extent, Inception was the same way. The slight difference being that, from the promos, you could tell that Inception was going to be something that tried to bend your brain. Fight Club was sold on the quote, "I want you to hit me as hard as you can."
And, face it, who doesn't want to hit Brad Pitt in the face, as hard as you can?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at December 04, 2012 09:01 AM (5DR1j)
Posted by: Baldy at December 04, 2012 09:02 AM (opS9C)
Posted by: EC at December 04, 2012 12:56 PM (GQ8sn)
May I submit for your approval, 'The Ring with the Red Velvet Ropes'....
Posted by: Romeo13 at December 04, 2012 09:02 AM (lZBBB)
YOU WERE ONLY SUPPOSED TO BLOW THE BLOODY DOORS OFF!
Posted by: EC at December 04, 2012 09:02 AM (GQ8sn)
Corollary to the 17 y/o boy rule: Girls who put out will be taken to whatever damn movie they want.
Posted by: Wodeshed at December 04, 2012 09:02 AM (a9L+B)
Posted by: Fed Up. at December 04, 2012 09:02 AM (WnjLc)
Posted by: The Sign Held By Death In The First Draft of The Seventh Seal at December 04, 2012 09:02 AM (QKKT0)
Posted by: Butters at December 04, 2012 09:02 AM (NIZHJ)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at December 04, 2012 09:02 AM (5PkZK)
Posted by: Jollyroger at December 04, 2012 12:59 PM (t06LC)
Oh God, hilarious. You have no idea. Your wife would hate them. lol!
I spent the entirety of "The Day After Tomorrow" (which I saw in theaters for some obscure reason) laughing my ass off. Everyone around me was deadly serious, and I could not keep my shit together. When the wolves attacked -- clearly having been starved by the Bronx Zoo staff, because why else would they be hunting humans after less than 24 hours on the loose? -- I lost it completely and had to put my coat over my head to try and muffle the laughter.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit [/b][/i][/u] at December 04, 2012 09:02 AM (4df7R)
But only three words at a time.
Posted by: HQ Standards Board at December 04, 2012 09:02 AM (jPVBi)
Posted by: Butters at December 04, 2012 09:03 AM (NIZHJ)
Posted by: Walkers! at December 04, 2012 09:03 AM (e/Cti)
I lost it completely and had to put my coat over my head to try and muffle the laughter.
***
That was me during the preview of the new Matt Damon anti-fracking movie.
Posted by: Wodeshed at December 04, 2012 09:03 AM (a9L+B)
Maybe they can mix it up a little bit and have some hot shot musician (Kenny Loggins comes to mind) do movie soundtracks?
Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 04, 2012 09:04 AM (Nfpnr)
I agree. It was a surprisingly good movie. But it was sold to the 17 year old male demographic. Which is why it was green-lit in the first place.
How do you know the movie was sold to 17 year old boys, even if it was made for adults (based on an adult novel)?
Immediately after the movie came out, all kinds of high school "fight clubs" started springing up all over the place, because they thought it was cool. And a good way to get great abs.
Message Utterly And Totally Not Received.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit [/b][/i][/u] at December 04, 2012 09:04 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Galadriel at December 04, 2012 09:04 AM (xG0vx)
Posted by: Dr. Mabuse at December 04, 2012 09:04 AM (FkH4y)
Moderator? Your HS combined the Debate Club and Archery Club? That's hardcore.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at December 04, 2012 09:04 AM (SY2Kh)
To some degree, this is unavoidable in Movies. Big team movies (like the stuff Joss Whedon does) can mostly avoid it. But anything that has a single "hero" has to have a reason for that character to be "the hero."
That reason can be self driven ("anyone" could have been Batman or Iron Man), or not self driven. If not self driven, then it's "the messiah" all over again.
Now, that can be more or less egregious. For instance, Harry Potter and The Matrix highlight the self-sacrificial nature of the Hero, especially at the "very" end. Eragon (what I could stomach of it) and the Star Wars prequels are more about the protagonist being the one-and-only-born-to-be-the-chosen-one who never makes hard choices, and never has to be willing to sacrifice himself. Those are really freaking annoying.
Where it's hard to avoid in movies that focus on one character, it's much easier to avoid in TV, where you're more likely to have a good ensemble cast in the first place.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at December 04, 2012 12:50 PM (5DR1j)
Yeah but Whedon falls for this also. In "Serenity" the chick with the huge forehead turns out to be the "savior" of them all against the Reavers.
Posted by: MrCaniac at December 04, 2012 09:05 AM (Zd/NW)
Posted by: Patrick at December 04, 2012 09:05 AM (6WpNC)
Posted by: taylork at December 04, 2012 09:05 AM (ppNDn)
It's pretty funny. Some of it may not be to your liking (gross potty humor), but some of the situations the characters find themselves in are pretty funny. The child molester ep is pretty good.
Posted by: EC at December 04, 2012 09:05 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Dr Spank at December 04, 2012 09:05 AM (4cRnj)
Posted by: Butters at December 04, 2012 09:06 AM (NIZHJ)
Going contrary here.
Saw Argo, Skyfall, Flight, Lincoln, Hope Springs, Anna Karenina, and have seen countless little kid moves in the last year. Plan to see the film version of Les Mis at Xmas. Seems like I saw a movie every other weekend in the past couple of years that no 17 year old boy would be caught dead at. A lot of them were good.
But I am a sucker for period pieces, and TV gave me Hell on Wheels and Copper this year [Copper ended up being rather lame; I kept thinking the overacting that popped up as the season went on was done on purpose, and there was some surprise lurking... instead, it was just overacting). Still not Deadwood, but what is?
Posted by: The other coyote at December 04, 2012 09:06 AM (yK44T)
Posted by: Walkers! at December 04, 2012 09:06 AM (e/Cti)
When I was 17 there was one chick flick that I really liked. Flashdance. At least 5 minutes of it anyway.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILWSp0m9G2U
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at December 04, 2012 09:06 AM (n/ubI)
There's a whole YouTube series of "Honest Trailers" that are both hilarious and heartbreaking. Watch them and you will see what's the matter with Hollywood.
Oh, and go watch "The Player" if you want to see what this guy is talking about. Best movie ever made about Hollywood. Even Whoopi Goldberg is good in it. Every time I watch it I am surprised that it got made.
Posted by: rockmom at December 04, 2012 09:06 AM (NYnoe)
On a completely unrelated topic, I see Lie-awatha Warren will be on the Senate Banking Committee.
Posted by: WalrusRex at December 04, 2012 09:07 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: Gerry at December 04, 2012 09:07 AM (UmkDS)
Posted by: BlackOrchid-StillMissingDagny at December 04, 2012 09:07 AM (F+ZCA)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at December 04, 2012 09:07 AM (J7sV0)
Both speakers get a chance to rebut while dodging arrows shot at them from 50 yards.
Posted by: EC at December 04, 2012 09:07 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: yerro at December 04, 2012 09:07 AM (CO/ju)
Posted by: BlackOrchid-StillMissingDagny at December 04, 2012 09:07 AM (F+ZCA)
Because I was a 19 year old boy at the time. As ace said, the farther I get from 17, the less attractive that kind of story (and marketing) is.
If I hadn't already seen Fight Club, and was just seeing the previews that were on back then, I wouldn't watch it today. I'd think it looked like mindless violence for the sake of mindless violence.
Again, the movie itself was surprisingly good. The promos and trailers were all Ed Norton looking lost and defeated until Brad Pitt said "I want you to hit me as hard as you can."
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at December 04, 2012 09:08 AM (5DR1j)
I think additional factors include the rising cost of movie tickets (and refreshments, etc) against inflation. Also the narrowing gap between theater release and DVD/Blueray release. People don't want to take a chance on a movie and discover that they've thrown away $50. They'll wait until the opinion makers decide that something non-formulaic is a must-see and get it via On Demad or Netflix. Therefore as a studio if you had a truly unique new film project on your hands that couldn't easily be marketed by way of the standard formulas and stars, you'd tend to shy away.
Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 04, 2012 09:08 AM (Nfpnr)
Posted by: dr. shatterhand at December 04, 2012 09:08 AM (n/ogz)
Posted by: Butters at December 04, 2012 09:08 AM (NIZHJ)
That was me during the preview of the new Matt Damon anti-fracking movie.
Posted by: Wodeshed at December 04, 2012 01:03 PM (a9L+B)
If I ever went to the movies anymore, I'd be doing the exact same thing.
As it is, the only movie I'm going to see this year is "The Hobbit," and dammit, i still have to pre-buy my ticket! If I have to elbow some Hobbit wannabe in the throat to get my foot in the door of that theater, then I'm sorry about your windpipe, Bob Costas. Consider it an opportunity to keep your yap shut.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit [/b][/i][/u] at December 04, 2012 09:08 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: red rock 'em sock 'em robot at December 04, 2012 09:08 AM (jPVBi)
Posted by: Walkers! at December 04, 2012 09:08 AM (e/Cti)
Posted by: The Mega Independent[/i] at December 04, 2012 09:08 AM (4QUIa)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Also on Teams Daryl and Glenn. at December 04, 2012 09:09 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: beach & a kindle at December 04, 2012 09:09 AM (LpQbZ)
Posted by: Michael Bay at December 04, 2012 09:09 AM (QKKT0)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit at December 04, 2012 12:57 PM (4df7R)
LOL - we watched that one on the Riffplayer just 2 nights ago! So funny - "Now, THERE's a cheap monster effect for you: *the wind*" "Yeah, the only thing cheaper would be *low humidity*!"
Posted by: Dr. Mabuse at December 04, 2012 09:09 AM (FkH4y)
oh.
Posted by: soothsayer at December 04, 2012 01:08 PM (jUytm)
He's also the same choad that wrote Prometheus. Look how good of a writer he is.
Posted by: EC at December 04, 2012 09:09 AM (GQ8sn)
Favorite film? A tie between Fellini's 'La Dulce Vita' and Bergman's 'Wild Strawberries'. Not being a snob, either. They're that good. The scene in 'Wild Strawberries' where the old man realizes he's been an absolute asshole all his life is one of the best scenes ever captured on film.
There's a low-budget post-Apocalypse movie out there called 'The Day'. Amazingly good.
Posted by: troyriser at December 04, 2012 09:10 AM (vtiE6)
Posted by: soothsayer at December 04, 2012 09:10 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: Walkers! at December 04, 2012 09:10 AM (e/Cti)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at December 04, 2012 09:11 AM (piMMO)
Sort of. The difference is that River isn't "The Hero." The Hero is Mal.
In point of fact, River being the genetically modified, mentally enhanced, demon-killer ninja makes Mal- who definitely isn't- all that more heroic.
It's like if you did a Star Wars movie where Han was the Protagonist, and Luke was one of the side-kicks.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at December 04, 2012 09:11 AM (5DR1j)
As long as I put new special effects through blue filters, you'll park your asses in the seats to watch my films
Gives me the cash to lecture you about your selfish ways and carbon footprints from the comfort of my many mansions
Posted by: James Fuckin' Cameron at December 04, 2012 09:11 AM (wwsoB)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at December 04, 2012 09:11 AM (5JmKY)
Posted by: soothsayer at December 04, 2012 09:11 AM (jUytm)
2001 A Space Odyssey
The Year of Living Dangerously with Mel Gibson
No Way Out with Kevin Costner
Return of the King
Memento
and sentimental all time favorite
The Wizard of Oz
Posted by: Sharon at December 04, 2012 09:11 AM (DtEq4)
I have not seen this show, is it worth seeing?
Posted by: chemjeff at December 04, 2012 01:03 PM (m/eXi)
Yes. Hell yes. FX has some of the best shows on television, and this is one of them.
Posted by: MrCaniac at December 04, 2012 09:12 AM (Zd/NW)
The thing is, The 17-year-old Boy doesn't exist; only a corporate idea of The 17-year-old Boy, far divorced from any real 17-year-old boy(s), does.
Big [Fill In The Blank], unless it's working under the dictatorial terror-image of a singular Steve Jobs type, makes crap, because...it just can't do otherwise. As the bumper stickers used to say, "Corporate Rock Sucks"--not "Corporate Rock Fans Suck" (though they mostly do). Consumers don't decide what gets made, or even really what's successful. That's *decided*, and they consent to they decision, to playing The 17-year-old Boy, or they don't.
The fundamental thing is, the primary product of bureaucracy is bureaucracy. Big [X]'s incentives are almost entirely internal, hierarchical, "political." Because it's Big.
If a bureaucracy *makes stuff*, the stuff it makes is really made for internal consumption. It shits that stuff into the world if it *has* to, to go on doing the things it *really* does, but...it's shit. A literal waste product of another process. You don't digest *so* you can make shit. You digest to stay alive, and shit comes out. Hollywood makes shit because "Hollywood," an understandable-as-singular entity, exists. When it was less singular, it made more varied stuff.
The guy's article comes close to getting it. He could *almost* be a writer.
(TV isn't much better.)
Posted by: oblig. at December 04, 2012 09:12 AM (cePv8)
Oldboy.
Has anyone seen this? Holy fuck, there is a gigantic REVEAL near the end for the protagonist. I have not seen a movie that even attempted to do something like this.
And now, fucking garden gnome Spike Lee is doing a remake of it with Josh Brolin.
Posted by: EC at December 04, 2012 09:12 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Walkers! at December 04, 2012 09:12 AM (e/Cti)
Posted by: beach & a kindle at December 04, 2012 09:12 AM (LpQbZ)
It's pretty funny. Some of it may not be to your liking (gross potty humor),
Believe it or not, despite my often foul-mouthed commentary, I absolutely HATE bathroom humor. Hence why the one time I ever saw any of "It's Always Sunny...," I immediately turned it off and never looked back.
It's also why, "Me, Myself and Irene" is still my #1 worst movie of all time.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit [/b][/i][/u] at December 04, 2012 09:13 AM (4df7R)
It's a wild poison pen letter to H-wood for their dumbshit product. Not Steve Martin's best work but I thought it was pretty funny. It took huge swings at Scient*l*gy and H-wood in general.
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at December 04, 2012 09:13 AM (JEpGb)
Also a lot of emerging markets where movie-going is huge have lower IQs for now.
Posted by: Emperor of Icecream at December 04, 2012 09:13 AM (ZMzpb)
Posted by: Captain Hate (more dagny and less curious) at December 04, 2012 09:13 AM (QDOVN)
Posted by: Walkers! at December 04, 2012 09:13 AM (e/Cti)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC Waiting for the Sun at December 04, 2012 09:13 AM (VUZ26)
I had lost power for a few days after the derecho struck and decided to go see Prometheus just to sit in an air conditioned room for a few hours. Prior to watching it, we ate and I couldn't come to terms with paying $35 for that movie (no lie, $35 for two tickets).
I went home and sat in the dark and heat for a few hours and I still don't regret that decision.
^ this ...
I can just wait a while and it will be 9.99 in the bargain bin and watch it on my 72 in Widescreen and have free popcorn and beer (or if I want to be really bad, I could get it off the torrent sites..)
Movies as we know them are dead.. they just don't look like Zombies yet..
Posted by: catman at December 04, 2012 09:14 AM (YKUmW)
The Thing (2011)
Nightmare on Elm Street (2010)
Final Destination 5
No, I think he sucks at what he does. If his big excuse is that his scripts are shitty because he has to put "footnotes" next to his shitty character's shitty dialogue then I think it's fair to say that this guy is just a shitty writer. The only thing I got from this guy is that his next script is called "Hours"
Starring Paul Walker.
About surviving the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.
No Ace, I think this guy can just go fuck himself. He just sucks at his profession and is the reason why modern movies suck, because he keeps getting work. Holy shit The Thing (2011) was so fucking terrible, and it was mostly the script. I want to punch him in the face.
Posted by: Cashin at December 04, 2012 09:15 AM (TYEu4)
I think it's one of Martin's best movies. And I'm a sucker for any movie Bill Murray is in, LOVED Kingpin.
Posted by: Dr Spank at December 04, 2012 09:15 AM (4cRnj)
Hahaha...lemme guess what scene turned you off.
Posted by: EC at December 04, 2012 09:15 AM (GQ8sn)
Oldboy.
That movie is one long, horrific mindfuck. As are a lot of Korean and Japanese horror and/or action and/or suspense films.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit [/b][/i][/u] at December 04, 2012 09:15 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Butters at December 04, 2012 09:15 AM (NIZHJ)
Posted by: Paladin at December 04, 2012 09:16 AM (ycm4Q)
Posted by: taylork at December 04, 2012 09:16 AM (ppNDn)
Posted by: soothsayer at December 04, 2012 09:16 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: bonhomme at December 04, 2012 09:16 AM (6qlHs)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at December 04, 2012 09:17 AM (piMMO)
We need a serious review on internet porn.
There are some sites that deserve recognition for a job well done.
Posted by: jwest at December 04, 2012 09:17 AM (ZDsRL)
Posted by: Walkers! at December 04, 2012 09:17 AM (e/Cti)
Holy shit! Don't sneak up on a guy like that with that stuff just outta the friggin' blue, would ya?!
Posted by: moron hiding under the blankets at December 04, 2012 09:17 AM (jPVBi)
Are we talking Mass Effect or Call of Duty Modern Warfare? One has it, the other sucks ass.
Posted by: EC at December 04, 2012 09:17 AM (GQ8sn)
I though Fight Club SUCKED. I didn't find it entertaining when I was 19, I don't find it meaningful now. Shit blew.
Posted by: BCochran1981 at December 04, 2012 09:18 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: EC at December 04, 2012 01:15 PM (GQ8sn)
I could not even begin to narrow it down. I hated it THAT MUCH. If it was possible to create a weapon powered purely by an object of utter loathing, then I would need one to hold a replicant of Barack Obama, and another to hold a copy of "Me, Myself and Irene."
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit [/b][/i][/u] at December 04, 2012 09:18 AM (4df7R)
It's also why, "Me, Myself and Irene" is still my #1 worst movie of all time. Posted by: MWR
I'm right there with you. Tried watching Sunny. Awful people being awful assholes. Um, yay?
Pass.
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at December 04, 2012 09:18 AM (JEpGb)
Have you seen the 1988 movie Without a Clue? Michael Kane plays Sherlock Holmes, but he's not the brains. Ben Kingsley's Dr Watson is the real detective.
Watson was forced to invent Holmes because as a respectable person he couldn't admit to being so uncouth as having a criminal detective hobby. He hires a failed actor to play the invented Holmes. Of course that opens a whole new world of troubles.
It is a fun movie and perfectly represents the theme you mentioned.
I saw it. Sherlock, in the end, is good enough to publicly credit Watson as the real reason why they are successful.
Posted by: EC at December 04, 2012 09:19 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Also on Teams Daryl and Glenn. at December 04, 2012 09:19 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Butters at December 04, 2012 09:19 AM (NIZHJ)
"Holy crap, it's a like a dead heat in a zepplin race!!!"
Posted by: EC at December 04, 2012 09:20 AM (GQ8sn)
Lawrence of Arabia, The Longest Day, What Ever Happened to Baby Jane?,
The Music Man, Dr. No, To Kill a Mockingbird, The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance,
How the West Was Won, Advise and Consent, Birdman of Alcatraz, Cape Fear,
Days of Wine and Roses, Lolita, The Manchurian Candidate, The Miracle Worker,
Requiem for a Heavyweight, Ride the High Country.
The decline is incredible. Posted by: Fed Up. at December 04, 2012 01:02 PM
Even from 17 years ago the decline is huge;
1995
Braveheart, Apollo 13, Heat, Casino, Crimson Tide, Clueless, Dolores Claiborne, Leaving Las Vegas, Othello, Sense and Sensibility, Twelve Monkeys
We'll just forget Batman Forever, Showgirls, and Waterworld
Posted by: kbdabear at December 04, 2012 09:20 AM (wwsoB)
Posted by: soothsayer at December 04, 2012 09:20 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: KJB at December 04, 2012 09:20 AM (ZhB0u)
Posted by: EC at December 04, 2012 01:12 PM (GQ8sn)
Hollywood is also planning to do a live action remake of "Akira." Cuz Hollywood can really capture the essence of a groundbreaking Japanese anime film with the likes of Justin Timberlake.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit [/b][/i][/u] at December 04, 2012 09:21 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Walkers! at December 04, 2012 09:22 AM (e/Cti)
Has anyone seen this? Holy fuck, there is a gigantic REVEAL near the end for the protagonist. I have not seen a movie that even attempted to do something like this.
Great movie and I can't believe that they are going to ruin it with a Remake.
Infernal Affairs was much better than the Hollywood version The Departed
Posted by: Patrick at December 04, 2012 09:22 AM (6WpNC)
Posted by: Sharon at December 04, 2012 09:22 AM (DtEq4)
Posted by: taylork at December 04, 2012 09:23 AM (ppNDn)
Waterworld is the modern Lawrence of Arabia good sir. Are you simply not a fan of Costner's gills?
Posted by: Cashin at December 04, 2012 09:23 AM (TYEu4)
Posted by: Galadriel at December 04, 2012 09:23 AM (xG0vx)
I admit that I already have tickets for my whole family to see Les Miserables on Christmas. But that's because my son's high school did the play 2 years ago and we all fell in love with it, and also because he and my husband are madly in love with Anne Hathaway.
Both of my kids LOVED Inception (they were 13 and 17 when it was released), it is probably the movie they still watch the most at home. But they're pretty mature and really love psychological thrillers. I may have the only 15-year-old girl on the planet who has neither read the books nor seen the "Twilight" movies. The only TV show she watches is The Walking Dead.
Recent movies I really liked were "The Artist," "The King's Speech," "Crazy Heart" (an honestly GREAT movie, not enough attention was paid to it,) "True Grit," "The Dark Knight Rises."
None of them are as good as "Mad Men," "Justified," or "The Tudors" though.
Posted by: rockmom at December 04, 2012 09:24 AM (NYnoe)
Is that the one where Wayne was the executive producer, and had Robert Mitchum as the star, but after Mitchum pushed the director off a pier, Wayne had to fire him.
Posted by: Paladin at December 04, 2012 09:24 AM (ycm4Q)
Posted by: soothsayer at December 04, 2012 09:24 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at December 04, 2012 09:25 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at December 04, 2012 09:25 AM (piMMO)
The celebtards making the movie will cheer electricity rate hikes because they can easily afford it, and the movie studios will get their special tax breaks for energy costs. However, the theaters will have to jack the ticket prices up to keep the concrete cubicles air conditioned. Then there will be the lost revenues when people don't buy the overpriced "healthy snacks" and they can't buy the Goobers and Raisinettes because of nanny state laws
Posted by: kbdabear at December 04, 2012 09:26 AM (wwsoB)
I though Fight Club SUCKED. I didn't find it entertaining when I was 19, I don't find it meaningful now. Shit blew.
It was unusual. Very different. But I thought it was pretty over-rated meh.
What the hell is supposed to be so wrong about having a furnished apartment? I just found that to be such a silly thing to be raging against.
1st world problems that aren't actually problems at all.
Posted by: eleven at December 04, 2012 09:26 AM (KXm42)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at December 04, 2012 09:26 AM (piMMO)
It's "Infernal Affairs". Both versions are available.
There is also an Infernal Affairs 2 and 3.
Posted by: EC at December 04, 2012 09:26 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Gabriel Syme at December 04, 2012 09:27 AM (g84Si)
Posted by: MrCaniac at December 04, 2012 09:27 AM (Zd/NW)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at December 04, 2012 09:28 AM (ZPrif)
Once Europe's economy goes into its final collapse and all the Arab countries are under Islamic law, they might have to rethink that marketing strategy
Posted by: kbdabear at December 04, 2012 09:30 AM (wwsoB)
When you choose to make the villain big (or situation big), it makes the characters small. Small characters begets very little feeling from the audience when they are in harm's way.
I know that everyone turns their nose up at "Independence Day," but I thought that movie did a great job of inverting this. The situation was huge, but the focus on the individual characters brought it down into relatable territory. I love movies where a lot of scattered heroes end up coalescing into one unified force by the end; that gives me chills every damn time.
Of course, I also partially blame "ID4" for starting off the whole "big boom! flash flash flash! KABLOOEY!" film genre. It's like Hollywood just ignored the "interesting characters" and "fun story" part of ID4 and decided that it's success was solely due to the big alien ships blowing up Washington, DC.
...
Though, to be honest, I wouldn't mind seeing that revisited in a more contemporary context.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit [/b][/i][/u] at December 04, 2012 09:31 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: the dowager countess of jersey shore at December 04, 2012 09:31 AM (jPVBi)
Posted by: Sharon at December 04, 2012 09:32 AM (DtEq4)
2001 A Space Odyssey
YOU LIE.
Nobody really liked 2001: A Space Odyssey. Because it was the worst fucking movie ever made. Yes, even worse than that one.
People believe they liked it, but only because they've been told they're supposed to. But watching it in its entirety, and not under the influence of a hallucinogen? It is unlikeable, unwatchable, and an affront to humanity.
I know what you're thinking- "But Hollowpoint, what about the awesome visuals? The effects were so far ahead of their time."
If movies were judged on special effects, Micheal Bay would be the greatest director alive. Shit, at least he makes a token effort towards something resembling a plot.
2001 has maybe 20 minutes of material with two hours of empty filler. It lacks anything resembling a plot, dialog, or character development. It does have multiple 7-10 minute sequences of spaceships floating by for no fucking reason. That the scenes are set to classical music doesn't make it art, interesting, or relevant. Just boring as hell.
2001: A Space Odyssey is too fucking awful to even be called a movie. I view it as a perverse psychological experiment to see how many viewers could be duped into pretending to like an intentionally terrible, worthless, boring movie with no redeeming qualities whatsoever.
In short, you didn't like it, and neither did anyone else. Because it's impossible.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at December 04, 2012 09:32 AM (SY2Kh)
Strangely, an early intro to European films at a small theatre in San Francisco during the '70s and '80s telegraphed Hollywood's creative impairment even then. Mom and I went frequently initially because of the wine and ice cream served on premises. Wine and ice cream, people. Who could resist? Then, the freshness of the predominantly French with a sprinkling of Italian films offered surfaced an unhappy comparison between Hollywood and Europe. Hollywood really suffered when attempting remakes of the Euro movies all of which Mom and I watched in the original. Heavy/ham-handed interpretations hammering home the original nuanced subtexts was the rule. So, your writer's thesis seems sound from my perspective.
Now, the equally heavy/ham-handed liberal moralizing from a group that has absolutely no moral credibility has sounded the death knell for this ex-movie fan. My better half and I used to attend an average of three to four movies a month. The awful and ongoing lambasting of conservative America by the creatively and morally impaired in Hollywood and the coastal artistic elite, cured me during "W's" first term. As with the union workers producing the cars and tires I prefer who chose to vote for BO twice: Screw you and the horse...
Posted by: Mazzuchelli at December 04, 2012 09:33 AM (piR98)
Posted by: WalrusRex at December 04, 2012 09:34 AM (Hx5uv)
Let's not forget, some of the Meryl Streep movies and "The King's Speech" type movies are vanity projects for the studios. They make them so that they can be thought of as "artists" while they are making a movie version of "Land of The Lost".
Meryl Streep movies can go suck a dick.
That said, at least it means studios have SOME idea of what a "good" movie really IS. It proves they have the wherewithal to make them, just not the desire to do it full time. Bastards.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit [/b][/i][/u] at December 04, 2012 09:35 AM (4df7R)
Now get off my lawn
Posted by: kbdabear at December 04, 2012 09:35 AM (wwsoB)
Yeah but Whedon falls for this also. In "Serenity" the chick with the
huge forehead turns out to be the "savior" of them all against the
Reavers.
Sort of. The difference is that River isn't "The Hero." The Hero is Mal.
I honestly think that Firefly is one of the greatest scifi shows of all time in no small part because it was cancelled after 1 season, and leaves you wanting. Everyone wants more Firefly because it was great, but careful what you ask for.
I think if it had been allowed to go on for 8 more seasons, it would have turned into River The Reaver Slayer, in space, with an alien lesbo sidekick. And also, somewhere along the way a small child with a bowl cut, gap teeth and a cute catch phrase would have joined the cast.
Posted by: entropy at December 04, 2012 09:35 AM (TULs6)
Posted by: kbdabear at December 04, 2012 09:36 AM (wwsoB)
Um, "Always sunny" is nothing but Seinfeld's slutty younger sister. Less funny too.
Posted by: flyonthewall at December 04, 2012 09:37 AM (pePug)
---
I'm reminded of Barton Fink about a big deal young play writer who is hired by Hollywood to write a wrestling picture.
Posted by: WalrusRex at December 04, 2012 09:37 AM (Hx5uv)
Secondhand Lions was good, but a little uneven. The scene in the bar was awesome.
Posted by: Emperor of Icecream at December 04, 2012 09:37 AM (ZMzpb)
Be VERY careful
Posted by: Star Trek TOS 3rd season at December 04, 2012 09:38 AM (wwsoB)
Posted by: alex at December 04, 2012 09:42 AM (uFY4s)
I am totally serious BTW.
How old are you?<
Not that old.
Do you realize that film is so good it is still being used in military training for leadership?
That a real movie. One that stands the test of time.
Posted by: marcus at December 04, 2012 01:00 PM (GGCsk)
marcus is right on! Watched 12 O'Clock High as a youngster and though I enjoyed the movie, the leadership traits were over my head at the time. Watched it again during Squadron Officers' School and it is a magnificent movie about leadership and the human condition.
Posted by: Ammo Dump at December 04, 2012 09:44 AM (YYyqq)
Posted by: WalrusRex at December 04, 2012 09:45 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: Walkers! at December 04, 2012 09:45 AM (e/Cti)
Posted by: Anthony Mann at December 04, 2012 09:45 AM (VUZ26)
Unless you're fascinated by primates picking each other's nits, grunting and screaming, use the first 20 minutes of the movie to do other stuff.
Then the next 12 minutes is docking sequences to the music of Strauss's Blue Danube Waltz
I've had more interesting times in the doctor's waiting rooms and DMV lines
Posted by: kbdabear at December 04, 2012 09:45 AM (wwsoB)
I think if it had been allowed to go on for 8 more seasons, it would have turned into River The Reaver Slayer, in space, with an alien lesbo sidekick. And also, somewhere along the way a small child with a bowl cut, gap teeth and a cute catch phrase would have joined the cast.
Posted by: entropy at December 04, 2012 01:35 PM (TULs6)
Don't forget the cute little pet that the little mop head would have picked up along the way that gets the two of them into a pickle every episode, but they would end up saving everyone who came to rescue them from said pickle.
Posted by: MrCaniac at December 04, 2012 09:46 AM (Zd/NW)
Posted by: KJB at December 04, 2012 09:47 AM (ZhB0u)
JJ Abrams will never reach that. His highest aspiration is not sucking as much as "Final Frontier"
Posted by: kbdabear at December 04, 2012 09:48 AM (wwsoB)
1) You inevitably find yourself catering to your perceptions of what you believe the perceptions of the lead note giver's perceptions are going to be; if one exec producer who is known to like gunplay thinks the script needs more nostalgia for the intended cable market venue, you may throw in a spaghetti westernish High Noon sequence to get him on your side and also please all the people who he assumes to be the target audience. Producer B, who came through the ranks shooting sci-fi, is convinced that hard-boiled, gritty, hi-tech crime is the THING these days, so you spin it that direction. Nobody really knows for sure who's going to actually watch this film when it's done. But the advance perceptions of who's going to watch it and who won't (along with the specific tastes of the note givers) will drive the decisions affecting the final product. Everyone is shooting furiously at some unseen target. You are constantly helping the big guys to recalibrate and, with any luck, aim in the same general direction. Your guesswork starts out as "what will please an audience" and becomes "what do I think Producers A, B & C think will please an audience"?
2) Somewhere after the initial notes/rewrite process, the script goes to the legal department for review before it's cleared for production. This is where it often gets interesting. If one of your character names happens to be the same as a distinguished cardiologist in Tempe AZ who runs a private clinic with his namesake incorporated on the shingle, and the suits decide you run a .0578% chance of legal exposure, guess what? Good chance you'll be renaming that character. Can't let your characters sing "Happy Birthday" in the birthday party scene (copyright too pricey) substitute "He's a Jolly Good Fellow" Children can NEVER smoke on screen (if I remember correctly, this potentially runs afoul of laws in several states), but they can swear and disrespect their parents. Everyone in Hollywood is afraid of getting sued and is in constant mortal fear of lawyers. This heavily influences the entire creative process and will undoubtedly redline a few of the best moments in a script.
Posted by: Mark Asread at December 04, 2012 09:48 AM (CtjOo)
---
Let's not forget the scene where the obelisk teaches the monkey to use weapons, much like the NRA in the ghetto.
Posted by: WalrusRex at December 04, 2012 09:49 AM (Hx5uv)
He said that girls will see movies that boys will see but not vice versa and kids will see movies older kids will see but not vice versa. So cater to teenage boys and you'll get all of them.
He also came up with the ARKOFF formula, not to be confused with the APGAR score:
Action (exciting, entertaining drama)Revolution (novel or controversial themes and ideas)Killing (a modicum of violence)Oratory (notable dialogue and speeches)Fantasy (acted-out fantasies common to the audience)Fornication (sex appeal, for young adults)
He and Roger Corman pretty much built AIP from the ground up.
Posted by: Rod Munsch at December 04, 2012 09:55 AM (2aB+q)
Thank you, Hollowpoint. That is exactly how I feel about that movie!
Posted by: Miss Marple at December 04, 2012 09:55 AM (GoIUi)
Posted by: Andrew S. at December 04, 2012 09:56 AM (9L8gm)
Therefore, the correct money-making demographic to make a movie for is a 17 year old boy.
Is that why most movies have a high content of casual sex and fart jokes?
Posted by: katya the designated driver at December 04, 2012 09:56 AM (DoZD+)
Posted by: katya the designated driver at December 04, 2012 09:56 AM (DoZD+)
I actually kind of liked (not loved) 2001. Then again I couldn't stand Apocalypse Now, another one of those movies you're supposed to like.
Kind of like Dickens. You're just supposed to like classics, or else you are a plebeian.
Posted by: fb at December 04, 2012 09:57 AM (JVEmw)
It's like what redletter media guy said about star trek, they took generic spy script and threw it into James Bond.
Posted by: joeindc44 part III the stutter cluster fuckering at December 04, 2012 10:00 AM (3zQJl)
Posted by: gary at December 04, 2012 10:00 AM (aUnng)
Also, please stop using *big stars* as your main characters and start using *good actors
I would much rather watch a movie with unknown or little-known actors. The A-listers always play themselves. Either they have forgotten how to act or they never know and someone thought they had an awesome aura or sexy hair or some stupid thing.
Posted by: katya the designated driver at December 04, 2012 10:00 AM (DoZD+)
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie ® at December 04, 2012 10:00 AM (1hM1d)
Also, please stop using *big stars* as your main characters and start using *good actors*
Same issues you have with politics. You're practically the only one who really wants good movies.
Our population does not shell out big bucks for good acting. They want to see a celebrity.
Posted by: entropy at December 04, 2012 10:01 AM (TULs6)
Posted by: Sharon at December 04, 2012 10:02 AM (DtEq4)
Our population does not shell out big bucks for good acting. They want to see a celebrity.
I hate our population.
Posted by: eleven at December 04, 2012 10:03 AM (KXm42)
Sorry. Nobody.
And a movie executive, I think, can be excused for not catching the subtle character points in the first read-through.
Yes, take a few minutes and spell it out.
Put comments in the C++ code.
Can't argue with the rest, though.
Posted by: AmishDude at December 04, 2012 10:03 AM (xSegX)
Posted by: katya the designated driver at December 04, 2012 10:04 AM (DoZD+)
Posted by: Tsar Nicholas II at December 04, 2012 10:10 AM (pmsMR)
Even those movies were pretty liberal though.. They just didn't bash you over the head with it. It was ignorable.
Posted by: eleven at December 04, 2012 10:13 AM (KXm42)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at December 04, 2012 10:15 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: joeindc44 part III the stutter cluster fuckering at December 04, 2012 10:17 AM (3zQJl)
That doesn't change the fact that no sober person who watched it in its entirety, beginning to end, actually liked it because that would be impossible. Every one of them was bored out of their minds, because it was a boring, terrible movie with no plot and little dialog or character development.
One could make an exception for those stoned out of their gourd on LSD or weed, but they'd be enthralled with the Teletubbies.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at December 04, 2012 10:23 AM (SY2Kh)
That's the 17-year old boy thing again. Stuff adults care about--losing your kids, your job, having things be worse for your kids when the grow up--don't matter to 17-year olds. So you either have to do super trivial shit that will lose the adult audience (Oh Noes Zits!) or you have to go gonzo. This applies to foreign audiences too.
Posted by: Emperor of Icecream at December 04, 2012 10:23 AM (ZMzpb)
Now your just being a fucking tool. Requiring everyone to hate what you hate is weak-minded, douchebag.
What are you 12?
Posted by: eleven at December 04, 2012 10:23 AM (KXm42)
I always threatened to take my Grandfather to see a movie. He would scoff and invariably say "I haven't seen a movie since Hoot Gibson!". So I suppose it's all relative isn't it? Hoot Gibson never said a word.
Posted by: dfbaskwill at December 04, 2012 10:25 AM (71LDo)
We will just have to agree to agree.
Posted by: eleven at December 04, 2012 10:28 AM (KXm42)
2001 A Space Odyssey
YOU LIE.
Nobody really liked 2001: A Space Odyssey. Because it was the worst fucking movie ever made. Yes, even worse than that one.
People believe they liked it, but only because they've been told they're supposed to. But watching it in its entirety, and not under the influence of a hallucinogen? It is unlikeable, unwatchable, and an affront to humanity.
I know what you're thinking- "But Hollowpoint, what about the awesome visuals? The effects were so far ahead of their time."
If movies were judged on special effects, Micheal Bay would be the greatest director alive. Shit, at least he makes a token effort towards something resembling a plot.
2001 has maybe 20 minutes of material with two hours of empty filler. It lacks anything resembling a plot, dialog, or character development. It does have multiple 7-10 minute sequences of spaceships floating by for no fucking reason. That the scenes are set to classical music doesn't make it art, interesting, or relevant. Just boring as hell.
2001: A Space Odyssey is too fucking awful to even be called a movie. I view it as a perverse psychological experiment to see how many viewers could be duped into pretending to like an intentionally terrible, worthless, boring movie with no redeeming qualities whatsoever.
In short, you didn't like it, and neither did anyone else. Because it's impossible.
Posted by: Hollowpoint
I like classic movies and literary stuff so eventually when everybody told me how great that flick was I and the wife-unit set aside an evening to watch it uninterrrupted. Holy Mother of Hell, that movie blew like Katrina, it was as appealing as someone repeatedly tapping your head with a hammer if that experience could somehow be made boring and also you are on LSD.
That was when I finally realized that most people have no clue and shouldn't be allowed to express an opinion, let alone vote or make movies and stuff.
Posted by: Emperor of Icecream at December 04, 2012 10:30 AM (ZMzpb)
Posted by: Adirondack Patriot at December 04, 2012 10:30 AM (iAUf+)
Posted by: Wally in Walla Walla at December 04, 2012 10:32 AM (Dll6b)
Hollywood makes movies.
Therefore movie sucks.
Garbage in, garbage out.
Posted by: Emperor of Icecream at December 04, 2012 10:36 AM (ZMzpb)
The UK approach may be better. Shorter seasons/series, and sometime they'll go a year or more without new material because everybody is off doing other stuff and the head writer hasn't got any ideas he really wants to do yet.
Not having a irreplaceable central character that the show ends without helps, too. The only character on E.R. that wasn't expendable was the hospital itself. The idea was that this is a place where stories happen. Who is in those stories changes over time.
Posted by: epobirs at December 04, 2012 10:37 AM (kcfmt)
Posted by: vern schlepker at December 04, 2012 10:39 AM (Kflw4)
Posted by: gp at December 04, 2012 10:41 AM (+Jpqc)
Jesus, it figures - Ace writes a good movie post, and I come into it 200-odd comments later. Very well, done, though, Ace. I agree with you totall, which is why I was so happy when The Artist came out. Sure, it's a gimmick movie - A Silent! In 2012! Boy Meets / Loses / Gets Girl! - but at least it didn't insult the audience.
One thing I didn't see you mention, though, Ace, is the depressing cynical snottiness that runs through so many movies, for which I blame that goddamn Seinfeld. I truly, truly hate the whole po-mo nothing's-sacred-and-nothing-matters-so-let's-snark-away underpinning of modern culture.
A producer, I think his name was Zanuck, worked out the logic like this: Girls will see anything boys will see, but boys will not see most things girls will see. Younger kids will see anything that older kids will see, but older kids will not see things made for younger kids. Adults will see most things that older teenagers will see, but older teenagers will not necessarily see things that adults would see. Therefore, the correct money-making demographic to make a movie for is a 17 year old boy.
Doesn't sound like Zanuck to me, more like Harry Cohn. But you may be right.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at December 04, 2012 10:42 AM (zF6Iw)
Hollowpoint:
I loved 2001 when I saw it in the theater. Of course, I was 7 and it was about spaceships.
Posted by: Simon Oliver Lockwood at December 04, 2012 10:43 AM (PaV2r)
Different people are allowed to like different things when you're an adult.
Posted by: eleven at December 04, 2012 10:51 AM (KXm42)
"if your budget is low enough, you have the liberty to do whatever you like"
Key point: if the budget is low there is no big risk to the studio, hence less people looking over your shoulder and worrying.
Posted by: Mikey NTH - channeling Rico at December 04, 2012 10:53 AM (hLRSq)
I like 2001: A Space Odyssey. No, really. Growing up, I was a big fan of Arthur C. Clarke's, along with other science fiction greats like Theodore Sturgeon and Larry Niven (whom I've met), Harlan Ellison and Cordwainer Smith. One can argue with the slow build of Kubrick's pacing, but even as a kid I 'got' the pyschedelic payoff at the end. I understood what was going on. Watching it again as an adult, I appreciate the solid acting and the utter lack of wordy exposition to describe what it is we're watching. Another thing, too: there's no sound in space. There can't be. Hearing explosions and lasers and shit in outer space is, well, fucking impossible. At least Kubrick acknowledged that fact when he made the space sequences for the movie.
Would you have liked it better if Jack Nicholson was around to chew up the scenery?
Posted by: troyriser at December 04, 2012 10:57 AM (vtiE6)
"Twilight -- the Sequel! Now with more adolescent dialogue and plot lines!"
Posted by: mallfly at December 04, 2012 10:59 AM (bJm7W)
El Mariachi was a fine movie, interesting, well made et cetera.
The remake starring Antonio Banderas sucked beyond measure.
You are dead to me. Desperado had (1) Salma Hayek nude; (2) Quentin Tarantino getting shot in the face; (3) Salma Hayek nude; (4) Danny Trejo; and (5) Salma Hayek nude. Sure, the last third of the movie was absolute crap, but the first two thirds Rodriguez wrote before he got "famous" and began mailing in his work. Seriously, in his book Rodriguez admits that he was about half way through the script when he ran out of time to get it to the studio.
Posted by: Wooga at December 04, 2012 10:59 AM (1wcHs)
At least Kubrick acknowledged that fact when he made the space sequences for the movie.
I like 2001. It's not riveting, it is a slow movie, but it's got that uniqueness to it. Lots of people will sit there and stare at the sky all night, lots of people like classical music and will just sit there and listen to it. People play Eve Online, that's like Space Odyssey The Videogame. It's not going to put you on the edge of your seat but it doesn't have to be excruciating unless you go in demanding a normal movie instead of what you get.
There is no sound in space and that is possibly the only movie that ever attempted to acknowledge it. Everyone else just chucks in explosions and laser beams and warp travel.
Posted by: entropy at December 04, 2012 11:06 AM (TULs6)
See:
Any actress or celebrity when they are "the very first" human ever to become pregnant.
Or:
The "very first" politician to know someone who died (Hillary Clinton during Bill's first term.)
Posted by: dfbaskwill at December 04, 2012 11:07 AM (71LDo)
I had problems with harry potter movies too because the directors were handed scripts and had scenes with characters together who had no reason to be there. Why would 5th years be hanging out with first years in certain scenes. Like lets have fred and george stand mutely behind potter doing something and make no comments.
Anyway, saw 2001 for first time last year on glorious big screen HD and it was awesome.
Posted by: joeindc44 part III the stutter cluster fuckering at December 04, 2012 11:09 AM (3zQJl)
"Movies really have become awful, haven't they?"
Yes, Ace. They really have.
" In the movies, it's all entirely predictable. Almost every studio movie is just an assemblage of things that have worked in other movies for the last 20 years."
And the movies in the last 20 years have been awful...so they've been rehashing the awfulness.
I think a big part of it is inbreeding.
Hollywood has become a place for 'liberals only', not only excluding and persecuting conservatives...but also ridiculing and deriding conservative ideas.
This has kept out a lot of conservative creativity.
There is a pragmatism to conservative ideas.
Conservatism is like the 'meat and potatoes' part of a meal.
Liberal ideas are like the desert that comes after a meal.
In the absence of any conservative ideas in the creative process...Hollywood has become sick on a diet of too much cake and cotton candy.
Posted by: wheatie at December 04, 2012 11:12 AM (CM59X)
If the kids don't drink deer blood and shoot commies directly in the motherfucking face, then it's not the same.
But the movies didn't create new red dawn and new conan to be awesome, they did it to cash in. There's your problem.
Posted by: joeindc44 part III the stutter cluster fuckering at December 04, 2012 11:12 AM (3zQJl)
Posted by: Dr. Varno at December 04, 2012 11:21 AM (3MTRV)
Add cast, director, (or even casting director) into the mix and you can predict everything from the total running time of the credits to the music.
But why would television be better? Everything is a rehash, as mentioned. What matters in all of this is not to analyze TV or film anymore, but to come to the realization that the will to analyze these products is itself part of that selfsame culture industry that feeds the technocratic infrastructure that in turn funds more technocracy and suffocates freedom.
There is something effete about sitting in front of a television or in a movie theater, you see. Something weak, pallid, stupid about it. It's not the mark of a serious person today to subject oneself to these things. It never was, but at least there was a time when entertainment could be challenging instead of the culture's great soporific.
Posted by: Fabio9000 at December 04, 2012 11:28 AM (srbDm)
2001 is one of the greatest movies ever made. I've seen it beginning to end more than once. I've never been bored--not for even a minute.
If you're in the mood for a recent great film I'd suggest Summer Hours - a French film about the loss of things, the end of a culture, from one generation to the next.
See some of Kurosawa's great samurai films and discover where George Lucas got his Star Wars ideas.
Get some Brigitte Bardot films for the late 50s / early 60s and see what the hottest woman ever on film looks like.
Posted by: gary at December 04, 2012 11:31 AM (aUnng)
Posted by: Stephen Potter at December 04, 2012 11:32 AM (VfO89)
Posted by: Oschisms at December 04, 2012 11:32 AM (idE8D)
I blame PG-13, which led to a lot of movies which should have just been R movies being watered/dumbed down to get the lower and more profitable rating.
Posted by: Brendan at December 04, 2012 11:38 AM (2jQGY)
Posted by: gary at December 04, 2012 03:31 PM (aUnng)
The hottest woman ever on film would be Hedy Lamarr, hands-down. Aside from being blindingly beautiful, she was also a genius inventor. And she had a great rack.
Posted by: troyriser at December 04, 2012 11:40 AM (vtiE6)
Posted by: eleven at December 04, 2012 11:45 AM (KXm42)
"Because it's EXACTLY what the Romulans would have done!"
"I CAN live with it."
So many great moments in that episode.
Thanks for the trip down memory lane -- I think I'll dig out the DVDs for that one.
Posted by: acethepug at December 04, 2012 11:51 AM (vjSfp)
LIES.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at December 04, 2012 11:54 AM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: Adirondack Patriot at December 04, 2012 12:07 PM (iAUf+)
You gotta switch to foreign movies. The following are some of the best films ever made:
I'm a Cyborg but That's Okay. (Korean)
Old Boy. (Korean)
The Mustache. (French)
Celebration. (Danish)
Mifune. (Danish)
Adam's Apples. (Danish)
Transylvania. (About ten European countries)
Against the Wall. (German)
Re-Cycle. (Chinese)
The Transporter (I, II, and III). (French-American)
Calvaire. (French)
Pulse. (Japanese)
Vital. (Japanese)
6ixtynin9. (Thai)
The Wishing Steps. (Korean)
Memento Mori. (Korean)
There are still great American films being made, too.
Breach.
Crank (I and II).
Infamous.
Up in the Air.
Intolerable Cruelty.
The Grudge.
Posted by: Llarry at December 04, 2012 12:12 PM (+QDEz)
Posted by: Adirondack Patriot at December 04, 2012 12:15 PM (iAUf+)
Posted by: Adirondack Patriot at December 04, 2012 12:19 PM (iAUf+)
Posted by: Bob at December 04, 2012 12:23 PM (cheRG)
Posted by: madamex at December 04, 2012 12:25 PM (+kvQd)
If you want to see a brilliant film about the love affair between an observant Muslim woman and a non-Muslim man, check out the Canadian production Sabah.
It's the only film about Islam I've ever seen that is totally un-politically correct and totally entertaining and non-polemical. It shows the warts and all without being melodramatic or smarmy. It doesn't beg for tolerance or assign blame. It simply presents a story about two people from radically different backgrounds.
Really terrific film.
Posted by: Llarry at December 04, 2012 12:28 PM (+QDEz)
Posted by: Adirondack Patriot at December 04, 2012 12:39 PM (iAUf+)
I don't even need a movie to be highbrow to enjoy it, just well made for the type of movie that it is. I loved Independence Day because it was fun, and I also had fun watching Transformers 3 (in 3D) with my 9 yr. old son for the same reason. In both cases the filmmakers & actors were actually trying to entertain.
Posted by: Lizzy at December 04, 2012 12:39 PM (kcbsg)
I'd like to put in a word for Bollywood films, too. Sure, they have their own cliches, and if you don't like musicals you're kind of sol, but they are made for grown-ups by and large. For example, Talaash, which I just saw a few days ago, is a middling-clever crime movie, but the real point of it is the detective resolving his guilt for failing to save his son's life. There's always some kind of serious family drama going on along with whatever genre stuff is happening, because that is what Indians think is important presumably.
Check your local theaters, a mainstream one in my area has suddenly started carrying them, maybe it's a national trend.
Oh, and I really liked Anna Karenina too, don't get the mixed reviews on that one. So beautiful up on the big screen, which is one of the few remaining reasons to keep seeing movies in the theater rather than at home.
Posted by: Dora at December 04, 2012 01:35 PM (0/Svj)
Universal and Tinseltown showing classic movies on the big screen: Jaws, Dr. Zhivago, Lawrence of Arabia, Bridge on the River Kwai, and Young Frankenstein.
I am actually dreading Peter Jackson's newest movie.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 04, 2012 01:37 PM (osh8D)
Posted by: CAC at December 04, 2012 01:42 PM (jL2X7)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 04, 2012 05:37 PM (osh8D)
I like Peter Jackson's old movies, the ones he made on a shoestring in New Zealand before he became big shakes in Hollywood, movies like 'Bad Taste', 'Meet The Feebles', and 'Dead Alive'--especially 'Dead Alive'. I mean, come on, zombies vs lawnmowers. Classic stuff.
Posted by: troyriser at December 04, 2012 01:42 PM (vtiE6)
Posted by: CAC at December 04, 2012 01:45 PM (jL2X7)
Posted by: Eric at December 04, 2012 02:06 PM (81pqi)
HWood flicks are made for the LCD of international audiences.
Americans are only placated because we still have the biggest microphone which gives us the ability to crush a movie's word-o'-mouth on the internets.
That blogger is copping out because his much vaunted career choice is turning out to be unfulfilling and embarrassing.
Studio execs are simps because they sign the back of the check, but love to act like their name goes on the front.
HWood is controlled by Wall Street, hedge funds and international investment.
It's New Coke on steroids. Marketing teams controlling the actual product by dictating what will and won't sell globally.
Posted by: Budfox at December 04, 2012 02:40 PM (9+DJg)
Notice the comic never did anything that lame. Green Lantern pissed off the other Lanterns and Guardians like clockwork.
Just proving the average big budget movie maker is not as smart as a kid writing comics. I would much rather have seen a Michael Bendis Avengers movie than Joss Whedon's.
Speaking of which, the only 17-year-old boys who went to that over and over again are the ones who noticed the Scarlet Johanssen nip-slip.
Posted by: richard mcenroe at December 04, 2012 04:49 PM (qvify)
Posted by: i wouldn't buy that for a dollar at December 04, 2012 05:18 PM (Kflw4)
Part of the problem is that movies today are not just ABOUT young people, they are BY young people. By the time a writer gets old enough to actually learn something about adult life, he's washed up in Hollywood. A producer who doesn't already have a hit by 40 never will. A "veteran" director is one that, by definition, doesn't "get what today's kids are thinking." And of course, movies about 18 year old boys tend to star 18 year old boys (and girls), and you can only imagine how much THEIR input must be accomodated.
Hollywood stopped making movies for people over 40 because people over 40 stopped going to the movies, because Hollywood stopped making movies for people over 40. It's set in stone now: Front of camera, back of camera, above the line, below the line, audience, you name it - 40 is TOO OLD for Hollywood.
Posted by: Dave H at December 05, 2012 08:06 AM (k85z0)
I jumped ship and began watching foreign films some years ago. Most of the dialogue in Hollywood films brought the reaction of nails screeching on a blackboard. The plots have become so boring it was an effective cure for insomia. Occasionally, something original manages to emerge, but not during the last decade.
An interesting theory to explain the era of garbage films. You could also argue that a culture which no longer acknowledges and respects its own heritage and history, lacks the depth to create good literature and art. Lacking access to the experiences and memories of the general population, we are reduced to plastic formulas and souless interpretations.
Think of the comparison between the powerful Russian Literature produced pre-1917, and what emerged after the Bolshevik Revolution (with the exception of banned literature such as Dr. Zhivago or Solzhenitsyn's works). Soviet approved films, literature and art had the impact of endless bad commericials.
Posted by: I'd rather be surfin at December 06, 2012 01:36 AM (OTWsz)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.6826 seconds, 477 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








BINGO. Same for TV, but it's written for a 17 year old girl.
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectual at December 04, 2012 08:30 AM (wR+pz)